Download - Report 36 Month Meeting
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 1/13
1
Report submitted to the 36-month SOLHYCARB Meeting
DLR, Cologne, Germany17-18 March, 2009
Recent improvements in the starting procedure of STMS tests
at WIS and some corresponding test results.
Abraham Kogan
The kinematic viscocity of Methane at room temperature is too low for the
establishment of a stable confined tornado flow configuration. The correct starting
procedure of a STMS test is by maintaining a whirling flow of a neutral gas (N2, He
or Ar) inside the reaction chamber for a short warm-up period. The whirling Methane
stream can be admitted into the reaction chamber only when the inside surface of the
chamber wall has attained a minimum predetermined temperature.
Up until recently the WIS SR10 reactor was equipped with a two-way entry valve
through which it was possible to introduce in sequence a transient warming-up flow
F′1(N2) and then the permanent flow F1(CH4) through the same annular entry port,situated just below the quartz window as shown in Fig 1. The zirconia insulation
temperature in the vicinity of the reactor aperture was obviously high enough to
sustain the high rate of decomposition of Methane passing through the aperture into
the lower part of the reaction chamber.
By visual observation of the gas flow inside the reaction chamber during high
temperature tests with the SR10 kW reactor equipped with the increased window
diameter, we became aware of the danger of window destruction due to slight
oscillation in the confined Tornado flow pattern, see, e.g., the heavy Pyrocarbon
deposit formed on the periphery of the reactor aperture on the side facing the reactor
quartz window, illustrated in figure 2.
By increasing the diameter of the reactor window and by removing the window plane
from the reactor aperture plane, the interior of the reaction chamber became divided
into two distinct parts: an upper part, the area between the aperture and window
planes and the main body of the reaction chamber, between the aperture plane and the
exit port.
In order to avoid this danger, we decided to eliminate the two-way entry valve and to
use the annular entry port situated above the aperture plane for the introduction of
whirling flow F′1(N2) and to install an additional annular entry below the aperture for
the introduction of whirling flow F1(CH4). The inside contour of the reaction chamber was designed in line with the following CFD simulation results.
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 2/13
2
Fig. 1 An early configuration of the upgraded SR10 WIS Reactor. The reactor quartzwindow was increased and moved 28mm by translation from the reactor aperture
plane towards the ø 155cm Secondary Concentrator.
Fig. 2 Formation of a heavy deposit of Pyrocarbon on the periphery of the reactor
aperture caused by splitting of Methane during its flow along the surrounding heated
Zirconia plate.
Fig. 3 shows contours of stream function inside the reaction chamber obtained by
CFD simulation with an improved reactor axial cross section [1]. The following four
gas flows were postulated:
F2(He) = 2 L/M
F′1(N2) = 26.3 L/M; whirling, horizontal deviation from radial direction θ = 55°
F1(CH4) = 20 L/M; whirling, horizontal deviation from radial direction, θ = 55°
F3,2(N2) = 1 L/M; blowing stream
The whirling flow F′1(N2) splits upon entry into the reaction chamber into two uneven
parts. The smaller part joins the Helium stream to form the gas curtain adjacent to the
reactor window. The larger part of stream F′1 follows line bcd towards the forced
separation point d . It continues almost undisturbed towards the axis of symmetry
where it joins the tornado funnel stream. The hefty funnel stream generates by friction
the large annular vortex stream dijkl. The ascending branch of the annular vortex
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 3/13
3
stream kl collides with the whirling Methane stream entering at point f and entrains it
along the wall fed to join the tornado funnel.
A slight blowing stream F3,2(N2) = 1 L/M enters the reaction chamber at point g just
out of the influence of the annular whirling stream. It flows along the peripheral
boundary gh of the chamber performing a slight blowing and cooling action along
wall gh.
Fig. 3 Contours of Stream Function 1
Fig. 4 Contours of Stream Function 2Fig. 4 shows contours of stream function of a similar flow configuration in which the
slight stream F3,2 (N2) = 1 L/M was replaced by an enlarged stream of Nitrogen, 20
L/M.
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 4/13
4
We observe that the large increase in the flowrate of the blowing stream F3,2 did not
modify most of the characteristics of the previous flow, except for providing
enhanced cooling and blowing along peripheral wall gh. Flow separation at point d ,
formation of the large annular vortex and entrainment of the Methane flow F1(CH4)
towards the aperture plane, which coincides with the secondary focal plane, thehottest region in the reactor cavity, were not much perturbed.
The updated design of the STMS reactor is illustrated in Fig. 5. In this design part of
the zirconia structure at the exit end of the reactor is replaced by a shaped cylinder
made of copper (a). The temperature of the external surfaces of shaped cylinder (a) is
kept down by out-of-contact water cooling. The inner surface (b) of the zirconia
insulation is partly cooled by blowing a tertiary stream of gas F(N2) at room
temperature in a direction tangential to surface (b). The “blowing” stream entrains any
solid particles in gas suspension in region (b) and thus prevents the formation of a
Pyrocarbon deposit.
Fig. 5: Axial cross section of the WIS 10 kW prototype reactor
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 5/13
5
Sequence of operations when starting a STMS test (Fig. 5).
1. The cooling water flow F(CW), the external cooling air flow F(CA) and the two
Nitrogen flows F(N2) (for boundary layer blowing and for quenching of products)
are started.
2. The secondary flow F2(He) is started.3. The confined tornado flow configuration is established in the reaction chamber by
starting the whirling flow F1'(N2).
4. Concentrated solar radiation is admitted to the reactor window.
5. When the reactor wall reaches a local predetermined temperature the whirling flow
of Methane F1(CH4) is started. It enters the reaction chamber along a horizontal
circle, somewhat below the aperture plane. It is intercepted by the ascending
branch of the large annular vortex that was generated by flow detachment at point
d (see Figs 3,4) which entrains it towards the aperture, i.e., towards the hottest spot
in the chamber.
6. When a steady state and steady flow is reached, the whirling N2 flow F1'(N2) may
be reduced appreciably.7. The Carbon Black–Nitrogen suspension F(N2-CB) is admitted into the reaction
chamber, pointing also towards the hottest region inside the chamber.
First STMS test with the present version of the WIS SR10 reactor
A first STMS test with the WIS SR10 version illustrated in Fig. 5 was performed on
Jan. 22, 2009.
During 11:07≤ t ≤ 12:15 insolation was 913 ≥ I ≥ 893 w/m2.
In order to prevent influence of a Taylor flow instability we used a 50% N2-50% He by volume gas mixture for the neutral gas mixture flows F′1 and F2.
During the starting warm-up period (t =11:12-11:25) the neutral gas flow F′1 + F2 =
30L/M was heated by concentrated radiation submitted to the reactor through the
60cm x 70cm wicket. The maximum temperature inside the reaction chamber reached
977°C.
At t =11:27 the concentrated radiation was admitted to the reactor through the 100%
open North window.
At t = 11:33 the maximum reactor temperature reached near the aperture plane was
1748°C. At this time we started seeding the reaction chamber with CB.
At 11:40 a flow F1(CH4) = 2 L/M was started into the reaction chamber.
During t =11:50 – 12:09 the Methane flow into the reaction chamber was increased to
F1(CH4) = 4 L/M.
The GC analysis indicated a 100% extent of reaction.
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 6/13
6
Table 2. Temperatures during experiment
PARAMETER
TIME
UNIT
11:07 11:12 11.15 11:20 11:25 11:27 11:33 11:40 11:50 11:57 12:05 12:09 12:15
TC-B1
near aperture, N°C 831 946 977 1748 1735 1680 1677 1675 1677
TC-B′1
Below aperture,N°C 242 325 618 756 840 860 875 886
TC-B′2 °C 835 934 960 1450 1446 1470 1430 1500 1454
TC-B3 °C 346 480 544 841 859 943 939 966 970
T pyrometer °C 122 126 264 265 330 322 330 322
I (Insolation) W/m2 906 913 911 912 904 911 906 885 884 893
F′1(N2+He)
50/50% by volSLM 25 24 24 24 24 24 25 25 25
F2(N2+He)
50/50% by volSLM 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
F1(CH4) SLM 0 0 0 0 0 2 4.2 4 4 4
Ffluidizer (N2) SLM 0 0 0 0 8 9 9 9 9 9
Freject (N2) SLM 0 0 0 0 8 8 9.3 9 8.8 8.8
F3,2 SLM 20
R a d i a t i o n a d m i t t e d t h r o u g h 6 0 c m x 7 0 c m w i c k e t
20 20 20 R
a d i a t i o n a d m i t t e d t h r o u g h 1 0 0 % o p e n N o r t h w
i n d o w
20 20 20 20 S h a
d o w
o f S o l a r T o w e r r e a c h e s H e l i o s t a t H 2 0
4 – T e s t
d i s c o n t i n u e d
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 7/13
7
Fig. 6. A Gas Chromatogram obtained during STMS test of Jan. 22, 2009, at 11:58
(Instrument time: Summertime +1)
The second STMS test with the WIS SR10 reactor version illustrated in Fig.5 was performed on Feb. 16, 2009. The original aperture diameter of 65mm was increased to
75mm. The test started at insolation I = 951w/m2. In order to operate at high reactor
temperature, a mixture of N2 and He 50%-50% by volume was used again as
secondary gas, to alleviate any Taylor flow instability.
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 8/13
8
PARAMETER TIME
UNIT
11:04 11:15 11:23 11:25 11:26 11:29 11:31 11:35 11:45 12:00 12:05 12:11 12:24
12:25
To
12:35
TC-C1 N
near aperture, N°C 892 1650 1790 1800 1700 1630 1700
TC-C′1 N
Below aperture,N°C 774 1302 1418 1430 1390 1370 1340
downto
570
TC-B′2 °C 15 895 1345 1410 1400 1420 1350 1330
TC-B3 °C 18 803 1007 1030 1025 1030 1080 1173
TCdeflector1 °C 16 16 16 16.5 18.5 16.7 17 18
TCdeflector2 °C 15 18 20 23 24 28 30 24
T pyr.housing °C 16 17 19 18.5 19 20 20 20
T pyrometer °C 15 123 18 310 310 310 308 305
T product1 °C 101 209 253 323 334 385 430 448
T product2 °C 16 25 30 31 32 35 40
TCfilter °C 15 25 30 29 28 25 25
I (Insolation) W/m2 936 951 959 934 930 940 950
F1(CH4) SLM 19 19 0
F2 SLM 1.2 2 2 2 2 2 2
F2(CH4) SLM 0 6 6 14 19 19
Ffluidizer (N2) SLM 0.1 5 8.2 8.5 8.8 0
Freject (N2) SLM 8.6 8.7 9.2 9.5 0
F3,2 (N2) SLM 20 20 20 20 24 20
F′1(N2+He)
50/50% by volSLM
R a d i a t i o
n a d m i t t e d t h r o u g h 6 0 c m x 7 0 c m w i c k e t
0
R a d i a t i o n a d m i t t e d t h r o u g h 1 0 0 % o p e n N o r t h w i n d o w
0 24 24 24 20
F 1
( N 2 ) s t o p p e d
24 C l o s e M e t h a n e ;
T o r n a d o
d i s a p p e a r s ;
C l o s e a p e r t u r e w i n d o w
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 9/13
9
-The Feb. 16, 2009 test endured almost an hour. During 20 minutes after start of CB
seeding, the flow of Methane to the reactor was increased gradually up to F1=20
L/M. Then it was kept constant at 19 L/M for half an hour, up to the end of the test.
-The tornado whirling flow was observed visually through a small plane reflecting
mirror during the whole test duration. It appeared steady.
-The Tornado initial “driving force”, the F′1(N
2+He)=24 L/M flow was maintained
constant throughout the test duration.
-The GC recordings indicate approximately 100% extent of reaction.
-Seventeen minutes before the end of the test the CB seeding was discontinued. The
tornado effect continued unaffected.
-The maximum temperature of 1600-1800°C was recorded by a C-type thermocouple
just below the aperture plane. About 2cm below that location the reactor inner wall
temperature was about 1400°C, while near the exit port the wall temperature was
below 1200°C.
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 10/13
10
Figures 6,7 and 8 are various SEM magnifications of parts of a CB cluster collected
from the product filter after the test of Feb. 16, 2009.
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 11/13
11
The additional 11 pictures are TEM magnifications of two additional CB samples
collected from the product filter after the same test.
Figure 9 is a slight magnification TEM picture of four adjacent clusters of CB
particles. The object at the extreme left at the base of the uppermost cluster is a
Fulerene surrounded by four small Fulerenes in different stages of their evolution.
Details of this group are shown in Figures 10-14. The big central unit servesapparently as catalyst in the formation of the smaller four units.
Fig. 9 TEM of four clusters of CB particles
Fig. 10 Fig. 11
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 12/13
12
Fig. 12 Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Figure 15 is apparently a spot of formation of nano-tubes that could be building
blocks in the formation of nearby Fulerenes, as suggested by the Figures 16-19
following.
Fig. 15
7/30/2019 Report 36 Month Meeting
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/report-36-month-meeting 13/13
13
Fig. 16 Fig. 17
Fig.18 Fig. 19
REFERENCE
[1] A. Kogan, et al A non-polluting solar chemical process for production of
Hydrogen and Carbon Black by solar thermal Methane splitting. 49th Israel Annual
Conference on Aerospace Sciences, Israel, March 4-5, 2009.