Transcript

ST

AT

E A

ND

LO

CA

L

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

P

EN

SIO

N P

LA

NS

Eco

no

mic

Do

wn

turn

S

pu

rs E

ffo

rts

to

Ad

dre

ss C

ost

s an

d

Su

stai

nab

ilit

y R

epo

rt t

o C

on

gres

sio

nal

Req

ues

ters

March

2012

GA

O-1

2-32

2

Un

ited

State

s G

overn

men

t A

cco

un

tab

ilit

y O

ffic

e

GA

O

U

nite

d St

ates

Gov

ernm

ent A

ccou

ntab

ility

Offi

ce

H

ighl

ight

s of

GA

O-1

2-32

2, a

repo

rt to

co

ngre

ssio

nal r

eque

ster

s

Mar

ch 2

012

STA

TE

AN

D L

OC

AL

GO

VE

RN

ME

NT

PE

NSI

ON

P

LAN

S E

co

no

mic

Do

wn

turn

Sp

urs E

ffo

rts

to

Ad

dress C

osts

an

d S

usta

inab

ilit

y

Wh

y G

AO

Did

Th

is S

tu

dy

Ove

r 27

mill

ion

empl

oyee

s an

d be

nefic

iarie

s ar

e co

vere

d by

sta

te a

nd

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

on p

lans

. H

owev

er, t

he re

cent

eco

nom

ic

dow

ntur

n an

d as

soci

ated

bud

get

chal

leng

es c

onfro

ntin

g st

ate

and

loca

l go

vern

men

ts p

ose

som

e qu

estio

ns a

s to

the

sust

aina

bilit

y of

thes

e pl

ans,

and

w

hat c

hang

es, i

f any

, sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

are

mak

ing

to s

treng

then

th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

of th

eir p

ensi

on

plan

s. G

AO

was

ask

ed to

exa

min

e

(1) r

ecen

t tre

nds

in th

e fin

anci

al

cond

ition

of s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent

pens

ion

plan

s an

d

(2) s

trate

gies

sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

are

usi

ng to

man

age

pens

ion

cost

s an

d th

e im

pact

s of

thes

e st

rate

gies

on

plan

s, s

pons

ors,

em

ploy

ees,

and

retir

ees.

To a

ddre

ss th

ese

topi

cs, G

AO

anal

yzed

var

ious

mea

sure

s of

sec

tor-

wid

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

base

d on

na

tiona

l-lev

el d

ata

on p

ensi

on fu

ndin

g fro

m th

e U

.S. C

ensu

s B

urea

u an

d ot

hers

, and

revi

ewed

info

rmat

ion

on

rece

nt s

tate

legi

slat

ive

chan

ges

affe

ctin

g go

vern

men

t pen

sion

s fro

m

annu

al re

ports

pre

pare

d by

the

Nat

iona

l Con

fere

nce

of S

tate

Le

gisl

atur

es (N

CS

L). G

AO

did

not

as

sess

the

soun

dnes

s of

indi

vidu

al

plan

s, b

ut d

id o

btai

n do

cum

ents

and

co

nduc

t int

ervi

ews

with

pen

sion

and

bu

dget

offi

cial

s in

eig

ht s

tate

s an

d ei

ght l

ocal

ities

, sel

ecte

d to

illu

stra

te th

e ra

nge

of s

trate

gies

bei

ng im

plem

ente

d to

mee

t cur

rent

and

futu

re p

ensi

on

fund

ing

requ

irem

ent.

The

Inte

rnal

Rev

enue

Ser

vice

and

S

ocia

l Sec

urity

Adm

inis

tratio

n pr

ovid

ed

tech

nica

l com

men

ts, w

hich

wer

e in

corp

orat

ed, a

s ap

prop

riate

.

Wh

at

GA

O F

ou

nd

Des

pite

the

rece

nt e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n, m

ost l

arge

sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t pe

nsio

n pl

ans

have

ass

ets

suffi

cien

t to

cove

r ben

efit

paym

ents

to re

tiree

s fo

r a

deca

de o

r mor

e. H

owev

er, p

ensi

on p

lans

stil

l fac

e ch

alle

nges

ove

r the

long

term

du

e to

the

gap

betw

een

asse

ts a

nd li

abili

ties.

In th

e pa

st, s

ome

plan

spo

nsor

s ha

ve n

ot m

ade

adeq

uate

pla

n co

ntrib

utio

ns o

r hav

e gr

ante

d un

fund

ed b

enef

it in

crea

ses,

and

man

y su

ffere

d fro

m in

vest

men

t los

ses

durin

g th

e ec

onom

ic

dow

ntur

n. T

he re

sulti

ng g

ap b

etw

een

asse

t val

ues

and

proj

ecte

d lia

bilit

ies

has

led

to s

tead

y in

crea

ses

in th

e ac

tuar

ially

requ

ired

cont

ribut

ion

leve

ls n

eede

d to

he

lp s

usta

in p

ensi

on p

lans

at t

he s

ame

time

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts fa

ce

othe

r fis

cal p

ress

ures

. Si

nce

2008

, the

com

bina

tion

of fi

scal

pre

ssur

es a

nd in

crea

sing

con

tribu

tion

requ

irem

ents

has

spu

rred

man

y st

ates

and

loca

litie

s to

take

act

ion

to s

treng

then

th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

of th

eir p

lans

for t

he lo

ng te

rm, o

ften

pack

agin

g m

ultip

le

chan

ges

toge

ther

. GAO

’s ta

bula

tion

of re

cent

sta

te le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

s re

porte

d by

NC

SL a

nd re

view

of r

efor

ms

in s

elec

ted

site

s re

veal

ed th

e fo

llow

ing:

Red

ucin

g be

nefit

s: 3

5 st

ates

hav

e re

duce

d pe

nsio

n be

nefit

s, m

ostly

for f

utur

e em

ploy

ees

due

to le

gal p

rovi

sion

s pr

otec

ting

bene

fits

for c

urre

nt e

mpl

oyee

s an

d re

tiree

s. A

few

sta

tes,

like

Col

orad

o, h

ave

redu

ced

post

retir

emen

t ben

efit

incr

ease

s fo

r all

mem

bers

and

ben

efic

iarie

s of

thei

r pen

sion

pla

ns.

Inc

reas

ing

mem

ber c

ontr

ibut

ions

: Hal

f of t

he s

tate

s ha

ve in

crea

sed

mem

ber

cont

ribut

ions

, the

reby

shi

fting

a la

rger

sha

re o

f pen

sion

cos

ts to

em

ploy

ees.

S

witc

hing

to a

hyb

rid a

ppro

ach:

Geo

rgia

, Mic

higa

n, a

nd U

tah

rece

ntly

im

plem

ente

d hy

brid

app

roac

hes,

whi

ch in

corp

orat

e a

defin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

an

com

pone

nt, s

hifti

ng s

ome

inve

stm

ent r

isk

to e

mpl

oyee

s.

At th

e sa

me

time,

som

e st

ates

and

loca

litie

s ha

ve a

lso

adju

sted

thei

r fun

ding

pr

actic

es to

hel

p m

anag

e pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

n re

quire

men

ts in

the

shor

t ter

m b

y ch

angi

ng a

ctua

rial m

etho

ds, d

efer

ring

cont

ribut

ions

, or i

ssui

ng b

onds

, act

ions

th

at m

ay in

crea

se fu

ture

pen

sion

cos

ts. G

oing

forw

ard,

gro

win

g bu

dget

pr

essu

res

will

cont

inue

to c

halle

nge

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts’ a

bilit

ies

to

prov

ide

adeq

uate

con

tribu

tions

to h

elp

sust

ain

thei

r pen

sion

pla

ns.

Not

able

Cha

nges

to S

tate

-Spo

nsor

ed P

ensi

on P

lans

(Jan

uary

200

8 to

Jun

e 20

11)

Vie

w G

AO

-12-

322.

For

mor

e in

form

atio

n,

cont

act B

arba

ra D

. Bov

bjer

g at

(202

) 512

-72

15 o

r bov

bjer

gb@

gao.

gov,

or S

tanl

ey J

. C

zerw

insk

i at (

202)

512

-680

6 or

cz

erw

insk

is@

gao.

gov.

Page

i G

AO-1

2-32

2 S

tate

and

Loc

al P

ensi

ons

Lett

er

1

Bac

kgro

und

4P

lans

Hav

e Su

ffic

ient

Ass

ets

to P

ay N

ear-

Ter

m B

enef

its,

but

G

row

ing

Bud

get

Pre

ssur

es W

ill C

halle

nge

The

ir S

usta

inab

ility

7St

ates

and

Loc

alit

ies

Hav

e M

ade

Cha

nges

to

Red

uce

Cos

ts a

nd

Impr

ove

Pla

n Su

stai

nabi

lity

18C

oncl

udin

g O

bser

vati

ons

33A

genc

y C

omm

ents

34

App

endi

x I

Pro

file

s of

Sel

ecte

d St

ate

and

Loca

l Gov

ernm

ent

Pen

sion

s

36

App

endi

x II

A

ctua

rial

Met

hods

and

Ass

umpt

ions

for

Mea

suri

ng F

unde

d St

atus

fo

r P

ublic

Sec

tor

Def

ined

Ben

efit

Pla

ns

45

App

endi

x II

I G

AO

Con

tact

s an

d St

aff

Ack

now

ledg

men

ts

49

Tab

les

Tab

le 1

: Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pla

ns S

elec

ted

for

Rev

iew

3T

able

2: U

nder

stan

ding

the

Fin

anci

al C

ondi

tion

of

a P

ublic

Def

ined

B

enef

it P

lan

10T

able

3: M

edia

n C

ontr

ibut

ion

Rat

es f

or L

arge

Pla

ns a

s a

Per

cent

age

of P

ayro

ll

15

Fig

ures

Fig

ure

1: S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t P

ensi

on C

ontr

ibut

ions

, F

isca

l Yea

r 20

09

4

Fig

ure

2: I

nves

tmen

t R

etur

ns f

or S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t P

ensi

on P

lans

, Fis

cal Y

ears

200

5–20

09

9

Fig

ure

3: H

isto

rica

l Tre

nds

in t

he F

inan

cial

Con

diti

on o

f St

ate

and

Loca

l Gov

ernm

ent

Pen

sion

Pla

ns—

Agg

rega

te R

atio

of

Mar

ket

Ass

ets

to T

otal

Exp

endi

ture

s, 1

957–

2009

11F

igur

e 4:

Var

iabi

lity

in L

arge

Pla

ns’ R

atio

s of

Ass

ets

to A

nnua

l E

xpen

ditu

res,

Fis

cal Y

ear

2009

11

Con

tent

s Pa

ge ii

G

AO-1

2-32

2 S

tate

and

Loc

al P

ensi

ons

Fig

ure

5: A

ggre

gate

Fun

ding

Rat

io: T

rend

Dat

a fo

r La

rge

Stat

e an

d Lo

cal G

over

nmen

t P

ensi

on P

lans

, Fis

cal Y

ears

200

1–20

10

14

Fig

ure

6: D

istr

ibut

ion

of P

erce

ntag

e of

AR

C P

aid

for

Larg

e P

lans

, F

isca

l Yea

r 20

10

16

Fig

ure

7: N

otab

le C

hang

es t

o St

ate-

Spon

sore

d P

ensi

on P

lans

, Ja

nuar

y 20

08–J

une

2011

19F

igur

e 8:

Pen

sion

Obl

igat

ion

Bon

d Is

suan

ces

Nat

ionw

ide,

Jan

uary

20

06–J

une

2011

29 A

bbre

viat

ions

AR

C

an

nual

requ

ired

cont

ribut

ion

ASB

Ac

tuar

ial S

tand

ards

Boa

rd

CAF

R

Com

preh

ensi

ve A

nnua

l Fin

anci

al R

epor

t C

OLA

co

st-o

f-liv

ing

adju

stm

ent

CPI

-W

Con

sum

er P

rice

Inde

x fo

r Urb

an W

age

Earn

ers

and

C

leric

al W

orke

rs

ERIS

A

Empl

oyee

Ret

irem

ent I

ncom

e Se

curit

y Ac

t of 1

974

GAA

P

gene

rally

acc

epte

d ac

coun

ting

prin

cipl

es

GAS

B

Gov

ernm

enta

l Acc

ount

ing

Stan

dard

s Bo

ard

NAS

BO

Nat

iona

l Ass

ocia

tion

of S

tate

Bud

get O

ffice

rs

NC

SL

Nat

iona

l Con

fere

nce

of S

tate

Leg

isla

ture

s PO

B

pens

ion

oblig

atio

n bo

nd

This

is a

wor

k of

the

U.S

. gov

ernm

ent a

nd is

not

sub

ject

to c

opyr

ight

pro

tect

ion

in th

e U

nite

d S

tate

s. T

he p

ublis

hed

prod

uct m

ay b

e re

prod

uced

and

dis

tribu

ted

in it

s en

tiret

y w

ithou

t fur

ther

per

mis

sion

from

GA

O. H

owev

er, b

ecau

se th

is w

ork

may

con

tain

co

pyrig

hted

imag

es o

r oth

er m

ater

ial,

perm

issi

on fr

om th

e co

pyrig

ht h

olde

r may

be

nece

ssar

y if

you

wis

h to

repr

oduc

e th

is m

ater

ial s

epar

atel

y.

Page

1

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Un

ited

Sta

tes G

overn

men

t A

cco

un

tab

ilit

y O

ffic

e

Wash

ingto

n,

DC

20

54

8

Mar

ch 2

, 201

2

The

Hon

orab

le H

erb

Kohl

C

hairm

an

Spec

ial C

omm

ittee

on

Agin

g U

nite

d St

ates

Sen

ate

The

Hon

orab

le M

icha

el B

. Enz

i R

anki

ng M

embe

r C

omm

ittee

on

Hea

lth, E

duca

tion,

La

bor,

and

Pens

ions

U

nite

d St

ates

Sen

ate

The

rece

nt e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n co

mbi

ned

with

con

tinui

ng b

udge

t ch

alle

nges

has

hei

ghte

ned

conc

erns

abo

ut th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

of s

tate

an

d lo

cal p

ensi

on p

lans

. Pen

sion

fund

ing

is a

long

-term

end

eavo

r, bu

t st

ates

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

ofte

n ha

ve a

nnua

l bal

ance

d bu

dget

re

quire

men

ts th

at c

an p

it go

vern

men

t con

tribu

tions

to p

ensi

on p

lans

ag

ains

t oth

er p

ress

ing

fund

ing

need

s. A

lthou

gh s

tate

and

loca

l ret

iree

bene

fits

are

not s

ubje

ct, f

or th

e m

ost p

art,

to fe

dera

l law

s go

vern

ing

priv

ate

sect

or re

tiree

ben

efits

, the

fede

ral g

over

nmen

t has

an

inte

rest

in

ensu

ring

that

all

Amer

ican

s ha

ve a

sec

ure

retir

emen

t. Th

is in

clud

es th

e ov

er 2

7 m

illion

peo

ple

cove

red

by s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

on

plan

s.1

1.

rece

nt tr

ends

in th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

of s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent

pens

ion

plan

s an

d

The

fede

ral g

over

nmen

t als

o ha

s an

inte

rest

in th

e ch

alle

ngin

g fis

cal s

ituat

ion

faci

ng th

e st

ate

and

loca

l sec

tors

bec

ause

fisc

al h

ealth

pr

esen

ts a

nat

iona

l cha

lleng

e sh

ared

by

all l

evel

s of

gov

ernm

ent.

In li

ght

of th

ese

conc

erns

, you

ask

ed u

s to

exa

min

e

2.

stra

tegi

es s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

are

usi

ng to

man

age

pens

ion

cost

s an

d th

e im

pact

s of

thes

e st

rate

gies

on

plan

s, s

pons

ors,

em

ploy

ees,

and

retir

ees.

1 Th

is to

tal i

s ba

sed

on th

e U

.S. C

ensu

s B

urea

u’s

2009

Sur

vey

of S

tate

and

Loc

al P

ublic

-E

mpl

oyee

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

ms

and

incl

udes

act

ive

mem

bers

, ina

ctiv

e m

embe

rs, a

nd

bene

ficia

ries.

Page

2

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

To d

escr

ibe

trend

s in

the

finan

cial

con

ditio

n of

sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

ensi

on

fund

s, w

e an

alyz

ed v

ario

us m

easu

res

of s

ecto

r-w

ide

finan

cial

con

ditio

n ba

sed

on e

xist

ing

natio

nal-l

evel

dat

a on

pen

sion

fund

ing.

We

anal

yzed

da

ta fr

om th

e U

.S. C

ensu

s Bu

reau

’s s

urve

ys o

f sta

te a

nd lo

cal r

etire

men

t sy

stem

s an

d fro

m th

e Pu

blic

Pla

ns D

atab

ase

deve

lope

d by

the

Bost

on

Col

lege

Cen

ter f

or R

etire

men

t Res

earc

h, w

hich

incl

udes

fina

ncia

l dat

a on

12

6 la

rge

stat

e an

d lo

cal d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans

cove

ring

mor

e th

an 8

5 pe

rcen

t of t

otal

sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t pen

sion

ass

ets

and

mem

bers

. To

bet

ter u

nder

stan

d th

e co

ntex

t for

thes

e tre

nds,

we

revi

ewed

exi

stin

g lit

erat

ure

on s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

on p

lans

and

inte

rvie

wed

na

tiona

l exp

erts

on

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

t pen

sion

issu

es.

To id

entif

y th

e pr

eval

ence

of v

ario

us s

trate

gies

sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

are

usi

ng to

man

age

pens

ion

cost

s, w

e an

alyz

ed n

atio

nal-

leve

l dat

a on

sta

te le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

s an

d us

e of

bon

ds to

fina

nce

thei

r pl

ans.

Spe

cific

ally

, to

iden

tify

legi

slat

ive

chan

ges,

we

anal

yzed

ann

ual

repo

rts p

repa

red

by th

e N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e of

Sta

te L

egis

latu

res

(NC

SL) s

umm

ariz

ing

sele

cted

sta

te p

ensi

on a

nd re

tirem

ent l

egis

latio

n en

acte

d fro

m J

anua

ry 1

, 200

8, th

roug

h Ju

ne 3

0, 2

011.

2 We

limite

d ou

r an

alys

is o

f the

se N

CSL

repo

rts to

cha

nges

affe

ctin

g br

oad

cate

gorie

s of

em

ploy

ees,

suc

h as

sta

te e

mpl

oyee

s, te

ache

rs, p

ublic

saf

ety

pers

onne

l, an

d lo

cal e

mpl

oyee

s w

ho a

re m

embe

rs o

f sta

te-a

dmin

iste

red

plan

s. In

so

me

limite

d in

stan

ces,

to b

ette

r und

erst

and

a le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

, we

revi

ewed

sup

plem

enta

l doc

umen

ts s

uch

as p

ensi

on p

lan

docu

men

ts a

nd

sum

mar

ies

of th

e le

gisl

atio

n pr

epar

ed b

y pl

ans,

sta

te le

gisl

ativ

e co

unse

l, or

sta

te a

genc

ies.

We

did

not c

ondu

ct a

n in

depe

nden

t leg

al a

naly

sis

to

verif

y th

e ac

cura

cy o

f the

info

rmat

ion

perta

inin

g to

rece

ntly

ena

cted

le

gisl

atio

n co

ntai

ned

in th

e N

CSL

repo

rts. T

o id

entif

y bo

nds

issu

ed fo

r the

pu

rpos

e of

fina

ncin

g pu

blic

pen

sion

pla

ns, w

e an

alyz

ed m

ultip

le s

ourc

es

of b

ond

data

, inc

ludi

ng M

erge

nt B

ondV

iew

er a

nd th

e El

ectro

nic

Mun

icip

al

Mar

ket A

cces

s sy

stem

.3

2 R

onal

d K.

Sne

ll, N

CS

L, P

ensi

ons

and

Ret

irem

ent P

lan

Ena

ctm

ents

, ann

ual r

epor

ts fo

r 20

08-2

010

and

2011

repo

rt as

of J

une

30, 2

011.

For

add

ition

al in

form

atio

n ab

out t

he s

tate

le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

s de

scrib

ed in

this

repo

rt, re

fer t

o th

e N

CS

L re

ports

.

We

supp

lem

ente

d th

ese

natio

nal-l

evel

dat

a by

in

terv

iew

ing

stat

e an

d lo

cal p

ensi

on a

nd b

udge

t offi

cial

s, a

nd re

view

ing

finan

cial

and

act

uaria

l rep

orts

, fro

m a

sm

all j

udgm

enta

l sam

ple

of p

lans

fro

m e

ight

sta

tes,

and

one

loca

lity

with

in e

ach

of th

ese

stat

es, t

hat h

ad

3 Mer

gent

Bon

dVie

wer

is a

n on

line

data

base

of b

ond

data

. The

Ele

ctro

nic

Mun

icip

al

Mar

ket A

cces

s sy

stem

, mai

ntai

ned

by th

e M

unic

ipal

Sec

uriti

es R

ulem

akin

g B

oard

, is

an

onlin

e da

taba

se o

f mun

icip

al d

iscl

osur

es a

nd d

ata

on th

e m

unic

ipal

sec

uriti

es m

arke

t

Page

3

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

impl

emen

ted

pens

ion

mod

ifica

tions

sin

ce 2

008

(see

tabl

e 1)

. Thi

s ju

dgm

enta

l sam

ple

was

sel

ecte

d to

pro

vide

exa

mpl

es o

f pla

ns

expe

rienc

ing

a ra

nge

of fi

nanc

ial c

ondi

tions

and

type

s of

stra

tegi

es

adop

ted

by th

eir s

pons

ors.

We

base

d th

is s

elec

tion

on o

ur a

naly

sis

of

NC

SL a

nnua

l rep

orts

on

pens

ion

legi

slat

ion

and

sugg

estio

ns fr

om o

ur

inte

rvie

ws

with

pen

sion

exp

erts

. We

did

not a

sses

s th

e fin

anci

al

soun

dnes

s of

indi

vidu

al p

lans

.

Tabl

e 1:

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pla

ns S

elec

ted

for R

evie

w

Stat

e St

ate

plan

Lo

calit

y

Loca

l pla

n C

alifo

rnia

Cal

iforn

ia S

tate

Tea

cher

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

Cal

iforn

ia P

ublic

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent

Sys

tem

Son

oma

Cou

nty

Son

oma

Cou

nty

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent

Ass

ocia

tion

Col

orad

o

Col

orad

o P

ublic

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent

Ass

ocia

tion

C

ity o

f Den

ver

Den

ver E

mpl

oyee

s R

etire

men

t Pla

n

Geo

rgia

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m o

f Geo

rgia

C

obb

Cou

nty

Cob

b C

ount

y E

mpl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t S

yste

m P

ensi

on P

lan

Illin

ois

S

tate

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m o

f Illin

ois

Te

ache

rs’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

of t

he S

tate

of

Illin

ois

City

of C

hica

go

Pol

icem

en’s

Ann

uity

and

Ben

efit

Fund

of

Chi

cago

Mis

sour

i

Mis

sour

i Sta

te E

mpl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

Mis

sour

i Dep

artm

ent o

f Tra

nspo

rtatio

n an

d H

ighw

ay P

atro

l Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m

City

of S

prin

gfie

ld

Pol

ice

Offi

cers

’ and

Fire

fight

ers’

R

etire

men

t Fun

d

Pen

nsyl

vani

a

Pen

nsyl

vani

a P

ublic

Sch

ool E

mpl

oyee

s’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m

P

enns

ylva

nia

Sta

te E

mpl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t S

yste

m

City

of P

hila

delp

hia

City

of P

hila

delp

hia

Mun

icip

al P

ensi

on

Pla

n

Uta

h

Uta

h R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

s C

ity o

f Bou

ntifu

l P

ublic

Saf

ety

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m (C

ity o

f B

ount

iful)-

par

t of t

he U

tah

Ret

irem

ent

Sys

tem

s

Virg

inia

Virg

inia

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m

City

of N

orfo

lk

Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m o

f the

City

of

Nor

folk

Sour

ce: G

AO.

Not

e: S

ee a

ppen

dix

I for

mor

e de

taile

d pr

ofile

s of

eac

h st

ate,

loca

lity,

and

pla

n.

We

cond

ucte

d th

is p

erfo

rman

ce a

udit

from

Dec

embe

r 201

0 to

Mar

ch

2012

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith g

ener

ally

acc

epte

d go

vern

men

t aud

iting

st

anda

rds.

Tho

se s

tand

ards

requ

ire th

at w

e pl

an a

nd p

erfo

rm th

e au

dit t

o ob

tain

suf

ficie

nt, a

ppro

pria

te e

vide

nce

to p

rovi

de a

reas

onab

le b

asis

for

our f

indi

ngs

and

conc

lusi

ons

base

d on

our

aud

it ob

ject

ives

. We

belie

ve

that

the

evid

ence

obt

aine

d pr

ovid

es a

reas

onab

le b

asis

for o

ur fi

ndin

gs

and

conc

lusi

ons

base

d on

our

aud

it ob

ject

ives

.

Page

4

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Ther

e ar

e ov

er 3

,400

sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

ensi

on s

yste

ms

in th

e U

nite

d St

ates

, acc

ordi

ng to

the

mos

t rec

ent C

ensu

s Bu

reau

Sur

vey

of S

tate

and

Lo

cal P

ublic

-Em

ploy

ee R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

s.4 M

ost l

arge

pla

ns a

re s

tate

pl

ans,

and

mor

e st

ate

and

loca

l em

ploy

ees

are

cove

red

by s

tate

-ad

min

iste

red

plan

s th

an b

y lo

cally

-adm

inis

tere

d pl

ans

(abo

ut 2

4 m

illion

m

embe

rs a

nd b

enef

icia

ries

com

pare

d w

ith a

bout

3 m

illion

). H

owev

er,

ther

e ar

e m

ore

loca

l gov

ernm

ent e

mpl

oyee

s th

an s

tate

gov

ernm

ent

empl

oyee

s (a

bout

14

milli

on c

ompa

red

with

abo

ut 5

milli

on),

and

whi

le

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

som

etim

es p

artic

ipat

e in

pla

ns a

dmin

iste

red

by s

tate

s,

the

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

gen

eral

ly re

tain

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r con

tribu

ting

the

empl

oyer

’s s

hare

of f

undi

ng to

the

plan

s fo

r the

ir em

ploy

ees.

As

a re

sult,

lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts c

ontri

bute

mor

e to

pen

sion

pla

ns e

ach

stat

e fis

cal

year

, ove

rall,

than

do

stat

e go

vern

men

ts (s

ee fi

g. 1

).5

Figu

re 1

: Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent P

ensi

on C

ontr

ibut

ions

, Fis

cal Y

ear 2

009

Pens

ion

plan

s ar

e ge

nera

lly c

hara

cter

ized

as

eith

er d

efin

ed b

enef

it or

de

fined

con

tribu

tion

plan

s. U

nlik

e in

the

priv

ate

sect

or, d

efin

ed b

enef

it

4 U

.S. C

ensu

s, 2

009

Sur

vey

of S

tate

and

Loc

al P

ublic

-Em

ploy

ee R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

s (W

ashi

ngto

n, D

.C. 2

011)

. 5 Th

roug

hout

this

repo

rt, th

e te

rm “f

isca

l yea

r” re

fers

to s

tate

fisc

al y

ear (

as o

ppos

ed to

fe

dera

l fis

cal y

ear)

. Sta

te fi

scal

yea

rs v

ary,

but

mos

t run

from

Jul

y 1

to J

une

30, a

ccor

ding

to

the

Cen

sus

Bure

au.

Bac

kgro

und

Page

5

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

plan

s pr

ovid

e pr

imar

y pe

nsio

n be

nefit

s fo

r mos

t sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ent w

orke

rs. A

bout

78

perc

ent o

f sta

te a

nd lo

cal e

mpl

oyee

s pa

rtici

pate

d in

def

ined

ben

efit

plan

s in

201

1, c

ompa

red

with

onl

y 18

pe

rcen

t of p

rivat

e se

ctor

em

ploy

ees.

6 In

a de

fined

ben

efit

plan

, the

am

ount

of t

he b

enef

it pa

ymen

t is

dete

rmin

ed b

y a

form

ula

(in th

e pu

blic

se

ctor

, the

form

ula

is ty

pica

lly b

ased

on

the

retir

ee’s

yea

rs o

f ser

vice

and

fin

al a

vera

ge s

alar

y, a

nd is

mos

t ofte

n pr

ovid

ed a

s a

lifet

ime

annu

ity).

How

ever

, unl

ike

priv

ate

sect

or e

mpl

oyee

s w

ith d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans,

st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent e

mpl

oyee

s ge

nera

lly c

ontri

bute

to th

eir

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans.

A fe

w s

tate

s of

fer d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n or

oth

er

type

s of

retir

emen

t pla

ns a

s th

e pr

imar

y re

tirem

ent p

lan.

7

Also

unl

ike

in th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, man

y st

ate

and

loca

l em

ploy

ees

are

not

cove

red

by S

ocia

l Sec

urity

. Abo

ut 6

.4 m

illion

, or o

ver o

ne-fo

urth

, of s

tate

an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

t em

ploy

ees

are

not e

ligib

le to

rece

ive

Soci

al

Secu

rity

bene

fits

base

d on

thei

r gov

ernm

ent e

arni

ngs

and

do n

ot p

ay

Soci

al S

ecur

ity ta

xes

on e

arni

ngs

from

thei

r gov

ernm

ent o

ccup

atio

ns.

In a

def

ined

co

ntrib

utio

n pl

an, t

he k

ey d

eter

min

ants

of t

he b

enef

it am

ount

are

the

mem

ber’s

and

em

ploy

er’s

con

tribu

tion

rate

s, a

nd th

e ra

te o

f ret

urn

achi

eved

on

the

inve

stm

ents

in a

n in

divi

dual

’s a

ccou

nt o

ver t

ime.

Al

tern

ativ

ely,

som

e st

ates

hav

e ad

opte

d hy

brid

app

roac

hes

that

com

bine

co

mpo

nent

s of

bot

h de

fined

ben

efit

and

defin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

ans.

8

6 U

.S. D

epar

tmen

t of L

abor

, Bur

eau

of L

abor

Sta

tistic

s, N

atio

nal C

ompe

nsat

ion

Surv

ey:

Em

ploy

ee B

enef

its in

the

Uni

ted

Sta

tes,

Mar

ch 2

011

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: 20

11).

As

a re

sult,

em

ploy

er-p

rovi

ded

pens

ion

bene

fits

for n

on-c

over

ed e

mpl

oyee

s ar

e ge

nera

lly h

ighe

r tha

n fo

r em

ploy

ees

cove

red

by S

ocia

l Sec

urity

, and

em

ploy

ee a

nd e

mpl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

are

hig

her a

s w

ell.

7 As

we

have

pre

viou

sly

repo

rted,

all

stat

es a

lso

offe

r a v

olun

tary

, sup

plem

enta

l def

ined

co

ntrib

utio

n op

tion

in a

dditi

on to

thei

r prim

ary

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

an. S

ee G

AO

, Sta

te a

nd

Loca

l Gov

ernm

ent R

etire

e B

enef

its: C

urre

nt S

tatu

s of

Ben

efit

Stru

ctur

es, P

rote

ctio

ns, a

nd

Fisc

al O

utlo

ok fo

r Fun

ding

Fut

ure

Cos

ts, G

AO

-07-

1156

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: S

ept.

24,

2007

).

8 42 U

.S.C

. § 4

10(a

)(7)

. His

toric

ally

, Soc

ial S

ecur

ity d

id n

ot re

quire

cov

erag

e of

go

vern

men

t em

ploy

men

t. In

195

0, C

ongr

ess

enac

ted

legi

slat

ion

allo

win

g vo

lunt

ary

cove

rage

to s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent e

mpl

oyee

s no

t cov

ered

by

publ

ic p

ensi

on p

lans

, an

d in

195

5, e

xten

ded

volu

ntar

y co

vera

ge to

thos

e al

read

y co

vere

d by

pla

ns a

s w

ell.

Soc

ial S

ecur

ity A

ct A

men

dmen

ts o

f 195

0, P

ub. L

. No.

809

, § 1

06, 6

4 S

tat.

477

(195

0),

codi

fied

at 4

2 U

.S.C

. § 2

18(a

) &(d

); S

ocia

l Sec

urity

Am

endm

ents

of 1

956,

Pub

. L. N

o.

880,

§ 2

11 (e

), 70

Sta

t. 80

7 (1

956)

, cod

ified

at 4

2 U

.S.C

. § 2

18(d

)(6)

.

Page

6

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

The

fede

ral g

over

nmen

t has

not

impo

sed

the

sam

e fu

ndin

g an

d re

porti

ng

requ

irem

ents

on

stat

e an

d lo

cal p

ensi

ons

as it

has

on

priv

ate

sect

or

pens

ion

plan

s.9 S

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

on p

lans

are

not

co

vere

d by

mos

t of t

he s

ubst

antiv

e re

quire

men

ts u

nder

the

Empl

oyee

R

etire

men

t Inc

ome

Secu

rity

Act o

f 197

4 (E

RIS

A)—

requ

irem

ents

whi

ch

appl

y to

mos

t priv

ate

empl

oyer

ben

efit

plan

s. N

or a

re th

ey in

sure

d by

the

Pens

ion

Bene

fit G

uara

nty

Cor

pora

tion

as p

rivat

e pl

ans

are.

Fed

eral

law

ge

nera

lly d

oes

not r

equi

re s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

to p

refu

nd o

r re

port

on th

e fu

nded

sta

tus

of p

ensi

on p

lans

. How

ever

, in

orde

r for

pa

rtici

pant

s to

rece

ive

pref

eren

tial t

ax tr

eatm

ent (

that

is, f

or e

mpl

oyee

co

ntrib

utio

ns a

nd in

vest

men

t ear

ning

s to

be

tax-

defe

rred

), st

ate

and

loca

l pe

nsio

ns m

ust c

ompl

y w

ith c

erta

in re

quire

men

ts o

f the

Inte

rnal

Rev

enue

C

ode.

10

Stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts a

lso

follo

w d

iffer

ent s

tand

ards

than

the

priv

ate

sect

or fo

r acc

ount

ing

and

finan

cial

repo

rting

. The

Gov

ernm

enta

l Ac

coun

ting

Stan

dard

s Bo

ard

(GAS

B), a

n in

depe

nden

t org

aniz

atio

n, h

as

been

reco

gniz

ed b

y go

vern

men

ts, t

he a

ccou

ntin

g in

dust

ry, a

nd th

e ca

pita

l m

arke

ts a

s th

e of

ficia

l sou

rce

of g

ener

ally

acc

epte

d ac

coun

ting

prin

cipl

es

(GAA

P) fo

r U.S

. sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts. G

ASB’

s st

anda

rds

are

not

fede

ral l

aws

or re

gula

tions

and

GAS

B do

es n

ot h

ave

enfo

rcem

ent

auth

ority

. How

ever

, com

plia

nce

with

its

stan

dard

s is

enf

orce

d th

roug

h la

ws

of s

ome

indi

vidu

al s

tate

s an

d th

e au

dit p

roce

ss, w

here

by a

udito

rs

rend

er o

pini

ons

on th

e fa

ir pr

esen

tatio

n of

sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts’

9 To

furth

er c

larif

y th

e di

ffere

nce

betw

een

gove

rnm

ent a

nd p

rivat

e se

ctor

pen

sion

pla

ns,

the

Inte

rnal

Rev

enue

Ser

vice

issu

ed a

n ad

vanc

e no

tice

of p

ropo

sed

rule

mak

ing

in

Nov

embe

r 201

1 re

latin

g to

the

defin

ition

of t

he te

rm “g

over

nmen

tal p

lan.

” The

gui

danc

e un

der c

onsi

dera

tion

is in

tend

ed to

est

ablis

h co

ordi

nate

d cr

iteria

for d

eter

min

ing

whe

ther

a

plan

is a

gov

ernm

enta

l pla

n an

d ad

dres

s cu

rren

t unc

erta

inty

rega

rdin

g en

titie

s w

ith

orga

niza

tiona

l, re

gula

tory

, and

con

tract

ual c

onne

ctio

ns w

ith s

tate

s or

pol

itica

l sub

divi

sion

s of

sta

tes.

Det

erm

inat

ion

of G

over

nmen

tal P

lan

Sta

tus,

76

Fed.

Reg

. 69,

172

(Nov

. 8,

2011

), to

be

codi

fied

at 2

6 C

.F.R

. § 1

.414

(d)-1

. 10

Con

tribu

tions

to q

ualif

ied

pens

ion

plan

s th

at m

eet c

erta

in re

quire

men

ts—

whe

ther

de

fined

ben

efit

or d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n—ar

e ge

nera

lly n

ot c

ount

ed a

s ta

xabl

e in

com

e to

em

ploy

ees

whe

n th

e co

ntrib

utio

ns a

re m

ade.

How

ever

, whe

n pe

nsio

n be

nefit

s ar

e pa

id,

amou

nts

not p

revi

ousl

y ta

xed

are

subj

ect t

o fe

dera

l and

per

haps

sta

te ta

x. T

his

also

ap

plie

s to

the

inte

rest

inco

me

such

con

tribu

tions

gen

erat

e. A

s an

alte

rnat

ive,

som

e st

ate

and

loca

l qua

lifie

d pe

nsio

n pl

ans

prov

ide

an o

ptio

n fo

r des

igna

ted

Rot

h co

ntrib

utio

ns to

R

oth

acco

unts

, and

suc

h co

ntrib

utio

ns to

Rot

h ac

coun

ts a

re m

ade

afte

r tax

atio

n. T

he

inte

rest

inco

me

earn

ed o

n su

ch c

ontri

butio

ns is

gen

eral

ly n

ot s

ubje

ct to

tax

upon

di

strib

utio

n, p

rovi

ded

that

the

requ

irem

ents

and

rest

rictio

ns a

pplic

able

to s

uch

acco

unts

un

der t

he In

tern

al R

even

ue C

ode

have

bee

n sa

tisfie

d.

Page

7

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

finan

cial

sta

tem

ents

in c

onfo

rmity

with

GAA

P. G

ASB’

s st

anda

rds

requ

ire

repo

rting

fina

ncia

l inf

orm

atio

n on

pen

sion

s, s

uch

as th

e an

nual

pen

sion

co

st, c

ontri

butio

ns a

ctua

lly m

ade

to th

e pl

an, a

nd th

e ra

tio o

f ass

ets

to

liabi

litie

s. In

add

ition

, act

uaria

l sta

ndar

ds o

f pra

ctic

e ar

e pr

omul

gate

d by

th

e Ac

tuar

ial S

tand

ards

Boa

rd. T

hese

sta

ndar

ds a

re d

esig

ned

to p

rovi

de

prac

ticin

g ac

tuar

ies

with

a b

asis

for a

ssur

ing

that

thei

r wor

k w

ill co

nfor

m

to a

ppro

pria

te p

ract

ices

and

to a

ssur

e th

e pu

blic

that

act

uarie

s ar

e pr

ofes

sion

ally

acc

ount

able

(see

app

. II f

or in

form

atio

n on

rece

ntly

pr

opos

ed c

hang

es to

GAS

B an

d Ac

tuar

ial S

tand

ards

Boa

rd s

tand

ards

).

Som

e m

unic

ipal

bon

d an

alys

ts h

ave

repo

rted

conc

erns

abo

ut s

tate

and

lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts’ c

redi

twor

thin

ess

in li

ght o

f the

rece

nt e

cono

mic

do

wnt

urn

and

cont

inui

ng p

ensi

on o

blig

atio

ns. I

n 20

08 a

nd 2

010,

re

spec

tivel

y, th

e Se

curit

ies

and

Exch

ange

Com

mis

sion

took

enf

orce

men

t ac

tions

aga

inst

the

city

of S

an D

iego

and

the

stat

e of

New

Jer

sey

for

mis

repr

esen

ting

the

finan

cial

con

ditio

n of

thei

r pen

sion

fund

s in

in

form

atio

n pr

ovid

ed to

inve

stor

s.11

Alth

ough

pen

sion

pla

ns s

uffe

red

sign

ifica

nt in

vest

men

t los

ses

from

the

rece

nt e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n, w

hich

was

the

mos

t ser

ious

sin

ce th

e G

reat

D

epre

ssio

n, m

ost s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

lans

cur

rent

ly h

ave

asse

ts

suffi

cien

t to

cove

r the

ir be

nefit

com

mitm

ents

for a

dec

ade

or m

ore.

N

ever

thel

ess,

mos

t pla

ns h

ave

expe

rienc

ed a

gro

win

g ga

p be

twee

n ac

tuar

ial a

sset

s an

d lia

bilit

ies

over

the

past

dec

ade,

mea

ning

that

hig

her

cont

ribut

ions

from

gov

ernm

ent s

pons

ors

are

need

ed to

mai

ntai

n fu

nds

on

an a

ctua

rially

bas

ed p

ath

tow

ard

sust

aina

bilit

y. In

spi

te o

f bud

get

pres

sure

s th

roug

h th

e re

cess

ion,

mos

t pla

ns c

ontin

ued

to re

ceiv

e pr

erec

essi

on c

ontri

butio

n le

vels

on

an a

ctua

rial b

asis

from

thei

r spo

nsor

s,

with

mos

t pla

ns c

ontri

butin

g th

eir f

ull a

ctua

rial l

evel

. How

ever

, the

re w

ere

som

e no

tabl

e ex

cept

ions

, and

thes

e pl

ans

cont

inue

d to

rece

ive

low

er

cont

ribut

ion

paym

ents

. Sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts e

xper

ienc

ed

decl

inin

g re

venu

es a

nd g

row

ing

expe

nses

on

othe

r fro

nts,

and

gro

win

g bu

dget

pre

ssur

es w

ill co

ntin

ue to

cha

lleng

e th

eir a

bilit

y to

pro

vide

ad

equa

te c

ontri

butio

ns to

hel

p su

stai

n th

eir p

ensi

on fu

nds.

11

GA

O is

con

duct

ing

wor

k un

der S

ectio

n 97

6 of

the

Dod

d-Fr

ank

Wal

l Stre

et R

efor

m a

nd

Con

sum

er P

rote

ctio

n A

ct, e

nact

ed in

201

0, to

stu

dy th

e in

form

atio

n th

at s

tate

and

loca

l go

vern

men

ts p

rovi

de in

vest

ors

in m

unic

ipal

sec

uriti

es, i

nclu

ding

the

adva

ntag

es a

nd

disa

dvan

tage

s of

pro

vidi

ng a

dditi

onal

fina

ncia

l inf

orm

atio

n. T

he re

port

is s

ched

uled

for

issu

ance

in s

umm

er 2

012.

Pla

ns H

ave

Suff

icie

nt

Ass

ets

to P

ay N

ear-

Term

Ben

efit

s, b

ut

Gro

win

g B

udge

t P

ress

ures

Will

C

halle

nge

The

ir

Sust

aina

bilit

y

Page

8

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

The

rece

nt e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n re

sulte

d in

sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

ensi

on p

lans

su

fferin

g si

gnifi

cant

inve

stm

ent l

osse

s. P

ositi

ve in

vest

men

t ret

urns

are

an

impo

rtant

sou

rce

of fu

nds

for p

ensi

on p

lans

, and

hav

e hi

stor

ical

ly

gene

rate

d m

ore

than

hal

f of s

tate

and

loca

l pen

sion

fund

incr

ease

s.

How

ever

, rat

her t

han

addi

ng to

pla

ns’ a

sset

s, in

vest

men

ts lo

st m

ore

than

$6

72 b

illion

dur

ing

fisca

l yea

rs 2

008

and

2009

, bas

ed u

pon

Cen

sus

Bure

au fi

gure

s fo

r the

sec

tor (

see

fig. 2

). Si

nce

2009

, im

prov

emen

ts in

in

vest

men

t ear

ning

s ha

ve h

elpe

d pl

ans

reco

ver s

ome

of th

ese

loss

es, a

s ev

iden

ced

by m

ore

rece

nt C

ensu

s Bu

reau

dat

a on

larg

e pl

ans.

12 M

ore

impo

rtant

ly, h

owev

er, p

ublic

pen

sion

pla

ns h

ave

built

up

asse

ts o

ver

man

y ye

ars

thro

ugh

pref

undi

ng (t

hat i

s, e

mpl

oyer

and

mem

ber

cont

ribut

ions

) and

thro

ugh

the

accu

mul

atio

n of

ass

ocia

ted

inve

stm

ent

retu

rns.

13

12

Bas

ed o

n C

ensu

s qu

arte

rly d

ata

on 1

00 la

rge

retir

emen

t sys

tem

s, in

vest

men

t ret

urns

ha

ve b

een

mos

tly p

ositi

ve s

ince

the

seco

nd q

uarte

r of 2

009.

See

Cen

sus,

Fin

ance

s of

S

elec

ted

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent E

mpl

oyee

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

ms.

13A

pre

fund

ed p

lan

mea

ns a

pla

n ha

s se

t asi

de fu

nds

for p

ensi

on o

blig

atio

ns m

ade

for

curr

ent e

mpl

oyee

s as

opp

osed

to p

ay-a

s-yo

u go

pla

n, w

hich

doe

s no

t set

asi

de fu

nds

to

pay

for f

utur

e ob

ligat

ions

to c

urre

nt e

mpl

oyee

s.

Des

pite

Inv

estm

ent

Loss

es,

Mos

t P

lans

Hol

d Su

ffic

ient

A

sset

s to

Pay

Ben

efit

O

blig

atio

ns f

or t

he N

ear

Fut

ure

Page

9

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Figu

re 2

: Inv

estm

ent R

etur

ns fo

r Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent P

ensi

on P

lans

, Fis

cal

Year

s 20

05–2

009

Asse

ssin

g th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

acro

ss a

ll pl

ans

usin

g ac

tuar

ially

de

term

ined

figu

res

(suc

h as

a p

lan’

s fu

nded

ratio

) is

chal

leng

ing,

in p

art,

beca

use

of th

e va

rious

met

hods

and

ass

umpt

ions

use

d by

thes

e pl

ans

(see

app

. II).

One

alte

rnat

ive

mea

sure

of f

inan

cial

con

ditio

n ac

ross

pe

nsio

n pl

ans,

alth

ough

not

opt

imal

whe

n as

sess

ing

the

finan

cial

hea

lth

of a

sin

gle

plan

, is

the

ratio

of f

und

asse

ts to

ann

ual e

xpen

ditu

res.

14 F

und

asse

ts re

pres

ent t

he d

olla

r am

ount

a p

lan

has

built

up,

whi

le a

nnua

l ex

pend

iture

s ul

timat

ely

dete

rmin

e ho

w q

uick

ly a

sset

s ar

e sp

ent d

own.

15

14

Exp

endi

ture

s in

clud

e bo

th a

nnua

l ben

efit

paym

ents

and

any

exp

ense

s pa

id o

ut o

f pla

n as

sets

.

Al

tern

ativ

ely,

whe

n as

sess

ing

the

finan

cial

con

ditio

n of

an

indi

vidu

al

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

an, v

ario

us a

ppro

ache

s ar

e us

ed, a

nd lo

okin

g at

mul

tiple

fa

ctor

s is

esp

ecia

lly u

sefu

l in

prov

idin

g a

mor

e co

mpl

ete

pict

ure

of a

pl

an’s

fina

ncia

l con

ditio

n. In

add

ition

to th

e le

vel o

f fun

ding

(lev

el o

f pla

n as

sets

rela

tive

to p

lan

liabi

litie

s), a

sses

smen

ts o

f a p

lan’

s fin

anci

al

15H

owev

er, u

sing

non

actu

aria

l fig

ures

is a

sim

plifi

catio

n be

caus

e it

does

not

con

side

r the

un

ique

dem

ogra

phic

pro

file—

espe

cial

ly, t

he re

lativ

e pr

opor

tions

of r

etire

d an

d ac

tive

wor

kers

in th

e pl

an’s

act

uaria

l lia

bilit

y—an

d re

late

d da

ta a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith e

ach

plan

.

Page

10

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

viab

ility

by ra

ting

agen

cies

and

oth

ers

may

take

into

con

side

ratio

n th

e in

fluen

ce o

f the

pla

n sp

onso

r, th

e pl

an’s

und

erly

ing

met

hods

and

as

sum

ptio

ns, a

nd e

fforts

to m

anag

e ris

k (s

ee ta

ble

2).

Tabl

e 2:

Und

erst

andi

ng th

e Fi

nanc

ial C

ondi

tion

of a

Pub

lic D

efin

ed B

enef

it Pl

an

Sa

mpl

e qu

estio

ns

Influ

ence

of p

lan

spon

sor

H

as th

e go

vern

men

t spo

nsor

mai

ntai

ned

its a

ctua

rial r

equi

red

cont

ribut

ions

ove

r tim

e?

W

hat i

s th

e ou

tlook

for t

he g

over

nmen

t spo

nsor

’s e

cono

my

and

budg

et (t

o af

ford

fu

ture

con

tribu

tions

)?

Is

the

plan

’s s

pons

or a

ble

to a

djus

t the

pla

n’s

desi

gn (t

hat i

s, b

enef

it le

vels

), if

need

ed?

Und

erly

ing

plan

met

hods

and

as

sum

ptio

ns

A

re u

nder

lyin

g ac

tuar

ial a

ssum

ptio

ns re

ason

able

, suc

h as

the

plan

’s d

isco

unt r

ate

or

assu

mpt

ions

for i

nfla

tion

and

sala

ry g

row

th?

D

o th

e sp

onso

r’s a

ctua

rial m

etho

ds fo

r det

erm

inin

g th

e ra

pidi

ty o

f pre

fund

ing

(act

uaria

l cos

t met

hods

for a

ssig

ning

cos

ts to

tim

e pe

riods

, am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riods

, and

an

y as

set s

moo

thin

g m

etho

ds) p

rodu

ce a

resp

onsi

ble

path

tow

ard

fund

ing

the

oblig

atio

n?

W

ho u

ltim

atel

y de

term

ines

a p

lan’

s m

etho

ds a

nd a

ssum

ptio

ns?

A

re th

ose

mak

ing

thes

e de

cisi

ons

doin

g so

with

sou

nd p

rofe

ssio

nal j

udgm

ent?

M

anag

ing

risk

Is

a p

lan’

s in

vest

men

t por

tfolio

pro

perly

pos

ition

ed to

bal

ance

risk

and

retu

rns?

Has

a ri

sk e

valu

atio

n, m

anag

emen

t, an

d re

porti

ng fr

amew

ork

been

iden

tifie

d to

hel

p m

anag

e pl

an ri

sk?

H

as th

e ris

k an

alys

is a

nd a

sset

allo

catio

n de

cisi

on ta

ken

into

acc

ount

rele

vant

risk

fa

ctor

s, s

uch

as th

e si

ze o

f the

spo

nsor

’s p

lans

rela

tive

to th

e si

ze o

f the

pla

n sp

onso

r’s ta

x ba

se, b

udge

t, or

oth

er m

easu

re o

f eco

nom

ic re

sour

ces?

Do

the

plan

’s b

enef

it fo

rmul

as o

r gov

erna

nce

proc

esse

s su

bjec

t the

pla

n sp

onso

r to

the

risk

of s

igni

fican

t inc

reas

es in

ben

efit

prom

ises

?

Sour

ce: G

AO a

naly

sis.

As

illu

stra

ted

in fi

gure

3, a

n an

alys

is o

f his

toric

al C

ensu

s Bu

reau

dat

a on

st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

ons

show

s th

at th

e ra

tio o

f fun

d as

sets

to

ann

ual e

xpen

ditu

res

fell

durin

g th

e st

ock

mar

ket d

ownt

urn

rela

ted

to

the

oil c

risis

of t

he e

arly

197

0s, b

ut e

vent

ually

reco

vere

d an

d re

ache

d its

pe

ak in

200

0, d

riven

by

stro

ng in

vest

men

t res

ults

thro

ugho

ut th

e 19

90s.

Si

nce

that

pea

k, b

oth

the

mar

ket d

ownt

urn

in th

e ea

rly 2

000s

and

su

stai

ned

econ

omic

wea

knes

s be

ginn

ing

in 2

008

drov

e th

e ra

tio o

f se

ctor

-wid

e as

sets

rela

tive

to e

xpen

ditu

res

low

er. O

vera

ll, th

ese

data

sh

ow th

at th

e ag

greg

ate

ratio

of f

und

asse

ts to

ann

ual e

xpen

ditu

res,

as

of

2009

, is

low

er, b

ut in

line

with

his

toric

al n

orm

s da

ting

back

to 1

957.

Page

11

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Fig

ure

3: H

isto

rical

Tre

nds

in th

e Fi

nanc

ial C

ondi

tion

of S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Pen

sion

Pla

ns—

Agg

rega

te R

atio

of

Mar

ket A

sset

s to

Tot

al E

xpen

ditu

res,

195

7–20

09

At th

e sa

me

time,

dat

a on

indi

vidu

al p

lans

indi

cate

that

this

mea

sure

can

va

ry c

onsi

dera

bly

acro

ss p

lans

. As

illust

rate

d in

figu

re 4

, dat

a on

larg

e pl

ans

for f

isca

l yea

r 200

9 sh

ow th

at th

eir f

und

asse

ts re

lativ

e to

ann

ual

expe

nditu

res

varie

d w

idel

y, w

ith ra

tios

rang

ing

from

less

than

5 to

gre

ater

th

an 2

0.

Figu

re 4

: Var

iabi

lity

in L

arge

Pla

ns’ R

atio

s of

Ass

ets

to A

nnua

l Exp

endi

ture

s, F

isca

l Ye

ar 2

009

Page

12

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

From

the

early

yea

rs o

f pre

fund

ing

of p

ensi

on p

lans

, sec

tor-w

ide

plan

co

ntrib

utio

ns o

utpa

ced

plan

exp

endi

ture

s, b

ut b

y th

e ea

rly 1

990s

, ex

pend

iture

s be

gan

outp

acin

g co

ntrib

utio

ns.16

Thi

s tre

nd w

as p

redi

ctab

le.

As p

ublic

pla

ns m

atur

ed, t

hey

bega

n to

hav

e gr

eate

r pro

porti

ons

of re

tiree

s to

act

ive

wor

kers

. As

such

, pay

men

ts to

retir

ees

incr

ease

d re

lativ

e to

pla

n co

ntrib

utio

ns a

nd, a

s a

resu

lt, in

mor

e re

cent

yea

rs, s

ecto

r-wid

e ex

pend

iture

s ha

ve o

utpa

ced

cont

ribut

ions

.17 N

ever

thel

ess,

giv

en th

e as

set

leve

ls o

f mos

t sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t pla

ns a

nd th

e pa

ce o

f ex

pend

iture

s re

lativ

e to

con

tribu

tions

, mos

t pla

ns c

an b

e ex

pect

ed to

cov

er

thei

r com

mitm

ents

for t

he n

ear f

utur

e w

ith th

eir e

xist

ing

asse

ts.18

For

ex

ampl

e, e

ven

if th

ese

plan

s re

ceiv

ed n

o m

ore

cont

ribut

ions

or i

nves

tmen

t re

turn

s, m

ost l

arge

pla

ns w

ould

not

exh

aust

thei

r ass

ets

for a

dec

ade

or

long

er, s

ince

they

hol

d as

sets

at l

east

10

times

thei

r ann

ual e

xpen

ditu

res.

Whi

le s

tate

and

loca

l pen

sion

pla

ns h

ave

suffi

cien

t ass

ets

to m

eet t

heir

oblig

atio

ns in

the

near

futu

re, a

n ex

amin

atio

n of

act

uaria

lly d

eter

min

ed

fund

ed ra

tios

amon

g la

rge

plan

s sh

ows

a gr

owin

g ga

p be

twee

n th

eir

16

This

tren

d is

con

sist

ent w

ith a

ctua

rial p

ract

ices

of p

ensi

on p

lans

that

hav

e in

crea

sing

pr

opor

tions

of r

etire

es (t

hat i

s, m

atur

ing

plan

s).

17W

heth

er p

ensi

on fu

nds

grow

or d

imin

ish

depe

nds

on w

heth

er p

ositi

ve in

vest

men

t re

turn

s an

d co

ntrib

utio

ns s

tay

ahea

d of

pen

sion

fund

exp

endi

ture

s.

18A

stu

dy b

y th

e C

ente

r for

Ret

irem

ent R

esea

rch

at B

osto

n C

olle

ge a

naly

zing

pla

n as

sets

re

lativ

e to

ben

efit

paym

ents

and

pro

ject

ing

thes

e fig

ures

forw

ard,

ass

umin

g in

vest

men

t re

turn

rate

s of

6 a

nd 8

per

cent

resp

ectiv

ely,

sho

wed

that

mos

t lar

ge p

lans

hav

e en

ough

pr

efun

ded

reso

urce

s to

cov

er th

eir b

enef

it pa

ymen

ts fo

r at l

east

30

year

s, w

ith a

few

no

tabl

e ex

cept

ions

. Pla

ns in

clud

ed in

this

stu

dy w

ere

chos

en fr

om th

e la

rges

t pla

ns fr

om

each

sta

te a

s w

ell a

s a

judg

men

tal s

ampl

e of

loca

lly a

dmin

iste

red

plan

s. T

he s

tudy

was

ba

sed

upon

200

9 da

ta th

at d

id n

ot re

flect

inve

stm

ent r

etur

n ga

ins

over

201

0 or

rece

nt

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

t effo

rts to

incr

ease

em

ploy

ee c

ontri

butio

ns a

nd re

duce

ben

efits

fo

r new

em

ploy

ees,

See

Alic

ia H

. Mun

nell,

Jea

n-Pi

erre

Aub

ry, J

osh

Hur

witz

, and

Lau

ra

Qui

nby,

Can

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s M

uddl

e Th

roug

h?(M

arch

201

1). A

lso,

just

prio

r to

the

econ

omic

cris

is, w

e re

porte

d th

at m

ost s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent p

ensi

on p

lans

had

en

ough

inve

sted

reso

urce

s to

kee

p up

with

ben

efits

they

wer

e sc

hedu

led

to p

ay fo

r se

vera

l dec

ades

. See

GA

O, S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Ret

iree

Ben

efits

: Cur

rent

Fu

nded

Sta

tus

of P

ensi

on a

nd H

ealth

Ben

efits

, GAO

-08-

223

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: Ja

n. 2

9,

2008

). Th

ere

have

bee

n ot

her s

tudi

es p

roje

ctin

g th

e lo

ngev

ity o

f sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

ensi

on

plan

s; n

otab

ly a

stu

dy b

y Jo

shua

Rau

h, s

ee J

oshu

a D

. Rau

h, A

re S

tate

Pub

lic P

ensi

ons

Sus

tain

able

? W

hy th

e Fe

dera

l Gov

ernm

ent S

houl

d W

orry

Abo

ut S

tate

Pen

sion

Lia

bilit

ies,

(M

ay 1

5, 2

010)

. The

stu

dy p

roje

cted

som

e no

tabl

y ea

rly fu

nd e

xhau

stio

n da

tes,

incl

udin

g so

me

fund

s ru

nnin

g ou

t of m

oney

this

dec

ade.

How

ever

, the

stu

dy w

as b

ased

on

the

assu

mpt

ion

that

ben

efits

ear

ned

to d

ate

wou

ld o

nly

be fi

nanc

ed o

ut o

f cur

rent

pla

n as

sets

an

d no

t fro

m a

ny fu

ture

con

tribu

tions

. The

pro

ject

ed e

xhau

stio

n da

tes

are

thus

not

re

alis

tic e

stim

ates

of w

hen

the

fund

s m

ight

act

ually

run

out o

f mon

ey.

Pla

ns F

ace

a G

row

ing

Gap

be

twee

n A

sset

s an

d Li

abili

ties

, Lea

ding

to

Hig

her

Con

trib

utio

n R

equi

rem

ents

Page

13

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

asse

ts a

nd li

abilit

ies.

19 T

his

ratio

is im

porta

nt s

ince

, on

a pl

an-b

y-pl

an

basi

s, a

pla

n’s

fund

ed ra

tio s

how

s th

e pl

an’s

fund

ing

prog

ress

and

is p

art

of th

e ba

sis

for d

eter

min

ing

cont

ribut

ion

leve

ls n

eces

sary

for f

und

sust

aina

bilit

y.20

As

a re

sult

of re

cent

mar

ket d

eclin

es a

nd o

ther

reas

ons—

such

as

spon

sors

’ fai

lure

to k

eep

pace

with

thei

r act

uaria

lly re

quire

d co

ntrib

utio

ns a

nd b

enef

it in

crea

ses

durin

g th

e ea

rly 2

000s

—fu

nded

ratio

s ha

ve tr

ende

d lo

wer

. Dat

a co

mpi

led

on la

rge

plan

s in

dica

te th

at th

e fu

nded

ra

tios

for t

hese

pla

ns, i

n ag

greg

ate,

hav

e fa

llen

over

the

past

dec

ade

from

ov

er 1

00 p

erce

nt in

fisc

al y

ear 2

001

to 7

5.6

perc

ent i

n fis

cal y

ear 2

010.

21

19

The

fund

ed ra

tio is

cal

cula

ted

by d

ivid

ing

plan

act

uaria

l ass

ets

by p

lan

actu

aria

l lia

bilit

ies.

See

app

endi

x II

for a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion

on a

ctua

rial m

etho

ds a

nd m

easu

res.

(S

ee fi

g. 5

.)

20C

urre

nt G

AS

B s

tand

ards

incl

ude

a m

easu

re k

now

n as

the

annu

al re

quire

d co

ntrib

utio

n,

or A

RC

, whi

ch is

not

nec

essa

rily

the

sam

e am

ount

as

the

cont

ribut

ion

actu

ally

mad

e by

th

e em

ploy

er to

the

plan

. Con

cept

ually

, the

AR

C is

an

amou

nt th

at w

ould

cov

er th

e em

ploy

er’s

sha

re o

f cos

ts a

ttrib

utab

le to

the

curre

nt y

ear o

f em

ploy

ee s

ervi

ce (t

he “n

orm

al

cost

”), p

lus

an a

mou

nt to

elim

inat

e th

e pl

an’s

unf

unde

d lia

bilit

y ov

er a

n am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riod,

all

dete

rmin

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

an

actu

aria

lly s

ound

fund

ing

met

hod

sele

cted

for

the

plan

(of w

hich

ther

e ar

e m

ultip

le c

hoic

es).

The

acco

untin

g co

st—

that

is, t

he c

ost f

or

the

year

reco

gniz

ed in

the

empl

oyer

’s fi

nanc

ial s

tate

men

ts—

is b

ased

on

this

AR

C. I

n th

is

sens

e, th

e ac

coun

ting

is b

ased

on

the

stat

ed fu

ndin

g m

etho

d se

lect

ed b

y th

e em

ploy

er.

But

the

empl

oyer

may

or m

ay n

ot a

ctua

lly c

ontri

bute

the

AR

C in

any

giv

en y

ear,

so th

at

the

acco

untin

g co

st m

ay d

iffer

from

the

fund

ing

cost

. See

app

endi

x II

for i

nfor

mat

ion

on

prop

osed

cha

nges

to G

AS

B s

tand

ards

. 21

Ana

lyzi

ng th

e ag

greg

ate

leve

l of l

arge

pla

ns m

inim

izes

the

diffi

culti

es in

mak

ing

com

paris

ons

acro

ss p

lans

with

act

uaria

lly b

ased

dat

a, s

ince

thes

e da

ta in

clud

e th

e sa

me

grou

p of

pla

ns o

ver t

ime.

Mos

t pla

ns k

eep

thei

r key

act

uaria

l met

hods

fairl

y st

eady

ove

r tim

e, w

ith s

ome

sign

ifica

nt e

xcep

tions

. For

exa

mpl

e, a

ny g

iven

pla

n w

ill ty

pica

lly u

se a

si

mila

r cos

t met

hod,

sm

ooth

ing,

and

am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riod

over

tim

e.

Page

14

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Figu

re 5

: Agg

rega

te F

undi

ng R

atio

: Tre

nd D

ata

for L

arge

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

G

over

nmen

t Pen

sion

Pla

ns, F

isca

l Yea

rs 2

001–

2010

Not

e: T

he n

umbe

r of l

arge

pla

ns in

clud

ed in

the

anal

ysis

rang

ed fr

om 1

19 to

126

pla

ns.

Seve

ral f

acto

rs h

ave

cont

ribut

ed to

the

grow

ing

gap

betw

een

plan

s’

actu

aria

l ass

ets

and

liabi

litie

s. F

or e

xam

ple,

larg

e pe

nsio

n fu

nds

gene

rally

as

sum

ed in

vest

men

t ret

urns

rang

ing

from

6 to

9 p

erce

nt th

roug

hout

the

2000

s, in

clud

ing

assu

min

g re

turn

s of

app

roxi

mat

ely

8 pe

rcen

t, on

av

erag

e, in

200

9, d

espi

te th

e de

clin

es in

the

stoc

k m

arke

t dur

ing

this

tim

e.22

Pen

sion

por

tfolio

s m

aint

ain

othe

r ass

ets

besi

de e

quiti

es; h

owev

er,

gain

s in

thes

e ot

her a

sset

cla

sses

did

not

mak

e up

the

amou

nts

lost

by

nega

tive

equi

ty p

erfo

rman

ce o

ver t

his

perio

d.23

22

Pla

ns ty

pica

lly p

erfo

rm “e

xper

ienc

e st

udie

s” a

s on

e fa

ctor

to g

uide

them

in m

akin

g ad

just

men

ts to

thei

r und

erly

ing

actu

aria

l ass

umpt

ions

suc

h as

adj

ustin

g ex

pect

ed

empl

oyee

sal

ary

leve

ls o

r ret

iree

life

expe

ctan

cies

.

It is

impo

rtant

to n

ote

that

th

e pe

riod

from

200

8 to

200

9 w

as a

n ex

traor

dina

ry lo

w p

erio

d fo

r ret

urns

on

inve

stm

ents

in th

e fin

anci

al h

isto

ry o

f the

Uni

ted

Stat

es.

23S

ee N

atio

nal A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Sta

te R

etire

men

t Adm

inis

trato

rs, P

ublic

Fun

d S

urve

y S

umm

ary

of F

indi

ngs

for F

Y200

9, (N

ovem

ber 2

010)

.

Gro

win

g G

ap b

etw

een

Act

uari

al A

sset

s an

d Li

abili

ties

Page

15

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Bene

fit in

crea

ses

wer

e an

othe

r im

porta

nt re

ason

for t

he g

row

ing

gap

betw

een

asse

ts a

nd li

abilit

ies

over

the

past

dec

ade.

The

se in

crea

ses

wer

e en

acte

d ea

rly in

the

deca

de w

hen

the

fund

ed s

tatu

s of

pla

ns w

as

stro

ng. F

or e

xam

ple,

11

stat

es in

crea

sed

pens

ion

bene

fits

in 2

001

acco

rdin

g to

repo

rts fr

om th

e N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e of

Sta

te L

egis

latu

res.

24

Amon

g th

e si

tes

incl

uded

in o

ur re

view

, Pen

nsyl

vani

a en

acte

d le

gisl

atio

n in

200

1 th

at in

crea

sed

the

pens

ion

bene

fit m

ultip

lier f

rom

2 to

2.5

pe

rcen

t—an

incr

ease

of 2

5 pe

rcen

t.25

Low

er fu

nded

ratio

s ge

nera

lly m

ean

high

er a

nnua

l con

tribu

tion

rate

s ar

e ne

cess

ary

to h

elp

sust

ain

pens

ion

plan

s. T

hus,

as

fund

ed ra

tios

trend

ed

low

er o

ver t

he p

ast d

ecad

e, s

pons

or c

ontri

butio

n ra

tes

trend

ed h

ighe

r. Fo

r exa

mpl

e, fr

om 2

002

to 2

009,

the

med

ian

gove

rnm

ent s

pons

or

cont

ribut

ion

rate

s am

ong

larg

e pl

ans

rose

as

a pe

rcen

tage

of p

ayro

ll,

whi

le e

mpl

oyee

con

tribu

tion

leve

ls re

mai

ned

the

sam

e th

roug

h th

is s

ame

perio

d (s

ee ta

ble

3).

Thi

s hi

gher

ben

efit

form

ula

appl

ied

to b

oth

new

and

cur

rent

ly e

mpl

oyed

pen

sion

pla

n m

embe

rs (c

over

ing

stat

e em

ploy

ees

and

loca

l pub

lic s

choo

l em

ploy

ees)

. Thi

s w

as a

lso

the

case

in C

alifo

rnia

and

Col

orad

o w

here

pen

sion

ben

efit

incr

ease

s in

the

late

199

0s a

nd e

arly

in th

e 20

00s

help

ed d

rive

liabi

litie

s hi

gher

.

Tabl

e 3:

Med

ian

Con

trib

utio

n R

ates

for L

arge

Pla

ns a

s a

Perc

enta

ge o

f Pay

roll

2002

20

09

Pla

ns n

ot p

artic

ipat

ing

in S

ocia

l Sec

urity

E

mpl

oyer

10

.3%

12

.7%

Em

ploy

ee

8 8

Pla

ns p

artic

ipat

ing

in S

ocia

l Sec

urity

E

mpl

oyer

6

9.4

E

mpl

oyee

5%

5%

Sour

ce: N

atio

nal A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Sta

te R

etire

men

t Adm

inis

trato

rs.

In s

pite

of b

udge

t pre

ssur

es th

roug

h th

e 20

07-2

009

rece

ssio

n, m

ost

gove

rnm

ent s

pons

ors

of la

rge

plan

s co

ntin

ued

to c

ontri

bute

abo

ut th

e sa

me

perc

enta

ge o

f the

ir an

nual

requ

ired

cont

ribut

ion

(AR

C) l

evel

s

24

See

Ron

ald

Sne

ll, N

CS

L, P

ensi

ons

and

Ret

irem

ent P

lan

Enac

tmen

ts in

200

1 S

tate

Le

gisl

atur

es (2

001)

. 25

Soo

n af

ter P

enns

ylva

nia

incr

ease

d be

nefit

s, th

e st

ate

also

cha

nged

its

actu

aria

l m

etho

ds to

am

ortiz

e ga

ins

mor

e qu

ickl

y th

an lo

sses

, effe

ctiv

ely

supp

ress

ing

the

empl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

n ra

te o

ver t

he s

ubse

quen

t 10-

year

per

iod,

acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n of

ficia

ls.

Act

uari

ally

Det

erm

ined

C

ontr

ibut

ion

Rat

es T

rend

ing

Hig

her

Page

16

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

dete

rmin

ed to

be

need

ed to

hel

p su

stai

n th

eir f

und

asse

ts.26

Fro

m 2

005

until

200

9, ju

st u

nder

two-

third

s of

larg

e pl

an s

pons

ors

cont

inue

d to

pay

at

leas

t 90

perc

ent o

f the

ir AR

C p

aym

ents

.27

In a

dditi

on, t

he d

istri

butio

n of

pla

n sp

onso

r con

tribu

tion

leve

ls in

201

0,

illust

rate

d in

figu

re 6

, sho

ws

that

abo

ut h

alf t

he s

pons

ors

of la

rge

plan

s co

ntrib

uted

thei

r ful

l 100

per

cent

or m

ore

of A

RC

pay

men

ts, w

hile

oth

ers

cont

ribut

ed m

uch

less

.

How

ever

, the

gap

in d

olla

rs

betw

een

wha

t lar

ge p

lans

wou

ld h

ave

rece

ived

, in

aggr

egat

e, if

they

re

ceiv

ed th

eir f

ull A

RC

pay

men

ts is

sig

nific

ant.

For e

xam

ple,

in 2

009,

la

rge

plan

s sp

onso

rs c

ontri

bute

d ap

prox

imat

ely

$63.

9 bi

llion

in a

ggre

gate

, $1

0.7

billio

n le

ss th

an if

they

had

mad

e th

eir f

ull A

RC

pay

men

ts.

Figu

re 6

: Dis

trib

utio

n of

Per

cent

age

of A

RC

Pai

d fo

r Lar

ge P

lans

, Fis

cal Y

ear 2

010

26

A g

over

nmen

t spo

nsor

may

pro

vide

a lo

wer

per

cent

age

of th

e A

RC

from

one

yea

r to

the

next

, yet

its

cont

ribut

ion,

in d

olla

rs, m

ay b

e hi

gher

than

the

prev

ious

yea

r’s a

mou

nt. T

his

is

sign

ifica

nt fr

om a

bud

getin

g pe

rspe

ctiv

e be

caus

e of

the

year

-to-y

ear i

ncre

ase.

27

This

leve

l had

falle

n si

nce

2001

, whe

n 9

of e

very

10

larg

e pl

an s

pons

ors

wer

e pa

ying

at

leas

t 90

perc

ent o

f the

ir A

RC

s.

Page

17

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Goi

ng fo

rwar

d, a

mon

g th

e ei

ght s

elec

ted

stat

es a

nd e

ight

sel

ecte

d lo

cal

juris

dict

ions

we

revi

ewed

, sev

eral

offi

cial

s to

ld u

s th

at th

ey e

xpec

ted

sign

ifica

nt in

crea

ses

in th

eir e

mpl

oyer

con

tribu

tion

rate

s as

a p

erce

ntag

e of

pay

roll.

For

inst

ance

, offi

cial

s fro

m th

e Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m

of G

eorg

ia e

xpec

t the

ir co

ntrib

utio

n ra

tes

to n

early

dou

ble

over

the

next

5

year

s (fr

om 1

0.5

to 2

0 pe

rcen

t of p

ayro

ll) to

hel

p m

aint

ain

a su

stai

nabl

e pa

th fo

r the

ir de

fined

ben

efit

plan

s. O

ffici

als

from

the

Uta

h R

etire

men

t Sy

stem

s ex

pect

rate

s to

incr

ease

from

app

roxi

mat

ely

13 to

20

perc

ent o

f pa

yrol

l.

Fisc

al p

ress

ures

on

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts’ b

udge

ts a

dd to

the

chal

leng

es fa

ced

by p

lan

spon

sors

and

thei

r abi

lity

to m

ake

adeq

uate

co

ntrib

utio

ns to

thei

r pen

sion

pla

ns. T

he e

cono

mic

dow

ntur

n an

d sl

ow

reco

very

led

to b

udge

t sho

rtfal

ls in

the

stat

e an

d lo

cal s

ecto

rs b

ecau

se o

f de

clin

ing

tax

reve

nues

and

incr

ease

d sp

endi

ng o

n ec

onom

ic s

afet

y ne

t pr

ogra

ms

such

as

heal

th c

are

and

soci

al s

ervi

ces.

Acc

ordi

ng to

sur

vey

data

from

the

Nat

iona

l Ass

ocia

tion

of S

tate

Bud

get O

ffice

rs (N

ASBO

), fro

m fi

scal

yea

rs 2

009

thro

ugh

2011

, sta

tes

repo

rted

solv

ing

near

ly $

230

billio

n in

gap

s be

twee

n pr

ojec

ted

spen

ding

and

reve

nue

leve

ls.28

Loc

al

gove

rnm

ents

hav

e al

so s

trugg

led

with

thei

r bud

gets

. For

exa

mpl

e, th

e N

atio

nal L

eagu

e of

Citi

es re

porte

d th

at if

all

city

bud

gets

wer

e to

tale

d to

geth

er, t

hey

wou

ld li

kely

face

a c

ombi

ned

estim

ated

sho

rtfal

l of

anyw

here

from

$56

billi

on to

$83

billi

on fr

om 2

010

to 2

012.

29

As a

resu

lt, h

ighe

r pen

sion

con

tribu

tions

hav

e be

en n

eede

d at

the

sam

e tim

e st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

hav

e fa

ced

adde

d pr

essu

res

to b

alan

ce

thei

r bud

gets

. Eve

n in

nor

mal

eco

nom

ic ti

mes

, sta

te a

nd lo

cal

gove

rnm

ents

see

k co

nsis

tenc

y in

pro

gram

spe

ndin

g ar

eas,

mea

ning

that

la

rge

year

-to-y

ear i

ncre

ases

in p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

n le

vels

can

stra

in

28

NA

SB

O, F

isca

l Sur

vey

of S

tate

s: S

prin

g 20

11 (W

ashi

ngto

n, D

.C.:

2011

). In

add

ition

, N

AS

BO

not

es th

at o

ne o

f the

cle

ares

t sig

ns o

f fis

cal s

tress

is th

e ne

ed fo

r sta

tes

to m

ake

mid

year

bud

get c

uts

to h

elp

bala

nce

thei

r bud

gets

. Sur

vey

resp

onse

s in

dica

te th

at 4

3 st

ates

mad

e su

ch re

duct

ions

in fi

scal

yea

r 200

9, a

nd 3

9 st

ates

did

so

in fi

scal

yea

r 201

0.

29A

s an

indi

catio

n of

ext

rem

e fis

cal s

tress

am

ong

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

, a s

mal

l num

ber h

ave

filed

for b

ankr

uptc

y: 4

file

d in

200

8, 1

0 in

200

9, 6

in 2

010,

and

4 a

s of

Jun

e 20

11. S

ince

19

37, w

hen

the

mun

icip

al b

ankr

uptc

y co

de w

as in

stitu

ted,

ther

e ha

ve b

een

624

filin

gs a

s of

Jun

e 30

, 201

1, a

ccor

ding

to a

n ex

pert’

s an

alys

is o

f mun

icip

al b

ankr

uptc

y fil

ings

. See

Ja

mes

E. S

piot

to, “

The

Myt

h an

d R

ealit

y of

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ents

Deb

t Fin

anci

ng

in th

e U

.S.A

. in

Tim

es o

f Fin

anci

al E

mer

genc

y,” (

July

25,

201

1). A

vaila

ble

on th

e U

.S.

Sec

uriti

es a

nd E

xcha

nge

Com

mis

sion

web

site

.

Pla

ns A

re V

ulne

rabl

e to

P

ress

ures

on

Stat

e an

d Lo

cal B

udge

ts

Page

18

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

budg

ets.

Sin

ce s

ome

of th

ese

gove

rnm

ents

are

sub

ject

to b

alan

ced

budg

et re

quire

men

ts, a

nnua

l pen

sion

con

tribu

tions

, whi

ch a

vera

ged

arou

nd 4

per

cent

of s

tate

and

loca

l bud

gets

in fi

scal

yea

r 200

8, m

ust

com

pete

with

oth

er p

ress

ing

need

s, e

ven

thou

gh p

ensi

on c

osts

are

ob

ligat

ions

that

gov

ernm

ents

mus

t eve

ntua

lly p

ay.30

Alth

ough

tax

reve

nues

are

slo

wly

reco

verin

g to

pre

-200

8 le

vels

, goi

ng

forw

ard,

long

-term

bud

get i

ssue

s w

ill lik

ely

cont

inue

to s

tress

sta

te a

nd

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

and

thei

r abi

lity

to fu

nd th

eir p

ensi

on p

rogr

ams.

GAO

ha

s re

porte

d th

at s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

face

fisc

al c

halle

nges

that

w

ill gr

ow o

ver t

ime,

and

with

cur

rent

pol

icie

s in

pla

ce, t

he s

ecto

r’s fi

scal

he

alth

is p

roje

cted

to d

eclin

e st

eadi

ly th

roug

h 20

60. 31

The

prim

ary

fact

or

driv

ing

this

dec

line

is th

e pr

ojec

ted

grow

th in

hea

lth-r

elat

ed c

osts

. For

ex

ampl

e, G

AO s

imul

atio

ns s

how

that

the

sect

or’s

hea

lth-r

elat

ed c

osts

will

be a

bout

3.7

per

cent

of g

ross

dom

estic

pro

duct

in 2

010,

but

gro

w to

8.3

pe

rcen

t by

2060

.32

The

se fi

scal

pre

ssur

es, c

ombi

ned

with

gro

win

g pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

n ra

tes,

hav

e sp

urre

d m

any

stat

es a

nd lo

calit

ies

to

take

act

ion

to re

duce

pen

sion

cos

ts a

nd im

prov

e th

e fu

ture

sus

tain

abilit

y of

thei

r pla

ns.

Stat

es a

nd lo

calit

ies

have

impl

emen

ted

vario

us c

hang

es to

thei

r pen

sion

sy

stem

s si

nce

the

2008

eco

nom

ic d

ownt

urn—

chan

ges

that

, acc

ordi

ng to

of

ficia

ls, w

ere

inte

nded

to h

elp

man

age

cost

s an

d im

prov

e pl

an

30

Pro

visi

ons

in s

tate

con

stitu

tions

, sta

tute

s, o

r rec

ogni

zed

lega

l pro

tect

ions

und

er c

omm

on

law

ofte

n pr

otec

t pen

sion

s fro

m b

eing

elim

inat

ed o

r dim

inis

hed

for c

urre

nt o

r ret

ired

mem

bers

. In

a fe

w ra

re e

xcep

tions

, som

e ju

risdi

ctio

ns h

ave

avoi

ded

payi

ng p

rom

ised

be

nefit

s. T

his

can

happ

en in

cas

es o

f gov

ernm

ent b

ankr

uptc

y or

whe

n le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

s to

redu

ce b

enef

its a

re m

ade

retro

activ

ely

and

surv

ive

any

lega

l cha

lleng

es.

31G

AO, S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

ts' F

isca

l Out

look

: Apr

il 20

11 U

pdat

e, G

AO

-11-

495S

P

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: A

pr. 6

, 201

1).

32To

pro

vide

mor

e fle

xibi

lity

in a

ddre

ssin

g th

e gr

owin

g co

st o

f gov

ernm

ent e

mpl

oyee

’ re

tiree

hea

lth c

are,

sta

te a

nd lo

cal j

uris

dict

ions

hav

e be

gun

to p

refu

nd th

ese

cost

s. W

ith

pref

undi

ng, g

over

nmen

ts c

an re

duce

the

unfu

nded

liab

ility

repo

rted

in th

eir f

inan

cial

st

atem

ents

, tak

e ad

vant

age

of th

e co

mpo

undi

ng e

ffect

s of

inve

stm

ent r

etur

ns o

n pl

an

asse

ts, a

nd p

rovi

de g

reat

er b

enef

it st

abilit

y fo

r em

ploy

ees

and

retir

ees.

In a

dditi

on, b

y se

tting

asi

de fu

nds

for t

his

purp

ose

in a

dvan

ce, g

over

nmen

t con

tribu

tions

can

be

redu

ced

whe

n fis

cal p

ress

ures

are

gre

at. H

owev

er, p

refu

ndin

g re

tiree

hea

lth b

enef

its re

quire

s hi

gher

con

tribu

tions

in th

e sh

ort t

erm

than

pay

-as-

you-

go fi

nanc

ing

requ

ires.

For

furth

er

disc

ussi

on o

f thi

s to

pic,

see

GA

O, S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Ret

iree

Hea

lth B

enef

its:

Liab

ilitie

s A

re L

arge

ly U

nfun

ded,

but

Som

e G

over

nmen

ts A

re T

akin

g Ac

tion,

GAO

-10-

61,

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: N

ov. 3

0, 2

009)

.

Stat

es a

nd L

ocal

itie

s H

ave

Mad

e C

hang

es

to R

educ

e C

osts

and

Im

prov

e P

lan

Sust

aina

bilit

y

Page

19

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

sust

aina

bilit

y lo

ng te

rm (s

ee fi

g. 7

). Ba

sed

on o

ur ta

bula

tion

of s

tate

le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

s re

porte

d an

nual

ly b

y N

CSL

, we

foun

d th

at th

e m

ajor

ity o

f sta

tes

have

mod

ified

thei

r exi

stin

g de

fined

ben

efit

syst

ems

to

redu

ce m

embe

r ben

efits

, low

erin

g fu

ture

liab

ilitie

s. H

alf o

f sta

tes

have

in

crea

sed

requ

ired

mem

ber (

that

is, e

mpl

oyee

) con

tribu

tions

, shi

fting

co

sts

to e

mpl

oyee

s. O

nly

a fe

w s

tate

s ha

ve a

dopt

ed p

rimar

y pl

ans

with

de

fined

con

tribu

tion

com

pone

nts,

whi

ch re

duce

pla

n sp

onso

rs’

inve

stm

ent r

isk

by s

hifti

ng it

to e

mpl

oyee

s. S

ome

stat

es a

nd lo

calit

ies

have

als

o ta

ken

actio

n to

low

er p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

ns in

the

shor

t ter

m b

y ch

angi

ng a

ctua

rial m

etho

ds, a

nd a

few

hav

e is

sued

pen

sion

bon

ds to

fin

ance

thei

r con

tribu

tions

or t

o lo

wer

thei

r cos

ts b

y re

duci

ng th

e ga

p be

twee

n pl

an a

sset

s an

d lia

bilit

ies.

In g

ener

al, w

e fo

und

that

sta

tes

and

loca

litie

s of

ten

pack

age

seve

ral o

f the

se d

iffer

ent p

ensi

on c

hang

es

toge

ther

. The

se p

acka

ged

chan

ges

can

have

var

ying

effe

cts

on e

mpl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

ns, p

lan

sust

aina

bilit

y, a

nd e

mpl

oyee

s’ re

tirem

ent s

ecur

ity.33

Figu

re 7

: Not

able

Cha

nges

to S

tate

-Spo

nsor

ed P

ensi

on P

lans

, Jan

uary

200

8–Ju

ne 2

011

33

See

app

endi

x I f

or a

sum

mar

y of

the

rece

nt p

ensi

on c

hang

es im

plem

ente

d in

the

eigh

t st

ates

and

eig

ht lo

calit

ies

we

revi

ewed

.

Page

20

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Sinc

e th

e ec

onom

ic d

ownt

urn

in 2

008,

35

stat

es h

ave

mod

ified

at l

east

on

e st

ate-

spon

sore

d de

fined

ben

efit

syst

em to

redu

ce m

embe

r ben

efits

an

d lo

wer

futu

re p

ensi

on li

abilit

ies,

acc

ordi

ng to

our

ana

lysi

s of

NC

SL

annu

al re

ports

on

rece

nt p

ensi

on le

gisl

atio

n.34

A

djus

ting

pens

ion

bene

fit fo

rmul

a. S

ince

200

8, 2

4 st

ates

hav

e ad

just

ed th

e de

fined

ben

efit

form

ulas

to re

duce

ben

efits

by

expa

ndin

g th

e tim

e pe

riod

for c

alcu

latin

g fin

al a

vera

ge s

alar

y or

low

erin

g th

e pe

rcen

tage

of f

inal

ave

rage

sal

ary

mul

tiplie

d by

yea

rs o

f ser

vice

for

dete

rmin

ing

bene

fits.

Sta

tes

and

loca

litie

s ha

ve

used

var

ious

stra

tegi

es to

redu

ce b

enef

its fo

r pla

n pa

rtici

pant

s, s

uch

as

adju

stin

g th

e be

nefit

form

ula,

rais

ing

elig

ibilit

y re

quire

men

ts, a

nd li

miti

ng

post

retir

emen

t ben

efit

incr

ease

s:

35

R

aisi

ng e

ligib

ility

requ

irem

ents

. Sin

ce 2

008,

29

stat

es h

ave

incr

ease

d re

tirem

ent a

ge o

r ves

ting

requ

irem

ents

for p

lan

parti

cipa

nts.

For

exa

mpl

e, C

alifo

rnia

rece

ntly

low

ered

the

bene

fit m

ultip

lier f

or n

ew s

tate

saf

ety

empl

oyee

s, m

any

of w

hom

are

no

t cov

ered

by

Soci

al S

ecur

ity, f

rom

2.5

to 2

per

cent

. In

addi

tion,

two

loca

litie

s w

e re

view

ed m

ade

sim

ilar c

hang

es. F

or e

xam

ple,

Den

ver,

Col

orad

o, in

crea

sed

the

perio

d us

ed fo

r cal

cula

ting

final

ave

rage

sa

lary

from

3 to

5 y

ears

for n

ew m

embe

rs o

f the

Den

ver E

mpl

oyee

s R

etire

men

t Pla

n.

36

Li

miti

ng p

ostr

etire

men

t ben

efits

. Sin

ce 2

008,

18

stat

es h

ave

redu

ced

or e

limin

ated

ann

ual p

ostre

tirem

ent c

ost-o

f-liv

ing

adju

stm

ents

(CO

LA).

Som

e st

ates

hav

e ev

en a

pplie

d th

ese

chan

ges

For

exa

mpl

e, M

isso

uri r

aise

d th

e no

rmal

retir

emen

t age

fo

r gen

eral

em

ploy

ees

from

62

to 6

7 an

d le

ngth

ened

the

vest

ing

perio

d fro

m 5

to 1

0 ye

ars

for n

ew m

embe

rs o

f the

Sta

te E

mpl

oyee

s’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m a

nd th

e M

isso

uri D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

porta

tion

and

Hig

hway

Pat

rol E

mpl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

. In

addi

tion,

two

loca

litie

s w

e re

view

ed m

ade

sim

ilar c

hang

es. F

or e

xam

ple,

the

norm

al

retir

emen

t age

for n

ew m

embe

rs o

f the

Pol

icem

en’s

Ann

uity

and

Be

nefit

Fun

d of

Chi

cago

was

rais

ed fr

om 5

0 to

55

year

s.

34

This

ana

lysi

s is

bas

ed o

n ou

r rev

iew

of a

nnua

l NC

SL

repo

rts fo

r the

yea

rs 2

008-

2010

an

d a

2011

repo

rt th

at c

over

ed c

hang

es a

dopt

ed b

y Ju

ne o

f tha

t yea

r. 35

Exp

andi

ng th

e tim

e pe

riod

for c

alcu

latin

g fin

al a

vera

ge s

alar

ies

gene

rally

redu

ces

pens

ion

bene

fits

by a

vera

ging

in lo

wer

em

ploy

ee s

alar

ies.

36

The

vest

ing

perio

d is

the

empl

oyee

s’ re

quire

d ye

ars

of s

ervi

ce b

efor

e th

ey e

arn

the

right

to

futu

re p

ensi

on b

enef

its.

Maj

orit

y of

Sta

tes

Hav

e R

educ

ed B

enef

its

sinc

e 20

08, R

educ

ing

Fut

ure

Liab

iliti

es

Page

21

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

to c

urre

nt re

tiree

s. In

the

case

of C

olor

ado,

the

stat

e re

cent

ly re

duce

d po

stre

tirem

ent C

OLA

s fo

r fut

ure,

cur

rent

, and

retir

ed m

embe

rs.

Acco

rdin

g to

pla

n do

cum

ents

, mos

t pla

n m

embe

rs, w

ho a

re n

ot

cove

red

by S

ocia

l Sec

urity

, had

pre

viou

sly

been

gua

rant

eed

an

annu

al p

ostre

tirem

ent C

OLA

of 3

.5 p

erce

nt, b

ut th

e re

cent

legi

slat

ion

elim

inat

ed th

e C

OLA

for 2

010

and

capp

ed fu

ture

CO

LAs

at 2

pe

rcen

t.37

The

maj

ority

of t

hese

ben

efit

chan

ges

have

bee

n lim

ited

to n

ew

empl

oyee

s, s

low

ing

the

futu

re g

row

th o

f pen

sion

liab

ilitie

s, b

ut u

sual

ly n

ot

sign

ifica

ntly

redu

cing

sys

tem

s’ e

xist

ing

unfu

nded

liab

ilitie

s, w

hich

are

ba

sed

on th

e be

nefit

s pr

omis

ed to

cur

rent

em

ploy

ees

and

retir

ees.

38 A

s w

e ha

ve re

porte

d pr

evio

usly

, pro

visi

ons

in s

tate

con

stitu

tions

, sta

tute

s, o

r re

cogn

ized

lega

l pro

tect

ions

und

er c

omm

on la

w o

ften

prot

ect p

ensi

ons

from

bei

ng e

limin

ated

or d

imin

ishe

d fo

r cur

rent

or r

etire

d m

embe

rs.39

Th

us, s

ome

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts c

hang

e be

nefit

s by

cre

atin

g a

new

tier

or p

lan

that

app

lies

to n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s hi

red

only

afte

r the

dat

e of

th

e ch

ange

, and

som

etim

es a

lso

to n

ewer

em

ploy

ees

who

are

not

yet

ve

sted

. It t

akes

tim

e fo

r the

se n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s w

ith le

ss e

xpen

sive

pe

nsio

n be

nefit

s to

bec

ome

a si

gnifi

cant

por

tion

of th

e w

orkf

orce

, de

layi

ng fo

r a d

ecad

e or

mor

e an

y si

gnifi

cant

redu

ctio

ns in

pla

n lia

bilit

ies.

40

37

Prio

r to

the

2010

legi

slat

ion,

the

amou

nt o

f pos

tretir

emen

t CO

LAs

depe

nded

on

whe

n em

ploy

ees

join

ed th

e sy

stem

, acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n do

cum

ents

. The

CO

LA a

mou

nt w

as 3

.5

perc

ent f

or m

embe

rs w

ho jo

ined

on

or b

efor

e Ju

ne 3

0, 2

005,

and

the

low

er o

f 3 p

erce

nt o

r th

e C

onsu

mer

Pric

e In

dex

for U

rban

Wag

e E

arne

rs a

nd C

leric

al W

orke

rs (C

PI-W

) for

m

embe

rs w

ho jo

ined

on

or a

fter J

uly

1, 2

005.

The

201

0 le

gisl

atio

n lo

wer

ed th

e C

OLA

for

all f

utur

e, c

urre

nt, a

nd re

tired

mem

bers

. For

mem

bers

who

join

ed b

efor

e Ja

nuar

y 1,

200

7,

the

CO

LA w

as re

duce

d to

2 p

erce

nt u

nles

s th

e pl

an h

as a

neg

ativ

e in

vest

men

t ret

urn

year

, in

whi

ch c

ase

the

CO

LA w

ill b

e th

e le

sser

of 2

per

cent

or t

he C

PI-W

for t

he n

ext

thre

e ye

ars.

A s

epar

ate

rese

rve

fund

was

cre

ated

for m

embe

rs w

ho jo

ined

on

or a

fter

Janu

ary

1, 2

007.

For

thes

e m

embe

rs, t

he C

OLA

will

be

the

less

er o

f 2 p

erce

nt o

r the

CP

I-W

as

long

as

paym

ents

do

not e

xcee

d 10

per

cent

of t

he C

OLA

rese

rve

fund

. The

le

gisl

atio

n al

so a

llow

s fo

r the

max

imum

CO

LA to

be

incr

ease

d w

hen

the

plan

’s o

vera

ll fu

nded

sta

tus

is a

t or a

bove

103

per

cent

and

low

ered

if it

sub

sequ

ently

dro

ps b

elow

90

perc

ent.

Ove

r the

long

term

, how

ever

, the

se b

enef

it re

duct

ions

can

38A

s di

scus

sed

late

r, Ill

inoi

s to

ok th

e m

ore

unus

ual s

tep

of ta

king

adv

ance

cre

dit f

or

bene

fit re

duct

ions

that

app

ly o

nly

to n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s.

39G

AO, S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Ret

iree

Ben

efits

: Cur

rent

Sta

tus

of B

enef

it S

truct

ures

, Pro

tect

ions

, and

Fis

cal O

utlo

ok fo

r Fun

ding

Fut

ure

Cos

ts, G

AO

-07-

1156

(W

ashi

ngto

n, D

.C.:

Sep

t. 24

, 200

7).

40E

mpl

oyer

s w

ith h

ighe

r rat

es o

f em

ploy

ee tu

rnov

er w

ill re

cogn

ize

savi

ngs

from

pen

sion

be

nefit

redu

ctio

ns s

oone

r tha

n th

ose

empl

oyer

s w

ith le

ss e

mpl

oyee

turn

over

.

Page

22

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

redu

ce p

ensi

on li

abilit

ies

and

cons

eque

ntly

low

er a

ctua

rially

requ

ired

spon

sor c

ontri

butio

ns. F

rom

the

empl

oyee

per

spec

tive,

thes

e ch

ange

s ca

n m

ean

that

thos

e in

the

new

tier

or p

lan

will

real

ize

low

er fu

ture

be

nefit

s th

an th

eir c

owor

kers

who

con

tinue

to p

artic

ipat

e in

the

old

plan

. Th

is c

ould

affe

ct e

mpl

oyee

recr

uitm

ent a

nd re

tent

ion

over

the

long

term

, bu

t som

e pe

nsio

n of

ficia

ls w

e sp

oke

with

exp

ecte

d an

y sh

ort-t

erm

im

pact

s to

be

min

imal

.

Amon

g th

e pe

nsio

n pl

ans

incl

uded

in o

ur re

view

, we

foun

d th

at s

ix s

tate

s an

d tw

o lo

calit

ies

had

redu

ced

the

bene

fits

in s

ome

of th

eir l

arge

st

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans.

For

exa

mpl

e, in

201

1, D

enve

r, C

olor

ado,

redu

ced

retir

emen

t ben

efits

for n

ew m

embe

rs o

f the

Den

ver E

mpl

oyee

s R

etire

men

t Pla

n hi

red

afte

r Jul

y 1,

201

1. D

enve

r rev

erse

d pr

evio

us

bene

fit e

nhan

cem

ents

ena

cted

ove

r prio

r dec

ades

by

incr

easi

ng th

e pe

riod

used

for c

alcu

latin

g fin

al a

vera

ge s

alar

y (th

e ba

sis

for b

enef

it ca

lcul

atio

ns) a

nd ra

isin

g th

e m

inim

um re

tirem

ent a

ge fr

om 5

5 to

60,

am

ong

othe

r cha

nges

. Ove

r the

nex

t 30

year

s, th

ese

chan

ges

are

expe

cted

to re

duce

the

city

’s p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

ns b

y 1.

65 p

erce

nt o

f pa

yrol

l. Ac

cord

ing

to p

lan

docu

men

ts, t

he c

hang

es e

nact

ed a

re e

xpec

ted

to re

duce

pen

sion

ben

efits

for n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s an

d w

ill re

quire

som

e m

embe

rs to

wor

k lo

nger

to re

ceiv

e fu

ll pe

nsio

n be

nefit

s. N

ever

thel

ess,

ci

ty o

ffici

als

do n

ot e

xpec

t any

of t

he re

cent

cha

nges

to s

igni

fican

tly a

ffect

em

ploy

ee re

crui

tmen

t and

rete

ntio

n.

Twen

ty-fi

ve s

tate

s ha

ve ta

ken

actio

n si

nce

2008

to in

crea

se m

embe

r co

ntrib

utio

ns, s

hifti

ng p

ensi

on c

osts

to e

mpl

oyee

s, a

ccor

ding

to N

CSL

re

ports

. Sta

tes

gene

rally

hav

e m

ore

leew

ay to

adj

ust m

embe

r con

tribu

tion

rate

s as

com

pare

d w

ith p

ensi

on b

enef

its fo

r exi

stin

g m

embe

rs. A

s a

resu

lt, m

ore

stat

es h

ave

incr

ease

d co

ntrib

utio

ns fo

r som

e ac

tive

empl

oyee

s ra

ther

than

lim

iting

the

incr

ease

s to

futu

re e

mpl

oyee

s. S

ome

stat

es a

re a

lso

requ

iring

mem

bers

to c

ontri

bute

to th

eir p

ensi

ons

for t

he

first

tim

e. A

mon

g th

e st

ates

we

revi

ewed

, Virg

inia

and

Mis

sour

i rec

ently

re

quire

d so

me

new

pla

n m

embe

rs to

con

tribu

te to

the

retir

emen

t pla

n (5

pe

rcen

t in

Virg

inia

and

4 p

erce

nt in

Mis

sour

i), w

here

as m

embe

rs d

id n

ot

prev

ious

ly c

ontri

bute

.

Incr

ease

s in

mem

ber c

ontri

butio

ns re

duce

the

actu

aria

lly re

quire

d am

ount

s pl

an s

pons

ors

need

to c

ontri

bute

to th

eir p

ensi

on s

yste

ms.

As

a re

sult,

thes

e ch

ange

s of

ten

do n

ot a

ffect

the

amou

nt o

f rev

enue

flow

ing

into

pen

sion

sys

tem

s, b

ut ra

ther

repr

esen

t a s

hifti

ng o

f pen

sion

cos

t fro

m

empl

oyer

s to

pla

n m

embe

rs. M

embe

r con

tribu

tions

are

a re

lativ

ely

stab

le

sour

ce o

f pen

sion

reve

nue,

sin

ce th

ey a

re le

ss s

usce

ptib

le to

mar

ket

Hal

f th

e St

ates

Hav

e R

aise

d M

embe

r C

ontr

ibut

ions

, Shi

ftin

g C

osts

to

Pla

n M

embe

rs

Page

23

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

cond

ition

s th

an in

vest

men

t ret

urns

, and

less

sus

cept

ible

to b

udge

tary

and

po

litic

al p

ress

ures

than

em

ploy

er c

ontri

butio

ns. H

owev

er, m

embe

r co

ntrib

utio

ns a

re s

usce

ptib

le to

dec

lines

in th

e si

ze o

f the

wor

kfor

ce a

nd

are

ofte

n re

fund

ed to

em

ploy

ees

if th

ey s

epar

ate

from

thei

r em

ploy

er

befo

re b

ecom

ing

elig

ible

to re

ceiv

e be

nefit

s.

Amon

g th

e ju

risdi

ctio

ns in

clud

ed in

our

revi

ew, w

e fo

und

that

four

sta

tes

and

one

loca

lity

had

incr

ease

d th

e m

embe

r con

tribu

tions

in s

ome

of th

eir

larg

est d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans.

For

exa

mpl

e, in

the

case

of N

orfo

lk,

Virg

inia

, the

city

beg

an re

quiri

ng n

ew m

embe

rs to

con

tribu

te 5

per

cent

to

the

Empl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

in 2

010,

whe

reas

cur

rent

mem

bers

do

not

con

tribu

te. A

s a

resu

lt of

this

cha

nge,

the

city

’s e

mpl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

ns w

ill de

clin

e as

mor

e co

ntrib

utin

g m

embe

rs jo

in th

e sy

stem

. C

ity o

ffici

als

said

that

new

em

ploy

ees

had

alre

ady

cont

ribut

ed o

ver

$140

,000

to th

e sy

stem

in th

e fir

st y

ear.

This

incr

ease

in m

embe

r co

ntrib

utio

ns w

ill re

duce

em

ploy

ee c

ompe

nsat

ion

and

coul

d af

fect

re

crui

tmen

t and

rete

ntio

n, p

artic

ular

ly s

ince

the

chan

ge w

ill be

im

med

iate

ly re

flect

ed in

low

er p

aych

ecks

. How

ever

, city

offi

cial

s di

d no

t ex

pect

the

chan

ges

to h

ave

a si

gnifi

cant

impa

ct o

n em

ploy

ee re

crui

tmen

t an

d re

tent

ion,

sin

ce th

e Vi

rgin

ia R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

had

rece

ntly

im

plem

ente

d si

mila

r cha

nges

for s

tate

em

ploy

ees.

Alth

ough

a m

ajor

ity o

f sta

tes

have

con

tinue

d to

use

trad

ition

al d

efin

ed

bene

fit p

lans

as

thei

r prim

ary

pens

ion

syst

em, o

ur a

naly

sis

of N

CSL

an

nual

repo

rts o

n re

cent

pen

sion

legi

slat

ion

foun

d th

at, s

ince

200

8, th

ree

stat

es—

Geo

rgia

, Mic

higa

n,41

and

Uta

h—ha

ve im

plem

ente

d hy

brid

ap

proa

ches

as

prim

ary

plan

s fo

r lar

ge g

roup

s of

em

ploy

ees,

42

41

Mic

higa

n ha

s op

erat

ed a

def

ined

con

tribu

tion

plan

for g

ener

al e

mpl

oyee

s si

nce

1997

, bu

t ado

pted

a n

ew h

ybrid

sys

tem

for p

ublic

sch

ool e

mpl

oyee

s in

201

0.

shi

fting

42P

rior t

o 20

08, t

hree

sta

tes,

Ala

ska,

Indi

ana,

and

Ore

gon,

and

the

Dis

trict

of C

olum

bia

had

alre

ady

adop

ted

defin

ed c

ontri

butio

n or

hyb

rid a

ppro

ache

s as

thei

r prim

ary

plan

s fo

r ge

nera

l pub

lic e

mpl

oyee

s. In

dian

a ha

s op

erat

ed a

hyb

rid s

yste

m s

ince

199

7, b

ut a

dopt

ed

a de

fined

con

tribu

tion

optio

n fo

r new

em

ploy

ees

in 2

011.

In a

dditi

on, N

ebra

ska

mai

ntai

ns

a ca

sh b

alan

ce d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

an a

s its

prim

ary

plan

. Alth

ough

stil

l pro

vidi

ng d

efin

ed

bene

fit p

lans

as

thei

r prim

ary

plan

s fo

r gen

eral

sta

te e

mpl

oyee

s, s

ome

stat

es a

lso

offe

r de

fined

con

tribu

tion

plan

s or

hyb

rid a

ppro

ache

s as

opt

iona

l alte

rnat

ives

to th

eir p

rimar

y pl

ans.

The

se s

tate

s in

clud

e C

olor

ado,

Flo

rida,

Mon

tana

, Ohi

o, S

outh

Car

olin

a, a

nd

Was

hing

ton.

Thr

ee S

tate

s R

ecen

tly

Ado

pted

Hyb

rid

App

roac

hes,

Red

ucin

g R

isk

for

Pla

n Sp

onso

rs

Page

24

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

som

e in

vest

men

t ris

k to

new

em

ploy

ees.

43 T

wo

of th

e ei

ght l

ocal

ities

we

revi

ewed

hav

e al

so s

witc

hed

to h

ybrid

app

roac

hes

sinc

e 20

08: C

obb

Cou

nty,

Geo

rgia

, and

Bou

ntifu

l, U

tah

(whi

ch p

artic

ipat

es in

Uta

h’s

stat

e-ad

min

iste

red

retir

emen

t sys

tem

). U

nlik

e in

a d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

an, w

hich

pr

ovid

es b

enef

its b

ased

on

a se

t for

mul

a,44

Def

ined

con

tribu

tion

and

hybr

id a

ppro

ache

s re

duce

the

impa

ct o

f mar

ket

vola

tility

on

plan

fund

ing

and

empl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

, but

are

risk

ier f

or

plan

mem

bers

. Whe

reas

und

er a

def

ined

ben

efit

syst

em, e

mpl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

ns g

ener

ally

rise

and

fall

depe

ndin

g in

par

t on

inve

stm

ent

retu

rns,

pla

n sp

onso

rs o

f a d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n sy

stem

con

tribu

te a

set

am

ount

rega

rdle

ss o

f inv

estm

ent r

etur

ns. T

his

redu

ces

the

risk

faci

ng th

e pe

nsio

n sy

stem

as

wel

l as

the

stat

e or

loca

lity

spon

sorin

g th

e pl

an.

How

ever

, sw

itchi

ng to

a d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

an c

an in

volv

e ad

ditio

nal

shor

t-ter

m c

osts

for p

lan

spon

sors

, sin

ce c

ontri

butio

ns fr

om n

ew

empl

oyee

s go

tow

ard

thei

r ow

n pr

ivat

e ac

coun

ts ra

ther

than

pay

ing

off

exis

ting

unfu

nded

liab

ilitie

s of

the

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

an o

nce

it is

clo

sed

to

new

em

ploy

ees.

Fro

m th

e m

embe

r’s p

ersp

ectiv

e, b

uild

ing

up re

tirem

ent

savi

ngs

in d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

ans

rest

s on

fact

ors

that

are

, to

som

e de

gree

, out

side

of t

he c

ontro

l of t

he in

divi

dual

wor

ker.

Mos

t not

able

am

ong

thes

e is

the

mar

ket r

etur

n on

pla

n as

sets

, whi

ch, a

mon

g ot

her

fact

ors,

det

erm

ines

futu

re re

tirem

ent b

enef

its. O

n th

e on

e ha

nd, t

his

expo

sure

to m

arke

t ris

k in

crea

ses

mem

bers

’ fin

anci

al u

ncer

tain

ty, s

ince

re

tirem

ent b

enef

its ri

se a

nd fa

ll ba

sed

on in

vest

men

t ret

urns

. On

the

othe

r ha

nd, d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

ans

are

ofte

n vi

ewed

as

mor

e po

rtabl

e th

an

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans,

as

empl

oyee

s ow

n th

eir a

ccou

nts

indi

vidu

ally

and

ca

n ge

nera

lly ta

ke th

eir b

alan

ces

with

them

—in

clud

ing

both

mem

ber a

nd

in a

def

ined

con

tribu

tion

com

pone

nt o

f a h

ybrid

app

roac

h, th

e ke

y de

term

inan

ts o

f the

ben

efit

amou

nt a

re th

e em

ploy

ee’s

and

em

ploy

er’s

con

tribu

tion

rate

s, a

nd th

e ra

te o

f ret

urn

achi

eved

on

the

amou

nts

cont

ribut

ed to

an

indi

vidu

al’s

ac

coun

t ove

r tim

e.

43

In th

is re

port

we

use

the

term

“hyb

rid a

ppro

ach”

to re

fer t

o pu

blic

pen

sion

sys

tem

s th

at

com

bine

def

ined

ben

efit

and

defin

ed c

ontri

butio

n co

mpo

nent

s. In

the

priv

ate

sect

or, a

hy

brid

pla

n m

ost o

ften

refe

rs to

a c

ash

bala

nce

plan

, whi

ch is

lega

lly a

def

ined

ben

efit

plan

that

exp

ress

es b

enef

its a

s a

hypo

thet

ical

indi

vidu

al a

ccou

nt b

alan

ce th

at is

bas

ed o

n pa

y cr

edits

(per

cent

age

of s

alar

y or

com

pens

atio

n) a

nd in

tere

st c

redi

ts. F

or a

dditi

onal

in

form

atio

n on

priv

ate

sect

or c

ash

bala

nce

plan

s, s

ee G

AO

, Priv

ate

Pen

sion

s: In

form

atio

n on

Cas

h B

alan

ce P

ensi

on P

lans

, GA

O-0

6-42

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: N

ov. 3

, 200

5).

44In

a p

ublic

sec

tor d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

an, t

he a

mou

nt o

f the

ben

efit

is d

eter

min

ed b

y a

form

ula

typi

cally

bas

ed o

n th

e re

tiree

’s y

ears

of s

ervi

ce a

nd fi

nal a

vera

ge s

alar

y.

Page

25

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

empl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

—w

hen

they

leav

e go

vern

men

t em

ploy

men

t, as

lo

ng a

s th

ey a

re v

este

d. In

con

trast

, em

ploy

ees

in d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans

can

gene

rally

take

thei

r mem

ber c

ontri

butio

ns, i

f any

, with

them

if th

ey

leav

e go

vern

men

t em

ploy

men

t, bu

t not

the

empl

oyer

’s c

ontri

butio

ns. 45

In th

e ca

se o

f Geo

rgia

, the

sta

te re

plac

ed it

s de

fined

ben

efit

plan

with

a

hybr

id a

ppro

ach

for a

ll ne

w e

mpl

oyee

s hi

red

afte

r Jan

uary

1, 2

009.

Thi

s ne

w h

ybrid

app

roac

h is

com

pose

d of

a s

mal

ler d

efin

ed b

enef

it re

lativ

e to

th

e pr

evio

us p

lan

(1 p

erce

nt o

f hig

hest

ave

rage

sal

ary

mul

tiplie

d by

yea

rs

of s

ervi

ce c

ompa

red

with

2 p

erce

nt p

revi

ousl

y) a

nd a

utom

atic

enr

ollm

ent

in th

e st

ate’

s 40

1(k)

pla

n w

ith th

e st

ate

mat

chin

g up

to 3

per

cent

of t

he

empl

oyee

’s c

ontri

butio

ns.

46

45

Onc

e an

em

ploy

ee is

ves

ted,

bot

h de

fined

con

tribu

tion

and

defin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans

coul

d be

rega

rded

as

“por

tabl

e.” I

n th

e ca

se o

f a d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

an, t

he d

epar

ting

empl

oyee

ta

kes

with

him

or h

er th

e rig

ht to

a fu

ture

ben

efit,

whe

reve

r he

or s

he g

oes.

How

ever

, the

be

nefit

form

ulas

of d

efin

ed b

enef

it pl

ans

are

ofte

n w

eigh

ted

tow

ard

empl

oyee

s th

at re

tire

afte

r man

y ye

ars

of s

ervi

ce w

ith a

sin

gle

empl

oyer

, so

wor

kers

cha

ngin

g jo

bs m

ay in

cur

futu

re li

fetim

e be

nefit

loss

es. T

he p

erce

ptio

n of

def

ined

con

tribu

tion

plan

s as

mor

e po

rtabl

e re

flect

s th

e gr

eate

r liq

uidi

ty a

nd e

mpl

oyee

dis

cret

ion

over

the

man

agem

ent o

f th

ese

bene

fits,

suc

h as

the

abilit

y to

cas

h th

em o

ut u

pon

leav

ing

empl

oym

ent,

or to

roll

them

ove

r int

o an

othe

r pla

n or

an

indi

vidu

al re

tirem

ent a

ccou

nt. F

or a

dditi

onal

info

rmat

ion,

se

e G

AO, P

rivat

e P

ensi

ons:

Alte

rnat

ive

Appr

oach

es C

ould

Add

ress

Ret

irem

ent R

isks

Fa

ced

by W

orke

rs b

ut P

ose

Trad

e-of

fs,

Pla

n of

ficia

ls s

aid

it is

diff

icul

t to

calc

ulat

e ho

w

muc

h th

e st

ate

will

save

as

a re

sult

of th

e ch

ange

, but

it is

exp

ecte

d to

be

finan

cial

ly a

dvan

tage

ous

for t

he s

tate

in th

e lo

ng ru

n. In

201

1, e

mpl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

ns fo

r the

def

ined

ben

efit

porti

on o

f the

hyb

rid a

ppro

ach

wer

e 6.

54 p

erce

nt o

f pay

roll,

com

pare

d w

ith 1

0.41

per

cent

for e

mpl

oyee

s co

vere

d un

der t

he o

ld p

lan.

How

ever

, sin

ce th

e ch

ange

s ar

e lim

ited

to

new

em

ploy

ees,

it w

ill ta

ke ti

me

for t

he s

tate

to re

aliz

e si

gnifi

cant

sav

ings

fro

m th

e ch

ange

. Acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n of

ficia

ls, o

ne o

f the

mot

ivat

ing

fact

ors

behi

nd th

e sw

itch

to th

e hy

brid

app

roac

h w

as th

e de

sire

to a

ttrac

t new

em

ploy

ees

to th

e st

ate

by p

rovi

ding

them

with

mor

e po

rtabl

e re

tirem

ent

bene

fits

that

mirr

ored

thos

e in

the

priv

ate

sect

or. H

owev

er, a

s is

com

mon

w

ith d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

ans

in th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, som

e pa

rtici

pant

s in

th

e hy

brid

app

roac

h m

ay n

ot b

e sa

ving

eno

ugh

for a

sec

ure

retir

emen

t. As

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 2

011,

80

perc

ent o

f em

ploy

ees

parti

cipa

ting

in th

e

GA

O-0

9-64

2 (W

ashi

ngto

n D

.C.:

July

24,

200

9).

46A

401

(k) p

lan

is a

type

of d

efin

ed c

ontri

butio

n pl

an th

at p

erm

its e

mpl

oyee

s to

def

er a

po

rtion

of t

heir

pay

to a

qua

lifie

d ta

x-de

ferr

ed p

lan.

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t def

ined

co

ntrib

utio

n pl

ans

are

typi

cally

457

(b) p

lans

. The

Tax

Ref

orm

Act

of 1

986

proh

ibite

d st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

from

est

ablis

hing

any

new

401

(k) p

lans

afte

r May

6, 1

986,

but

ex

istin

g pl

ans

wer

e al

low

ed to

con

tinue

. Pub

. L. N

o. 9

9-51

4, §

111

6(b)

(3),

100

Sta

t. 20

85,

2455

.

Page

26

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

401(

k) c

ompo

nent

of t

he h

ybrid

app

roac

h w

ere

cont

ribut

ing

only

the

defa

ult 1

per

cent

, acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n of

ficia

ls. A

t thi

s le

vel,

empl

oyee

s m

ay

stru

ggle

to b

uild

ade

quat

e re

tirem

ent s

avin

gs. P

lan

offic

ials

sai

d th

ey

have

trie

d to

enc

oura

ge m

embe

rs to

con

tribu

te m

ore

to th

eir 4

01(k

) pla

ns,

but t

hese

effo

rts h

ave

not b

een

succ

essf

ul.

To a

ddre

ss ri

sing

act

uaria

lly re

quire

d pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

n le

vels

and

bu

dget

pre

ssur

es, s

ome

stat

es a

nd lo

calit

ies

have

take

n ac

tions

to li

mit

empl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

in th

e sh

ort t

erm

or r

efin

ance

thei

r con

tribu

tions

.47

Thes

e st

rate

gies

incl

uded

cha

ngin

g ac

tuar

ial m

etho

ds o

r iss

uing

pen

sion

bo

nds

to s

uppl

emen

t oth

er s

ourc

es o

f fin

anci

ng fo

r pen

sion

pla

ns. S

uch

stra

tegi

es h

elp

plan

spo

nsor

s m

anag

e th

eir c

ontri

butio

ns in

the

near

term

, bu

t may

incr

ease

thei

r fut

ure

cost

s. F

ewer

nat

ionw

ide

data

are

ava

ilabl

e on

the

use

of th

ese

stra

tegi

es; h

owev

er, w

e w

ere

able

to d

ocum

ent t

heir

use

acro

ss s

ever

al o

f our

sel

ecte

d pe

nsio

n pl

ans.

48

Som

e st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

hav

e lim

ited

or d

efer

red

thei

r pen

sion

co

ntrib

utio

ns in

the

shor

t ter

m b

y m

akin

g ac

tuar

ial c

hang

es. I

t is

diffi

cult

to d

eter

min

e th

e re

cent

pre

vale

nce

of th

ese

chan

ges

natio

nwid

e;

how

ever

, fiv

e of

the

eigh

t sta

tes

and

one

of th

e lo

calit

ies

we

revi

ewed

had

im

plem

ente

d ac

tuar

ial c

hang

es to

redu

ce th

eir p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

ns

sinc

e 20

08.

49

47

Sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

lan

spon

sors

can

als

o ad

dres

s th

eir p

ensi

on fi

nanc

e ch

alle

nges

by

adju

stin

g th

eir i

nves

tmen

t pol

icy,

par

ticul

arly

pla

n as

set a

lloca

tion,

whi

ch is

the

third

key

m

echa

nism

, bes

ides

ben

efit

polic

y an

d fu

ndin

g po

licy,

that

pla

n sp

onso

rs h

ave

in

atte

mpt

ing

to m

anag

e th

e am

ount

, ris

kine

ss, a

nd s

usta

inab

ility

of th

eir p

ensi

on c

osts

. A

less

risk

y as

set a

lloca

tion

can

rais

e es

timat

ed c

osts

but

als

o m

ake

them

less

vol

atile

; a

mor

e ris

ky a

lloca

tion

can

low

er e

stim

ated

cos

ts b

ut a

t the

pric

e of

gre

ater

risk

. We

have

pr

evio

usly

repo

rted

that

sta

te a

nd lo

cal p

lans

hav

e gr

adua

lly c

hang

ed th

eir a

sset

por

tfolio

s ov

er m

any

year

s by

incr

easi

ng th

eir a

lloca

tions

in h

ighe

r-ris

k in

vest

men

ts p

artly

in p

ursu

it of

hig

her r

etur

ns. S

ee G

AO

, Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Gov

ernm

ent P

ensi

on P

lans

: Gov

erna

nce

Pra

ctic

es a

nd L

ong-

Term

Inve

stm

ent S

trate

gies

Hav

e E

volv

ed G

radu

ally

as

Pla

ns T

ake

On

Incr

ease

d In

vest

men

t Ris

k,

The

cha

nges

incl

uded

exp

andi

ng a

mor

tizat

ion

perio

ds (t

he

num

ber o

f yea

rs a

llotte

d to

pay

off

unfu

nded

liab

ilitie

s) a

nd a

djus

ting

smoo

thin

g te

chni

ques

(met

hods

for r

educ

ing

the

effe

ct o

f mar

ket v

olat

ility

GAO

-10-

754,

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.: A

ug. 2

4, 2

010)

. 48

Sin

ce im

plem

enta

tion

of a

ctua

rial c

hang

es s

omet

imes

doe

s no

t req

uire

a le

gisl

ativ

e ch

ange

, use

of s

uch

stra

tegi

es is

not

refle

cted

in th

e N

CS

L an

nual

repo

rts o

f sta

te

legi

slat

ive

chan

ges.

As

a re

sult,

our

ana

lysi

s of

suc

h ch

ange

s is

bas

ed o

n re

view

s of

our

se

lect

ed s

tate

s an

d lo

calit

ies

rath

er th

an N

CS

L re

ports

. 49

In th

e st

ates

we

revi

ewed

, act

uaria

l cha

nges

wer

e im

plem

ente

d ei

ther

by

stat

e le

gisl

atio

n or

by

the

pens

ion

plan

boa

rds.

Som

e St

ates

and

Loc

alit

ies

Hav

e A

djus

ted

Pen

sion

F

undi

ng P

ract

ices

, P

oten

tial

ly I

ncre

asin

g F

utur

e C

osts

Adj

usti

ng A

ctua

rial

Met

hods

Page

27

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

on p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

ns b

y av

erag

ing

asse

t val

ues

over

mul

tiple

yea

rs).

50

For e

xam

ple,

Uta

h re

porte

d th

at it

incr

ease

d th

e am

ortiz

atio

n fo

r the

st

ate’

s re

tirem

ent s

yste

m fr

om 2

0 ye

ars

to 2

5 ye

ars

to e

xten

d th

e le

ngth

of

tim

e fo

r pay

ing

dow

n un

fund

ed p

ensi

on li

abilit

ies.

51

Som

e st

ate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ents

, whi

le n

ot fo

rmal

ly c

hang

ing

thei

r un

derly

ing

actu

aria

l met

hods

, hav

e si

mpl

y de

ferre

d or

cap

ped

thei

r pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns. T

wo

stat

es a

nd o

ne lo

calit

y w

e re

view

ed li

mite

d co

ntrib

utio

ns in

the

shor

t ter

m b

y ca

ppin

g in

crea

ses

in e

mpl

oyer

co

ntrib

utio

ns o

r by

sim

ply

post

poni

ng o

ther

wis

e sc

hedu

led

cont

ribut

ions

. C

appi

ng in

crea

ses

in c

ontri

butio

ns a

llow

ed th

ese

stat

es a

nd th

is lo

calit

y to

tem

pora

rily

supp

ress

the

incr

ease

s th

at w

ould

oth

erw

ise

have

bee

n re

quire

d gi

ven

2008

inve

stm

ent l

osse

s an

d ot

her f

acto

rs. I

n th

e ca

se o

f th

e Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia, t

he s

tate

add

ress

ed a

n ex

pect

ed 1

9 pe

rcen

t inc

reas

e in

act

uaria

lly re

quire

d co

ntrib

utio

ns to

the

Stat

e Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent

Syst

em b

y ca

ppin

g an

nual

incr

ease

s at

3 p

erce

nt fo

r 201

2, 3

.5 p

erce

nt

for 2

013,

and

4.5

per

cent

ther

eafte

r. Si

mila

rly, t

he Il

linoi

s M

unic

ipal

R

etire

men

t Fun

d al

low

ed lo

cal p

lan

spon

sors

to c

ap c

ontri

butio

n in

crea

ses

at 1

0 pe

rcen

t sta

rting

in 2

010.

Alte

rnat

ivel

y, Il

linoi

s re

porte

d th

at it

rece

ntly

requ

ired

all I

llinoi

s st

ate

retir

emen

t sys

tem

s to

sw

itch

from

a m

arke

t val

uatio

n w

ith n

o sm

ooth

ing

to a

5-y

ear s

moo

thin

g m

etho

d fo

r cal

cula

ting

actu

aria

l ass

ets

and

empl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

to

less

en th

e im

med

iate

impa

ct o

f fis

cal y

ear 2

009

inve

stm

ent l

osse

s on

co

ntrib

utio

ns.

Alth

ough

adj

ustin

g pl

an fu

ndin

g pr

oduc

ed s

ome

shor

t-ter

m s

avin

gs fo

r st

ate

and

loca

l bud

gets

, it a

lso

incr

ease

d th

e un

fund

ed li

abilit

ies

of th

e pe

nsio

n sy

stem

and

will

nece

ssita

te la

rger

con

tribu

tions

in th

e fu

ture

. In

the

case

of P

hila

delp

hia,

the

city

use

d its

aut

horit

y un

der s

tate

law

to

parti

ally

def

er p

ensi

on p

aym

ents

by

$150

milli

on in

fisc

al y

ear 2

010

and

$90

milli

on in

201

1. W

hile

thes

e de

ferr

als

help

ed th

e ci

ty re

duce

its

cont

ribut

ions

in th

e sh

ort t

erm

, sta

te la

w re

quire

s th

at th

e m

oney

be

50

Oth

er a

ctua

rial c

hang

es, s

uch

as re

duci

ng th

e as

sum

ed ra

te o

f inv

estm

ent r

etur

ns, c

an

incr

ease

act

uaria

lly re

quire

d pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns.

51U

tah

mov

ed fr

om a

n op

en 2

0-ye

ar a

mor

tizat

ion

perio

d (m

eani

ng th

at th

e am

ortiz

atio

n w

as fr

ozen

at 2

0 ye

ars)

to a

clo

sed

25-y

ear a

mor

tizat

ion

perio

d ( m

eani

ng th

at th

e am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riod

will

dec

reas

e an

nual

ly b

y on

e ye

ar).

As a

resu

lt, U

tah

is c

urre

ntly

at a

23

-yea

r am

ortiz

atio

n pe

riod,

and

the

perio

d w

ill c

ontin

ue to

dec

reas

e an

nual

ly u

nles

s its

bo

ard

take

s ac

tion

to c

hang

e th

e am

ortiz

atio

n po

licy.

Cap

ping

or

Pos

tpon

ing

Em

ploy

er C

ontr

ibut

ions

Page

28

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

repa

id w

ith in

tere

st b

y fis

cal y

ear 2

014.

The

city

has

ado

pted

a te

mpo

rary

1

perc

ent i

ncre

ase

in th

e sa

les

tax

to h

elp

cove

r the

se fu

ture

cos

ts.52

Issu

ing

pens

ion

oblig

atio

n bo

nds

(PO

B) is

ano

ther

fund

ing

stra

tegy

, al

thou

gh re

lativ

ely

few

sta

tes

and

loca

litie

s ha

ve u

sed

it, a

s it

can

expo

se

plan

spo

nsor

s to

add

ition

al m

arke

t ris

k. P

OBs

are

taxa

ble

gene

ral

oblig

atio

n bo

nds

that

pro

vide

a o

ne-ti

me

cash

infu

sion

into

the

pens

ion

syst

em. T

hey

conv

ert a

cur

rent

pen

sion

obl

igat

ion

into

a lo

ng-te

rm, f

ixed

ob

ligat

ion

of th

e go

vern

men

t iss

uing

the

bond

. PO

Bs a

re is

sued

for

gene

rally

one

of t

wo

purp

oses

: eith

er to

pro

vide

tem

pora

ry b

udge

t rel

ief

by fi

nanc

ing

a pl

an s

pons

or’s

act

uaria

lly re

quire

d co

ntrib

utio

n fo

r a s

ingl

e ye

ar, o

r as

part

of a

long

er-te

rm s

trate

gy fo

r pay

ing

off a

pla

n’s

unfu

nded

lia

bilit

y. U

sing

PO

Bs to

pay

off

all o

r a p

ortio

n of

a p

lan’

s un

fund

ed li

abilit

y po

tent

ially

redu

ces

futu

re a

ctua

rially

requ

ired

pens

ion

cont

ribut

ions

, but

re

quire

s pl

an s

pons

ors

to m

ake

annu

al d

ebt s

ervi

ce p

aym

ents

on

the

POBs

inst

ead.

53

We

anal

yzed

dat

a on

sta

te a

nd lo

cal g

over

nmen

t bon

d is

suan

ces

natio

nwid

e an

d fo

und

that

oth

er th

an th

e st

ates

of I

llinoi

s an

d C

onne

ctic

ut, a

nd th

e C

hica

go T

rans

it Au

thor

ity, m

ost s

tate

and

loca

l go

vern

men

ts h

ave

not i

ssue

d si

zabl

e PO

Bs o

ver t

he p

ast 6

yea

rs (s

ee

fig. 8

). Th

is ty

pe o

f pen

sion

fund

ing

has

been

lim

ited,

with

onl

y 25

or

few

er P

OB

issu

ance

s in

eac

h of

the

last

6 y

ears

. The

tota

l am

ount

of

POBs

issu

ed in

a s

ingl

e ye

ar h

as n

ot e

xcee

ded

mor

e th

an 1

per

cent

of

tota

l ass

ets

in s

tate

and

loca

l pen

sion

pla

ns.

52

Phi

lade

lphi

a w

as n

ot th

e on

ly lo

calit

y w

e re

view

ed th

at u

sed

a te

mpo

rary

tax

incr

ease

to

cove

r pen

sion

con

tribu

tions

. In

2009

, Spr

ingf

ield

, Mis

sour

i app

rove

d a

0.75

cen

t sal

es ta

x,

all o

f whi

ch w

ill g

o to

war

d fu

ndin

g th

e ci

ty’s

Pol

ice

Offi

cers

' and

Fire

fight

ers'

Ret

irem

ent

Fund

. 53

Issu

ing

PO

Bs

can

be a

leve

ragi

ng s

trate

gy, s

ince

fund

s ar

e bo

rrow

ed a

t a fi

xed

inte

rest

ra

te a

nd th

en in

vest

ed in

the

stoc

k m

arke

t in

an a

ttem

pt to

ach

ieve

a h

ighe

r rat

e of

retu

rn

(arb

itrag

e).

Issu

ing

Pen

sion

Obl

igat

ion

Bon

ds

Page

29

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Figu

re 8

: Pen

sion

Obl

igat

ion

Bon

d Is

suan

ces

Nat

ionw

ide,

Jan

uary

200

6–Ju

ne 2

011

Thes

e tra

nsac

tions

invo

lve

sign

ifica

nt ri

sks

for g

over

nmen

t ent

ities

be

caus

e in

vest

men

t ret

urns

on

the

bond

pro

ceed

s ca

n be

vol

atile

and

lo

wer

than

the

inte

rest

rate

on

the

bond

s. In

thes

e ca

ses,

PO

Bs c

an le

ave

plan

spo

nsor

s w

orse

off

than

they

wer

e be

fore

, jug

glin

g de

bt s

ervi

ce

paym

ents

on

the

POBs

in a

dditi

on to

thei

r ann

ual p

ensi

on c

ontri

butio

ns.

In a

rece

nt b

rief,

the

Cen

ter f

or S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Exc

elle

nce

repo

rted

that

by

mid

-200

9, m

ost P

OBs

issu

ed s

ince

199

2 w

ere

a ne

t dr

ain

on g

over

nmen

t rev

enue

s.54

54

Cen

ter f

or S

tate

and

Loc

al G

over

nmen

t Exc

elle

nce,

Issu

e B

rief:

Pen

sion

Obl

igat

ion

Bon

ds: F

inan

cial

Cris

is E

xpos

es R

isks

(Was

hing

ton,

D.C

., Ja

nuar

y 20

10).

In li

ght o

f the

se c

once

rns,

offi

cial

s in

Page

30

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Penn

sylv

ania

not

ed th

at th

e st

ate

had

enac

ted

legi

slat

ion

in 2

010

proh

ibiti

ng th

e us

e of

PO

Bs.55

Two

of th

e pe

nsio

n sy

stem

s in

clud

ed in

our

revi

ew—

Illin

ois

and

Sono

ma

Cou

nty,

Cal

iforn

ia—

have

issu

ed P

OBs

sin

ce 2

008.

Illin

ois,

whi

ch is

di

scus

sed

at le

ngth

bel

ow, h

as b

een

the

larg

est s

ingl

e is

suer

in re

cent

ye

ars,

issu

ing

over

$7

billio

n in

PO

Bs s

ince

201

0. In

the

case

of S

onom

a C

ount

y, C

alifo

rnia

, the

cou

nty

issu

ed $

289

milli

on o

f PO

Bs in

201

0 w

ith

mat

uriti

es ra

ngin

g up

to 1

9 ye

ars.

Cou

nty

offic

ials

exp

lain

ed th

at th

e PO

Bs w

ere

finan

cial

ly a

dvan

tage

ous

beca

use

they

had

an

aver

age

inte

rest

rate

of j

ust u

nder

6 p

erce

nt, w

hich

is lo

wer

than

the

8 pe

rcen

t ex

pect

ed re

turn

on

the

pens

ion

fund

inve

stm

ents

at t

he ti

me

the

bond

s w

ere

issu

ed. T

he d

iffer

ence

bet

wee

n th

e PO

B in

tere

st ra

tes

and

the

assu

med

rate

of r

etur

n is

pro

ject

ed to

sav

e th

e co

unty

$93

milli

on in

co

ntrib

utio

ns o

ver t

he li

fe o

f the

bon

ds.

56

How

ever

, res

ults

cou

ld v

ary

sign

ifica

ntly

. The

PO

Bs c

ould

incr

ease

the

coun

ty’s

futu

re e

xpen

ses

if ac

tual

inve

stm

ent r

etur

ns fa

ll be

low

6 p

erce

nt. O

ver t

he p

rior 1

0-ye

ar

perio

d en

ding

in 2

010,

the

retir

emen

t sys

tem

’s a

vera

ge in

vest

men

t rat

e of

re

turn

was

4.1

per

cent

, but

retu

rns

over

the

prio

r 20-

year

per

iod

have

be

en s

igni

fican

tly h

ighe

r at 8

.4 p

erce

nt.

Stat

es a

nd lo

calit

ies

ofte

n pa

ckag

ed m

ultip

le p

ensi

on c

hang

es to

geth

er.

For e

xam

ple,

our

ana

lysi

s of

the

NC

SL re

ports

reve

aled

that

23

stat

es

have

bot

h in

crea

sed

empl

oyee

con

tribu

tions

and

redu

ced

mem

ber

bene

fits.

Eac

h ch

ange

mad

e, a

nd th

e in

terp

lay

amon

g th

e ch

ange

s,

cont

ribut

es to

var

ious

impa

cts

on p

lan

spon

sors

, pen

sion

sus

tain

abilit

y,

and

plan

mem

bers

. The

follo

win

g ex

ampl

es d

emon

stra

te s

ome

of th

e w

ays

stat

es h

ave

pack

aged

thes

e ch

ange

s, a

nd th

e va

ryin

g im

pact

s th

at

are

expe

cted

as

a re

sult.

55

The

prov

isio

ns o

f Pen

nsyl

vani

a’s

pens

ion

refo

rm le

gisl

atio

n (A

ct 2

010-

120)

, ena

cted

in

Nov

embe

r 201

0, a

re s

umm

ariz

ed in

Com

mon

wea

lth o

f Pen

nsyl

vani

a S

tate

Em

ploy

ees’

R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

, Com

preh

ensi

ve A

nnua

l Fin

anci

al R

epor

t for

the

year

end

ed

Dec

embe

r 31,

201

0 (H

arris

burg

, PA

: May

201

1). T

he re

port

desc

ribes

the

act’s

pro

visi

ons

for r

educ

ing

bene

fits

for f

utur

e pl

an m

embe

rs a

nd fo

r cha

ngin

g fu

ndin

g m

etho

ds, a

nd

note

s th

at th

e ac

t als

o pr

ohib

its th

e us

e of

pen

sion

obl

igat

ion

bond

s fo

r fun

ding

liab

ilitie

s.

24 P

a. C

.S.A

. § 8

308

(201

0).

56Th

e co

unty

pen

sion

sys

tem

sub

sequ

ently

low

ered

its

assu

med

rate

of r

etur

n to

7.7

5 pe

rcen

t. Th

is a

ctio

n, a

long

with

any

futu

re a

ctua

rial c

hang

es, w

ould

affe

ct th

e ex

pect

ed

savi

ngs

from

the

PO

Bs.

Stat

es a

nd L

ocal

itie

s O

ften

C

ombi

ne S

trat

egie

s

Page

31

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Mis

sour

i is

an e

xam

ple

of a

sta

te th

at p

acka

ged

incr

ease

s in

mem

ber

cont

ribut

ions

with

redu

ctio

ns in

ben

efits

to n

arro

w th

e ga

p be

twee

n pl

an

asse

ts a

nd li

abilit

ies.

For

new

gen

eral

mem

bers

of t

he M

isso

uri S

tate

Em

ploy

ees

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m a

nd th

e M

isso

uri D

epar

tmen

t of

Tran

spor

tatio

n an

d H

ighw

ay P

atro

l Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m, t

he

stat

e in

crea

sed

the

norm

al re

tirem

ent a

ge fr

om 6

2 to

67,

exp

ande

d th

e ve

stin

g pe

riod

from

5 to

10

year

s, a

nd re

quire

d m

embe

rs to

con

tribu

te 4

pe

rcen

t of p

ay to

the

pens

ion

syst

em, a

lthou

gh c

urre

nt m

embe

rs d

o no

t co

ntrib

ute.

The

se c

hang

es a

re e

xpec

ted

to lo

wer

the

stat

e’s

cont

ribut

ions

to

the

syst

em o

ver t

he lo

ng ru

n by

mor

e th

an 5

per

cent

of p

ayro

ll, b

ut th

e in

itial

sav

ings

are

muc

h sm

alle

r. In

fisc

al y

ear 2

012,

the

bene

fit a

nd

cont

ribut

ion

chan

ges

are

expe

cted

to re

duce

the

stat

e’s

cont

ribut

ion

to it

s la

rges

t pla

n by

less

than

1 p

erce

nt o

f pay

roll,

sin

ce th

ere

will

be o

nly

a sm

all n

umbe

r of n

ewly

hire

d m

embe

rs in

the

syst

em. H

owev

er, b

y fis

cal

year

201

8, e

mpl

oyee

s co

vere

d un

der t

he re

duce

d be

nefit

stru

ctur

e ar

e ex

pect

ed to

acc

ount

for o

ver h

alf o

f pay

roll,

furth

er re

duci

ng th

e st

ate’

s an

nual

con

tribu

tions

. Pla

n of

ficia

ls s

aid

thes

e ch

ange

s co

uld

pose

issu

es

for r

ecru

itmen

t and

rete

ntio

n, a

lthou

gh th

e in

fluen

ce o

f ret

irem

ent p

lan

deta

ils w

ill va

ry b

ased

on

indi

vidu

al c

ircum

stan

ces.

The

y al

so n

oted

that

th

e ch

ange

s co

uld

affe

ct e

mpl

oyee

mor

ale,

sin

ce n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s w

ill ha

ve to

wor

k lo

nger

to q

ualif

y fo

r ben

efits

and

the

requ

ired

pens

ion

cont

ribut

ions

will

redu

ce th

eir c

ompe

nsat

ion.

In th

e ca

se o

f Pen

nsyl

vani

a, th

e st

ate

pass

ed a

pac

kage

of p

ensi

on

chan

ges

in 2

010

that

offs

et a

sho

rt-te

rm fu

ndin

g ca

p w

ith lo

ng-te

rm

bene

fit re

duct

ions

to li

mit

the

impa

ct o

n th

e pl

an’s

fund

ed s

tatu

s. F

or th

e St

ate

Empl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

, the

mos

t sig

nific

ant f

undi

ng

chan

ge w

as a

sta

tuto

ry c

ap o

n em

ploy

er c

ontri

butio

n ra

te in

crea

ses.

The

le

gisl

atio

n ad

dres

sed

an e

xpec

ted

19 p

erce

nt in

crea

se in

act

uaria

lly

requ

ired

cont

ribut

ions

by

capp

ing

any

incr

ease

s at

3 p

erce

nt fo

r fis

cal

year

201

1/20

12, 3

.5 p

erce

nt fo

r fis

cal y

ear 2

012/

2013

, and

4.5

per

cent

th

erea

fter.

In th

e sh

ort t

erm

, the

cap

s ef

fect

ivel

y re

duce

d th

e st

ate’

s ex

pect

ed c

ontri

butio

ns o

ver t

he n

ext 4

yea

rs b

y $2

.5 b

illion

. But

in th

e lo

ng te

rm, t

he c

aps,

alo

ng w

ith o

ther

act

uaria

l cha

nges

, are

exp

ecte

d to

in

crea

se th

e st

ate’

s pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns to

the

syst

em b

y $7

billi

on o

ver

the

next

32

year

s. T

o he

lp o

ffset

the

addi

tiona

l lon

g-te

rm c

osts

, Pe

nnsy

lvan

ia e

nact

ed p

ensi

on le

gisl

atio

n ca

lling

for v

ario

us b

enef

it re

duct

ions

for f

utur

e em

ploy

ees.

For

exa

mpl

e, th

e st

ate

redu

ced

the

bene

fit m

ultip

lier f

or fu

ture

em

ploy

ees

from

2.5

to 2

per

cent

(with

an

optio

n fo

r mem

bers

to m

aint

ain

the

2.5

mul

tiplie

r by

payi

ng a

hig

her

mem

ber c

ontri

butio

n ra

te);

incr

ease

d th

e no

rmal

retir

emen

t age

from

60

to 6

5; a

nd e

xpan

ded

the

vest

ing

perio

d fro

m 5

to 1

0 ye

ars.

The

se b

enef

it re

duct

ions

will

redu

ce fu

ture

liab

ilitie

s an

d ar

e ex

pect

ed to

low

er th

e

Red

ucin

g B

enef

its

and

Incr

easi

ng C

ontr

ibut

ions

for

N

ew M

embe

rs

Com

bini

ng S

hort

-Ter

m F

undi

ng

Adj

ustm

ents

wit

h Lo

nger

-Ter

m

Ben

efit

Red

ucti

ons

Page

32

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

stat

e’s

pens

ion

cost

s by

alm

ost $

8.5

billio

n ov

er th

e ne

xt 3

2 ye

ars,

for a

n es

timat

ed n

et s

avin

gs o

f $1.

5 bi

llion

over

the

cost

of t

he c

aps

and

othe

r fu

ndin

g ad

just

men

ts. B

oth

pens

ion

and

budg

et o

ffici

als

said

thes

e ch

ange

s w

ill he

lp th

e st

ate

bette

r man

age

risin

g pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns in

th

e sh

ort t

erm

, but

the

over

all s

avin

gs fr

om th

e le

gisl

ativ

e pa

ckag

e ar

e re

lativ

ely

mod

est o

ver t

he lo

ng te

rm. M

eanw

hile

, the

cha

nges

will

requ

ire

new

em

ploy

ees

to w

ork

long

er fo

r low

er b

enef

its a

nd w

ill le

ave

mor

e em

ploy

ees

with

no

bene

fit a

t all.

Pla

n of

ficia

ls s

aid

it is

too

early

to te

ll if

this

will

affe

ct e

mpl

oyee

recr

uitm

ent a

nd re

tent

ion.

57

In th

e ca

se o

f Illin

ois,

the

stat

e co

mbi

ned

use

of P

OBs

, act

uaria

l cha

nges

, an

d be

nefit

redu

ctio

ns to

man

age

the

stat

e’s

pens

ion

cost

s. T

he s

tate

is

sued

$3.

5 bi

llion

of P

OBs

in 2

010

and

$3.7

billi

on in

201

1 w

ith

mat

uriti

es u

p to

8 y

ears

and

use

d th

e pr

ocee

ds to

fund

the

stat

e’s

annu

al

cont

ribut

ions

to v

ario

us p

ensi

on s

yste

ms.

An

Illin

ois

budg

et o

ffici

al

expl

aine

d th

at is

suin

g th

e PO

Bs h

elpe

d th

e st

ate

avoi

d m

akin

g ad

ditio

nal

spen

ding

cut

s to

oth

er p

ortio

ns o

f the

sta

te’s

bud

get.

Alte

rnat

ivel

y, g

iven

th

e st

ate’

s bu

dget

ary

chal

leng

es, s

ome

pens

ion

offic

ials

sai

d th

at if

the

stat

e ha

d no

t iss

ued

the

POBs

, it i

s m

ore

likel

y th

at it

wou

ld h

ave

not p

aid

its fu

ll re

quire

d pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns.

Use

of P

OBs

will

be c

ostly

to Il

linoi

s, s

ince

the

stat

e w

ill fa

ce a

nnua

l deb

t se

rvic

e pa

ymen

ts o

f abo

ut $

1 bi

llion

over

the

next

9 y

ears

. How

ever

, the

st

ate

incr

ease

d in

divi

dual

and

cor

pora

te ta

xes

in 2

010

and

stat

e bu

dget

of

ficia

ls to

ld u

s th

e st

ate

plan

s to

use

the

addi

tiona

l rev

enue

to fu

nd th

ese

debt

ser

vice

pay

men

ts a

s w

ell a

s ot

her b

udge

tary

prio

ritie

s. W

heth

er th

e st

ate’

s st

atut

orily

requ

ired

cont

ribut

ions

are

fund

ed th

roug

h PO

Bs o

r ge

nera

l rev

enue

doe

s no

t dire

ctly

affe

ct th

e fin

anci

al c

ondi

tion

of th

e pe

nsio

n sy

stem

. How

ever

, som

e pe

nsio

n of

ficia

ls w

ere

conc

erne

d th

at

the

debt

ser

vice

pay

men

ts o

n th

e PO

Bs w

ould

redu

ce a

vaila

ble

fund

ing

for f

utur

e pe

nsio

n co

ntrib

utio

ns.

Illin

ois

has

also

low

ered

em

ploy

er c

ontri

butio

ns to

the

stat

e’s

pens

ion

syst

ems

in th

e sh

ort t

erm

by

adju

stin

g ac

tuar

ial m

etho

ds. I

n 20

09, t

he

stat

e re

quire

d its

pen

sion

sys

tem

s to

sw

itch

from

a m

arke

t val

ue (n

o sm

ooth

ing)

to a

5-y

ear s

moo

thin

g m

etho

d fo

r cal

cula

ting

actu

aria

l ass

ets

57

The

expa

nded

ves

ting

requ

irem

ent,

from

5 y

ears

to 1

0, w

ould

mea

n th

at m

ore

empl

oyee

s w

ould

leav

e se

rvic

e w

ith n

o be

nefit

at a

ll, e

xcep

t for

a re

turn

of m

embe

r co

ntrib

utio

ns. I

n th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, 5-y

ear v

estin

g ha

s be

en th

e st

anda

rd fo

r def

ined

be

nefit

pla

ns s

ince

198

6.

Man

agin

g F

undi

ng t

hrou

gh

PO

Bs,

Act

uari

al C

hang

es, a

nd

Ben

efit

Red

ucti

ons

Page

33

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

and

empl

oyer

con

tribu

tions

. Pla

n of

ficia

ls e

xpla

ined

that

the

chan

ge w

as

inte

nded

to re

duce

the

stat

e’s

cont

ribut

ions

and

dam

pen

the

impa

ct o

f fis

cal y

ear 2

009

mar

ket l

osse

s fo

r the

sho

rt te

rm. A

s a

resu

lt of

the

chan

ge, t

he s

tate

’s a

ctua

rially

cal

cula

ted

cont

ribut

ion

to th

e St

ate

Empl

oyee

s’ R

etire

men

t Sys

tem

of I

llinoi

s w

as re

duce

d by

$10

0 m

illion

in

the

first

yea

r, ac

cord

ing

to p

lan

offic

ials

. How

ever

, pla

n ac

tuar

ies

note

d th

at th

is s

trate

gy o

nly

defe

rs c

ontri

butio

ns w

hen

plan

ass

ets

expe

rienc

e a

loss

, as

they

did

in fi

scal

yea

r 200

9. F

utur

e co

ntrib

utio

ns w

ill be

hig

her

than

they

wou

ld h

ave

been

pre

viou

sly

once

the

fisca

l yea

r 200

9 m

arke

t lo

sses

are

fully

reco

gniz

ed.

In a

dditi

on to

the

use

of P

OBs

and

act

uaria

l cha

nges

, Illin

ois

also

redu

ced

bene

fits

for n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s an

d ap

plie

d th

e fu

ture

sav

ings

to re

duce

em

ploy

er c

ontri

butio

ns in

the

shor

t ter

m. F

or e

xam

ple,

the

stat

e ra

ised

ne

w e

mpl

oyee

s’ n

orm

al re

tirem

ent a

ge to

67,

cap

ped

final

ave

rage

sa

larie

s us

ed fo

r pen

sion

pur

pose

s, a

nd re

duce

d an

nual

CO

LAs.

58

Ac

cord

ing

to p

lan

offic

ials

, the

se c

hang

es a

re e

xpec

ted

to re

duce

the

Stat

e Em

ploy

ees’

Ret

irem

ent S

yste

m’s

futu

re li

abilit

ies

by a

third

. Sta

te

budg

et o

ffici

als

said

the

proj

ecte

d to

tal e

stim

ated

sav

ings

for t

he s

tate

ov

er th

e ne

xt 3

5 ye

ars

will

be a

bout

$22

0 bi

llion.

Sin

ce th

e ch

ange

s ap

ply

only

to n

ew e

mpl

oyee

s, th

e sa

ving

s w

ill sl

owly

acc

rue

over

the

next

35

year

s. N

ever

thel

ess,

the

stat

e to

ok a

dvan

ced

cred

it fo

r the

se fu

ture

be

nefit

redu

ctio

ns, f

urth

er re

duci

ng c

ontri

butio

ns in

the

shor

t ter

m.

Acco

rdin

g to

pla

n ac

tuar

ies,

by

taki

ng th

is a

dvan

ce c

redi

t, th

e st

ate

also

in

crea

sed

unfu

nded

liab

ilitie

s in

the

shor

t ter

m, a

dver

sely

affe

ctin

g its

re

tirem

ent s

yste

ms.

Stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts c

ontin

ue to

exp

erie

nce

the

linge

ring

effe

cts

of in

vest

men

t los

ses

and

budg

et p

ress

ures

in th

e w

ake

of th

e re

cent

ec

onom

ic d

ownt

urn.

Alth

ough

mos

t lar

ge s

tate

and

loca

l gov

ernm

ent

pens

ion

plan

s st

ill m

aint

ain

subs

tant

ial a

sset

s, s

uffic

ient

to c

over

thei

r pe

nsio

n ob

ligat

ions

for a

dec

ade

or m

ore,

hei

ghte

ned

conc

erns

ove

r the

lo

ng-te

rm s

usta

inab

ility

of th

e pl

ans

has

spur

red

man

y st

ates

and

lo

calit

ies

to im

plem

ent a

var

iety

of r

efor

ms,

incl

udin

g re

duct

ions

in

bene

fits

and

incr

ease

s in

mem

ber c

ontri

butio

ns.

58

Acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n of

ficia

ls, c

appi

ng s

alar

ies

used

for b

enef

it ca

lcul

atio

ns a

nd fo

r de

term

inin

g co

ntrib

utio

ns d

ecre

ases

the

antic

ipat

ed a

mou

nt o

f fut

ure

payr

oll a

nd

empl

oyee

con

tribu

tions

, whi

ch a

ffect

s fu

ture

sta

te c

ontri

butio

ns.

Con

clud

ing

Obs

erva

tion

s

Page

34

GAO

-12-

322

Sta

te a

nd L

ocal

Pen

sion

s

Des

pite

thes

e ef

forts

, con

tinue

d vi

gila

nce

is n

eede

d to

hel

p en

sure

that

st

ates

and

loca

litie

s ca

n co

ntin

ue to

mee

t the

ir pe

nsio

n ob

ligat

ions

. Se

vera

l fac

tors

will

ultim

atel

y af

fect

the

sust

aina

bilit

y of

sta

te a

nd lo

cal

pens

ion

plan

s ov

er th

e lo

ng te

rm. I

mpo

rtant

am

ong

them

are

whe

ther

go

vern

men

t spo

nsor

s m

aint

ain

adeq

uate

con

tribu

tions

tow

ard

thes

e pl

ans,

and

whe

ther

inve

stm

ent r

etur

ns m

eet s

pons

ors’

long

-term

as

sum

ptio

ns. G

oing

forw

ard,

gro

win

g bu

dget

pre

ssur

es w

ill co

ntin

ue to

ch

alle

nge

stat

e an

d lo

cal g

over

nmen

ts’ a

bilit

ies

to p

rovi

de a

dequ

ate

cont

ribut

ions

to h

elp

sust

ain

thei

r pen

sion

pla

ns a

nd e

nsur

e a

secu

re

retir

emen

t for

cur

rent

and

futu

re e

mpl

oyee

s.

We

prov

ided

offi

cial

s fro

m th

e In

tern

al R

even

ue S

ervi

ce a

nd th

e So

cial

Se

curit

y Ad

min

istra

tion

with

a d

raft

of th

is re

port.

The

y pr

ovid

ed te

chni

cal

com

men

ts th

at w

e in

corp

orat

ed, a

s ap

prop

riate

. In

addi

tion,

we

prov

ided

of

ficia

ls fr

om th

e st

ates

and

citi

es w

e re

view

ed w

ith p

ortio

ns o

f the

dra

ft re

port

that

add

ress

ed a

spec

ts o

f the

pen

sion

fund

s in

thei

r jur

isdi

ctio

ns.

We

inco

rpor

ated

thei

r tec

hnic

al c

omm

ents

, as

appr

opria

te, a

s w

ell.

We

are

send

ing

copi

es o

f thi

s re

port

to re

leva

nt c

ongr

essi

onal

co

mm

ittee

s, th

e C

omm

issi

oner

s of

the

Inte

rnal

Rev

enue

Ser

vice

and

the

Soci

al S

ecur

ity A

dmin

istra

tion,

and

oth

er in

tere

sted

par

ties.

In a

dditi

on,

this

repo

rt w

ill be

ava

ilabl

e at

no

char

ge o

n G

AO’s

web

site

at

http

://w

ww

.gao

.gov

.

Age

ncy

Com

men

ts


Top Related