Download - Reversing the Middle Class Jobs Deficit
Reversing the Middle Class Jobs Deficit
Alan B. KruegerChairman
Council of Economic Advisers
April 26, 2012
Figure 1: The 2000s Saw Far Weaker Job Creation Than Each of the Previous Five Decades
2Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; CEA calculations.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1950s+24%
1960s+31%
1970s+27%
1980s+20%
1990s+20%
2000s
Nonfarm Payroll Employment Millions
Jan. 2000-Dec. 2007
+5.7%
Figure 2: Real Earnings for the Median Year-Round Worker Stagnated
3Note: Earnings adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers. Source: CEA calculations based on Current Population Survey March Supplement.
32,000
34,000
36,000
38,000
40,000
42,000
44,000
46,000
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006
Real Median Earnings for Full-Time Year Round Workers, 1981-2010
2010 Dollars
2010
Figure 3: The Share of Workers Earning a Middle-Class Income Has Been in Decline Over the Past Three Decades
4Source: CEA calculations based on Current Population Survey March Supplement.
66.1
64.8
60.259.5
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
1980 1990 2000 2010
Share of Full-Time Year Round Workers With Annual Earnings Within 50 Percent of the Median
Percent
0
Figure 4: Economic Growth Turned Positive in 2009:Q3 and Has Continued for 10 Straight Quarters
5Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Shading denotes NBER recession.
0.5
3.63.0
1.7
-1.8
1.3
-3.7
-8.9
-6.7
-0.7
1.7
3.8 3.9 3.8
2.5 2.3
0.41.3
1.8
3.0
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
2007:Q1 2008:Q1 2009:Q1 2010:Q1 2011:Q1
Real GDP GrowthAnnualized Quarterly Percent Change
2011:Q4
Figure 5: Jobs Have Been Growing Since February 2010
6Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Shading denotes NBER recession.
-900
-750
-600
-450
-300
-150
0
150
300
-900
-750
-600
-450
-300
-150
0
150
300
Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12
Change in Private Nonfarm PayrollsThousands, Seasonally Adjusted
Feb-10
Figure 6: Job Growth in the Current Recovery is Closely Tracking the Early 1990s Recovery
7Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; CEA calculations.
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
-36 -30 -24 -18 -12 -6 Trough 6 12 18 24 30 36
Private Payroll Employment During RecoveriesNBER-Defined Cycle Trough = 100
Current (June 2009
Trough)
Months from Trough
1991
2001
Figure 7: Strong Economic Growth in the 1990s Helped Lift Incomes for All Quintiles
8Source: Census Bureau; CEA calculations.
-0.4% 0.1%0.3%
0.6%
1.2%
Lowest fifth 2nd fifth Mid fifth 4th fifth Top fifth-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5Percent
Annual Growth Rate of Real Income Across the Family Income Distribution,1979 to 2010
2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.3%
3.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
Lowest fifth 2nd fifth Mid fifth 4th fifth Top fifth
Annual Growth Rate of Real Income Across the Family Income Distribution,1995-2000
Percent
Figure 8: The Manufacturing Sector Provides a Path to the Middle Class, Especially for Workers with an Associate’s Degree or Less
9Note: The median annual earnings is based on full-time year-round workers.Source: CEA calculations based on Current Population Survey 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
Manufacturing 56%
Manufacturing63%
Non-Manufacturing
47%
Non-Manufacturing
49%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
All Workers
Associate's Degree or Less
Percent of Workers With Annual Earnings Within 50 Percent of the Median, 2010
Percent
Figure 9: Manufacturing Employment Fell Beneath Its Normal Bounds Early in the 2000s
10Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, CEA calculations.
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Manufacturing Employment Millions
Dec. 2000-Dec. 2007
-3.4 million
Dec. 2007-Jun. 2009
-2.0 million
Jan. 2010-Mar. 2012+470,000
Figure 10: Domestic U.S. Manufacturers Are Increasingly Competitive
11Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, International Labor Comparisons; CEA Calculations.
-23.0 -10.8 2.1 2.9
14.1 17.120.8
40.8 44.1
67.6
79.0
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Singapore Japan U.K. Korea SwedenGermany France Canada Italy
Change in Manufacturing Unit Labor Costs, 2002-2010Percent
Taiwan
UnitedStates
Figure 11: Share of Population with a Post-Secondary Degree in 2009 by Birth Cohort
12Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Education at a Glance 2011.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Port
ugal
Mex
ico
Turk
ey
Italy
Cze
ch R
ep.
Slov
ak R
ep.
Pola
nd
Kore
a
Gre
ece
Aust
ria
Hun
gary
Spai
n
Chi
le
Slov
enia
Fran
ce
Irela
nd
Icel
and
Belg
ium
Luxe
mbo
urg
Ger
man
y
Den
mar
k
Swed
en
Nor
way
Japa
n
Net
herla
nds
Switz
erla
nd
U.K
.
Finl
and
Aust
ralia
Esto
nia
New
Zea
land
Can
ada
Uni
ted
Stat
es
Share of 55-64 Year Olds With a Post-Secondary DegreePercent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Turk
ey
Italy
Mex
ico
Cze
ch R
ep.
Slov
ak R
ep.
Aust
ria
Port
ugal
Hun
gary
Ger
man
y
Gre
ece
Slov
enia
Chi
le
Pola
nd
Icel
and
Esto
nia
Spai
n
Finl
and
Switz
erla
nd
Net
herla
nds
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Swed
en
Belg
ium
Isra
el
Fra
nce
Den
mar
k
Aust
ralia
U.K
.
Luxe
mbo
urg
New
Zea
land
Nor
way
Irela
nd
Japa
n
Can
ada
Kor
ea
Share of 25-34 Year Olds With a Post-Secondary DegreePercent
Figure 12: College Completion Rate by Income Quartile
13Source: Bailey and Dynarski (2011) based on National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979 and 1997. College completion is measured by age 25.
0.09
0.21
0.32
0.54
0.050.14
0.17
0.36
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
Lowest Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile Top Quartile
1979 to 1982 birth cohorts
1961 to 1964 birth cohorts
Fraction of Students Completing a Bachelor's Degree, by Income Quartile and Birth Year