![Page 1: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The onset of antiferromagnetism in metals
HARVARDsachdev.physics.harvard.edu
Lorentz Lecture, Leiden June 4, 2012
Subir Sachdev
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 2: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Max Metlitski
HARVARDMatthias Punk Erez Berg
Eun Gook Moon
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 3: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The cuprate superconductors
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 4: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ground state has long-range Néel order
Square lattice antiferromagnet
H =�
�ij�
Jij�Si · �Sj
Order parameter is a single vector field �ϕ = ηi�Si
ηi = ±1 on two sublattices
��ϕ� �= 0 in Neel state.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 5: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 6: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
Electron-doped cuprate superconductors
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 7: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
Resistivity∼ ρ0 +ATn
Electron-doped cuprate superconductors
Figure prepared by K. Jin and and R. L. Greenebased on N. P. Fournier, P. Armitage, and
R. L. Greene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2421 (2010).
StrangeMetal
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 8: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ishida, Nakai, and HosonoarXiv:0906.2045v1
Iron pnictides: a new class of high temperature superconductors
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 9: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
TSDW Tc
T0
2.0
0
!"
1.0 SDW
Superconductivity
BaFe2(As1-xPx)2
AF
Resistivity∼ ρ0 +ATα
S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda,
Physical Review B 81, 184519 (2010)
StrangeMetal
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 10: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Lower Tc superconductivity in the heavy fermion compounds
G. Knebel, D. Aoki, and J. Flouquet, arXiv:0911.5223
2
Generally, the ground state of a Ce heavy-fermion sys-tem is determined by the competition of the indirect Ru-derman Kittel Kasuya Yosida (RKKY) interaction whichprovokes magnetic order of localized moments mediatedby the light conduction electrons and the Kondo interac-tion. This last local mechanism causes a paramagneticground state due the screening of the local moment ofthe Ce ion by the conduction electrons. Both interac-tions depend critically on the hybridization of the 4felectrons with the conduction electrons. High pressure isan ideal tool to tune the hybridization and the positionof the 4f level with respect to the Fermi level. Thereforehigh pressure experiments are ideal to study the criti-cal region where both interactions are of the same orderand compete. To understand the quantum phase transi-tion from the antiferromagnetic (AF) state to the para-magnetic (PM) state is actually one of the fundamen-tal questions in solid state physics. Di!erent theoreticalapproaches exist to model the magnetic quantum phasetransition such as spin-fluctuation theory of an itinerantmagnet [10–12], or a new so-called ’local’ quantum criti-cal scenario [13, 14]. Another e"cient source to preventlong range antiferromagnetic order is given by the va-lence fluctuations between the trivalent and the tetrava-lent configuration of the cerium ions [15].
The interesting point is that in these strongly corre-lated electron systems the same electrons (or renormal-ized quasiparticles) are responsible for both, magnetismand superconductivity. The above mentioned Ce-115family is an ideal model system, as it allows to studyboth, the quantum critical behavior and the interplay ofthe magnetic order with a superconducting state. Espe-cially, as we will be shown below, unexpected observa-tions will be found, if a magnetic field is applied in thecritical pressure region.
PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE PHASE DIAGRAM
In this article we concentrate on the compoundCeRhIn5. At ambient pressure the RKKY interactionis dominant in CeRhIn5 and magnetic order appears atTN = 3.8 K. However, the ordered magnetic moment ofµ = 0.59µB at 1.9 K is reduced of about 30% in com-parison to that of Ce ion in a crystal field doublet with-out Kondo e!ect [17]. Compared to other heavy fermioncompounds at p = 0 the enhancement of the Sommerfeldcoe"cient of the specific heat (! = 52 mJ mol!1K!2) [18]and the cylotron masses of electrons on the extremal or-bits of the Fermi surface is rather moderate [19, 20]. Thetopologies of the Fermi surfaces of CeRhIn5 are cylin-drical and almost identical to that of LaRhIn5 which isthe non 4f isostructural reference compound. From thisit can be concluded that the 4f electrons in CeRhIn5
are localized and do not contribute to the Fermi volume[19, 20].
By application of pressure, the system can be tunedthrough a quantum phase transition. The Neel temper-
FIG. 2. Pressure–temperature phase diagram of CeRhIn5 atzero magnetic field determined from specific heat measure-ments with antiferromagnetic (AF, blue) and superconduct-ing phases (SC, yellow). When Tc < TN a coexistence phaseAF+SC exist. When Tc > TN the antiferromagnetic order isabruptly suppressed. The blue square indicate the transitionfrom SC to AF+SC after Ref. 16.
ature shows a smooth maximum around 0.8 GPa andis monotonously suppressed for higher pressures. How-ever, CeRhIn5 is also a superconductor in a large pres-sure region from about 1.3 to 5 GPa. It has been shownthat when the superconducting transition temperatureTc > TN the antiferromagnetic order is rapidly sup-pressed (see figure 2) and vanishes at a lower pressurethan that expected from a linear extrapolation to T = 0.Thus the pressure where Tc = TN defines a first criticalpressure p!
c and clearly just above p!c anitferromagnetism
collapses. The intuitive picture is that the opening of asuperconducting gap on large parts of the Fermi surfaceabove p!
c impedes the formation of long range magneticorder. A coexisting phase AF+SC in zero magnetic fieldseems only be formed if on cooling first the magnetic or-der is established. We will discuss below the microscopicevidence of an homogeneous AF+SC phase.
At ambient pressure CeRhIn5 orders in an incommen-surate magnetic structure [21] with an ordering vectorof qic=(0.5, 0.5, ") and " = 0.297 that is a magneticstructure with a di!erent periodicity than the one of thelattice. Generally, an incommensurate magnetic struc-ture is not favorable for superconductivity with d wavesymmetry, which is realized in CeRhIn5 above p!
c [22].Neutron scattering experiments under high pressure donot give conclusive evidence of the structure under pres-sures up to 1.7 GPa which is the highest pressure studiedup to now [23–25]. The result is that at 1.7 GPa the in-commensurability has changed to " ! 0.4. The main dif-ficulty in these experiments with large sample volume isto ensure the pressure homogeneity. Near p!
c the controlof a perfect hydrostaticity is a key issue as the materialreacts quite opposite on uniaxial strain applied along thec and a axis.
From recent nuclear quadrupol resonance (NQR) data
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 11: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 12: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 13: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
What is the physics of the strange metal ?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 14: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 15: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 16: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Fermi surface
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Momenta with electronic
states empty
Momenta with electronic
states occupied
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 17: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fermi surface+antiferromagnetism
The electron spin polarization obeys�
�S(r, τ)�
= �ϕ(r, τ)eiK·r
where K is the ordering wavevector.
+
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 18: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surfaceWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 19: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fermi surfaces translated by K = (π,π).Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 20: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Electron and hole pockets inantiferromagnetic phase with ��ϕ� �= 0
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 21: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Fermi surface+antiferromagnetism
��ϕ� = 0
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0
S. Sachdev, A. V. Chubukov, and A. Sokol, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14874 (1995). A. V. Chubukov and D. K. Morr, Physics Reports 288, 355 (1997).
Increasing interaction
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 22: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
N. P. Armitage et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 257001 (2002).
Photoemission in Nd2-xCexCuO4
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 23: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Nd2−xCexCuO4
T. Helm, M. V. Kartsovnik, M. Bartkowiak, N. Bittner,
M. Lambacher, A. Erb, J. Wosnitza, and R. Gross,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 157002 (2009).
Quantum oscillations
Increasing SDW order
s
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 24: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Fermi surface+antiferromagnetism
��ϕ� = 0
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0
sS. Sachdev, A. V. Chubukov, and A. Sokol, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14874 (1995).
A. V. Chubukov and D. K. Morr, Physics Reports 288, 355 (1997).Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 25: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
FluctuatingFermi
pocketsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Underlying SDW ordering quantum critical pointin metal at x = xm
Increasing SDW order
T*QuantumCritical
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 26: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
FluctuatingFermi
pocketsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
Relaxation and equilibration times ∼ �/kBT are robustproperties of strongly-coupled quantum criticality
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Increasing SDW order
T*QuantumCritical
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 27: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
FluctuatingFermi
pocketsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
Relaxation and equilibration times ∼ �/kBT are robustproperties of strongly-coupled quantum criticality
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Increasing SDW order
T*QuantumCriticalStrangeMetal ?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 28: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
LargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuations
SDW quantum critical point is unstable to d-wave superconductivityThis instability is stronger than that in the BCS theory
M. A. Metlitski andS. Sachdev,Physical ReviewB 82, 075128 (2010)
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 29: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
BaFe2(As1−x Px)2
K. Hashimoto, K. Cho, T. Shibauchi, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, R. Katsumata, Y. Tsuruhara, T. Terashima, H. Ikeda, M. A. Tanatar, H. Kitano, N. Salovich, R. W. Giannetta, P. Walmsley, A. Carrington, R. Prozorov, and Y. Matsuda, Science in press
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 30: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
BaFe2(As1−x Px)2
K. Hashimoto, K. Cho, T. Shibauchi, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, R. Katsumata, Y. Tsuruhara, T. Terashima, H. Ikeda, M. A. Tanatar, H. Kitano, N. Salovich, R. W. Giannetta, P. Walmsley, A. Carrington, R. Prozorov, and Y. Matsuda, Science in press
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 31: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
BaFe2(As1−x Px)2
K. Hashimoto, K. Cho, T. Shibauchi, S. Kasahara, Y. Mizukami, R. Katsumata, Y. Tsuruhara, T. Terashima, H. Ikeda, M. A. Tanatar, H. Kitano, N. Salovich, R. W. Giannetta, P. Walmsley, A. Carrington, R. Prozorov, and Y. Matsuda, Science in press
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 32: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
BaFe2(As1−x Px)2
Notice shift between the position of the QCP in the superconductor, and the divergence in effective mass in the metal
measured at high magnetic fieldsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 33: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
LargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuations
SDW quantum critical point is unstable to d-wave superconductivityThis instability is stronger than that in the BCS theory
M. A. Metlitski andS. Sachdev,Physical ReviewB 82, 075128 (2010)
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 34: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
LargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuations E. G. Moon andS. Sachdev, Phy.Rev. B 80, 035117(2009)
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Competition between SDW order and superconductivitymoves the actual quantum critical point to x = xs < xm.
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 35: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
LargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuations E. G. Moon andS. Sachdev, Phy.Rev. B 80, 035117(2009)
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Competition between SDW order and superconductivitymoves the actual quantum critical point to x = xs < xm.
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 36: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pocketsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
Theory of quantum criticality in the cuprates
Competition between SDW order and superconductivitymoves the actual quantum critical point to x = xs < xm.
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets E. G. Moon andS. Sachdev, Phy.Rev. B 80, 035117(2009)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 37: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pocketsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
Spin density wave (SDW)
d-wavesuperconductor
T*
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 38: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 39: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*
Neutron scatter-
ing experiments on
Nd2−xCexCuO4 show
that at low fields
xs = 0.14, while
quantum oscilla-
tions at high fields
show that xm = 0.165.
QuantumCritical
E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 40: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Nd2−xCexCuO4
T. Helm, M. V. Kartsovnik, M. Bartkowiak, N. Bittner,
M. Lambacher, A. Erb, J. Wosnitza, and R. Gross,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 157002 (2009).
Quantum oscillations
Increasing SDW order
s
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 41: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
0 100 200 300 4005
10
20
50
100
200
500
Temperature (K)
Spin
cor
rela
tion
leng
th
/a
x=0.154x=0.150x=0.145x=0.134x=0.129x=0.106x=0.075x=0.038
E. M. Motoyama, G. Yu, I. M. Vishik, O. P. Vajk, P. K. Mang, and M. Greven,Nature 445, 186 (2007).
Nd2−xCexCuO4
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 42: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*
Neutron scatter-
ing experiments on
Nd2−xCexCuO4 show
that at low fields
xs = 0.14, while
quantum oscilla-
tions at high fields
show that xm = 0.165.
QuantumCritical
E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 43: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Similar phase diagram for CeRhIn5
G. Knebel, D. Aoki, and J. Flouquet, arXiv:0911.5223.Tuson Park, F. Ronning, H. Q. Yuan, M. B. Salamon, R. Movshovich, J. L. Sarrao, and J. D. Thompson, Nature 440, 65 (2006)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 44: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*QuantumCritical
There is a muchlarger shift fromxm to xs in the
hole-dopedcuprates.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 45: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
QuantumCritical
Many experiments in hole-doped cuprates
have presented evidence for the
predicted green quantum phase
transition line from SC to SC+SDW
in a magnetic field
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 46: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
QuantumCritical
Many experiments in hole-doped cuprates
have presented evidence for the
predicted green quantum phase
transition line from SC to SC+SDW
in a magnetic field
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 47: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*E. Demler, S. Sachdevand Y. Zhang, Phys.Rev. Lett. 87,067202 (2001).
QuantumCritical
Many experiments in hole-doped cuprates
have presented evidence for the
predicted green quantum phase
transition line from SC to SC+SDW
in a magnetic field
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 48: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
hole doping x
YBCO6.5
YBCO6.45YBCO6.35
SC
SC+
AFm
agne
tic fi
eld H
AF
D. Haug, V. Hinkov, Y. Sidis, P. Bourges, N. B. Christensen, A. Ivanov,
T. Keller, C. T. Lin, and B. Keimer, New J. Phys. 12, 105006 (2010)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 49: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
H
SC
M"Normal"
(Large Fermisurface)
SDW(Small Fermi
pockets)
SC+SDW
Small Fermipockets with
pairing fluctuationsLargeFermi
surface
StrangeMetal
d-waveSC
T
Tsdw
Fluctuating, paired Fermi
pockets
T*QuantumCritical
This opens a wideintermediate regimefor new physics:
bond-nematic order,T -breaking,
fractionalization andMott physics etc.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 50: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 51: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 52: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Quantum phase transition with Fermi surface reconstruction
��ϕ� = 0
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0
S. Sachdev, A. V. Chubukov, and A. Sokol, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14874 (1995). A. V. Chubukov and D. K. Morr, Physics Reports 288, 355 (1997).
Increasing interaction
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 53: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Boson-fermion theory for both phases
S =
�d2rdτ [Lc + Lϕ + Lcϕ]
Lc = c†aε(−i∇)ca
Lϕ =1
2(∇ϕα)
2 +r
2ϕ2α +
u
4
�ϕ2α
�2
Lcϕ = λϕα eiK·r c†a σαab cb.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 54: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Boson-fermion theory for both phases
“Yukawa” coupling between fermions and
antiferromagnetic order:
λ2 ∼ U , the Hubbard repulsion
S =
�d2rdτ [Lc + Lϕ + Lcϕ]
Lc = c†aε(−i∇)ca
Lϕ =1
2(∇ϕα)
2 +r
2ϕ2α +
u
4
�ϕ2α
�2
Lcϕ = λϕα eiK·r c†a σαab cb.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 55: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
• Integrate out Fermi surface quasiparticles and
obtain an effective theory for the order param-
eter �ϕ alone.
• This is dangerous, and will lead to non-local in
the �ϕ theory. Hertz focused on only the simplest
such non-local term.
• However, there are an infinite number of non-
local terms at higher order, and these lead to
a breakdown of the Hertz theory in two spatial
dimensions.
Hertz-Moriya-Millis theory
Ar. Abanov and A.V. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255702 (2004).Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 56: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
• Integrate out Fermi surface quasiparticles and
obtain an effective theory for the order param-
eter �ϕ alone.
• This is dangerous, and will lead to non-local in
the �ϕ theory. Hertz focused on only the simplest
such non-local term.
• However, there are an infinite number of non-
local terms at higher order, and these lead to
a breakdown of the Hertz theory in two spatial
dimensions.
Hertz-Moriya-Millis theory
Ar. Abanov and A.V. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255702 (2004).Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 57: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Hertz-Moriya-Millis theory
Ar. Abanov and A.V. Chubukov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255702 (2004).
• Integrate out Fermi surface quasiparticles and
obtain an effective theory for the order param-
eter �ϕ alone.
• This is dangerous, and will lead to non-local in
the �ϕ theory. Hertz focused on only the simplest
such non-local term.
• However, there are an infinite number of non-
local terms at higher order, and these lead to
a breakdown of the Hertz theory in two spatial
dimensions.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 58: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Sung-Sik Lee, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165102 (2009) M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075128 (2010)
• In d = 2, we must work in local theoreswhich keeps both the order parameter andthe Fermi surface quasiparticles “alive”.
• The theories can be organized in a 1/N ex-pansion, where N is the number of fermion“flavors”.
• At subleading order, resummation of all“planar” graphics is required (at least): thistheory is even more complicated than QCD.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 59: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Sung-Sik Lee, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165102 (2009) M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075128 (2010)
• In d = 2, we must work in local theoreswhich keeps both the order parameter andthe Fermi surface quasiparticles “alive”.
• The theories can be organized in a 1/N ex-pansion, where N is the number of fermion“flavors”.
• At subleading order, resummation of all“planar” graphics is required (at least): thistheory is even more complicated than QCD.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 60: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Sung-Sik Lee, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165102 (2009) M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075128 (2010)
• In d = 2, we must work in local theoreswhich keeps both the order parameter andthe Fermi surface quasiparticles “alive”.
• The theories can be organized in a 1/N ex-pansion, where N is the number of fermion“flavors”.
• At subleading order, resummation of all“planar” graphics is required (at least): thistheory is even more complicated than QCD.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 61: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Fermi surfaces translated by K = (π,π).Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 62: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
“Hot” spotsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 63: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Low energy theory for critical point near hot spotsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 64: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Low energy theory for critical point near hot spotsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 65: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
v1 v2
ψ2 fermionsoccupied
ψ1 fermionsoccupied
Theory has fermions ψ1,2 (with Fermi velocities v1,2)and boson order parameter �ϕ,interacting with coupling λ
kx
ky
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 66: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Pairing “glue” from antiferromagnetic fluctuationsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 67: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Unconventional pairing at and near hot spots
∆−∆
�c†kαc
†−kβ
�= εαβ∆(cos kx − cos ky)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 68: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
At stronger coupling, different effects compete:
• Pairing glue becomes stronger.
• There is stronger fermion-boson
scattering, and fermionic quasi-
particles lose their integrity.
• Other instabilities can appear
e.g. to charge density waves/stripeorder.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 69: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
At stronger coupling, different effects compete:
• Pairing glue becomes stronger.
• There is stronger fermion-boson
scattering, and fermionic quasi-
particles lose their integrity.
• Other instabilities can appear
e.g. to charge density waves/stripeorder.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 70: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
At stronger coupling, different effects compete:
• Pairing glue becomes stronger.
• There is stronger fermion-boson
scattering, and fermionic quasi-
particles lose their integrity.
• Other instabilities can appear
e.g. to charge density waves/stripeorder.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 71: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
BCS theory
1 + λe-ph log�ωD
ω
�
Electron-phononcoupling
Debyefrequency
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 72: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)
Enhancement of pairing susceptibility by interactions
Antiferromagnetic critical point
1 +sin θ
2πlog2
�EF
ω
�
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 73: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)
Enhancement of pairing susceptibility by interactions
Antiferromagnetic critical point
1 +sin θ
2πlog2
�EF
ω
�
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 74: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)
Enhancement of pairing susceptibility by interactions
Antiferromagnetic critical point
1 +sin θ
2πlog2
�EF
ω
�
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 75: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)
Fermienergy
Enhancement of pairing susceptibility by interactions
(see also Ar. Abanov, A. V. Chubukov, and A. M. Finkel'stein, Europhys. Lett. 54, 488 (2001))
Antiferromagnetic critical point
1 +sin θ
2πlog2
�EF
ω
�
θ is the angle between Fermi lines.Independent of interaction strength
U in 2 dimensions.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 76: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
θ
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 77: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
M. A. Metlitski and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075127 (2010)
Enhancement of pairing susceptibility by interactions
Antiferromagnetic critical point
1 +sin θ
2πlog2
�EF
ω
�
• Universal log2 singularity arises from Fermi lines;singularity at hot spots is weaker.
• Interference between BCS and quantum-critical logs.
• Momentum dependence of self-energy is crucial.
• Not suppressed by 1/N factor in 1/N expansion.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 78: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 79: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 80: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
v1 v2
ψ2 fermionsoccupied
ψ1 fermionsoccupied
Theory has fermions ψ1,2 (with Fermi velocities v1,2)and boson order parameter �ϕ,interacting with coupling λ
kx
ky
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 81: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
v1 v2
Theory has fermions ψ1,2 (with Fermi velocities v1,2)and boson order parameter �ϕ,interacting with coupling λ
kx
ky
To faithfully realize low energy theory in quantum Monte Carlo,we need a UV completion in which Fermi lines don’t end
and all weights are positive.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 82: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
K
Hot spots in a single band model
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 83: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
K
Hot spots in a two band model
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 84: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
K
Hot spots in a two band model
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 85: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
K
Hot spots in a two band model
No sign problem in fermion determinant Monte Carlo !
Determinant is positive because of Kramer’sdegeneracy, and no additional symmetries are needed; holds for
arbitrary band structure and band filling, provided K only connects hot spots in distinct bands
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 86: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Electrons with dispersion εkinteracting with fluctuations of the
antiferromagnetic order parameter �ϕ.
Z =
�DcαD�ϕ exp (−S)
S =
�dτ
�
k
c†kα
�∂
∂τ− εk
�ckα
+
�dτd2x
�1
2(∇x�ϕ)
2 +r
2�ϕ2 + . . .
�
− λ
�dτ
�
i
�ϕi · (−1)xic†iα�σαβciβ
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 87: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Electrons with dispersions ε(x)k and ε(y)kinteracting with fluctuations of the
antiferromagnetic order parameter �ϕ.
Z =
�Dc(x)α Dc(y)α D�ϕ exp (−S)
S =
�dτ
�
k
c(x)†kα
�∂
∂τ− ε(x)k
�c(x)kα
+
�dτ
�
k
c(y)†kα
�∂
∂τ− ε(y)k
�c(y)kα
+
�dτd2x
�1
2(∇x�ϕ)
2+
r
2�ϕ2
+ . . .
�
− λ
�dτ
�
i
�ϕi · (−1)xic(x)†iα �σαβc
(y)iβ +H.c.
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 88: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Electrons with dispersions ε(x)k and ε(y)kinteracting with fluctuations of the
antiferromagnetic order parameter �ϕ.
Z =
�Dc(x)α Dc(y)α D�ϕ exp (−S)
S =
�dτ
�
k
c(x)†kα
�∂
∂τ− ε(x)k
�c(x)kα
+
�dτ
�
k
c(y)†kα
�∂
∂τ− ε(y)k
�c(y)kα
+
�dτd2x
�1
2(∇x�ϕ)
2+
r
2�ϕ2
+ . . .
�
− λ
�dτ
�
i
�ϕi · (−1)xic(x)†iα �σαβc
(y)iβ +H.c.
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
No sign problem !
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 89: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
K
Hot spots in a two band model
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 90: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1k y/! K
a)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Center Brillouin zone at (π,π,)
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 91: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1
kx/!
k y/!
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1
k y/! kx/!
K
a) b)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Move one of the Fermi surface by (π,π,)
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 92: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1k y/!
a)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Now hot spots are at Fermi surface intersections
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 93: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
v1 v2
Theory has fermions ψ1,2 (with Fermi velocities v1,2)and boson order parameter �ϕ,interacting with coupling λ
kx
ky
To faithfully realize low energy theory in quantum Monte Carlo,we need a UV completion in which Fermi lines don’t end
and all weights are positive.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 94: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1k y/!
a)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Now hot spots are at Fermi surface intersections
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 95: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1
kx/!
k y/!
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1k y/!
kx/!
K
a) b)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
Expected Fermi surfaces in the AFM ordered phase
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and
S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 96: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1r = !0.5
kx/!
k y/!
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1
kx/!
r = 0
!1 0 1!1
!0.5
0
0.5
1
kx/!
r = 0.5
0.5
1
1.5
Electron occupation number nk
as a function of the tuning parameter r
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 97: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
!0.5 0 0.5 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
rBi
nder
cum
ulan
t!0.5 0 0.5 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
r
! "/(L
2 #)
L=8L=10L=12L=14
a) b)
AF susceptibility, χϕ, and Binder cumulantas a function of the tuning parameter r
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 98: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
!2 !1 0 1 2 3!2
0
2
4
6
8
10 x 10!4
r
P ±(xmax
)L = 10
L = 14
L = 12
rc
!
P+
_
_P_
|
s/d pairing amplitudes P+/P−as a function of the tuning parameter r
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 99: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
QMC for the onset of antiferromagnetism
!2 !1 0 1 2 3!2
0
2
4
6
8
10 x 10!4
r
P ±(xmax
)L = 10
L = 14
L = 12
rc
!
P+
_
_P_
|
Notice shift between the position of the QCP in the superconductor, and the position of maximum pairing
E. Berg, M. Metlitski, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:1206.0742
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 100: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
BaFe2(As1−x Px)2
Notice shift between the position of the QCP in the superconductor, and the divergence in effective mass in the metal
measured at high magnetic fieldsWednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 101: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 102: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
1. Phenomenology of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 2. Quantum field theory of the onset of antiferromagnetism in a metal 3. Quantum Monte Carlo without the sign problem
4. Fractionalization in metals, and the hole-doped cuprates
Outline
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 103: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 104: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Hole-doped
Electron-doped
?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 105: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Quantum phase transition with Fermi surface reconstruction
��ϕ� = 0
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 106: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0 ��ϕ� = 0
Separating onset of SDW orderand Fermi surface reconstruction
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 107: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0 ��ϕ� = 0
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)
��ϕ� = 0
Separating onset of SDW orderand Fermi surface reconstruction
Electron and/or hole Fermi pockets form in “local” SDW order, but quantum fluctuations destroy long-range
SDW order
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 108: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0 ��ϕ� = 0
Fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) phasewith no symmetry
breaking and “small” Fermi surface
��ϕ� = 0
Separating onset of SDW orderand Fermi surface reconstruction
Electron and/or hole Fermi pockets form in “local” SDW order, but quantum fluctuations destroy long-range
SDW order
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 109: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Heavy Fermi liquid with “large” Fermi
surface of hydridized f and
c-conduction electrons
Magnetic order and the heavy Fermi liquid in the Kondo lattice
��ϕ� = 0
Magnetic Metal: f-electron moments
and c-conduction electron
Fermi surface
��ϕ� �= 0
f
c
f+c
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 110: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Separating onset of SDW order and the heavy Fermi liquid in the Kondo lattice
Magnetic Metal: f-electron moments
and c-conduction electron
Fermi surface
��ϕ� �= 0
f
c
Heavy Fermi liquid with “large” Fermi
surface of hydridized f and
c-conduction electrons
��ϕ� = 0
f+c
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 111: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Separating onset of SDW order and the heavy Fermi liquid in the Kondo lattice
Magnetic Metal: f-electron moments
and c-conduction electron
Fermi surface
��ϕ� �= 0
f
c
Heavy Fermi liquid with “large” Fermi
surface of hydridized f and
c-conduction electrons
��ϕ� = 0
f+c
c
f
Conduction electronFermi surface
andspin-liquid of f-electrons
��ϕ� = 0
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 112: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Separating onset of SDW order and the heavy Fermi liquid in the Kondo lattice
Magnetic Metal: f-electron moments
and c-conduction electron
Fermi surface
��ϕ� �= 0
f
c
Heavy Fermi liquid with “large” Fermi
surface of hydridized f and
c-conduction electrons
��ϕ� = 0
f+c
c
f
Fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) phasewith no symmetry
breaking and “small” Fermi surface
��ϕ� = 0
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 113: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
f- sp
in:
loca
lized
delo
caliz
ed
Fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*)
AFM Metal
large Fermi surface heavy Fermi liquid
YbAlB4
K
Q
Kc
Qc
QC1
QC2
YbRh2Si2Yb(Rh0.94Ir0.06)2Si2
YbAgGe
YbRh2(Si0.95Ge0.05)2
Yb(Rh0.93Co0.07)2Si2
QTC
Kondo screened paramagnet
spin
liqu
id
YbIr2Si2
CeCu2Si2
Experimental perpective on same phase diagrams of Kondo lattice
J. Custers, P. Gegenwart, C. Geibel, F. Steglich,
P. Coleman, and S. Paschen, Phys. Rev. Lett.
104, 186402 (2010)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 114: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
finite B range (factor of 45 in T, factor of 2.3 in B consid-ering the expected crossover to a quadratic dependence ateven lower T in the AFM state at B< Bc1 ! 0:3 T, seeFig. 3) has not previously been observed in any HF com-pound [9–11]. In analogy with YbRh2Si2 [16], the resis-tivity !"B# isotherms have been examined. Clear crossoverbehavior is seen for B ? c and B k c which is character-ized by inflection points [16] denoted as Binfl in Figs. 1(b)and 1(c), respectively. It is clear from these figures that Binfl
increases with increasing T. Like Co- and Ir-substitutedYbRh2Si2 [9], the crossover behavior for the Ge-substituted compound investigated here is found to be al-most identical with the one of pure YbRh2Si2 [Fig. 1(b)].
This is further supported by another measure of thecrossover scale T$, the position Tmax of maxima in iso-B""T# curves [16], cf. Fig. 2. Like !"B#, also the ""T# datashow that, while TN is strongly suppressed upon substitut-ing YbRh2Si2 with Ge, T$ does not move (Fig. 2, inset).
Figure 3 summarizes all characteristic features ofYbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 in a T-B phase diagram. As indicatedby the shaded area, a finite range of NFL behavior at zero Tappears between the critical fields Bc1 and Bc2 for thesuppression of TN and T$.
In pure YbRh2Si2, the in-T linear resistivity extends tothe lowest accessible T (20 mK) at a single critical B, yet inYbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 this canonical behavior is violated,and instead, in-T linear resistivity extends to the lowest Tover a substantial B range. In isolation, this behavior mightbe dismissed as an anomaly. However, similar behavior hasrecently been observed also in other Yb-based HF com-pounds [9–11].
Conservatively, we might attribute these observations todisorder. In the Hertz-Millis theory, the in-T linear resis-tivity of HF systems is itself attributed to disorder [18,19].Furthermore, disorder is expected to smear a well-definedQCP into a region [20].
However, various aspects speak against this conservativeview point. First, it is unlikely that the smearing of a QCPwill be ‘‘asymmetric’’. The position of the T$ line inYbRh2"Si1%xGex#2 and hence of the entrance into theLFL phase is not affected by going from x ! 0 to x !0:05 (see Refs. [15,16] for the phase diagram ofYbRh2Si2); the NFL region in YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 thusspreads only to the left of T$. Second, the NFL power lawdependencies are identical for YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 andYbRh2Si2 [12]. Thus, either both systems are disorderdominated or none. And finally, values for the normalizedlinear rise of resistivity !!=!0 are, with &4 forYbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 [21],&5 for early YbRh2Si2 samples[22], and & 20 for the new generation of ultrapureYbRh2Si2 (where ! ! !0 ' AT# with # ! 1( 0:2 holdsup to 20 K) [23], all beyond the maximum value of unityexpected within the Hertz-Millis type scenario for disor-dered systems [18]. !!=!0 values more compatible withthis scenario are observed for CeCu5:9Au0:1 (!!=!0 &0:5) [24] and YbAgGe (!!=!0 & 1) [10], values muchlarger than unity for CeCoIn5 (!!=!0 & 100 for I ? c)[25]. Of course, the significance of !!=!0 in estimatingthe role of disorder is questionable in systems such asYbRh2Si2 and YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 where the Hertz-Millis theory fails [12,15,16].
FIG. 3 (color online). Phase diagram of YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2for B k c. Symbols represent Binfl (r) and the upper boundary ofLFL behavior (.). The dashed TLFL line is the polynomial fitshown in the inset of Fig. 1(a). Data points from measurementswith B ? c are included by multiplying B with the factor 11: )symbolizes Binfl, * displays Tmax from "ac"T#. The solid T$ lineis taken from the inset of Fig. 2. Hexagons represent T$ [16] (orTHall [15]) of YbRh2Si2. j marks TN observed by specific heat.The dotted TN line indicates the typical evolution of TN forYbRh2Si2, TN"B# ! TN"0#"1% B=Bc#0:36 [9], using the respec-tive parameters for YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 (TN"0# ! 18 mK, Bc !11+ B?c
c & 0:3 T) [12]. The hatched area 0:3 T , B , 0:66 Tmarks the zero T NFL phase characterized by !!- T. The insetcompares the evolution of the resistivity exponent ", derivedfrom the dependence "!% !0# - T" (see also Ref. [12]), forYbRh2Si2 (top) and YbRh2"Si0:95Ge0:05#2 (bottom) in the same Band T range.
0 0.1 0.2 0.30
0.5
1
0.03 0.1 1 101
3
5
7
YbRh2(Si
1-xGe
x)
2
x = 0x = 0.05
Tmax , Binfl
,,
B ! c
T (
K)
B (T)
x = 0.05
B = 0.28T
0.22T
0.12T
0.1T
0.075T
0.065T
0.05T
Tmax
B ! c
"
(# 1
0-6m
3 m
ol$1
)
x = 0
YbRh2(Si
1-x Ge
x)2 ;
ac
T (K)
FIG. 2. Ac susceptibility of YbRh2"Si1%xGex#2 for x ! 0:05(d) and, for comparison, for x ! 0 (*). Inset: Positions of themaxima in iso-B "ac"T# curves (circles) and of the inflectionpoints [16] Binfl of !"B# isotherms (diamonds) of both samples.The power law "B% Bc#0:75 (solid line) with Bc ! 0:06 T is agood description of all data points.
PRL 104, 186402 (2010) P HY S I CA L R EV I EW LE T T E R Sweek ending7 MAY 2010
186402-2
J. Custers, P. Gegenwart, C. Geibel, F. Steglich, P. Coleman, and S. Paschen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 186402 (2010)
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 115: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Metal with “large” Fermi surface
Metal with electron and hole pockets
Increasing SDW order
��ϕ� �= 0 ��ϕ� = 0
Fractionalized Fermi liquid (FL*) phasewith no symmetry
breaking and “small” Fermi surface
��ϕ� = 0
Separating onset of SDW orderand Fermi surface reconstruction
Electron and/or hole Fermi pockets form in “local” SDW order, but quantum fluctuations destroy long-range
SDW order
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 116: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
k_x
k_y
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
k_x
k_y
Hole pocket of a Z2-FL* phase
in a single-band t-J model
M. Punk and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195123 (2012)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 117: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
are larger than the presumed doping levels, 0.11, 0.085, and<0:05, respectively, it is clear that the pocket size scalesqualitatively with the doping level as predicted theoreti-cally [6,10]. Interestingly, two fluid models of the pseudo-gap state do predict the observed discrepancy between thepocket size and carrier concentration or doping level [22].The finding of a finite nodal FS rather than a ‘‘nodal’’ pointat low T for the Tc ! 0 K sample is at variance withrecently reported findings under the same conditions[23]. The measured Fermi pockets are, however, ingood agreement with those predicted by the YRZansatz. In Fig. 2(b) we show the spectral function calcu-
lated at EF as a function of doping, where A" ~k; 0# !$"1=!# ImGYRZ" ~k; 0# and where GYRZ" ~k; 0# is Green’sfunction taken from Ref. [6]. The experimental observa-tions are remarkably well reproduced by this model withthe doping level as the only adjustable parameter.
Turning to the question of whether the pocket areas aretemperature dependent, we show in Fig. 3(a) the observedFermi arc for the Tc ! 45 K sample measured at threedifferent temperatures: 60, 90, and 140 K, all in the normalstate but well below T%. The measured FS crossings inthe figure are determined by the same method used inFigs. 1 and 2 rather than from the spectral weight at theFermi level. In Fig. 3(b) we show the measured arc lengthas a function of temperature. It is clear that any changewithtemperature is minimal and certainly not consistent with anincrease by more than a factor of 2 between the data takenat 140 and 60 K as would be expected by a T=T% scaling ofthe arc length [21]. The discrepancy arises because pre-vious experiments have not fully determined whether ornot a band actually crosses the Fermi level.
The picture of the low energy excitations of the normalstate emerging from the present study is of a nodal FScharacterized by a Fermi ‘‘pocket’’ that, at temperaturesabove Tc, shows a minimal temperature dependence and anarea proportional only to the doping level. We now turn ourattention to the antinodal pseudogap itself.
Several theories of the pseudogap phase propose theformation of preformed singlet pairs above Tc in the anti-nodal region of the Brillouin zone [24]. The YRZ spinliquid based on the RVB picture is one such model as itrecognizes the formation of resonating pairs of spin sin-glets along the copper-oxygen bonds of the square latticeas the lowest energy configuration. Figures 4(a)–4(d) showa series of spectral plots along the straight sector of theLDA FS in the antinodal region at a temperature of 140 Kfor the Tc ! 65 K sample at the locations indicated inFig. 4(e). Figure 4(f) shows intensity cuts through theseplots along the horizontal lines indicated in Figs. 4(a)–4(d).It is evident that a symmetric gap exists at all points alongthis line. The particle-hole symmetry in binding energyobserved here is in marked contrast to the particle-holesymmetry breaking predicted in the presence of densitywave order and is a necessary condition for the formationof Cooper pairs. Thus the present observations add supportto the hypothesis that the normal state is characterized bypair states forming along the copper-oxygen bonds and isconsistent with earlier studies.The combination of Figs. 2 and 4 points to a more
complete picture of the low energy excitations in the nor-mal state of the underdoped cuprates. For Tc < T < T%, aFermi pocket exists in the nodal region with an area pro-portional to the doping level. One does not need to invokediscontinuous Fermi arcs to describe the FS of underdopedBi2212, and Luttinger’s sum rule, properly understood, isseen to still approximately stand. However, as is evident inthe inset of Fig. 2(a), the area of the hole pockets wouldappear to be larger than assumed doping level at the higherdoping levels. This may reflect the presence of electronpockets at the higher doping level or it may reflect thepresence of a bilayer splitting, even though the latter isnot observed in the present study. We note that the splittingwill be smaller in the underdoped region and in the nodalregion. Although not verified in the present study, one
Tc65K@140K Tc45K@140K Tc0K@30K
(0,0) (!,0)
(0,!) (!,!)
(a)
kx
ky
(0,0) (!,0)
(0,!) (!,!)
(b) x = 0.03x = 0.12x = 0.14
kx
ky
0.2
0.1
0.0
x AR
PE
S
0.100.00 xn
FIG. 2 (color online). (a) The pseudopockets determined forthree different doping levels. The black data correspond to theTc ! 65 K sample, the blue data correspond to the Tc ! 45 Ksample, and the red data correspond to the nonsuperconductingTc ! 0 K sample. The area of the pockets xARPES scales with thenominal of doping level xn, as shown in the inset. (b) The Fermipockets derived from YRZ ansatz with different doping level.
(!,0)(0,0)
(0,!)140K 90K 60K
(!,!)
"arc
kx
ky
40
30
20
10
0
" arc (
°)
200150100500Temperature (K)
(a) (b)
FIG. 3 (color online). (a) The Fermi surface crossings deter-mined for the Tc ! 45 K sample at three different temperatures.The triangles indicate measurements at a sample temperature of140 K, the circles measurements at 90 K, and the diamondsmeasurements at 60 K. (b) The measured arc lengths in (a)plotted as a function of temperature. We note that rather thancycling the temperatures on the same sample, the data in (a) aremeasured on different samples cut from the same crystal.
PRL 107, 047003 (2011) P HY S I CA L R EV I EW LE T T E R Sweek ending22 JULY 2011
047003-3
Reconstructed Fermi Surface of Underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8!! Cuprate Superconductors
H.-B. Yang,1 J. D. Rameau,1 Z.-H. Pan,1 G. D. Gu,1 P. D. Johnson,1 H. Claus,2 D.G. Hinks,2 and T. E. Kidd3
1Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA2Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
3Physics Department, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa 50614, USA(Received 6 August 2010; published 20 July 2011)
The Fermi surface topologies of underdoped samples of the high-Tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8!!
have been measured with angle resolved photoemission. By examining thermally excited states above the
Fermi level, we show that the observed Fermi surfaces in the pseudogap phase are actually components of
fully enclosed hole pockets. The spectral weight of these pockets is vanishingly small at the magnetic zone
boundary, creating the illusion of Fermi ‘‘arcs.’’ The area of the pockets as measured in this study is
consistent with the doping level, and hence carrier density, of the samples measured. Furthermore, the
shape and area of the pockets is well reproduced by phenomenological models of the pseudogap phase
as a spin liquid.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.047003 PACS numbers: 74.25.Jb, 71.18.+y, 74.72.Kf, 79.60."i
Understanding the pseudogap regime in the high-Tc
superconducting cuprates is thought to be key to under-standing the high-Tc phenomenon in general [1]. An im-portant component of that understanding will be thedetermination of the nature of the low lying normal stateelectronic excitations that evolve into the superconductingstate. It is therefore critically important to know the exactnature of the Fermi surface (FS). Photoemission studies ofthe pseudogap regime reveal gaps in the spectral function indirections corresponding to the copper-oxygen bonds and aFS that seemingly consists of disconnected arcs falling onthe FS defined within the framework of a weakly interact-ing Fermi liquid [2]. A number of different theories haveattempted to explain these phenomena in terms of compet-ing orders whereby the full FS undergoes a reconstructionreflecting the competition [3,4]. An alternative approachrecognizes that the superconducting cuprates evolve withdoping from a Mott insulating state with no low energycharge excitations to a new state exhibiting propertiescharacteristic of both insulators and strongly correlatedmetals.
Several theories have been proposed to describe thecuprates from the latter perspective [5–7]. One such ap-proach is represented by the so-called Yang-Rice-Zhang(YRZ) ansatz [6], which, based on the doped resonantvalence bond (RVB) spin liquid concept [8], has beenshown to successfully explain a range of experimentalobservations in the underdoped regime [9–12]. The modelis characterized by two phenomena, a pseudogap thatdiffers in origin from the superconducting gap and holepockets that satisfy the Luttinger sum rule for a FS definedby both the poles and zeros of Green’s function at thechemical potential [13]. The pockets manifest themselvesalong part of the FS as an ‘‘arc’’ possessing finite spectralweight corresponding to the poles of Green’s function as ina conventional metal. The remaining ‘‘ghost’’ component
of the FS is defined by the zeros of Green’s function andtherefore possesses no spectral weight to be directly ob-served. Importantly, the zeros of Green’s function at thechemical potential coincide with the magnetic zone bound-ary associated with the underlying antiferromagnetic(AFM) order of the Mott insulating state and thereforerestrict the pockets to lying on only one side of this line.The model further predicts that the arc and ghost portionsof the FS are smoothly connected into pockets. Severaltheoretical studies indicate that within this framework thepockets have an area that scales with the doping [6,10].Recent photoemission studies have indeed provided someindication that the pseudogap regime is characterized byhole pockets centered in the nodal direction [14,15].Furthermore, the possibility that FS in the underdopedmaterials consists of a pocket structure is at the heart ofthe interpretation of recent studies that identified quantumoscillations in these materials [16]. In the present study, wedemonstrate for the first time that the FS of the underdopedcuprates in the normal state is characterized by hole pock-ets with an area proportional to the doping level.The photoemission studies reported in this Letter were
carried out on underdoped cuprate samples, both Ca dopedand oxygen deficient. The Ca-rich crystal was grown froma rod with Bi2:1Sr1:4Ca1:5Cu2O8!! composition using anarc-image furnace with a flowing 20% O2-Ar gas mixture.The maximum Tc was 80 K. The sample was then annealedat 700 #C giving a 45 K Tc with a transition width of 2 K.The oxygen-deficient Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8!! (Bi2212) crystalswere produced by annealing optimally doped Bi2212 crys-tals, at 450 #C to 650 #C for 3–15 days. The spectra shownin this Letter were all recorded on beam line U13UB at theNSLS using a Scienta SES2002 electron spectrometer.Each spectrum was recorded in the pulse-counting modewith an energy and angular resolution of 15 meVand 0.1#,respectively.
PRL 107, 047003 (2011) P HY S I CA L R EV I EW LE T T E R Sweek ending22 JULY 2011
0031-9007=11=107(4)=047003(4) 047003-1 ! 2011 American Physical Society
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 118: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Characteristics of FL* phase
• Fermi surface volume does not count
all electrons.
• Such a phase must have neutral S = 1/2 ex-
citations (”spinons”), and collective spinless
gauge excitations (“topological” order).
• These topological excitations are needed to
account for the deficit in the Fermi surface
volume, in M. Oshikawa’s proof of the
Luttinger theorem.
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 119: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Characteristics of FL* phase
• Fermi surface volume does not count
all electrons.
• Such a phase must have neutral S = 1/2 ex-
citations (”spinons”), and collective spinless
gauge excitations (“topological” order).
• These topological excitations are needed to
account for the deficit in the Fermi surface
volume, in M. Oshikawa’s proof of the
Luttinger theorem.
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 120: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Characteristics of FL* phase
• Fermi surface volume does not count
all electrons.
• Such a phase must have neutral S = 1/2 ex-
citations (”spinons”), and collective spinless
gauge excitations (“topological” order).
• These topological excitations are needed to
account for the deficit in the Fermi surface
volume, in M. Oshikawa’s proof of the
Luttinger theorem.
T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 216403 (2003)Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 121: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
What is the physics of the strange metal ?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 122: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions and Answers
Yes; convincing evidence from field theory and sign-problem free quantum Monte Carlo
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
What is the physics of the strange metal ?
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 123: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions and Answers
Yes; convincing evidence from field theory and sign-problem free quantum Monte Carlo
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
What is the physics of the strange metal ?
The QCP shift from the metal to the superconductor is large. New physics (charge order, fractionalization...) is likely present in the intermediate regime
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 124: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Can quantum fluctuations near the onset of antiferromagnetism induce higher temperature superconductivity ?
Questions and Answers
Yes; convincing evidence from field theory and sign-problem free quantum Monte Carlo
How should such a theory be extended to apply to the hole-doped cuprates ?
What is the physics of the strange metal ?
The QCP shift from the metal to the superconductor is large. New physics (charge order, fractionalization...) is likely present in the intermediate regime
Strongly-coupled quantum criticality of Fermi surface change in a metal
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
![Page 125: The onset of antiferromagnetism in metalsqpt.physics.harvard.edu/talks/lorentz12_4.pdf · antiferromagnetism in metals sachdev.physics.harvard.edu HARVARD Lorentz Lecture, Leiden](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050401/5f7eba3afada245ea91e298e/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Thank you !
Wednesday, June 6, 2012