Southern Nuclear Operating Company
ND-18-0300
Enclosure 1
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Units 3 and 4
Presentation Material:
Crediting First of a Kind Testing from China AP1000 Units - Open Meeting (Non-Proprietary)
(Enclosure 1 consist of 27 pages, including this cover page)
Crediting First of a Kind Testing from China AP1000 Units
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 2 of 27
Agenda
• Background• Quality Assurance Program Assessment• China Test Assessments and Applicability to Vogtle 3&4
– In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank Heatup Test– Reactor Vessel Internal Vibration Testing – Core Makeup Tank Test Heated Recirculation Tests – Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test
• Path Forward
2
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 3 of 27
Background
• The VEGP 3&4 Combined Licenses (COLs) currently require First Plant Only Tests (FPOTs) and First Three Plant Only Tests (F3POTs) be performed on both Unit 3 and Unit 4
• If Licensee would like to credit a test performed at a previous plant (unit), a LAR is required.
• SNC would like to credit testing completed on the China AP1000 units • During certification of AP1000, the purpose of first plant only testing was provided
in Section 14.2.5:– Special tests to further establish a unique phenomenological performance parameter of the
AP1000 design features beyond testing performed for Design Certification of the AP600 and that will not change from plant to plant, are performed for the first plant only. Because of the standardization of the AP1000 design, these special tests (designated as first plant only tests) are not required on follow plants.
3
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 4 of 27
Background
• The SNC intent is to submit LARs covering China FPOT/F3POT applicability• The LAR scope will be split by:
– Pre-operational tests– Start-up tests
• The LAR scope being split allows for submittal of the first LAR while the remaining FPOT tests are being completed and/or vetted
• This presentation will cover the pre-operational testing scope for the first LAR– In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank (IRWST) Heatup Test– Reactor Vessel Internal Vibration Testing (or Comprehensive Vibration Assessment Program,
CVAP)– Core Makeup Test Heated Recirculation Tests (F3POT)– Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test (F3POT)
4
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 5 of 27
LAR Scope
• LAR(s) will be submitted to delete the COL conditions requiring First Plant Only and First 3 Plant Only Tests for Vogtle 3&4
• The LAR technical evaluation will demonstrate– Adequacy of China QA program governing FPOT/F3POT– Acceptability of China FPOT/F3POT results– Applicability of China FPOT/F3POT results to Vogtle 3&4
5
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 6 of 27
COL Requirements for Pre-Operational FPOT
6
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 7 of 27
Proposed COL Changes
7
(2) Pre-operational Testing
(a) SNC shall perform the design-specific pre-operational tests identified below:
1. In-Containment Refueling Water Storage Tank (IRWST) Heatup Test (first plant test as identified in AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Item (h));
2. 1. Pressurizer Surge Line Stratification Evaluation (first plant test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.7 Item (d)) as revised by Amendment No. 83;
3. Reactor Vessel Internals Vibration Testing (first plant test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.9);
4. Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (first three plants test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w)); and
5. Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test (first three plants test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Item (s)).
b) SNC shall review and evaluate the results of the applicable tests identified in Section 2.D.(2)(a) of this license and confirm that these test results are within the range of acceptable values predicted or otherwise confirm that the tested systems perform their specified functions in accordance with AP1000 DCD Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9,
c) SNC shall notify the Director of NRO, or the Director’s designee, in writing, upon successful completion of the applicable design-specific pre-operational tests identified in Section 2.D.(2)(a) of this license; and
d) SNC shall notify the Director of NRO, or the Director’s designee, in writing, upon the successful completion of all the ITAAC included in Appendix C to this license.
Corresponding changes would be proposed to UFSAR
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 8 of 27
Licensing Changes Impacting FPOT Pre‐Operational TestsLAR-17-033 (155), Submitted Oct. 2017 IRWST HeatupNRC Approved LAR-16-011 (100) Aug. 2017
Pressurizer Surge Line Stratification Evaluation
LAR 125, Feb. 2018 Submittal Reactor Vessel Internals VibrationCMT Heated Recirculation (F3POT)ADS Blowdown (F3POT)Startup Tests
LAR-17-041 (84), Submitted Nov. 2017 Natural CirculationRCCA Out of Bank Load Follow Demo
LARs Impacting FPOT LAR Submittal
8
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 9 of 27
Proposed Path Forward
• Perform assessment of China Quality Assurance Program (complete)• Assess Sanmen test execution for pre-op tests (complete)• Evaluate Sanmen/Haiyang pre-op FPOT results (complete)• Evaluate Sanmen/Haiyang pre-op F3POT results (still need last F3POT reports from
recently completed Sanmen 2 tests)• Demonstrate applicability (LAR)• Revise FPOT/F3POT License Conditions (LAR)
9
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 10 of 27
Quality Assurance Program Assessment
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 11 of 27
Overview
• Comparison of Chinese Regulation to 10 CFR 50 Appendix B• Assessment of implementation
– Review of completed tests– Observations for future tests– Westinghouse/Customer interface during testing
11
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 12 of 27
Comparison of Chinese Regulation to 10 CFR 50 Appendix B
• Industry Subject Matter Expert compared requirements from China HAF 003-1991, “Safety Regulations for Quality Assurance of Nuclear Power Plants” to 10 CFR 50 Appendix B
• Concluded that requirements of HAF 003 are comparable to, and encompass, the requirements of Appendix B
12
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 13 of 27
Review of Completed Tests
• Test specifications (including acceptance criteria) are developed and approved by the design authority (Westinghouse)
• SNC completed a review of the completed test procedures at Sanmen/Haiyang for QA adherence– The review resulted in no impacts to the test results
• SNC will continue to monitor future tests
13
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 14 of 27
Applicability of China Tests to Vogtle 3&4
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 15 of 27
IRWST Heatup Licensing Commitments
15
UFSAR 14.2.5
IRWST Heatup Test (14.2.9.1.3 item (h))During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a natural circulation test of the passive residual heat removal (PRHR) heat exchanger is conducted (item f). For the first plant only, thermocouples are placed in the IRWST to observe the thermal profile developed during the heatup of the IRWST water during PRHR heat exchanger operation. This test will be useful in confirming the results of the AP600 Design Certification Program PRHR tests with regards to IRWST mixing, and is useful in quantifying the conservatism in the Chapter 15 transient analyses.
Due to the standardization of the AP1000, the heatup and thermal stratification characteristics of the IRWST will not vary from plant to plant. The PRHR heat exchanger design, and the size and configuration of the IRWST are standardized, such that the heatup characteristics will not significantly change from plant to plant.
Therefore, since the phenomenon to be tested (i.e., heatup and mixing characteristics of the IRWST) will not vary significantly from plant to plant due to standardization, a first plant only test of the IRWST heatup characteristics is justified.
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 16 of 27
• Proposed acceptance criteria for IRWST heat up test described in LAR-17-033 for UFSAR Section 14.2.9.1.3, item h):
The heatup characteristics of the in-containment refueling water storage tank water are verified by measuring the vertical water temperature gradient that occurs in the in-containment refueling water storage tank water at the passive residual heat removal heat exchanger tube bundle and at several distances from the tube bundle, during testing in Items f) [PRHR natural circulation preoperational test—required for all plants] and g) [PRHR forced flow test—required for all plants], above. Note that this verification is required only for the first plant. The acceptance criterion demonstrates that the average IRWST heatup is consistent with the PRHR heat transfer modeling in the Chapter 15 analysis. These results (in conjunction with Items f) and g)) are evaluated to demonstrate that the overall PRHR heat transfer performance, i.e., heat removal from the RCS, is conservative with respect to the analysis documented in Chapter 15.
IRWST Heatup Licensing Commitments (post LAR)
16
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 17 of 27
• The CVAP test program is described in UFSAR Subsection 3.9.2.4– The AP1000 reactor internals testing is part of a comprehensive vibration assessment program performed in accordance
with Regulatory Guide 1.20 – This testing obtains data to verify the structural integrity of the AP1000 reactor internals with regard to flow-induced
vibrations, as part of an internals vibration assessment program. – This program also includes visual examination of the reactor internals after testing is completed, and analysis of the test
data. • The program is directed toward confirming the long-term, steady-state vibration response of the
reactor internals for operating conditions.• LAR-125 to be submitted and will revise CVAP description from DCD Rev. 19 and align to CVAP
completed in China
CVAP Licensing Commitments
17
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 18 of 27
• During certification, NRC approved CVAP Topical Reports, containing methodology to measure, analyze, and inspect the reactor vessel internals for vibration, which are Incorporated by Reference (IBR) Documents, WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687
• However, CVAP methodology in IBR WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 needs to be revised:– Finalized reactor vessel internals (RVI) design is not incorporated
• WCAP-17983 and WCAP-17984 were created to update CVAP measurement, analysis, and inspection information – Methodology continues to comply with Reg. Guide 1.20– Incorporates the revised RVI design– Incorporates acoustical loads from the canned RCPs– Adds data collection points for RCS cooldown and pump speed reduction as part of test conditions during tested
shutdown conditions– WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 will be removed from UFSAR Table 1.6-1, retained as historical references in UFSAR
Chapter 3• WEC LAR-125 will propose replacing WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 with WCAP-17983 and
WCAP-17984
CVAP Licensing Commitments
18
LAR-125 proposed changes will align Vogtle CVAP with China CVAP
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 19 of 27
(UFSAR 14.2.5) Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w))
“During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a test is performed for each plant to verify the CMT inlet piping resistances. In addition, cold draining tests of the CMTs are conducted that verify the discharge piping resistance and proper drain rate of the CMTs for each plant. For the first three plants, two additional CMT tests are conducted during hot functional testing of the RCS. These tests are a natural circulation heatup of the CMTs followed by a test to verify the ability of the CMTs to transition from a recirculation mode to a draindownmode while at elevated temperature and pressure.Operation of the CMTs in their natural circulation mode is conducted on the first three plants only for the following reasons:
• Natural circulation of the CMTs will not vary from plant to plant, provided that the other verifications discussed above are performed as specified.
• Natural circulation testing of the CMTs was extensively tested as part of the Design Certification Tests.• Performance of this test results in significant thermal transients on Class 1 components including the
CMTs and the direct vessel injection nozzles.”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
19
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 20 of 27
UFSAR 14.2.9.1.3 Passive Core Cooling System Testing, Item (k):
“[Proper operation of the core makeup tanks to perform their reactor water makeup and borationfunction is verified by initiating recirculation flow through the tanks during hot functional testingwith the reactor coolant system at ≥ 530°F. This testing is initiated by simulating a safety signalwhich opens the tank discharge isolation valves, and stops reactor coolant pumps after theappropriate time delay. The proper tank recirculation flow after the pumps have coasted down isverified. Based on the cold leg temperature, CMT discharge temperature, and temperature CMTflow instrumentation, the net mass injection rate into the reactor is verified” Note that this verification is required only for the first three plants.]*
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
20
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 21 of 27
(UFSAR 14.2.5) Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w))
“During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a test is performed for each plant to verify the CMT inlet piping resistances. In addition, cold draining tests of the CMTs are conducted that verify the discharge piping resistance and proper drain rate of the CMTs for each plant. For the first three plants, two additional CMT tests are conducted during hot functional testing of the RCS. These tests are a natural circulation heatup of the CMTs followed by a test to verify the ability of the CMTs to transition from a recirculation mode to a draindownmode while at elevated temperature and pressure.Operation of the CMTs in their natural circulation mode is conducted on the first three plants only for the following reasons:
• Natural circulation of the CMTs will not vary from plant to plant, provided that the other verifications discussed above are performed as specified.
• Natural circulation testing of the CMTs was extensively tested as part of the Design Certification Tests.• Performance of this test results in significant thermal transients on Class 1 components including the
CMTs and the direct vessel injection nozzles.”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
21
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 22 of 27
UFSAR 14.2.9.1.3 Passive Core Cooling System Testing, Item (w):“[In conjunction with the verification of the core makeup tanks to perform their reactor water makeup function and boration function described in item k) above, the proper operation of the core makeup tanks to transition from their recirculation mode of operation to their draindown mode of operation after heatup will be verified. This testing will also verify the proper operation of the core makeup tank level instrumentation to operate during draining of the heated tank fluid. The in-containment refueling water storage tank initial level is reduced to atl east 3 feet below the spillway level as a prerequisite condition for this testing in order to provide sufficient ullage to accept the mass discharged from the reactor coolant system via the automatic depressurization stage 1.
The recirculation operation in Item k) above, should be continued until the core makeup tank fluid has been heated to≥ 350°F. The core makeup tank isolation valves are then closed, the reactor coolant pumps are started, and the reactor coolant system is reheated up to hot functional testing conditions. This testing is initiated by shutting off the reactor coolant pumps, opening the core makeup tank isolation valves, and by opening one of the automatic depressurization stage 1 flow paths to the in-containment refueling water storage tank. This will initiate a large loss of mass from the reactor coolant system, depressurization of the reactor coolant system to the bulk fluid saturation pressure, and additional recirculation through the core makeup tank. Core makeup tank draindown initiates in response to the continued depressurization and mass loss from the reactor coolant system. The automatic depressurization stage 1 flow path is closed after the core makeup tank level has decreased below the level at which stage 4 actuation occurs. Note that this verification is required only for the first three plants.]*”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
22
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 23 of 27
(UFSAR 14.2.5) ADS Blowdown Test (14.2.9.1.3 Item (s))“During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, the resistance of the automatic depressurization system Stage 1, 2, 3 flow path(s) is verified. For the first three plants only, an automatic depressurization blowdown test is performed to verify proper operation of the ADS valves, and demonstrate the proper operation of the ADS spargers to limit the hydrodynamic loads in containment to less than design limits. This test is performed on only the first three plants for the following reasons:• The operation of the ADS, and the resultant hydrodynamic loads will not vary significantly from
plant to plant.• Full scale automatic depressurization testing was performed in the AP600 Design Certification
Program. Testing was conducted to conservatively bound ADS flow rates and resultant hydrodynamic loads that will be experienced by the plant during ADS operation.
• Performance of this test results in significant thermal transients on Class 1 components including the primary components. It also results in hydrodynamic loads in containment including the IRWST.”
ADS Blowdown Test Licensing Commitments
23
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 24 of 27
UFSAR 14.2.9.1.3 Passive Core Cooling System Testing, Item (s):
“[During hot functional testing of the reactor coolant system, proper operation of automatic depressurization is verified by blowing down the reactor coolant system. This testing verifies proper operation of the stage 1, 2, and 3 components including the ability of the spargers to limit loads imposed on the in-containment refueling water storage tank by the blowdown. Proper operation of the stage 1, 2 and 3 valves is demonstrated during blowdown conditions. Note that this verification is required only for the first three plants.]*”
ADS Blowdown Test Licensing Commitments
24
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 25 of 27
Applicability of China Tests to Vogtle 3&4
• First Plant Only Tests performed at SM1/HY1 were successful• Test results from China have been reviewed for applicability to Vogtle 3&4• Applicability of the tests is shown through
– ITAAC– Design Control– Construction tolerances
Testing at China Sites establishes the unique phenomenological performance parameters of
the AP1000 design features
Testing at China Sites establishes the unique phenomenological performance parameters of
the AP1000 design features
25
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 26 of 27
Licensing Path Forward
• LAR(s) will be submitted to revise the COL conditions requiring First Plant Only and First 3 Plant Only Tests for Vogtle 3&4
• The LAR technical evaluation will demonstrate– Adequacy of China QA program governing FPOT/F3POT– Acceptability of China FPOT/F3POT results– Applicability of China FPOT/F3POT results to Vogtle 3&4
26
ND-18-0300 Enclosure 1 Page 27 of 27
Southern Nuclear Operating Company
ND-18-0300
Enclosure 2
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Units 3 and 4
Presentation Material:
Crediting First of Kind Testing from China AP1000 Units - Closed Meeting (Non-Proprietary)
(Enciosure 2 consist of 149 pages, including this cover page)
Crediting First of a Kind Testing from China AP1000 Units
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 2
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 3 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 2 of 149
Agenda
• Background• Quality Assurance Program Assessment• China Test Assessments
– In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank Heatup Test– Reactor Vessel Internal Vibration Testing – Core Makeup Test Heated Recirculation Tests – Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test
• Proposed LAR Schedule• Wrap Up
2
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 3
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 4 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 3 of 149
Background
• The VEGP 3&4 Combined Licenses (COLs) currently require First Plant Only Tests (FPOTs) and First Three Plant Only Tests (F3POTs) be performed on both Unit 3 and Unit 4
• If Licensee would like to credit a test performed at a previous plant (unit), a LAR is required.
• SNC would like to credit testing completed on the China AP1000 units
3
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 4
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 5 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 4 of 149
Background
• The SNC intent is to submit LARs covering China FPOT/F3POT applicability• The LAR scope will be split by:
– Pre-operational tests– Start-up tests
• The LAR scope being split allows for submittal of the first LAR while the remaining FPOT tests are being completed and/or vetted
• This presentation will cover the pre-operational testing scope for the first LAR– In-containment Refueling Water Storage Tank (IRWST) Heatup Test– Reactor Vessel Internal Vibration Testing (or Comprehensive Vibration Assessment Program,
CVAP)– Core Makeup Tank Test Heated Recirculation Tests (F3POT)– Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test (F3POT)
4
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 5
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 6 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 5 of 149
LAR Scope
• LAR(s) will be submitted to delete the COL conditions requiring First Plant Only and First 3 Plant Only Tests for Vogtle 3&4
• The LAR technical evaluation will demonstrate– Adequacy of China QA program governing FPOT/F3POT– Acceptability of China FPOT/F3POT results– Applicability of China FPOT/F3POT results to Vogtle 3&4
5
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 6
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 7 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 6 of 149
COL Requirements for Pre-Operational FPOT
6
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 7
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 8 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 7 of 149
Proposed COL Changes
7
(2) Pre-operational Testing
(a) SNC shall perform the design-specific pre-operational tests identified below:
1. In-Containment Refueling Water Storage Tank (IRWST) Heatup Test (first plant test as identified in AP1000 Design Control Document (DCD), Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Item (h));
2. 1. Pressurizer Surge Line Stratification Evaluation (first plant test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.7 Item (d)) as revised by Amendment No. 83;
3. Reactor Vessel Internals Vibration Testing (first plant test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.9);
4. Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (first three plants test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w)); and
5. Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test (first three plants test as identified in AP1000 DCD, Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9.1.3 Item (s)).
b) SNC shall review and evaluate the results of the applicable tests identified in Section 2.D.(2)(a) of this license and confirm that these test results are within the range of acceptable values predicted or otherwise confirm that the tested systems perform their specified functions in accordance with AP1000 DCD Rev. 19, Section 14.2.9,
c) SNC shall notify the Director of NRO, or the Director’s designee, in writing, upon successful completion of the applicable design-specific pre-operational tests identified in Section 2.D.(2)(a) of this license; and
d) SNC shall notify the Director of NRO, or the Director’s designee, in writing, upon the successful completion of all the ITAAC included in Appendix C to this license.
Corresponding changes would be proposed to UFSAR
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 8
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 9 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 8 of 149
Licensing Changes Impacting FPOT Pre‐Operational TestsLAR-17-033 (155), Submitted Oct. 2017 IRWST HeatupNRC Approved LAR-16-011 (100) Aug. 2017
Pressurizer Surge Line Stratification Evaluation
LAR 125, Feb. 2018 Submittal Reactor Vessel Internals VibrationCMT Heated Recirculation (F3POT)ADS Blowdown (F3POT)Startup Tests
LAR-17-041 (84), Submitted Nov. 2017 Natural CirculationRCCA Out of Bank Load Follow Demo
LARs Impacting FPOT LAR Submittal
8
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 9
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 10 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 9 of 149
Proposed Path Forward
• Perform assessment of China Quality Assurance Program (complete)• Assess Sanmen test execution for pre-op tests (complete)• Evaluate Sanmen/Haiyang pre-op FPOT results (complete)• Evaluate Sanmen/Haiyang pre-op F3POT results (still need last F3POT reports from
recently completed Sanmen 2 tests)• Demonstrate applicability (LAR)• Revise FPOT/F3POT License Conditions (LAR)
9
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 10
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 11 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 10 of 149
Proposed Schedule
10
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 11
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 12 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 11 of 149
Quality Assurance Program Assessment
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 12
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 13 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 12 of 149
Overview
• Comparison of Chinese Regulation to 10 CFR Appendix B• Assessment of implementation
– Review of completed tests– Observations for future tests– Westinghouse/Customer interface during testing
12
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 13
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 14 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 13 of 149
Comparison of Chinese Regulation to 10 CFR Appendix B
• Industry SME compared requirements from China HAF 003-1991, “Safety Regulations for Quality Assurance of Nuclear Power Plants” to 10 CFR 50 Appendix B
• Concluded that requirements of HAF 003 are comparable to and encompass the requirements of Appendix B with four exceptions
• For each exception, additional information is provided to demonstrate that as implemented the requirements are comparable
• With the supplemental information, the comparative analysis supports crediting AP1000 China FPOT testing for U.S. licensees
13
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 14
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 15 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 14 of 149
Comparison of Chinese Regulation to 10 CFR Appendix B
• Criterion VIII, Identification and Control of Material, Parts, and Components—HAF 003 “batch number” vs. Appendix B “heat number” have the same meaning
• Criterion XV, Nonconforming Materials, Parts, and Components—HAF 003 does not specifically address identification and documentation of nonconformances; however, this is addressed by HAD 003/03, “Quality Assurance in the Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plant”
• Criterion XVII, Quality Assurance Records—HAF 003 does not contain level of detail for inspection and test records that Appendix B does; however, test procedures have been reviewed and meet Appendix B requirements (e.g., data collector signature, calibration dates, results and acceptability)
• Criterion XVIII, Audits—HAF 003 requires review by the organization having responsibility in the area audited but Appendix B requires review of audit results by management of that organization; this is an interpretation difference and in practice audits are reviewed by management of the organization
14
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 15
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 16 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 15 of 149
Review of Completed Tests
• SNC completed a review of the completed test procedures at Sanmen/Haiyang for QA adherence
• Any potential issues that were identified were categorized based on potential impact and then dispositioned for any impacts on the test– The review resulted in no impacts to the test results
15
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 16
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 17 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 16 of 149
Observations of Tests
• Sanmen Unit 2 preop tests are complete• SNC had staff at Sanmen performed testing observations on F3POTs per NRC IP
70702, Part 52 Inspection of Preoperational Test Performance, including:o Verifying pretest requirements are meto Verify the test is conducted in accordance with the approved procedureo Test changes, anomalies, problems, interruptions and/or deficiencies are identified and
controlledo Observed data is properly recorded
o Startup Test observations will use portions of NRC IP 72304 criteria
16
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 17
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 18 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 17 of 149
Westinghouse/Customer Interface During Testing—Overview
– China Commissioning Organization– Test Procedure Development – Administrative Controls and Procedure Execution – Data Collection – Engineering Analysis
17
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 18
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 19 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 18 of 149
SITE STARTUP MANAGER
NI STARTUP MANAGER
SITE PROJECT DIRECTOR
TEST REVIEW BOARD
COORDINATION AND PLANNING MANAGEMENT
NI MECHANICAL LEAD SRTF I&C LEAD (NI) FLUSHING & HYDRO TEST LEAD
ELECTRICAL LEAD (NI)
DEPUTY NI STARTUP MANAGER
INTEGRATED TEST
China Commissioning Organization
18
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 19
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 20 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 19 of 149
Test Procedure Development
• Test specifications (including acceptance criteria) are approved by the design authority (WEC HQ engineering)
• Changes to the test specs are authorized and approved by design authority via E&DCR (Engineering and Design Coordination Reports)
• Development of the test procedures for the PXS FPOT/F3POT performed by China ITP and WEC Engineering (Systems, I&C, Safety Analysis)
• Prior to approval of the PXS FPOT/F3POT procedures, final drafts were reviewed and executed in the WEC HQ Simulator.
19
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 20
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 21 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 20 of 149
Test Procedure Development
• Final procedures were presented to the Test Review Board (TRB) by ITP Test Engineers. TRB approves all safety related test procedures and major changes to the previously approved procedures.
• TRB was led by WEC Commissioning Manager also included a required member of WEC engineering.
• All minor changes made to the existing procedures following their final approval by the TRB were signed and approved by WEC Personnel
20
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 21
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 22 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 21 of 149
Administrative Controls and Procedure Execution
Administrative Control Program under Owner QA program. Procedures were jointly developed, reviewed and approved by WEC and Owner for items such as:
Conduct of Testing Test Deficiencies/ResolutionsProcedure development Test Review Board Human Performance Qualification and Training
Procedure Execution • Simulator sessions with Operations, WEC ITP and WEC Engineering• Tests led by WEC Test Coordinators• WEC Test Engineers directly involved with testing
21
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 22
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 23 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 22 of 149
Data Collection
• Prior to FPOT/F3POT WEC ITP, WEC Engineering and Owner walked-down instrumentation to ensure proper installation
• Calibration record for temporary instrumentation used for the Engineering analysis was provided by the Owner.
• All settings (filters, conversion factors,…) in the Data Acquisition (DAQ) system were reviewed by WEC ITP and WEC Engineering prior to tests requiring the use of the DAQ
22
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 23
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 24 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 23 of 149
Engineering Analysis
• Test data was collected by WEC ITP and provided to WEC Engineering for post test analysis
• WEC PXS System experts reviewed all of the test data and performed engineering analysis used as an input to Safety Analysis
• WEC Safety Analysis compared the test data with the predictive analysis models. Test success/failure declared by the WEC Safety Analysis
• Test report for each PXS FPOT/F3POT included WEC Engineering and WEC Safety Analysis reports under WEC QA Program
23
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 24
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 25 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 24 of 149
IRWST Heatup Test
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 25
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 26 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 25 of 149
Agenda
25
– Brief overview of the PXS/RCS– IRWST heatup licensing commitments– Licensing commitment background– IRWST heatup test background– LOFTRAN model vs. test data– Critical design/construction parameters of the PRHR heat transfer/IRWST heatup
tests– China versus US AP1000 PXS/RCS design– Controls of the design and system performance variability – Introduction of the PRHR heat transfer/IRWST heatup tests – Test equipment– Review and comparison of the Sanmen 1/Haiyang 1 test results– Vogtle 3&4
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 26
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 27 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 26 of 149
Overview of the PXS/RCS
26
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 27
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 28 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 27 of 149
In-containment refueling water storage tank (IRWST)
Passive Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger (PRHR HX)
PRHR HX Inlet Line
PRHR HX Outlet Line
Overview of the PXS/RCS
27
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 28
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 29 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 28 of 149
IRWST Heatup Licensing Commitments
28
UFSAR 14.2.5
IRWST Heatup Test (14.2.9.1.3 item (h))During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a natural circulation test of the passive residual heat removal (PRHR) heat exchanger is conducted (item f). For the first plant only, thermocouples are placed in the IRWST to observe the thermal profile developed during the heatup of the IRWST water during PRHR heat exchanger operation. This test will be useful in confirming the results of the AP600 Design Certification Program PRHR tests with regards to IRWST mixing, and is useful in quantifying the conservatism in the Chapter 15 transient analyses.
Due to the standardization of the AP1000, the heatup and thermal stratification characteristics of the IRWST will not vary from plant to plant. The PRHR heat exchanger design, and the size and configuration of the IRWST are standardized, such that the heatup characteristics will not significantly change from plant to plant.
Therefore, since the phenomenon to be tested (i.e., heatup and mixing characteristics of the IRWST) will not vary significantly from plant to plant due to standardization, a first plant only test of the IRWST heatup characteristics is justified.
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 29
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 30 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 29 of 149
• Proposed acceptance criteria for IRWST heat up test described in LAR-17-033 for UFSAR Section 14.2.9.1.3, item h):
The heatup characteristics of the in-containment refueling water storage tank water are verified by measuring the vertical water temperature gradient that occurs in the in-containment refueling water storage tank water at the passive residual heat removal heat exchanger tube bundle and at several distances from the tube bundle, during testing in Items f) [PRHR natural circulation preoperational test—required for all plants] and g) [PRHR forced flow test—required for all plants], above. Note that this verification is required only for the first plant. The acceptance criterion demonstrates that the average IRWST heatup is consistent with the PRHR heat transfer modeling in the Chapter 15 analysis. These results (in conjunction with Items f) and g)) are evaluated to demonstrate that the overall PRHR heat transfer performance, i.e., heat removal from the RCS, is conservative with respect to the analysis documented in Chapter 15.
IRWST Heatup Licensing Commitments (post LAR)
29
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 30
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 31 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 30 of 149
IRWST Heatup Test Background
30
– During Hot Functional testing (HFT), two tests are performed to confirm the heat transfer capability of the PRHR HX:
1. PRHR Natural Circulation Test2. PRHR Forced Flow test
– IRWST heatup characteristics analyzed in Safety Analysis when PRHR HX is actuated– The IRWST heatup is measured during both of these tests
Objective of these two PRHR tests and IRWST heatup profile:
Confirm that overall LOFTRAN heat transfer model is conservative and phenomena are well understood(i.e. no critical phenomena that requires changes to analytical methods or inputs.)
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 31
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 32 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 31 of 149
LOFTRAN Model vs. Test Data
31
– LOFTRAN Model1. PRHR Flow Rate2. The Overall PRHR Heat Transfer Coefficient 3. IRWST “bulk mass” modeled with single node
– Test Data1. PRHR Flow Rate2. PRHR Heat Transfer Rate 3. IRWST temperature measured at different
elevations and locationsa,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 32
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 33 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 32 of 149
Critical design/construction parameters
32
– The overall LOFTRAN PRHR heat transfer model for the non-LOCA events is fully characterized by the following variables:
1. PRHR Flow Rate2. The Overall PRHR Heat Transfer Coefficient 3. Free IRWST Volume
– Critical design/construction attributes for the overall LOFTRAN PRHR Heat Transfer model:1. PRHR HX design including inlet and outlet channel heads2. PRHR inlet and outlet piping and fittings/valves design3. Location of the PRHR HX relative to hot/cold legs and SG4. Free IRWST volume
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 33
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 34 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 33 of 149
China vs. US AP1000 PXS/RCS design
33
– Major PXS/RCS components at SM1/HY1/SV3/SV4 such as Reactor Vessel, Pressurizer, Steam Generators, Reactor Coolant Pumps, PRHR HX (including inlet and outlet channel heads) are:
1. Manufactured to the same design spec2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– The RCS pressure boundary piping, including PRHR inlet outline lines:1. Manufactured to the same design specification2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– The design of the IRWST (structural modules CA01, CA02, CA03, CA55, CA56 and CA57) is the same in China and the US
– Location/elevation of the PRHR HX relative to Hot/Cold legs and SG is also the same.
PXS/RCS design is the same at Vogtle 3&4, Sanmen 1 and Haiyang 1
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 34
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 35 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 34 of 149
PRHR heat transfer/IRWST heatup tests
34
• PRHR forced flow test– RCPs are running at 50% speed– RCS is at 350oF, IRWST at ~ 80oF– Test initiated by opening PXS-V108B – Test terminated when RCS reaches 250oF– Engineering acceptance criteria: overall PRHR heat
transfer performance• PRHR natural circulation test
– RCPs are initially running at 100% speed– RCS hot leg is at ≥ 540oF, IRWST at ~ 80oF– Trip RCPs– Test initiated by opening V108B immediately after RCP trip– Test terminated when RCS hot leg < 420oF– Engineering acceptance criteria: overall PRHR heat
transfer performance
PXS-V108B
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 35
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 36 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 35 of 149
Test equipment
35
Temporary:
• IRWST Data Acquisition System (DAQ)• Associated cabling• Mounting fixtures• Calibration records have been reviewed prior the tests• Instrumentation walk-downs performed prior to the tests
Permanent plant instrumentation:• Thermocouples PXS-JE-TE064 and RCS-JE-TE161• RCS PT measuring the RCS/PRHR loop pressure• PRHR flow element (pitot tube)• Calibration of permanent plant instrumentation was
performed under Owner calibration program • Owner calibration processes were under jurisdictional
controls of the component testing program
a,c
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 36
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 37 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 36 of 149
Test equipment
36
a,c
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 37
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 38 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 37 of 149
Review of the SM1/HY1 test results
37
– Sanmen Unit 1 has successfully performed
1. PRHR heat transfer natural circulation test, 2. PRHR forced flow test and 3. IRWST heatup characteristics measurements.
– Haiyang 1 has successfully performed:
1. PRHR heat transfer natural circulation test, 2. PRHR forced flow test 3. Haiyang 1 did not measure IRWST heatup, IRWST heatup is FPOT
Results of the Safety Analysis show:
LOFTRAN heat removal model is conservative with respect to Chapter 15 non-LOCA analysis Additional margin for the min PRHR HX heat transfer capability for both Sanmen and Haiyang
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 38
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 39 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 38 of 149
SM1 IRWST heatup profile (forced flow)
38
Heat propagates throughout the tank Bulk heatup of the tank
IRWST Heatup profile is fully characterized
a,ca,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 39
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 40 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 39 of 149
Permanent plant IRWST temp. SM1/HY1
39
Similar trends between SM1/HY1 Consistent with temporary instrumentation
a,c a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 40
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 41 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 40 of 149
SM1 vs. HY1 PRHR heat transfer
40
– Instrumentation uncertainty is accounted for in the test results– Uncertainty models developed per the ASME PTC 19.1-2005– Total average uncertainty on the flow is ~ 2%– Total average uncertainty on the heat transfer ~ 3%– Difference in heat transfer between the two units ~ 3%-4%
Reproducibility of the test results• same boundary conditions • same test methods
IRWST heatup characteristics similar between the two units
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 41
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 42 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 41 of 149
Controls of the design and system performance variability
41
Controls of the plant to plant variability and system performance insuring that the phenomena tested will remain unchanged:– Procurement control: Same design specification– Construction control:
1. Same installation tolerances 2. Same installation specifications3. ITAACs on PRHR elevation/location and IRWST volume:
• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08b.02 (PRHR center line elevation)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08c.vi.03 (PRHR inlet line sloping)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08c.iv.04 (PRHR outlet line to SG elevation)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08c.iii (IRWST volume)
– Component tests: not relevant to the control of the IRWST heatup characteristics – Pre-operational tests same for all plants:
1. ITAAC No. No. 2.2.03.08b.01 (PRHR Heat Transfer Capability, Natural Circulation Test)2. PRHR forced flow test (IST per the Table 3.9-17 of the UFSAR)
Variability of the boundary conditions and PRHR performance from plant to plant is controlled
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 42
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 43 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 42 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
42
– Tests performed at SM1/HY1 were successful:
IRWST heatup phenomenon is fully characterized
No new phenomena identified that could challenge design and analysis basis or methods
LOFTRAN heat transfer model is conservative with respect to Chapter 15 non-LOCA analysis
– Boundary conditions and geometry are preserved at Vogtle 3&4:
– Vogtle 3&4 will perform PRHR natural circulation heat transfer and IST
– Reproducibility of the heat transfer results demonstrated at SM1/HY1
IRWST heatup characteristics are expected to be similar at Vogtle 3&4 => temporary IRWST instrumentation not necessary
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 43
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 44 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 43 of 149
Crediting China CVAP
Westinghouse Advanced Reactor Internals Design and Analysis (ARIDA)
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 44
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 45 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 44 of 149
– CVAP licensing commitments– Brief overview of the Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI)– CVAP test background– Predictive model vs. test data– Critical design/construction parameters of the CVAP test– China versus US AP1000 RVI design– Introduction of the CVAP test – Test equipment– Review of the Sanmen 1 test results– Vogtle 3&4
Agenda
44
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 45
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 46 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 45 of 149
• The CVAP test program is described in UFSAR Subsection 3.9.2.4– The AP1000 reactor internals testing is part of a comprehensive vibration assessment program performed in accordance
with Regulatory Guide 1.20 – This testing obtains data to verify the structural integrity of the AP1000 reactor internals with regard to flow-induced
vibrations, as part of an internals vibration assessment program. – This program also includes visual examination of the reactor internals after testing is completed, and analysis of the test
data.
• The program is directed toward confirming the long-term, steady-state vibration response of the reactor internals for operating conditions.
• LAR-125 to be submitted and will revise CVAP description from DCD Rev. 19 and align to CVAP completed in China
CVAP Licensing Commitments
45
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 46
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 47 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 46 of 149
• During certification, NRC approved CVAP Topical Reports, containing methodology to measure, analyze, and inspect the reactor vessel internals for vibration, which are Incorporated by Reference (IBR) Documents, WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687
• However, CVAP methodology in IBR WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 is not up to date:– Finalized reactor vessel internals (RVI) design is not incorporated
• WCAP-17983 and WCAP-17984 were created to update CVAP measurement, analysis, and inspection information – Methodology continues to comply with Reg. Guide 1.20– Incorporates the revised RVI design– Incorporates acoustical loads from the canned RCPs– Adds data collection points for RCS cooldown and pump speed reduction as part of test conditions during tested
shutdown conditions– WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 will be removed from UFSAR Table 1.6-1, retained as historical references in UFSAR
Chapter 3
• WEC LAR 125 will propose replacing WCAP-15949 and WCAP-16687 with WCAP-17983 and WCAP-17984
CVAP Licensing Commitments
46
LAR-125 proposed changes will align Vogtle CVAP with China CVAP
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 47
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 48 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 47 of 149
Background on Structural Components
47
• Reactor Vessel– Reactor pressure boundary– 2 x 4 reactor coolant loop arrangement– Supported at inlet nozzles– Ledge at the top of reactor vessel shell
is interface / support for reactor internals
• Lower RVI Assembly– Core barrel (CB) – shell, flange, lower
core support plate (LCSP)– Core shroud (CS) – base plate bolted
and pinned to top of LCSP– Secondary core support structure
(SCSS) – bolted to bottom of LCSP– Components bolted to exterior of core
barrel – neutron shield panels, specimen baskets, DVI deflectors
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 48
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 49 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 48 of 149
• Upper RVI Assembly– Upper support assembly (USA)– Upper core plate (UCP)– Upper support columns (USC)– Lower and upper guide tubes
(LGT, UGT)• Instrumentation Grid Assembly (IGA)
– IGA plate– Quickloc stalk assemblies– Instrumentation guide tubes (IITA)
Background on Structural Components
48
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 49
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 50 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 49 of 149
Instrumentation on Reactor Vessel
49
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 50
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 51 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 50 of 149
Lower Reactor Vessel Internals
50
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 51
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 52 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 51 of 149
Lower Reactor Vessel Internals
51
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 52
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 53 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 52 of 149
Upper Reactor Vessel Internals
52
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 53
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 54 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 53 of 149
Upper Reactor Vessel Internals
53
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 54
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 55 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 54 of 149
Instrumented Grid Assembly (IGA)
54
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 55
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 56 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 55 of 149
CVAP Predictive Methodology
55
• Full-scale and model-scale test and operating plant data are used as sources for model and forcing function benchmarking.
Analysis Methodologya,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 56
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 57 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 56 of 149
RESM & Predictive Models vs. Actual Plant and Dataa,c
56
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 57
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 58 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 57 of 149
CVAP Predictive Methodology
57
• CVAP RVI configuration and flow conditions – Appropriate representations of the RVI configuration – Covers flow conditions during normal operation and start-up– Analyses cover both linear and non-linear phenomena (However, no non-linear phenomena
predicted to occur for normal operation and start-up)
• Structural response predictions developed for both sensor locations and maximum response locations– Maximum response as related to maximum stress locations for a given instrumented component
• All predictive models, predictions, and reports are the same for both U.S. and China plants (No plant-specific predictions)
• Positive CVAP margins are predicted for all components– Predictions confirm the structural integrity of the AP1000 RVI for flow-induced vibration during
steady-state and anticipated transient conditions for HFT and normal operation
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 58
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 59 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 58 of 149
Critical Operational / Design Parameters
58
– Forcing function models are fully characterized by the following variables:
1. Cover all normal operating and start-up conditions 2. Cover broad array of forcing function types
» Turbulence (channel, jetting, buffeting, etc.)» Acoustics (RCP blade passing and harmonics, system acoustic modes)» Fluid elastic instabilities, gap-flow instabilities, vortex shedding and lock-in, base-loads
– Critical design/construction of dynamic (structural) system and sub-component models:
1. All system structural boundary conditions including RCS piping, RV, RV supports and integrated head package. Account for responses with and without fuel loaded.2. All RVI components modeled – system & component level structural coupling3. Account for full system hydrodynamic coupling4. Dynamic analyses – time dependent/frequency-dependent
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 59
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 60 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 59 of 149
China vs. US AP1000 RCS and RVI Design
59
– Major components at SM1/HY1/SV3/SV4 such as Reactor Vessel, Reactor Vessel Internals, Pressurizer, Steam Generators, Reactor Coolant Pumps, primary piping (including supports) are:
1. Manufactured to the same design spec2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– RCS pressure boundary piping, including the reactor vessel are:1. Manufactured to the same design spec2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– Detailed design of the reactor vessel internals (e.g., core barrel, core shroud, neutron pads and specimen baskets, etc.) are the same in China and the US
– No major as-built differences for Sanmen and Haiyang compared to the generic design– As-built configurations for Vogtle 3 & 4 will be reconciled with generic design to confirm the applicability of
the CVAP predictive analyses and results
RVI, RV and RCS designs are the same at Vogtle 3&4, Sanmen 1 and Haiyang 1
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 60
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 61 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 60 of 149
CVAP Test Conditions
60
• HFT – Forced flow test
– Repeated measured data over range of conditions– Engineering acceptance criteria – related to endurance limit for high-cycle fatigue
• Over all RCS operational flows and temperatures• Including transient startup/shutdown
• Test Conduct and Data Recording– Data recorded during steady-state and transient conditions for start-up/heat-up, normal
operation, cooldown, and shutdown– Procedures conducted and completed in accordance with Westinghouse QA program.
• Instrumentation calibrations, DAQ calibrations, connectorization, etc.• Data recording procedures and logs• Pre- and Post-inspection procedures
– Collection and correlation in-time with RCS recorded parameters
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 61
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 62 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 61 of 149
CVAP Test Conditions
61
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 62
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 63 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 62 of 149
CVAP Test Conditions
62
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 63
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 64 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 63 of 149
CVAP Test Conditions
63
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 64
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 65 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 64 of 149
Test Equipment
64
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 65
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 66 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 65 of 149
Test Equipment
65
Instrumented Components:• Core Barrel• Core Shroud• Secondary Core Support Structure• Lower Guide Tube• Upper Guide Tube• Upper Support Column• Upper Support Assembly• IGA Components
Data Recording:• All data recorded synchronously• Long recording times to minimize
measurement error (30 to 90 min.)• CVAP data correspondence and
correlation with plant data
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 66
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 67 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 66 of 149
CVAP Inspection Program
66
CVAP Inspections
• CVAP Inspection program consists of inspections of the RVI Pre- and Post- Hot Functional Testing– Includes tabulation of all RVI components and local inspection areas– Includes description of inspection procedures including the following:
• Inspection methods• Documentation• Access provisions• Any specialized equipment
• Inspection criteria: – Loose parts, debris, abnormal corrosion products, structural distortion or displacement of parts, loss of integrity at
clamped joints, loss of integrity of supporting elements, cracks in welds, abnormal or unexpected wear.– Inspection locations have written inspection results and photographic records
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 67
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 68 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 67 of 149
CVAP Inspection Program
67
CVAP Inspections (cont’d)
• Pre-HFT Inspections: Inspections at each plant provide baseline for comparison of post-HFT inspection results
• Post-HFT Inspections: Inspection results for both Sanmen 1 (instrumented CVAP) and Haiyang 1 (non-instrumented CVAP) indicate the inspection locations met the inspection criteria
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 68
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 69 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 68 of 149
Summary of the SM1/HY1 CVAP Test Results
68
– Sanmen Unit 1 has successfully performed
1. RCS cold hydro-test2. Instrumented Hot Functional Test (HFT)3. Reactor vessel and reactor internals inspections before and after HFT
– Haiyang 1 has successfully performed:
1. RCS cold hydro-test2. Non-instrumented HFT3. Reactor vessel and reactor internals inspections before and after HFT
Results of the CVAP Results and Analyses show:
RVI FIV modeling/prediction results are conservative with respect to high cycle fatigue endurance limit Significant measured high cycle fatigue margin for reactor internal components No significant inspection anomalies observed for either Sanmen I or Haiyang I
Instrumented CVAP
Non-Instrumented CVAP
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 69
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 70 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 69 of 149
Predictions and Measurements
Summary:• Generally good correspondence between predicted
and measured modal shapes and frequencies
• Predictions bound measurements for total RMS response
• Predicted spectral responses predominantly bound measured spectral responses
– Where measurements were higher in level, the results on the total RMS stress were trivial:
• At higher frequencies, which are not relevant to stress/ displacement (levels did not contribute to overall RMS stress)
• Due to non-RVI dynamic response noise levels (e.g., sensor noise)
a,c
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 70
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 71 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 70 of 149
Acceptance Criteria and Measured Responses
70
Summary:• Positive (+) margin for all
components
• Includes measurement uncertainties
• Includes conservatisms in acceptance criteria
• All inspections meet inspection criteria (no unexpected results)
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 71
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 72 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 71 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
– CVAPs performed at SM1/HY1 were successful: FIV response and subsequent high cycle fatigue performance fully characterized
No new phenomena identified that could challenge design and analysis basis or methods RESM FIV model results are conservative with respect to reactor internals vibratory measurements Measured results are conservative and bounded by the acceptance criteria (inspection results as expected)
– Boundary conditions and geometry are preserved at Vogtle 3&4:1. At Vogtle, all major reactor vessel internals components and RCS components designs are the same as at SM1. As-
builts will be reconciled with the generic design.2. Construction ITAACs related to the installation/location of the RCS/RV/RVI:
• ITAAC No. 2.1.02.01 (Inspection of As-built System – RCS functional arrangement)• ITAAC No. 2.1.03.01 (Inspection of As-built System – RXS functional arrangement)• ITAAC No. 2.1.03.02a (Inspection of As-built System – Fuel assembly positions and CRDMs)• ITAAC No. 2.1.03.02b (Inspection of As-built System – Control assemblies and drive rods)• ITAAC No. 2.1.03.02c (Inspection of As-built System – Reactor Vessel Arrangement)
– Vogtle 3&4 will perform a non-instrumented CVAP as specified in Reg. Guide 1.20 Rev. 2 • ITAAC No. 2.1.03.07.i (Flow testing of RVI)• ITAAC No. 2.1.03.07.ii (Inspection of RVI)
Reactor Vessel Internals FIV and high cycle fatigue characteristics at Vogtle 3&4 are expected to be similar to SM171
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 72
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 73 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 72 of 149
CMT Recirculation
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 73
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 74 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 73 of 149
– Brief overview of the PXS/RCS– Overview of the Core Makeup Tank– CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments– Test objectives and predictive analysis – NOTRUMP model vs. test data– Critical design/construction parameters of the CMT recirculation test– China versus US AP1000 PXS/RCS design– Introduction of the CMT recirculation test– Test equipment– Review and comparison of the Sanmen 1/Haiyang 1 test results– Controls of the design and system performance variability – Vogtle 3&4
CMT Recirculation Test Agenda
73
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 74
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 75 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 74 of 149
Overview of the PXS/RCS
74
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 75
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 76 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 75 of 149
Overview of the PXS/RCS
75
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 76
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 77 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 76 of 149
Overview of the Core Makeup Tank
76
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 77
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 78 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 77 of 149
(UFSAR 14.2.5) Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w))
“During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a test is performed for each plant to verify the CMT inlet piping resistances. In addition, cold draining tests of the CMTs are conducted that verify the discharge piping resistance and proper drain rate of the CMTs for each plant. For the first three plants, two additional CMT tests are conducted during hot functional testing of the RCS. These tests are a natural circulation heatup of the CMTs followed by a test to verify the ability of the CMTs to transition from a recirculation mode to a draindown mode while at elevated temperature and pressure.Operation of the CMTs in their natural circulation mode is conducted on the first three plants only for the following reasons:
• Natural circulation of the CMTs will not vary from plant to plant, provided that the other verifications discussed above are performed as specified.
• Natural circulation testing of the CMTs was extensively tested as part of the Design Certification Tests.• Performance of this test results in significant thermal transients on Class 1 components including the
CMTs and the direct vessel injection nozzles.”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
77
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 78
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 79 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 78 of 149
UFSAR 14.2.9.1.3 Passive Core Cooling System Testing, Item (k):
“[Proper operation of the core makeup tanks to perform their reactor water makeup and boration
function is verified by initiating recirculation flow through the tanks during hot functional testing
with the reactor coolant system at ≥ 530°F. This testing is initiated by simulating a safety signal
which opens the tank discharge isolation valves, and stops reactor coolant pumps after the
appropriate time delay. The proper tank recirculation flow after the pumps have coasted down is
verified. Based on the cold leg temperature, CMT discharge temperature, and temperature CMT
flow instrumentation, the net mass injection rate into the reactor is verified” Note that this verification is required only for the first three plants.]*
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
78
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 79
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 80 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 79 of 149
Test objectives and predictive analysis
79
– Objectives of the CMT Recirculation Test is to demonstrate CMT makeup and boration functions – The SBLOCA NOTRUMP model is used to predict CMT flow rates and CMT temperature distribution for the
test– AP1000 Standard Plant procedure for the test was issued in HQ and localized in China– NOTRUMP model simulates test procedure steps for the test setup and test execution– NOTRUMP simulations were performed with min and max CMT line resistances providing a bounding
cases for the actual test– Variation of the initial conditions used for the simulations and as performed test were technically assessed
Direct comparison of the test results and NOTRUMP model
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 80
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 81 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 80 of 149
Critical design/construction parameters
80
– Critical design/construction attributes for the CMT temperature distribution and CMT injection flow rates:
1. CMT Balance Line design (line resistance and layout)2. CMT design (geometry, volume, location)3. CMT Injection Line (line resistance and layout)4. Direct Vessel Injection (DVI) Line design (line resistance, layout)
– Several preoperational line resistance tests are performed prior to CMT Recirculation test:
1. Line resistance test of the CMT Balance line RNS is used to fill up the CMT through the CMT Balance Line
2. Line resistance test of the CMT Injection and DVI lines CMT injections tests performed at “cold” RCS conditions Orifices located in the CMT injection lines are sized to meet the ITAAC
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 81
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 82 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 81 of 149
China vs. US AP1000 PXS/RCS design
81
– Major PXS/RCS components at SM1/HY1/SM2/SV3/SV4 such as Reactor Vessel, Pressurizer, Steam Generators, Reactor Coolant Pumps, CMT and Accumulators:
1. Manufactured to the same design specification2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– The RCS pressure boundary piping, including CMT Balance line, CMT injection line and DVI line:1. Manufactured to the same design specification2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– Layout of the CMT Balance line, CMT, CMT injection and DVI lines is the same
PXS/RCS design is the same at Vogtle 3&4, Sanmen 1 and Haiyang 1
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 82
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 83 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 82 of 149
CMT Recirculation test
82
CMT recirculation test
PXS-V108B
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 83
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 84 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 83 of 149
Test equipment
83
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 84
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 85 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 84 of 149
UFM and DP cell calibration
84
– CMT Injection lines do not meet ideal layout requirements for the UFMs.– Site calibration of the UFMs was required to fully characterize measurement uncertainties
Four CMT injections (two per tank) performed at cold RCS conditions CMT temperature was preserved Difference in pressure between actual test and calibration was accounted for UFM response was compared to reference flow (CMT maps) Calibration factors for the UFMs were calculated
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 85
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 86 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 85 of 149
UFM and DP cell calibration
85
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 86
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 87 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 86 of 149
UFM and DP cell calibration
86
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 87
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 88 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 87 of 149
UFM and DP cell calibration
87
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 88
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 89 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 88 of 149
Review of the SM1/HY1 test results
88
– Sanmen Unit 1 and Haiyang 1 has successfully performed CMT Recirculation test.
– Comparison between the test results and NOTRUMP model show that:
Overall good agreement on the CMT recirculation flow rates
Actual CMT temperature profile matched expectations
Similar RCS depressurization trend
Predictive analysis (NOTRUMP) demonstrates that the Safety Analysis acceptance criteria for the CMT Recirculation test are met
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 89
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 90 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 89 of 149
NOTRUMP Model vs. Test Data
89
– NOTRUMP Model1. Predicts Min and Max CMT Flow Rates with
similar initial conditions as the actual test 2. CMT temperature distribution predicted at the
same locations as the test
– Example of initial conditions test & code
– Test Data1. CMT Flow Rate measured using UFMs and
Pressure Transmitters2. CMT Temperature measured at 3 different
locations in the CMTs
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 90
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 91 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 90 of 149
Review of the SM1/HY1 test results
90
– SM1 and HY1 CMT Recirculation flow rates
1. Good agreement between NOTRUMP and test between 100s-600s.
2. Slight divergence after 600s due to numerical diffusion and simplified modeling of the CMT geometry in NOTRUMP.
3. NOTRUMP overmixes (gradual temperature increase throughout the tank) in the control volumes reducing the driving head over time.
4. Difference in CMT geometry between the actual and modeled. NOTRUMP models right cylinder with constant flow area.
5. Time to displace the half of the CMT volume remains similar between NOTRUMP and test results.
Overall good agreement between NOTRUMP and SM1/HY1 test results
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 91
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 92 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 91 of 149
Review of the SM1/HY1 test results
91
– SM1 and HY1 CMT temperature profile
1. Expected lack of stratification in NOTRUMP due to numerical diffusion of the hotter fluid into lower CMT nodes.
2. NOTRUMP prediction consistent with the AP600 validation report for the CMT performance during SBLOCA.
3. Test results do not invalidate NOTRUMP model for the CMT temperature profile.
SM1 and HY1 temperature profile of the CMTs is consistent with the AP600 separate effect and integral effect tests.
Numerical mixing in NOTRUMP causing the divergence between test results and code prediction does not impact overall CMT performance
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 92
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 93 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 92 of 149
Controls of the design and system performance variability
92
Controls of the plant to plant variability and system performance insuring that the natural circulation in the CMTs will remain unchanged:– Procurement control: Same design specification
1. ITAACs on the CMT volume: ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08vi.– Construction control:
1. Same installation tolerances 2. Same installation specifications
– Pre-operational tests:1. RCP trip following CMT actuation is tested in the PMS pre-op program 2. Pressurizer heaters trip following CMT actuation is tested under PMS pre-op program 3. ITAACs on the balance line resistance, injection line resistance:
• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08cii (CMT Balance Line resistance)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08ci (CMT Injection Line resistance)
Variability of the boundary conditions from plant to plant is controlled ensuring consistent CMT performance
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 93
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 94 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 93 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
93
– Tests performed at SM1/HY1 were successful:
CMT Recirculation/natural circulation is fully characterized and consistent with the AP600 testing
No new phenomena identified that could challenge design and analysis basis or methods
Test results consistent with NOTRUMP predictive analysis
– Boundary conditions and geometry are preserved at Vogtle 3&4:
– Vogtle 3&4 will perform line resistance tests (ITAACs)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08cii (CMT Balance Line resistance)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08ci (CMT Injection Line resistance)
– Reproducibility of the natural circulation demonstrated at SM1/HY1
CMT flow rates and CMT temp profile are expected to be similar at Vogtle 3&4
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 94
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 95 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 94 of 149
(UFSAR 14.2.5) Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w))
“During preoperational testing of the passive core cooling system, a test is performed for each plant to verify the CMT inlet piping resistances. In addition, cold draining tests of the CMTs are conducted that verify the discharge piping resistance and proper drain rate of the CMTs for each plant. For the first three plants, two additional CMT tests are conducted during hot functional testing of the RCS. These tests are a natural circulation heatup of the CMTs followed by a test to verify the ability of the CMTs to transition from a recirculation mode to a draindown mode while at elevated temperature and pressure.Operation of the CMTs in their natural circulation mode is conducted on the first three plants only for the following reasons:
• Natural circulation of the CMTs will not vary from plant to plant, provided that the other verifications discussed above are performed as specified.
• Natural circulation testing of the CMTs was extensively tested as part of the Design Certification Tests.• Performance of this test results in significant thermal transients on Class 1 components including the
CMTs and the direct vessel injection nozzles.”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
94
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 95
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 96 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 95 of 149
UFSAR 14.2.9.1.3 Passive Core Cooling System Testing, Item (w):“[In conjunction with the verification of the core makeup tanks to perform their reactor water makeup function and boration function described in item k) above, the proper operation of the core makeup tanks to transition from their recirculation mode of operation to their draindown mode of operation after heatup will be verified. This testing will also verify the proper operation of the core makeup tank level instrumentation to operate during draining of the heated tank fluid. The in-containment refueling water storage tank initial level is reduced to atl east 3 feet below the spillway level as a prerequisite condition for this testing in order to provide sufficient ullage to accept the mass discharged from the reactor coolant system via the automatic depressurization stage 1.
The recirculation operation in Item k) above, should be continued until the core makeup tank fluid has been heated to≥ 350°F. The core makeup tank isolation valves are then closed, the reactor coolant pumps are started, and the reactor coolant system is reheated up to hot functional testing conditions. This testing is initiated by shutting off the reactor coolant pumps, opening the core makeup tank isolation valves, and by opening one of the automatic depressurization stage 1 flow paths to the in-containment refueling water storage tank. This will initiate a large loss of mass from the reactor coolant system, depressurization of the reactor coolant system to the bulk fluid saturation pressure, and additional recirculation through the core makeup tank. Core makeup tank draindown initiates in response to the continued depressurization and mass loss from the reactor coolant system. The automatic depressurization stage 1 flow path is closed after the core makeup tank level has decreased below the level at which stage 4 actuation occurs. Note that this verification is required only for the first three plants.]*”
CMT Recirculation Licensing Commitments
95
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 96
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 97 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 96 of 149
Test objectives and predictive analysis
96
– Objectives of the CMT Draindown Test is to demonstrate: 1. proper transition from CMT recirculation mode to CMT draindown mode 2. proper operation of the CMT level instrumentation used for the ADS 1234 actuation for LOCA
events– The SBLOCA NOTRUMP model used for the Chapter 15 SBLOCA events has been modified in order to
simulate the CMT draindown test
– NOTRUMP model simulates test procedure steps for the test setup and test execution
– NOTRUMP simulations were performed with min and max CMT line resistances providing a bounding case for the actual test
– Variation of the initial conditions used for the simulations and as performed test were technically assessed and for some cases, simulations were updated
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 97
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 98 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 97 of 149
CMT Draindown Test
97
CMT draindown test
PXS-V108B
Phase 1: Hot RCS waterPhase 2: Steam a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 98
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 99 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 98 of 149
Test equipment
98
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 99
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 100 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 99 of 149
Permanent plant CMT instrumentation
99
Wide range level instrumentation:
• Non-safety related, measures differential pressure between the fluid in reference leg (connected to the top of the CMT) and variable level in the CMT itself
• Density compensated
Upper/lower narrow range:
• Safety-related level instrumentation• Two distinct setpoints are used for ADS 123 (Low-3) and
ADS 4 actuation (Low-6)• Low-3 corresponds to ~ 71% of CMT volume and Low-6
corresponds to ~ 24% of CMT volume• Upper and narrow range employ magnetic floats located in
external standpipes that actuate reed-switches sensors depending on the fluid level in the CMT
• Standpipes connected to the side of the CMT via two short pipes
a,c
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 100
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 101 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 100 of 149
Review of the SM1/HY1 test results
100
– Sanmen Unit 1 and Haiyang 1 have successfully performed CMT draindown test.
– Test results confirm:o Proper transition from recirc to draindowno All CMT alarms related to CMT level were received in the main control roomo Wide range and upper/narrow range level indications track well
– Comparison between the test results and NOTRUMP model show:
Good agreement on the CMT transition from recirculation to draindown mode
Faster RCS depressurization in NOTRUMP due to modeling simplifications (discussed later)
Good agreement on the CMT discharge flow rates and CMT level (Low-3 and Low-6) ADS actuation setpoints
Overall simplified NOTRUMP model predicts the test results
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 101
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 102 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 101 of 149
NOTRUMP Model vs. Test Data
101
– NOTRUMP Model predicts:1. CMT level and temperature distribution2. CMT flow rates with min and max line
resistances3. Pressurizer pressure4. IRWST level
– Collected test data1. CMT levels and temperature distribution2. CMT Flow Rate measured using Pressure
Transmitters3. Pressurizer pressure4. IRWST level
Direct comparison of the test results and NOTRUMP model
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 102
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 103 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 102 of 149
Review of the SM1 test results
102
– SM1 RCS pressure:
1. NOTRUMP model was developed for the full tier of ADS 1-3 operation consistent with prototypic small break LOCA system performance
2. For the CMT draindown test, simplistic approach was used to modeling only ADS-1.
3. This simplified model of the ADS-1 over-predicts the ADS-1 discharge
4. ADS-1 flow area is reduced to match the RCS depressurization.
5. Approach acceptable since primary focus is CMT performance and ADS actuation signals.
6. Full ADS-123 operation is demonstrated in the ADS Blowdown test (see next presentation)
Overall good agreement between NOTRUMP and SM1 test results
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 103
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 104 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 103 of 149
Review of the SM1 test results
103
– SM1 CMT wide range and narrow range level indications:
1. Wide range and narrow range track well, dynamic effects in the CMTs are negligible
2. With the reduced ADS-1 flow area, NOTRUMP wide range level tracks well narrow range level
Good agreement between NOTRUMP and SM1 test results
a,ca,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 104
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 105 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 104 of 149
Review of the HY1 test results
104
– Test procedure for SM and HY required operator to keep secondary pressure higher than primary– SM1 complied throughout the entire transient, whereas HY1 secondary pressure fell below primary pressure
for some time.
– Higher primary pressure than secondary causes heat removal from primary to secondary – Heat removal from the primary to secondary caused CMTs to drain slower than expected– Despite the inconsistency, CMTs drained down to the Low-6 ADS 4 actuation setpoint as required
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 105
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 106 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 105 of 149
Review of the HY1 test results
105
– HY1 RCS pressure:
1. Steam Generator secondary side pressure was modeled to match test secondary pressure
2. ADS-1 flow area is reduced to match the RCS depressurization. Same reason as for Sanmen:
Approach (matching RCS pressure by reducing ADS1 flow area) is acceptable since primary focus is CMT performance and ADS actuation signals
Overall good agreement between NOTRUMP and HY1 test results
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 106
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 107 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 106 of 149
Controls of the design and system performance variability
106
Controls of the plant to plant variability and system performance insuring that draindown of the CMTs and ADS actuation will remain unchanged:– Procurement control: Same design specification
1. ITAAC on the CMT volume: ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08vi.– Construction control:
1. Same installation tolerances 2. Same installation specifications
– Pre-operational tests:1. CMT narrow and wide range level will be tested in the Component Test program2. PMS logic and ADS actuation is tested during the PMS testing program3. Proper operation of the CMT level instrumentation is demonstrated during the draindown testing of the
CMTs4. ITAACs on the balance line resistance, injection line resistance:
• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08cii (CMT Balance Line resistance)• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08ci (CMT Injection Line resistance)
Variability of the boundary conditions and CMT performance from plant to plant is controlled
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 107
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 108 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 107 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
107
– Tests performed at SM1/HY1 were successful:
CMTs transition from recirculation to draindown mode is fully characterized and consistent with Chapter 15 Analysis
No new phenomena identified that could challenge design and analysis basis or methods
Test results are consistent with NOTRUMP predictive analysis
– Boundary conditions and geometry are preserved at Vogtle 3&4:
– Vogtle 3&4 will perform Component Tests and Pre-operational test ensuring proper operation of the instrumentation and ADS actuation
– Reproducibility CMT performance demonstrated at SM1/HY1
CMT performance is expected to be similar at Vogtle 3&4
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 108
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 109 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 108 of 149
ADS Stage 1, 2, and 3 Blowdown Test
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 109
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 110 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 109 of 149
Agenda
– Brief overview of the AP1000® PXS/RCS– ADS Blowdown Test licensing commitments– ADS Blowdown Test background– Critical design/construction parameters of the ADS Valves and IRWST Pressure tests– China versus US AP1000 PXS/RCS design– Test equipment– Sanmen 1/Haiyang 1 test results– Vogtle 3&4
109
AP1000 is a trademark or registered trademark of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, its affiliates and/or its subsidiaries in the United States of America and may be registered in other countries throughout the world. All rights reserved.
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 110
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 111 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 110 of 149
Brief overview of the PXS/RCS
110
IRWST
SpargersStage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Pressurizer Pressure for the Inadvertent ADSActuation Transient Analysis
Pressurizer Pressure for the Inadvertent ADSActuation Transient Analysis
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 111
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 112 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 111 of 149
Blowdown Test Licensing Commitments
111
UFSAR Section 14.2.9.13, item (s): • For the first three plants only, an automatic
depressurization blowdown test is performed to verify proper operation of the ADS valves, and demonstrate the proper operation of the ADS spargers to limit the hydrodynamic loads in containment to less than design limits.
Application of Acceptance Criteria• The ADS valves (stages 1, 2 and 3) operate properly;
indicating full open in the MCR within the required stroke time during blowdown conditions.
• Loading within the in-containment refueling water storage tank (IRWST) is limited to less than 5 psi (average) along the walls.
Test Objectives Confirm proper valve operation, that IRWST loading is bounded by analysis and is consistent from plant to plant.
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 112
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 113 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 112 of 149
ADS Blowdown Test Background
112
Predictive Analysis:– The SBLOCA NOTRUMP model is used to predict RCS depressurization for the test.– NOTRUMP model simulates test procedure steps for the test setup and test execution.– NOTRUMP simulations were performed with min and max ADS 1-3 valve opening times
providing a bounding cases for the actual test.– Variation of the initial conditions used for the simulations and as performed test were
technically assessed.
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 113
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 114 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 113 of 149
Critical design/construction parameters
113
– Critical design/construction attributes for the overall depressurization flow:
1. ADS Stage 1, 2, and 3 valve effective flow area (choked flow)2. Sparger design3. Valve opening time4. Design of IRWST walls, floors and total volume
China and US Design
are controlled
China and US Design
are controlled
PXS/RCS design is the same at Vogtle 3&4, Sanmen 1, 2, and Haiyang 1
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 114
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 115 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 114 of 149
China versus US AP1000 PXS/RCS design
114
– Major PXS/RCS components at SM1/HY1/SM2/SV3/SV4 such as Reactor Vessel, Pressurizer, Steam Generators, Reactor Coolant Pumps, Safety-related PXS/RCS Valves, Spargers:
1. Manufactured to the same design specification2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same design tolerances
– The RCS pressure boundary piping, including ADS Discharge lines:1. Manufactured to the same design specification2. Procured to the same quality requirements imposed by the design specification3. Built to the same line routing and design tolerances
– The design of the IRWST (structural modules CA01, CA02, CA03, CA55, CA56 and CA57) is the same in China and the US
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 115
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 116 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 115 of 149
China vs. US AP1000 PXS/RCS design
115
– Critical Parameters for Key Components for (Spargers, ADS 1/2/3 Valves) are identical
Effective PXS/RCS design is the same at Vogtle 3&4, Sanmen 1, 2, and Haiyang 1
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 116
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 117 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 116 of 149
ADS Blowdown Test
116
•
CLHL
N2
PRESSURIZER
IRWST
ACCUM. (1 OF 2)
CORE
REACTORVESSEL
CORE MAKEUPTANK (1 OF 2)
#3
#2
#1
FAI
REFUELCAVITY
FO
RNS
SPARGERS
M
RNSPUMPS
LOOPCOMPART.
RECIRCSCREEN(1 OF 2)
M
DVI CONN.(1 OF 2)
PRHRHX
(1 OF 2)
ADSSTAGES 1-3
(1 OF 2)
ADSSTAGE 4(1 OF 2)
PUMPS
CONTAINMENT
M M
MM
M M
M
M
M
M
(1 OF 2)
IRWSTSCREEN
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 117
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 118 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 117 of 149
China Test equipment
117
Temporary Instrumentation on CA03 Module:• Four strings of pressure transducers (Primary IRWST Acceptance
Criteria)• Pressure Transducers on ADS Piping (information only)• 5 sets of transmitters (2 strain gauges and 1 accelerometer) are
placed at of the 4 azimuthal location.Other Temporary Instrumentation:• Instrumentation of all ADS isolation and control valves using
VOTES® Infinity diagnostic system• Strain gauges, accelerometers, and force measurement on select
piping segments and pipe supports.Permanent Plant Instrumentation:• Valve Position Indication• RCS Pressurizer Pressure and Level• IRWST Level
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 118
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 119 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 118 of 149
Test equipment
118
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 119
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 120 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 119 of 149
SM1 RCS Depressurization Profile
119
– NOTRUMP Model1. Pressurizer Pressure2. ADS Valve Area3. IRWST Level
– Test Data1. Wide Range Pressurizer Pressure2. As-Built Valve Area3. IRWST Wide Range Level
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 120
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 121 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 120 of 149
RCS Depressurization Profile SM1/HY1 Comparison
120120
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 121
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 122 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 121 of 149
RCS Depressurization Profile SM1/HY1 Comparison
121
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 122
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 123 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 122 of 149
ADS Valve Performancea,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 123
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 124 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 123 of 149
IRWST and Sparger Performance
123
The design loading for the IRWST tank models the ADS discharge as a uniform pressure of ±5 psi applied to the tank floor, walls, and roof. • The readings taken during the test represent the dynamic response and are converted to
an average distributed pressure then compared to the ±5 psi acceptance criteria. • ADS Blowdown test data confirmed that average distributed pressures on the IRWST are
less than ±5 psid for blowdown into a sub-cooled tank. a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 124
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 125 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 124 of 149
IRWST and Sparger Performance
• The strain gauge plots also show small amplitude strain oscillations reflecting the formation and collapse of the steam bubbles in the water.
• The thermal and increased hydrostatic effects dominate the behavior of the tank versus the effect of the pressure loadings.
124
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 125
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 126 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 125 of 149
IRWST and Sparger Performance HY1/SM1 Comparison
125
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 126
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 127 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 126 of 149
IRWST and Sparger Performance
126
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 127
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 128 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 127 of 149
IRWST and Sparger Performance
127
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 128
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 129 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 128 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
128
– Tests performed at SM1/HY1 were successful: The ADS spargers to limit the hydrodynamic loads to less than design of ±5 psi Proper operation of the ADS valves demonstrated
– Boundary conditions and geometry are preserved at Vogtle 3&4:1. At Vogtle, major RCS/PXS components are the same as at SM1/HY12. Construction ITAACs related to the installation/location of the ADS Piping and IRWST volume:
• ITAAC No. 2.2.03.08c.iii (IRWST volume)• ITAAC No. 2.1.02.08d.i Preoperational Test for Resistance of the ADS Stage 1, 2, 3
flow path(s)• ITAAC No. 2.1.02.08d.iv Vendor report on ADS 1, 2, 3 valve effective flow area• ITAAC No. 2.1.02.08d.vii Vendor report on Sparger flow area• ITAAC No. 2.1.02.08d.viii Inspection of Sparger location
– Vogtle 3&4 will perform testing to demonstrate Component Operability:• ADS 1, 2, and 3 valve operation verified by the performance of baseline in-service tests
Testing at China Sites establishes the unique phenomenological performance
parameters ofthe AP1000 design features.
Testing at China Sites establishes the unique phenomenological performance
parameters ofthe AP1000 design features.
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 129
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 130 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 129 of 149
Vogtle 3&4
Test Objectives have been met:
129
Testing at SM1, HY1, and SM2 establishes the unique
phenomenological performance parameters of
the AP1000 design features.
Testing at SM1, HY1, and SM2 establishes the unique
phenomenological performance parameters of
the AP1000 design features.
Confirm proper valve operation
Valves showed proper performance during blowdown testing
Confirm IRWST loading is bounded by analysis and is
consistent from plant to plant.
Loading was consistent and less than the 5 psi criteria
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 130
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 131 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 130 of 149
Summary
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 131
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 132 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 131 of 149
Licensing Path Forward
• LAR(s) will be submitted to delete the COL conditions requiring First Plant Only and First 3 Plant Only Tests for Vogtle 3&4
• The LAR technical evaluation will demonstrate– Adequacy of China QA program governing FPOT/F3POT– Acceptability of China FPOT/F3POT results– Applicability of China FPOT/F3POT results to Vogtle 3&4
131
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 132
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 133 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 132 of 149
Licensing Path Forward
• Supporting documents for the LAR are available for review now– QA Assessment Report– China Test Procedures– SNC Documentation of Review of China Test Procedures
132
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 133
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 134 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 133 of 149
Proposed Schedule
133
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 134
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 135 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 134 of 149
Backup Slides
134
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 135
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 136 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 135 of 149
Backup Slides
135
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 136
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 137 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 136 of 149
Review of the SM1 test results (Backup)
136
– SM1 CMT injection flow rates:
1. With the reduced ADS1 flow area, NOTRUMP CMT injection flow rates are similar to the test results
Overall, simplified NOTRUMP model and test results confirm that CMTs operate as expected (transition from recirculation to draindown and drain through ADS setpoints)
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 137
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 138 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 137 of 149
Review of the HY1 test results (Backup)
137
– HY1 CMT wide range and narrow range level indications:
1. Wide range and narrow range track well, dynamic effects in the CMTs are negligible
2. With the reduced ADS-1 flow area, NOTRUMP wide range level reaches lower narrow range level at a similar time
Good agreement between NOTRUMP and HY1 test results
a,ca,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 138
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 139 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 138 of 149
Review of the HY1 test results (Backup)
138
– HY1 CMT injection flow rates:
1. Shorter draindown interruption in NOTRUMP and slower and more gradual draining after the delay2. With the reduced ADS1 flow area, NOTRUMP CMT injection flow rates are overall similar to the test results
Overall, simplified NOTRUMP model and test results confirm that CMTs operate as expected (transition from recirculation to draindown and drain through ADS setpoints)
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 139
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 140 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 139 of 149
Backup Slides CMT Draindown
139
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 140
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 141 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 140 of 149
Backup Slides – CMT Recirculation Test
140
– SM1 and HY1 RCS pressure
1. Pressurizer level controlled with the CVS makeup/letdown during the test.
2. Predictive analysis does not control Pressurizer level
3. Cold leg (Pressurizer side) was slightly lower in the test
4. Use of CVS makeup/letdown does not invalidate NOTRUMP predictive analysis
Overall RCS depressurization trend is similar
CMT recirculation is not significantly impacted by the CVS makeup/letdown
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 141
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 142 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 141 of 149
Backup Slides – CMT Recirculation Test
141
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 142
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 143 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 142 of 149
Other Infoa,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 143
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 144 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 143 of 149
SM1/HY1 test results
143
Sanmen Unit 1 & Haiyang Unit 1 have successfully performed the ADS Blowdown Test 1. Data collected for IRWST Pressure, Strain, and Level2. RCS Parameters monitored3. Valve Diagnostics recorded
Comparison to Predictive Safety Analysis show: Depressurization of the RCS following the ADS Blowdown Test is acceptable
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 144
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 145 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 144 of 149
ADS Valve Performance Issuesa,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 145
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 146 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 145 of 149
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 146
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 147 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 146 of 149
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 147
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 148 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 147 of 149
ADS Valve Performance Issues - Supplementary Testing
147
a,c
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 148
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 149 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 148 of 149
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
APP-GW-GLY-151, Rev. 0 Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 Page 149
© 2018 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved
*** This record was final approved on 2/27/2018 12:56:40 PM. ( This statement was added by the PRIME system upon its validation)
Enclosure 4 SVP_SV0_005166
February 28, 2018 Page 150 of 151ND-18-0300 Enclosure 2
Page 149 of 149