dr. russell williamsrussellw/teaching_files/3250 lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · essay proposal due...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Unit Four: Historical Materialism & IPE Dr. Russell Williams
![Page 2: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!!! Required Reading:
Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:
Robert W. Cox, “Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order,” Review of International Studies, 25 (1999), pp. 3-28.
Outline: 1. Introduction & Key Concepts 2. Marxist Economics 3. Historical Structuralism and IPE 4. Modern Approaches 5. Conclusions
![Page 3: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1) Introduction & Key Concepts
a) Same origins as liberal approaches – focus on economic relations under capitalism and globalization “Possibilities of cooperation” (liberalism)
replaced with “structural imperatives” of capitalism E.g. Class Conflict
b) Interested in issues “discursively excluded” by Liberalism and Realism
E.g. Exploitation and Inequality
![Page 4: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
c) Key Concepts (derived from Marx):
“Mode of Production”: Basic system of production Impacts all other social relations
“Relations of Production”: Society’s laws, politics, culture and ideology The “social superstructure”
Determined by mode of production (?)
Importance of history: Specific historical & geographical settings have
different modes/relations of production
![Page 5: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Class: Each mode of production organizes individuals
into classes A )Those who own and control the means of
production; and b) Those who sell their labour
Class Struggle Struggle between these classes “drives” history
![Page 6: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2) Marxist Economics:
a) Labor the basis of all value . . . Total direct & indirect labor in production
determines “true price” of product
b) Profits based on “surplus value” . . . Capitalism always exploitative
c) Increases in profit only achieved by increasing extraction of surplus value
d) Capitalism was dynamic – would spread
![Page 7: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2) Marxist Economics cont. . . .
Key analytical claim - Capitalism based on fundamental “tensions”: 1) Economic concentration: Competitive markets produced
“concentration” E.g. monopolies
2) “Falling rate of profit”: As the ratio of indirect labour (machinery) grew in relation to direct labour, there would be a steady decline in the rate of profit.
3) Growing exploitation of workers: Produced “crisis of under-consumption” Recessions and unemployment
Bottom Line: Capitalism prone towards crises and collapse
![Page 8: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3) Historical Structuralism and IPE:
Problem: If capitalism should collapse, why does it survive and flourish?
a) Theory of Monopoly Capitalism: When capitalism became “monopolistic”, corporations
could force the state to support their activities. Prevent collapse of system
Required more consideration of the role of the state . . .
![Page 9: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Problem: If capitalism should collapse, why does it survive and flourish?
b) State-Capital relations . . . . Two theories:
“Instrumental Marxism”: State run by, or run in the direct interest of, capitalists. State must be captured by proletariat
“Structural Marxism”: State serves interests of capitalists over the long term. Has relative autonomy in the short term. E.g. Post war “class compromise”
Overcame problem of under-consumption
Either way . . . State protects capitalism
![Page 10: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Problem: If capitalism should collapse, why does it survive and flourish?
c) “Lenin’s Theory of Imperialism”:
Argued: Monopoly Capitalism led to imperialism –
overcome domestic falling rate of profit . . . . Lead to “New Imperialism”, nationalism and WAR
Implications: Capitalism must be violently overthrown –
imperialism and conflict, inevitable, and good for capitalism
Impact on non-colonial societies . . . ?
![Page 11: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
4) Modern Approaches: a) “Dependency Theory”:
(Gunder-Frank and Cardosso and Faletto) Popular in Latin America and Canada
Sources: 1) Marxists: Argued MNC’s from north prevented development in
south for “super-exploitation” 2) Latin American Structuralism (Prebisch): Argued free trade didn’t
work for South Problem of “Declining Terms of Trade”
Claims: Developing nations exploited by powerful capitalist states Capitalism uneven: “core and periphery” = underdevelopment
South dominated by “Comprador Classes”
![Page 12: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“Dependency Theory” implications: Radicals recommended socialist revolutions =
Breakout of global capitalism!
Moderates recommended “economic nationalism” – autonomy “Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)”: Tariffs to
protect development of local industries Situation could be changed . . .
Problems? Unclear concepts - economic nationalism vs. Marxism Importance of state power? Empirical problems – Success of East Asian “NIC’s”
thought to disprove theory Dependencistas do not accept this!
![Page 13: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4) Modern Approaches: b) “World Systems Theory”: (Wallerstein)
Derived from “Dependency Theory” but focuses on geographic exploitation of capitalism
Argues: Single world capitalist system – power comes from position in
system States organized hierarchically (Core, semi-periphery and
periphery) Logic of Marxist exploitation applied to states
E.g. Periphery are exploited for their surplus value
Problems: Vague, not widely applied Marxists criticize lack of class analysis IR scholars criticize under-theorization of state power
![Page 14: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
4) Modern Approaches: c) Regulation Theory: (Lipietz – “regulation school”)
Very “Structural Marxist” approach to IPE
Argues: States create different “regimes of accumulation” to
adapt to changing “labour process” After WWII= “Fordism” and “Taylorism”
Required Keynesianism Since 1980s= “Post-fordism”
Profit squeeze requires Neo-liberalism
Political struggle not as important as needs of capitalism However, problem of “economism”/“economic-determinism”
![Page 15: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
4) Modern Approaches: c) Regulation Theory: (Lipietz – “regulation school”)
Very “Structural Marxist” approach to IPE
Argues: States create different “regimes of accumulation” to
adapt to changing “labour process” After WWII= “Fordism” and “Taylorism”
Required Keynesianism Since 1980s= “Post-fordism”
Profit squeeze requires Neo-liberalism
Political struggle not as important as needs of capitalism However, problem of “economism”/“economic-determinism”
![Page 16: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
4) Modern Approaches: d) “Gramscian” or “Neo-Gramscian” Theory:
(Gramsci, Cox, Gill and others . . .) Global politics understood through a Neo-Marxist class
analysis Rejects economism of Regulation Theory
Concepts: a) Interrelationship of “material capabilities”, “institutions”
and “ideas” – all impact class struggle
b) “Hegemony”: Seen as class domination - economic and ideological domination of elite class
c) “Organic Intellectuals”: Ideological organizers of class politics
![Page 17: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Further Reading: Dependency Theory:
Joseph L. Love, "The Origins of Dependency Analysis," Journal of Latin American Studies, 22 (February, 1990), pp. 143-68.
World Systems Theory: Christopher Chase-Dunn and Peter Grimes, “World-Systems
Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology, 21 (1995), pp. 387-417.
Regulation Theory: Michael Dunford, “Globalization and Theories of Regulation,” in
Ronen Palan, ed., Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 143-167.
Gramscian Methods: Robert W. Cox, “Gramsci, Hegemony and International
Relations: An Essay in Method,” Millennium, 12-2 (1983), pp. 162-175.
![Page 18: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions: Strengths?
Focus on concepts ignored by realism and liberalism (Exploitation and inequality)
Central emphasis on capitalism and globalization
Weaknesses? Lack of “prescription” – What is to be done? (E.g.
Regulation Theory) Confusing concepts, not widely applied Role of state power often obscured
Is this a problem?
![Page 19: Dr. Russell Williamsrussellw/Teaching_files/3250 Lecture... · 2010. 9. 13. · Essay Proposal due in class, October 8!!!!! Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5. Class Discussion Reading:](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022071419/61173970fda9ae5c85646c00/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
For Next Time: Unit Five: Contemporary Approaches -
Feminism and Constructivism (October 15 & 20)
Required Reading: Cohn, Ch. 5.
Class Discussion Readings: Penny Griffin, “Refashioning IPE: What and how
gender analysis teaches international (global) political economy,” Review of International Political Economy, Oct2007, Vol. 14 Issue 4, pp. 719-736.
Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons, “The Case for a Constructivist International Political Economy,” in Constructivist Political Economy (Unpublished manuscript)