1
The Tjon Band inNuclear Lattice EFT
Ulf-G. Meißner, Univ. Bonn & FZ Julich
Supported by BMBF 05P15PCFN1 by DFG, SFB/TR-110 by CAS, PIFI by Volkswagen Stftung
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
2
CONTENTS
• Introduction: What is the Tjon line/band?
• Recap: Basics of nuclear lattice simulations
• The two-nucleon system at NNLO
• The three-nucleon system at NNLO
• The four-nucleon system at NNLO & the Tjon band
• Summary & outlook
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
3
Introduction
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
4
WHAT is the TJON LINE/BAND?
• Tjon observed a correlation between the 4He and
triton (3H) binding energies for local interactions
Tjon, Phys. Lett. 56B (1975) 217
• This correlation, then called the Tjon line,
was also found using high-precision potentials
↪→ three-nucleon forces required
↪→ no nedd for additional four-nucleon forces
Nogga et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 944
Bt
Bα
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
5UNDERSTANDING the TJON LINE/BAND?
• Consider pionless EFT: contact interactions
〈k′|V |k〉 = Ps λs2 g(k′)g(k) + Pt λt2 g(k′)g(k) + . . . , g(u) = exp(−u2/Λ2)
↪→ physics independent of cut-off Λ
• Renormalization of the three-nucleon system requires a three-nucleon force (3NF)Bedaque, Hammer, van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 463
V3 = Paλ3h(u1, u2)h(u′1, u′2) , h(u1, u2) = exp(−(u2
1 + 34u2
2)/Λ2)
• This also renormalizes the four-nucleon system!Platter, Hammer, UGM, Phys. Rev. A70 (2004) 052101
↪→ explains naturally the correlation
↪→ it is really a band (theor. uncertainty)Platter, Hammer, UGM, Phys. Lett. B607 (2005) 254
↪→ width of the band shrinks at higher orders 7.5 8 8.5 9Bt [MeV]
20
25
30
35
Bα [M
eV]
◦ chiral NLO, various Λ , O chiral N2LO� phenomenological potentials
Exp.
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
6STATUS of NUCLEAR LATTICE EFT
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
0 5 10 15 20
E (
MeV
)
L (fm)
Etriton (NNLO)Ehelium-3 (NNLO)
physical Etriton (infinite volume)physical Ehelium-3 (infinite volume)
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1<
E4H
e >
(M
eV
)
t (MeV-1
)
LO+ ∆NLO
+ ∆IB + ∆EM+ ∆NNLO
+ 4N Contact
-2
0
2
4
6
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
t (MeV-1
)
∆NLO∆IB + ∆EM
∆NNLO4N Contact
• standard coarse lattice at NNLO, a = 1.97 fm, N = 8
11+2 LECs, incl. isospin breaking and Coulomb
local smearing of the LO contact interactions in S-wave
↪→ 3H and 3He well described
E(3He)− E(3H) = 0.78(5) MeV [exp.: 0.76 MeV]
↪→ 4He overbound by a few MeV
↪→ cured by an effective four-nucleon interaction
V(4)
eff = D(4)eff
∑~n
[ρ(~n)]4
Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 142501, Eur. Phys. J. A 45 (2010) 335
• presumably a lattice artefact?or non-local smearing required?
↪→ investigate this in more detail!
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
7The D-TERM in ACTION•Works quite well up to the mid-mass region:↪→ 1% accuray for ground-state energies
28Si
24Mg
20Ne
16O
12C
8Be
4He
-400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0
E (MeV)
ExperimentNNLO
NNLO + 4Neff
Lahde, Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Rupak, Phys. Lett. B732 (2014) 110
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
8
Basics of nuclearlattice simulations
for an easy intro, see: UGM, Nucl. Phys. News 24 (2014) 11
for an early review, see: D. Lee, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63 (2009) 117
upcoming textbook, see: T. Lahde, UGM, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
9NUCLEAR LATTICE SIMULATIONSFrank, Brockmann (1992), Koonin, Muller, Seki, van Kolck (2000) , Lee, Schafer (2004), . . .
Borasoy, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Nucl. Phys. A768 (2006) 179; Borasoy, Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Eur. Phys. J. A31 (2007) 105
• new method to tackle the nuclear many-body problem
• discretize space-time V = Ls × Ls × Ls × Lt:nucleons are point-like particles on the sites
• discretized chiral potential w/ pion exchangesand contact interactions + Coulomb
→ see Epelbaum, Hammer, UGM, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1773
• typical lattice parameters
pmax =π
a' 314 MeV [UV cutoff]
p
p
n
n a
~ 2 fm
• strong suppression of sign oscillations due to approximate Wigner SU(4) symmetryJ. W. Chen, D. Lee and T. Schafer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 242302, T. Lahde et al., EPJA 51 (2015) 92
• hybrid Monte Carlo & transfer matrix (similar to LQCD)
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
10
TRANSFER MATRIX METHOD
• Correlation–function for A nucleons: ZA(τ ) = 〈ΨA| exp(−τH)|ΨA〉
with ΨA a Slater determinant for A free nucleons[or a more sophisticated (correlated) initial/final state]
• Transient energy
EA(τ ) = −d
dτlnZA(τ )
→ ground state: E0A = lim
τ→∞EA(τ )
• Exp. value of any normal–ordered operator O
ZOA = 〈ΨA| exp(−τH/2)O exp(−τH/2) |ΨA〉
limτ→∞
ZOA (τ )
ZA(τ )= 〈ΨA|O |ΨA〉
Euclidean time
𝛑 𝛑
Eucl
idea
n t
ime
𝑎
𝐿
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
11CONFIGURATIONS
⇒ all possible configurations are sampled⇒ preparation of all possible initial/final states⇒ clustering emerges naturally
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
12AUXILIARY FIELD METHOD
• Represent interactions by auxiliary fields:
exp
[−C
2
(N†N
)2]=√
12π
∫ds exp
[−s2
2+√C s
(N†N
)]
𝛑 𝛑
Eucl
idea
n t
ime
𝒔
𝒔𝑰
𝒔𝝅
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
13EXTRACTING PHASE SHIFTS on the LATTICE
• Luscher’s method:Two-body energy levels below theinelastic threshold on a periodiclattice are related to the phaseshifts in the continuum
Luscher, Comm. Math. Phys. 105 (1986) 153Luscher, Nucl. Phys. B 354 (1991) 531
• Spherical wall method:Impose a hard wall on the lattice anduse the fact that the wave functionvanishes for r = Rwall:
ψ`(r) ∼ [cos δ`(p)F`(pr) + sin δ`(p)G`(pr)]
Borasoy, Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM,EPJA 34 (2007) 185
Carlson, Pandharipande, Wiringa,NPA 424 (1984) 47
𝑝
𝑅wall
L
L
L
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
14
COMPUTATIONAL EQUIPMENT
• Mostly used = JUQUEEN (BlueGene/Q)
6 Pflops
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
15RESULTS from LATTICE NUCLEAR EFT
� Lattice EFT calculations for A=3,4,6,12 nuclei, PRL 104 (2010) 142501
� Ab initio calculation of the Hoyle state, PRL 106 (2011) 192501
� Structure and rotations of the Hoyle state, PRL 109 (2012) 142501
� Validity of Carbon-Based Life as a Function of the Light Quark MassPRL 110 (2013) 142501
� Ab initio calculation of the Spectrum and Structure of 16O,PRL 112 (2014) 142501
� Ab initio alpha-alpha scattering, Nature 528 (2015) 111
� Nuclear Binding Near a Quantum Phase Transition, PRL 117 (2016) 132501
� Ab initio calculations of the isotopic dependence of nuclear clustering,PRL 119 (2017) 222505
A = 20!
A = 16!
A = 12!
A = 8!
λ
EA–Eα A/4|aαα| = ∞aαα = 0
Alpha gas Nuclear liquid
λ20λ16 λ12 λ8
λ = 0 λ = 1
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
AHAHe
ABe
AC
AO
ener
gy (M
eV)
A
LOexperiment
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
16
The two-bodysystem at NNLO
Alarcon, Du, Klein, Lahde, Lee, Li, Luu, UGMEur. Phys. J. A 53 (2017) 83 [arXiv:1702.05319]
Klein, Elhatisari, Lahde, Lee, UGM [arXiv:1803.04231]
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
17NUCLEAR FORCES at NNLOfor details, see: Epelbaum, Hammer, UGM, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1773
• Potential at next-to-next-to-leading order [Q = {p/Λ,Mπ/Λ}]:'
&
$
%
�Chiral expansion of nuclear forces [based on NDA]
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-KraftTwo-nucleon force Three-nucleon force Four-nucleon force
LO (Q0)
NLO (Q2)
N2LO (Q3)
N3LO (Q4)
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
N4LO (Q5)
• NN potential to NNLO [all πN and ππN LECs fixed from πN scattering]:
VNN = V(0)
LO + V(2)
NLO + V(3)
NNLO
= V contLO + V OPE
LO + V contNLO + V TPE
NLO + V TPENNLO
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
18NUCLEAR FORCES at NNLO continued
• Analytic expressions [2+7 LECs]:
V contLO = CS + CT (~σ1 · ~σ2)
V OPELO = −
g2A
4F 2π
τ1 · τ2
(~σ1 · ~q) (~σ2 · ~q)q 2 +M2
π
~q = t-channel mom. transfer
V contNLO = C1q
2 + C2k2 +
(C3q
2 + C4k2)
(~σ1 · ~σ2) + iC512
(~σ1 + ~σ2) · (~q × ~k)
+ C6 (~σ1 · ~q) (~σ2 · ~q) + C7(~σ1 · ~k)(~σ2 · ~k) ~k = u-channel mom. transfer
V TPENLO = − τ1·τ2
384π2F 4πL(q)
[4M2
π
(5g4A − 4g2
A − 1)
+ q2(23g4
A − 10g2A − 1
)+
48g4AM
4π
4M2π+q2
]− 3g4
A
64π2F 4πL(q)
[(~q · ~σ1) (~q · ~σ2)− q2 (~σ1 · ~σ2)
]• Loop function: L(q) = 1
2q
√4M2
π + q2 ln√
4M2π+q2+q√
4M2π+q2−q
→ 1 + 13q2
4M2π
+ · · · for q � Λ
→ for coarse lattices a ' 2 fm, the TPE at N(N)LO can be absorbed in the LECs Ci
→ no longer true as a decreases, need to account for the TPE explicitely
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
19A FEW DETAILS ON THE FITS• Fits in large & fixed volumes, vary a from 1 to 2 fm:
a−1 [MeV] a [fm] L La [fm]
100 1.97 32 63.14120 1.64 38 62.48150 1.32 48 63.14200 0.98 64 63.14
• OPE and TPE LECs completely fixed (gA ∼ gπNN and c1,2,3,4 from RS analysis)Hoferichter, Ruiz de Elvira, Kubis, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 092301
• Smeared LO S-wave contact interactions: f(~q ) ≡ f−10 exp
(−bs
~q 4
4
)• Partial-wave projection of the contact interactions
→ fit bs and two S-wave LECs Ci at LO up to pcm = 100 MeV
→ w/ bs fixed, fit two/seven S/P-wave LECsCi at NLO/NNLO up to pcm = 150 MeV
→ treat NLO and NNLO corrections perturbatively
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
20NEUTRON–PROTON SCATTERING• neutron-proton scattering
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200δ(3
S1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
ε1 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
P1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
Nijmegen PWALattice LO
Lattice N2LO-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
D2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D3)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
S1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
ε1 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
P1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
Nijmegen PWALattice LO
Lattice N2LO-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
D2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D2)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D3)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
a=
1.32
fm
a=
1.97
fm→ up to pcm ' 150 MeV, physics largely independent of a
√
→ description consistent with the continuum within error bands√
→ however: there are some differences in the P-waves description improveswith decreasing a
→ errors appear large due to recaling of χ2
� = LO� = N2LO
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
21PROTON-PROTON SCATTERING
• proton-proton scattering
↪→ only in I = 1, so L+ S must be even
↪→ fit to Coulomb functions on the spherical wall at Rwall ' 28 fm
↪→ fit additional LEC to proton-proton scattering length
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
Lattice spacing a = 1.97 fm
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
Lattice spacing a = 1.64 fm
Nijmegen PWALattice LO+Coulomb
Lattice N2LO+Coulomb
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
Lattice spacing a = 1.32 fm
• somewhat too large for the coarse a, improving with decreasing a
• other phases only differ by Coulomb, very small effect
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
22
The three-bodysystem at NNLO
Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 142501 [arXiv:0912.4195]
Klein, Elhatisari, Lahde, Lee, UGM [arXiv:1803.04231]
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
23BASICS of the THREE NUCLEON SYSTEM
• At NNLO, the firstnon-vanishing 3NF appears
1 2 3c1,3,4 cD cE• c1,3,4 from RS analysis of πN → πN
Hoferichter, Ruiz de Elvira, Kubis, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 092301
↪→ longest range part determined from chiral symmetry
↪→ corresponds to the renowned Fujita-Miyazawa forceFujita, Miyazawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 17 (1957) 360; UGM, AIP Conf. Proc. 1011 (2008) 49
• cD and cE are correlatedEpelbaum, Nogga, Glockle, Kamada, UGM, Witala, Phys. Rev. C66 (2002) 064001
↪→ fix cD = −0.79 and determine cE from the 3H binding energy
-2 0 2 4 6c
D
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
c E
Λ=500 MeVΛ=600 MeV
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
24CALCULATING the THREE-NUCLEON SYSTEM
• can use MC methods or Lanzcos, here: Lanczos plus finite volume corrections
• no finite volume corrections for V ' (10 · 1.97 fm)3 ' (12 · 1.64 fm)3 ' (20 fm)3
• scaling as L6, so for a = 1.32 fm, we must include finite volume corrections
• ground state energy:
E3N (L) = E3N∞ +A
exp(
2κL√3
)(κL)
32
κ =√−mE3N
∞
• higher order corrections:
〈Oi〉 (L) = 〈Oi〉∞ +Aiexp
(2κL√
3
)(κL)
32
UGM, Rios, Rusetsky,Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 091602
Hammer et al., JHEP 1709 (2017) 109
-12
-11.5
-11
-10.5
-10
-9.5
-9
-8.5
-8
-7.5
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15E
B [M
eV
]
L [l.u.]
E3H
LON2LO 2N
N2LO 2N+EMN2LO 2N+EM+ 3N
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
25RESULTS for the THREE-NUCLEON SYSTEM
• Triton binding energy at various orders:
a = 1.97 fm a = 1.64 fm a = 1.32 fmELO [MeV] −7.80 −8.29 −8.74
EN2LO [MeV] −7.846(4) −8.11(2) −7.95(2)
E+EMN2LO [MeV] −7.68(2) −7.91(3) −7.77(2)
E+EM+3NN2LO [MeV] −8.48(3) −8.48(3) −8.48(2)
cE 0.5309(2) 0.3854(3) 1.0386(5)
• different overbinding at LO can be mostly traced back to the 3P0 wave
• N2LO w/o 3NF similar to phenomenological potentials
• cE of natural size, that is of O(1)
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
26
The four-bodysystem at NNLO& the Tjon band
Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 142501 [arXiv:0912.4195];Eur. Phys. J. A 45 (2010) 335 [arXiv:1003.5697]
Klein, Elhatisari, Lahde, Lee, UGM [arXiv:1803.04231]
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
27CALCULATING the FOUR-NUCLEON SYSTEM
• must use MC methods→ correlation function:
Z4He (t) = 〈ψ4He | exp(−tHLO) | ψ4He〉
• Transient energy: ELO (t) = −d logZ4He (t)
dt
• preparation of initial states utilizing the Wigner SU(4) symmetry:
H0 = Hfree + 12C0
∑~n1,~n2
f (~n1 − ~n2)︸ ︷︷ ︸Gaussian smearing
ρ (~n1) ρ (~n2)
↪→ create initial states close to the physical one: from the antisymm. free-particle solution:
|ψ4He〉 = exp (−t0H0) |ψ0〉
↪→ leading order Hamiltonian:
HLO = Hfree +HLO,contact +HOPE
↪→ higher orders as perturbative corrections:
ZO (t) = 〈ψ4He | exp(−tH
2
)O exp
(−tH
2
)| ψ4He〉
〈O〉 (t) =ZO (t)
Z4He(t)
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
28RESULTS for the FOUR-NUCLEON SYSTEM
• Time extrapolations for various lattice spacings
a = 1.97 fm a = 1.64 fm a = 1.32 fm
−29
−28
−27
−26
−25
−24
−23
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
4He binding energy
LO contribution
ELO = −28.8(1) MeV
−0.5
−0.4
−0.3
−0.2
−0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N N2LO contribution
EN2LO= −0.34(2) MeV
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N EM contribution
EEM = 0.91(5) MeV
−6
−5
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
3N N2LO contribution
E3N = −6.3(1) MeV
−29
−28
−27
−26
−25
−24
−23
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
4He binding energy
LO contribution
ELO = −27.36 (6) MeV
−3
−2.5
−2
−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N N2LO contribution
EN2LO =−1.39(4) MeV
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N EM contribution
EEM=0.881(1) MeV
−6
−5
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
3N N2LO contribution
E3N =−3.22(2) MeV
−28
−26
−24
−22
−20
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
He−4 binding energy
LO contribution
ELO = −24.8 (2) MeV
−6
−5
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N N2LO contribution
EN2LO = −1.1(2) MeV
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
2N EM contribution
EEM=0.809(1) MeV −6
−5
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
0 5 10 15 20
EB [M
eV
]
Nt
3N N2LO contribution
E3N = −3.29(6) MeV
• agrees with the earlier calculation at a = 1.97 fm, much faster√
Epelbaum, Krebs, Lee, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 142501, Eur. Phys. J. A 45 (2010) 335
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
29
RESULTS for the FOUR-NUCLEON SYSTEM
• 4He binding energy at various orders for various lattice spacings
a = 1.97 fm a = 1.64 fm a = 1.32 fmELO −28.81(11) −27.36(6) −24.81(19)
EN2LO −29.15(11)(3) −28.75(7)(5) −25.89(27)(3)
E+EMN2LO −28.23(12)(3) −27.87(7)(6) −25.08(27)(3)
E+EM+3NN2LO −34.55(18)(3) −31.09(7)(6) −28.37(28)(3)
↪→ revover the overbinding for the coarse lattice already found in 2010
↪→ overbinding decreases with with decreasing lattice spacing
↪→ look at the Tjon band plot
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
30RESULTS for the FOUR-NUCLEON SYSTEM cont’d• Tjon band plot
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24-9-8.8-8.6-8.4-8.2-8-7.8-7.6
E4H
e [M
eV
]
E3H [MeV]
LO; a = 1.97 fm
N2LO; a = 1.97 fm
LO; a = 1.64 fm
N2LO; a = 1.64 fm
LO; a = 1.32 fm
N2LO; a = 1.32 fm
NNLO, a = 1.97 fm
NNLO, a = 1.64 fm
NNLO, a = 1.32 fmExp
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
31DISCUSSION
• Deviation from the Tjon band confirmed for the coarse lattice spacing a = 1.97 fm
• Deviation decreases with decreasing a,perfect agreement for the smallest a = 1.32 fm
↪→ no more need for four-nucleon interactions for these smaller values of a
↪→ intrinsic problem of the standard action resolved√
• how about improved actions and or higher orders?
non-local smearing: mimimizes remainingsign oscillations / higher-body forcesElhatisari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 132501
N3LO is required for a better precision→ better 2NFs and 3NFsLi, Lu, ... et al., in preparation
a
a
a
a
a
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
32SCATTERING at N3LO• coarse lattice a = 1.97 fm, TPE absorbed in the local operators
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200δ(3
S1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
NPWALO
NLO,N2LON3LO
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200
ε1 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200
ε2 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P0)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
P2)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200
δ(1
D2)
[de
gre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D1)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D2)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 50 100 150 200
δ(3
D3)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
PRELIMINARY
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
33SCATTERING at N3LO• finer lattice a = 1.32 fm, TPE fully included
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200 250δ(3
S1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
NPWALO
NLON2LON3LO
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
ε1 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
ε2 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P0)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P2)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
D2)
[de
gre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D1)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D2)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D3)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
PRELIMINARY
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
34SCATTERING at N3LO• very fine lattice a = 0.98 fm, TPE fully included
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
S0)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 50 100 150 200 250δ(3
S1)
[degre
es]
pCM [MeV]
NPWALO
NLON2LON3LO
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
ε1 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
ε2 [d
egre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P0)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P1)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
P2)
[deg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(1
D2)
[de
gre
es]
pCM [MeV]
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D1)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
0
5
10
15
20
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D2)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 50 100 150 200 250
δ(3
D3)
[d
eg
ree
s]
pCM [MeV]
PRELIMINARY
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
35DISCUSSION and OUTLOOK
• All phases well described, no more differences for the various a values
↪→ Calculations of the binding energies of 3H and 4He will recover the Tjon band
• Upcoming papers:
Neutron-proton scattering at N3LO
Light and medium-mass nuclei at N3LO up A = 30 with N3LO forces
Excited spectrum of nuclei using the pinhole algorithm
How nuclei boil: Simulations of nuclei at nonzero temperature
↪→ with increased precision for the nuclear forces,many exciting results in nuclear structure & reactions to come
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
36
SPARES
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
37
NUCLEAR FORCES: OPEN ENDS
•Why is there this hierarchy V2N � V3N � V4N ?
• Gauge and chiral symmetries difficult to include (meson-exchange currents)Brown, Riska, Gari, . . .
• Connection to QCD ?most models have one-pion-exchange, but not necessarily respect chiral symmetrysome models have two-pion exchange reconstructed via dispersion relations from πN → πN
⇒We want an approach that
− is linked to QCD via its symmetries− allows for systematic calc’s with a controlled theoretical error− explains the observed hierarchy of the nuclear forces− matches nucleon structure to nuclear dynamics− allows for a lattice formulation / chiral extrapolations− puts nuclear physics on a sound basis
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
38NUCLEAR FORCES in CHIRAL NUCLEAR EFT• expansion of the potential in powers of Q [small parameter]: {p/Λb, Mπ/Λb}
• explains observed hierarchy of the nuclear forces
• extremely successful in few-nucleon systemsEpelbaum, Hammer, UGM, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2009) 1773�Chiral expansion of nuclear forces [based on NDA]
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-KraftTwo-nucleon force Three-nucleon force Four-nucleon force
LO (Q0)
NLO (Q2)
N2LO (Q3)
N3LO (Q4)
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
26 rubin | frühjahr 12
�).�!,3%1.!3)5%1�� 2823%-!3)2#(%1� 4!'!.'�)23�-<',)#(��6%..�-!.�$!2��!4-� %)3��/.3).44-�$41#(�%).�%.$,)#(%2��)3!3%1�$!123%,,3���)%�-<',)#(%.��/2)3)/.%.�$%1��4!1+2�6%1$%.�$!"%)�$41#(�%).%�%.$!,)#(%��.9!(,�5/.��4.+3%.�).�%).%-��)33%1�"#$%&%&'&()*+,&-&*.,//&$0#$123,&$2(%*,-/*%).�'%%)'.%3%1��42'!.'204.+3�&=1�.4-%!1)2#(%��)-4,!3)/.%.�5/.�(!$1/.)2#(%.� %!/"!#(34.'2'1<:%.�$41#(�%).%�23!3)23)2#(%��;(%14.'���)%�6)1$�).2"%2/.$%1%�&=1�$)%� %23)--4.'�$%1�23!3)2#(%.��)'%.2#(!&!3%.�5/.��!$1/.%.�5/.��14.$�!4&��/(.%��%16%.$4.'�%70%1)-%.3%,,%1��!3%.��$�(��!"�).)3)/���6)%�%36!�)(1%1��!22%.��%1&/,'!$&,45*6(%&76(8/)*�!�$%1�.4-%1)2#(%��4&6!.$�2/,#(%1��)!
-4,!3)/.%.�2%(1�2#(.%,,�-)3�$%1��1<:%�$%2��)33%12�6;#(23��2).$�$)%��.6%.$4.'%.�$%1!9%)3�-%)23%.2�!4&�$)%��)'%.2#(!&3%.�%).9%,!.%1��!$1/.%.�"%2#(1;.+3���).%.�!,3%1.!!3)5%.�4.$�+/-0,%-%.3;1%.� 4'!.'�")%!3%.�%A%+3)5%��%,$3(%/1)%.��������"%)�$%.%.�-!.�$!2��1/",%-�$!$41#(�5%1%).&!#(3��$!22�16(*,$$&3&"6(/&*95:(#1&(&*,%(#$,&$/*2(8*$!"%)�).��!4&�.)--3��$!22�2)#(�$)%��=,3)'!+%)3�$%1� %1%#(.4.'�!4&�%).%.�+,%).%.� %!1%)#(�"%2#(1;.+3���)%�$!1!42�1%24,3)%1%.$%��%A%+3)5%� %2#(1%)"4.'�)23�.41�).�%).%-�"%!23)--3%.��.%1')%��"96���"23!.$2"%1%)#(�5/.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�'=,3)'��
�)%2%1��14.$'%$!.+%�)23�%).�6/(,"%!+!..3%2��1).9)0�).�$%1��(82)+��/�23%,,3�"%)!20)%,26%)2%�$)%�!42�$%1��#(4,%�"%+!..3%��/1!-%,�&=1�$)%��.9)%(4.'2+1!&3�4.2%1%1��1$%�����-�'��%).%��;(%14.'�$%2��%63/.2#(%.��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�$!1���)%�'),3�.41�&=1��"!23;.$%�96)2#(%.�%).%-��<10%1�4.$�$%1��1$!/"%1C;#(%��$)%�)-��%1',%)#(�94-��1$1!$)!42�+,%).�2).$���)%�!,,'%-%).'=,3)'%��/1-%,�$%2��1!5)3!3)/.2'%2%39%2�)23�+/-0,)9)%13%1��)%�+!..�-!.�$)%2%��$%%.�!4&�(!$1/!
.)2#(%��823%-%�!.6%.$%.���%1�%.32#(%)!$%.$%��20%+3�,)%'3�).�$%1��!32!#(%��$!22�$)%��8.!-)+�5/.��!$1/.%.��9� ��"%)-� 42!-!-%.31%A%.�5/.�96%)��1/3/.%.�-)3�.)%$!1)'%1��.%1')%��.)#(3�4.-)33%,"!1�5/.��/1!';.'%.�!"(;.'3��$)%�)-��..%1%.�$%2��1/!3/.2�96)2#(%.��4!1+2�4.$��,4/.%.�!",!4!&%.���)%� %2#(1%)"4.'�2/,#(%1��823%-%�)23�$!(%1�5)%,�%B9)%.3%1��4.$�%).&!#(%1��-<'!,)#(��6%..�-!.��!$1/.%.�!,2��!.9%2�"%!31!#(3%3�4.$�.)#(3�!,2�942!--%.'%2%393%��"*%+3%�-)3�%).%1�+/-0,)9)%13%.��314+341���<,,)'�!.!,/'�,;223�2)#(�"%)20)%,26%)2%�).�$%1�-/$%1.%.��4!.3%.#(%-)%�$)%��314+!341�5/.��3/-%.�4.$��/,%+=,%.�2%(1�01;9)!2%�"%23)--%.��/(.%�$!&=1��.&/1-!3)/.%.�="%1�$%.��4&"!4�$%2��%1.2�/$%1�$%2��4!+,%/.2�5%16%.$%.�94�-=22%.���)%� 5%1%).&!#(3%� %2#(1%)"4.'� $%1�
�4!.3%.#(1/-/$8.!-)+�"%)�.)%$1)'%.�
�""�����)%��%#(2%,6)1+4.'�96)2#(%.�$%.��4+,%/.%.��!,2�$41#('%(%.$%1��31)#(�$!1'%23%,,3��6)1$�)-��%2%.3!,)#(%.�$41#(�$)%��1;&3%�96)2#(%.�96%)��%),#(%.�"%23)--3���)%�+<..%.�+,%).%��%)#(6%)3%.�(!"%.��!,2��4.+3�$!1'%23%,,3��/$%1�,!.'1%)#(6%)3)'�2%).��'%231)#(%,3%��).)%.���)/.%.!423!42#(��
Zwei-Nukleon-Kraft
Führender Beitrag
Korrektur 1. Ordnung
Korrektur 2. Ordnung
Korrektur 3. Ordnung
Drei-Nukleon-Kraft Vier-Nukleon-Kraft
N4LO (Q5)
— have been worked out and employed (recently, also parts of the N5LO NN force have been worked out )
— have been worked out but not employed yet [LENPIC, work in progress]— have not been completely worked out yet
worked out and applied worked out and to be applied calculations in progress
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
39PHASE SHIFTS at N4LO⇒ Precision phase shifts with small uncertainties up to Elab = 300 MeV
Epelbaum, Krebs, UGM, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 122301
-20
0
20
40
60
� [d
eg]
1S0
-20
0
20
40
60
� [d
eg]
1S0
-10
0
10
20 3P0
-10
0
10
20 3P0
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
1P1
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
1P1
-30
-20
-10
03P1
-30
-20
-10
03P1
0
60
120
180
� [d
eg]
3S1
0
60
120
180
� [d
eg]
3S1
-5
0
5
10�1
-5
0
5
10�1
-30
-20
-10
0
3D1
-30
-20
-10
0
3D1
0
5
10
15
20
1D2
0
5
10
15
20
1D2
0
10
20
30
0 100 200 300
� [d
eg]
Elab [MeV]
3D2
0
10
20
30
0 100 200 300
� [d
eg]
Elab [MeV]
3D2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
3P2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
3P2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
�2
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
�2
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
3D3
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 100 200 300
Elab [MeV]
3D3
NLO N2LO N3LO N4LO
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
40LOCAL/NON–LOCAL INTERACTIONS on the LATTICE
a
a
a
a
a
• Local operators/densities:
a(n), a†(n) [n denotes a lattice point]
ρL(n) = a†(n)a(n)
• Non-local operators/densities:
aNL(n) = a(n) + sNL
∑〈n′ n〉
a(n′)
a†NL(n) = a†(n) + sNL
∑〈n′ n〉
a†(n′)
ρNL(n) = a†NL(n)aNL(n)
→ where∑〈n′ n〉
denotes the sum over nearest-neighbor lattice sites of n
→ the smearing parameter sNL is determined when fitting to the phase shifts
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
41NUCLEON–NUCLEON PHASE SHIFTS
• Show results for NN [and α-α] phase shifts for both interactions:
0
20
40
60
80
0 50 100 150
a
0
60
120
180
0 50 100 150
b
-10
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150
c
0
5
10
15
0 50 100 150
d
Nijmegen PWAContinuum LO
Lattice LO-ALattice LO-B
-10
-5
0
0 50 100 150
δ or
ε (
deg)
e
0
2
4
6
0 50 100 150
f
-1
0
1
2
3
0 50 100 150
g
-6
-4
-2
0
0 50 100 150
h
0
5
10
0 50 100 150
i
-1
0
1
0 50 100 150
j
-5
0
5
0 50 100 150
pcms (MeV)
k
-2
-1
0
0 50 100 150
l
1S03S1
1P13P0
3P13P2
1D23D1
3D23D3 ε1 ε2
→ both interactions very similar
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •
42
The Tjon Band in Nuclear Lattice EFT – Ulf-G. Meißner – Peking University, April 27, 2018 · ◦ C < ∧ O > B •