Download - Student teacher engagement with research
![Page 1: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project 4: Student teacher
engagement with research
Elspeth McCartney, Helen Marwick
University of Strathclyde
HEA TEd Conference
11th July 2014, Birmingham City University
![Page 3: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• There is a renewed emphasis on developing
‘evidence based’ classroom practices
• Traceable across UK countries’ policies,
BERA publications, HEA research
• Agree on teachers as ‘discerning consumers’
of research
3
The (re)turn to research evidence
![Page 4: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• ‘Critical Policy’ evidence, synthesising
(often) large-scale data and existing
research studies into policy statements
• ‘What works’ research, evaluating and
synthesising studies on the effects of
specific classroom approaches
4
Two types of evidence considered
![Page 5: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Policy makers and service commissioners seek ‘best’ evidence, e.g. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) which provide a ‘counterfactual’ (control) condition
• RCTs offer the possibility of results generalising to similar situations
• However, they then need real-world follow-up implementation studies
5
The turn to (medical) trials model
![Page 6: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Not all teachers qualify in Higher Education (England)
• No agreement on underpinning disciplines, for teachers, beyond curriculum areas (UK)
• Much research, but poorly articulated with teachers’ needs/poorly ‘translated’ for use
6
(Re)turn to varied ITE programmes
![Page 7: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Research on the distinctive contribution of HE to ITE (Florian & Pantić, 2013)
• Strategic priority: ‘Supporting research-informed teacher education in a changing policy environment’
• Ultimate aims -
- to develop educational opportunity and achievement for the diverse modern classroom
- for teachers to respond effectively to developmental, social, cultural and/or linguistic factors that impact, often adversely, on child attainment and wellbeing
7
HEA response
![Page 8: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• Commissioned as a strategic social
science project within this priority research
strand
• Investigated student teachers’ views on
and use of research evidence
8
HEA Project 4
![Page 9: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Little is known about student teachers’ views as they progress towards practice
• Teachers’ views of research evidence and its uses are not uniformly welcoming (Helmsley Brown & Sharp 2003)
• Students are transitioning into the new research context, and may have similarly mixed views
9
Because …..
![Page 10: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1 identify examples of research evidence on the influences of developmental, social, cultural and/or linguistic factors on child attainment and wellbeing, and of their inter-relationships – policy research.
2 identify selected information about ‘What Works’ research evaluating classroom practices for children with developmental, social, cultural and/or linguistic factors that may impact adversely on their attainment and wellbeing – what works research.
10
Specific project aims were to:
![Page 11: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3 prepare and pilot workshop materials to engage participants in appraising selected reports of relevant research, using questionnaire and group discussion methods, and to discuss the barriers and facilitators they perceive in using research
4 identify key themes emerging from pilot workshops
11
Specific project aims were to:
![Page 12: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Education research evidence was sourced
• from Faculty staff, as a scholarly
community
• and from targeted literature searches
Aims 1 and 2: sourcing evidence
12
![Page 13: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• Faculty staff sent policy research
examples, but no What Works research
examples.
• Targeted searches found both kinds of
evidence.
• One example of each was used in each
workshop.
13
Evidence retrieved
![Page 14: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Key sources of policy research were:
• The Joseph Rowntree Foundation http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications
• The National Foundation for Educational Research http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/
• The Teachers College Record http://www.tcrecord.org/
14
Sources for policy evidence
![Page 15: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Key sources of ‘What Works’ research were:
• The Campbell Collaboration Library of Systematic Reviews http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/
• The Cochrane Collaboration reviews http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews
• The Education Endowment Foundation http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit/
• The ‘What Works’ Clearinghouse http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/findwhatworks.aspx
15
Sources for ‘What Works’ evidence
![Page 16: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Education students could be studying for a:
• Post Graduate Diploma in Education (PGDE), primary or secondary,
• BEd degree, primary; or
• BA Childhood Practice (BACP), a part-time degree for individuals already working with pre-school children
16
Selecting evidence to discuss
![Page 17: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• Sosu & Ellis (2014). Closing the
Attainment Gap in Scottish Education.
York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/education
-attainment-scotland-summary.pdf
• New, relevant to Scotland
Policy example: all courses
17
![Page 18: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• All What Works Clearinghouse - Quick Reviews
• PGDE: Closing the Social-Class Achievement Gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transitions.
• BEd: Reciprocal Teaching: Students with learning difficulties.
• BACP: Head Start Impact Study: Final report
• All http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/quick_reviews
‘What works’ examples: varied
18
![Page 19: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Each workshop had five activities:
1. an individual Pre-workshop Questionnaire, asking
about current uses of research evidence, its sources
and utility, barriers and facilitators to use, and views
about research;
2. an activity on Views of Research, asking whether
statements about educational research were or were
not close to the participant’s personal views, with
group discussion;
3. group discussion focussed on Research Summary 1,
the selected policy research summary;
19
Aim 3: workshop activities
![Page 20: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
4 group discussion focussed on Research Summary 2, the
selected WWC Quick Review, and
5 an individual Post-workshop Questionnaire, asking how
research could be made more useful, about students’
experiences of participating in workshops, and about any
personal changes resulting from workshop participation.
6 a Follow-up Questionnaire was sent a month later asking
about any further changes in views following the workshop.
20
Workshop activities:
![Page 21: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Workshop materials were piloted with a post-graduate student who had experience as an ITE teaching associate, as a primary teacher and as a teacher of children with learning difficulties, to clarify procedures and timing
• Then with BA Childhood Practice students
Piloting workshop materials
21
![Page 22: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• The workshop materials proved feasible,
and uncovered relevant information
• Final versions of the materials are
attached to the report to HEA
Outcomes
22
![Page 23: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• Recordings of group discussion were
transcribed, and thematically analysed.
• Nine key themes emerged.
• Further piloting could uncover further
themes.
23
Aim 4: emerging themes
![Page 24: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• A qualitative analysis was undertaken, with
too few participants in the pilot workshops
to allow quantitative measures.
• For discussion, we will consider some of
the themes, and their implications, and
some views on research.
24
What did participants say?
![Page 25: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Teacher’s role - including barriers to undertaking
research (e.g. work pressure, time constraints,
and the belief that research is the job of
academics), as well as the belief that it is the
teacher’s role to adapt research to classroom
context.
• “What I’ve heard in schools I’ve been in is that
research is the job of the academics in the
universities, but we just want a summary of
‘How’s this going to help me, what I need to do,
why does it help, and how do you know it will?”’
(W1)
25
Theme One
![Page 26: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Suggests teachers as ‘discerning
consumers’ of research, not as
researchers
26
Implications -
![Page 27: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Identifying practical application/s of the research, potentially useable within personal practice.
• “For example, like the after-school club not just being ICT because that is the traditional one. … But this is saying not necessarily, ‘supported study’ is more helpful so if we can change what clubs we’re offering, it has a big impact.” (W1)
27
Theme Three
![Page 28: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• Teachers actively applying research
findings.
28
Implications
![Page 29: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Challenging the research methodologies - such as population characteristics, relevance and value.
• “ What do they mean by ‘learning disabilities’, what’s ‘adequate (pre-coding) proficiency’, ‘who - what pupils do they have?” (W1)
• “What was the temperament of the children, things like that?” (W2)
29
Theme Five
![Page 30: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• Evaluating how trustworthy the findings
are.
30
Implications
![Page 31: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• In/accessibility of the research message
• “It’s not normal language (academic jargon) and
how it’d be spoken. There’s so much pressure in
schools and the pace goes so quickly, there's no
time to sit and think, ‘What does that mean?’,
and if I need to go to the effort to find out what it
means, I’m not going to bother reading it at all.”
(W1)
• “It’s not user-friendly, isn’t it not?” (W2)
31
Theme Six
![Page 32: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• Need for ‘translation’ and implementation
information
32
Implications
![Page 33: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• Position in a job hierarchy and top-down
decision making.
• “If I take anything back and try to discuss it
you’re kind of closed down; nobody’s
willing to listen.” (W2)
33
Theme Eight
![Page 34: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• Individuals are limited in the use they can
make of research.
34
Implications
![Page 35: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• The policy research extract was considered
accessible, with its messages understood
• The ‘What Works’ Quick Reviews were not
considered accessible
• Although written for a professional audience,
Quick Reviews require understanding of how
study quality is evaluated, and how systematic
reviews are constructed, which challenged the
students
35
Types of research
![Page 36: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• Students responded by attempting to relate to personal experience (Theme 2) and challenging the research methodologies (Theme 5).
• They expressed discomfort in discussing the Quick Reviews when they had not understood them (Theme 7), which they said would impact upon workshop participation in less supportive contexts.
36
Types of research
![Page 37: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• Such responses may be due to the underpinning evaluative principles of ‘What Works’ research being unfamiliar.
• This could make it difficult for education students to engage with current ‘What Works’ research initiatives, and to understand the outcome metrics used by researchers such as the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF)
37
Issues for ITE
![Page 38: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• Resonances with some teachers’ views
(Connolly, 2009)?
38
Not enough data, but ….
![Page 39: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
• On post-workshop questionnaires, participants answered ‘yes’ to all questions about whether they had changed their views following workshops. For example:
• “Developing my understanding of analysis/methodologies.” (W1)
• It has encouraged me to think more about, are there any weaknesses to research?” (W2)
• “Finding out that research and implementation of practices are not always evaluated and clearly written.” (W2)
• On the follow-up questionnaire, a student noted that she had accessed the relevant web sites suggested, and found them very useful.
41
Impact of workshops
![Page 42: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
• The workshops proved a viable means of assessing and discussing students’ views
• Further examples from many other courses are needed
• There are clear barriers to using research evidence
• As an illustration of a workshop activity, we can discuss the ‘views of research’ section…..
42
Conclusions – and your views?
![Page 43: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
1. Education research isn’t helping people live with daily reality.
2. In order to influence teachers’ practice, research-based teaching materials that translate findings into practical strategies are required.
3. Teachers have concerns about their ability to evaluate research information.
4. Teachers are less interested in research if they believe that the intention in sharing the research evidence is to impose a particular style or model on their teaching.
5. Having research evidence for practice prevents inappropriate or time- wasting activities in class.
43
Views of research statements
![Page 44: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
6. Without strong research evidence for good practice, teachers can be pushed into doing whatever politicians dictate.
7. Educational research is often not applicable to individual classroom situations.
8. Research is often full of jargon and
9. Statistics that are hard to understand.
10.Having research evidence for practice allows teachers to justify their professional decisions.
11.Theory without practice is empty; practice without theory is blind.
44
Views of research statements
![Page 45: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
• Thank you for listening.
Thank you
45
![Page 46: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
• BERA (2014). The Role of Research in Teacher Education:
Reviewing the Evidence. London: BERA
• Connolly, P. (2009) Paradigm Wars, Evidence and Mixed Methods
in Educational Research http://www.paulconnolly.net/publications/
pdf_filesTERN_Presentation_2009.pdf
• Florian, L. & Pantić, N. (2013), Eds. Learning to teach. Part 2:
Exploring the Distinctive Contribution of Higher Education to Teacher
Education. York: HEA
• Helmsley-Brown, J. & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to
improve professional practice: a systematic review of the literature.
Oxford Review of Education, 29 (4) 449 – 470.
• Schleicher, A. (2012), Ed. Preparing Teachers and Developing
School Leaders for the 21st Century: OECD Publishing.
Key readings
46
![Page 47: Student teacher engagement with research](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051816/54623793b1af9f71408b4f8c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)