dr. israr ahmed preached that the quran is not the real

Upload: rana-mazhar

Post on 09-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That the Quran Is Not the Real

    1/3

    Moujoda Quran Asli Nahin: Dr. Israr Ahmad

    Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That the Quran Is Not the Real

    Compi led by: Rana Ammar Mazhar

  • 8/7/2019 Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That the Quran Is Not the Real

    2/3

  • 8/7/2019 Dr. Israr Ahmed Preached That the Quran Is Not the Real

    3/3

    kalaam

    08-10-2010, 03:36 AM

    Karachi (representative of Zarb-e-Haq): Internationally famed, renowned scholar Dr. Israr Ahmed; thefounder of organizations like Khudam al Quran, Tanzeem-e-Islami and Tehreek-e-Khilafat has preached tothe public in public gatherings, writings and video cassettes that the Quran we have in our possession is not

    the real one rather it is a copy. The real Quran is written on Loh-e-Mehfooz which is free from all mistakeswhilst the Quran possessed by the Ummah has mistakes in it. Whilst providing a commentary of the versesdealing with the protection of the Quran Dr. Israr asserted that the promise is not about the Quran possessed

    by the Ummah, rather it is about the Quran of Loh-e-Mehfooz. Surely We have revealed the Reminder andWe will most surely be its guardian do not refer to the copy of Allahs book that is in our hands rather theseverses were revealed for the verses written on Loh-e-Mehfooz. Allah also says "None touches save the

    purified ones" this verse likewise does not refer to the copy of the Quran we possess, that is the Usmaniscripture that is unprotected and can be touched by impure and pure people.

    Zarb-e-Haqs Commentary: . the intellectual commentaries of the Ulema exist in their academic and non

    academic books. Whilst one can also deem such commentaries as incorrect, it remains an unequivocal factthat none of these scholars of commentary ever had doubts over the authenticity of the Quran. This Quranicverses are deemed sufficient enough about the protection of the present Quran. Qazi Abdul Kareem Kalachikept strking his head on account of the statement of Maulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri about Tahreef of wordsin the Quran in his Faiz al Baari. Had Maulana Anwar Shah Kashmiri like Dr. Israr spoken these words in

    public gatherings or common gatherings of scholars then he would have been excommunicated from Islamand would have been forced for repent

    Monthly Zarb-e-Haq, for the month of May 2005 (Madressa Mehmoodia, Jain Road, Gazdarabad, RanchodLine Karachi) ( https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0523/5b04c38dbb54e/5b04c39135dbe.jpg)

    We would like to ask the mullhas why they are merely targeting Dr. Israr Ahmed? It is not like he woke upin the morning and inexplicably uttered those words. His theory is based on the various Sunni traditions thatimply that mistakes are present in the present Quran. If Deobandi logic suggests that Dr. Israr should bedeemed an infidel then what about those scholars that he relied upon to shape his theory?

    When Zarbe Haq doesn't know the reality about what Anwar Shah kashmiri really said, how can you trust itin case of Israr Ahmad? So it is to be rejected too. Find some other evidence

    http://haqforum.com/vb/archive/index.php/t-12190.html

    http://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/tahreef/zarbehaq.jpghttp://haqforum.com/vb/archive/index.php/t-12190.htmlhttp://www.answering-ansar.org/answers/tahreef/zarbehaq.jpghttp://haqforum.com/vb/archive/index.php/t-12190.html