Transcript
Page 1: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN:Wired vs. Wireless

Terry GrayDirector,

Networks & Distributed ComputingUW Computing & Communications

September 2001

Page 2: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Scope of UW Networking• UW Campus Networks

– Seattle– Tacoma– Bothell/CCC

• Medical Centers (net design)– UW Physicians Network– UW Medical Center– Harborview Medical Center

• Pacific/NorthWest Gigapop– Pacific Wave exchange point– Pacific Light Rail

• Statewide K20 Network

Page 3: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pacific Northwest Gigapop

Page 4: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Baseline Connectivity

• Shared 10Mbps HD

• Switched 10Mbps HD

• Switched 10/100Mbps FD– backed by GE switch/router infrastructure

• Goal: Switched 10/100 FD for all; GE for a few

• Reality: Cat3 wireplant upgrade will take multiple years and multiple millions of dollars

Page 5: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Advanced Services• Multicast

– Partially deployed– Older routers need to be replaced

• QoS– Laissez faire? Premium service?– Best with FD connections.

• VoIP– Needs QoS, extra-high availability– POE desirable; implies UPS in closets

• IPv6

Page 6: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Premium Services?

• Wide-area QoS chargeback?

• Preferred access to Internet for a fee?

• Lots of interesting policy and tech issues...

Page 7: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Mistakes We Didn't Make

• FDDI to the desk• VLANs• ATM• Various "cut-thru IP switching" digressions

• Claim: Staying with pure IP and Ethernet has served UW very well...

Page 8: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Current Statistics• Avg Backbone traffic: nearly 2 TB/day• Peak Inbound traffic: 100 Mbps (40 in 1999)• Peak Outbound traffic: 160 Mbps (20 in 1999)• Doubling time: Less than 2 years!!• Hosts: over 50,000• Modems: over 2,000• Switched subnets: 70% (30% in 1999)• 10/100 FD subnets: 25% (5% in 1999)• Cat 5 buildings: 10%

Page 9: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

UW-S Building/Subnet Status

Depts Dorms Hospitals TOTAL

Buildings 193 Cat 3 175 Cat 5 18

Subnets 269- 41 - 310

10Mbps 85 100Mbps 1311000Mbps 94

Page 10: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

GigE Buildings

• Physics/Astronomy• Fisheries Center• new Ocean• Lander Hall• McCarty Hall• Parrington Hall• Edmondson Pavillion• Mary Gates Hall• OUG Library

• part of Electrical Engr.• part of HS K wing• part of HS T wing • part of Johnson Hall• part of Savery• part of Thomson Hall• part of 4545

Page 11: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Simplified Network Topology

Router Router

BorderRouter

CoreSwitch

EdgeSwitch

Edge Switch

InteriorSwitch

InteriorSwitch

Gigapop Internet2

DesktopDesktop

Internet

Fed Nets4

30

300

1000+Branch Site

50,000

PBX

Page 12: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Page 13: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Number of Devices

Page 14: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Backbone Traffic

Page 15: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Border Traffic 1999

Page 16: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Border Traffic 2001

Page 17: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Recurring Theme: Explosive Growth

• More users• More devices• Longer use• New (bandwidth-intensive) applications

– e.g. remote collaboration tools– audio/video streaming– tele-immersion– distance learning

Page 18: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Networking Hot List• Campus building/subnet upgrades• Backbone upgrades (production, experimental)• Regional networking• Network Hardening• Security• Advanced Services• Wireless• Management/diagnostic tools

Page 19: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Success Metrics

• 10/100 FD connections: xx%

• Multicast deployment: xx%

• QoS deployment: xx%

• Dept’l wireless coverage: xx%

• Router center hardening: xx%

• Backbone capacity

• IPv6 capable routers

Page 20: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

On to Wireless...

Page 21: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless Categories

• Wireless by Purpose– Point-to-Point links– Access networks

• Wireless by Spectrum– Infrared– RF– Optical

Page 22: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless RF by Range• PAN/HAN (Personal/Home-Area-Network)

– Bluetooth– HomeRF

• LAN (Local-Area-Network)– IEEE 802.11– ETSI HiperLAN2

• MAN (Metro-Area-Network)– LMDS, “Fixed Wireless”

• WAN (Wide-Area-Network)– Ricochet (R.I.P.)– CDPD– 2.5G, 3G, etc, etc, etc

Page 23: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

LAN Wireless Standards

• IEEE 802.11 2.4GHz, 1-2Mbps, FHSS, DSSS

• IEEE 802.11b 2.4Ghz, 11Mbps DSSS (WiFi)

• IEEE 802.11a 5Ghz, 54Mbps

• ETSI HiperLAN2 5Ghz, 54Mbps, TDMA

• In US, all use unlicensed “ISM” bands

Page 24: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

802.11 ISSUES

• Network Design, esp. Topology

• Access control

• Security

• Compatibility

• Interference

• Relation to Bluetooth, HomeRF, etc

• Obsolescence

Page 25: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

ROAMING ISSUES

• Layer 2 (802.11) vs. Layer 3 (Mobile IP)

• Vendor incompatibility

• LAN vs. WAN

• We will support L2 roaming within a building by dedicating one subnet for all access points in the building.

Page 26: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Policy Issues

• Part of campus network infrastructure

• Want to encourage small-scale deployments with minimum overhead, but coordination needed to avoid interference

• Large-scale deployments need to be coordinated by C&C

• Campus-wide access control policy

Page 27: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

UW-S Wireless Deployment

• C&C Pilot Project– Kane Hall, Rm. 130– Mary Gates Hall– Gerberding Hall– Odegaard Undergraduate Library

• Other wireless projects– CS, C&C, Business, MCIS, ...

Page 28: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pilot Project Objectives

• Provide 11 Mb coverage throughout selected facilities.

• Allow roaming within facility space.

• Develop suitable policies.

• Gain operational experience.

Page 29: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pilot Project Lessons Learned

• Success depends on cooperation w/dep’ts

• It takes more wire than you think!

• Site surveys & frequency sweeps needed.

• WEP is not secure; use SSH, SSL, etc.

• Technology still evolving

• 2.4GHz phones interfere badly

Page 30: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wired vs. Wireless Issues

• Server suitability• Performance• Performance variation• Price/Performance• Interference• Technology maturity• Advanced services• Security

Page 31: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

802.11a: Successor?

• Faster• Shorter distance• More power consumption• Probably won’t replace 802.11b• Probably need WAPs for both

Page 32: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Infrastructure Requirements

Phones Wired Wireless

Closets YES YES YES

Conduit YES YES YES

Wireplant YES YES Much

Switches Maybe YES Some

WAPs NO NO YES

Page 33: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Conclusions

• Wireless is very addictive.

• It will be very popular.

• It will be very problematic.

• The dust has not settled.

• In offices, it is not a replacement for wired.

• In classrooms, lounges, etc, it is… but that still requires some wired infrastructure.

Page 34: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless References• Open Group: www.openwirelessdata.org• Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance (WECA)• Wireless LAN Association (WLANA)• Portable Computer & Communications Association (PCCA)• Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)• WAP Forum• Bluetooth Special Interest Group• Mobile Wireless Internet Forum (MWIF)• Wireless Information Networks Forum (WINForum)• HiperLAN2 Global Forum• Wireless Data Forum


Top Related