-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
1/19Page 1
Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No.167 OF !!7
M/s Boorugu Mahadev & Sons & Anr. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
Sirigiri Narasing Rao & rs. Respondent(s)
J U D " M E N T
Ab#a$ Ma%o#ar Sapre& J.
!) "his appeal is #iled against the #inal $udg%ent
and order dated '..* o# the +igh ,ourt o#
-udiature Andhra 0radesh at +1dera2ad in ,ivil
Revision 0etition No. *3 o# 4here21 the +igh
,ourt allo4ed the revision petition #iled 21 the
respondents herein and set aside the $udg%ent dated
!5.. passed 21 the Additional ,hie# -udge ,it1
S%all ,auses ,ourt +1dera2ad in R.A. No. 6 o# !3
1
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
2/19Page 2
and restored the $udg%ent dated 6!.!.!5 passed
21 the 0rinipal Rent ,ontroller Seundera2ad in R.,.
No. !'* o# !6.
) 7n order to appreiate the issue involved in this
appeal 4hih lies in a narro4 o%pass it is neessar1
to set out the relevant #ats in 2rie# in#ra.
6) "he pre%ises 2earing No. 868' to '9
Regi%ental Ba:ar Seundera2ad (hereina#ter re#erred
to as ;suit pre%ises< 4as purhased $ointl1 21 the
predeessors o# the appellants herein under a
registered sale deed dated 3.5.!9 #ro% Sirigiri
=ellaiah and others 4hih the1 sold in disharge o#
pre8e>isting %ortgage de2t to avoid ourt attah%ent
in .S. No. !53 o# ! on the #ile o# the ?istrit
,ourt. Sine the date o# sale the respondents@
predeessors ontinued to oup1 the suit pre%ises
and thus 2ea%e the tenants o# the appellants@
predeessors8in8title on a %onthl1 rent o# Rs.!/8 in
2
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
3/19Page 3
addition to pa1%ent o# propert1 ta>es onservan1
and eletriit1 harges et. under an agree%ent dated
!.3.!9. "he said agree%ent 4as inorporated in
a 2oo %aintained 21 the appellants@ predeessors in
the regular ourse o# 2usiness and 4as dul1 signed 21
the respondents@ predeessors 21 4a1 o# rent ever1
%onth. A#ter the death o# Sirigiri Vish4anadha% i.e.
respondents@ predeessor his #our sons 2ea%e the
tenants and ontinued to pa1 %onthl1 rent at the rate
o# Rs.5*/8 2esides other harges. "he respondents are
the grand hildren o# late Sirigiri Vish4anadha% 4ho
ontinued to oup1 the suit pre%ises as the tenants
o# the appellants. +o4ever the respondents stopped
pa1ing rent 4.e.#. !.'.!35 to the appellants. Sine
the rent 4as not 2eing paid in spite o# repeated
reuests and de%ands a legal notie 4as sent 21 the
appellants to the respondents on .5.! to 4hih
interi% repl1 4as sent on 6.3.! #ollo4ed 21 a
3
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
4/19Page 4
detailed repl1 on 6.3.! and therea#ter there 4ere
e>hange o# legal noties ensued 2et4een the parties.
9) Sine despite servie o# the legal notie sent 21
the appellants to the respondents de%anding arrears
o# rent the respondents #ailed to o%pl1 4ith the
de%and the appellants #iled Evition 0etition 2eing
R.,. No. !'* o# !6 2e#ore the 0rinipal Rent
,ontroller Seundera2ad against the respondents
under Setion ! o# the A.0. Buildings (Cease Rent
and Evition) ,ontrol At !' (hereina#ter re#erred to
as ;the At
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
5/19Page 5
appellants had purhased the suit pre%ises 4as a
%ortgage 4ith a right o# re8onve1ane 4hereas the
respondents@ predeessors ontinued to 2e the o4ners
o# the suit pre%ises. Aording to the% the suit
pre%ises 4as o##ered onl1 as a seurit1 #or 2orro4ed
a%ount and su2seuentl1 their #ore#athers disharged
the lia2ilit1 o# 2orro4ed a%ount. +o4ever due to
so%e reasons the respondents@ #ore#athers ould not
o2tain the re8onve1ane o# the suit pre%ises in their
na%e though o4nership o# suit pre%ises re%ained
4ith the respondents@ #ore#athers. 7t 4as also averred
that #or the last #i#t1 1ears there 4as no pa1%ent o#
rent either 21 the% or their #ore#athers in respet o#
the suit pre%ises 4hereas their #ore#athers paid the
propert1 ta> et. as the o4ners. 7t 4as also averred
that the appellants #a2riated the reords to #ile an
evition petition against the respondents.
5
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
6/19Page 6
') Vide order dated 6!.!.!5 the Rent ,ontroller
dis%issed the petition #iled 21 the appellants.
5) ,hallenging the said order the appellants #iled
#irst appeal 2eing R.A. No. 6 o# !3 2e#ore the
Additional ,hie# -udge ,it1 S%all ,auses ,ourt at
+1dera2ad.
3) B1 order dated !5.. the Additional ,hie#
-udge S%all ,auses ,ourt allo4ed the appeal and
4hile setting aside the order o# the Rent ,ontroller
direted the respondents to vaate and handover the
vaant possession o# the suit pre%ises to the
appellants 4ithin t4o %onths #ro% the date o# the
$udg%ent. 7t 4as held 21 the appellate ,ourt that the
appellants@ predeessors 4ere the o4ners o# the suit
pre%ises on the strength o# sale deed8E>.0.5. 7t 4as
also held that the sale in uestion in relation to the
suit pre%ises 2et4een the parties 4as not a
transation o# %ortgage as alleged 21 the respondents
6
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
7/19Page 7
2ut it 4as an outright sale in #avour o# the appellants@
predeessors8in8title. 7t 4as also held that the
respondents #ailed to addue an1 evidene to prove
that the transation o# sale o# suit pre%ises 4as a
%ortgage and the 2orro4ed a%ount having 2een paid
the %ortgage 4as redee%ed. 7t 4as also held that the
respondents@ predeessors 4ere there#ore in
possession o# the suit pre%ises as tenants and later
2ea%e the appellants@ tenants 21 operation o# la4. 7t
4as also held that the respondents #ailed to pa1 the
arrears o# rent #ro% !.'.!35 and hene the1
o%%itted 4ill#ul de#ault in pa1%ent o# rent rendering
the%selves lia2le to 2e evited #ro% the suit pre%ises
under the provisions o# the At.
) Against the said $udg%ent the respondents
herein #iled revision petition 2eing ,.R.0. No. *3 o#
2e#ore the +igh ,ourt.
7
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
8/19Page 8
!) Cearned Single -udge o# the +igh ,ourt 21
i%pugned $udg%ent dated '..* allo4ed the
revision petition #iled 21 the respondents herein and
set aside the $udg%ent o# the Additional ,hie# -udge
S%all ,auses ,ourt and restored the order o# the Rent
,ontroller.
!!) Aggrieved 21 the said $udg%ent the appellants
have pre#erred this appeal 21 4a1 o# speial leave.
!) +eard Mr. B. Adinara1an Rao learned senior
ounsel #or the appellants and Mr. A.".M. Ranga
Ra%anu$a% learned senior ounsel #or the
respondents.
!6) Mr. B. Adinara1ana Rao learned senior ounsel
appearing #or the appellants 4hile assailing the
legalit1 and orretness o# the i%pugned order urged
t4o su2%issions. 7n the #irst plae he su2%itted that
the +igh ,ourt erred in allo4ing the respondents@
revision petition and there21 erred in inter#ering in its
8
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
9/19Page 9
revisionar1 $urisdition 21 upsetting a 4ell reasoned
#indings o# #ats reorded 21 the #irst appellate ,ourt
in #avour o# the appellants. +e #urther su2%itted that
the #irst appellate ,ourt 4hile hearing the appellants@
appeal 4as 4ithin its $urisdition to pro2e into all
issues o# #ats and the evidene and reord its #inding
de horsthe #indings o# the Rent ,ontroller and one
an1 #inding o# #at 4as reorded 21 the #irst appellate
,ourt then suh #inding is 2inding on the +igh ,ourt
4hile hearing the revision against suh $udg%ent o#
the #irst appellate ,ourt. Cearned ounsel pointed out
#ro% the i%pugned $udg%ent that the +igh ,ourt in
this ase deided the revision lie the #irst appeal
4ithout eeping in %ind the su2tle distintion
2et4een the revisionar1 and the #irst appellate
$urisdition there21 o%%itted a $urisditional error in
rendering the i%pugned $udg%ent.
9
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
10/19Page 10
!9) 7n the seond plae learned senior ounsel #or
the appellants su2%itted that even other4ise there
4as no $usti#iation on the part o# the +igh ,ourt on
#ats to have reversed the 4ell reasoned #indings o#
#at reorded 21 the #irst appellate ,ourt 2eause
aording to the learned ounsel the appellants 4ere
a2le to prove 4ith adeuate evidene addued 21 the%
that #irstl1 the1 4ere the o4ners o# the suit pre%ises
and seondl1 there 4as a relationship o# landlord and
tenant 2et4een the predeessor8in8title o# the
appellants and the respondents@ predeessor8in8title in
relation to the suit pre%ises. 7t 4as also urged that in
the evition petition #iled 2e#ore the Rent ,ontroller
under the At the issue o# title to the suit pre%ises
ould not 2e gone into lie a regular title suit 1et the
appellants addued adeuate evidene to prove their
title over the suit pre%ises and the relationship o#
landlord and tenant 2et4een the parties 4hereas the
10
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
11/19Page 11
respondents #ailed to prove that the sale o# suit
pre%ises in #avour o# the appellants@ predeessors 4as
not a sale 2ut 4as a transation o# %ortgage and that
their predeessor8in8title redee%ed the alleged
%ortgage 21 repa1ing the de2t.
!*) 7n support o# his su2%issions learned ounsel
relied upon the deision o# the ,onstitution Benh o#
this ,ourt in H'%()*ta% Petrole)+ Corporat'o%
L'+'te( ,*. D'lba#ar S'%-#& (!9) S,, 53.
!') 7n ontra Mr. A.".M. Ranga Ra%anu$a% learned
senior ounsel #or the respondents supported the
i%pugned $udg%ent and pra1ed #or its upholding
alling no inter#erene therein.
!5) +aving heard learned ounsel #or the parties and
on perusal o# the reord o# the ase 4e #ind #ore in
the su2%issions o# the learned ounsel #or the
appellants.
11
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
12/19Page 12
!3) "he ,onstitution Benh o# this ,ourt settled the
la4 relating to e>erise o# $urisdition o# the +igh
,ourt 4hile deiding revision in rent %atters under
the Rent ,ontrol At in the ase o# H'%()*ta%
Petrole)+ Corporat'o% L'+'te( *)pra/. -ustie
R.M. Codha the learned ,hie# -ustie speaing #or the
Benh held in para 96 thusD
02. 3e #ol(& a* 4e +)*t& t#at %o%e o5 t#eabo,e Re%t Co%trol At* e%t'tle* t#e H'-#Co)rt to '%ter5ere 4't# t#e 5'%('%-* o5 5atreor(e( b$ t#e 5'r*t appellate o)rt5'r*tappellate a)t#or't$ bea)*e o% reappre'at'o%o5 t#e e,'(e%e& 't* ,'e4 '* ('55ere%t 5ro+ t#eo)rta)t#or't$ belo4. T#e o%*'(erat'o% ore8a+'%at'o% o5 t#e e,'(e%e b$ t#e H'-#Co)rt '% re,'*'o%al 9)r'*('t'o% )%(er t#e*e
At* '* o%5'%e( to 5'%( o)t t#at 5'%('%- o55at* reor(e( b$ t#e o)rta)t#or't$ belo4'* aor('%- to la4 a%( (oe* %ot *)55er 5ro+a%$ error o5 la4. A 5'%('%- o5 5at reor(e( b$o)rta)t#or't$ belo4& '5 per,er*e or #a*bee% arr',e( at 4't#o)t o%*'(erat'o% o5 t#e+ater'al e,'(e%e or *)# 5'%('%- '* ba*e( o%%o e,'(e%e or +'*rea('%- o5 t#e e,'(e%e or'* -ro**l$ erro%eo)* t#at& '5 allo4e( to *ta%(&'t 4o)l( re*)lt '% -ro** +'*arr'a-e o5 9)*t'e&'* ope% to orret'o% bea)*e 't '* %ot treate(
a* a 5'%('%- aor('%- to la4. I% t#at e,e%t&t#e H'-# Co)rt '% e8er'*e o5 't* re,'*'o%al9)r'*('t'o% )%(er t#e abo,e Re%t Co%trolAt* *#all be e%t'tle( to *et a*'(e t#e'+p)-%e( or(er a* be'%- %ot le-al or proper.T#e H'-# Co)rt '* e%t'tle( to *at'*5$ 't*el5 a*
12
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
13/19Page 13
to t#e orret%e** or le-al't$ or propr'et$ o5a%$ (e'*'o% or or(er '+p)-%e( be5ore 't a*'%('ate( abo,e. Ho4e,er& to *at'*5$ 't*el5 tot#e re-)lar't$& orret%e**& le-al't$ or
propr'et$ o5 t#e '+p)-%e( (e'*'o% or t#eor(er& t#e H'-# Co)rt *#all %ot e8er'*e 't*po4er a* a% appellate po4er to reappre'ateor rea**e** t#e e,'(e%e 5or o+'%- to a('55ere%t 5'%('%- o% 5at*. Re,'*'o%al po4er '*%ot a%( a%%ot be e:)ate( 4't# t#e po4er o5reo%*'(erat'o% o5 all :)e*t'o%* o5 5at a* ao)rt o5 5'r*t appeal. 3#ere t#e H'-# Co)rt '*re:)'re( to be *at'*5'e( t#at t#e (e'*'o% '*aor('%- to la4& 't +a$ e8a+'%e 4#et#er t#eor(er '+p)-%e( be5ore 't *)55er* 5ro+
proe()ral 'lle-al't$ or 'rre-)lar't$.;
!) 7t is also no4 a settled priniple o# la4 that the
onept o# o4nership in a landlord8tenant litigation
governed 21 Rent ontrol la4s has to 2e distinguished
#ro% the one in a title suit. 7ndeed o4nership is a
relative ter% the i%port 4hereo# depends on the
onte>t in 4hih it is used. 7n rent ontrol legislation
the landlord an 2e said to 2e the o4ner i# he is
entitled in his o4n legal right as distinguished #ro%
#or and on 2ehal# o# so%eone else to evit the tenant
and then to retain ontrol hold and use the pre%ises
#or hi%sel#. hat %a1 su##ie and hold good as proo#
13
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
14/19Page 14
o# o4nership in landlord8tenant litigation pro2a2l1
%a1 or %a1 not 2e enough to suess#ull1 sustain a
lai% #or o4nership in a title suit. (,'(e S#eela < Or*.
,*. F'r+ Pra#la( Ra' Pre+ Pra=a*#& () 6 S,,
65*).
) ,o%ing no4 to the #ats o# this ase eeping in
vie4 the priniple o# la4 laid do4n in the
a#ore%entioned t4o ases and on perusal o# the order
o# the #irst appellate ,ourt 4e #ind that the #irst
appellate ,ourt properl1 appreiated the #ats and
evidene addued 21 the parties and on that 2asis
reorded all neessar1 #indings (detailed a2ove) in
#avour o# the appellants. "his the appellate ,ourt
ould do and in our opinion rightl1 did in the #ats o#
this ase.
!) Cie4ise 4hen 4e peruse the i%pugned order
4e #ind as rightl1 urged 21 the learned ounsel #or the
appellants that the +igh ,ourt did not eep in %ind
14
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
15/19Page 15
the a#oresaid priniple o# la4 laid do4n 21 the
,onstitution Benh in the ase o# H'%()*ta%
Petrole)+ Corporat'o% Lt(. *)pra/ 4hile deiding
the revision petition and proeeded to deide the
revision petition lie the #irst appellate ,ourt. "he
+igh ,ourt as is lear #ro% the $udg%ent pro2ed in all
the #atual aspets o# the ase undertoo the
appreiation o# 4hole evidene and then reversed all
the #atual #indings o# the appellate ,ourt and restored
the order o# the Rent ,ontroller. "his in our vie4 4as
a $urisditional error 4hih the +igh ,ourt o%%itted
4hile deiding the revision petition and hene it
deserves to 2e orreted in this appeal. 7n other
4ords the +igh ,ourt should have on#ined its inuir1
to e>a%ine as to 4hether an1 $urisditional error 4as
o%%itted 21 the #irst appellate ,ourt 4hile deiding
the #irst appeal. 7t 4as ho4ever not done and hene
inter#erene in this appeal is alled #or.
15
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
16/19Page 16
) "hat apart 4e #ind that the appellants 4ere a2le
to prove their o4nership through their predeessor8in8
title on the strength o# sale deed (E>80.'/5) o# the suit
pre%ises 4hereas the respondents #ailed to prove their
de#ene. 7ndeed the 2urden 2eing on the% it 4as
neessar1 #or the respondents to prove that the sale in
#avour o# the appellants@ predeessor8in8title o# suit
pre%ises 4as a transation o# %ortgage and not an
outright sale. Sine the respondents did not addue
an1 dou%entar1 or oral evidene to prove their
de#ene the #irst appellate ,ourt 4as $usti#ied in
allo4ing the evition petition. 7n our vie4 the
evidene addued 21 the appellants to prove their title
over the suit pre%ises 4as su##iient to %aintain
evition petition against the respondents and it 4as
there#ore rightl1 aepted 21 the #irst appellate ,ourt.
6) As o2served supra the #irst appellate ,ourt
having reorded ategorial #indings that the
16
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
17/19Page 17
relationship o# landlord8tenant 4as proved and
seondl1 the respondents had o%%itted a 4ill#ul
de#ault in pa1%ent o# %onthl1 rent and its arrears
#ro% !.'.!35 these #indings 4ere 2inding on the
+igh ,ourt 4hile deiding the revision petition. 7t 4as
%ore so 4hen these #indings did not su##er 4ith an1
$urisditional error 4hih alone 4ould have entitled
the +igh ,ourt to inter#ere.
9) Cearned ounsel #or the respondents lastl1
argued that there 4as an enroah%ent %ade 21 the
appellants on the suit pre%ises and dou%ent (E>808
') 4as inad%issi2le in evidene hene the evition
petition 4as lia2le to 2e dis%issed on these t4o
grounds also. "hese su2%issions in our onsidered
vie4 deserve to 2e re$eted at their threshold 2eause
the sa%e 4ere not raised in the 4ritten state%ent #iled
21 the respondents 2e#ore the Rent ,ontroller and nor
4ere urged at an1 stage o# the proeedings. e annot
17
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
18/19Page 18
there#ore allo4 suh #atual su2%issions to 2e raised
#or the #irst ti%e in this appeal.
*) 7n the light o# #oregoing disussion the appeal
sueeds and is here21 allo4ed. "he i%pugned
$udg%ent is set aside and that o# the $udg%ent o# the
#irst appellate ,ourt dated !5.. in R.A. No. 6
o# !3 is restored. As a onseuene thereo# the
evition petition #iled 21 the appellants against the
respondents in relation to the suit pre%ises is allo4ed.
"he respondents are ho4ever granted three %onths@
ti%e to vaate the suit pre%ises #ro% the date o# this
order su2$et to #urnishing o# the usual undertaing in
this ,ourt to vaate the suit pre%ises 4ithin 6 %onths
and #urther the respondents 4ould deposit all arrears
o# rent till date at the sa%e rate at 4hih the1 had
2een pa1ing %onthl1 rent to the appellants (i# there
are arrears) and 4ould also deposit three %onths@ rent
in advane 21 4a1 o# da%ages #or use and oupation
18
-
7/25/2019 Supreme Court: Proof of Ownership varies in Landlord - Tenant Litigation and Title Suit.
19/19
as per%itted 21 this ,ourt. Cet the undertaing
arrears o# rent da%ages #or three %onths and ost
a4arded 21 this ,ourt 2e deposited 4ithin !* da1s
#ro% the date o# this order.
') "he appeal is aordingl1 allo4ed 4ith ost 4hih
uanti#1 at Rs.*/8 to 2e paid 21 the respondents to
the appellants.
....................................-.
F-. ,+ECAMESARG
..................................-.
FAB+A= MAN+AR SA0REGNe4 ?elhi
-anuar1 !3 !'.
19