Download - The New Myth (First Draft)
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
1/38
1
The New Myth: Frederic Spiegelberg and the Rise of a Whole Earth, 1914-1975
Ahmed Kabil
Abstract. The present article provides, through the life and teachings of a little-known Germanscholar of religions named Frederic Spiegelberg (1897-1994), a novel account of the uniquehistorical and intellectual developments that converged in the San Francisco Bay Area from1951-1968 and subsequently informed and enabled many of the defining chapters of recentglobal history. Separately, these developments are known as the dissemination in the West ofAsian religious perspectives and practices, the San Francisco Renaissance, the rise of the hippiecounterculture, the widespread blossoming of environmental awareness, and the Silicon ValleyRevolution. Together, they comprise the New Myth. The New Myth: synchronous with and inreaction to the planetary spread of technology and the global experiential horizons suchtechnology discloses, a constellation of holistic integral thought emerged in various domains inthe West that was characterized above all by a spatiotemporal emphasis on the Here and Nowand the realization of unity through the recognition and transcendence of polarity. The origins,afterlives, and implications of this constellation of thought are only now being discerned. Thestory of Spiegelbergs lifelittle known and largely forgottenfunctions as the conduit throughwhich the New Myths historical and intellectual contours are traced and thereby renderedintelligible.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
2/38
2
The New Myth: Frederic Spiegelberg and the Rise of a Whole Earth, 1914-1975
Ahmed Kabil
Taking LSD was one of the two or three most important things Ive done in my life,
Steve Jobs, the founder and then-CEO of one of the most successful companies in the world told
reporter John Markoff of the New York Times in 2001 as they watched the psychedelic fractals
of Apples iTunes visualizer undulate across the screen. People who havent taken acid will
never fully understand me.1
Jobs first psychedelic experience came in high school, and his trajectory afterward was
typical. He attended Reed College, a small liberal arts college in Portland, Oregon that was
culturally counter yet academically conservative, and where five years earlier Timothy Leary
extolled the students to tune in, turn on, and drop out. As Isaacson notes, many of Reedsstudents took all three of those injunctions seriously, and Jobs was no exception. He still
dropped in to classes, but only those that interested him, such as calligraphy.2
Outside of class, Jobs was receiving an education of an altogether different kind. The
goal was to remember: LSD shows you that theres another side to the coin, and you cant
remember it when it wears off, but you know it, Jobs recalled later. It reinforced my sense of
what was importantcreating great things instead of making money, putting things back into the
stream of history and of human consciousness as much as I could.3 Fieldwork came in the form
of meditation retreats, psychedelic sessions, extended stays at Robert Friedlands All-One
communal apple farm, and a seven-months-long adventure in India in search of enlightenment.
The India trip was motivated by Dr. Richard AlpertsBe Here Now (1971), a psychedelic
meditation manual in the Hindu tantric tradition whose esoteric aphorisms regaling the divine
bliss of consciousness emblazoned on brown pulp and whose mysterious blue cover of a radial
mandala bracketed with the injunction to Remember, Be Here Now continue to draw in
curious seekers to this day. Alpert was Learys partner-in-crime at Harvard in the early 1960s
when, inspired by the pioneering work of Aldous Huxley and their own experiences with
psychedelics, they initiated the Harvard Psilocybin Project as director David McClellands ill-
fated attempt to establish Harvard Psychology as the paragon of the discipline. By 1963 Alpertand Leary were fired. Leary retreated to a mansion in New York to keep running experiments.
Alpert went to India, found a guru in Neem Karoli Baba, and returned to America in 1967
1 Walter Isaacson, Steve Jobs (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2011), 384.
2 Ibid., 33.
3 Ibid., 41.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
3/38
3
barefoot, bearded, and calling himself Baba Ram Dass with the steady gaze of conviction in his
eyes.
After readingBe Here Now, Jobs and fellow Reed student Daniel Kottke decided they
would go to India to find Alperts guru. But by the time they reached the foothills of the
Himalayas that Neem Karoli Baba called home, he was already dead. Members of his
community remained, however, such as a westerner, Larry Brilliant, whom Neem Karoli Baba
named Subramanyum and with whom Jobs would remain lifelong friends. Brilliant was an
epidemiologist who would one day lead the successful WHO global campaign to eradicate
smallpox, cofound the Seva Foundation with Baba Ram Dass (a nonprofit organization created in
1978 best known for restoring eyesight to 3 million blind people) and cofound the WELL, one of
the first and most successful online communities, with technologist and futurist Stewart Brand in
1985.
Be Here Now, along with Shunryu SuzukisZen Mind, Beginners Mind(1970), formedthe twin pillars of Jobs practice during these early days of spiritual exploration. Zen Mindwas
also a meditation manual, albeit steeped in the fierce discipline of the Zen tradition and
expounded by its chief transmitter to the West in the 1960s. WhereBe Here Now spoke
esoterically about the Kingdom of Heaven, Christ consciousness, and Hindu deities like Shiva,
Kali, and Hanuman,Zen Mindemphasized focus, discipline, simplicity, and clarity. WhereBe
Here Now emphasized an open surrender to the present moment,Zen Mindemphasized posture.
IfBe Here Now andZen Mindwere the gospels of Jobs curriculum, then Stewart
Brands Whole Earth Catalog (1968)was the bible. Its worn pages accompanied him to Reed, to
the commune, to India and beyond. But how to describe it? To many, it was an
incomprehensible mass, a shopping catalog in the spirit of Montgomery Ward of seemingly
unrelated products, disciplines, and lifestyle approaches. Brand called it Access to Tools, an
attempt to generate a low maintenance high-yield self-sustaining critical information service.4
Jobs called it Google before Google existed. No cultural document from the period better
captured the ethos of the counterculture, and few were more pivotal. Though the impact of
works like Silent Spring (1962)and the Port Huron Statement(1962) received more attention at
the time, the prescient Whole Earth Catalog can claim a stake in the founding of both modern
environmentalism and the information revolution in Silicon Valley. The Catalog captured anew alchemy of environmental concern, small-scale technological enthusiasm, design research,
alternative lifestyles, and business savvy that created a model of environmental advocacy5
4 Fred Turner, From Cyberculture to Counterculture(Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007), 78.5 Andrew Kirk, Counterculture Green (Lawrence: U of Kansas P, 2007), 2.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
4/38
4
But to many, the Whole Earth Catalog remained a mystery that they were content never
to unravel; its incomprehensibility suggested that the catalog was almost too full of ideas and
subjects to come to terms with an overall synthetic view of them all.6
Almost. For the Catalog did offer a viewon its front page, in factand the seemingly
unrelated contents within could only be understood by reference to it. It was a view of the
whole earth seen from space, and it was under this banner that the Catalog integrated the various
trends in the countercultural, academic, and technological communities of the late 1960s.
It was on LSD while gazing at the San Francisco skyline on the rooftop of a North Beach
apartment in February 1966 that Brand realized that seeing these images would change the
world. There I sat, he later recalled, wrapped in a blanket in the chill afternoon Sun, trembling
with cold and inchoate emotion, gazing at the San Francisco Skyline, waiting for my vision. He
would not have to wait long:
The buildings were not parallelbecause the Earth curved under them, and me, and all of us; itclosed on itself. I remembered that Buckminster Fuller had been harping on this at a recentlecturethat people perceived the Earth as flat and infinite, and that that was the root of all theirmisbehavior. Now from my altitude of three stories and one hundred miles, I could see that itwas curved, think it, and finally feel it. But how to broadcast it?7
The vision became a question: why havent we seen a photograph of the whole earth yet?
Whether Brands famed campaign, where he showed up on college campuses around the country
dressed in hippie freak regalia selling buttons that posed the fateful question, ultimately resulted
in NASAs decision to release the photographs is a matter of debate. That these images changed
the world, and we how think about it, is not.
For Brand, the whole earth was an icon, one he hoped would supplant the mushroom
cloud as the dominant lens through which we saw the world. As an icon, it symbolized two
facets of Brands philosophy: first, a holistic, integral, microcosm-macrocosm understanding of
reality expressed through cybernetic whole systems theory that sought to overcome eternally
troublesome distinctions between, among other things, man and his tools, organisms and
artifacts, and self and world; second, the conviction that technology, when used appropriately,
can function as a tool for personal liberation.
Regardless of Brands intentions, the whole earth image soon acquired a life of its own,
one far removed from its initial connotations. As the most ubiquitous and widely disseminatedimage in human history, the whole earth has seeped into the ways we relate to the world to such
a degree that our ability to discern its history and implications is obscured. Historian Benjamin
Lazier, in one of the first attempts to historicize these developments, sees an epochal moment
6 Ibid.
7 Robert Poole,Earthrise: How Man First Saw The Earth (New Haven: Yale UP, 2008)149-150.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
5/38
5
emerge in 1968 that he claims inaugurated an era that we still inhabit. He calls it the Earthrise
era:
Broadly speaking, the Earthrise era comprises several important developments. The first is therise of an Earthly vision, or a pictorial imagination characterized by views of the Earth as awhole. Hear the word Earth, and the images likely to flash through the mind are descendants oftwo views afforded by the Apollo missions. One shows the Earth half-cloaked in shadow as itfloats over a lifeless moonscape. It arrived on Christmas 1968 and is called Earthrise: hence,the Earthrise era. A second photograph, from December 1972, shows the disk of ourterraqueous planet suspended in the void. It is officially titled Blue Marble and is reputed to bethe most widely disseminated photograph in human history. Its frameless framethe voidhas left it especially open to appropriation. These two images and their progeny now grace T-shirts and tote bags, cartoons and coffee cups, stamps commemorating Earth Day and postersfeting the exploits of suicide bombers. In other words, this pictorial imagination is not simplythat. As a stand-in for the idea of the Whole Earth itself, it has acquired an iconic power thathelps organize a myriad of political, moral, scientific, and commercial imaginations as well.Views of Earth are now so ubiquitous as to go unremarked. But this makes them all the moreimportant, and their effects historically novel. Our ideas and intuitions about inhabiting the worldare now mediated through images that displace local, earthbound horizons with horizons thatare planetary in scopethe distinction between earth and sky surmounted by that between Earthand void. These intuitions have dovetailed with new habits of speech, a vocabularyand asecond key development of the Earthrise era. But there is something peculiar about thisvocabulary. It is just as global as Earthly, if not more so, and it is peculiar because the Earthas seen from space is often perceived as the natural or organic antithesis of an artifacual globe.Still, there is no avoiding the fact that as common expressions, the word globalization and thephrases global environment, global economy, and global humanity simply did not existbefore the Earthrise era, and this explosion of globe talk is part and parcel of changes in theWestern pictorial imagination that at first glance seem unsuited to it8
Lazier situates the Earthrise era as a chapter in a larger story about the crisis of Western
modernity, specifically concerning the displacement of the grown by the made in the modern
age. It was an anxiety shared by a host of Western thinkers in the early twentieth century, who
broached the issue through meditations on technology and the relationship between organisms
and artifacts:
Although Germanophone in origin, this tradition has migrated across both national anddisciplinary borders, with several important afterlives in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Ithas also bequeathed several foundational stories about the modern relation of the natural to theartifactual, now spoken, often unwittingly, by technophobes and technophiles, philosophers andlaymen alike. They include, first, a story about the early modern reversal of the ancientinjunction that art is to imitate nature. This story narrates a momentous change: from an ancientunderstanding of human artifice as indebted to the rules nature gives to man, to a modernapproach for which nature is an imitation of art, and artifice a means to dominate that to which itwas in thrall [] If this first story is a tale of human mastery, the secondthe modern victory ofinstrumental reasondiscovers a powerlessness at the heart of modern human self-assertion.Something about our attempts to master the world has gone awry, this story goes. Technical
8 Benjamin Lazier, Earthrise; or: The Globalization of the World Picture in The American Historical Review,Vol. 116, No. 3, (June 2011), 605-6.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
6/38
6
achievement has become compulsion. Freedom from a hostile or stingy nature comes at the priceof a new form of servitudeto the inexorable power of the things we make, as Max Weberonce put it, and still more to the technological impulse itself9
One of the traditions foremost interpreters was Martin Heidegger (1887-1976), perhaps the
twentieth centurys most important and controversial philosopher. He had spoken presciently,
almost prophetically, since the 1930s about the self-perpetuating nature of the technological
attitude that challenges man forth to subdue the natural world now presented to him as an object
of his conquest. Heidegger traces this dominion of the technological in our lives to a confluence
of developments in the West over the last three hundred years that yielded what he calls
calculative thinking, reckon[ing] with conditions that are given, tak[ing] them into account with
the calculated intention of their serving specific purposes. This calculative thinking has set into
motion the dominion of modern technology while obscuring western mans fundamental relation
to Being.10
9 Ibid., 605.
10 The result is that, according to Heidegger, we are all of us today in flight from thinking. Though we donot admit it, this flight from thought is the ground for thoughtlessness. And this thoughtlessness is its own
kind of thinking: calculative thinking. And it is calculative thinking that is the danger: Its peculiarity consistsin the fact that whenever we plan, research, and organize, we always reckon with conditions that are
given. We take them into account with the calculated intention of their serving specific purposes. Thus wecan count on definite results. This calculation is the mark of all thinking that plans and investigates []
Calculative thinking never stops, never collects itself. Calculative thinking is not meditative thinking, notthinking which contemplates the meaning which reigns in everything that is (Martin Heidegger,Discourse on
Thinking [New York: Harper & Row, 1966], 46). Both kinds of thinking, the meditative and the calculative,
are needed for man. The method of meditative thinking lies in dwell[ing] on what lies close and meditat[ing]on what is closest; upon that which concerns us, each one of us, here and now; here, on this patch of home
ground; now, in the present hour of history (53). This meditative thinking demands effort and practice, and isin need of even more delicate care than any other genuine craft. But it must also be able to bide its time, to
await as does the farmer, whether the seed will come up and ripen, for we are plants which whether we liketo admit it to ourselves or not must with our roots rise out of the earth in order to bloom in the ether and to
bear fruit (47). Here we come to the crux of Heideggers sentiments on just what modern man has lost. Why,asks Heidegger, does the work of art flourish? Because the artist is able to mount from the depth of his home
ground up into the ether. A work rootedin its home groundmay blossom forth into the ether (48). ForHeidegger, man today has lost this rootedness. Traditional notions of home, as mediated through ones culture,
creed, conventions and customs, are uprooted by the technology of this atomic age. The advances andplanetary scope of technology and the calculative thinking it portends have rendered home meaningless for
man. We are driven from our homeland, both in the physical sense of increased resettling in the big cities andin the spiritual sense of wandering to and fro around the ever-tightening circle of technological forces without
a ground from which to rise. Such is the spirit of the age into which man is born. Its symbol is the atom bomb the harbinger of the new energies discovered and set free in nature by modern technology. The ground that
enabled modern technology to do so has its roots in the Western intellectual tradition, namely, in Cartesiandualism and scientific materialism. The result is a relation of man to the world in which the whole earth
appears as an object open to the attacks of calculative thought, attacks that nothing is believed any longer toresist (50). Technologys planetary reach is uncanny enough, but for Heidegger the true danger lies in our
unpreparedness for this transformation, our inability to confront meditatively what is really dawning in thisage (52). As such, there is no way to stop it.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
7/38
7
In an interview withDer Spiegel in 1966, Heidegger singled out the photographs of the
earth from space as exemplifying this process of the uprooting of man by the global spread of
technology. In these very photographs one sees the displacement of the grown by the made and
the dominance of calculative thinking over meditative thinking in the atomic age:
HEIDEGGER: Everything functions. That is exactly what is uncanny. Everything functions andthe functioning drives us further and further to more functioning, and technology tears peopleaway and uproots them from the earth more and more. I dont know if you are scared; I wascertainly scared when I recently saw the photographs of the earth taken from the moon. We dontneed an atom bomb at all; the uprooting of human beings is already taking place. We only havepurely technological conditions left. It is no longer an earth on which human beings live today.11
All of this is curious when we reflect on the example of Stewart Brand. Where Brand saw the
whole earth icon as an iconoclastic overcoming of the mushroom cloud and the calculative
thinking it symbolized, Heidegger saw it as the epitome, indeed, the culmination, of that very
thinking. Brand understood the earth cybernetically as a system and all the phenomena within it
as interconnected, self regulating systems. Doing so, he believed, allowed an overcoming of the
eternally troublesome distinction that so assailed Heidegger, that of the natural and artifactual.
The same teleological principle is in effect for organisms and artifacts, for man and his
machines, this thinking goes. They are both self-organizing and self-regulating, and as systems
function as components within other interconnected systems. Any further distinctions, argued
Brand, were unnecessary. Mans tools were simply an extension of himself.
To this Heidegger countered that technology, above all, is not a tool, and no longer has
anything to do with tools.12 We are not the ones using technology. Technology is using us.
When the world presents itself as a system, Heidegger contends, it is simply exemplifying the
attitude of calculative thinking. That which stands before us becomes a picture, presented in all
that belongs to it and all that stands together in it as a system. The photographs of the earth
from space mark for Heidegger the culmination calculative thinking, the moment when, as he
puts it in theDiscourse on Thinking, it rules the whole earth.
Where the world becomes picture, what is, in its entirety, is juxtaposed as that for which man isprepared and which, correspondingly, he therefore intends to bring before himself and havebefore himself, and consequently intends in a decisive sense to place before himself13
11 Der Spiegel Interview with Martin Heidegger (1966).
web.ics.purdue.edu/~other1/Heidegger%20Der%20Spiegel.pdf. Scanned from Gunther Neske & EmilKettering (eds), Martin Heidegger and National Socialism, (New York: Paragon House, 1990), 41-66.
12 Ibid.
13 Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology & Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1977),129.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
8/38
8
The fundamental event of the modern age, Heidegger concludes, is the conquest of the
world as picture. No bigger confirmation of his claims can exist than reflecting on the
transcript of the first astronauts from space as they become the first humans to see the whole
earth. Just prior to taking the iconic photograph of Earthrise, they have the following exchange:
Borman: Oh my God! Look at that picture over there! Heres the Earth coming up! Wow, that ispretty!
Anders: Hey, dont take that, its not scheduled.
Borman: (Laughter). You got a color film, Jim?
Anders: Hand me that roll of color quick, will you
Lovell: Oh man, thats great!
Anders: Hurry. Quick
Lovell: Take several of them! Here, give it to me
Borman: Calm down, Lovell.
14
When the interviewers ofDer Spiegel ask Heidegger if theres any way to influence the
seemingly inevitable onward march of global technology and the mode of being it reinforces,
Heidegger answers cryptically, Only a God can save us.
We are as gods, Brand proclaimed on the first page of the whole earth catalog two years
later.
What are we to make of these pirouettes? Does Brand overcome Heideggers distinctions
between the natural and artifactual, or does he exemplify the very process of calculative thinking
Heidegger disparages? How do we understand the technophilic ethos engendered by Brand that
has bequeathed to us not only the Earthrise era, but technologies such as the personal computer
and internet that typify both thinkers attitudes about technology?
The present article broaches these questions through presenting a vignette of the life and
teachings of a little-known and largely forgotten professor of comparative religions named
Frederic Spiegelberg (1897-1994). Through the lens of his life and teachings, several contours of
the developments outlined above are rendered intelligible. Many parts of the tale have been told
before. But the whole, as history, has not. To be sure, the full breadth of the story, with all the
origins, afterlives, and implications, is outside the scope of this article. The goal here, then, is to
point to key moments in a tale that stretches across traditions, continents and eras.My central contention is that the path of Spiegelbergs life discloses a hitherto obscured
constellation of holistic, integral thought and the network of thinkers who disseminated it. The
constellation of thought and the network of its promulgation reveal a history of the spiritual
14 Poole,Earthrise, 1.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
9/38
9
revitalization of the West, one undertaken through rediscovering and appropriating the Wests
shared origins with the East. The goal was to discover a way of being suitable to the age of
global technological modernity. I call the network the drive towards wholeness. I call the
constellation of thought the New Myth. Synchronous with and in reaction to the planetary spread
of technology and the global experiential horizons such technology discloses, a New Myth
emerged in various domains in the West that was characterized above all by a spatiotemporal
emphasis on the Here and Now and the realization of unity through the recognition and
transcendence of polarity. These efforts culminated in a convergence of developments during the
late 1960s that have informed and enabled many key developments in world history since, most
notably the rise of environmentalism, personal computing and the Internet.
A theologian by training and a professor of comparative religions by vocation,
Spiegelberg was in a sense an ideal albeit typical scholar, occupying a stable post at Stanford
University for three decades with the odd publication here and there before retiring to a quiet lifein his bay front apartment overlooking Ghirardelli Square.
But Spiegelberg was anything but conventional. His interests ranged far and wide and
East and West. As well versed in Greek and Latin as he was in Sanskrit, Spiegelberg
administered Rorschach tests to Indian yogis, dabbled in the dark and disreputable arts of
alchemy and gnosticism, and exalted heresy and iconoclasm as paths to salvation. He possessed
the largest collection of Tibetan ghost traps in the West, and grew convinced that an earlier
encounter with the Indian mystic Sri Aurobindo infused him with a divine energy he could
summon and transmit in lectures. Spiegelberg warned his followers he was not a prophet, yet
made prophecies nevertheless. He spoke of vast changes in store for the world, and believed his
endeavors were to play a key part.
And he was right.
Spiegelberg stood knee-deep in the currents of East and West at the crucial moment of
their confluence. His actions and ideas were pivotal in transmitting the New Myth to the West, a
mode of Being that could embrace and transcend warfare, the threat of nuclear annihilation, and
the global spread of technology. His story tells of three overcomings; the first is an overcoming
of the spiritual crisis of Interwar Europe symbolized by world war; the second is an overcoming
of the mechanized outlook of postwar cold war American society symbolized by the mushroomcloud; the third is an overcoming of the widespread belief that technology was an antagonistic
force in the aim of global unity, symbolized by the whole earth.
The trajectory of the drive towards wholeness in brief:
World War (Part I). Disillusioned intellectuals in war-ravaged Europe forsook the
dominant rational approaches of the Western tradition after the collapse of the liberal ideal.
They revived ancient debates long-thought settled through countenancing the heretical
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
10/38
10
understandings of God as expressed in gnosticism, pantheism, and alchemy, Greek
understandings of man and nature as expressed by the presocratics, and Eastern understandings
of the divine as expressed in Daoism, Zen Buddhism, and Indian yoga. This cross-cultural
pollination yielded much fruit, such as the understanding of Being developed by Martin
Heidegger that subsequently informed the philosophical trends of existentialism and
postmodernism, and C.G. Jungs theories on myth, symbols, and archetypes that informed
psychoanalysis and the burgeoning field of comparative religions.
Mushroom Cloud (Part II). World War II forced many of these European thinkers to
become refugees and flee to the United States with little but their ideas. But ideas were enough,
as New York and San Francisco emerged as postwar hubs of transmission where the unique
cross-cultural thinking engaged in during the interwar period could remain pursued. The center
quickly shifted West, however, as the postwar Beat generation came of age. Inheritors after two
world wars of a mechanized society defined largely by the threat of nuclear annihilation, theBeats were as disillusioned as their interwar counterparts, and their migratory journeys on the
road across America appear to confirm Heideggers sentiments on the spiritual homelessness of
man in the modern age. They eventually found a way, however, in the methods of the East (Zen
Buddhism and Indian yoga) disseminated by teachers in the San Francisco Bay Area through
learning centers such as Stanford University and the American Academy of Asian Studies.
Though the Academy of Asian Studies was short lived, its legacy continued as the cluster of
writers, artists, philosophers and poets that gathered there in the early 1950s continued to meet at
institutes they themselves created in the tradition of this cross-cultural transmission, such as the
Esalen Institute founded in 1961, the California Institute of Asian Studies founded in 1968, and
the Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, founded in 1975.
Whole Earth (Part III). The disillusionment that marked the earlier Beats gave way in
the late 1950s and early 1960s to a utopic optimism informed by the interwar-postwar
combination of Zen Buddhism, Indian yoga, western psychology and alchemy. Once the early
1960s were underway and psychedelics entered the scene, a noticeable shift occurred in these
thinkers attitudes towards technology. Technology has produced a chemical, wrote Allen
Ginsberg at the time, which catalyzes a consciousness which finds the entire civilization leading
up to that pill absurd.
15
The technology against which they rebelled, long seen as a harbinger ofdoom and responsible for the mechanized postwar American society, was now viewed as a
potential tool for liberation. Now countenancing ideas on technologys potential, the thinkers of
the drive towards wholeness latched on to the insights of cybernetics theory. Emerging out of
15 Peter Conners, White Hand Society: The Psychedelic Partnership of Timothy Leary and Allen Ginsberg (SanFrancisco: City Lights, 2010).
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
11/38
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
12/38
12
breath, by the sound of my own voice and the movement of my own fingers the moment that I
touch this bewildering, surprising, unexplainable, perfectly miraculous reality itself as an
astounding mystery,thatis the miracle of being.17
He brought this understanding of being and the spiritual experience that informed it with
him to the German Academy. He arrived there at a unique time in modern European history.
The war eroded faith in the liberal idealan ideal that was supposed to deliver modern man
from the dark ages and religious superstitions with its vaunting of the liberal trappings of the rule
of law, a constitution, individual liberties, property rights, and a market society. Yet here we
were, having marched headlong down the long bloody path from the French revolution in 1793
to the upheavals of 1848 to the aftermath of the bloodiest moment in human history. If this was
the path to Enlightenment, it appeared as if the final nirvanic insight would all but confirm
Hobbes eternal words spoken three centuries earlier inLeviathan that, rather than promises of
life, liberty and property, mans lot was a life solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.The result was crisis. The liberal project, writes Benjamin Lazier in a study on
theology in Interwar Europe (2007) had derived much of its impetus from a confidence in the
capacity for human progress, and could not help but falter as the trust proved folly. The war in
particular dealt a deathblow to a faith in the progressive moral perfection of man, and in its wake
came a post-liberal ethos more at home in crisis than in calm. 18 In theological circles this ethos
manifested as crisis theology. Age-old debates about man, god and world were revived as many
of Europes greatest thinkers broached the crisis of the West through resurrecting the heretical
traditions of gnosticism and pantheism to ask whether and why God had forsaken them.
Spiegelberg saw it differently. God had not forsaken us, we in our abstract rationalizing
had simply forgotten that he was as near to us as the present moment. It is, Spiegelberg later
wrote, the instantaneous experience of the Being of Being in all its transcendence in and as this
most immediate Here and Now.19 Through identifying with the fundamental aspect of Being
rather than our constricted ego, we experience a world transformed.
The problem, then, was to develop modes of thought that reacquainted us with this
fundamental component of our experience since forgotten in the modern age. In a set of notes
from this period titledEx Oriente Lux, Spiegelberg ruminates on whether the East can provide
the ground for a spiritual revitalization of the West. Today, he writes, we realize [the divine
17 Frederic Spiegelberg, The Integral Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo (London: George Allen, 1960), 53.
18 Benjamin Lazier, God Interrupted(Princeton: Princeton UP, 2008), 5.
19 Frederic Spiegelberg,Zen, Rocks, Waters (New York: Pantheon Books, 1961), 22.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
13/38
13
reality] has to come from within and beyond. Yet maybe the direction from where to get the
stimulation could still be East.20
These first inklings of East-West synthesis led Spiegelberg to taking full advantage of the
German academys offerings on windows to the East that at the time were rather extensive. He
took courses on Indology, theBhagavad Gita, Sanskrit, Islam, Zen Buddhism, and the mentality
of Modern Japan. Yet Spiegelberg recognized that one could not turn Eastward and assimilate
its beliefs and practices wholesale, and so he found in his Western teachers similar attempts to
discuss the fundamental experience of being, here and now, that he experienced in the wheat
fields.
Martin Heideggers thought would ultimately prove the most influential for Spiegelberg,
though more so in later years than in Marburg.21 In Heidegger he found a true revolutionary, a
thinker whose ideas on being (Dasein) and the here and now (hic et nunc) resonated deeply with
Spiegelbergs own experience and were unlike anything he had ever read by a Westernphilosopher. He immediately drew connections between Heideggers insights and those of the
East, despite Heideggers apparent fidelity to his Greek and German intellectual heritage. It was
too obvious, to too many of his students, Spiegelberg later put it, that a certain amount of
parallels were there.22
Spiegelberg started teaching at Dresden in 1927, and it was there that he met Carl Jung.
Through Jungs pioneering work on myth, symbols, and the relationship between self and world,
Spiegelberg found an interpretive model for comparative religions far surpassing contemporary
approaches. Jung determined through his confrontations with the unconscious that the
experiences disclosed to him were not random permutations of neurosis rooted in sexual trauma
as his teacher Freud proposed, but rather transmitted symbols from the unconscious to the
conscious mind. These symbols pointed to the perennial experience of mans attempts to
20 Undated Notebook in the Papers of Frederic Spiegelberg (SC0638), Department of Special Collections and
University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif.
21 Spiegelberg in a 1976 interview: There are so many teachers who became friends and from whom I,knowingly or non-knowingly, derived much of my own thought that I will only mention still in the strict line
of philosophy the most influential man. That was Martin Heidegger. Not as a lecturer, nor in personal contact,
which I enjoyed in Marburg for years, but through his books. And even more so through his books which hewrote in times when I no longer knew him and met with him. In America I think I have read every line that
Martin Heidegger has ever written in his life. I made it a point to search for every article that he published orthat was published about him. And no other philosopher or philosophy professor seemed to me so
immediately related to my own search for the essential answer to the ultimate questions of existence. This hasbeen my interest, I might almost say my main interest throughout my life. Mukunda Mukowsky,
Conversation with our Philosopher President in California Institute of Integral Studies Newsletter (June1976), 1.
22 Frederic Spiegelberg, The Integral Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo, 51.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
14/38
14
balance the complementary facets of consciousness and unconsciousness. The recognition,
acknowledgement and control of the unconscious by the conscious is called by Jung the process
of individuation, the process by which a person becomes a psychological in-dividual, that is, a
separate, indivisible unity or whole, the process of coming to selfhood.23
The purpose of myth has always been to tell this story of individuation. That is, Jung
found that the symbols expressed in his personal experiments and in the dreams and psychoses of
his patients shared striking parallels with the myths of myriad spiritual traditions, past and
present. He concluded that the symbols disclosed an archetype a symbol of the unity of
conscious and unconscious and a link between the individual and the cosmos of which he is
part.24 A Tibetan mandala, for example, is an archetypal symbol signifying the wholeness of
the individuated self as a microcosm of the macrocosm of which the self is part.
The two outlooks of Jung and Heidegger informed Spiegelbergs seminal intellectual
contribution, the Religion of No Religion. He first published the Religion of No Religion as alecture in 1938 at the London Buddhist lodge. Spiegelberg was a refugee at the time, having fled
Nazi Germany in 1937 after being dismissed from Dresden for going to a conference banned by
the Nazis. While in London, he serendipitously wandered into the only Zen Buddhist specialist
in England, a brilliant 21-year old named Alan Watts (1915-1973). Watts would go on to
become the principal popularizer of Zen Buddhism to American audiences in the 1950s and 60s,
as well as the central teacher of Zen to the Beats, but that comes later. For now he was simply a
prodigy hanging around the London Buddhist Lodge. He had already written a book on D.T.
Suzukis interpretations on Zen Buddhism, and Spiegelberg found him an almost superhuman
being, a young lad with eyes of an angel.25
Spiegelberg begins the Religion of No Religion by asserting that the spiritual experience
of Being Here and Now is the ground for the forms, symbols and rituals of religions to emerge.
These symbols, if they are to be successful, must point to that fundamental experience of the
miracle of being as well as to the unity of man and cosmos. Inevitably, the time will come when
these symbols become meaningless because they fail to adequately convey the experience to
which they point. What results is an iconoclastic reaction in which the symbols are thrown off as
illegitimate, because they do not accurately express the miracle of being. But the cycle is ever to
repeat itself. Indeed, it is the repetition of this cycle of the change and renewal of the miracle ofbeing that is the history of religions.
23 Eric J. Sharpe, Comparative Religion: A History (La Salle: Open Court, 1975), 206.
24 Ibid., 207.
25 Letter to Rosali Spiegelberg, Papers of Frederic Spiegelberg (SC0631).
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
15/38
15
The process begins with the astonishmentor miracle of being, in which the individual
realizes that God or Being is in all and everything. Following the astonishment is a feeling of
pantheistic mysticism, which means here that the limits between the ego and its opposites, such
as the cosmos or God, are wiped out, and one all-combining feeling of community spreads over
the entire universe.26 All symbols of God must be abolished, for they can only mean a
separation from him. This pantheistic moment results in apsychological inversion where that
which stands before man becomes an inner reality of what Spiegelberg calls the all penetrating
holiness. Inevitably, the process repeats itself, as the astonishment of being always culminates
in new attempts to reify it through names and symbols: The paradox of a religion of no-religion
is produced by the fact that the human mind cannot grasp and realize any feeling or fact without
giving it a name.27
The Religion of No-Religion was the fruit borne by Spiegelbergs experience as a refugee,
of being forced down to the barest essentials, of holding on to only that which is whollynecessary for survival. It was at once a dialectical theology,28 a mode of being-in-the-world, and
an explanatory tool for the historical trajectory of religious traditions.
Spiegelberg saw it more as a passport, a belief of universal currency necessary for safe
passage through the coming turbulent Atomic age an age, he feared, where many would
wander futilely in search of home amidst the ruins of the worlds spiritual traditions as visions of
mushroom clouds dotted the skies and obscured the divine light. We are rapidly moving away
from traditions and former ways of life that, in a few years, will be no more than distant
memories, he wrote. The sudden developments of technology are changing our life beyond
recognition. We are passing into an era of unknown experiences, call it the atomic age, or what
you will. All that we can carry with us from the past is essential, the things without which men
cannot live. And to cross the border safely, we will need some sort of passport that all men will
recognize, some belief that has a universal currency. 29
And so Spiegelberg made his way to America, bouncing around on the East Coast for a
few years before winding up at Stanford University in 1941. He carried little with him but his
own ideas. But as we shall soon see, that was more than enough.
26 Spiegelberg, The Religion of No-Religion, 22.
27 Ibid., 55.
28 Dialectical theology is a theological approach based in Protestantism that covers a range of orientations. The
transcendence and revelation of God is typically emphasized, as it was by Spiegelbergs teacher and the best-known crisis theologian, Karl Barth. As we shall see, Spiegelbergs understandings of Barth, as well as that
of his other teacher and good friend, the Lutheran theologian Paul Tillich, both typify and confound thegeneral distinctions of dialectical theology.
29 Frederic Spiegelberg,Living Religions of the World(Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1956), 18-19.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
16/38
16
Part II. Mushroom Cloud (1945-1958)
O, where have you been, my blue-eyed son? And what did you see, my darling young
one? In 1952 an eight-year old American child named Frederick Moore, Jr. witnessed what
countless of his generation coming of age in the postwar West only imagined: the aftermath ofthe mushroom cloud. Moores family lived in Tokyo, his father stationed there as part of the
occupation force. The young Moore saw the ravages of radiation sickness in children and dogs
that wandered like walking dead in the nuclear-charred ruins of former cities. 30 For Moore, the
experience informed a pacifism so strong that he would single-handedly change the world time
and time again throughout his life through the sheer force of his conviction.
Yet hardly anyone knows his name. He remains the unsung hero of the antiwar protests
of the 1960s and the personal computing revolution we still a part of today. In 1959 he attended
Berkeley but refused to partake in the mandatory ROTC program. Given the ultimatum that he
could either take the class or leave the school, the young Fred Moore set the standard for antiwar
protest on college campuses by setting up a table outside of Sproul Hall and declaring that he
was going on a seven-day fast to protest mandatory ROTC. A letter Moore wrote at the time to
the US Attorney General, William P. Moore, encapsulates his anti-war beliefs:
Dear Sir:
This letter is to inform you that I, Frederick Lawrence Moore, Jr., will not register for the draft.Due to my religious beliefs I cannot comply with any law that opposes them.
I follow a Higher Law. A law called LOVE.
I am opposed to war, and I will not participate in killing, whether directly or indirectly. I willneither serve, nor support, any organization or action in which I do not believe.
My services are to all mankind.
Sincerely,
Frederick L. Moore, Jr.31
A hard rains gonna fall means somethings gonna happen, said Bob Dylan in 1963.
Frederick L. Moore made sure of that.
***
At Stanford Spiegelberg grew entranced by the writings of Sri Aurobindo, the Indian
freedom fighter and saint whose philosophy is known as integral yoga.32 He traveled in India in
30 John Markoff, What the Dormouse Said(New York: Penguin, 2005), 61.
31 Ibid., 62-3.
32 An integral vision of reality implies two things: first, immediate contact with the inmost nature of existencein its manifold richness of content; second, an integration of such different provinces of experience as commonsense, science, art, morality, religion, and the like, in the light of ones immediate insight into the heart of
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
17/38
17
1949 on a Rockefeller Grant where he received darshan from Sri Aurobindo.33 Upon his return,
he founded the American Academy of Asian Studies, a center of cross-cultural dissemination the
likes of which had never been seen before. There was at that time not yet any competition in the
way of live Asian studies in America, not even in the Bay Area, reflected Spiegelberg in a 1976
interview. We did not have at that time any ashrams or Zen monasteries, of which we have so
many today.34
Indeed, in an article for theNew York Times (written in 1950, the year before the
Academys founding) reviewing D.T. SuzukisEssays in Zen Buddhism, Gerald Heard (1889-
1971) reacts positively to the work and the promise of Zen Buddhism for American society, yet
notes the unsuccessful reception the Eastern faiths typically elicit out of American audiences.
He attributes the lukewarm response, not pejoratively I might add, to the West having outgrown
its medieval regard for contemplation as a high or even respectable vocation.35
Heard, the son of an Anglo-Irish clergyman, studied history and theology at Cambridgeand was later a science commentator for the BBC. He forged a lifelong friendship in England
with Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), and emigrated with him to Hollywood, California in 1937.
Heard introduced Huxley to Vedanta, a Hindu philosophy based on the Upanishads that stresses
the divinity of human nature and experience. Huxley, like Heard, would become a Vedanta
initiate.36
In the article, Heard singles out the Eastern interpretations offered by Alan Watts, now a
36 year-old Episcopal chaplain at Northwestern, as having roused little more than a faint
realityIt is important to note that, according to Sri Aurobindo, a true harmonization of the totality of humanexperience is not possible through mere criticism of the categories of common sense and science, or throughlogico-empirical analysis of different types of human judgment, or through conceptual formulation of one-
sided spiritual experience. Such harmonization can adequately be achieved only on the basis of integralspiritual realization, which means immediate experience of reality in its fullness of content and rich diversity
of aspect. Haridas Chaudhuri, The Integralism of Sri Aurobindo in Philosophy East and West, Vol. 3, No. 2
(Jul., 1953), 131-2.
33 Kripal defines darshan as a kind of sacramental seeing in which the essence of the god or guru istransmitted into the viewer through the mystical medium of sight. Jeffrey J. Kripal,Esalen: America and the
Religion of No-Religion (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007), 55.
34 Mukowsky, 5.
35
Gerald Heard, On Learning From Buddha in The New York Times, 4 June 1950.36 Shortly after his initiation into Vedanta, Huxley released the Perennial Philosophy (1945), which he defined
as: the metaphysic that recognizes a divine Reality substantial to the world of things and lives and minds; thepsychology that finds in the soul something similar to, or even identical with, divine Reality; the ethic that
places man's final end in the knowledge of the immanent and transcendent Ground of all being; the thing isimmemorial and universal. Rudiments of the perennial philosophy may be found among the traditional lore of
primitive peoples in every region of the world, and in its fully developed forms it has a place in every one ofthe higher religions.36 Aldous Huxley, The Perennial Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1945), vii.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
18/38
18
esthetic curiosity.37 Watts left Europe in 1938 not long after Spiegelberg and went to New York
to study Zen. Dissatisfied with his Zen teacher yet still committed to spiritual pursuits, Watts
decided to enter the priesthood in 1945 and moved to Evanston, Illinois. And in the priesthood
he may well have stayed had not a fortuitous string of events taken place in short succession in
1950. The first was an extramarital affair; the second, his young wife annulling their marriage;
the third, getting kicked out of the ministry; the last, a letter he received from Frederic
Spiegelberg. Spiegelberg was starting a graduate institute to open in 1951 geared towards a
wide-scale spiritual transformation of the consciousness of the West through the teachings of
psychology, Zen Buddhism, and the integral ideas of Sri Aurobindo. Would he like to join him
in San Francisco?
How convenient.
Happily, Alan Watts replied, Circumstances are so arranged at present that I could
come out to San Francisco this winter.Spiegelberg then set about calling a first-rate man from Aurobindos ashram to join
him and spread Aurobindos message to the West. After some correspondence, the Bengali
integral philosopher Haridas Chaudhuri was recommended, who at the time was the head of the
Philosophy Department at Krishnagar College in Bengal. The question was brought to Sri
Aurobindo himself, Spiegelberg recalled. He approved of Chaudhuris coming with us with
the word Acha (Of course!).38
Two months later, in December of 1950, Sri Aurobindo died. In his letter asking for
Chaudhuri to join him at the Academy, Spiegelberg wrote that Aurobindo is the guiding light of
this earth and the prophet of our age. I believe that the last most important contribution that Sri
Aurobindo made before passing was to send you here.39
And just like that, the man who would become the most popular Western interpreter of
Zen Buddhism (in Watts) and Sri Aurobindos vision (through Chaudhuri) were brought to San
Francisco. And here Watts and Chaudhuri would remain until their deaths in 1973 and 1975,
respectively.
The Academy was a brazen attempt to expand the consciousness of the West so that the
world did not end in a nuclear holocaust. Indeed, there were no illusions among these early
teachers of the true purpose of the Academy. Here, the mission statement from the initialbrochure announcing the program:
37 Ibid.
38 David Ulansey, The American Academy of Asian Studies: A History, California Institute of IntegralStudies Archives, CIIS Library, San Francisco, Calif., 4.
39 Ibid.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
19/38
19
The development of human consciousness has called at many times during history for a specialeffort of men to realize and bring down to earth the visions of their spiritual leaders. Today weare well aware of the necessity of unified mankind. To help the growth of this coming reality isthe object of numberless associations who thus fight on all sides the forces of darkness andretrogression. It is the conviction of the founders of this Institute that a merging of the highestvalues of Western and Eastern civilizations will establish the decisive foundation for the next
upward movement of the evolving human mind and society.40
The institute had all the expected struggles, namely, difficulties in acquiring funding and
credibility. Clearly, recalled Watts in 1971, we were just another California cult trying to
assume the mask of a respectable educational institution. But then only twenty years ago it
was not as easy to see as it is today that when you make a powerful technology available to
human beings with the normal form of egocentric consciousness, planetary disaster is inevitable.
Moreover, the point had to be made that the egocentric predicament was not a moral fault to be
corrected by willpower, but a conceptual hallucination requiring some basic alterations of
common sense; a task comparable to persuading people that the earth is round rather than flat.This was very largely the subject of discussion at the weekly colloquium of the Academys
faculty, at which Spiegelberg was the invariably provocative moderator, and which became an
event increasingly attractive to San Francisco artists and intellectuals.41
The Academy functioned as a hub around which ideas on Being influenced by the East
and the Interwar scene were promulgated to the Beat Generation. Like their interwar
counterparts, the postwar Beats were disillusioned by the mechanized ideals of cold war
American society, the valueless abyss of modern life.42 After World War II, Allen Ginsberg
recalled, there was a definitive shrinkage of sensation, of sensory experience, and a definite
mechanical disorder of mentality that led to the cold war.the desensitization had begun, the
compartmentalization of the mind and heart, the cutting off of the head from the rest of the body,
the robotization of mentality.43 And like Frederic Spiegelberg, they were after the ragged
ecstatic joy of pure being,44 as they put it, in which existence itself was God. Through the
American academy of Asian studies, the Beats saw that the East could them provide paths to the
experiences they sought.
Heres Michael Murphy, a student of Spiegelbergs at Stanford and the Academy whose
life was changed by Spiegelbergs courses on Sri Aurobindo, on what the Academy was like in
the early days:
40 AAAS Program Announcement, Papers of Frederic Spiegelberg (SC0631).
41 Alan Watts,In My Own Way, (New York: Vintage Books, 1972), 286-7.
42 John Clellon Holmes, This is the Beat Generation in The New York Times (16 November 1952), 10.
43 Conners, White Hand Society, 62.
44 Jack Kerouac, On the Road(New York: Viking, 1957), 195.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
20/38
20
You had to get there about an hour early to get into the room, and I remember that there were agroup of us then from down at Stanford. We used to have dinner at the La Fontere up here aboutfive in the afternoon, and there was this enormous excitement about coming in to the oldAcademy at First and Sansome Street down south, and then over on Broadway, to get there earlyenough to sit in on those first meetings. And the electricity then was really enormous. There weresome hundreds of students who started to gather around that Academy. In those early days there
were a number of poets who contributed later to the San Francisco Renaissance: Gary Snyderused to come to those colloquia, and occasionally Allen Ginsberg. Most people forget this, but aconsiderable amount of the inspiration for the poetry of the Beat Generation came right throughthat Academy of Asian Studies. Michael McClure and David Meltzer, Phil Whalen, Ginsberg andSnyder...I would say all of them either directly or indirectly were influenced by HaridasChaudhuri, Alan Watts and Frederic Spiegelberg, either directly or indirectly, and some of themwould be in the audiences of those early colloquia and in those classes.45
The institute collapsed by the mid 1950s but its progeny live on today. Michael Murphy
established the Esalen Institute in 1962 in the spirit of the American Academy, Spiegelbergs
Religion of No Religion, and Aldous Huxleys ideas on human potential; the California Institute
of Asian Studies was established by Spiegelbergs colleague Haridas Chaudhuri in 1968; and the
Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, where Spiegelberg served on the Board of Advisers, was
founded by his colleagues and friends Robert Frager, Jim Fadiman and David J. Hall in 1975.
Assessing its legacy shortly before his death in 1973, Alan Watts wrote:
The American Academy of Asian Studies was one of the principal roots of what later came to beknown, in the early sixties, as the San Francisco Renaissance, of which one must say, like SaintAugustine when asked about the nature of time, "I know what it is, but when you ask me, I don't."I am too close to what has happened to see it in proper perspective. I know only that between, say,1958 and 1970 a huge tide of spiritual energy in the form of poetry, music, philosophy, painting,religion, communications techniques in radio, television, and cinema, dancing, theater, and
general life-style swept out of this city and its environs to affect America and the whole world.46
Spiegelberg maintained his post at Stanford for the short duration of the American Academy of
Asian Studies, where he could oscillate between the roles of guru and professor depending on the
situation. If an impressed student in one of his introductory courses to comparative religions at
Stanford stayed after class asking for more, Spiegelberg directed him or her to North Beach.
Such was the case in 1956 when a young student from his comparative religions class
approached him asking where he could find people who thought this way.
Oh, well youll find none of that in Stanford, Spiegelberg chuckled. When I want the
news, I dont look for it in the paper, he added. I go to the poets.What do you mean, the student asked.
North Beach, Spiegelberg said after a pause. Go to North Beach.
45 Ulansey, 6-7.
46 Watts,In My Own Way, 284.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
21/38
21
And with that, young Stewart Brand made his way to North Beach. And in a sense, he
never left.47
Part III. Whole Earth (1958-1975)
How to describe those strange things that happened in the decade we call the sixties? To
say nothing of the unprecedented global upheavals, wars, crises, movements, and protests, how
to describe the sequence of events that led to the technologies of the military industrial complex
merging with the ideas of the counterculture to give us computers and the internet? How to
describe the shift in the attitude towards the boogeyman of technology, long-seen as an
instrument of government control and worldwide uprooting and annihilation, now seen as a tool
of personal liberation and global unity? How do we account for the role of psychedelics incatalyzing this shift? How do we account for the fact that, for the thinkers of the drive towards
wholeness in the 1960s, technology, systems theory, integral yoga, zen Buddhism, and
psychedelic experiences all came to be seen as methods to bring about a consciousness of the
miracle of this, our being here and now?
A Liberation of Earth and Being Through Technology
In an essay based on a lecture given on 21 August 1958, Frederic Spiegelberg used the
example of the Beats to compare Martin Heideggers thought with Sri Aurobindos. Speaking
on the occasion of Sri Aurobindos 100th birthday, Spiegelbergs goal was to show that the ideas
of Aurobindo and Heidegger were compatible and manifested in the example of the Beat
Generation. Time was of the essence, for the Beatniks of North Beach, as Spiegelberg called
them, were no longer a secret now that Jack Kerouacs On the Road(written in two weeks in
April 1951 but left unpublished until 1957) was a mainstream cultural phenomenon. In the essay,
he groups Heidegger and the beatniks together by virtue of their shared central message: an
emphasis on the here and now and directly experiencing the present moment. Both Heidegger
and the Beats hold that the rational mind is overemphasized, and here Spiegelberg feels they
share the outlook of Vedanta and Aurobindo particularly.Spiegelberg also wanted to use the examples of Aurobindo and the Beats to broach
Heideggers new ideas on technology. Indeed, since the publication ofBeing and Time in 1927,
Heideggers writings took an increasingly mystical turn as he devoted more and more of his
attention to what he called the question concerning technology. As he had before, Spiegelberg
47 Email correspondence with Stewart Brand, 13 December 2010.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
22/38
22
drew attention to the zen-like quality of Heideggers message, yet also found in him a global
vision that strikingly called to mind Aurobindo. Heidegger had not yet been translated to
English, but Spiegelberg nevertheless engaged in a detailed exposition on the congruence of
thought between Aurobindo, Heidegger, and the Beats using his own translations of Heideggers
work.
In his essays in The Question Concerning Technology (1977), Heidegger mysteriously
speaks of a saving power in the essence of the danger of technology, and associates this saving
power with the coming to presence of a god. But where danger is, writes Heidegger quoting
the poet Holderlin, grows the saving power also.48 Only when we can reach the insight of how
technology enframes us, how technology challenges us forth to order the world as standing-
reserve, do we see how the truth of Being is hidden from us. 49 It is only once we can discern that
all mere willing and doing in the mode of ordering steadfastly persists in injurious neglect [of
Being] that we can give utterance to insight into that which is. When we give utterance intothat which is, it is the constellation of Being that is uttering itself to us.50
Will we understand this insight, asks Heidegger. Will we, he asks, correspond to that
insight, through a looking that looks into the essence of technology and becomes aware of Being
itself within it?51
Esoteric remarks, to be sure. Spiegelberg understood Heideggers ideas on the saving
power as countenancing technology as a tool to achieve Beings task of liberating earth. In this
Heidegger strongly echoes Aurobindos ideas on global unity. Comparing the two, Spiegelberg
believes they both share the same understanding ofDasein (being-there). Spiegelberg feels
translating this term to Being in English is inaccurate. It is, rather, the be-power itself.52 In
Aurobindos schema, the equivalent term would be satrather than bhava. It is the essence and
key word of Heideggers existentialism, Spiegelberg writes. Everything is Sein. And there
cannot be anything that is not ultimately a part of that all-comprising Beingness. Even becoming
is an expression of Being. This statement can be found in Aurobindo.53 The limited personal
subjectivity of the ego veils man from understanding the divine as Aurobindos gnostic being,
which is none other than the god Heidegger speaks of. As such, the worlds spiritual traditions
have declined and the miracle of being is forgotten because of mans rationality. Whether the
48 Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, 28.
49 Ibid., 48.
50 Ibid.
51 Ibid., 49.
52 Spiegelberg, Sri Aurobindo and Existentialism in The Integral Philosophy of Sri Aurobindo, 53.
53 Ibid., 53
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
23/38
23
god lives or remains dead is not decided by the religiosity of men and even less by the
theological aspirations of philosophy and natural science, writes Heidegger. Whether or not
God is God comes disclosingly to pass from out of and within the constellation of Being.54
For both Heidegger and Aurobindo, writes Spiegelberg, there is only one hope. Here,
they both quote Nietzsches idea of the Superman. When it comes to testify to a mentality that
is greater than the degenerated mentality in which we find ourselves as a whole in this century,
superman is called for, and to characterize him we must say he will have true existentialist
mentality, which looks for the direct experience rather than for the taming of reality by our
mentality. This superman will have to be more daring than any man who ever walked. And
therefore, because he is more daring, he will be able to say more.55
For too long we have cried for individual salvation, thinking only of ourselves in the
constricted terms of our egos, when our task has been otherwise. What is the task then, if it is
not man? asks Spiegelberg. Aurobindo and Heidegger have the same answer: the earth. Forboth Heidegger and Aurobindo, Earth needs man to liberate her, maybe even Being itself.
Dasein needs man.56
Heidegger and Aurobindo agree that because all is sein, because all is sat-chit-ananda,
nothing is to be thrown out or rejected. Everything has meaning as expressions ofDasein.
Spiegelberg then draws a link between the Vedanta understanding of the divine play of Brahman,
lila, where the divine plays hide and seek by searching and finding itself through us (coming to
consciousness of itself), with Heideggers notions that Dasein Being itself comes to self
consciousness in our own longing.57
We do not need to escape technology to achieve Beings task of liberating earth,
Spiegelberg says of Heidegger.
The world of science and technique does not at all preclude a jump beyond itself, says Heidegger.We do not have to get away from civilization, to do away with all our gadgets and with the all-too-fast progress of technique and science. Rather, the more you go into science, the more youtalk to the great men of science, the more you meet an awareness of the mystery, the more itbecomes possible to take science itself as a jumping board. It does not any more today seem thatscience would drive us away from the opening of the greater gates toward higher realization.Aurobindo in his Savitri has said that many times. He agrees completely with the existentialistmessage as Heidegger presents it.58
54 Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, 49.
55 Spiegelberg, 54.
56 Ibid., 55.
57 Ibid., 58.
58 Ibid., 58-9.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
24/38
24
In the essay, Spiegelberg provides his own translation of Heideggers quote of the poet
Holderlin concerning Beings task of liberating earth:
Earth. It not this what you long for?
To be resurrected invisibly in us.
Is it not your dream one day to become invisible?
Earth invisible.
What, if not transformation
Would be your urgent task?
Earth O Beloved One,
I will.59
The Iconoclasm of Stewart Brand
Like Spiegelbergs teacher Martin Heidegger, Stewart Brand remains keen on asserting
that hes not a religious man. Spiegelbergs course was Brands first exposure to Eastern idea
systems. He cured me of religion, Brand said later.
In looking at Brands notes from his course with Frederic Spiegelberg, he appears most
struck by the paradox of unity within polarity and the various means to express that paradox,
such as the symbol of the mandala and the Daoist/Buddhist notions yin and yang, and dao. He
quotes extensively from Carl Jung and Richard Wilhelms Secret of the Golden Flower (1931).
The boxed exclamation points after the quoted passages appear to register the shock of influence.The trajectory of his later life and projects confirms it. This initial encounter with Eastern
thought brought about by Spiegelberg provided Brand with the blueprint of a constellation of
thought whose claims of a divine unity of immanence and transcendence he would confirm
experientially through the use of psychedelic drugs and encode scientifically through systems
theory and cybernetics.
A noteworthy quote speaks of Jungs notion of outgrowing, whereby an individual may
outgrow an insoluble problem through raisingthe level of consciousness. From a wide view,
the insoluble problem lose[es] its urgency.60 For Jung, [t]he greatest and most important
problems of life are all fundamentally insoluble. They must be so, because they express the
59 Ibid., 55.
60 Journal entry (9 December 1957), Papers of Stewart Brand (M1237), Department of Special Collections andUniversity Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
25/38
25
necessary polarity inherent in every self-regulating system. They can never be solved, but only
outgrown.61
Brand would seize upon this notion of the polarity inherent in every self-regulating
system. Though here applied to the individual, the idea applies in the Golden Flower to the
cosmos at large:
[The philosophy ofThe Secret of the Golden Flower] is built on the premise that the cosmos andman, in the last analysis, obey the same law; that man is a microcosm and is not separated fromthe macrocosm by any fixed barriers. The very same laws rule for the one as for the other, andfrom the one a way leads into the other. The psyche and the cosmos are to each other like theinner world and the outer world. Therefore man participates by nature in all cosmic events, and isinwardly as well as outwardly interwoven with them.62
Hence, the polarity inherent in the self-regulating system of man the individual is the same as
that of the self-regulating system of the world at large. If this sounds familiar, its because its a
hallmark insight of cybernetics and systems theorythe very approach Brand would later vaunt
in his Whole Earth Catalog. Here the cybernetic insight is expressed almost verbatim, but in a
spiritual context. This spiritual expression of the polarity in every self-regulating system stands
as Brands earliest known exposure to systems theory.63
After Stanford, Brand spent two years as a parachutist in the army. In December of 1962
he signed up for an LSD session, his first psychedelic experience, with the International
61 Ibid.
62 Richard Wilhelm, The Secret of the Golden Flower (Abingdon: Routledge, 1931), 11.
63 A word on the history of this field is in order. In the early 20th century, the sciences came to grapple with the
breakthroughs in quantum mechanics that tore asunder the Classical Newtonian paradigm of physicalprocesses. From out of the wreckage emerged the field of thermodynamics unscathed, and with it the
principles that gave birth to the whole system models of the ecosystem and biosphere. The whole systemmodel eschews the traditional boundaries between organic and inorganic entities by centering them within the
supraentity of the system, of which they are mutually formative. According to this line of thought, theres nodistinction between organism and artifice because both are self-organized and self-regulating, reflecting a
certain systemic wholeness. Out of whole systems theory emerged cybernetics in the postwar era, and throughits study of information, communication, and feedback reframed the ecosystem conceptual tool in techno-
scientific terms. By focusing on behavior rather than structure, cybernetics founder Norbert Weiner placedorganisms and self-directed machines in the same order on the basis of the purposeful behavior that both
share.63 Weiner saw in information feedback the mechanism by which entities fight entropy. Systems use
information feedback to maintain dynamic equilibrium, or homeostasis. Cybernetics demonstrated thepotential for systems to go awry by way of positive feedback loops. The techno-scientific discourse of
cybernetics reframed the debates of various fields in terms of information feedback. In the sciences,cybernetics met with ecosystem theory and redefined organisms as self-regulating machines. When applied to
social systems, we begin to see the far-reaching implications of positive feedback: unless variables withinsystems respond to one another through communication, feedback, and circular causality within the set limits,
system failure may result in the form of, say, an escalating nuclear arms race. See William Harold Bryant,Whole System, Whole Earth (Ann Arbor: UMI, 2006), 59.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
26/38
26
Federation of Advanced Study, an organization with ties to the Stanford Research Institute and
Douglas Engelbarts Augmentation Research Center. SRI and its wing the ARC transitioned over
the 1950s and 60s from nodes of defense oriented military technology sponsored by the Defense
Departments Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) into centers of cybernetic
exploration of networking and communications. Human-machine collaboration became a vision
that would eventually yield the Internet and personal computer. Voices in the community like
Engelbart, Vannevar Bush, and Joseph C.R. Licklider saw a future of unprecedented possibility.
Heres Fred Turner:
Licklider, like Bush and Engelbart, envisioned the computer becoming a communications device;along with the user and as part of a whole information system, it might, properly deployed, be ofuse to humanity as a whole. Man-computer symbiosis, he suggested, should produceintellectually the most creative and exciting [period] in the history of mankind.64
Engelbart, for his part, saw the individual and the computer, like the group and the computer
system, as complementary elements in a larger information systema system that would use
cybernetic processes of communication and control to facilitate not only better office
communication, but even the evolution of human beings.65
Brand and Spiegelberg each collaborated with SRI and ARC separately over the course
of the 1960s to participate in bringing about this vision. Spiegelbergs friendship with Stanford
psychologist Jim Fadiman and SRI Research Engineer David J. Hall led to consulting
opportunities and eventually to Spiegelberg serving on the Board of Advisors for their Institute
of Transpersonal Psychology in the 1970s. Brand, for his part, hung out often with the
community, and was videographer for Douglas Engelbarts infamous Mother of All Demosevent in 1968 that showed off the framework of tools that would one day become the personal
computer.
But that comes later. The man in charge of administering LSD to Brand in December of
1962 was Jim Fadiman, a Stanford psychologist and friend and colleague of Spiegelbergs who
later worked at ARC with Engelbart as the division explored networked computing.66 Fadiman
would remain a lifelong proponent of psychedelic use. His first experience came when his
former undergraduate advisor at Harvard, none other than Dr. Richard Alpert, dosed him as
Alpert, Timothy Leary and Aldous Huxley were on their way to a Copenhagen conference to
64 Fred Turner, From Counterculture to Cyberculture, 109.
65 Ibid., 108.
66 Ibid., 61.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
27/38
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
28/38
28
projects in the 1950s like the CIAs MK-ULTRA program (which saw LSD as a potential
weapon for mind control in the Cold War), the development of the Stanford Research Institute as
a military think tank, and the advent of cybernetics as a means of bolstering defense-oriented
military technologies. But where the danger is, grows the saving power also. Somehow, in the
apotheosis of the cold war attempt to control came the primal cry to be free. The technology
driving the cold war ever onward to increasing mechanization was the very technology that led
the way out. LSD, cybernetic systems theory, and the technologies that became the Internet and
personal computer were embraced as tools for global and personal integration and unity. Will
we see the lightning-flash of Being in the essence of technology, asked Heidegger. Will we
correspond to that insight, through a looking that looks into the essence of technology and
becomes aware of Being itself within it?
After his first psychedelic experience, Brand immersed himself in techno-mystical San
Francisco communities like USCO and Ken Keseys Merry Pranksters. Kesey was a subject inthe MK-ULTRA experiments in 1961 and was dosed with LSD, psilocybin, and IT-290. He
liked what he saw, procured a stash for himself and his buddies, and started a burgeoning Bay
Area artistic scene frequented by the likes of Richard Alpert, Jerry Garcia, and Page Browning.71
This eventually transformed into the Merry Pranksters, and Brand soon wrote Kesey and became
a key member.
The Merry Pranksters famed journey across America in a psychedelic bus in 1964
captures the celebratory albeit nave techno-utopic psychedelic optimism of the period well. It
also symbolized a transition, a passing of the torch from the Beat Generation towell, to
whatever these folks imagined themselves to be. Jack Kerouac, the so-called King of the
Beatniks, would have none of it when Ken Kesey and the rowdy bunch of Pranksters finally
made it to New York and showed up to a Madison Avenue apartment party in November 1964.
His best friend, and the hero On the Road, Neal Cassady, served as the Pranksters bus driver on
their journey further as they careened ever-precariously around the corners of too far. This
would be the last time the two would see one another. Cassady fully embraced the Prankster
way, as did Allen Ginsberg, who also showed up that night. Most at the party were looking for
an endorsement, tacit or otherwise, from Kerouac that the Pranksters marked the natural
evolution of the Beats.
72
But Kerouac said no. He spent the evening on a couch, getting increasingly drunk and
repeatedly denying the proffered acid tabs. By now he was a broken man, his good looks (Dali
71 Ibid., 61.
72 David Sandison,Jack Kerouac: An Illustrated Biography (Chicago: Octopus Publishing Group, 1999) 149-50.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
29/38
29
once called him the most beautiful man he had ever seen) ruined by the ravages of an alcoholism
so severe it would soon claim his life five years later at 47 when the blood that started pouring
from his mouth simply would not stop, even after 26 transfusions. No, Kerouac did not intend to
start this revolution. And he would not endorse it now.
Two years earlier Ginsberg had finally convinced Kerouac to try LSD with Timothy
Leary. Leary and Ginsberg were on a quest to turn on as many creative people as possible.
Kerouac, as a Beat Buddhist Catholic and one of his generations most talented writers, was the
holy grail. Dr. Leary, on acid as well for his psychedelic session with Kerouac, must have been
surprised when he started having his first bad trip. Perhaps up to that point he did not think such
a thing was possible. But Kerouac proved to him undeniably that it was. He stood up and
shouted at Leary (who was also raised a Catholic): Can your drugs absolve the mortal and
venial sins which our beloved savior, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, came down and
sacrificed his life upon the cross to wash away!? Leary was spooked. Later, Ginsberg askedKerouac about his trip. Walking on water wasnt made in a day, he replied. As David
Sandison notes, that response encapsulates Jacks later open distaste of the hippie movement
and its lazy assumption (largely inspired by the pronouncements of Leary and his acolytes) that
enlightenment could be achieved overnight through chemicals.73
It was advice the counterculture would have done well to heed. The cluster of thinkers
comprising the drive towards wholeness eventually realized that psychedelics did not provide
ersatz enlightenment so much as a temporary one. What goes up, must come down and
sometimes very hard. The cognitive framework of the ego, transcended through the psychedelic
experience, always seemed to return once the trip ended. If the disparity between ones every-
day experience of reality through the ego versus ones experience of reality on psychedelics was
too great, the reintegration post-psychedelic session could be bumpy. Some never reintegrated at
all. But by the time these beatnik psychonauts realized that, to quote Alan Watts, one should
hang up the phone once the message is received, it was too late. The demon scourge of LSD was
already loosed upon the American culture, brought about in no small part by the efforts of the
thinkers of the drive towards wholeness.
For his part, Brand remained optimistic that coupled with the right reintegrative
frameworks, psychedelics offered much promise, and at the very least yielded interestingprojects. Over the 1960s he would become a central node on the drive towards wholeness as he
coordinated projects between the technological, academic, and spiritual wings of the
counterculture. He interfaced perfectly with Beats and Hippies, scientists and mystics. His
projects during this period include the America Needs Indians Campaign and the Trips Festival.
73 Ibid., 148.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
30/38
30
And then, in March 1966, on a North Beach rooftop, Brand received his vision.
***
We do not know if Frederic Spiegelberg ever tripped. He cannot claim, like his friend
Alan Watts, essays on the congruence between contemporary psychedelic use and ancient
alchemy, or between the insights of LSD and cybernetics. But Spiegelberg participated in this
burgeoning techno-utopic cyberdelic scene in his own way, making his unique contributions to
Beings need of man to liberate earth through technology.
Perhaps the most interesting is a project he collaborated on with the Stanford Research
Institute in 1969. Titled Computer Processing and Bibliography of Literature Related to
Voluntary Improvement of Individual Performance (1969), the project had as its aim the
production of a global network of research information exchange concerning literature on yoga,
meditation, physiological feedback training, altered states of consciousness, and other
subjects related to voluntary improvement of individual performance.
74
As a consultant to theproject along with Haridas Chaudhuri, Spiegelberg was tasked with providing direction in
assessing a literature that was global, ancient, immense and poorly classified. The idea was to
use the latest technologies of SRI and SRIs Augmentation Research Center both to create and
catalogue the information service as well as to perform a series of experiments relating to that
literature. SRI had just become one of the first four nodes on ARPANET, the network that
became the Internet.
Why yoga and meditation? A few reasons. The first was, simply, to catalyze a mode of
being suitable to the modern technological age, one that could lead to the voluntary
improvement of individual performance. Here, from the research proposal:
Improvement of human performance has for some time been one of the prime aims of ourtechnology. This has been achieved, in our society, largely by providing the human withsignificant tools and automation procedures that, with proper training, augment his abilities toperform [] The goals of our technological culture at this time are epitomized by our explorationinto outer space, such as our landings on the moon and other technological feats requiring a highdegree of skill and expertise in controlling our external environment [] However, for theexploration of the inner man, our educational concepts, training methods, and research, seem lesssuitable.75
Far out is the only adequate term that could encompass the long-term goals of the project.
Through cataloging, researching, and integrating all the data on yoga, meditation, and alteredstates into an information system, the engineers hoped that man would soon, through mastery of
yoga, reach the ability to control computers directly through the voluntary use of brainwave
74 Computer Processing and Bibliography of Literature Related to Voluntary Improvement of IndividualPerformance, Papers of Frederic Spiegelberg (SC0631).
75 Ibid., 3.
-
7/27/2019 The New Myth (First Draft)
31/38
31
signals. Studies will undoubtedly soon be carried out using these physiological instruments in
conjunction with computers, in the most advanced type of man/machine communication and
human augmentation system we can imagine [] Many years may pass before significant
progress and useful results can be produced in the control of computers directly from brainwave
signals. In the meantime, it would seem prudent to explore the use of yoga, meditation, and
other t