dr. satyajit phadke, ces
TRANSCRIPT
Emerging Applications: Current Status and Future of Energy Storage
Technologies
Satyajit Phadke, PhDCustomized Energy Solutions (CES)
Application Technology Mapping
Space Applications Medical Devices
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Wearable Electronics
Space Applications
Satellite ApplicationsClass of Satellite
Height of Orbit (km)
Purpose Eclipseduration
(min)
Number of
Eclipses(per day)
Frequency of Eclipse (per year)
Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
200 - 2000 Earth observation (geological,environmental)
37 12 4200
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
20000 Navigation, Global Positioning System (GPS)
45 4 1500
Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO)
35786 Telecommunication, broadcasting and Weather forecasting
72 <1 90
GeostationaryOrbit
35786 Telecommunication, broadcasting and Weather forecasting
72 <1 90
• Satellites can be classified into 3
main categories based on their
altitude namely LEO, MEO and
GEO. The altitude at which the
satellite is located determines the
speed of the satellite and frequency
of revolution around the earth. The
higher the satellite lower is the
frequency.
• Geosynchronous satellites (GEO)
are located at a fixed altitude of
35786 km and have the same
rotation speed as the earth.
Geostationary satellites are a special
case of GEO which are located
above the equator and rotate along
with the earth.Sputnik, 1956: First satellite to be
launched into space contained Zinc –
silver primary batteries manufactured
by Clyde Space Technologies. No
charging equipment (such as solar
panels) was present on the satellite
and its batteries ran out of charge
after 21 days of operation. Silver –
zinc batteries have an energy density
of 117 Wh/kg.
All satellites are powered with solarpower and have continuous access tounobstructed sunlight (no clouds, dust orother interfering objects) except duringtimes of eclipse. An eclipse occurs whenthe satellite falls in the shadow of theearth.
Satellite Applications
30
28
21
43 11
Mass Distribution of a GEO Satellite Source: Spacecraft Design Lifetime, MIT, Cambridge 2002
Energy Power System PayloadStructure PropulsionThermal Dissipation Others
Energy Power System (EPS) is about 30% of
the total weight of the satellite. The EPS
weight is equally distributed the solar panels,
power control unit (PCU) and energy storage
(batteries). Overall the batteries form about
8-12% of the total weight of the satellite.
SatelliteType
Lifetime (years)
Cycles (over lifetime)
DOD (%)
Weight range (kg)
Power Requirement (kW)
LEO 7-10 35000 –45000
20-40 1-200 0.05-0.2
MEO 10-12 15000 40-60 500-800 2-5
GEO 15 1500 80 1000 – 6000 10-30
• LEO satellites can be classified into minisatellite (180-100 kg),
microsatellite (100-10 kg), nanosatellite (10-1 kg). The latest
design from NASA is the femtosatellite (< 1 kg) which imposes
very small payload requirements on the launch vehicle and is
designed for short term scientific measurements and
experiments
• All types of satellites are designed for a 7-15 year lifetime but
the storage requirements are entirely different. LEOs which
circle the earth 12-16 times a day go through an equal number
of eclipses in a day i.e. ~40K cycles during life .
• GEO satellites go through about 1500 eclipses in their entire
lifetime and duration of each is about 72 minutes. These are
usually much larger size and have higher power requirements.
• Due to the low cycle life requirements these systems can
generally operate at high DOD compared to LEOs and MEOs
Satellite Applications
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Small Medium Large
Ave
rage
Pay
load
per
Veh
icle
(kg
)
Pay
load
Pri
ce (
$/k
g)
Payload Price Per Unit Weight (kg)Source: Hosted Payload Guidebook, NASA Langley Research Center, Aug 2010
Payload Price Average Payload
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Ener
gy D
ensi
ty (
Wh
/L o
r W
h/k
g)
Energy Density of Various Technologies
Specific Energy (Wh/kg) Energy Density (Wh/L)
STATE OF THE ART SECONDARY BATTERY
Li-S Battery Technology
• Payload price is the amount expressed in $/kg for
any instrument that needs to be launched into space
from earth
• The price depends heavily on the size of the vehicle
being used for the actual launch and can range
anywhere between $2500-$8000/kg depending on
whether a small, medium or large vehicle is being
used.
• Any reduction in the weight of the installed batteries
frees up space for additional instruments,
transponders, scientific measurement devices, and
other crucial equipment and in turn increases the
revenues from individual launches.
Primary batteries
Within the secondary batteries LiS (1000 Wh/kg) has more
than twice the energy density of Li-ion batteries. Even in the
applications requiring primary batteries Li-S has the highest
energy density (compare with Primary batteries on the
graph). The payload price for satellite weight is
approximately is $2500-8000/kg. Thus any reduction in
battery weight has immense commercial value.
Satellite Applications -Focus Areas
• All types of satellites require batteries with a very high energy density as payload comes at a high premium. As a result the conventionally used battery technology has been completely replaced by Li-ion technology over the past decade.
• LiS which has about 4-5x the energy density of Li-ion has immense prospects for used on satellites and has the potential to completely replace existent technology
• Launch vehicles and interplanetary missions which require primary batteries are also good candidates for replaced by LiS technology because the energy density and specific energy is higher than any of the existing technology.
• Suggested Technological Testing:
DOD and Cycle life Relationship: Lower DOD leads to high cycle life. The relationship between the DOD and cycle life needs to be evaluated to guide the design parameters for the overall system.
Reliability: The reliability and temperature ability of the system will need to be verified to be able to function in a wide temperature range.
Self Discharge: For primary battery applications a low self discharge is important to obtain a long calendar life. The self discharge rate will need to be tested for this.
EnergyDensity
PowerDensity
Safety
Self Discharge
TemperatureCost
Cycle Life
Maturity ofTechnology
Efficiency
Space - Satellites
Space - Planet Missions
Medical Devices
MD - PacemakersBoston Scientific:
Modern pacemakers
have a total lifetime of 8-
12 years and are run by
primary Li-based battery
systems with a energy
rating of 2-4 Wh.
Dr Lillehei: In 1958 a
pacemaker was used for
the first time. It
employed NiCd batteries
which were
rechargeable and had a
tiny capacity of 0.23 Wh.
These needed to be
charged by the patient
on a regular basis.
• The main function of the pacemaker is to provide a pulse of
current every second which regulates the heart beat.
• The device is implanted in to the body of the patient with leads
into the heart. About 20 uJ of energy is required for every pulse
which at a rate of 60 min-1. This leads to an energy consumption
of 0.2 Wh per year.
• The first pacemaker was introduced in 1958 using NiCd batteries.
These needed to be recharged every week for 12 hours using an
inductive charger (wireless). They were also heavy and had a
total lifetime of only 2 years.
• Li-Iodide primary cell technology was introduced in 1975 and has
since become immensely popular due to the higher energy
density which . About 600,000 pacemakers are installed
worldwide using various Li-ion technologies every year.
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1961 – Zn-HgO primary batteries were introduced in 1969 and became widely popular for the next 10-15 years.
1958 – NiCd batteries were used on the first pacemaker installed. These needed to be charged externally every week.
1975 – Li-iodide primary batteries were introduced in 1975 and remain popular all the way up to today. Many other variations such as LiSVO, LiCFn are also commonly used.
New innovations are required to reduce weight and increase the lifetime of the batter.
Primary batteries are used for pacemakers
with primary requirements being high
energy density and reliability of operation.
Rechargeable batteries are not used.
MD - PacemakersCompany Product
Weight (g)Battery Capacity (Wh)
Battery Type
BatteryWeight (g)
% weight of battery
DeviceLifetime (y)
Dr. Lellihei 64 0.23 NiCd - - 2
Pacetronix 25.1 4.42 Li-I2 15.9 63 8
Boston Scientific 29.1 4.8 Li-CFn 15 52 12.1
Boston Scientific 24.8 3.0 Li-CFn 12 48 7.6
Medtronic 21 3.52 LiSVO 11 52 8
• About 50-60% of the weight of device is the weight of the
battery itself and it takes up about 2/3rd of the volume of
the device.
• After the EOL of the battery the device needs to be
replaced with a new one which is involves an operative
procedure. The device lifetime on an average is 8-12
years which is merely limited by the stored energy in the
battery.
• Since implanted devices cannot be recharged cycle life is
not an important criteria for these batteries. However, self
discharge of the batteries needs to be very low to enable a
10 year lifetime.
• Since the battery is implanted the temperature range of
operation of the batteries is not an important criteria.
Energy Density
Power Density
Safety
Self Discharge
TemperatureCost
Cycle Life
Maturity ofTechnology
Efficiency
Implanted Medical Devices External Medical Devices
The energy density and the self
discharge of the batteries is very
important for implanted devices.
State of the art batteries offer a
10 year lifetime. LiS batteries
with an energy density of 1000
Wh/kg have the potential to
enable a 30-40 year lifetime thus
eliminating replacement surgery.
MD – Novel Applications• Endoscopes are normally used for investigation of the GI
tract using a long cable with a camera and a light
source. Endoscopy capsules provide visualization by
wirelessly transmitting from a disposable capsule to a
data recorder worn by the patient.
• The main applications are visual observation of the
esophagus, small intestine, abdomen where endoscopes
find it difficult to reach
• With current battery technology the pills are quite large
in size and have a limited lifetime (2-4 h) and the camera
resolution is quite limited.
• The pills are designed to be a one time use and hence
cycle life is not important. High energy and specific
density are technology enablers.
PillCam: The current design of
the pill camera utilizes two
cells which provides a few
hours of video recording.
Higher energy density cells will
be required for longer viewing
time and high resolution
imagery equipment. Currently
Li-SOCl2 primary batteries are
used in these applications.
Smaller batteries has the
potential to free up space for
additional electronics and
visualization imagery.
High energy density
batteries can enable longer
duration of viewing which is
of actual practical
importance. It can also free
up space for additional
imaging instrumentation as
well as power for
customized navigation
through the GI tract.
Unmanned Vehicles
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
• Energy Management – Monitoring of mining
sites, large solar parks, power line
monitoring, offshore wind turbine monitoring.
• Agriculture and Forestry – Real time crop
data, detection of irregularities, early
corrective action with pesticide, herbicide,
fertilizer and tracking forest fires.
• Construction site planning – Analyse site
from above, monitor progress of overall
construction.
• Aerial film and photography – Aerial
photography of landscapes and filming of
sequences for film industry. Eg. The Dark
Knight Rises, Skyfall, Hunger Games.
• Cargo delivery – Mainly in urban locations,
working prototypes are built by DHL,
Amazon, GoogleX
• Emergency response and police –
Safeguarding and monitoring of protected
species, birds eye view of disaster site
(earthquake, flood, fire, radiation hit sites,
etc), entry into damaged buildings prior to
sending relief personnel.
Type Advantages Disadvantages Applications
Fixed Wing Higher speed, larger distance range, easier to control
Too fast for still imagery, no hover capability
Energy management,forestry, aerial filming
Multicopters(quad, hexa)
VTOLcapability, hovering
Difficulty control, shorter range
Agriculture, construction, aerial filming, emergency response
AEYRON LABS: Quadcopter
manufactured by this company
was used in aerial photography in
the aftermath of the Nepal
earthquake. It weight about 2.4 kg
and 50 min of flight time. The
diameter of the vehicle shown is
about 40 inches and can carry a
payload of about 2 kg.
The weight of most imaging instruments is in the range of 1-2
kg which is also the minimum payload requirement of the
UAVs. The endurance time needs to be more than 1.5 hours
for most applications to be relevant.
UAV Applications
Company Product Weight (kg)
BatteryWeight (kg)
Battery Capacity (Wh)
Battery wt. %
Speed (kmph)
Vehicle Type Time (min)
Agribotix 2.72 1.08 177.6 40.0 48 Quadcopter 25
AgDrone 2.15 0.54 88.8 25.1 45-65 Fixed Wing 44
EbeeAg 0.71 0.16 23.8 22.5 40-90 Fixed wing 45
• The battery weight is approximately 20-40% of the total
weight of the UAV
• Currently achievable endurance times are in the range
of 15-30 minutes for quadcopters and 30-45 min for
fixed wing aircraft
• Increasing the battery weight leads to an increase in the
endurance time of the UAV but beyond a limit there are
diminishing returns as the vehicle becomes too bulky to
take off and there are marginal increases in the range.
• At 50 Wh/kg (NiCd type battery) flight times of only a
few minutes are possible. Thus the electric UAV field
has only been possible due to the invention of Li-ion
battery technology.
• Electric operation has several advantages over hybrids
and gasoline based specially in urban settings.Source: CES internal analysis, IEEE Transactions, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2014)
An energy density of 900-1000
Wh/kg can enable flight times of 1.5-
2 hours which required for most
applications.
Wearable Electronics
Wearable Electronics• Wearable electronics encompasses
any electronic device or product that
can be worn by a person to integrate
computing in his daily activity or
work and use technology to avail
advanced functions, features and
characteristics.
• Some of the examples include
Google Glass
GoPro wearable Camera
Smart watches
Sports band etc.
• The overall wearable electronics and
technology market is estimated to
grow $11.61 Billion by the end of
2020 at a compound annual growth
rate (CAGR) of 24.56% from 2014 to
2020.(Source M&M)
ProductBattery
TechnologyLifetime
energy (Wh)Weight Ratio
(Battery : Product)
Google Glass Li-Ion 2.17 70%
Go Pro Camera Surge Li-Ion 4.48
Apple Watch (38 mm model)
Li-Polymer 0.78 19%
Apple Watch (42 mm Model)
Li-Polymer 0.93 21%
One touch watch 0.80 20%
Samsung Gear 1.20 31%
Life Band touch Li-Ion 0.33 12%
Nike+ Fuel Band 1 Li-Polymer 0.26 13%
Nike+ Fuel Band 2 Li-Polymer 0.19 13%
Wearable Electronics
• As these products/devices are replaced in
few years (2-4 years) by the customer, cycle
life doesn’t play vital role in battery
technology considerations.
• These devices mostly use advanced
technologies and the product pricing is value
based. Generally the typical customer base
is willing to spend more for premium
technology
• Since these are low energy/power
applications the roundtrip energy efficiency
will not have a major impact on the usage of
the battery.
• Owing to the short lifespan (2-4 years) the
maturity of the technology is not crucial. The
batteries are usually readily replaceable in
case of suboptimal performance.
Energy Density
Power Density
Safety
Rechargable
WeightCost
Cycle Life
Maturity ofTechnology
Efficiency
Glass Wearable Cameras
Smart Watches Sports Band
In cases such as Google Glass the high energy
density of LiS has the potential reduce the
overall weight of the device immensely allowing
much better user comfort, more sleek designs,
and flexibility for adding additional electronics.
For other wearable electronics additional
benefits may be availed by reducing the
frequency of charging requirement from daily to
once in 4-5 days.
Summary