2
Tawasol
Qatar University
Educational Reform Journal
Thirteenth Issue - Fall 2010
Issued by the External Relations Department
3
Tawasol
Qatar University Reform Newsletter
Editorial
Zeina Al Azmeh
Dr. Abdul Aziz Al Bayoumi
Dr. Ali Abdul Minaem
Joy Moini
English Language editing and proof-reading by Joy Moini
Articles published in this newsletter represent the opinions and points of views of their authors
and not necessarily those of the University
*contributions, questions or comments may be sent to :
Fax: 44033051
This Issue‘s Contents Accreditation: A Continuous Journey toward Excellence. ........................................................... 4
E- Learning and Reform at Qatar University ................................................................................ 7
Qatar University Ranking ........................................................................................................... 11
Museums’ Architecture and Urbanism as an Educational Tool ................................................. 18
4
Accreditation: A Continuous Journey toward
Excellence.
Dr. Khalid Al-Ali
In April 2010, Qatar University’s Foundation Program Department of English (FPDE) was
awarded five-year accreditation by the Commission on English Language Program Accreditation
(CEA) - a United States accrediting organization for English language programs and institutions
worldwide. Five years is the highest accreditation granted to programs and institutions by the
CEA. The Foundation English Program is very proud to have achieved accredited status, as
faculty and staff worked diligently for three years to raise the program to international standards.
However, achieving accreditation is only the first step, albeit a major one, on the path to
continued excellence. For the coming years, the Foundation English Program must submit
annual reports showing that it is committed to policy and procedural maintenance and
improvement. In 2013, the re-accreditation process will begin, with a further appraisal of the
program. The next goal is to achieve 10 year re-accreditation with the CEA. Therefore, the
accreditation journey has only just begun.
The Foundation English Program began this journey in 2006 with the formation of the
Accreditation Committee, which prepared an application of eligibility and initial self-study plan. In
2007, the Committee coordinator and members worked toward completing a Self-Study Report,
which included a description and evaluation of current practices in ten standard areas. The full
Self-Study Report, with supporting documentation, is currently available on the Foundation
English website at: http://www.qu.edu.qa/foundation/english/accreditation/self_study_report.php.
Upon submission of the aforementioned report, the program underwent a site review visit in
November 2009. Over four days, the site-review team met with the Foundation Program Director,
coordinators, faculty and students, and conducted classroom visits and interviews in order to
determine whether the CEA standards had been met. In April 2010, the thirteen-member CEA
Commission reviewed the Self-Study Report, the Review Team Report and the program’s
finances to make its accreditation decision.
5
Meeting the CEA Standards has had an extremely positive impact on the program. The self-
study process led to the establishment of a review cycle in which all faculty participated in
surveys, focus groups and committee work, to assess policies and procedures and make
recommendations. This led to the implementation of a well-planned and positive change to the
Foundation English Program, with clearer policies, procedures and greater standardization. In
addition, an outcomes-based
curriculum aligned with
assessment was developed to
more accurately measure the
attainment of learning
outcomes. Consequently, this
has made the program more
effective in meeting the needs
of the students, and thus
fulfills its inherent mission to
prepare them for subsequent
entry to colleges within Qatar
University.
The Foundation English
Program is now a member of
the CEA Constituent Council,
and therefore agrees to
uphold and adhere to its
stipulated standards and requirements. Each year, the Program must submit an annual report
demonstrating that standards continue to be met. As part of the process of completing the annual
report, an internal audit will be conducted in order to ascertain that sample policies and
procedures are compliant. Furthermore, the Program will continue to carry out review &
modification plans, and update documentation (see table below). The re-accreditation process
will begin in 2013 and, once again, the Foundation English Program will complete a Self-Study
Report and welcome a re-accreditation site visit team the following year. Re-accreditation may
be given for one year for programs and institutions that substantially meet CEA standards, or ten
years for programs and institutions that fully comply with them. The initial goal of a five-year
accreditation has been successfully achieved, and it is only the beginning of a journey in which
the Foundation English Program will continue to adapt and improve to the ever-changing needs
of Qatari society.
The CEA is an independent accrediting organization based in
Alexandria, Virginia. For the past 10 years, it has accredited
86 programs and institutions and currently has over 40 new
national and 10 new international programs seeking
accreditation. The Foundation English Program is one of the
largest programs accredited by the CEA with over 2000
students and 128 faculty. Other English language centers in
the region have also been accredited, including the American
Universities in both Cairo and Kuwait, and the Al Akhawayn
University in Morocco. The commission is recognized by the
U.S. Secretary of Education as an authority on the
accreditation of postsecondary English language programs
and institutions. The CEA achieves its mission by using
widely-held standards that reflect current best practice in
language teaching, learning and administration. For further
information about the CEA, please visit http://www.cea-
accredit.org/.
6
CEA Accreditation Annual Report
verify that program continues to
meet standards
internal compliance
audit of CEA 's 52 standards
review & modification
plans by committees
program developments and changes documented
financial statement
end-of-year
financial
statement
documents
brochures, handbooks, newsletters, Blackboard
7
E- Learning and Reform at Qatar University
Dr Ahmed Jasem Al Saai1
A new dawn hovers on the horizon, filled with technological advancements in computing, the
Internet, virtual worlds, e-learning, and many other developments affecting the growth of
education. Therefore, an immediate effect is obvious upon the cultural structure of the local,
regional, and international learning communities. In addition, one can easily notice a disparity in
the technological culture of such communities based on the level and extent of their advancement
and development and alignment of their education institutions with such cultural and intellectual
changes resulting from the spread of those advancements, and to benefit from them as much as
possible mainly in the learning / teaching process, classroom infrastructure, and dissemination of
significance among respective stakeholders in order to develop education and its institutions and
outcomes.
Technology culture changes over time and place, from one community to another, and across
generations in a community. Today’s technology is not that of the past, and what looks easy
today might not have been as such before. Circumstances have changed, and while some of
life's facets have become more complicated, many have turned easier; time and spatial distances
shorter, barriers toppled, events accelerated, and the world, by virtue of technological and
scientific advancement, has become a small village which one can browse and navigate in
moments. Just a click on the keyboard, and the whole world is at hand as scientific and cultural
circles state.
Change and development are two main features of life in its generality, whether it is
contemporary or not. Change and alignment with technological developments are at the core of
modern life requirements, -however- and -wherever-. Thus, it is not possible to stand motionless
while facing these rapid changes; the best option is to adapt and take advantage of surrounding
developments, so as not to lag behind progressing civilization. It is this perception from which the
QU reform initiative began at the beginning of Fall 2003, as stated by Moini et al. 2009>
The QU reform initiative came in response to a need for change at the university level, in
alignment with the State's efforts to develop the education system in the country. This was done
1 Associate Professor of Education Technology, Department of Educational Sciences - College of
Education
8
under the call of “Education for a new era”, which started in 2001 and was then establishing and
operating in independent schools in 2004. (Brewer, et al 2007). QU's reform touched many
aspects of the university, including administration, the library, IT, teaching & learning
methodologies in both theory and practice. A plan was set for that known as “Academic Planning”
which started in Fall 2005 (Tawasol 2006).
New technologies and information have held the lion's share in the Academic Plan, which
adopted integration of said technologies to enhance and promote the learning/teaching process in
an effort to improve its outcomes (Al Thani 2007). Therefore, much attention was given to e-
learning due to its increasing popularity among academia worldwide. QU holds the desire to
remain academically competitive, in order to advance and develop higher education. Therefore, it
invested aggressively in providing facilities and necessary infrastructure on campus and in
classrooms, especially those services and technologies that serve and support e-learning. These
included data-shows, electrical connections, wired and wireless internet access, and other things
that create an interactive setting between all elements of the learning / teaching process be they
learners, instructors, resources, and syllabi all through the Blackboard System. To best utilize
such facilities, many training seminars, presentations and workshops have been conducted to
introduce the system and enable faculty to use it comfortably.
As a result of the 2005 launch of the e-learning emphasis, and in light of the intensive training,
practice, and unhindered usage of the systems by faculty, the e-learning culture outside the
Blackboard System (BbS) has spread rapidly among QU students, faculty and other respective
stakeholders. It has continued to draw spotlight attention, and is looked upon as the most
effective teaching technique to ensure continued communication between faculty and students,
by virtue of the many options and advantages it has, both within and outside of Campus.
In addition to the interactive communication between faculty and their students through channels
such as email and the virtual classroom, other advantages are present as the need arises. For
example, course descriptions and breakdowns might be placed on the courses' designated page
in the system, for students to access at any time. Other Course materials such as print-outs,
worksheets, and illustrative layouts can be published onto the same web-page, instead of being
printed and given to students. Moreover, the System can be used to timely broadcast live lectures
in entirety through video capture (Capture from Lecture). This practice has become common and
widely used in the College of Pharmacy, as Dean of Pharmacy Dr. Peter Jewesson once stated
during a seminar titled “Capture from Lecture”, held at QU on January 17th, 2010.
9
The “Virtual Classroom” is a resource students may use to interact with faculty from remote
locations while the lecture is ongoing, and discuss topics relevant to the course. Remote
interaction commonly includes areas such as home, QU campus, offices, or any other place with
internet access. The Author of this article has experience such interaction with a number of
groups and Courses during the past two academic semesters (Fall 2009 and Spring 2010).
Course instructors may also communicate messages to students on any unexpected
developments in terms of lecture timing; delays, absences, and apologies through the
“Announcement” tab. The System includes other features and functions that support
communication between students and faculty, in a fashion that turns the teaching / learning
process into a more comfortable and effective experience between both learners and educators.
Issues of technology in e-learning and related functions are not confined to teaching only. They
go beyond to open new research horizons and promote and encourage scholarly endeavors in
the field of e-learning and education technology. There has been an ideal environment to conduct
field empirical research in the e-learning domain, where many QU faculty were given
opportunities to conduct research and present them before world-class conferences addressing
education and education technology. The Author of this article, in collaboration with two other
colleagues in the Department of Educational Sciences (Al Saai, Al Kaabi, Al Muftah 2009),
presented an empirical field research paper in an international conference titled “ Redesigning
Pedagogy”. The conference was held in Singapore, and discussed the role of e-learning in
promoting the learning/ teaching process. There are great research opportunities before those
who are interested in this field.
As usual and since its inception, QU has always been seeking academic advancement and
development. It has participated in a multitude of conferences addressing education technology
and e-learning. It has never lagged behind in the march towards progress and advancement,
seeking the newest methodologies and providing cutting-edge technology that may serve its
objectives and plans. We all remember the consecutive managements of the University and their
relentless efforts to promote the institution. We remember the transparencies, OHPs, slides,
educational TV, computers, the internet, video-conferencing, and others progressive
advancements. Today there is e-learning and its technology constituents.
QU has and will always lead as one of the ambitious institutions which embarks on fulfilling
innovation and effects change to achieve the reform it has been aspiring toward.
10
References:
Al-Saai, A. J., Al-Kaabi, A. F., & Al-Muftah, S. A. (2009). Students' Attitudes and Achievement
Outcomes in Normal Lecture & Synchronous Blended Approach. Redesigning Pedagogy
International Conference 2009, 1-3 June 2009 –Singapore-NIE
Al-Thani, S. J. (2007). Academic Planning: An Update on the Process and Lessons Learned.
Tawasol Newsletter, QU, (7), pp2-5. Available @
http://www.qu.edu.qa/newsletters/tawasol/documents/Tawasol_Spring_07.pdf
Brewer, D. J., Augustine, C. H., Zellman, G. L., Ryan, G., Goldman, C. A., Stasz, C., Constant, L.
(2007). Education for a New Era, RAND Corporation.
Jewson, P. (2010). Capture from Lecture, One-day Symposium. External Affairs – Qu. Doha,
Qatar - 17 Jan 2010.
Moini, J. S., Bikson, T. K., Neu, C. R., DeSisto, L., Al Hamadi, M. & Al Thani, S. (2009). The
Reform of Qatar University. RAND-Qatar Policy Institute.
11
Qatar University Ranking
Webometrics Ranking
Prof Rashid Belhabib2
Analyzing the Ranking and Its Implications
Origin of Academic Ranking of World Universities
To occupy an advanced position on the list of the World's Best Universities is an objective that
most universities strive to achieve. To that end, they exert every available effort and mobilize all
possible potential in teaching and quality outputs, research and quality publications,
infrastructure and buildings, in addition to recruitment and retention of competences and
reputable expertise, besides professional development of its staff, all to fulfill and comply with
international ranking standards.
An academic ranking of world universities was first designed at the Institute of Higher Education
of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. It includes the most innovative and prestigious Higher
Education Institutions, which are ranked according to specific criteria that depend on many
standards used to independently rank the best of world universities. The objective behind the
process of ranking is to realize the rank of Chinese universities in the field of higher education,
and then attempt to narrow the gap between them and other world reputable universities.
This ranking depends on objective standards, and that dependence makes it occupy special
importance among universities which have begun competing to position themselves in a higher
rank to gain world reputation. The ranking examines 2000 universities from a grand total of about
10,000 universities registered in UNESCO as qualified institutions eligible to compete. Next, I000
universities are selected to compete in the second stage and to occupy a position among the best
500 universities in the world to be published.
Ranking Standards:
Criteria followed to measure universities' quality and efficiency are based principally on the
following four standards:
2 Professor of Arabic Language, College of Arts and Science, Qatar University
12
1 . Quality of Teaching: An indicator of university Alumni who won Nobel and Field Awards and
Medals and constitutes 10 % of the grand total.
2. Quality of Faculty: This stands for faculty who are Noble & Field laureates; it constitutes 20 %
of evaluation ranking. Combined with this indicator is consideration for the number of most cited
researchers in 21 academic disciplines, which stands for 20 % as well.
3. Research Output: an indicator of published works in nature and Science. It stands for 40%.
4 . University Size: This measures the institutions' academic achievements, and weighs 10 %.
Standard Percentage
Quality of Teaching 10 %
Quality of Faculty 40 %
Research Output 40 %
Size of Institution 10 %
Grand Total 100%
2010 Ranking and Criteria:
Ranking of world universities has become a global culture and practice carried by many
international academic institutions. Ranking has taken varied paths, including Pure sciences,
humanities, scholarly publication and electronic publication. In this context, Webometrics of the
Cybermetrics Lab CSIC announced University ranking of the year 2010. Webometrics aims to
encourage electronic publication of scholarly research, and evaluates four standards:
o Size: this relates to number of pages obtained by the four research engines from
the University Website.
o Electronic citation: Number of University website links that appear on other
external websites.
o Rich files: Number of files uploaded on the Website: this includes Adobe, Adobe
Acrobat, Microsoft Power Point( ppt), PostScript (ps.), Microsoft Word (.doc)
o Number of research papers and references published on the Website.
University ranking has become an indicative and helpful parameter that reflects the level of
University institutions and their respective achievements. For example, when 3 Arab universities
appear among the 500 world best universities, only 4 among the best 1000, only 3 among the
100 best Asian universities, and the first ever 1 Arab university has been listed as 164th at the
world level, this gives implication of the modest position that those institutions have occupied,
how far away the Arab world is from the renaissance it aspires to achieve, and that Arab
universities still must face a number of challenges and need to exert relentless efforts to catch up.
13
Continent Best 200 Best 500 Best1000
USA & Canada 122 212 398
Europe 60 222 415
Asia 7 38 104
Oceania 6 15 35
Latin America 3 9 39
Arab World 2 3 4
Africa 0 1 5
Qatar University Ranking:
Regardless of ranking standards and themes, QU's ranking at 11th among the 100 best Arab
universities from a total exceeding 300 in the Arab World is a very important position. Add to that
the qualitative leap that QU did in comparison to its position in the previous ranking, where it
placed 26th. This substantial shift of 15 grades and placement ahead of hundreds of reputable
universities in the region affirms that the University's tremendous effort, special care, thorough
thinking, and strategic perceptions have been highly rewarding.
Country
Ranking University Country World ranking
1 King Saud University
161
2 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
171
3 King Abdulaziz University
291
1 Umm Al-Qura University
611
5 An-Najah National University
1160
14
6
American University of Beirut
1111
7 United Arab Emirates University
1521
1 Cairo University
1601
9 American University in Cairo
1657
10 Kuwait University
1163
11 Qatar University
1910
To move from a lower grade to a higher one in light of tough and hard competition among
reputable and well-established universities necessitates thorough planning and efficient
implementation, in accordance with clear and measurable standards. It also requires
infrastructure that accommodates students, and offers them higher education and skills that
enable them to easily and smoothly integrate with the Country’s social and economic structure.
Furthermore, it requires that faculty be provided with a research environment equipped with
necessary apparatuses, means, and resources, and that the staff be provided horizons for
creativity and flexibility.
As Qatar University is not on the list of the 100 best universities in Asia, and not among the 500
or even the 1000 best universities in the world, then "the 1000-mile journey begins with a step",
as a Chinese proverb states. That step has now been walked, and its good representation is
manifested in the 11th position ranking which QU occupies ahead of a number of reputable
universities, such as those of Jordan, Morroco, Tunisia, Syria, and Egypt, which used to occupy
advanced positions.
Over a short period of time, Qatar University has hurdled towards excellence in a harmonious
context that integrates urban and human development. While Qatar is achieving leadership and
groundbreaking progress in politics, economics, and urban development, it also focuses on
human development being the true capital and cornerstone of a stable society. On many
occasions, Qatar leaders have always affirmed that the Nation's real wealth and development is
in advancement and promotion of the welfare of the human being.
The great care given to human beings is immediately obvious in the University's grand projects
and open workshops to achieve academic accreditation from reputable institutions in respective
15
fields. Further manifestations include the many construction projects to provide fully equipped
facilities, a modern library, initiatives by the Office of Instructional Development, encouragement
of scholarly research with huge allocated budgets, and encouraging students towards self-
learning and research endeavors through support of grants, scholarships, and other incentives.
Reform and innovation are an ongoing process. In terms of teaching, study plans are reviewed
and innovated to align with modern international standards which benefit from experienced and
highly competent faculty, and from practices of the best and most renowned world universities.
In the academics, the University encourages research and publications whether electronic or
whatsoever, supports and finances faculty to attend local and external specialized conferences,
and launches MA programs that respond to community needs.
As for faculty professional development, many orientation and professional development
workshops are conducted in order to enhance faculty professionalism and achieve quality
learning outcomes. Add to that the very informative and effective Web services, including the
newly inaugurated Arabic website, which together facilitate effective and prompt communication
through daily newsletters and press publications, in addition to student services including all
registration and Add and Drop process, electronic exams and other blogs and forums available
through the Blackboard software.
The abovementioned developments and efforts have helped Qatar University to advance its
position in the ranking classification; a promising position which offers a very positive outlook for
the future.
Ranking and the Social and Human Sciences:
It is necessary to develop and advance what is known as “pure” Sciences for their crucial role in
raising and developing the Country’s growth in the industry and service sectors. However, that is
not the only way to achieve advancement and progress. Social and Human Sciences, which are
deemed the back garden of higher education institutions and their diversified offerings, may play
an affirmative crucial role in improving university ranking. Universities of Oxford, Cambridge,
Harvard, California, Chicago, Colombia, and Pennsylvania have achieved high ranking in pure
Sciences and similarly they occupied advanced ranking positions in Social and Human Sciences
as well.
Best University Ranking in Arts and Humanities
Ranking 2010 Ranking2009 University Country
1 2 University of Oxford United Kingdom
16
Ranking 2010 Ranking2009 University Country
2 3 University of Cambridge United Kingdom
3 1 Harvard University United States
4 4 University of California, Berkeley
(UCB)
United States
5 5 Yale University United States
6 6 Princeton University United States
7 9 University of California, Los
Angeles (UCLA)
United States
In the Arab world, lesser or modest care is given to Humanities, which are often viewed of second
degree. This in fact strongly affects high-ranking Arab Universities' standings. The following Arab
universities represent the best in the Arab World in Arts and Humanities ( ranking out of 300)
University Country Ranking
King Saud university Saudi
Arabia
101
Cairo University Egypt 210
Al Azhar University Egypt 215
King Faisal University Saudi
Arabia
221
UAE University UAE 235
King Abdu-Aziz University Saudi
Arabia
256
Islamic University - Lebanon Lebanon 270
Social and Human Sciences, if not taken into account appropriately, will stand as a heavy burden
before universities that seek to improve their world ranking. A bird with one wing never flies, and
as such, there will be no academic growth, creative knowledge, or technological development in
the absence of Human Sciences. We have seen a strong correlation between Pure Sciences and
Humanities in reputable universities around the Globe, as they know that there must be a balance
between the needs of minds and those of souls.
17
In this context, Qatar University attaches considerable importance to Human Sciences and a
good return to Arabic language, best demonstrated in upgrading study plans, launching new MA
programs, giving care to cultural issues, and debate with others, with special attention given to
maintaining Qatar’s national identity, and Arabic as well.
Conclusion:
Assessment of any university is not an easy task in light of the prevailing conflict between
different theories and contradictory standards on assessing real university performance. Any fair
assessment must be based on availability of data and facts that would facilitate process of
ranking. Such data may include high research visibility among academic institutions and on the
Web. Any university lagging behind in that context would be disadvantaging itself.
Challenges and obstacles should not make us unable to realize the genuine value of university
ranking, which stands as good evidence of quality of education being good or bad. In this context,
we may notice the retreat of Jewish and Germany universities and some British ones. On the
other hand, some universities have improved their ranking and have placed themselves among
the best 100 universities, such as those of Finland, Australia, Austria, and Belgium. Saudi
universities have headed Arab Universities. Definitely, moving ahead or retreating back do not
take place haphazardly. In light of the tough competition to occupy advanced ranking positions,
many universities have established special Deanship for quality assurance in an attempt to
follow-up on and assess teaching and research achievements, to exert relentless efforts to
professionally implement their plans to achieve optimal reward, and to comply with international
standards pertaining to all types of academic accreditation.
18
Museums’ Architecture and Urbanism as an
Educational Tool
The Case of Museum of Islamic Art, Doha
Ali A. Alraouf 3, Ph. D.
Abstract
As we are heading through the second decade of the 21st century, architecture of the Islamic
communities is still an unresolved dilemma. In this context, the impact of iconic buildings which
claim to represent Islam or provide a contemporary approach to Islamic architecture is crucial on
different levels. Therefore, a year after the Museum of Islamic Art's (MIA) opening in Doha, Qatar,
an evaluative perspective of the institution’ development story needs to be sketched. In this essay
I will use MIA, Doha as a springboard for a discussion related to the museums of the 21th
century. Then, I will try to exploit the findings of this discussion in the assessment and critical
review of the museum itself. The assessment will include the ability of contemporary architecture
to credibly represent Islamic cultural identity. This essay will analyze how and why community
participation in museums is a significant factor in bridging the gap and improving relationship
between the two institutions. The social inclusion leads to trust, understanding, a sense of
identity, and creating a museum that is more relevant to the community. This essay also give
some suggestions on how to build bridges between museums and communities, to provide an
opportunity for the people living in such communities, like Gulf ones, to find out about their own
heritage and to help them realize that it is through their active participation in museum activities
that heritage is kept alive. Considering Qatar’s thrust into a post-oil paradigm where a knowledge
economy might be the generative force for development, an examination of how MIA is
contributing to Qatar’s new vision becomes so relevant.
3 Ali A. Alraouf, is an academic, architect, scholar and urban designer focusing on research within the
domain of theory, criticism and creativity in architecture, urban design and planning. He is Associate
Professor of Urban Planning at the College of Arts and Sciences in Qatar University.
19
Keywords: Museums, Community, Qatar, Museum of Islamic Art, Knowledge-based urban
development.
Preamble
Recently, extensive cultural information has become easily available through the accessibility of
digital formats. The need for the establishment of new museums is becoming an argumentative
issue with virtual art museums and digital art libraries and galleries available from everyone’s
desktop. Apparently, the governing factor is questioning the nature of the relationship between
museums and communities. First, what do museums and communities have to offer each other?
What should be put in place to ensure that relationship between museums and communities is
entertaining, healthy and educational? How does the museum become an integral part of
community life, representing its values and identity? These are some of the fundamental
questions that researchers were trying to answer as an attempt to articulate the relation between
museums and communities. Most museums in the world have been transformed and taken
communities as partners in their programs and activities (Nyangila, 2006). This new approach
has created a favorable working condition between museums and communities, as museums are
about people and created by the people themselves.
Qatar’s plan for a world-class set of cultural facilities has made an impressive start with I.M. Pei’s
Museum of Islamic Art (MIA) in Doha. MIA opened its door to visitors in December 2008. The
design of the museum went through a long path, beginning when the Aka Khan Trust for Culture
(AKTC) organized an international architectural competition in 1997. While getting contestants
from all over the world, the jury selected eight projects for a second and final phase including
signature architects like Richard Rogers, Zaha Hadid, Charles Correa and the most prominent
Arab architect, Rasem Badrani. Correa and Badran were selected by the jury as finalists, to
conduct a final decision between the two of them. A tendency towards favoring Badran’s project
was rising, especially from the client’s point of view. Without clear justification, the whole process
of the competition came to a dramatic end by the client’s decision to pass the project to the
Chinese-American signature architect I.M. Pei ii.
Theoretical Discussion:
Contemporary Muslim Community: A Defining Moment
“Traditional Islamic civilization is marked by its emphasis on beauty being wedded to every
aspect of human life, from the chanting of the Quran to the making of pots and pans. The
traditional Islamic ambience, both the plastic and the sonoral, have always been beautiful, for
traditional Islam sees beauty as a complement of the Truth.” S. H. Nasr (1990)
p: 20
20
In a world where the beauty of Islam is shadowed by fear, the art speaks to the truth of this great
way of life. Contemporary Muslim communities, regionally and around the globe, are facing a
defining moment. The post 9/11 incident, as agreed upon by different researchers, established a
new milestone in the contemporary history of Muslim communities (Melnick, 2009; Faludi, 2007;
Chomsky, 2005). Crucial questions related to identity, image, misconception and misjudgment of
Islam as a religion and Muslims as part of the human community flourished in political, religious,
economical and cultural literature. Subsequently, it is becoming clear that a comprehensive
understanding about how these communities are constructing their current identity is essentially
needed. Muslim communities are continually balancing the essence of their faith with the diversity
of geography, politics, cultures, and economies.
Nasr (1987) analyzed different themes of traditional art, architecture, calligraphy, poetry, prose
literature, etc, as it developed in Islamic lands. He provided a crucial explanation based on
interpreting every art form as a sacred act contributing to the overall spirituality of the individual
and the community. He reveals how each art form in the Islamic tradition is based upon a science
of nature concerned, not with the outer appearance of things, but with their inner reality. Ranging
across calligraphy, painting, architecture, literature, music, and the plastic arts, Nasr penetrates to
the inner dimension of Islam and shows the role art plays in the life of individual Muslims and the
community as a whole--the role of inspiring the remembrance and contemplation of God. Once
Nasr establishes art as an aid and support to the spiritual life, he traces the creative act to its
ultimate source: inner knowledge and barakah, or grace, which makes the crystallization of inner
realities in form and space and time possible. Through this knowledge and grace, the author
asserts, unity manifests upon the plane of multiplicity, making archetypal realities perceivable by
the senses. Through this knowledge and grace, art functions as a ladder for the journey of the
soul from the visible to the invisible.
Architecture and urbanism, as numerous researchers have suggested, used to be the physical
representation of Muslim communities’ abilities, creativity, and positive contributions in mankind
development (Al-Hahtlul, 1981; Hakim, 1986). I would argue in this essay that better
contemporary architecture and urbanism within the boundaries of Muslim communities can
rejuvenate this role. MIA, Doha will be analyzed as a case study where it will be argued that it is a
very profound attempt to achieve such an important goal.
New Museums for a New Millennium
Today, most of the museums have shifted their focus and policies in order to bridge the gap
between the museums and local communities. Graham (2005), have suggested that new
demands are placed on twenty-first century museums. He draws a comparison between
“traditional” and “new” museum audiences, stressing the challenges of avoiding social exclusion.
21
By looking at the development of museum content, specific groups like children, women, and
families with young children can be engaged. During the past two decades, museums of all kinds
have tried to become more responsive to the interests of a diverse public by shifting from the
presentation of inert objects to the production of experiences, as Hein (2000) rightly argued.
Anderson (2004) established an overall argument which reflects the unfolding thinking on what it
means to be a museum in today’s world. Most of the contemporary perspectives, he argues,
suggest the importance of the community and intensifying the role of the public. Alexander (2008)
articulated the transformations in museums definition. While it may appear a very simple
question, she asked what a museum is. She has illustrated the transformation from the historical
notion of a museum as a building to protect and display valuable items to a museum as an
educator. To relate her argument with my essay, I would highlight her perspective on art
museums. Her position toward Art museum differs from science and history museums in that their
collections exist to allow their viewers to experience beauty rather than to convey information is
so relevant to my argument. The shift occurs with emphasis on art in everyday activities of the
community, to make different social groups proud of their culture and their products. In short, she
defines the museum as an instrument for community betterment (Alexander, 2008. P: 42).
With Museums becoming more people-centered, idea-oriented, and contextualized, the
boundaries between museums and the “real” world are becoming eroded. Setting the transition
from object-centered to story-centered exhibitions in a philosophical framework, Hein (2000)
contends that glorifying the museum experience at the expense of the objects deflects the
Museum’s educative, ethical and aesthetic roles. But has the difficult issue always been how to
effectively involve the community and maintain the relationship? In the following section, I would
elaborate on MIA, Doha narrative in engaging the community. I will examine how architecture,
urbanism and management of the museum are working together to achieve this goal.
MIA Celebrating Islamic Culture: Critical Thoughts
In constructing my critical thoughts and reflections for the project, I want to emphasize on three
main aspects. Firstly, the museum and its role in disseminating culture, then the museum as part
of Doha’s new urbanism. Finally, the Museum’s architecture will be analyzed to investigate its
ability to act as a representation and critical interpretation of Islamic art, creativity and diversified
culture. In the following sections, I would argue that the museum created a positive relation with
Doha city and its community. This positive impact can be seen on different levels:
Museum and community involvement:
Contemporary museums recently started to adopt a new approach in considering their social
responsibility. This new approach has created a favorable working condition between museums
and communities, as museums are about people and created by the people themselves. Most
22
museums in the world have been transformed, and now consider communities as partners in their
programs and activities.
A community can be best defined as a group of people living within the same geographical area,
sharing certain characteristics and common interests, values, customs and beliefs. A museum
community consists of people who visit the museum, live and work in its vicinity, are stakeholders
to it, or have donated or have collections within the museum. Engagement is the level of
involvement in museum activities in the areas of ideas, publicity, communications and exhibitions.
MIA’s management perception, of creating a bond between the Museum and the city dwellers
and visitors, has emerged primarily from the notions of education and knowledge. Inviting
students from schools and universities in addition to local community members to attend frequent
shows, public lectures, seminars, workshops and exhibitions, constructs the pillar of such a bond.
A small, yet very important detail about MIA is that the Qatar Museums Authority (QMA) have
decided to keep admittance to the museum free for all visitors. This decision has helped in
strengthen the bond between the museum and the community. Access to the museum is
available through two separate entries. From the main gate located directly by the city’s
promenade, visitors will gradually travel the path leading to the main plaza and the museum’s
main entrance. The entry is via the community park adjacent to the museum, which opens up
towards the two sides of the museum’s urban context; the city and the bay. The planning of these
two entries has successfully enhanced the visitor experience. More profoundly, the arrangement
of the entries diffuses any physical or non-physical boundaries between the building, community
and the city.
The MIA Cultural and Educational Roles:
The Qatar Museums Authority (QMA) constructs the umbrella underneath which MIA and other
museumsiii are covered, has its own cultural development strategy for Qatar. First, QMA is
interested in incorporating all museums of Qatar within the overall cultural vision of the country.
Hence, constructing museums would substantiate Qatar’s vision for Doha as an emerging
knowledge city amid other Gulf Cities. Second, QMA is planning to have a partnership with
educational institutions; locally, regionally and internationally, to enhance the cultural capabilities
of children and youth. One of the main pillars of QMA's vision is the creation of new learning
experiencesiv. Museums can be directly connected to the lifelong process of learning. In addition,
museums can support structured or institutional education in schools by focusing on creating
positive experiences for students. Hence, enjoyment and positive memories cherished should
come first, as Graham (2005) rightly argued.
On the occasion of hosting the Global Art Forum (GAF) at MIA's premises, Abdulla Al Najjar,
CEO of Qatar Museum Authority, told his audience the following:
23
“The Global Art Forum is the leading platform for cultural debate and discussion in the Middle
East, focusing on key issues that bring together the art scenes of this region with the rest of the
world. Qatar Museums Authority has keenly hosted the Global Art Forum at the Museum of
Islamic Art as it closely ties in with our vision as a vehicle for sharing culture and heritage through
education and community interaction.”v
The Museum’s education programs are housed in a wing to the east of the MIA main building
across a fountain courtyard. The Education Wing includes the Museum library, classrooms,
workshops, study spaces, and technical and storage facilities. The MIA education center opened
to the public in October 2009. It was established as a core component of the museum, since the
stress on the educational role was highly emphasized from the early stages of design. The Center
provides a variety of activities, public lectures, and interactive workshops, all of which are geared
towards enhancing cultural life and raising local community’s awareness of art and cultural
issues.
MIA's Education Center managed to organize an introductory conference wherein the concept of
education within the museum was introduced. The conference title, “Partnership in Arts
education: The Museum, the School and The community”, suggests a positive understanding of
the new museum's role in not only enhancing cultural life, but creating a strong bond between key
stakeholdersvi. Driven by such initiative, MIA invested substantially in building bridges with
community members from different age, gender, and social demographics. More importantly,
children were seen as the primary focal group on issues related to raising awareness about art
and culture. The typical gap between schools and museums, where the later was only perceived
as one of the typical destinations for school trips, needs to be bridged. That was precisely one of
the MIA initiative's well-declared intentions and goals.
The Architectural and Visual Impact: MIA as an Icon
Inspired by the magical geometry of Ahmad Ibn Tulun Mosque in the heart of Islamic Cairo, the
museum is a contemporary representation of generative architecture produced from applying
three dimensional geometrical complexities. The overall composition of the Museum is comprised
of two cream-colored limestone buildings, a five-story main building and a two-story education
wing, connected across a central courtyard. Internally, the spatial composition is articulated
around a main central space covered with a monumental dome and skylight. A geometric matrix
transforms the dome’s descent from circle to octagon, to square, and finally to four triangular
flaps, which angle back at different heights to become the atrium’s columns. Despite the
building's size and purpose, the architecture seems positively modest. Humbleness and modesty
are underlying values of Islamic architecture and urbanism.
24
“I think geometry is the fundamental element of architecture, it doesn’t matter is it is Islamic or
Renaissance. Geometry is the framework. But if the geometry is obvious, then I’ve failed” I.M.Pei
(quoted from Merrick, 2008).
Visually, the museum is located on a reclaimed island right in front of the city’s main promenade
“Al Corniche”. By being sensitive to the project context, architect I. M. Pei was able to create a
landmark which is literally visible from all around Doha bay. At Pei’s insistence, the museum has
been built on an artificial island in Doha’s broad bay, linked to the mainland by a causeway.
He was concerned to ensure that the museum should never be overwhelmed by the skyscrapers
leaping up all over Doha, which is in the process of converting itself from a Gulf version of Nice
into a mini-Manhattan by the sea (Hall, 2008)
Pei observes the unique morphology of the city waterfront and arranged the museum in a position which
would engage city dwellers and visitors in an interesting visual dialogue with museum masses. More
importantly, the museum architect has also created a visual link with the city from within the museum. The
internal spatial composition on different levels provides interesting glimpses towards the city’s new
development and vivid skyline. On the north side of the Museum a 45 meter tall glass curtain wall, the only
major window, offers panoramic views of the Gulf and West Bay area of Doha from all five floors of the
atrium. In addition, a series of outdoor spaces and terraces were introduced to play the role of city balconies
for museum visitors or even for pedestrians passing through the garden spaces and strolling around the
main masses. The architecture and outdoor spaces result in the framing of a series of city views. It was this
approach in architecture and urban design which helped Pei succeed in crafting stimulating visual and
intellectual dialogues between past, present and future in people’s minds.
Water is one of the museum’s key features. The fact that water is all around it was not enough for Pei, who
was well informed after his long journey learning from Islamic architecture monuments around the world,
and understood that the presence of water, especially inside mosques and houses, is almost scared. Hence,
Pei called for internal and external fountains surrounding the building, adding positively to the sensual
experience of the museum.
MIA, Doha as an Identity Manifestation
The issue of identity is of a double-faced nature when it comes to analyzing a cultural facility in an
Arabic and Islamic context. The first aspect is to what degree the project is in harmony with the
overall identity the country is seeking for. MIA, Doha served perfectly the purpose of Doha’s new
identityvii. Qatar did a radical transformation to go beyond the typical image of a Gulf city relying
on assets of oil and gas. A move towards being a regional center for education, knowledge and
culture is the newly aspired sense of identity for Qatar. A major investment in knowledge-based
urban development has characterized major projects in the country during the last five years
(Alraouf, 2008). These efforts have resulted in the selection of Doha as a capital for Arab culture
in 2010.
The second aspect of representing the country’s identity, which may be the most critical one, is
the Arab and Muslim nature of the community. In most of the examples around Arab and Gulf
cities, architecture was naively used to express artificially the Islamic identity. By focusing on
25
reusing limited vocabulary form historical Islamic styles, architecture was not successful in this
critical representation. In the case of MIA, Pei succeeds in resolving the main dilemma of Middle
Eastern cities’ architecture and urbanism. He created an interesting balance between Doha’s
contemporary aspirations without neglecting the value of its contextual heritage that the city has
acquired by belonging to Arab and Islamic world. One more virtue about Pei’s approach in
designing MIA is his ability to escape from focusing solely on Doha’s heritage, since the museum
was envisioned as an icon for a whole nation rather than for a single city or a single country.
MIA as a Branding Catalyst for Contemporary Doha
The vision of His Highness the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, is to mold the
State of Qatar into a capital of culture. The royal family’s plan is to make Doha a cultural bridge
between the Middle East and the rest of the world. All this activity is testament to the fact that
Qatar’s enormous oil and natural gas reserves have provided it with the highest per capita
income of any country in the world. It is also a mark of the cultural changes that the Amir Hamad
bin Khalifa Al-Thani has brought about since he took the responsibility in 1995. Central to the
Amir’s vision is the recognition that, as plentiful as Qatar’s natural resources may be, their value
will one day be significantly diminished by the emergence of sustainable forms of energy
production (Woodman, 2008). The country is therefore seeking to diversify its economy and, to
that end, is investing vast sums in the development of its human capital. The creation of a world-
class set of cultural facilities is a key element of this strategy, and includes the hugely ambitious
plan to build 10 completely new museums.
As explained earlier, under the umbrella of Qatar Museums Authority, MIA is the leading project
of His Highness’s vision. As stated in the vision, The Museum of Islamic Art, Qatar is a museum
for the world. It will bring the world to Doha, but it will also connect Doha to the world. MIA is
dedicated to being the foremost museum of Islamic art in the world, and as well a centre of
education and information in the field of the arts of the Islamic world. Through the vision of its
leadership and the dedication of its staff, the Museum of Islamic Art will manifest this commitment
by establishing, preserving, and documenting a collection that reflects the vitality, the complexity,
and the diversity of the arts of the Islamic world.
The well-known “Bilbao Effect” phenomenon has created a new benchmark for cultural facilities’
impact on cities. The Museum of art at Bilbao, Spain designed by architect Frank Gehry was
envisioned by Bilbao city officials as their only salvation after years of economic crisis. An
assumption which was proven to be right after the new museum helped the city to regain its
vitality and became one of the top destinations for tourists visiting Spain.
Qatar vision 2030 is suggesting four pillars for a more developed and prosperous Qatar. Human
and Cultural development is a core element in this vision. A reasonable justification for a tedious
effort to promote Qatar and Doha as an emerging center for culture and knowledge. Cultural
26
facilities are proved to be a viable tool by which cities can be marketed. It can also be seen as a
catalyst for development and progress transforming cities from side to side and from rank to rank
on progress scale.
Recent statistics published by the Qatar Museum Authority have shown that MIA, Doha was
visited by more than 300,000 visitors on its very first year. Speaking of people visiting cultural
facilities in Gulf countries, this number is considered extraordinary. The accelerated recognition of
MIA is substantiated by hosting international events throughout the first year after its
inauguration. The objective of MIA hosting these cultural events is to educate the community and
bridge the gap between popular and elitist culture. The first Doha Tribeca film festival (DTFF),
one of the most prominent cultural events in the Middle East, was among these events which
have used the fascinating setting of the Museum to intensify the drama of its opening. A
magnificent ceremony was held and attended by over 4000 people enjoying MIA as DTFF's major
venue.
MIA Spectacle: Exhibiting vs. Freezing Culture.
The thorny issue has always been how to effectively exhibit Islamic art and heritage without
establishing a negative notion regarding the lack of contemporary creative contributions from
Muslim communities or artists. A common thread which I found manifested clearly in different
Museums of Islamic arts including MIA, Doha is freezing a continuous cultural and transforming it
into a spectacle for contemporary viewersviii. No one can question the contribution of Muslim
artists and scientists in the development of humanity. Evidence suggests that their creations,
inventions and intellectual thoughts have been a continuous source of inspiration, and paved the
way in different fields for the western civilization to be inspired by and learn from.
I would argue that art is a valuable tool in comprehending different communities cultures. It will be
completely unfair to see a repeated pattern in all Islamic museums where focus is on the value
and outcome of Islamic art from a historical perspective, assuming that the present time does not
exist when it comes to the contribution of Muslim artists. Most museums of Islamic art regionally
and internationally were not able to include the current paradigm as a logical continuation of
Muslims contribution to art and creativity. By focusing only on historical aspects, the image of
Muslims as non-contributors to the current human endeavor in development is highly intensified.
What the contribution of contemporary Muslim artists is, and how this contribution can be
exhibited, both generally and in MIA, is a fundamental question which I doubt, due to my critical
assessment of existing Islamic museums, if there were any serious attempts to confront it.
27
Concluding Remarks
I shall conclude by affirming that Architecture and urbanism of contemporary Muslim communities
should seek to express and represent the spirit, values, creativity, underlying principles and
sacredness of Islam. Copying or reshuffling old architectural vocabularies from past eras is not
only antithesis to Islamic notions of the duty of innovations and creativity, but it also contributes
passively to the already shattered image of Muslims across the world.
Today, unlike any time before in their history, Muslims need to vigorously emphasize that their
presence on earth is a sacred mission characterized by a compelling desire, faith and
commitment towards enhancing mankind. Contemporary Muslims need to use art, architecture
and creativity to regain their shattered image as positive members in global development. While,
due to contemporary obstacles, a tremendous effort is needed to change such an image,
investing in culture and knowledge-making would be of a major help.
MIA has a mission to explain Islamic art and culture to the world. In so doing, it is stating a
profound example on how cultural facilities, especially in the Middle East, redraw or better
remove the boundaries between people and places. The Museum is not only contributing in
sustaining the local and ideological identity of Qatar, but more critically, it contributes positively to
the country’s strategic aspiration to transform Doha into a city of knowledge. A quest for identity,
in the contemporary moment, implies twofold pursuits. First, it would speak to the locality and
relate to the community heritage and roots. The second should respect the global aspirations and
each city’s compelling desire to accommodate a place on the global stage and to brand itself as a
global city attracting tourists, workers and global citizens.
Knowledge-based urban development should be perceived by Gulf cities as the most appropriate
answer for their quest to overpass the oil economy era and moving vigorously towards post-oil
one. A large part of the motivation behind the project is clearly the desire to establish Qatar as
both a tourist destination and as an ideal place where intellectuals might be prepared to relocate.
Hence, the Museum of Islamic Art gave every indication that it was on the right track.
References
Anderson, Gail. (2004) Reinventing the Museum, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift”.
AltaMira Press.
Alexander, Mary. & Alexander, E. (2008) Museums in Motion: An Introduction to the History and Functions of Museums”.
AltaMira Press; 2 edition.
Al-Hahtlul, S. “Tradition, Continuity and Change in the Physical Environment: the Arab-Muslim City.” PhD Dissertation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981.
Alraouf, Ali A. (2008), “Emerging Middle Eastern knowledge cities: the unfolding story” in “Knowledge Based Urban
Development: Planning and Application in the Information Era”. Tan Yigitcaular & V. Koray (eds.), IGI Global Publishing,
USA.
Alraouf, Ali A. (2006). Dubaization vs. Glocalization: Territorial Outlook of Arab/Gulf Cities Transformed. The 9th Sharjah
Urban Planning Symposium (SUPS), April 2-4, 2006. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
28
Alraouf, Ali. (2005). Knowledge Cities: Examining the Discourse: Smart Villages, Internet Cities or Creativity engines. In
the proceedings of the International Symposium on Knowledge Cities, November 28th-30th 2005, The World Bank and
Arab Urban Development Institute. Medina, Saudi Arabia.
Black, Graham. (2005). The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums For Visitor Involvement. Routledge.
Chomsky, Noam and Barsamian, David (2005) Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World. Metropolitan
Books.
Davidson, Cynthia and Ismail Serageldin. eds. 1995. Architecture Beyond Architecture. London: Academy Editions.
Faludi, Susan (2007). The Terror Dream: Fear and Fantasy in Post-9/11 America. Metropolitan Books.
Frampton, K. (1980). Modern Architecture: A critical History. Oxford University Press
Hakim, Besim Arabic-Islamic Cities: Building and Planning Principles, London and New York, [1979] 1986, 2nd Ed. 1988,
Editorial, “MIA shines in its first year”. In Al-Assema, Cultural magazine published by High committee for Celebrating
Doha, Capital of Arab Culture. Issue 1. 2010, pp:70-73.
Black, Graham. 2005. The Engaging Museum: Developing Museums for Visitor Involvement. Routledge.
Hein, Hilde S. (2000) The Museum in Transition: A philosophical Perspective. Smithsonian Institution Press.
Brend, Barbara. Islamic Art Harvard University Press (1992).
Hillenbrand, Robert Islamic Art and Architecture Thames & Hudson (1998).
Grabar, Oleg and Ettinghausen, Richard. The Art and Architecture of Islam: 650-1250 (Viking, 1988).
Jodidio, Philip. (2008) Museum of Islamic Art, Doha, Qatar, New York, NY: Prestel.
Melnick, Jeffrey (2009) 9/11 Culture. Wiley-Blackwell
Merrick, Jay (2008) Xanadu Reborn: New MIA. The independent. 25 Nov. 2008.
Nasr, S. H. (1987) Islamic Art and Spirituality. State University of New York Press.
Nasr, S. H. (1990) Traditional Islam in the Modern World. Routledge London and New York.
Nyangila, Jacob. (2006) Museums and Community Involvement. INTERCOM Conference.
Powell, Robert, ed. (1983) Architecture and Identity. Singapore: Concept Media/The Aga Khan Award for Architecture.
Özkan, Süha. (1996) Faith, Culture and Architecture. In Faith and the Built Environment: Architecture and Behavior in
Islamic Cultures. Vol. 11, no 3-4, p. 181 – 186.
Serageldin, Ismaïl (ed.). (1989) Space for Freedom. London: Butterworth Architecture.
Tim , Caulton. (1998) Hands-on Exhibitions: Managing Interactive Museums and Science Centers. Routledge.
Weil. Stephen.(2007) Making Museums Matter”. Smithsonian Institution Press.
Woodman, Ellis. 2008. I.M. Pei’s MIA opens in Doha, Review http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3129204
Accessed 28-03-2010
i Rasem Badran is a Jordanian architect who is
a famous as believer in theory and practice in the value of Islamic
heritage. He is the recipient of the prestigious Agha Khan Award for Islamic Architecture.
ii One of the convincing interpretations of such a decision is that due to Qatar’s desire to transform Doha, the capital into a
global city. While Badran is with no doubt an expert in the use of Islamic architectural heritage, Pei was a more
appropriate choice for globalizing Doha by putting his signature architecture in one of its prominent locations.
iii Marking the next stage of its program to develop Qatar into a hub of culture and communications for the Gulf region and
the world, the Qatar Museums Authority (QMA) revealed its plans for the new National Museum of Qatar, as expressed in
a striking and evocative design by Pritzker Prize-winning architect Jean Nouvel.
iv www.qma.com.qa accessed on March 14, 2010.
29
v www.qma.com.qa accessed on March 25, 2010.
vi Museum of Islamic Art http://www.mia.org.qa accessed March 3, 2010.
vii Qatar’s vision to substantiate its position as a knowledge and cultural center in the post-oil paradigm was also a vehicle
to create a different identity for the country’s development strategy, which will distinguish Qatar from other Gulf States.
Building museums, universities and knowledge centers highlighted this approach. Yet, because of the strong and
sometimes harsh competition between Gulf cities, Abu Dhabi challenged Qatar by the announcement of developing
Sadiyyat Island as host for four mega museums designed by four of the top signature architects of our contemporary time.
viii My extensive visits to Islamic Museums regionally and internationally are supporting this view. Seldom do Islamic
museums invest in contemporary or future agenda for Islamic art and creativity. Their collections are basically celebrating
the past and keep the viewers ignorant about the present. Examples will include Islamic museum in Cairo, Damascus,
Sharjah In addition to Islamic exhibitions in Paris and London Museums.