ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP)
AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND
STANDARDS Reading/ELA
Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate Participation: 95% Participating
Mathematics Performance: 83% Proficiency Rate Participation Rate: 95% Participating
Other Indicator Graduation Rate (High School): 75% Target Attendance Rate (Junior and Elementary Schools): 90%
Rate
AYP MEASURESAll Students and the following student groups: African American Hispanic White Economically Disadvantaged Special Education Limited English Proficient
FEDERAL CAP Federal regulations limit the number of
proficient assessment results from alternate assessments that may be counted as proficient in evaluating AYP.
A district’s federal cap limit is based on the total number of students enrolled in the district in grades 3-8 and 10 on the day of the test.
1% Cap: STAAR Alternate
2% Cap: STAAR Modified/TAKS-M
2012 AYP STATUS: MEETS AYP
IMPACT ECHS Peter Hyland Program Highlands Junior Austin Elementary Bowie Elementary San Jacinto Elementary Hopper Primary
2012 AYP STATUS: “MISSED AYP”
District: Reading Performance: AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed., LEP Math Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed., LEP
Graduation Rate: Sp. Ed.
Lee High School: Reading Performance: All, Hispanic, White, ED, Sp. Ed.
Math Performance: All, Hispanic, White, ED, Sp. Ed.
Graduation Rate: Sp. Ed.
Sterling High School: Reading Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed.
Math Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed.
Graduation Rate: Sp. Ed.
Memorial High School: Math Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED
Baytown Junior: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED
Math Performance:: All, AA, Hispanic, ED
Cedar Bayou Junior: Reading Performance: Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed.
Gentry Junior: Math Performance: AA, ED, Sp. Ed.
Horace Mann Junior: Reading Performance: All, AA, White, ED, Sp. Ed.
Math Performance: All, AA, ED, Sp. Ed
2012 AYP STATUS: “MISSED AYP”
Alamo Elementary: Reading Performance: All, Hispanic
Math Performance: AA, ED
Ashbel Smith Elementary: Reading Performance: All, Hispanic, ED, LEP
Math Performance: All, Hispanic, ED Carver Elementary: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED
Math Performance: All, AA, ED
Crockett Elementary: Reading Performance: ED
De Zavala Elementary:Reading Performance: Hispanic, ED
Harlem Elementary: Math Performance: AA, ED Highlands Elementary: Reading Performance: AA, LEP Lamar Elementary: Reading Performance: All, AA, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed,, LEP
Math Performance: All, AA,, Hispanic, ED, Sp. Ed., LEP Travis Elementary: Math Performance: AA
Victoria Walker Elementary:Reading Performance: AA
Math Performance: AA, ED
TITLE I SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
Districts and campuses receiving Title I, Part A funds are subject to School Improvement requirements if they do not meet the AYP standard for the same indictor (Reading/ELA, Mathematics, Graduation Rate or Attendance Rate) for two or more consecutive years.
Districts and campuses are no longer subject to School Improvement when they meet the AYP standard for two consecutive years for the same indicator that originally triggered School Improvement.
GOOSE CREEK CISD SIP STATUS
District: Stage 2 (Reading)
Alamo Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Reading)
Carver Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Reading)
Travis Elementary: Stage 1 Year 1 (Math)
DETERMINING SIP STATUS
District Stage 2: Result of missing AYP in Reading for three years in a row.
Campus Stage 1 Year 1: Result of missing AYP in the same indicator two years in a row
SIP REQUIREMENTS: DISTRICT STAGE 2
Select a District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) by September 7, 2012
Parent notification by September 15, 2012
Establish a District Leadership Team to conduct and monitor improvement activities
Implement and revise the district improvement plan developed under Stage 1
SIP REQUIREMENTS: CAMPUS STAGE 1 YEAR
1 Principals view applicable webinars in September
Principals attend Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1 training at Region 4 on September 10, 2012
Establish Intervention Team
Conduct a student level review and data analysis
Conduct a needs assessment
SIP REQUIREMENTS: CAMPUS STAGE 1 YEAR 1
(Cont.) Develop an improvement plan
Conduct a targeted student analysis
Revise CIP within 3 months
District provides technical assistance as the campus develops and implements the CIP
District reviews CIP
Support Focus Priority
Defi
niti
on Formerly AU CIT released
SIP Stage 1 (Year 1)
AU 1 or 2 SIP Stage 1 (Year 2), 2, & 3 Formerly AU with CIT
AU 3-6 SIP Stage 4 & 5+
Tech
nica
l A
ssis
tanc
e LEA ESC
LEA ESC PSP (Professional Service Provider) TCDSS (TX Center for District & School Support)
LEA ESC PSP (Professional Service Provider) TCDSS (TX Center for District & School Support)
Req
uire
d Im
prov
emen
t In
terv
enti
ons
All
Cam
puse
s in Im
prov
emen
t
Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) in ISAM
Sept. 7 Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) & PSP in ISAM
Sept. 7 Designate District Coordinator of School Improvement (DCSI) & PSP in ISAM
Sept. 7
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1: District Foundations (ESC led): District level staff (DCSI, if named), optional for principal
Mid-Aug. – Mid-Sept.
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1: District Foundations (ESC led): District level staff (DCSI, if named), optional for principal
Mid-Aug. – Mid-Sept.
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS), Part 1: District Foundations (ESC led): District level staff (DCSI, if named), optional for principal
Mid-Aug. – Mid-Sept.
Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan
* Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan
Oct. 15 Data Analysis, Needs Assessment, and Improvement Plan
Oct. 15
Review of Student Level Data
* Review of Student Level Data
Oct. 31, June 30 Review of Student Level Data
Oct. 31, June 30
Targeted Student Analysis * Targeted Student Analysis Oct. 31, Jan. 31, March 31, June 30
Targeted Student Analysis Oct. 31, Jan. 31, March 31, June 30
Monitoring Reporting * Monitoring Reporting Sept-June & Aug Monitoring Reporting Sept-June & Aug
Stat
e O
nly
AU 2 Reconstitution Planning
Drafts Oct. and Jan., final in June
AU 3 Reconstitution Plan Implementation AU 6 Parent Petition Option
Fede
ral O
nly
SIP Stage 1 (Year 1) SIP Stage 1 (Year 2), 2, & 3 SIP Stage 4 & 5+ Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & submitted in ISAM
Aug. 13 Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & maintained locally
Aug. 13 Parent Notification & School Choice letter sent & maintained locally
Aug. 13
Stage 1, Year 1 Webinar: DCSI
Sept. Supplemental Educational Services (SES)**
Send letter by Sept. 10
Supplemental Educational Services (SES)
Send letter by Sept. 10
TAIS, Part 2: District Support Modules (TCDSS led)
Mid-Sept. – Early Oct.
TAIS, Part 2: District Support Modules (TCDSS led)
Mid-Sept. – Early Oct.
2-year CIP Within 3 months of notification
2-year CIP Within 3 months of notification
2-year CIP Within 3 months of notification
HQ records submitted in ISAM, if requested
HQ records submitted in ISAM, if requested
HQ records submitted in ISAM, if requested
AIE Conference: Principal and DCSI
Oct. 17-18 AIE Conference: Principal and DCSI
Oct. 17-18
SIP Funding Application Level 2 - 20% SIP funds to ESC for support
Oct. 25 SIP Funding Application ***SIP Effective Strategy Choice
Oct. 25 SIP Funding Application ***SIP Effective Strategy Choice
Oct. 25
Stage 3 Corrective Action (CA)****
Progress reports Oct., Jan., and June
Stage 4 Restructuring**** Stage 5 Alt. Gov.****
Progress reports Oct., Jan., and June
*Ongoing documentation at the local level, but ISAM submission is not required **SES is not a requirement for Stage 1, Year 2 campuses ***Only applicable if effective strategy funding is selected **** For TTIPS campuses, their SIG intervention model is the CA, Restructuring or Alt. Gov.
REQUIREMENTS: NON-TITLE I CAMPUSES Non-Title I schools that do not meet AYP for two
consecutive years are required to amend their school improvement plan to address the deficit areas. Non-Title I campuses and school districts will not be subject to other school improvement activities, supplemental services and corrective actions.
Sterling High School (Math)
Cedar Bayou Junior (Reading)
SIP FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES
Professional development (District)
Professional development (Stage 1 campuses)
School Choice transportation
Systems for Continuous District
and School Improvement