ARTICLE-A-DAY™
Women Who Made a Difference8 Articles
Check articles you have read:
The Good Work of Jane Addams417 words
Jane Addams, the Peacemaker324 words
Rachel Carson's Silent Spring549 words
The Consequences of Silent Spring539 words
Civil Rights on a City Bus464 words
Women's Rights324 words
Malala Yousafzai363 words
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony251 words
Page 1 of 14 ReadWorks.org · © 2018 ReadWorks , Inc. All rights reserved.®
Jane Addams wanted to help people wholived in slums like these.
At the National Progressive Convention in 1912,Jane Addams supported the party's nomination ofTheodore Roosevelt for president.
The Good Work of Jane AddamsT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
In the 1880s Jane Addams traveled to Europe. While she was in
London, she visited a settlement house called Toynbee Hall .
Settlement houses were created to provide community services to
ease urban problems such as poverty. Inspired by Toynbee Hall,
Addams and her friend, Ellen Gates Starr, opened Hull House in a
neighborhood of slums in Chicago in 1889. Many who lived there
were immigrants from countries such as Italy, Russia, Poland,
Germany, Ireland, and Greece. For these working poor, Hull House
provided a day care center for children of working mothers, a
community kitchen, and visiting nurses. Addams and her staff gave
classes in English literacy, art, and other subjects. Hull House also became a meeting place for
clubs and labor unions. Most of the people who worked with Addams in Hull House were well
educated, middle-class women. Hull House gave them an opportunity to use their education and it
provided a training ground for careers in social work. . . .
Jane Addams, who had become a popular national figure, sought
to help others outside Hull House as well . She and other Hull
House residents often "lobbied" city and state governments.
When they lobbied, they contacted public officials and
legislators and urged them to pass certain laws and take other
actions to benefit a community. For example, Addams and her
friends lobbied for the construction of playgrounds, the setup of
kindergartens throughout Chicago, legislation to make factory
work safer, child labor laws, and enforcement of anti-drug
laws.
Addams believed in an individual's obligation to help his or her community, but she also thought the
government could help make Americans' lives safer and healthier. In this way, Addams and many
other Americans in the 1890s and 1900s were part of the Progressive movement. For a while, they
even had a political party. When Theodore Roosevelt ran for president for the Progressive Party in
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGOThe Good Work of Jane Addams
Page 2 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
Jane Addams working for world peace
1912, Jane Addams publicly supported him at the party convention.
Jane Addams was a strong champion of several other causes.
Until 1920, American women could not vote. Addams joined in
the movement for women's suffrage (women's right to vote).
She was a vice president of the National American Woman
Suffrage Association. Addams was also a founding member of
the National Association for the Advancement of Colored
People (NAACP).
The Good Work of Jane Addams
Page 3 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
During World War I, newspapercartoons like this one made fun ofpacifists like Jane Addams.
Baroness Bertha Felicie Sophie vonSuttner was the first woman to winthe Nobel Peace Prize in 1905. Infact, her work inspired the creation ofthe Prize.
Jane Addams, the PeacemakerT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
Jane Addams was a peacemaker even when she was criticized for her
views. She taught, wrote, and lectured about peace both nationally and
internationally. Before World War I, Addams was probably the most
beloved woman in America. In a newspaper poll that asked, "Who
among our contemporaries are of the most value to the community? "
Jane Addams was second, after Thomas Edison . . . . When she opposed
America's involvement in World War I, however, newspaper editors
called her a traitor and a fool, but she never changed her mind. . . .
Jane Addams's reputation gradually was
restored during the last years of her life. She
continued to run Hull House and work on
other peacemaking activities. Addams was president of the Women's
International League for Peace and Freedom and traveled overseas to
meet with officials of other nations to persuade them of the importance
of working to preserve world peace. Addams was rewarded for her
efforts in 1931 with the Nobel Peace Prize. The prize is awarded annually
by a committee in Norway to those who have made major contributions to
world peace efforts. She was the first American woman to win this prize.
There are many women today who have followed Addams's lead. . . .
Some of the other women who have also been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize are Emily Greene
Balch in 1946 and Jody Williams in 1997.
During her final years, Addams was ill with cancer. She died on May 21, 1935, 10 days after a banquet
in Washington, D.C., honored her and the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.
When she won the Nobel Peace Prize, the committee cited her for her "expression of an essentially
American democracy of spirit." . . .
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGOJane Addams, the Peacemaker
Page 4 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
dusting with an airplane
buffalo
Rachel Carson's Silent SpringT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
In January 1958, Rachel Carson received a letter from her friend Olga
Owens Huckins. Huckins lived in an area of Massachusetts where the
state was trying to get rid of mosquitoes. They had used planes to spray
a mixture of fuel oil and DDT (a pesticide, which is something that kills
pests such as insects, weeds and rodents) all over the area around
Huckins' home. DDT was supposedly harmless[, but on] the morning
after the spraying, Huckins found several of her favorite birds dead
outside her house. And the spraying did not even kill all of the
mosquitoes; in fact, that summer there were more of them than ever
before. Huckins asked Carson if she knew someone in Washington who could help prevent future
spraying.
Carson had been hearing about DDT since a Swiss chemist discovered it could be used to kill insects
in 1939. To many people, DDT seemed like a miracle substance. Farmers were excited about saving
their crops from pests. Doctors and others were excited about saving people's lives by killing
disease-carrying insects. But to Carson, DDT appeared to be dangerous to all l iving creatures.
The more Carson found out about DDT and other pesticides, the more she realized that she needed
to help stop future spraying. Carson decided to write a book about pesticides. She said, "…there
would be no future peace for me if I kept silent." She called her book Silent Spring.
Carson had spent her life studying, observing, and writing about
nature. She was a trained biologist and a talented writer who knew
how to present scientific information in compelling stories. Before
Silent Spring, she had written other books from the perspective of fish,
birds, islands, and oceans. Carson knew that all things in nature exist
in a delicately balanced ecosystem. In Silent Spring, Carson wrote that
although the ecosystem can adjust to changes, it needs time. Carson
believed that people in the 1950s were using pesticides carelessly.
Nature didn't have time to adjust, wrote Carson, because so many
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGORachel Carson's Silent Spring
Page 5 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
Rachel Carson
pesticides had been used in such large quantities in such a short time.
Carson wrote that pesticides should be called "biocides" because they
killed many living things, both bad and good. Although she was alarmed
by acute pesticide poisoning (like Huckins' dead birds), she was even
more concerned about the slow poisoning of plants, animals, and
people from pesticides. To make her point, she wrote the first chapter of
Silent Spring as a fable about a town. The town is a wonderful place until
everything and everyone--the animals, plants, insects and people--
slowly starts to get sick and then die. She ends the fable by saying that
although the town is not real, the fable is based on a collection of true
stories. Each of the tragedies had already happened somewhere because of pesticides.
Carson wrote Silent Spring to educate regular people about the dangers of pesticides. She asked,
"How could intelligent beings seek to control a few unwanted species by a method that
contaminated the entire environment and brought the threat of disease and death even to their own
kind? " She hoped that by bringing together scientific facts and presenting them in understandable
language, she could stop the fable from becoming a reality.
Rachel Carson's Silent Spring
Page 6 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
JFK
The Consequences of Silent SpringT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
Before her book Silent Spring was published in 1962, Rachel Carson knew it would be controversial.
Carson had written about how the reckless use of pesticides was contaminating the natural
environment and slowly poisoning living things. She knew her claims would surprise "99 out of 100
people." Many people, especially those in the chemical industry, would undoubtedly feel
threatened by her book. She knew these people would attack her and try to discredit her writing,
but this did not stop her. Carson believed in her book. She wanted to let the public know the facts
about pesticides and she hoped it would lead to stricter environmental laws.
Carson had no idea just how popular and influential her book would
become. Soon after Silent Spring was published, even the president, John
F. Kennedy, knew about it.
Carson was right about her critics. They spent hundreds of thousands of
dollars attacking her personally and trying to discredit her claims. She
was called "a bird lover--a cat lover--a fish lover, a priestess of
nature..." as well as [a] hysterical woman and a poor scientist. Even
before Silent Spring came out, an agricultural trade organization
distributed counterarguments to Carson's main points.
Carson was prepared for this kind of criticism. Before her book was published, it had been reviewed
by many scientists and experts. Carson knew her claims were scientifically sound. Other critics
misrepresented her claims. One chemical company wrote their own book called The Desolate Year. It
was the story of how terrible the world would be if pesticides didn't exist, even though Carson had
never said that pesticides should be eliminated entirely. Carson believed that pesticides should be
used appropriately by educated professionals. The criticisms did not stop Silent Spring from
becoming a success. Carson's writing was so understandable and her topic so compelling that the
book quickly became a best-seller.
Reading Carson's book changed many people's ideas about the environment and inspired some to
take action. People wrote to their representatives in congress and asked them to do something
about the misuse of pesticides. When several senators created a committee to research
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGOThe Consequences of Silent Spring
Page 7 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
environmental dangers, they asked Carson to speak to them about pesticides. Carson
recommended that the government regulate and reduce pesticide use, and that it ban the most
toxic pesticides. She said that a citizen of the United States had the right "to be secure in his own
home against the intrusion of poisons applied by other persons."
President Kennedy understood the importance of Carson's book. He asked his Science Advisory
Committee to research Carson's claims in Silent Spring. In 1963 the Committee released a report
called "The Uses of Pesticides." It supported Silent Spring. Environmental activists continued to
push the government to regulate pesticides. Changes in federal law in 1964 required companies to
prove that something did not cause harm before they could sell it. In 1972, activists pushed for and
won a ban on DDT, the pesticide that started Carson's research for Silent Spring. And in 1970 the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created "in response to the growing public demand
for cleaner water, air and land." Who knows what the world would be like today if Rachel Carson had
not written Silent Spring?
The Consequences of Silent Spring
Page 8 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
Civil Rights on a City BusBy ReadWo rks
On the first of December 1955, the African American seamstress Rosa Parks helped change the
course of history on a city bus. Rosa boarded the bus after a day’s work at a Montgomery, Alabama,
department store. She settled towards the middle, past the first several rows, which at that time
were reserved for white people. After making a few stops, the bus became full . Then a white man
boarded, but there was nowhere for him to sit. The driver ordered Rosa and the rest of the black
passengers in her row to stand at the back of the bus and let the white man sit. In an act of defiance
that would help intensify the American Civil Rights Movement, Rosa refused to give up her spot.
For violating the laws of segregation, referred to as the “Jim Crow laws” (which were meant to
keep white people and black people separate), Rosa was arrested and fined. Her refusal to move
was a quiet and simple action, but she took an enormous risk that evening. She also became a hero
and an inspiration to people all over the nation who were fighting for racial equality, including Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr., a young minister who would soon become a major civil rights leader. In
response to Rosa’s arrest, blacks in the city of Montgomery boycotted the public bus system for
more than a year. Like her, they had had enough of being treated like second-class citizens. The
Monday after Rosa’s arrest, most black commuters walked to where they needed to go—some
traveling more than 20 miles.
© 2014 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.NO_PARTNER_LOGOCivil Rights on a City Bus
Page 9 of 14 © 2014 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.
In her autobiography, Rosa Parks: My Story, Rosa writes of that day on the bus:
People always say that I didn't give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn't true. I was not
tired physically, or no more tired than I usually was at the end of a working day. I was not old,
although some people have an image of me as being old then. I was forty-two. No, the only
tired I was, was tired of giving in.
Finally, in November of 1956, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Jim Crow laws that kept blacks
and whites segregated were unconstitutional. Rosa Parks had challenged the law and shown
people far beyond her own town how cruel and unjust segregation could be, and she had won. The
boycott ended more than a month later, when the Montgomery buses were integrated, but the
resistance to racial prejudice did not stop there. Rosa and the Montgomery Bus Boycott, as it has
come to be known, sparked a series of nonviolent mass protests in support of civil rights. One
woman’s strength and commitment to change helped fuel a movement. Sometimes that is all it
takes.
Civil Rights on a City Bus
Page 10 of 14 © 2014 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton in 1856
Stanton's "Declaration of Rights andSentiments"
Stanton's draft of The Woman's Bible
Women's RightsT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
From a young age, Elizabeth Cady Stanton learned that girls didn't have
the same rights or opportunities as boys. Stanton went to Johnston
Academy, a co-ed school. She later wrote that she was "the only girl in
the higher classes of mathematics and the languages." She wasn't
allowed to go to college because she was a girl, so instead she studied at
Emma Willard's Troy Female Seminary. Stanton was a firm believer in
individual rights, such as the right to vote or the right to have any job for
which you are qualified. Stanton's father was a judge. She read law with
him but wasn't allowed to practice because . . . she was a woman. . . .
In 1840, Elizabeth Cady Stanton attended the World Antislavery
Convention in London with Lucretia Mott, an outspoken Quaker
abolitionist (someone who opposed slavery), and some other women
representatives. She believed that the laws that treated women
differently than men needed to be reformed. Stanton drafted a
"Declaration of Rights and Sentiments," which she modeled after the
Declaration of Independence. In the document, she called for moral,
economic, and political equality for women. In 1848, she presented the
document at the Seneca Falls Convention in New York. . . .
Frederick Douglass, a former slave and abolitionist leader, stood with
Elizabeth Cady Stanton at the Seneca Falls Convention and argued for
women's right to vote. One hundred people signed the "Declaration of
Rights and Sentiments." The Declaration wasn't just about women
getting the right to vote. In it and throughout her life, Stanton argued for
women's rights to higher education, to professional life, to the
ownership of property, and to obtain a divorce. She wrote The Woman's
Bible in which she criticized the treatment of women in the Old
Testament. Nowadays women in [the United States] have almost all the
same opportunities as men, or do they?
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGOWomen's Rights
Page 11 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.
Malala YousafzaiBy ReadWo rks
Photo Credit: DFID - UK Department for InternationalDevelopment (Malala Yousafzai: Education for girls), CC BY 2.0
Photograph of Malala Yousafzai
Malala Yousafzai was born on July 12, 1997, in Mingora, Pakistan. As a young child, Malala was
exposed to the importance of education. Her father was in charge of running a local learning
institution and instilled in Malala the value of attending school. Everything changed for Malala and
her family when the Taliban began to have more authority in the Swat Valley region around 2007.
The Taliban, a violent fundamental Islamist group, prohibited females from participating in many
activities, including attending school. The Taliban were so committed to banning female access to
education that they destroyed around 400 schools within two years of their control.
But Malala would not be deterred from her passion for learning. Not only did she continue to attend
school, but she also spoke publicly about her dissent. On a Pakistani televised program, Malala was
brave enough to express her disbelief; "How dare the Taliban take away my basic right to
education? " Malala boldly proclaimed. Under the pseudonym 'Gul Makai,' she also began to blog
about what it was like as a female under the Taliban's oppressive rule. Life became so dangerous for
Malala and her family that they had to flee their home as a temporary safety measure. When they
returned, Malala and her father started to become more vocal in opposition to the Taliban's sexist
© 2017 ReadWorks, Inc. All rights reserved.NO_PARTNER_LOGO® Malala Yousafzai
Page 12 of 14 © 2017 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.
rules. Word started to spread about this father-daughter duo and Malala began to win awards for
her bravery. The Taliban was extremely unhappy with Malala, and on October 9, 2012, a member of
the Taliban shot Malala in the head.
Malala received immediate medical attention, and after multiple surgeries, she woke up from a
coma. Miraculously, the trauma did not cause any permanent brain damage! As the story of her
survival and bravery spread, Malala became an international icon and an education advocate. Since
recovering from her wound, Malala has written a best-selling book and started a foundation for
female empowerment. In October 2014, Malala won a much-deserved Nobel Peace Prize.
Photograph of the Obama family meeting with Malala
Malala Yousafzai
Page 13 of 14 © 2017 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.
Susan B. Anthony and ElizabethCady Stanton at work
Anna Howard Shaw in an academicrobe, 1920
"The Apotheosis of Suffrage," a cartoonmocking Stanton and Anthony
Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. AnthonyT he text and imag es are fro m “America’s Sto ry fro m America’s Library” by the Library o f Co ng ress.
In 1851, Stanton started working with Susan B. Anthony, a well-known
abolitionist. The two women made a great team. Anthony managed the
business affairs of the women's rights movement while Stanton did most
of the writing. Together they edited and published a woman's
newspaper, the Revolution, from 1868 to 1870. In 1869, Anthony and
Stanton formed the National Woman Suffrage Association. They traveled
all over the country and abroad, promoting woman's rights.
Anna Howard Shaw, another suffragist, wrote
a description of the relationship between
Stanton and Anthony in The Story of a Pioneer:
"She [Miss Anthony] often said that Mrs. Stanton was the brains of the
new association, while she herself was merely its hands and feet; but in
truth the two women worked marvelously together, for Mrs. Stanton was
a master of words and could write and speak to perfection of the things
Susan B. Anthony saw and felt but could not herself express." . . .
Not everyone thought that what Elizabeth
Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony were
working towards was a good idea. This 1896 political cartoon pokes
fun at Stanton and Anthony by suggesting they be considered as
important as George Washington. Today, we wouldn't think it's
funny because just as George Washington is considered a
"forefather" of American democracy, Stanton and Anthony are
"foremothers" of the struggle for women's equality.
SHOW_AUTO_COPYRIGHTThis article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.NO_PARTNER_LOGOElizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony
Page 14 of 14 © 2018 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved.This article from the Library of Congress has no known copyright restrictions.