Download - The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
![Page 1: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy
ISAJEHelsinki1 September 2006
Peter Anderson
![Page 2: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 3: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 4: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Concentration in the global beer market 1979-2004
Corporation Country1979/80 2004
Inbev Belgium * 13.9% (1)SABMiller UK 4.83% (2-Miller), 12.0% (2)
0.93% (17-SAB)Anheuser-Busch USA 6.48% (1) 10.8% (3)Heineken NV Netherlands 2.84% (4) 7.6% (4)Carlsberg Breweries A/S Denmark 3.08% (3) 4.3% (5)Molson Coors Brewing Co. USA + 4.0% (6)Scottish Courage UK + 3.4% (7)Grupo Modelo Mexico 1.34% (12) 2.9% (8)Kirin Japan * 2.5% (9)Baltic Beverages Holding Russia * 2.5% (10)Total market share of top ten companies 27.99% 63.90%
Global Market Share
Jernigan 2006
![Page 5: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Concentration in the global distilled spirits market, 1991-2003
Corporation Country of HQ
Global Market Share 1991
Global Market Share 2004
UDV (Diageo) UK 10.5% (1) 14.7% (1)
Pernod Ricard France 5.7% (4) 12.9% (2)
UB Group India 3.7%(8) 8.5%(3)
Jim Beam (Fortune) US 4.8% (6) 5.9% (4)
Bacardi Bermuda 7.7% (3) 5.8% (5)
Suntory Japan 4% (7) 2.7% (6)
Constellation Brands US 2.5% (10) 2.5% (7)
Brown-Forman US * 2.4% (8)
V&S Vin and Sprit AB Sweden * 2.2% (9)
Gruppo Campari Italy * 2.2% (10)
Total share of top ten 57% 60.0%
Jernigan 2006
![Page 6: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 7: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. The companies themselves, e.g. Diageo
2. Category Associations (Beer, spirits, wines)
3. Social aspects organizations
![Page 8: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Dangers facing beverage alcohol industry
taxes; vigorous drink driving measures; restrictions on availability; treatment services; advertising restrictions; warning labels; and ingredient labelling.
Tim AmblerGrand Metropolitan, 1984
![Page 11: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
“It is generally agreed that the tobacco industry reacted to not dissimilar threats in a passive, inadequate manner and most of all too late …..”
Tim AmblerGrand Metropolitan, 1984
![Page 12: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The Portman Group Allied DomecqBacardi Brown Forman BrandsBeverage Brands (UK) LtdCarlsberg UKCoors Brewers UKDiageo Great Britain Interbred UK Period Ricard UKScottish and Newcastle
1989
www.portman-group.org.uk
United Kingdom
"The majority of people who drink alcohol enjoy it without causing harm to themselves or others. The Portman Group acts to reduce the misuse of alcohol by the minority through a strategy of working with other organisations locally and nationally."
![Page 13: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
European Forum for Responsible Drinking (ex Amsterdam group)
Allied Domecq Bacardi-MartiniBrown-Forman Diageo Groupe Pernod Ricard Moët Hennessy Rémy Cointreau V&S Group
1990
www.amsterdamgroup.org
Europe
Communicate thought leadership by developing tools that deliver evidence-based balanced policies.
Provide the intellectual base to drive positive change in attitude and drinking behaviour
Develop and promote programmes that seek to reduce alcohol related harm in partnership with most relevant stakeholders.
Promote the responsibilities of all social actors in the supply chain.
![Page 14: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The International Center for Alcohol Policies
Allied Domecq PLC Asahi Breweries, LTD. Bacardi-Martini Brown-Forman Corporation Coors Brewing Company Diageo PLC Foster's Group Limited Heineken N.V. Molson SABMiller PLC
1996
http://www.icap.org
Global
To promote understanding of the role of alcohol in society and help reduce the abuse of alcohol worldwide.
To encourage dialogue and pursue partnerships involving the beverage alcohol industry, the public health community and others interested in alcohol policy.
![Page 15: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Social Aspect Organizations Funded by Alcohol Industry
0
5
10
15
20
25
1971 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Worldwide Brewing Alliance: Global social responsibility initiativesBritish Beer & Pub Association, 2003
From Babor, 2006
![Page 16: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 17: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1. There is a cultural complexity to alcohol consumption across Europe.
2. Alcohol-related harm is largely related to high-risk drinking behaviour.
3. Any alcohol harm reduction strategies should be underpinned by robust evidence and sound data.
4. The most effective harm reduction strategies are those that bring about sustainable results towards a reduction in risky drinking behaviour.
5. Reducing alcohol-related harm requires a broad societal commitment and a concerted effort of all relevant stakeholders.
![Page 18: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Stakeholder analysis
0123456789
10
Po
licy
imp
act
Regulation Education Implementation of law
Policy options
NGO
GO
AI
![Page 19: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Stakeholder analysis
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
SD
aw
ay f
rom
med
ian
of
scal
e
Regulation Education Implementation of law
Policy options
NGO
GO
AI
![Page 20: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
1. Attempting to influence governmental organizations;
2. Becoming members of international organizations to broaden policy influence and respectability;
3. Recruiting policy advisers and scientists;
4. Creating social aspects organizations in low income countries; and
5. Preparing and promoting consensus statements and codes of practice.
![Page 21: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Open lobby
Open: classical, accepted and ‘legal’ lobby:
• Meetings with politicians• Influencing political
agenda• Personal networking/ Old
Boys Clubs
![Page 22: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hidden lobby
• Strong influence in the decision making process within the Ministry of Health
• They won the right of formal meetings with all partners: they want to be informed about every political strategy beforehand
• They initiated an informal subgroup with some managers in the Ministry
• They gained regular meetings with the Secretary General of the Ministry of Health.
![Page 23: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Hidden Lobby
• At the most critical political moments (a marketing ban, a happy hour ban or a excise-duty rise) they have a direct access to the Minister of Health by a former Minister of Home Affairs who is commissioner of the drinks industry
![Page 24: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 25: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Babor and Xuan
Alcohol policyresearch andthe grey literature
A Tale of Two Surveys
NAT, 2004
![Page 26: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Compared results of:
ICAP survey of 48/114 (42%) countries, representing 22% of the world’s population
WHO survey of 118/175 (67%) countries, representing 86% pf the world’s population
![Page 27: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Compared Prevalence of existing policies between 2 surveys
Reported on results of partnerships with the beverage alcohol industry from ICAP survey
![Page 28: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Compared Prevalence of existing policies between 2 surveys
Reported on results of partnerships with the beverage alcohol industry from ICAP survey
![Page 29: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Regarding the issue of partnerships with the alcoholic beverage industry, 50% of the 48 respondents answered yes to the question:
“Do you view the beverage alcoholindustry as an effective partner in developing alcohol policies in your country?”
![Page 31: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Among the respondents answering yes (N = 24), respondents were then asked to list the topic areas for potential partnerships
![Page 32: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
But, ICAP used the wrong denominator, 24,
the respondents who answered yes to the question “Do you view the beverage alcoholindustry as an effective partner in developing alcohol policies in your country?”,
instead of the total sample of 48.
![Page 34: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Munro
AN ADDICTION AGENCY’S COLLABORATION WITH THE DRINKS INDUSTRY: MOO JOOSE AS A CASE STUDY
Addiction, 2005
![Page 37: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Alcohol Education Australia Ltd
In August 2002, the Alcohol and Drug Foundation - Queensland (ADFQ) announced the formation, in conjunction with the alcohol industry, of Alcohol Education Australia Ltd. (AEA), to “promote responsible drinking and moderation in the consumption of alcohol.”
![Page 38: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The host, Alcohol and Drug Foundation – Queensland, was a non-government, not-for-profit body with a thirty-year history. It conducted treatment services in residential, custodial and community settings, a prevention program, an annual conference, and published a quarterly magazine.
![Page 39: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
According to the Alcohol Education Australia prospectus: “The Company is owned by the Alcohol and Drug Foundation - Queensland, and was set up as a separate legal entity for the purpose of being recognised as a national public health organisation.”
A board of nine directors will govern AEA, three appointed by each of ADFQ, industry stakeholders, and community stakeholders.
![Page 40: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
The Moo Joose case
Within months of forming AEA, ADFQ intervened in a licensing case to support a manufacturer whose application to sell alcoholic milk (Moo Joose) was rejected by a state licensing authority. Two principals of ADFQ, the president, and the CEO submitted an eight-page statement in defence of Moo Joose and both appeared before the tribunal as witnesses for the manufacturer.
![Page 41: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
In supporting Moo Joose, ADFQ reversed a previous policy.
In 1997 ADFQ declared Candy Shots, a vodka-based pre-mixed drink marketed in flavours of chocolate, banana, caramel, and marshmallow, “dangerous,” and called for proscription.
The CEO said, “But everyone knows that underage drinking occurs and this is just the type of drink that will make it easier for kids to get started.”
![Page 42: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Features of ADFQ’s defence of Moo Joose included:
The narrow neck of the bottle and the screw top would militate against the risk of drink spiking.
The four-pack was “a harm minimisation strategy” that would limit consumption.
The milk content would prevent excessive use and intoxication.
![Page 43: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The Outcome
Liquor Licensing Victoria rejected Moo Joose because it saw alcoholic milk as a corruption of a product known to be healthy and one that might easily be taken up by children.
![Page 44: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 45: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Two cases
‘Working for the alcohol industry’
‘social aspects organization’
![Page 46: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Areas where industry interests interact with alcohol science
• Industry sponsorship of research funding organizations
• Direct financing of university-based scientists and centers
• Research conducted through contract research organizations
• Research conducted by trade organizations and SAOs
• Efforts to influence public perceptions of research, research findings and alcohol policies
• Publication of scientific documents and support of scientific journals
• Sponsorship of scientific conferences and presentations at scientific conferences
Babor 2006
![Page 47: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Areas where industry interests interact with alcohol science
• Industry sponsorship of research funding organizations
• Direct financing of university-based scientists and centers
• Research conducted through contract research organizations
• Research conducted by trade organizations and SAOs
• Efforts to influence public perceptions of research, research findings and alcohol policies
• Publication of scientific documents and support of scientific journals
• Sponsorship of scientific conferences and presentations at scientific conferences
• Involvement with alcohol science journal editors
Babor 2006
![Page 48: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Contents:
1. Who is the alcohol industry?
2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?
3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?
4. Two examples
5. Two cases
6. Some questions
![Page 49: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062421/56649d965503460f94a7ec8c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Some questions:
1. Does involvement of journal editors with the alcohol industry matter?
2. If so, should we do something about it?
3. Should there be conflict of interest statements by journal editors and editorial boards on journal websites and in the journals’ front pages?