The Strategic Action Programmefor
The Sustainable Management ofLake Tanganyika
By Nick HODGSONFacilitator, SAP
Project Objectives
• Ultimate Objective– “…control pollution and to prevent the loss of the
exceptional diversity of Lake Tanganyika’s International Waters.”
• Immediate Objective 1– “…establish a regional long-term management plan for
pollution control, conservation and maintenance of biodiversity in Lake Tanganyika.”
The Strategic Action ProgrammeThe SAP
• The Concept– What is a SAP
• The Consultation– How the SAP was developed
• The Conclusions– What are the priority actions addressed in the SAP
The Concept
From a Management Plan toa Strategic Action Programme
• Management of the lake is a continuing activity. Research, monitoring and evaluation are continuing activities supporting management.
• Management Plans need to be revised in response to changes in threats and opportunities, and information.
• The Strategic Action Programme defines an agreed framework within which management programmes are developed and revised, and the steps needed to achieve this framework.
Strategic Action Programmes Evolve
Management of the Lake Resources......
DraftSAP
AgreedSAP
RevisedSAP
RevisedSAP
PrioritisedManagementInterventions
Funded+
Monitoring &Evaluation
+Further Research
RevisedManagementInterventions
Funded+
Monitoring &Evaluation
+Further Research
The GEF ApproachThe Corner Stones of the SAP
Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis carried out by participating countries, identifying priority concerns threatening shared lake resources.
Strategic Action Programme prepared by participating countries, committing them to the prioritised programme of actions
Regional Convention, signed by participating countries, formalising national obligations to support the SAP
The Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis
“The centerpiece of the GEF strategy... is the concept of “strategic joint fact finding” as a means of arriving at a consensus on what actions are needed to address threats... collaborating states establish technical teams that work to establish a common baseline of facts and analysis of the problem in the form of a transboundary diagnostic analysis (TDA), which is then used to set (national) priorities for actions to address threats to international waters in the form of the SAP.”
Study of GEF’s Overall Performance ; GEF 1998
Strategic Action Programme
The SAP should establish clear priorities that are endorsed at the highest levels of government and widely disseminated. Priority transboundary concerns should be identified, as well as sectoral interventions (policy changes, program development, regulatory reform, capacity-building investments, and so on) needed to resolve the transboundary problems as well as regional and national institutional mechanisms for implementing elements of the SAP.”
Operational Strategy of the GEF; GEF 1996
Strategic Action Programme
“... a balanced programme of preventive and remedial actions, support both investment and capacity-building, and identify key activities in the following areas:
–Priority preventive and remedial actions–Cross-cutting issues and linkages to other focal areas–Institutional strengthening and capacity-building needs–Stakeholder involvement and public awareness activities–Program monitoring and evaluation–Institutional mechanisms for implementation.”
How the SAP Helps Management
• A regional programme establishing:– agreed principles and objectives for managing the
shared resource of the Lake;– an initial prioritisation of management interventions
and institutional development.
• A tool to:– direct national investments towards priorities; – “leverage” finance from donor agencies for
National and Regional Programmes.
The Consultation Process
Initiating the Process of Consultation
• January 1996, Baseline Reviews summarised available information
• March 1996, Inception Workshop identified priority concerns and proposes research priorities
• January 1998, Steering Committee endorsed a process of consultation for the SAP and the Convention– led at national level by National Working Groups– led at regional level by the Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) SAP Planning Group.
Seven Steps in Developing the SAP
National Consultation Workshops - March to November 1998
Preliminary TDA Workshop - November 1998
SCM Endorses Preliminary TDA - May 1999
Draft SAP Workshop - January 2000
Final TDA Workshop - March 2000
Final SAP Workshop - May 2000
SCM adopt the Final SAP - July 2000
Linking the SAP and the Convention
SAP1 National Consultation2 Regional Problem
Analysis and Prioritisation
3 Draft SAP incorporating concepts from Draft Convention
4 SAP Signed
Convention1 National Consultation2 Draft Convention
presented to Regional Meetings
3 Convention incorporates concepts from signed SAP
4 SC Endorses Convention5 Diplomatic Negotiation
A E Mayawalla Tanzania; A Kabeleka Zambia; A Lugome Tanzania; A Madete Tanzania; A Mphande Zambia; A Muvwende Zambia; Agapit Kabwa Burundi; AJ Mkama Tanzania; Andrew Menz PCU; Antoine Kiyuku Burundi; B Lukama Zambia; B N Marwa Tanzania; Baluku Bajope DR Congo; Benoit Bihamiriza Burundi; Benoit Nzigidahera Burundi; Bitijula DR Congo; Boniface Nyakageni Burundi; Bungisabo DR Congo; C Akashambatwa Zambia; C Kabumbu Zambia; C Kangero Tanzania; C Makundi Tanzania; C Mung’ong’o Tanzania; C Phiri Zambia; C Rumisha Tanzania; C Swai Tanzania; Catherine Msigwa Tanzania; Cécile Gakima Burundi; Célestin Burundi; D B R Chitamwebwa Tanzania; D Mhalu Tanzania; Damien Nindorera Burundi; Denis Barandemaje Burundi; Didace Nimpagaritse Burundi; E Bwalya Zambia; E Lenganasa Tanzania; E Makwaia Tanzania; Eddie Allison Biodiversity SS; Elongo Buedi DR Congo; Elysée Ntiranyibagira Burundi; F Mukome Tanzania; F Nyirenda Zambia; F Stolla Tanzania; Faustin Masanja Tanzania; Francis Chale Tanzania; François Nkurunziza Burundi; G Chikwama Zambia; G Chilukusha Zambia; G Makinda Tanzania; G Mpango Tanzania; G Mudenda Zambia; G Muwowo Zambia; G Strunden Tanzania; Gabriel Hakizimana Burundi; Gaspard Niragira Burundi; Gaspard Ntakimazi Burundi; Gayo DR Congo; George Hanek FAO; George M Chitalu Zambia; Georgina Zulu Zambia; Gerard Cougny GEF; Gérard Ntungumburanye Burundi; Golama DR Congo; Gombo Eunda Matunga DR Congo; Graeme Patterson Sediment and Pollution SS; H M Mohamed Tanzania; H Mollel Tanzania; H N Kachechele Tanzania; Henry Sichingabula Zambia; Hidaya M M Faraji Tanzania; Hudson Nkotagu Tanzania; I Aboud Tanzania; Ignace Bandandaza Burundi; J Mwilwa Zambia; J Phiri Zambia; J Shilungushela Tanzania; J Uronu Tanzania; James Phiri Zambia; JB M S Gilbert Tanzania; Jean Berchmans Manirakiza Burundi; Jean Paul Ledant NRI; Jean-Marie Bukuru Burundi; Jerome Dukuduku Tanzania; Jerome Karimumuryango Burundi; John Dorr Fishing Practices, SS; K Mazingaliwa Zambia; K Mungule Zambia; K Siame Zambia; Kalambayi DR Congo; Karen Zwick SS Facilitators; Kayega Tanzania; Kelly West PCU; Kihurnwa Tanzania; Kinezero, Mathias Burundi; Kinomvyi, Antoine Burundi; Kirit Vaitha Tanzania; Kitungano DR Congo; Kumbu di Mbemba DR Congo; L Mawele Zambia; L Nzali Tanzania; L Rwebembera Tanzania; Leonard Mwape Zambia; Lukonge Tanzania; M M Shirima Tanzania; M Mbijima Tanzania; M Musaba Zambia; M Nagahusedi DR Congo; M Nsomi Zambia; M Pearce PCU; M Phiri Zambia; M T Looboki Tanzania; Mady Amule DR Congo; Mandgi DR Congo; Marcelin Burundi; ME Bashige DR Congo; ME Mbombo DR Congo; Mino-Kahozi Kalibu DR Congo; Misana Tanzania; Mohamed Bahari Tanzania; Msemi Tanzania; Mudherwa Nshombo CRH-Uvira; Mulimbwa CRH-Uvira; Mulimbwa Nsibula DR Congo; Mwenyi Kaningingi DR Congo; Nakizimana, Gabriel Burundi; Ndimbo Tanzania; Ndizeye, Pascal Burundi; Nicholas Hodgson NRIe; Niels Henrik Ipsen GEF; Nshombo Mudherwa DR Congo; O Kalumiana Zambia; O Lungu Zambia; Olivier Drieu SS Facilitator; P Banda Zambia; P Chipungu Zambia; P Chisara Tanzania; P Kimena Zambia; P Nnyiti Tanzania; Palata Kabudi DR Congo; Pierre Bakevya Burundi; R Chiti Zambia; R Sinyinza Zambia; Rawson Yonazi Tanzania; Richard Paley SS Facilitators; Robert Lindley SS Facilitators; Roger Kanyaru Burundi; S Capper Tanzania; S Chisamga Zambia; S Kisinto Tanzania; S Mayeye Tanzania; S Nkondokaya Tanzania; S Siachoono Zambia; Salvator Ruzima Burundi; Shadreck Nsongela Zambia; Stanislas Nzabimana Burundi; Swedi DR Congo; T Killenga Tanzania; T Mwaijande Tanzania; Takoy Lomema DR Congo; Tharcisse Songore Burundi; Tindyembwa Tanzania; V Lyimo Tanzania; V Macha Tanzania; W Daniel Tanzania; W Malambo Zambia; W N Sarunday Tanzania; W Y Haule Tanzania; Z Kittina Tanzania; Z Mshanga Tanzania;
Consultation
• Special studies implemented with 125 scientists from the four countries
• National TDA/SAP consultations involving 80 institutions and 160 individuals
• Regional TAC/SAP planning team involving 18 institutions and 30 individuals
• 16 National Meetings and 16 National Workshops• 4 Regional Workshops and 3 SCM Discussions
National Consultation ReportsCompleted October 1998
Preliminary TDA Endorsed May 1999
Preliminary SAP Completed February 2000
Final Draft TDACompleted May 2000
Final Draft SAPPresented May 2000
The ConclusionsA Programme of Priority Actions
The TDA Reviewed National and Regional Concerns
• National Workshops identified national concerns and proposed national actions to counteract threats or maximise opportunities
• Regional Workshops - the TAC SAP Planning Team of planners and scientists - reviewed national concerns and regional concerns within a regional perspective
• Based on best available scientific and management knowledge - with specific support from the special studies
The TDA provided a General Framework for Action
Main Threat toBiodiversity andSustainable Use
Cross-CuttingTransboundaryImplications
Cross-CuttingInstitutionalProblems
General ActionAreas
UnsustainableFisheries
IncreasingPollution
ExcessiveSedimentation
HabitatDestruction
Global Loss ofBiodiversity
Loss of SharedFisheries Resource
Decline in WaterQuality
Lack of Resources
Poor Enforcement ofExisting Regulations
Lack of AppropriateRegulations for LakeTanganyika
Lack of InstitutionalCoordination
Reduce Impact ofFishing
Control Pollution
ControlSedimentation
HabitatConservation
The TDA Defined a Three Level Analytical Framework
Main Threats toBiodiversity andSustainable Use
TransboundaryImplications
Main InstitutionalCauses
General ActionAreas
Programme ofActions
Time Frame Key AgencyAvailability ofResources
Specific Problems Stakeholders UncertaintiesProgramme of
Actions
General Action Area
The TDA Listed and Prioritised Specific Groups of Actions
• Prioritised on a combination of three criteria:– The severity of the problem threatening
biodiversity– The feasibility of a management solution– The benefits to sustainable development
• Gave a high, medium or low priority rating
The TDA Proposed Priority National Actions within a Regional Priority Framework
• For the high priority regional specific actions identified relevant national concerns
• Prepared a detailed matrix which:– Identified stakeholders, uncertainties and detailed
breakdown of proposed actions– Reviewed possible timing of actions, key agency
responsibility and availability of resources
The SAP Defines an Interim Lake Tanganyika Management Body
• With immediate responsibilities:– To promote the signing of convention and the
establishment of functioning management bodies required in the convention
– To develop detailed budgeted proposals and source funding for priority regional actions within the SAP
– To coordinate and support national development of priority budgeted proposals and facilitate funding
– To maintain an information resource
The SAP Defines an Agreed Programme of Priority Actions Based on the TDA
• Identifying cross-cutting themes from within the proposed actions– Information management; socio-economic development;
institutional reform and capacity building; environmental education; baseline monitoring
• Defining national priority actions within the regional framework– Development of a sustainable fisheries; pollution control;
sediment management; habitat conservation
With Actions Addressing the Development of a Sustainable Fisheries
• Excessive fishing effort in the littoral zone– Excessive fishing pressure; lack of quota on licenses; co-
management of fisheries • Excessive fishing effort in the pelagic zone
– Linking to the LTR proposals “Regional Framework Planning for lake Tanganyika Fisheries Management”; including artisanal and industrial fishing
• Excessive or uncontrolled extraction of ornamental fish– Excessive extraction of targeted species
With Actions Addressing Pollution Control
• Urban and Industrial pollution– domestic effluents; untreated sewage; waste from institutions; solid
waste treatment; factories; power stations; tanneries• Harbour Pollution
– spillage of oil and other cargoes; waste from boats; storage• Future mining and oil exploration
– toxic wastes; EIA procedures• Marine accidents
– risk assessment and contingency planning
With Actions Addressing Sediment Management
• Promotion of sustainable agriculture– focused on critical lakeshore and medium scale
catchments; erosion control; extensive agriculture; stream bank cultivation
• Deforestation– gazetted protection forests; fuelwood and charcoal;
replanting and rehabilitation of critical areas; community forest management
With Actions Addressing Habitat Conservation
• Support of parks management– existing parks areas cover much of the widespread
species diversity; pressure on parks resources from adjacent communities; definition of aquatic boundaries
• Protection of key habitats– degradation of sensitive coastal areas; protection of
spawning and nursery grounds; wetlands areas
The Next Steps
• Identification of support mechanisms for an interim period to:
– Promote the finalisation and subsequent signing of the Convention
– Finalise regional and national detailed, budgeted project proposals for the priority actions identified in the SAP
– Negotiate country commitment and incremental support to implement priority regional and national actions