UCC1: New Course Transmittal FormDepartment Name and Number
Recommended SCNS Course Identi�cation
Transcript Title (please limit to 21 characters)
Pre�x Level Course Number Lab Code
Amount of Credit
Repeatable Credit
Contact Hour: Base or Headcount
Course Description (50 words or less)
Prerequisites Co-requisites
Degree Type (mark all that apply) Baccalaureate Graduate Other
Introductory Intermediate Advanced
Department Contact
College Contact
Name
Phone Email
Name
Phone Email
Rev. 10/10
Rationale and place in curriculum
Category of Instruction
E�ective Term and Year Rotating Topic yes no
S/U Only yes no
yes no If yes, total repeatable credit allowed
Variable Credit yes no If yes, minimum and maximum credits per semester
Professional
Full Course Title
1
SYLLABUS FOR CROSS CULTURAL COUNSELING* FALL 2011 (6930/013B)
*Cross cultural counseling is any counseling in which the lawyer and client have cultural
worldviews or values that are sufficiently different to impact on the decision-making process.
TEACHER: Iris Burke
TEACHER CONTACT INFORMATION:
Email: [email protected];
Office Phone: 273 – 0804
Office location: Rm. 368D in the Center for Children and Families
Office hours: Monday, Tuesday and Thursday, 10:00 – 4:00.
CLASS TIME: Wednesdays from 2:00- 3:50
CLASS ROOM: Rm. 284
CREDITS: 2
NUMBER OF STUDENTS: capped at 24
COURSE MATERIALS: Photocopied course materials available for purchase at Target Copy.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
The goal of this course is to help prepare lawyers to recognize and work with clients whose values
or cultural worldviews are different from the lawyers, in situations where the differing worldviews
matter to both the lawyer and client. This course is NOT designed to study any specific cultural
group(s). Instead, we will focus on overall cultural worldviews which have been identified as
having significant influence on people’s thinking and decision-making.
In addition to legal materials, the course will draw on writings from a broad range of disciplines
outside of legal study: (e.g. cultural anthropology, business, sociology, psychology, political
science) and apply them to lawyer – client counseling situations.
DISABILITY ACCOMMODATION. Students requesting classroom accommodation must first
register with the University’s Office of Disability Resources. The UF Office of Disability
Resources will provide documentation to the student, who must then provide this documentation to
the Law School Office of Student Affairs when requesting accommodation.
POLICY RELATED TO MAKE-U[P EXAMS OR OTHER WORK
Students may delay taking a scheduled exam only in exceptional circumstances approved by the
Assistant Dean. Delayed exams must be taken as soon as reasonably possible prior to the
beginning of the next term. Students are not permitted to take exams before the scheduled time.
2
GRADING:
There is no final exam. There will be a final paper, and several smaller assignments. More
detailed information about grading of assignments is found on the last page of this syllabus. The
grade curve for this course is a maximum of 3.6. (For courses in which there are 25 or fewer
students, there is no minimum curve, and the maximum curve is 3.60.
LAW SCHOOL GRADING POLICY:
Grade Points Grade Point Grade Point
A (Excellent) 4.0 C+ 2.33 D- 0.67
A- 3.67 C (Satisfactory) 2.00 E (Failure) 0.0
B+ 3.33 C- 1.67
B (Good) 3.00 D+ 1.33
B- 2.67 D (Poor) 1.00 .
CLASS #1: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE AUGUST 24
Readings: None
Written Assignments: None
In-class discussion:
Goals of the course
What the course covers, and what it does not cover
Review of the syllabus
Explaining assignments and grading
Introduction to basic concepts
Goals for discussion
In class exercise(s) (time permitting)
CLASS #2: BASIC PRINCIPLES OF CLIENT COUNSELING AUGUST 31
To understand how cultural worldview difference affect client counseling, we need to
understand basic principles of the counseling process. A common misconception amongst non-
lawyers (and some lawyers) is that the lawyer’s role in counseling a client is simply to tell the
client what to do. Rather, in most circumstances, the appropriate role of the lawyer is to provide
the client with sufficient information that the client makes informed decisions as to what works
best for them. This becomes more challenging when the lawyer has a “moral” or “values” conflict
with the client’s proposed course of action.
3
Reading(s): Excerpts from the following Interviewing and Counseling textbooks:
1. Binder, Bergman, Price & Tremblay, Lawyers as Counselors: A Client-Centered
Approach: pp. 281 – 285 (Your Role in the Counseling and Advising Process) and
391-397 (Intervening in Client Decisions)
2. Cochran, DiPippa and Peters, The Counselor-at-law: A Collaborative Approach to
Client Interviewing and Counseling, 2d Edition: Chapter 9/pp. 169 – 189 (Moral
Choices in the Law Office: Who Gets Hurt? and Who Decides?)
3. Ellman, Dinerstein, Gunning, Kruse, & Shalleck, Lawyers and Clients, Critical Issues
in Interviewing and Counseling: Chapter 7/ pp 279 - 318 (Engaging in Moral Dialogue)
In-class discussion:
What is the lawyer’s role in the counseling process?
Disagreement among “the experts” about when and how lawyers should intervene in “grey-
area” client decision-making: “hired guns” vs. “moral activists”.
What is a “moral” belief? How does it differ from a values or cultural worldview belief?
Written Assignment: There is NO written assignment due for the August 31 class. There
will be a written assignment related to “grey-area” moral conflicts that will be due on
September 9, at 5:00 PM. It is worth 8 points. The assignment is as follows:
Send me a link to or copy of an article from a news source that describes an action that you
would find to be a “grey area conflict” with your values. The action should not be illegal or
require you to do something unethical. However, if the person came to you as a client, and told
you that they were going to take the action described in the newspaper article, you would have a
moral or values conflict with it, and might wish to dissuade them from that course of action or
even refuse to represent them. I am not looking for an analysis of what you would do or why it
would conflict with your values. I am only asking you to identify the specific action that you
would find “morally” troubling. (The client can be an individual, a business entity, or a
governmental agency.)
CLASS #3: INTRODUCTION TO THE BASIC CULTURAL WORLDVIEWS SEPT. 7
What works best for the client will be a personal decision, unique to each client. A client’s
comfort with a particular option (and relative discomfort with other options) often rests on cultural
worldviews which the client may not articulate and about which the client may not even be
consciously aware. Lawyers also have cultural worldviews. As with clients, lawyers are typically
unlikely to articulate, or even to be aware of, their own worldviews. When the lawyer and the
client share the same worldview, its influence will typically be invisible. However, in our
increasingly multi-cultural world, the lawyer and client may hold conflicting worldviews
Reading(s): 1. Excerpt(s) from Prof. Burke’s Article on Cross-Cultural Counseling (on TWEN)
2. Introduction: The Rules of the Social Game, excerpted from Geert Hoftede,
Software of the Mind
3. Kahan, et.al. The Second national Risk and Culture Study: Making Sense of –
and Making Progress in – the American Culture War of Fact
In-class Discussion:
4
An introduction to the worldviews:
Individualism vs. Community
Authoritarianism/Hierarchy vs. Egalitarianism
The neuroscience of culture:
What happens in the amygdale?
What happens in the neo-cortex?
What does that mean for client counseling?
CLASS #4: INDIVIDUALISM VS. COMMUNITY SEPT. 14
Written ungraded assignment(s): Due on Wednesday, Sept. 14 by 9:00 AM. These assignments
are anonymous. After you have read the materials listed below under Readings:
1. In the customized poll on TWEN, indicate where you believe that you fall on the scale
of Individualism vs. Community.
2. Take the self quiz on p. 20 – 21 of Warriors and Villagers. Take the customized poll
on TWEN regarding the results.
Reading(s):
1. Excerpt from Landis, Bennett and Bennett, Handbook of Intercultural Training (3rd
Edition), foreword, written by Harry Triandis
2. Excerpts from Geert Hofstede: I, We, and They: The Individual and the
Collective in Society.
3. Excerpts from Katherine G. Kearney, & Thomas I White, Men & Women at Work:
Warriors and Villagers on the Job. (Note: Despite its title – these readings are not
primarily about gender – they are about individualism and community.) pp. 15 – 30.
4. Excerpt from Richard E. Nisbett, The Geography of Thought, How Asians and
Westerns Think Differently . . . and Why: Chapter 3/ pp. 47 – 77 (Living Together vs.
Going it Alone.)
5. Excerpts from Prof. Burke’s article (on TWEN)
In-class discussion: Discussion of individualism and community generally
Applying the concepts to business situations
Applying the concepts to views of family
Applying the concepts in a team sports context
Applying the concepts to one or more legal situations
CLASS #5: AUTHORITARIANISM/HIERARCHY VS. EGALITARIANISM
PART I: INTRODUCTION: CLASS, MONEY, POWER AND PRIVILEGE SEPT. 21
Written Graded Assignment: 12 points: Due on TWEN by Tuesday, Sept. 20, at 9:00 AM
After you read the materials below, answer the following questions:
1. (4 pts.) The amygdale processes fear/responds to perceptions of threat.
a. What do people who have internalized an authoritarian world view fear, or feel threatened by?
5
b. What do people who have internalized an egalitarian world view fear, or feel threatened by?
2. (4 pts.) Both authoritarians and egalitarians favor government programs and policies that
further, or are consistent with, their particular worldview. Can you identify government programs
and policies that further, or are consistent with:
a. Authoritarian worldviews?
b. Egalitarian worldviews?
3. (4 pts.) Both authoritarians and egalitarians support efforts to regulate behavior in ways
that further, or are consistent with, their particular worldview.
a. Whose (or what) behavior do authoritarians primarily seek to regulate?
b. Whose (or what) behavior do egalitarians primarily seek to regulate?
Written Ungraded Assignment: Due by Tuesday, Sept. 20, at 9:00 AM. This assignment is
anonymous. After you have read the materials listed below under Readings:
1. In the customized poll on TWEN, indicate where you believe that you fall on the scale
of Authoritarianism vs. Egalitariansim.
Reading(s):
1. Two Excerpt(s) from Geert Hofstede:
a. From Chapter 3: More Equal Than Others
b. From Chapter 6: What is Different is Dangerous
2. Marc. J. Hetherington & Jonathan D. Weiler, from Authoritarianism and Polarization
In American Politics, Spanking or Time Out, A Clash of Worldviews, pp. 1 – 11.
3. Relevant current news articles (links are on TWEN) (Two articles: Egypt’s Ire Turns . .
. and Financial Overhaul Bill . . . )
4. Prof. Burke’s 2 page summary on Authoritarianism and Egalitarianism.
5. Gini Index Map (Income Inequality Map)
CLASS #6: AUTHORITARIANISM/HIERARCHY VS. EGALITARIANISM
PART 2: DIFFERING APPROACHES TO RAISING CHILDREN SEPT. 28 Socialization into cultural worldviews begins in the family, and the family’s impact on
socialization is the most powerful. Social scientists have identified differing approaches to child
rearing. We will discuss approaches along a continuum, with primary focus on authoritarian
(control/obedience oriented) and authoritative (autonomy/reason oriented) approaches. These
differing approaches influence human development in accordance with cultural worldviews of how
people should be. Each approach likely works better in some cultural settings than in others.
Written Assignment: (7 points) Due on TWEN by Tues., Sept. 27, at 9:00 AM.
After you read the materials below, answer the following questions:
1. (4 points) What do you think are the goals (or outcomes, even if not intended) of:
a. Authoritarian approaches to child rearing? (high demanding/low responsive)
b. Authoritative approaches to child rearing? (high demanding/high responsive)
c. Indulgent approaches to child rearing? (low demanding/high responsive)
2. (3 pts.) How might this issue (child rearing approaches) involve clients and lawyers?
Give two examples.
6
Reading(s):
1. Parenting Style and Its Correlates, by Nancy Darling, PhD, MS
2. “Why Chinese Mothers are Superior”, online Wall Street Journal article dated January
8, 2011. (link is on TWEN)
3. Disabled Students are Spanked More, NY Times article (and graphic) dated August 11,
2009 (link is on TWEN)
4. “Floating Out of Poverty on a Deep River of Words” (article on Harlem Children’s
Zone Baby College.)
5. Audio recording of interview with Geoffrey Canada about “baby college” and his
efforts to consciously try to change child rearing approaches as part of the Harlem
Children’s Zone project. This audio is not required. It is a more detailed explanation of
the Harlem Children’s Zone Baby College. To listen to the audio recording, go to
https://connect.ufl.edu/law/video/courses/SitePages/6930-8933.aspx. To log in, you
must preface your gatorlink username with UFAD\
6. Authoritarian child rearing “on steroids”: Excerpts from the Conclusions section of
the Executive Summary of the Ryan report. The Ryan report covers physical, sexual
and emotional abuse in Catholic Institutions in Ireland over a 40 year period. This
2500 page report, issued in May of 2009, concluded a 10 year investigation, and
remains a major issue in Ireland. It is quite depressing, but I ask you to read it because
it represents the “outer edge” of what some people consider to be appropriate child
rearing approaches, and is related to attitudes that can be found in some juvenile
facilities in the US.
7. The Irish Affliction, NY Times Magazine Article, dated Feb. 9. 2011. Note: This
reading is optional, not required. It relates to the subject matter of the Ryan report.
In Class Discussion: Parenting approaches and culture
CLASS #7: AUTHORITARIANISM/HIERARCHY VS. EGALITARIANISM
PART 3: SPECIAL ISSUES OF ASCRIPTION – POLICING AND RACE OCT. 5
Written Assignment: 7 points Due on TWEN by Tuesday, October 4 at 9:00 AM
After you read the materials below, answer the following questions. Try to relate your
answers to the reading materials.
Do you think it is accurate (or likely accurate) that the employment field of
policing/prosecution/corrections is disproportionately populated by people with
authoritarian perspectives? YES or NO
a. If yes, is that a problem? (Why or why not)
b. If it is a problem, can you propose any solutions?
c. If NO (if you DON’T think that that the employment field of
policing/prosecution/corrections is disproportionately populated by people with
authoritarian perspectives, what is your opinion about the relative proportion of
people who go into police work, in terms of authoritarian and egalitarian
worldview?
7
Readings:
1. Hillary Haley and Jim Sidanius, Person-Organization Congruence and the
Maintenance of Group-Based Social Hierarchy: A Social Dominance Perspective, 8 Group
Processes Intergroup Relations 187, (2005), pp. 187-203
2. R. Richard Banks, Jennifer L. Eberhardt and Lee Ross, Discrimination and Implicit
Bias in a Racially Unequal Society, pp 1172 – 1176.
3. Excerpts from Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow, Mass Incarceration in the
Age of Colorblindness, (2010); pp. 59; 96-103; 115-116; 121-125; 201.
4. The following articles from the NY Times.
a. Bias Seen in Police on Police Shootings (article is from May 26, 2010)
b. New York Minorities More Likely to be Frisked (article is from May 12, 2010)
c. Watching Certain People (op ed by Bob Herbert from March 1, 2010)
d. Blacks Still Being Blocked From Juries in the South (article from June 2, 2010)
CLASS # 8: RESEARCHING IN NON-LAW DATABASES OCT. 12
Written Assignment: None
Reading Assignment: None
In-Class Discussion: At this point, you should be closing in on identifying a final paper topic.
Because of the nature of this course, information in the law library will likely not be as useful as
non- law databases in helping you to “flesh out” your topic ideas. Library personnel will come to
class and talk about non-law data bases at the University of Florida, and how to find materials for
your papers in those non-law databases.
CLASS #9: SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS OF GREY AREA CONFLICTS OCT. 19
Written Assignment: None
Reading Assignment: None
In-Class Discussion: The purpose of this class is to provide practice in relating potential lawyer-
client conflicts to cultural worldviews. We will go back to the article that you submitted for the
assignment called “Grey Area Conflict with Client’s Proposed Course of Action.” Now that you
are more aware of cultural worldviews, discuss the grey area conflict in terms of those worldviews,
in a small group of approximately 5 students. (You are allowed to substitute a different article
than the one you turned in, for purposes of this small-group discussion.) After groups have
discussed the articles, each group should report to the class about one (or at most two) of these
discussions.
CLASS #10: STRATEGIES FOR WORKING ACROSS CULTURAL WORLDVIEWS
OCT. 26
Written Assignment: None
Reading(s):
1. Excerpts from Prof. Burke’s article: Chapter on strategies for working with
8
clients across cultural worldviews (on TWEN); and
2. Hypothetical(s ) (on TWEN)
In-class discussion: Discuss how to work across cultural worldviews.
CLASS #11: CULTURE EVOLVES: GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES NOV. 2
Written Assignment: None
Reading(s):
1. Excerpts from Professor Burke’s Article on Cross Cultural Counseling (on TWEN)
2. Excerpt from Morley Winograd & Michael D. Hais, Millennial Makeover,
pp. 66 – 86, (Meet the Millennials), and 167 – 171 (sharing defines a generation.)
3. Excerpts from Robert B. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of
American Community: Introduction (explaining the concept of social capital) pp. 18-
28; Chapter 2, Political Participation, pp. 31-35; Chapter 14, Generation to
Generation, pp.247-276; NOTE: The Bowling Alone readings are on reserve.
In-class discussion: Generational differences in worldview
NOTE: Wednesday, NOV. 2 at 5:00 PM is the deadline for submitting topic ideas for the
final paper.
CLASS #12: REGIONAL/ URBAN-RURAL WORLDVIEW DIFFERENCES NOV. 9
Written Assignment: None
Reading(s):
1. Carr & Kefalas, Hollowing out the Middle: The Rural Brain Drain and What it
Means for America, pp. 1 – 26/Introduction/The Heartland and the rural Youth Exodus.
2. Bill Bishop, The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like Minded America is
Tearing Us Apart, Chapter 6, The Economics of the Big Sort, pp. 129 – 155. NOTE: The
Big Sort readings are on reserve. 3. Richard C. Longworth, Caught in the Middle, America’s Heartland in the Age of
Globalism, pp. 30 – 37 (From Rust to Bust); pp. 128 – 134 (New Blood for Cities)
4. Excerpts on urban-rural differences from Prof. Burke’s Article on Cross Cultural
Counseling (on TWEN)
In Class Discussion: Urban – rural worldview differences
CLASS #13: GENDER – PULLING IT ALL TOGETHER NOV. 16
Cultural issues relating to gender arise in almost every context. We will have discussed
those issues during the semester in the context of other topics. This is an opportunity to pull those
discussions together and focus specifically on gender issues.
Readings:
1. Excerpts from Professor Burke’s article on cross cultural counseling. This is brief (less
than 2 pages.)
9
2. In Sweden, Men Can Have It All (about government policies in Sweden that encourage
fathers to take parental leave.) NY Times Article dated June 9. 2010
CLASS #14: STUDENT PRESENTATIONS NOV. 23 OR POSSIBLY NOV. 30
Nov. 23 is the eve of the Thanksgiving holiday. Nov. 30 is a Friday at the law school, but I would
guess that few of you have classes on Friday afternoon. Let’s discuss what works best.
Presentations themselves are not graded. (Only the final papers will be graded.)
**************************
GRADED ASSIGNMENTS:
1. Major paper: Maximum of 60 pts. Due by DECEMBER 2, at 5:00 PM.
Approximately 10 - 12 pages. Extensions on final papers will be given, on reasonable
request.
NOTE: Topic ideas should be cleared with Professor Burke by November 2 at 5:00.
Option A: Take some current issue from the news, and do the following:
a. Link to or attach the news article(s) that you are using as a starting point;
b. Analyze the situation described in the article(s) in terms of what we have learned
about cultural worldviews this semester;
c. Create a hypothetical based on that situation which involves a legal client and a
lawyer who is seeking to counsel that client. Ideally, this should be a situation in
which your own worldview is different from that of the client;
d. Discuss how the lawyer could counsel the client, given the differing worldviews
involved.
OR
Option B: Pick any topic (not necessarily to a current news issue) and analyze that issue in
terms of what we have learned about cultural worldviews this semester.
2. Written Assignments in Syllabus Maximum of 34 points.
Note: In awarding points for these assignments, I do not curve the points given.
a. Grey Area Conflict with Client’s Proposed Action article, due Sept. 9, at 5:00 PM
(8 points)
10
b. Written questions: (26 points): Weeks 5 (12 points), 6 (7 points), and 7 (7 points)
Extensions on written assignments will be given on reasonable request, but not after
the assignment has been discussed in class (if the student was present in class.)
3. Class participation: Maximum of 6 points total. This is a discussion class, and only works if people participate. However, not all people
are equally comfortable speaking in class. You may also earn participation points by
sending me an email relating to the class discussion.
4. Class attendance policy: Students with more than two unexcused absences will lose
some or all of their participations points. If you know that you will be absent because of
religious observation, extra-curricular activity, job interview, or other significant event,
please speak to me.
UCC: Syllabus Checklist
Rev. 10/10
All UCC1 forms and each UCC2 form that proposes a change in the course description or credit hours must include this checklist in addition to a complete syllabus. Check the box if the attached syllabus includes the indicated information.
Instructor contact information (and TA if applicable)
Course objectives and/or goals
Policy related to class attendance
Policy related to make-up exams or other work
Statement related to accommodations for students with disabilities
Information on current UF grading policies for assigning grade points
Syllabus MUST contain the following information:
It is recommended that syllabi contain the following information:
1. Critical dates for exams and other work
2. Class demeanor expected by the professor (e.g., tardiness, cell phone usage)
4. Contact information for university counseling and mental health services
The University’s complete Syllabus Policy can be found at:
3. UF’s honesty policy
http://www.aa.u�.edu/policy/SyllabiPolicy.pdf
A topical outline (at least tentative) of subjects to be covered
Required and recommended textbooks
Methods by which students will be evaluated and their grades determined