USE OF INTRANET AND OTHER INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE INFLUENZA VACCINATION AMONG HEALTH CARE WORKERS
Chris Ferris, MAUniversity of Texas
School of Public HealthApril 14, 2011
2
Influenza (the Flu)
• Serious respiratory illness• Epidemics occur annually• 3-5 million cases worldwide• 500,000 deaths
SOURCE: “Seasonal Influenza: The Disease.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/index.htm.
3
Impact in the United States
• 200,000 hospitalizations• 36,000 deaths
SOURCE: “Seasonal Influenza: The Disease.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/index.htm.
4
Prevention
• Virus mutates every year
• Vaccination• Frequent hand
washing
SOURCE: "Prevention and Control of Influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)." MMWR. 54(RR08); July 29, 2005.http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/PREVIEW/MMWRHTML/rr5408a1.htm.
5
Health Care Workers (HCWs)
• Can pass virus to patients and other staff
• Influenza infections low vaccination rates among HCWs
SOURCES: "Influenza Vaccination of Health-Care Personnel: Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)." MMWR. 55(RR02);1-16: February 24, 2006: http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/PREVIEW/MMWRHTML/rr5502a1.htm.
Elder AG, O’Donnell B, McCruden EA, Symington IS and Carman WF. “Incidence and recall of influenza in a cohort of Glasgow healthcare workers during the 1993-4 epidemic: results of serum testing and questionnaire.” BMJ; 313(7067): 1241-2.
6
Policy Recommendations
SOURCES: “Prevention & Control of Influenza - Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).” MMWR Jul 13, 2007; 56(RR06): 1-54.
Lugo, N. “Will carrots or sticks raise influenza immunization rates of health care personnel?” American Journal of Infection Control. February, 2007; Vol. 35, No. 1: 1.
• CDC: Health care facilities “should offer influenza vaccinations to all” health care personnel
• The Joint Commission: Require organizations to track employee vaccination rates
7
Vaccination Rates among HCWs
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
38%40% 42%
33%
42%45%
48%
21%22% 23%
16%20% 21% 24%
Health Care WorkersUS Adults (18-64)
SOURCE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “Self-reported influenza vaccination coverage trends 1989 - 2008 among adults by age group, risk group, race/ethnicity, health-care worker status, and pregnancy status, United States, National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).” http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/pdf/NHIS89_08fluvaxtrendtab.pdf.
8
Mandatory Vaccinations?
SOURCES: “Policy Statement—Recommendation for Mandatory Influenza Immunization of All Health Care Personnel.” Committee on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics; published online Sept. 13, 2010: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/peds.2010-2376v1.
Stein R. “Mandatory Flu Shots Hit Resistance.” The Washington Post. Sept. 26, 2009.
• H1N1 Influenza spurred some to mandate vaccine
• AAP: “Mandatory programs for all [health care personnel] should be implemented nationwide”
• Most hospitals and other health care facilities do not mandate vaccination
9
Economics
SOURCES: Folland S, et al. The Economics of Health and Health Care. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001: 8.
Camerer C. “Behavioral Economics: Reunifying Psychology and Economics.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Sept. 1999; 96: 10575, 10577.
• Traditional economics– Assumes decision-maker is rational– “Making the best choices that further one’s own ends”– Because rational people make few mistakes, policies aren’t
necessary to help them• Grossman’s theory of human capital
– Individuals invest in themselves– Trade current utility for future utility
• Behavioral economics– Relaxes rationality assumptions– Allows for “non-rational” factors
10
Behavioral Economics
SOURCES: Shumaker SA, Ockene JK and Reikert KA. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. Hamilton Printing Company, New York; 2009: 21.
Richman B. “Behavioral economics and health policy: understanding Medicaid's failure.” Cornell Law Review. Mar 2005; 90(3): 722.
• What non-rational factors influence decisions?– Health information can lead to improved health
behaviors– Limited success
• Theory of Reasoned Action – Education is not enough– Intention also determines behavior
• Attitude toward behavior• Subjective norms associated with behavior
11
Behavioral Economics
SOURCE: Shumaker SA, Ockene JK and Reikert KA. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. Hamilton Printing Company, New York; 2009: 21.
• Theory of Planned Behavior (TBP)– Attitude toward the behavior– Subjective norms– Perceived behavioral control
• Apply TBP to influenza vaccination among HCWs
12
Dissertation Aims
• Analyze and evaluate results of replication of Intranet intervention
• Conduct systematic review of literature to determine other ingredients for successful interventions
• Recommend policy changes to improve influenza vaccination rates among HCWs
13
Journal Article I: Use of Intranet to Increase
Influenza Vaccination Among Health Care Workers
14
Overview
• Objective: Evaluate effectiveness of Intranet intervention in increasing influenza vaccination level among HCWs
• Design/Methods: New intervention at non-profit, adult hospital which “required” employees to select vaccination status on Intranet. This tactic was accompanied by other, related interventions.
• Results: Statistically significant difference in percentage of employees vaccinated: 36.3% in previous year vs. 48.5% in intervention year (P<.001)
15
Cleveland Clinic
• 2004-05 flu season: Cleveland Clinic used unique declination form on Intranet
SOURCE: Bertin M, Scarpelli M, Proctor AW, et al. “Novel use of the Intranet to document health care personnel participation in a mandatory influenza vaccination reporting program.” American Journal of Infection Control. February, 2007; Vol. 35, No. 1.
16
Cleveland Clinic
• Mandatory but not enforced• 90% of HCWs participated• Vaccination rate improved from 38% to 55%• Replication of Intranet intervention at other
hospital
SOURCE: Bertin M, Scarpelli M, Proctor AW, et al. “Novel use of the Intranet to document health care personnel participation in a mandatory influenza vaccination reporting program.” American Journal of Infection Control. February, 2007; Vol. 35, No. 1.
17
Intervention at St. Luke’s
• Similar to Cleveland Clinic• Oct. 2008 – Jan. 2009• Strategies:– Education and information– Free vaccine– Vaccine easily accessible– Online questionnaire– Pop-up window for declining employees– E-mails to managers
18
Intervention at St. Luke’s
• Similar to Cleveland Clinic intervention• Draws on Theory of Planned Behavior– Education not enough– Intention is key determinant of behavior• Attitude• Subjective norms• Perceived behavioral control
SOURCE: Ajzen I and Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980: 5.
19
Theory of Planned BehaviorCommunication Methods Salient Messages TPB Dimensions
Wallpaper on computers “Flu doesn’t fight fair”“You can spread flu to coworkers, patients, family”
Subjective normAttitude toward behavior
Employee newsletter “Vaccine is best way to protect yourself and patients”“Free flu shots”Signed by CEO, PSO and CNO
Attitude toward behaviorPerceived behavioral controlSubjective norm
Employee Intranet “Vaccine is best way to protect yourself and patients”“All employees required to complete online questionnaire”
Attitude toward behaviorSubjective norm
E-mails to managers “Not too late”“Occupational Health giving free shots”Locations and times for free shots
Perceived behavioral controlSubjective norm
20
Data Collection and Analysis
• Occupational Health: number of employees vaccinated
• Web Center: participation in online questionnaire • Human Resources: average number of
employees during intervention
• Statistical comparison of employees vaccinated to previous year using Pearson chi-square test (P<0.05)
21
Results• Online Questionnaire: 42.68% participated • 40.02%: Received flu shot this year• 2.67%: Decline flu shot for medical reason• 0%: Choose not to be vaccinated
22
Results• Overall Vaccination Level
Vaccinated (%)
Δ% compared to 2008-09 season
P value
Flu Season Yes No
2007-08 2,046 (36.3%)
3,595 (63.7%)
12.2% <0.005
2008-09 2,546 (48.5%)
2,702 (51.5%)
- -
23
Results• Intranet intervention associated with increase
in vaccination rate among HCWs• Adds strength to Cleveland Clinic study
24
Journal Article II: Use of Interventions to Promote
Influenza Vaccination Among American Health Care Workers:
A Systematic Review
25
Overview
• Objective: Assess current interventions to determine which policies have been the most effective in increasing influenza vaccination rates among HCWs.
• Methods: Systematic review of research published between January 1994 and March 2010; studies found in Medline/Pubmed, Ovid and Ebsco databases were included.
• Results: Combination of several interventions may prove successful in improving vaccination rates among American HCWs.
26
Systematic Review
• Analysis of existing literature• Examine which interventions associated with
increase in vaccination rates among HCWs• Identify active ingredients for successful
interventions
27
Systematic Review
• Peer-reviewed journals Jan. 1994-Mar. 2010• Effects of interventions for increasing
influenza vaccination rates among HCWs• At hospitals, nursing homes, etc. in U.S.• Online databases:• Medline/Pubmed• Ovid• Ebsco
28
Studies Included
• 21 studies met initial inclusion criteria• 9 dropped • 12 included for systematic review
Multiple-Arm Studies Pre-Post Studies
Zimmerman, et al. Ribner, et al.
Kimura, et al. Polgreen, et al. (2008)
Polgreen, et al. (2009) Bertin, et al.
Gazmararian, et al. Kuntz, et al.
Nicholson, et al.
Shah, et al.
Nace, et al.
CDC
29
Interventions
• Strong administrative support• Free or no charge• More easily accessible• Education/information campaign• Declination/consent forms• Vaccine “champions” within organization• Incentives
30
Multiple Arm Studies Author Population (N) Post-Intervention
Vaccination Rate %Intervention(s)
Zimmerman, et al. Non-clinical staff (969) 46.2 education
Non-clinical staff (7,015) 39.6 education, incentive
Indirect patient contact (412) 33.5 education
Indirect patient contact (888) 33.7 increased access, education
Indirect patient content (1,478) 43.3 education, incentive
Indirect patient contact (2,359) 37.9 increased access, education, incentive
Direct patient contact (1,247) 34.5 education
Direct patient contact (2,461) 39.0 increased access, education
Direct patient contact (3,904) 38.4 education, incentive
Direct patient contact (6,500) 41.4 increased access, education, incentive
Kimura, et al. All employees/Group D (754) 53 education, vaccine day, free vaccine
All employees/Group C (832) 46 vaccine day, free vaccine
All employees/Group B (821) 34 education
All employees/Group A (1517) 28 no intervention/control group
31
Multiple Arm Studies Author Population (N) Baseline %
Change %Intervention(s)
Zimmerman, et al. Non-clinical staff (969) 40.1+6.1
education
Non-clinical staff (7,015) 34.6+5.0
education, incentive
Indirect patient contact (412) 30.5+3.0
education
Indirect patient contact (888) 28.3+5.4
increased access, education
Indirect patient contact (1,478) 32.8+10.5
education, incentive
Indirect patient contact (2,359) 32.0+5.9
increased access, education, incentive
Direct patient contact (1,247) 31.6+2.9
education
Direct patient contact (2,461) 30.2+8.8
increased access, education
Direct patient contact (3,904) 31.6+6.8
education, incentive
Direct patient contact (6,500) 31.1+10.3
increased access, education, incentive
Kimura, et al. All employees/Group D (754) 39+14
education, vaccine day, free vaccine
All employees/Group C (832) 35+11
vaccine day, free vaccine
All employees/Group B (821) 29+5
education
32
Multiple Arm Studies Author Population (N) Vaccination rate % Intervention(s)
Polgreen, et al. (2009) Hospitals (79) +12.6 declination/consent form
Gazmararian, et al. Hospital 1 59 increased access, prioritized by employee type, quarantine after FluMist
Hospital 2 47 increased access, prioritized by employee type
Hospital 3 46 increased access, prioritized by employee type, employee families vaccinated
Hospital 6 39 increased access, quarantine after FluMist, declination/consent form
Hospital 7 38 increased access, prioritized by employee type
Hospital 4 43 increased access
Hospital 5 40 increased access
Hospital 8 34 increased access
Hospital 9 27 increased access
33
Single Arm Studies Author Population (N) Baseline %/
Change %Intervention(s)
Ribner, et al. All non-MD employees (9,200) 43.0+23.5
feedback, incentive, manager support, consent/ declination form
Polgreen, et al. (2008)
All employees (22 hospitals) 54+11.6
declination/ consent form
Bertin, et al. All employees (20,170) 38+17
feedback, manager support, Intranet form
Kuntz, et al. All employees (5,467) 41+10
education, increased access, peer vaccination, feedback, free, vaccine champion
Nicholson, et al. All employees (3,200) 45+20
education, e-mail, increased access, declination/consent form, peer vaccination
Shah, et al. All employees (112) 41+26
education, vaccine available to parents, increased access
Nace, et al. All employees (236) 54.0+32.0
education, feedback, manager support, declination/consent form
CDC All employees (25,000) 53.6+23.5
education, increased access, free, peer vaccination, vaccine champion
34
Results
• Multiple Arm Studies:– Education necessary but not sufficient– Increased access associated with higher
vaccination rates, but not on its own– Incentives and declination/consent forms may also
have impact
35
Results
• Single Arm Studies:– Education works best with other interventions– Incentives associated with increases– Easier access has impact as well
36
Results
• Combination of interventions may prove successful
• Education and easier access seem necessary foundation
• Also need:– Declination/consent forms– Incentives
37
Conclusion
• Vaccine is best protection against the flu• Short of mandating vaccines, what tools are
available to health care organizations?– Intranet-based intervention– Combination of interventions may be most
successful• Free vaccine that is easily accessible• Education campaign• Incentives• Online declination/consent form
38
Policy Implications and Recommendations
• Changes in institutional policies• The Joint Commission• State governments• Other incentives– U.S.News & World Report– Most Wired Hospitals
39
Further Study
• Further testing of Intranet intervention hypothesis
• Replication of multiple arm, pre-post intervention study by Zimmerman
• Larger systematic review to include interventions from abroad
40
Thank You
• Dr. Pauline Rosenau• Dr. L. Kay Bartholomew• Dr. Kay Dunn • Dr. Beatrice Selwyn• Dr. Margaret Price • David Koontz
41
Thank You