Download - Rice husk power plant project for finance, subsidy & project related support contact - 9861458008
IGES-ICS CDM PDD TRAINING WORKSHOP
January 24- 26, 2005, MMLDC Antipolo city
PREPARATION OF PDD:
INTERCORICE HUSK POWER PLANT PROJECT
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
CONTENTS:
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITYB. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGYC. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/CREDITING
PERIODD. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND
PLANE. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCESF. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSG. STAKEHOLDERS’ COMMENTS (to follow)
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.1. TITLE OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY:
INTERCO 5 MW Rice Husk Fired Power Plant
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
PURPOSE:
The Project is designed to use rice husk for power generation that would otherwise be burned in the open air or left to decay.
Project is expected to bring the following benefits:– Improve the quality of power by minimizing distribution loss– Lower the cost of power to the entire rice milling operation (80
rice mills) within the estate– Lower the cost of rice husk disposal
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
CONTRIBUTION TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
USE OF CHEAP INDIGENOUS RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN AN IMPORT ENERGY-DEPENDENT COUNTRY
USE OF ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGY
REDUCTION OF AIR POLLUTION AND SOLID WASTE IN THE COUNTRYSIDE
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.3. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS:
PROPONENT: INTERCOCDM ADVISER: NONE YET
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY:
LOCATION OF PROJECT ACTIVITY:
1.2 HECTARE LOCATED WITHIN INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
MC ARTHUR HIWAY, BRGY. SAN JUAN, BALAGTAS, BULACAN, PHILIPPINES
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY:
A.4.2 CATEGORIES OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects: I.A. Electricity generation by the user
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
A.4.3 TECHNOLOGY TO BE EMPLOYED
Boiler and steam generation systemMaker: Yoshimine Co. Pte. of JapanModel: Water Tube Boiler H-900Steam Evaporation: 30,000 kg/hr at MCRSteam pressure: approx. 42 kg.cm2GBoiler efficiency: 83.0% Flue gas loss measureDraft / Anti pollution system: Balance draft electrostatic precipitator – particles less than 100 mg/m3
Steam turbine for generatorMaker: Shinko Ind. Ltd. of JapanModel: SHINKO DNGG62Output: 5,000 kW x 8,119 / 1,800 rpmType: Horizontal Rateau 6-stages, condensing type with reduction gear, forced lubrication system
A.4. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY:
A.4.4 EXPLANATION ON HOW PROPOSED CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY CAN REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS
CDM PROJECT CAN REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS BY:
DISPLACEMENT OF ELECTRICTY DEMAND FROM ELECTRICITY GRID PRIMARILY PRODUCED FROM FOSSIL FUEL WITH ELECTRICITY PRODUCED FROM RICE HUSK FIRED GENERATOR
PREVENTION OF UNCONTROLLED OPEN AIR BURNING OF RICE HUSK AS A MODE OF DISPOSAL BY DIVERTING BIOMASS WASTE MATERIAL TO BOILER FUEL APPLICATION
LESSEN TRAVEL DISTANCE OF TRUCKS DISPOSING RICE HUSK
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B.1: TITLE AND REFERENCE OF THE APPROVED BASELINE METHODOLOGY
Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects: I.A. Electricity generation by the user
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B.2: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE METHODOLOGY IS APPLIED IN THE CONTEXT OF PROJECT ACTIVITY
STEPS IN METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO PROJECT TO ASCERTAIN THAT IT IS ADDITIONAL
1. PROJECT IS DIFFERENT TO BAU PRIMARILY DUE TO INVESTMENT AND TECHNOLOGY BARRIERS
2. LARGE SURPLUS SUPPLY AVAILABILITY OF BIOMASS
3. THE PLANT SIZE IS LESS THAN 15MW, WHICH IS CONSIDERED SMALL SCALE TO AFFECT THE BASELOAD OF LUZON GRID
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B.3: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE ANTHROPOGENIC GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCES ARE REDUCED BELOW THOSE THAT WOULD HAVE OCCURRED IN THE ABSENCE OF A CDM PROJECT ACTIVITY
THIS PROJECT INTRODUCES STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY TO THE COUNTRY THAT PROVIDES ENERGY FROM UNUSED BIOMASS AS FUEL
THIS PROJECT IS ADDITIONAL SINCE ELECTRICITY FROM RICE HUSK-FIRED POWER PLANT IS NOT LOCALLY AVAILABLE DUE TO ABSENCE OF TECHNOLOGY
IMPORTED TECHNOLOGY IS NOT YET ECONOMICALLY VIABLE.
IT PRODUCES LESS CO2 EMISSIONS DUE TO DISPLACEMENT OF FOSSIL FUEL FOR HEAT AND POWER GENERATION IN THE BASELINE SCENARIO WITH BIOMASS FUEL IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO. BIOMASS IS CO2 NEUTRAL
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B.4: DESCRIPTION OF HOW THE DEFINITION OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY RELATED TO THE BASELINE METHODOLOGY SELECTED IS APPLIED TO THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
PER METHODOLOGY, THE PHYSICAL DELINEATION IS DEFINED AS THE INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE WHICH INCLUDES THE INTERCO POWER PLANT SITE. ALL EMISSION SOURCES INCLUDED IN THE PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE WITHIN THE INTERCITY INDUSTRIAL ESTATE.
B. APPLICATION OF A BASELINE METHODOLOGY
B.5: DETAILED BASELINE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THE BASELINE STUDY AND THE NAME OF PERSON(S)/ENTITY(IES) DETERMINING THE BASELINE
DETAILS OF BASELINE INFORMATION : REFER TO FEASIBILITY STUDY
DATE OF COMPETING THE FINAL DRAFT OF THIS BASELINE SECTION
DD/MM/YYYY
NAME OF PERSONS/ENTITY DETERMINING THE BASELINE
NAME OF ORGANIZATIION
AND ADDRESS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/ CREDITING PERIOD
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/ CREDITING PERIOD
C.1. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
25 YEARS
C.1.1 STARTING DATE OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
DECEMBER 1, 2006
C..1.2. EXPECTED OPERATIONAL LIFETIME OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
MINIMUM 25 YEARS
C. DURATION OF THE PROJECT ACTIVITY/ CREDITING PERIOD
C.2. CHOICE OF CREDITING PERIOD AND RELATED INFORMATION
C.2.1. RENEWABLE CREDITING PERIOD ( MAX. 7 YEARS )
STARTING DATE OF FIRST CREDITING PERIOD: 2006
LENGTH OF FIRST CREDITING PERIOD: DD/MM/YYYY
C.2.2 FIXED CREDITING PERIOD
STARTING DATE: DD/MM/YYYY
LENGTH: ? YEARS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D.1 NAME AND REFERENCE OF APPROVED MONITORING METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO THE PROJECT ACIVITY
Small scale CDM Type 1 – Renewable energy projects: I.A. Electricity generation by the user
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D.2. JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF THE METHODOLOGY AND WHY IT IS APPLICABLE TO THE
PROJECT ACTIVITY
THE CHOICE OF METHODOLOGY IS JUSTIFIED SINCE THE PROPOSED PROJECT ACTIVITY AND THE CONTEXT OF PROJECT ACTIVITY MEET THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE METHODOLOGY IS APLLICABLE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
1. PROJECT ACTIVITY INVOLVES ELECTRICITY GENERATION UTILIZING RICE HUSK DUE FOR OPEN AIR BURNING
2. HAVE ACCESS TO ABUNDANT SUPPLY OF BIOMASS
3. PROPOSED POWER GENERATION PROJECT IS NOT CONSIDERED A BUSINESS AS USUAL SCENARIO
4. THE PROJECT IS TOO SMALL TO HAVE IMPACT ON PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW POWER PLANTS
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
D.2.1. OPTION 1: MONITORING OF THE EMISSIONS IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO
AND BASELINE SCENARIO
D.2.1. MONITORING OF THE EMISSIONS IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO AND BASELINE
SCENARIO
MONITORING EMISSIONS IN THE PROJECT SCENARIO:
DATA COLLECTION AND ARCHIVING
APPLICABLE EQUATIONS
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO MONITOR EMISSIONS FROM THE BASE LINE ACTIVITY
AND HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED
TOTAL BASELINE EMISSIONS
28,350t CO2EQUIV. /YR
RICE HUSK OPEN AIR BURNING
(1,437.4 t CO2, not claimed)
DIESEL FOR TRANSPORT
(52.62 t CO2e, not claimed)
ELECTRICITY GRID
28,350 t CO2
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO MONITOR EMISSIONS FROM THE PROJECT ACTIVITY
AND HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED
TOTAL PROJECT EMISSIONS
RICE HUSK BOILER23,762 t/yr
(336 TJ)
RICE HUSK TRANSPORT TO GENERATION PLANT
1 km
RICE HUSK TRANSPORT WITHIN THE PLANT
Fuel consumed
AUXILIARY FUEL FOR START-UP
Fuel Consumed
D.2.1.1 DATA TO BE COLLECTED IN ORDER TO MONITOR EMISSIONS FROM THE BASE LINE & PROJECT ACTIVITY AND
HOW THESE DATA WILL BE ARCHIVED Data
Type Data Variable
Data Unit
Measured (m), calculated (c) or estimated (e)
Recording frequency
Proportion of data to be monitored
Archive as paper or electronic?
How long is archived data kept?
Baseline Quan Actual power generation
Mwh m monthly 100% electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
Project Quan Amount of rice husk delivered
Tons m As per delivery
100% electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
Quan Moisture content
% m As per delivery
100% electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
Quan diesel oil used for pay loader
L m As per delivery
100% electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
Quan Bunker fuel oil for plant’s start upt
KL m As per delivery
100% Electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
Quan Diesel oil used for delivery of rice husk from RM to power plant site
km m As per delivery
100% Electronic minimum of two years after last issuance of CERs
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D.4. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE THAT THE PROJECT OPERATOR WILL IMPLEMENT TO MONITOR EMISSION REDUCTION AND LEAKAGE EFFECTS GENERATED BY PROJECT ACTIVITY
TO MAINTAIN A DAILY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE LOGS BY OPERATORS HEADED BY SHIFT LEADER THAT CAN ALLOW LSRM MANAGEMENT TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATE PROBLEMSTO PREPARE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE MANAGEMENT’S TECHNICAL MONITORING GROUP TO DETERMINE SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS TO TARGET EMISSIONS LEVEL AND RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE ACTIONSSUMMARY REPORT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:
1. SUMMARY2. ACCIDENTS AND MALFUNCTIONS3. SAFETY AND ENVRONMENT4. PLANT PERFORMANCE AND AVAILABILITY5. METER RECORDS6. FUEL REPORT7. PERSONNEL CHANGES
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMOPERATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE TO
MONITOR MISSION REDUCTION AND LEAKAGE EFFECTS
OPERATORS OPERATE & MONITOR PLANT BY
SHIFTS, DAILY
MANAGEMENT ACTION FOR LONG TERM
SOLUTION
IN CASE OF VISIIBLE PROBLEMS, CORRECTIVE
ACTION IMMEDIATELY DONE BY ENG’G AND
MAINTENANCE GROUP
REPORT/DATA INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATION BY
TECHNICAL GRO UP
MONTHLY REPORT PREPARATION BY
OPERATORS
D. APPLICATION OF A MONITORING METHODOLOGY AND PLAN
D.5. NAME OF PERSONS/ENTITY DETERMINING THE MONITORING METHODOLOGY
INTERCO PERSONNEL
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
E. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCES
E. ESTIMATION OF GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCES
TOTAL BASELINE EMISSIONS
28,350 t CO2/YR
TOTAL PROJECT EMISSIONS
279.39 t CO2/ YR
EMISSION
REDUCTION
28,071 t CO2/ YR
$ 140,353
RICE HUSK BOILER274.18 t CO2 EQUIV / YR
HAULING TO PLANT5.21 t CO2 EQUIV / YR
ON-SITE TRANSPORTMINIMAL
AUXILIARY FUELMINIMAL
RICE HUSK OPEN AIR BURNING
(1,437.4 t CO2, not claimed)
DIESEL FOR TRANSPORT
(52.62 t CO2e, not claimed)
ELECTRICITY GRID28,350 t CO2
PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSF.1 DOCUMENTATION ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS, INCLUDING TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS
SO2 emissions will be within DENR standards. There will be regular quarterly monitoring to ensure compliance with the standard. Anyexpected SO2 will be captured in the scrubber stage of the electrostatic precipitator. NOx emissions is not expected to go beyond the standard as the lowNOx design of boiler will ensure compliance.Particulates and fly ash will be captured in an electrostatic precipitator for controlled removal..Wastewater will not be permitted to leave the plant site. Instead, it will be first treated and then evaporated from an evaporating pond.Ash will be disposed of safely. If the RHA from the project cannot be sold, provision has been made to bury the ash on-site, thereby preventing it from escaping into the atmosphere or entering the local waterways via runoff. The large size of the site combined with tree plantings will buffer ambient noise.
Domingo PerezChristian Alvin Ong
Art TorralbaAngelito DavidMerlyn Rivera
INTERCO GROUP MEMBERS