Canutillo ISD Campus and District Improvement Planning Timelines
May 2010 – May 2011
May 14, 2010
May 17-June 10, 2010
Individual Meetings:
Finalize budget allocations to match expenditures for federal, state funding and local funding including personnel sources. (SCE, Title I, II, III DATE, ARRA funds or any other funding sources)
Campuses Elect CIC's Begin reviewing TAKS data and Needs Assessment(s) with CIC to begin process in formulating CIP for new school year.
June 10, 2010
June 15, 2010
June 16, 2010
Complete all Summative Evaluations for last year's CIP, PIP and DIP (2009-2010)
Divisions and Departments compare 2009/10 performance objectives to prior year available data. Develop and summarize District needs assessment Review and develop District goals and objectives
Develop and summarize campus needs assessments Hold a Principal's Data Retreat - compare prior year performance with tentative data (TAKS, AYP, PBMAS, TPRI/Tejas Lee,
TELPAS) Principals discuss prior year performance objectives with tentative data.
July 28, 2010 Administrative Planning Retreat:
Principals discuss needs assessment and highlight proposed objectives Discuss district needs assessment and proposed District goals and objectives with campus administration. Principals compare prior year performance objectives with accountability data and include in CIP needs Assessment. Principals continue to examine and develop preliminary campus performance objectives with accountability data and include in
CIP needs. Discuss with Central Office District Administrators
August 17-20,2010
August 31, 2010
CIC's review CIP's and ask for grade level/or department feedback, such as, objectives and strategies to improve in the identified areas of concern.
CIC's review, discuss and revise the CIP, and will approve the portions of the campus plan addressing strategies and campus staff development needs
Principals, Departments, and Divisions turn-in the CIP, PIP to the Superintendent. All Objectives must be completed.
1
September 1-3, 2010
September 8, 2010 or first DAC Meeting
September 20-24, 2010
Election/Appointment of DAC members
DAC review/discuss the performance of the District, performance objectives and the DIP
Financial audit of CIP's and PIP's
October 12, 2010 orfirst Regular Board Meeting
Approval of Campus Performance Objectives by the Board of Trustees. The Board will review all campus improvement plans and the District improvement plan to ensure they are mutually supportive to accomplish the identified objectives and support the state goals and objectives under Education Code Chapter 4.
November 18, 2010 Complete formative review of all strategies in CIP/DIP and adjust plans as necessary. Check dates and budget allocations and make revisions
December/January Division and Departments reviews progress of strategies in DIP
March 30, 2011 Complete formative review of all strategies in CIP/DIP and adjust plans as necessary
May 13, 2011 Examine and finalize budget allocations to match expenditures for local, federal and state funding including all personnel funding sources. (FTE's)
June 10, 2011 Complete formative/summative evaluations of all objectives and strategies in CIP/PIP/DIP for the 2010-2011 school year.
2
Canutillo Independent School District Focus Goals
Goal 1
o TAKS/AEIS Goal 1.1
All students will reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Goal 1.2 Staff will provide leadership, products, services, technical assistance, and effective and efficient administration, resulting in the district and all campuses being rated recognized or exemplary and making adequate yearly progress.
Goal 1.3 All English learners will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Goal 2
o College Readiness 3
Goal 2.1 All students will graduate from high school. Students experiencing difficulty will be provided effective and timely assistance and student will successfully transition from program to program, campus to campus, and high school to post-secondary.
Goal 3o Collaborative Community
Goal 3.1 All students will be educated in learning environments that are appropriate, safe, drug and violence free, and conducive to learning. Students will be provided with facilities, materials, tools, equipment, etc. needed.
Goal 3.2 All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers and, where applicable, qualified instructional aides in schools led and supported by highly qualified administrators, able to meet the needs of diverse learners.
Goal 3.3 Parents and community members will support and contribute to efforts that all students reach high academic standards.
Goal 4
4
o Fiscally-sound During Fiscal Year 2011, expenditures will not exceed allotted budget outside 3% variance.
5
__Gonzalo & Sofía García Elementary__
Campus/Program Name
_______2010-11_______Year
Mission Statement
The mission of the Gonzalo and Sofía García Elementary community is to empower students to succeed in a multicultural setting and to provide a
challenging learning environment, thus preparing all students to meet the challenges of a changing global
society.
6
2010-2011 Improvement Plan Goals and Objectives
Program/Campus__Gonzalo & Sofia Garcia Elementary_______________________
GOAL 1.1 TAKS/AEIS FOCUS
All students will reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Objective 1.1.1: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Reading.Objective 1.1.2: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Writing.Objective 1.1.3: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Mathematics.Objective 1.1.4: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Science.Objective 1.1.5 At least 90% of all 504 students tested in TAKS will meet or exceed state standards on TAKS.Objective 1.1.6 The Technology Team will meet on a monthly basis to conduct needs assessment to ensure equitable access and understanding of technology.Objective 1.1.7 100% of the classroom teachers will utilize CISD Curriculum for mathematics, science, language arts and social studies to support Power Standards.Objective 1.1.8 90% of the special education students tested with TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will pass or exceed the state standards for proficiency.Objective 1.1.9 100% of the advanced academics students tested with TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will pass or exceed the state standards for proficiency.Objective 1.1.10 Maintain an attendance rate of 97.7% or better.Objective 1.1.11 100% of the students K-5 will receive fine arts instruction, such as art, theatre and music in the classroom and with a certified music teacher.
GOAL 1.2 TAKS/AEIS FOCUS
7
Staff will provide leadership, products, services, technical assistance, and effective and efficient administration, resulting in the district and all campuses being rated recognized or exemplary and making adequate yearly progress.
Objective 1.2.1 The Student Study Team (SST), consisting of Administrator, Instructional Coordinator, Teaching Staff, Counselor, and Parents will identify 100% of students needing Response to Intervention (RtI) support in reading, mathematics and/or behavior.
Objective 1.2.2 Staff and students will be provided access to computers for instruction.
Objective 1.2.3 100% of all new teachers and other staff will receive technical assistance and staff development by campus or district staff in the areas of instructional strategies, evaluating and monitoring student progress, and reporting grades and attendance on the TEAMS system.
Objective 1.2.4 All teachers and staff will be provided with activities and celebrations to help reduce stress.
GOAL_____1.3_ TAKS/AEIS Focus
All English learners will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Objective 1.3 : The gaps between ELL and non-ELL students, in the aggregate and each subgroup, on each TAKS test, at each grade level will close by at least 25%.
GOAL______2.1_ College Readiness Focus
All students will graduate from high school. Students experiencing difficulty will be provided effective and timely assistance and students will successfully transition from program to program, campus to campus, and high school to post-secondary.
8
Objective 2.1.1: All 5th grade students will participate in transition activities to facilitate a successful transition from an elementary to a middle school setting.
Objective 2.1.2: Maintain programs to encourage all at risk students to stay in and be successful in school.
Objective 2.1.3: Maintain Destination College to encourage all students to pursue post high school education.
Objective 2.1.4: Counselor will organize Career Days to enable students to become more aware of career choices, which require higher education.
Objective 2.1.5: Provide information for parents of PreK students about PreK and Kindergarten.
GOAL______3.1 Collaborative Community Focus
All students will be educated in learning environments that are appropriate, safe, drug and violence free, and conducive to learning. Students will be provided with facilities, materials, tools, equipment, etc. needed.
Objective 3.1.1 : 100% of the objectives and activities in the Counselor’s action plan for the 2010/11 school year will be completed.
9
Objective 3.1.2 : 100% of our students will participate in a health and nutrition curriculum and program for students Kinder – 5th grade that is geared to develop healthy minds and bodies and prevent violence and drug use among the students.
Objective 3.1.3 : 100% of students will have access to state of the art technology equipment, library resources, and supplemental materials to increase student success at school and prepare them for real life job skills.
Objective 3.1.4 : 100% of the activities described in the campus Positive Behavior Support Initiative (PBSI) to improve the learning environment for students will be completed.
Objective 3.1.5 : Maintain plan of action with objectives, desired change, strategies/program, persons responsible and timeframe that addresses Security Audit Report.
Objective 3.1.6 : Maintain facility and grounds to ensure student/staff safety and hygiene.
10
GOAL______3.2_ Collaborative Community Focus
All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers and, where applicable, qualified instructional aides in schools led and supported by highly qualified administrators, able to meet the needs of diverse learners.
Objective 3.2.1: 100% of teachers will receive training in areas of need, such as, professional learning communities (PLC), integration of technology, critical thinking skills, mathematics, science, reading and writing.
Objective 3.2.2 100% of teachers will receive training in their area of need to assist them in providing instructional modifications for special populations, such as: Special Education, Advanced Academics, second language acquisition, 504 and migrant education.
Objective 3.2.3 100% of teachers will receive training in the implementation of the Positive Behavior Support Initiative.
Objective 3.2.4 Training will be provided as necessary for the school nurse to enable the support of the Coordinated School Health Program.
Objective 3.2.5 100% of paraprofessional instructional aides will participate in training at the local and out of district level to improve methods of teaching for special program students.
Objective 3.2.6 Principal, Assistant Principal, Counselor and Instructional Coordinator will each accrue at least 30 hours of professional development annually as required to maintain certification and to improve instruction.
Objective 3.2.7 Training will be provided for the Emergency Operation Plan and School Safety.
11
GOAL 3.3____ Collaborative Community Focus
Parents and community members will support and contribute to efforts to ensure that all students reach high academic standards.
Objective 3.3.1: Parents, teachers and community members will be invited to participate on the Principal’s Advisory Council (PAC) through written notices or other forms of communication.
Objective 3.3.2: 100% of parents will be invited to Reading, Math and Science Fair presentations.
Objective 3.3.3: 100% of parents will be surveyed to recruit parent representatives for CIC, PAC and other school-based committees.
Objective 3.3.4: 100% of the objectives and activities described in the Parenting Component of the School Support Division Action Plan will be completed.
Objective 3.3.5: 100% of parents who have students that are not performing at high academic standards will be notified of their child’s “at risk” academic performance.
Objective 3.3.6: 100% of parents of ELL and non-ELL students in the Two-Way Dual Language program will be provided with information regarding student success in second language acquisition.
GOAL_4.1 Fiscally-sound
During Fiscal Year 2011, expenditures will not exceed allotted budget outside 3% variance.
12
Objective 4.1.1 During Fiscal Year 2011, campus expenditures will not exceed allotted budget outside 3% variance.
13
Planning and Decision Making Committee
Name Position
Parent, Business, Community, Teacher, etc
Signature
Carla Acevedo Kinder Teacher
Anna Weaver Guerra First Grade Teacher
Irene Alderete Mendez Second Grade
Claudia Lopez Third Grade
Corina Chaires Fourth Grade
Yvonne Gonzalez Fifth Grade
Emily Denny Special Programs
Elizabeth Del Val DAC
Debbie Coppenbarger Librarian
Maria E. Williams Instructional Coordinator
Julia Crowley Counselor
Gloria Smith Parent
Laura Lerma Parent
Frank Stewart Community
14
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Data Documentation
The following data were used to create and verify the comprehensive needs assessment analysis:
√ Review of district goals √ Disaggregation longitudinal AEIS data √ Disaggregation current-year AEIS data(TAKS and TAKS subgroup populations) (SAT/ACT/AP, College Readiness,
Dropout and graduation rates) √ Disaggregation AYP data Analysis of PBMAS data √ Disaggregated Texas Primary Reading Inventory (TPRI) or Tejas LEE results √ Analysis of special education population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility Analysis of homeless population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility Analysis of migrant population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility √ Analysis of At-Risk population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility √ Analysis of LEP population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility √ Analysis of gifted population, including performance, discipline, attendance, referral percentages and mobility District/Campus Dropout and School Leaver data √ Prior year(s) campus and/or district improvement plans √ Campus and/or district planning and decision making committee meeting discussions Results of benchmark assessments Number of students assigned to special programs and their academic achievement Discipline records and Truancy data Violence and/or violence prevention records Student surveys Community and/or parent surveys and/or feedback State and/or federal planning Student failure and/or retention rates Study of best practices Teacher Retention data Fitness Gram data and other
15
Canutillo Independent School DistrictDistrict Improvement Plan
Annual Performance Goals for District/SubpopulationsWhere do we want to be?We want all students to meet the state (Panel expectations) and achieve “exemplary” status in 2010-2011.Reading
All Students’ passing rate will increase from 89.9% to 90% African American students’ passing rate will increase from __0.0_% to
0.0% Hispanic students’ passing rate will increase from 89.3% to 90% White students’ passing rate will increase from 93.8% to 95% Economically Disadvantage students’ passing rate will increase from
87.6% to 90% At-Risk students passing rate will increase from 85% to 90%
Science All students’ passing rate will increase from 71.8% to 90% African American students’ passing rate will increase from 0.0% to
0.0% Hispanic students’ passing rate will increase from 69.9% to 90% White students’ passing rate will increase from 84.6% to 90% Economically Disadvantage students’ passing rate will increase from
65.6% to 90% At-Risk students passing rate will increase from45% to 90%
Math All students’ passing rate will increase from 80.1% to 85% African American students’ passing rate will increase from 0.0% to
0.0% Hispanic students’ passing rate will increase from 78.5% to 90% White students’ passing rate will increase from 93.8% to 95% Economically Disadvantage students’ passing rate will increase from
74.6% to 80% At-Risk students passing rate will increase from76% to 90%
Social Studies - NA All students’ passing rate will increase from _____% to _____% African American students’ passing rate will increase from * Hispanic students’ passing rate will increase from ____% to _____% White students’ passing rate will increase from _____% to _____% Economically Disadvantage students’ passing rate will increase from
_____% to _____% At-Risk students passing rate will increase from_____% to _____%
Writing All students’ passing rate will increase from 94.3% to 95% African American students’ passing rate will increase from 0.0% to
0.0% Hispanic students’ passing rate will increase from 94.2% to 95% White students’ passing rate will increase from 95% to 96% Economically Disadvantage students’ passing rate will increase from
87.1% to 90% At-Risk students passing rate will increase from 82% to 90%
16
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
A Comprehensive Needs Assessment was conducted with the Committee on _______________.
Participants in Attendance Data Sources Examined Carla Acevedo, Kinder
Anna Weaver Guerra, 1st Grade
Irene Alderete Mendez, 2nd Grade
Claudia Lopez, 3rd Grade
Corina Chaires, 4th Grade
Yvonne Gonzalez, 5th Grade
Emily Denny, Special Programs
Elizabeth Del Val, DAC
Deborah Coppenbarger, Librarian
Maria E. Williams, Instructional Coordinator
Sheryl Maxsom, Principal
17
AEISAYPTAKS TELPASTPRITejas Lee
Comprehensive Needs Assessment:
Summary of Findings
You may provide a written summary of the findings from the data analysis, i.e. Blank Elementary School has need for improvement in the areas of math, 3rd grade reading, 5th grade science, classroom discipline, and parental involvement. or choose to use something like the table below.
Prioritized Areas of Concern
Areas of Concern Data Source
5th Grade Science (LEP and Mono) TAKS
ED - 3rd, 4th, 5th – Math, Science TAKS
Hispanic Students - 4th and 5th – Math and Science TAKS
At Risk – All grades - Math, Reading, Writing, Science TAKS
Attendance Attendance documents (TEAMS)
18
In this plan, the term “student groups” refers to students who are
H, W, ED, Migrant, LEP, G/T, and Special Education.
State Compensatory Education
State of Texas Student Eligibility Criteria:
A student under 21 years of age and who:
1. Is in prekindergarten – grade 3 and did not perform satisfactorily on a readiness test/assessment given during the current school year.
2. Is in grades 7-12 and did not maintain a 70 average in two or more subjects in the foundation curriculum during a semester in the preceding or current school year OR is not maintaining a 70 average in two or more foundation subjects in the current semester.
3. Was not advanced from one grade to the next for one or more school years (students in pre-k and k that are retained at parent request are not considered at-risk).
4. Did not perform satisfactorily on a state assessment instrument, and has not in the previous or current school year performed on that instrument or another appropriate instrument at a level equal to at least 110 percent of the level of satisfactory performance on that instrument
5. Is pregnant or is a parent6. Has been placed in an AEP during the preceding or current school year7. Has been expelled during the preceding or current school year8. Is currently on parole, probation, deferred prosecution, or other conditional release9. Was previously reported through PEIMS to have dropped out of school10. Is a student of limited English proficiency11. Is in the custody or care of DPRS or has, during the current school year, been referred to DPRS12. Is homeless13. Resided in the preceding school year or resides in the current school year in a residential placement facility in the district, including a detention facility, substance abuse treatment facility, emergency shelter, psychiatric hospital, halfway house, or foster group home.
19
Federal, State and Local Funding Sources
Federal funding sources that will be integrated and coordinated with State and Local funds to meet the needs of all students;
Program/Funding Source
Federal Programs
Title 1, Part A
Title I, Part C (Migrant)
Title II, Part A (TPTR)
Title II, Part D (Technology)
Title III (Federal)
Title IV, Part A – Safe and Drug Free School
Title VI, Part B Rural/Low Income
Special Education
Carl Perkins
ARRA Stimulus Funds (List Specific ARRA Fund)
State Programs/Funding Source
Student Success Initiative Funds
ATOV Violence Program
Career/Technology Education
State Compensatory Education
Dyslexia
Gifted/Talented
Special Education
Bilingual/ESL Program
Local Programs/Funding Source
Grants
20
Title I, Part ASchool-wide Program
Component #1 – A Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Component #2 – School-wide Reform Strategies to
Component #3 – Instruction by Highly Qualified Teachers
Component #4 – Professional Development
Component #5 – Highly Qualified Teachers to High-Need Schools
Component #6 – Parental Involvement
Component #7 – Transition from Early Childhood Programs
Component #8 – Academic Assessments (Measures to include teachers in decisions)
Component #9 – Effective and Timely Assistance Activities
Component #10 – Coordination of Federal, State and local services and programs STATE COMPENSATORY
21
Title I
Gonzalo & Sofía García Elementary School
Name Position Program FTEMartha Sanchez Library Aide Instructional 1Laura Schenk Teacher Advanced Academics 1Jennifer R. Torres Parent Liaison Parent Program 1Maria E. Williams Instructional Coordinator RtI 1Irma Sambrano Migrant Facilitator Migrant .2
22
State Compensatory
Gonzalo & Sofía García Elementary School
Name Position Program FTECarmen Castaneda RIF Facilitator CEI 1Consuelo Rios 504 Interventionist 504 1Lilia T. Sotelo 504 Facilitator 504 1
23
State Compensatory Education
This District has written policies and procedures to identify the following:
Students who are at risk of dropping out of school under state criteria Students who are at risk of dropping out of school under local criteria How students are entered into the SCE program How students are exited from the SCE program The cost of the regular education program in relation to budget allocations per student and/or instructional staff per student
ratioTotal SCE funds allotted to this Campus: $155,950.10
Total FTEs funded through SCE at this Campus: 3 - $115,338.10
The process we use to identify students at risk is:
CISD utilizes the 13 criteria under State Compensatory Education requirements, and as further specified in HBD (Local) Regulation __________________________________________________________________________
The process we use to exit students from the SCE program who no longer qualify is:
CISD utilizes defined exit criteria specified by State Compensatory Education requirements. and as further specified in EHBD (Local) Regulation.
24
Optional for Title I Schoolwide schools:At Gonzalo & Sofía García Elementary School State Compensatory Funds are used to support Title I initiatives.
State Compensatory Education Program
Program Evaluation/Needs Assessment
Grades 3-5
TAKS Math
% Met Standard
Reading/ELA
% Met Standard
Writing
% Met Standard
Science
% Met Standard
Social Studies
% Met Standard
2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010
Students At-Risk
49% 83% 76% 85% 80% 85% 70% 94% 82% 63% 67% 45% NA NA NA
Students Not At-Risk
61% 80% 96% 89% 86% 95% 94% 94% 95% 91% 85% 96% NA NA NA
Drop Out Data Completion Data
2008 2009 2008 2009
Students At-Risk
Students Not At-Risk
The comprehensive, intensive, accelerated instruction program at this district/campus.
Upon evaluation of the effectiveness of this program the committee finds that at risk students are in need of additional support in mathematics, reading, writing and science in order to achieve at exemplary levels.
25
Goal 1 TAKS/AEIS Focus
Objective 1.1 All Students will reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Objective 1.1.1: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Reading.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.1a Teachers will follow the CISD Curriculum for reading address the CISD ELAR Power Standards.
1,2,3,8,9 Administration,Teaching staff,Instructional Coord.
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Fund 199 - $1,000$1,770,058.30266 - $293,227.01211 - $61,817.55
Lesson PlansCommon AssessmentsWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.1b Students will be exposed to different genre of literature.
1, 3, 8, 9 AdministrationTeaching staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Fund 199 - $7,672 211 - $$10,784
Lesson PlansMonthly Library ReportInteractive NotebooksWalk-throughs
26
Strategy 1.1.1c Students will apply critical thinking skills when analyzing literature and examining literary elements in grades K-5, as evidenced in interactive notebooks.
1, 3, 8, 9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
- Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.1d Enhance student reading with “Guided Reading” strategies in all classrooms.
1,3,4,8,9 Teaching staff, Instructional Coordinator
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $500 Lesson Plans
Walk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.1e Implement Reading Framework methodology (phonics, phonemic awareness, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension) in instruction in all classrooms.
1,3,4,9 Teaching staff, Instructional Coordinator, Administrators
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson Plans
Walk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.1f The “Book of the Month” reading selection will align across grade levels to enhance literature.
1,2,3,4,9 Teaching staff and Instructional Coordinator
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $10,784 Lesson Plans
Strategy 1.1.1g Students will participate in the “Accelerated Reading” program.
1,2,6,9 Teaching staff, Librarian, Parent Volunteers
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $5,064 Lesson PlansAR Monthly Reports
Strategy 1.1.1h Provide interactive bulletin boards in hallways to build vocabulary throughout the year.
2,9 Administration,Parent Liaison
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $100 Bulletin Boards
Strategy 1.1.1i RIF Facilitator will provide additional support
1,2,6,8,9 RIF FacilitatorTeaching Staff
Sep 2010 – June 2011
185 - $22,031.95 RIF Facilitator monthly report
27
for student in grades K-2 using CEIStrategy 1.1.1j Provide an academic tutor for grades 3-5 in reading based on student need.
1,6,8,9 Academic TutorInstructional Coordinator
Sep 2010 – May 2011
185 - $13,068 Monthly Report
Strategy 1.1.1k Provide after school tutoring one day each week for students who are struggling to learn reading concepts.
1,6,8,9 Teaching Staff Sep 2010 – May 2011
Tutoring Sign-in sheets; Lesson plans
Objective 1.1.2: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Writing.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.2a Teachers will follow the CISD Curriculum for language arts to address the CISD ELAR Power Standards.
1, 3, 8, 9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $1000 Lesson Plans Common AssessmentsWalk-throughs
28
Strategy 1.1.2b Provide writing activities in all content areas in grades K-5 as evidenced in interactive notebooks.
1, 3, 8, 9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansInteractive NotebooksWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.2c Students will write across the contents with an emphasis on nonfiction writing.
1, 3, 8, 9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansInteractive NotebooksWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.2d Students will be given the opportunity to participate in the English or Spanish Spelling Bee
Spelling Bee Sponsor
Spelling Bee Lists of student participants
Objective 1.1.3: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Mathematics.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
29
Strategy 1.1.3a Assess, examine and close gaps between female/male and ED/non ED students by offering targeted instructional methods and techniques, including the use of manipulatives, calendar math (Gr K-2), interactive journals, UPSE problem solving process and other tools to target deficiencies.
1,2,3,8,9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 – $5,437 Lesson PlansCommon AssessmentsWalk-throughs
Strategy1.1.3b All teachers and special areas will utilize and implement CISD Curriculum to address Math Power Standards.
1,2,3,4,8,9,10
Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - Lesson PlansCommon Assessments
Walk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.3c All 1st and 2nd grade students will use JiJi weekly to support math instruction.
1,2,3,9 Teaching Staff Sep 2010 – June 2011
199 - $2,500 Reports on usage of JiJi for Mind Research Inst.
Strategy 1.1.3d Provide opportunity for students to participate in UIL Number Sense
Teaching Staff Sep 2010 – April 2011
199 - $450 UIL Number Sense Coach Report
Strategy 1.1.1j Provide an academic tutor for grades 3-5 in mathematics for students in need.
1,6,8,9 Academic TutorInstructional Coordinator
Sep 2010 – May 2011
185 - $13,068 Monthly Report
30
Strategy 1.1.1k Provide after school tutoring one day each week for students who are struggling to learn math concepts/skills.
1,6,8,9 Teaching Staff Sep 2010 – May 2011
Tutoring Sign-in sheets; Lesson plans
Objective 1.1.4: By the end of the 2010-11 school year, student performance on TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will meet or exceed targets needed to attain exemplary status in Science.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy1.1.4a All teachers and special areas teachers will implement CISD Curriculum utilizing all available resources (AIMS, FOSS kits, GEMS, textbook (5th grade) to address Science Power Standards.
1,2,3,4,8,9,10
Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $4,900
185 - $6119
Lesson PlansCommon AssessmentsWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.4b All grade level teachers will display content
1,2,3,8,9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June
199 - $500 Word WallsWalk-throughs
31
word walls. 2011
Strategy 1.1.4c Students will use interactive science notebooks that will include reflections about nonfiction content and acquired vocabulary.
1,2,3,8,9 Teaching staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
Interactive NotebooksWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.4d All students will be provided the opportunity to participate in the annual Science Fair.
1,2,3,9 Science Fair Sponsor
April 2011 – May 2011
199 - $175 Science Fair participant list
Strategy 1.1.4e Instruction will include time for investigations, such as descriptive, comparative, and/or experimental.
1,2,3,8,9 Teaching Staff Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.1j Provide an academic tutor to help at risk students with science concepts in grade 5.
1,6,8,9 Academic TutorInstructional Coordinator
Sep 2010 – May 2011
185 - $13,068 Monthly Report
Objective 1.1.5: At least 90% of all 504 students tested in TAKS will meet or exceed state standards on TAKS.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
32
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy1.1.5a 504 Interventionist will provide research-based reading instruction for struggling students
1,2,3,4,8,9,10
Administration,504 Interventionist
Aug 2010 – June 2011
185 - $66,429.62 Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.1.5b 504 Interventionist will provide support for classroom teachers in appropriate intervention strategies.
1,2,3,8,9,10
504 Interventionist, Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson Plans
Strategy 1.1.5c 504 Facilitator will provide instructional support in math and reading.
1,2,3,8,9,10
504 FacilitatorTeaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
185 - $26,876.53 Intervention Plans
Objective 1.1.6: The Technology Team will meet on a monthly basis to conduct a needs assessment to ensure equitable access and understanding of technology.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy1.1.6a Technology Team will monitor use of labs to ensure that all students have equitable
1,2,3,4,8,
9,10
Administration,Technology Committee members
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lab calendar sheets
33
access to computer labs.
Strategy 1.1.6b Create and maintain grade level schedule for library and computer lab to ensure equitable access to all grade levels to prepare them for real life job skills.
1,2,3,8,9 Administration,Technology Committee members, Librarian
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lab calendar sheets
Strategy 1.1.6c Install JiJi on laptops for Grades1-2 to ensure equal access for all students in Grades 1-2.
1,2,3,9 Administration,IT Dept.
Sep 2010 199 - $2,500 Work order completion
Strategy 1.1.6d Utilize librarian to ensure that media services and materials support student mastery of the TEKS.
1,3,8,9,10 Librarian Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $57,253.83211 – $25,869.68
Lesson Plans
Objective 1.1.7: 100% of the classroom teachers will utilize CISD Curriculum for mathematics, science, language arts and social studies to support Power Standards.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.7a Support the implementation of the CISD Curriculum, Common Assessments and TAKS documents throughout
1,2,3,4,8,9,10
Administration,Teaching Staff, Instructional Coordinator
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansCommon assessments
34
the school year.
Strategy 1.1.7b Provide a 90-minute block for grade level PLCs on the first Monday of the six weeks for planning of instruction based on disaggregated data, YAG, IFD, VAD.
1,2,3,4,8,9,
10
Administration,Teaching Staff, Instructional Coordinator
Aug 2010 – May 2011
199 - $4,590 Lesson Plans
Strategy 1.1.7c Provide targeted tutoring based on Power Standards and assign flexible groups to teachers.
1,2,3,8,9, 10
Administration,Teaching Staff
Sep 2010 – May 2010
Tutoring Lists
Objective 1.1.8: 90% of the special education students tested with TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will pass or exceed the state standards for proficiency.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.8a Provide the least restrictive environment for all Special Education students, such
1,2,3,4,8,
9,10
Administration,Special Education Teacher,
Aug 2010 – June 2011
224 - $75,211.13 Lesson Plans
35
as, Inclusion in the regular classroom.
Teaching Staff
Strategy 1.1.8b Provide research-based accelerated instruction for Special Education students, such as balanced literacy, Writer’s Workshop, process and inquiry-based science and hands-on math.
1,2,3,4,8,9,
10
Administration,Special Education Teacher, Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson Plans
Objective 1.1.9: 100% of the advanced academics students tested with TAKS (and TAKS-based assessments) will pass or exceed the state standards for proficiency.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.9a All Advanced Academics students will each complete a Texas Performance Standards Project.
1,2,3,8,9 Administration,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansTPSP 6-week Progress Reports
36
Strategy 1.1.9b Differentiation for Advanced Academics students will be provided in the regular classroom.
1,2,3,8,9 Administration,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Objective 1.1.10: Maintain an attendance rate of 97.7% or better.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
% Met Standard
Activity/Strategy Title 1 Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)
Responsible
Timeline Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.10a Provide attendance incentives to students and classrooms, such as, award ribbons, certificates, and classroom popcorn parties for classes that spell “Perfect Attendance.” Classrooms receive a letter each day when all students in the class are present all day (no tardies and no students leave early).
1,2,3,9,10 Administration Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $500 List of awards for students/classrooms
37
Objective 1.1.11: 100% of the students K-5 will receive fine arts instruction, such as art, theatre and music in the classroom and with a certified music teacher.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s)Responsible Timeline
Funding Source/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 1.1.11a Provide fine arts instruction in the classroom, such as drama, art, and music to develop healthy minds that can think critically and creatively, express their thoughts, reflect, make connections, discover patterns and solve problems.
1,2,3,9 Administration,Teaching Staff,Music Teacher
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $49,741.83 Lesson Plans
Walk-throughs
Goal 1.2 TAKS/AEIS Focus: Staff will provide leadership, products, services, technical assistance, and effective and efficient administration, resulting in the district and all campuses being rated recognized or exemplary and making adequate yearly progress.
Objective 1.2.1: The Student Study Team (SST), consisting of Administrator, Instructional Coordinator, Teaching Staff, Counselor, and Parents will identify 100% of students needing Response to Intervention (RtI) support in reading, mathematics and/or behavior.
38
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 1.2.1a SST will identify academic, emotional and physical needs of struggling students in need of intervention and offer assistance and/or written accelerated intervention plan (AIP).
1,6,8,9,10 Administration,Instructional Coordinator,Teaching Staff, Counselor, Parents(Students)
Aug 2010- June 2011
Individual SST packets
Strategy 1.2.1b Students that are considered highly mobile or at risk will receive RtI interventions, such as (but not limited to) ARI, AMI, behavior modification plans, scientific research-based strategies.
1,2,3,8,9,10 Administration,Instructional Coordinator,Teaching Staff, Counselor, Parents(Students)
Aug 2010- June 2011
Lesson Plans
Strategy 1.2.1c Provide extended day instruction (through tutoring during PE two times each week by classroom teacher and after school Mon & Wed by all teachers, including Kinder and Special Program) and extended year instruction (when fiscally possible) for at risk students in reading and
1,2,3,8,9,10 Administration,Instructional CoordinatorTeaching Staff
Aug 2010- June 2011;
June – July 2011
211 - $9796285 - $29,630
Lists of Tutoring students
39
mathematics.
Objective 1.2.2: Staff and students will be provided access to computers for instruction.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 1.2.2a All teachers, counselor, instructional coordinator, librarian, administration will be provided with a laptop for instructional use.
3,10 Administration,IT Staff.Technology CMTE
Aug 2010
285 Laptop Distribution List
Objective 1.2.3: 100% of all new teachers and other staff will receive technical assistance and staff development by campus or district staff in the areas of instructional strategies, evaluating and monitoring student progress, and reporting grades and attendance on the TEAMS system.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
40
Strategy 1.2.3a Plan in collaboration with District Support Team to offer technical and resource assistance to teachers who are using the TEAMS grading system.
Administration,IT Staff, Technology CMTE
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Work orders
Objective 1.2.4: All teachers and staff will be provided with activities and celebrations to help reduce stress.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 1.2.4a All teachers and staff will be provided with activities and celebrations, such as Fish Philosophy, luncheons and before and after school refreshments to reduce stress.
Administration, Social CMTE
Aug 2010 – June 2011
865 - $1000 List of activities and sign in sheets
Goal 1.3 TAKS/AEIS Focus: All English learners will become proficient in English and reach high academic standards attaining at a minimum proficiency or better in the foundation curriculum.
Summative EvaluationData All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec. Ed. GT Male Female
41
2010-2011
% Met Standard
Objective 1.3.1 : The gaps between ELL and non-ELL students, in the aggregate and each subgroup, on each TAKS test, at each grade level will close by at least 25%.
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 1.3.1a Implement the 50/50 Two-Way Dual Language model using guidelines provided by ALS consistently using the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) in the foundation curriculum to ensure ELL students’ academic performance is demonstrating equal progress with native English speakers.
1,2,3,8,9,10
Administration, ALS Dept, Dual Language Teachers
Aug 2010 – June 2011
State Bil - $22,500 Lesson PlansWalk-throughsCommon Assessments
Strategy 1.3.1b Assess, examine and close gaps between ELLs and non-ELLs by offering ESL instructional methods and techniques to target deficiencies.
1,2,3,8,9,10
Administration, ALS Dept, Dual Language Teachers
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansWalk-throughsCommon Assessments
Strategy 1.3.1c Grade level 1,2,3,8,9,10 Administration, Instructional
Aug 2010 – June
PLC meeting agendas
42
and vertical PLCs will meet a minimum of once each week to examine CISD Curriculum documents and state assessment data to adapt and adjust instruction to meet the academic needs of the English language learner to improve instruction and achieve exemplary levels on TAKS.
Coordinator, Dual Language Teachers
2011
Strategy 1.3.1d Teachers will utilize cognates and word walls in science and math to build vocabulary.
1,2,3,8,9,10 Administration, Dual Language Teachers
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.3.1e English will be the focus language of instruction in math and science enabling an increase of 5% of ELL students to successfully take the TAKS test in English in grades 4-5.
1,2,3,8,9,10 Administration, ALS Dept, Dual Language Teachers
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansWalk-throughs
Strategy 1.3.2d Migrant facilitator and bilingual facilitator will maintain records and when necessary tutor appropriate students to support academic success.
1,3,8,9,10 Migrant facilitatorBilingual facilitator
Aug 2010 – Dec 2010
212 - $8,169.64
State Bil - $22,918.86
Periodic Reports
Goal 2 College Readiness
43
Goal 2.1 All students will graduate from high school. Students experiencing difficulty will be provided effective and timely assistance and students will successfully transition from program to program, campus to campus, and high school to post-secondary.
Objective 2.1.1: All 5th grade students will participate in transition activities to facilitate a successful transition from an elementary to a middle school setting.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec.Ed. GT Male Female
Dropout Report
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 2.1.1a Middle school counselors will visit with 5th grade students early in the second semester to explain the registration process and instructional possibilities.
7, 9 Administration,MS and Elem Counselors
Jan 2011 - Mar 2011
Strategy 2.1.1b All 5th grade students will visit the middle school in May to familiarize students with the middle school campus, procedures and classes
7,9 Administration,MS and Elem Counselors
May 2011
199 - $150 Lists of students participating
Objective 2.1.2: Maintain programs to encourage all at risk students to stay in and be successful in school.
44
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec.Ed. GT Male Female
Dropout Report
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 2.2.2a Maintain Mother/Daughter, Father/Son program.
7, 9 Administration,
Aug 2010 – June 2011
185 - $2,000 Reports
Objective 2.1.3: Maintain Destination College to encourage all students to pursue post high school education.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec.Ed. GT Male Female
Dropout Report
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
45
Strategy 2.1.3a Each grade level will maintain previously selected college/university to highlight to students the importance of pursuing a post-high school education. The grade level selections will remain the same each year to ensure all students become familiar with different colleges/universities.
6,7, 9 Administration,Counselor,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
List of activities
Strategy 2.1.3b Implement various activities, such as assemblies, visits by college representatives, and mock college applications, to encourage focus on post high school education.
7,9 Counselor Aug 2010 – June 2011
List of activities
Objective 2.1.4: Counselor will organize Career Days to enable students to become more aware of career choices, which require higher education.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec.Ed. GT Male Female
Dropout Report
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
46
Strategy 2.1.4a Counselor will work with the community to arrange presentations for students about various careers, which require higher education.
6,7, 9 Counselor Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $150 EOY Report
Strategy 2.1.4b Counselor will provide career oriented activities, such as Mock Job Wall and dress like your favorite career day, to encourage interest in various careers.
6,7 Counselor Aug 2010 – June 2011
EOY Report
Objective 2.1.5: Provide information for parents of PreK students about PreK and Kindergarten.
Summative Evaluation:
Data2010-2011
All Students H W AA ED Migrant LEP Spec.Ed. GT Male Female
Dropout Report
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 2.1.5a Work with HeadStart to provide smooth transition for students to PreK
6,7, 9 Counselor May – June 2011
List of possible students from HeadStart
Strategy 2.1.5b Provide information during 1 morning and 1 evening session for parents of
AdministrationALS
April 2011
865 - $25 Sign-in sheets
47
PreK students in regard to Dual Language and Mono English Kinder program.
Goal 3 Collaborative Community
Goal 3.1 All students will be educated in learning environments that are appropriate, safe, drug and violence free, and conducive to learning. Students will be provided with facilities, materials, tools, equipment, etc. needed.
Objective 3.1.1 : 100% of the objectives and activities in the Counselor’s action plan for the 2010/11 school year will be completed.
Summative Evaluation :
Data2010-2011
All Students
Discipline/Incidents
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.1a Incorporate a curriculum that is geared to develop healthy minds and bodies, respect for others and prevent violence among our students, such as Character Counts and No Place for Hate.
1, 2, 10 Counselor,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $42,570.63$1,348
PE Lesson PlansDiscipline Reports
Strategy 3.1.1b A student from each class in each grade level per six weeks is nominated by the
9 Counselor Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lists of StudentsChart with student names
48
teacher/class to receive recognition based on the pillar of that six weeks.
Objective 3.1.2 : 100% of our students will participate in a health and nutrition curriculum and program for students Kinder – 5th grade that is geared to develop healthy minds and bodies and prevent violence and drug use among the students.
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.2a Students, K-5th grade, will participate in the Coordinated School Health Program that includes Fitness Gram assessment for improving their health and nutrition.
1,9 CSH Team,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $48,303.05 PE Lesson Plans
Strategy 3.1.2b Continue recess before lunch to support health, nutrition and learning.
AdministrationCSH Team
Aug 2010 – June 2011
101 - $162,627.64 Recess/lunch schedule
Strategy 3.1.2c Incorporate a health awareness week for students to focus on good nutrition.
1,9 CSH Team,Food Services
April 2011 Nurse’s report
Objective 3.1.3 : 100% of students will have access to state of the art technology equipment, library resources, and supplemental materials to increase student success at school and prepare them for real life job skills.
49
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.3a Provide support for a Title I, Part A School-wide program; supplementary materials, media services, technology, support student mastery of the TEKS.
1, 2, 10 LibrarianTeaching Staff
Aug 2010 – June 2011
Lesson PlansLibrarian
Objective 3.1.4 : 100% of the activities described in the campus Positive Behavior Support Initiative (PBSI) to improve the learning environment for students will be completed.
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.4a Strategies to encourage positive behavior will be implemented throughout the year.
1, 2, 10 Librarian Aug 2010 – June 2011
Discipline Reports
Strategy 3.1.4b Raven Tokens will be given to classes and or individual students when respectful, responsible, safe behavior is exhibited.
2,9 AdministrationInstructional Staff,Counselor,Custodians,Food Services
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $100 Discipline Reports
Strategy 3.1.4c The class with the most Raven Tokens each six weeks at each grade level will be
2,9 AdministrationCounselor
Aug 2010 – June 2011
865 - $500 Discipline Reports
50
awarded a popcorn party.
Strategy 3.1.4d Implement a Ravens Club to encourage goal setting by students for academics and behavior. Students select with parents 2 academic and 2 behavioral goals each 6 weeks. Students who meet at least 2 of the 4 goals, as verified by parent and teacher, join the Principal in the cafeteria for recognition and reward.
2, 6, 9 AdministrationCounselor,Teaching Staff,Parents
Aug 2010 – June 2011
865 - $1000 Discipline ReportsRavens Club lists
Objective 3.1.5 : Maintain plan of action with objectives, desired change, strategies/program, persons responsible and timeframe that addresses Security Audit Report.
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.5a Maintain 100% compliance with the Security Audit Plan of Action to ensure student and staff safety.
Librarian Aug 2010 – June 2011
Security Audit Plan
Strategy 3.1.5b Update the Emergency Operation Plan as needed.
AdministrationCIC
Aug 2010 – June 2011
EOP
Objective 3.1.6 : Maintain facility and grounds to ensure student/staff safety and hygiene.
51
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/Amounts Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.1.6a Custodial Team will ensure that the building and grounds are safely maintained and cleaned per maintenance schedule.
Lead and Asst. Lead Custodian,District Maintenance Team
Aug 2010 – June 2011
199 - $98,302.27, $250
Custodial Reports
Goal 3.2 TAKS/AEIS Focus: All students will be taught by highly qualified teachers and, where applicable, qualified instructional aides in schools led and supported by highly qualified administrators, able to meet the needs of diverse learners.
Objective 3.2.1: 100% of teachers will receive training in areas of need, such as, professional learning communities (PLC), integration of technology, critical thinking skills, mathematics, science, reading and writing.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.1a Provide staff development as requested by teachers in Teacher Self-Report part III and/or as observed thru walk-throughs and through the Campus Improvement Committee.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration,Instructional Coordinator,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
199 - $4,700 Staff Development recordsTSR IIIWalk-throughs
52
Strategy 3.2.1b Offer local and out of district professional development opportunities to teachers to receive training to assist them in developing and implementing PLC and best teaching practices for students with diverse learning styles.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration,Instructional Coordinator,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
185 - $4,863 Travel Reports
Strategy 3.2.1c Provide books for study during PLCs/Faculty meetings by teachers/staff to gain expertise in PLCs and best teaching practices.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration,Instructional Coordinator,Teaching Staff
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheetsActivities
Strategy 3.2.1d Conduct small group sessions/trainings for teachers on the effective use of technology in the classroom.
Administration,Technology CMTE
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheets
Objective 3.2.2: 100% of teachers will receive training in their area of need to assist them in providing instructional modifications for special populations, such as: Special Education, Advanced Academics, second language acquisition, 504 and migrant education.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline
Funding Sources/Amount
s
Formative Evaluation
53
Strategy 3.2.2a Provide opportunities for all teachers not certified in Bilingual Education to enroll in online courses through ALS to complete English as a Second Language (ESL) certification.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration, ALS Dept
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
State Bil Certificate of completion
Strategy 3.2.2b 100% of teachers of Advanced Academics students will complete the required 30 hours of professional development prior to the first day of instruction. Teachers who have not completed the required hours will have one semester to do so.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration, Advanced Academics
Aug 2010 - Dec 2010
211 - $55,926.57 Certificates of completion
Strategy 3.2.2c 100% of teachers of Advanced Academics students will complete the required 6 hours of annual ongoing professional development within the first semester.
1,2,3,4,10 Administration, Advanced Academics
Aug 2010 – Dec 2010
Sign-in sheets
Strategy 3.2.2d DL teachers in grades K-5, IC and Administrator attend bilingual/dual language conferences, such as, La Cosecha Dual Language
1,3,4,9,10 AdministrationInstructional Coord.Dual Language Teachers
Nov 2010
255 - $8,856 Travel documents
54
Conference in Santa Fe, NM, TABE, NABE.
Objective 3.2.3: 100% of teachers will receive training in the implementation of the Positive Behavior Support Initiative.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.3a PBSI Team will provide training for teachers in strategies for students to encourage respectful, responsible, safe behaviors
1,2,3,4,9,10 Administration,PBSI Team
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheetsDiscipline records
Strategy 3.2.3b PBSI Team will attend training to learn new techniques to share with campus to encourage respectful, responsible, safe behaviors
1,2,3,4,10 Administration,PBSI Team
Aug 2010 - Jun 2011
199 - $300 Sign-in sheetsDiscipline records
Objective 3.2.4: Training will be provided as necessary for the school nurse to enable the support of the Coordinated School Health Program.
Summative Evaluation:
55
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.4a School Nurse will attend training as necessary related to duties (CSH, etc).
1,2,4,9,10 Administration,Nurse
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
199 – $50,643.12,$200, $2,148
Objective 3.2.5: 100% of paraprofessional instructional aides will participate in training at the local and out of district level to improve methods of teaching for special program students.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.5a Highly trained paraprofessionals will provide small group and individual instruction for ELLs, Migrant, 504, and Special Education students.
1,2,4,9,10 Administration,Instr. Aides
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
State Bil - $22,918.86
Reports
Objective 3.2.6: Principal, Assistant Principal, Counselor and Instructional Coordinator will each accrue necessary hours of professional development annually as required to maintain certification and to improve instruction.
Summative Evaluation:
56
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
School-wide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.6a Principal, Assistant Principal, Counselor, and Instructional Coordinator will each attend professional development as required for certification.
1,2,4,9,10 Administration,Counselor,Instructional Coordinator
Aug 2010- June 2011
199 - $156,369.58 Travel Reports
Objective 3.2.7: Training will be provided for the Emergency Operation Plan and School Safety.
Summative Evaluation:
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline Funding
Sources/AmountsFormative Evaluation
Strategy 3.2.7a Provide monthly training for all staff on school safety and the Emergency Operation Plan
1,2,4,9,10 Administration, Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheets
Goal 3.3 Collaborative Community
Parents and community members will support and contribute to efforts to ensure that all students reach high academic standards.
Objective 3.3.1: Parents, teachers and community members will be invited to participate on the Principal’s Advisory Council (PAC) through written notices or other forms of communication.
57
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.1a Conduct bi-monthly PAC meetings to facilitate communication between the school, families, and community regarding the instructional program and safety at the school.
1,2,6,8,9,10 Administration Aug 2010-Jun 2011
865 - $300 PAC agendas and sign-in sheets
Objective 3.3.2: 100% of parents will be invited to Reading, Math and Science Fair presentations.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.2a The reading, math and science committees will hold at least one evening activity to encourage parents to assist their children in improving their academic
1,2,6,8,9,10 AdministrationReading CMTE, Math CMTE, Science Fair CMTE,
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
211 – $24,124.02 Sign-in sheets
58
performance. Parent Liaison
Objective 3.3.3: 100% of parents will be surveyed to recruit parent representatives for CIC, PAC and other school-based committees.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.3a Hold CIC, PAC, Coordinated School Health, Coffee with the Principal and other meetings during which parents and community members can provide information and feedback on their child’s instructional and safety needs.
1,2,6,8,9,10 AdministrationParent Liaison
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
865 - $250 Completed surveys
Objective 3.3.4: 100% of the objectives and activities described in the Parenting Component of the School Support Division Action Plan will be completed.
Summative Evaluation
59
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.4a Offer ESL, GED, Nutrition and computer literacy classes through community-based projects and/or through the Student Support Division for parents to advance their academic skills and/or their nutritional knowledge to benefit themselves and their children.
1,2,6,8,9,10 AdministrationParent Liaison,Student Support Div.
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheets
Objective 3.3.5: 100% of parents who have students that are not performing at high academic standards will be notified of their child’s “at risk” academic performance.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.5a Provide opportunities for parents to meet and form partnerships with teachers and staff to improve student performance, such as parent/teacher conferences, SST meetings, 504 meetings, Special
1,2,6,8,9,10 AdministrationInstructional Coordinator,Counselor,Parent Liaison, 504 CMTE, SpEd Dept.
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
Sign-in sheets
60
Education ARDs, and academic behavior intervention plan meetings.Strategy 3.3.5b Provide ARI and AMI support for parents of students who are at risk of failing reading and/or math
Parent Liaison,Student Support Div.
Aug 2010- Jun 2011
Sign-in sheets
Strategy 3.3.5c Encourage use of CISD Parent Portal to support student academic success.
6,9 Administration
Objective 3.3.6: 100% of parents of ELL and non-ELL students in the Two-Way Dual Language program will be provided with information regarding student success in second language acquisition.
Summative Evaluation
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
(#1-10)
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 3.3.6a Provide opportunity for parents to learn about the Two-Way Dual Language program through parent nights (at least one per semester).
1,2,6,10 AdministrationALS Dept.
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
865 - $50 Sign-in sheets
Strategy 3.3.6b Provide progress reports three times per year (October, February,
1,2,6,8,9,10 AdministrationDL Teachers
Aug 2010-Jun 2011
199 - $50 Progress Reports
61
and May) to parents demonstrating student progress in second language acquisition.
Goal 4 Fiscally-sound
Goal 4.1 During Fiscal Year 2011, expenditures will not exceed allotted budget outside 3% variance.
Objective 4.1.1 During Fiscal Year 2011, campus expenditures will not exceed allotted budget outside 3% variance.
Activity/StrategyTitle 1
Schoolwide Component
Person(s) Responsible Timeline
Funding Sources/Amounts
Formative Evaluation
Strategy 4.1.1a Review budgets on a timely basis to ensure the campus stays within allotted budget spending to avoid negative balances and utilize budget efficiently and effectively as planned for the 2010-2011 school year.
9 AdministrationOffice ManagerCIC Members
Weekly, and monthly at CIC Meetings
State, Local and Federal Funding
Monthly Expenditure reports
62