dr. ralph ellis click to edit master title style click to edit master subtitle style 1 dispute...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master subtitle style
1
Dispute Review Board Value Contributions
Ralph Ellis, P.E., Ph.D.
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Potential Benefits
• Direct saving in dispute resolution cost
• Direct savings in improved project performance
• Indirect value gained from DRB hearings
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Savings in Dispute Resolution Cost
• Litigation cost is high– Legal expenses– Key personnel time– Loss of attention to your business
• The outcome is uncertain
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Improved Project Performance
• Projects with DRBs on average perform better than projects without DRBs
• Lower cost growth
• Lower time growth
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Analysis of FDOT Projects
• In 1994 FDOT began introducing DRBs
• From 2000 to 2002 we have both non-DRB and DRB projects
• This provides a rare opportunity to compare project performance
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Performance MeasuresTime Cost Growth = Final Contract Amount - Original Contract Amount
Original Contract Amount
Time Growth = Final Contract Time - Original Contract Time
Original Contract Time
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Project Cost Growth on FDOT Projects
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
1999 2000 2001 2002*
Year of Completion
Per
cen
tag
e o
f G
row
th
Traditional Projects
DRB Projects
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Time Growth on FDOT Projects
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
1999 2000 2001 2002*
Year of Completion
Per
cen
tag
e o
f G
row
th
Traditional Projects
DRB Projects
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Cost Growth on FDOT Projects
5.00%
6.00%
7.00%
8.00%
9.00%
10.00%
11.00%
12.00%
13.00%
1999 2000 2001 2002*Year of Completion
Per
cen
tag
e o
f G
row
th
Traditional Projects
DRB Projects
Regional DRBsFormed
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Time Growth on FDOT Projects
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
1999 2000 2001 2002*Year of Completion
Per
cen
tag
e o
f G
row
th
Traditional Projects
DRB Projects
Regional DRBsFormed
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Findings
DRBs resulted in:
2.7% Net Cost Growth Savings
15.1% Net Time Growth Savings
Dr. Ralph Ellis
In Today’s Work Program
2.7% x $3 Billion = ?
15.1% x 60,000 days = 9000 days9000 x $4,000 per day = ?
DRBs result in significant direct savings.
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Differing SiteConditions
Pay Items andQuantities
General Contract Interpretation
Other Issues
DesignErrors
Rework
24%
27%
21%
14%
7%6%
DRB Hearing Disputes by Category 1996 - 2006
Dr. Ralph Ellis
27%Differing Site Conditions
• Utility Conflicts
• Different Subsurface Conditions
• Different Project Environment
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Differing Site ConditionExisting Gravity Walls
• Plans do not show existing gravity wall and do not call for removal
• Walls are mostly underground, from the road they appeared to be a thickened sidewalk edge
• Contractor did not notice the walls during the pre-bid site visit
• Contractor request compensation for removing the walls
Dr. Ralph Ellis
EOR :
We generally we don’t call out items to be
removed such as curb, sidewalks, etc. The intent
is to have the contractor perform a site visit before
submitting a bid as required by the specifications.
Specification 2-4
Examine the contract documents and the site of
the proposed work carefully before submitting a
proposal for the work contemplated.
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Differing Site ConditionsEnvironmental Issues
• Noise ordinances and permitting
• No night work ordinances
• Security procedures
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Contract Interpretation DisputeTime Extensions
• Design-Build contract with A+B bid and I/D provisions
• Contractor believes that weather time extensions are applicable to Liquidated Damages and Disincentives
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Rework
• We have had several substantial disputes involving replacement of concrete structures due to cracking
• These are serious issues because of the time and cost
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Lessons to Be Learned
DRB hearing issues are indicators of areas that may need management attention. Owners can use this information to improve the design and construction process.
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Find the Shortest Path from A to B
A
B
Forget Engineering. Try Art History or Journalism
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Find the Shortest Path from A to B
A
B
Not a Construction Engineer Great Potential in Structural Engineering
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Find the Shortest Path from A to B
A
B
Definitely Construction Engineering. Great Potential as Owner’s Project Engineer
Dr. Ralph Ellis
Find the Shortest Path from A to B
A
B
Definitely Construction Engineering. Great Potential as a Contractor