Download - South Africanada
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
1/18
SOUTH AFRICANADA
Located in Trafalgar Square London England lays the culture center and social
club known as Canada House. Opposite Canada House sits South Africa House, home
of the South African embassy, and formerly a popular target for activists to throw things
at during the era of apartheid. They face across from each other as two branches thatgrew off of the British Empire, and remain united to the trunk by the Commonwealth.
This puts South Africa in an advantageous position to be the proxy for spreading Global
Canada through the African continent, motherland to all humanity. First: a brief history.
Wikipedia
Most of the colonial possessions that were controlled by the European empires
can be divided into two categories. Some were just a source of raw materials, cheaplabor, and forcing the locals to buy your crap. Others were targeted for large scale
settlement, creating a colonial civil society modeled closely on west-European culture.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
2/18
Category 2 colonies included ones in Australia, New Zealand, and the Americas.
Category 1 colonies were found more in South Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. In Africathere was one notable exception, to be found at the southern edge of the continent, where
a hybrid of a Category 1 and a Category 2 colony was created.
European colonization began with a Dutch port in the Cape of Good Hope, to re-
supply ships that traveled along the trade routes between Europe and Asia, making it a lot
like the trading posts that fur trappers frequented in the wilderness of New France.
With the liberation of the serfs in the Netherlands there were a lot of landless
farmers that went to southern Africa in the same spirit as European immigrants who went
to the New World, to find some land for themselves. The Dutch were joined byGermans, and the French Huguenots. As a religious minority in France, the Huguenots
left in the same spirit as the Pilgrims on the Mayflower. Just as the descendants of
European settlers in the Americas eventually began to think of themselves as Americans,
the white people born of these European refugees came to think of themselves asAfricans. Thats right, White Africans.
Just as the English did with New France, they took over South Africa and
imposed their rule. Just like the residents of Quebec, the non-English speaking whites
were not too happy with this arrangement. In both New France and South Africa, not
only did the English rule over them, but they began bringing their own settlers, creating aprivileged minority loyal to the crown, just like in the plantation of Ireland.
So, even amongst whites there was a sense developed of us and them. Thosewho spoke English became the permanent outsiders, while those who spoke the local
form of Dutch, mixed with French and German, were the true Africans, or as they called
themselves in their own language Afrikaners.
As they also did throughout their empire, the English brought in a sizeable
population of cheap skilled workers, mostly from their largest Category 1 colony, India.
In all of these ways, South Africa seemed like a Category 2 colony, like Canada.
South Africa was also like a Category 2 colony in that the land European settled on
already had people living on it. And, like in the Americas, it was easy to push the nativesaside, because they did not use the same kind of concepts of property and ownership, and
they lacked firearms.
No longer tolerating British rule, the Afrikaners headed deeper into the interior of
the continent, just as settlers in North America headed into the Wild West. They even
traveled in covered wagons. Unfortunately for the Afrikaners, on this land where theyhad established the Boer Republics of the Transvaal and the Orange Free State, there was
plenty of diamonds and gold that England wanted for itself. Canada sent troops to aid
England in the Anglo-Boer War, although many French-Canadians opposed this,
sympathizing with the Boers as another group of European colonists being subjected to
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
3/18
English rule. During the war, many of the Afrikaners, including women and children
were rounded up and put in concentration camps.
Just like how the adjacent English colonies of Upper Canada, Lower Canada,
New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia were each given a degree of self governance, so were
the adjacent English colonies of Cape Colony, Natal, the Transvaal, and the Orange FreeState. And just as these four British North American colonies were united under the self
governance of the Dominion of Canada, these four British African colonies were united
in their autonomy as the Union of South Africa, founded in 1910.
For all of these forms of parallel development, there was one really big difference
between South Africa and Category 2 colonies. They never saw the same large influx of
constant newcomers from Europe that Australia or the Americas saw. As such, the whiteAfricans did not manage to push into every nook and cranny of habitable land in South
Africa. Settlers, in South Africa faced a problem that no true Category 2 colony faced.
They had never become the majority.
In North America, the First Nations were eventually given the civil rights, on
paper at least, of full citizenship. This was only after centuries of decimation guaranteedthat they werent going to be taking over the government. Cecil Rhodes never got to see
the same demographic change that General Custer did. Coincidentally, South Africa was
a bit slower to grant citizenship to its darker skinned residents.
Even amongst the white population, Afrikaners felt like they were left in a
position of being underprivileged. Having traditionally been the elite, English-speaking
white South Africans remained the wealthiest residents. Each group remained separatefrom the other, living in different areas, working in different jobs, and attending different
schools. This sounds much akin to the lines that have long been drawn between
Americans of different races. And sounding a lot like the ideas of Black Power seen inthe United States, Afrikaners sought to establish their own institutions for their own
communities, so they wouldnt have to be dependent on the English-speaking whites,
who were living their parallel lives. I can kind of see how this might have inspiredpolitical ideas that were yet to come to full fruition.
In 1931 the same Statute of Westminster that granted Canada complete control
over its own legislation also gave South Africa its full independence. Eventually all of theother colonies in Africa broke free of colonization. However in South Africa, although
they were now independent of Europe, the people left in charge of the military, the
police, and the government, were all of European descent.
South Africa might have seemed like a unique case of a colony gaining
independence but it is more of a microcosm of what was typical for post-colonial states.In every case of decolonization, the conquerors left in place the sense of nation-state that
developed in Europe.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
4/18
Also, although they were rarely white, residents of the colony who were the most
familiar with the systems of governance that the colonial powers established became the
leaders of the newly independent states, and continued to use the same styles of laws,economics and social organization that the empires established. It ensures that the
perceptions of property and ownership imported from Europe remain the law of the land,
and anyone who ever hopes of being in any position of importance must learn and live bythose principles. The former colonial powers find governments like the one in South
Africa the easiest to do business with. They speak the same language, money.
If the old colonial empires no longer had teeth it was because they remained
embedded in the wounds they inflicted. Like in other countries, most South Africans still
lived traditional lifestyles, but they were not the ones with the authority. Without the
means to take control for themselves and preserve their access to the resources that gavethem the independence to survive on their own, for many people living a traditional
lifestyle came to mean living in poverty.
I think one thing tourists like about Australia, is that the land seems so exotic, butthe lifestyle and the people are comfortably familiar. South Africa also has an exotic
landscape, and for a long time if tourists walked the city streets, most of the people theywould see were white like them. Of course, in South Africa this was only maintained
because of curfew laws placed on blacks, who were not allowed to live in the same parts
of the city, but relegated to metal shacks in the townships that were only close by enough
to provide cheap labor during daylight hours. Unlike Australia, South Africas populationwas over 70% pure black African, and it could only look like Australia to the people in
charge because of some very restrictive housing laws underapartheid. As much as we
might like another Australia in the world, our conscience should tell us that there issomething wrong with that.
International opinion of the apartheidgovernment, even amongst whites inEurope and North America, was often negative. White South Africans have had some
trouble understanding this, because they saw our culture as being from the same western,
European roots as their own. Many of the people who have denounced apartheidwouldnot be ready to admit it, I believe that there is a chance that their condemnation might not
have been so strong had they lived in South Africa and been amongst the privileged
minority. This still doesnt mean that they were wrong to condemn injustice. An
apartheid-era politician said that South Africa could not be held hostage by the U.S butdid that justify the National Party government holding South Africa hostage itself?
History will now show that apartheid eventually came to an end, and all SouthAfricans were granted the rights of universal suffrage. Many white South Africans came
to accept these changes, but many missed the days when the justices of the peace,
administrators of governance, and civil servants looked the same as them and shared theircultural values. Almost a million whites have emigrated since the end of apartheid.
It is easy to argue that the situation for white South Africans is in many ways
worse now than it was forty years ago. When the government is no longer primarily
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
5/18
concerned with ensuring that everyone amongst the white minority has a job,
unemployment figures amongst Afrikaners are certainly going to go up. Furthermore,
with continuing income inequalities combined with the repeal of segregation laws thathad maintained a barrier between the rich and the poor, the end of apartheid was marked
by an increase in crime. Many would argue that this also had to do with a loss of
government efficiency when jobs in the service sector, economic management, and policeenforcement were given to mostly inexperienced black South Africans. White
supremacists will of course argue that this proves that blacks are inherently inferior, but
when few blacks had access to higher education there is going to be an experience gap.
With the legacy of apartheid, it explains, but does not justify, why there are some
in South Africa who feel like the whites do not belong in their country. There have been
many documented cases of farmers and their families being attacked because they werewhite. Many were tortured before being eventually killed. A lot of whites used to live in
neighboring Zimbabwe, but most have been driven out, and their president has stated that
whites should not live in Zimbabwe. There are fears that this reverse color KKK
mentality could take root in South Africa as well.
There have been instances when the South African Police Force has kept jobpositions unfilled rather than give them to whites. South Africans had good reason to fear
the brutality of white cops during the era of apartheid, but with the new democratic
government they would finally be the protection force for the whole country, regardless
of their color. This is doing a disservice to a country that has been plagued by high ratesof violent crimes like rape and murder. It also indicates that there might be some
government officials with a screw you attitude towards the white minority.
Afrikaners still mostly control agriculture in South Africa, owning most of the
farms. The skills of white farmers have been a valuable resource in making the land
productive. Although this makes them important for national interests it doesnt meanthat they deserve special rights, or keep the black farm workers they employ from owning
their own homes. But this shouldnt mean that someone should have to give up their farm
just because they are white. Whites used to also dominate the farmland in neighboringZimbabwe. Zimbabwes government was more concerned about removing this image of
their colonial past than they were with smart development, so they quickly seized all of
the land from the white farmers and redistributed to government supporters who had very
little knowledge about how to tend the land. A country that was once known as thebreadbasket of Africa is now threatened with famine. Despite this failure, some South
African politicians want to take the same route and cut off their nose to spite their face.
During apartheid, the South African government was by the Afrikaners, and for
the Afrikaners. From the hardships their ancestors faced to settle the land, with a history
often written in blood, there is this feeling that South Africa really is their homeland.Like any tribe, they felt it was their duty to protect their homeland, and to be first and
foremost concerned for the well-being of their own. For this reason many white South
Africans felt betrayed when their government negotiated a transition to black majority
rule. Some feel a longing for many aspects of their former lives that now feel lost, like a
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
6/18
sense of security sovereignty, and the right to preserve ones own culture. With
sentiments of feeling cheated by the power-sharing negotiations that preceded the
election of Nelson Mandela as the first black president, it is obvious that there are somewhite South Africans who miss the comforts they had under apartheid. I can understand
this.
I have just one question. HOW THE HELL DID THEY THINK THEY WERE
GOING TO DO IT? We are talking about less than 20% of the population thinking they
could maintain control over the destiny of the other 80% of the people living in theircountry. But out of curiosity, let us try to think up things that the apartheid era
government could have done differently to better serve the white people in the long run.
It is fair to speculate that the present situation in South Africa would be a lot morefavorable to everybody, including Afrikaners, if the government began deconstructing
apartheid much earlier. I wish someone could have shown a crystal ball to the architects
of apartheid, and made them see that despite their best efforts, Afrikaners would no
longer be in control fifty years in the future. Perhaps then we could have convinced themto start introducing political reforms, to appease both international and domestic demands
for change and thus buy time to help birth a future non-racial South Africa.
A good place to start political reform would have been Namibia, the large
territory to the north-west that they were given trusteeship over. They extended the laws
of apartheid to Namibia, where whites made up an even smaller portion of the populace.The United Nations thus decreed that South African control of Namibia was illegal.
It might have been possible to convince South Africa to not apply the laws ofapartheid to Namibia. The white government would only do this if they thought they had
something to gain from it, so such a proposal would want to be worded as if it was to the
benefit of the whites. Well for one, making a conciliatory gesture to the internationalcommunity could have opened up new trading opportunities. Also, if they had shown
more enlightened governance of its trust-territory, Britain might have given more serious
consideration to South Africas request to for jurisdiction over the neighboring territoriesof Bechuanaland and Rhodesia (now Botswana and Zimbabwe respectively). It would
also give them good practice in organizing a non-racial society for themselves.
The apartheid government was not completely oblivious to the pressures ofreform, but they still wanted a country where Afrikaners could be in charge. This inspired
the new constitution in the 1980s that would have provided a tri-cameral legislature. One
house of parliament would be for whites, one for the Indians, and one for the Coloreds(mixed race population). However, it was still set up so the white parliament would have
most of the power, and it still did not grant full civil rights to the Indian or Colored
minorities. Both of these communities put together were still less numerous than thewhite South Africans, so even if they were given universal suffrage they would not have
robbed the Afrikaners of their numerical majority in the government. The white
government could have easily granted this without conceding control, but even that was
considered being too charitable.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
7/18
Even with the multiracial tri-cameral parliament, the South African government
was still ignoring the black majority. The government justified itself by saying that thesepeople were mostly uneducated, and were too unfamiliar with western norms to become
fully integrated into the system. They did however give the title of honorary whites to
immigrants from Taiwan or Japan. They justified this because they considered thesepeople, although not Caucasian, as being educated and familiar with the standards and
social norms of living in an industrialized society. Among the tens of millions of black
South Africans surely the government could have found at least a couple of million whocould have qualified. Nelson Mandela was a lawyer for Christs sake. If they granted full
rights of citizenship to a fraction of the countrys blacks they could have still maintained
a white majority in the government but given the appearance of being more inclusive.
Even this would not erase the evils of apartheid however. It might have offered
the opportunity to allow many black South Africans to join the middle class, but millions
of others would still be left in the poverty of the townships. But then, this is not so
different from the present day reality of South Africa. Although the African NationalCongress now controls the government, for many blacks life is as hard as it was during
apartheid. Had the reality of the black middle class been established while the whites stillcontrolled the country it would have put more pressure on the government after it was
finally transferred to black majority rule to narrow the income gap.
If there was going to be true democracy, the Afrikaners still wanted to have acountry where they could be the majority. This inspired them to create the homelands,
areas of land within the established borders of South Africa set aside for the different
cultural groups within the black South African community that would eventually be madeinto independent countries.
At first glance the homeland idea might seem like an acceptable proposal. Itensured that everyone got a slice of the cake that was South Africa. But imagine someone
who is about to have a slice of cake for themselves, but instead of taking the small wedge
shaped slice, you see them claim the large Pac-man shaped piece representing themajority of the cake only for themselves. So it was with the land distribution that the
white South Africans intended to keep for themselves. The homelands (aka Bantustans)
totaled a land area of about 13% of South Africa, to be set aside for over 70% of the
population. And despite their limited size, these homelands were distorted into oddshapes and fragmented territories that looked too ridiculous to ever be taken seriously as
independent countries. This was to ensure that white land owners could still have
unfettered access to the best land. That is hardly generous.
Furthermore, when giving independence to the Bantustans, South Africa followed
the same pattern used in de-colonization. The homelands were left impoverished, andwithout any infrastructure of their own, so they were still economically dependent, and at
the mercy of their former masters. The administrators left in charge of these new
governments were rarely democratic, but rather despotic puppet regimes.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
8/18
The apartheid government dictated the reality of the Bantustans, and they had a
distorted perception of what was equitable. To even come close to being fair, the territory
of the independent homelands would have had to have been much bigger, and made outof contiguous pieces of land.
The map on the left, from Wikipedia, shows the size and locations of the former
Bantustans in South Africa. The altered map on the right shows what the size of theBantustans would have been if they actually reflected the distribution of the population
groups they were meant to represent. Even then, the non-black minority would be left
with a disproportionately large share of the country. This would only come close toseeming equitable if you take into account that most of the arable land is in the east, and
if whites offered full rights to the Colored population who dominate most of the western
half of the country. They once had those rights, until the apartheid regime removed them.
Another alternative is that if in addition to these 10 Bantustans there was anadditional Bantustan meant for Afrikaners. Like the Bantustans, it would be limited in
size, and the rest of South Africa outside of these Bantustan areas would be a multiracialdemocracy, like South Africa is today. The demand for an Afrikaner Bantustan was never
too great however since the white rulers still deluded themselves into thinking they could
control the country as a whole.
Proposing a power distribution in South Africa that looked like the map on the
right would never have been accepted by the apartheid government. What is strange isthat now many people who used to support apartheid might wish they had such an
arrangement, since it would leave whites in control over a much larger area than they do
now.
Even this multicolored map on the right does not accurately reflect the
multicultural nature of South Africa. Areas where one cultural group form a clear
majority still often have a large minority made up of other cultural groups. A largeportion of the white population lives in the eastern part of the country, despite being
clearly outnumbered by groups like the Zulu and Sesotho. If each of these regions were to
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
9/18
be exclusively for the people in the majority then millions of South Africans would
become internally displaced.
One possible alternative that South Africa could have tried was to not try to
classify the homelands as independent ethnically exclusive countries, but rather as
provinces. This way they could comprise a larger area without carving up the Republic ofSouth Africa like a roast. For instance, the Xhosa homelands of Transkei and Ciskei
would be united as one, and be roughly the same size and shape as the current province of
the Eastern Cape, where over 80% of the people speak Xhosa. Like Namibia, theseprovinces would be apartheid-free zones.
Most African countries only use the languages of their former colonial masters as
official languages. South Africa however now has eleven official languages. I do worrythough that, just like French in Louisiana and Gaelic in Nova Scotia that most of these
languages might be in danger of falling into novelty status. During apartheid, most signs
in South Africa were in English and Afrikaans. Rather than now include nine other
languages, new signs are usually in English only, even if the majority in that area speakAfrikaans, Xhosa, Zulu, etc.
The new provinces of South Africa, formed after the dismantling of apartheid,
look a lot like the map with the envisioned enlarged Bantustans. There are provinces
where different languages are in the majority, but in commerce and government
preference is still always given to English. This is another example of just emphasizingthe use of the language that is already the most popular to learn. Will there be much
incentive for most people to take the time to learn these languages? I fear that this could
turn into another example of the growing gap between many people speaking a fewlanguages, and a few people speaking many languages, and being threatened with
insignificance. It makes it seem in South Africa, like in Ireland, as if the ultimate victory
still belongs to the British Empire.
To preserve linguistic diversity, I would be a Language Nazi, and enact in all of
these new South African provinces stringent measures to preserve and promote theselanguages. That being, on the provincial level that regional language is the only official
language, and if any signs or documents are going to be in more than one language, the
official language would still be displayed the most prominently. Everyone in the Free
State would be expected to learn Sesotho, everyone in the Eastern Cape would beexpected to learn Xhosa, and everyone in Kwazulu-Natal would be expected to learn
Zulu. Provincial boundaries might be adjusted to more closely reflect linguistic areas.
The population in these provinces could still be multiracial, and people could still speaktheir own languages, but they would need a working knowledge in the language of the
local majority. The country as a whole could still have multiple official languages, just as
Canada as a whole has two official languages.
Even after making all of these pro-active reforms, the white government still
would not have been able to save apartheid, but it would have been a lot easier to make
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
10/18
the transition to an apartheid-free South Africa. This would have made the current
situation better for all South Africans, including the whites.
Amazingly, well before Nelson Mandela was released from prison, many white
South Africans thought that they had already made too many concessions. Giving away
scraps is hardly charity. This shows how delusional ones perceptions of fairness can be.Had the apartheid government any common sense they would have yielded much more in
order to preserve their institutions, but cognitive dissonance kept them from seeing the
truth of their inevitable future.
Not realizing the inherent impermanence of apartheid, the former rulers of South
Africa had missed a golden opportunity to ensure that the well-being of the white South
Africans they served would be secure in the present time. By starting earlier to begintearing down the barriers of apartheid, they could have bought themselves time to make a
much smoother transition, avoiding economic and social chaos that so many whites lost
their livelihoods because of. By helping to create a large black middle class, it would
mean the lines of rich and poor did not coincide so closely to white and black. This couldhave defused a lot of resentment that has been focused towards whites, and often made
them the targets of hate crimes.
Many Afrikaners keep hope for a brighter future. For some, this still entails
picturing a state in Africa with a white majority, but by different means than the failed
homelands plan. Even as a minority, white South Africa is a nation larger than thepredominantly white nation of New Zealand. In every province white South Africans are
a minority. However, the western half of the country is populated mostly by Coloreds,
who make up a local majority in much of South Africa, even though they make up aneven smaller percent of the country as a whole than the mostly urbanized whites do.
Despite being a minority in Canada as a whole, French Canadians form a regionalmajority in Quebec, and if they wanted to whites in South Africa could be the same way.
The white population in South Africa is much larger than the whole population of the
thinly populated Northern Cape, which is the largest province. If they all decided to movethere they might be more visible in a multiracial South Africa.
As global warming becomes an undeniable fact, the people who tried to deny it as
long as possible tend to be the same ones who come up with the wrong approachestowards dealing with it. Likewise, Afrikaners who did their tribe no favors by failing until
the last minute to recognize that apartheids days were numbered are still making
unrealistic plans for their future.
One lunatic fringe group promoting white South African nationalism is the AWB,
known in English as theAfrikaner Resistance Movement. They actually believed that theapartheid government was too liberal. They still believe in the implausible vision of
complete separation of the whites from other South African groups. They support a rabid
white independence with the people spread out as thinly as they can, with an extreme
individualism which is why they lost the Anglo-Boer War in the first place.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
11/18
The AWB talks about being united in their religious values. As a testament to
their faith they use a symbol that incorporates the number 777, because the say that is thenumber of God. They use the color white which is supposed to represent the courage in
their hearts and the purity of their intentions. They also use the color red, which is
supposed to represent the blood that Christ shed to save his people. They want there to beno mistake about where their faith lies, and state clearly that the insignia of the Afrikaner
Resistance Movement is meant to be a Christian symbol. However, when I look at what
they came up with, I get the sneaking suspicion that they might have gotten theirinspiration from somewhere other than Jesus.
Wikipedia
Even without their Nazi-esque symbols, the hatred behind the AWB is well
known. If they give other South Africans more excuses to hate whites back, then theAWB is as guilty as anyone for the murder of white farmers. That is certainly not going
to help their fellow Caucasians.
Another unrealistic goal in Afrikaner nationalism is the Boerstaat movement. The
basis of this movement is that the Boer Republics of the Transvaal and the Orange Free
State were illegally annexed by the United Kingdom, and that they should be restored asindependent countries meant for white, Afrikaans speaking people (and dont forget
Christian). These regions lost their independence over a century ago, and were only
actual countries for less than 50 years. They are also in the area where most of the blackSouth Africans live. Are they supposed to just leave?
The following Wikipedia map of South Africa has had sections colored in to
represent where white separatists would like their future country to be located, along withthe location of another secessionist movements proposed state.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
12/18
The location of the former, short-lived Boer Republics (black)
Territory claimed by the Cape Party (blue)
A more modest (and realistic) proposal comes in the form of the Cape Party. This
group advocates complete independence of the western half of the country, where the use
of English and Afrikaans is predominant instead of the Bantu languages. It is more
realistic because it not only acknowledges the right of different cultural groups to self-determination, but doesnt require any population transfers. Non-blacks already form the
majority in this region. It is also more inclusive, by acknowledging the Afrikaans-
speaking Coloreds as a part of their nation, something that most white Afrikanernationalists have never done.
The only problem is that the Cape Party has so little support. They are only aregistered political party in the Western Cape, a small portion of the territory they claim
for their future state. And even there, they have only managed to attract a fraction of one
percent of the vote during elections. Most moderate white South Africans probably thinkthat it makes little sense to split up the most prosperous and developed country on the
continent, and leave the commercial-industrial centers of Cape Town and Johannesburgin two different countries.
The most appealing part about the Cape Party Movement is that if they succeeded
they would limit the power of the African National Congress (ANC). Since the end of
apartheid, the ANC has dominated South Africas government. There is some concernthat with their power, the ANC might be losing sight of their original principles. When
they were banned, it was easier for members to remember their principles, because being
involved did not offer much hope for power. Now, being a member of the ANC providesthe best opportunity to be in a position of power, and like it was for the Afrikaners, power
can be intoxicating and overpower common sense.
Many white South Africans think Nelson Mandela destroyed everything theybuilt. But white South Africans have as much reason to be thankful that Mandela was
their first black president as anyone. Mandela knew that to do that forgiveness had to take
priority over vengeance, because he saw white South Africans as partners in building thecountry. Whites could have had some megalomaniac like Mugabe, with his thinly veiled
racism towards whites, as their countrys first black president.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
13/18
But Nelson Mandela is not immortal, and leadership in South Africa has passed to
a new generation. They often dont use the language of reconciliation as much as
Desmond Tutu does. There was a lot of support for changing the name of South Africasrugby team, but those efforts were stopped by Mandela, who saw that there was nothing
to gain from it. I like the new South African flag and national anthem a lot more than the
old one, but I still worry that the drive behind removing familiar symbols could be a signof contempt towards the white minority.
The fact that Julius Malema leads the ANC Youth League makes me worry howfar contempt could go. His criticism of all political opponents would make him the
perfect Republican in the U.S. He especially shows contempt for any concerns voiced by
white politicians. He is also known for proudly singing songs about killing white farmers.
Most disturbing of all might be Malemas support for Robert Mugabe. Mugabe
has been president of neighboring Zimbabwe since that country removed its own white-
minority government. He has ruled with an iron fist, and directed his hatred not only
towards the few white Rhodesians who still live there, but the entire half of the countrythat supports the Movement for Democratic Change. He has solidified his power by
getting his cult-like supporters riled up against everyone else, and refuses to rescind hispower, even though he is driving the country into the ground. He sees love of Zimbabwe
as being directly tied to support for his rule, accusing his opponents of treason, and any
criticism as being from foreign influence. He has also voiced claims that God is on his
side. It is for all of these reasons that I refer to Mugabe as the African Bush.
I would rather see South Africa split in two than be completely under the rule of
someone like Mugabe or Malema. There is some hope in preventing complete ANCdominance from the Democratic Alliance. Most white South Africans give their vote to
this party, but this party is not an heir of the apartheid politicians, and has a home grown
sense of liberal-democratic values and social equity that the National Party neverpossessed. It proves that many white South Africans are now more progressive minded.
The Democratic Alliance also gets a lot of support from the Asian and Colored
communities. This is because they are conscious of the fact that, like the whites, they area minority in South Africa, and as such worry about being disregarded by the ruling elite.
It is because the Coloreds form the majority in Western Cape that the Democratic
Alliance forms the government in that province. It is the only province that is notcontrolled by the ANC. KwaZulu-Natal was once dominated by the opposition Inkatha
Freedom Party advocating for more sovereignty for the Zulu nation. However, the ANC
now dominates there as well, and many of its supporters hope that someday they mayalso be able to gain control of Western Cape as well, leaving no one to oppose them. Just
as I would like to see Canadas Liberal Party and New Democratic Party work together to
oppose the Conservative Party, I hope that the Democratic Alliance, the Inkatha FreedomParty, the Minority Party (representing the Asian community), and the Congress of the
People (made up of ANC defectors) can work together to keep the ANC in check.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
14/18
Some white South Africans say there is now reverse apartheid, claiming they
cant get jobs because they are white. Yet, despite Black Economic Empowerment
(BEE), white unemployment is still much lower, and their standard of living is still muchhigher. Cities like Johannesburg are a lot like Montreal, in that most of the top offices in
the skyscrapers are occupied by people from an elite WASP minority, while most of the
people from the majority group live in the less affluent neighborhoods.
Some white South Africans try to claim that apartheid was wrong, but that it is in
the past. The past still haunts the present. If you look at an economic development map ofGermany, you can clearly make out the old border between East Germany and West
Germany, more than 20 years after reunification. The disparity between the two halves of
Germany was never as great as the disparity of wealth between black and white South
Africans, and apartheid ended more recently. Also, if you look at a map of South Africashowing population density in different regions, you can clearly see that the outlines of
the old Bantustans are still visible.
Wikipedia
South Africa has definitely had some growing pains, but it is imperative for them
to recover from the chaos they face. This is not only for their benefit, but for the benefitof underrepresented, and underprivileged groups throughout the world. If they fail it will
make the old colonial assumptions that people of color were incapable of governing
themselves seem like they have some credibility.
Hypothetically, if there were to be an Afrikaner sovereignty movement, a more
down to earth proposal might be Orania, a town that was established by Afrikaners that
saw that apartheids days were numbered. They were just a group of people who decided
to live and work together, where their language and culture could be in the majority.When I learned about Orania it gave me mixed feelings. I hoped that Afrikaner culture
could be preserved, but being a liberal-minded WASP it is hard to endorse any proposalthat sounds like white separatism.
Imagine you heard someone say I thought Orania was crazy, But when you see
your own people in charge, you begin to believe reality is here. How does that sound toyou, exclusionary? Racist? Well, this is real quote that I took from an old National
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
15/18
Geographic article, but the person quoted was not talking about Orania, but the proposed
Canadian territory of Nunavut. I learned about Orania around the same time I heard about
plans to create Nunavut. The stated purpose of creating Nunavut was so there could be anadministrative area in Canada where the Inuit could be in the majority, and thus control
the regional government. If Inuit can have self-determination why not Afrikaners?
Of course, in the case of Nunavut, the Inuit majority was not created by
migration. Also, the Inuit are largely impoverished, while the Afrikaners are not. I worry
they might try to use a white homeland as a tax haven to avoid helping alleviate poverty.
The Orania movement should change some of its language and state that it has no
objectives of removing non-Afrikaners, and that like Nunavut, the right to vote and the
full protection of the law would be given to everyone in their jurisdiction, regardless ofbackground. They should also drop the goal of a completely independent Afrikaner state.
It would be better if Orania was like Quebec. They could form a province where
anyone with citizenship could live there, but with a focus on linguistic conservation ofthe Afrikaans language. The Northern Cape would be the most ideal place for this, since
Afrikaans is already one of the most widely used languages in that region. If a bunch ofwhite South Africans feel like they want to consolidate themselves in one area, it is there
right to live within their national borders where they like. Of course, they cant make the
people already living there feel unwelcome.
I would rather that white people live throughout the country to remind the world
that South Africa is supposed to be a rainbow nation. Support among white South
Africans for Orania is weak anyhow. Even if they are in the minority, you would find alot more white people in cities like Cape Town. People can join together and play fort
like a bunch of pioneers, but I prefer a more cosmopolitan environment, and since most
Afrikaners live in urban environments I am guessing that they do as well. Only a fewthousand people live in Orania. You could find enough white people in Zimbabwe to fill
that town, and they might have a greater need for it.
Orania might be an improvement over other white sovereignty movements like
the Boerstaat, but it still needs to dial down the crazy a little bit, and modify its visions, if
it wants to have any lasting effect. However, as a minority, I understand the need for
white South Africans to protect their rights, just as all minorities do. That is why I amglad that the Afrikaners were accepted into the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples
Organization. But if they can do so, so can any of the other national groups in South
Africa, none of which forms a majority by itself.
In another light I could look at Orania as a town like Clare, Cheticamp, or another
Acadian community. A town where a certain culture dominates the seen, but it is still apart of the country that it is in. If Orania wanted to reinvent itself as a living museum they
might have the support of the South African tourist board.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
16/18
The question is could it be more than just a town? There are certainly enough
white South Africans to turn it into its own little country. Over 850,000 white South
Africans, have left the country. Tens of thousands have moved to Canada to get betterpaying jobs and escape the violence and chaos of their home country. They have made
themselves settled.
In one highly publicized case reported by the BBC, a white South African named
Brandon Huntley who had been violently attacked seven different times (stabbed on three
of those occasions), sought asylum in Canada, and was allowed to stay when CanadasImmigration and Refugee ruled that the South African government had not done enough
to protect him. The ruling ANC condemned this ruling as racist.
This large scale emigration is a brain drain for South Africa, which can no longeruse their knowledge and skills to help build their country. There is now a website called
homecomingrevolution.co.za to encourage these expatriates to return. If all of these
people moved to the Northern Cape they could have easily made up the majority in the
southern half of the province. At least then they could still put their education and skillsto the service of South Africa.
Here is what I propose. Many white South Africans have complained that
Affirmative Action laws have made it impossible for them to find work in their home
country, which is why they emigrate. I propose that a portion of the sparsely populated
Northern Cape south of the Orange River be made exempt from these Affirmative Actionlaws to encourage disaffected whites to move there as an alternative to living abroad, and
attract some of the emigrants who have packed for Perth to return. It might also give
economic incentive to fill this empty quarter of the country.
Proposed Northern Cape territory exempt from Affirmative Action Laws
Politics must not resemble what existed under apartheid however, and equality
under the law must be guaranteed to all residents of Northern Cape Province regardless ofrace. Economic aid from supporters of this social experiment must not only be used to
establish infrastructure for the expatriates they hope to lure back to South Africa, but to
the current residents. If Afrikaners are going to become predominant, the non-whites
should not be left behind again, and their standard of living should be raised significantly.If they are critical of the African National Congress then they should do what the ANC
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
17/18
has only had partial success with, and no longer let color determine who the haves and
have-nots in South Africa are.
It is also important that Afrikaners see that their language, more than their skin
color, is the key to cultural preservation. It makes their concerns more legitimate and less
racist. There should be at least one province where the same kinds of measures that aretaken to promote French in Quebec are used to promote Afrikaans. But regardless of race,
everyone who identifies the use of Afrikaans as a part of their cultural identity, should be
accepted as a part of the Afrikaner nation, establishing themselves as a domestic-globalempire. It will also help their cause if they support the rights of other linguistic groups to
cultural preservation, and agree that whites living in areas with a Xhosa or Zulu majority
should try to learn their languages.
A spirit of philanthropy is also indispensable. If white South Africans want to
remain significant and visible then it benefits them greatly to have a sense of
responsibility and volunteerism, not only for their cultural community but for South
Africa as a whole. Mentor underprivileged children, care for the environment, bestewards of the land. Give back what you can. It might sound like communism, but it
isnt if you do it willingly. By staying educated and focused on participating in the well-being of the country, whites can be an indispensable resource to South Africa. White
farmers from South Africa and Zimbabwe could help teach black farmers more effective
agricultural practices.
Just like Erinsville Ontario, South Africa could be a potential home for a future
Gaeltacht. A lot of South Africans have Celtic ancestry, and a Gaeltacht would be a
testament to just how culturally diverse the country is, and how even small minoritygroups can remain significant and visible in the Rainbow Nation. Similar communities
could be established with the goal of providing a space for a revival of French, German,
and Dutch speaking communities, which provided the roots for Afrikaans.
The king of the Zulus is given ceremonial status even though political power is
held elsewhere. Several other tribal kings are given similar recognition by the SouthAfrican government. The people do not have to acknowledge these monarchs, but many
choose to because it is a part of their cultural identity. I would suggest that in addition to
these monarchs of the Bantu nations, the British Monarch and the Dutch Monarch also be
counted among the official royalty, to firmly state that the citizens who trace theirancestry to those nations are also a part of South Africa.
***
There is a lot that Canada and the world can learn from South Africa as it was and
as it is, and how it could be. Not just amongst the militant and crazy fringe of the of theAfrikaner tribe, there are forces of tribalism that could threaten national unity. There is
the question of what it means to Xhosa, Zulu, Afrikaner, English, Sesotho, Tswana,
Swazi, Indian, Malay, Colored, as well as the question of being South African, and can
you be both without sacrificing your sense of belonging to one or the other.
-
8/3/2019 South Africanada
18/18
There are a lot of violent clashes that take place in the name of tribal loyalties, but
in the end, what have they done to help any tribe? Obviously they have not helped SouthAfrica reach its full potential. Would the tribes not all benefit from a South Africa that
can avoid the fate of so many African nations, as long as there is a policy of the
prosperity of the country being for the benefit of all? Can they not then put aside violencenot only out of what is best for them as South Africans, but what is best for their tribe?
Likewise, we must ask ourselves if we can move our world towards the futureeven in terms of what is best for our nations. Can there be a world without nations? Can
there be a South Africa without tribes? And if so, was the cost for unity worth it, and was
that cost necessary?
More specifically for the rest of the world, and in particular countries like Canada
and the United States, there is something that can be learned from South Africa. It helps
give white people a sense of what it would be like to be a minority. Perhaps we can feel a
sense of sympathy for the white Africans based on our similar cultural backgrounds. Wellwhatever you want for the whites of South Africa, you must then give to the non-whites
in your own countries. Even when people like the Afrikaners and the English SouthAfricans are not given this courtesy they deserve as a human right, remember to be
willing to see that non-whites in the western world still deserve to be able to be
considered a part of those countries.
We should still remember that it is supporting someone elses right to call a land
home that will support your own right to do the same. A large Buddhist temple outside of
Johannesburg was targeted by attack by a white terrorist. They might as well haveattacked themselves. White South Africans should realize that the Asians and Coloreds
are also visible minorities, and like different non-white groups are natural allies in North
America, different non-black groups are natural allies in South Africa. By defending therights of others that are seen as different you are defending your own rights.
Like in North America, there really is no group in South Africa that is in themajority. In either case it is the diversity we fail to see that makes it seem like there is a
dominant group. And it is only when we can acknowledge the differences that some use
to divide us that we can truly be whole when we are united. And everyone must feel like
they can have their space, and that there is enough space for everyone.