![Page 1: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
1
Towards 2020
Variable Crewing project: Review of the wholetime shift duty system
This is a Technical Appendix to the 2013 Safety Plan
![Page 2: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
2
![Page 3: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
3
Contents
Contents ................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5
Project Assumptions .............................................................................................................. 5
Scope of Review ................................................................................................................... 6
Background ............................................................................................................................... 7
Current conditions of Service ................................................................................................. 8
Calculation methodology and rationale ................................................................................ 11
Duty Hours .......................................................................................................................... 11
Leave entitlement ................................................................................................................ 12
Base Option: Existing arrangements ....................................................................................... 14
Description .......................................................................................................................... 14
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 15
Current Costs ...................................................................................................................... 16
Scope for change .................................................................................................................... 17
Area 1: Conversion of wholetime shift fire engines to another duty system, or their removal
from the fleet ....................................................................................................................... 17
Area 2: Self-rostering ........................................................................................................... 17
Area 3: Banked Shifts .......................................................................................................... 18
Area 4: Reduce crew numbers ............................................................................................ 19
Area 5: Personnel Reserve duty system .............................................................................. 19
Options ................................................................................................................................ 20
Option 1: Change some whole-time shift fire stations to wholetime day-crewed to reduce
numbers of firefighters ............................................................................................................ 21
Description .......................................................................................................................... 21
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 22
Indicative costs .................................................................................................................... 23
Option 2: Apply self-rostering to wholetime shift stations ......................................................... 24
Description .......................................................................................................................... 24
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 26
Option 3: Implement a new duty system increasing the number of watches to five (five watch
duty system) ........................................................................................................................... 27
![Page 4: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
4
Description .......................................................................................................................... 27
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 29
Indicative costs .................................................................................................................... 30
Option 4: Reduce the number of fire engines but keep the ridership factor ............................. 31
Description .......................................................................................................................... 31
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 32
Indicative costs .................................................................................................................... 33
Option 5: Reduce watch strength by one at every wholetime shift fire station. ........................ 34
Description .......................................................................................................................... 34
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 35
Indicative costs .................................................................................................................... 36
Option 6: Implement a new Personnel Reserve duty system to dynamically overcome crewing
deficiencies ............................................................................................................................. 37
SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................... 38
Indicative costs .................................................................................................................... 39
Evaluation and Summary ........................................................................................................ 40
Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 42
![Page 5: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
5
Introduction
1. In 2012 Kent and Medway Fire and Rescue Authority commissioned a project to explore
different ways of using staff to provide emergency cover. This followed previous work to
establish the locations fire engines were required to meet risk, demand and isolation
factors across the County. This work was published in 2011, and is available on our
website. This new project, referred to as the Variable Crewing Project, is designed to
identify the most effective and efficient ways of staffing all fire engines across Kent and
Medway. The project is divided into a number of workstreams which allow each duty
system to be challenged in turn.
2. The context of the project is to make a significant contribution to the savings the Authority
needs to make over the next three financial years. Every area of back room cost
reduction has been explored, resulting in staff reductions across the Authority, including
the compulsory redundancy of some non uniformed members of staff. The objective of
this review is to see where savings can be made by working in a different way to reduce
the overall numbers of uniformed shift firefighters. At this time, any reduction in the
numbers of uniformed staff is planned through the anticipated retirement profile of our
current workforce, although the future prospect of redundancies cannot be ruled out in
the longer term.
3. An impact assessment specific to this element of the project has been completed and
considered when developing options (see Annex 1). In order to allow a comparison
between options presented the strengths and weaknesses of the current wholetime shift
duty system have also been explored.
4. Throughout this document reference is made to positive hours. Positive hours are those
where a firefighter is actually at a fire station or with the crew on the fire engine in the
local area1.
Project Assumptions
5. The following assumptions have been made when conducting this work:
The review extends to all 12 fire stations currently working the wholetime shift
system, and looks forward to when the new wholetime shift station at Rochester
is anticipated to be operational in late 2014;
Current operational procedures are followed;
Levels of staffing are based on establishment figures and may not reflect actual
numbers of firefighters at stations;
1 Other duty systems used by the Authority employ standby and on-call hours. In the case of the
day-crewed duty system, this is alongside positive hours. Under standby and on-call arrangements firefighters respond from nearby homes to emergency calls. They travel to the fire station, collect the fire engine and then travel to the incident, within five minutes of being alerted.
![Page 6: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
6
Any savings described may not be cashable savings – resources may be
redeployed elsewhere in Kent and Medway rather than being surplus to
requirements; and
Crewing fire engines with four firefighters is used when examining staffing levels
Scope of Review
6. The review has been commissioned as part of the Variable Crewing project to review the
current shift duty system as operated at 12 fire stations across the County. The review
focused on:
Continuing to match resources to risk, demand and isolation as defined by the
Review of Emergency Response Provision;
To ensure an effective and efficient system of work for the delivery of the
Authority’s services;
To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of
fire stations within their operational clusters; and
To consider value for money principles at all times.
7. Wholetime firefighters employed in the Urban Search and Rescue Team at Maidstone
and at the Channel Tunnel fire station are out of the scope of this review.
8. This review assessed the suitability of the wholetime shift duty system in being able to
deliver emergency cover as set by the Review of Emergency Response Provision; and if
considered necessary, developed and implemented a series of recommendations for
alterations to the duty system. Outcomes will be applied uniformly across all stations
using the current wholetime shift duty system.
9. The project will not determine the levels of emergency cover required in the area.
![Page 7: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
7
Background
10. The wholetime shift duty system is one of three working patterns operated by the
Authority for firefighters and provides wholetime availability by means of positive hours
worked at fire stations. There are currently twelve wholetime shift fire stations across the
County. This is made up of five fire stations with two fire engines2 (known as multi-pump
stations) and seven with one fire engine.3 This arrangement will change when the new
station is built at Rochester, taking the total of multi-pump stations to four and single
pump stations to nine. Current crewing numbers are detailed below in Table 1.
11. Wholetime shift fire stations are in the larger towns where risk and demand has
traditionally been deemed high enough to warrant fire engines permanently crewed by
firefighters that are always at the station and immediately available to respond. The levels
of activity are such that crews undertake a single shift and have a distinct off duty period
before commencing the next, to ensure they remain fit for duty. Some stations have a
single fire engine (one pump), others two (multi pump).
12. Each multi-pump station has four watches of thirteen staff comprising ten firefighters, two
crew managers and one watch manager. This is referred to as the ‘watch strength’ or
‘establishment’. Each single pump station has four watches of seven staff, consisting of
five firefighters, one crew manager and one watch manager. At the current time, Medway
fire station has 14 firefighters per watch, and Ashford and Ramsgate have ten. This is to
allow for the crewing of height vehicles and other special appliances based at these fire
stations.
13. Throughout this document, the watch composition is generically referred to as
‘firefighters.’ At the time of writing, some watches on wholetime shift stations are below
these levels through recent retirements or cases of long-term sickness. Some wholetime
shift fire stations have an on-call fire engine attached to them, although this arrangement
is out of scope for this review.
14. There are some specialist vehicles located on wholetime shift stations which perform a
variety of specialist functions. These are also summarised in Table 1.
2 Current multi-pump stations are Dartford, Thames-side, Medway, Maidstone and Canterbury.
3 Current single pump stations are Strood, Tunbridge Wells, Ashford, Folkestone, Dover, Margate
and Ramsgate.
![Page 8: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
8
Table 1: Fire engines, special appliances and staff numbers at shift stations
Station Fire engines Special
appliances
Number of wholetime
shift firefighters4 Whole-time On-call
Ashford 1 1 3 40
Dover 1 1 1 28
Folkestone 1 1 1 28
Dartford 2 1 52
Thames-side 2 2 52
Strood 1 1 28
Medway 2 1 2 56
Maidstone 2 2 52
Tunbridge Wells 1 1 1 28
Canterbury 2 2 52
Margate 1 1 0 28
Ramsgate 1 1 2 40
15. Running concurrently to this review is the review of working at height, a workstream of
the Operational Capability review. This review makes recommendations on the number
of height vehicles required by the Authority. At the time of writing, the review is proposing
to reduce the number to three height vehicles in total, and for them to be based at
Maidstone and Canterbury with a third for the purposes of resilience based at Ashford. It
also recommends that they are crewed ‘alternately’ with a fire engine. This means that
current posts in the establishment that crew the height vehicles permanently will be
removed. Although the locations of height vehicles is out of scope for this review, the
resultant issues relate to potentially ‘spare’ firefighters being released as a result of the
reduction in height vehicles and how they are crewed has been factored in. This means
that costs and budgets savings discussed in this document will include separate figures
regarding reducing the numbers of staff from the working at height review and the
variable crewing project. The Technical Appendix ‘Working at Height’ can be accessed at
http://www.kent.fire-uk.org/pdf/pp_sp2014_ta_oc_height.pdf.
Current conditions of Service
16. This particular duty system does not require the staff to live within a close proximity of the
station as they only work positive hours. This is in contrast to the day-crewed duty
system, which is considered for change in the day-crewed technical appendix.
Firefighters at shift stations work a ‘two days, two nights, four days off’ duty system which
ensures the fire engine is available wholetime 365 days of the year.
4 ‘Numbers of shift firefighters’ refers to establishment figures, and may not reflect actual numbers of
firefighters working at the station at the time of publication of this document. Budgets are based on establishment figures.
![Page 9: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
9
17. Traditionally, crewing a single pump station has been based on five firefighters riding a
fire engine multiplied by a ‘ridership factor’ of 1.42. This results in seven firefighters on
each of the four watches on a single fire engine wholetime shift station. On a fire station
with two full-time fire engines, there are 13 firefighters per watch, based on the second
engine being ridden by four firefighters. The ridership factor was designed to cover
sickness, training and annual leave. On occasions where all the firefighters report for
duty, they are detached to other stations where riding positions are available.
18. Where changes to the wholetime shift system are proposed, the extract below from the
Fire Services’ National Schemes of Conditions of Service (Grey Book 6th Edition SOCOS)
sets out the framework for negotiations:
![Page 10: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
10
‘the following duty system shall continue to operate until replaced or supplemented locally by new
systems under the following terms;
‘Duty systems will need to meet the requirements of the fire and rescue authority’s Integrated Risk
Management Plan (in Kent this is known as the Safety Plan). Any proposed system should be
discussed with the recognised trade unions and be based on the following principles:
Basic working hours should average forty-two per week (inclusive of three hours of meal breaks in
every twenty-four hours) for full-time employees. Hours of duty should be pro-rata for part-time
employees.
There should be at least two periods of twenty-four hours free from duty each week.
It should comply with relevant United Kingdom and European law, Including the Working Time
Regulations 1998, and Health, Safety and Welfare at Work legislation.
It should have regard to the special circumstances of individual employees and be family friendly.
Where, following discussion, there is no agreement between the Fire and Rescue authority and
recognised trade union over a proposed duty system (and it does not accord with the principles of
any of the existing national duty systems at paragraphs 7 to 16 below) the difference can be referred
by either party to the NJC’s Technical Advisory Panel. The Panel will be chaired by an Independent
Expert (appointed on a three-yearly basis by the NJC), who will be assisted by the Joint Secretaries.
The Panel will seek to broker an agreement between the parties, but where that is not possible it will
make recommendations. The Panel’s recommendations will ensure that the duty system follows the
four principles set out at paragraph 3 above and is compatible with the deployment of resources that
the fire and rescue authority has determined is necessary to implement its Integrated Risk
Management Plan. This process will be concluded within one month of reference to the Panel, or
longer with the agreement of the parties. The parties will decide their responses to any
recommendations from the Panel within fourteen days of receipt’.
Shift duty system (para seven SOCOS)
The hours of duty of full time employees on this system shall be an average of 42 per week. The
rota will be based on the following principles:
1) Each period of 24 hours shall be divided into a day shift and a night shift
2) The night shift shall not be less than 12 hours.
3) There shall be at least two complete periods of 24 hours free from duty each week.
4) Leave days shall change week by week in a regular progressive manner.
5) No rota system shall include continuous duty periods of 24 hours.
6) Three hours shall be specified for meals breaks in every 24 hours.
The timing of these periods is at the discretion of the Authority. Account shall be taken of
meal breaks interrupted by emergency calls’.
![Page 11: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
11
Calculation methodology and rationale
19. The following section details the methodology for the calculation of hours worked, for the
purposes of assessing feasibility of change options and compliance with the National
Schemes of Conditions of Service. It is important to understand the methods and
calculations used as they will be consistently applied through the options appraisals later
in this document.
Duty Hours
20. Currently the duty hours worked at station are 42 hours per week averaged over an eight
week period, which meets the National Schemes and Conditions of Service. (Grey Book
6th Edition). The duty system consists of two, consecutive nine hour days 09:00-18:00
followed by two consecutive 15 hour nights 18:00-09:00. This is followed by four
consecutive days off. Table 2 illustrates current working arrangements of wholetime shift
fire stations.
Table 2: working hours over an eight week period on wholetime shift fire stations
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun Total
D N D N D N D N D N D N D N D N
Week 1 9 9 15 15 18 30
Week 2 9 9 15 15 18 30
Week 3 9 9 15 15 18 30
Week 4 9 9 15 15 18 30
Week 5 9 9 15 18 15
Week 6 15 9 9 18 15
Week 7 15 15 9 9 30
Week 8 9 15 15 9 30
D – Day duty positive hours
N – Night duty positive hours
Total
Total hours per 8 weeks
Average working week (336 ÷ 8)
126
336
42
210
![Page 12: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
12
21. For the purpose of evaluating and calculating hours as part of the review, the hours in
this eight week cycle have been multiplied out to ‘annualise’ the hours, as a basis for
option appraisal calculations. This is shown in Table 3:
Table 3: Annualisation of 42 hour week
Positive hours over 8 weeks
(from table 2)
Number of 8 week cycles per
year (365 ÷ 56 days)
Total number of positive
hours worked
336 X 6.517 = 2190(rounded up)
Average hours per week Number of weeks per year
(365 ÷ 7)
42 X 52.14 = 2190(rounded up)
Leave entitlement
22. Currently firefighters are entitled to 42 days annual leave per year. This is comprised of
25 days of annual leave, five ‘scale B’ days, three long service days (after five years
service), eight public holidays and one Christmas concessionary day.
23. The 25 days of annual leave is divided into three blocks of 14 days, six days and five
days. These blocks cannot be separated which means that some of the leave days are
taken when firefighters are rostered to be on a rota day (i.e. would be off duty anyway).
This anomaly was allowed for when the number of leave days for this duty system was
agreed. If the block booking system was not in use, it is possible to reduce the annual
leave allowance by the nine rota days taken as annual leave, without affecting the hours
worked by firefighters.
24. The following tables show how annual leave is used on rota days.
25. During the 14 day annual leave, six will always be non-working days, and therefore the
14 day annual leave represent eight shifts absent not 14 (Table 4).
Table 4: 14 day annual leave
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
D D N N R R R R D D N N R R
26. During the six day annual leave, two will always be non-working days; therefore the six
day annual leave represent four shifts absent not six, as shown below.
![Page 13: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
13
Table 5: Six day annual leave
27. During the five day annual leave, one will always be a non-working day; therefore the five
day annual leave represents four shifts absent not five (Table 6).
Table 6: Five day annual leave
1 2 3 4 5
D D D D R
28. The remaining leave days can all be taken as single days, or be booked in blocks of up to
four days in a row.
29. In summary, for firefighters working the shift duty system, 42 days of annual leave
account for 33 rostered duty periods. The balance being used up when they are not
scheduled to be on duty.
1 2 3 4 5 6
D D D D R R
![Page 14: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
14
Base Option: Existing arrangements
Description
30. All technical appendices to the Safety Plan have a base option, against which any
proposals can be compared. The following analysis evaluates the impact of making no
changes to the existing shift system, so stations would carry on working their current shift
patterns with no changes to watch structures.
31. Table 7 shows the shift crewing for each wholetime fire station, forming the service wide
wholetime shift establishment. This is the figure used in the preparation of budgets.
Table 7: Wholetime shift establishment
Station Firefighters
Ashford 40
Dover 28
Folkestone 28
Dartford 52
Thames-side 52
Strood 28
Medway 56
Maidstone 52
Tunbridge Wells 28
Canterbury 52
Margate 28
Ramsgate 40
Total Shift Establishment 484
![Page 15: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
15
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Existing system has the
benefit of staff familiarity
Gives a stable workforce
Provides immediately
available, highly trained and
experienced firefighters
wholetime across Kent &
Medway
Limits the flexibility in contractual offers which can be made to firefighters.
Recruitment into the system is needed to maintain current establishment levels
Expensive to maintain
No change to the shift system makes no contribution to the overall requirement for the Service to generate £10m of savings in the next three years, creating risk of overrunning financial capacity
![Page 16: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
16
Current Costs
32. The current budgeted costs of the wholetime shift system across the 12 stations are
£18,166,800 for the financial year ending 31 March 2014. This includes wages and
employer costs (National Insurance and pension contributions). This figure excludes
28 Firefighter posts associated with crewing height vehicles that are currently in the
establishment. Expenditure on premises, utilities, vehicles etc is also excluded from
this figure.
33. There are currently 17 wholetime shift fire engines in the fleet. Each fire engine
therefore has an approximate cost of £1,068,000 per annum
![Page 17: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
17
Scope for change
Area 1: Conversion of wholetime shift fire engines to another duty
system, or their removal from the fleet
34. The review team were conscious that underpinning all work in the 2020 programme is
the need to meet the Authority’s requirement to save £10m in the coming three years.
It was also conscious that it had recently published the results of the Review of
Emergency Response Provision, which set out how the Authority would provide
emergency services across the County based on the factors of risk, demand and
isolation. Aligning these two factors is a critical consideration. To meet the financial
challenge, relatively straightforward steps could be taken to reduce the size of the
Authority’s overall fleet, and alongside this, remove firefighting posts. The review team
felt it was important to consider these, not least because there is a risk that further,
more significant savings will be required in the future, which might require revision to
the outcomes of the Review of Emergency Response Provision.
35. These options are summarised in the Safety Plan, and subject to an options appraisal
later in this document. The first is the conversion of a number of wholetime shift fire
stations to the day-crewed duty system. The second was the removal of a number of
wholetime shift fire engines from the fleet. This would be most likely to happen at multi-
pump stations. The impacts of both options have been assessed.
Area 2: Self-rostering
36. Self-rostering is a concept that is currently being proposed for wholetime day-crewed
firefighters. As part of this review, consideration has been given to whether self
rostering can be extended (with some adaptations) to wholetime shift stations at some
point in the future.
37. Self-rostering is a method of providing enough firefighters to crew a fire engine based
on a principle of local management arrangements. As long as certain criteria are met,
the hours that an individual firefighter works will be primarily managed through local
discussions with work colleagues, rather than central imposition and rigid systems. It
allows staff some flexibility around the days they work each week within agreed
parameters and managed through our workforce planning system. The concept
assumes that the system is managed locally by the supervisory managers with each
watch manager having overall responsibility for crewing the fire engine.
38. There are a number of fire and rescue authorities using different forms of self-rostering
to crew fire engines. These include Mid & West Wales, Lancashire, Leicestershire,
Nottinghamshire, and Merseyside. The models used in these areas have all been
examined as part of this review, by way of site research, conversation or exchange of
![Page 18: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
18
documentation. The review team noted that these services had used self rostering in a
day-crewed rather than shift setting.
39. One of the services was specifically selected for research as they employ the same
workforce planning system as the Authority.
40. The review explored the potential to introduce a system of self-rostering, giving
firefighters the freedom to provide cover using local arrangements within a framework
of parameters. The arrangements will aim to achieve self-sufficiency on shift stations,
meaning that specialist skills are always available for the different vehicles located
there, and detached duties out to or in from other stations to make up crewing
shortages will be required rarely, if at all.
41. Self rostering and flexible working forms the basis of another alternative wholetime
duty system using five watches instead of four, with a crewing level of four per watch.
In this concept, all leave, training and other abstractions are covered by members of
other watches in a flexible way, using surplus contracted hours held by firefighters for
this purpose, similar to banked shifts, explained in the following section.
Area 3: Banked Shifts
42. The concept of banked shifts is that they are a product of self rostering using an
annual total of the hours of duty each firefighter is contracted to work for. In the context
of wholetime shift they would work in a different way to day-crewed self rostering,
although the working operation of banked shifts is not fully developed at this stage and
subject to further research.
43. Banked Shifts are the hours (converted to shifts) that are in excess of those required
for crewing a fire engine. These shifts originate from the annualisation of a 42 positive
hour working week. They have therefore already been paid for by the Authority and so
are held as a balance ‘banked’, to be used up when staff attend prearranged station-
based or external training, medicals or other abstractions when not rostered for
crewing duty.
44. Balances of banked shifts will be agreed at the start of each leave year. Although not
expected, in the event of staff overrunning their allocated number of banked shifts, any
additional hours worked through training or other duties will be paid at flat rate. At the
end of the leave period, any banked shifts left in the balances of individuals will be
written off prior to ‘resetting’ the arrangements at the beginning of the next year.
45. There is a relationship between the number of staff on a self-rostered section, the
different levels of positive hours in a shift, and the number of banked shifts generated.
The elements of the relationship are simply defined as:
![Page 19: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
19
The greater the number of staff operating the same length of shift, the more
banked shifts are generated
The shorter the shift applied to a fixed number of staff, the greater number of
banked shifts are generated
46. In the case of wholetime shift, banked shifts will be complex to reconcile, given the
current nine hour day shift and fifteen hour night. If the idea progresses, further work
will need to be undertaken in this area.
Area 4: Reduce crew numbers
47. The Authority has proposed the formal removal of the ridership factor5 (although in
practice it has not been used for several years). It is now looking to crew fire engines
with four firefighters. This, combined with the potential for self rostering with fewer staff
in the future, enables the reduction in the number of firefighters at each shift station,
with no impact on the service which members of the public receive, or removing fire
engines from service.
Area 5: Personnel Reserve duty system
48. There are already times where the Authority experiences crewing shortages. This is a
result of staff abstraction for statutory training such as driving courses, long and short
term sickness and temporary promotions. Shortages are exacerbated in the summer
months which naturally are the most popular for the taking of annual leave. This
Authority does not roster leave to create an even spread across the course of a year,
some others do. Rostering of leave is out of the scope of this review, but the impact of
leave on crewing will be examined in the future to fully establish how it interacts with
the current crewing system or any future proposed changes to it. The review
recognises that a reduction in wholetime firefighter numbers may increase crewing
shortages unless efficient ways of managing the hours they work are developed and
implemented.
49. The concept of a personnel reserve duty system is to provide a resource to assist in
times of crew depletion at any station either at short notice or for longer term periods of
crewing. (e.g. long term sickness). Some shifts will be allocated in advance, but the
system will be designed to provide enough flexibility to allocate shifts on any given day
and despatch staff to provide crewing cover where it is needed.
50. Careful consideration will be necessary in the construction of a personnel reserve. The
members must be flexible enough to travel across Kent and Medway for various
5 Currently for each position available on an appliance riding at standard crewing (five), we
employ 1.42 staff, this is to cover sickness, training etc
![Page 20: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
20
duties, sometimes at short notice. The correct balance and range of skills must be
achieved in order that individuals can perform a wide range of tasks. This brings a high
commitment to training and maintaining competence across a wide range of fire
service equipment and procedures.
51. In recognition of the extra commitment and flexibility required from members of the
personnel reserve, an enhanced rate of pay is envisaged.
Options
52. The remainder of this document sets out the options that have been developed for the
future of the wholetime shift system. The options considered were:
Option 1:Change some wholetime shift fire stations to wholetime day-crewed to
reduce numbers of firefighters;
Option 2: Apply self rostering to wholetime shift stations to achieve staff reductions;
Option 3: Implement a new duty system increasing the watches to five (five watch
duty system);
Option 4: Reduce the number of fire engines but keep the ridership factor;
Option 5: Reduce watch strength by one at every wholetime shift fire station
Option 6: Implement a new Personnel Reserve duty system to dynamically
overcome crewing deficiencies
![Page 21: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
21
Option 1: Change some whole-time shift fire stations to
wholetime day-crewed to reduce numbers of firefighters
Description
53. This option considers changing some wholetime shift stations to wholetime day-crewed
stations. The variable crewing project has reviewed the wholetime day-crewed system.
The technical appendix for the day-crewed review can be accessed from
http://www.kent.fire-uk.org/pdf/pp_sp2014_ta_dsr_dc.pdf.
54. The context of the day-crewed review has been set against the existing workforce in
their own accommodation local to their fire station, or in housing provided by the
Authority. In this sense, this option applied to wholetime shift firefighters poses a
fundamental problem of accommodation, as shift firefighters do not live within a
suitable distance of stations to provide a five minute response time.
55. Other UK fire and services have created stations with enhanced self contained
accommodation for firefighters. Under these arrangements, a wholetime day-contract
and an on-call night contract is utilised, with the firefighters only occupying the
accommodation when they are rostered for on-call duty. The Authority has taken the
view that this scheme, known as ‘day-crewed plus’, amounts to continuous duty, but
without appropriate time for firefighters to spend with their families in a conventional
domestic setting, a facility currently available in the Authority’s day-crewed system.
There is also concern around this style of working compiling with working time
regulations. Therefore, ‘day-crewed plus’ has been discounted as an option from this
review.
56. The Authority has also chosen to reduce the tenancies it currently provides at day-
crewed fire stations through natural wastage as staff retire from the Authority. With this
in mind the purchase or building of new housing around existing or planned fire
stations would be contradictory to this intention.
57. The previous paragraphs indicate that turning a wholetime shift station to day-crewed
is not a simple matter, and would involve a number of firefighters moving house or
making private arrangements for accommodation when performing ‘on-call’ duty at
night.
58. Another option considered is utilising wholetime firefighters for the periods of peak
demand during the daytime and evening, with the fire engine changing to ‘on-call’
arrangements at night. There are a number of stations in Kent and Medway that have
a wholetime shift and an on-call fire engine. This would effectively merge the two
separate sections into crewing one fire engine instead of two, reducing the number of
fire engines in the fleet.
![Page 22: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
22
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Contributes to the financial savings required by the Authority
Maintains highly trained and experienced firefighters in areas of greatest risk and demand
Difficult to implement in terms of accommodation
Potential in the future to
recruit firefighters for specific
stations under pre-set
contract conditions of where
they live.
Insufficient uptake by current staff
Changes in fire and rescue cover are subject to formal consultation processes, which if not followed give rise to judicial review
Rapid establishment reduction is likely to exceed natural wastage, giving rise to compulsory redundancy
![Page 23: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
23
Indicative costs
59. The current day-crewed system crews a single fire engine with 14 firefighters, at a cost
of £662,400 including retaining, turnout and attendance fees. The base option in this
document for a single fire engine crewed on a wholetime shift basis indicates 28
firefighters at a cost of £1,136,200. This figure is slightly different from the £1,068,000
quoted earlier, as multi pump stations do not have exactly double the numbers of
firefighters as a single pump. Every wholetime shift fire engine that converts to day-
crewing would create a saving of £473,800 per annum in base wages, national
insurance and pension costs. There would, however, be additional costs in any future
consolidated pay arrangements for the on-call element of the working hours, or high
turnout and attendance fees as the wholetime stations are situated in our busiest
areas. These costs have not been fully assessed at this stage of the review.
![Page 24: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
24
Option 2: Apply self-rostering to wholetime shift stations
Description
60. This option involves removing the four watches on wholetime shift stations, creating a
single section that operates on a flexible self rostered basis. This option has been
explored in terms of the numerical relationships that exist between shift length, the
annual amount of working hours that firefighters are contracted for, and the number of
surplus hours that are created to enable training away from station duties, to cover
sickness and other uses. This concept has been examined at wholetime day-crewed
stations as part of the variable crewing project, and is more developed there than for
wholetime shift stations. Initial parameters and guidance for self rostering are
appended to the review of the day-crewed shift duty system. They are not finite, but
serve as a general indicator as to the spirit and governance necessary to implement
such a system.
61. Through self-rostering and local management it is expected that this option will provide
a degree of self-sufficiency for shift stations. This means that staff will always have the
necessary skills to keep special appliances available at all times. With the expectation
of self-sufficiency at shift stations, it is anticipated that shift firefighters will not be used
for detached duties to make up shortfalls on other stations. Self-sufficiency also means
that interoperability between duty systems referred to in the scope of the variable
crewing project only has to function in terms of attendance at operational incidents.
62. A self rostered single section has the potential to achieve staff reductions across the
wholetime shift workforce. Initial calculations around the numbers of banked shifts
generated by different staffing levels and the associated cost savings have been
completed ranging from 23 down to 20 staff for a one pump station and 45 to 40 for
multi pump. The results of these are summarised in Table 8.
![Page 25: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
25
Table 8: Summary of initial calculations for self rostered single section applied to
wholetime shift one pump station
Number of Staff
Post reductions Banked shifts
generated
Estimated
savings from
base case of
52 or 28 Staff
Multi pump £
45 1 WM 1 CM 5 FF 20 275,900
44 1 WM 1CM 6 FF 17 313,400
43 1 WM 1 CM 7 FF 15 350,900
42 1 WM 1 CM 8 FF 11 388,400
41 1 WM 1 CM 9 FF 8 425,900
40 1 WM 1 CM 10 FF 4 463,400
One pump
23 2 WM 3 FF 23 205,900
22 2 WM 4 FF 17 243,400
21 2 WM 5 FF 11 280,900
20 2 WM 6 FF 4 318,400
![Page 26: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
26
63. The following SWOT analysis is generic to the principle of self rostering, incorporating issues associated with larger and smaller numbers
of staff outlined in Table 8.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Ensures staff are permanently available on station so no impact on service delivery
Built in resilience utilising designated Banked shifts and principle of self sufficiency
Achieves financial savings through a reduction in staff numbers
Reduction in establishment numbers complements current and future retirement profiles
Initial management & audit process becomes more onerous, more time consuming for supervisory managers and Group
Too smaller numbers of staff may lead to unmanageable crewing shortages
Ownership by staff of self rostering system
More flexible for staff
Integration of staff
Banked shifts being used for station training events attended by all station staff
Lack of staff engagement and resistance to proposals
Other difficulties associated with change management
![Page 27: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
27
Option 3: Implement a new duty system increasing the number of
watches to five (five watch duty system)
Description
64. This option considered an alternative method of crewing wholetime shift stations. A new
working pattern is created, another watch is added to make five in total, and the ridership
factor is removed, leaving each watch rostering a crew of four. The scheme is known to
be operating successfully already in an industrial setting within Kent and Medway.
Fundamental to this system is the concept that all annual leave has been absorbed into
the rota so there is no formal provision for taking time off. When a firefighter needs to be
absent from rostered duty, cover will need to be sought by that individual making
arrangements with off duty staff on a flexible basis.
65. This scheme provides six days between finishing a tour of duty and beginning the next,
as shown below:
Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun Total
D N D N D N D N D N D N D N D N
Wk 1 9 9 15 15 18 30
Wk 2 9 9 15 15 18 30
Wk 3 9 18 30
Wk 4 9 15 15 9 30
Wk 5 9 9 15 15 18 30
Wk 6 9 9 18 0
Wk 7 15 15 15 0
Wk 8 9 9 15 15 18 30
Wk 9 9 9 15 18 15
Wk 10 15 0 15
Total 360 120 210
![Page 28: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
28
66. The following section reconciles the scheme against hours currently worked under the
National Schemes of Conditions of Service;
Number of hours worked per ten week period 360
Multiplied by the ten week periods per year 5.2
Total hours worked per year under five watch scheme 1,872
Hours worked under current scheme (Base Option) 2,190
Less: Hours not worked for Scale A annual leave (192)
Less: Hours not worked for other leave 6 (204)
Total actual hours worked under current scheme 1, 794
67. Both the current and five watch systems have very similar actual weekly working hours;
Current system: 1,794 ÷ 52.14 = 34.4 hours per working week
Five watch system: 1,872 ÷ 52.14 = 35.9 hours per working week
6 It has been assumed that ‘other leave’ is used in equal proportion of day and night shifts for the
purposes of the calculation
![Page 29: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
29
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Ensures staff are permanently available on station so no impact on service delivery
Built in resilience utilising flexible cover arrangements
Achieves financial savings through a reduction in staff numbers
Controlled reduction in establishment numbers complements current and future retirement profiles
Favourable working patterns similar to those at present
Promotes self sufficiency at individual stations, reducing need for detachments
Reduction in establishment numbers exceeds current and future retirement profiles
Increased planning and organising for supervisory managers responsible for crewing
Lack of staff engagement and resistance to proposals
Potentially rapid and significant reduction in establishment may exceed natural wastage giving rise to compulsory redundancies
![Page 30: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
30
Indicative costs
68. Implementation of a five watch duty system reducing the watch strength to four would be
expected to deliver cost savings of £ 327,600, in wages, pension and national insurance
costs. This figure is based on a structure of one watch manager, four crew managers and
15 firefighter posts. The saving is calculated from a base case of the current structure of
four watches of seven; one watch manager, one crew manager and five firefighters on
each.
![Page 31: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
31
Option 4: Reduce the number of fire engines but keep the
ridership factor
Description
69. This option examines the potential for leaving the current crewing arrangements in
place and retaining the ridership factor. Simply put, the establishment would be
reduced to a number that delivered the necessary saving and the number of wholetime
shift appliances in service would be derived from this figure.
![Page 32: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
32
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Makes the financial savings required by the Authority.
There is no reference in this option to an assessment of the impact on fire and rescue provision, service delivery and resilience, or performance standards resulting from a drastic reduction in wholetime shift fire engines
Risk of failing to meet our legal duties under the Statutory requirements of Fire Services Act and Civil Contingencies Act
Changes in fire and rescue cover are subject to formal consultation processes, which if not followed give rise to judicial review
Such drastic and rapid establishment reduction is likely to exceed natural wastage, giving rise to compulsory redundancy
![Page 33: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
33
Indicative costs
70. With overall savings of £10m required over the next three years, and the cost of
crewing wholetime shift fire engines identified earlier in this document as £1,068,000,
the removal of nine wholetime fire engines would achieve this in a single plan. There
are however, several other projects in progress all with budget reductions as a clear
focus. This review must be taken into account with all the other workstreams to form
an integrated financial strategy.
![Page 34: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
34
Option 5: Reduce watch strength by one at every wholetime
shift fire station.
Description
71. This option is exactly the same as the current arrangements described earlier in this
document as the base option. The only variation is that each watch would reduce in
size by one firefighter. Staff would carry on working their current duty patterns. This
option is closely linked to the proposal by the Authority to remove the ridership factor
and crew fire engines with four firefighters.
![Page 35: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
35
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Easy to manage and audit as little change from current arrangements
Has served the Authority well
for over 40 years
Existing system has the
benefit of staff familiarity
Gives a stable workforce
Results in financial savings through a reduction of 48 firefighter posts
Reduction in establishment numbers complements current and future retirement profiles
The system is not self-sufficient and creates the need for higher numbers of detachments from other stations to cover absences.
Resilience around staff absence and maintaining specialist knowledge is reduced.
No built in resilience utilising the ridership factor.
Potential to redeploy
firefighters into personnel
reserve to cover long or short
term crewing shortages
Explore and quantify impact of
current leave arrangements
on crewing levels
![Page 36: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
36
Indicative costs
72. Implementation of reducing watch strength by one on each of the 12 shift stations will
result in cost savings of approximately £1,800,000 per annum in base wages, national
insurance and pension costs for 48 firefighter posts. The separate reductions in crewing
proposed by the working at height review reduce the overall establishment by an
additional 28 firefighter posts. This represents an annual saving of £1,049,000.
73. In future, when the new station at Rochester is open the overall cost savings listed above
will be remain the same, explained as follows;
Current
Current Medway Establishment 56
Reduction from height vehicle review (4)
Reduction from Variable crewing (4)
Revised Medway Establishment 48
Future
Single pump Medway Establishment 24
Single pump Rochester Establishment 24
Total Establishment 48
![Page 37: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
37
Option 6: Implement a new Personnel Reserve duty system to
dynamically overcome crewing deficiencies
74. The concept of a personnel reserve is explained in the ‘scope for change’ section of this
document. The staff employed in the reserve would be managed by the Authority’s
Central Resourcing Team, to undertake various agreed duties at any location in the
County. It is also feasible that in the event of their not being needed to make up crewing
shortages they could form an independent fire engine crew for what would otherwise be
an uncrewed vehicle.
75. It is important to understand that the concept of a personnel reserve is not linked to any
particular option in this document or any from the day-crewed element of the Variable
Crewing project. It is an entirely stand alone proposal that could be implemented at any
time in the future. Further research as part of the project is necessary before finite details
on how the scheme would operate can be produced.
![Page 38: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
38
SWOT Analysis
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
Flexible
Staff can cover any duty
system in operation
The system is not self-sufficient and creates the need for higher numbers of detachments from other stations to cover absences.
Resilience around staff absence and maintaining specialist knowledge is reduced.
No built in resilience utilising the ridership factor.
Potential to redeploy
firefighters into personnel
reserve to cover long or short
term crewing shortages
Explore and quantify impact of
current leave arrangements
on crewing levels
![Page 39: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
39
Indicative costs
76. Initial thoughts around the implementation of the personnel reserve are based around six
firefighters competent in a wide range of operational skills including driving, pump
operation, incident command, breathing apparatus and suitable knowledge of a wide
range of specialist vehicles. This number is not finite. The reserve may grow in size in the
future.
77. The six ‘personnel reserve’ will result in costs of approximately £250,200 per annum in
base wages, national insurance and pension costs, assuming they are paid at crew
manager rate in order to provide incident command capability. This is a cost to the
Authority so will need to be treated as offsetting savings that are made from other areas
in this or other reviews. The team is also likely to incur additional costs related to travel,
and training costs. These are not expected to be prohibitive, and can be contained within
existing budgets.
![Page 40: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
40
Evaluation and Summary
78. This evaluation summarises the findings of the review so far, taking each option in turn as
presented in this document.
79. The base option as described has served the Authority well for many years, but
represents the most expensive form of service delivery. With other areas of financial
saving having been explored and implemented, the review team is of the view that some
savings must be made from wholetime shift budgets in view of the need to save £10m
over the next three years. Furthermore, there are no guarantees that further budget
reductions will not be required, so additional contingencies against this possibility should
continue to be considered as part of the on-going Variable Crewing project. On this basis,
leaving the existing arrangements as they are is not considered a viable option.
80. The conversion of wholetime shift stations as described in Option 1 brings with it certain
difficulties around accommodation for staff and high levels of activity in busier areas and
the associated payments that would be generated. The concept of day-crewed plus is not
considered a suitable operating system by the Authority. It would also be a breach of due
process to implement such changes to fire and rescue cover without an assessment of
risk and impacts, subjected to a public consultation process. For these reasons this
option is not viable at the current time, but future implementation is not ruled out. An
additional option considered by the Review Team was the conversion of some wholetime
fire engines at multi-pump fire stations to on-call arrangements. This would have a
significant financial benefit. However, it fundamentally alters the outcomes of the review
of emergency cover published in 2011, and making significant amendments to that was
out of scope for the review. If it is deemed necessary in order to make future savings,
then a further Review of Emergency Response will need to be completed
81. A self-rostering single section to replace four wholetime shift watches is described in
Option 2. Whilst the calculations around hours and working time can be completed, the
idea of applying the scheme to wholetime shift stations is not developed enough to form a
proposal at the present time. The proposals around self rostering for wholetime day-
crewed stations in the current safety plan have been considered and discussed with staff
at those stations and joint working groups have been established to consider
implementation. For shift stations, this has not yet taken place. Whilst this option may be
subject to further consideration, it is not a viable proposal at this time.
82. Option 3 describes creating an additional watch and reducing the numbers on what
would be five watches on station to just four firefighters each. This introduces a
completely new method of managing annual leave and a large element of finding cover
locally to maintain crewing levels. This is a drastic change to how wholetime shift stations
operate and is not in a state of development to form a proposal. It is however, closely
linked to the concept of self rostering so may still be considered alongside this in the
future.
![Page 41: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
41
83. A simple reduction in crew numbers and distributing staff equally across a smaller
number of fire engines using the current ridership factor is discussed in Option 4. In the
same way as turning wholetime shift stations into day-crewed, this option is discounted
immediately by virtue of the fact that fire station locations and numbers have been
publicly consulted upon as part of the Review of Emergency Response Provision in 2011.
Similar assessment will need to be published for consultation before any changes to fire
and rescue provision are made.
84. Option 5 describes reducing every wholetime watch establishment by one firefighter
post. Combined with the proposal to remove the ridership factor and crew to four
firefighters per fire engine, the review team consider that this is a viable option to put
forward as a proposal. There are no significant changes in how the system operates, but
significant savings (48 posts) can be made at this stage whilst further research is done by
the Variable Crewing project to develop future options. It is recognised that some strain
on crewing may result, but this should prompt further work around annual leave, or
developing a personnel reserve to help manage crewing shortages as described in
Option 6.
![Page 42: Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review - Kent Fire and Rescue Service · 2014-09-18 · To ensure the service delivery model reflects the operational requirements of fire](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050612/5fb2f7f65427f119a534cf0b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Variable Crewing Project: Wholetime Shift Review
42
Recommendations
85. The Variable Crewing project team recommends that:
a. Option 5 – to reduce watch strength on every wholetime watch by one
firefighter is implemented, in conjunction with removal of the ridership factor;
b. Option 6 – to develop and implement a Personnel Reserve of highly versatile
and flexible staff to assist in managing crewing shortfalls be implemented;
c. That review work around fire and rescue cover be undertaken to validate the
previous recommendations of the Review of Emergency Response Provision,
and to assess the impacts of various changes to fire and rescue provision in
future years;
d. Day-crewed plus is discounted from the project as a field of research; and
e. Further research and development be undertaken regarding self-rostered
systems at wholetime stations