Download - Social Media Management - Phase 2 (Optimize)
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Social Media Management – Phase 2Optimize
1.22.2014
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS
1. Overview – Imagine!2. Social Management – Phase 1 (Design)3. Social Management – Phase 2 (Optimize)
– Deliverable: Operational Roadmap
4. Social Management – Phase 3 (Build)– Deliverable: Operational Management Document
5. Social Management – Phase 4 (Manage)– Deliverable: User Scenarios
6. Social Management – Phase 5 (Professional Brand-building)7. Social Management – Phase 6 (Sales)
2
OPTIMIZE BUILD MANAGEDESIGN
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
THE EVOLUTION OF BRANDS & SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT
3
Social Brand – Highly interactive and engaged brand uses social media to… • connect with consumers &
customers by anticipating their needs (based on previous)
• drive conversation with constant questions and engaging content
• provide a long-term platform to inspire advocacy and reward loyalty
• highlight the personality of the brand thru people & relationships (vs. corporations)
• connect consumer interaction to brand KPI’s/ROI
• continuously engages in dialog with consumers – not afraid to turn the power of thought to the community
• empower the consumer to speak • share information and provide
insider access• continuously understand the
changing landscape of their market, customer and competitor
• lead rather than follow the market
Social Marketer – Data driven brand uses social media to… • create, grow and manage user
communities• support paid media investment
through content calendars• measure marketing results thru
actions (clicks, likes, follows, shares)
• respond to issues that impact brand perception (Care & PR)
• occasionally start limited engagement with closed-ended comments
Social User – Activity-driven brand uses social media to… • measure traffic and sentiment• craft social tactics around user
generated actions (channels, clicks, sentiment)
• determine success metrics thru quantitative analysis
• reactively change tactics (rare to no engagement)
Social Monitoring Tools
Social Center of Excellence
Social Command Center
Profitability/Margin
No Risk/Reward - Safe Low Risk/Reward – Utilitarian High Risk/Reward – Interactive & Intuitive
Human
Technology
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION
4
Creation of a highly efficient social management platform by a) determining the long-term needs of the business, b) assessing the current assets/processes of the business and c) building a roadmap to becoming a
Social Media Center of Excellence
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
WHAT IS SOCIAL MEDIA MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION?
• Social Management Optimization is a broader term than what is commonly referred to today by brands and marketers alike, Social Media Optimization (SMO) which is simply the optimization of a website and its content in terms of improving sharing across social media and networking sites.
– Similar to Search Engine Optimization (SEO), SMO is designed to analyze the use of a social media outlets and communities to generate publicity to increase the awareness of a product, brand or event. This occurs by understanding what visitors do within social channels in terms of what they view, like, share, return back, click on and the length of time they engage to learn and increase those actions.
• Social Media “Management” Optimization is a similar process however the goal is to analyze how a brand or Enterprise uses social internally and externally to drive Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) effectively.
• Where as SMO looks at the Social channels directly, SMMO also looks at:
– Social Management – How the brand is aligned and functions at the Enterprise level (across BU’s). This area is a key component as it looks at how the brand acts externally (public persona) as well as internally (effective use of social technology, assets, resources and budgets)
– Social Technologies – Tools & platforms to manage, monitor, measure, publish & engage
– Social Processes – How is social marketing, insights, activities, care and reputation management resolved
– Social Assets – What are the properties owned by the brand currently and are they effective, utilized properly? What is the process to create and edit assets (content)? Does the brand get value from external partners and suppliers (e.g. Agencies)?
5
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMMO – HOW TO BEGIN…
• The process of SMO is a common practice today and this document doesn’t intend to “re-invent the wheel” in that regard. Although SMO is crucial to effectively running social marketing campaigns, it is our belief that real SMMO begins with how the brand acts internally…– How is the Enterprise set up organizationally?– How is it managed across functions & BU’s?– Is there a central decision-maker internally”– Is there a single voice, action and persona seen by the consumer publicly?– Are resources effectively used to manage social?– Are budgets, spend, training and skills sets properly aligned?– Can it be improved?– What’s missing?
• The remainder of this document focuses on Optimizing the Enterprise organizationally to assist in re-inventing brands to think, act and succeed as a singular social brand!
6
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Getting Started…A Few Questions
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION
How to get started?• Create of a cross-organizational working team to develop and enterprise-wide social
media strategy to optimize corporate assets, content, skills & technology investments
What happens first?• Create a roadmap to determine what the “end state” will look like organizationally,
operationally and objectives to build towards
What happens next?• Create a series of workshops with the participating groups (vendors & suppliers too) to
understand common needs, obstacles, assets and goals
What else?• Create a Steering Committee and/or Senior Leadership
Champion to help manage the process remove obstacles and present needs to the Executive Level/C-Suite
8
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION PROCESS
• Issues• Social Management Workshop• Organizational Re-alignment• Social Management Platform[s]
– Social Listening– Community Management– Marketing/Content Management– Social Care– Social Management Response Center (SMRC)…– Social Center of Excellence
9
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
OPTIMIZATION 1.0
Organizational Alignment
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMP Optimization – Organization [re-] alignment
• The process of leading clients through a series of audits, reviews, workshops and training to provide solutions around:– Creation of an integrated, consistent approach around social media that combines
and optimizes the use of resources, tools, budget, metrics and tactics across the Enterprise
– Development of a single set of standards and Best Practices around the Brand that provides a means to maximize it’s impact within Social Media and ROI
– Delivery of a strategic solution that allows the client to focus their resources on delivering a highly visible brand experience within Social Media a single approach and voice.
11
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
THE CHALLENGE TO THE ENTERPRISE
• Structuring for Social Media continues to be a significant challenge for large corporations. Their current practices spans at least 5 different groups and no less than 25 employees.
• In order to provide insight into a solution, the following were reviewed:– Industry Expert insights– Internal POV documents– Cross Team Organizational Workshop
12
Organizations should look at social media governance as a way to re-think traditional ownership roles in their
organization. When this type of governance is based on open discussion and mutual respect instead of turf-
protecting and power grabs, who owns what becomes less important and who KNOWS what becomes more important.Steve Radick
SM Strategist – Booz Allen
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Who Manages Social Now…?
• The public-facing nature of the customer service makes it more PR than strict customer service, however, CRM tools [e.g. Salesforce] have integrated with Twitter/Facebook in that allows customer service tickets to be created from those interactions.
• There are still some very valid reasons for trying to figure out what department ultimately owns social media.– Large organizations are finding it necessary to create a social media policy for both internal &
external communication. Having a departmental ownership can help guide those policies
13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
THREE PRIMARY SOCIAL MANAGEMENT APPROACHES
14
Centralized (AKA “The Tower”) Has a Social Management strategy, deployment and management from a single group
SOURCE = “How to Organize Your Company For Social Computing” Forrester June 2009
Distributed (AKA “The Tire”) Employees from different organizations adopt different tools without centralized organization
Cross-Functional (AKA “Hub & Spoke”) Team led by a single leader and small team with cross functional representation responsible for strategy and coordinated execution
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
PROS AND CONS OF EACH
15
Distributed = Employees from different organizations adopt different tools without centralized organization
Centralized = Has all Social Management strategy, deployment and management from a single group
Cross Functional (AKA “Hub & Spoke”) = led by a single leader responsible for strategy and coordinated execution with both direct and cross functionally represented teams
Pros Cons Summary
• Actions typically driven by passionate groups
• Group typically have genuine intent
• Disconnects often occur• Different Groups provide multiple messages to a single
Customer unknowingly• Groups often do not share common technology and best
practices and small dispositional differences manifest in inconsistent approaches
Often this orientation is the beginning of a social media movement for most companies. Most frequently develops organically but often lacks sufficient executive endorsement and strategic incorporation to reach full potential
Pros Cons Summary
• Provides cohesive message to the market• Benefits from shared like minded resources and unifying leadership direction
• If centralized in the wrong place that does not understand the two-way nature of the medium it quickly becomes irrelevant
• If not two way and proactive will be criticized by Customers as not “joining the conversation”
• If not tied to the Digital Marketing activities it can become isolated and greatly diminish the ROI
Often a reaction to the disconnects seen in the Distributed model as an organization matures and realizes the need for cohesion in the social media arena
Pros Cons Summary
• Facilitates cross functional stakeholders
• Enables a larger number of resources to engage in social media
• Requires Senior Executive Level Buy-in• Requires cultural agreement across multiple teams
with often differing agendas
The most mature model and often achieved only after first being centralized to initiate cohesive strategy and direction that build s sufficient momentum
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SOLUTION: HYBRID VERSION OF CROSS-FUNCTIONAL
ORGANIZATION MODEL
16
– A Social Management leader [Director Level] to provide a voice for the board/ council to Senior Leadership, coordinate and allocate resources as needed.
– Governance Board/Council consisting of representatives from each group to bring issues, needs, ideas, solutions and “passion” to the forefront with a singular focus on customer.
– Social Management Working Team to plan, coordinate and activate cross-team initiatives and identify issues.
8+ Member Social Management Governance Board[2 Director Level Members from each Organization}
OCEWorking
Team
MarComWorking
Team
CorpComWorking
Team
LegalWorking
Team
BUWorking
Team
Social Managem
ent Director
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
MOST BRANDS COMPARED TO BEST PRACTICES
17
ATTRIBUTE BEST PRACTICE MOST BRANDS RATING
Strategy
Broad active support from impacted groups with concise cross functional alignment
Multiple Groups , pockets of communication and collaboration, No collective shared strategy
Low
Roles/Organization
Business & Technology Strategist often centralized with the Org owning P&L. Multiple “Community Managers” in place with strong cross functional relationships.
7 Different Organizations with no central leadership or strategy. Independent needs, metrics and strategies
Low
ExperimentationCulture
Creation of a safe place to experiment and learn quickly. A culture that is risk tolerant
Good understanding of the need across organizations that risk is required but still a strong fear based undertone
Medium
Process/Metrics
Elimination of red tape empowering rapid responses. A single system to keep teams informed and measuring common metrics
Processes in place in certain areas. Product ingests Ratings and reviews into official vendor review processes. Different metrics and tools utilized
Medium
Corporate Buy-In
High levels of Executive Buy-in and encouragement to experiment and drive into the culture
Pockets of Executive participation, Ninja Program endorsed, community and social media not consistently leveraged or understood at exec levels
Mid-High
SOURCE = “How to Organize Your Company For Social Computing” Forrester June 2009
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
The Starting Point – SM Workshop
• In order to get each of the primary users/drivers of Social Management moving forward, begin by inviting representatives all the primary groups to participate in…– Online Survey (SurveyMonkey) to provide anonymous feedback on key
areas of strength and weakness with the management of their Social Management strategy
– Attend a ½ day workshop to discuss issues and come to general consensus on those issues and prioritization
– Provide feedback on general recommendations made to Senior Leadership• General Recommendations
– Create a Social Management Leadership Council– Social Management Working Teams– Social Management Leader to act as the voice of the Council
18
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
KEY INSIGHTS
A composite of enterprise-wide survey’s from their employees says…• Individual organizations struggling to prioritized & manage workload
• Very little top-line view/input into Marketing programs in advance to plan and efficiently utilize resources
• Each organization has a need to have a driving force/champion to move the ball forward with regard to social media programs but have concerns that their needs/resources will be re-allocated towards other more visible programs beyond their control
• There is clear lack of communication between teams. Groups need to involve others early on in the process. One top solution is the introduction of a Social Media editorial calendar which is discussed on a regular basis (e.g. monthly or weekly).
• Because of the lack of communication groups are going off and doing their own thing without consulting with others, development of a central Social Management strategic framework was another top suggestion.
• ‘Leadership’ issues included centralization and allocation of decision-making authority. As there is no central Social Management strategy, there is no guidance. One idea was to create a social media “council” made up of key team members. This council would also be accountable - reporting into senior management.
• Absent of clear Social Management leadership, nominate a single leader of SM who rotates through teams as needed.
• Contingency Staffing - flexible and expandable - to address urgent short-turn needs were very top of mind. Citing the Ninja programs success, many felt assembling best staff is about leveraging passions and activating in areas as needed. The consensus felt pre-planning and creating “tent-pole” teams as a viable option to handling these uncertainties.
19
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SOCIAL MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
20
Teams presenting back their ideas and voting on the ones which are most actionable…
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
TOP ISSUES & SOLUTIONS
21
Detail Insights/POVChallenge ConcernsLeadership – How to get centralized leadership across cross-functional teams
Cross-Team Integration – How to coordinate early on in the process
Staffing – How to establish an approach with is flexible and expandable
1. Create a Social Management ‘Council’ which is accountable2. Create single “oversight” position within the brand to
oversee all Social Media3. Nominate “Voice” or “Champion” of Social Management
Council4. Rotate Leadership through departments as needed by
cross-functional initiatives
1. Set Social Media “Editorial Calendar” and create discussion forum/distribution list (e.g. rework weekly/monthly meetings)
2. Develop a Centralized Social Management Framework/Strategy
3. Make distribution list
4. Define Roles & Ownership
5. Think “Blended”
1. Pre-plan and agree on “Tent Pole” teams to handle specific events
2. Develop Contingency staff/Social Management SWAT Teams
3. Cross-train teams on Social Media to create a “super staff”
4. Develop Process [e.g. checklist, guidelines] for BUs when using with Social Media
5. Designate ‘Point-of-Contact’ for common requests
6. Incent employees & external advocates through recognition
1. Need for a single leader to act as decision-maker, voice of the brand Social Media and act as Champion for organization to senior leadership
2. Creation of a Governing Board or Council that provides equal access and representation for each department into SM
1. Need for a coordinated Working Team that builds, manages and executes tactically from a common set of standards, goals and action items
2. Better definition of roles and integrated processes
1. Need for “forward thinking”proactive planning and management around programs to include staffing and expertise to manage workload.
• No clear, singular voice or vision
• No decision-maker• “Land grab”• No singular focus on
customer• Lack of senior
leadership visibility• One team will not
have 360 ° view
• One organization will control view, strategy and resources
• Conflicting priorities• Conflicting strategies• Lack of bandwidth• “Turf battles”
• Not enough support or expertise for specific priorities as they occur
• No one can say “no”• No proactive
planning which causes conflict in resources and priorities
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
• Loss of Control: A common concern was that needs/resources will be re-allocated towards other more visible programs beyond their own – Team opted for a rotating leader in order to give their group an opportunity to lead
• Why Would This Work: Social Management is just as unorganized and lacking in communication as everything else
• Flexibility: How can we operate when budgets and resources are locked in 3 quarters out
22
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Case study:
Recommendations for a major US telecom provider
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
HOW DO YOU DEFINE A BEST-IN-CLASS SOCIAL MEDIA
PROGRAM?
24
“Being open, honest, transparent”
“Create consumer relationships with the company that goes beyond customer/provider”
“leveraging the collective insights from all of the key players in the social space”
“engages a customer on their terms with content of interest and allows for a two way dialogue”
“Openness to try new programs and partners”
Source: verbatim from client survey 2010
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
No one thinks their brand’s Social Management Program is “Best in Class”
25
Q1. Please rate your brand’s Social Management program using a 5 point scale where 1 means “Best in Class” and 5 means “Below Average”
Average
Below Average
Above Average
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
At best, Leadership is felt to be “aware but disengaged” in this regard
26
Q2 Please rate the awareness of client's Senior Management (VP+) as it relates to the following topics regarding social media.
Slightly unaware
Unaware
Aware/Disengaged
Aware/Engaged
Actively Engaged
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
The expectations are low for the brand’s team collaboration
27
Q3 How well does the client use their resources (e.g. people, tools, budgets, best practices) to advance their social media programs?
Almost meetsexpectations
Does not meetexpectations
Meets
Exceeds
Actively Engaged
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SURVEY OVERVIEW & INSIGHTS
Overall the following general themes and insights were derived from the survey:
• Overall sentiment of the brand’s Social Management program is above average although a majority of the components were deemed overwhelmingly average.
• The consensus is also that senior leadership is aware of the impact of Social Media however a majority are disengaged with the overall process with some exceptions.
• With regards to Resource utilization, the general opinion is that the brand’s score of “Almost Meets to Meets expectations” with the highest scores for leveraging best practices and the lowest for transparency of external information.
• As expected, the biggest gaps currently are equally divided across staffing, Cross-Team Integration, Budget, Leadership and Processes however when prioritized by each respondent the two recurring issues were leadership [25%] and staffing [22%] were far ahead of any other gap with budget [16%] a distant third.
28
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Prioritized “Gaps” in the current program
1. Leadership2. Staffing3. Budget4. Cross-team integration
29
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
LEADERSHIP
“The lack of a centralized leader with senior level support means often groups are acting independently with little thought as to overall strategy and coordination of efforts.”
30
CROSS-TEAM INTEGRATION
“To be best in class, our brand needs to support with dedicated internal experts that have time to bring forth thought leadership and provide strategic guidance to the agencies.”
Source: verbatim from client survey 2010
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
BUDGET
“Yes and no support for a program cannot be relegated to the person managing the budget.”
31
STAFFING
“While the teams work well together in terms of communicating their distinct initiatives and collaborating where appropriate, we are still working in silo's to set overall social strategy.”
Source: verbatim from client survey 2010
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
THE WORK SHOP: SESSION TEMPLATE
32
1:00pm 4:05pm1:30pm
Ice Breaker
Ground Rules
Define the Gaps
Problem Clarification(Full Group)
“How Might We”statements
Ice Breaker
Break into Teams
(2-3 based on # of attendees)
Reaffirm Task
Headlining ideas to solve selected gaps
in Social media processes.
2:10pm 2:35pm
Approximate timings
Gap 1
Each group gets 30m to develop
solutions to specific ‘gap’
After 10 solutions, group votes on top 2
ideas
Intro/Overview
of Challenge
Top line review of
survey findings
Stimulus Action
BR
EA
K
2:25pm 3:05 pm
Wrap Up
Teams present back top solutions to their gaps.
Discuss.
Next Steps.
End
4:45pm
Gap 2
Each group gets 30m to develop
solutions to specific ‘gap’
After 10 solutions, group votes on top 2
ideas
Gap 3
Each group gets 30m to develop
solutions to specific ‘gap’
After 10 solutions, group votes on top 2
ideas
3:35 pm
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SESSION OBJECTIVE
• In the time allotted, participants were able to explore 3 of the 4 core issues:
- Leadership
- Staffing
- Cross-team Integration
• The single filter for measuring success was short-term versus long-term actionability.
33
Generate ideas against identified gaps, which highlight the necessity of working together smarter; these are headline solutions – not the detailed plans for action.
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SUMMARY OF KEY TAKEAWAYS
• There is clear lack of communication between teams. Groups need to involve others early on in the process. One top solution is the introduction of a Social Media editorial calendar which is discussed on a regular basis (e.g. monthly or weekly).
• Because of the lack of communication groups are going off and doing their own thing without consulting with others, development of a centralized Social Management strategic framework was another top suggestion.
• ‘Leadership’ issues included centralization and allocation of decision-making authority. As there is no central Social Management strategy, there is no guidance. One idea was to create a social media “council” made up of key team members. This council would also be accountable - reporting into senior management.
• Absent of clear Social Management leadership, nominate a single leader of SM who rotates through teams as needed.
• Contingency Staffing - flexible and expandable - to address urgent short-turn needs were very top of mind. Citing the Ninja programs success, many felt assembling best staff is about leveraging passions and activating in areas as needed. The consensus felt pre-planning and creating “tent-pole” teams as a viable option to handling these uncertainties.
• Budget, while not discussed specifically, will need to be addressed to carry these ideas forward.
34
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Session Details
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GETTING STARTED
Leadership
Staffing
Cross-team Integration
“How to get centralized leadership across cross-functional teams?”
“How to establish staffing approach which is flexible and expandable?”
“How to coordinate with each other earlier in the process?”
** This was done by generating a lot of angles on the issue and then voting on which one got most to the “heart of the matter”
Issue Top restatement
36
• The room as a whole first worked on restating each issue as workable “How to” questions…
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP A WORK FOR CTI
1. Establish points of contact• POC in each org to learn about & shape developments @ planning stage• Have central point-of-entry for short-turn projects so entire team can be briefed• Educate other teams on responsibilities
2. Panel/Ongoing Survey• Survey current “pain points” to track progress/contribution effects
3. Early collaboration/Communication• Mandatory schedule for regular meetings/updates• Develop a cross-party reporting structure; info-sharing on a consistent basis• Share base level problems and identify interaction points, foundations• Share ideas with POC across orgs in early planning phases
4. Centralized Framework• Establish a central strategic framework of goals for Social Media across orgs• Set out the goal to be attained by the brand SM groups• Develop an Enterprise-wide SM strategy to get agreed goals
5. Process for Shared Assets/Bank • Forums to share case studies• Take inventory of assets/content
6. Social Innovation Sharing• Regular meetings to discuss opportunities for SM innovation
7. Urgent Project planning Flexibility• Anticipate Flexible urgent needs & build contingencies
37
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP B WORK FOR CTI
1. Clearly define/empower SM governance board• Clearly define and empower Social Management team• Streamline communication between groups• Identify early on all aspects of SM initiatives• Open opportunity for BU partners to be treated as extended team members• Create core SM team that brings initiatives & plans back to larger teams• Have a social media manager/director preside over all SM
2. Rework weekly/monthly meetings and distribution of info across teams• Cross-team social briefings from the beginning• Weekly/monthly meetings• Bring up challenges or requests in our weekly/monthly collaboration meetings• More contribution from others in weekly extended meetings• We should distribute shared calendar to expanded group/stakeholders• Establish distribution list/Consolidate social media distribution list• Reformat weekly meetings – have other groups involved• Communicate talking points – allows for faster knowledge exchange
3. Create Social Brief• Create SM brief for all teams to work from as filter for initiating work• Establish better accountability
38
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP C WORK FOR CTI
1. Collaborate on agenda for bi-weekly call• the brand will foster open collaboration early in the strategic planning process• Essential for pre-planning for “tent-pole” events
2. Ideation and discussion of corporate rumblings• Survey current “pain points” to track progress/contribution effects
3. Think as a “blended social person”• i.e. “If I am the social VP, this is how I’d approach…”• Social Management alias of task force
4. Define roles and ownership
39
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP A WORK FOR STAFFING
1. Contingent Staff for Short Term!!!• Establish & train contingent staff for urgent short-term needs
2. Line item for budgets/media• Estimate resource budget to address short term contingencies• Find “invested” partners (media $ for execution volunteers)
3. Up Skilling/Training 101• Grow overall awareness of importance of SM among employees• Feed the brand SM outputs to all employees (i.e. Twitter sign-up for all)• Apply Ninja approach where bodies are needed• Training/train all employees in SM 101
4. Central point for “alarms” authority• Establish a central POC to “sound the alarm” and communicate urgent needs
5. Establish discipline timelines• Being respectful of other’s needs/time• Learning about other team’s responsibilities & existing bandwidth
6. Social KPI’s and Corp Goals• Set out how each group will deliver on core strategy within their discipline• Champion the needs for increased staff to leadership that translates to corporate goals
40
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP B WORK FOR STAFFING
1. Develop a process to better utilize resources at the BU/Agency requesters (people outside core team)
• Utilize agency partners more effectively• Recruit and use marketing partners outside core teams to take on work• Create process/workflow to quickly ramp-up ninja participation for campaigns or
reactive issues• Recruiting passionate people as shared resource• Use BU as extended team member for particular initiative
2. Create and utilize extended partnership to identify common goals and stakeholders
• Leadership buy-in to sharing resources
41
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP C WORK FOR STAFFING
1. “Tent-pole” social media team• Agreement over tent pole events• Having Social Management committee/task force encompassing all groups• Cross-functional team comes together to be ‘nimble’ and responsive to events in the market• Team members will be assigned based on what events are• Assign key personnel to manage tent pole initiatives• the brand will foster open collaboration early in the strategic planning process• Essential for pre-planning for “tent-pole” events
2. Long term planning process• Consolidate staffing across teams (as it pertains to SM)• Allow teams to have dedicated ‘social media’ people• Have role of each SM person spelled out so there is no misunderstanding of needs• Create steering committee & editorial calendar
3. Short term rapid response• Use SM engagement tools to target and respond to external posts• Recruit brand Advocates from customer base to engage in SM efforts
4. Employee/BU involvement• Make SM participation easy for employees (i.e. not too restrictive)• Assign team members to manage relationship with key internal partners• Invite BU participation• Create agency pool of personnel solely for execution against segments outside tech
42
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP A WORK FOR LEADERSHIP
1. Council• Leadership panel• Accountable social media council• Establish cross-functional leadership team to coordinate and advise best practices in SM
2. Central Person• Consider an individual leader versus a “Council” to lead• Establish a VP of Social Management with cross-org authority
3. Council + Central Person• Coordinate teams to report successes and educate exec leaders
4. Champion• Establish sponsor from Dan’s lead team to champion SM effort (in addition to council or VP)• Hire person responsible for sharing knowledge/programs across groups
5. Central “Knowledge Center”6. Best Practice – Ninja Training
• Hire for new role• Train within BU’s (e.g. guiding principles for navigating SM)• Train executive leaders on what SM ecosystem looks like and how the brand is perceived
7. New Social Organization Focus! Re-Org!• Have a central, dedicated organization responsible for meeting the goal of having a ‘best-in-class’ SM
program• Make being ‘best-in-class’ a concrete goal which compensation is based
43
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP B WORK FOR LEADERSHIP
1. Empowered governance board• Define what is needed from leadership
• Establish formal governance board and set leader of board
• Assign VP to lead and empower board
2. Need a SM champion as part of, voice of and sponsor of that board (CEO/Board)
• Consider an individual leader versus a “Council” to lead
• Establish a VP of Social Management w cross-org authority
3. Define a Single SM strategy
4. Define Criteria for Leadership
44
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
GROUP C WORK FOR LEADERSHIP
1. Create new position to oversee all SM• Get a “social media director”
• Create management-level position to oversee SM efforts
• Appoint VP of SM with responsibility for reporting to Sr. Leadership (has final call)
• Appoint one nominated executive to lead & champion social-cross-functional teams
2. Create steering committee with clear areas of ownership + accountability• Define “ownership” areas among teams that have “final call” with input from steering
committee
• Teams nominate key point person
• Key constituents will create committee to discuss issues
• Leadership from all areas jointly decide strategy & projects
• Made of “Certified Decision Makers”
3. Rotating inter-departmental leadership• Leader rotates between departments as needed by cross-functional initiatives
45
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
TOP SOLUTIONS FOR LEADERSHIP
“How to get centralized leadership across cross-functional teams?”• Create a Social Management ‘Council’ which is accountable• Rotate Leadership through departments as needed by cross-functional initiatives • Create single “oversight” position within the brand to oversee all Social Media• Nominate “Voice” or “Champion” of Social Management Council
Top voted ideas
46
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
TOP SOLUTIONS FOR CROSS-TEAM INTEGRATION
“How to coordinate early on in the process?”• Set Social Media “Editorial Calendar” and create discussion forum/distribution
list (e.g. rework weekly/monthly meetings)• Develop a Centralized Social Management Framework/Strategy• Make distribution list• Think “blended”• Define Roles & Ownership
Top voted ideas
47
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
TOP SOLUTIONS FOR STAFFING
“How to establish an approach with is flexible and expandable?”
• Pre-plan and agree on “Tent Pole” teams to handle specific events • Develop Contingency staff/Social Management SWAT Teams
– Cross-train teams on Social Media to create a “super staff”
• Develop Process [e.g. checklist, guidelines] for BUs when using with Social Media
• Designate ‘Point-of-Contact’ for common requests• Incent employees & external advocates through recognition
Top voted ideas
48
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
CLIENT SELECTED RECOMMENDATION
– A Social Management leader [Director Level] to provide a voice for the board/ council to Senior Leadership, coordinate and allocate resources as needed.
– Governance Board/Council consisting of representatives from each group to bring issues,
49
8+ Member Social Management Governance Board[2 Director Level Members from each Organization}
OCEWorking
Team
MarComWorking
Team
CorpComWorking
Team
LegalWorking
Team
BUWorking
Team
Social Management
Director
– needs, ideas, solutions and “passion” to the forefront with a singular focus on customer.
– Social Management Working Team to plan, coordinate and activate cross-team
initiatives and identify issues.
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
ROLE: THE SOCIAL MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
• Primary Function: Provide Leadership and a Voice for the Governance Board and SM Working Team to create a Best-in-Class Social Media Program.
• Action: Provides a centralized strategic view of Social Media that can be translated at the organizational level. – Oversees the Governance Board and provides final “vote” [Decision-maker]– Brand Social Management Champion & Voice to Senior Leadership– Overall Brand Social Management Strategy and Vision– Create and manage the brand Social Management Guidebook to encompass an
overall external and internal Social Management strategy– A social media roadmap [calendar] to include all events, requirements, resource
needs etc. to coordinate across all organizations– A core set of KPI’s and measurements to manage the organization to negotiate
resources [staffing, budget] in advance as needed– Prioritized workload across all organizations– Capture and share Best Practices to continuously feed back into planning
50
Social Management
Director
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
ROLE: THE GOVERNANCE BOARD
• Primary Function: To remove obstacles from the SM Working Team delivery of the Social Management program by providing resources and support when requested.
• Action: Meets and discusses overall brand integrated strategy across all organizations to represent and leverage the diverse knowledge, experience, resources, expertise and relationships to manage reactive issues but plan proactively.
– Brand Social Management Champion & Voice to Senior Leadership– Overall brand Social Management Strategy and Vision– Create and manage the brand Social Management Guidebook to encompass an overall
external and internal Social Management strategy– A social media roadmap [calendar] to include all events, requirements, resource needs
etc. to coordinate across all organizations– A core set of KPI’s and measurements to manage the organization to negotiate
resources [staffing, budget] in advance as needed– Prioritized workload across all organizations– Capture and share Best Practices to continuously feed back into planning– Determines organizational Benchmark Objectives and monthly Management by
Objectives [MBO’s].
51
GovernanceBoard
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
ROLE: SOCIAL MANAGEMENT WORKING TEAM
• Primary Function: To identify and provide clarity/prioritization around obstacles and requirements to drive the Social Management program.
• Action: Focuses on weekly/monthly/quarterly management of overall marketing planning, activities, events, messaging, trends, issues and campaigns. as well as identification and clarity – Create a running monthly quarterly plan of all activities to determine and prioritize
workload, resource needs, upcoming issues to report to Governance Board.
– Articulate issues, requirements and timelines to Governance Board for assistance and resolution.
– Reports on current outputs and adherence to KPI’s.
– Shares resources, tools as appropriate
– Provides assistance and SME resources as appropriate
52
SMWorking
Team
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
BENEFITS
• Team Approach to social media coordination across all organizations and function with centralized leadership and decision-making
• Ability to capitalize on core strengths, passion and creativity of each group vs. one group/one viewpoint.
• Integrated strategy allows the team to project 360° view of marketplace and combine resources
• Optimized process that provides ability to utilize resources more efficiently and increase speed-to-market
• Shift from reactive to proactive management
53
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
HOW IT WORKS…
54
8+ Member Social Management Governance Board[2 Director Level Members from each Organization}
OCEWorking
Team
MarComWorking
Team
CorpComWorking
Team
LegalWorking
Team
BUWorking
Team
Social Managem
ent Director
• Meets Weekly to discuss calendar and identify needs & resources
• Meets Bi-Weekly to resolve issues, implement strategy and discuss metrics
• Manages overall brand Social Management vision and strategy. Convenes and oversees Social Management Governance Board Bi-Weekly and reports progress to Senior Leadership on a Monthly bases or as appropriate.
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
OPTIMIZATION 1.1
Process
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMP Optimization – Process
• Identification of how the client works within and across departments:– How is social used?– How does the brand engage?– Is there a singular “brand voice” and who owns that voice?– Who is listening and raising alerts when issues occur?– What processes are followed when alerts are raised?– Who has ownership?– How are things prioritized and escalated?– Where does the content come from and who’s budget is responsible for creating it?– What metrics are being used to measure how things are done?
56
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Process: Matrix Management
• A starting point to optimizing SMP processes is to categorize within three critical areas– Existing processes that are required in-place– Existing processes that need to be changed or removed– Gaps that need to be fixed
57
Required
Not Required
Gap/New
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Listening Engagement ContentChannel
ManagementPrioritization & Escalation
???
???
???
Reporting
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
OPTIMIZATION 1.2
Resources
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMP Optimization – Resources
• Identification of how the client works within and across departments:– People:
• What are the specific job titles? • What are their skill sets?• Are they dedicated?• Who do they report to?
– Content• Who owns it?• Who creates it?• Who funds new content development?
– Communities (Branded Channels & Influencers)• Do they exist now and who manages them?• Who owns the budget?• Is there Media investment?
– Metrics & Reporting• Are there metrics & reports in-place that drive back to performance, objectives & brand KPI’s• Who owns and produces them? Frequency• Are they compartmentalized or across the Enterprise? (Can and should they be?)
– Training• What exists today?• Is it specific to the performance of the brand within SM?
59
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Resource: Matrix Management
• A starting point to optimizing SMP resources is to categorize within three critical areas– Existing resources that are required in-place– Existing resources that need to be changed or removed– Gaps that need to be fixed
60
Required
Not Required
Gap/New
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
People Content CommunitiesMetrics & Reporting Training
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
OPTIMIZATION 1.3
Content
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMP Optimization – Content
• Identification of what types of content exists today and how is it produced and published within & across departments as well as to their customers:– Branded Content (Owned)– Content Creation (Paid) – Who creates it?– UGC – Is it used and how is it generated– Content Types – Text, Video, Photo, Audio?– Digital – How does the brands online assets perform?– Mobile – Does the brand have a “solomo” strategy? Does it generate the right engagement?
62
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Content: Matrix Management
• A starting point to optimizing SMP processes is to audit and categorize within three critical areas– Existing content that is high-value– Existing content that needs to be changed or removed from the process– Gaps that need to be addressed in terms of creating new content
63
Required
Not Required
Gap/New
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Branded Creation UGCContent
Types Digital
???
???
???
Mobile
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
OPTIMIZATION 1.4
Technology
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
SMP Optimization – Technology
• Identification of what types of tools & technologies exist today and how are they used within & across departments as well as their customers:– Listening/Monitoring– Engagement– Content Management– Channel Management– Data & Insights– Reporting
65
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
Technology: Matrix Management
• A starting point to optimizing SMP technology is to perform and extensive audit of what the brand has invested in/is using currently and then categorize within four critical areas– Existing tools/technologies that are required in-place (contract or internally developed)– Existing tools/technologies that need to be changed or removed– Gaps that need to be fixed– Requirements that must be integrated into the overall Platform to provide across the Enterprise
value
66
Required
Not Required
Gap/New
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
???
Listening EngagementContent
ManagementChannel
ManagementData &
Insights
???
???
???
Reporting
Integration ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
NEXT STEPS…
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
WHAT’S NEXT?
• Construct a plan to that looks at the results of the optimization process to consolidate the brands’ assets, resources, processes, budget & technology/tools
• Identify which assets can be re-used and what development or investment needs to occur to make the SMP work effectively
• Phase 3 – Begin laying out the basic component of the SMP that incorporates all of the information determined above that will result in highly-efficient, valued SMP.
• Build with a plan that is [short-term] scalable and [long-term] evolutionary to meet the changing needs of the brand “proactively.”
68
azblue© 2014 AZBlue | www.azblueinc.com
AZURITE BLUE INC.
69
We are a consulting firm that has the experience and ability to help clients articulate their needs with regards to “all things social” from marketing to operational design to management. Our strength is to analyze your need,
assess your strengths and create an operational roadmap to get there!
Contact: Jim Clark – 908-305-8475
www.linkedin.com/in/azblue/
https://www.facebook.com/azblueinc