Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
1
European Collaboration
Practical experiences of running a project with DG SANCO funding
Meeting Public Health Institute of Iceland
23 September 2005
Georg Bröring
Senior advisor
NIGZ, AIDS & Mobility Europe
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
2
Introduction
• Three elements of the presentation– Funding procedures
• Framework of funding• How to apply• How to manage the contract
– Networking at the European level• Being involved in networks• Running a network• Collaboration with other networks
– Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe• History• National Focal Points• Financing the project
• A&M working plan (if requested)
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
3
Funding procedures
• Framework: Decision by European Parliament– Programme of Community action in the field of
public health (2003-2008)– Workplan– http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/
ph_programme/programme_en.htm
• Policy context (e.g. in 2004): focus on
– Inequality
– Enlargement
– Best practice promotion
– Capacity and skills building
– EU CDC
– Continuity of support for key networks
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
4
Funding procedures
• How to apply?– Develop a draft plan• According to EU priorities• According to (epidemiological)
evidence– Establish European added-value– Find partners (or confirm existing ones)– Formalise (in draft form) collaboration– Submit application– Negotiate, if necessary
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
5
Funding procedures
• The Application form Part I: The story– Two page summary!– Aims & objectives– Tasks & time table– Deliverables, expected results– Community-added value– Consistency with EU work plan– Dissemination of results– Effectiveness of partnerships– Consistency of funding plan– Loads of appendices
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
6
Funding procedures
• The Application form Part II: The money– The Budget• Fees (salaries etc.0• Travel and subsistence• Miscellaneous services• Administration• Unexpected costs
– Balance of EU and other funding
– Negotiate, if necessary
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
7
Funding procedures
• Factors of success?– Evidence & data– Geography– Contacts – Quality of results– Good management– Visibility of EU– Politics– You never know…
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
8
Funding procedures
• Managing the contract– In general max 60 % co-funding by EU– In general quite clear contracts• But procedures may change during
the project period• Clarity/detailed budget may lead to
limitations• There is (little) space for negotiation
– Make sub-contracting agreements– Interim (financial) reporting– Final (financial) report / audit– Pre- , Interim, Final payment
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
9
Networking at European level
• Being involved in networks– Advantages• Access to information• Access to experiences• Access to contacts• Being aware of new trends• Motivating to share expertise• Achieve political support• International collaboration can be fun
and motivate for your work at home
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
10
Networking at European level
• Being involved in networks– Obstacles and concerns• ‘Transferability’ of experiences–Diversity in Europe limits the use
of the same approaches• Make the right choices, where to be
involved• Time investment often under-
estimated• Measuring output may be difficult
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
11
Networking at European level
• Running a network– Advantages• Visibility of your organisation• Access to expertise and contacts• Developing broader (over)view• Gaining management experience• International collaboration can be fun
and motivating for your work at home
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
12
Networking at European level
• Running a network– Obstacles and concerns• Financial risks– In preparation stage - > pre-
investment– In implementation stage - >
reliability of partners– In final stage - > financial
reporting• What if funding stops? –Staff? Project partners?
• Time investment often under-estimated• Bureaucracy
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
13
Networking at European level
• Running a network– Tasks of the supervisor• Process management–Guide the project from A -> B
• Define terms of collaboration• Develop project culture• Motivate partners–Cope with diversity of situations
and people• Quality control• Contacts with funding agencies• (Financial) reporting
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
14
Networking at European level
• Collaboration with other networks– EuroHealthNet
• General overview about Europen health issues
• Insider information• Support with agenda setting
– Tampep• Focussing on migrant prostitution
– Correlation• Focused on health and social inclusion
– Integration project• Focused on HIV in Central/Eastern Europe
– AIDS Action Europe• Focused on NGOs and advocacy
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
15
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• History– Start in 1991• WHO review on ‘Migrants and
travellers’• Hosted by National AIDS Commission
of the Netherlands (NCAB)– 1992: start European funding• Pilot projects• Creating databases• Collaboration with selected European
countries on migration issues
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
16
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• 1995: Moving to NIGZ
• 1996: Creation of NFP network
– At the request of European Commission
– Changed position in the field
• 1996: In addition to primary prevention, care aspects became important
– Access to care
• 2004: Broadening
– Public Health Programme
– Enlargement
– Merging ‘AIDS & Mobility’ and ‘AIDS & Youth’
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
17
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• National Focal Points– Formal contacts and contracts with
organisations in the ‘old’ EU member states– Currently extended to the new member states
• Definition – A NFP is a set of functions additional to an existing
(unit of a) governmental or non-governmental body.
– It supports A&M and the EC in planning effective HIV/AIDS and STD prevention programmes addressing the needs of international mobile groups.
– It is a key information and exchange point and will take care of advocacy and networking on a national level.
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
18
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• Objectives of NFPs– To assess needs and problems of the mobile target
groups at a national level– To advocate the needs and problems of mobile
groups at a national and European level– To support the A&M coordinator in providing the EC
and member states with objective, reliable and comparable information at European level concerning target groups
– To improve the quality of European Health Promotion Programmes by coordinating their own national network and transmitting the necessary information for developing effective health promotion programmes
– To be aware of information, to gain access to this information and to interpret the information and where useful disseminate the information to relevant partners in the network
– Capacity development; to strengthen NGOs and CBOs
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
19
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• Tasks of NFPs – Collection and dissemination of information– Organising a national network in which all
mobile target groups are represented– Stimulating collaboration with other European
networks within the country itself– Stimulating collaboration between member
states (NFPs will function as interfaces between the European and the national level)
– Country coordination on HIV/AIDS & STDs and mobility issues
– Advocacy for themes which should be translated in national and European action plans
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
20
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• Role of NIGZ – Co-ordination of the network
• Motivating project partners• Supervising processes• Control quality
– Providing communication structures, i.e. website, newsletter etc.
– Advice • Towards policy makers• Towards health workers
– Responsible towards main funding agency (European Commission) re. contents and finances
– Reporting
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
21
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• Role of the European Commission – Evaluate A&M activities– Translate outcomes of the project into policies– Provide financial and technical support
• Agreements formulated in document formulated together with A&M partners and confirmed in sub-contracting agreement (agreement between ‘main beneficiary’ and ‘associated beneficiary’)
Seminar Reykjavik September 2005
22
Structure of AIDS & Mobility Europe
• Challenges – Inclusion of communities
• NFP structure created distance between A&M and migrant populations
– Quality control• Few means of sanctions in case of non-
compliance– Responding to diversity in Europe
• More countries, more mobile populations, more issues
– Advocacy and agenda setting• Decision making processes have become
more complex• European policy development not easily
accessible