![Page 1: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The negative condition
for Laplace transforms
No.2
Takao Saito
1
![Page 2: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Thank you for our world
2
![Page 3: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The negative condition
for Lapalace transforms
3
![Page 4: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Preface
This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-
erator algebras in L1, L2-spaces. Second is operator algebras for Laplace
transforms. Finally, the property of semi-groups in Laplace transforms.
Papers
About solvers of differential equations of relatively
for Laplace transforms
Operator algebras for Laplace transforms
Rings and ideal structures for Laplace transforms
Groups and matrix operator for Laplace transforms
Extension and contaction for transrated operators
Operator algebras for group conditions
Some matrices rings for Laplace transforms
The projection operator for Laplace transforms
Now, let′s consider with me!
695-52 Chibadera-cho
Chuo-ku Chiba-shi
Postcode 260-0844 , Japan
URL: http://opab.web.fc2.com/index.html
(Mon)5.Oct.2009
Takao Saito
4
![Page 5: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Contents
Preface
§ Chapter 4
D(a)
◦AboutD(-a),O(-a)for matrix operator · · · · · ·8◦D(a) About (D(a),O(a))(D(−a),O(−a)) · · · · · ·9◦ Relation ofD(a) andO(a) · · · · · ·11
◦About < D(a),O(a) >< D(−a),O(−a) > · · · · · ·12
Y (a)
◦ About Y(−a),N (−a) for Laplace transforms · · · · · · · · · · · ·14
◦About (Y(a),N (a))(Y(−a),N (−a)) · · · · · · · · · · · ·14
◦About < Y(a),N (a) >< Y(−a),N (−a) > · · · · · ·16
F (a)
◦ About F(−a),G(−a) for matrix operator · · · · · ·18
◦ About < F(a),G(a) >< F(−a),G(−a) > · · · · · ·19
T (a) (Laplace transforms)
◦ About T (−a),S(−a) for Laplace transforms · · · · · · · · · · · ·21
◦ Relation of T (a) and S(a) · · · · · · · · · · · ·22
◦ About < T (a),S(a) >< T (−a),S(−a) > · · · · · ·23
◦ Some results · · · · · ·25
§ Chapter 5
D(a)
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras · · · · · ·28
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·29
5
![Page 6: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
◦ Basic operator algebras · · · · · ·30
◦ Basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · ·30
◦ Basic normed operator algebras · · · · · · 31
◦ Basic normed operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·31
Y (a)
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras · · · · · ·33
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·34
◦ Basic operator algebras · · · · · ·35
◦ Basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · ·35
◦ Basic normed operator algebras · · · · · · 36
◦ Basic normed operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·36
F (a)
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras · · · · · ·48
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·39
◦ Basic operator algebras · · · · · ·40
◦ Basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · ·40
◦ Basic normed operator algebras · · · · · · 41
◦ Basic normed operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·41
T (a) (Laplace transforms)
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras · · · · · ·44
◦ Figure of basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · · 45
◦ Basic operator algebras · · · · · ·46
◦ Basic operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · ·46
◦ Basic normed operator algebras · · · · · · 47
◦ Basic normed operator algebras (Duality) · · · · · · · · · · · ·47
◦ Some results · · · · · · · · · · · ·48
§ Chapter 6
D(a)
◦ Associative and commutative of D(a) operations (L1-space)
· · · 49
6
![Page 7: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
◦ Associative and commutative of D(a) operations (L2-space)
· · · 50
◦ Semi-groups for D(a) operation · · · · · · · · · · · ·52
◦ Semi-group for O(a) operation · · · · · · · · ·52
Y (a)
◦ Associative and commutative of Y (a) operations (L1-space)
· · · 54
◦ Associative and commutative of Y (a) operations (L2-space)
· · · 55
◦ Semi-groups for Y (a) operation · · · · · · · · · · · ·56
◦ Semi-group for N (a) operation · · · · · · · · ·57
E(a)
◦ About the property of eas · · · · · · · · · · · · 58
F (a)
◦ Associative and commutative of Pascal’s matrix (L2-space)
· · · 58
◦ Semi-groups for F (a) operation · · · · · · · · · · · ·59
◦ Semi-group for G(a) operation · · · · · · · · ·59
T (a) (Laplace transforms)
◦ Associative and commutative of Laplace transforms (L2-space)
· · · 62
◦ Semigroups of translate operators and convolutions · · · 63
◦ Some results · · · · · · · · · · · · 66
◦ Conclusion · · · · · · · · · 67
◦ References · · · · · · · · · · · · 68
7
![Page 8: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Chapter 4
In this chapter, we want to extend to negative conditions for ′′a′′ in
Laplace transforms T (a). The first step, I want to explain about D(a)
and Y(a) operations in L1, L2-spaces. The next step, I explain about
F(a) and T (a) operations in L2-spaces.
©About D(−a),O(−a) for matrix operator. (vector spaces)
D(a) operation is the simplest form for F (a) operations. F (a) op-
eration (matrix operator) is isomorphic with T (a) operations. (Laplace
transforms)
D(a) operations are defined as following.
D(a) = easD(a) = eas
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
, O(a) = easO(a) = 0 (annihilator) (1)
as a whole
D(a) + O(a) = H(a) = easH(a).
D(a) and D(a) operations have a property of ring conditions because
of it generats from matrix structures.
Especially, this operation has following important property.
(semi− group) D(−a) = D−1(a) (group or field)
Left side is generated as semi-groups. In this time, it’s able to extend
to group condition with inverse. So D(a) operation generats group struc-
tures. Furthermore, this group is able to extend to ring. In fact, D(a) is
8
![Page 9: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ring.
On the other hand,
H(a) = D(a) +O(a) = D(−a) +O(−a) = H(−a) = Identity
N.B. D(0)def .= Identity.
In this time,
D(a) =
a0
a0
a0
a0
a0
=
(−a)0
(−a)0
(−a)0
(−a)0
(−a)0
= D(−a). (2)
So we have following.
D(a) = D(−a) , O(a) = O(−a).
Therefore D(a) and O(a) operations has identical forms, respectively.
©About (D(a),O(a))(D(−a),O(−a))
If it’s defined on L1-space then I will define following.
(D(a),O(a))(D(−a),O(−a))def .= (D(a)D(−a),O(a)D(−a) +D(a)O(−a) +O(a)O(−a))
O(a) = D(0)−D(a) , O(−a) = D(0)−D(−a).
In this case,
O(a)D(−a) = (D(0)−D(a))D(−a) = D(−a)−D(0) = 0
D(a)O(−a) = D(a)(D(0)−D(−a)) = D(a)−D(0) = 0
O(a)O(−a) = (D(0)−D(a))(D(0)−D(−a)) = D(0)−D(a)−D(−a)+D(0)
= 2D(0)−D(a)−D(−a) = 0
9
![Page 10: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Therefore
O(a)D(−a) +D(a)O(−a) +O(a)O(−a) = 0.
Hence
(D(a),O(a))(D(−a),O(−a)) = (D(0), 0) = (I, 0).
On the other hand,
D(a) = D(−a) = D−1(a).
So
D2(a) = I(a)
The involution of D(a) operation is given by
D∗(a) =
a0
a0
. . .
a0
=
a0
a0
. . .
a0
= D(a) = I(a) (3)
So
D(a) = D∗(a) = D2(a) = I(a)
Similarly
N (a) = N ∗(a) = N 2(a) = 0
In this time, the projection operator is able to represent following.
P = P ∗ = P 2 = {1}, {0} in L1 − spaces.
Moreover, since the property of group ring, we have following conditions
D(a) = D(na) = Dn(a) invariant− form.
I is identity as ring condition and 0 is satisfied ideal structures. So,
(I, 0)
↙ ↘ring ideal
10
![Page 11: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(see, p.16, Chapter 1, No.1)
If this condition is presented on L2-spaces then the operator algebra
for D(a) is following.
D(a) +O(a) = H(a) = I(a) (additive)
< D(a),O(a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
Similarly
D(−a) +O(−a) = H(−a) = I(−a) (additive)
< D(−a),O(−a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
The projection operator is able to represent as P = {1, 0} in L2-spaces.
© Relation of D(a) and O(a)
Now, I want to extend finite conditions to infinite conditions. Fi-
nite conditions couud deal with field theory, however infinite space is two
kind of situations 1 and 0. First and second situations 1,0 are maked
O⊥(∞) and D⊥(∞) , respectively. If we deal with D⊥(∞) then we ob-
taine O⊥(∞) = T (0) = {1}. It commutes spectral dicomposition. Now,
D⊥(∞) = {0} on Hilbert spaces. Of caurse ‖T (0)‖ = 1. Since ideal
N (a) = {0} , then O(a) = {0} iff a is finite. If a is infinite then
‖O⊥(∞)‖ = ‖D(0)‖ = 1. These operations are bounded on Hilbert
spaces, respectively. In this time, the behaviour of projection operator
P (a), Q(a) are same with D(a),O(a) operations, respectively.
P (a) + Q(a) = {1} for all ′′a′′.
D(a) +O(a) = H(a) = D(0)
If a is infinite condition then we have following.
O⊥(−∞) = D(0) = O⊥(∞) = {1}.
D⊥(−∞) = O(0) = D⊥(∞) = {0}.
11
![Page 12: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
©About < D(a),O(a) >< D(−a),O(−a) > .
< D(a),O(a) >< D(−a),O(−a) >def .= < D(a)D(−a),O(a)D(−a)+D(a)O(−a)+O(a)O(−a) >
O(a) = D(0)−D(a) , O(−a) = D(0)−D(−a).
In this case,
O(a)D(−a) = (D(0)−D(a))D(−a) = D(−a)−D(0) = 0
D(a)O(−a) = D(a)(D(0)−D(−a)) = D(a)−D(0) = 0
O(a)O(−a) = (D(0)−D(a))(D(0)−D(−a)) = D(0)−D(a)−D(−a)+D(0)
= 2D(0)−D(a)−D(−a) = 0
Therefore
O(a)D(−a) +D(a)O(−a) +O(a)O(−a) = 0.
Hence
< D(a),O(a) >< D(−a),O(−a) >=< D(0), 0 >=< I, 0 >= 0.
In this condition, we are better off considering on L1-spaces because
of O(a) is pure null operation for all a.
12
![Page 13: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
©About Y(−a),N (−a) for Laplace transforms.
This condition is basic integral operations for Laplace transforms. eas
term traet as norm for Y (a) operations. The matrix operator D(a) is iso-
morphic with integral operator Y (a). Similarly, there unitary operations
D(a) and Y(a) are isomorphic, respectivily.
Y (a) = easY(a) , N(a) = easN (a)
as a whole,
Y (a) + N(a) = W (a) = easW(a)
Y(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)dt , N (a)f(t) =
∫ a
0f(t)dt
Y(−a)f(t) =∫ ∞
−af(t)dt =
∫ ∞
0f(t)dt +
∫ 0
−af(t)dt
Y(−a)f(t) = W(−a)f(t)−∫ −a
0f(t)dt = W(−a)f(t)−N (−a)f(t)
Y(−a)f(t) +N (−a)f(t) = W(−a)f(t)
So Y(−a) +N (−a) = W(−a).
Hence
W(a) = Y(a) +N (a) = Y(−a) +N (−a) = W(−a) = Identity.
N.B. Y(0) is also identity.
Moreover, now Y(a) operation is defined on L1-spaces. So we have
following relations.
Y(a) = Y(−a) , N (a) = N (−a) , respectively.
In this time, we should be atention Y(0) operation. This operation is
isomorphic with D(0) operation. In fact, D(0) is generated as 00. This
condition is no define. Therefore Y(0) should be also defined on ”no
13
![Page 14: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
define”. Moreover, since Y(a) is isomorphic with D(a) then we have
following formura.
(semi− group) Y(−a) = Y−1(a) (group).
Similarly, we have following in integral operations.
Y(a) = Y(−a) = Y−1(a) = I(a)
Y2(a) = I(a).
Moreover, the involution for Y(a) operation has following.
Y∗(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)dt =
∫ ∞
af(t)dt = Y(a)f(t)
when f(t) is real functional.
So we have
Y(a) = Y∗(a) = Y2(a) = I(a)
Similarly,
N (a) = N ∗(a) = N 2(a) = {0}On the other hand, the projection operator is represrnted following.
P = P ∗ = P 2 = {1}, {0} in L1 − spaces.
Moreover, since the property of group ring, we have following conditions
Y(a) = Y(na) = Yn(a) invariant− form.
©About (Y(a),N (a))(Y(−a),N (−a)).
Now, I want to define following
(Y(a),N (a))(Y(−a),N (−a))def .=
(Y(a)Y(−a),N (a)Y(−a) + Y(a)N (−a) +N (a)N (−a)).
N (a) = Y(0)− Y(a) , N (−a) = Y(0)− Y(−a)
14
![Page 15: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
N (a)Y(−a) = (Y(0)− Y(a))Y(−a) = Y(−a)− Y(0)
Y(a)N (−a) = Y(a)(Y(0)− Y(−a)) = Y(a)− Y(0)
and
N (a)N (−a) = (Y(0)−Y(a))(Y(0)−Y(−a)) = Y(0)−Y(a)−Y(−a)+Y(0)
= 2Y(0)− Y(a)− Y(−a).
Therefore
N (a)Y(−a) + Y(a)N (−a) +N (a)N (−a) = 0.
Hence
(Y(a),N (a))(Y(−a),N (−a)) = (Y(0), 0) = (1, 0) algebraic.
1 is identity as group condition and 0 is satisfied subgroup in this
group. Furthermore, this argument able to extend to ring condition from
group structures.
(1, 0)
↙ ↘ring ideal
Now, Y(a) operation define on L1-spaces. p.26. Since, the property of
O(a) operation in L1-spaces then N (a) is also better off considering as
pure null conditions. So I define N (a)f(t) as following.
N (a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)dt = 0 =
∫ 0
−af(t)dt = N (−a)f(t)
N.B f(t) = 0 for (−a ≤ t ≤ a).
This projection operator is able to represent following.
P = P ∗ = P 2 = {1, 0} in L2 − spaces.
15
![Page 16: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
If it’s defined on L2-spaces then the operator algebra for Y(a) operation
is presented following.
Y(a) +N (a) = W(a) = I(a) (additive)
< Y(a),N (a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
Similarly
Y(−a) +N (−a) = W(−a) = I(−a) (additive)
< Y(−a),N (−a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
©About < Y(a),N (a) >< Y(−a),N (−a) > .
Now, I want to define following
< Y(a),N (a) >< Y(−a),N (−a) >def .=
< Y(a)Y(−a),N (a)Y(−a) + Y(a)N (−a) +N (a)N (−a) > .
N (a) = Y(0)− Y(a) , N (−a) = Y(0)− Y(−a)
N (a)Y(−a) = (Y(0)− Y(a))Y(−a) = Y(−a)− Y(0)
Y(a)N (−a) = Y(a)(Y(0)− Y(−a)) = Y(a)− Y(0)
and
N (a)N (−a) = (Y(0)−Y(a))(Y(0)−Y(−a)) = Y(0)−Y(a)−Y(−a)+Y(0)
= 2Y(0)− Y(a)− Y(−a).
Therefore
N (a)Y(−a) + Y(a)N (−a) +N (a)N (−a) = 0.
Hence
< Y(a),N (a) >< Y(−a),N (−a) >=< Y(0), 0 >=< 1, 0 > algebraic.
Similarly
< Y (a), N(a) >< Y (−a), N(−a) >=< Y (a)Y (−a), Y (a)N(−a)+Y (−a)N(a)+N(a)N(−a) >
16
![Page 17: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
=< Y (0), 0 >=< 1, 0 >= 0 algebraic.
Reference
< D(a), O(a) >< D(−a), O(−a) >=< D(a)D(−a), D(a)O(−a)+O(a)D(−a)+O(a)O(−a) >
=< D(0), 0 >=< I(0), 0 >= 0 for matrix.
17
![Page 18: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
©About F(−a),G(−a) for matrix operator.
F (a) operation is builded as Pascal’s triangle. This form should con-
sider the ideal structures with D(a) operations. Furthermore these ma-
trices will be generated from power condition for Laplace transforms. In
this time, I want to explain the L2-space, only.
Let the following
F (a) = easF(a) = eas
a0
a a0
a2 2a a0
.... . .
an · · · a0
(4)
G(a) = easG(a) = −eas
0
a 0
a2 2a 0...
. . .
an · · · 0
(5)
and
H(a) = easH(a) = eas
a0
a0
a0
. . .
a0
. (6)
As a whole, we have
F (a) + G(a) = H(a) = D(a) + O(a).
F(a) + G(a) = H(a) = D(a) +O(a).
Similarly, this operation has following property.
F(−a) = F−1(a)
18
![Page 19: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
In this time, the F (a) operation is same with D(a) operation. Only,
F (a) operation has ideal structure.
On the other hand,
H(a) = F(a) + G(a) = F(−a) + G(−a) = H(−a) = Identity
N.B. F(0)def .= Identity.
In this case, we have following conditions
F(a) 6= F(−a) , G(a) 6= G(−a) if a 6= 0.
Clearly,
L2 − spaces F(a)homo−→ D(a) L1 − spaces.
If F(a) operation is defined on Hilbert space then we have following
conditions.
G⊥(−∞) = F(0) = G⊥(∞) = {1}F⊥(−∞) = G(0) = F⊥(∞) = {0}
Fundamental structure for projectin operator is following.
Q⊥(−∞) = P (0) = Q⊥(∞) = {1}
P⊥(−∞) = Q(0) = P⊥(∞) = {0}
The normed condition for F(a) and G(a) operations are following.
‖F(a)‖ = ‖F(−a)‖ = ‖F−1(a)‖ = ‖F∗(a)‖ = ‖F2(a)‖ = {1, 0}
Similarly
‖G(a)‖ = ‖G(−a)‖ = ‖G−1(a)‖ = ‖G∗(a)‖ = ‖G2(a)‖ = {0, 1}
On the other hand, the projection operator for normed condition is
following.
‖P (a)‖ = ‖P ∗(a)‖ = ‖P 2(a)‖ = {1, 0}
©About < F(a),G(a) >< F(−a),G(−a) > .
19
![Page 20: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
< F(a),G(a) >< F(−a),G(−a) >def=< F(a)F(−a),G(a)F(−a) + F(a)G(−a) + G(a)G(−a) >
G(a) = F(0)−F(a) , G(−a) = F(0)−F(−a).
G(a)F(−a) = (F(0)−F(a))F(−a) = F(−a)−F(0)
F(a)G(−a) = F(a)(F(0)−F(−a)) = F(a)−F(0)
G(a)G(−a) = (F(0)−F(a))(F(0)−F(−a)) = F(0)−F(a)−F(−a)+F(0)
= 2F(0)−F(a)−F(−a)
Therefore
G(a)F(−a) + F(a)G(−a) + G(a)G(−a) = 0.
Hence
< F(a),G(a) >< F(−a),G(−a) >=< F(0), 0 >=< I, 0 >= 0.
I is identity as ring condition and 0 is satisfied ideeal structures.
< I, 0 >
↙ ↘ring ideal
In this time, the operator algebra for F(a) operation is presented
following.
F(a) + G(a) = H(0) = I(a) (additive)
< F(a),G(a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
20
![Page 21: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
©About T (−a),S(−a) for Laplace transforms.
T (a) operation is my Laplace transforms. It’s defined as following
T (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−(t−a)sdt , S(a)f(t) =
∫ a
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
and
R(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
As a whole,
T (a) + S(a) = R(a).
In this time, the term of kernel do include with a term. It depends
with greatest lower bounded of integral operation. Similarly, I treated as
L2-spaces, only. This operation is isomorphic to F (a) operation. (matrix
operator)
Similarly
T (a) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−stdt , S(a) =
∫ a
0f(t)e−stdt
So we have
T (−a)f(t) =∫ ∞
−af(t)e−stdt =
∫ ∞
0f(t)e−stdt +
∫ 0
−af(t)e−stdt
T (−a)f(t) = R(−a)f(t)−∫ −a
0f(t)dt = T (0)f(t)− S(−a)f(t)
T (−a)f(t) + S(−a)f(t) = R(−a)f(t)
So T (−a) + S(−a) = R(−a).
Hence
R(a) = T (a) + S(a) = T (−a) + S(−a) = R(−a).
N.B. R(a) = T (0) = R(−a) = identity.
21
![Page 22: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
© Relation of T (a) and S(a)
Now, I want to extend finite conditions to infinite conditions. Finite
conditions couud deal with field theory, however infinite space is two kind
of situations 1 and 0. First and second situations 1,0 are maked S(∞)
and T (∞) , respectively. If we deal with T (∞) then we obtaine S(∞) =
T (0) = {1}. It commutes spectral dicomposition. Now, T (∞) = {0}on Hilbert spaces. Of caurse ‖T (0)‖ = 1. Since ideal G(a) = {0} , then
S(a) = {0} iff a is finite. If a is infinite then ‖S(∞)‖ = ‖T (0)‖ = 1 This
operations are bounded on Hilbert spaces, respectively. In this time, the
behaviour of projection operator P (a), Q(a) are same with T (a),S(a)
operations, respectively.
P (a) + Q(a) = {1} for all ′′a′′.
T (a) + S(a) = R(a) = T (0)
The relations for T (a) and S(a) operations in Hilbert spaces are following.
S⊥(−∞) = T (0) = S⊥(∞) = {1}
T ⊥(−∞) = S(0) = T ⊥(∞) = {0}Fundamentally, the structure for projectin operator is following.
Q⊥(−∞) = P (0) = Q⊥(∞) = {1}
P⊥(−∞) = Q(0) = P⊥(∞) = {0}
The normed condition for T (a) and S(a) operations are following.
‖T (a)‖ = ‖T (−a)‖ = ‖T −1(a)‖ = ‖T ∗(a)‖ = ‖T 2(a)‖ = {1, 0}
Similarly
‖S(a)‖ = ‖S(−a)‖ = ‖S−1(a)‖ = ‖S∗(a)‖ = ‖S2(a)‖ = {0, 1}
On the other hand, the projection operator for normed condition is
following.
‖P (a)‖ = ‖P ∗(a)‖ = ‖P 2(a)‖ = {1, 0}
22
![Page 23: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
©About < T (a),S(a) >< T (−a),S(−a) > .
Now, I want to define following
< T (a),S(a) >< T (−a),S(−a) >def .=
< T (a)T (−a),S(a)T (−a) + T (a)S(−a) + S(a)S(−a) > .
S(a) = T (0)− T (a) , S(−a) = T (0)− T (−a)
S(a)T (−a) = (T (0)− T (a))T (−a) = T (−a)− T (0)
T (a)S(−a) = T (a)(T (0)− T (−a)) = T (a)− T (0)
and
S(a)S(−a) = (T (0)−T (a))(T (0)−T (−a)) = T (0)−T (a)−T (−a)+T (0)
= 2T (0)− T (a)− T (−a).
Therefore
S(a)T (−a) + T (a)S(−a) + S(a)S(−a) = 0.
Hence
< T (a),S(a) >< T (−a),S(−a) >=< T (0), 0 >=< 1, 0 >= 0 algebraic.
1 is identity as ring condition and 0 is satisfied ideeal structures.
< 1, 0 >
↙ ↘ring ideal
See the paper “The projrction operator for Laplace transforms”
p.75,76 L2-spaces.
23
![Page 24: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
In this time, the operator algebra for T (a) operation is presented fol-
lowing.
T (a) + S(a) = R(a) = I(a) (additive)
< T (a),S(a) >= 0 (Multiplicative)
Reference
< D(a), O(a) >< D(−a), O(−a) >=< D(a)D(−a), D(a)O(−a)+O(a)D(−a)+O(a)O(−a) >
=< D(0), 0 >=< I(0), 0 >= 0 for matrix.
< Y (a), N(a) >< Y (−a), N(−a) >=< Y (a)Y (−a), Y (a)N(−a)+N(a)Y (−a)+N(a)N(−a) >
=< I(0), 0 >= 0 for matrix.
< F (a), G(a) >< F (−a), G(−a) >=< F (a)F (−a), F (a)G(−a)+F (−a)G(a)+G(a)G(−a) >
=< I(0), 0 >= 0 for matrix.
24
![Page 25: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Some results
◦ T (a) operation has following relation
T (−a) = T−1(a)
◦ T (a) operation has anti-symmetrical relation for axis of ordinate.
◦ The unitary operation for T (a) is following.
T (a) = T (−a) = T −1(a)
◦ Projection operator in L1-spaces are able to represent two forms. {1}, {0}
◦ Symmetrical concept for T (a) operation generats the elements that it
is separated by ring and ideal.
◦ T (a) and S(a) operations are acrossing on infinite conditions in L2-
spaces.
◦ The projection forms on L2-space is able to represent as {1, 0}.
◦ The relations for T (a) and S(a) operations in Hilbert spaces are follow-
ing.
S⊥(−∞) = T (0) = S⊥(∞) = {1}T ⊥(−∞) = S(0) = T ⊥(∞) = {0}
The projection forms are following.
Q⊥(−∞) = P (0) = Q⊥(∞) = {1}
P⊥(−∞) = Q(0) = P⊥(∞) = {0}
◦ T (a) and F (a) operations will be necessary the idea of norm.
◦ The projection form for T (a) operation is following.
‖T (a)‖ = ‖T ∗(a)‖ = ‖T 2(a)‖ = {1, 0}
25
![Page 26: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Chapter 5
In this chapter, I want to explain the negative conditions for Laplace
transforms. Since the property of projection operator, we have P =
P ∗ = P 2. So I add the *-algebras for Laplace transforms. Fundamental
concepts are L1 − space D(a)iso←→ Y (a)
homo←− F (a)iso←→ T (a) L2 − space
and it’s all satisfied the property of semi-groups.
D(a) and O(a) are defined following. It is the best simple operations.
D(a) = easD(a) = eas
a0
a0
a0
. . .
a0
(7)
O(a) = easO(a) = eas
1− a0
1− a0
1− a0
. . .
1− a0
(8)
and
H(a) = D(a) + O(a) = easD(0) = eas
1
1
1. . .
1
(9)
26
![Page 27: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Similarly
D∗(a) = easD∗(a) = eas
a0
a0
a0
. . .
a0
(10)
O∗(a) = easO∗(a) = eas
1− a0
1− a0
1− a0
. . .
1− a0
(11)
and
H∗(a) = D∗(a) + O∗(a) = easD∗(0) = eas
1
1
1. . .
1
(12)
N.B. Since this D(a) operation is satisfied completed space then we
should define following.
lima→±∞ a0 def .
= 0.
On the other hand, I define
00 def .= 1.
27
![Page 28: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (eigenvalues)
Moreover, I want to explain from eigenvalues.
D(a) + O(a) = eas · D(0) = H(a)
↖ extended ↗D(a) = easD(a)
D(0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘D(a) + O(a) = H(a) = D(0)
D(−a) + O(−a) = H(−a) = D(0)
↘ contracted ↙D(−a) = e−asD(−a)
D(−a) + O(−a) = e−as · D(0) = H(−a)
or
D(a)−1 + O(−a) = e−as · D(0) = H(a)−1
(13)
N.B. D(−∞) = 0 (annihilator).
Now,D(a) operation is the simplest form in these operator alge-
bras. D(a) is isomorphic to Y (a) operation. Since, Y(a) is Riemann or
Lebesgue integral opeerations.
D(a) is matrix operation that it’s generated only diagonal elements.
This condition is also extended by |eas|. O(a) is pure null operation. So
D(a) is influenced the right terms, directly. D(0) is identity. And this
D(0) is able to decompose D(a) and O(a). In fact, D(a) is able to define
as identity.
If a is negative condition then D(a) is able to be contraction opera-
tor. In this time, it’s represented by D(−a) (a is positive). The D(−a)
is same with D(a)−1. So the contraction operators are represenred two
forms. In this case, I could also obtain the following form.
D(−a) = D(a)−1.
Since O(a) is pure null operation then it’s satisfied the ideal condition.
28
![Page 29: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (Duality of eigenspaces)
D∗(a) + O∗(a) = eas · D∗(0) = H∗(a)
↖ extended ↗D∗(a) = easD∗(a)
D∗(0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘D∗(a) + O∗(a) = H∗(a) = D∗(0)
D∗(−a) + O∗(−a) = H∗(−a) = D∗(0)
↘ contracted ↙D∗(−a) = e−asD∗(−a)
D∗(−a) + O∗(−a) = e−as · D∗(0) = H∗(−a)
or
D∗(a)−1 + O∗(−a) = e−as · D∗(0) = H∗(a)−1
(14)
Essentially D∗(a) is same with D(a). D∗(a) is extended from unitary
operation by |eas|. D∗(0) is also identity. If D(a) is defined in real space
then we have D(a) = D∗(a).
D∗(0) is able to decomposeD∗(a) andO∗(a), respectively. The element
ofD(a) was difined as 00. So we haveD∗(a) = D(a) = identity. Therefore
D∗(a) has always Hermitian form.
D∗(a) = D(a) =
(00
00
)⇒
(1
1
)(15)
If a is negativ condition then D∗(a) is also contracted and have inverse
condition by |e−as| , simultaneously.
Precisely,
D∗(−a) = e−asD(−a) = e−as
((−a)0
(−a)0
)(16)
= e−asI∗(−a) = e−asI∗(a)−1 = D∗(a)−1.
N.B. I∗(−a) = I∗(a)−1
Therefore
D∗(−a) = D∗(a)−1.
29
![Page 30: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
©Basic operator algebras. (eigenvalues)
D(a) + O(a) = easD(0) = H(a)
D(a) = easD(a)
D(0) = I
D(a) +O(a) = H(a) = I(a)
D(−a) + O(−a) = e−asD(0) = H(−a)
or
D(a)−1 + O(−a) = e−asD(0) = H(a)−1
(17)
O(a) is also ideal. (simple)
©Basic operator algebras. (Dual eigenvalues)
D∗(a) + O∗(a) = easD∗(0) = H∗(a)
D∗(a) = easD∗(a)
D∗(0) = I
D∗(a) +O∗(a) = H∗(a) = I(a)
D∗(−a) + O∗(−a) = e−asD∗(0) = H∗(−a)
or
D∗(a)−1 + O∗(−a) = e−asD∗(0) = H∗(a)−1
(18)
O∗(a) is also ideal. (simple)
30
![Page 31: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
and normed condition is following.
©Basic normed operator algebras. (eigenspaces)
‖D(a) + O(a)‖ = ‖easD(0)‖ = ‖H(a)‖ = |eas|
‖D(a)‖ = |eas|‖D(a)‖
‖D(0)‖ = 1
‖D(a) +O(a)‖ = ‖D(0)‖ = 1
‖D(−a) + O(−a)‖ = ‖e−asD(0)‖ = ‖H(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖D(a)−1 + O(−a)‖ = ‖e−asD(0)‖ = ‖H(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(19)
N.B. ‖T (a)‖ = ‖F (a)‖ = ‖D(a)‖ = |eas|
©Basic normed operator algebras. (Dual eigenvalues)
‖D∗(a) + O∗(a)‖ = ‖easD∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖D∗(a)‖ = |eas|‖D∗(a)‖
‖D∗(0)‖ = 1
‖D∗(a) +D∗(a)‖ = ‖D∗(0)‖ = 1
‖D∗(−a) + O∗(−a)‖ = ‖e−asD∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖D∗(a)−1 + O∗(−a)‖ = ‖e−asD∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(20)
N.B.‖T ∗(a)‖ = ‖F ∗(a)‖ = ‖D∗(a)‖ = |eas|. Of course ‖D(a)‖ = ‖D∗(a)‖.
31
![Page 32: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Similarly
T (a)f(t) = Y (a)f(t)e−st
Therefore
Y (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)easdt
N(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)easdt
Y(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)dt
N (a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)dt
and
W (a)f(t) = Y (a)f(t) + N(a)f(t) = eas · Y (0)f(t)
∗-algebra is following.
Y ∗(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)easdt
N∗(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)easdt
Y∗(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)dt
N ∗(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)dt
and
W ∗(a)f(t) = Y ∗(a)f(t) + N∗(a)f(t) = eas · Y ∗(0)f(t)
N.B f(t) is real functional.
32
![Page 33: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras.
Y (a) + N(a) = eas · Y (0) = W (a)
↖ extended ↗Y (a) = easY(a)
Y (0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘Y(a) + N (a) = W(a) = Y (0)
Y(−a) + N (−a) = W(−a) = Y (0)
↘ contracted ↙Y (−a) = e−asY(−a)
Y (−a) + N(−a) = e−as · Y (0) = W (−a)
or
Y (a)−1 + N(−a) = e−as · Y (0) = W (a)−1
(21)
N.B. Y (−∞) = 0 (annihilator).
In this case, Y (a) is kind of the simplest form for integral operations.
‖Y (a)‖ = |eas| , ‖N(a)‖ = 0 and ‖W (a)‖ = |eas|. So there is extended
from unitary conditions. The unitary conditions are generated iff a = 0.
Therefore we could represent Y (0) = Y(0) and it’s unitary operators.
Moreover the unitary operation Y(0) is decomposed by Y(a) and N (a),
respectivrly. In this time, Y(a) is the best simple form for the integral
operation. And it’s following form.
Y(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)dt
iso↔ D(a) = I(a).
Similarly, N (a) is given as following.
N (a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)dt
iso↔ O(a) = 0(a).
Now, Y (−a) is contracted by |e−as|. So Y (−a) is contraction operator.
In this time, it’s generated Y (−a) = Y (a)−1. Therefore contraction form
has two types. However the ideal N(−a) have same conditon.
33
![Page 34: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (Duality)
Y ∗(a) + N∗(a) = eas · Y ∗(0) = W ∗(a)
↖ extended ↗Y ∗(a) = easY∗(a)
Y ∗(0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘Y∗(a) + N ∗(a) = W∗(a) = Y ∗(0)
Y∗(−a) + N ∗(−a) = W∗(−a) = Y ∗(0)
↘ contracted ↙Y ∗(−a) = e−asY∗(−a)
Y ∗(−a) + N∗(−a) = e−as · Y ∗(0) = W ∗(−a)
or
Y ∗(a)−1 + N∗(−a) = e−as · Y ∗(0) = W ∗(a)−1
(22)
Essentially, Y ∗(a) is samely with Y (a) operation. Y ∗(a) is conjugate
operator of Y (a) operation. So it’s satisfied the ring condition. If a = 0
then Y (0) = Y ∗(0). In this case, this form is satisfied Hermitian form.
Y ∗(0) is also existed on ring boundary. Of caurse, it’s unitary operator.
In general, if Y (a) is existed in real space then Y (a) is satisfied Her-
mitian form. Therefore Y (a) = Y ∗(a) and Y(a) = Y∗(a) in real spaces
(see p.118,119, Chapter 5, reprinted, paper-1).
In this case, the contraction operator Y ∗(−a) is same as Y ∗(a)−1.
Therefore inverse for Y ∗(a) is represented as negative condition for Y ∗(a).
If it’s unitery condition for Y ∗(a) (Y∗(a)) then it’s same with translated
operator.
Finally, N∗(a) is kind of ideal. This ideal structure is isomorphic with
kernel for semi-group. Therefore, in general, the ideal N∗(a) is not able
to be semi-groups. So I obtain
N∗(a)−1 6= N∗(−a).
Therefore the ideal structure is not able to change to N∗(a)−1 in this
inverse formation.
34
![Page 35: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
©Basic operator algebras.
Y (a) + N(a) = easY (0) = W (a)
Y (a) = easY(a)
Y (0) is unitary
Y(a) +N (a) = W(a) = Y (0)
Y (−a) + N(−a) = e−asY (0) = W (−a)
or
Y (a)−1 + N(−a) = e−asY (0) = W (a)−1
(23)
©Basic operator algebras. (Duality)
Y ∗(a) + N∗(a) = easY ∗(0) = W ∗(a)
Y ∗(a) = easY∗(a)
Y ∗(0) is unitary.
Y∗(a) +N ∗(a) = W∗(a) = Y ∗(0)
Y ∗(−a) + N∗(−a) = e−asY ∗(0) = W ∗(−a)
or
Y ∗(a)−1 + N∗(−a) = e−asY ∗(0) = W ∗(a)−1
(24)
Since F (0) = I and F (a)iso←→ Y (a) then I have Y (0) = I. It is clear
that Y (0) is able to represent “1”.
35
![Page 36: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
and normed condition is following
©Basic normed operator algebras.
‖Y (a) + N(a)‖ = |eas|‖Y (0)‖ = ‖W (a)‖ = |eas|
‖Y (a)‖ = |eas|‖Y(a)‖ = ‖eas‖
‖Y (0)‖ = 1
‖Y(a) +N (a)‖ = ‖Y (0)‖ = 1
‖Y (−a) + N(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖Y (0)‖ = ‖W (−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖Y (a)−1 + N(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖Y (0)‖ = ‖W (a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(25)
N.B. ‖Y(a)‖ = 1 for all “a”.
©Basic normed operator algebras.
‖Y ∗(a) + N∗(a)‖ = |eas|‖Y ∗(0)‖ = ‖W ∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖Y ∗(a)‖ = |eas|‖Y∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖Y ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖Y∗(a) +N ∗(a)‖ = ‖Y ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖Y ∗(−a) + N∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖Y ∗(0)‖ = ‖W ∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖Y ∗(a)−1 + N∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖Y ∗(0)‖ = ‖W ∗(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(26)
N.B. ‖Y∗(a)‖ = 1 for all “a”.
In this case, |eas| = |eas|. Therefore, ‖Y (a)‖ = ‖Y ∗(a)‖.
36
![Page 37: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
©Definition of F (a) operations
F (a) = easF(a) = eas
a0
a a0
a2 2a a0
......
. . .
annC1a
n−1nCka
n−k a0
(27)
G(a) = easG(a) = −eas
0
a 0
a2 2a 0
......
. . .
annC1a
n−1nCka
n−k 0
(28)
F ∗(a) = easF∗(a) = eas
a0 a a2 · · · an
a0 2a · · · ...
a0 · · · nCkan−k
. . ....
a0
(29)
G∗(a) = easG∗(a) = −eas
0 a a2 · · · an
0 2a · · · ...
0 · · · nCkan−k
. . ....
0
(30)
37
![Page 38: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (Pascal′s triangle)
F (a) + G(a) = eas · F (0) = H(a)
↖ extended ↗F (a) = easF(a)
F (0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘F(a) + G(a) = H(a) = F (0)
F(−a) + G(−a) = H(−a) = F (0)
↘ contracted ↙F (−a) = e−asF(−a)
F (−a) + G(−a) = e−as · F (0) = H(−a)
or
F (a)−1 + G(−a) = e−as · F (0) = H(a)−1
(31)
N.B. F (−∞) = 0 (annihilator).
Now, F (a) and H(a) are able to extend from unitary operation. And
F (a) operator is isomorphic with T (a) operation. G(a) is kind of ideal.
F (0) is identity. Therefore it’s satisfied unitary operation. Precisely, the
diagonal on there operations F (0) and H(0) are defined as 00 for the
elements. Since, 00 = e0s, there operations F (0) and H(0) are difined as
F (0) =
(00
00
)= H(0). (32)
Moreover this F (0) is decomposed F(a) and G(a) operations. F(a) is
satisfied the ring condition and G(a) is kind of ideal.
If a is negative condition then the operarions are generated the con-
traction operators by e−as. So, in this time, F (−a) and H(−a) are rep-
resented two forms by F (−a) = F (a)−1, H(−a) = H(a)−1 ,respectively.
Since, in general, G(−a) 6= G(a)−1 then the ideal G(−a) is common
for two forms. In this case, I could obtain
H(−a) = H(a)−1.
38
![Page 39: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (Duality of Pascal′s triangle)
F ∗(a) + G∗(a) = eas · F ∗(0) = H∗(a)
↖ extended ↗F ∗(a) = easF∗(a)
F ∗(0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘F∗(a) + G∗(a) = H∗(a) = F ∗(0)
F∗(−a) + G∗(−a) = H∗(−a) = F ∗(0)
↘ contracted ↙F ∗(−a) = e−asF∗(−a)
F ∗(−a) + G∗(−a) = e−as · F ∗(0) = H∗(−a)
or
F ∗(a)−1 + G∗(−a) = e−as · F ∗(0) = H∗(a)−1
(33)
Essentially, the structure F ∗(a) is same with F (a) operation. Now,
F ∗(a) and H∗(a) are able to extend from unitary operation. So, in this
case, we have Hermitian form as F (0) = F ∗(0). Now, F ∗(a) operator is
isomorphic with T ∗(a) operation. G∗(a) is kind of ideal. F ∗(0) is also
identity. Precisely, the diagonal on there operations F ∗(0) and H∗(0) are
defined as 00 for the elements. Therefore 00 = e0s. So there operations
F ∗(0) and H∗(0) are difined as
F ∗(0) = F (0) =
(00
00
)= H(0) = H∗(0) (34)
Moreover this F ∗(0) is decomposed F∗(a) and G∗(a) operations. F∗(a)
is satisfied the ring condition and G∗(a) is kind of ideal.
If a is negative condition then the operarions are generated the con-
traction operators by e−as. So, in this time, F ∗(−a) and H∗(−a) are
represented two forms by F ∗(−a) = F ∗(a)−1, H∗(−a) = H∗(a)−1 ,respec-
tively. Since, in general, G∗(−a) 6= G∗(a)−1 then the ideal G∗(−a) is
common for two forms. In this case, I could obtain
H∗(−a) = H∗(a)−1.
39
![Page 40: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Now,since Pascal’s matrix, I could have following.
©Basic operator algebras. (Pascal′s triangle)
F (a) + G(a) = easF (0) = H(a)
F (a) = easF(a)
F (0) = I
F(a) + G(a) = F (0) = I
F (−a) + G(−a) = e−asF (0) = H(−a)
or
F (a)−1 + G(−a) = e−asF (0) = H(a)−1
(35)
S(a) and G(a) are ideals.
©Basic operator algebras. (Dual Pascal′s triangle)
F ∗(a) + G∗(a) = easF ∗(0) = H∗(a)
F ∗(a) = easF∗(a)
F ∗(0) = I
F∗(a) + G∗(a) = F ∗(0) = I
F ∗(−a) + G∗(−a) = e−asF ∗(0) = H∗(−a)
or
F ∗(a)−1 + G∗(−a) = e−asF ∗(0) = H∗(a)−1
(36)
S∗(a) and G∗(a) are ideals.
40
![Page 41: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
and normed condition is following.
©Basic normed operator algebras. (Pascal′s triangle)
‖F (a) + G(a)‖ = ‖easF (0)‖ = ‖H(a)‖ = |eas|
‖F (a)‖ = |eas|‖F(a)‖
‖F (0)‖ = 1
‖F(a) + G(a)‖ = ‖F (0)‖ = 1
‖F (−a) + G(−a)‖ = ‖e−asF (0)‖ = ‖H(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖F (a)−1 + G(−a)‖ = ‖e−asF (0)‖ = ‖H(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(37)
N.B. ‖T (a)‖ = ‖F (a)‖ = |eas|
©Basic normed operator algebras. (Dual Pascal′s triangle)
‖F ∗(a) + G∗(a)‖ = ‖easF ∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖F ∗(a)‖ = |easF∗(a)‖
‖F ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖F∗(a) + G∗(a)‖ = ‖F ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖F ∗(−a) + G∗(−a)‖ = ‖e−asF ∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖F ∗(a)−1 + G∗(−a)‖ = ‖e−asF ∗(0)‖ = ‖H∗(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(38)
N.B.‖T ∗(a)‖ = ‖F ∗(a)‖ = |eas|. Of course ‖F (a)‖ = ‖F ∗(a)‖.
41
![Page 42: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
In this place , I reserch the operator T (a) from the structures of F (a).
Background is following.
Definitions
T (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−(t−a)sdt
S(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
T (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−stdt
S(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)e−stdt
and
R(a)f(t) = T (a)f(t) + S(a)f(t) = eas · T (0)f(t)
∗-algebra is following.
T ∗(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−(t−a)sdt
S∗(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
T ∗(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−stdt
S∗(a)f(t) =∫ a
0f(t)e−stdt
and
R∗(a)f(t) = T ∗(a)f(t) + S∗(a)f(t) = eas · T ∗(0)f(t)
42
![Page 43: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Now, let extend to the two-sided form for ′′a′′. Since this conditions
we have following. N.B. (−∞ ≤ t ≤ ∞). In this time, ‖T (a)‖ is extended
to |eas| by Hahn-Banach theorem. Since P (a)iso↔ T (a)
iso↔ T (a), then I
could extend to Banach spaces. I want to generate that T (∞) = 0 in
Banach spaces. In this space, S(∞) is infinite, however, as a whole, it’s
satisfied bounded conditions. If s is pure complex then we have Fourier
transforms and it’s converged to 1. On the contrary, S(−∞) is converged
to zero and T (a) operation is generated as contraction operator iff a ≤ 0.
In this case, we have (eas)−1 = e(−a)s. Therefore
T (a)−1 = T (−a) if a ≥ 0.
If a ≥ 0 then we should understand for positive operations. Therefore
it’s generated normed conditions larger than unitary condition. So we
could consider the C∗-algebras forms.
43
![Page 44: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras.
T (a) + S(a) = eas · T (0) = R(a)
↖ extended ↗T (a) = easT (a)
T (0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘T (a) + S(a) = R(a) = T (0)
T (−a) + S(−a) = R(−a) = T (0)
↘ contracted ↙T (−a) = e−asT (−a)
T (−a) + S(−a) = e−as · T (0) = R(−a)
or
T (a)−1 + S(−a) = e−as · T (0) = R(a)−1
(39)
N.B. T (−∞) = 0 (annihilator).
This structure is represented as T (a) of before figure. R(a) is not
always unitary. So T (a), R(a) is able to extend from unitary operations.
Since ‖T (a)‖ = |eas| then we have ‖T (0)‖ = 1. Therefore T (0) is able
to be unitary operator. In this case, if a = 0 then we have 00 = e0s.
In general, 00 is not defined. So I am not clear the structure for T (0)
operation in this view point.
In this case, T (0) is able to decompose T (a) and S(a) conditions.
T (a) is generated as ring and S(a) is situated as ideal structures. N.B.
If f(t) = 0 (0 ≤ t ≤ a) then we have S(a)f(t) = 0, clearly.
This T (a) is able to contract by the factor of e−as. So R(−a) and
R(a)−1 are generated as contraction operators. Therefore we can obtain
T (−a) = T (a)−1.
Since this things, There contraction operators T (a), R(a) are repre-
sented two forms.
Now, S(−a) has also ideal structure. In general, S(−a) 6= S(a)−1. So
ideal structure is not able to be semi-groups.
44
![Page 45: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
©Figure of basic operator algebras. (Duality)
T ∗(a) + S∗(a) = eas · T ∗(0) = R∗(a)
↖ extended ↗T ∗(a) = easT ∗(a)
T ∗(0) is identity.
↙ decomposition ↘T ∗(a) + S∗(a) = R∗(a) = T ∗(0)
T ∗(−a) + S∗(−a) = R∗(−a) = T ∗(0)
↘ contracted ↙T ∗(−a) = e−asT ∗(−a)
T ∗(−a) + S∗(−a) = e−as · T ∗(0) = R∗(−a)
or
T ∗(a)−1 + S∗(−a) = e−as · T ∗(0) = R∗(a)−1
(40)
Essentially, T ∗(a) is samely with T (a) operation. T ∗(a) is conjugate
operator of T (a) operation. So it’s satisfied the ring condition. If a = 0
then T (0) = T ∗(0). In this case, this form is satisfied Hermitian form.
T ∗(0) is also existed on ring boundary. Of caurse, it’s unitary operator.
In general, if T (a) is existed in real space then T (a) is satisfied Her-
mitian form. Therefore T (a) = T ∗(a) and T (a) = T ∗(a) in real spaces
(see p.88,89, Chapter 5, reprinted, paper-1).
In this case, the contraction operator T ∗(−a) is same as T ∗(a)−1.
Therefore inverse for T ∗(a) is represented as negative condition for T ∗(a).
If it’s unitery condition for T ∗(a) (T ∗(a)) then it’s same with translated
operator.
Finally, S∗(a) is kind of ideal. This ideal structure is isomorphic with
kernel for semi-group. Therefore, in general, the ideal S∗(a) is not able
to be semi-groups. So I obtain
S∗(a)−1 6= S∗(−a).
45
![Page 46: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
©Basic operator algebras.
Now, “Basic oprator algebra” for Laplace transforms are following.
T (a) + S(a) = easT (0) = R(a)
T (a) = easT (a)
T (0) = 1
T (a) + S(a) = T (0) = 1
T (−a) + S(−a) = e−asT (0) = R(−a)
or
T (a)−1 + S(−a) = e−asT (0) = R(a)−1
(41)
©Basic operator algebras. (Duality)
T ∗(a) + S∗(a) = easT ∗(0 = R∗(a)
T ∗(a) = easT ∗(a)
T ∗(0) = 1
T ∗(a) + S∗(a) = T ∗(0) = 1
T ∗(−a) + S∗(−a) = e−asT ∗(0) = R∗(−a)
or
T ∗(a)−1 + S∗(−a) = e−asT ∗(0) = R∗(a)−1
(42)
Since F (0) = I and F (a)iso←→ T (a) then I have T (0) = 1. However it
is not clear that T (0) is able to represent as “1”.
46
![Page 47: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
and normed condition is following
©Basic normed operator algebras.
‖T (a) + S(a)‖ = |eas|‖T (0)‖ = ‖R(a)‖ = |eas|
‖T (a)‖ = |eas|‖T (a)‖ = ‖eas‖
‖T (0)‖ = 1
‖T (a) + S(a)‖ = ‖T (0)‖ = 1
‖T (−a) + S(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖T (0)‖ = ‖R(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖T (a)−1 + S(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖T (0)‖ = ‖R(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(43)
N.B. ‖T (a)‖ = 1 for all “a”.
©Basic normed operator algebras.
‖T ∗(a) + S∗(a)‖ = |eas|‖T ∗(0)‖ = ‖R∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖T ∗(a)‖ = |eas|‖T ∗(a)‖ = |eas|
‖T ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖T ∗(a) + S∗(a)‖ = ‖T ∗(0)‖ = 1
‖T ∗(−a) + S∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖T ∗(0)‖ = ‖R∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|or
‖T ∗(a)−1 + S∗(−a)‖ = |e−as|‖T ∗(0)‖ = ‖R∗(a)−1‖ = |e−as|
(44)
N.B. ‖T ∗(a)‖ = 1 for all “a”.
In this case, |eas| = |eas|. Therefore, ‖T (a)‖ = ‖T ∗(a)‖.
47
![Page 48: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Some results
◦ If a is positive then T (a) is extended from unitary conditions. On the
contrary, if a is negative then T (a) is contracted from it. There conditions
will be treated in C∗-algebras.
◦ The contraction forms from unitary operator is able to represent fol-
lowing.
T (−a) + S(−a) = e−as · T (0) = R(−a)
or
T (a)−1 + S(−a) = e−as · T (0) = R(a)−1
(45)
◦ In general, T (a) and R(a) operations are satisfied ring conditions and
S(a) is ideal.
◦ In the ring conditions, we have following relations.
T (−a) = T (a)−1 , R(−a) = R(a)−1.
◦ T (0) operation is able to decompose T (a) and S(a) operations, respec-
tively.
◦ Essentially, T (0) operation and T (a) operation have same property.
◦ ∗-algebra for Lapace transforms is same with T (a) operation. Especially,
T (0)∗ = T (0) (Hemitian form).
48
![Page 49: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Chapter 6
In this chapter, I want to explain the semi-groups for Laplace trans-
forms. As this application, I assert that it is able to treat the group-rings
for semi-groups.
©Assosiative and commutative of D(a) operations.
(L1-spaces)
It’s the simplest operation for Pascal’s matrix.
D(a)v is defined following
D(a) = easD(a) = eas
a0
a0
. . .
a0
(46)
If it’s treated on L1-spaces then we have following.
Since definition of D(a) operations, we have following.
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a)v] = D(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easO(a)]v = eas[O(a)v] = O(a)[easv]
[easD(a) + easO(a)]v = eas[D(a)v +O(a)v] = [D(a) +O(a)][easv]
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a))v] = D(a)[easv] (1)
For example, let following.
eas D(a) v
49
![Page 50: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
↓ ↓ ↓α x y
Since (1), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Therefore, D(a) operation has a property of seni-groups.
In general, the operation D(a) is able to extend to negative condition.
[e−asD(−a)]v = e−as[D(−a)v] = D(−a)[e−asv]
⇓(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Hence
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a)v] = D(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easO(a)]v = eas[O(a)v] = O(a)[easv]
and
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a)v] = D(a)[easv]
It has a property of all semi− groups for all a.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
If it’s treated on L2-space then we have following.
©Assosiative and commutative of D(a) operations.
(L2-spaces)
50
![Page 51: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a)v] = D(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easO(a)]v = eas[O(a)v] = O(a)[easv]
[easD(a) + easO(a)]v = eas[D(a)v +O(a)v] = [D(a) +O(a)][easv]
[easH(a)]v = eas[H(a)v] = H(a)[easv] (i)
For example, let following.
eas H(a) v
↓ ↓ ↓α x y
Since (i), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
In general, the operation H(a) is able to extend to following condition.
[e−asH(−a)]v = e−as[H(−a)v] = H(−a)[e−asv]
⇓(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Hence
[easD(a)]v = eas[D(a)v] = D(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easO(a)]v = eas[O(a)v] = O(a)[easv]
and
[easH(a)]v = eas[H(a)v] = H(a)[easv]
51
![Page 52: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
It has a property of all semi− groups for all a.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
©Semi− groups for D(a) operation
D(a)v is defined following
D(a) = eas
a0
a0
. . .
a0
(47)
So we have
D(a)D(b) = D(a + b)
D(0) = I
s− lima→0 D(a)v = v
(48)
Therefore
D(a) is generated with semi− groups.
©Semi− groups for O(a) operation
Essentially, O(a) operation is able to be ideal. So this semi-group
is treated iff it’s maximal ideal. If I defined on L2-space then O(∞) is
following.
O(∞) = −
a0 − 1
a0 − 1. . .
a0 − 1
def .= Identity as a → ±∞.(49)
52
![Page 53: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
So we have
O(±∞)O(±∞) = O(±∞)
O(±∞) = I
s− lima→±∞O(a)v = v
(50)
Therefore
O(a) is generated with semi− groups iff a is ±∞.
Moreover we will have following equivalence.
D(a)D(b) = D(a + b) −→ D(a)n = D(na)
↘ ↙
D(0)2 = D(0)
This condition is also semi-groups. Lower form is able to consider as
projection operator. And right is able to generate invariant form.
This condition is able to represent only one by using the group-ring.
D(a)nD(b)m = D(an + bm) = D−n(a)D−m(b)
If D(a) is norm condition , then we have following.
‖D(a)‖‖D(b)‖ = ‖D(a + b)‖ −→ ‖D(a)‖n = ‖D(na)‖
↘ ↙
‖D(0)‖2 = ‖D(0)‖ = 1
53
![Page 54: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
©Assosiative and commutative of Y (a) operations.
(L1-spaces)
Y (a) oparations are defined following.
Y (a)f(t) = easY(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)easdt , N(a)f(t) = easN (a)f(t) =
∫ a
0f(t)easdt
and
W (a)f(t) = Y (a)f(t) + N(a)f(t) = easW(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
0f(t)easdt
So we have following conditions.
[easY(a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)] = Y(a)[easf(t)]
Similarly
[easN (a)]f(t) = eas[N (a)f(t)] = N (a)[easf(t)]
[easY(a)+easN (a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)+N (a)f(t)] = [Y(a)+N (a)][easf(t)]
[easY (0)]f(t) = eas[Y (0)f(t)] = Y (0)[easf(t)] (1).
Now, let following.
eas Y (0) f(t)
↓ ↓ ↓α x y
Since (1), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
54
![Page 55: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Hence
[easY(a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)] = Y(a)[easf(t)]
Similarly
[easN (a)]f(t) = eas[N (a)f(t)] = N (a)[easf(t)]
and
[easY (0)]f(t) = eas[Y (0)f(t)] = Y (0)[easf(t)]
It has property of semi− groups.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
If we consider on L2-space then we have following.
©Assosiative and commutative of Y (a) operations.
(L2-space)
[easY(a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)] = Y(a)[easf(t)]
Similarly
[easN (a)]f(t) = eas[N (a)f(t)] = N (a)[easf(t)]
[easY(a)+easN (a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)+N (a)f(t)] = [Y(a)+N (a)][easf(t)]
[easW(a)]f(t) = eas[W(a)f(t)] = W(a)[easf(t)] (i)
Now, let following.
eas W(a) f(t)
↓ ↓ ↓
55
![Page 56: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
α x y
Since (i), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Hence
[easY(a)]f(t) = eas[Y(a)f(t)] = Y(a)[easf(t)]
Similarly
[easN (a)]f(t) = eas[N (a)f(t)] = N (a)[easf(t)]
and
[easW(a)]f(t) = eas[W(a)f(t)] = W(a)[easf(t)]
It has property of semi− group.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
N.B. Essentially, we have Y (0) = W(a).
©Semi− groups for Y (a) operations
T (a)f(t) is defined following
Y (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)easdt
So we have
Y (a)Y (b) = Y (a + b)
Y (0) = 1
s− lima→0 Y (a)f = f
(51)
Therefore
Y (a) is generated with semi− groups.
56
![Page 57: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
©Semi− group for N (a) operation
Essentially, N (a) operation is able to be ideal. So this semi-group
is treated iff it’s maximal ideal. If I defined on L2-space then N (∞) is
following.
N (∞)f(t) = Y(0)f(t) =∫ ∞
0f(t)dt = Identity.
So we have
N (±∞)N (±∞) = N (±∞)
N (±∞) = I
s− lima→±∞N (a)f = f
(52)
Therefore
N (a) is generated with semi− groups iff a is ±∞.
Moreover we will have following equivalence.
Y (a)Y (b) = Y (a + b) −→ Y (a)n = Y (na)
↘ ↙Y (0)2 = Y (0)
This condition is also semi-groups. Lower form is able to consider as
projection operator. And right is able to generate invariant form.
This condition is able to represent only one by using the group-ring.
Y (a)nY (b)m = Y (an + bm) = Y−n(a)Y−m(b)
If Y (a) is norm condition , then we have following.
‖Y (a)‖‖Y (b)‖ = ‖Y (a + b)‖ −→ ‖Y (a)‖n = ‖Y (na)‖↘ ↙‖Y (0)‖2 = ‖Y (0)‖ = 1
57
![Page 58: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
©About the property of eas.
Let E(a) = eas separated three types E(a) , E−1(a) and E∗(a),respectively.Now,
I want to explain the property of E(a).
E(a) have a following properties.
E(a)E(b) = E(a + b)
E(0) = 1 (identity)
s− lima→0 E(a)T (0) = T (0)
(53)
Therefore
E(a) have properties of semi− groups.
Furthermore we will find that E(a) have ideal structures.
©Assosiative and commutative of Pascal′s matrix.
(L2-space)
In this time, I want to explain L2-space for F (a) operations.
F (a) is defined following
F (a) = easF(a) = eas
a0
a a0
.... . .
an · · · a0
(54)
G(a) = −easG(a) = −eas
a0 − 1
a a0 − 1...
. . .
an · · · a0 − 1
(55)
58
![Page 59: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
and
F (a) + G(a) = H(a) = easH(a).
Since this definitions then we have following.
[easF(a)]v = eas[F(a)v] = F(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easG(a)]v = eas[G(a)v] = G(a)[easv]
[easF(a) + easG(a)]v = eas[F(a)v + G(a)v] = [F(a) + G(a)][easv]
[easH(a)]v = eas[H(a))v] = H(a)[easv] (1)
For example, let following.
eas H(a) v
↓ ↓ ↓α x y
Since (1), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Therefore, Pascal’s matrix H(a) has a property of seni-groups. In this
case, ‖H(a)‖ = |eas| and it’s irreducible form.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
In general, the operation F(a) is able to extend to following condition.
[e−asF(−a)]v = e−as[F(−a)v] = F(−a)[e−asv]
59
![Page 60: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
⇓(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Hence
[easF(a)]v = eas[F(a)v] = F(a)[easv]
Similarly
[easG(a)]v = eas[G(a)v] = G(a)[easv]
and
[easH(a)]v = eas[H(a)v] = H(a)[easv]
It has a property of all semi− groups for all a.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
©Semi− groups for F (a) operation
Since definition of Pascal’s matrix, we have following.
F (a)F (b) = F (a + b)
F (0) = I
s− lima→0 F (a)v = v
(56)
Therefore
F (a) is generated with semi− groups.
©Semi− group for G(a) operation
Essentially, G(a) operation is able to be ideal. So this semi-group
is treated iff it’s maximal ideal. If I defined on L2-space then G(∞) is
60
![Page 61: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
following.
G(∞) = −
a0 − 1
a a0 − 1...
. . .
an · · · a0 − 1
def .= Identity as a → ±∞.(57)
So we have
G(±∞)G(±∞) = G(±∞)
G(±∞) = I
s− lima→±∞ G(a)v = v
(58)
Therefore
G(a) is generated with semi− groups iff a is ±∞.
Moreover we will have following equivalence.
F (a)F (b) = F (a + b) −→ F (a)n = F (na)
↘ ↙F (0)2 = F (0)
This condition is also semi-groups. Lower form is able to consider as
projection operator. And right is able to generate invariant form.
This condition is able to represent only one by using the group-ring.
F (a)nF (b)m = F (an + bm) = F−n(a)F−m(b)
If F (a) is norm condition , then we have following.
‖F (a)‖‖F (b)‖ = ‖F (a + b)‖ −→ ‖F (a)‖n = ‖F (na)‖↘ ↙‖F (0)‖2 = ‖F (0)‖ = 1
61
![Page 62: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
©Assosiative and commutative of Laplace transforms.
(L2-space)
T (a) operations are defined following
T (a)f(t) = easT (a)f(t) =∫ ∞
af(t)e−(t−a)sdt , S(a)f(t) = easS(a)f(t) =
∫ a
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
and
R(a)f(t) = T (a)f(t) + S(a)f(t) = easR(a)f(t) =∫ ∞
0f(t)e−(t−a)sdt
So we have following conditions
[easT (a)]f(t) = eas[T (a)f(t)] = T (a)[easf(t)]
Similarly
[easS(a)]f(t) = eas[S(a)f(t)] = S(a)[easf(t)]
[easT (a)+easS(a)]f(t) = eas[T (a)f(t)+S(a)f(t)] = [T (a)+S(a)][easf(t)]
[easR(a)]f(t) = eas[R(a)f(t)] = R(a)[easf(t)] (1)
Now, let following.
eas R(a) f(t)
↓ ↓ ↓α x y
Since (1), then we have
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy). (semi− groups)
Hence
[easT (a)]f(t) = eas[T (a)f(t)] = T (a)[easf(t)]
62
![Page 63: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Similarly
[easS(a)]f(t) = eas[S(a)f(t)] = S(a)[easf(t)]
and
[easR(a)]f(t) = eas[R(a)f(t)] = R(a)[easf(t)]
It has property of all semi− groups for all a.
(αx)y = α(xy) = x(αy).
©Semigroups of transrate operators and convolutions.
Since definition of Laplace transforms, we have following.
T (a + b)∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t− τ)dτ = T (a)
∫ t
af(τ)g(b + t− τ)dτ =
= T (a)T (0)∫ t
af(τ)g(b + t− τ)dτ = T (a)
∫ t
af(τ)T (0)g(b + t− τ)dτ =
= T (a)∫ t
af(τ)T (b)g(t− τ)dτ = T (a)T (b)
∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t− τ)dτ =
= T (a)f(t)T (b)g(t) =
= T (a)T (b)∫ t−a
bf(t− τ)g(τ)dτ = T (b)
∫ t
bT (a)f(t− τ)g(τ)dτ =
= T (b)∫ t
bT (0)f(a + t− τ)g(τ)dτ = T (b)T (0)
∫ t
bf(a + t− τ)g(τ)dτ =
= T (b)∫ t
bf(a + t− τ)g(τ)dτ = T (a + b)
∫ t−a
bf(t− τ)g(τ)dτ
So
T (a+b)∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t−τ)dτ = T (a)f(t)T (b)g(t) = T (a+b)
∫ t−a
bf(t−τ)g(τ)dτ
63
![Page 64: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
T (a+b){f(t)∗g(t)}(a,b) = {T (a)f(t)}{T (b)g(t)} = T (a+b){g(t)∗f(t)}(b,a)
Moreover
T (a + b)∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t− τ)dτ = T (a)
∫ t
af(τ)g(b + t− τ)dτ ≡ T (a)h(t)
N.B. h(t) =∫ ta f(τ)g(b + t− τ)dτ
T (a)h(t) = T (0)h(t + a)
T (a)T (0)h(t) = T (0)T (0)h(t+a) = T (0)h(t+a) iff T (0)2 = T (0)
T (a)T (b)h(t− b) = T (a)h(t)
T (a)T (b)∫ t−b
af(τ)g(b+t−b−τ)dτ = T (a)
∫ t
af(τ)g(b+t−τ)dτ = T (a+b)
∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t−τ)dτ
so
T (a)T (b)∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t− τ)dτ = T (a + b)
∫ t−b
af(τ)g(t− τ)dτ
Hence T (a)T (b) = T (a+b) iff T (0)2 = T (0)
Now, T (0) is able to regard as kind of projection operator.
So, since P 2 = P , then we have
T (a)T (b) = T (a + b).
T (a) operation is satisfied following conditions.
T (a)T (b) = T (a + b)
T (0) = I
s− lima→0 T (a)f = f
(59)
64
![Page 65: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Therefore T (a) has a property of semi-groups.
Moreover we will have following equivalence.
T (a)T (b) = T (a + b) −→ T (a)n = T (na)
↘ ↙
T (0)2 = T (0)
See p.76 appendix for ′′Rings and ideal structures for Laplace transforms′′
(reprint).
This condition is able to represent only one by using the group-ring.
T (a)nT (b)m = T (an + bm) = T−n(a)T−m(b)
This condition is also semi-groups. Lower form is able to consider as
projection operator. And right is able to generate invariant form.
If T (a) is norm condition , then we have following.
‖T (a)‖‖T (b)‖ = ‖T (a + b)‖ −→ ‖T (a)‖n = ‖T (na)‖
↘ ↙
‖T (0)‖2 = ‖T (0)‖ = 1
Finally
In this time, all operations that T (a), Y (a), F (a) and D(a) are all
semi-groups. Ideal operations that S(a),N (a),G(a) and O(a) are also all
semi-groups iff a → ∞. If eas is kind of ideal then it’s satisfied dense
condition. Therefore S(a), N(a), G(a) and O(a) will have semi-groups.
So ideal structure is able to have a property of semi-groups. Especially,
the semi-groups (ring operations) have following properties.
T (a)−1 = T (−a) , F (a)−1 = F (−a) , etc
65
![Page 66: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Some results
◦ The property of semi-group for T (a) operation is able to extend to the
L2-space.
◦ Since the convolution theorem, we could have following form.
T (a)T (b) = T (a + b).
◦ L1-space to L2-space condition for T (a) operation is continue as follow-
ing form.
(L1 − space) T (0) = R(a) (L2 − space)
◦ In this case, this operator algebras for T (a) operation is following rela-
tions.
Integral operator
T (a)homo−→ Y (a)
iso l l iso
F (a)homo−→ D(a)
Matrix operator
◦ Ideal operation is able to be semi-group iff a → ±∞ in Hilbert space.
◦ All operations are able to represent on semi-groups.
◦ This semi-groups are able to apply to group-rings.
66
![Page 67: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Conclusion
In previous paper, we explained about the projection for Laplace trans-
forms in positive condition. In this time, I extend for “a′′ of T (a) to
negative condition. Essential conception does not change with positive
condition. However, in general, T (a) operation is not unitary operation.
So it’s generated anti-symmetrical form.
‖T (−a)‖ = ‖T (a)−1‖ = |e−as|.The projection operator in L2-space should consider the set condition
{1, 0}. If this projection operator in L1-space then we should consider
the separated form {1} and {0}, respectively.
The operator algebras for negative condition is realized in contracted
form. Rings are able to change to negative conditions. On the other
hand, this ideal structure is not able to change to negative except for
a → ±∞ in L2-spaces.
As a whole, There operator algebras for Laplace transforms have fol-
lowing condition.
Ring + Ideal = Ring.
Similarly the ∗−algebras have identical conceptions.
Finally, in this case, all ring operations have following relations.
T (a)T (b) = T (a + b).
So we have the property of semi-groups. Therefore the fundamental
condition for Laplace transforms may consider it. In this time, I extend
to group-ring for this application. So we have following.
T n(a)Tm(b) = T (na + mb) = T−n(a)T−m(b).
Similarly, the projection form is following.
P n(a)Pm(b) = P (na + mb) = P−n(a)P−m(b).
(Tue)6.Oct.2009
Now let′s go to the next papers with me!
67
![Page 68: The negative condition for Laplace transformsopab.web.fc2.com/no.2.pdfPreface This paper is builded by three parts. First is negative condition of op-erator algebras in L1;L2-spaces.Second](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042104/5e82918f4f423064510385d1/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
References
[1] Bryan P.Rynne and Martin A.Youngson, Linear functional anal-
ysis, Springer, SUMS, 2001.
[2] Micheal O Searcoid, Elements of Abstract Analysis, Springer,
SUMS, 2002.
[3] Israel Gohberg and Seymour Goldberg, Basic operator theory,
Birkhauser, 1980.
[4] Harry Hochtadt, Integral Equations, John & Sons,Inc, 1973.
[5] P.M.Cohn, Springer, SUMS, An Introduction to Ring Theory.
[6] M.A.Naimark, Normed Rings, P.Noordhoff,Ltd, 1959.
[7] Hille and Philips, Functional analysis and semi-Groups, AMS,
1957.
[8] Paul L.Butzer Hubert Berens, Semi-groups of Operators and
Approximation, Springer, 1967
[9] Irina V.Melnikova, Abstract Cauchy problems, Chapman, 2001.
[10] Takao Saito, Operator algebras for Laplace transforms (reprint),
(Mon)8.Oct.2007.
Furthermore
[11] Kosaku Yoshida, Functional Analysis, Springer, 1980.
[12] Richard V. Kadison John R.Ringrose Fundamentals of the the-
ory of Operator Algebras, AMS
[13] Dunford & Schwartz Linear operators I,II,III, Wiley.
[14] Charles E.Rickart, General theory of Banach algebras, D.Van
Nostrand Company,Inc,1960.
[15] J.L.Kelley · Isaac Namioka Linear topological spaces,
D.Van Nostrand Company,Inc, 1961.
68