![Page 1: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS
CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS
DISSEMINATION MODEL
![Page 3: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SERIALS INCREASE
• 1985/86 103,700 SERIALS TITLES
• 1999 161,000 SERIALS TITLES
• INCREASE 55%
SOURCE: ULRICH’S INTERNATIONAL PERIODICALS DIRECTORY
![Page 4: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
CALIBRATIONSBETWEEN 1986 AND 2000
• CONSUMER PRICE INDEX INCREASED 57%
• COST OF MONOGRAPHS INCREASED 66%
• PRICE OF HEALTH CARE INCREASED 111% (’86-98)
• COST OF SCHOLARLY JOURNALS INCREASED
226%
• ARL LIBRARY BUDGETS INCREASED 105%
![Page 5: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
THE PROBLEM
• IF A SERIALS BUDGET WERE $10 MILLION IN 1986, IT WOULD HAVE REQUIRED $32.6 MILLION TO PURCHASE THE SAME NUMBER OF SERIALS IN 2000.
• BUT TO PURCHASE THE SAME PROPORTION OF ALL SERIALS WOULD HAVE REQUIRED A SERIALS BUDGET OF $49.8 MILLION.
• DURING THIS TIME PERIOD THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX ROSE TO 157% OF ITS 1986 LEVEL AND ARL ACQUISITIONS BUDGETS ROSE TO ABOUT 205% OF THEIR 1986 LEVELS.
![Page 6: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNSUSTAINABLE! 1986-2000
0%50%
100%150%200%250%300%350%400%450%500%
Price Increase
Volume Increase
Increase to Keep 1986ProportionLibrary BudgetIncrease
![Page 7: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CONSEQUENCES
• ARL SERIALS SUBSCRIPTIONS -7%
• ARL MONOGRAPHS -17%
• IMPACT ON SCHOLARSHIP ?
![Page 8: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WHY?
• WE GAVE OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AWAY TO PRIVATE FIRMS AND SCHOLARLY SOCIETIES.
• THEY HAVE FOUND THEY CAN SELL IT BACK TO US AT PRICES THAT WILL PRODUCE PROFITS AND/OR SUPPORT THE COST OF OTHER ACTIVITIES.
![Page 9: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MARKET POWER EXISTS
• NEW ENTRANTS DO NOT REDUCE MARKET POWER
• TOP JOURNALS IN EACH DISCIPLINE HAVE MARKET POWER, that is, THEY CAN RAISE PRICES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF SUBSCRIPTION VOLUME.
![Page 10: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ON AVERAGECOMMERCIAL PUBLISHERS HAVE INCREASED PRICES
MOST.
SCHOLARLY SOCIETIES HAVE ALSO INCREASED
PRICES.
![Page 11: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DUNN & BRADSTREET CALCULATES THAT THE PERIODICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGED A 5% NET
PROFIT MARGIN IN 1997.
WOLTERS KLUWER, REED ELSEVIER, WILEY AND PLENUM HAD AN AVERAGE NET PROFIT MARGIN
OF 18.8%.
HAD THE NET PROFIT MARGIN OF THESE FOUR FIRMS BEEN 5%, THEIR CUSTOMERS WOULD
HAVE SAVED $884,653,000.
SOURCE: BRENDAN J. WYLEY, CORNELL UNIVERSITY “COMPETITION IN SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION? WHAT PROFITS REVEAL” IN VIEWS OF THE CURRENT MARKETPLACE
FOR SCHOLARLY JOURNALS, arl
http://www.arl.org/newsltr/200/intro.html (1998).
![Page 12: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Reed ElsevierScience Publishing Division
Net Sales Operating Operating
(pounds) Income Margin
1995 532 M 211 M 39.66%
1996 553 M 231 M 41.77%
1997 571 M 230 M 40.28%
1998 622 M 223 M 35.85%
1999 652M 231M 35.43%
2000 693M 252M 36.36%
2001 1,024M 344M 33.59%
Source: Brendan Wyley and ARL Staff
![Page 13: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Average Price and Factor of Increase by Type of Publisher: 1975 and 1995
(in Current and Constant Dollars)
TYPE OF PUBLISHER AVERAGE PRICE INCREASE FACTOR IN:
Current Constant 1975 1995 Dollars Dollars
Commercial $55 $487 8.9 3.1
Society 28 229 8.2 2.9
Educational 15 81 5.4 1.9
Others 40 119 3.0 1.1
All 39 284 7.3 2.6
Source: Tenopir and King 1997
![Page 14: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
JOURNAL AVERAGE PRICE INCREASES BY DISCIPLINARY
CATEGORY – 1999-2003• AGRICULTURE 34.1%
• ANTHROPOLOGY 36.4%
• ART AND ARCHITECTURE 23.8%
• ASTRONOMY 26.3%
• BIOLOGY 30.3%
• Botany 26.7%
• BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS 44.7%
• CHEMISTRY 42.8%
• EDUCATION 47.1%
• ENGINEERING 38.6%
![Page 15: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• FOOD SCIENCE 27.6%
• GENERAL SCIENCE 42.2%
• GENERAL WORKS 22.9%
• GEOGRAPHY 44.7%
• GEOLOGY 33.3%
• HEALTH SCIENCES 35.6%
• HISTORY 35.0%
• LANGAUGE & LITERATURE 34.8%
• LAW 41.5%
• LIBRARY & INFO. SCIENCES 33.4%
• MATH AND C. S. 29.4%
• MILITARY SCIENCE 40.6%
![Page 16: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• MUSIC 19.1%
• PHILOSOPHY
• & RELIGION 37.8%
• PHYSICS 34.9%
• POLITICAL SCIENCE 51.4%
• PSYCHOLOGY 43.5%
• RECREATION 65.0%
• SOCIOLOGY 44.6%
• TECHNOLOGY 37.2%
• ZOOLOGY 35.6%
• (SOURCE - LIBRARY JOURNAL 2003)
![Page 17: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
AAU INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GENERAL
PRINCIPLES• OPEN, FREE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS• PUBLICATION IN SCHOLARLY AND SCIENTIFIC
JOURNALS• MERITOCRACY – REWARDS ARE ON THE BASIS OF
QUALITY OF WORK• ORGANIZED SKEPTICISM – JUDGMENTS WITHHELD
UNTIL IDEAS ARE TESTED• COMMON OWNERSHIP OF GOODS, WHICH HOLDS
THAT RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP ARE PRODUCTS OF SOCIAL COLLABORATIONS AND ARE ASSIGNED ULTIMATELY TO THE COMMUNITY
![Page 18: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ALTERNATIVES SOLUTIONS
• DRAMATIC INCREASES IN LIBRARY BUDGETS
• ANTITRUST ACTIVITY
• DECOUPLING – AAU• UNIVERSITY OR FACULTY COPYRIGHT
RETENTION• REDUCE THE AMOUNT PUBLISHED BY
FACULTY• BUYING COOPERATIVES
![Page 19: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
ALTERNATIVES (Continued)
• SPARC (the SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING & ACADEMIC RESOURCES COALITION)
• DEMAND BY FACULTY THAT SCHOLARLY ASSOCIATIONS RETAIN JOURNALS AND PRICE THOSE JOURNALS AT THE COST OF PRODUCTION
• FACULTY BOYCOTT
• OPEN ARCHIVES-BY UNIVERSITY OR DISCIPLINE
• OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
• NEAR
![Page 20: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
VOTING WITH YOUR FEET• VEGETATIO (KLUWER) TO JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE• EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY (now KLUWER) TO EVOLUTIONARY
ECOLOGY RESEARCH • JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP (PERGAMON-ELSVIER)
TO PORTAL: LIBRARIES AND THE ACADEMY • JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ELSEVIER) TO THEORY AND
PRACTICE OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING • ARCHIVES OF INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY & PHYSIOLOGY (WILEY–
LISS) TO JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE• TOPOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS (ELSEVIER ) TO ALGEBRAIC
AND GEOMETRIC TOPOLOGY • MACHINE LEARNING (KLUWER) TO JOURNAL OF MACHINE
LEARNING RESEARCH • EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (ELSEVIER) TO JOURNAL OF THE
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION (MIT PRESS)
![Page 21: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
FACULTY BOYCOTT: PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE
PETITIONTo encourage the publishers of our journals to
support this endeavor, we pledge that, beginning in September, 2001, we will publish in, edit or review
for, and personally subscribe to, only those scholarly and scientific journals that have agreed to grant unrestricted free distribution rights to any and
all original research reports that they have published, through PubMed Central and similar
online public resources, within six months of their initial publication date.
![Page 22: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
As of this date30,000+ scientistsfrom 182 countries
signed.
…..
![Page 23: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SINCE SEPT. 1 HAS PASSED
• PLOS received a $9 million grant from the Moore Foundation and in October 2003 has begun the publication of two open access journals. The two journals are free of subscription charges to all and are funded by fees levied on the author of $1,500 per article.
![Page 24: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Open Archives Initiative
• PLACE PRE- OR POST-PRINTS ON UNIVERSITY OR COLLECTIVE WEB SITE
• 55% OF JOURNALS PERMIT PRE- OR POST- PRINTS TO BE OPENLY SELF-ARCHIVED (PROJECT ROMEO)
• SOME JOURNALS EXPLICITLY FORBID SELF-ARCHIVING
• MANY JOURNALS WILL GRANT EXCEPTIONS
![Page 25: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CONCERNS ABOUT SELF- ARCHIVING
• WILL IT DESTROY THE ECONOMICS OF JOURNALS AND UNDERMINE REFEREEING?
• WILL JOURNALS RESPOND BY REFUSING TO PUBLISH PAPERS THAT ARE SELF-ARCHIVED?
• CAN VOLUNTARY SELF-ARCHIVING EVER BE COMPLETE ENOUGH SUCH THAT ONE CAN RELY ON IT TO ACCESS THE LITERATURE?
• WILL SELF-ARCHIVED ITEMS EVER BE PERMANENTLY ARCHIVED?
![Page 26: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
OPEN ACCESS JOURNALS
– JOURNALS WITH NO SUBSCRIPTION FEE– 500/24,000 JOURNALS– SUPPORTED BY AUTHOR SUBMISSION FEE,– OR COST ASORBED BY ASSOCIATION,
UNIVERSITY, FUNDING AGENCY, FOUNDATION, ETC.
– WELLCOME FOUNDATION HAS AGREED TO PAY SUBMISSION FEES FOR BRITISH RESEARCHERS
– HUGHES WILL FUND SUBMISSIONS FROM ITS RESEARCHERS TO PLOS JOURNALS
![Page 27: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CONCERNS ABOUT AUTHOR –PAY MODEL
• RATE OF INCREASE IN JOURNAL COST MAY BE UNAFFECTED
• TRIED BEFORE & RESULTED IN PRIVATE SECTOR JOURNALS GETTING A FOOTHOLD IN MARKET
• SHIFTS ALL OF JOURNAL COSTS ONTO RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES
• TOXIC WASTE ANALOGY• RESULTS IN A MIXED SYSTEM, AT BEST
![Page 28: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Welcome Foundation, April 2004
• Concludes that “ . . . the question facing journal publishers is not whether to offer open access or not, but how to position their journals so that they are able to continue to play an important part in a world in which open access . . . is the norm.”
![Page 29: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
NEAR
•National Electronic Article Repository
![Page 30: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
REQUIRE AS A CONDITION OF RECEIVING FEDERAL RESEARCH FUNDS THAT THE AUTHOR OF ANY
SCHOLARLY MANUSCRIPT ARISING OUT OF THE FUNDED PROJECT WOULD GRANT EXCLUSIVE
COPYRIGHT TO A JOURNAL FOR NO MORE THAN 90 (OR 180) DAYS.
AFTER THE FIXED EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHT PERIOD ENDS, REQUIRE THAT THE ARTICLE,IN THE FORM IN WHICH IT WAS PUBLISHED, BE PLACED ON A
PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE WEBSITE MAINTAINED BY THE FUNDING AGENCY.
THE AUTHOR COULD ALSO PLACE THE ARTICLE ON THEIR OWN OR THEIR UNIVERSITY’S WEBSITE.
![Page 31: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
NEAR IS . . .
• A FORM OF SELF-ARCHIVING
• OPEN ACCESS WITH A DELAY
• IMPOSSIBLE FOR JOURNALS TO DEFEAT
• INEFFECTIVE FOR JOURNALS PUBLISHING NON-FUNDED RESEARCH
![Page 32: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Recommendations For Faculty
• Retain the right to post your articles on a publicly accessible website
• Self-archive your work• Ensure that your professional society retains
its journals and prices them at cost• Support efforts to keep public goods public• Don’t submit your work to very expensive
journals
![Page 33: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Notwithstanding the above language, I reserve the right to use this manuscript in my teaching and research, for my colleagues at the University of X to use this manuscript in their teaching and research, and I also reserve the right to place an electronic copy of this manuscript on a publicly accessible web site.
![Page 34: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
FOR MORE INFORMATION
WWW.CREATECHANGE.ORG
![Page 35: THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS CRISIS: A PUBLIC GOODS DISSEMINATION MODEL](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022042718/56649e5e5503460f94b57709/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)