Download - Wordfile of q.25
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
1/17
Frequency Table
internet facility
8 8.0 8.0 8.0
3 3.0 3.0 11.0
7 7.0 7.0 18.0
9 9.0 9.0 27.0
8 8.0 8.0 35.0
4 4.0 4.0 39.0
6 6.0 6.0 45.0
8 8.0 8.0 53.0
13 13.0 13.0 66.0
6 6.0 6.0 72.0
9 9.0 9.0 81.0
7 7.0 7.0 88.0
8 8.0 8.0 96.0
4 4.0 4.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th Rank
14th Rank
16th Rank
Total
ValidFrequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
internet %acilit
16th Rank
14th Rank
12th Rank
11th Rank
10th Rank
9th Rank
8th Rank
7th Rank
th Rank
5th Rank
4th Rank
3rd Rank
2nd Rank
1st Rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (8%), 2ndrank (%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (#%),
$thrank (8%), thrank ("%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (8%), #thrank (1%), 10thrank (%),
11thrank (#%), 12thrank (!%), 1"thrank ( 8%), 1thrank ("%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave "thrank to internet facility.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
2/17
Digital facility
3 3.0 3.0 3.0
7 7.0 7.0 10.0
5 5.0 5.0 15.0
13 13.0 13.0 28.0
15 15.0 15.0 43.0
10 10.0 10.0 53.0
2 2.0 2.0 55.0
9 9.0 9.0 64.0
11 11.0 11.0 75.0
3 3.0 3.0 78.0
2 2.0 2.0 80.0
3 3.0 3.0 83.0
7 7.0 7.0 90.0
2 2.0 2.0 92.0
8 8.0 8.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
6th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th rank
13th Rank
14 th rank
15th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
&i'ital %acilit
15th rank
14 th rank
13th Rank
12th rank
11th Rank
10th Rank
9th Rank
8th Rank
7th Rank 6th Rank
5th Rank
4th Rank
3rd Rank
2nd Rank
1st Rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank (!%), rdrank ($%), "thrank (1%),
$thrank (1$%), thrank (10%), !thrank (2%), 8thrank (#%), #thrank (11%), 10thrank
(%), 11thrank (2%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank (!%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (8%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave "thrank to digital facility.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
3/17
more specialization
4 4.0 4.0 4.0
2 2.0 2.0 6.0
7 7.0 7.0 13.0
6 6.0 6.0 19.0
14 14.0 14.0 33.0
11 11.0 11.0 44.0
13 13.0 13.0 57.0
6 6.0 6.0 63.0
10 10.0 10.0 73.0
19 19.0 19.0 92.0
3 3.0 3.0 95.0
2 2.0 2.0 97.0
3 3.0 3.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
#ore s(eciali)ation
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, theygave ranks to internet facility, 1strank ("%), 2ndrank (2%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (%),
$thrank (1"%), thrank (11%), !thrank (1%), #thrank (%), 10thrank (10%), 11thrank
(1#%), 1thrank (%), 1$thrank (2%), 1thrank (%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave $thrank to more specialiation.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
4/17
place or city
11 11.0 11.0 11.0
5 5.0 5.0 16.0
15 15.0 15.0 31.0
10 10.0 10.0 41.0
8 8.0 8.0 49.0
5 5.0 5.0 54.0
4 4.0 4.0 58.0
14 14.0 14.0 72.0
6 6.0 6.0 78.0
9 9.0 9.0 87.0
3 3.0 3.0 90.0
5 5.0 5.0 95.0
4 4.0 4.0 99.0
1 1.0 1.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
(lace or cit
16th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (11%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (1$%), "thrank(10%), $thrank (8%), thrank ($%), !thrank ("%), 8thrank (1"%), #thrank (%), 10thrank
(#%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( "%), 1thrank (1%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave rdrank to *lace or city.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
5/17
placements
12 12.0 12.0 12.0
29 29.0 29.0 41.0
7 7.0 7.0 48.0
2 2.0 2.0 50.0
6 6.0 6.0 56.0
14 14.0 14.0 70.0
6 6.0 6.0 76.0
7 7.0 7.0 83.0
1 1.0 1.0 84.0
3 3.0 3.0 87.0
4 4.0 4.0 91.0
4 4.0 4.0 95.0
2 2.0 2.0 97.0
3 3.0 3.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
(lace#ents
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (12%), 2ndrank (2#%), rdrank (!%), "thrank (2%),$thrank (%), thrank (1"%), !thrank (%), #thrank (!%), 10thrank (1%), 11thrank (%),
12thrank ("%), 1thrank ("%), 1$thrank ( 2%), 1thrank (%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 2nd rank to *lacements.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
6/17
university
12 12.0 12.0 12.0
13 13.0 13.0 25.0
7 7.0 7.0 32.0
11 11.0 11.0 43.0
12 12.0 12.0 55.0
8 8.0 8.0 63.0
10 10.0 10.0 73.0
3 3.0 3.0 76.0
2 2.0 2.0 78.0
13 13.0 13.0 91.0
2 2.0 2.0 93.0
4 4.0 4.0 97.0
2 2.0 2.0 99.0
1 1.0 1.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
uni$ersit
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (12%), 2ndrank (1%), rdrank (!%), "thrank(11%), $thrank (12%), thrank (8%), !thrank (10%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (2%), 10th
rank (1%), 12thrank (2%), 1thrank ("%), 1$thrank ( 2%), 1thrank (1%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 2ndand 10thrank to university.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
7/17
fee structure
6 6.0 6.0 6.0
9 9.0 9.0 15.0
13 13.0 13.0 28.0
10 10.0 10.0 38.0
6 6.0 6.0 44.0
7 7.0 7.0 51.0
14 14.0 14.0 65.0
2 2.0 2.0 67.0
12 12.0 12.0 79.0
6 6.0 6.0 85.0
9 9.0 9.0 94.0
1 1.0 1.0 95.0
2 2.0 2.0 97.0
3 3.0 3.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
%ee structure
15th rank
14th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank (#%), rdrank (1%), "thrank (10%),$thrank (%), thrank (!%), !thrank (1"%), 8thrank (2%), #thrank (12%), 10thrank (%),
11thrank (#%), 12thrank (1%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave !thrank toffee structure.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
8/17
infrastructure
2 2.0 2.0 2.0
10 10.0 10.0 12.0
9 9.0 9.0 21.0
11 11.0 11.0 32.0
11 11.0 11.0 43.0
14 14.0 14.0 57.0
7 7.0 7.0 64.0
6 6.0 6.0 70.0
7 7.0 7.0 77.0
3 3.0 3.0 80.0
6 6.0 6.0 86.0
2 2.0 2.0 88.0
7 7.0 7.0 95.0
5 5.0 5.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
in%rastructure
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank (10%), "thrank (#%), $thrank(11%), thrank (11%), !thrank (1"%), 8thrank (!%), #thrank (%), 10thrank (!%), 11th
rank (%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank (2%), 1$thrank ( !%), 1thrank ($%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave !thrank to infrastructure.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
9/17
faculty
28 28.0 28.0 28.0
5 5.0 5.0 33.0
4 4.0 4.0 37.0
8 8.0 8.0 45.0
4 4.0 4.0 49.0
10 10.0 10.0 59.0
10 10.0 10.0 69.0
2 2.0 2.0 71.0
9 9.0 9.0 80.0
3 3.0 3.0 83.0
1 1.0 1.0 84.0
8 8.0 8.0 92.0
3 3.0 3.0 95.0
3 3.0 3.0 98.0
2 2.0 2.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
%acult
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank5th rank
4th rank
3th rank
2th rank
1th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (28%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank ("%), "thrank (8%),
$thrank ("%), !thrank (10%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (2%), 10thrank (#%), 11thrank
(%), 12thrank (1%), 1thrank (8%), 1thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%), 1thrank (2%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1st rank to faculty.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
10/17
collegereputation
6 6.0 6.0 6.0
5 5.0 5.0 11.0
7 7.0 7.0 18.0
4 4.0 4.0 22.0
2 2.0 2.0 24.0
13 13.0 13.0 37.0
3 3.0 3.0 40.0
10 10.0 10.0 50.0
2 2.0 2.0 52.0
8 8.0 8.0 60.0
4 4.0 4.0 64.0
7 7.0 7.0 71.0
5 5.0 5.0 76.0
6 6.0 6.0 82.0
11 11.0 11.0 93.0
7 7.0 7.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
colle'ere(utation
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3th rank
2th rank
1th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (!%), "thrank ("%),
$thrank (2%), thrank (1%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (2%), 10thrank (8%),11thrank ("%), 12thrank (!%), 1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( %), 1$thrank (11%), 1thrank
(!%)&&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1$thrank to college reputation.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
11/17
extracurricularactivities
2 2.0 2.0 2.0
3 3.0 3.0 5.0
2 2.0 2.0 7.0
4 4.0 4.0 11.0
4 4.0 4.0 15.0
2 2.0 2.0 17.0
10 10.0 10.0 27.0
9 9.0 9.0 36.0
6 6.0 6.0 42.0
7 7.0 7.0 49.0
15 15.0 15.0 64.0
12 12.0 12.0 76.0
12 12.0 12.0 88.0
12 12.0 12.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
e*tracurricularacti$ities
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank 11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3th rank
2th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2ndrank (2%), rdrank (%), "thrank (2%), $thrank ("%),thrank ("%), !thrank (2%), 8thrank (10%), #thrank (#%), 10thrank (%), 11thrank (!%),
12thrank (1$%), 1thrank (12%), 1"thrank ( 12%), 1$thrank (12%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1"th and 1$th rank to e+tracurricular activities.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
12/17
playground
5 5.0 5.0 5.0
2 2.0 2.0 7.0
6 6.0 6.0 13.0
3 3.0 3.0 16.0
7 7.0 7.0 23.0
8 8.0 8.0 31.0
8 8.0 8.0 39.0
19 19.0 19.0 58.0
12 12.0 12.0 70.0
15 15.0 15.0 85.0
15 15.0 15.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
4th rank
6th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
(la'round
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
8th rank
6th rank
4th rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, "thrank ($%), thrank (2%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (%),
10thrank (!%), 11thrank (8%), 12thrank (8%), 1thrank (1#%), 1"thrank (12%), 1$thrank
(1$%), 1thrank (1$%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1thrank to playground.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
13/17
canteen
2 2.0 2.0 2.0
1 1.0 1.0 3.0
4 4.0 4.0 7.0
2 2.0 2.0 9.0
5 5.0 5.0 14.0
5 5.0 5.0 19.0
7 7.0 7.0 26.0
6 6.0 6.0 32.0
10 10.0 10.0 42.0
8 8.0 8.0 50.0
26 26.0 26.0 76.0
6 6.0 6.0 82.0
18 18.0 18.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
canteen
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
7th rank
6th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank (1%), rdrank ("%), thrank (2%),
!thrank ($%), 8thrank ($%), #thrank (!%), 10thrank (!%), 11thrank (%), 12thrank(10%), 1thrank (8%), 1"thrank ( 2%), 1$thrank (%), 1thrank (18%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1"thrank to canteen.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
14/17
hostel facility
7 7.0 7.0 7.0
3 3.0 3.0 10.0
1 1.0 1.0 11.0
4 4.0 4.0 15.0
2 2.0 2.0 17.0
8 8.0 8.0 25.0
9 9.0 9.0 34.0
4 4.0 4.0 38.0
9 9.0 9.0 47.0
11 11.0 11.0 58.0
4 4.0 4.0 62.0
21 21.0 21.0 83.0
17 17.0 17.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
8th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
hostel %acilit
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank12th rank
11th rank
10th rank
8th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (!%), 2ndrank (%), rdrank (1%), "thrank ("%),
$thrank (2%), 8thrank (8%), #thrank (#%), 10thrank (#%), 11thrank ("%), 12thrank (#%),1thrank (11%), 1"thrank ( "%), 1$thrank (21%), 1thrank (1!%)&&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 1$thrank to hostel facility.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
15/17
brand of the college
6 6.0 6.0 6.0
12 12.0 12.0 18.0
8 8.0 8.0 26.0
2 2.0 2.0 28.0
4 4.0 4.0 32.0
8 8.0 8.0 40.0
3 3.0 3.0 43.0
13 13.0 13.0 56.0
1 1.0 1.0 57.0
18 18.0 18.0 75.0
5 5.0 5.0 80.0
3 3.0 3.0 83.0
5 5.0 5.0 88.0
12 12.0 12.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10thn rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
+rand o% the colle'e
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank
10thn rank
9th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
4th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2ndrank (%), rdrank (12%), "thrank (8%), $thrank (2%),thrank ("%), !thrank (8%), 8thrank (%), #thrank (1%), 10thrank (18%), 12thrank ($%),
1thrank ($%), 1"thrank ( %), 1$thrank ($%), 1thrank (&12%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 10thrank to brand of the college.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
16/17
foreign tour or local visit by flight
2 2.0 2.0 2.0
5 5.0 5.0 7.0
6 6.0 6.0 13.0
4 4.0 4.0 17.0
6 6.0 6.0 23.0
3 3.0 3.0 26.0
11 11.0 11.0 37.0
15 15.0 15.0 52.0
6 6.0 6.0 58.0
7 7.0 7.0 65.0
20 20.0 20.0 85.0
3 3.0 3.0 88.0
12 12.0 12.0 100.0
100 100.0 100.0
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total
Valid
Frequenc !ercent Valid !ercent
"u#ulati$e
!ercent
%orei'n tour or local $isit + %li'ht
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank 11th rank
8th rank
7th rank
6th rank
5th rank
3rd rank
2nd rank
1st rank
Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, theygave ranks to internet facility, 1strank (2%), 2ndrank ($%), rdrank (%), $thrank ("%),
thrank (%), !thrank (%), 8thrank (11%), 11thrank (1$%), 12thrank (%), 1thrank
(!%), 1"
th
rank ( 20%), 1$
th
rank (%), 1
th
rank (12%)&
Interpretation ' ost of respondents gave 20thrank to foreign tour or local visit by
flight&a.
-
8/11/2019 Wordfile of q.25
17/17