InterIm
StudentIndividual Student Report (ISR)
educator/GroupCurrent ProgressResponse/Content AnalysisSkill Proficiency by StudentSkill Proficiency by GroupSkill Proficiency by Student/Group Student Performance Subject Proficiency by Student Subject Proficiency by Student/Group
SchoolSubject Proficiency by Demographic Subject Proficiency by Grade
DistrictSubject Proficiency by Demographic Subject Proficiency by Grade Subject Proficiency by School
StateSubject Proficiency by District
Interim Report Status Student/
Parent Educator School District State
Dynamic or Static
Format
Individual Student Report (ISR) Updated X X Dynamic PDF
Current Progress Report New X Dynamic PDF
Response/Content Analysis No Change X Dynamic HTML/PDF
Skill Proficiency by Student Updated X Dynamic PDF
Skill Proficiency by Student/Group
Updated X Dynamic PDF
Skill Proficiency by Group Updated X Dynamic PDF
Student Performance Updated X Dynamic HTML
Subject Proficiency by Student Updated X Dynamic PDF
Subject Proficiency by Student/Group
Updated X Dynamic PDF
Subject Proficiency by Demographic
New X X Static PDF
Subject Proficiency by Grade Updated X X Static PDF
Subject Proficiency by School Updated X Static PDF
Subject Proficiency by District Updated X Static PDF
SPF – Scores New X X X NA CSV
SPF – Reporting Categories New X X X NA CSV
INTERIMAssessed Sep 25, 2017-Nov 7, 2017
Steve StudentGrade 4SAMPLE ELEM. SCH., District ID:00000 Birth Date: 10/17/2007, Student ID: 0000000000000
Page 1 of 1Current ProgressHow is Steve progressing toward unlocking his potential and preparing for college and a career?
EnglishMeetsBenchmark158
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 157 National Average: 159
ScienceBelowBenchmark160
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 164 National Average: 163
ReadingMeetsBenchmark160
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 160 National Average: 159
MathBelowBenchmark159
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 160 National Average: 160
EnglishProduction of Writing 38%3 of 8
Conventions of Standard English 50%5 of 10
ReadingKey Ideas and Details 86%6 of 7
Craft and Structure 57%4 of 7
Students must read and understand increasingly complextexts to prepare for the reading demands of college andcareer. Examples of factors that contribute to text complexityare vocabulary level and sentence structure. The reading testmeasures progress with text complexity by checking forunderstanding of texts from a range of complexity levels.
Sufficient Progress
Yes No
PROGRESS WITH TEXT COMPLEXITY
NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK
Percentile
SCALE SCORE RANGEAll measurements, including test scores,contain uncertainty. Your test scoreindicates how well you performed on theactual test day. However, this rangeshows scores you would likely obtain ifyou took the test again without additionalcoursework.
Subject RangeEnglishReadingScienceMath
158-160160-162160-162159-161
ScienceInterpretation of Data 64%7 of 11
Scientific Investigation 40%2 of 5
Evaluation of Models, Inferences,and Experimental Results 20%1 of 5
Math29%5 of 17Grade Level Progress
• Number and Operations –Fractions 0%0 of 4
67%2 of 3• Number and Operations in Base10
33%1 of 3• Operations and Algebraic Thinking
25%1 of 4• Geometry
33%1 of 3• Measurement and Data
Integrating Essential Skills 50%4 of 8
Modeling 33%4 of 12
Learn about the ACT Aspire assessment and results: DiscoverACTAspire.org
ACT Interim Readiness Range: Shows where a student who has metthe Benchmark on this assessment would typically perform.
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: Students who score at or abovethese benchmarks are on target to meet ACT's College and CareerReadiness Benchmarks when they leave high school.
Predicted Path: Predicted end-of-year score range assuming typicalgrowth.
Your ranks show the percentage of other grade 4 students in the nation who receiveda score that is the same as or lower than yours. For example, a rank of 70 for yourmath score means 70% of students earned that score or below.
ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/2/20183237©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved.Scores are estimates of student knowledge and achievement. Actual achievement could be slightly higher or lower than the scores shown.
• Within-year longitudinalgrowth
• Scale score aligned withcollege and careerreadiness benchmarks
Snapshot of performance within reporting categories, compared to ACT Interim Readiness Range
National percentile rank
Page 1 of 1
INTERIMAssessed Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 18, 2017
Grade 6SAMPLE MIDDLE SCHOOL, District ID: 0000
Current ProgressHow are students progressing toward unlocking their potential andpreparing for college and a career?
ENGLISHMeetsBenchmarkCurrentAverage: 161.0
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 160 National Average: 163
Total UniqueStudents: 79
SCIENCEBelowBenchmarkCurrentAverage: 162.0
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 163 National Average: 163
Total UniqueStudents: 79
READINGMeetsBenchmarkCurrentAverage: 162.0
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 159 National Average: 158
Total UniqueStudents: 79
MATHMeetsBenchmarkCurrentAverage: 162.0
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark: 158 National Average: 158
Total UniqueStudents: 79
33%MeetsBenchmark
Students must read and understand increasingly complex texts to prepare for thereading demands of college and career. Examples of factors that contribute totext complexity are vocabulary level and sentence structure. The reading testmeasures progress with text complexity by checking for understanding of textsfrom a range of complexity levels.
Progress Distribution: Percent and CountSufficient Progress Insufficient Progress
26 5333% 67%
PROGRESS WITH TEXT COMPLEXITY NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANK
Percentile
The ranks show how this group performed in comparison to other grade 6 students in the nation.For example, if the median English score is at the 78th percentile, the typical student in this groupachieved as well as or better than 78% of the students in the nation.
ABOUT PROGRESSThe progress charts summarize aggregate performance of students against the backdrop of theACT Interim Readiness Benchmarks.
The solid orange circle plots the average (mean) score for the most recent month, the gray circlesplot average scores from previous months, and the hollow orange circle plots the predicted end-of-year average score assuming that students will demonstrate average growth.
n=XXX
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
Number of Students
Trend
Predicted Path
Previous Average
Current Average
Predicted Average
Average Scores: Current Progress and Predicted Path
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/9/2018
Provides view of selected students’ progress with text complexity
Compares selected students to the national performance
Shows past class performance, current performance, and future predicted performance relative to the ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
.ACT' Aspire
Grade 5 Math, Interim I Assessed Sep 13. 2017. Sep 13. 2017 Standard Forms Groups Sselected All students included
Number and Operations in Base 1 O
35% I
Geometry
33% 1111111:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::]1
Response and Content Analysis What in>ghts mto student responses can help understand comprehension?
O ExpandAII
Question 7 0 31% I
Question 8 0 54% I
Question 24 0 21% - I
Question 3 0 36% I
Question 14 O 56% I
Question 19 O 18% I
Number of Students 39 Items: 25 Categories : 8
5.NBT.B.6 / Resources
5.NBT A3 / Resources
5.NBT.B.5 / Resources
5.G.B.3 / Resources
5.G.A.2 / Resources
5.G.A.2 / Resources
·�-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Number and Operations - Fractions 14% - I Question 5 0 0% I I 5.NF.B.6 / Resources
Question 9 0 10% • 5.NF A 1 I Resources
Question 18 0 36% I 5.NF.B.3 / Resources
Question 20 0 10% • 5.NF.B.4 / Resources
Response Key Correct Answer
Response Percent so1o 92% Student Count 2 23
Response A D
Standards® Copjrighl 2010. National Gowmors Associatioo Cemer for Best Practices ard Col.ncil of Chief State SchooJ Oooers. Al rglts reserved.
ACT® Aspire®© 2012-2017. All rights reseived. Version: 3.1.21.23 !Ill Contact Us or l!!!l 1.855.730.0400
Response and Content Analysis Number of Students Items: 25
What insights ll'lto student responses can help understand comprehension? Categories : 8
.ACT' Aspire
Grade 5 Math. Interim I Assessed Sep 13. 2017. Ses: 13, 2017 Standard Forms Groups Selected All studen1s included
0 Expand All
Number and Operations in Base 1 O
35% I Question 7 0 31% I \5.NBT.B.5j/ Resources -- �
Question 8 0 54% 5.NBT.B.6
Question 24 0 21% - Find whole-number quotients of
whole numbers with up to four-
Geometry digit dividends and �No-digit
divisors, using strategies based 33% I Question 3 0 36%
on place value, the properties of
Question 14 0 56% operations, and/or the
relationship between
Question 19 0 18% multiplication and division.
Illustrate and explain the Question 22 0 21% - calculation by using equations,
rectangular arrays, and/or area
Integrating Essential Skills models.
31% I Question 1 0 10% • I 4.NF A2 / Resources
Question 4 0 38% I 4.NBT.8.4 / Resources
Question 6 0 41% I 4.G.A.2 / Resources..
View classroom performance by reporting category
For mathematics, OpenEd resources are linked to each item to provide immediate remediation or enrichment opportunities for students. (Coming fall 2018 for other subjects)
Hyperlink allows educator to view the item
INTERIMAssessed Sep 29, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017
Grade 10SAMPLE HIGH SCHOOL District ID: 123-HS001
Skill Proficiency: MathHow can students be grouped by skill proficiency to inform teaching?
Page 1 of 2
Grade LevelProgress Number and
QuantityAlgebra Functions Geometry Statistics and
Probability
IntegratingEssential
Skills
Modeling
Scale Score162-180Meets Benchmark
Texas, Houston 168
Cairo, Egypt 166
Keokuk, Havanna 166
Peoria, Kansas 166
Honolulu, Alberta 165
Houston, California 164
Kemper, Janesville 164
Madison, Mississippi 164
Bakersfield, Nevada 163
Maine, Austin 163
Miami, Jackson 163
Liberty, Emu 162
150-161Below BenchmarkMemphis, Jonestown 161
Olagalla, Jesper 161
Ewa, Beach 160
Georgia, Rainforest 160
Helena, Vegas 160
Redwood, Redstone 159
Kailua, Hawaii 158
Kaneohe, Emu 158
Mitchelville, Greece 158
Blank = Meets BenchmarkBelow Benchmark
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/18/2017
INTERIMAssessed Sep 29, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017
Grade 10SAMPLE HIGH SCHOOL District ID: 123-HS001
Skill Proficiency: MathHow can students be grouped by skill proficiency to inform teaching?
Page 2 of 2
Grade LevelProgress Number and
QuantityAlgebra Functions Geometry Statistics and
Probability
IntegratingEssential
Skills
Modeling
Scale ScoreBelow Benchmark 150-161
Eudoria, Venezuela 157
Redmond, Sanka 157
Grinnell, Colfax 156
Kiluea, Abbott 156
Moana, Vatican 156
Nuuanu, Kiaiser 156
Greenland, Jakarta 154
Kalaneoleani, Hana 154
Lilikoi, Kavika 153
Blank = Meets BenchmarkBelow Benchmark
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/18/2017
Clear indicator for which students meet the benchmark
Each subject area has its own report
If students are below benchmark, it is easy to see which reporting categories need to be targeted for remediation.
INTERIMAssessed Oct 2, 2017 - Oct 5, 2017
SAMPLE HIGH SCHOOLGrade 9SAMPLE DISTRICT, School ID: 123-HS001
Skill Proficiency by Group: MathHow can decisions be informed by group performance in different skillareas?
Page 1 of 1
Grade LevelProgress Number and
QuantityAlgebra Functions Geometry Statistics and
Probability
IntegratingEssential
Skills
Modeling
SAMPLE HIGHSCHOOL
166% 94%
6% 19% 44% 38% 19% 44% 0% 25%
GROUP 1
1010% 90%
10% 10% 30% 40% 30% 50% 0% 10%
GROUP 3
166% 94%
6% 19% 44% 38% 19% 44% 0% 25%
GROUP 2
60% 100%
0% 33% 67% 33% 0% 33% 0% 50%
SKILL FOCUS Better proficiency in this skill may improve scores.Integrating Essential Skills: The questions and tasks in this skill category assess students’ continued integration, strengthening, andapplication of mathematics learned in earlier grades.
Students Meeting ACT InterimReadiness BenchmarkBlank = 50% or More
Fewer Than 50%
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/15/2017
ACT Aspire allows educators to create their own cohorts of students, helping to differentiate instruction for both enhancement and remediation.
User-created groups can be compared against school-level performance, by skills in each subject area
INTERIMAssessed Sep 29, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017
Group ABCGrade 10SAMPLE HIGH SCHOOL, District ID: 123-HS001
Skill Proficiency: ScienceHow can students be grouped by skill proficiency to inform teaching?
Page 1 of 2
Interpretation of Data Scientific Investigation Evaluation of Models,Inferences, and
Experimental ResultsScale Score
164-171Meets BenchmarkBakersfield, Nevada 167
Honlolulu, Alberta 167
Cairo, Egypt 166
Georgia, Rainforest 166
Keokuk, Havanna 166
Maine, Austin 166
Ewa, Beach 165
Gainesville, Reno 165
Redmond, Sanka 165
Helana, Vegas 164
Texas, Houston 164
Hampton, Carson 164
Madison, Mississippi 164
Mitchelville, Greece 164
Miami, Jackson 164
Olagalla, Jesper 164
150-163Below BenchmarkKaneohe, Emu 163
Liberty, Emu 163
Nuuanu, Kaiser 163
Kember, Janesville 162
Eudoria, Venezuela 161
Blank = Meets BenchmarkBelow Benchmark
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/18/2017
INTERIMAssessed Sep 29, 2017 - Oct 12, 2017
Grade 10SAMPLE HIGH SCHOOL, District ID: 123-HS001
Skill Proficiency: ScienceHow can students be grouped by skill proficiency to inform teaching?
Page 2 of 2
Interpretation of Data Scientific Investigation Evaluation of Models,Inferences, and
Experimental ResultsScale Score
Below Benchmark 150-163
Peoria, Kansas 161
Redwood, Redstone 161
Grinnell, Colfax 160
Kalaneoleani, Hana 160
Kiluea, Abbot 160
Kailua, Hawaii 159
Moana, Vatican 157
Miami, Jackson 157
Lilikoi, Kavika 156
Blank = Meets BenchmarkBelow Benchmark
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness Benchmark
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/18/2017
Once groups are defined by the user, these groups can be broken down by student performance in each group.
Report tracks each student Interim assessment with a clear indicator for if the student is below benchmark.
An “Off Grade” indicator is provided. This indicates that the student took an exam not of the same grade level as the student is registered.
INTERIMAssessed Sep 18, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017
Grade 6SAMPLE MIDDLE SCHOOL, District ID: 0000
Subject Proficiency by StudentHow can students be grouped by subject to inform teaching?
Page 1 of 2
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATHStudent CountMeets Benchmark 19 14 12 12Below Benchmark 11 16 18 18
164 161 169 162
168 162 167 158
162 161 165 162
163 X 168 158
168 162 163 156
163 161 166 159
X 158 166 158
165 161 166 154
162 161 163 160
165 160 161 160
164 159 165 154
162 160 161 158
163 X 161 158
California, Redding M
Brown, Red D
Arizona, Flagstaff O
Clayton, Anna G
California, Salinas Q
Butte, El Paso
Boston, Bakersfield P
Cairo, Austin
Alaska, Charlotte l
Cork, Mali
Anoka, Minnesota A
Wisconsin, Grants H
Bayfield, Boston B
Marion, Iowa L 162 161 159 158
166 158 166 157
166 157 162 157
166 158 160 155
164 159 159 155
157 157 160 156
156 157 163 153
161 155 160 152
155 154 160 158
157 153 160 156
154 155 159 156
158 154 155 157
159 156 155 152
Below Benchmark in 2+ Subjects Aspen, Colorado E
Avon, Illinois M
Basalt, Virginia D
Ellis, Alexia E
Cortez, Montana M
Sheraton, Mexico L
Clayton, Lynn E
Carl, Missoui Q
Aardvark, Maine W
Estes, France X
Libya, Brazil L
Champaign, Illinois T
Rochester, Sweden E 157 154 156 155
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness BenchmarkBlank = Meets Benchmark
Below BenchmarkX Not Tested
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/5/2018
OffGrade
OffGrade
OffGrade
OffGrade
An “Off Grade” indicator is provided.
Summary data is listed at the top of the report for a quick assessment of classroom-level performance.
Labels separate by student performance
“X” indicates that a student did not test
INTERIMAssessed Sep 18, 2017 - Sep 21, 2017
GROUP ZGrade 6SAMPLE MIDDLE SCHOOL, District ID: 0000
Subject Proficiency by StudentHow can students be grouped by subject to inform teaching?
Page 1 of 1
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATHStudent CountMeets Benchmark 19 14 12 12Below Benchmark 11 16 18 18
164 161 169 162
168 162 167 158
162 161 165 162
163 160 168 158
168 162 163 156
163 161 166 159
165 158 166 158
165 161 166 154
162 161 163 160
165 160 161 160
164 159 165 154
162 160 161 158
163 159 161 158
California, Redding M
Brown, Red D
Arizona, Flagstaff O
Clayton, Anna G
California, Salinas Q
Butte, El Paso
Boston, Bakersfield P
Cairo, Austin
Alaska, Charlotte l
Cork, Mali
Anoka, Minnesota A
Wisconsin, Grants H
Bayfield, Boston B
Marion, Iowa L 162 161 159 158
166 158 166 157
166 157 162 157
166 158 160 155
164 159 159 155
157 157 160 156
156 157 163 153
161 155 160 152
155 154 160 158
157 153 160 156
154 155 159 156
158 154 155 157
159 156 155 152
Below Benchmark in 2+ Subjects Aspen, Colorado E
Avon, Illinois M
Basalt, Virginia D
Ellis, Alexia E
Cortez, Montana M
Sheraton, Mexico L
Clayton, Lynn E
Carl, Missoui Q
Aardvark, Maine W
Estes, France X
Libya, Brazil L
Champaign, Illinois T
Rochester, Sweden E 157 154 156 155
Off Grade studentstested below or abovetheir current grade.
ACT Interim Readiness BenchmarkBlank = Meets Benchmark
Below BenchmarkX Not Tested
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/5/2018
Same as previous report, with student organized into user-created groups.
Assessed Oct 18, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
SAMPLE ELEMENTARYGrade 3SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School ID: 000000
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 1 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY No Students Tested26% 74%
239% 91%
2322% 78%
23
Gender
Female No Students Tested23% 77%
School Performance
138% 92%
School Performance
1315% 85%
School Performance
13
Male No Students Tested30% 70%
School Performance
1010% 90%
School Performance
1030% 70%
School Performance
10
Race / Ethnicity
American Indian /Alaska Native No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Asian No Students Tested 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Black /African American No Students Tested22% 78%
School Performance
911% 89%
School Performance
90% 100%
School Performance
9
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/10/2018
Assessed Oct 18, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY Grade 3SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School ID: 000000
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 2 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY No Students Tested26% 74%
239% 91%
2322% 78%
23
Hispanic or Latino No Students Tested 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Native Hawaiian /Other PacificIslander
No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
White No Students Tested31% 69%
School Performance
138% 92%
School Performance
1331% 69%
School Performance
13
Not Categorized No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Other Demographics
Economically Disadvantaged No Students Tested10% 90%
School Performance
1010% 90%
School Performance
1010% 90%
School Performance
10
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/10/2018
Assessed Oct 18, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY Grade 3SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School ID: 000000
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 3 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY No Students Tested26% 74%
239% 91%
2322% 78%
23
ELL No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Gifted No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
IEP No Students Tested 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Migrant No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Section 504 No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Other Accoms Plan No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/10/2018
Assessed Oct 18, 2017 - Oct 24, 2017
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY Grade 3SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School ID: 000000
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 4 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY No Students Tested26% 74%
239% 91%
2322% 78%
23
Homeless No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Parent in Military No Students Tested 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
In Foster Care No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/10/2018
School-level proficiency shown, with total number of students tested per subject Demographics breakouts shown:
• Gender• Race/ethnicity• Other demographics (Economically
Disadvantaged, ELL, Gifted, IEP, Migrant,Section 504, Other Accommodations Plan,Homeless, Parents in Military, In Foster Care)
SAMPLE MIDDLE SCHOOL SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, School ID: 0000001
Subject Proficiency by Grade LevelHow can decisions be informed based upon grade level subjectproficiency?
Page 1 of 1
INTERIMAssessed Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 18, 2017
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATHSAMPLE MIDDLE SCHOOL
71%255
29% 51%255
49% 37%255
63% 34%255
66%
Grade 6
7958% 42%
7946% 54%
7939% 61%
7941% 59%
Grade 7
8076% 24%
8054% 46%
8039% 61%
8031% 69%
Grade 8
9677% 23%
9654% 46%
9634% 66%
9630% 70%
SUBJECT FOCUS Better proficiency in math may improve scores.ACT Aspire Mathematics Assessments assess students’ ability to solve problems, explain and justify, and model with the mathematics up through thegiven grade.
Results for groups with 4or fewer students are notshown
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/6/2018
View proficiency by grade across a school to see patterns or curriculum deficiencies.
INTERIMAssessed Sep 27, 2017 - Oct 23, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 3District ID: 0000
Subject Proficiency by SchoolHow can decisions be informed based upon school and subjectproficiency?
Page 1 of 1
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT No Students Tested176
28% 72%57
37% 63%242
31% 69%
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 No Students Tested No Students Tested 37% 63%57
37% 63%62
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 No Students Tested 25% 75%91
No Students Tested 31% 69%91
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 No Students Tested 32% 68%85
No Students Tested 28% 72%89
SUBJECT FOCUS Better proficiency in reading may improve scores.ACT Aspire Reading Assessments determine whether students can understand what increasingly challenging texts say explicitly and what can reasonablybe inferred from these texts; understand general academic and domain-specific language in the context in which it is used; and integrate knowledge andideas from multiple texts.
Results for groups with 4or fewer students are notshown
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/6/2018
Understand how each school is performing relative to the district
Assessed Sep 26, 2017 - Oct 3, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 4District ID: 9999
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 1 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT65% 35%
9229% 71%
9236% 64%
9248% 52%
92
Gender
Female72% 28%
District Performance
4333% 67%
District Performance
4340% 60%
District Performance
4351% 49%
District Performance
43
Male59% 41%
District Performance
4927% 73%
District Performance
4933% 67%
District Performance
4945% 55%
District Performance
49
Race / Ethnicity
American Indian /Alaska Native 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Asian63% 38%
District Performance
850% 50%
District Performance
850% 50%
District Performance
875% 25%
District Performance
8
Black /African American40% 60%
District Performance
1020% 80%
District Performance
1050% 50%
District Performance
1050% 50%
District Performance
10
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/19/2017
Assessed Sep 26, 2017 - Oct 3, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 4District ID: 9999
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 2 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT65% 35%
9229% 71%
9236% 64%
9248% 52%
92
Hispanic or Latino67% 33%
District Performance
922% 78%
District Performance
933% 67%
District Performance
967% 33%
District Performance
9
Native Hawaiian /Other PacificIslander
No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
White67% 33%
District Performance
8830% 70%
District Performance
8836% 64%
District Performance
8849% 51%
District Performance
88
Not Categorized No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
Other Demographics
Economically Disadvantaged58% 42%
District Performance
6025% 75%
District Performance
6028% 72%
District Performance
6043% 57%
District Performance
60
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/19/2017
Assessed Sep 26, 2017 - Oct 3, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 4District ID: 9999
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 3 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT65% 35%
9229% 71%
9236% 64%
9248% 52%
92
ELL 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Gifted100% 0%
District Performance
1573% 27%
District Performance
1580% 20%
District Performance
1580% 20%
District Performance
15
IEP50% 50%
District Performance
1217% 83%
District Performance
1225% 75%
District Performance
1242% 58%
District Performance
12
Migrant 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Section 504 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Other Accoms Plan No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested No Students Tested
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/19/2017
Assessed Sep 26, 2017 - Oct 3, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 4District ID: 9999
Subject Proficiency by DemographicWhich student subgroups are in greatest need of additionalsupport?
Page 4 of 4
INTERIM
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT65% 35%
9229% 71%
9236% 64%
9248% 52%
92
Homeless 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
Parent in Military58% 42%
District Performance
1911% 89%
District Performance
1937% 63%
District Performance
1947% 53%
District Performance
19
In Foster Care75% 25%
District Performance
838% 63%
District Performance
825% 75%
District Performance
850% 50%
District Performance
8
©2017 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 12/19/2017
Demographics breakouts shown:• Gender• Race/ethnicity• Other demographics (Economically
Disadvantaged, ELL, Gifted, IEP, Migrant,Section 504, Other Accommodations Plan,Homeless, Parents in Military, In Foster Care)
District-level proficiency shown, with total number of students tested per subject
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT District ID: 000
Subject Proficiency by Grade LevelHow can decisions be informed based upon grade level subjectproficiency?
Page 1 of 1
INTERIMAssessed Sep 18, 2017 - Oct 18, 2017
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATHSAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
65%636
35% 34%637
66% 32%637
68% 35%636
65%
Grade 3
7658% 42%
7616% 84%
7625% 75%
7637% 63%
Grade 4
9265% 35%
9229% 71%
9236% 64%
9248% 52%
Grade 5
9365% 35%
9418% 82%
9429% 71%
9339% 61%
Grade 6
7958% 42%
7946% 54%
7939% 61%
7941% 59%
Grade 7
8076% 24%
8054% 46%
8039% 61%
8031% 69%
Grade 8
9677% 23%
9654% 46%
9634% 66%
9630% 70%
Grade 9
5444% 56%
5428% 72%
5430% 70%
5431% 69%
Grade 10
6665% 35%
6626% 74%
6624% 76%
6618% 82%
SUBJECT FOCUS Better proficiency in science may improve scores.ACT Aspire Science Assessments assess students’ science practices using real-world scientific scenarios. Scenarios in upper-grade assessments includestudent investigations, formal scientific research, formal scientific data from references, and students or scientists providing competing explanations forreal scientific phenomena. At the earlier grades, topics generally focus on everyday student discovery rather than formal science.
Results for groups with 4or fewer students are notshown
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/6/2018
View proficiency by grade across an entire district to see patterns or curriculum deficiencies.
INTERIMAssessed Sep 27, 2017 - Oct 23, 2017
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Grade 3District ID: 0000
Subject Proficiency by SchoolHow can decisions be informed based upon school and subjectproficiency?
Page 1 of 1
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT No Students Tested176
28% 72%57
37% 63%242
31% 69%
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 No Students Tested No Students Tested 37% 63%57
37% 63%62
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 No Students Tested 25% 75%91
No Students Tested 31% 69%91
SAMPLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 No Students Tested 32% 68%85
No Students Tested 28% 72%89
SUBJECT FOCUS Better proficiency in reading may improve scores.ACT Aspire Reading Assessments determine whether students can understand what increasingly challenging texts say explicitly and what can reasonablybe inferred from these texts; understand general academic and domain-specific language in the context in which it is used; and integrate knowledge andideas from multiple texts.
Results for groups with 4or fewer students are notshown
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/6/2018
Understand how each school is performing relative to the district
INTERIMAssessed Sep 11, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
SAMPLE STATEGrade 9
Subject Proficiency by DistrictHow can decisions be informed based upon district and subjectproficiency?
Page 1 of 30
ENGLISH READING SCIENCE MATH
SAMPLE STATE15519
53% 47%18543
33% 67%17878
28% 72%19881
32% 68%
DISTRICT 1No Students Tested 19% 81%
27
No Students Tested 11% 89%27
DISTRICT 2 No Students Tested 22% 78%9
No Students Tested 22% 78%9
DISTRICT 3 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer 4 Students or Fewer
DISTRICT 470% 30%
3352% 48%
3345% 55%
3353% 47%
32
DISTRICT 546% 54%
12324% 76%
11925% 75%
11128% 72%
123
DISTRICT 655% 45%
18133% 67%
17733% 67%
17833% 67%
181
Results for groups with 4or fewer students are notshown
©2018 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. ACT, Inc.-Confidential Restricted www.DiscoverACTAspire.org Created 1/4/2018
Understand how each district is performing relative to the state