dr. wolfgang peters, mbagasvaluechain.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/2017_12-13_p… · iea...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Wolfgang Peters, MBA
Managing Director, The Gas Value Chain Company GmbH, Germany
Former CEO, RWE Supply & Trading CZ, a.s., Czech Republic
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
2
IEA WEO 2016: second gas revolution LNG ‘revolution’
LNG to overtake piped gas in global trade
Source: IEA WEO 2016
3
LNG ‘revolution’: price spreads vs. price regions LNG driven spread arbitrage causes price convergence
4
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017
LNG ‘revolution’ spurs global gas market: Increasing diversity & interconnectivity
5
Source: IEA WEO 2017
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
6
IEA Global Gas Security Review 2016:
Regional approach no longer appropriate
“As the role of gas … evolves, a narrow approach
to gas security focussing on gas as a stand-alone
fuel in an individual region is no longer
appropriate.”
7
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2016
8
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
Europe capable of sending price signals by traded markets
Source: Heather/Petrovich, OIES May 2017
9
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
North-West European markets >92% hub-indexed
Source: ICIS Heren, European Gas Markets 15-11-2017
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
Redundant import capacities: ~220 bcm/a of LNG regas
terminals (~75% idle)
10
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
Global LNG supply avails increasing share of flexible volumes
11
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
Global LNG supply response time reduces significantly
12
Source: IEA WEO 2017
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
13
IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017 Caveat: Unexpected ‘shocks’ nonetheless possible
14
IEA Caveat: ‘Shocks’ nonetheless possible E.g. Hurricane Harvey reminds of concentration risk Gulf Coast
15
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017
IEA Caveat: ‘Shocks’ nonetheless possible
(Harvey turned out to be a ‘threat’ instead of a shock)
16
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017
IEA Caveat: ‘Shocks’ nonetheless possible: e.g. Qatar
(also Qatar only threat, not ‘shock’, supplies within 5 year range)
17
Source: IEA Global Gas Security Review 2017
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
18
Interim Conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
19
• Security of supply no longer regional
• But ‘shocks’ nonetheless possible
• Ideal market set-up:
• Diversity of (competing) pipeline supplies
• plus optionality to avail of LNG supplies
• plus well interconnected markets
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
20
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘Money talks …’ – not
sanctions
Source: ICIS Heren
21
Premium NBP over HH required
Full cost: 15% HH + ~$2.25 liquefaction + 0.50 shipping + $ 0.50
regas = ~$3.70/MMBtu
Marginal cost (liquefaction sunk): ~$1.45/MMBtu
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
22
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2:SoS has transformed from bi-lateral physical dependency to a
functionality of price signals in an integrated traded market
Ukrainian Crisis 2009: Andrej Budajew, “Putin’s recalcitrant bride”
23
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2:E.g. Lithuania: arbitraging Russian gas vs. LNG
Note: first US cargo 2017 (Cheniere) not a game changer
24
Source: ICIS Heren
IEA: Second gas revolution (LNG) spurs Global Gas
Market
Security of supply re-defined – also for Europe
IEA Caveat: ‘unexpected shocks’ nonetheless
possible
Interim conclusion: diversity, optionality &
interconnectivity
Misplaced US sanctions: ‘money talks’
Misplaced EC efforts to derail Nordstream 2: ‘Putin
phobia’ no longer warranted
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
25
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
26
Electrification of transport & heat sector would massively increase
power demand (Quaschning: from ~590 to 1,300 TWh)
Source: Quaschning, Sektorkopplung, page 29
27
RES capacity in 2040 ~doubled to 187 GW
RES output 2040: 460 TWh
Short position: 840 TWh
Source: : Quaschning, Sektorkopplung, page 29
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
28
How to cover short position?
Higher load factors lignite/coal would increase CO2 emissions
~100 GW additional gas capacity: 840 TWh (at 8,400 Lhrs)
Source: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/energiebereitstellung-
verbrauch/konventionelle-kraftwerke-erneuerbare-energien#textpart-1
Misplaced German ‘denial’ of need for gas
‘Kalte Dunkelflaute’: residual load requirement
29
‘Residual Load’ needed for complete wind & solar capacities
Weather year 2006 (recurrent) projected on to 2016
Source: Greenpeace/Energy Brainpool, ‘Kalte Dunkelflaute’, page 5
30
Solar + wind capacity 2040: 178 GW
Residual load requirement: 178 GW
Further new GAS capacity: ~178 GW
Source: : Quaschning, Sektorkopplung, page 29
‘Kalte Dunkelflaute’: residual load requirement
For further reading soon to come:
31
‘Energiewende: From Champion to ‘Fossil of the Day’
Without natural gas to save the day, ‘all-electric sector-coupling’
will ensure further fossil of the day awards(www.gasvaluechain.com)
Thank you very much for your attention!
Source: www.climatenetwork.org/fossil-of-the-day