draft environmental impact assessment and emp … · 2019-03-11 · draft environmental impact...

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

ASSESSMENT AND EMP REPORT

FOR

PROPOSED GREEN FIELD PROJECT OF COMMON INTEGRATED

LANDFILL (7,82,181 MT) AND INCINERATION FACILITY (1 MT/HR)

AT

SURVEY NO. 2483, 2500, 2501, 2503, 2482, 2484, 2499, 2502, 2504, 2486, 2485, 2487,

2488, 2498, 2497, 2505, 2506, 2490, 2491, 2496, 2509, 2510, 2523, 2528/1, 2528/2, 2524,

VILL. – CHANASMA, TAL. – CHANASMA, DIST. PATAN, GUJARAT

PROJECT CATEGORY: A, 7(d), COMMON HAZARDOUS WASTE

TREATMENT, STORAGE & DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDFs)

STUDY PERIOD:

OCTOBER, 2018 TO DECEMBER, 2018

PROJECT PROPONENT:

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS

PREPARED BY:

en-VISIOn ENVIRO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

2nd

FLOOR, SHRI RAM COMPLEX, ABIVE BANK OF INDIA,

NEAR KARGIL CHOWK, SURAT-DUMAS ROAD,

PIPLOD, SURAT-395007

GUJARAT.

Phone No.: (0261) 2223003, 2224004

Email Add.: [email protected]

Website: www.en-vision.in

Accreditation by

QCI / NABET Certificate No. NABET /EIA/1821/RA 0102

February 2019

190209_RP06_0

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT Q-1

Declaration by Experts contributing to the EIA/EMP Report

For Proposed Green Field Project of Common Integrated Landfill (7,82,181 MT) and Incineration Facility

(1 MT/hr) at Survey No. 2483, 2500, 2501, 2503, 2482, 2484, 2499, 2502, 2504, 2486, 2485, 2487, 2488,

2498, 2497, 2505, 2506, 2490, 2491, 2496, 2509, 2510, 2523, 2528/1, 2528/2, 2524, Vill.– Chanasma, Tal.

– Chanasma, Dist. Patan, Gujarat.

Project Category: 7(d) “A”

I, hereby, certify that I was a part of the EIA team in the following capacity that developed the above EIA.

EIA Coordinator

Name : Nihar Doctor

Signature and Date :

Name of Associate EIA

coordinator

: Jignesh Patel

:

Period of involvement : June – 2018 to February – 2019

Contact information : ENVISION ENVIRO TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

3rd

Floor, Shree Ram Complex, Above Bank of India,

Near Kargil Chowk, Surat-Dumas Road,

Piplod, Surat-395007, Gujarat.

Phone No.: (0261) 2223003, 2224004

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: www.en-vision.in

Functional Area Experts

Sr.

No.

Functional

Areas

Name of the

Expert/S

Involvement

(Period Task) Signature

1 AP Nihar Doctor

Period: June – 2018 to February – 2019

Site visit; technical guidance to associate EIA coordinator

and team member, verify FAE report, Review and

comment on EIA report.

2

WP

Nihar Doctor





3 SHW Nihar Doctor





en-vιsι�n


Sr.

No.

Functional

Areas

Name of the

Expert/S

Involvement

(Period Task) Signature

4 SE Arif Shaikh


Site visit; socioeconomic data collection; identification of

impact and suggesting mitigative measures of project on

community, Impact aspect evaluation, preparation of

CER plan; finalization of FAE report.

5 EB Manoj Eledath

Period: October to December – 2018

Site visit; EB data collection; Identification of Impacts and

suggested mitigation measures; finalization of FAE report.

6 HG Ravikant

Sharma


Collection of Secondary data and its verification during site

visit and based on ground water analysis reports; Geology

& Geomorphological analysis based on Secondary data;

Preparation of FAE report

7 GEO Ravikant

Sharma

8 SC Dr. B. K. Patel Not utilized as per Scheme

9 AQ Nihar Doctor

Period: January – 2019

Based on project specific emission technical guidance to

associate EIA coordinator and team member to run the

model. Verify FAE report, Review and comment on EIA

report.

10 N Ananta Desai


Site visit; Identifying possible source of noise pollution at

various stages of development & operation. Impact

identification and suggesting mitigation measures;

finalization of FAE report.

11 LU Dr. Y.

Ramamohan


Site visit; Collection of secondary data; preparation of land

use/land cover map from the satellite image based on site

visit. Identification of impacts and suggesting mitigation

measures.

12 RH Jignesh Patel


Site visit; Collection of technical data; Identified potential

risk due to proposed activities at various stage of

development. Suggesting safety measures. Finalization of

FAE report.

en-vιsι�n


Declaration by the Head of the accredited consultant organization/ Authorized Person

I, Nihar Doctor, hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA of proposed Common

Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage & Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) unit by “North Gujarat Enviro

Projects (NGEP)”. “It is certified that no unethical practice like ‘copy and paste’, and used external data /

text without proper acknowledgement, while preparing this EIA report”. I also confirm that the consultant

organization shall be fully accountable for any mis-leading information mentioned in this statement.

Signature :

Name : Nihar Doctor

Designation : Director

Name of the EIA consultant

organization

: Envision Enviro Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

NABET Certificate No. & Issue

Date

: NABET/EIA/1821/RA 0102 valid up to December 06, 2020

en-vιsι�n


UNDERTAKING

I, Patel Dharnendrabhai Natwarlal, Partner of North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP) willing to submit this

undertaking with respect to the Terms of References (TOR) prescribed by MOEF/CC, India, vide ToR letter no. 10-

39/2018-IA-III dated 29/08/2018 for the proposed project located at Survey No. 2483, 2500, 2501, 2503, 2482, 2484,

2499, 2502, 2504, 2486, 2485, 2487, 2488, 2498, 2497, 2505, 2506, 2490, 2491, 2496, 2509, 2510, 2523, 2528/1,

2528/2, 2524, Vill. – Chanasma, Tal. – Chanasma, Dist. Patan, Gujarat. Further, we have not received any additional

TOR for this project except this.

North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP) is also undertake that information and data contained in this EIA

report are factual and correct and any content of this report pertaining to this project is not copied from any

other report and we own entire responsibility for the same.

Date: 04/02/2019 For, North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP).

Place: Chanasma

Patel Dharnendrabhai Natwarlal Partner

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT I-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Purpose of EIA ....................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Project Proponent ................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2.1 Promoter’s Background ..................................................................................................... 1-2

1.3 Identification of Project ......................................................................................................... 1-2

1.3.1 Nature, Size and Location .................................................................................................. 1-2

1.3.2 Importance of Project to Region ........................................................................................ 1-2

1.4 Regulatory Frame Work ........................................................................................................ 1-3

1.4.1 Applicable CPCB’s Guideline ........................................................................................... 1-4

1.4.2 Applicability of EIA Notification ...................................................................................... 1-4

1.5 Scope and methodology of EIA Study ................................................................................... 1-4

1.5.1 Baseline Study ................................................................................................................... 1-4

1.5.2 Identification of Impact and Mitigation ............................................................................. 1-6

1.5.3 Environmental Management Plan ...................................................................................... 1-6

1.5.4 Additional Studies .............................................................................................................. 1-6

1.5.5 Structure of EIA Report ..................................................................................................... 1-6

CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 2-7

2.1 introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2-7

2.1.1 Waste Generation and Management in Gujarat ................................................................. 2-7

2.1.2 TSDF/Incineration Facility in Gujarat ............................................................................... 2-7

2.2 proposed project ..................................................................................................................... 2-8

2.2.1 Need of project ................................................................................................................... 2-8

2.2.2 Justification of Project site ................................................................................................. 2-9

2.2.3 Project location ................................................................................................................ 2-10

2.2.4 Project Site History .......................................................................................................... 2-15

2.2.5 Salient Feature ................................................................................................................. 2-17

2.3 project size ........................................................................................................................... 2-17

2.3.1 Justification for capacity .................................................................................................. 2-18

2.4 project component ................................................................................................................ 2-18

2.5 Land fill................................................................................................................................ 2-18

2.5.1 Component of Landfill ..................................................................................................... 2-18

2.6 Incineration .......................................................................................................................... 2-20

2.7 handling of hazardous waste ................................................................................................ 2-22

2.7.1 Hazardous waste acceptance criteria ................................................................................ 2-22

2.7.2 Pre-treatment of hazardous waste .................................................................................... 2-23

2.7.3 General Pathway of the waste .......................................................................................... 2-24

en-vιsι�n


2.8 hazardous waste transportation ............................................................................................ 2-26

2.8.1 Packing ............................................................................................................................. 2-26

2.8.2 Labelling .......................................................................................................................... 2-26

2.8.3 Manifest System............................................................................................................... 2-27

2.9 project phase ........................................................................................................................ 2-27

2.9.1 Pre-construction Activity ................................................................................................. 2-27

2.9.2 Construction Activity ....................................................................................................... 2-27

2.9.3 Technical detail of landfill cell ........................................................................................ 2-28

2.9.4 Operation Phase ............................................................................................................... 2-31

2.9.5 Closure of landfill cell ..................................................................................................... 2-31

2.10 general guideline for daily activity ...................................................................................... 2-31

2.11 resorce requirement .............................................................................................................. 2-32

2.11.1 Capital investment ........................................................................................................... 2-32

2.11.2 Land ................................................................................................................................. 2-32

2.11.3 Water ................................................................................................................................ 2-33

2.11.4 Electricity/Power .............................................................................................................. 2-35

2.11.5 Machineries ...................................................................................................................... 2-35

2.11.6 Fuel .................................................................................................................................. 2-35

2.11.7 Manpower ........................................................................................................................ 2-35

2.11.8 Chemical .......................................................................................................................... 2-35

2.11.9 Laboratory ........................................................................................................................ 2-35

2.12 pollution load and mitigation measures ............................................................................... 2-36

2.12.1 Wastewater ....................................................................................................................... 2-36

2.12.2 Leachate Management ..................................................................................................... 2-39

2.12.3 Observatory Well Groundwater Monitoring stations ....................................................... 2-41

2.12.4 Air emission ..................................................................................................................... 2-41

2.12.5 Waste generation .............................................................................................................. 2-42

2.13 ecology and bio divercity ..................................................................................................... 2-43

2.13.1 Green belt ......................................................................................................................... 2-43

2.14 noise pollution ...................................................................................................................... 2-43

2.15 project implementation ........................................................................................................ 2-43

2.15.1 Organization Structure ..................................................................................................... 2-45

CHAPTER 3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONTMENT ...................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3-1

3.1.1 Objectives of Baseline Monitoring .................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.2 Data Collection Methodology ............................................................................................ 3-1

3.1.3 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 3-2

3.2 Meteorological Environment ................................................................................................. 3-2

3.2.1 Climate of Study Area ....................................................................................................... 3-2

en-vιsι�n


3.3 Air Environment .................................................................................................................... 3-6

3.3.1 Sampling Methodology and Analysis ................................................................................ 3-6

3.3.2 Selection of Monitoring Locations .................................................................................... 3-6

3.3.3 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................... 3-8

3.4 Water Environment .............................................................................................................. 3-11

3.4.1 Sampling Methodology and Analysis .............................................................................. 3-11

3.4.2 Selection of Monitoring Location .................................................................................... 3-12

3.4.3 Results-Ground Water and Surface Water ....................................................................... 3-15

3.5 Noise Environment .............................................................................................................. 3-21

3.5.1 Selection of Monitoring Locations and Results ............................................................... 3-22

3.5.2 Discussion of Noise Levels .............................................................................................. 3-25

3.5.3 Traffic Study .................................................................................................................... 3-25

3.6 Soil Environment ................................................................................................................. 3-27

3.6.1 Sampling Methodology and Analysis .............................................................................. 3-27

3.6.2 Discussion and interpretation ........................................................................................... 3-31

3.7 Discussion-Soil Environment .............................................................................................. 3-31

3.8 Land Environment ............................................................................................................... 3-32

3.8.1 Methodology of Study ..................................................................................................... 3-32

3.8.2 Data Used ......................................................................................................................... 3-33

3.8.3 Land Use / Land Cover Map ............................................................................................ 3-33

3.9 Hydrology and ground water ............................................................................................... 3-36

3.9.1 Geomorphology, Drainage & Watershed: ....................................................................... 3-37

3.9.2 Geotechnical Studies: ....................................................................................................... 3-38

3.9.3 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................. 3-40

3.10 Ecology and Bio-diversity ................................................................................................... 3-42

3.10.1 Biodiversity of Terrestrial Environment .......................................................................... 3-42

3.10.2 Biological Diversity ......................................................................................................... 3-42

3.10.3 Ecological Impact Assessment......................................................................................... 3-43

3.10.4 Period of the study and Study area................................................................................... 3-43

3.10.5 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 3-43

3.10.6 Presence –Absence ........................................................................................................... 3-44

3.10.7 DAFOR Scale .................................................................................................................. 3-45

3.10.8 Biodiversity of Terrestrial Environment .......................................................................... 3-45

3.10.9 Floral Diversity of the Study Area ................................................................................... 3-53

3.10.10 Faunal Diversity of Study Area ....................................................................................... 3-61

3.10.11 Sampling Methodology Adopted: .................................................................................... 3-71

3.10.12 Samples Processing For Chlorophyll Estimation: ........................................................... 3-71

3.11 Socio-economic Environment .............................................................................................. 3-75

3.11.1 Major Objectives of the Study ......................................................................................... 3-75

en-vιsι�n


3.11.2 Identification of Stakeholders’ ......................................................................................... 3-75

3.11.3 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 3-75

3.11.4 Limitations ....................................................................................................................... 3-77

3.11.5 The Project Influence Area .............................................................................................. 3-77

3.11.6 Findings of Community Consultations ............................................................................ 3-81

3.11.7 Population Density ........................................................................................................... 3-82

3.11.8 Sex Ratio .......................................................................................................................... 3-82

3.11.9 Population Distribution (Rural & Urban) ........................................................................ 3-82

3.11.10 Quality of life ................................................................................................................... 3-85

3.11.11 People’s Perception .......................................................................................................... 3-85

3.11.12 Conclusions Socio-Economic Survey .............................................................................. 3-88

CHAPTER 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............... 4-1

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1.1 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1.2 Environmental Aspect and Impacts ................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.3 Environmental Indices ....................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.4 Environmental Impact Assessment .................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 Impact Identification .............................................................................................................. 4-2

4.2.1 Identification Matrix .......................................................................................................... 4-2

4.3 Impact Quantification ............................................................................................................ 4-5

4.3.1 Scoring the Overall Impact ................................................................................................ 4-5

4.3.2 Probability of Occurrence of the Impact ............................................................................ 4-6

4.3.3 Impact Signification Criteria .............................................................................................. 4-7

4.4 Significance of Impacts & Proposed Mitigation Measures ................................................... 4-8

4.4.1 Land Environment ............................................................................................................. 4-8

4.4.2 Soil Environment ............................................................................................................... 4-9

4.4.3 Water Environment .......................................................................................................... 4-11

4.4.4 Hydro Geological Environment ....................................................................................... 4-12

4.4.5 Noise Environment .......................................................................................................... 4-14

4.4.6 Ecological Environment ................................................................................................... 4-16

4.4.7 Socio Economic Environment ......................................................................................... 4-18

4.4.8 Risk & Hazard.................................................................................................................. 4-20

4.4.9 Occupational Health & Safety ......................................................................................... 4-20

4.4.10 Solid & Hazardous Waste Management .......................................................................... 4-22

4.4.11 Air Environment .............................................................................................................. 4-23

4.5 Cumulative Impact ............................................................................................................... 4-25

4.5.1 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 4-26

4.6 Air Quality Modelling ......................................................................................................... 4-26

4.6.1 AERMOD ........................................................................................................................ 4-26

en-vιsι�n


4.6.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 4-27

4.6.3 Mixing Height .................................................................................................................. 4-27

4.6.4 Maximum Ground Level Concentration .......................................................................... 4-27

4.7 Air Quality index ................................................................................................................. 4-36

CHAPTER 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY AND SITE) ................................................. 5-1

5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5-1

5.2 Analysis for Site Alternative .................................................................................................. 5-1

5.2.1 Site Evaluation Criteria ...................................................................................................... 5-5

5.2.2 Siting Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 5-6

5.3 Analysis for Technology Alternative ..................................................................................... 5-7

CHAPTER 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ....................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6-1

6.2 Environmental Monitoring Program ...................................................................................... 6-1

6.2.1 Env. Monitoring Budget .................................................................................................... 6-3

6.2.2 Records .............................................................................................................................. 6-4

6.2.3 Laboratory Facility ............................................................................................................. 6-4

CHAPTER 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES .................................................................................................... 7-1

7.1 PUBLIC Consultation ............................................................................................................ 7-1

7.2 Social Impact Assessment and R & R Action Plan ............................................................... 7-1

7.3 RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES .......................................................................................... 7-1

7.3.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 7-1

7.3.2 Risk Assessment: An Overview ......................................................................................... 7-1

7.3.3 Objective of the Study ....................................................................................................... 7-2

7.3.4 Project Description ............................................................................................................. 7-2

7.3.5 Identification of Hazards .................................................................................................... 7-3

7.3.6 Storage, Handling and Transportation of Hazardous Materials ......................................... 7-3

7.3.7 Major Hazards and Damage Criteria ................................................................................. 7-6

7.3.8 Hazard Indices ................................................................................................................... 7-7

7.3.9 Software Used For Calculations ...................................................................................... 7-10

7.3.10 Natural Hazards and Its Control Measures ...................................................................... 7-12

7.3.11 Risk Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................ 7-13

7.3.12 Disaster Management Plan .............................................................................................. 7-14

7.3.13 Occupational Health and Safety Program for the Project ................................................ 7-22

CHAPTER 8 PROJECT BENEFITS ............................................................................................................... 8-1

8.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 8-1

8.2 Environmental Benefits ......................................................................................................... 8-1

8.3 Physical Benefits .................................................................................................................... 8-1

8.4 Social Benefits ....................................................................................................................... 8-1

8.5 Corporate environment responsibility .................................................................................... 8-2

en-vιsι�n


8.6 Other Tangible Benefits ......................................................................................................... 8-1

CHAPTER 9 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS ........................................................ 9-1

9.1 Investment in project ............................................................................................................. 9-1

9.2 Cost benefit analysis .............................................................................................................. 9-1

9.2.1 Financial Pattern ................................................................................................................ 9-1

9.2.2 Environmental Cost Analysis............................................................................................. 9-1

CHAPTER 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .............................................................. 10-1

10.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 10-1

10.1.1 Objectives of EMP ........................................................................................................... 10-1

10.1.2 Components of EMP ........................................................................................................ 10-1

10.2 Environment Management Plan ........................................................................................... 10-2

10.2.1 Land Environment ........................................................................................................... 10-2

10.2.2 Soil Environment ............................................................................................................. 10-4

10.2.3 Water Environment .......................................................................................................... 10-6

10.2.4 Hydro Geological Environment ....................................................................................... 10-7

10.2.5 Ecological Environment ................................................................................................... 10-9

10.2.6 Socio Economic Environment ....................................................................................... 10-15

10.2.7 Risk & Hazard and Occupational Health & Safety ........................................................ 10-16

10.2.8 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management ..................................................................... 10-17

10.2.9 Air Environment ............................................................................................................ 10-18

10.3 Environmental Management Cell (EMC) .......................................................................... 10-19

10.3.1 Environment Policy and its Standard Operating Procedure ........................................... 10-20

10.3.2 Reporting System ........................................................................................................... 10-20

10.3.3 Reporting System ........................................................................................................... 10-20

10.4 Budget for Environment Protection ................................................................................... 10-20

CHAPTER 11 SUMMERY AND CONCLUSION ................................................................................... 11-1

11.1 Project description ............................................................................................................... 11-1

11.2 Project Requirement ............................................................................................................ 11-1

11.2.1 Pollution Potential ............................................................................................................ 11-1

11.3 baseline environment ........................................................................................................... 11-2

11.3.1 Existing Environment Quality ......................................................................................... 11-2

11.4 alternative site study ............................................................................................................ 11-3

11.5 Identification of impact and mitigation measures ................................................................ 11-3

11.6 Monitoring plan and additional study .................................................................................. 11-4

11.7 Environmental Management plan ........................................................................................ 11-4

CHAPTER 12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED ....................................................................... 12-1

12.1 EIA team .............................................................................................................................. 12-3

12.2 Laboratory Involved ............................................................................................................ 12-4

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT F-1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1: Scope of Baseline Study ................................................................................................................. 1-5

Table 2-1: Total Hazardous Waste Generation in Gujarat ............................................................................... 2-7

Table 2-2: Common Hazardous Waste TSDF [Treatment Stabilization Disposal and Facilities] ................... 2-7

Table 2-3: HWIF [Common Hazardous Wastes Incineration Facility] in Gujarat .......................................... 2-8

Table 2-4: Key Feature around the Project Site ............................................................................................. 2-17

Table 2-5: Hazardous waste acceptance criteria ............................................................................................ 2-22

Table 2-6: Manifest System ........................................................................................................................... 2-27

Table 2-7: Technical Design of Landfill ........................................................................................................ 2-28

Table 2-8: Liner Design ................................................................................................................................. 2-29

Table 2-9: Project cost ................................................................................................................................... 2-32

Table 2-10: Financial Model .......................................................................................................................... 2-32

Table 2-11: Area Breakup .............................................................................................................................. 2-33

Table 2-12: Land Acquisition ........................................................................................................................ 2-33

Table 2-13: Water Consumption ................................................................................................................ 2-34

Table 2-14: Fuel Source ................................................................................................................................. 2-35

Table 2-15: Laboratory Equipment required for Environmental Monitoring ................................................ 2-36

Table 2-16: Wastewater Generation .............................................................................................................. 2-36

Table 2-17: Effluent Characteristic ................................................................................................................ 2-37

Table 2-18: Technical detail of ETP .............................................................................................................. 2-37

Table 2-19: Stage-wise effluent characteristic ............................................................................................... 2-38

Table 2-20: Details of Flue gas emission ....................................................................................................... 2-41

Table 2-21: List of Hazardous waste ............................................................................................................. 2-42

Table 2-22: Project Implementation Schedule ............................................................................................... 2-44

Table 3-1: Summary of Site Specific Meteorological Data ............................................................................. 3-4

Table 3-2: Air – Parameters analyzed and sampling duration ......................................................................... 3-6

Table 3-3: Ambient Air Quality - Methodology .............................................................................................. 3-6

Table 3-4: Ambient Air Monitoring Locations ................................................................................................ 3-7

Table 3-5: Ambient Air Quality Status ............................................................................................................ 3-9

Table 3-6: Ambient Air result Summery Table ............................................................................................. 3-11

Table 3-7: Sample Collection and Analysis of Water Sample ....................................................................... 3-12

Table 3-8: Monitoring Locations for Ground Water and Surface Water ....................................................... 3-12

Table 3-9: Water Quality – Physico-chemical Analysis of Ground Water .................................................... 3-15

Table 3-10: Water Quality – Physico-chemical Analysis of Surface Water .................................................. 3-17

Table 3-11: Summary for ground water ......................................................................................................... 3-19

Table 3-12: Summery table for surface water ................................................................................................ 3-20

Table 3-13: Noise Monitoring Methodology ................................................................................................. 3-21

Table 3-14: Ambient Noise Quality Standards for Different Areas/Zones .................................................... 3-22

Table 3-15: Noise Monitoring Locations ....................................................................................................... 3-23

Table 3-16: Noise Levels ............................................................................................................................... 3-24

Table 3-17: Noise level due to transportation ................................................................................................ 3-24

Table 3-18: Summery table for Noise study .................................................................................................. 3-25

en-vιsι�n


Table 3-19: Traffic Counts (up and down) .................................................................................................... 3-26

Table 3-20: Existing Traffic Scenario ............................................................................................................ 3-26

Table 3-21: Level of Service .......................................................................................................................... 3-27

Table 3-22: Methodology of Testing of Soil Samples ................................................................................... 3-28

Table 3-23: Soil Sampling Location .............................................................................................................. 3-28

Table 3-24: Physicochemical Characteristics of the Soil ............................................................................... 3-30

Table 3-25: Details of Sources & the Maps Prepared .................................................................................... 3-33

Table 3-26: Land Use / Land Cover Statistics of the Study Area (10 km Radius) ........................................ 3-33

Table 3-27: Trees in the Study area ............................................................................................................... 3-54

Table 3-28: List of the Shrubs in the Study Area .......................................................................................... 3-56

Table 3-29: List of Herbaceous Species Observed in the Study Area ........................................................... 3-57

Table 3-30: List of Climbers observed in the Study Area ............................................................................. 3-60

Table 3-31: Birds of the Study Area .............................................................................................................. 3-61

Table 3-32: Migratory Birds of the Study Area ............................................................................................. 3-66

Table 3-33: Butterflies in the Study Area ...................................................................................................... 3-66

Table 3-34: Reptiles observed in the study area ............................................................................................ 3-67

Table 3-35: Mammals in the Study Area ....................................................................................................... 3-67

Table 3-36: Threatened Fauna Of The Study Area ........................................................................................ 3-68

Table 3-37: Species provided Protection as per Wild Life Protection Act 1972 ........................................... 3-69

Table 3-38: Sampling stations within 2km radius from the project site ........................................................ 3-70

Table 3-39: List of Phytoplankton in study area ............................................................................................ 3-73

Table 3-40: Evaluation of phyto plankton population ................................................................................... 3-73

Table 3-41: List of zooplankton in study area ............................................................................................... 3-74

Table 3-42: Evaluation of zooplankton population ........................................................................................ 3-74

Table 3-43: list of villages where Socio-economic study conducted ............................................................. 3-76

Table 3-44: List of Villages in PIA (Census 2011)........................................................................................ 3-78

Table 4-1: Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................... 4-3

Table 4-2: Overall Impact Scoring System ...................................................................................................... 4-5

Table 4-3: Impact scoring for Ecology and Biodiversity ................................................................................. 4-5

Table 4-4: Occurrence Frequency Assessment- Ecological ............................................................................. 4-6

Table 4-5: Occurrence Frequency Assessment-Others .................................................................................... 4-6

Table 4-6: Impact Significance Criteria ........................................................................................................... 4-7

Table 4-7: Environmental Risk Categorization ............................................................................................... 4-7

Table 4-8: Ecological Risk Categorization ...................................................................................................... 4-7

Table 4-9: Assessment of Proposed Traffic Load .......................................................................................... 4-15

Table 4-10: Traffic Scenario .......................................................................................................................... 4-15

Table 4-11: Weighted Environmental Impacts without Mitigation Measures ............................................... 4-25

Table 4-12: Weighted Environmental Impacts without Mitigation Measures ............................................... 4-25

Table 4-13: Details of Stacks ......................................................................................................................... 4-26

Table 4-14: Maximum Ground Level Concentration (Average 24 hourly) ................................................... 4-27

Table 4-15: Predicted 24 hourly Short Term Incremental Concentrations from Proposed Source................ 4-35

Table 4-16: Air quality index ......................................................................................................................... 4-36

Table 5-1: Summery of Alternative Sites ........................................................................................................ 5-1

Table 5-2: Knock-out criteria for TSDF site .................................................................................................... 5-2

en-vιsι�n


Table 5-3: Site Evaluation for Finalize the Project Location ........................................................................... 5-5

Table 5-4: Siting Criteria for Chansma Project Site ........................................................................................ 5-6

Table 6-1: Environmental Monitoring Programme.......................................................................................... 6-1

Table 6-2: Frequency of monitoring at Incinerator .......................................................................................... 6-2

Table 6-3: Environmental Monitoring Plan ..................................................................................................... 6-3

Table 7-1: Storage Details of Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................... 7-3

Table 7-2: Hazards of Other Types and Its Control ......................................................................................... 7-6

Table 7-3: Damages to Human Life Due to Heat Radiation ............................................................................ 7-8

Table 7-4: Effects Due to Incident Radiation Intensity ................................................................................... 7-8

Table 7-5: Possible Accident Scenario ............................................................................................................ 7-9

Table 7-6: Summary of Consequence Analysis - Fire end points .................................................................. 7-11

Table 7-7: Natural Hazard Occurrence in the District & its Impacts ............................................................. 7-13

Table 7-8: Proposed Fire Fighting Equipments ............................................................................................. 7-14

Table 7-9: General Emergency Response Plan .............................................................................................. 7-21

Table 7-10: Occupational Health Monitoring ................................................................................................ 7-23

Table 7-11: List Of Personnel Protective Equipment .................................................................................... 7-23

Table 8-1: Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) Plan for Five Years ............................................... 8-1

Table 10-1: Recommended Plant Species for Greenbelt ............................................................................. 10-12

Table 10-2: Greenbelt Development Plan .................................................................................................... 10-14

Table 10-3: Roles and Responsibility of in Existing EMC Cell .................................................................. 10-19

Table 10-4: Capital cost for EMS ................................................................................................................ 10-20

Table 10-5: Recurring cost for EMS ............................................................................................................ 10-21

Table 12-1 EIA Team .................................................................................................................................... 12-3

Table 12-2 Details of Laboratory ................................................................................................................... 12-4

en-vιsι�n


LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1: Composition of Hazardous Waste Generated in Gujarat .............................................................. 2-9

Figure 2-2: Location Map .............................................................................................................................. 2-10

Figure 2-3: Google image showing the project site ....................................................................................... 2-11

Figure 2-4: Plant Layout ................................................................................................................................ 2-13

Figure 2-5: Topography Map Showing 10 km Radius Study area of Project Sit ........................................... 2-14

Figure 2-6: Earthquake hazard zone map of India ......................................................................................... 2-15

Figure 2-7: Detail of Landfill Cell ................................................................................................................. 2-20

Figure 2-8: Flow diagram of incinerator ........................................................................................................ 2-21

Figure 2-9: General Pathway of the waste ..................................................................................................... 2-25

Figure 2-10: Bottom liner .............................................................................................................................. 2-30

Figure 2-11: Final cover ................................................................................................................................. 2-30

Figure 2-12: Water Balance Diagram ............................................................................................................ 2-34

Figure 2-13: ETP Flow Diagram ................................................................................................................... 2-38

Figure 2-14: Organizational Structure ........................................................................................................... 2-45

Figure 3-1: Annual Wind Rose of Daily Surface Data (8:30 a.m.) at Ahemedabad Station (1971-2000)....... 3-3

Figure 3-2: Annual Wind Rose of Daily Surface Data (5:30 p.m.) at Ahemedabad Station (1971-2000) ...... 3-4

Figure 3-3: Primary Wind rose Diagram (October-December 2018) .............................................................. 3-5

Figure 3-4: Google Image Showing Ambient Air Quality Locations .............................................................. 3-7

Figure 3-5: Google Image Showing Ground Water Sampling Locations ...................................................... 3-13

Figure 3-6: Google Image Showing Surface Water Sampling Locations ...................................................... 3-13

Figure 3-7: Google Image Showing Noise Sampling Locations ................................................................... 3-23

Figure 3-8: Google Image Showing Location of Traffic Survey ................................................................... 3-25

Figure 3-9: Google Image Showing Soil Sampling Locations ...................................................................... 3-29

Figure 3-10: Land use/Land Cover Map of 10 km Radius Study Area ......................................................... 3-34

Figure 3-11: Satellite Imaginary of 10 km Radius Study Area ...................................................................... 3-35

Figure 3-12: Hydrogeology study within Study area ..................................................................................... 3-36

Figure 3-13: Soil at Project Site ..................................................................................................................... 3-39

Figure 3-14: Drainage Map of study area ...................................................................................................... 3-41

Figure 3-15: Ecology at and near project site ................................................................................................ 3-46

Figure 3-16: Water bodies in study area ........................................................................................................ 3-47

Figure 3-17: Biodiversity of Study Area ........................................................................................................ 3-53

Figure 3-18: Sampling at Khari river near Vadavli ...................................................................................... 3-71

Figure 3-19: Villages in Study Area .............................................................................................................. 3-76

Figure 4-1: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hour Average PM10 Concentration (µg/m3) ...................................... 4-28

Figure 4-2: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hour Average SO2 Concentration (µg/m3) ........................................ 4-29

Figure 4-3: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hour Average NOx Concentration (µg/m3) ....................................... 4-30

Figure 4-4: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hr Average HCl Concentration (µg/m3) ............................................ 4-31

Figure 4-5: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hr Average CO Concentration (µg/m3) ............................................. 4-32

Figure 4-6: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hr Average NH3 Concentration (µg/m3) ........................................... 4-33

Figure 4-7: Spatial Distribution of 24-Hr Average HF Concentration (µg/m3) ............................................ 4-34

Figure 5-1: Locations for Alternative sites ...................................................................................................... 5-1

en-vιsι�n


Figure 5-2: Closure view of Site 1 ................................................................................................................... 5-3




Figure 7-1: Threat zone of Maximum Credible Accident Scenario for FO – Pool Fire ................................ 7-11

Figure 7-2: Threat zone of Worst Case Scenario for FO – Pool Fire ............................................................ 7-12

Figure 10-1: Environment Management Cell .............................................................................................. 10-19

en-vιsι�n


LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS

Photograph 2-1 Project Site Photograph ........................................................................................................ 2-12

Photograph 3-1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring ........................................................................................... 3-8

Photograph 3-2 Surface & Ground Water Sampling ..................................................................................... 3-14

Photograph 3-3 Noise Monitoring and Traffic Study .................................................................................... 3-24

Photograph 3-4 Soil Sampling ....................................................................................................................... 3-29

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT A-1

LIST OF ANNEXURE

Annexure 1 TOR letter ......................................................................................................................... A-2

Annexure 2 List of hazardous waste to be managed at proposed TSDF .............................................. A-3

Annexure 3 CGWA application copy ................................................................................................... A-4

Annexure 4 Conservation plan for schedule – i fauna .......................................................................... A-5

Annexure 5 Write up on confirmation of complying with conditions of protocol ............................... A-6

Annexure 6 Land Doocuments ............................................................................................................. A-7

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT T-1

TOR COMPLIANCE

ToR letter no. 10-39/2018-IA-III dated 29/08/2018

TOR

No. TOR condition ToR Compliance Section/Page no.

A Specific and General TOR

1 Importance and benefits of the project Section no. 1.3.2

Page no. 1-2

Chapter – 1

2 The E.I.A would address to the

conformity of site to the stipulations as

made in the Hazardous and Other

Wastes (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

and will have a complete chapter

indicating conformity to the said rules.

For the proposed project total

four sites were identified. Based

on CPCB knock out criteria, two

sites were rejected and other two

sites were further evaluated in

detailed, and based on suitability

proposed site located at

Chansma village is selected.

Section no. 5.2

Page no. 5-1

Chapter – 5

3 Project proponents would also submit a

write up on how their project proposal

conform to the stipulations made in the

“protocol for Performance evolution and

monitoring of the Common Hazardous

Waste Treatment Storage and Disposal

facilities including common Hazardous

Waste incinerators”, published by the

CPCB on May 24,2010.

Write up on how their project

proposal conforms to the

stipulations made in the protocol

is attached in EIA report.

Annexure 5

A-6

4 Details of various waste management

units with capacities for the proposed

projects.

Landing of total capacity -

7,82,181 MT Hazardous waste

Incineration (solid and liquid

waste): 1 MT/hr capacity.

Section no.2.4

Page no. 2-18

Chapter – 2

5 List of waste to be handled and their

source along with mode of

transportation.

All hazardous waste listed in

SCHEDULE - I of Hazardous

and Other solid wastes

(management and Trans

boundary Movement) Rules,

2016 will be handled at

proposed project. Waste will be

transported by road through

trucks/tankers covered with

tarpaulin with all safety

precautions.

Annexure 2

A-3

6 Other chemicals and materials required

with quantities and storage capacities.

Chemicals and materials will be

required are lime, alum,

polyelectrolyte to be required

for ETP, lime, flyash, bentonite

(clay), cement and saw dust.

Storage quantity will be 7 days.

Section no. 2.11.8

Page no. 2-35

Chapter – 2

7 Details of temporary storage facility for

storage of hazardous waste at project

site

Around 500 sq.m. area is

provided as temporary storage

facility having impervious layer

and leachate collection system.

Section no.2.9.4.1

Page no. 2-31

Chapter – 2

8 Details of pre-treatment facility of

hazardous waste at TSDF..

Pre-treatment facility consists of

neutralization, stabilization will

be provided for hazardous waste

at TSDF.

Section no. 2.7.2

Page no. 2-23

Chapter – 2

en-vιsι�n


TOR


9 Details of air emissions, effluents,

hazardous/solid waste generation and

their management.

Details of air emission,

effluents, hazardous/solid waste

generation and their

management are incorporated.

Section no. 2.12

Page no. 2-36

Chapter – 2

10 Requirement of water, power, with

source of supply, status of approval,

water balance diagram, man power

requirement (regular and contract).

Project requirement,

• Water: 43 KLD from bore

well

• Power: 400 KVA from

UGVCL

• Fuel: FO 1200 kg/day and

coal 200 kg/hr from local

suppliers

• Manpower: 100 nos. from

local region.

Section no. 2.11

Page no. 2-32

Chapter – 2

11 Process description along with major

equipments and machineries, process

flow sheet (quantitative) from waste

material for disposal to be provided.

Process description along with

major equipments and

machineries, process flow sheet

(quantitative) from waste

material for disposal is provide.

Section no. 2.5 &

2.6

Page no. 2-18 &

2-20

Chapter – 2

12 Hazard identification and details of

proposed safety systems.

Major hazard associated with

the proposed project are fire due

to handling and storage of

incinerable hazardous waste.

To prevent fire hazard adequate

safety system is proposed.

Section no.

7.3.7.1

Page no. 7-6

Chapter – 7

13 Details of Drainage of the project up to

5 km radius of study area. If the site is

within 1 km radius of any major river,

peak and lean season river discharge as

well as flood occurrence frequency

based on peak rainfall data of the past

30 years. Details of Flood Level of the

project site and maximum Flood Level

of the river shall also be provided.

Nearest rivers,

• Khari river at 2.22 km

• Pushpavati River at 8.12

km.

These rivers are tributary of

Rupen River and flowing within

the study area of proposed

project.

Chapter – 3

Figure 3-14

3-41

14 Ground water quality monitoring in and

around the project site.

For ground water quality

monitoring, eight water samples

were collected from the study

area during October 2018 to

December 2018.

Table 3-9

Page no.3-15

Chapter – 3

15 The Air Quality Index shall be

calculated for base level air quality.

Air Quality Index is calculated

for base level air quality for all

the locations.

Table 4-16

Page no. 4-36

Chapter – 4

16 Status of the land purchases in terms of

land acquisition Act and study the

impact.

Entire land is/will be purchased

from private owners through

mutual agreement.

Section no. 2.11.2

Page no. 2-32

Chapter – 2

17 Status of acquisition of land. If

acquisition is not complete, stage of the

acquisition process and expected time of

complete possession of the land.

Major part of project area is

already purchased from private

land owner. Procurement of rest

part is under process.

--

18 R&R details in respect of land in line

with state government policy.

Entire land is/will be purchased

from private owners through

mutual agreement hence R&R

study is not applicable.

--

19 Details of effluent treatment and

recycling process.

In-house ETP having primary,

secondary, tertiary followed by

Section no. 2.12.1

Page no. 2-36

en-vιsι�n


TOR


RO and spray dryer unit will be

installed. No effluent will be

sent to outside premises.

Chapter – 2

20 Leachate study report and detailed

leachate management plan to be

incorporated.

Around 15 KLPD Leachate will

be generated from the landfill

and it will be treated in ETP

followed by RO and spray dryer.

Section no.

2.12.2

Page no. 2-39

Chapter – 2

21 Action plan for measures to be taken for

excessive leachate generation during

monsoon period.

A guard pond of 250 m3 is

proposed to take care excessive

leachate generation during

monsoon period, which will be

gradually taken to ETP.

Section no.

2.9.4.1

Page no. 2-31

Chapter – 2

22 Detailed Environmental Monitoring

Plan as well as Post Closure monitoring

Plan.

Detailed Environmental

Monitoring Plan as well as Post

Closure monitoring Plan is

prepared and incorporated.

Section no. 6.2

Page no.6-1

Chapter – 6

23 Action plan for any pollution of ground

water is noticed during operation period

or post closure monitoring period.

Action plan for GW pollution is

incorporated in EIA report.

Section no.

10.2.4.1

Page no. 10-7

Chapter – 10

24 A certificate of adequacy of available

power from the agency supplying power

to the project along with the load

allowed for the project.

No such adequacy certificated is

being issued by the power

supplying agency. However it is

assured to supply required

power load.

--

25 The EMP would also include proposals

for creating a solar power generation

farm.

In post closure phase solar panel

will be installed for the

generation of power.

Section no. 2.9.5

Page no. 2-31

Chapter – 2

26 A detailed plan for green belt

development. Impact of tree felling, if

any, along with a management plan.

About 33 % of total project area

(35,123 m2) shall be developed

as green belt at facility

boundary, road side, around

offices & buildings.

Section

no.10.2.5.1

Page no. 10-10

Chapter – 10

27 A certificate from the local body

supplying water, specifying the total

annual water availability with the local

authority, the quantity of water already

committed, the quantity of water allotted

to the project under consideration and

the balance water available. This should

be specified separately for ground water

and surface water sources, ensuring that

there is no impact on other users.

Application for obtaining No

objection certificate from

Central Ground Water Authority

is submitted.

Annexure 3

A-4

28 Public hearing to be conducted and

issues raised and commitments made by

the project proponent on the same

should be included in EIA/EMP Report

in the form of tabular chart with

financial budget for complying with the

commitments made.

This is draft EIA report,

submitted for Public hearing.

This point will be complied after

public hearing.

--

29 The project proponents shall satisfactory

address to all the complaints

/suggestions that have been received

against the project till the date of

submission of proposals for appraisal.

Details of all the complaints

/suggestions if any will be

incorporated.

--

en-vιsι�n


TOR


30 Any litigation pending against the

project and/or any direction/order

passed by any Court of Law against the

project, if so, details thereof shall also

be included.

There is no litigation and

direction/order passed by any

Court of Law against the

proposed Greenfield Project.

--

31 Plan for Corporate Environmental

Responsibility (CER) as specified under

Ministry’s Office Memorandum vide

F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st may

2018 shall be prepared and submitted

along with EIA Report

Plan for Corporate

Environmental Responsibility

(CER) as specified under

Ministry’s Office Memorandum

vide F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III

dated 1st may 2018 is prepared

and incorporated in EIA Report.

Section no. 8.5

Page no. 8-2

Chapter – 8

32 A tabular chart with index for point wise

compliance of above TORs

A tabular chart with index for

point wise compliance of TORs

is prepared and incorporated.

--

B Standard Terms of Reference

1 Reasons for selecting the site with

details of alternate sites

examined/rejected/selected on merit

with comparative statement and

reason/basis for selection. The

examination should justify site

suitability in terms of environmental

damages. Resources sustainability

associated with selected site as

compared to rejected sites. The analysis

should include parameters considered

along with weightage criteria for short-

listing selected site.

For the proposed project total

four sites were identified. Based

on CPCB knock out criteria, two

sites were rejected and other two

sites were further evaluated in

detailed, and based on suitability

proposed site located at

Chansma village is selected

Section no. 5-1

Page no. 5-1

Chapter – 5

2 Submit the details of the road/rail

connectivity along with the likely

impacts and mitigative measures.

Project site is well connected

with road network. However,

approach road of 2 km from

village road to project site will

be developed.

Table 2-4

Page no. 2-17

Chapter – 2

3 Submit the present land use and

permission required for any conversion

such as forest, agriculture etc.

Present land use of is Single

crop agricultural which will be

converted into Non-agricultural

activities land use.

Figure 3-11

Page no. 3-35

Chapter – 3

4 Examine the details of transportation of

Hazardous wastes and its safety in

handling.

Hazardous waste will be

transported with safety as per

the Guidelines for transportation

of hazardous waste prescribed

by CPCB.

--

5 Examine and submit the details of on

line pollutant monitoring

As per CPCB guidelines online

pollutant monitoring system will

be implemented for the

parameters like Temperature,

Carbon monoxide, Excess

oxygen, Pressure, Total

particulate matter, HCl, SO2,

NOx as per applicable.

Table 6-1

Page no.6-1

Chapter – 6

6 Examine the details of monitoring of

Dioxine and Furan.

Dioxine and Furan will be

monitored Twice a year under

critical operating conditions

through NABL/MoEF&CC

Table 6-1

Page no.6-1

Chapter – 6

en-vιsι�n


TOR


accredited agency.

7 MoU for disposal of ash through the

TSDF.

No MOU of TSDF is required,

as fly ash it will be disposed in

proposed landfill site within

premises.

--

8 MoU for disposal of scrubbing waste

water through CETP.

As proposed scrubbing waste

water will be treated in in-house

ETP having primary, secondary,

tertiary followed by RO and

spray dryer unit. No effluent

will be sent to outside premises.

--

9 Examine and submit details of

monitoring of water quality around the

landfill site.

Three observatory well around

the landfill site are proposed for

regular Water quality

monitoring to examine the

impact on the ground water.

Section no. 6.2

Page no. 6-1

Chapter – 6

10 Examine and submit details of the odour

control measures.

Odour control measures are as

follows,

• Daily waste covering with soil

• Spraying of Odour

suppression chemicals.

• Greenbelt containing odour

capturing species

Section no.

2.12.4.3

Page no. 2-42

Chapter – 2

11 Examine and submit details of impact

on water body and mitigative measures

during rainy season.

A guard pond of 500 m3 is

proposed to take care excessive

leachate generation during

monsoon period, which will be

gradually taken to ETP. Hence

there will not be any significant

impact on water body.

Section no.

2.9.4.1

Page no. 2-31

Chapter – 2

12 Environmental Management Plan

should be accompanied with

Environmental Monitoring Plan and

environmental cost and benefit

assessment. Regular monitoring shall be

carried out for odour control.

- Environmental Management

Plan is prepared covering

Environmental Monitoring

Plan and environmental cost

and benefit assessment

- Regular monitoring shall be

carried out for odour control

Section no. 10.2

Page no. 10-2

Chapter – 10

13 Water quality around the landfill site

shall be monitored regularly to examine

the impact on the ground water.

Three observatory well around

the landfill site are proposed for

regular Water quality

monitoring to examine the

impact on the ground water.

Table 6-1

Page no. 6-1

Chapter – 6

14 The storage and handling of hazardous

waste shall be as per the Hazardous

Waste Management Rules.

The storage and handling of

hazardous waste will be carried

out as per the Hazardous Waste

Management Rules.

Section no. 2.7

Page no. 2-22

Chapter – 2

15 Submit details of a comprehensive

Disaster Management Plan including

emergency evacuation during natural

and manmade disaster.

Details comprehensive Disaster

Management Plan including

emergency evacuation during

natural and manmade disaster is

prepared and incorporated.

Section no. 7.3.12

Page no. 7-14

Chapter – 7

16 Public hearing to be conducted for the

project in accordance with provisions of

Environmental Impact assessment

This draft EIA report is

submitting to conduct public

hearing as per provision made in

--

en-vιsι�n


TOR


notification, 2006 and the issues raised

by the public should be addressed in the

Environmental Management Plan. The

public Hearing should be conducted

based on the ToR letter issued by the

Ministry and not on the basis of minutes

of the Meeting available on the web site.

EIA notification.

Issues to be raised by the public

will addressed in the final EIA.

17 A detailed draft EIA/EMP report should

be prepared in accordance with the

above additional TOR and should be

submitted to the Ministry in accordance

with the Notification.

A detailed draft EIA/EMP report

is prepared in accordance with

additional TOR.

--

18 Details of litigation pending against the

project, if any, with direction/order

passed by any Court of Law against the

Project should be given.

There is no litigation and

direction/order passed by any

Court of Law against the

Project.

--

19 The cost of the project (capital cost and

recurring cost) as well as the cost

towards implementation of EMP should

be clearly spelt out.

Total cost of the project is Rs.

38.45 Crores. And capital cots

cost towards implementation of

EMP is Rs. 3.25 Crores and

recurring is Rs. 66 Lakh Per

Annum.

Table 10-4 &

Table 10-5

Page no.10-21

Chapter – 10

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT E-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMERY

1 INTRODUCTION North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP) has proposed to set up Common Hazardous Waste Treatment,

Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) comprising of land filling and incinerator located at Survey No.

2483, 2500, 2501, 2503, 2482, 2484, 2499, 2502, 2504, 2486, 2485, 2487, 2488, 2498, 2497, 2505, 2506,

2490, 2491, 2496, 2509, 2510, 2523,2528/1,2528/2, 2524 Village. – Chanasma, Taluka. – Chanasma,

District- Patan, Gujarat. Proposed facility falls under Category “A”, 7(d) as it is comprising TSDF and

incineration facility, as per EIA notification dated 14th September, 2006 & its subsequent amendments time

to time.

En-vision Enviro Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (NABET Accreditation no. : NABET/EIA/1821/RA 0102), was

appointed as environmental consultant to carry out the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for

their proposed project.

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECT DETAILS

Maximum Capacity of the

Land fill and incineration

Land fill : 7,82,181 MT Hazardous waste

Incineration (solid and liquid waste): 1 MT/hr capacity.

Hazardous waste to be

handled

All hazardous waste listed in SCHEDULE - I of Hazardous and Other

solid wastes (management and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2016

will be handled at proposed project. Waste will be transported by road

through trucks/tankers covered with tarpaulin with all safety precautions.

Land area Total plot area : 1,06,432 m2 (considering survey no. 2482/1, 2482/2,

2486, 2483/1, 2483/2, 2500, 2499, 2498, 2496/1, 2496/2, 2497, 2502,

2501, 2503, 2506, 2509, 2510, 2523, and 2491/1)

land fill area : 49,903 m2

Project cost Rs. 38.45 Crore

Cost for EMS Capital Cost: Rs. 3.25 Crores

Recurring cost: Rs. 66 Lakh Per Annum.

Cost for CSR activity Rs. 76.90 Lacs (for first five years)

2.2 Environmental Setting :

No. Description

From Project Site

Remarks Distance

(km)

Direction

1. National High Way (NH 15) 43.31 NW -

2. State High Way (SH-7) 1.38 WSW -

State High Way (SH-55) 2.36 NE -

3. Railway Station (Chansma) 4.0 NNW -

4. Airport (Ahmedabad) 84.7 SE -

5. River (non-perennial river)

Pushpavati River 8.12 SSE Nr. Mahadevpura village

Khari River 2.22 East Nr. Zilliyavasana village

Karoda Lake 1.60 WSW In Karoda village

6. Sea (Gulf of Khambhat) 203.9 South -

7. Village (Ziliyavasna village) 1.45 East Population – 709 nos.

8. City (Chansma) 4.0 NNW -

en-vιsι�n


No. Description

From Project Site

Remarks Distance

(km)

Direction

9.

Heritage site/ Archeological Site

12.33 South Modhera Sun Temple

15.33 NNW Rani ki Vav

17.91 NNW Sahastralinga Talao

14.63 North Jami Masjid

10. Reserve Forests Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

11. National Park/Wild Life Sanctuary Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

12. Bird Sanctuary Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

13. Eco Sensitive Area Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

14. Industries in surrounding Non within 2 km radius of the project site.

2.3 PROJECT REQUIREMENT:

Water & its source Source: Bore well.

Construction phase

• Domestic – 10 KLD

• Construction and other activity – 25 KLD

• Total – 35 KLD

Operation phase

• Domestic – 8 KLD

• Industrial activity – 20 KLD

• Greenbelt – 15 KLD

• Total – 43 KLD 22 KLD fresh + 21 KLD recycle)

Electricity & its

source

Source: Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (UGVCL).

• Construction phase – 350 KVA

• Operation phase – 400 KVA

(Backup power: D.G. set – 1 no 1500 KVA.)

Manpower • Construction phase : Total 195 Nos.

(170 no. of skilled and semi skilled workers, 25 no. technical people)

• Operation phase: 100 no. of technical staff

Fuel Construction phase : High Speed Diesel: 100 liter/Hr in D.G. Set

Operation phase :

• Furnace Oil: 1200 kg/day in Incinerator

• High Speed Diesel (HSD) : 300 liter/Hr in D.G. Set

• Coal: 200 kg/Hr (Spray Dryer with Inbuilt HAG)

2.4 WASTEWATER GENERATION Approximately 35 KLD of wastewater will be generated. Waste water generation is mainly from washing

(5 KLD), domestic (4 KLD), scrubber of incinerator/spray dryer (15 KLD) and leachate from landfil (15

KLD). Industrial waste water will be treated in proposed Effluent/leachate treatment plant followed by RO

and spray dryer. Domestic wastewater will be collected and disposd off through septik tank followed by

soak pit.

2.5 AIR EMISSION & CONTROL MEASURES The air emission from the proposed project will be landfill gas (VOC and H2S), control system will be

provided to collect and extract gas from the landfill and vent hole pipe network will be installed for the

same. Air emission from incinerator would be controlled by providing cyclone separator, bag filter, Wet

scrubber and alkali scrubber. Air Emission from Spray Dryer/Hot air generator would be controlled by

providing cyclone separator and Bag filter and air emission from D. G. set would be controlled by

providing adequate stack height and acoustic enclosure during emergency only.

en-vιsι�n


2.6 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION AND ITS DISPOSAL Solid / hazardous waste i.e. Spent/used oil (200 Lit/Yr.) will be reused as a lubricant/ sent to recyclers.

ETP Sludge (180 MTPA) will be disposed to own landfill site. Incineration ash (360 MTPA) will be

generated which will be disposed in own TSDF site. Spray dyer sludge (220 MTPA) will be disposed at

proposed landfill site within premises. Discarded containers & bags (72 MTPA) Sell to

approved/registered recycler.

3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT The baseline environmental quality of air, water, soil noise and Ecology & Bio diversity, etc has been

assessed in a Post-monsoon season (October 2018 to December 2018). Study area of 10 km radial distance

from the project site is selected along with socioeconomic and ecology status during study period.

3.1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY

No. of AAQM station – 8

Criteria

Pollutant Unit

Maximum

value

Minimum

value

98th

Percentile

Prescribed

Standard Observation

PM10 µg/m3 80.8 60 80.43 100 concentrations

were found

well below

the stipulated

standards

PM2.5 µg/m3 45.83 30 45.83 60

SO2 µg/m3 12.8 7 12.62 80

NOx µg/m3 30.5 19.5 30.5 80

VOC, CO, HG, HCl, Cl2, NH3, HBr, Br2, H2S, HC, HF are found below detectable limit (BDL)

3.2 WATER QUALITY No. of ground water samples collected – 5 and No. of surface water samples collected – 7

Criteria Pollutant (Ground water) Unit Maximum

value

Minimum

value

pH - 7.7 7.42

Total Dissolve Solids (TDS) mg/L 2820 2020

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) mg/L 25 20

Total Hardness (TH) mg/L 882 750

Clorides mg/L 1106.8 620.4

Fluoride mg/L 1.2 0.8

Heavy metals like Iron (as Fe), Lead (as Pb),

Copper (as Cu), Total Arsenic (as As), Cynide (as

CN) etc.

mg/L BDL BDL

Criteria Pollutant (Surface water) Unit Maximum value Minimum

value

pH - 7.88 7.35

Dissolve Oxygen (DO) mg/L 5.7 4.9

Biochemical Oxygen Demand(BOD) mg/L 3.5 3

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/L 13.9 12.2

Total Dissolve Solids (TDS) mg/L 272 176

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) mg/L BDL BDL

Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/L 162.4 107.8

Clorides mg/L 18.1 12.4

Fluoride mg/L 0.68 0.51

Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) mg/L 147.2 133.7

Sodium mg/L 29.7 19.6

Lead mg/L BDL BDL

copper mg/L BDL BDL

zinc mg/L BDL BDL

en-vιsι�n


3.3 BACKGROUND NOISE LEVEL No. of soil samples collected – 5

Criteria

Pollutant

Noise level dB(A) Leq

Maximum Minimum

Leq (Day) 58.5 45.8

Leq (Night) 44.2 40.1

3.4 SOIL QUALITY No. of soil samples collected – 6

Criteria Pollutant Unit Maximum

value

Minimum

value

pH - 8.5 7.6

N (Nitrogen) mg/kg 273.7 159.4

P (Phosphorous) mg/kg 82.2 8.3

K (Potassium) mg/kg 77 64

Electric Conductivity µS/cm 785 180.1

3.5 LAND USE PATTERN Land use within 10 km radius of the study area has been determined with the help of satellite imagery, and

broadly consists of single crop (80.1%), Tank/River/Major canal (6.8%), settlements (4.7%), and waste

land with scrub/ without scrub(8.4%). Predominant land use is Single crop.

3.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY The PIA for the concerned project comprises 55 major villages and urban areas in 10 km radius around the

proposed project in Ziliya village, Chanasma Taluka of Patan district. Total population in the study area

was 10,62,653 with a sex ratio of 938 females per 1000 males and total literacy rate was found 72.30 as per

Census 2011.

3.7 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT There is no ecological sensitive area within 10 km radius of the project site. The vegetation of this area

can be classified on the basis of habitats as; open fallow lands, areas under cultivations, hedge vegetation

and scrub vegetation. The tree species, herbs and shrubs and major crops, were documented during this

base line study. The dominant trees growing in this area were Prosopis cineraria (Khyigdo), Azadirachta

indica,. Acacia nilotica (Baval), Salvadora oleoides (Piludi), and Salvadora persica (Piludo) Shrubs are the

dominant perennials of this area, represented mainly by, Prosopis juliflora, Capparis decidua, Senna

auriculata (Aval), Senna occidentalis (Sundro), Zizyphus nummularia (Chanibor) Calotropis procera,

Calotropis gigantea, (Akado) and Lantana camara.

Some of the sighted fauna within study area was given protection by the Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act,

1972 by including them in different schedules. Among the birds in the study area, Pea fowl (Pavo

cristatus), Eurasian Spoonbill (Platalea leucorodia) are included in schedule I, while many other birds are

included in schedule IV of Wild life protection Act (1972). Among the reptiles, (Indian Mud or Flap shell

Turtle Lissemys punctate) were provided protection as per Schedule-I of Wild life protection act, (1972).

Conservation plan for the said fauna is incorporated in EIA report.

3.8 HYDROGEOLOGY Major water bearing formation of Patan district is quaternary alluvium. Phreatic aquifer (is the area in an

aquifer, below the water table, in which relatively all pores and fractures are saturated with water) of study

area and surroundings is 1.7 to 32.01 DTW in pre-monsoon while in post monsoon it is 1.0 to 20.98 DTW.

Ground water is available at depth 40 – 618.9 mtr, while discharge is 6 – 2616 LPM. Chansma is fall under

over exploited zone of GW. The surface water resources are very limit at and around the PS. Ground

water is major and only source of irrigation, but GW found in the area is predominantly high in

bicarbonate and Floride.

en-vιsι�n


4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES An effort has been made to identify various environmental, social and ecological impacts due to proposed

project during construction and operation phases considering present environmental scenario as baseline.

The corresponding mitigation measures to take care of the adverse impacts are also discussed in following

sections.

4.1 IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES - CONSTRUCTION PHASE Dust will be the main pollutant affecting the ambient air quality of the surrounding area during the

construction phase. Impact during construction phase on air quality is limited to fugitive dust generated by

earth moving activities, hauling of materials, base course surfacing and moving of construction vehicles.

Motor vehicle transportation (to, from and around the site) particularly the traffic of trucks at the site,

material movement into the site will introduce particulates and other exhaust gases into the local ambient

air and there is some likelihood that during the construction period local air quality may be temporarily

affected by these emissions. To reduce air pollution during this phase following mitigation measures will

be implemented.

• Suitable surface treatment to ease the traffic flow and regular sprinkling of water to be carried out to

control dust/fugitive emission.

• To reduce fugitive dust emission, construction activity shall be covered

• Construction material to be stored in covered shed.

• Condition of all vehicles, generators and compressors to be maintained and regularly serviced.

4.2 IMPACT & MITIGATION MEASURES - OPERATION PHASE

4.2.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT

Impact Impacting Activity Mitigation

Flue gas emission

from stacks

Operation of Incineration, spray

dryer and D. G. Set; Vehicular

movement

• Quencher, Carbon Column, Droplet Separator,

Cyclone Separator, Bag Filter, Ventury

Scrubber, Alkali Scrubber will be installed as

APCM with incinerator.

• Cyclone Separator, Bag Filter will be installed

with flue gas emission control

• HDPF perforated vent pipes to collect land fill

gas and its regular monitoring

• Development of green belt

• Internal pucca road and only PUC certified

vehicles will allowed in premises

Fugitive dust

emission

Waste transportation, handling

and disposal

VOC gas

generation

Landfill

4.2.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT


Increase in

noise level

- Handling and disposal of

hazardous waste.

- Transportation of waste

- Operation of pumps,

motors, engines, auxiliary

equipment’s, etc

• All vehicles entering into the project will be informed to

maintain speed limits, and not blow horns unless it is

required. The noise level within facility would be kept

less than 75 dBA

• Acoustic enclosures will be provided to D. G. sets to

reduce the noise level

• Development of greenbelt

4.2.3 WATER ENVIRONMENT


Stress on ground

water source

Water consumption • Reuse of treated effluent (21 KLD), which is approx.

50% of water requirement

• Installation of flow meter to check daily water

consumption

• Water conservation through rainwater harvesting, which

will help to reduce fresh water demand

en-vιsι�n


Contamination of

surface water as

well as ground

water

Transportation and

handling of

hazardous waste

• Storm water management

• Impervious layer and Leachate collection facility at

Temporary waste storage area

Wastewater

generation • Domestic and

industrial use of

water

• Leachate

generation from

landfilling cell

• Domestic effluent will be treated in ETP along with

industrial effluent

• Installation of trenches, cells, etc. and proper leachate

collection and control system so that it will not cause any

contamination of surface water as well as ground water

• Industrial effluent (26 KLD) will be treated in ETP

followed by RO plant.

• Leachate (15 KLD) and RO reject (5 KLD) will be

treated in spray dryer

• Reuse of treated effluent (21 KLD)

4.2.4 SOIL ENVIRONMENT


Generation of

solid/hazardous

waste

- Operation of ETP

- Incineration of waste

- Operation of spray dryer

- Operation of utility and

machineries

- Handling and disposal of

waste

• Separate designated storage area will be provided with

sign boards/labels for solid and liquid hazardous

wastes

• Regular training of employee will be ensured

• Hazardous waste generation and disposal as per SOP

• Maintain printed logbook for any spillage

Contamination

of soil due to

accidental

spillage

- Transportation, handling

and disposal of

hazardous waste

• In case of such condition entire contaminated soil will

be removed and disposed within land fill cell to

reduce impact

• Use of spill kit

4.2.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 33 % of total project area (35,123 m

2) will be developed as green belt at facility boundary, road side,

around offices & buildings. In Green belt area about 10418 trees shall be planted.

4.2.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECT Impact on Socio-Economic aspect will be mainly on population, migration, culture, economic status,

health, education, drinking water facility, drainage facility, primary infrastructure, etc. Due to proposed

facility, impact on socioeconomic environment will be nominal. However, proposed CER activities will

improve socioeconomic status of the area.

5 ALTERNATIVE SITE STUDY For the proposed project following four sites were identified.

Site-1 : Village: Ziliyavasna, Taluka: Chansma, Dist: Patan (Guj.)

Site-2 : Village: Kamboi, Chansma-Harij road, Taluka: Chansma, Dist: Patan (Guj.)

Site-3 : Village: Vadavli, Taluka: Chansma, Dist: Patan (Guj.)

Site-4 : Village: Chansma, Taluka: Chansma, Dist: Patan (Guj.)

Based on CPCB knock out criteria, site -1 and site – 3 is rejected due to existence of water body and

agricultural land. Site – 2 and site – 4 are further evaluated in detail and site – 4 located at Chansma village

are found more suitable for development of TSDF compare to site – 2, hence it is selected.

6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME Regular monitoring of environmental parameters like air, water, noise, vegetation and soil as well as

performance of pollution control facilities and safety measures in the facility is important for proper

environmental management of any project. Env. monitoring programme as mentioned in EIA report will be

implemented.

en-vιsι�n


7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES

7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT The management is very much aware of their obligation to protect all persons at work and others in the

neighborhood that may be affected by an unfortunate and unforeseen incidence occurring at the works.

Any hazard either to employees or environment arising from project activities at the facility shall, as far as

possible, be handled by the management of the company and prevented from spreading any further. Safety

audit and compliance of recommendation of audit will be ensured by all the persons worked in plant.

Personnel protective equipment will be provided and ensure its use.

7.2 ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEARING Public hearing will be conducted as per TOR condition and public hearing document will be incorporate in

final EIA report.

7.3 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN

Hazardous waste from various industries will be received approx. 200 MT/day i.e. approx. 18 Nos. of

trucks will be required per day for transportation of waste. Approx. 25 Nos. of Cars will move per day. The

water sprinkling will be done and all vehicles will be of valid PUC.

8 PROJECT BENEFITS

• Indirect employment generation for surrounding villagers.

• Proposed greenbelt developed and rainwater harvesting at PS will have positive impact on

environment

• Creation of community assets/facility under CER plan. Rs. 76.90 Lacs will utilize for the CER

activities for the first five years

9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

9.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECTS) Environmental monitoring of different parameters will be done regularly and the activity will be

coordinated by the Environmental Management Cell (EMC). Mitigation of environmental impact has to be

implemented according to the suggestions and will be monitored regularly to prevent any lapse. The EMC

will be under the overall supervision of CEO. The cell will report on a regular basis to the management.

The EMC will prepare a formal report on environmental management and mitigation at six month

intervals. The company will undertake various training programme for improving the performance of the

working personnel. Special training will be arranged in regular intervals to combat emergency scenarios

that may occur during the operation.

10 CONCLUSION Company has committed to implement all the pollution control measures to protect the surrounding

environment and hence there will be negligible impact on the same.

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT 1-1

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Hazardous wastes are extremely harmful for the environment and cause significant health hazards. Rapid

industrialization has resulted in the generation of huge quantity of wastes, both solid and liquid form.

Many industrial processes have the potential to produce hazardous waste which includes any material that

is render useless during a manufacturing process. It is presumed that about 10 – 15% of wastes produced

by industries are hazardous and the generation of hazardous wastes is increasing at the rate of 2 – 5 % per

year.

In India, absence of adequate infrastructure for scientific disposal and recycling of hazardous waste has

resulted in poor waste handling. Burning of hazardous waste at landfills is still one of the most common

and primitive methods of disposing, resulting in immense harm for health and environment. Despite

requirements for pollution control measures, these wastes are generally dumped on land or discharged into

water bodies, without adequate treatment, and thus become a large source of environmental pollution and

health hazard. To overcome such situations, integrated waste management facilities are developed. The

capacity of an integrated waste management facility should be decided based on availability of hazardous

waste in the State/in nearby area. Such a facility should comprise a secured landfill, arrangements for

treatment, incinerator, a laboratory capable of comprehensive analysis, and arrangement for transportation

and handling of wastes including supporting infrastructure.

Obtaining Environmental Clearance before setting up industrial plant as per EIA notification is statutory

requirement. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study is carried out as a part of the process to

obtain Environmental Clearance for the proposed waste management facility.

1.1 PURPOSE OF EIA

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study is carried out as a part of the process to obtain

Environmental Clearance for the proposed Green field project of common Integrated Landfill and

Incineration facility by North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP).

Proposed project falls under category “A” of activity 7(d) as this project having incineration & landfill as

per EIA Notification dated 14th September, 2006 and its subsequent amendments.

The purpose of the EIA study is to identify and assess the adverse impacts of a project in the planning

stage itself, so that necessary mitigation measures to prevent or minimize these adverse impacts can be

planned early and cost-effectively. EIA report has been prepared in line with ToR letter vide 10-39/2018-

IA-III dated 29/08/2018 issued by MoEFCC, New Delhi. Further, Technical EIA Guidance Manual for

Common Hazardous Waste TSDF - IL&FS, August, 2010 is also referring to prepare EIA report. ToR

letter is attached as Annexure – 1 with EIA report.

1.2 PROJECT PROPONENT

The company North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP) has been established in the year 2017 by persons who

has experience in the field of waste management, chemical industry etc.

en-vιsι�n


1.2.1 Promoter’s Background

Following are the partners involved in management and decision maker of the company.

1) Dharnendrabhai Natvarlal Patel

2) Dharmendrabhai Kantilal Patel

3) Santosh Mahanandu Naik

4) Samirbhai Govindbhai Patel

5) Mishal Govindbhai Patel

1.3 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT

Industrialization is lead to generation of solid/hazardous waste day by day which has to be collected,

transported, treated and disposed in a properly designed TSDF as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes

(Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

CPCB have laid down a procedure for collection, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes.

The scientifically proven method either incineration or disposal in a secured landfill are used for disposal

of hazardous waste. Such facility requires proper design and operation according to existing guidelines.

Proposed common Integrated Landfill and Incineration Facility will cater environmentally and

economically sound option for industrial waste disposal.

1.3.1 Nature, Size and Location

NGEP proposes Greenfield common integrated Landfill and Incineration facility for disposal of industrial

waste to be generated from various industries located in and around Ahmedabad & North Gujarat region.

Design capacity of the proposed landfill is 7,82,181 MT in 6,51,353 m3 which is based on a bulk

compaction factor of 1.2 MT/m3. Further one incinerator (1 MT/hr.) for the incineration of liquid and solid

waste will be installed.

After detailed alternative site study, project proponent decided to develop proposed facility at Survey No.

2482/1, 2482/2, 2486, 2487, 2483/1, 2483/2, 2491/1, 2491/2, 2500, 2499, 2498, 2496/1, 2496/2, 2497,

2502, 2501, 2503, 2506, 2509, 2510, 2523 Vill. – Chanasma, Tal. – Chanasma, Dist. Patan, Gujarat.

Alternative site selection study is described in chapter – 5 of EIA report.

1.3.2 Importance of Project to Region

Hazardous wastes generated from various industries in and around Ahmedabad and Mehsana, need to be

disposed in an environmentally safe manner. GPCB data shows that TSDF sites located in Surendranagar

and Nandesari (Vadodara) is in operation. A new landfill facility is required for hazardous waste disposal

as existing facilities has utilized their maximum design capacity. Presently non-landfillable waste which is

voluminous and toxic is incinerating in common incineration facility by BEIL, Ankleshwar and NECL,

Nandesari-Vadodara. Both facilities located around 313 km and 203 km respectively from proposed

project site. It is unwanted transportation burden on the industries for economic point as well as risk on the

existing road network on environment point of view. In view of above scenario, proposed integrated

facility will be set up at advantageously location i.e. at Chanasma, near Patan district.

en-vιsι�n


1.4 REGULATORY FRAME WORK

Proposed Green field project is waste treatment facility; hence the regulatory framework related with the

hazardous or toxic chemicals/wastes as well as regulatory provision of risk, safety & emergency

management is applicable. The major regulatory provisions applicable to the proposed project are tabulated

as under:

Sr. No. Legal Provision Concern Authority or Bodies

1 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,

1981 amended 1987

CPCB and GPCB

2 Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution)

(Union Territories) Rules, 1983

CPCB and GPCB

3 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution)

Act, 1974 amended 1988

CPCB and GPCB

4 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,

1974 and its subsequent amendments

CPCB and GPCB

5 Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Rules,

1975 and its subsequent amendments

CPCB and GPCB

6 The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986,

amended 1991

Ministry of Environment and Forests, & Climate

Change (MoEF&CC), CPCB and GPCB

7 Environmental (Protection) Rules, 1986

(Amendments in 1999, 2001, 2002, 2002, 2002,

2003, 2004)


Change (MoEF&CC), CPCB and GPCB

8 Hazardous Waste (Management and

Handling) Rules, 1989 amended 2000 and 2003

MoEF&CC, CPCB, SPCB,

9 Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning

Preparedness and Response) Rules, 1996

CCG, SCG, DCG, LCG and MAH Units

10 EIA Notification, 2006 and its subsequent

amendments


Change (MoEF&CC), GPCB

11 Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991

amended 1992

Ministry of Environment & Forests, District

Collector

12 Public Liability Insurance Rules, 1991

amended 1993

Ministry of Environment & Forests, District

Collector

13 The Factories Act, 1948 Ministry of Labor, DGFASLI and Directorate of

Industrial Safety and Health/Factories Inspectorate

14 The Explosive Act ,1884 Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Department

of Explosives)

15 The Explosive Rules, 1983 Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Chief

Controller of Explosives, port conservator,

customs collector, railway administration

16 The Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and

Highways

17 The Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and

Highways

18 Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

MoEF&CC, CPCB, GPCB

19 Gaseous Emission Norms for Common Hazardous

Waste Incinerators notified as

Environment (Protection) Fifth Amendment Rules,

2008 dated 26 June 2008

CPCB and GPCB

en-vιsι�n


1.4.1 Applicable CPCB’s Guideline

Following guideline published by CPCB and time to time amendment in it was referred partially or whole

to prepare EIA report of proposed integrated TSDF project.

• Guidelines for Setting up of Operating Facility: Hazardous Waste Management

• Guidelines for the Selection of Site for Land filling

• Guidelines for Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment : Site Selection for Common Hazardous

Waste Management Facility

• Revised Guidelines for Pre-processing and Co-processing of Hazardous and Other Wastes in Cement

Plant as per H&OW(M & TBM) Rules, 2016

• Guidelines on Implementing Liabilities for Environmental Damages due to Handling & Disposal of

Hazardous Waste and Penalty

• Guidelines for Common Hazardous Waste Incineration

• Criteria for Hazardous Waste Landfills

• Protocol for performance Evaluation and Monitoring of the Common Hazardous Waste Treatment

Storage and Disposal Facilities including Common Hazardous Waste Incinerators

• Guidelines for Proper Functioning and Upkeep of Disposal Sites

• Guidelines for Environmental Sound Recycling of Hazardous Waste as per Schedule-V of Hazardous

Waste (Management Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2008

• Guidelines for Transportation of Hazardous Wastes

• Guidelines for Storage of Incinerable Hazardous Wastes by the Operators of Common Hazardous

Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities and Captive HW Incinerators

1.4.2 Applicability of EIA Notification

Proposed project activities attract the provisions of EIA notifications 2006 (SO – 1533) and as amended

thereafter. Proposed project activities fall under 7(d) – {Common hazardous waste treatment, storage and

disposal facilities (TSDFs)} category – A {All integrated facilities having incineration & landfill or

incineration alone} as per notification. Public hearing is applicable to proposed project as project site

located in Chansma village. Proponent shall follow the regulatory frame work as mentioned in above table

as well as referred mandatory provision time to time impose by regulatory authority.

Public hearing shall be conducted as per provision of EIA notification and issues raised as well as

commitments made by the project proponent on the same will be included in final EIA/EMP Report.

1.5 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY OF EIA STUDY

EIA study is conducted to incorporate all relevant critical issues of the proposed project. EIA report

incorporate field monitoring of environmental parameter for one season (excluding monsoon months),

impact-mitigation and Environment Management Plan. Project proponent has appointed Envision Enviro

Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (EETPL) for conducting EIA study for proposed project. EETPL is QCI approved

environmental consultant and authorized organized to represent the proposed project to MoEFCC. QCI

Accreditation certificate is incorporated in chapter – 12 of EIA report.

1.5.1 Baseline Study

Baseline data collection and environmental monitoring was undertaken to gather relevant information from

available sources from the project site and surrounding areas during October to December – 2018.

Environmental attributes, frequency of monitoring and scope of the baseline study is mentioned in Table

1-1.

en-vιsι�n


Table 1-1: Scope of Baseline Study

S.

No.

Environmen

tal

Component

Sampling

parameters

Sampling

period

Sampling

Frequency

Sampling

Locations Objective

1 Meteorology • Temperature,

• Wind Speed,

• Wind Direction,

• Precipitation,

• Rain fall,

• Relative Humidity,

• Cloud Cover

3 months • Hourly

except

Rainfall.

• Rainfall data

daily

1 Site specific meteorological

status of the study was

carried out for prediction of

ground level concentration in

downwind direction.

2 Ambient Air

Quality

PM10, PM2.5, SO2,

NO2

Twice in

week

for 12 weeks

24 hr 8 Prediction of impacts on air

quality due to proposed

project activities and

suggestion for mitigative

measures based on air quality

models results.

NH3 Once in

Month

24 hr

CO, VOC Once in

Month

8 hr

Cl2, HCl, HG, HC

HF, H2S, HBr, Br2,

Once in

Month

24 hr

3. Water

Quality

pH, TDS, temperature

and other Physico-

chemical and

biological parameters

Once in a

baseline

period

- 5 Ground

Water

8 Surface

Water

To established water quality

data with respect to physico-

chemical, biological

parameters and heavy metals

for assessing the impact of

the proposed project

activities on water

environment.

4. Noise Leq 24 hourly

composite

Once during

Study period

5 To established baseline status

of noise and it was used in

assessing the impact of noise

of the surrounding.

5. Soil Soil profile, Chemical

constituents

- Once during

Study period

6 To established

physiochemical characteristic

of soil to understand soil

quality as well as assessing

the impact of the proposed

project activities on soil

environment.

6. Ecology and

Bio-diversity

(EB)

Flora and Fauna of

the study area

- Once during

Study period

Study area

(10 km

from PS)

Primary survey of Flora and

fauna species and established

EB data based on primary as

well as available secondary

information.

7. Socio-

Economic

aspects

demographic

structure, provision of

basic amenities,

health status

-- Once during

Study period

Study area

(10 km

from PS)

To understand the socio-

economic status of study

area; perceptions of people

about the impact of proposed

project activities and suggest

CER plan accordingly.

8. Land use Trend of land use

change for different

categories

-- Once during

Study period

Study area

(10 km

from PS)

To understand the existing

land use pattern and changes

to be occurred due to

proposed project activities.

9. Geology &

Geo-

Hydrology

Ground water status

along with geological

features of the study

area

- Once during

Study period

Study area

(10 km

from PS)

Geological and geo-

hydrological investigation to

know the status of the study

area and it was used in

assessing the impact.

10. Risk and

Hazard

Analysis

Risk due to proposed

project and its

quantitative/qualitativ

e analysis of potential

hazards

- Once during

Study period

Plant

premises

and

immediate

surroundin

gs

To evaluate risk, assess its

impact associated to the

proposed project activity and

plan the appropriate action to

control risk by the most

economical means.

en-vιsι�n


1.5.2 Identification of Impact and Mitigation

Analysis of technical information of proposed project and project activities has been done to link it with

the existing environmental status in order to list out the risk to affect environmental parameters. Likely

impacts on such parameters are assessed based on it and accordingly mitigation measures are suggested to

comply with statutory standards.

1.5.3 Environmental Management Plan

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is preparing in such a way so that successful implementation of

suggested mitigative measures will be achieved. The EMP envisages the plans for the proper

implementation of mitigation measures to reduce the adverse impacts arising out of the project activities

during construction and operational activities.

1.5.4 Additional Studies

Any specific study suggested by committee in ToR letter after looking the proposed project scenario will

conducted after consultation with subject specific expert and detail of the same is incorporate in EIA

report.

1.5.5 Structure of EIA Report

EIA report of proposed project has been prepared accordingly generic structure given in Appendix – III of

EIA notification for MoEFCC scrutiny and judging the environmental compatibility of the project as per

ToR letter issued by them.

en-vιsι�n


CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 INTRODUCTION

Along with encouraging the industrial growth, the Government of Gujarat is also aware about the

environmental considerations of the industries. Gujarat tops the list of Hazardous waste generating states in

India with 42 % contribution to the country’s overall hazardous waste generation. In view of the same, it

had taken steps to establish Common integrated landfill and incineration facilities for treatment & disposal

of solid/hazardous Waste.

2.1.1 Waste Generation and Management in Gujarat

Hazardous waste can be broadly classified into three categories, Incinerable, Recyclable and Landfillabe.

Gujarat is one of the most industrialized states in India, in which industrial growth has been consistently

increased on faster rate over the last decade. 28.76% of India’s total landfillable hazardous waste as well as

26.12% of India’s total incinerable hazardous waste has been generated by industrial units located in

Gujarat. Following table shows Hazardous Waste generated scenario in the Gujarat State.

Table 2-1: Total Hazardous Waste Generation in Gujarat

Type of waste Unit 2006 2007

Landfill MMTPA 0.795 1.137

Incinerable MMTPA 0.106 0.106

Reclyclable MMTPA 0.375 0.524

Total 1.276 1.767 Source: Hazardous waste Inventory as on 31.08.2007- Gujarat state by GPCB

MMTPA – Million Metric Tone per Annum

From table, approx. 60 – 65 landfillable and 5 – 10% incinerable wastes generated which required proper

disposal method which will not harmful to environment.

Currently, Seven Common Hazardous Waste TSDF [Treatment, Stabilization, and Disposal Facilities] and

Six Common Hazardous Wastes Incineration Facilities mentioned below are operated in Gujarat.

The hazardous waste generated by industries in Gujarat cannot be accommodated adequately at the

existing TSDF sites, hence another TSDF site has been proposed at Chanasama village in Chanasma

Taluka & Dist – Patan .The proposed facility is located at Chanasma, Dhanodharda to Ziliya vasna Road

and it will help in the disposal of hazardous waste generated from various industrial premises in and

around North Gujarat and Madhya Gujarat.

2.1.2 TSDF/Incineration Facility in Gujarat

Hazardous waste Facilities in Gujarat as on Decmber-2016 are as follow:

Table 2-2: Common Hazardous Waste TSDF [Treatment Stabilization Disposal and Facilities]

Sr. No. Operator of TSDF Status

1. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd, Ankleshwar In Operation

2. Vapi Green Enviro Ltd. Vapi In Operation

3. Nandesari Environment Control Ltd. Nandesari, Vadodara, In Operation

4. Gujarat Maritime Board, Alang, Bhavnagar. In Operation

5. Saurashtra Enviro projects Pvt. Ltd, Bhachau, Kutch In Operation

6. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd. Dahej, Bharuch. In Operation

en-vιsι�n


Sr. No. Operator of TSDF Status

7. Eco care Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Dasada , Surendranagar In Operation

8. Naroda Enviro Project Ltd., Odhav, Ahmedabad. Capped and Closed

9. The Green Environment Services Co. Op. Society Ltd. Vatva Ahmedabad. Capped and Closed

10. Gujarat Enviro protection & infrastructure Ltd. Surat. Closed

Source: GPCB website (January 2019)

Table 2-3: HWIF [Common Hazardous Wastes Incineration Facility] in Gujarat

Sr. Operator of CHWIF Status

1. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd, Ankleshwar In Operation

2. Nandesari Environment Control Ltd. Nandesari, Vadodara, In Operation

3. Gujarat Maritime Board, Alang, Bhavnagar In Operation

4. Saurashtra Enviro projects Pvt. Ltd, Bhachau, Kutch In Operation

5. Saurashtra Enviro projects Pvt. Ltd, Dahej, Bharuch In Operation

6. Geohybrid Industrial Solutions Private Limited. Plasana,Surat In Operation

7. Gujarat Enviro protection & infrastructure Ltd. Surat. Closed

Source: GPCB website (January 2019)

Apart from above Common TSDFs and Incinerators, there are total 16 Captive Hazardous Waste

Treatment and Disposal Facilities and 72 Captive Incinerators in Gujarat.

2.2 PROPOSED PROJECT

North Gujarat Enviro Projects (NGEP) proposes common integrated TSDF, Incineration facility

comprising of landfill which will cater to environmentally and economically sound disposal of waste

generated in Ahmedabad & North Gujarat region, minimizing long distance haulage of waste. Proposed

facility shall be developed at Survey No. 2482/1, 2482/2, 2486, 2487, 2483/1, 2483/2, 2491/1, 2491/2,

2500, 2499, 2498, 2496/1, 2496/2, 2497, 2502, 2501, 2503, 2506, 2509, 2510, 2523 Vill. – Chanasma, Tal.

– Chanasma, Dist. Patan, Gujarat. As per EIA notification, it is necessary to get Environmental Clearance

(EC) prior to commissioning of the proposed project. For this purpose the application is made for obtaining

the Environmental Clearance.

2.2.1 Need of project

Approx. 22.64 lakh Metric Tonnes of hazardous waste was treated/disposed from 2008-09 to 2011-12, out

of which almost 92% was landfillable; 6.6% was incinerable; 0.9% was landfillable after treatment and

0.6% was co-processed in Gujarat1. There was approx. 150793.65 MMTPA and 30498.99 MMTPA

landfillable wastes generated from Ahmedabad and Vadodara region in the year 2011 – 12.

In recent time Saurashtra and North Gujarat are the new destinations for the Red Category (Polluting)

industrial units in the Gujarat. There are ecologically fragile in terms of prevailing arid conditions and

unique bio-diversity and will have more deleterious impact on the environment due to polluting industries

compared to other regions. Hence, it is most important that hazardous wastes generated from various

industries in and around Ahmedabad, Vadodara and Mehsana district to be disposed in an environmentally

1 GPCB, 2012 report

en-vιsι�n


safe manner. As a matter of consequence, a need is arising to develop a common environmental

infrastructure to treat and dispose the hazardous waste. The hazardous waste generated by industries may

not be accommodated adequately at TSDF sites operated in Gujarat. Current scenario shows that most of

TSDF sites have been closed or about to reach at their maximum design capacity. With each passing day

industrial waste generation will increase and in absence of proximity to TSDF site, the proposed project is

well justified in meeting the current and increasing waste management demand.

Source: Hazardous waste Inventory as on 31.08.2007- Gujarat state by GPCB

Figure 2-1: Composition of Hazardous Waste Generated in Gujarat

From above figure and detail mentioned in section 1.1.1, it is observed that major landfillable waste

generation in three region of Gujarat state i.e. from central Gujarat, North Gujarat and Kutch region.

Proposed facility at Chanasma located advantageously in centre of all three regions and directly receives

the hazardous waste to be generated from said regions. Considering above scenario project proponent

understand that there is need of common facility to manage hazardous waste. Proposed project developed

by NGEP is Greenfield project having following components,

• Landfill of 7,82,181 MT overall capacities, to be developed in cellular fashion, in phase-wise.

• Incinerator of 1 MT/Hr.

2.2.2 Justification of Project site

Project site has been finalized after detailed study of site alternative. Although following points are justify

the selected project site,

• Well established transportation network2

• No R & R will be required; as no displacement of settlement.

• Sensitive environmental locations like national park or wildlife Habitats, reserve forest, coral reef,

sanctuary is not fall within 10 km radial distance from project site.

• Easy availability of skilled and unskilled manpower from nearby area

2 Although strengthening of existing road (approx. 2.63 km) and development of road (approx. 1.00 km) to assess project site will

be required.

en-vιsι�n


2.2.3 Project location

Project site is located at 23°41'18.31" North latitude and 72° 8'36.02" East longitude. Location map

showing project site is depicted as Figure 2-2 Short view of the project site on Google earth is depicted as

Figure 2-3. Plant layout shows detail of entry, exit, internal road, waste storage area, land fill and process

area, greenbelt, treatment area, admin and laboratory, observatory well etc. and the same is depicted as

Figure 2-4. Topography map of 10 km radious from the project site is given as Figure 2-5

Figure 2-2: Location Map

en-vιsι�n


Identification Latitude Longitude

23°41'18.31"N 72° 8'36.02"E

A 23°41'26.42"N 72° 8'30.52"E

B 23°41'23.68"N 72° 8'31.69"E

C 23°41'20.44"N 72° 8'33.15"E

D 23°41'21.39"N 72° 8'36.82"E

E 23°41'24.87"N 72° 8'36.27"E

F 23°41'25.37"N 72° 8'37.80"E

G 23°41'24.81"N 72° 8'38.73"E

H 23°41'25.18"N 72° 8'43.40"E

I 23°41'19.74"N 72° 8'43.77"E

J 23°41'19.46"N 72° 8'43.04"E

K 23°41'15.83"N 72° 8'43.45"E

L 23°41'15.59"N 72° 8'41.62"E

M 23°41'19.24"N 72° 8'41.22"E

N 23°41'19.16"N 72° 8'39.73"E

O 23°41'17.02"N 72° 8'39.81"E

P 23°41'16.16"N 72° 8'34.84"E

Q 23°41'13.81"N 72° 8'35.29"E

R 23°41'14.63"N 72° 8'39.84"E

S 23°41'12.67"N 72° 8'40.40"E

T 23°41'10.93"N 72° 8'39.87"E

U 23°41'10.32"N 72° 8'37.99"E

V 23°41'9.88"N 72° 8'35.64"E

W 23°41'12.38"N 72° 8'34.60"E

X 23°41'12.04"N 72° 8'32.79"E

Y 23°41'23.09"N 72° 8'29.91"E

Z 23°41'26.00"N 72° 8'29.15"E

Figure 2-3: Google image showing the project site

en-vιsι�n


Kuchcha Road Access to PS Kuchcha Road Access to PS

Junction of Zilliyavasana village road & approach road

connecting PS

Project site with existing trees

Project site Irrigation surrounding PS through Narmda canal water

Berry shrubs on the way to PS Cotton crop near to PS

Photograph 2-1 Project Site Photograph

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-4: Plant Layout

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-5: Topography Map Showing 10 km Radius Study area of Project Sit

en-vιsι�n


2.2.4 Project Site History

Proposed project will be developed at Chansma village. Project site history with respect to various

environmental attributes are described as under,

2.2.4.1 Topography

Toposheet no. 46 A/1 and 46 A/2; issued by Survey of India covered the project site and 10 km radial area.

The entire study area is almost flat and no hilly area observed. Maximum elevation above Means Sea Level

is 61 mtr. Major physiography of Patan district is Alluvial plain and Rann. It is found that major soil of

area is sandy, saline and alkaline soils. No electrical/ high tension line passes through the centre of

proposed project area.

2.2.4.2 Seismic Zone

The latest version of seismic zoning map of India given in the earthquake resistant design code of India [IS

1893 (Part 1) 2002] assigns four levels of seismicity for India in terms of zone factors. The map shows that

proposed project site fall under Seismic Zone – IV, which is the considered to be the high seismic zone.

Precautionary measures as per guideline will be considered during detailed engineering design of TSDF

site.

Figure 2-6: Earthquake hazard zone map of India

2.2.4.3 Land use

Land use of project site and surrounded area is prominently of agricultural land (80% of study area) with

very less industrial set up. Agriculture land is single crop and major crops are cotton, wheat, bajara, fennel

(Variyali), Rapes (Aerando), Muster, isabgul, cowpea, other cereal and grams etc. 8% of study area is

waste land, while remaining are water bodies and built-up land. During the project site visit by FAEs in the

month of October – 2018, it was obaserved that agricultural activities is being carried out by villagers at

surrounding the project site as well as all the locations visited.

en-vιsι�n


2.2.4.4 Hydro-geology

Major water bearing formation of Patan district is quaternary alluvium. Phreatic aquifer (is the area in an

aquifer, below the water table, in which relatively all pores and fractures are saturated with water) of

study area and surroundings is 1.7 to 32.01 DTW in pre-monsoon while in post monsoon it is 1.0 to 20.98

DTW. Ground water is available at depth 40 – 618.9 mtr, while discharge is 6 – 2616 LPM. Chansma is

fall under over exploited zone of GW. The surface water resources is very limited at and around the PS.

Ground water is major and only source of irrigation, but GW found in the area is predominantly high in

bicarbonate and floride3. Quality of groundwater (ground level to 100 m or more) is not good i.e. mixed

(saline/marginal/slightly saline/good) as per existing sources in core/buffer zone of studied area. As per

inventory groundwater quality becomes highly variable upto deeper depth. Ground water movement is

towards south west and south west west area which is towards little Rann and ultimately to Gulf of

Kachchh. The site is very sensitive from environmental point of view due to highly permeable sub strata.

2.2.4.5 Drainage pattern

Rivers Banas, Khari and Umardasi drain part of the Patan district. All are Ephemeral and non-perenial

rivers in nature. It flows only during good monsoon years. Major part of the Patan districts is devoid of any

drainage network and do not falls in any catchment area. Origin of Rupen River is Tunga hill and end in

the small desert of Katchhchh. Puspavati and Khari is the tributary of Rupen River and flowing within the

study area of proposed project.

2.2.4.6 Flood Scenario

Good monsoon is main source of water in rivers located in the study area and only due to heavy monsoon

brings floods in the river basin. Average rainfall data during 2006 to 2015 for Patan district shows that it

hardly gets 654 mm rain only4. There is no flood history in Chansma last decade.

2.2.4.7 Environmental Sensitive Receptor

S.

No Sensitive Receptor Distance and Direction w.r.t. PS

A Social Infrastructure

Habitation Ziliyavasna village (Population – 709 nos.) at 1.45 km in E direction.

Local Market None within 2 km radius of the project site.

Religious Place • Amba mata temple in Ziliyavasna Village at 1.45 km in E direction.

• Ancient Temple of Nilkantheshwar Mahadev in Jasalpur Village at 3.0

km in NNW direction.

• Religious activities (every punam, salgiri etc.) are frequently performed

at both the places.

Primary School Primary School (approx. 85 students) Ziliyavasna Village at 1.45 km in E

direction.

B Historical Places/

Monuments

Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

C Environmental

Agriculture Land Surrounded by single crop agricultural land

Public Park None within 2 km radius of the project site.

Lake or pond Karoda Lake at 1.60 km in WSW Direction

Critical habitat area Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

3 GW broucher of Patan District, March – 2014 4 Ground water year book (2016 – 170 Gujarat state, March – 2018

en-vιsι�n

NORTH GUJARAT ENVIRO PROJECTS, CHANSMA, GUJARAT 2-16A

Based on CPCB & MoEF guidelines for Hazardous waste landfill site (Criteria for hazardous Water Landfills, February 2001), proposed TSDF site is analyzed in addition to above environmental sensitive receptor and details are mentioned as under.

S. No

Site location Criteria as per CPCB Guideline Remarks

1 Lake or Pond No landfill shall normally be constructed within 200 m of any lake or pond.

Nearest lake (Karoda Lake) is at 1.60 km in WSW Direction

2 River No landfill shall be constructed within 100 m of a navigable river or stream.

• No Navigable river within 5 km radius. • Non-perennial Khari river is at 2.22 km

in E direction and Pushpavati river is at 8.12 km in SSE direction.

3 Flood plain Not in flood plain

4 Highway No landfill shall be constructed within 500 m of the right of way of any state or national highway

• Nearest State Highway (SH-7) is at 1.38 km in WSW direction.

• State Highway (SH-55) is at 2.36 km in NE direction.

• Nearest National Highway (NH 15) is at 43.31 km in NW direction

Habitation A landfill site shall be atleast 500 m from a notified habitated area A zone of 500 m around a landfill boundary should be declared a no-deveiopment buffer zone after the landfill location is finalised.

Nearest habitation (Ziliyavasna Village) is at 1.45 km in E direction.

6 Public parks No landfill shall be constructed within 500 m of a public park.

None

7 Critical Habitat Area No landfill shall be constructed within critical habitat areas including reserved forest areas.

• Jessore Sloth Bear Sanctuary is situated at 84.09 km in NNE direction.

• Balaram Ambaji Sanctuary is located at 61.76 km in NNE direction

8 Wetlands No landfill shall be constructed within wetlands.

None

9 Airports No landfill shall be constructed within a zone around Airports as notified by the regulatory authority or the aviation authority

• Nearest airport - Mehsana Airport is at 23.8 km in ESE direction and Ahmedabad Airport is at 84.7 km in SE direction

10 Water Supply Well No landfill shall be constructed within 500 m of any water supply well

None within 500 m radius

11 Coastal Regulation Zone No landfill shall be sited in a coastal regulation zone.

None

12 Ground water table level No landfill shall be located in areas where the ground water table will be less than 2 m below the base of the landfill

Ground water table is more than 20 m Below GL.

13 Other Criteria - Presence of monuments / religious structures • Rani ki Vav is located at 15.33 km in NNW direction.

• Sahastralinga Talao located at 17.91 km in NNW direction

• Jami Masjid is situated at 14.63 km in North direction

• Modhera Sun temple is located at 12.33 km in South direction

en-vιsι�n


2.2.5 Salient Feature

Defense installation, critically polluted area, protected area notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act

(1972) & Eco-sensitive area notified under Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act- 1986 are not

located within 10 km radius of the project site as per topo-sheet obtained from Survey of India (SOI) and

available secondary data. Key infrastructure like National Highway, State Highways, other roads with the

railway lines etc and Environmental settings like river, water bodies, forest, monuments, heritage palces

around the project site is mentioned in Table 2-4.

Table 2-4: Key Feature around the Project Site

No. Description

From Project Site

Remarks Distance

(km)

Direction

1. National High Way (NH 15) 43.31 NW -

2. State High Way (SH-7) 1.38 WSW -

State High Way (SH-55) 2.36 NE -

3. Railway Station (Chansma) 4.0 NNW -

4. Airport (Ahmedabad) 84.7 SE -

5. River (non-perennial river)

Pushpavati River 8.12 SSE Nr. Mahadevpura village

Khari River 2.22 East Nr. Zilliyavasana village

Karoda Lake 1.60 WSW In Karoda village

6. Sea (Gulf of Khambhat) 203.9 South -

7. Village (Ziliyavasna village) 1.45 East Population – 709 nos.

8. City (Chansma) 4.0 NNW -

9.

Heritage site/ Archeological Site

12.33 South Modhera Sun Temple

15.33 NNW Rani ki Vav

17.91 NNW Sahastralinga Talao

14.63 North Jami Masjid

10. Reserve Forests Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

11. National Park/Wild Life Sanctuary Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

12. Bird Sanctuary Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

13. Eco Sensitive Area Non within 10 km radius of the project site.

14. Industries in surrounding Non within 2 km radius of the project site.

2.3 PROJECT SIZE

Proposed TSDF landfill of capacity 7,82,181 MT and incinerator of capacity 1 MT/Hr. to be developed at

Chansma village. It is assume that hazardous waste disposal in landfill cell and incineration of waste will

be carried out for 16 hr. per day respectively. Landfilling activities will be closed during the monsoon

period; hence it will be in operation for 8 months i.e. 240 days while incineration will be continue

throughout the year except maintenance.

en-vιsι�n


2.3.1 Justification for capacity

There was approx. 150793.65 MMTPA and 30498.99 MMTPA landfillable wastes generated from

Ahmedabad and Vadodara region in the year 2011 – 125. Based on secondary data available for hazardous

waste generation data, it is expected that more than 40000 MTPA hazardous waste will be received by the

proposed project, even after considering capacity of existing common facilities in Gujarat.

Engineering design of proposed TSDF cell has been done considering life span of 20 years.

2.4 PROJECT COMPONENT

Proposed integrated waste management facility comprises of mainly following two components

• Landfill cells

• Incinerator

Other facilities associated with above components are as follows:

• Security and Administrative office equipped with walkie-talkie, internet and other amenities

• Laboratory with latest equipment

• Waste reception area

• Weigh bridge

• Wheel wash facility

• Covered shed for intermediate waste storage (pre-treatment)/ Temporary waste storage

• Waste stabilization facility

• Storm water drain network

• Internal RCC roads and approach road

• Workshop for maintenance (machinery, vehicles, electrical maintenance etc.)

• Sanitation and drinking water facilities

• Observatory well for ground water monitoring

2.5 LAND FILL

A landfill is a site for the disposal of waste by burial. It is a carefully designed and monitored structure that

isolates wastes with the help of a bottom liner and daily covering of soil from the surrounding environment

i.e. groundwater, air, rain etc.

2.5.1 Component of Landfill

The main components of any secured, permitted landfill are bottom liners, landfill cells, Leachate

collection system, storm water drainage etc and it is described in respective sections.

2.5.1.1 Bottom Liner

The bottom liner separates and prevents the buried waste from coming in contact with underlying natural

soils and groundwater. Bottom liners are generally constructed using durable, puncture-resistant synthetic

plastic HDPE (High Density Polyethylene).

2.5.1.2 Cells

This is the area in a landfill that has been constructed and approved for disposal of waste. It is proposed to

develop four cells of 13133 sq.mtr; 12009 sq.mtr; 13486 sq. mtr; and 11274 sq. mtr. area respectively

considering total 200 MTPD waste received at the landfill. Inside larger cells there are smaller cells

known as the daily workface, or sometimes referred to as cells. This is where the waste coming into the

5 GPCB report 2012

en-vιsι�n


landfill for disposal that day is prepared by placing the material in layers or lifts where the waste is then

compacted and shredded by heavy landfill compaction machinery.

2.5.1.3 Leachate Collection System

Landfill is typically designed in such a way so that the bottom surface of the landfill is sloped to a low

point from where any liquids (leachate) that are trapped inside the landfill are collected and removed from

the landfill. Leachate collection system typically consists of a series of perforated pipes, gravel packs and a

layer of sand or gravel placed in the bottom of the landfill. Once the leachate is removed from the sump, it

is typically pumped or gravity-flowed to a holding tank or pond, where it is either treated on site or hauled

off site to wastewater treatment facility.

Rain falling on active landfill area is collected separately via leachate collection system or sump and

treated it as Leachate only.

2.5.1.4 Storm Water Drainage

This is an engineered system designed to control water runoff during rain or storm events and manage it in

such a way so that it does not drain into the landfill cell from surrounding area. Further water logging or

ponding on landfill covers can be avoided. Surface runoff is directing in channels though culverts and

design in such a way so that the runoff water flow is slowed down or held long enough to allow the

suspended soil particles to settle out before the water is discharged for treatment. Strom water drainage

requires a low permeability lining to prevent leakage in to the landfill.

2.5.1.5 Gas Collection System

Hazardous waste/inert wastes are proposed to be disposed at TSDF site from their landfill gas is generated

due to presence of VOCs in the wastes. Almost at all HW landfill site gaseous emission are anticipated, but

it is not significant. For removal of landfill gases a series of pipes (HDPE perforated vent pipes 50 mm dia)

at every 50 m distance either ways are embedded within the landfill. These pipes shall be connected at the

top of the waste body after closure and a vent shall be provided at top for monitoring of generation of vent

gases if any after closure.

2.5.1.6 Cover (or cap)

Wastes placed in a cell is required to be covered daily with either compacted soil or an alternative daily

cover i.e. application of spray-on cover materials(foam, flame-retardant fiber material etc.); large panels of

tarpaulin-type material that is laid over the waste at the end of each day and removed the next day before

waste is placed. Covering (or capping) is performed in order to isolate the waste from exposure to the air

and to control odors. When the landfill filled upto its capacity, it is permanently covered with a

combination of a layer of polyethylene plastic, compacted soil and a layer of topsoil that will support

growth of vegetation to prevent erosion.

Establishment of a solar power generation farm over final cover will also be explored and if found suitable

Solar panels will be installed to generate power and transfer to grid.

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-7: Detail of Landfill Cell

2.6 INCINERATION

Wastes having high calorific values is directly incinerate without any pre-treatment at site. 1 MT/Hr

incinerator is proposed considering daily waste receipt of 16 MTPD. Incinerator will be operating for day

time in two shifts. The incinerator consists of following components,

1. Feed section : Feed tank and Heaters

2. Incineration system consist of Primary chamber (Rotary kiln), Secondary chamber, Mixing

chamber/Quench chamber, Waste heat recovery system and Force evaporation (Liquid quenching)

3. Flue gas treatment installing Multi-Cyclone, three stage scrubber and Mist eliminator, finally vent

through chimney

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-8: Flow diagram of incinerator

Process Description of Incineration System

� Primary and secondary chamber

• Incinerator system shall consist of primary chamber and secondary combustion chambers in series,

followed by quenching section. Both the combustion chambers shall have refractory lined self-

supported structure. Primary chamber burner and secondary chamber burner shall fire the liquid fuel,

when required. Primary and secondary chambers are wall mounted burners. Air blowers, supply

combustion air to these burners and liquid waste atomizers. Fuel oil flow will be regulated to maintain

the temperature inside the furnaces, with help of modulation control panel

• Combustion air flow will be regulated by manually operated air flow dampers. Temperature in primary

chamber will be maintained at about 800 – 900 ºC.

• Burners will be provided with flame detector, which controls flame and burner for safe and automatic

operation. Liquid waste shall be injected using pumps through nozzle into primary chamber. Atomizing

air will be supplied to it which will helps in proper combustion of the waste. The nozzles shall be

supplied with air to avoid any damage, which also helps for efficient combustion. Primary combustion

chamber, which is a rotary kiln, also has a solid waste charging system with double door automatic

feeding system to ensure safety of a person and equipment as well.

• The flue gases from the primary chamber travel to the secondary chamber which will be further heated

beyond 1150 ºC with help of burner and air supply for complete combustion. The secondary chamber

will be designed in such a way that the residence time of flue gas coming from primary chamber will be

more than 2 sec.

• Ash generated in the incinerator shall fall at the rear end of primary chamber (Rotary Kiln) in ash

collection pit and at the bottom of secondary combustion chamber, which shall be removed periodically

by opening ash removal door at side for its further disposal to a secure landfill site.

• All the operating parameters will be controlled and monitored by PLC based SCADA system.

• Sight glass near burner assembly and minimum two no. of peep holes will be provided in primary

chamber and secondary chamber as well. With help of which, the flame and chamber can be seen from

both the chambers

• Both the chambers will be provided with refractory bricks which can withstand approx. 1500 ºC.

en-vιsι�n


• Explosion window with vent pipe will be provided in both the chambers for safety of the equipment

and personnel, to release the flue gases to safe location and avoid backfire in case of any eventuality of

pressure rise.

� Quench chamber

• Quenching chamber is provided to quench the flue gas to desirable temperature by adding fresh air. The

air is being fed with quench air blower and flow rate is controlled by controlling the blower speed with

help of VFD.

• Quenching system will be placed at the first stage of an APCS to reduce temperature of flue gas after

secondary chambers immediately from 1200 ºC to 500 ºC. Gas quench system includes use of cooling

blower. Apart from this due to quenching formation of furans and dioxins will be eliminated.

� Flue gas treatment system

Flue gases after getting cooled in quenching chamber and waste heat recovery section; it will be passed

through series of multi cyclones and scrubbed in three stages scrubber.

2.7 HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

All hazardous wastes listed under Schedule – I of Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and amended thereafter will be received and treated at proposed

project. Hazardous wastes acceptance criteria mentioned in following section should be strictly followed

by member industries and waste will be accept only after confirmation of compliance with criteria. List of

hazardous waste with source of generation from various industries is attached as Annexure – 2 with EIA

report.

2.7.1 Hazardous waste acceptance criteria

Waste generator member industries should have authorization for disposal of hazardous waste. At the time

of obtaining membership, Waste generator industry carry out comprehensive analysis of solid/hazardous

waste and the same waste will be accepted at TSDF after physical/chemical verification. Criteria for

acceptance of hazardous wastes6 for direct disposal to secured landfill are mentioned in Table 2-5

Table 2-5: Hazardous waste acceptance criteria

Leachate Quality Concentration

pH 4-12

Total Phenols <100 mg./l.

Arsenic <1 mg./l.

Lead <2 mg./l.

Cadmium <0.2 mg /l.

Chromium-VI <0.5 mg./l.

Copper <10 mg./l.

Nickel <3 mg./l.

Mercury <0.1 mg./l.

Zinc <10 mg./l.

Fluoride <50 mg./l.

6Table – 6 from Protocoal for performance evoluation HAZWAMS

en-vιsι�n


Leachate Quality Concentration

Ammonia <1,000 mg./l.

Cyanide <2 mg./l

Nitrate <30 mg./l

Adsorbable organic bound Chlorine <3 mg./l

Water soluble compounds except salts <10 %

Strength

Transversal Strength (Vane Testing) >25 KN/m2

Unconfined Compression Test >50 KN/m2

Axial Deformation <20 %

Degree of Mineralization or Content of Organic Materials (original sample)

Annealing loss of the dry residue at 550o C <20 Wt. % (for non- biodegradable waste) <5

Wt. % (for biodegradable waste)

Extractable Lipophylic contents (Oil & Grease) <4 Wt. % Note:

1) leachate quality is based on water leachate test i.e Leachability tests are conducted by preparing a suspension of waste and water i.e taking

100 gm of waste and filling up to 1 liter with distilled water, stirring or shaking for 24 hrs, filtering the solids and analyzing the filtrate.

2) Calorific value of the land disposable hazardous waste should be less than 2500 K. Cal/Kg

Engineering design of proposed TSDF site has been done considering above criteria as well as following

parameters,

• Moisture ≤ 20%

• Calorific value ≤ 2500 Kcal/Kg.

• Biodegradable organic matter ≤ 5%

• Total organic conternt ≥ 20%

• Waste amenable to stabilization

• High TDS Effluent (for incinetation)

2.7.1.1 Weighing and sampling

Dedicated vehicles with rubber liners for hazardous waste collection will be allowed to enter in project

site. Weighing of vehicles will be done at weigh-bridge and samples from three different locations shall be

taken to prepare composite sample for quick analysis of parameters like color; odour; moisture; pH; TOC;

flammability etc. Waste sample shall be OK on desire results and vehicles allowed for waste disposal.

If any waste consignment is not meeting the waste acceptance criteria, it will be either returned to the

waste generator industries or taken for appropriate pre-treatment like neutralization / stabilization etc. after

obtain consent for waste generator unit.

2.7.2 Pre-treatment of hazardous waste

If landfillable waste does not meeting the waste acceptance criteria than various pre-treatment of waste

shall be applicable on receipt of consent from waste generator. On completion of pre-treatment, waste is

disposed to TSDF site. In case of incinerable hazardous waste not meeting the waste acceptance criteria

than it will be return to waste generator.

2.7.2.1 Stabilization of waste

Stabilization of waste is a process to convert hazardous wastes in the form of non-aqueous liquids, semi-

solids or reactive solids into less leachable solids that can then be deposited directly into the secured

landfill.

en-vιsι�n


Any waste reject after analysis will be transferred to waste stabilization area. For stabilization of hazardous

waste for secured landfilling, a mechanized closed conveyer system to carry the waste up to stabilization

area will be installed. Hazardous waste is mixed with typical reagents like lime, flyash, bentonite (clay),

cement, saw dust, etc., in combination with sodium silicate solution, if required to create additional binding

properties of the wastes at separate mechanized mixing unit having suction duct/hood, scrubber system and

stack. After completion of mixing, waste is allow to cure for appropriate time. After curing again waste is

analysed as per waste acceptance criteria and if sample found OK than it will finally disposed to TSDF.

2.7.2.2 Neutralization of waste

Addition of effective neutralizing agents into waste to achieve desire range of pH, then it will send to

TSDF cell for disposal or temporary waste storage shed.

2.7.2.3 Alternative use of waste

The waste not meeting the waste acceptance criteria either landfill or incineration will be return to waste

generator. Further guidance will be given to waste generator for conducting feasibility study for alternative

use of waste so that it can be utilized in other industries.

2.7.3 General Pathway of the waste

Waste received at landfill site can be handled in different ways i.e.,

1. Direct disposal into landfill

2. Pre –treatment (stabilization; neutralization) of wastes and then disposal into landfill

3. Direct incineration

4. Pre-treatment incineration and disposal of incineration ash in landfill

5. Waste processed for fuel/industrial by-products for recycling

6. Others

Depending upon the characteristics of waste and the reactivity of the wastes with each other as well as with

the liner system, the wastes which could be allowed are identified. General pathway of landfill waste from

receives to safe disposal is described below:

• Comprehensive analysis of the wastes – Laboratory facilities

• Decision of waste pathway i.e. Pre-treatment/ storage/disposal

• Collection of wastes from waste generator industries and its transportation to TSDF site

• Waste received at TSDF site.

• Weighing and recording of waste receipt.

• Representative waste sampling and finger print analysis

• Storage at the temporary storage area.

• Waste confirmation w.r.t. waste acceptance criteria

• Secure landfilling of waste.

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-9: General Pathway of the waste

en-vιsι�n


2.8 HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTATION

Transportation of the waste from generator to TSDF site is most important aspect as hazardous waste may

have toxic, flammable, explosive or corrosive characteristics. Hence, transportation of hazardous waste has

to be done in such a way so that it does not cause any risk to health as well as impact on environment

during transportation and handling.

Hazardous waste generators ensure that the packaging and method of transport determines the safety of

hazardous wastes during the transit without any accident or spillage. There is high risk of waste spillage

during waste loading, transportation and unloading.

Dedicated and specially designed vehicles with hydraulic unloading mechanism; linner coated with epoxy

resin and "HAZARDOUS WASTE" will be displayed in bold red letters on a fluorescent yellow

background. The vehicle to be used for the hazardous waste transportation will not be used for any other

purposes. RTO registration numbers of vehicles involved in waste transportation will be shared with

GPCB. Transporters authorized by TSDF shall be allowed to transport waste and he will ensure that at

least two dedicated vehicle shall be maintained/made available to TSDF for emergency situation. Project

authority will also make such provision of spare vehicle to handle emergency.

The transporter and manpower involved for waste transportation shall be trained for awareness about rules,

guidelines, procedure for loading and unloading of waste, safety during waste handling; proper and rapid

identification of emergency and its effective control; emergency response etc. Only after successful

completion of training, transporter will be selected.

Waste to be received at site is expected to be around 200 MTPD on average basis and max. 20 – 25 trucks

will be deploying during operation phase. Packaging, labeling of individual containers and transportation

of hazardous wastes will be done as per provision made in Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and amended thereafter.

2.8.1 Packing

Hazardous waste generator will ensure that waste packing containers must be durable to withstand worst

handling practice (jerks and vibrations caused by uneven road surface); leakproof sealing and retain for at

least six month. Mild steel container with suitable corrosion-resistant coating; 200-litre plastic drums;

cardboard cartons, PP and HDPE/LDPE containers, etc., are may be used based on variety of wastes.

2.8.2 Labelling

All hazardous waste containers must be clearly labeled showing all required contents as per Form – 8 of

Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and amended

thereafter. Containers storing hazardous waste shall be labeled with the words “HAZARDOUS WASTE”

in vernacular language, Hindi/English. The label shall be of non-washable material, weather proof and

easily visible. The waste generator unit shall provide information in Form 9 [Transport Emergency

(TREM) card] of Haz. waste rule to the transporter. Emergency contact numbers shall be prominently

displayed viz. the phone number of concerned Regional Officer of the SPCB/PCC, Fire Station, Police

Station and other agencies concerned in the label.

en-vιsι�n


2.8.3 Manifest System

Safe transportation of hazardous waste to the TSDF is a collective responsibility of the waste generator,

operator of a facility for treatment and disposal of hazardous waste and the transporter. There is Manifest

system (Movement Document) for hazardous and other waste transportation to be used within the country.

Waste generator unit shall prepare seven colour copies of the manifest (as per Form – 10 of Haz. Rules –

2016) in which each colour code indicated purpose is mentioned in below table. All seven copies shall be

signed by the sender.

Table 2-6: Manifest System

Manifest copy Purpose

Number Colour

1 White To be forwarded by the sender to the State pollution Control Board after signing

all the seven copies.

2 Yellow To be retained by the sender after taking signature on it from the transporter and

the rest of the five signed copies to be carried by the transporter.

3 Pink To be retained by the receiver (actual user or treatment storage and disposal

facility operator) after receiving the waste and the remaining four copies are to

be duly signed by the receiver

4 Orange To be handed over to the transpoter by the receiver after accepting waste.

5 Green To be sent by the receiver to the state Pollution Control Board.

6 Blue To be sent by the receiver to sender

7 Grey To be sent by the receiver to the State Pollution Control Board of the sender in

case the sender is in another state

2.9 PROJECT PHASE

Secure landfill site will be developed phase-wise in cell while incinerator will be installed as per project

scheduled. Activities based on project stages has been identified and described in respective section.

2.9.1 Pre-construction Activity

There is no major cutting at proposed project site as it is located almost on flat terrain. Any clearance of

vegetation is not expected. Existing tree shall not be disturbed during the construction activities as it will

be a part of proposed greenbelt area. Hence, there is no case of tree cutting.

There is no direct accessibility to project site from state or internal road. SH – 7 and SH – 55 is located

1.38 km and 2.36 km from the project site. There is no direct accessibility to project site from SH. It is

observed during site visit that approx. 1.7 km single lane black top bitumen internal road of Zilliyavasan

village is passing nearby (700 mtr.) the project site. It needs to be strengthening to access the project site.

Further, from internal village road approx. two km road shall be developed to access the project site.

2.9.2 Construction Activity

Building a new landfill cell involves various stages of construction and it is meticulously engineered

practice in the ground. The landfill is divided into cells or designated areas where the land will be prepared

for trash disposal. Project site is fall under seismic zone – IV, which is the considered to be the high

seismic zone and engineering design of SLF cell will be done considering seismicity of the area. Following

steps are involved in construction of landfill cell.

en-vιsι�n


• Excavation (digging) down to the bottom of the sub-grade.

• Excess material (mostly clay) hauled to on-site stock pile.

• Cell is smoothed and laying of impervious liners at bottom and side slope of cell

• Pipeline installation for leachate and gas collection

• Ramp/access road to cell for waste disposal

Proposed SLF will be developed in phase-wise means second cell will be developed only after cell is filled

to its full capacity. Excavated soil generated due to construction of cell will be properly stored with in

premises and will be reused in construction of bunds, daily waste cover and final cover of the cell as per

requirement.

In addition to above, following structure will be developed.

• Fencing and/or construction of compound wall around the perimeter of site in the interests of security and

public safety.

• Construction of weigh bridge cabin

• Construction of administrative office, Watchman cabin, laboratory etc.

• Construction of internal roads

• Earth Moving Equipment Shelters

• Temporary waste storage, treatment & disposal sites for special wastes

• Water supply facility (bore well)

• Electricity supply system

• Construction of observatory well (Monitoring wells)

• Construction of surface water drainage system

• Green belt

Construction materials like steel, cement, crushed stones; sand, rubble, etc. will be procured from the local

suppliers.

2.9.3 Technical detail of landfill cell

The depth of excavation and height of embankment construction have been considered based on site

constraints and depth of ground water table. Approximately 49,902 sq.mtr. area are allocated for the

construction of secured landfill cells (4 nos.) having height of approximately 15 m (below ground 10 m

and above ground 5 m) and total 7,82,181 MT landfilling is planned as phase wise manner.

Pre-construction soil testing and geophysical investigation has been conducted and based on that designed

is proposed. However no. of cell, height (below ground & above ground), will be decided considering

actual geohydrological features of the site. Design calculation considering maximum capacity of the

proposed landfill site is given in following table:

Table 2-7: Technical Design of Landfill

Sr.

No. Technical Specifications Value

1 Total waste filling landfill area 49902 m2

2 Volume of waste to be disposed 651352.6 m3

3 Quantity of waste to be disposed 7,82,181 MT

4 Bulk density of compacted solid waste 1.2 MT/m3

5 Height of waste bund above GL 7 meters

6 Depth of Excavation 12 meters

7 Waste application height (total) 15 meters

en-vιsι�n


Sr.

No. Technical Specifications Value

8 Total height of landfill 19 meters

9 Bottom Slope (Traverse) 3%

10 Leachate drainage slope (Longitudinal) 1.5%

11 Inner side slopes of Embankment 1:2 (V:H)

12 Outer side slopes of Embankment 1:3 (V:H)

13 Total no of cell 4

14 Observatory wells Three

Above landfill has been design considering guideline under criteria for hazardous waste landfill, although

this will be finalized during the detailed engineering phase of the facility considering geological aspects.

2.9.3.1 Liners and Final Cover

1.5 mm thick High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane will be used in the construction of secured

landfill site. The membrane will consist of single resin being one hundred (100%) virgin and of a narrow

molecular distribution Carbon black will be added to the resin for ultra violet resistance. The flexible

membrane will be purchase to the following approximate ratio; HDPE 97.5% and carbon black 2.5%.

Different impervious layers at the bottom and side of the cell as well as once cell will reach its full capacity

final cover will be laid down as per guideline. Technical information of liners is mentioned in following

Table 2-8.

Table 2-8: Liner Design

Sr

No.

Description Technical information

1

Bottom liner 1st layer from

bottom

450 mm thick compacted clay layer as secondary composite

liner (Permeability co-efficient, k ≤ 10-7

cm/sec)

2nd

layer ≥ 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane lining

3rd

layer ≥ 300 mm thick sand layer (Secondary Leachate collection)

(Permeability co-efficient, k ≥ 10-3

cm/sec)

4th layer 450 mm thick compacted clay layer as primary composite liner

(Permeability co-efficient, k ≤ 10-7

cm/sec)

5th layer ≥ 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane lining

6th layer ≥ 300 mm thick sand layer (Primary Leachate collection)

(Permeability co-efficient, k ≥ 10-2

cm/sec)

2 Side Liner 1st layer from

bottom

450 mm compacted clay

2nd


3rd

layer 450 mm thick compacted clay layer


cm/sec)

4th layer ≥ 1.5 mm thick HDPE geomembrane lining

5th layer 450 mm compacted clay

3 Top liner 1st layer from

bottom

Regular Soil Layer (300 mm) – optional

2nd

layer 600 mm thick compacted clay layer as single composite barrier


cm/sec)

3rd


4th layer 300 mm thick drainage cover

5th layer 600 mm thick top soil

en-vιsι�n


2.9.3.2 Final Cover After completion of landfill, a final cover will be laid to minimize infiltration and erosion. A final cover

system is provided at the top of landfill, which will enhance surface drainage, prevents infiltrating water

and support vegetation or installation of solar panel for power generation facility.

Section details of bottom and top liner of cell is shown as Figure 2-10 and Figure 2-11

Figure 2-10: Bottom liner

Figure 2-11: Final cover

en-vιsι�n


2.9.4 Operation Phase

Proposed project is waste management facility; hence receiving of hazardous waste, its storage and

disposal after treatment is main operational activities. The facility shall operate only during day hours

throughout the year except monsoon season.

Following are routine activities of TSDF site,

• Transportation of hazardous waste from member industries to the landfill site.

• Accepting hazardous wastes like ETP sludge, Gypsum/Lime sludge, Iron Sludge, Incinerator Ash, Brine

Sludge, etc. at TSDF only from the generator authorized by SPCB/PCC.

• Quick analysis (fingerprinting analysis) of hazardous waste on receipt.

• Stabilization of hazardous waste – as applicable.

• Compaction of hazardous waste as per Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) specification.

• Installation of intermediate and final covers.

• Leachate collection and Treatment at the site.

• Effluent Treatment Plant (ETP) for treatment of wastewater at the site.

• Ensuring waste treatment and/or disposal as per Hazardous Rules, 2016and as amended.

• Operation of incinerator and APCM

• Undertake cleanup operation in case of contamination resulting from the site.

2.9.4.1 Action Plan during Monsoon

15 days before onset of monsoon, landfill cell will be covered with impervious layer As per CPCB /

MoEFCC guidelines, to avoid contact of rainwater on the waste body. Topography of site is not prone to

any flooding. However guard pond of 500 m3 will be provided for any emergency. The run-on during this

period due to unexpected rain, shall be directed to guard pond and shall be gradually taken to ETP for

treatment and/or evaporated through spray dryer.

Impervious layer will be reopened 15 days after end of monsoon season.

2.9.5 Closure of landfill cell

Once landfill cell reach its full capacity, cell will be closed with final cover as mentioned in Section 2.9.3.1

Following interconnectivities are established.

• The leachate collection system of each cell/phase shall be sequentially connected.

• The surface water drainage system at the cover of each cell/phase shall be sequentially connected.

• The temporary surface water drainage system constructed at the base of each completed phase shall be

dismantled.

• The gas collection system of each phase shall be sequentially connected.

Upon completing of all phases a final check shall be made of the proper functioning of all inter connected

systems. An access road shall be provided on the landfill cover to enable easy approach for routine

inspection of the landfill cover. After completion of the phase long term vegetative stabilization will be

undertaken to return the land to its original and natural vegetative landform.

2.10 GENERAL GUIDELINE FOR DAILY ACTIVITY • The landfill will be staged in cells so that the minimum practical area of waste is exposed and maximum

practical area of waste has the final cap in place i.e., progressive filling and capping of the landfill ensuring

minimization of infiltration of wastes.

• The weigh bridge at the main entrance will record all movements and weights and receive waste tracking

receipt as required by the waste manifest system.

• The stand pipe forming part of the leachate collection system shall be checked regularly for the presence of

leachate. Once leachate is detected it shall be regularly pumped out and transferred to the leachate treatment

facility on-site.

en-vιsι�n


• The level of leachate in the standpipe shall not be allowed to rise above the level of the leachate collection

system.

• Once a waste is received at the site, a sample of waste shall be collected, at the samplingbay/ temporary

storage facility and shall undergo laboratory analysis based on which its pathway of treatment / disposal

shall be determined.

• A waste manifest system shall be developed in accordance with the requirement of the regulatory agencies to

cover the transportation of the waste to TSDF and to provide for record of waste manifestation.

• Each load of waste arriving at the facility shall be located properly and logged to identify its pathway of

treatment/ storage/ disposal.

2.11 RESORCE REQUIREMENT

2.11.1 Capital investment

For establishment of common treatment and disposal facilities for hazardous wastes, capital investment

towards land cost, land development cost, TSDF components, transport, Earthmoving and other

machinery, construction of lab admin. Building, Security, weighbridge, internal roads and drains network,

green belt development etc is estimated around Rs. 38.45 Crores.

Table 2-9: Project cost

Sr. No. Description Cost in Rs. (Crores)

1 Land & site development 2.00

2 Civil work 3.00

3 Land fill site 25.00

4 Incinerator 5.00

5 Utilities & Miscellaneous 0.20

6 EMS 3.25

TOTAL 38.45

2.11.1.1 Financial model

Proposed financial model for the TSDF facility is given in following Table 2-10

Table 2-10: Financial Model

Sr No. Terms Amount in crore

1 State & Central Subsidy 9.61

2 Bank Loan 19.23

3 Promoters Contribution 9.61

TOTAL 38.45

2.11.2 Land

Proposed project will developed on 1,06,432 Sq.m plot area. Land is already in possession with project

proponent. Detailed area breakup is shown in table 2-11 below.

en-vιsι�n


Table 2-11: Area Breakup

Area for Area in m2 % Area

Landfill 49903 46.89%

Temporary landfillable waste storage area 500 0.47%

Incinerator 2350 2.21%

Temporary Incinerable waste storage area 810 0.76%

stabilization area 225 0.21%

Internal road 10792 10.14%

Greenbelt 35123 33.00%

Admin, lab, canteen security 500 0.47%

Parking 5300 4.98%

Open space 379 0.36%

ETP area 500 0.47%

Security office 50 0.05%

Total 106432 100.00%

2.11.2.1 Land Acquisition

During the ToR application project proponent has identified plot no. 2483, 2500, 2501, 2503, 2482, 2484,

2499, 2502, 2504, 2486, 2485, 2487, 2488, 2498, 2497, 2505, 2506, 2490, 2491, 2496, 2509, 2510,

2523,2528/1,2528/2,2524,Village. – Chanasma, Taluka. – Chanasma, District Patan, Gujarat. After TOR

and during the preparation of EIA report, some plots were not available for the project. Details of available

and omitted plots are as follows. Hence total plot area from 1,40,881 sq.mtr. is reduce to 1,06,432 sq.mtr.

Table 2-12: Land Acquisition

Sr no. Land Acquisition Status

Acquired Acquisition in process Omitted

1. 2482/1, 2482/2, 2486, 2483/1,

2483/2, 2500, 2499, 2498,

2496/1, 2496/2, 2497, 2502,

2501, 2503, 2506, 2509, 2510

2523, and 2491/1

2487,2491/2 2504, 2485,

2487, 2488, 2505

2490, 2528/1,2528/2, 2524

Land documents are attached as Annexure – 6 with EIA report.

2.11.3 Water

There is no major river flow from the project area; hence water for domestic, construction and industrial

activities of proposed project is sourced from bore well. Application to central ground water authority for

withdrawal of ground water has been made. Application copy is attached as Annexure – 4. During

construction phase it is estimated that approximately 35 KLD water will required for various activities

Construction phase :

• Domestic – 10 KLD,

• Construction & other – 25 KLD

• Total – 35 KLD

There is no major use of water during operation phase in proposed project. Water required for various

activities is mentioned in following table, while the water balance diagram is shown as Figure 2-12

en-vιsι�n


Table 2-13: Water Consumption

Sr

no. Activity

Water Consumption

(KLD) Remarks

A Domestic 8 Fresh water

B Green belt 15 Fresh water

C Industrial 20 -

Boiler 0

Washing

5

water for floor washing, wheel

washing and dust suppression

Cooling 0

Others

(scrubber-incinerator/spray dryer) 15

Total 43

• Total water requirement for the project: 43 KLD

• Quantity to be recycled: 21 KLD

• Total Fresh water requirement: 22 KLD

Figure 2-12: Water Balance Diagram

en-vιsι�n


2.11.4 Electricity/Power

Power requirement of proposed project will fulfill by Uttar Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (UGVCL). Power

requirement is estimated 350 KVA and 400 KVA during construction and operation phase respectively. In

case of power failure one DG set of 1500 KVA will be installed as backup power arrangement.

2.11.5 Machineries

Appropriate earth moving equipment like JCB, compactors and waste transportation trucks/dumpers with

hydraulic jack etc. will be required for waste handling and disposal. Installation of mechanized cover

system having arrangement of waste conveyor system, mixing unit with mechanized mixing arrangement,

suction duct/hood and scrubber system with stack.

2.11.6 Fuel

Indian Coal and Furnace Oil (FO) will be used as main fuel at proposed project. Detail of fuel and its

requirement is mentioned in below Table 2-14.

Table 2-14: Fuel Source

Sr no. Fuel Fuel utilized for Quantity

Construction phase

1 High Speed Diesel (HSD) D.G. Set 100 liter/Hr

Operation phase

1 Furnace Oil Incinerator 1200 kg/day

2 High Speed Diesel (HSD) D.G. set 300 liter/Hr

3 Coal Spray Dryer with Inbuilt HAG 200 kg/Hr

2.11.7 Manpower

It is estimated that approximately 170 nos of skilled and semi skilled workers and 25 nos of technical

persons will required for construction activities and development of secured landfill site. During operation

phase, for waste management activities 100 nos of technical staff will be required. Preference to local

person within study area will be given based on their experience and education.

2.11.8 Chemical

Proposed project is waste management facility, hence no major chemical will required at site. Although

chemicals like lime, alum, polyelectrolyte to be required for effluent treatment plant further in addition to

above, lime, flyash, bentonite (clay), cement, saw dust etc. will be utilized for the stabilization of

hazardous waste. Separate shed for storage of such chemicals will be provided. Provision of seven days

storage of above chemicals near to stabilization area will be made.

2.11.9 Laboratory

A well equipped laboratory shall be established to carry out comprehensive analysis (CA) of hazardous

wastes, finger print analysis (FPA) and treatability studies to decide on the disposal path way as per the

waste acceptance criteria.

Analytical equipment required for CA and FPA as well as for routine environmental monitoring during

operation phase will be installed at in-house laboratory. The list of laboratory equipment to be required is

mentioned in table 2-15.

en-vιsι�n


Table 2-15: Laboratory Equipment required for Environmental Monitoring

No. Name Of The Equipment No of Instruments

1 Respirable Dust samplers 3

2 Fine Dust samplers 3

3 Portable Flue Gas Combustion analyzer 1

4 Portable Noise level meter (Dosimeter) 1

5 Portable Waste water Analysis Kit 1

6 BOD Incubator 1

7 COD Digester with colorimeter 2

8 Electronic Balance 1

9 Spectrophotometer 1

10 Hot Air Oven 1

11 Laboratory Water Distillation and demineralization unit 2

12 General glass ware and laboratory chemicals, etc. As per requirement

2.12 POLLUTION LOAD AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Proposed facility is for waste management, but there is certain pollutant as described in respective section

which required to treat and disposed within plant premises. There will be pollution load due to propose

project in form of wastewater; air emission-flue and process and waste generation.

2.12.1 Wastewater

At the end of industrial activities it is assumed that 35 KLD wastewater will be generated from operational

activities, utility and domestic activities, which will be treated in ETP having capacity of 50 KLD. Sewage

from domestic activities will be mixed with the wastewater for dilution. Treated wastewater from ETP will

be again passess from RO plant. RO permeate will be reuse and RO reject will be evaporated in spray

dryer. Hence unit will be Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD).

Table 2-16: Wastewater Generation

Sr

no.

Activity Wastewater

Generation

(KLD)

Treatment Method

A Domestic 4 Septic tank/soak pit

B Industrial

Washing 5 Treated in ETP followed by RO and

spray dryer Others- (scrubber- incinerator/spray dryer) 15

leachate from landfill 15*

Total Effluent to ETP 35 Treated water sent to RO plant for

further treatment

D RO Reject 14 Evaporated in spray dryer

*considering worst case scenario like heavy rain on SLF cell which is not covered with sheet which is rare occasion of leachate

generation.

Expected characteristics of combined effluent are given in table 2-17.

en-vιsι�n


Table 2-17: Effluent Characteristic

Sr.

No.

Particular Washing Others

(Scrubber)

Leachate

from SLF

Composite

Effluent

Flow (KLD) 5 15 15 35

1 pH 8.5 7 8 7.64

2 Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 150 180 550 334.29

3 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) 2000 950 50000 22121.43

4 Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L) 70 2500 20000 9652.86

5 Biological Oxygen Demand (mg/L) 50 70 12000 5180.00

6 Phenolic compounds (mg/L) - - 8 3.43

7 Ammonical Nitrogen (NH4-N) (mg/L) - - 52 22.29

8 Manganese (mg/L) - - 2.5 1.07

9 Copper (mg/L) - - 0.25 0.11

10 Iron (mg/L) - - 2.5 1.07

11 Lead (mg/L) - - 2.5 1.07

12 Nickel (mg/L) - - 0.8 0.34

2.12.1.1 Effluent Management in ETP

Collection network will be provided for collection of wastewater generated from land fill as leachate,

vehicle wheel washing, scrubber and from laboratory. After collection of wastewater in collection tank it

will be transferred into neutralization cum settling tank for neutralization. After neutralization effluent will

be transferred into filter press where execs water will be drain and remaining sludge will be transferred to

sludge drying bed. Effluent from filter press will be transfer to spray dryer for the drying and dried mass is

disposed into TSDF site along with dried sludge. Effluent treatment units mentioned in Table 2-19 and

effluent treatment process flow diagram is depicted as figure-2.8.

Table 2-18: Technical detail of ETP

Sr

No. Treatment unit No.

Dimension (L, B, H in meter)

or Capacity (KL/hr. or KLD)

Capacity

(KL)

1. Equalization Tank 1 3.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 12.0 m3

2 Neutralization Tank 1 1.0 x 1.0 x (1.0 + 0.8 H.B.+ 0.3 F.B.) 1.8 m3

3 Primary Settling Tank 1 2.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 1.0 H.B. + 0.3 F.B.) 12.0 m3

4 Aeration Tank 1 6.0 x 5.0 x (4.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 120.0 m3

5 Secondary Settling Tank 1 2.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 1.0 H.B. + 0.3 F.B.) 12.0 m3

6 Intermediate Sump 1 3.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 12.0 m3

7 Filter foundation 1 1.5 x 1.0 1.5 m2

8 Treated Sump 2 3.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 12.0 m3

9 RO Shed 1 5.0 x 4.0 20 m2

10 RO Permeate tank 1 2.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 8 m3

11 Spray dryer feed tank 1 3.0 x 2.5 x (3.0 + 0.5 F.B.) 22.0 m3

en-vιsι�n


Figure 2-13: ETP Flow Diagram

Table 2-19: Stage-wise effluent characteristic

Sr.

No. Parameters ETP Inlet

Primary

Outlet

Secondary Outlet/

RO Inlet

RO Permeate

for reuse

RO Reject for

Spray dryer

Flow 35 35 35 21 14

1 pH 7.3 6.5 – 7.5 6.5 – 7.5 6.5-7.5 6.5 – 7.5

2 S.S. (mg/L) 220 < 100 < 100 ≤ 30 80

3 TDS (mg/L) 1150 < 2000 < 2000 ≤ 2000 10000

4 COD (mg/L) 2000 <1600 < 250 ≤ 100 150

5 BOD (mg/L) 150 < 50 < 500 ≤ 50 50

2.12.1.2 Technical specification of RO

i) Ultra Filtration System

• Feed Flow Rate 2400 LPH

• UF product water 2100 LPH

• Reject Flow Rate 300 LPH

• U.F. Module Recovery @ 86-90%

• Operating Pressure 2-3 Kg/Cm²

en-vιsι�n


ii) RO Module

• Feed Flow Rate 2070 LPH

• R.O. Product Water 1200 LPH

• R.O. Module Recovery @ 55-58%

• Operating Pressure 10.0-15.0 Kg/Cm²

2.12.2 Leachate Management

Moisture content in the hazardous waste to be accepted at proposed TSDF site is restricted ≤ 20 % by

disposal criteria. It is assume that daily 200 TPD hazardous wastes will be disposed at site from which 4

KLD Leachate will be generate considering 2 – 5 % leachate generation rate. 15 KLD of leachate assume

to be generated during operation phase considering worst case scenario like heavy rain on SLF cell which

is not covered with sheet which is rare occasion of leachate generation.Waste disposal activities will be

closed during the monsoon; hence leachate generation is unlikely in monsoon. Further impervious liner

will be laid on waste application area during Monsoon to avoide rain water contact with waste. However,

in rare occasion of leachate generation, guard pond of 250 m3 will be provided for any emergency and

gradually leachate will be directed to ETP for treatment and/or disposed through spray dryer.

Following leachate collection and conveyance facility will be provided.

1. Leachate collection sump/wells: Two primary and two Secondary

2. Leachate collection Pumps:

a. Two (1 working + 1 stand by) Primary submersible 5 m3/hr capacity at 15 m head

b. Two (1 working + 1 stand by) Secondary submersible 5 m3/hr capacity at 15 m head

3. Conveyance of leachate: HDPE pipeline

4. Waste water collection tank: RCC lined / RCC tank with impervious liner.

5. Raw wastewater pumps: 5 m3/hr capacity centrifugal pump, 15 m head

As per guideline, facility will take sludge from various chemical industries contains low organic load for

landfilling. So, the sludge will contains very less VOC as well as Ammonical Nitrogen content. However

Leachate will be collected and send to ETP and will undergo primary, Secondary and advanced RO

treatment. RO rejected will be sent to coal fire spray dryer, where max temperature will be kept at round

600 – 650 0C. spray dryer salt will be collected and disposed to landfill site itself.

Due to high temperature of spray dryer and adequate APC system, most of the VOC components will be

decomposed. So, there will be no chances of emission of VOC compounds and Ammonical into air.

2.12.2.1 Technical specification of Spray dryer

Details of technical specification of spray dryer id as follows.

I-DESIGN BASE

Application : WASTEWATER

CAPACITY

Feed rate : 3500 Ltrs/Hr.

Product Rate : 2000 Ltrs/Hr.

Evaporation Rate : 10000 Ltrs/Hr

FEED PROPERTIES

Solid Content Range : 5-25%

Form : Slurry/Solution

Nature : Settling

Solvent : Water

Temperature : 30º C

en-vιsι�n


PRODUCT PROPERTIES

Product Moisture : 8-10%

No. of Product Collection Points : 2

OPERATING CONDITION

Mode of Heating : Hot Air Generator

Inlet Air Temperature : 550-600 ºC

Outlet Air Temperature : 110-120 ºC

II- UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS

Power : Voltage : 415 V / 4 Wire / 3 phase

Connected Load : 322 KW

Fuel : COAL :

Normal Consumption 200±20 kg/hr @ 5000

GCV

Space Requirement (Approx.) For SPRAY DRYER – 11 M (W) × 19 M (L) × 18.5 M (H)

For HAG - 7 M (W) × 12 M (L) × 12 M (H)

III- SCOPE OF SUPPLY :

COMPONENET WISE DETAILS ARE AS BELOW

1. FEED SECTION

Feed Tank

A feed tank is provided for storage of feed slurry

Type : Vertical Cylindrical, Self Supported

Capacity : 400 L

Material of Construction : Stainless steel 316 L

2. AIR HEATING SECTION

HOT AIR GENERATOR

The fluidized Bed Combustion fired system consists of a fire chamber, Air pollution control equipment. With

furnace and fans

CAPACITY

Energy Generation : 15,00,000 K cal / Hr

Type : Coal Fired Direct HAG

OPERATING CONDITIONS

Mode of Heating : Steam Coal / Imported Coal / Indian Coal

Air Temperature : 50 ºC – 580 ºC

SPRAY DRYER SECTION

Air Distributor

Hot air distributor is located on the top of the spray chamber for distributing the air uniformly across the spray

dryer inlet in the swirl fashion, which will have an arrangement for the cooling to atomizing zone.

Air distributor and chamber roof is designed to minimize deposition of material on chamber roof by minimizing

dead zones of air.

Spray Chamber

A cylindrical vessel with flat / shallow roof and conical bottom is used as spray drying chamber. The chamber is

with inlet and outlet port for hot air exhaust gases and powder.

Wet Scrubber

A water scrubber is provided before the exhaust blower. Dry powder escaping the cyclone will be further treated

with water spray in a close loop system and collected in the bottom tank.

Type : Direct contact type with water spray

No. of Unit : 1

Material of construction

(Contact Parts)

: Stainless steel 316 L

Support Bracket : Carbon steel

Accessories : Droplet separator and interconnecting piping, spray nozzle, hose and

clamp for recycle water, sight/light glass, support bracket, anti

vortex arrangement on bottom cone for water

Circulating Water Tank

The Scrubber tank is provided and shall be self supporting. Feed inlet, feed outlet, drain, provision for mounting

level gauge is provided.

Type : Vertical Cylindrical

Capacity : 5000 L

Material of construction

(Contact Parts)

Stainless steel 316 L

Accessories : Drain Valve

en-vιsι�n


2.12.3 Observatory Well Groundwater Monitoring stations

Observatory well is the structure to be developed within plant premise for directly access and test the

groundwater around the landfill cell for presence of leachate chemicals or any other contamination due to

project. Typically a groundwater monitoring system will have a series of wells that are located up-gradient

and down-gradient of the landfill disposal area. The up-gradient wells test the water quality before it

moves under the disposal area in order to get a background analysis of the water. The down-gradient wells

then allow testing of the water after it has passed under the disposal area so it can be compared to the

quality of the up-gradient wells to make sure there has been no impact or contamination of the

groundwater. Layout map (Figure 2-4) shows the location of observatory well in proposed project site.

2.12.4 Air emission

Air emission in form of flue gas and process emission will expected to be release from stack attach to hot

air generator, D.G. set and incinerator. Main source of fugitive emission are hazardous waste handling and

transportation. Air emission from proposed project and control measures to be provided is mentioned in

Table 2-21.

2.12.4.1 Flue gas emission

During construction phase, pollutants like PM, SOx, NOx to be emitted from construction machineries and

due to construction activities like excavation, storage of excavated soil etc. Details of emission during

operation are presented in following table.

Table 2-20: Details of Flue gas emission

Sr.

no

Source of

Air

Emission

Pollutant to be emitted

Stack height

and

Diameter

Air pollution

control Equipment

/Mitigation

Measure

Limiting concentration

1 Hot Air

Generator

PM, SO2, NOx Height :20 m

Dia :1 m

Cyclone Separator,

Bag Filter

PM ≤ 150 mg/Nm3

SO2 ≤ 100 ppm

NOx ≤ 50 ppm 2 D.G. set PM, SO2, NOx Adequate

stack height

Adequate stack

height as D.G. set

will be used as back-

up power source.

3 Incinerator PM, HCl, SO2, CO, TOC,

HF, NOx, Total Dioxin &

Furan, Cd+Th+Their

compounds,

HG and its compounds

(Sb+As+Pb+Cr+CO+Cu+

Mn+Ni+V+their

compounds

Height : 30

m

Dia : 1.2 m

Quencher, Carbon

Column, Droplet

Separator, Cyclone

Separator, Bag

Filter, Ventury

Scrubber, Alkali

Scrubber

PM ≤ 50 mg/Nm3

HCl ≤ 50 mg/Nm3

Sulphur Dioxide ≤ 200 mg/Nm3

CO ≤ 50 mg/Nm3 (24 hr)

TOC ≤ 20 mg/Nm3

HF ≤ 4 mg/Nm3

NOx ≤ 400 mg/Nm3

Total Dioxin & Furan, ≤ 0.1

ngTEQ/Nm3

Cd+Th+Their compounds ≤

0.05 mg/Nm3

HG and its compounds ≤ 0.05

mg/Nm3

(Sb+As+Pb+Cr+CO+Cu+Mn+

Ni+V+their compounds ≤ 0.05

mg/Nm3

en-vιsι�n


2.12.4.2 Fugitive emission

It is assumed that during construction phase, mainly fugitive dust generated by earth moving activities,

hauling of soil, construction materials, and base course surfacing and moving of construction vehicles.

Continuous water sprinkling around the construction area for dust suppression will take place. Greenbelt

around the boundary of project site consisting air pollution capturing species will acts as natural barrier to

stop carrying of dust along with the wind current.

Fugitive emissions in the form of dust, PM and VOCs will mainly generated due hazardous waste

transportation and handling activities at SLF and incineration during operation phase. There will be

possibility of VOC generation from temporary waste storage area also.

2.12.4.3 Odour control

There will be odour due to handling of hazardous waste at landfill cell as well as incinerator. Following

measures will be adopted by project proponent to control the odour.

• Daily waste covering with soil will help to reduce odours from newly deposited wastes.

• Odour suppression chemicals like foaming, spraying of deodorant chemicals at odour generating

area like around a landfill site, temporary waste storage/handling area, ETP area etc.

• Ventilation at odorous chemical storage area will be provided in such a way so that it will be

disperse properly.

• Greenbelt containing odour capturing species will be developed along the boundary of project site

2.12.5 Waste generation

As a waste management facility, hazardous waste to be collected from waste generating industries will be

handling and manage as per Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement)

Amendment Rules, 2016. All the hazardous waste generated from the project itself will also be managed as

per the rule within plant premises. List of hazardous waste to be generated from proposed project is

mentioned in Table 2-21

Table 2-21: List of Hazardous waste

Sr.

no.

Name of

Waste

Source of

Waste

Generation

Category

of Waste

Quantity to

be generated

(MTPA)

Waste management method

1 ETP Sludge ETP 35.3 180 Collection & disposed at


premises

2. Incineration

Ash

Incinerator 37.2 360 Collection & disposed at


premises

3. Spray Dryer

Sludge

Spray Dryer 37.1 220 Collection & disposed at


premises

4. Used Oil Utility

/machineries

5.1 200 LPA Sell to approved/registered

recycler

5. Discarded

containers &

bags

Storage area 33.1 72 Sell to approved/registered

recycler

en-vιsι�n


2.13 ECOLOGY AND BIO DIVERCITY

There is no tree cutting is envisaged for the development of the project. However around 33% are of total

project will be developed as green belt and will be will be started along with construction phase as per

greenbelt development plan.

2.13.1 Green belt

Green belt not only provides habitat for faunal species but also acts as a sink for pollutants, attenuation of

noise levels and improvement in aesthetic quality of the plant. This not only mitigate the ecological

problem but also enhance the beauty of project area that will attract avifauna, small mammals & insect

species, and by this way ecological balance can be maintained to great extent. Greenbelt with varieties of

species is preferred to maintain species diversity, rational utilization and for maintaining health of the

trees. 35123 m2

area consisting of air, odor and noise pollution capturing species (10415 nos.) will be

developed as Greenbelt as per CPCB guideline of 1000 trees per acre as well as considering 80% survival

rate of tree.

2.14 NOISE POLLUTION

Main source of noise in proposed project are vehicular movement involved in waste transportation,

machineries involved in waste handling and operation of utilities. To mitigate noise within project

premises, following measures will be taken:

• Greenbelt around the project boundary consisting of noise and air pollution capturing species and acts

as natural barrier to stop carrying of noise propagate.

• To reduce the noise generation during the transportation activities; the vehicle will be kept periodically

serviced and maintain as per the requirement. Only those vehicles with PUC’s will be allowed for the

transportation.

• Noise monitoring will be carried out regularly at prominent places in the plant as per guideline.

2.15 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

Implementation of project within a pre-determined time frame is an important factor for the success of

project. Timely implementation may save on various costs like interest, administrative overheads and helps

to realize the goals as per pre-determined objectives. The implementation of the project will involve major

activities like preparation of specification / drawings, receipt of quotations, scrutiny of quotations, placing

of orders, civil & structural construction, delivery & erection of equipment, test trial runs of various items

of equipment and commissioning of equipment.

All project activities will be started only after obtaining EC from MoEFCC and CTE/CTO from GPCB. A

tentative project schedule presented in Table 2-22 is prepared considering day one from the obtaining all

mandatory approvals from the statutory authority as mentioned above and other.

en-vιsι�n


Table 2-22: Project Implementation Schedule

Project Activities Period in Month

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Strengthening of kuchcha road and construction of

bore well

Preconstruction activity- contour survey, Site

grading, site preparation, Boundary wall etc.

Creation of storm water drain

Development of cell including excavation, layers,

liners etc. and installation of incinerator

Fabrication, painting and installation of hardware

Civil building construction, weigh bridge,

laboratory, admin, internal road, leachate treatment

etc

Final inspection of SLF and Incinerator

en-vιsι�n


2.15.1 Organization Structure The Chief Executive Officer of the proposed facility is responsible for all the project activities i.e. landfill

and incineration. Based on the project requirement following organizational structure has been decided by

project proponent. Role and responsibilities of each persons involved in activates is defined in following

figure. Organizational structure shall be made available on-site to regulatory officials.

Figure 2-14: Organizational Structure

draft environmental impact assessment and emp … · 2019-03-11 · draft environmental impact...

Documents