Download - Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
1/345
I
CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA
AGENDA BILL
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members
of
the City Council
Mike Calhoun, Interim City Administrator
FROM:
Sharon Friedrichsen, Director
of
Budget and Contracts
SUBJECT: Workshop: Cost of Services Study
AMOUNT OF EXPENDITURE
N/A
AMOUNT BUDGETED
N/A
APPROPRIATION REQUIRED N/A
RECOMMENDATION
AB 1095
February
29,
2016
Public Hearing
Receive a presentation by Eric Johnson
of
Revenue and Cost Specialists, LLC on the draft cost
of
services study and provide direction .
SUMMARY
The City currently charges fees for a variety
of
services performed by departments, such as business
registration, tree removal permits, the replacement
of
library cards, design review, and parking permits.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
2/345
associated cost. The cost
o
service for five service groups (Community Building and Planning, Public
Works, Public Safety, Community Activity and Library Services and Administrative Services) was then
matched with the current amount
o
revenue to determine whether a tax subsidy existed . Based upon
this analysis, Council may consider policy options pertaining to each service center such as : (1)
reducing costs o service and any tax subsidy by reducing the level of service
or
restructuring the way
the service is delivered; (2) adjusting or instituting a fee or charge to recover all of the reasonably
borne cost ; or (3) eliminating the tax subsidy to another less deserving service to utilize the taxes to
provide a service.
In addition to identifying the cost of services and any tax subsidy that may exist, the draft study also
provides service revenue recommendations. If the recommendations are fully implemented, then
additional revenues will be available to the City. These potential revenues would be
in
the form of a fee
increase and would replace any tax monies currently making up the difference between fees collected
and the cost o services. As a result, there would be greater taxpayer equity and opportunities to
redirect tax monies to services that can only be funded from taxes.
After Council approved the agreement with RCS, departmental staff and the consultant worked in
earnest to identify services and their associated costs and develop the draft report . The presentation o
the draft report allows Council the opportunity to entertain another workshop i needed and also
consider a master fee schedule and resolution as part
o
a regular Council meeting before the adoption
o the Fiscal Year 2016-17 budget in June 2016.
PRIOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
As part o the adoption o the fiscal year 2015-16 budget, Council provided direction regarding
undertaking a comprehensive review of citywide fees . Council approved the agreement with RCS for
the fee study for a not to exceed cost of $24,750 on August
4
2015 via Resolution 2015-057.
ATTACHMENTS
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
3/345
DRAFT
Cost of Services Study
for the
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
JANUARY 2!"
#re$ared by%
Reve&ue ' Cost S$ecialists ))C
ATTACHMENT - 1
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
4/345
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
5/345
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1
CHAPTER I .....................................................................................................................................3
BACKGROUND OF STUDY .........................................................................................................3
More Definii!e Po"i#$ M%&in' ...........................................................................................3
Fin%n#in' A()*+,en+ Per+*%n o Pro-o+iion ...............................................................De+ir%/i"i$ of Dire# Re"%ion+0i- /eeen P%$,en %n( Ser!i#e .....................................
I,-%# of Pro-o+iion+ 2 132 42 %n( 15 ...........................................................................6Te7 To-i#+ ..........................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER II ....................................................................................................................................8
IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICE CENTERS................................................................8
I(enif$in' Ser!i#e Cener+..................................................................................................8
Re+*"%n Ser!i#e Cener+ ....................................................................................................5
Con+i*ion%" B%+i+ for Co+ of Ser!i#e+ ............................................................................5T$-e+ of Co++......................................................................................................................9
S#0e(*"e 1 : Infr%+r*#*re Re-"%#e,en Co++ .....................................................1
F*""$ A""o#%e( Ho*r"$ R%e+ ............................................................................................1
CHAPTER III ................................................................................................................................13
OVERVIE; OF SERVICE REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS ................................13A##o*nin' for A"" Re!en*e+.............................................................................................13
S#0e(*"e : S*,,%r$ of Fee Ser!i#e+ %n( C*rren Fin%n#in' ............................1
T%7 Re!en*e+ .....................................................................................................................19
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
6/345
Table of Contents (cont.)
Co,,*ni$ De!e"o-,en Ser!i#e+ ...................................................................................8P*/"i# ;or&+ Ser!i#e+ .......................................................................................................3<
P*/"i# S%fe$ Ser!i#e+........................................................................................................31
Co,,*ni$ A#i!i$ > ?i/r%r$ Ser!i#e+ ...........................................................................3A(,ini+r%i!e Ser!i#e+ .....................................................................................................33
S*,,%r$ of Per+on%" C0oi#e Ser!i#e+ ..............................................................................3
A M%+er Fee Re+o"*ion ...................................................................................................3Po"i#$ Re'%r(in' @Ne Ser!i#e+ .....................................................................................36
Con#"*+ion .........................................................................................................................36
CHAPTER V .................................................................................................................................38
CONC?USION ..............................................................................................................................38E"i,in%ion of S*/+i(ie+ ....................................................................................................38
I++*e+ In!o"!e(...................................................................................................................38
A((re++in' of I++*e+ /$ Ci$ Co*n#i" ................................................................................38
Con#"*+ion .........................................................................................................................35
APPENDIX A : SUMMARY OF CURRENT FEES AND PROPOSED FEES
APPENDIX B : REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY ;ORKSHEETS MATCHED ;ITH
COST DETAI? ;ORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C : TAX SUPPORTED SERVICES COST DETAI? SHEETS
APPENDIX D BUI?DING > SAFETY FEE DETAI?
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
7/345
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Propositions 13, 4 & 218, have significantly changed California local government finance.
In the effort to provide core services, Cities find themselves in a diminishing tax revene
environment re!iring them to prioriti"e resorce otlays and explore operational
efficiencies. #his report !antifies $st ho% tax dollars are allocated and applied to assistfiscal planning.
• #his stdy has identified potential additional fee revene of '8(,)2* as reslt of
recommended ne% fee implementation and ad$stments to existing fees. In doing so this
stdy has proposed pdated fees for the most crrently availa+le costs inclded in the
-2*1'2*1( +dget. #hese are smmari"ed on Appendix A.
• )'*,*** in tax proceeds are +eing tili"ed to spport Personal Choice services that might
other%ise +e spported %ith associated fees. #his stdy has identified these s+sidy areas,
information that is presented in this exective smmary for consideration in the annal fee
setting process.
• #he City incrs an o+ligation to maintain and replace its crrent infrastrctre. #his /eporthas identified sch costs on a total replacement cost +asis, %ith reslting annaldepreciation amonts totaling almost 4.' million.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
8/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
9/345
CHAPTER I
BACKGROUND OF STUDY
0y acceptance of the /evene & Cost pecialists /C proposal, the City Concil decided tos+$ect the Citys operations to a detailed analysis to%ard see5ing alternate and more e!ita+le
%ays to finance its services. #his /eport presents the analytical advantages %hich are availa+leto the City throgh the instittion of a comprehensive system designed +y /C to implement6rticle 7III0 of the California Constittion.
Moe De!ini"i#e Po$i%& M'(in)
0ased on data presented in this /eport, the City Concil can respond to the limits on taxrevenes availa+le to the City, the constant demand for higher and more operational services andcapital improvements. e to demands made of the City, it is essential that the Concil and Citymanagement have complete information upon %hich to chart a ftre financial corse that %ill preserve the !ality of life %hich its citi"ens have come to expect.
ystematic and ocmented 6pproach. #his analysis, among other things, %as designed to provide the City %ith a systematic and docmented approach to 5no%, control, and to recaptrethe costs %hich are forced on it +y normal service demands, gro%th and general economic
inflation. #he reslt shold +e a +etter level of service provided to the longtime +sinesses andresidents of the City, as opposed to the n%itting deterioration of City services %hich cold +eexpected in the a+sence of this type of financial planning.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
10/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
inancial Integrity ;sta+lished. #his text smmari"es the %or5 accomplished and presentsrecommendations. #hese recommendations, if implemented, %old firmly esta+lish the financialintegrity of the analy"ed City services and %old esta+lish a contining cost control systemfollo%ing the +siness principles %hich are generally esposed for government, +t sallyignored in application.
Fin'n%in) Ad*+,"-en", P+,+'n" "o Popo,i"ion
Proposition 4, %hich is more commonly referred to as the :o+ Initiative:, %as adopted +y ?4.3@ of the voters, of California on Aovem+er (, 1)?). It +ecame effective on >ly 1, 1)8*, retroactive to iscal -ear 1)?81)?). tattes clarifyingcertain provisions of the Proposition, %hich is no% 6rticle 7III0 of the California Constittion, +ecame effective >anary 1, 1)81.
#his /eport provides data to the City for revie%ing the reported feefinanced services +ased onfllcosting information and for implementing the :costs reasona+ly +orne: provision of thisConstittional 6rticle, %ithin presently 5no%n legal parameters and the 6thors prononced and p+lished intent.
6d$stments to inancing. 6s a reslt of this analysis, the City no% possesses, at least in part,the +asis for ma5ing necessary ad$stments to its methods of financing services for those servicesreported on herein. It can achieve a more e!ita+le and fair mix for financing those services andcapital needs, as +et%een taxes and service charges, in the direction pointed +y passage of
6rticle 7III0, and the +siness methodologies inherent in that 6rticle.
It shold +e remem+ered from the start that taxes are no% limited and controlled, and thereforethe capa+ility of sing these taxes to s+sidi"e :special: services %hich are %holly or partially
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
11/345
Chapter I – Background of Study
6t the same time, the City can in great part reesta+lish +asic fairness and e!ity +et%een sers
of City services and those %ho pay for them, and control those costs on a contining +asis. #hisalso assres taxpayers that their tax monies are +eing spent properly.
I-p'%" o! Popo,i"ion, 2 342 562 'nd 537
Initiative 4 of Aovem+er 1)?), copled %ith its immediate predecessor the famos Proposition
13 of a year earlier %roght the greatest changes in California governmental financing in acentry. Proposition 218, passed in 1))( and +ecoming 6rticles 7IIIC & , frther limited localgovernmentsB revene sorce options. #hose propositions have had, and %ill contine to have, a profond effect on California governments.
;ffects on the City. ne effect of these propositions has +een a constant search for ne% revenesorces to finance services re!ired +y the City. Do%ever, at the same time, tate and ederal program revenes contine to decrease. Conse!ently, the City faces the prospect of providingsteadily decreasing levels of service.
Costs ;xceeding /evenes. #he fll costs of delivering the Citys defined feefinanced services as defined in +siness terms +y the athors of 6rticle 7III0, and as applied +y the +sinessmethods of this analysis as +ased on that Constittional 6rticle are rnning at an annal rate%ell +eyond crrent or expected fee revenes. #he reslt is the diversion of tax monies to ma5ep the difference +et%een fee revenes collected and fll +siness costs incrred.
Eariety of ;!ita+le /evene orces. #his analysis presents a %ide variety of %ays in %hichrevene can srely and legally +e raised and, pro+a+ly as important, more e!ita+ly raised thanat present #he amont of ne% revenes to +e raised is of corse dependent pon the Concils
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
12/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
Tex" Topi%,
#he remaining Chapters of this text address the follo%ing topicsG
II. Identifying and Costing ervice Centers
III. vervie% of ervice /evenes 9atched 6gainst Costs
IE. ervice /evene /ecommendations
E. Conclsion
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
13/345
CHAPTER II
IDENTIFYING AND COSTING SERVICE CENTERS
#here are three +asic steps in the process sed +y /C. #he first step is to identify the services. Aext, the service costs are calclated. 6nd finally, the revene crrently received is matched to
the cost of providing the service to determine the s+sidy from taxes. #his chapter covers thefirst t%o steps and Chapter III sho%s the matchp of revenes and costs.
Iden"i!&in) Se#i%e Cen"e,
#%o techni!es %ere tili"ed to identify the service centers for %hich revene and cost data%ere gathered and arond %hich the service cost analysis of this /eport is +ilt.
/evene 6nalysis
#he first techni!e involved gathering revene information for the past fiscal year, and thenpdating and revising the +dget estimates for the same revene sorces for the fiscal yeardring %hich the analysis %as performed +y /C.
0dgets and inancial /eports Hsed. #he 0dget for the crrent fiscal year %as secred andanaly"ed. 0dgeted and received revenes for all feespported services %ere extracted from
those reports, %here sch information %as availa+le.
ivision of /evene orces. /C has divided services into far smaller :service centers: than
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
14/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
Re,+$"'n" Se#i%e Cen"e,
:ervice Center: efined. #he :service revene: fee or charge for a service and the related:service cost: comprise a :service center:. ;ach service center has a ni!e :/evene and Costmmary For5sheet: and a matching :Cost etail For5sheet, %hich are fond in 6ppendix 0of this /eport. #hese :ervice Center For5sheets: are matched to one another on facing pages.
etailed 0ac5Hp For5papers. #he costs are +ac5ed p +y detailed analyses, %hich have +een
trned over to the City in several volmes of %or5 papers and detailed cost distri+tion reports.
Con,"i"+"ion'$ B',i, !o Co," o! Se#i%e,
#he costs determined +y /C for the varios service centers are +ased on the definitions ofJcosts reasona+ly +orne as tili"ed in 6rticle 7III0 Proposition 4 and as frther defined +y its6thors in their +ac5grond docments. #he 6thors of Proposition 4 intended their fll +siness costing definitions to +e sed +y California governments. #hs, the City can 5no% and
control its costs, sing those Constittionallyset +siness principles and legally set elements anddefinitions of Jcosts reasona+ly +orne.
=isting of etailed ll 0siness Cost efinitions. #hs the follo%ing are pt for%ard +y the6thors as the accepted elements of :costs reasona+ly +orne:G
1. =a+or costs.
2. ;mployee +enefit costs.
3. perational services and spply expenses.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
15/345
Chapter II – Identifying and Costing Service Centers
6thors 0ac5grond. It is not srprising that the 6thors sed sch +siness definitions andelements of :cost: as !oted herein. #hey represented several 5no%n +siness organi"ationsG
• #he California #axpayers 6ssociation
• #he California Cham+er of Commerce
• #he Aational #ax =imitation Committee
• #he California 6ssociation of /ealtors
In effect, the pillars of California +siness and their thin5ing %ere represented. 6nd their ideas%ere adopted over%helmingly +y the electorate of California at referendm. #hs, +y definition,the premises of this /eport process have a California electoral mandate.
Principle Involved. 6 +asic principle involved in this /eport %as the recognition of those fll +siness costs as sed and as defined +y the 6thors of the Constittional amendment, A# $st1 those costs %hich the City might recogni"e and decide to +dgetK or 2 %hich it might decide
to se in some other cost analysis methodologyK or 3 that other $risdictions not so complyingmight seK or 4 that some acconting or conslting firm might decide it shold se, +ased onsome external, nonCalifornia legal or external technical re!irement.
T&pe, o! Co,",
#he follo%ing costs, identified a+ove as part of :costs reasona+ly +orne: +y the 6thors ofProposition 4, ma5e p the cost detail fond on the righthand page in 6ppendix 0 for each
service center.
alaries and Fages
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
16/345
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
17/345
Chapter II – Identifying and Costing Service Centers
identified in a department or division.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
18/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
chedle 1 +elo% identifies these infrastrctre fixed assets and their total replacement cost as%ell as the annal replacement cost, or depreciation cost.chedle 1
TOTAL ANNUAL
REPLACEMENT ASSET REPLACEMENT
COST LIFE COST
STREETS $95,040,000 30 $3,168,000
CURB, GUTTER, & S/W $9,504,000 30 $316,800STREET TREES $2,025,000 50 $40,500
PAR TREES $450,000 50 $9,000
PE!ESTRIAN BRI!GES $225,000 30 $",500
SEAWALL STRUCTURES $36,000,000 50 $"20,000
STORM !RAINAGE S#STEM $10,348,800 50 $206,9"6
$153,592,800 $4,468,""6
F+$$& A$$o%'"ed Ho+$& R'"e,
6ll of the a+ove items ma5e p the flly allocated horly rate %hich is calclated for each position in the City. #he ma5ep of each component of the City%ide average flly allocatedhorly rate is detailed in the chart +elo%.
Fully Allocated Hourly Rate Components
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
19/345
CHAPTER III
OVERVIE8 OF SERVICE REVENUES MATCHED AGAINST COSTS
In the last chapter the method of calclating the costs for all City services %as identified. #hischapter +egins %ith a mmary that itemi"es the revenes and costs +y service center. #hen, anovervie% is presented of %hat %ill +e presented in the follo%ing chapter, %hich sho%s that there
is no one soltion to the CityBs financial challenge.
A%%o+n"in) !o A$$ Re#en+e,
6s an example in the follo%ing schedle, for #rac5 1 esign /evie%Mtdy 9inor **1, thecrrent fees for this service, amonting to 12,3)), are matched %ith the fll costs of providingthis service, %hich are 31,?'2. #his leaves a tax revene, or s+sidy, of 1),3'3 necessary tocover the fll cost of the service. #his s+sidy can +e eliminated +y raising the relevant fees. #o
the extent that the fees are A# increased, the difference is paid for +y general City taxes paid +y all taxpayers.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
20/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
SC!ED"#E 2
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF FEE SERICES A!" CURRE!T FI!A!CI!#
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$# &ESO"&CES "SED
SE&'(CE $O )(**CE SE&'(CE
&E) + SE&'(CE COS$ )EES $,ES
-1 -2 -3 -4 -/
COMMU!ITY )LA!!I!# * BUIL"I!# SERICESS001 $&C 1 DES(* &E'(ES$"D5 6(*O& 7318/2 7128399 71983/3
S002 $&C 1 DES(* &E'(ES$"D5 6:O& 72/893 7138; 71280;
S003 $& 1 DES(* &E'S$"D5 &E) $O
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
21/345
Chapter III – Overview of Service Revenues atched !gainst Costs
SC!ED"#E 2
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF FEE SERICES A!" CURRE!T FI!A!CI!#
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$# &ESO"&CES "SED
SE&'(CE $O )(**CE SE&'(CE
&E) + SE&'(CE COS$ )EES $,ES
-1 -2 -3 -4 -/S031 6E*DED )(*# 6< * * *
S032 CE&$()(C$E O) CO6
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
22/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
SC!ED"#E 2
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF FEE SERICES A!" CURRE!T FI!A!CI!#
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$# &ESO"&CES "SED
SE&'(CE $O )(**CE SE&'(CE
&E) + SE&'(CE COS$ )EES $,ES
-1 -2 -3 -4 -/
)UBLIC +OR,S SERICES S00 #*DSC
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
23/345
Chapter III – Overview of Service Revenues atched !gainst Costs
SC!ED"#E 2
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF FEE SERICES A!" CURRE!T FI!A!CI!#
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$# &ESO"&CES "SED
SE&'(CE $O )(**CE SE&'(CE&E) + SE&'(CE COS$ )EES $,ES
-1 -2 -3 -4 -/
S0; *(6# $&*S
S092 BEC! S
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
24/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
SC!ED"#E 2
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA SUMMARY OF FEE SERICES A!" CURRE!T FI!A!CI!#
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$# &ESO"&CES "SED
SE&'(CE $O )(**CE SE&'(CE
&E) + SE&'(CE COS$ )EES $,ES
-1 -2 -3 -4 -/
A"MI!ISTRATIE SERICES
S10 *E B"S(*ESS &E(S$&$(O*
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
25/345
Chapter III – Overview of Service Revenues atched !gainst Costs
T'x Re#en+e,
#he revenes that %ere not directly associated %ith a personal choice service are itemi"ed onchedle 3 +elo%.
SC!ED"#E 3
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF TA REE!UESFISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
26/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
T'x Se#i%e,
n a simplified level of discssion tax services might +e defined as any activity the City providesthat the p+lic has paid taxes for. -et, the analysis is more complex than it appears. ther definitionssggest that tax services are derived from a social contract, generally sed +y all, related to +enefitservices received, and not al%ays easily measred.
#a5ing a pragmatic vie% of tax services, they can +e nderstood to +e anything that a City Concildecides to spport +y taxes given the availa+ility of commensrate levels of revene. #his +eingconsidered, there is no one tre classification of tax services, only services that policy ma5ers havedecided to +e tax spported. In other %ords, determining $st %hat a tax service is entails J+ac5inginto those services that can +e fnded once availa+le and alloca+le amonts of tax revenes aredetermined.
#his ma5es more sense %hen one considers the alternate models that exist in charging for sometraditional tax services as exemplified +elo%G
ire erviceG ome fire athorities in rral areas directly contract %ith property o%ners in providingfire sppression services. #his follo%s a perhosehold priced s+scription +ased model that contrasts%ith the tax+ased model that typifies local government models.
Par5 ervicesG pen space is generally considered free for se yet, once facility improvements are setinto place, a degree of charging the +enefitting ser may +e set into place. ch an improvementcold +e as +asic as providing resce services to the %ee5end or offhors hi5erMclim+er.
#he a+ove noted examples in no %ay sggest that the City charge for the a+ove mentioned services +t only illstrate that policy decisions, sometimes inflenced +y past practice or ha+it, define theextent to %hich services, or at least a certain service level, is spported %ith taxes.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
27/345
Chapter III – Overview of Service Revenues atched !gainst Costs
6s the voter initiative most concerned %ith fee services, the initiative athors of Proposition 4 %erenot concerned %ith %hat categories of services %ere +eing s+sidi"ed as long as s+sidy levels set +y
policy %ere explicit decisions made +y the athori"ing +ody %ith 5no%ledge of fll cost information.
#he follo%ing chedle 4 smmari"es, and 6ppendix C details, the #ax pported ervices.
SC!ED"#E 4
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF TA SU))ORTE" SERICES
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
28/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
SC!ED"#E 4
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
SUMMARY OF TA SU))ORTE" SERICES
FISCAL YEAR $%&'-$%&(
$O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
29/345
Chapter III – Overview of Service Revenues atched !gainst Costs
annal financial reports, the costs are reported on an historical +asis and not a replacement +asis.
0t the financial pictre is mch different %ith the Infrastrctre /eplacement costs removedG
TOTAL REENUES %SEE ABOE' $18,"84,225
TOTAL SERICE COSTS %SEE ABOE' $22,298,612
LESS INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACE COSTS %$4,468,""9'
TOTAL E(PEN!ITURES $1",829,830
TOTAL REENUES IN E(CESS OF COSTS $954,392
#he +dget pictre no% loo5s mch +etter. Ao% there is a srpls of almost 1 million.Hnfortnately, the City still has to fnd its Capital Improvement Program, %hich can re!ire theCity to se nd 0alances to +e a+le to meet crrent capital expenses over 1 million. 0t nd 0alances
only last for so long and the City can still +e left %ith a crm+ling infrastrctre.
Insfficient #axes. It can +e seen from the a+ove analysis and from comparing the total taxes
necessary in chedle 4, %ith the #ax /evenes in chedle 3, that the fll cost of City services isin excess of the total revenes availa+le to the City. #he reason for this excess is that the /C fll, +sinessli5e, cost of services incldes the fixed asset replacement costs from chedle 1 of ChapterII. #hese replacement costs are real expenses +t not al%ays real annal expenditres. In other
%ords, the assets lose vale each year creating an expense +t this cost is often deferred ntil theasset mst +e replaced +y spending cash expenditre of cash.
Po$i%& Re#ie1 In!o-'"ion
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
30/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
Re,+$" o! A%%ep"'n%e o! Fee S+))e,"ion,
If the sggestions in the follo%ing Chapter and on the ervice Center For5sheets are adopted in fllthen a significant amont of added revenes %ill +e availa+le to the City, %hich %old providetaxpayer e!ity. 9ost of these ne% revenes %ill +e from fee increases to replace tax monies sed toma5e p the difference +et%een fees collected and costs incrred in providing the services, %hich%ill then +e availa+le for those services %hich can only +e fnded from taxes.
#hese tax :diversions: are the no%docmented tax s+sidies to potentially selfspporting Cityservices. #hs additional monies cold +e made availa+le for police services, infrastrctremaintenance, and other City services %hich are not generally condcive to service charges, there+yachieving mch closer e!ity +et%een +enefits and associated payments.
Policy
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
31/345
CHAPTER IV
SERVICE REVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS
#he prpose of this Chapter is to present the services %hich /C has initially la+eled as PersonalChoice and to sggest the magnitde of tax revenes that cold +e diverted from these servicesto Commnity pported ervices.
City Concil has inal >dgment. It mst +e nderstood that considera+le $dgmental+eitexperienced%as exercised +y /C in sggesting %hat services %ere Personal Choice asopposed to Commnity pported ervices and in sggesting that most Personal Choice ervicesshold +e paid for +y the service re!estor rather than s+sidi"ed +y the entire commnity.Do%ever, the final decision on the natre of the service and %hether it deserves to +e s+sidi"ed%ill have to +e made +y the City Concil.
Se#i%e Go+p,
/C has organi"ed Personal Choice ervices into the follo%ing five service grops for prposesof discssionG
Commnity Planning & 0ilding ervices
P+lic For5s ervices
P+lic afety ervicesCommnity 6ctivity & =i+rary ervices
6dministrative ervices
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
32/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
Gene'$ Co--en"'& on C0'p"e T'/$e,
;ach ta+le has eight colmns, explained hereG
Colmn 1 is the /eport /eference Am+er.
Colmn 2 is the title of the service.
Colmn 3, 4 & ' are the same amonts for revene, cost and profit s+sidy fond on the left page of the detail service sheets in 6ppendix 0.
Colmn ( is the crrent percentage of costs recovered from the ser fees and charges %ith thedifference +eing s+sidi"ed +y taxes.
Colmn ? is the percentage of ser fee cost recovery %hich might +e o+taina+le %ithot taxs+sidy. f corse, decisions regarding tax s+sidies to a service are a City Concil policy
decision on ho% to allocate its tax and general revenes.
Colmn 8 contains the estimated amont of revenes %hich /C sggests cold +e raised orredced.
S+))e,"ion, Fo Se#i%e, An'$&9ed
It is sggested that the City Concil revie% each of the services in this Chapter for the follo%ingreasonsG
• #o confirm or negate the decision that the ser ice is a Personal Choice er ice
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
33/345
Chapter I" – Service Revenue Recommendations
De#e$op-en" Se#i%e,
Fhen +asic City development services are spported +y general taxes, there is little reason fortaxes to also finance those Personal Choice services %hich mainly +enefit a developer or specific property o%ner. #hs, the expenses distri+ted across these service centers are primarily theincremental additional expenses cased +y commnity development. Fere no development tota5e place, most of these costs cold +e eliminated, or at least significantly redced.
T'/$e 3Co--+ni"& P$'nnin) : B+i$din) Se#i%e,
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
34/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
T'/$e 3Co--+ni"& P$'nnin) : B+i$din) Se#i%e,
;Con"in+ed<
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
35/345
Chapter I" – Service Revenue Recommendations
Infre!ent ervices. #o avoid overstating possi+le ne% revene, some services are mar5ed %iththe pond sign N. #hese services have +een inclded to calclate the crrent cost +t there may +e no demand for some or all of these Jmar5ed services in any single fiscal year.
Con%$+,ion o! De#e$op-en" Se#i%e,
If the sggestions made in 6ppendix 6 are approved, approximately ''8,4** in ne% revene
cold +e reali"ed annally.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
36/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
P+/$i% 8o(, Se#i%e,
#hese service centers are identified for varios private services %hich occr in the p+lic rightof%ay.
T'/$e 5
P+/$i% 8o(, Se#i%e,
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
37/345
Chapter I" – Service Revenue Recommendations
P+/$i% S'!e"& Se#i%e,
#hese service centers are identified for those %ho se the City p+lic safety servicesdisproportionately from others.
T'/$e 4
P+/$i% S'!e"& Se#i%e,
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
38/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
Co--+ni"& A%"i#i"& : Li/'& Se#i%e,
#a+le 4 lists the services revie%ed nder the heading of Commnity 6ctivity & =i+rary ervices.
T'/$e
Co--+ni"& A%"i#i"& : Li/'& Se#i%e,
$O$# $O$# $O$#
ey to ym+olsGO 9ar5et ensitive
Conclsion of Commnity 6ctivity ervices #he City Concil shold loo5 at the costs of these
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
39/345
Chapter I" – Service Revenue Recommendations
Ad-ini,"'"i#e Se#i%e,
9iscellaneos administrative service centers fall into this grop.
T'/$e =
Ad-ini,"'"i#e Se#i%e,
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
40/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
S+--'& o! Pe,on'$ C0oi%e Se#i%e,
#he follo%ing #a+le ( smmari"es the recommendations and sggestions made in this Chapter.
T'/$e 6
S+--'&
$O$# $O$# $O$#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
41/345
Chapter I" – Service Revenue Recommendations
Po$i%& Re)'din) >Ne1? Se#i%e,
/C also recommends that the City Concil adopt a policy of not starting any ne% service %ithota cost analysis, sing the costing approach tili"ed in this /eport, so as to determine %ays in %hichthe service cold +e feefinanced, if at all possi+le. #his approach cold +e sed %hen consideringne% par5s or p+lic +ildings, improved police protection, or any other desired fnction or service.
Con%$+,ion
/C is availa+le to discss the process and reslts %ith the City Concil. In addition, %e can shareor experience of doing this for over t%o hndred cities as the City Concil determines %hataction to ta5e.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
42/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
43/345
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
E$i-in'"ion o! S+/,idie,
#his /eport highlights tax s+sidies and recommends that most +e eliminated as +eingnintentional. ervice sers ths can vote %ith their dollars and not se a service for %hich they aren%illing or na+le to pay. Didden s+sidies, %hich have existed for many of the CityBsspposedly selffinanced and selfspporting services, can no% +e reevalated.
I,,+e, In#o$#ed
#he +asic isse involved in vie%ing the reslts of the analysis presented +y this text is to %hat
degree fees shold +e expected to spport the costs of the services.
r vie%ed another %ay, to %hat extent shold general taxes +e tili"ed to s+sidi"e the difference +et%een the costs of each service center and the revene prodced from fees paid +y the ser of thatserviceQ
Pressre on #ax 9oney Hse. #he opposite side of this isse is the increasing pressre on the se of p+lic tax monies. #ax monies have severely decreased for local government in California. If fees
do not pay all costs, then taxes mst ma5e p the differences not paid for +y fees generated +y sersof specific services, or those services are threatened %ith extinction.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
44/345
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Cost of Services Study
pecific Policy 6lternatives to 0e 6ns%ered. nce the a+ove cost isses are determined then theCity Concil has for clear policy alternatives availa+le as to the reveneMcost mix of each servicecenterG
• Contine any tax s+sidy %hich might +e fond.
• ;liminate the tax s+sidy +y increasing fees to cover all :costs reasona+ly +orne:.
• /edce costs +y redcing the level of service.
• ecide on an appropriate level of tax s+sidy, +eing a%are that taxes are no% limited in
rate, +ase and, conse!ently, in amonts yielded and availa+le.
Con%$+,ion
#he City has appropriately responded to the mandate and spirit of Proposition 4. It is tili"ing the passage of Propositions 4, 13 and 218 and the attention given to them as an opportnity to revie%its financial strctre and philosophy, and to institte a +sinessli5e cost control system, tailored to
the Citys needs, to spplement its governmental acconting and +dgeting systems.
#he cooperation, excellent spport and data provided in accomplishment of the %or5 reportedherein spea5s %ell of the %ay in %hich a City organi"ation can adapt to the socalled :ne% realities:of California governmental finance.
END
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
45/345
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY
OF
CURRENT FEESAND
PROPOSED FEES
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
46/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-001 TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MINORREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$395 per application$154.99 per application
S-002 TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MA!ORREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$765 per application$408.15 per application
S-00" TR 1 DESIGN REV/STUDY - REF TO PCREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,095 per application in addition to the base Track 1 fee$206.66 per application in addition to the base Track 1 fee
S-00 TRACK 2 DESIGN REVIEW - MINORREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,065 per application$785.30 per application
S-005 TRACK 2 DESIGN REVIEW - MA!ORREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
47/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-00$ REASONABLE ACCOMODATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,680 per application$408.15 per application
S-00% VOLUMETRIC ANALYSISREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$120 per application pl's $1,500 deposit )ith char*es at thef'll( allocated ho'rl( rates pl's an( o'tside costs.
$1,500 deposit )ith act'al costs
S-00& USE PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,730 per application$785.30 per application
S-010 MINOR USE PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,510 per application$614.81 per application
S-011 USE PERMIT AMENDMENTREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
48/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-01" RESTRICTED USE TRANSFER RE'UESTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$795 per application$1,291.61 per application
S-01 WATER CREDIT TRANSFER RE'UESTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,730 per application$1,653.26 per application
S-015 VARIANCEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,750 per application$785.30 per application
S-016 VARIANCE AMENDMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This serice is no lon*er proided.$614.81 per application
S-01$ PRE-APPLICATIONREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
49/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-01& COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,140 per application$614.81 per application
S-020 SPECIFIC PLANREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( ratespl's o'tside costs.
/ct'al costs )ith a deposit of $2,893.31
S-021 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( ratespl's o'tside costs.
+one
S-022 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( rates
pl's o'tside costs.
/ct'al costs )ith a deposit of $2,893.21
S-02" SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENTREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
50/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-025 ANNE)ATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( ratespl's o'tside costs.
+one
S-026 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( ratespl's o'tside costs.
+one
S-02$ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW *IS/ND/EIR+REF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
10- of contract cost10- of contract cost
S-02% ENVIRONMENTAL NOTICE OF E)EMPTIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$250 per application pl's o'nt( fees+one
S-02& MITIGATION MONITORINGREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
51/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0"1 AMENDED FINAL MAPREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,000 deposit )ith char*es at the f'll( allocated ho'rl( ratespl's an( o'tside costs.
$614.81 per !ap
S-0"2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$645 per application$160.16 per application
S-0"" LOT LINE AD!USTMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,680 per application$785.30 per application
S-0" LOT MERGERREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$515 per application$785.30 per application
S-0"5 PRELIM HISTORIC EVALUATION - STAFFREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
52/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0"$ HISTORIC DETERMIN,/APPEAL TO HRBREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,340 per applicationistorian #eie) " /ct'al costs )ith a $1,000 deposit
$304.82 per applicationistorian #eie) " /ct'al costs )ith a $1,000 deposit
S-0"% MILLS ACT CONTRACT PROCESSINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2,425 per application$304.82 per application
S-0"& PC CODE DETERMINATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$820 per application$206.66 per application
S-00 (ONING COMPLIANCE DETERMINATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$575 per application$139.49 per application
S-01 TIME E)TENSION - STAFFREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
53/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0" PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUANCEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$760 per contin'ance$309.99 per contin'ance
S-0 APPEALREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,275 per appeal
/ppeal in the oastal one " +o har*e b( tate la)
$304.82 per appeal
/ppeal in the oastal one " +o har*e b( tate la)
S-05 SIGN APPLICATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$280 per application$154.99 per application
S-06 SIGN REFERRAL TO PCREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$755 per applicationin*le i*n referral to " $200 per application in addition tothe base si*n application fee'ltiple i*ns " $354.99 per application
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
54/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0& DEMOLITION - PC REVIEWREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
This serice is no lon*er proided as a separate fee, as it is partof the esi*n #eie)esi*n t'd( fees.
$232.49 per application
S-050 MOVED BUILDINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$1,715 per application+one
S-051 LARGE HOME DAY CAREREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$670 per application+one
S-052 GENERAL PLAN UPDATEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
3.5- of all 'ildin* afet( per!its.+one
S-05" PLANNING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCEREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
55/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-055 BUILDING SINGLE TRADE PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
56/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-061 NEW BENCH LOCATIONREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$955 per application pl's the act'al cost of the bench andpla?'e pl's 20- for f't're !aintenance%pl's $995 if a p'blic hearin* in re?'ired.
$154.99 per application pl's $750 per benchpl's $361.65 if a p'blic hearin* in re?'ired.
S-062 ADOPTION OF E)ISTING BENCHREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$335 per application pl's the act'al cost of the bench andpla?'e pl's 20- for f't're !aintenance%pl's $470 if a p'blic hearin* in re?'ired.
$361.65 per application pl's $750 per bench
S-06" REPLACEMENT OF BENCH PLA'UEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$335 per application pl's the act'al cost of the pla?'epl's $470 if a p'blic hearin* in re?'ired.
$120 per pla?'e
S-06 CURB/GUTTER ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$335 per per!it$95.35 per per!it
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
57/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-06$ RIGHT-OF-WAY E)CAVATION PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
atch 'p to 100 s?'are feet " $335 per per!it>ther " $335 per per!it pl's $3.55 per linear foot oer 25 linearfeet
treet 'tatch>penin* " $95.35 per per!itAtilit( @:caation " $95.35 per per!it pl's $1 per linear foot
S-06% STREET DUMPSTER/STORAGE POD PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$135 per per!it pl's $40 per da( if in the o!!ercial istrict'!pster in the o!!ercial istrict " $31 per da(tora*e od in the o!!ercial istrict " $31 per )eek#esidentail /reas " +o =ee
S-06& TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
rane>ersiBed ;ehicle " $335 per per!it>ther " $140 per per!it
Te!porar( #eal @state i*n " $38.14
S-0$0 PERMANENT ENCROACHMENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
+e) " $865 per per!it+e) " $317.82 /nn'al #ene)al " $47.33
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
58/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0$" PRIVATE TREE FALL IN PUBLIC R-O-WREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
har*e the f'll( allocated ho'rl( rate for all personnel inoledpl's an( o'tside costs
/ct'al costs
S-0$ DAMAGE TO CITY PROPERTYREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
har*e the f'll( allocated ho'rl( rate for all personnel inoledpl's an( o'tside costs.
/ct'al osts
S-0$5 LOUD PARTY PUBLIC DISTURBANCE RESP,REF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
st #esponse " +o har*e2nd #esponse the sa!e da( " $165 per response3rd #esponse )ithin a calendar (ear " $495 per response
+one
S-0$6 POLICE FALSE ALARM RESPONSEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
=irst 2 /ctiations in a calendar (ear " +o har*e3rd /ctiation " $854th /ctiation " $1705th and 'bse?'ent /ctiations " $255
1st /ctiiation " $41.332nd /ctiation " $62.003rd /ctiation " $82.66
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
59/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0$& MISDEMEANOR BOOKINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
+on"ar!el bookin*s " $125 per bookin*+one
S-0%0 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$150 per application pl's >& fees+one
S-0%1 FINGERPRINTING ON RE'UESTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$30 pl's o'tside a*enc( feesCiescan#ollin* " $18.60tate >& fees " $33.07= fees " $17.57hild /b'se entral nde: fee " $15.50
S-0%2 CLEARANCE FORM TRAVEL LETTERREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$45 per letter $48.56 per application
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
60/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0%5 ANIMAL IMPOUNDREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
61/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0&1 POLICE PHOTOGRAPH COPYREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
photo " $5 per photodi*ital " $5 per disk
3 : 5 color pict're " $5.17 per pict'redi*ital " $15.50 per disk
S-0&2 BEACH SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
rocessin* " $685 per rental#ental " $400 per rental pl's $200 ref'ndable da!a*e deposit
rocessin* " $155 per rental#ental " $400 per rental pl's $200 ref'ndable da!a*e deposit
S-0&" PARK SPECIAL EVENT PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
rocessin* " $685 per rental /lcohol " $170#oad los'reD / #eie) " $710 it( o'ncil #eie) " $225
ark #ental eendorf and =orest ill, b't not icadill(%D =irst 4 ho'rs " $400 /fter 4 ho'rs " $300 per ho'r #ef'ndable a!a*e eposit " $350
rocessin* " $155 per rentaleendorf ark #entalD =irst 4 ho'rs " $401 /fter 4 ho'rs " $300 per ho'r #ef'ndable a!a*e eposit " $351
S-0& PRIVATE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT IN ROWREF # TITLE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
62/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-0&6 FILM PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$405 per per!it$266 per per!it
S-0&$ CAR WEEK EVENT PLANNING/SERVICESREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
The it( sho'ld recoer all costs related to these eents.onco'rs on the /en'e pa(s !ini!al fee and receies fee)aiers.ebble each To'r E@le*ance pa(s for staffin*, block clos'refees, park rental fees, and parkin* stall rentals.
S-0&% FOREST THEATERREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
ain ta*eD erfor!ance " $500 per da(
#ehearsal " $250 per da(
o)nstairs ta*eD $100 per da(
$25 per da( for technical )ork, constr'ction, load ino't, orrehearsals )ith no ad!ission fee char*ed.
erfor!ance dates " a !ini!'! of $25 per da( for eachperfor!ance of 10- of *ross receipts, )hicheer is *reater.
S-0&& FACILITY RENTALREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
63/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-101 LIBRARY CARD REPLACEMENTREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$3 per card$2 per card
S-102 INTERLIBRARY LOAN PROCESSINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per ite!$3 per ite!
S-10" OVERDUE MATERIAL PROCESSINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$0.50 per da(e#eaders " $1 per da(>ther ite!s " $0.25 per da(
S-10 LOST/DAMAGED MATERIALS PROCESSINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
ooks, ;s, a'dio books, s, cassettes, ; " $15 pl'sact'al costa*aBines " $5
ooks, ;s, a'dio books, s, cassettes, ; " $10 pl'sact'al costa*aBines " $5e#eader " $125e#eader carr(in* case " $35
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
64/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-10$ NEW BUSINESS REGISTRATION PROCESSREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
=i:ed Cocation " $350 per applicationn /bo't " $20 per applicationo!e Cicense " $120 per application
=i:ed Cocation " $388.50 per applicationn /bo't " $52.65 per applicationo!e Cicense " $156 per application
S-10% BUSINESS REGISTER RENEWAL PROCESSREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$10 per rene)al$52.65 per rene)al
S-10& DUPLICATE BUSINESS LICENSEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$5 per license+one
S-110 CHANGE BUSINESS NAMEREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$15 per b'siness+one
S CO S C O G#
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
65/345
CITY OF CARMEL BY THE SEA
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
66/345
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
FEE COMPARISON REPORT
S-11& NOTARY PUBLICREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
+o han*e$10 per si*nat're fee is set b( the tate%
S-120 LOCAL INITIATIVE PROCESSINGREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$200 per initiatie
=ee is ref'ndable to the filer, if )ithin one (ear of filin* the noticeof intent, the elections official certifies the s'fficienc( of thepetition.
This fee is li!ited b( the tate Ca) " @lections ode ection
9202b%
+one
S-121 HIGH HEEL PERMITREF # TITLE
CURRENT FEE RECOMMENDED FEE
$2 per per!it+one
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
67/345
APPENDIX B
REVENUE AND COST
SUMMARY WORKSHEETS
Matched With
COST DETAIL WORKSHEETS
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
68/345
S-001TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MINOR
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a Track !inor desi"n review or desi"n stud# $# staff for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards&suc% as landscapin"& fences& decks& or windows'
()*'++ per application
$154.99
#Y 015-016
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $1)399
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
69/345
SERVICE
TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MINOR S-001
80
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 0#$$ %21#1& '0 %1,()1
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#0' %15#)( '0 %1,2//
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 2#/5 %$$$#)$ '0 %2(,/1&
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ '0 %2,0/0
!"1#$52 !"%6.%0 ".&1TYE SUBTOTAL
!"1#$52 ".&1TOTALS !"%6.%0
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
70/345
S-00TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MA+OR
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a Track !aor desi"n review or desi"n stud# $# staff for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards&suc% as !inor co!!ercial facade re!odels or additions to residential $uildin"s'
(*.0') per application
$40".15
#Y 015 016
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $13)"**
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
71/345
SERVICE
TRACK 1 DESIGN REVIEW/STUDY - MA'OR S-002
"&
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 0#$$ %21#1& $& %/1)
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#50 %))#/& $& %$,$)1
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 5#0' %(1(#'( $& %20,)/$
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ $& %''0
!25#%6" !$6".61 6.16TYE SUBTOTAL
!25#%6" 6.16TOTALS !$6".62
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
72/345
S-003TR 1 DESIGN REV/STUDY - RE# TO 'C
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a Track desi"n review or desi"n stud# to t%e Plannin" Co!!ission'
(-.2'22 per application in addition to t%e $ase Track fee
$06.*0
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $)06*
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
73/345
SERVICE
TR 1 DESIGN REV/STUDY - REF TO C S-00"
10
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#00 %(/ 10 %(&1
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 1#'$ %$(5#05 10 %$,(51
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 5#25 %($/#51 10 %(,$/5
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 10 %25)
!10#%25 !1#0%2.50 8.""TYE SUBTOTAL
!10#%25 8.""TOTALS !1#0%2.50
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
74/345
S-004TRACK DESIGN REVIEW - MINOR
APPLICATION Developer/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a Track - !inor desi"n review $# t%e Plannin" Co!!ission for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes andstandards& suc% as full co!!ercial facade re!odels or su$stantial c%an"es to site la#out'
(10)',. per application
$*"5.9
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $9)"41
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
75/345
SERVICE
TRACK 2 DESIGN REVIEW - MINOR S-00&
"8
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#5' %101#2$ $' %$,'&/
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 $' %1,'2(
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#$$ %&(/) $' %1/,((2
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 10#'$ %1,$15#0) $' %&),)/$
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ $' %)'$
!".T3PA"43+.AC CIT !".T." 0#50 %10/#)1 $' %&,101
!$8#"%2 !2#062.%& 16.2&TYE SUBTOTAL
!$8#"%2 16.2&TOTALS !2#062.%5
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
76/345
S-005TRACK DESIGN REVIEW - MA+OR
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a Track - !aor desi"n review $# t%e Plannin" Co!!ission for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes andstandards& suc% as a new co!!ercial or residential $uildin"& su$stantial addition to e3istin" $uildin"& or secondfloor additions'
Co!!ercial 4 (&1.*'+, per applicationResidential 5R46 4 (&)-*'. per application
$1)614.50
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISONUNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $41)9**
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
77/345
SERVICE
TRACK 2 DESIGN REVIEW - MA'OR S-005
26
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" $#&2 %21)#12 2( %5,()/
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 2( %1,2&)
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" /5 %)&/#5$ 2( %2&,($(
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 2&2 %2,)(5#$2 2( %//,0)'
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 2( %(/$
!".T3PA"43+.AC CIT !".T." 1#50 %$2$#/$ 2( %',&1/
!11$#$$0 !4%.62 "5.0%TYE SUBTOTAL
!11$#$$0 "5.0%TOTALS !4%.62
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
78/345
S-006'REIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Prior to a Track - application& a site and tree review to deter!ine t%e feasi$ilit# of t%e proect wit%in Cit# plannin"standards'
(,,)'0- per application
$335."1
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISONUNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $1)49
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
79/345
SERVICE
RELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT S-006
6&
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 0#1/ %10#') (& %()/
PLANNING AT3A!C PLANN." $#(/ %$((#($ (& %2$,&(&
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#0' %15#)( (& %1,021
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 0#5' %/0#&$ (& %&,50'
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ (& %1,(5(
!".T3PA"43+.AC CIT !".T." 1#50 %$2$#/$ (& %20,/1)
!52#065 !81".51 6.25TYE SUBTOTAL
!52#065 6.25TOTALS !81".52
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
80/345
S-00*REASONAE ACCOMODATION
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a proposed proect to deter!ine c%an"es for co!pliance wit% accessi$ilit# standards'
(*.0') per application
$40".5
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISONUNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $1)633
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
81/345
SERVICE
REASONABLE ACCOMODATION S-00$
&
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#5' %101#2$ & %&05
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#(/ %5$2#(1 & %2,1$0
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." '#&2 %1,022#&& & %&,0)0
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ & %10$
!6#$2% !1#682.15 12.%2TYE SUBTOTAL
!6#$2% 12.%2TOTALS !1#682.25
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
82/345
S-00"VOUMETRIC ANAYSIS
PRO78CT Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of t%e total volu!e of a proposed proect to deter!ine its co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(&).. deposit wit% actual costs
$0.00
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
83/345
SERVICE
VOLUMETRIC ANALYSIS S-008
&5
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." Pls Actal Costs 1#00 %121#&$ &5 %5,&(&
!5#&6& !121.&" 1.00TYE SUBTOTAL
!5#&6& 1.00TOTALS !121.&2
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
84/345
S-009USE 'ERMIT
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a use per!it for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(10)',. per application
$*"5.3
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $14)91
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
85/345
SERVICE
USE ERMIT S-00%
1%
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#)2 %12$#01 1) %2,$$/
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 1) %)1$
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#)2 %5'2#&' 1) %11,0(/
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 1(#0' %1,)52#5) 1) %$/,0))
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1) %&)2
!51#%08 !2#$"2.00 21.%2TYE SUBTOTAL
!51#%08 21.%2TOTALS !2#$"2.00
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
86/345
S-010MINOR USE 'ERMIT
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a !inor use per!it for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(2*'0 per application
$615.00
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $615
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
87/345
SERVICE
MINOR USE ERMIT S-010
1
REFERENCE NO.
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#)2 %12$#01 1 %12$
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 1 %&'
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#(/ %5$2#(1 1 %5$$
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 1(/ %1,/'1#$' 1 %1,/'1
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1 %2(
!2#511 !2#510.%2 20.26TYE SUBTOTAL
!2#511 20.26TOTALS !2#511.00
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
88/345
S-011USE 'ERMIT AMENDMENT
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of an a!end!ent to an approved use per!it for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(2*'0 per application
$615.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $615
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
89/345
SERVICE
USE ERMIT AMENDMENT S-011
1
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#)2 %12$#01 1 %12$
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 1 %&'
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#(/ %5$2#(1 1 %5$$
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 1(/ %1,/'1#$' 1 %1,/'1
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1 %2(
!2#511 !2#510.%2 20.26TYE SUBTOTAL
!2#511 20.26TOTALS !2#511.00
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
90/345
S-01TEM'ORARY USE 'ERMIT
APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING
Review of ate!porar# use for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards& suc% as a parkin" lot sale or %olida# lot'
None
$0.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
91/345
TEMORARY USE ERMIT S-012
1
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#/5 %1&)#(1 1 %150
!150 !1&%.61 0.$5TYE SUBTOTAL
!150 0.$5TOTALS !150.00
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
92/345
S-013RESTRICTED USE TRANS#ER RE,UEST
APPLICATION BusinessPLANNING
Review of a re9uest for a transfer of a restricted use 5suc% as a ewelr# license or %otel/!otel/B:B unit6 forco!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(&-+'2 per application
$1)9.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $1)9
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
93/345
RESTRICTED USE TRANSFER RE(UEST S-01"
1
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 0#&2 %2(#)1 1 %2/
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#0' %15#)( 1 %1(
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." (#00 %/2'#5' 1 %/2)
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1 %2(
!$%$ !$%$."2 6.$5TYE SUBTOTAL
!$%$ 6.$5TOTALS !$%$.00
S 014WATER CREDIT TRANS#ER RE,UEST
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
94/345
S-014WATER CREDIT TRANS#ER RE,UEST
APPLICATION Developer/ResidentPLANNING
Review of a proposed water credit transfer $# t%e Cit# Council for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(&2),'-2 per application
$1)653.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $1)653
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
95/345
WATER CREDIT TRANSFER RE(UEST S-01&
1
TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#)2 %12$#01 1 %12$
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 1 %&'
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 2#)2 %5'2#&' 1 %5'2
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 1(#0' %1,)52#5) 1 %1,)5$
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1 %2(
!2#$"2 !2#$"2.00 21.%2TYE SUBTOTAL
!2#$"2 21.%2TOTALS !2#$"2.00
S-015VARIANCE
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
96/345
S-015VARIANCE
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a proposed variance fro! t%e ;onin" code for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(10)',. per application
$*"5.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $*"5
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
VARIANCE S 015
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
97/345
VARIANCE S-015
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#)2 %12$#01 1 %12$
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 1 %&'
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" $#1/ %($2#$5 1 %($2
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." /#5' %)20#&& 1 %)20
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 1 %2(
!1#$50 !1#$&%.$2 1".6$TYE SUBTOTAL
!1#$50 1".6$TOTALS !1#$50.00
S-016VARIANCE AMENDMENT
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
98/345
S 016VARIANCE AMENDMENT
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of an a!end!ent to an approved variance for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
(2*'0 per application
$0.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
VARIANCE AMENDMENT S 016
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
99/345
VARIANCE AMENDMENT S-016
0TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
0#00 %0#00 0 %0
!0 !0.00 0.00TYE SUBTOTAL
!0 0.00TOTALS !0.00
S-01*'RE-A''ICATION
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
100/345
R8T Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a proposed proect in t%e preli!inar# sta"e $# staff at t%e re9uest of t%e applicant'
(11* per application
$**4.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $**4
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
RE-ALICATION S-01$
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
101/345
RE ALICATION S 01$
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 0#1/ %10#') 1 %11
PLANNING AT3A!C PLANN." 5#)2 %5)1#&1 1 %5)1
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 0#/5 %1&)#(1 1 %150
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 0#0' %)#/1 1 %10
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#1/ %1/#5) 1 %1'
PU+LIC 6!"4 P6 UP."INT.ND.NT 2#00 %&15#)& 1 %&1(
!".T3PA"43+.AC CIT !".T." 2#00 %&$1#(& 1 %&$2
!1#62$ !1#626.$% 11.0%TYE SUBTOTAL
!1#62$ 11.0%TOTALS !1#62$.00
S-01"CONCE'TUA REVIEW
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
102/345
APPLICATION Developer/Resident/BusinessPLANNING
Review of a proposed proect in t%e conceptual sta"e $# t%e Plannin" Co!!ission or Cit# Council at t%e re9uest oft%e applicant'
(,). per application
$350.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $350
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
CONCETUAL REVIEW S-018
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
103/345
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#(/ %10/#00 1 %10/
PLANNING AT3A!C PLANN." $#$$ %$$2#(/ 1 %$$$
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 1#5' %$15#1' 1 %$15
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 0#5' %/0#&$ 1 %/0
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#1/ %1/#5) 1 %1'
PU+LIC 6!"4 P6 UP."INT.ND.NT 0#50 %10$#)) 1 %10&
!".T3PA"43+.AC CIT !".T." 1#00 %215#'2 1 %21(
!1#16" !1#162.68 8.8"TYE SUBTOTAL
!1#16" 8.8"TOTALS !1#16".00
S-019COASTA DEVEO'MENT 'ERMIT
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
104/345
APPLICATION Business/Co!!' GroupPLANNING
Review of an event in t%e Coastal @one'
(2*'0 per application
$614."0
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $3)0*4
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
COASTAL DEVELOMENT ERMIT S-01%
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
105/345
5TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" 1#00 %(/ 5 %$20
PLANNING ADIN C!!"DINAT!" Pblic Noticing 0#/5 %&'#05 5 %2&0
PLANNING PLAN * +LDG -C DI".CT!" 1#'$ %$(5#05 5 %1,'25
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." 5#25 %($/#51 5 %$,1''
+UILDING P."IT T.C 0#25 %25#'/ 5 %12)
!5#$0" !1#1&0.55 %.08TYE SUBTOTAL
!5#$0" %.08TOTALS !1#1&0.60
S-00S'ECI#IC 'AN
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
106/345
APPLICATION Developer PLANNING
Review of a developer initiated specific plan for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
Actual costs wit% a deposit of (-&0+,',
$0.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SECIFIC LAN S-020
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
107/345
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." De7osit 0#00 %0#00 1 %0
!0 !0.00 0.00TYE SUBTOTAL
!0 0.00TOTALS !0.00
S-01S'ECI#IC 'AN AMENDMENT
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
108/345
APPLICATION Developer PLANNING
Review of a developer initiated specific plan a!end!ent for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
None
$0.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
SECIFIC LAN AMENDMENT S-021
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
109/345
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." De7osit 0#00 %0#00 1 %0
!0 !0.00 0.00TYE SUBTOTAL
!0 0.00TOTALS !0.00
S-0GENERA 'AN AMENDMENT
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
110/345
APPLICATION Developer PLANNING
Review of a developer initiated "eneral plan a!end!ent for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standards'
Actual costs wit% a deposit of (-&0+,'-
$0.00
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
DESCRI'TION O# SERVICE
CURRENT #EE STRUCTURE
REVENUE AND COST COM'ARISON
UNIT REVENUE TOTA REVENUE $0
CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA
FY 2015-2016
COST DETAIL WORKSHEET
SERVICE
GENERAL LAN AMENDMENT S-022
REFERENCE NO.
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
111/345
1TOTAL UNITSNOTE
Unit Costs are an Average of Total Units
DEARTMENT OSITION TYE UNIT TIME UNIT COST ANN. UNITS TOTAL COST
PLANNING .NI!" PLANN." De7osit 0#00 %0#00 1 %0
!0 !0.00 0.00TYE SUBTOTAL
!0 0.00TOTALS !0.00
S-03S'&ERE O# IN#UENCE AMENDMENT
CITY O# CARME-Y-T&E-SEA
#Y 015-016
REVENUE AND COST SUMMARY WORKS&EET
SERVICE RE#ERENCE NO.
'RIMARY DE'ARTMENT UNIT O# SERVICE SERVICE RECI'IENT
-
8/20/2019 Workshop Cost of Services Study 02-29-16
112/345
APPLICATION Developer PLANNING
Review of a developer initiated spe%ere of influence a!end!ent for co!pliance wit% Cit# codes and standar