Yun-Pi Yuan 1
Sociolinguistics
I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social function
II. Why should linguistics study?
III. The difficulty of defining what language is
IV. Social functions of speech
V. Telephone conversation
VI. Compliments
Yun-Pi Yuan 2
I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social
function (1) Lang. cannot be studied separately from its social/speech context. 9 Sentences:
1. Should I make some tea?2. Would you like some tea?3. Can I make you a cup of tea?4. Let’s have a cup of tea.5. How about a nice cup of tea?6. I could make you a cup of tea.7. Do you drink tea?8. Have some tea.9. There’s tea in the pot. What are these sentences doing? When, and with whom, would each one be appropriate? From these examples, would you say that linguistic form and social
function are unrelated? Should we study them separately? Interaction between Pycholinguistics and Sociolinguistics
Yun-Pi Yuan 3
I . Inter-relationships between linguistic form and social function (2) Mandarin examples:
您, 你,敝人 府上,舍下 令郎,小犬
Geographical origin Phonological variant
Northern Taiwanese vs. southern Taiwanese Examples of Taiwanese spoken in I-lan
Yun-Pi Yuan 4
II. What should linguistics study?
Grammar only: (the structure/form of language) to discover the rules of language x and thus universal
rules Problems:
Speech is social behavior and has many social functions
What is language X? what’s the language x?
people who language spoken Speak language x by people x
who are people x? What is a native speaker?
Social functions/factors: Speech is a form of social behavior; language must be
related to and interact with society.
Yun-Pi Yuan 5
III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (1)
Mutual intelligibility ≠ the same language. Scandinavia 76%
Norwegian Swedish 87% Number= %of informants who
18% claimed to understand their
72% 42% neighbors’ language fairly
23% easily on 1st encounter
Danish Dutch and German Romance languages (Spanish, Portuguese, French, Italian, etc.)
Potato joke Spanish vs. Italian
4. Hindi and Urdu
Yun-Pi Yuan 6
III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (2)
Same language ≠ mutual intelligibility (ex1)one language (ex2) one original languag
e dialect dialect dialect different languages
ex1: one language (mutual intelligibility? same nation? same language?)
Chinese (Taiwanese, Cantonese, Shanghai, Shandung, Mandarin, etc.) ex2:
the Romance situation (sharing a common writing system, culture, history; next to each other geographically)
Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, etc.
Germanic languages: Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, etc.
Yun-Pi Yuan 7
III. The difficulty of defining what “one language” is (3)
How to define native speakers?Northwest Amazon: 20 different tribes, each with a different languages All are exogamous, so a man’s wife must speak a d
ifferent language Marriage is patrilocal, and a wife must speak the hu
sband’s language to their children Most people here are multilingual
* Conclusion; to define a language, we have many factors (social, cultural, political, linguistic, etc.)
Yun-Pi Yuan 8
IV. Social functions of speech
Communication: Communicative pressures can influence the forms/rules of language. Quick & easy contractions Rhetorically expressive more complex
forms Identification:
of other people of ourselves
Yun-Pi Yuan 9
Identification of Other People geographic/natural/ethnic
social class
people education
professional group: occupation
role (at any time)
Role -teacher Role (students)
(myself) –professor -student
-wife -big sister
-daughter -younger person
-little sister: to older sister -responsible adult
-elder sister -girlfriend
-sister-in-law -tutor
-friend
* Each of these roles may have “sub roles,” too.
Yun-Pi Yuan 10
Identification of Self
groups you belong to
education
Self occupation
geographic
role at any one time
Yun-Pi Yuan 11
V. Telephone conversation (1)
Telephone openings basic structure of conversation: ab, ab, ab Problem 1: how can we get the conversation go
ing? How do we get into the structure? (Schegloff’s study)
Basic structure of telephone openings: summons- answer sequences
Summons Answer Question Answer (raise topic) A structure of obligations and rights between two people
Yun-Pi Yuan 12
V. Telephone conversation (2) Adjacency Pair (coordinated pair):
Definition: Many acts require replies of specific kinds and put the hearer under a conversational obligation to provide them.
Examples: summons-answer; Q-A; greeting-greeting; offer-acceptance/refusal; thanks-acknowledgement; apology-acceptance (refusal)
Why does the answerer always speak first instead of the caller (since he doesn’t know to whom he’s speaking and he’s not the one who wants to initiate a conversation)?
Yun-Pi Yuan 13
V. Telephone conversation (3) Viewing the ring as a nonlinguistic realization
of a caller’s summoning act solves the problem. Phone ring = summons of caller answer of answerer
A case of an utterance realizing more than one act.
Another general rule: “those who initiate conversations have the right to raise the topic, and answerer has the obligation to listen.”
A conversational social relationship
Yun-Pi Yuan 14
V. Telephone conversation (4)
Identification on telephone Problem 2: how to achieve mutual recognition? “Preferred method of identification involves the mi
nimum use of recognitional resources.” “oversuppose and undertell”
Two identification problems (on telephone): Caller identifies Answerer Answerer identifies Caller
TA T1 T2 T3 ring Hello? Tom? Yeah, Bill *summons *answer+ voice *ID of other+ (question) voice clue to self
Yun-Pi Yuan 15
V. Telephone conversation (5)
e.g.1 Ring summons answerer T1: Hello? answer/question (ID resource + oblige caller to ID)
caller T2: Hi greeting (claim of ID; an answer to the Q)
answer T3: Hi greeting (claim of ID + complete greeting)
e.g.2 Ring summons answerer: 1Hello? answer/question (provide ID resource
caller: 2 Hello, Jenny. greeting/claim of ID/oblige--resource
(pause) failure by A to recognize C
This is Paul. provide more resource
answerer: 3 Oh, hello, Paul. greeting/claim of ID
Yun-Pi Yuan 16
V. Telephone conversation (6)e.g.3 Answerer: T1 Hello?
Caller: T2 Connie?
Answerer: T3 Yeah, John.
e.g.4 Variation
A: T1 Hello?
C: T2 Connie?
A: T3 Oh, hi. How are you?
Yun-Pi Yuan 17
Language vs. Society
There is a social structure to language. What is said and how it is said is determined
socially. An utterance is a complex of actions.
Yun-Pi Yuan 18
VI. Compliments—giving compliments (I)
Giving compliments: Status and age Sex (gender)
Women to women most frequent
Women to men (descending frequency)
Men to women least frequent
Men to men
Yun-Pi Yuan 19
VI. Compliments—giving compliments (II) Syntactic patterns
Three major patterns NP be/look (intensifier) ADJ “You look really nice.”
ADJ includes: nice, good, beautiful, pretty, great, wonderful, lovely
I (intensifier) like/ love NP “I really like that skirt.” VERB includes: like, love. enjoy, admire, be impressed by
PRO be (intensifier) (a) ADJ NP “That’s really a nice coat.” Formulaic Language: a very limited subset of English sen
tence structure and vocabulary is used to give compliments.
Yun-Pi Yuan 20
VI. Compliments—giving compliments (III)
Topics Appearance
clothes, hair Ability (skill)/performance
a well-done job, a skillfully played game, a good meal
Personality/friendship “That was kind.”
Possessions “I live your new bike.”
Yun-Pi Yuan 21
VI. Compliments—responding (I)
Responding to compliments What compliments do?
Two types of action Supportive action: an offer, congratulations, a gift
“That’s a good idea.”
to be taken as TURE. Assessment: saying something which is supposed
“That’s really a nice coat.” Three social norms (rules)
Accept supportive action Accept truth of assessment Avoid self-praise
Yun-Pi Yuan 22
VI. Compliments—responding (II)
Some conventional, formulaic responses Thank you, 哪裡,哪裡 Other types of solutions:
accept by agreeing A: Your dress is very nice.
B: Yeah, this is my favorite dress. reject by disagreeing (indirect/implicit rejection) A: You did a great job cleaning the house.
B: Well, I guess you haven’t seen the kid’s room.
other “in-between” responses Scale down (agree with reservations) Transfer Return to the speaker
Yun-Pi Yuan 23
Examples of Other in-between Responses
Scale Down:A: She’s a real fox. B: Yeah, she’s a pretty woman. A: You brought—like a ton of things.B: Just a few little things.A: This is a really good paper.B: Yeah, there are still a few parts that need work, though.
Transfer:A: That’s a nice sweater. B: Do you like it? My mother brought it for me.
Return to the Speaker:A: That’s a nice sweater. B: Yours is new, too, isn’t it? That color really suits you.
Yun-Pi Yuan 24
Reasons for giving compliments
If compliments are so hard to respond to why give them? Solidarity (another norm: Speaker should express solida
rity with hearer, and raise the hearer’s status when possible.)
Encouragement Expression of gratitude Compliment preceding and thus softening a c
riticism
Yun-Pi Yuan 25
Language and Gender Different norms for the conversational styles of women an
d men: Women: focus on “connection” (solidarity), so
“intimacy” is the key Men: focus on “status” ( so “independence,” the key)
Conclusion: Women: “Rapport talk” (“trouble talk”)—recount their trouble, an
d expect sympathy, understanding affirmation, but not a solution. Men: “Report talk” (“solution talk”)—exhibiting knowledge and s
kill, holding center stage thus storytelling, joking, or imparting information.
Cause asymmetrical situation, result in some arguments. (You Just Don’t Understand by D. Tannen, 1986.)