![Page 1: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ten Markers of Success Ten Markers of Success
(for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010)(for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010)
Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”“Dashboard Indicators”
![Page 2: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Methodology Notes
The Following slides present statistics calculated from the StatsOnline surveys collected in 2008-2009 and 2009-2010
In order to collect accurate data during the summer/fall of the current school year, StatsOnline uses some statistics belonging to the previous fiscal year and others to the current fiscal year as follows:
– From the previous fiscal year: a) Applications per Acceptance; Attrition; Giving; Professional Development and Technology Budget; and Endowment Statistics
– From the current fiscal year: Teachers Salaries; Tuition; Financial Aid; and Full-Time Equivalent Staffing (FTE) Statistics
![Page 3: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1st Marker of Success: Market DemandNumber of applications per acceptances measures the market’s perception of the school’s “brand” (high ratio a proxy for reputational value), the higher the ratio, the greater the pricing/tuition) flexibility
Percentile(25) 1.2
Percentile(50) 1.5
Percentile(75) 1.9
Percentile(90) 2.8
Day Schools 2009-2010 Boarding Schools 2009-2010
Percentile(25) 1.3
Percentile(50) 1.6
Percentile(75) 2.1
Percentile(90) 3.1
Day Schools 2008-2009 Boarding Schools 2008-2009
Percentile(25) 1.3
Percentile(50) 1.6
Percentile(75) 2.2
Percentile(90) 3.4
Percentile(25) 1.4
Percentile(50) 1.8
Percentile(75) 2.4
Percentile(90) 3.6
(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 4: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2nd Marker of Success: Low Attrition Low annual student attrition measures stability of school and satisfaction of parents (low percent a proxy for high stability and satisfaction)
Percentile(25) 5.9
Percentile(50) 9.2
Percentile(75) 13.8
Percentile(90) 18.6
Attrition Day Schools : 2009-10 Attrition Boarding Schools: 2009-10
Percentile(25) 6.1
Percentile(50) 10.1
Percentile(75) 17.0
Percentile(90) 25.5
Attrition Day Schools: 2008-09 Attrition Boarding Schools: 2008-09
Percentile(25) 5.0
Percentile(50) 7.9
Percentile(75) 12.4
Percentile(90) 18.6
Percentile(25) 5.4
Percentile(50) 9.8
Percentile(75) 17.5
Percentile(90) 26.1
(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 5: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3rd Marker of Success: Giving (Day)Generous giving measures constituent loyalty (generosity as a proxy for high support and attributed effectiveness)
2008-09 Alumni % Parent % Trustee %AlumniAvg Gift
ParentAvg Gift
TrusteeAverage Gift
Percentile(25) 4% 48% 93% $135 $556 $2,007
Percentile(50) 9% 64% 100% $271 $916 $3,670
Percentile(75) 17% 80% 100% $447 $1,508 $6,288
Percentile(90) 29% 91% 100% $692 $2,388 $10,667
2009-10 Alumni % Parent % Trustee %AlumniAvg Gift
ParentAvg Gift
TrusteeAverage Gift
Percentile(25) 4% 49% 93% $137 $508 $1,936
Percentile(50) 8% 64% 100% $261 $860 $3,804
Percentile(75) 16% 79% 100% $427 $1,438 $6,228
Percentile(90) 27% 91% 100% $612 $2,208 $10,486
(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 6: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2008-09 Alumni % Parent % Trustee %AlumniAvg Gift
ParentAvg Gift
TrusteeAverage Gift
Percentile(25) 9% 32% 87% $304 $711 $3,067
Percentile(50) 17% 51% 100% $439 $1,136 $6,334
Percentile(75) 27% 69% 100% $645 $1,771 $10,306
Percentile(90) 39% 81% 100% $988 $3,048 $18,454
2009-10 Alumni % Parent % Trustee %AlumniAvg Gift
ParentAvg Gift
TrusteeAverage Gift
Percentile(25) 8% 28% 87% $268 $688 $2,912
Percentile(50) 15% 48% 96% $443 $1,166 $5,455
Percentile(75) 24% 65% 100% $605 $1,699 $11,076
Percentile(90) 36% 78% 100% $875 $2,647 $18,814
3rd Marker of Success: Giving (Boarding) Generous giving measures constituent loyalty (generosity as a proxy for high support and attributed effectiveness)
(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 7: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
4th Marker of Success: Faculty Salaries (Day)Competitive Faculty Salaries: measures a school’s capacity to attract, keep, and reward high quality faculty (salaries a proxy for competitiveness in recruitment and high quality teachers)
2008-09 Highest Median Lowest
Percentile(25) $60,961 $42,284 $31,037
Percentile(50) $72,000 $49,042 $35,325
Percentile(75) $86,000 $57,000 $41,000
Percentile(90) $101,220 $67,262 $46,563
2009-10 Highest Median Lowest
Percentile(25) $61,644 $42,925 $31,809
Percentile(50) $73,394 $50,134 $36,000
Percentile(75) $87,588 $58,500 $41,624
Percentile(90) $105,106 $68,538 $47,205(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 8: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
4th Marker of Success: Faculty Salaries-BoardingCompetitive Faculty Salaries: measures a school’s capacity to attract, keep, and reward high quality faculty (salaries a proxy for competitiveness in recruitment and high quality teachers)
2008-09 Highest Median Lowest
Percentile(25) $55,000 $36,533 $25,719
Percentile(50) $67,500 $43,100 $29,166
Percentile(75) $83,547 $52,814 $34,260
Percentile(90) $96,873 $59,900 $40,000
2009-10 Highest Median Lowest
Percentile(25) $54,688 $36,554 $25,565
Percentile(50) $67,750 $43,750 $29,445
Percentile(75) $84,276 $53,501 $34,134
Percentile(90) $98,180 $60,261 $38,830(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 9: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
5th Marker of Success: TuitionsLower percentile/low tuition (a proxy for comparative “affordability” & competing on price); higher percentile/ high tuition (a proxy for competing on brand)
2008-09 Day Schools Avg. Tuition
Day School1Year%Change
Boarding Sch Avg. Tuition
Boarding School1Year%Change
Percentile(25) $13,188 4.9% $34,943 3.1%
Percentile(50) $16,659 4.5% $39,363 5.0%
Percentile(75) $21,327 4.5% $41,729 6.0%
Percentile(90) $27,074 4.6% $43,148 6.0%
2009-10 Day Schools Avg. Tuition
Day School1Year%Change
Boarding Sch Avg. Tuition
Boarding School1Year%Change
Percentile(25) $13,839 4.9% $36,250 3.7%
Percentile(50) $17,532 5.2% $40,890 3.9%
Percentile(75) $22,418 5.1% $43,400 4.0%
Percentile(90) $28,444 5.1% $44,815 3.9%(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 10: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
6th Marker of Success: Financial Aid - DayA substantial proportion of students receiving financial aid measures a school’s commitment to diversity (financial aid a proxy for socio-economic diversity) and/or a tuition discounting strategy for full enrollment
2008-09Students on Tuition Assistance as % of Enrollment
Tuition Assistance as % of Day Tuition
Percentile(25) 15.2% 44.5%
Percentile(50) 20.9% 55.2%
Percentile(75) 29.1% 65.1%
Percentile(90) 38.9% 74.3%
2009-10Students on Tuition Assistance as % of Enrollment
Tuition Assistance as % of Day Tuition
Percentile(25) 17.1% 43.1%
Percentile(50) 24.0% 54.5%
Percentile(75) 33.0% 64.1%
Percentile(90) 43.9% 72.6%(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 11: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
6th Marker of Success: Financial Aid-BoardingA substantial proportion of students receiving financial aid measures a school’s commitment to diversity (financial aid a proxy for socio-economic diversity) and/or a tuition discounting strategy for full enrollment
2008-09Students on Tuition Assistance as % of Enrollment
Tuition Assistance as % of Boarding Tuition
Percentile(25) 25.8% 34.2%
Percentile(50) 33.2% 48.4%
Percentile(75) 44.0% 59.5%
Percentile(90) 54.3% 69.9%
2009-10Students on Tuition Assistance as % of Enrollment
Tuition Assistance as % of Boarding Tuition
Percentile(25) 28.2% 35.3%
Percentile(50) 36.8% 49.5%
Percentile(75) 47.1% 60.8%
Percentile(90) 58.1% 71.5%(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 12: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
7th Marker of Success: High Productivity-DayComparatively high student:faculty and student:total staff ratios (percentiles): measure high workload productivity (a proxy for institutional efficiency); low productivity/ratios (a proxy for competing on brand or program not price)
2008-09Students : FTE
FacultyStudents : FTE
ALL Staff
Percentile(25) 7.5 4.6
Percentile(50) 8.7 5.3
Percentile(75) 10.1 6.4
Percentile(90) 11.3 7.3
2009-10Students : FTE
FacultyStudents : FTE
ALL Staff
Percentile(25) 7.6 4.6
Percentile(50) 8.8 5.3
Percentile(75) 10.2 6.2
Percentile(90) 11.5 7.0(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 13: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
7th Marker of Success: High Productivity-BoardingComparatively high student:faculty and student:total staff ratios (percentiles): measure high workload productivity (a proxy for institutional efficiency); low productivity/ratios (a proxy for competing on brand or program not price)
2008-09Students : FTE
FacultyStudents : FTE
ALL Staff
Percentile(25) 6.3 2.4
Percentile(50) 7.4 3.0
Percentile(75) 8.4 4.2
Percentile(90) 9.6 5.6
2009-10Students : FTE
FacultyStudents : FTE
ALL Staff
Percentile(25) 6.1 2.4
Percentile(50) 7.5 2.9
Percentile(75) 8.7 3.8
Percentile(90) 9.8 5.0(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 14: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
8th Marker of Success: Funding Prof Dev & Tech- Day Significant budget for professional development and technology: measures commitment to human resources and innovation (a proxy for investment in supporting a high-quality learning environment).
2008-09Prof Development as %
of ExpensesTechnology Budget as %
of Expenses
Percentile(25) 0.47% 0.62%
Percentile(50) 0.71% 1.05%
Percentile(75) 0.99% 1.65%
Percentile(90) 1.29% 2.41%
2009-10Prof Development as %
of ExpensesTechnology Budget as %
of Expenses
Percentile(25) 0.39% 0.60%
Percentile(50) 0.61% 1.01%
Percentile(75) 0.86% 1.65%
Percentile(90) 1.17% 2.34%(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 15: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
8th Marker of Success: Funding Prof Dev & Tech- Boarding Significant budget for professional development and technology: measures commitment to human resources and innovation (a proxy for investment in supporting a high-quality learning environment).
2008-09Prof Development as %
of ExpensesTechnology Budget as %
of Expenses
Percentile(25) 0.32% 0.66%
Percentile(50) 0.49% 1.20%
Percentile(75) 0.70% 1.82%
Percentile(90) 0.94% 2.61%
2009-10Prof Development as %
of ExpensesTechnology Budget as %
of Expenses
Percentile(25) 0.26% 0.75%
Percentile(50) 0.40% 1.16%
Percentile(75) 0.61% 1.75%
Percentile(90) 0.92% 2.32%(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 16: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
9th Marker of Success: Endowment - DayGrowing endowment: measures commitment to financial security (a proxy for inter-generational equity and long-term stability).
2008-09 Endowment ValueEndowment per Student
Value
Percentile(25) $1,379,789 $3,794
Percentile(50) $4,853,810 $10,721
Percentile(75) $15,103,881 $25,993
Percentile(90) $35,512,368 $50,509
2009-10 Endowment ValueEndowment per Student
Value
Percentile(25) $1,123,728 $3,102
Percentile(50) $3,853,836 $9,339
Percentile(75) $11,935,669 $19,971
Percentile(90) $27,342,579 $39,818(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 17: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
9th Marker of Success: Endowment - BoardingGrowing endowment: measures commitment to financial security (a proxy for inter-generational equity and long-term stability).
2008-09 Endowment ValueEndowment per Student
Value
Percentile(25) $4,075,892 $15,872
Percentile(50) $14,831,665 $44,935
Percentile(75) $44,654,304 $109,199
Percentile(90) $113,750,125 $295,087
2009-10 Endowment ValueEndowment per Student
Value
Percentile(25) $2,708,421 $12,535
Percentile(50) $11,032,719 $41,458
Percentile(75) $37,581,369 $85,995
Percentile(90) $102,775,000 $265,450(Years mentioned are data collection years)
![Page 18: Ten Markers of Success (for data collection years: 2008-09 and 2009-2010) Defining Goals for Schools by Using Data Proxies as “Dashboard Indicators”](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070401/56649f1d5503460f94c3402d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
10th Marker of Success: Student OutcomesStudent outcomes measure overall success of mission (persistence and graduation rates a proxy for effective preparation academically and constitutionally to succeed in future competitive academic environments)
Metrics and Tools To Measure Student Outcomes• Normative Testing (SATs, ERBs, APs, IBs, etc.) • Formative Testing (ERBs, MAP, CWRA, etc.)• Demonstrations of Learning (e-Portfolios)• Matriculation to academically competitive secondary schools and colleges• Graduation from 4-year colleges within six years (NELS)• High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE) • Transcripts/Self-reporting on preparation for and success in college (NAIS Young Alumni Survey; UCLA/HERI Annual College Freshmen Survey)