TA-1
Technical Appendix for “Impeding the Juggernaut of Innovation
Diffusion: A Production Constrained Model”
Section A. Proofs for Theorems, Lemmas and Corollaries
Constant annual production policy
Proof of Theorem 1:
We consider a new product market where the diffusion of innovation can be characterized by
the Bass (1969) model. Here, if the installed production capacity is sufficiently high then we
should not have any customers waiting to purchase once they have made the mental commitment
to adopt. Any production capacity C(t) greater than Cm satisfies the no waiting constraint and
results in a Bass like diffusion. However, this comes at the cost of carrying excess inventory. As
shown in figure 4, by setting A1=A3+A4, we derive an expression for the minimum capacity
Cm*. Using equation 1, Area A1 as shown in figure 4 can be represented as
∫ ) )
)) (E1)
To calculate A3+A4 as shown in figure 4, only A3 needs to be computed. The unimpeded
diffusion curve described by Bass is symmetric and bell shaped, as shown in figure 4.
Specifically, the adoption process is symmetric around time-to-peak sales T* up to time 2T
*
(Mahajan, Muller, and Bass 1990). We exploit this analytical property to derive an expression
for Cm*. The symmetry of the curve allows us to double the area of A3 to get the total area. To
calculate A3, we first evaluate A2+A3+A5 and then subtract A2 and A5.
) ) ) (E2)
) ) ) (E3)
We equate (E1) and (E3) to calculate Cm*
) ) )
)
) ))
) (E4)
TA-2
Figure 4: Constant annual production (reproduced from main paper)
Proof of Corollary 1:
Equation E4 can be rewritten for easier managerial interpretation. Specifically, we express
Cm* as a combination of two terms as expressed by equation E5.
)
(E5)
Where,
[
] [{
( ) ))
)}
)
] (E6)
Equation E6 can be rewritten to show that is always positive.
[
)] [ ) )] (E7)
Since ,
) is always positive. The term inside the second square bracket in
E7 can be shown to be > 0 by rewriting as an inequality:
) ) )
)
(E8)
The inequality in equation E8 is always true as average sales up to peak is always greater
than average sales up to any time less than T*. Hence proved that is always a positive term.
TA-3
Linearly increasing production policy
Proof of Theorem 2:
For a new product market with a linearly increasing production policy and initial capacity a,
an expression for minimum production rate b* can be derived as follows. As shown in figure T-1,
A1=A3 is the necessary condition to have unconstrained diffusion. Area A1 can be calculated by
adding area A1 and A2 followed by subtraction of area A2. Area A1+A2 corresponds to the area
of a quadrilateral whereas area A2 can be calculated by employing equation 1. Consequently,
Area A1 is given by equation E9 as follows:
)
) ) (E9)
Area A3 can be calculated as (A2+A3+A4)-(A2+A4). Similar to the calculation of A2,
(A2+A3+A4) can be represented as m×F( ) by employing equation 1. Area A4 corresponds to
the area of quadrilateral. Thus, Area A3 is represented by equation E10 as follows:
[ ) )] [ ) ] [
) )] (E10)
We equate E9 and E10 and substitute for CT1 and CT2:
)
(
) )
[ ) )]
) [ ) ] (E11)
Simplifying the expression above, the minimum production rate b*
needed for unconstrained
diffusion is represented by equation E12.
[ ) ] (E12)
TA-4
Figure T-1: Linearly increasing production
Proof of Corollary 2:
On the other hand, if the rate of capacity change b is known, then we can provide an
expression to determine the initial installed capacity. Equation E12 can be rewritten to provide
an expression for minimum initial industry capacity needed for unimpaired and impeded
diffusion in terms of the diffusion parameters, time and the constant production rate b as:
[{ )
}
] (E13)
Linearly decreasing production policy
Proof of Lemma 1:
For a new product market with a linearly decreasing production rate b, an expression for
minimum initial capacity a*
can be derived as follows. As shown in figure T-2, the necessary
condition to have unconstrained diffusion is when area A1equals A3. Area A1 can be calculated
by adding area A1 and A2 followed by subtraction of area A2. Area A1+A2 corresponds to the
area of a quadrilateral whereas area A2 can be calculated by employing equation 1 is given by:
) ) (E14)
TA-5
Area A3 can be calculated by evaluating A2+A3+A4 and subtracting A2 and A4. Area
A2+A3+A4 represents the entire area under the diffusion curve and is equal to market size m. A2
is given by equation 1, whereas A4 corresponds to a triangle with area
) ).
Thus,
) [
) )] (E15)
Thus, equating areas A1 and A3,
) ) ) [
) )] (E16)
Since at T2, capacity is zero, equation E16 can be simplified by cancelling common terms and
substituting T2 =a/b. Thus, the minimum initial installed capacity is represented as:
√ (E17)
Proof of Theorem 3:
We employ Lemma 1 to evaluate the condition under which minimum installed capacity a*
is less than unconstrained peak sales. Specifically, we compare the expression for peak sales
from Bass (1969) with equation E17. Under the condition of unconstrained diffusion, the impact
of social influence from adopters, q, proposed by Bass (1969) is equivalent to the term q2 in our
C-WBM model. The necessary condition therefore is expressed as √
)
which can be further simplified and expressed in terms of a minimum production rate
b* as given by equation E18.
)
(E18)
Proof of Theorem 4:
We invoke Lemma 1 to derive an expression for the minimum initial capacity needed for
unconstrained diffusion while satisfying the condition that production stops before peak sales
TA-6
occurs. By rearranging equation E17, we derive an expression for T2 and compare it with time
taken to reach unconstrained peak sales, T*. Specifically, we take the square on both sides of
E17, substitute T2 =a/b (at T2, capacity is zero), and rewrite T2 as shown in E19.
(E19)
From Bass (1969), we know that time to peak sales can be expressed in terms of p and q
as
) (
). The impact of social influence from adopters, q, in the standard Bass model is
captured by the term q2 in our C-WBM model. Thus, equating E19 with time to reach peak sales
yields an expression for minimum initial capacity given by E20 such that T2 < T*.
)
)
(E20)
Figure T-2: Linearly decreasing production
Exponentially increasing annual production policy
Proof of Theorem 5:
For an exponentially increasing policy with a production rate b, an expression for minimum
initial capacity a* can be derived as follows. As shown in figure T-3, the necessary condition to
have unimpeded diffusion is when area A1 equals A3. Area A1 can be calculated by computing
A1+A2 followed by subtraction of A2. Area A1+A2 corresponds to the area under the curve
TA-7
between interval [0, T1] whereas area A2 can be calculated by employing equation 1. Therefore,
Area A1 is given by equation E21 as follows:
∫
) (E21)
Solving the integral and imposing the limits, A1, can be expressed as:
[ ] ) (E22)
Area A3 can be calculated as (A2+A3+A4)-(A2+A4). Similar to the calculation of A2,
(A2+A3+A4) can be represented as m×F( ). Area A4 corresponds to the area under the curve
between interval [T1, T2]. Thus, Area A3 is represented by equation E22 as follows:
) ) ∫
(E23)
Solving the integral and applying the limits, A3 can be expressed as:
) )
[ ] (E24)
Given a rate of production b, minimum value of initial installed capacity, a*, needed for
unconstrained diffusion can be calculated by equating E23 with E24 and represented as:
)
[ ] (E25)
Figure T-3: Exponentially growing production
TA-8
S-shaped annual production policy
Proof of Theorem 6:
For an S-shaped production policy with a production rate b, an expression for minimum
initial capacity a* can also be derived as follows. In such a production environment, as shown in
figure T-4, no customer waiting will occur, if area A1 is equal to area A3. Area A1 can be
calculated as (A1+A2)–(A2). Area A3 can be calculated as (A2+A3+A4)-(A2)-(A4).
) (E26)
Where ∫
)
Integral can be solved by rewriting I as:
∫
)
[∫ (
)
∫
)
(E27)
The first part of equation E27 equals T1; the second part of equation E27 can solved by a
simple substitution of , and . Thus, substituting and solving for the
limits of the integral leads to A1, where:
[
)] ) (E28)
Similarly, A3 can be calculated and shown to be equal to:
) ) )
[ (
)] (E29)
Equating equation E28 and E29 and simplifying for a, the minimum initial capacity for a given
production growth rate of b is represented by E30:
)
[
(
)] (E30)
TA-9
Figure T-4: S-shaped production
Two-regime production policy
Proof of Lemma 2:
In hi-tech markets, production may be carried out in discrete chunks (see figure T-5). In such
a two-regime production environment, there are two questions of interest. First, how long should
one wait (T1), before installed capacity has to be expanded to avoid customer waiting? A second
related question is related to the minimum capacity that needs to be added at T1 in order to avoid
customers waiting over the remaining diffusion life cycle. To address the first question, we
derive an expression for the longest time T1 that one can wait before capacity needs to be
expanded in order to avoid waiting customers. T1 can be evaluated in close form, given CT1 is
known. At T1, ) = C T1, and as per Bass (1969) ) can be expressed in terms of p, q, m,
and T1 as shown in E31.
)
(
)
(
) )
) (E31)
By substituting
)
) equation E31 can be rearranged in a
quadratic form shown by E32.
) (E32)
TA-10
If , the equation will have imaginary roots and T1 cannot be calculated. Our
computational experience with real world product data shows that is always lower than 0.25
and that both roots of the quadratic equation are always positive. As noted earlier, the term q in
the standard Bass model maps on to its counterpart, q2 in our C-WBM model. Thus, taking the
larger of the two roots can be expressed in terms of the original parameters p, q2, and m.
Therefore, T1max
is expressed as shown in equation E33:
[
)]
(
[ ) ]
{
[(
[ ) ]) √(
[ ) ]
)]
}
)
(E33)
Proof of Theorem 7:
To address the second question, an expression for minimum additional capacity can be
derived by invoking Lemma 2. Specifically, at T1<=T1max
, capacity has to be expanded to CT2 to
avoid waiting. As shown in figure T-5, to derive CT2, we once again use the symmetric property
of a Bass diffusion curve. Specifically, in order to ensure unimpeded diffusion, areas (A1+A3)
should be equal to areas (A6 +A7). Area A1 can be evaluated as (A1+A4) – (A4) whereas A3
can be evaluated as (A3+ A5) - (A5-A4). Area A1+A3 is thus represented by equation E34 as
follows:
{ } { ) )} (E34)
Area A6 can be calculated as (A5+A8+A6)-(A5-A8). Thus, A6+A7 can be calculated by
exploiting the curve symmetry and doubling A6 as represented by equation E35. T* represents
time to peak sales as discussed previously and m×F(T*) is the cumulative sales up to T
*.
[ ) ) ) ] (E35)
Equating equation E34 and E35, results in an expression with two variables as shown by
equation E36.
TA-11
) [ ) )] (E36)
Given CT1 is a known quantity, CT2 can be expressed as:
[ ) )]
) (E37)
Minimum additional capacity is then a difference between CT2 and CT1 and can be
represented as:
) ) )
) (E38)
Figure T-5: Two-regime production
Section B: Simulation Settings for Parameter Estimation with Early Sales Data
To assess the ability of our model to identify installed production capacity from early sales
observations, we employ the C-WBM model with constant annual production to generate
synthetic data. Using different values of p, q2, and m to seed the diffusion environment, we set up
diffusion scenarios under two different production settings. Specifically, under setting A, we
employ values of p=0.03, q2=0.38, m=22,389, and a value of C=1,250 such that diffusion occurs
with a time to peak sales in the unconstrained process at period seven. The first occurrence of
backorder appears at period six (TB), right before peak sales have occurred. Under setting B, we
employ values of p=0.013, q2=0.38, m=40,001, and a value of C =2,300 to set up diffusion that
TA-12
has a time to peak sales in the unconstrained process at period 11. The first occurrence of
backorder appears at period 12 (TB), right after peak sales has occurred.
There is a material difference between employing data points after the first occurrence of the
backorder and those prior to the onset of this. From the point of first occurrence of the backorder,
the “true” diffusion process is not only impacted but is also impeded. Prior to the onset of
backorders, both the “true” and the capacity constrained diffusion curves are identical.
Conceptually, this means that prior to the first occurrence of the backorder we need to be able to
estimate the minimum supply needed for “true” unimpeded diffusion. Consequently, this
suggests that we may be able to deploy our production capacity constrained diffusion model to
help managers and analysts get an early handle on the industry supply required. Subsequent to
the onset of backorders, the observed sales will diverge from the “true” unimpeded and
unimpaired sales. From this point forward, we now have information that can help us understand
the specific industry level supply that is in play (which led to the divergence). Therefore, it
would be possible with our C-WBM model to unearth the magnitude of the industry capacity.
Under each of the two constrained diffusion settings, we estimate p, q2, m, and C with limited
data, going back up to five periods, starting from TB and going forward two periods from TB.
Thus, our experimental design has two different constrained diffusion settings and set of eight
limited data points resulting in 16 scenarios.
Reference
Mahajan, V., Muller, E., Bass, F.M. 1990. New product diffusion models in marketing:A review
and directions for research. Journal of Marketing. 54(1), 1-26.
Balakrishnan, P.V. (Sundar), Pathak, S.D. 2013. Impeding the Juggernaut of Innovation
Diffusion: A Production Constrained Model. Production and Operations Management,
Forthcoming.