Scenario 2.0 Comprehensive and Committee Support
Tables“Demonstrate the tool’s ability to
collect the data needed to produce a Comprehensive (Comp) Table and how the
various Bureau Comp Tables can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table.”
1
2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).
BFEM Methods•Hierarchy Org Structure•Reports
2
Customers using Method•State•Treasury•DHS•House of Reps•CNCS•ACF•USAID
Demonstration•State: Tracking at various levels
3
2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).
2.1.1 Tracking funds/positions at various levels – via the User Interface Bureau-Level
data
Account-Level data
4
2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).
2.1.2 Tracking based on grouping accounts
This example shows fee accounts
5
2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).
2.1.3 Tracking based on modifications A report that shows
all modifications
6
2.1 Demonstrate that budget authority and FTE data can be tracked by varying levels of detail (e.g., OMB Account, Treasury Account, Appropriation, Budget Activity, Sub-Activity, Program, and Project/Line Item).
2.1.4 Tracking of crosscuts at various levels
This accounts are summed in this
report
These accounts are summed in this
report
2.2 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to assign attributes to data (e.g., to a particular fund type, departmental crosscut, as mandatory/discretionary, as an earmark, etc.).
BFEM Methods•Create and assign GDPs•Mod Types•Allocations•Generic Attributes
7
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, when applicable
Demonstration•Treasury: GDP variations by Approps, Non Approps, Credit Bureaus
8
2.2 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to assign attributes to data (e.g., to a particular fund type, departmental crosscut, as mandatory/discretionary, as an earmark, etc.).
2.2.1 Adding attributes to modifications, funding types, crosscuts, etc.
Demonstration
2.3 Demonstrate that data can be collected at the dollar level, but reported as dollars in thousands or millions depending on the report requirements.
BFEM Methods•Data Load / Configuration
9
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, various collection methods.
Demonstration•House of Reps: Screen shot of whole dollars in UI and Overview Tables in dollars in thousands)
10
2.3 Demonstrate that data can be collected at the dollar level, but reported as dollars in thousands or millions depending on the report requirements.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DETAILED ANALYSIS OF CHANGE BY ORGANIZATION
SALARIES AND EXPENSES FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 14 vs. FY 13 FY 14 vs. FY 13 Enacted Estimates Net Change Net Change Dollars ($000) Dollars ($000) Dollars ($000) Percent % A. MANDATORY CHANGE 967,257 971,897 4,641 0.48% Base Adjustment 1 (5,784) (5,785) (460,601.27%) Cost of Living Adjustment - 8,863 8,863 - Cost of Living Adjustment Annualized - 928 928 - Longevity Increase - 181 181 - Meritorious Increase - 30 30 - Overtime Pay 200 762 562 281% Personnel Base 700,586 700,449 (138) (0.02%) Personnel Benefits 266,469 266,469 - - Reclassifications - - - - Temporary Positions - - - - B. PRICE LEVEL INCREASES - - - - C. PROGRAM CHANGES 265,924 261,284 (4,641) (1.75%) House Leadership Offices 1,250 849 (401) (32.08%) Members' Representational Allowances 159,188 152,990 (6,198) (3.89%) Standing Committees, Special & Select 8,491 6,745 (1,746) (20.56%) Committees on Appropriations 2,568 2,010 (558) (21.73%) Salaries, Officers and Employees 70,098 74,401 4,303 6.14% Allowances and Expenses 24,329 24,289 (41) (0.17%) TOTAL 1,233,181 1,233,181 - - POSITIONS 12,845 12,845 - -
2.3.1 Data can be reported as required
House of Representatives
collects$s in whole numbers.
House of Representatives
reports$s in thousands.
2.4 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to collect and report on fixed costs (e.g., salary, benefits, unemployment, rents, Departmental Working Capital Fund charges, etc.).
BFEM Methods•Modification Type with Preconfigured Modification Names
11
Customers using Method•State•Treasury•House of Reps
Demonstration•State: Fixed costs
12
2.4 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to collect and report on fixed costs (e.g., salary, benefits, unemployment, rents, Departmental Working Capital Fund charges, etc.).
2.4.1 Modifications can be collected and reported on any type of cost
Adding a modification
Reporting on Costs
2.5 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture data and report at the object class level if required.
BFEM Methods•Collect and Report by Allocation•Collect and Report by Modification
13
Customers using Method•State•Treasury•CNCS•DHS•House of Reps
Demonstration•State: BOC crosscut
14
2.5 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture data and report at the object class level if required.
Typical BOC Crosscut user interface
2.5.1 The Budget Object Class is collected for most accounts
2.6 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture comments/explanatory information when modifying a record.
BFEM Methods•Add comment via Add Modification screen
15
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, various collection methods.
Demonstration•State: Add modification
16
2.6 Demonstrate the tool’s ability to capture comments/explanatory information when modifying a record.
2.6.1 Text can be associated with each modification
2.7 Given that requirements change from submission to submission, demonstrate and/or discuss how an authorized user would add/remove/modify records on the fly.
BFEM Methods•User defined configuration of :
– Organizations– Modifications– GDPs– Allocations– Generic Attributes– Security Assignments
•Customer Administrator to make changes for some report types•Add and Edit Doc Templates
17
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers
Demonstration•State: Flexibility of all entities
18
2.7 Given that requirements change from submission to submission, demonstrate and/or discuss how an authorized user would add/remove/modify records on the fly.
2.7.1 Text can be associated with each modification
Demonstration2.7.2 Text can be associated with each bureau
2.8 Demonstrate that the tool supports the creation of custom data elements that the Department or subordinate organizations (Bureaus and/or Programs) may use for budget formulation.
BFEM Methods•User defined configuration of :
– Modifications– GDPs– Allocations– Generic Attributes– Security Assignments on the org
19
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers
Demonstration•State: Customizing Entities
20
2.8 Demonstrate that the tool supports the creation of custom data elements that the Department or subordinate organizations (Bureaus and/or Programs) may use for budget formulation.
2.8.1 Modify Org Structure
2.8.2 Modify Modifications
2.8.3 Modify GDPs
2.8.4 Modify Allocations
2.9 Demonstrate how Bureau Comp Table data can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table; demonstrate how additional records, such as offsets, can be added to the database at any level of detail and be included in the Committee Support Table (e.g., net receipt sharing, changes in mandatory programs, etc.).
BFEM Methods•Currently:
– Crosstab Reports– Java Reports
•Will be: XML Reports
21
Customers using Method•All BFEM Customers, when applicable
Demonstration•State•DOJ•Forest Service
22
2.9 Demonstrate how Bureau Comp Table data can be consolidated to produce a Committee Support Table; demonstrate how additional records, such as offsets, can be added to the database at any level of detail and be included in the Committee Support Table (e.g., net receipt sharing, changes in mandatory programs, etc.).
Demonstration
2.9.1 Modifications and fund types can be added at any level