Download - Scatterplots
![Page 1: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ch3 Bivariate Data
ScatterplotsRegression
![Page 2: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Scatterplots
![Page 3: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Scatterplots
![Page 4: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Scatterplots
![Page 5: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Scatterplots
![Page 6: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Scatterplots
![Page 7: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
L1 L2
![Page 9: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
![Page 10: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
![Page 11: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Do a Residual PlotCalculator: In the List Menu(2nd Stat) find the name RESID and place in for Ylist.
![Page 12: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Residual Plot
A randomly scattered residual plot shows that a linear model is appropriate.
![Page 13: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Write the linear equation:
GPA = 1.8069326 + .4247748(Study Time)
![Page 14: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Interpret the Slope(b):
For every hour of study our model predicts an avg increase of .4247748319 in GPA.
![Page 15: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Interpret the y-intercept(a):
At 0 hours of study our model predicts a GPA of 1.8069326.
![Page 16: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Interpret the correlation(r):
There is a strong positive linear association between hours of study and GPA.
![Page 17: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Study Time and GPA
Interpret the Coefficient of Determination(r2):
66.6% of the variation in GPA can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with hours of study.
![Page 18: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabLAST YEAR
![Page 19: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabHave you ever wondered how many tootsie pops you could grab in one hand?
LAST YEAR
![Page 20: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabFirst we need to get an accurate measurement of the hand that you will use to grab the tootsie pops?
LAST YEAR
![Page 21: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab23 CM
LAST YEAR
![Page 22: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabLAST YEAR
![Page 23: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabLAST YEAR
![Page 24: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabLAST YEAR
![Page 25: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabLAST YEAR
![Page 26: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
Are there any outliers or influential points?
If this point was removed, the slope of the line would increase and the correlation would become stronger.
LAST YEAR
![Page 27: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
Predicted # of Pops = -12.9362 + 1.57199(Handspan)
LAST YEAR
![Page 28: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
For every………
Interpret the slope “b”LAST YEAR
![Page 29: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
For every cm of handspan our model predicts an avg increase of 1.57199322 in the # of pops you can grab.
Interpret the slope “b”LAST YEAR
![Page 30: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
If your handspan was 0 cm, ………
Interpret the y-intercept “a”LAST YEAR
![Page 31: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
If your handspan was 0 cm our model predicts -12.9361942 pops that can be grabbed.
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Why is this not statistically significant?
This is not statistically significant because you cannot have a negative # of pops grabbed.
LAST YEAR
![Page 32: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
There is a , ………
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
LAST YEAR
![Page 33: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
There is a moderate positive linear association between handspan and the # of pops you can grab.
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
LAST YEAR
![Page 34: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
__% of the variation ………
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
LAST YEAR
![Page 35: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
38.6% of the variation in pops grabbed can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with handspan.
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
LAST YEAR
![Page 36: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Scatterplot vs Residual Plot
The residual plot uses the same x-axis but the y-axis is the residuals.The residual plot shows the actual points. It shows whether they were above or below the prediction line.
LAST YEAR
![Page 37: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Scatterplot vs Residual Plot
Prediction line
LAST YEAR
![Page 38: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
What was the predicted # of pops for a handspan of 24?
Predicted # of Pops = -12.9362 + 1.57199(Handspan)
LAST YEAR
![Page 39: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
What was the predicted # of pops for a handspan of 24?
Predicted # of Pops = -12.9362 + 1.57199(24)
24.79
LAST YEAR
![Page 40: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
What was the ACTUAL # of pops for a handspan of 24?
Check the residual plot for this.
It’s predicted +/- residual.
24.79 + 4 = 28.79
LAST YEAR
![Page 41: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Skittles Bag GrabPeriod 2
![Page 42: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Skittles Bag GrabHave you ever wondered how many skittles bags you could grab in one hand?
Period 1
![Page 43: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Skittles Bag GrabFirst we need to get an accurate measurement of the hand that you will use to grab the tootsie pops?
Period 2
![Page 44: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Skittles Bag Grab23 CM
Period 2
![Page 45: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Skittles Bag GrabPeriod 2
![Page 46: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Predicted # of Skittles Bags = -16.639+ 1.74544(Handspan)
Skittles Bag GrabPeriod 2
![Page 47: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
For every………
Interpret the slope “b”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 48: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Skittles Bag Grab
For every cm of handspan our model predicts an avg increase of 1.74544 in the # of skittles bags you can grab.
Interpret the slope “b”
Period 2
![Page 49: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
If your handspan was 0 cm, ………
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 50: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
If your handspan was 0 cm our model predicts -16.639 in the # of skittles bags that can be grabbed.
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Why is this not statistically significant?
This is not statistically significant because you cannot have a negative # of skittles bags grabbed.
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 51: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
There is a , ………
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 52: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
There is a moderate positive linear association between handspan and the # skittles bags you can grab.
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 53: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
__% of the variation ………
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 54: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
42.7% of the variation in skittles bags grabbed can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with handspan.
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Period 2Skittles Bag Grab
![Page 55: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabPeriod 3
![Page 56: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabHave you ever wondered how many tootsie pops you could grab in one hand?
Period 3
![Page 57: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabFirst we need to get an accurate measurement of the hand that you will use to grab the tootsie pops?
Period 3
![Page 58: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab23 CM
Period 3
![Page 59: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabPeriod 3
![Page 60: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Tootsie Pop GrabPeriod 3
![Page 61: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
Predicted # of Pops = -27.7801 + 2.34491(Handspan)
Period 3
![Page 62: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
For every………
Interpret the slope “b”
Period 3
![Page 63: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
For every cm of handspan our model predicts an avg increase of 2.34491 in the # of pops you can grab.
Interpret the slope “b”
Period 3
![Page 64: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
If your handspan was 0 cm, ………
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Period 3
![Page 65: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
If your handspan was 0 cm our model predicts -27.7801 pops that can be grabbed.
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Why is this not statistically significant?
This is not statistically significant because you cannot have a negative # of pops grabbed.
Period 3
![Page 66: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
There is a , ………
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Period 3
![Page 67: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
There is a moderate positive linear association between handspan and the # of pops you can grab.
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Period 3
![Page 68: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
__% of the variation ………
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Period 3
![Page 69: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Tootsie Pop Grab
48.0% of the variation in pops grabbed can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with handspan.
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Period 3
![Page 70: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 71: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Have you ever wondered how many smarties you could grab in one hand?
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 72: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
First we need to get an accurate measurement of the hand that you will use to grab the tootsie pops?
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 73: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
23 CM
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 74: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 75: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Predicted # of Smarties Packages = -10.3911+ 1.8359(Handspan)
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 76: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
For every………
Interpret the slope “b”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 77: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
For every cm of handspan our model predicts an avg increase of 1.8359 in the # of smarties you can grab.
Interpret the slope “b”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 78: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
If your handspan was 0 cm, ………
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 79: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
If your handspan was 0 cm our model predicts -10.3911 in the # of smarties that can be grabbed.
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Why is this not statistically significant?
This is not statistically significant because you cannot have a negative # of smarties grabbed.
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 80: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
There is a , ………
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 81: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
There is a moderate positive linear association between handspan and the # smarties you can grab.
Describe the association……this means interpret the correlation “r”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 82: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
__% of the variation ………
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 83: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
35.1% of the variation in smarties grabbed can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with handspan.
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
Smarties GrabPeriod 4
![Page 84: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Surfing
![Page 85: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Below are 22 randomly selected days that Mr. Pines has surfed in the past few years.
Time(Min)
45 60 43 30 62 59 61 44 70 75 85
# of Waves
2 6 5 2 5 8 5 6 15 9 11
Time(Min) 90 58 47 31 63 64 73 42 65 57 66# of Waves
10 6 7 3 2 10 10 7 3 12 12
Is there an association between minutes surfed and # of waves ridden?
![Page 86: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Create a Scatterplot of the data.
Minutes will be the Explanatory Variable x and # of Waves will be the response variable y.
Calculator: Minutes in L1 and Waves in L2
![Page 87: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Find your linear model.Calculator: Stat, Calc, 8:LinReg(a + bx), L1,L2,Vars,Y-Vars,1:Function,Y1
If your r and r2 do not show up you need to go to catalog and turn Diagnostic On
![Page 88: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Write your linear model properly.
Predicted # of Waves = -1.205 + .141811(minutes surfed)
DO NOT use X and Y, ALWAYS use the words in context.
![Page 89: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Use your linear model to make a prediction.
Predicted # of Waves = -1.205 + .141811(49)
How many waves does your model predict if you surfed for 49 minutes?
Predicted # of Waves = 5.74
![Page 90: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Beware of Extrapolation.
Predicted # of Waves = -1.205 + .141811(120)
How many waves does your model predict if you surfed for 120 minutes?
Predicted # of Waves = 15.81
Because 120 minutes is beyond our domain on the x-axis our answer cannot be trusted, this is called Extrapolation.
![Page 91: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Interpret the y-intercept “a”
Surfing 0 minutes, our model predicts -1.205 waves ridden.
ALWAYS use context.
![Page 92: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Interpret the slope “b”
For every minute surfed, our model predicts an average increase of .141481 in waves ridden.
ALWAYS use context.
![Page 93: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Interpret the correlation coefficient “r”
There is a moderate positive linear association between minutes surfed and waves ridden.
ALWAYS use context.
![Page 94: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Interpret the coefficient of determination “r2”
35.9% of the variation in waves ridden can be explained by the approximate linear relationship with minutes surfed.
ALWAYS use context.
![Page 95: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Graph the Scatterplot Again.Now that you have had your calculator find your linear model, the LSRL should now show up on your scatterplot
Calculator: Zoom 9
![Page 96: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Do a Residual PlotCalculator: In the List Menu(2nd Stat) find the name RESID and place in for Ylist.
![Page 97: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
What does the Residual Plot tell you?
The points on the residual plot are called residuals. They are the actual points and the horizontal axis is your LSRL.
![Page 98: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
What does the Residual Plot tell you?
If the residual plot shows a random scatter like this one, then the linear model is a good fit. If there is a curved pattern then a nonlinear model may be a better fit.(we will do these later in chapter 12.
![Page 99: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Understanding Computer OutputThis is often given to you on the AP test so you don’t have to waste time putting #’s in your calculator
![Page 100: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Make sure you know which one is “a” and “b”R is obtained from taking the square root of R-Sq
S is the standard deviation of the residuals(not used much in our class)
Seb is the standard deviation of the slope(more of this in CH15)T and P are also used in CH15
![Page 101: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Too many people at my party
Is there an association between the # of people at a party and the # of fights that occur?
![Page 102: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Influential Points and OutliersPoints that are extreme values in the x-direction may be influential points.
An influential point is a point that strongly affects the regression line if that point was removed.
![Page 103: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Extreme points
in x-direction
in y-direction
![Page 104: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Try removing this point
Notice the change in the regression line and the value of the slope.
That point is an influential point
![Page 105: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Try removing this point
Notice how the slope and regression line do not change much.
That point is NOT an influential point it is an Outlier
![Page 106: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Influential Points and OutliersPoints that are extreme values in the x-direction are called influential points.
Points that are extreme in the y-direction are called Outliers…..an outlier will have a large residual value Outlier
Influential Point
![Page 107: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
More Influential Points
![Page 108: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
More Influential Points
![Page 109: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Using the Residual Plot
This is the scatterplot for # of people at a party and # of fights that occur.
![Page 110: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Residual plot for people at party and fights
What is the predicted # of fights for having 8 people at a party?
Fights = 2.94738 + .1222(people)
![Page 111: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Fights = 2.94738 + .1222(people)Fights = 2.94738 + .1222(8)Predicted # of fights is about 3.92
![Page 112: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Residual plot for people at party and fights
What was the actual # of fights that occurred for having 8 people at a party?
Fights = 2.94738 + .1222(people)
![Page 113: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
The residual seems to be about 2 below the prediction line. So 3.92 – 2 = 1.92 actual fights.
![Page 114: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
You can see that the original point (8,2) matches our answer from the previous slide.
![Page 115: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Correlation
![Page 116: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Correlation
![Page 117: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Correlation
![Page 118: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Correlation
r = ± .70 to ± .99 Strong Correlation
r = ± .40 to ±.69 Moderate Correlation
r = ± .01 to ± .39 Weak Correlation
![Page 119: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Scatterplot & Residual PlotSometimes you can spot a curved residual plot in the scatterplot
![Page 120: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Slope and CorrelationThe slope and the correlation should be heading in the same direction
![Page 121: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Ministers and Rum
![Page 122: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Ministers and Rum
Explanatory Variable(X)# of Methodist Ministers
Response Variable(Y)Barrels of Cuban Rum
![Page 123: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Ministers and Rum
![Page 124: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Ministers and Rum1. Write the linear equation.
2. In your own words tell me what the meaning of the y-intercept is for this situation.
3. Make a prediction for the number of barrels of rum if there were 150 methodist ministers.
Predicted # of Barrels of Rum = 33.18073414 + 132.1220623(Ministers)
If there were no ministers we could expect about 33 barrels of rum
Plugging 150 into the linear equation predicts 19,851.5 barrels.
![Page 125: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Ministers and Rum
6. The correlation is near perfect, what conclusions can be made here?
5. Describe the association between Ministers and Rum.
4. Make a prediction for the number of barrels of rum if there were 400 methodist ministers…..What would be your concerns with making this type of prediction?
Plugging 400 into the linear model predicts 52,882 barrels…….this is a concern because we are predicting beyond the domain of the x-axis…..this is called EXTRAPOLATION.
There is a strong positive linear association between the # of methodist ministers and the # of barrels of rum.
We cannot make conclusions or cause and effect. We can only SUGGEST an association.
![Page 126: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Ministers and Rum7. Since it is not likely that the ministers were drinking the rum, what might be a lurking variable for this situation?
Population increase from 1860 to 1940 brings a demand for more ministers and more rum
![Page 127: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Ministers and Rum8. What year created the largest residual in this situation?
1920
![Page 128: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 129: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Hand Span vs Foot Length
Hand Span(cm)
Foot
Len
gth
(in)
![Page 130: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Hand Span vs Foot LengthPredicted Foot Length = 1.17366746 + .4165143(Hand Span)
Interpret a,b,r,r2
At a hand span of 0 cm our model predicts a foot size of about 1.17 inches
For every additional cm in hand span our model predicts and avg increase of about .417 inches in foot length.
There is a moderate positive linear relationship between hand span and foot length.
47.5% of the variation in foot length can be explained by the linear relationship with Hand Span.
R2 = .4750
![Page 131: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 132: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 133: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 134: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 135: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 136: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
![Page 137: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Text Messaging
18 Students text messages(sent and received) for the past 24 hours per were recorded.
Is there a linear relationship between sending and receiving messages?
Period 2
Predicted Texts Received = 2.63407 + .905352(texts sent)
There is a strong positive linear association between the number of texts sent and received.
![Page 138: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Text Messaging
18 Students text messages(sent and received) for the past 24 hours per were recorded.
Is there a linear relationship between sending and receiving messages?
Period 2
![Page 139: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Is this linear model a good fit?
Period 2
Yes, a linear is a good fit because the RESIDUALS show a random scatter above and below the prediction line.
Don’t call them DOTS or IT or THEY
![Page 140: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What is the residual for the student who sent 40 text messages?
Period 2
Predicted Texts Received = 2.63407 + .905352(texts sent)
-2
![Page 141: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What was the actual number of text messages received for the student with 40 text messages sent?
Period 2
Predicted Texts Received = 2.63407 + .905352(texts sent)
37
![Page 142: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What was the actual number of text messages received for the student with 0 text messages sent?
Period 2
Predicted Texts Received = 2.63407 + .905352(texts sent)
5
![Page 143: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
Text Messaging
18 Students text messages(sent and received) for the past 24 hours per were recorded.
Is there a linear relationship between sending and receiving messages?
Period 3
Predicted Texts Received = -1.2379 + 1.08031(texts sent)
There is a strong positive linear association between the number of texts sent and received.
![Page 144: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
Insert residual plotPeriod 3
Is this linear model a good fit?
Yes, a linear model is a good fit because the RESIDUALS show a random scatter above and below the prediction line.
Don’t call them DOTS or IT or THEY
![Page 145: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What is the residual for the student who sent 35 text messages?
Period 3
Predicted Texts Received = -1.2379 + 1.08031(texts sent)
-4
![Page 146: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What was the actual number of text messages received for the student with 35 text messages sent?
Period 3
Predicted Texts Received = -1.2379 + 1.08031(texts sent)
32
![Page 147: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
Text Messaging
18 Students text messages(sent and received) for the past 24 hours per were recorded.
Is there a linear relationship between sending and receiving messages?
Period 4
Predicted Texts Received = 1.79437 + 0.848007(texts sent)
There is a strong positive linear association between the number of texts sent and received.
![Page 148: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
Text Messaging
18 Students text messages(sent and received) for the past 24 hours per were recorded.
Is there a linear relationship between sending and receiving messages?
Period 4
![Page 149: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
Insert residual plot
Is this linear model a good fit?
Period 4
Yes, a linear is a good fit because the RESIDUALS show a random scatter above and below the prediction line.
Don’t call them DOTS or IT or THEY
![Page 150: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What is the residual for the student who sent 15 text messages?
Period 4
Predicted Texts Received = 1.79437 + 0.848007(texts sent)
-8
![Page 151: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
Insert residual plot
What was the actual number of text messages received for the student with 15 text messages sent?
Period 4
Predicted Texts Received = 1.79437 + 0.848007(texts sent)
7
![Page 152: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
Things you need learn to do for CH3•Do a scatterplot on your calculator•Do a Residual plot on your calculator•Find the linear equation on your calculator•Write your linear equation in context•Make a prediction using your equation•Interpret the slope(b) in context•Interpret the y-intercept(a) in context•Interpret “r” in context•Interpret “r2” in context•Use the residual plot to determine if your model is a good fit.
![Page 153: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
•Correlation does not imply Causation…..this means that a scatterplot with a strong correlation does not necessarily mean that x leads to y. Only a well designed experiment can give cause and effect conclusions.
•Making predictions beyond the domain of the x-axis cannot be trusted, this is called Extrapolation
•On a scatterplot extreme values in the y-direction are called “outliers” and extreme values in the x-direction are called “influential points”
•R is the correlation coefficient, it measures the strength of the association between x and y
•R2 is the coefficient of determination which is the % of variation in y that is explained by approzimate linear association with x
![Page 154: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
•The sum and the mean of the residuals is always zero.
•The standard deviation of the residuals gives a measure of how the points in the scatterplot are spread around the regression line.
•The point is always on the regression line.
•The correlation “r” is not changed by adding the same number to every value of one of the variables, by multiplying every value of one of the variables by the same positive number, or by interchanging the x and y variables.
•The correlation “r” cannot be greater than 1 or less than -1.
![Page 155: Scatterplots](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062520/5681624a550346895dd28de0/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
•Correlation is strongly affected by outliers.
•The slope and the correlation have the same sign.
•Influential points are points who sharply affect the regression line. An influential point may have a small residual but have a large effect on the regression line.
•A residual plot that shows a curved pattern shows that your linear model may not be a good fit. A residual plot that is randomly scattered shows that your model may be a good fit.