draft - home page | california state water resources ...€¦ · draft water quality assessment may...

DRAFT

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

MAY 24,1994

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

CALIFORNIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT (WQA)..

I. INTRODUCTION..................... i

11. WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION..... i

111. INTERPRETING THE WQA............. ii

IV. FEDERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ii ...

KEY TO WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT............ iii

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

REGION I............................. 1

REGION 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

REGION 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

REGION 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

REGION 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

REGION 6............................. 186

REGION 7............................. 258

REGION 8............................. 271

REGION g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290

CALIFORNIA WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

I- INTRODUCTION

The California Water Quality Assessment (WQA) is a catalog of the State's water bodies and their water quality condition. Organized by region and by water body type, the WQA categorizes each water body as good, intermediate, impaired, or unknown; it is a compilation of the nine Regional WQAs. The Water Quality Assessment serves several different purposes. The WQA reports to the public on the condition of the State's water bodies in a highly summarized tabular format. The 1994 Statewide WQA update contains 3040 water bodies. The previous WQA, adopted in April 1992, contained 2859 water bodies.

The Staters nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards were asked to review the 1992 WQA data for accuracy (primarily the water quality condition and size estimates) and to complete the pollutant and source characterizations for the 303(d) listed waters and those water bodies considered high priority in the Clean Water Strategy.

11- WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION

Good Oualitv Waters:

are waters that support and enhance the desianated beneficial uses. Water bodies classified as good may be designated as a high priority by the Regional Board if a threat to water quality is present.

Intermediate ~ualitv Waters:

are waters that support desianated beneficial but there is occasional dearadation. For example, biological data may show minor changes in abundance and distribution. Intermediate quality waters also include those water bodies where impairment is suspected but available data are inadequate to allow a definitive conclusion on the condition.

Impaired Waters:

are water bodies that cannot reasonablv be expected to attain or maintain amlicable water aualitv standards. A water quality standard includes both State and Regional Board numeric and narrative water quality objectives and the beneficial use(s) the objectives are meant to protect. A water body is impaired when data indicate that adopted objectives are continually exceeded or that beneficial uses are not protected (e.g., health warnings are in effect). In many cases this

determination will involve evaluating many sources of data to arrive at a judgement.

For ground waters the beneficial uses may be different, but any determination of impairment is based on an approach equivalent to that used for surface waters. Ground water is not included in the federal reporting requirements.

Unknown Qualitv Waters:

are water bodies where few or no direct observations are available.

111. INTERPRETING THE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Individual water bodies are listed by the region in which they are located and by type, such as enclosed bays, estuaries, rivers and streams, lakes and reservoirs. In some cases an entire water body is included under one water quality classification. In other cases, segments of water bodies are listed separately because of their unique differences or problems. Water quality problems for each water body are described when known or suspected.

IV. FEDERAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

The WQA serves the purpose of satisfying several federal Clean Water Act requirements for lists and reports including those for Section 303(d) Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLS). For the 1994 WQA update, the Regional Boards were asked to place special emphasis on reviewing information for the State's highest priority water bodies (determined by the Clean Water Strategy) and those surface waters on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d).

The 303(d) list identifies WQLS where standards are not attainable after implementation of technology-based requirements (Best Available Technology /Best Control Technology).

Water bodies identified on the 303(d) List will require Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) to be established for them. Subsequently, each point source and nonpoint source discharging pollutants to the listed water body will require a Waste Load Allocation or Load Allocation, respectively, assigned to it. The 303(d) requirements include establishing a time schedule for developing TMDLs.

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT KEY TO LISTING

The elements of the Water qua l i t y Assessment are keyed t o the numbered elements on the fol lowing Water Qua l i t y Assessment example.

De f in i t i on

1. Region# Regional Board Number

2. Waterbody Type Waterbodies i n the State are categorized under one o f the following headings 1 i s ted below:

T m o f Waterbody

Bays and Harbors Estuaries Ground Water Lakes and Reservoirs Oceans and Open Bays Rivers and Streams Sal i ne Lakes Wetl ands

3. Waterbody Name

4. Hydro Unit #

6. Total Size

Name o f the waterbody. This i s the same name as used i n the Basin Plans. There are, however, addit ional

waters presented i n the WQA that have not yet been incorporated i n t o the Basin Plans.

Hydrologic Unit from Basin Maps. Geographical locat ions o f water resource.

Waterbodies are c lass i f i ed under four columns t i t l e d Good, Intermediate, Impaired, o r Unknown based on the rat ionale f o r Water Qua l i t y Class i f icat ion shown i n Table 1. Each waterbody i s l i s t e d under one o r more of

these columns t o indicate i t s water qual i ty.

The to ta l size o f each waterbody measured i n the un i t s shown below. Where other un i t s are used, they are

indicated.

Bays and Harbor Estuaries Ground Water Lakes and Reservoirs Oceans and Open Bays Rivers and Streams Saline Lakes Wetl ands

Acres Acres Square mi 1 es Acres Miles Miles Acres Acres

7. Fact Sheet This column indicates whether a fac t sheet (a State Board management too l ) has been prepared. Fact sheets have been created for waterbodies c lass i f i ed as impaired, o r i f the waterbody i s o f high p r i o r i t y .

8. Problem Description/Comnents "Problem Descrlption/Comnents" has been used t o give a b r i e f explanation o f the reason fo r par t i cu la r c lass i f icat ion.

9. Problem Source The problem source, f o r waterbodies wi th water qua l i t y problems, i s e i ther Point o r Nonpoint o r both.

10. Federal L i s t s Environmental Protection Agency 1 i s t s required by various sections o f the Clean Water Act. An X i n the l i s t column indicates that the waterbody o r a por t ion thereof appears on the Indicated l i s t .

L i s t o f Water Qua l i t y Limited Segments where numeric or narrat ive water qua l i t y objectives are not being maintained and/or where beneficial uses are not f u l l y protected a f t e r appl i ca t ion o f Best Available Treatment/Best Control Technology (BAT/BCT).

A l i s t o f lake p r i o r i t i e s f o r restorat ion.

A l i s t o f impaired surface waterbodies from nonpoint source problems due t o both tox ic and nontoxic pol lutants.

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/96

R e g i o n 1 Bays a n d H a r b o r s

U a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n H y d r o I n t e r - - T o t a l

U a t e r Body Name U n i t 1 Good m e d i a t e I m i r e d U n k m u n size U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

ARCATA BAY 110.00 0 8500

BODEGA BAY 115.00 SO00 0

BODEGA HARBOR 115.20 340 0

'i

CRESCENT CITY HARBOR 103.11 384 0

WHBOLDT BAY 110.00 0 8000

HUIBOLDT BAY - NORTH 110.00 0 1360

HUHBOLDT BAY - SOUTH 110.00 0 4600

AC Yes

AC Yes

AC y e s

AC

AC Yes

AC Yes

AC Y c r

AC Yes

Page 1

POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY OF BAY I S INTERUEDIATE, NOT IMPAIRED.

POINT AND NOW-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES THREATEN BENEFICIAL USES.

NOWPOINT SWRCE DISCHARGES FROM RUNOFF. SPILLS AND NPS DISCHARGE FROM FISHING INDUSTRY.

POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY 19 INTERMEDIATE, NOT I W A I RED.

POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE DISCHARGES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY I S INTERMEDIATE, NOT IMPAIRED.

POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE DISCHARGES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY I S 1NTERMEDl ATE, NOT IMPAIRED.

POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCE DISCHAROES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY I S INTERMEDIATE, NOT .IMPAIRED.

F e d e r a l L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Prob lem Sou rce D

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSnElOT

Region 1 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition In te r - -

Good mediate lapaired Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Yeed DeSCri~tiOn ---

128 AC

9 AC

2 AC

1220 AE

215 AC

9 AC

Hvdro Water Body Name Unit #

ALBION RIVER DELTA 113.40

ALDER CREEK ESTUARY 113.63

BEAR HARBOR ESTUARY 113.11

BIG LAGOON 108.10

BIG RIVER DELTA 113.30

BIG SALMON CREEK 113.40 ESTUARY

BODEGA HARBOR 115.20 UETLAND

BRUSH CREEK ESTUARY 113.64

CASPER CREEK ESTUARY 113.20

CLARK'S SLOUGH 110.00

CLEON LAKE UETLAND 113.20

COTTONEVA CREEK 113.12 ESTUARY

CRESCENT CITY MARINE 103.11

Page 2

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 1 Es tuar ies

Water Ouel i t y C o n d i t i o n Hydro - I n t e r - - T o t a l - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Inma i red Unknom Site U n i t s Sheet

DEAD LAKE UETLAND 103.11 0 0 0 50 50 AC

DRY LAGOON 108.10 0 0 0 80 80 AC

EEL RIVER DELTA 111.11 0 0 0 6350 6350 AC

EEL RIVER ESTUARY 111.11 0 0 0 9600 9600 AC Yes

0 0 17 17 AC ELK CREEK ESTUARY 113.62 0

ESTER0 AMERICAN0 115.30 322 0 370 0 692 AC Yes

ESTER0 M SAW 115.40 64 0 255 0 319 AC Yes ANTWlO

EUREKA SLOUGH 110.00 0 0 0 4 4 AC

FRESHWATER LAGOON 108.10 245 0 0 0 245 AC

GARCIA RIVER DELTA 113.70 0 0 0 264 264 AC

GREENUOO~ CREEK 113.61 0 0 0 14 14 AC ESTUARY

Sedimentat ion Threat o f f i s h p o p u l a t i o n d e c l i n e Threat o f sed imenta t ion

SEOIHENTATIOW, L W DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND HIGH AIO(0NIA LEVELS FROM NPS DISCHARGES HAVE IMPAIRED FlSH AND Yl lDLlFE HABITAT

SEOICIENTATION, LOU DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND HIGH A M W I A LEVELS FROl UPS DISCHARGES HAVE IMPAIRED FlSH AND Yl lDLIFE llABlTAT

Report Da te : 05/23/94

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 3

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 1 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce - D

Uater Owli t y Condition In te r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Totat - fact - size Uni ts Sheet ProblWNeed O e s c r i ~ t i o n

Hydro Water Body Name Uni t #

GUALALA RIVER DELTA 113.80

HARDY CREEK ESTUARY 113.12

HATHAWAY CREEK 113.70 ESTUARY

HUMBOLDT BAY NUR 110.00

HUNTERS LAGOON 113.64

INGLENOOK CREEK 113.20 ESTUARY

INGLENOOK FEN 113.20

JACKASS CREEK 113.11 ESTUARY

KLAMATH RIVER DELTA 105.11

KLAMATH RIVER 105.11 ESTUARY

400 AC Yes Sedimentation Threat of f i s h population decline Threat of sedimentation

LACUNA CREEK MARSH 113.64

LAKE EARL 103.11

Page 4

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSNEWT Report Date : 05/23/96

~ e g i on' 1 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Uater O w l i t y Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknom -- Hvdro

Uater Bodv Name Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion ---

LAKE EARL VETLAND 103.11

LAKE TALAUA 103.11

LITTLE RIVER ESTUARY 108.20

100 AC Yes Sedimentation Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of sedimentation

MAD RlMR ESTUARY 103.10

HAD RIVER SLOUGH 100.00

MATTOLE RIVER 112.30 ESTUARY

NAVARRO RIVER DELTA 113.50

NOYO RIVER ESTUARY 113.20 82 AC Yes Sedimentation Threat of f i sh poprlation decline Threat of sedimentation

PUDDING CREEK 113.20 ESTUARY

REDUOOD CREEK DELTA 107.10

RED- CREEK 107.10 ESTUARY

Page 5

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMNT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 1 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

Hydro Uater Body Name Uni t #

RUSSIAN RIVER DELTA 114.11

RUSSIAN RIVER 114.11 ESTUARY

SALMON CREEK LAGOON 115.10

SANDHILL LAKE 113.20 ESTUARY

WITH RIVER DELTA 113.11

WITH RIVER ESTUARY 103.11

STONE LAGOON 108.10

TEN MILE RIVER DELTA 113.13

USAL CREEK ESTUARY 113.11

Water h r a l i t v Condition In ter - - Total - Fact

Good mediate 1-i red Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/#eed Description --

0 0 0 150 150 AC Yes Sedimentation Threat of f i s h population decl ine Threat of sedimentation

415 0 0 0 415 AC Yes Sedimentation Threat of f i s h population decline Threat of sedimentation

3 3 3 D l 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 6

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94

R e g i o n 1 G r d Water


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

P r o b l e m Sou rce - D

Water O u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n

I n t e r - - Good m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d Unknown --

Hydro

Water Body Name U n i t # T o t a l - F a c t -

S i z e U n i t s Sheet --- ProblemfNeed D e s c r i p t i o n

23 SaMl Yes WATER YELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS FUEL RELEASES

ALEXANDER VALLEY AREA

5 SOMI Yes UATER YELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS

ANDERSON VALLEY

10 SPMI Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING

UNDERGROUND TANKS ANNAPOLIS OHLSON

RANCH

5 SOMI

5 SaMl Yes

B I G LAGOON AREA

WATER YELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY SPILLS OR

LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS. B I G RIVER VALLEY

5 SOMI Yes WATER M L L S ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS

BODEGA BAY AREA

5 Sanl

5 SOHI

480 SOMI

9 SOMI Yes

BRANSCOWB T W N AREA

BRAY TOWN AREA

BUTTE VALLEY

CLOVERDALE AREA WATER YELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS VOCs, METALS, CHLOROPHENOLS AND FUEL

5 SQMl

Page 7

COTTONEVA CREEK

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/96

R e g i o n 1 Ground U a t e r


Water O u a l i t v C o n d i t i o n

Hyd ro - I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t Wa te r Bady Name U n i t # m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d U n k n o m Size U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i p t i o n VALLEY

DINSMORES T O M AREA 0 0 0 5 5 SPMI

EDEN VALLEY 0 0 0 5 5 SPMl

EEL RIVER VALLEY

EUREKA PLAIN

FAIRCHILD SUAMP VALLEY

FORT BRAGG TERRACE AREA

GARBERVILLE TOW AREA

GARCIA RIM^ AREA

GRAVELLY VALLEY

119 0 1 0 120 SQMI Yes UATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKIHG UNDERGROUND TANKS AND SPILLS

59 0 1 0 60 SQMI Yes UATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGRWND TANKS;FUEL/VOC/METAL SPILLS/ WOOD TREATEMENT CHEIICALS/VOC FROM LAWDF

23 0 1 0 24 SQMl Yes WATER UELLS ARE IWAIUED AN0 THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS AND FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS

4 0 1 0 5 SQMl Yes WATER E L L S ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING WDERGRWND TANKS AND FUEL RELEASES

Page 8

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Prob lem S o u r c e D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1W4 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


U a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n

Hvd ro - I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t U a t e r Bodv Name U n i t # m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d Unknown Site U n i t s Shee t Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i ~ n

GUALALA RIVER VALLEY 4 0 1 0 5 Spnl Yes UATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UWDERGROUWD TANKS AND FUEL RELEASES.

HAPPY CAMP TOW AREA 0 0 0 5 5 S W l

HAYFORK VALLEY 0 0 0 6 6 SPnl

HEALDSBURG AREA 26 0 1 0 27 SQMl Yes UATER UELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS VOCs, IIETALS, AND FUEL RELEASES

HETTENSHAU VALLEY 0 0 0 5 5 SPnl

HONEYDEU TOW AREA o o o 5 5 SPMI

HWPA VALLEY 0 0 0 5 5 SQMI

HYAPIWH VALLEY 0 0 0 5 5 Spnl

KEN- VALLEY 0 0 0 6 6 SPnl

KLAMTH RIVER VALLEY o o o n o 720 san~

KNIGHTS VALLEY 0 0 0 5 5 SPnI

LARABEE VALLEY

LAYTONVI LLE VALLEY

0 0 0 5 5 San l

0 0 0 12 12 San l

Page 9

R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Prob lem Sou rce D -

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 1 Ground Water

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

4.. water Q u a l i t y Cond i t ion

&dro - I n t e r - - T o t a l - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # mediate Inmaired Unknoun Sire U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i p t i o n

LEGGETT AREA 1 0 1 0 2 SQMI Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUWD TANKS

AND FUEL RELEASES

LITTLE LAKE VALLEY 16 0 1 0 17 SQMI Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TAWS AND FUEL RELEASES

LITTLE VALLEY

LOUER KLAMATH RIVER VALLEY

LOWER LAYTONVILLE

8 0 1 0 9 SQMI Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS RELATED TO FUEL RELEASES

LOWER RUSSIAN RIVER VALLEY

MAD RIVER VALLEY i

59 0 1 0 60 SOMl Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS AND UOQ) TREATEHENT CH EMICALS

0 0 0 5 5 SQMl HATTOLE RIVER VALLEY

HCDOUELL VALLEY 0 0 0 3 3 SQMl

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Water Quel i tv Condition

Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact Water Body Name Un i t # Good mediate lnaaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t im

HODOC PLATEAU PVA

NAVARRO RIVER VALLEY

PEPPER- TOUN AREA

POTTER VALLEY

PRAIRIE CREEK AREA

RED ROCK VALLEY

RED- CREEK VALLEY

RINCON VALLEY

ROUND VALLEY

SANEL VALLEY

SANTA ROSA PLAINS

0 3000 3000 SPMI Yes THREAT TO DRINKING WATER FRQl CONTMINATlW RELATED 10 YDCs, UETALS, AND FUEL RELEASES

1 0 1000 SPnl Yes WATER UELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY LEAKING UNOERGROUWD TANKS

0 5 5 Sanl

0 5 5 Sanl

0 13 13 SPnl

0 4 4 S a n l

5 0 96 SWI Yes WATER UELLS ARE IllPAlRED B I SPILLS, LEAK ING UNDERGROUND TANKS AND FAILING SEPTIC SYSTEMS

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D -

Page 11

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 1 Ground Uater

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

U a t e r O u a l i t v C o n d i t i o n Hydro I n t e r - - T o t a l - Fact

7

U a t e r Body Name U n i t # @oJ mediate I m m i r e d Unknown Size U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

SCOTT RIVER VALLEY

SEIAD VALLEY

0 80 8 0 S W l

1 0 5 SPMl Yes UATER UELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS AND FUEL RELEASES

1 0 340 SQMl Yes UATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY SPILLS, LEAKS AND UNDERGROUWD TANKS MTALS, AND FUEL RELEASES

SHASTA VALLEY

0 5 5 SPMI

20 0 7 0 S W I Yes

SHERUOOD VALLEY

SMITH RIVER PLAIN UATER WELLS ARE IMPAIRED BY SPILL LEAKIN G UNDERGRWND TAUKS AND AGRICULTURAL CHEMl CALS

0 5 5 SOMl

1 0 16 SpMl Yes

TEN MILE RIVER VALLEY

UKIAH VALLEY UATER E L L S ARE THREATENED BY LEMIPG UNDERGRWND TANKS VOCs, CHROMIUM, AND FUEL RELEASES

UEAVERVILFE AREA 1 D 2 SQMl Yes UATER WELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKIWG UNDERGRWND TANKS VOC6, METALS, AND FUEL RELEASES

UEOTT TOW AREA

Page 12

Region 1

Water Bodv Name

UILLIAnS VALLEY

WINDSOR AREA

STATE WTER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1394 WTER WALITY ASSESSHENT

Ground Water

Water Q u a l i t y Condition Hvdro - Inter- Tota l - Fact - Unit # mediate I n m i r e d Unknoun Site. Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i g -

1 0 1 0 2 SOMl Yes WATER UELLS ARE THREATENED BY LEAKING UNDERGROUWO TANKS VMs, METALS, AND FUEL RELEASES

Report Date : 05/23/94

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 13

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/a/%

Region 1 Lakes and Reservoirs

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In te r -

~ o o d mediate I n m i r e d Unknom -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Oescristion ---


BIG ELK LAKE 105.22

WCK LAKE 105.31

CANYON CREEK LAKES 106.15

24805 AC Yes lNSUFFtClElPTDATATOJUSTIFYLlSTINGAT THrS TIME

CLEAR LAKE RESERVOIR 105.93

COPCO LAKE 105.38

CUDDIHY LAKES (SW) 105.22

DEVILS PUNCHBOUL 105.31

EUING RESERVOIR 106.25

GRANITE LAKE 106.40

INDIAN TOM LAKE 105.91

IRON GATE RESERVOIR 105.37

JUANITA LfiKe 105.81

KLAFIATH LAKE SUHP 105.91

LAKE MENDOCINO 114.32 1960 AC Yes DATA INDICATES UATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION IS WOO.

Page 14



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - 0

Water Quality Condition In ter - -

Coed mediate Impaired Unknoun Hydro Uni t # -

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i m --- Water Body Name

LAKE PILLSBURY

LAKE RALPHINE

LAKE SHASTINA

LAKE SONOMA

LEUISTON LAKE

LITTLE SOUTH FORK

LONG GULCH LAKE

LOST LAKE (2)

L M R WRIGHT LAKE

MISS LAKE ( R l )

PICAYUNE LAKE

RUTH LAKE

SPRING LAKE

STODDRRD LAKE

SUGAR PINE LAKE

Page 15

STATE UAlCR RCSOURCCS CONIROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R r p r t Date : 05/23/44

Region 1 Lakes a d Reservoirs

Federal Lists

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total

Water Body Name unit # Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown Size

TRINITY LAKE 106.40 16400 0 0 0 16400

TULE LAKE SUMP 105.92 0 0 0 12416 12416

VAN ARSDALE 111.63 0 0 0 163 163 RESERVOIR

Fact - Units Sheet P-

AC

AC Yes

AC

Page 16

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/96 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WTER WALITV ASSESSMENT

R e g i o n 1 Ocean and Open Bays


3 3 5 0 1 1 3 4 9

P r o b l e m Sou rce D

Water Qua1 i ty C o n d i t i o n I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t -

Good m e d i a t e I n m a i r e d Unknonn U n i t s Shee t Problem/Need D e s c r i A i o n -- 200 0 0 0 200 AC

Hyd ro Water Body Name U n i t #

BODEGA MARINE REFUGE 115.20

DEL MAR LANDING 113.85 RESERVE

GERSTLE COVE 113.85

KELP BEDS SAUNDERS 113.70 REEF

KELP BEDS TRINIDAD 108.10

KINGS RANGE NATIONAL 112.30 CONSERVATION AREA

NORTH (KLAHATH RIVER 105.11 BASIN)

44 . O 0 0 44 nl Yes POINT AND NOY-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES THREATEN BENEFI C I A 1 USES

P o i n t OCEAN OFF OF SAMOA 110.00 PEN1 NSULA

2 0 0 0 2 HI Yes THREATENED CHRONIC TQWICllV.

PYGMY FOREST ASBS 108.10

REDWOO NATIONAL 117.10 PARK

SOUTH (NORTH COASTAL 294 0 0 0 294 SOH1 Yes POINT AND NOW-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES BASIN) THREATEN BENEFICIAL USES

Page 17

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1 9 9 4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 0 5 / 2 3 / 9 4

R e g i o n 1 R i v e r s a n d S t r e a m s


3 3 3 0 1 1

3 4 9 P r o b t e m S w r c e D

W a t e r O u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n

H y d r o - I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t U n i t # m c d i a t e I m p a i r e d U n k n o m Size, U n i t s S h e e t Prob tem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n W a t e r Bodv Name

AH PAH CREEK

ALBION RIVER 113.40 0 14 0 0 1 4 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM WATURAL AND HUMAN N o n - P o i n t SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

X . .

AMERICANO CREEK 115.30 0 0 7 0 7 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION, LOU DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND HIGH AMMONIA LEVELS FROM I P S DISCHARGES HAVE IMPAIRED F I S H AND WILDLIFE HABITAT

APPLEGATE RIVER, MIDDLE FORK

ATASCADERO CREEK

BARKER CREEK

114.11 1 0 0 0 1 M I Yes ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS SUCCESSFUL. DISCHARGE ELIMINATED.

BARLOW CREEK

BEAR CREEK (R1)

BEAR RIVER 112.20 0 2 5 0 0 2 5 M I Yes DATA INDICATE QUALITY I S INTERMEDIATE. L I S T I N G NOT NEEDED AT T H I S TIME

BEAUGHTON CREEK 105.50 2 3 1 0 6 M I Yes FISHERY HABITAT I W A I R E D WE TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES. REMEDIAL ACTIONS UNDERWAY.

X . .

BEAVER CREEK

P a g e 18

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 1 Rivers and Streams

Water Q u a l i t y Condition

Hydro - I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Water Bocb Name U n i t # mediate lnoa i red Unknown Size U n i t s Sheet Problemlleed D e s c r i ~ t i o n

BIG CREEK (TRIB. TO 106.22 0 0 0 5 5 MI TRINITY SOUTH FORK)


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem S w r c e D

BIG RIVER 113.30 0 60 0 0 40 HI Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HMAN Non-Point

SOURCES HAS IMPACTEO BEUEFICIAL USES.

BIG SALMON CREEK 113.40 0 0 0 12 12 MI

BIG SULFER CREEK 114.26 18 0 0 0 18 HI

BLACK BUTTE RIVER 111.73 0 0 0 25 25 HI

\ BLUE CREEK 105.11 22 0 0 0 22 MI

BLUE WATERHOLE CREEK 113.70 0 4 0 0 4 MI

BOHEMIAN CREEK 114.11 0 1 0 0 1 MI

BROWS CREEK (R1) 106.31 0 0 0 21 21 HI

BRUSH CREEK 113.64 0 0 0 12 12 MI

BUCKEYE CREEK 113.83 0 15 0 0 15 HI

BULL CREEK CR1) 111.31 0 12 0 0 12 MI

BULLWINKLE CREEK 108.20 1 3 0 0 4 MI

BUMMER LAKE CREEK 103.13 0 0 0 1 1 HI

Page 19

X . .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSPENT

Region 1 Rivers and Strearns

Water Q u a l i t y Condi t ion

Hydro - Inter - - Tota l - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # mediate Impaired Unknom Size Un i t s Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i ~ t i ~ f I

CAMF'BELL CREEK 106.11 0 0 0 6 6 MI

CANNON CREEK 109.30 0 5 0 0 5 MI

CAPPELL CREEK 105.11 0 0 0 6 6 MI

CARR CREEK 106.25 0 0 0 6 6 MI

COFFEE CREEK 106.40 16 0 0 0 16 MI

COLD CREEK 114.32 0 0 0 5 5 MI (MENDOCINO COUNTY)

COLD CREEK (TRIB. TO 106.25 0 0 0 3 3 MI SALT, THEN HAYFORK)

COLGAN CREEK 114.21 0 5 0 0 5 MI

COON CREEK 113.50 0 2 0 0 2 MI

COTTANEVA CREEK 113.12 0 5 0 0 5 MI

COTTONUOOD CREEK 105.36 0 0 0 15 15 MI [TRlB. TO kLI\MATH)

DEADUWD CREEK 1M.31 0 0 0 6 6 MI

DEAN CREEK 111.32 0 0 0 7 7 MI

Report Date : 05/a/%

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source k

Page 20

Repor t D a t e : 05/23/96 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Federa l L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

P r o b l e m Source - 0

U a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t -

~ o o d med ia te I m i r e d Unknown Size U n i t s Sheet ProblemlNeed D e s c r f ~ t , t l m -- Hydro U n i t Rr U a t e r Body Name

I ORY CREEK (R1' DUTCH B I L L CREEK

0 200 0 0 200 MI Yes SEDIMENTATION FROn NATURAL AND KUUAN Non-Po in t SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

X . . I EEL R l K R

EEL RIVER, EAST BRANCH, SOUTH FORK

EEL RIVER, MIDDLE FORK

EEL RIVER, NORTH FORK

0 85 0 0 85 MI Yes SEDIMENTATION FRCU UAfURAL AMR HWN SGURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES

22 o o o 22 HI

0 17 0 0 17 MI

o 2 o o 2 MI

9 0 0 0 9 MI Yes

o o o 1s 15 nr

EEL RIVER, SOUTH FORK

ELDER CREEK

ELK RIVER

ESSEX GULCH

ETNA CREEK

FORSYTHE CREEK

Page 21

STATE WATER RESWlRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/96


Federal L i s t s

Water Qua l i t y Condition Hydro In te r - 9 - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet

FRENCH CREEK 105.42 4 6 0 0 10 M I Yes

FULLER CREEK 113.84 0 9 0 0 9 M I

GARCIA RIVER 113.70 0 0 39 0 39 M I Yes

GARCIA RIVER, NORTH 113.70 0 7 0 0 7 HI FORK

GILBERT CREEK 101 .OO 0 0 0 5 5 M l

GRASS VALLEY CREEK 106.31 0 14 0 0 14 M I Yes

GRAY CREEK 108.10 0 4 0 0 4 M I

GREEN VALLEY CREEK 114.11 0 5 0 0 5 M I

(R1)

GREENWOOD CREEK t1'3.61 0 15 0 0 fS M I

GROUSE CREEK 1'06.21 0 22 0 0 22 Bf

GUALALA RIVER '1'13.80 0 35 0 0 35 MI Yes

HARDSCRABBLE CREEK 163.30 0 0 0 5 5 M I

Page 22

Problem/Need Description

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

s ~ o r ~ € M # i r o ~ FROM I ~ ~ U R A L A)(D KUUAN Non-Point SOURCES HAS IMP~cTE~ BEEFlCPAL USES.

DATA INDICATE WATER QUALlTI CLASSIFICATION IS INTERHEDIATE. DOES NOT REWIRE LlSTlUG At THIS TIME

EPA 304(L) LISTED.

EPA 306(L) LISTED.

SEDIMENTATION FRW NATURAL AN0 HU@bi Non-Poht SoURCES HAS HMPACTW B ~ E F I C ~ A L USE^;

X . .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSCgNT

Region 1 Rivers and Streems

Water Oua l i t v Condit ion

Hydro - I n t e r - - Total - Fact Water Body Name - Unit # Good mediate Inmaired Unknonn Sire Un i t s Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i d i o n

HARDY CREEK

HAYFORK CREEK

HIGH PRAIRIE CREEK

HOADLEY GULCH

HOLLOW TREE CREEK

HOPPAW CREEK

HOSPITAL CREEK

HUNTER CREEK

ILLINOIS RIVER, EAST FORK

INDIAN CREEK

INDIAN CREEK

INHAN CREEK

JACOBY CREEK

JANES CREEK

4 M I

13 MI Yes

4 HI

4 HI

19 HI

5 HI

3 HI

5 MI

9 MI


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Page 23

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94



U a t e r Q u a l i t y C o r t d i t i o n

H y d r o I n t e r - - F a c t W a t e r B o d y Name - U n i t # Good m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d Unknown Sire U n i t s S h e e t Prob lem/Need D e s c r i p t i o n

JEUETT CREEK 112.30

JOE CREEK 102.30

JOHNSON CREEK (TRIB. 105.11 TO KLAMATH)

JOLLY GIANT CREEK 110.00

JUAN CREEK 113.12

JUG HANDLE CREEK 113.20

JULIAS CREEK 113.11

KIDDER CREEK 105.62

KLAMATH RIVER 105.00

KLAMATH RIVER, LOUER 105.10

KLAMATH RIVER, 105.30 MIDDLE

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

P r o b l c m S o u r c e D

0 0 16 M I Yes DATA INDICATE QUALITY I S INTERMEDIATE.

0 0 126 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION AWD ELEVATED UATER U n k n o m TERPERATURES HAVE IMPACTED FISHERY RESOURCES.

LAGUNA OE SANTA ROSA 191.24 0 0 26 0 26 M I Yes LOU DISSOLVED OXTGE41 111-611 &l@lCWIA LEVEL DUE TO RPS DISCBARGES WVE IMPAIRED FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.

Pege 24

. . .

. * .

. . . 0 . .

. . . X . .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALITY ASSESSNENT

R e g i o n 1 R i v e r s a n d S t reems

U a t e r O u a I i t v C o n d i t i o n Hydro - I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t

Water Bodv Name U n i t # Good m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d Unknown U n i t s Shee t Problem/Need D e s c r i d i o n

LARABEE CREEK 111.13 0 0 0 21 21 H I

LEGGETT CREEK 111.32 0 0 0 1 1 M I

LINDSAY CREEK 109.10 0 7 0 0 7 M I

L ITTLE GRASS VALLEY 106.31 0 b 0 0 6 M I CREEK

LITTLE JUAN CREEK 113.12 0 0 0 3 3 M I

L ITTLE R I M R 108.20 0 0 0 17 17 M I Yes SEDlMENTATlON FROM NATURAL AND HUMAN SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES

LITTLE SHASTA RIVER 105.50 0 25 0 0 25 M I No

LOST RIVER 105.93 0 26 0 0 26 M I Yes DATA INDICATE THAT WTER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION I S INTERUEDIATE. LISTING NOT REOUIRED AT THIS TIHE.

R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Prob lem S w r c e D

LUFFENHOLTZ CREEK 108.10 0 0 0 1 1 M I

HAD RIVER 109.00 0 90 0 0 90 M I Y e s SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HIMAN Non-Po in t SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

M P L E CREEK 108.10 0 0 0 16 16 M I

MARK UEST CREEK 114.23 0 18 0 0 18 M I

Page 25

. . . X . .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n Problem Source 9

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In te r - -

Good mediate I n m i r e d Unknoun 7-

Hydro Uater BodV Name Uni t #

Total - Fact - Site . Units Sheet ---

MATTOLE RIVER 112.30 56 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HLlHAN Won-Point X . . SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

MCGARVEY CREEK 105.11

MILL CREEK (OEL 103.13 NORTE COUNTY)

MILL CREEK (TRIB. TO 105.41 SCOTT, SISKIYOU CO)

MILL CREEK 108.10 (TRINIDAD, HUnsOLOT COWTY)

MOFFETT CREEK 105.42 21 M I

4 M I

3 M I

4 M I

3 M I

25 M I Yes

MOREK CREEK 105.11

MORRISON CREEK 103.11

MULE CREEK 106.40

HVNOT CREEK 105.11

NAVARRO RIVER 113.50 SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HLlllAN Won-Point X . . SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

NEU RIVER (R1) 106.14

Page 26

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALITY ASSESSMENT

R e g i o n 1 R i v e r s and Streems

Water Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n Hydro - I n t e r -

Water Body Name U n i t # = media te I m i r e d U n k n o m

NOISY CREEK 107.30 0 0 0 10

NOYO RIVER 113.20 0 35 0 0

NOYO RIVER, LITTLE 113.20 0 6 . 0 0 NORTH FORK

OMAGAR CREEK 105.11 0 0 0 3

OUTLET CREEK 111.61 . 0 0 0 30

PANTHER CREEK 107.20 0 4 0 0

PATRICK CREEK 109.10 0 2 0 0

PEACOCK CREEK (TRIB. 103.11 0 0 0 3 TO SMITH)

PECUAN CREEK 105.11 0 0 0 10

PELLETREAU CREEK 106.22 0 0 0 7

PHILPOT CREEK 106.25 0 0 0 5

PINER CREEK 114.22 1 3 0 0

POISON GULCH 106.15 0 0 0 2

T o t a l - Fact - S i z e U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i m t i o n ---

35 MI Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND H W N SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEF lC lAL USES.

Repor t D a t e : 05/23/94


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Prob lem Source - 0

Non-Point X . .

Page 27

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 UATER QUALITY ASSESWENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94



H y d r o W a t e r B o d y Name U n i t #

POST CREEK 106.23

WTATO PATCH CREEK 105.11

RATTLESNAKE CREEK 106.23

REDWOOD CREEK (NOYO 113.20 TRIB.)

REDUDOD CREEK ( ~ 1 ) 107.00

RICHARDSON CREEK 105.11

ROCKPI LE CREEK 113.82

ROSELAND CREEK 114.21

R M Y CREEK 103.12

RUSH CREEK 106.31

RUSSIAN RIVER 114.10

RUSSIAN RIVER, EAST 114.32 FORK

W a t e r U a l i t v C o n d i t i o n I n t e r - - rotal - F a c t

~ o o d m e d i a t e Inmaired Unknown Size U n i t s S h e e t P r o b l e m / N e e d D e s c r i p t i o n --

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

P r o b l e m S o u r c e D

0 63 0 0 63 M I Y e s SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HUMAN N o n - P o i n t W C E S M S lWACTED BEWf I C l A L U-SES.

105 0 0 0 105 M I Y e s WATER DIVERSIONS, POINT AND WON-POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES HAVE IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

I Page 28 I

X . .

R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALITY ASSESSMENT

R e g i o n 1 R i v e r s a n d St reams


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Prob lem S o u r c e - D

Water Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n 0 I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t - Water Body Name - U n i t # Good m e d i a t e lngeired Unknown Size U n i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

RUSSIAN RIVER. LOWER 114.11

SALMON RIVER 105.20 46 0 0 0 46 M I Yes SEDlMENTATlON AND ELEVATED WATER TEMPERATURES HAVE IMPACT ED FISHERY RESOURCES

SALT CREEK (TRIB. TO 106.25 HAY FORK)

SALT RIVER 111.11

SANTA ROSA CREEK 114.22 (R1)

SAUGAP CREEK 105.11

0 68 0 0 68 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AM) lRMAW Unknown SOURCES HAS IHPACTED BENEFICIACUSES.

SCOTT RIVER 105.40 X . .

SHACKLEFORD CREEK 105.42 (TRIB. TO SCOTT)

SHASTA RlVER 105.50 0 22 30 0 52 M I Yes UATER DlVERSlONS AM) NOW-POINT SOURCE Non-Po in t DISCHARGES HAVE IWACTED FISHERV RESOURCES.

W I T H RIVER 103.00 50 0 0 0 50 MI Yes ION-POINT SCURCE DISCHARGES THREATEN BENEFICIAL USES. QUALITY I S LINKNOUN.

Page 29

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1 9 9 4 WATER PUALITY ASSESSmMT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/a/Pt

R e g i o n 1 R i v e r s and S t r e a m s


H y d r o W a t e r B o d y Name U n i t #

STEMPLE CREEK 115.40

S U M I T CREEK

SUN VALLEY CREEK

SUPPLY CREEK

SWIFT CREEK

TARUP CREEK

TECTAH CREEK

TEN M I L E RIVER

TISH TANG CREEK

T W K I CREEK

TRAnUAY GULCH 113.50

TRINITY RIVER 106.00

TRINITY RIVER, EASt 106.23

W a t e r P u a l i t v C o n d i t i o n I n t e r -

Good m e d i a t e I m p a i r e d Unknoun -- T o t a l - F a c t -

S i z e U n i t s S h e e t --- 1 7 M I Yes

3 M I

1 H I

8 M I

1 4 M I

4 M I

1 0 M I

1 0 M I

1 0 M I

1 8 M I Yes

2 # I

i70 MI Yes

8 M I

Page 3 0

SEOIMNTATIUN, LOU DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND HIGH AMMONIA L E M L S FROM NPS DISCHARGES HAVE IMPAIRED F I S H AND WILDLIFE HABITAT

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9


DATA INDICATE THAT THE UATER W A L l T Y N o n - P o i n t CLASS1 FICAT ION I S INTERIIEDIATE.

FLOU DIVERSIONS AND SEDIMENTATION #AVE on-point

IMPACTED BENEF 1CIAL USES.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x . .

. . . X . .



Federal Lf s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Ouel i tv Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

toed mediate Impaired Unknown Site Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion Hydro

Uater Body Name Uni t # FORK, SOUTH FORK

TRINITY RIVER, LOUER 106.11 . . . X . . TRINITY RIVER, SOUTH 106.20

FaRK

80 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION FROM NATURAL AND HUMAN SUJRCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES.

TURUAR CREEK 105.11

USA1 CREEK 113.11 . . . X . . 63 M I Yes SEDIMENTATION FRU4 NATURAL AND IRIIIAN Non-Point

SOURCES HAS IMPACTED BENEFICIAL USES. VAN DUZEN RIVER 111.20

UAUKEL CREEK 105.11

UEAMR CREEK 106.32

UILDCAT CREEK (TRIB. 111.32 TO EEL)

UlLLOU CREEK (R1) 106.12 11 MI Yes Sedimentation . Fish population decl ine Threat of dr ink ing water impsirment

UILSON CREEK 103.50

UlNCHESTER CREEK 108.20

UINCHUCK RIVER 101.00

Page 31

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Rivers and Streams Federal L ists

Uater Body Name

WINDSOR CREEK

YREKA CREEK

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact Unit # @ mediate Impaired Unknown Units Sheet Problem/Need Descriotion

Page 32

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITI ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 1 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

Hvdro Water Body Name Uni t #

BUTTE VALLEV UETLAND 105.81

CLEAR LAKE RESERVOIR 105.93 NWR

LAUJNA DE SANTA ROSA 114.21 UETLANDS

LOUER KLAMTH NUR 105.91

TULE LAKE NUR 105.92

water Owl i tv Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate I m a f r e d Unknown Site Uni ts Sheet Problern/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n -- 0 0 0 3000 3000 AC

0 0 0 1890 1890AC

Page 33

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSNEWT

Region 2 N/A

Uater Qual i tv Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate I n m i r e d Unknoun Site Units Sheet Problem/Need D e S c r i ~ t i ~ n

ALAnO CANAL 204.302 0 0 0 0 0

ARROYO CORTE WERA DEL PRESIDO

I ARROYO HONDO 0 0 0 0 0

ARROYO HOCHO 204.302 0 0 0 0 0

BELUONT SLOUGH 0 0 0 0 0

CAUPBELL PERCOLATION POND

1 ISLAIS CHANNEL 0 0 0 0 0

I LAURlTZEN CANAL 0 0 0 0 0

WHTEZLIMA SLOUGH 0 0 0 0 0

PACHECO POND 0 0 0 0 0

SANTA FE CHANNEL 0 0 0 0 0

SUISUN SLOUGH 0 0 0 0 0

o l d sept ic system

Page 35


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

STATE UATEK RESOURCES CONTROL WARD 1994 UATER PUALITY ASSESSHESOT Report Date : 05/23/96

Region 2 Bays and Harbors

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition Hvdro - l n t w -

Water Body #am Unit # p& mediate Impaired Unknown

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Problem/#eed Description

6560 Yes Fish popr{atim decline Elevated f ish tissue Lewls Elevated shell f ish tissue levels

Point & Non-Point X . X CARPUlNEt STRAIT 207.10 0 0 6560 0

Metals exceed shallow water eff luent 1 i m i ts.

Point X . . PEYTON SLOUGH 207.10 0 0 1 0 1 Y e s

2560 yes Point 8 Won-Point X . X RICHARDSON BAY 203.13 0 0 2560 0 Fish population decline Elevated f ish t i s s w levels Elevated shell f ish tissue levels

Fish population decline Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels

Point 8 #on-Point X . X SAW FRANCISCO BAY, 203.12 0 0 67700 0 CENTRAL

67700 AC Yes

Point 8 Non-Point X . X

Point & #an-Point X . X

Point & Won-Point X . X

SAN FRANCISCO BAY, 204.10 0 0 79900 0 LOWER

79900 Yes Fish poputation &l ine Elevated f i sh tissue tevets Elevated shettf ish tissue levels

SAN FRANCISCO BAY, 205.10 0 0 24500 0 SOU1 H

24500 AC Yes FisH populatftwi &c l iW Elevated ti& tfssue levels Elevated sheltf ish tissue levels

SAN PABLO BAY 206.10 0 0 71300 0 71300 yes Fish population decline Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels

I Page 46

STATE UATER RESOURCES COSlTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water mli t~ Condition Inter- - Total -

Uater Body lame Unit # toad mediate Impaired Unknown Site

SUISUW BAY 207.10 0 0 25000 0 25000

TOMALES BAY 201.11 0 0 1820 0 7820

Fact - Units Sheet Problem/leed Descr i~ t ion

Yes Fish population decline Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels

AC Yes Fish population decline Spawning impeirnent Coliform, She1 l f ish harvest closure.

Report Date : 05/23194

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D


Non-Point X .. X

Page 37

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR0 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSUENT

Region 2 Estuaries

Hydro Water Body Name - Unit #

ABBOTTS LAGOON

BAIR ISLAND

BOLINAS LAGOON ESTUARY

CASTRO COW 206.60

COON ISLAND

CORTE MADERA ER

CORTE WERA MARSH

DAY ISLAND

DRAKES ESTER0 201.20

FAGEN SLWGH

GALLINAS CREEK MARSH

LllrlANToUR ESTER0 201.20

N RICHM$W HARSH

Water Q u a l i t y Condition In te r - -

G o d mediate lamaired Unknown -- Total - Fast - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr io t im ---

0

960 AC

0 AC

25 AC Yes

250

85

200

75

2560

330

850

1

400

Page 38


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce - D

Point & Non-Point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

STATE WATER RESCURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALlTV ASSESSMENT Report Date : O!i/23/94

Region 2 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

Hydro Water Bodv Name Unit #

UAPA MRSHES

NOVATO CREEK MARSH

OAKLAND HARBOR 204.20

PESCADERO M R S H

PETALWA RIVER MARSH

PILLAR UARSH

POINT EDITH WETLANDS

W180WIO CREEK LAGOO)(

PRINCETON MRSH

PI REVES PENNINSULA

REDYOOD SHORES ER

Water Qual i ty Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknom -- Total 7

Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

10000 l es

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem/Need Desc r i~ t i aq Problem Source - D

Portion or ig inst ly was saline wetlands . . . Alterred by diking t o create farmland DFG mw restwing t o freshuater wetlends

Page 39

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESWNT

Region 2 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

Water Ouali t y C d i t ion

Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name - Unit # mediate 1-i red Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Ned O e ~ c r i p t i ~

SACRAMENT0 SAN 207.10 JOAPUIN DELTA

SAN PABLO BAY ESTUARY

SAW GREGORIO CREEK LAGOON

SAN PEDRO HILL HARSH

SAM RAFAEL CREEK MARSH

SANDPIPER UETLANDS

SWTH HAMPTON BAY UETLANDS

SWTH SAW FRANCISCO BAY ESTUARY

su1 .s~~ ~ B S P ESTUARY

TWITAS CREEK LAG+N

0 0 3400 0 3600 Yes Fish population decline Elevated f i sh end shell f ish tissue level Aquatic hpbi tg t cjegradst ion

0 0 9 0 0 AC

0 0 0 11 11

Page 40

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 2 Estuaries

water Quality Condition '

Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact Water Body Name Unit # a mediate Impaired Unknom Units Sheet ProblemfNeed D e s c r i ~ t i m

WALKER CREEK CIARSH

UHlTE SLOUGH

0 0 0 15 15 AC Fish population decline Elevated f ish tissue tevels Elevated she1 t f ish tissue levels

Page 41


Federa( Lists

3 3 3 O l t 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WAClTY ASSESSWENT


Water Qua l i t y Condition Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # mediate Inpaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i ~ t i o n

ARROYO DEL HAMBRE GU

CASTRO VALLEY GU

CLAYTON VALLEY GU

EAST BAY PLAIN GU

HALF MOON BAY TERRANCE GU

ISLAIS VALLEY GU

KENUOOO VALLEY GU

LIVERMORE VALLEY 204.30

LIVERMORE VALLEY GV 204.30

MERCED VALLEY GU

0 0 0 2 2

0 0 0 4 4 SQMl

0 30 0 0 30

0 0 20 0 20 SQMl

0 0 0 3 3

0 0 0 0 0 SQMI

0 0 0 0 0 SQMl

0 100 0 0 100 SPMl


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Saurce 0

Drinking water impmirment Point Threat o f dr inking water impeirfnent Solvent p l u m i n usable gw, especial ly

Yes Drinking water inpeirment Threat of dr inking water illpeirment fue l leaks/MC po l lu t ion

Point

Drinking water impairment Point & Non-Point . . . threat of dr inking water inpairment fue l leaks/VW: po l lu t ion '

Page 42

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD l W 4 UATER PUALITY ASSESSllENT


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Oual i tv Condition In ter - -

Good mediate lnoaired Unknown -- Hvdro

Uater Body Name - Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Drinking water impeirment Threat o f dr inking water iapai ramt f u e l Leaks/WC contamination

Point 8 Non-Point . . . NAPA VALLEY GU 230 Spnl Yes

96 SQnl Yes Drinking water ilnpairarnt Threat o f dr inking water iapaiment F w l leaks/MC po l lu t ion

Point 8 Non-Point . . . NILES CONE GU 204.30

NOVATO VALLEY GU

PESCADERO VALLEY GU

PETALWA VALLEY GU

. . .

. . . Non-Point . . . Drinking water iopainmnt

Threat o f dr inking water iapei ramt fue l Leaks/Mt po l lu t ion

30 SPnl Yes

6

0 S M l

Threat o f dr inking water fupaironrt Point & Non-Point . . . . . . . . .

PITTSBURC PLAIN GU

ROSS VALLEY GU

SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CENTRAL GU

SAW FRANCISCO SAND GU

Page 43

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e S C r i ~ t i ~

SM GREGORIO VALLEY CY

SAW HATE0 PLAIN GU 204.40 0 0

SAW PEDRO VALLEY GU 0 0

SAN RAFAEL VALLEY GU 0 0

SAN RAMON VALLEY GU 0 30

SAND POINT AREA GU 0 0

SANTA CLARA VALLEY 205.00 230 0 CV

20 100 350 SWI Yes Drinking uater impairment Threat o f dr inking water iapeirment fue l leaks/VW: pollution

Point B Non-PoPnt . . .

SEBASTOPOL-RERCED GU 0 0

SONOMA VALLEY GU 0 0 0 50 50 SOHI Yes Threat o f dr inking water inpairmsnt Fuet lealts/VOC p o l lutlon

SOUTH BAY GU 0 0

SUlSUW FAIRFIELD VALLEY GU

Page 44

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UAIER OUALITY ASSES!#ENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

Hvdro Water Body Name Unit #

VISITATION VALLEY GU

YGNACIO VALLEY GU

Water Qua1 i t v Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Good mediate I m ~ e i r e d Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- 0 0 0 3 3

0 30 0 0 30 SWI

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Page 45

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Water Qua l i t y Condition Hydro - Inter -

Water Body Name Uni t # mediate Impaired Unknoun

0 ALAMEDA CREEK QUARRY - ,. . . O. . 0 0 PONDS

ALMAI?EN RES 205.40 0 62 0 .O

ALPINE LAKE 201.13 219 0 0 0

ANDERSON RES 205.30 0 1600 0 0

ANDERSOU RESERVOIR 205.30 0 # 0 0

ANZA LAKE 0 0 0 0

BEAR GULCH RES 205.50 25 0 0 0

BELL CANYON 206.50 0 . 0 0 0 RESERVOIR

BERKELEY AQUATIC 203.00 0 65 0 0 PARK LAGCON

BOW TEMPE LAKE 201.13 140 0 0 0

BRIWES RES 206.60 730 0 0 0

CALAVERAS RES 2fl4.30 1450 0 0 0 I . (

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet ---

42 ,AC Yes

219 +?C Yes

1600 AC

1690 AC

0

25 Yes

25 AC Yes

65 AC Y e s

140 Yes

i a 0 Yes

1450

Rcoblem+Heed Descript ion

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Elevated , f ish t issue rLevels

Elevated f i s h t issue L e w l s Threat ,of rec ree t ime l inpacts

Won-Point . . . . . .

Non-Poi n t . X .

Sedimentation Eutrophication

Recreational impacts Eu t raph ica t~m

Non-Point

Page 46

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSmNT Report Oate : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0 - Water Quali tv Condition

Inter- - Good mediate l m i r e d Unknoun --

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Ueter Bodv Name Unit #

Non-Point X X X CALERO RES 205.40 350 AC Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Mercury exceeds FDA in f ish

315 Yes CHABOT LAKE 204.20 (ALMDA)

Non-Point CHABOT LAKE (SOLANO) 206.50

CHERRY FLAT RESERVOIR

COTTON UOW LAKE 0

640 AC Yes

. . . Won-Point - . x . Elevated f i sh tissue levels

Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels COYOTE RES . 205.30

CRYSTAL LAKE (RZ)

CRYSTAL SPRINGS, 204.40 LOUER

Drinking water iopiirmt Sedimentat ion Recreational impests

CRYSTAL SPRINGS, 206.40 UPPER

682 AC Yes Drinking water inpairment Sedimentation Recreational impects

CULL CAVYON RES 204.20

OALYlCK LAKE 206.50

19

35

Page 47

Sedimentat ion

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSENT


water Qua l i t y Condition Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact -

Uater Body Name Un i t # mediate I m i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e ~ C r i ~ t i o n

DEL VALLE RESERVOIR 204.30 0 0 0 0 1060

DON CASTRO RES 204.20 0 19 0 0 19

ELIZABETH LAKE (REG 205.20 0 63 0 0 63 AC Periodic elevated c o l i f o w

2)

FELT LAKE 205.50 0 38 0 0 38 Yes Eutrophication

FREMONT LAGOON 205.20 0 0 0 3 3 Yes

GOLDEN GATE PARK 203.40 0 0 0 0 0 LAKE

GUADALUPE RES

HALLS VALLEY RESERVOIR

HENNESSEY LAKE

HERMAN LAKE

HORSESHOE LAKE

JEUEL LAKE

KENT LAKE

205.40 0 0 80 0 80 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels

0 0 0 0 0

206.50 850 0 0 0 850 Yes Eutrophication

207.21 0 0 110 0 110 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels

204.20 0 0 0 1 1

0 0 0 0 0

201.13 265 0 0 0 265 Yes


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Won-Point . X .

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point . X .

Non-Point X X X

. X .

Page 48

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALllV ASSESSllENT


Water Oual i tv Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Bodv Name Uni t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descrivtion

KIMBALL RESERVOIR 206.50 0 0 0 0 0

LAFAVETTE LAKE 207.32 SO0 0 0 0 500 Ves

LAKE CURRY

LAKE DEL VALLE

LAKE ELSlUN

LkKE FREV

LAKE HERMAN

LAICE LAWNITAS

L M HADIGAN

LAKE MRlE

LAKE HERCED

LEXlNGTON LAKE


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

0 180 180 AC Ves Impacted by dropping Lake levels Qe t o Won-Point drought and groudmter w i n g by Daly C i t y

0 0 450 Ves Threat of elevated fish t issue l w e l s Won- Point

MALLARD RESERVOIR 0 0 0 0 0

HERRlTT LAKE 204.20 0 160 0 0 160 Yes Eutrophication

Page 49

Won-Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSf@ttT Report Date : 05/23/94


Water Qua1 i t v Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name - Unit 1 mediate Inmaired Unknoun Sire Units Sheet Problem/Need Des eriet ion

MILLIKEN RES 206.50 50 0 0 0 50 Yes Eutvophication

NICASIO RES 201.13 0 044 0 0 844 AC Yes Eutrophication

PHOENIX LAKE (REG 2 ) 203.20 18 0 0 0 18 yes

PILARClTOS LAKE 202.22 109 0 0 0 109 AC Yes ROAD EROSION

RECTOR RES 206.50 90 0 0 0 90 Yes Eutrophication

SAN ANDREAS LAKE 204.40 550 0 0 0 550 AC Yes Drinking water impa i rmt Sedinientetfon 8ecreet im1 illpact8

SAW ANTONIO RES 204.30 825 0 0 0 825 Yes

SAW LEANDRO RES 204.20 f88 0 0 0 788

SAW PABLO RES 206.60 854 0 0 0 854 Yes

SANDY WOOL LAKE 0 0 0 0 0

s c o ~ r s o ~ i k ~ A K E 2 d . 20 o o o 15 15

SEARSVILLE LAKE 205.50 0 109 0 0 1b9

S M W ~ 1 1 1 ~ s 0 0 0 0 0 RESERVOIR

Page 90

Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR0 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Hydro Uater Body Name - Unit #

SWLE JULE RES 201.13

STAFFORO LAKE 206.20

STEVENS CREEK RESERVOIR

TEHESCAL LAKE 203.30

VASONA LAKE 205.40

Uater Quality Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

~ o o d mediate lnuaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet ProblemlNeed Descr i~ t ion -- 63 0 0 0 63 Yes

245 0 0 0 245 Yes Eutrophication

0 10 0 0 10 AC Yes Sedimentation sedimentation from firestorm area nutrients


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Non- Point . X .

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1594 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMEST Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 2 Ocean and Open Bays

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D - Uater Qua l i t y Condition

Hydro In te r - - Fact - Uater Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inpaired Unknow Size Uni ts Sheet problem/Weed D w c r i d i o n - - -

ANGEL ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 M I

BIRD ROCK 72 0 0 0 72

BOLINAS BAY 201.30 0 0 0 0 1

DOUBLE POINT 86 0 0 0 86

DRAKES BAY 201.20 0 0 0 0 0

DUXBURY REEF RSRV . . . Won-Poi n t . . . Elevated she1 l f i sh t issue trtvels FARALLON ISLAND

GULF OF THE FARALLONS NMS

HALF mXlN BAY 202.21 0 0 0

0 0 1006 Yes ElevatedshellfishtissueLevels JAMES FITZGERALD 202.21 RESERVE

0 0 0

0 0 112

0 0 1359

0 0 2333

Page 52

PACIFIC OCEAN COAST

PT. REYES HEADLANDS 2P1.20

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Oualitv Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water B o d Name Unit # a mediate lmraired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problm/Yeed Oescri~tfon ASBS

Report Date : 0s/B/%

Federal Lists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 53

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1W4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSENT

Region 2 Rivers end Streams

Water Quality Condition Hydro - Inter- Tot.81 - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun .Units Sheet ProblemfNeed Oescriotim

ADOBE CREEK 206.301 0 0 0 0 0

AGUA CALIENTE CREEK 2U6.401 0 0 0 0 0

Report bate : 05 /U /eb

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

ALAWDA &EEK 204.3b 0 0 24 0 t'l M I Yes Threat of recreational iapacts #on-Point Fisheries habftat degradetien

ALAHITOS CREEK 205.40 0 0 14 7 21 M I Yes Recreationelimpacts #on-Point Migh concentrations o f Rlercury in f i sh

APPANOLlO CREEK 202.22 0 0 0 0 3 $41 Yes Theet of equetic habitat Ilesltrrrction Threat of w f l d l i f e habitat deshvctim Threat of ' f ish~papr lat ien decline

ARROYO AQClEGlA CREEK 205.301 0 0 0 0 -0

ARROYO M LA LACUNA 204.30 0 0 5 ,O 5 M I Threat of objecriws violated Yon-Point l o te l Dissolved Solid, Chlorides violate objettives

ARROYO DE ! LAS *-204.302 0 0 0 0 0 POSl TAS

ARROYO DEL VALCE 3a4.3 0 0 0 0 0 M I o ld septic systems

Federal L is ts

ALW CR&K 204.30 0 0 0 0 0 MI old septic systems Won-Point

ALPINE CREEK 202.301 0 0 0 0 0

Page 54

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSWNT


Water Qual i ty Condition

Hvdro - Inter- - Total - fact Water Body Name - Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Uni ts Sheet Problemlleed D e s c r i ~ t i m

ARROYO LEON CREEK 202.321 0 0 0 0 0

ARROYO SAUSAL CREEK 201.121 0 0 0 0 0

ARROYO SECO (ALA) 204.3 0 0 0 0 0 HI

ARROYO SECO CREEK 206.401 0 0 0 0 0

BARRETT CANYON CREEK 205.401 0 0 0 0 0

BEAR CANYON CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

BEAR VALLEY CREEK 201.132 0 0 0 0 0

BELL WILLIAMS CREEK 203.201 0 0 0 0 0

BERRYESSA CREEK 205.301 0 0 0 0 0 HI

BIG CARSON CREEK 201.131 0 0 0 0 0

BOGES CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

BOOTJACK CREEK 201 -302 0 0 0 0 0

BROW'S VALLEY CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

CALABAZAS CREEK 206.401 0 0 0 0 0

CARNEROS CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

o l d sept ic systems

Page 55


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Won-Point



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i t y Condition In te r - -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Oescriotion ---

0

0

0

Hydro Water Body Heme Unit #

CARRICER CREEK 206.401

CASCADE CREEK 206.201

CHILES CREEK

CLEAR CREEK (R2) 202.301

COAST CREEK

CON# CREEK

CORTE WERA CREEK 206.20

COYOTE CREEK (REG 2) 205.30 60 M I Yes Threat of drinking water i ~ p a i m t Non-Point Threat of recreationel lapacts Threat of objectives violated

CRW CREEK 204.202

CYRUS CREEK 206.501

DENNlSTON CREEK

DEVILS GULCH CREEK 201 .I32

DRY CREEK ~ d 2 ) 206.50

EASKWT CREEK 201.301

0

0

0

0

0

0

Page 56

STATE WATER RESOURCES COUTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Oualitv Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # a mediate Inpaired Unknoun Site Units Sheet ProblemlNeed Desc r i~ t i a r

EL WRTE OE WERA 202.301 0 0 0 0 0 CREEK

FALL CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

FIRST VALLEY CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

FISH HATCHERY CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

FOULER CREEK 206.401 0 0 0 0 0

FRENCWS CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

FRIUK CANYON CREEK 201.121 0 0 0 0 0

GALLINAS CREEK 201.30 0 0 0 0 0

GARUETT CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

GRAHAU CREEK 206.401 0 0 0 0 0

GREEN VALLEY CREEK (R2)

GUADALUPE CREEK 205.40 0 0 6 0 6 HI Yes Elevatedfishtissuelevels

GUADALUPE RIVER 205.40 0 0 12 0 12 HI Yes Elevated f i sh tissue lcvels Fish population decline

Report Date : 051 23194

Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - 0

Page 57

Non-Point X . X

Point 8 Mar-Point X . X

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BQARO lw4 UATER QUALITY ASSESSSansT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Uater P u e l i t y Condition

I n t e r - - Total - Fact - Uater Bodv Name Un i t # mediate Impaired Unknoxn Size Un i t s Sheet Problem/Need D e ~ c r i ~ t i ~ f !

HAGGERTY GULCH CREEK 201.132 0 0 0 0 0

HALLECK CREEK 201 .I33 0 0 0 0 0

HARRlNGTON CREEK 202.301 0 0 0 0 0

HERBERT CREEK 205.401 0 0 0 0 0

HOFFMN CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

HOWSINGER CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

HOPPER CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

HUlCHlCA CREEK 206.50 0 0 0 25 25 M I Yes H i l l s i d e D e v e l ~ t f w V i n e y a r d s Threat of spewning iqmi rment

ISABEL CREEK 204.301 0 0 0 0 0

JERICHO CANYON CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

JONES WLCH CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

KAISER CREEK 204.201 0 0 0 0 0

LA HONDA CREEK 202.301 0 0 0 0 0

LACOSTA CREEK 204 -303 0 0 0 0 0

Page 58

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source &

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1.994 WATER PUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Qual i t y Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # toad mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet ProblemlNeed Oescr id lon

LAFAYETTE CREEK 207.3

LAGUNITAS CREEK 201.13

W E R T CREEK 202.401

LAS TRAMPAS CREEK 207.3

LAUREL CREEK

LEDGEUOQ) CREEK

LITTLE BaUUIER CREEK 202.401

LOBITAS CREEK

LOS GATOS CREEK (REG 205.40 2)

LOS TRANCOS CREEK 205.501

UATADERO CREEK

UCWRUACK CREEK 202.401

HCKENNAN GULCH CREEK 201.301

HILLER CREEK

0 M I sept ic system refuse i n creek

22 nl Yes Sedimentation

0

15 nl septic systems, refuse in creek

0

0

0

0

20 M I Sedimentation Urban nonpoint p o l l u t i o n

0

0

0

0

0

Page 59


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Non-Point . . .

Won-Point X . X

. . . Non-Point . . .

. . . a * .

. . .

. . .

. . . Non-Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSWT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Inpsired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/hleed Oescrfptian ---

0

Hydro Unit # Water Body Name

MILLIKEN CREEK

MILLS CREEK

MINOEGO CREEK

RORAGA VALLEY CREEK

MORSES GULCH CREEK

M l . DIABLO CREEK

NAPA CREEK

WAPA R l M R

. . . Point & Won-Point X . X 55 M I Yes Eutrophicetion

Sedimentation Degrfidat ion of fisheries habf t e t

NATHANSEN CREEK 206.401

NlCASlO CREEK 201.13

NOVATO CREEK M6.20

OIL CREEK 202.401

OLEHA CREEK

OTIS CANYON CREEK 205.301

Page 60


Region 2 Rivers and Stream

Federal L i s t s

Hvdro Uater Bodv Name Uni t #

PALWRES CREEK 204.202

PENITENCIA CREEK 205 301

PERMANENTE CREEK

PESCADERO CREEK (REG 202.40 2)

PETALUMA RIVER 206.30

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In ter - - Total -

Good mediate Impaired Unknom Size -- 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 . o 0 0 0

21 0 0 0 21

PETERS CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0 0

PHOENlX CREEK 203.201 0 0 0 0 0

PICICLE CREEK 206.501 0 0 0 0 0

PIKE COUllTY GULCH 201 301 0 0 0 0 0 CREEK

PILARCITOS CREEK 202.32 11 0 0 0 11

PINE CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

PINE GULCH CREEK 201.301 0 0 0 0 0

Fact - Units Sheet Problem/Need D e a c r i ~ t i o n

HI Yes Eutrophication Sedimentat i o n Fisheries habi ta t deeradat ion

nl Yes Drinking water impairment Fish k i l l s Fish population decl ine

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Non-Point . . .


Page 61

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALlTY ASSESSRENT Report Date : 05/23/34


Federal L is ts

Hydro Water Body Name - Unit #

PlNE GULCH CREEK 201.302

PINOLE CREEK

POWON10 CREEK

PURlSlWA CREEK

RECTOR CREEK 206.501

REDUOOD CREEK (RZ) 201.30

REDUOOD CREEK (R2-A) 206.501

REDUM#) CREEK (R2-B) 204.201

RlTCHlE CREEK 206.501

RODEO CREEK 201.30

ROSS CREEK 206.201

Water Quality Condition lnter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need DeSCri~tiOn ---

13 M l Yes Recreational inpacts Fisheries habitat impgirment Agrlculturel runoff

SAGE CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

SALHON CREEK 801.121 0 0 0 0 0

SAW ANSELCU) CREEK 206.201 0 0 0 0 0

Page 62

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problm Swrce 0 - Uater Qua1 i t v Condition

In ter - - Good mediate I m ~ a i r e d Unknoun --

Hydro Un i t #

Total - Size -

Fact - Units Sheet Problm/Need O e s c r i ~ t i m Ueter Bodv Name

MI Yes Eutrophi cat im S4N ANTONIO CREEK (REG 2 )

Non-Point . . .

SAW FELIPE CREEK

SAW FRANClSWlTO CREEK

SAW GREGORIO CREEK Threat o f sedimentatim Non-Point

SAN LEANDRO CREEK

SAY LORENZO CREEK (R2)

SAW MATE0 CREEK

SAW PABLO CREEK

SAW PEDRO CREEK

septic systeas, refuse in c n a k Non-Point SAW RAMON CREEK

SAN VICENTE CREEK

SARATOGA CREEK

SARO CREEK

Page 63

STATE UATER RESOURCES COWTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSltENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Probtem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inpaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i m

SILVER CREEK 205.301

SLATE CREEK 202.401

SLEEPY HOLLW CREEK 206.201

SMITH CREEK 204.301

SODA CREEK 206.501

SQlA SPRINGS CANYON 205.301 CREEK

SONW CREEK 206.40 23 RI Yes Eutrophication Exceedame o f co l i fonn s t a d d

STEVENS CREEK 205.50 55 Yes

SUISUN CREEK 207.22

SULPHER CREEK 204.301 (ALAMEDA)

SULPHER CREEK (NAPA) 206.501

SUSWL CREEK 206.501

TARUATER CREEK 202.401

Page 66

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALlTY ASSESSNEWT


w r o Water BodV Name Unit #

TASSAJARA CREEK 204.302

T1Q CREEK 207.321

~ O C A Y CREEK 206.501

TUNlTAS CREEK 202.23

VERDE CANYON CREEK 201.121

WALKER CREEK (REG 2) 201 -12

Water Qual i tv Condition lnter- -

Goad mediate lma i red Unknown -- 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 25 0

WALNUT CREEK 207.32 0 0 20 0

UATERMN CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0

NEST UN1W CREEK 205.501 0 0 0 0

UlLOCAT CREEK 206.60 0 0 0 0

UILLOY CREEK 206.301 0 0 0 0

UOWW VALLEY CREEK 207.221 0 0 0 0

UMDRUFF CREEK 202.401 0 0 0 0


o nr

2s MI Y ~ S

0

0

40 M I Yes

0

0

0

Page 65

Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion

old septic s y s t e ~ ~

Report Date : 05f23/9b

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Sedimentat i on Won-Poi n t Nonpoint source pol lut ion - & i r k s mining discharge

threat of exceeding col l f o m standard Uon-Point Sedimentation Objectives vtolated

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal Lists

Uater Ouality Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name - Unit # a mediate Inmired Unknown Size Units Sheet problem/Need BescriDtion

YaRK CREEK 0 0 0 0 0

WLUPA CREEK 206.401 0 0 0 0 0

Page 66

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Report Date : 05/23/91 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUAL1TY ASSES#EWT

Region 2 Wet l ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Owl i t v Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknoun Size Uni ts Sheet ProblemfNeed Descrimtion

B(B1NAs LAGOON UETLANDS

CENTRAL SAN FRAWCISW BAY WETLANDS

DRAKES BAY YETLANDS

HALF ClOOW BAY UET LANDS

L M R SAW FRANCISCO BAY UETUNDS

BURIN COASTAL YETLANDS

W A RIVER UETlANDS

PEYTON SLOUGH UETLANDS

SAW HATE0 COASTAL UETUNDS

. . . .

Point 6 Won-Point . . . SMI PABLO BAY UETlANDS

Page 67

Region 2

Hvdro Water Body Name - Unit #

STATE WTER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER PUALfTY ASSESSMENT

Uet lands

SWTH HAnPTON BAY 207.21 UETLANDS

SOUTH SAU FRANCISCO 205.10 BAY UETLANDS

SUlSUN BAY UETLANDS 207.23

SUISUN HARSH 207.23 UETLANDS

TOUALES M Y UETLANDS 201.11

Water Qual i ty Condition Inter-

God mediate Inmaired Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet PsoblemlcNeed Oescr i~t iun ---

0 AC Yes Conversion of saltwater marsh t o freshwater marsh, xetlands alteration

57000 AC Yes Aquatic 8 u i l d l i f e habitat inpeired

Page 68


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Sowce - D

. . . Point 8 .Won-Point X . X

0

STATE WTER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Repcrt Date : 01/25/94


Federat L is ts

Water Quality Condition Hydro - Inter-

Uater Bodv Neme - Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun

HONTEREY HARBOR 309.50 25 35 14 0

WRRO BAY 310.22 0 1000 800 1400

MOSS LANDING HARBOR 306.00 0 40 40 80

SAN LUIS HARBOR 310.22 0 20 0 0

SANTA BARBARA HARBOR 315.32 0 78 6 0

SANTA CRUZ HARBOR 304.12 0 0 0 38


74 AC Yes

3200 AC Yes

160 AC Yes

20 AC Yes

78 AC Yes

38 AC Yes

Pr&em/Need Descr i ~ t i o n

Elevated shell f ish tissue levels

Sedimentation

ELeveted shell f ish tissue Levels

Potential elevated metals i n sediments Potential impacts from o i l operations

Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Elevated metals i n shell f ish tissue (Hg, tn,Cu) / threat of ambient tox ic i ty

Elevated shetlf ish tissue Levels Threat of anhient toxfc i ty <Zn,Cu,Hg)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X . X


Won-Point X . X

Point 8 Won-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

Pege 70

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALlTY ASSESSMNT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descridion -- Hydro Unit # Water Bodv Name

ARROYO DE CORRAL

ARROYO DE LA CRUZ ESTUARY

ARROYO LACUNA

BAUIUIN CREEK ESTUARY

BARKA SLOUGH

0 5 0 0 5 AC Yes RareatDonel i n p e t s U n k m Need to provide protection for t h i s mi- Sedfmentation

BIG SUR RIVER ESTUARY

CANADA HOWDA CREEK 315.10 ESTUARY

0 42 0 0 42 AC Yes Insuff icient data. ASBS inpeirment metal accrmuletion i n biote o t estunry

CARUEL RIVER ESTUARY 307.00

0 150 80 0 230 AC Yes Sedimentation Won-Point Threat to ui l d l i f e populations. Rare L Endangered Species i n p a ! m t

CARPINTERIA MARSH 315.34 (EL ESTER0 MARSH)

Page 71

STATE UAlER RESOURCES CONTROL @ARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSHENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

Hydro Water Bodv Name - Unit #

CASCADE CREEK 304 -20 LAGCQN/ESTUARY

DEVEREAUX LAGOON 315.31

ELKHORN SLOUGH 306.00

GALLIGHAN SLOUGH 305.10

GAZOS CREEK 304.20 lAOOOW/ESTUARY

GREEN OAKS CREEK 304.20 LAGOON/ESTUARY

HANSOhl SLOUGH 385.10

HARKINS SLWOH 305.10

JALAWA CREEK ESTUARY 315.10

LACUNA CREEK ESTUARY 304.12

Uater Qual i ty Condition In te r - - Total - Fact

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknoun Site Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n --

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

0 500 500 1500 2500 AC Yes Elevated she l l f i sh t issue levels PointBNon-Point X . X Receives Agr i cu l tu ra l I r r i g a t i o n Runoff Receives H. 1. Harbor Uater v ie PC8E PP

0 200 200 0 400 AC Yes Elevated she l l f i sh t issue levels Non-Point X . X Sedimentation Non-point ruroff from urban developnent

Page 72

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 YATER OUALlfY ASSESSHEIT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Water Oual i t v Condition Inter- - Totat - Fact -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Sise Units Sheet Probtem/Need Oescr i~ t ion Hydro

Water Body Name -#

LlTTLE PlCO CREEK 310.13 ESTUARY

LITTLE SUR RIVER 308.00 ESTUARY

2 0 0 0 2 AC Yes Need to protect t h i s unique resource

LUCERNE LAKE ESTUARY 304.11

MCCLUSKY SLOUGH 306.00

OLD SALlNAS RlVER 303.10 ESTUARY

0 0 55 0 55 AC Yes Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Non-Point Sedimentatlm Pesticide residues i n f i s h and shell f ish

PARSONS SLOUGH 305.10

3 0 0 0 3 AC No Suspect natural lead in sediments

PI- CREEK ESTUARY 310.26

SMINAS RlVER LAGOON 303.10 (NORTH)

0 100 75 0 175 AC Yes Agricultural m f f carrying toxic o m . Won-Point Threat of mbimt ton ic i ty Bioaccraulation o f toxic8

SAW ANTONIO CREEK 313.00 ESTUARY

Page 73

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 3 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0


Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problein/Need Descriotion -- Hydro

Uater Body Name Unit #

SAW CARPOFORO CREEK 310.11 ESTUARY

SAN JOSE CREEK 308.00 ESTUARY

0 0 20 0 20 AC Yes Sedimentation Elevated bacteria Levels

Won-Point X . K SAW LORENZO R I M R 304.12 ESTUARY

0 23 0 0 23 AC No Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of speuning.impeirment Threat of sedimentation

Point 8 Non-Point . . . SAW LUIS OBlSPO 310.24 CREEK ESTUARY

SAN SIHEOW CREEK 310.13 ESTUARY

SANTA UARlA RIVER 312.10 ESTUARY

SANTA ROSA CREEK 310.13 ESTUARY

0 69 0 0 69 AC No Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of spewning impeirment

Non-Point . . . SANTA YNEZ RIVER $14.00 ESTUARY

SCOTT CREEK LAGWN 304.11

STRUM SLWGH 305.10

Page 74


Region 3 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

Hvdro Uater Body Name Uni t #

VALENCIA LAGOON 304.13

UADDELL CREEK 304.11 ESTUARY

UATSONVILLE SLOUGH 305.10

UllDER CREEK ESTUARY 304.12

K # ) S LAGOOW 304.12

Uater Quality Condition In ter - - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Units Sheet -- 0 0 0 3 3 AC

0 0 0 20 20 AC No

0 0 300 0 300 A t Yes

Problem/Need Descrict i on

Elevated s h e l l f i sh t issue levels Elevated f i s h t issue tevels Sedimentation

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source - D

Page 75

hi.

iB.; ?,' ;:& e-~. -7,

.g ?{

3 ,:I

3 3 w:. !${

3; 2,

33 - 8 --'.

$! +- $,

STATE UATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALlTY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94


federal L i s t s

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # k o d mediateImpairedUnknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/NeedOescription

AN0 NUEVO AREA 304.20 0 0 0 2 2 sqmi No Limited Informetian Available

ARROYODELACRUZ 310.12 0 0 0 3 3 SQHl No VALLEY

ARROYO GR -NIPOMA 310.30 0 0 0 40 40 SQMI No

ARROYO GRANDE 310.30 0 60 0 30 90 SPMl Yes Object ivesv io la ted VALLEY-NIPOnO MESA AREA

BIG SPRINGS AREA 317.00 0 0 0 8 8 SQMl NO

BIG SUR GROUE(DWTER 308.00 0 0 1 0 1 SPMl Yes Objectives v io la ted BASIN

Threat of dr ink ing water impairment

BITTER WTER VALLEY 309.70 0 0 0 7 7 SQHl No

CAREAGA SAND 314.30 0 15 0 0 15 sqni No

HIGHLANDS

CARMEL VALLEY 307.00 0 0 10 0 10 sqmi No Drinking water i m p a i m t Objectives v io la ted

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

. . . Unknown . . .

Unknoun

Non-Point

Elevated NO3 in shal la , wells

CARPINTERIA BASIN 315.34 0 12 0 0 12 sqmi No High TDS concentretione (mineralization) Non-Point

CARRIZO PLAIN 31 1-00 0 0 0 270 270 SQMI No

Page 76

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oualitv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Water Body Name - Unit dl

CAYUCOS VALLEY 310.16

CHOLAHE VALLEY 317.00

CHORRO VALLEY 310.22 20 Saul Yes Drinking uater iapairment Objectives violated *

Point 8 Non-Point . . .

20 SPHl No

105 Saul Yes

230 sqni No

4 SaHl No

350 sqni Yes

CORRAL DE TEIRRA 309.50

WYAM VALLEY 312.30 Objectives violated

NW VALLEY

DRY LAKE VALLEY 305.50

GILROY-HOLLISTER 305.30 Drinking vater iapglrarnt Objectives violated Threat of nitrates

Non-Point

TDS,CL, S04, exceeded s t transfer stet. Point Threat of drinking water impairment

GOLETA BASIN 315 31

HERNANDEZ VALLEY 305.50 2 SQnl NO

6 SWl No

27 sqni Yes

HUASNA VALLEY 312.30

Won-Point LANGLEY AREA 309.20 GRQUNDUATER BASIN

Drinking vater impaimant Objectives violated High IDS near Crazyhorse Landff 11

Page 77

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94 ,


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3

?ydro Uater Body Name

LOCKWOOD VALLEY (REG 309.83 3)

LOS MOS VALLEY 310.23

HONTECITO AREA 315.33

HORRO VALLEY 310.21

OLD VALLEY 310.17

PAJARO VALLEY 305.10

PAS0 ROBLES BASIN 309.80

PEACH TREE VALLEY

PlSW C R F K VALLEY 330.26

PO20 VALLEY 309.90

QUIW SABF VALLEY W5.50

RAFEAL VALLEY 397.00

Uater Qual i ty Condition In te r - - Total - Fat t -

Good mediate I m ~ a i r e d Unknom Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- 0 0 0 90 90 SQMI No

0 0 10 10 20 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment Objectives v io la ted

0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


0 3 0 0 3 SQMl Yes Threat of dr inking water iapeirment Unknown . . . 0 0 0 5 5 SQMl No . . .

0 3 3 SQMI No . . . 0 0 120 sqmi Yes Drinking water iapeirment

Objectives v io la ted Point 8 Won-Point . . .

22 800 886 SOMI Yes Drinking water impeirment Point 8 Yon-Point . . . Objectives v io la ted Boron, Flouride, TDS cancent. ere high

0 10 10 SQMI No

0 7 7 SQMI No

Page 78



Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - 0

Uater Oual i t y Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Inuaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need DeSCri~tiOq ---

Hydro Uater Body N~me Unit #

RINCONADA VALLEY 309.81

SALlNAS VALLEY, 309.20 EASTSIDE AQUIFER

124 SOMl Yes Drinking water ilpeimt Objectives violated High n i t ra te concentrations

Point P Non-Point . . .

SALINAS VALLEY, 309.30 FOREBAY

167 SWl Yes Objectives violated Point 8 Non-Point . . . Nitrate levels exceed drinkjng standards Threat of drinking water impeirment

SALINAS VALLEY, 309.10 PRESSURE

124 SWl Yes Drinking water iapaiment Point 8 Won-Point . . . Saltwater intrusion a t 180' and 400' Nitrate cow exceed drinklng water stds.

SALIUAS VALLEY, 309.40 UPPER VALLEY AQUIFER

205 SQMl Yes Drinking water hpairaent Point 8 Urn-Point . . . Objectives violated Nitrate concentrations (Ag and Septic)

SAN ANTONIO CREEK 313.00 0 0 10 15 25 SPMl Yes Objectives violated VALLEY


Y SAN BEN110 RIVER 305 .SO 0 0 0 10 10 Sat41 No

VALLEY

SAN CARPOFOR0 VALLEY 310.11 0 0 0 2 2 Sanl No

t SAW LUIS OBlSPO 310.24 0 2 4 9 15 SWl Yes Drinking water impairsent VALLEY Objectives violated !

Page 7!3

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOW 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESGMUIT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

Uater Quai i t y Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # mediate Impaired Unknm Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion

SAN SIMEON VALLEY

SANTA ANA VALLEY

SANTA BARBARA BASIN

SANTA CRUZ PURlSlM

SANTA MARIA RIVER VALLEY

SANTA ROSA VALLEY

SANTA YNEZ RIVER VALLEY

SMlTTS VALLEY

SEASIDE AREA GRWNDUATEP BASIN r

2 SQMI

4 SQMl

20 SQMI

65 sqmi

265 sgni

5 sqmi

123 SPMl

60 sqai

50 SQHl

NO

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yea

SOQUEL VALLEY 304.13 0 0 0 7 7 SQM1 No

TOR0 VALLEY 410.18 0 0 0 2 2 SQMI No

DrinkCng uater inpeirment

Drinking water impeirment Portions exceed Basin Plan objectives Overdraft ing

Drinking water inpgirrpent Lampoc Plain a potential UOL segnent objectives violated

Drinking water impairmant objectives violated Excessive n i t ra te concentratiars

Drinking weter iapeirmant Objectives violated

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

. . .

. . . Point 8 #on-Point . . .

. . . Point 8 Won-Point . . .

. . . Point 8 #on-Point . . .

Point 8 Uon-Point . . .

Page 80

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSES!MENT


Uater Pual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Uni t I Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Weed Descrivt ioq

TRES PINOS CREEK 305.50 0 0 0 4 4 sat41 NO

VALLEY

UPPER S M A ANA 305.50 0 0 0 3 3 SOMI Mo VALLEY (REG 3)

VILLA VALLEY 310.15 0 0 0 4 4 Spnl No

WEST SANTA CRUZ TE 304.12 0 0 0 6 6 Spnl No

Page 81

federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSENT' Report Date : 05/23/94


F e r a l L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Uater Pual i t y Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Unit # poJ mediate l m i r e d Unknown Units Sheet Problem/Need Descrirrtion

ABBOTT LAKES

ANDREE CLARK BIRD REFUGE

ARROYO DE LOS FREJOLES RESERVOIR

0 0 74 AC No

0 30 30 AC

0 23 23 AC

0 12 12 AC

0 7 7 AC

6 0 3205 AC Yes

0 243 243 AC Yes

0 6 6 AC No

0 46 46 AC No

0 0 33 AC Yes

Eutrophic Nm-Point ATASCADERO LAKE

BIG POCKET LAKE

BIG TWIN LAKE

BLACK LAKE

BOLSA CHIC0 LAKE

CACHIJMA RESERVOIR Sedfrrrentation

Limited Information Avaflable

Limited information evsilabla

Won-Point

Unknoun CHESBRO RESERVOIR

DEL PKNITE U ~ E

DREW LAKE

EL ESTER^ LAKE Threat of elevated nutrients. Candidate for the €PA 304(1) long l i s t Potential impects from UPS m f f

Page 82

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUMITV ASSESglfNT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Water Oual i tv Condition Hvdro inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Units Sheet ProbleWNeed Descr i~t ion

ESPlNOSA LAKE 309.20 0 0 0 141 141 AC

FREEWW LAKE 305.10 0 0 0 18 18 AC No

GIWLTAR RESERVOIR 314.51 371 0 0 0 371 AC No Sedimentation Hg mine ta i l ings in l a b TSl4 date showed no iwt

Point L Ion-Point . X .

HERUANDEZ RESERVOIR 305.50 0 0 619 AC Y e s Suspett mining ac t iv i ty SW-t M~uI'o~ ng SOUrCOS He detected in f i sh tfsrue

Nm-Point . X X

IIOSPITAL LAKE 310.32

JAUEsOW RESERVOIR 314.51

ICELLEY UKE 305.10

LMillRALAKE 310.24

Domestic uater q l y

Nm-Point Limited i n fo ra t i on available Pest mining w t i v f t y i t k uatershcd Eutrophicflrban off

LAS PADRES RESERVOIR 307.00

LOCH LOlOWD 304.12

LOPa RESERVOIR 310.31

LOS PADRES RESERVOIR 307.00

0 67 67 AC

0 0 264 AC No

0 1004 l W 4 A C No

0 0 1024 AC No

Page 83

Domestic m t e r q l y

IJnknWl

Won-Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESmENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition '

Hydro Inter- Total - Fact Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmired Unknoun Units Sheet ProblWNeed Description

LUCERNE LAKE 304.20 0 0 0 35 35 AC

MILL CREEK RESERVOIR 304.11

MUD LAKE 310.32

NACIMIENTO RESERVOIR 309.82 0 0 5370 0 5370 AC Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Won-Point Rare B Endangered Species ilrpeirment Water quali ty l imited segment

X X X

NEUELL CREEK 304.12 RESERVOIR

0 0 0 20 20 AC Unknoun

PACHECO LAKE 305.40

0 0 0 2 2 AC Yes Limited information available Exact location not yet det€Pmined

PALM BEACH POND 305.10

PINTO LAKE 305.10 0 121 0 0 121 AC No Elevated bacteria levels Non-Point

PIPELINE LAKE- 310.32

ROBERTS/LAWA 309.50 GRAMDE LAKE

0 136 0 0 136 AC Yes Beneficial uses not impaired Non-Point Si l tat ion of lake. Urban runoff /col i f o m

SAN ANTONIO 309.83 RESERVOIR

0 5725 0 0 5725 AC Yes Cdinf isht issuesamples Won-Point

Page 84

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1991 UATER QUALITV ASSESSUENT


Hvdro Uater Bodv Name - Unit #

SAN CLEMENTE 307.00 RESERVOIR

SAW FELIPE LAKE 305.30

SANTA HARGARITA 309.81 RESERVOIR

SEWERVIRENS 304.20 RESERVOIR

SMALL TUlN LAKE 310.32

TUITCHELL RESERVOIR 312.30

TYNAN LAKE 305.10

WAS RESERVOIR 305.20

UARDEN LAKE UETLAND 310.23

WARNER LAKE 305.10

UHALE ROCK RESERVOIR 310.17

UHITE LAKE 310.32

UHITE ROCK LAKE 308.00

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In ter - -

Good mediate f m i r e d Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n --- 365 AC No Domestic water supply


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 1 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMUT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federat L is ts

Water Body Name

UlLLOU LAKE

ZACA LAKE

Uater Qua l i t y Condition Hydro Inter - - Totat - Fact Uni t # Good mediate I m a i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i ~ t i o n

310.32 0 0 0 20 20 AC

314.30 0 0 0 25 25 AC

Page 86

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D




Water Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Imaired Unknown Units Sheet

AN0 NUEM COAST 304.00 26 0 0 0 26 M I Yes

AN0 NUEVO ISLANO 304.20 1 0

BIG SUR COAST 308.00 86 0

CARHEL BAY 307.00 0 16

DIABLO COAST 310.25 11 0

ESTER0 BAY COAST 310.00 23 0

NLIA PFEIFFER BURNS 308.00 10 0 UNDERWATER PARK

WOnTEREY BAY NORTH 309.50 106 0

MONTEREY BAY SOUTH 309.50 15 0

PACIFIC GROVE MARINE 309.05 7 0 GARDENS

PESCADERO COAST 304.00 17 0

PlmO COAST 310.00 26 0

0 0 1 M I Yes

0 0 86 M I Yes

0 0 16 M I Yes

0 0 14 M I Yes

0 0 23 M I Yes

0 0 10 M I Yes

0 0 106 SQWl Yes

10 0 25 M I Yes

0 0 7 M I Yes

0 0 17 M I Yes

0 0 26 M I Yes

Page 87

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem/Ueed Desc r i~ t i on Problem Source D

Point Ano Nuevo t o Saqwi Point . . . ASBS . . . ASBS areas contained within coastal area Pt. Pinos to Pt. Piedres Blancas

ASBS impairment Point 8 Uon-Point . . . Dl ablo Canyon power plant discharge Point . . . Point Estero t o Point Buchm (Worrs Bay) . . . ASBS . . .

Threat of objectives violated Point 8 Non-Point . . . Threat of embient tom. near Ag. nnof f Municipal a r t f a l l s

Monterey Harbor Has High Lead Content Point 8 Won-Point X . X Threat of ASBS impairment

ASBS . . .

Pescedero Point t o Point Am Uuevo . . . Point San Luis t o Point Sat . . .

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR0 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSHENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

Hydro Water Body Name Unit #

POINT LOBOS 308.00 ECOLOGICAL RESERVE

SAN MICUEL ISLAND 316.10

SAN SIMEON COAST 310.13

SANTA BARBARA NORTH 313.00 COAST

SANTA BARBARA SOUTH 315.00 COAST

Water Quality Condition Inter-

Good mediate l m d r e d Unknown --

SANTA CRUZ ISLAND 316.10 76 0 0 0

S M T A ROSA ISLAND 316.10 56 0 0 0

VANDENBURG COAST 314.10 35 0 0 0


8 M I Yes

26 M I Yes

31 M I Yes

56 M I Yes

25 M I Yes

76 M I Yes

56 M I Yes

35 MI Yes

Probl em/Need Descriet ion

ASBS

ASBS

Point Arguello t o Coal O i l Point

Elevated bacteria levels i n shel l f ish Storm water runoff - suspeet qual i ty Threat of elevated f i sh tissue Levels

ASBS

ASBS

Page 88

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

. . . Unknom . . .

. . .


Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSlWT


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Quali t v Condition Inter- -

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Unit XI Problem/Need Description

Limited informmtion avai lsble

)later Bodv Name

AGUA CALIENTE CREEK 314.51 (R3)

W l A S CREEK 305.30 10 M I

22 n l NO

19 M I No

1 nr Yes

A W CREEK 312.30 Limited informstion available

A L M PlNTAOO CREEK 314.40 Limited Information available

Non-Point Sedimentat ion Low flows

ALBA CREEK 304.12

ALEC CANYON CREEK 305.20

AL 1 SAL 309.70 CREEK(SAL1NAS)

3 M I No

4 M I No

'10 ni yes

Log jans end landslides Point 8 Non-Point . . . Unknown . . . Non-Point X . X

AMAYA CREEK 304.13

Limited Information Available AN0 NUEW CREEK 304.20

Fish population decline Sedimentation Sedimentation

APTOS CREEK 304.13

AWA CALIEWTE CANYON 314.51 1s M l

Page 89

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALiTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water W a l i t v Condition In ter - - Total - Fact

Good mediate Inuaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e ~ c r i ~ t i o n -- Hydro

Water Bock Name - Unit #

ARANA GULCH 304.12

ARROYO BULITO 315.10

ARROYO BURRO CREEK 315.32 0 0 6 0 6 M I Yes Threat o f recreational impacts Bacteria i n creek wateZ may af fect bact i

Levels of she l l f i sh in SB c h m l

Won-Point

ARROYO DE LA CRUZ 310.12 CREEK

0 0 0 10 10 M I No Limited Information Available Unknown

ARROYO DE LOS CHINOS 310.12

ARROYO DE LOS 304.20 FREJOLES CREEK

ARROYO DEL CORRAL 310.12

ARROYO DEL OSO 310.13

ARROYO GRANDE CREEK, 310.31 DOUNSTRE AH

ARROYO GRANDE CREEK, 310.31 UPSTREAM

0 0 0 6 6 M I No Limited Informetion Available

ARROYO PAREDON 315.34 0 0 0 6 6 M I

41 0 0 0 41 M I No I n f o Available th ru Mont. Co. Flood Con.

Page 90

ARROYO SECO RIVER 300.60

Region 3

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT

Rivers and Streams


Uater Qua1 i t v Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate l fn~aired Unknoun Sire Units Sheet Problemfleed Descr i~ t ion

ATASCADERO CREEK 309.81 0 0 0 10 10 M I No Limited Information Available (R3)

ATASCADERO CREEK 315.31 0 0 0 6 6 M I Yes EPA cendidate for 3041 lang l i s t (SB) Limited information available

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

BALDUIN CREEK 304.11 0 0 0 4 4 MI No Limited informt ion available Unknown . . .

i' BATES CREEK 304.13 0 3 0 0

I

BEAN CREEK 304.12 0 9 0 0 .

BEAR CREEK (R3) 304.12 0 9 0 0

BENNETT CREEK 304.12 0 2 0 0

BERRY CREEK 304.11 0 0 0 2

BIG CREEK(AN0 NUEVO) 304.20 0 0 0 8

BIG CREEK(B1G SUR 308.00 0 0 0 3

9 nl Yes

2 M I NO

2 M l

8 M I No

3 M I

Page 91

\.

Sedimentation Point &l Non-Point . . . Natural log jeras, blockages t o f i sg sig. S i l t e d dam prevents f i sh aigratlon

Fish population decline Sedimentation Drinking uater iapa i raa t

Sedimentation Recreationml Impacts Fecal Coliform

Quarry Operations on Creek

Limited Information Available

Point B Won-Point . . .

Non-Point

Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR0 1994 WATER WALlTY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter-

Water Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Inmired Unknom COAST

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Probl em/Need Desc r i~ t i on

BIG SANDY CREEK 309.81 0 0 0 22 22 M I

16 M I Yes

7 M I

5 M I NO

2 M I

(Son-Point BIG SUR R l M R 308.00 0 16 0 0 Elevated bacteria levels

BIRD CREEK 305 .50

BlXBY CREEK 308.00 Flous year roud

BLACK HAWK CANYON 305.20 CREEK

3 M I No

8 M I Yes

Limited Information Available U n k m

~ g r i c u i t u r a l drain. Non- Point Elevated f i sh tissue t e a l s Pest. i n f i sh tissue violate FDA std.

BUNCO DRAIN 303.10

BLOOMS CREEK 304.11

BODFISH CREEK 305.20

BCULDER CREEK 304.12

U n k m

Non-Point


Sedimentation Recreational inpacts Fecal colifam levels

BOYER CREEK 304.20

BRACKEN BRAE CREEK 304.12

4 M I

1 M I

Page 92

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESU(EN1 Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Water Oual i t y Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good mdiate Inmaired Unknoun Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion

BRANCI FORTE CREEK 304.12 0 8 0 0 8 HI No Sedimentation Won-Point . . . BRIOGE CREEK 304.13 0 0 0 2 2 Ul

BRIZZIOLARI CREEK 310.24 o o o 3 3 HI

Nan-Point

Unknoun

BROUllS CREEK (R3) 305.10

BULL CREEK CR3) 304.12

BURNETT CREEK 310.12

BURNS CREEK 304.13

5 a1 NO Sedimentation

2 nl NO Limited Information Available

8 MI No Limited Information Available

2 MI Yes Sedimentation Fish hebitat fapaired

Won-Point

Unknorrn 5 Ul No Limited infonmtion m i l a b l e CACHAGUA CREEK 307.00

UWAOAAQUAVIVA 315.10

CANADA DE LA GAVIOTA 315.10

CANADA DE SANTA 315.10 ANITA

P W A DEL CAPITAN 315.10 6 HI

4 nr

Page 93

CANADA DEL COJO 315.10

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/i!3/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quali ty Condition Inter- - Total - Fact

~ o o d mediate Impaired Unkmmn Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Oescr i~ t ion -- Hydro

Water Body Name Unit #

CANADA DEL JOLLORU 315.10

CANADA DEL MOLINO 315.10

CANADADELREFUGIO 315.10

CANADA DEL SACATE 315.10

CANADA HONDA CREEK 315.10

CARBONERA CREEK 304.12 0 0 10 0 10 M I Yes Sedimentation Fish population decline Spuning ilrpairment

Point & Nan-Point X . X

CARMEL RIVER 307.00 0 32 0 0 32 M I Yes ASBS impairment Non-Point . . . Sedimentation Threat of drinking water inpeirment

CARNADERO CREEK 305.20

GRPINTERIA CREEK 315.34 0 0 8 0 8 M I Yes High bacteria levels a t most stations Won-Point X . . kutrophication

CASCADE kREEK 304.20

CASMALIA C A ~ Y ~ 313.00 CREEK

0 0 0 7 7 M I No Limited Informetion Avaf lable Unknown . . . Page 94



Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Oualitv Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact -

Uater Body Name Unit # a mediate I m i r e d Unknown Units Sheet ProblWNeed D e s c r i l ~ t i g

CHALOlE CREEK 317.00 0 0 0 28 28 M I

CHALONE CREEK

CHORRO CREEK

28 HI Yes . . X

11 nl Yes Sedimentation Spauning iapeirment . Objectives violated


CLEAR CREEK (R3) 2 MI No Sedimentation Non-Point Threat of drinking water impairment

CLIPPER GULCH Non-Point

WOKHOUSE WLCH 1 MI No Limited In formt ion Avaitable Unknown

10 nl

10 nr

COOW CREEK

CORRAL r TOS CAWYON CREEK

CORRALITOS CREEK 14 M I Yes Sedimentation

2 111

Non-Point

CROV CREEK

91 MI Yes Elevated levels of W03, SOb, IDS i n Non-Point r iver bela, Tuitchell Res.

Limited i n t o m t i o n m t l s b l e

CWAIIA RIVER

Page 95

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESMEN1 Report Date : M/23/%


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Uater Quali ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

CUYAMA RIVER, 312.30 0 0 0 8 8 M I DOUWST REAM

CUYAMA RIVER, 312.30 0 0 0 75 75 MI

UPSTREAM

DAIRY CREEK 310.22 5 M I No Mines near heed waters Suspected natural Cr. in sediments

Non-Point

DAVENPORT CREEK 310.24

DAVIS CREEK 314.10

DEADHAW GULCH CREEK 304.11

DEER CREEK 304.12 10 M I No Sedimentation Non-Point Periodic elevated nutrient/bacterie Lev.

DEVILS CANYON CREEK, 308.00 MIDDLE FORK

DEVILS CANYON CREEK, 308.00 NORTH FORK

DEVILS CANYON CREEK, 308.00 SOUTH FORK

DIABLO CANYON CREEK 310.25

Page 96

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1W4 UATER PUALlTY ASSES!MENT Report Date : 05/23#4


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D - Uater Ouelity Condition

Inter- - Good mediate Imoeired Unknom --

Total - Fact -. Size Units Sheet --7

Hvdro yater Bodv Name Unit # Problem/Need Oescr i~ t ion

DIABLO GULCH CREEK 305.10 z nr Yes Sedimentat ion Low flaws

Won-Point . . X

DOS PUEBLOS CANYON 315.10 CREEK

Limited Information Available Unknown DOYLE GULCH CREEK

EASTMAN CANYON CREEK

EL CALLEJON CREEK

EL JAR0 CREEK

ELLIOT CREEK

ESCOWDlDO CREEK

ESPADA CREEK

ESTRELU RIVER

EUREKA GULCH

Unknown Limited Information Available

Limited Information Avai table Unknown

Sedimentation Won-Point Main sedimentation source t o Corralitos

FALL CREEK (R3) 304.12

FALLS CREEK 304.11

Limited Information Available Unknoun

Page 97

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 1 9

Problem Source 0

Water Ouality Condition nvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name - Unit # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

FINNEY CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 1 1 M I

FOREMAN CREEK 304.12 0 0 0 1 1 MI

FRANKLIN CREEK 315.36 0 0 0 4 4 M I

FRANKLIN CREEK (SLO 309.81 0 0 0 5 5 M I

CO)

FRITCH CREEK 304.12 0 0 0 1 1 M I No Limited Information Availeble

MILAN CREEK 309.70 0 0 0 11 11 M I . . . Point & Non-Point . . . WECOCK CREEK 305.10 0 2 0 0 2 RI No Sedimentat ion

GARRAPATA CREEK 308.00 0 0 0 8 8 M I Y Limited information aveileble

GASPER CREEK 315.10 0 0 0 . 5 5 M I

GAZOS CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 10 10 M I No Limited information available

GLEN ANNE CREEK 315.31 0 0 0 4 4 M i No Limited Information Available . . . Point 8 Ron-Point . . X GOLD GULCH CREEK 304.12 0 2 0 0 2 M I Yes Sedimentation

Lou flows

GRANITE CREEK 3Q4.12 0 0 0 3 3 M I No Limited Information Available Unknown . . . GREEN OAKS CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 4 4 M I No Limited information availeble

Page 98

STATE WATER RESUJRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMEW1 Report Date : 05/23/96

Region 3 Rivers and Streenrp

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Water Quelitv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

7 nl

3 nl yes

Water Body Name

GREEN VALLEY CREEK

GROVER GULCH Sedimentat ion Log jams and other natural blockages hanper f i sh migration.

Won-Point . . X

HAWS CREEK

HARE CREEK Won-Point Sedimentation Periodic elevated nutrient/bacti. levels

HENRY CREEK

HESTER CREEK

HINCKLEY CREEK

Limited Inforumtion Available Won-Point

Won-Point Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of sedimentation Threat of objectives vfolatcd

HOPKINS WLCH

HUASNA RlVER 312.30 0 0 0 10 10 nl Yes Candidate fo r the €PA 3061 long l i s t Unknown Limited infomation a h i l a b l e

HUERHUERO CREEK 309.81 o o o 20 20 nl

INDIAN CREEK (R3) 314.51 0 0 0 18 18 nl No Limited Informt ion Avai labla Unknown

ISLAY CREEK 310.25 0 0 0 8 8 HI

Page 99



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Uater Qua l i t v Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Bodv Name - Unit # Goad mediate Impaired Unknown size Units Sheet Problem/Weed Descriotion

JACK CREEK 309.81 0 0 0 9 9 M I

JALAMA CREEK 315.10

JMISON CREEK 304.12

10 MI No Year round flow Unknown

2 # I No Sedimentation Won-Point Periodic elevated nutr ient/bact i levels

KINGS CREEK 304.12 5 M I Yes Sedimentation Low f lovs Elevated bacteria

Won-Point

LA SALLE CANYON 314.10 CREEK

LAGUNA CREEK 304.11 9 M I No Sedimentation Non-Point . . . Threat of dr inking water iapairment

LAS PALMS CREEK 315.32

LAS TABLAS CREEK 309.81 13 M I Yes Potential Water Qua l i t y Limited Segment Point 8 Non-Point X . X Sedimentation TDS, Conductivity, SOb, M i

LAS TABLAS REEK, 309. .81 NORTH FORK

5 MI Yes Excessive metal coneentretlons Point 8 Non-Point X . X

Objectives violated

LAS TABLAS CREEK, 309.81 SOUTH FORK

4 M I Yes Excessive e t a 1 concentrations Point 8 Won-Point X . X Objectives violated

Page 100

Report Date : 05123/92


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quali ty Condition Hydro - Inter-

Uater Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmired Unknown Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

1 nr

3 nl NO

LAST CHANCE CREEK 304.11 0 0 0 1

LAURA1 CREEK 304.13 Sedimentation Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of sedimentation

Non-Point . . .

Sedimntetion Threat of drinking water inpsirment

Won-Point . . . LIOQELL CREEK 304.11

LIDDELL CREEK, EAST BRANCH

LIMEKILN CREEK

LITTLE ARTHUR CREEK

LITTLE CHALQIE CREEK

LITTLE CREEK

LITTLE LLAGAS CREEK

LITTLE MORRO CREEK

LITTLE PIC0 CREEK

LITTLE ~h RIVER

LITTLE WAS CREEK

5 nl NO

6 M I

11 M I

3 nr NO

8 nr

7 nr

5 nl

15 nr Yes

5 nt

Page 101

~ i m i ted information available

Limited Information Avalable

Limited lnfolmstion Avalable

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

Uater Quality Condition Hydro - Inter-

Water Body Name Unit # mediate Inmired Unknown

LIVE OAK CREEK 305.30 0 0 0 3

LLAGAS CREEK 305.30 0 22 0 0

LLAGAS CREEK (ABOVE 305.20 0 0 0 15 CHESBRO RES)

LLANITO CREEK 314.20 0 0 0 2

LOCKHART GULCH CREEK 304.12 0 3 0 0

LOGAN CREEK 304.12 0 2 0 0

LOMPICO CREEK 304.12 0 0 5 0

~ a ~ w c CA~YON 314.10 0 0 0 5

LOS BERROs CREEK 310.31 0 0 0 14

LOS CANEROS 315.31 0 0 0 2


3 M I

22 HI Yes

2 M I

3 M I Yes

2 M I Yes

5 M I Yes

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

ProbleWNeed Description Problem Source - D

Threat of drinking uater iapairment Point B Non-Point . . . Recreational impacts Fecal Col i fom levels

Sedimentation Lou flovs Nutrients

Won-Point . . I

Sedimentation Won-Point . . X Periodic elevated nutrients/bacti levels

Sedimentat ion Drinking water inpalrment Elevated bacteria levels

Non-Point X . X

Limited Information Available U n k m

Page 102

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSNENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro

Uater Body Name - Unit # mediate Inmaired Unknown Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

LOS OSOS CREEK 310.22 0 5 5 0 10 Ul Yes Sedimentat ion Orains agricul tu ra l lands, flows in to Uorro Bay

Non-Point X . X

LOVE CANYON CREEK

LOVE CREEK

. . . Non-Poi n t . . . Sedimentation

Low flows

Limited Information Available Unknown . . . . . .

Non-Point . . .

RACKENZIE CREEK

IUDDOCKS CREEK

HAJORS CREEK Sedimmtation Threat of drinking water i n p a i m t

HALOSKY CREEK

HARSHALL CREEK

2 MI NO

2 Ul Yes

Limited Information Available Unknon . . . Non-Point . . x Sedimentation

Lou flows

Limited Infomation Available FMON CREEK

WCDWALD GULCH

HEADW CREEK

n m CREEK (BIXBY CREEK)

Page 103

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALITY ASSESmNT Report Date : O!iI23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Water Qua1 i t y Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Im~aired Unknom Sire Units Sheet Problem/Weed Description

MILL CREEK (BONNIE 304.11 0 0 0 3 3 MI No Limited Information Available o m )

UlU CREEK (CAPE SAN 308.00 0 0 0 3 3 M I UARTIW)

Unknown

Non-Point

MILL CREEK (SCOTT 304.11 CREEK)

5 M I No Limited Information Available

2 MI Yes Sedimentation MIUERS CREEK 304.13

MINERS GULCH CREEK 304.13

9 M I Yes Coliform Objectives violated

Non-Point MISSION CREEK 315 -32

MOLINO CREEK 304.20

M CREEK 314.51

ROORE CREEK 304.11

CaKRES GULCH 304.13

27 M I No Limited I n f o m t i o n Available Unknown

Non-Point 3 M I No Fish popi lat im decline Sedimentation

IIORI(ON GULCH 305.10

llORRO CREEK 310.21 14 M I No Abandoned mines Suspect natural C r in sedilnent

Non-Point

Page 104



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce - D

Uater Pual i t v Condition Inter- -

Goad mediate I m i r e d Unknom -- Hvdro Unit # -

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Uater Body Nam

Sedimentation Low flow

llOUWTAIN CHARLIE GULCH

Non-Point . . .

NACIMIENTO R I V E R Limited information available

NAClMIENTO RIVER, DUNSTR FROM DAM

NACIMIENTO RIVER, UPSTREAM OF DAM

Limited Inforpletion Available

Limited informt ion avel labla

Limited information available

Non-Point NEUELL CREEK

NOJOQUI CREEK

OAK CANYON CREEK

OAK KNOLL CREEK

OLD CREEK Unknom

OLD CREEK, DWNSTREAH

7 M I

5 MI yes

OLD CREEK, UPSTREAM

Non-Point Elevated shell f ish ttssue Levels Elevated f ish tissus levels Sedimentation

OLD SALINAS RIVER

Page 105

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD l W 4 WATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report bate : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - 0

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Unit # good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

OLD UOMANS CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 2 2 M I

OPAL CREEK 304.11 0 0 0 4 4 U1

ORWTT CREEK 312.10 0 0 0 13 13 M I

OSO FLACO CREEK 312.10

PACHECO CREEK 305.40

PAJARO RIVER 305 .OO

17 M I No Limited information avai lable Unknom . . . 32 M I Yes Sedimentation

Eutrophication Potential inpacts t o REC-I, MlGR, COLD


PAL0 CMORADO CANYON

P A L M CREEK

PANCHO RlCO CREEK

PAS0 ROBLES CREEK

PEAVINE CREEK

PERRY CREEK

PESCADERO CREEK

PESCADERO CREEK (S.

4 HI No Limited Information Available

27 M I Yes

9 M I l o Limited Inforination Available

13 M I

Page 106

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 UATER WALlTV ASSESSMENT Report Date : M/U/%


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quell t v Condition Hydro - Inter-

Water Body Name Unit # 4 mediate I m i r e d Unknoun BENITO R.)

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- ProblemlNeed Descriot ion

Threat of drinking uater im i r racnt Abandoned mine on south fork

Won-Point . . . PlCO CREEK 311). 13 0 1 0 0

PIC0 CREEK, NORTH 310.13 0 0 0 9 FORK

Lirni ted Information Available

Limited Information Available PIC0 CREEK, SOUTH 310.13 0 0 0 6 FORK

PISMO CREEK 310.26 0 0 0 5 Limited Information Available Unknown . . . P R E W CREEK 310.24 0 0 0 6 . . .

Non-Point . . i Sedimentation Threat of f i sh ti 11s

Nm-Point . . . Non-Point . . x

RAT1 LESNAKE GULCH 305.10 0 2 0 0

REDWCREEK(R31 305.10 0 3 0 0

2 nl NO

3 nl yes Natural barriers t o fish migr&tion Low flows Sedimentation

RELlZ CREEK 309.60 0 0 0 17

RIDER CREEK 305.10 0 0 0 2

Page 107



Water Quali ty Condition

Hydro - Inter- Water Body Name Unit # mediate Inmaired Unknoun

RIDER GULCH CREEK 305.10 0 0 2 0

RINCONCREEK(R3) 315.34 0 10 0 0

ROCKY CREEK 308.00 0 0 0 7

RODEO CREEK GULCH 304.13 0 0 0 6

ROGERS CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 1

RUINS CREEK 304.12 0 3 0 0

SALINAS RECLAUATION 309.20 0 0 20 0 CANAL

SALINAS RIVER 309.10 60 70 50 0

SALZWAS R I M R , 309.40 0 0 0 75 CHUALAR-NACIUIENTO RIVER

SALINAS RIVER, DNSTR 30P.10 0 0 0 15 OF SPRECKELS GAGE

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet

2 M I Yes

10 M I No

7 M I

6 M I

1 M I

3 M I Yes

20 M I Yes

180 M I Yes

Sedimentation Spmuning inpairment Objectives violated

Sedimentation

Low f lous Sedimentation

Potential water qua1 i t y limited Segment Suspect toxic organics in Ag. nnoff Organics i n sediments<persistant chem. )

Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Objectives violated

Sedimentation


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 O l t 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point . . . . . . . . . . . .

Won-Point . . X

Non-Point X . X

Point 8 Won-Point X . X

Page 108



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Swrce D

Water Qua1 i t v Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Site Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i m -- 0 0 0 61 61 HI Yes

Hvdro Water Bodv Name Uni t #

SALINAS RIVER, 309.81 NAClMlENTO R.- HEADWATERS

SALINAS RIVER, 303.10 SPRECKELS GAGE- CHUALAR

Unknown sALnw CREEK (BIG 308.00 SUR COAST)

5 0 0 0 5 MI Yes ASBS

SALMON CREEK (R3) 308.00 0 0 0 G G U l Yes Limited i n f o r m t i o n available

o o o 3 3 nl SALSl PUEDES CREEK, 305.10 S.CRUZ CO.

0 0 0 9 9 U l No Limited Informatien Available Unknown

Unknoun SAN ANTONlO CREEK 313.00 (HYO 313)

SAN ANTONlO CREEK (S 315.31 BARBARA COUNTY

0 0 0 9 9 MI Yes Limited informetian evai la6le Unknown Threat o f elevated c@&~iun Levels

S A W ANTONIO RIVER, 309.81 DUN STU FROM SAN ANT

SAW ANTONIO RIVER, 390.81

Page 109

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Uater Qual i ty Condition

Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact Water Body Name Unit # mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet UPST SAN ANTONIO RES.

SAN BENlTO RIVER 305 .50 0 86 0 0 86 M I Yes

SAW BERNARD0 CREEK

SAW CARPOFORO CREEK

SAW CLEMENTE CREEK

SAN DIEGO CREEK

SAW JOSE CREEK

SAW JOSE CREEK (S BARBARA CO)

SAW JUAN CREEK (R3)

SAN LORENZO CREEK

S A W LORENZO R l M R


Report Date : =/a/%

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Mining ac t i v i t y a t upstream locations Non-Point . . . (Hernandez Reservoir)

L i m i ted information available

7 M I No Abandod mines a t headwater Won-Point

4 M I No Limited Information Available Unknown

8 M I No Limited information available Unknom

5 M I No Limited information aveflable Unknown

9 M I No Limited Information Aveilable Unknoun

33 HI Yes

25 M I Yes Drinking uater impairment Fish population decline Spawning impairment

Won-Point

Page 110

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITI ASSESSMENT Report Date : Os/i!S/W


Federal L i s t s

Uater Qua1 i t v Condition Hvdro Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Imoeired Unknown Units Sheet Problm/Need DesCri~tiOQ

SAN LUIS OBISPO 310.24 0 0 0 6 6 M I Threat of sedimentation CREEK, EAST FORK Threat of toxic bi-y results

Threat of objectives violated

SAY LUIS OBISW 310.24 10 0 0 0 10 MI Yes Threat of sed im ta t i on CRK.<ABOM U.MARSH ST.

SAR LUIS OBISPO 310.24 0 0 9 0 9 MI Yes Eutrophication CRK.(BEL(IU W.MARSH ST.)

SAN LUISITO CREEK 310.22 0 7 0 0 7 M I No Mines at headwaters Suspect natural C r i n sediments

!U MARm CREEK 309.81 0 0 0 11 11 M I No Limited i n t o m t i o n avnileble

SAN MlGUELITO CREEK 314.10 0 0 0 10 10 MI No Spring fed, runs year rand

SAW SIMEON CREEK 310.13 0 6 0 0 6 MI No Mines on creek headnntcts Suspect natural mercury in o c d i m t s Threat of drinking w t e r Irpairaent

SAW VICENTE CREEK 304.11 0 9 0 0 9 HI No Threat of sediaentatim CR3)

SAUTA CRUt CREEK 314.51 0 0 0 14 14 M I No Limited Information Available

SANTA LUCIA CANYON 314.10 0 0 0 7 7 MI

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Point 8 Won-Point X . K

Non-Point . . .

U n k n o n . . . . . .

Yon-Point . . .

Non-Point

U n k m

Page 111

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/U/%


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0, 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

water Qua l i t y Condition In te r - -

~ o o d mediate lmpai red Unknown - Hydro Uni t At

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Water Body Name

CREEK

Limited information avai lable

Limited information avai lable

Unknown . . . Unknown . . . Non-Point . . . Unknown . . .

. . .

SANTA LUClA CREEK

SANTA MARIA RIVER

Pesticides i n stream sediments


SANTA MONICA CREEK

SANTA RITA CREEK

SANTA RITA CREEK (SANTA YNEZ BASIN)

Abandoned mining operations Won-Point Suspect natural Ni, Cr, Hg in sed/uater Threat o f tox ic bioassay resul ts

SAWTA ROSA CREEK (R3)

70 M I Yes Excessive TDS/ConQrtivity Non-Point Objectives v io la ted Coliform levels may inpair REC-1

SANTA YNEZ RlVER

SANTA YNEZ RIVER, DOWNSTREAM

SANTA YNEZ RIVER, UPSTREAM

SCOTT CREEK 304.11 0 0 0 10 10 HI No Limited Information Available

SEHPERVIRENS CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 2 2 M I

Page 112

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY AS&SSC~EWT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Quali t v C d i t i on Inter- -

Good mediate Inpaired Unknom -- Hydro

yater Body Name - Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- ProblemlNeed Desc r i~ t ion

SHEAR CREEK 306.12

SHlNGLE MlLL CREEK 304.12 2 Ul Yes Eutrophication Sedimentation Low flows

Non-Point X . X

Sedimentation Low f lous

Non-Point . . . SHINGLE MlLL GULCH 305.10

Point 8 Non-Point . . . . . .

Nan-Point . . .

S W N CANYON CREEK 313.00

SILVER CREEK 304.12

SISPUOC RlVER 312.20 Sedimentation Objectives violated Seasonal f lou

S I M RIVER, 312.20 WMSSTREAH

SlSQUOC RIVER, 312.20 UPSTREAM

SLEEPER GULCH 304.12

SLOANS CANYON CREEK 314.10

Limited Infomiation Available SMlTH CREEK (R3) 306.12

Page 113

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/U/94

Region 3 Rivers and Streans

Federal L i s t s

Water Quel i ty Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Imwi red Unknoun Size Units Sheet

SOQUEL CREEK 304.13 0 7 0 0 7 M I Yes

SOglEL CREEK, EAST 304.13 BRANCH

SWUEL CREEK, EST 304.13 BRANCH

SOUTH FALL CREEK 304.12

SPRING CREEK 304.12

SPRING CREEK GULCH 304.12

STEINER CREEK 310.13

STENNER CREEK 310.24

SWANSON CANYON CREEK 305.20

SYCAMORE CREEK 315.32

TAJIGAS CREEK 315.10

TASSAJARA CREEK (R3) 309.60

TECOLOTE CREEK 315.10

2 MI No

1 M I

1 M I

6 M I No

7 nl

2 M I

3 M I

6 M I

12 MI No

7 MI No

Page 114

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

ProblWNeed Description Problem Source D

Threat of dr inking water impeinnent Non-Point . . . Sedimentation Threat of spawning impeirment

Sedimentation Non-Point . . .

f i s h population declines Sedimentation

Won-Point . . .

Limited Information Available Unknom . . .


Limited information avai lable Unknown

Limited Information Available Unknom

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITV ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/91


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Water Qual i tv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 12

0 0 0 33

0 0 0 8

0 0 0 15

0 4 0 0

Hydro Water Bodv Name - Unit #


1 nr NO

12 nr

n nt NO

8 nr

15 nt NO

C nt NO

Problem/Need DeSCri~tion

Limited Infonuation Available TIE WLCH 304.12 Unknoun . . . TOR0 CREEK 310.18

TRES PINOS CREEK 305 .SO Limited informstion avaf lable

TROUT GULCH 304.13

Unknown TULARCITOS CREEK 307.00 Limited informstion avai lable

TW BAR CREEK 304.12 Sedimentation Periodic elevated nutrient-ti levels

Non-Point

UNIOW CREEK 304.20 0 0 0 2

WAS CREEK 305.20 0 13 0 0 DOWNSTREAM

Possible urban nnoff prob lgs Non-Point

WAS CREEK UPSTREAM 305.20 0 0 0 10 10 I t

7 MI Yes Non-Point VALENCIA CREEK 304.13 0 0 7 0 Fish population decline Sedimentation Migration barriers

VAQUEROS CREEK 309.60 0 0 0 11

VILLA CREEK 310.15 0 0 0 11

VINEYARD CANYON 309.81 0 0 0 16

11 nl

11 nl

16 nl

Page 115

STATE VATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSNEWT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - -

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown CREEK

WADDELL CREEK (MAIN 304.11 0 3 0 0 STEM)

W E L L CREEK, EAST 304.11 0 0 4 0 BRANCH

WADDELL CREEK, UEST BRANCH

WATER CANYON CREEK

UHITEHOUSE CREEK

WILDER CREEK

WlLLOU CREEK (R3)

WOO CANYON CREEK

YRIDlSlS CREEK

ZACA CREEK

ZAYANTE CREEK


4 MI Yes

2 M I

5 M I

5 M I

6 M I No

4 MI

4 M I

18 M I

11 MI Yes

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem/Need Description Problem Swrce D

Threat o f dr inking water i a p a i m t Point 8 Won-Point . . . Threat of f i s h k i l t s Potent ial inpacts f ran UUTP discharge

Drinking water i n p a i m t Eutrophication Fish habitat inpairment

Point B Non-Point X . X

Year round f lw

Sedimentation Non-Point High turbidi ty, incieesed nutr ient load Fecal Co1 i form

Page 116

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSWEWT

Region 3 Saline Lake

Water Qua1 i tv Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Unit # mediate lrrmeired Unknom Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descri~t ion

SODA LAKE 311.00' 0 0 0 3334 3334 AC No


Federal Lists

Page 117

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Uet l ands

Federal L is ts

Hydro Uater Bodv Name Unit #

ANTONELLIS POND 304.12

CORCORAN LAGOON 304.13

CORRAL1 TOS LAGOON 305.10

DUE LAKES MARSH 310.32 AREA

ESPINOSA SLOUGH 309.10

Meter ouali tv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Irrpaired Unknom --

GOLETA POINT HARSH 315.31 0 0 0 35

GRAMS UETLAND 314.10 0 0 0 30

LAWNA DEL REV 309.50 0 0 0 17

LOS CANEROS MTLAND 315.31 0 0 0 25

HARINA PONDS 309.10 0 0 0 8

MORAN LAKE 304.13 0 0 0 8

MORO COJO SLOUGH 309.10 0 200 145 0

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Probtem/Need Descr i~ t ion ---

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

8 AC No elevated bateria levels Won-Point . . . 26 AC No Minor exceedance of bacteria c r i te r ia Won-Point . . .

Yes Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Won-Point Elevated f i sh .tissue levels Return Ag flows carrytng pesticides.

No Bordered by 50% urban, 5 m €IS. land

Unknown

Yes Sedimentation Non-Point Receives di rect discharge f ran 4g drains Threat of ambient toxic i ty / Hyper saline

Page 118

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Wet l ends

Federal L is ts

Water Quality Condition &dro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Bodv Name - Unit I @oJ mediate Inmired Unknown Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

NEARY'S LAGOON 304.12 0 0 0 50 50 AC No

OCEAN0 LAGOW 310.31 0 0 0 32 32 AC Yes Agricultural runoff Limited data avai table Excessive tu le grouth

OSO FLACO LAKE 312.10 0 320 0 0 320 AC Yes Trace amounts of heavy metals, herbicide Threat of sedimentation

PAJARO SLOUGH 305.10 0 0 0 120 120 AC

SALlNAS RIVER REFUGE 309.10 0 0 163 LAGOON (SOUTH)

SCHUAN LAKE 304.12 0 0 32

TEHBLADERO SLWGH 309.10 0 75 75

TEWlSPUllA SLWGH 305.40 300 0 0

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Unknown . . . Non-Point . . .

Won-Point . X .

0 163 AC Yes Agricultural m f f carring toxic8 Non-Point

0 32 AC Yes Eutrophication Excessive plant growth Objectives violated

0 2 AC Yes Eutrophication Objectives violated Bacteria and nutrient levels

0 150 AC Yes Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Objectives violated Elevated pesticides in fish tissue

Won-Point

Non-Point

Non-Poi n t

. . . x . x

X X X

Page 119

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSRENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 3 Wet 1 ands

Federal L ists

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inpaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion

WASTE SLWGH 315.32 0 0 0 1 1 MI

YOUNGER'S LAGOON 304.11 0 0 0 7 7 AC No Limited information available

Page 120

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D



Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Good mediate Impaired Unknown Site Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- Hydro Unit # Water Body Name

ALAMITOS BAY 0 285 0 0 285 AC No Heavy metals Marina inpects Recreational impacts

Yon-Point . . X

0 220 0 0 220 AC No Elevated shell f ish tissue Levels Pesticides

Yon-Point

Won-Point

CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR

40 50 0 0 90 AC Yes Heavy metals Marina impacts Elevated shell f ish levels

KING HARBOR

0 0 840 0 840 AC Yes Elevated shell f ish tissue Levels Non-Point X . X

Health advisory i n effect, PCB's > WAS LONG BEACH HARBOR (INNER)

0 0 1260 0 l 2 6 O A C Yes Elevated shell f ish tissue levels Point 8 Non-Point X . X Health advisory i n effect Objectives violated

LOS ANGELES HARBOR (INNER)

0 0 354 0 354 AC Yes Elevated shell f ish tissue levels Threat of toxf c bf oassey results Threat of f i sh population decline

Won-Point MARINA DEL REY HARBOR

Non-Point PORT HUENEHE (HARBOR )

0 0 121 0 121 AC Yes Toxic pollutants Heavy metals Mi l i tary impacts

Point 8 Non-Point . . X SAN PEDRO BAY 0 10200 500 0 10700 AC No Public health concern Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shell f ish tissue levels

Page 122


Region 4

Water Body Name

VENTURA HARBOR

Bays and Harbors

Water Ouel i t v Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Unit U Good mediate Inmaired Unknom Sire Units Sheet

Page 123


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem/Need D e ~ c r i ~ t f on Problem Swrce - D

Suspected hemy metals, DOT, chlordane Non-Point . . X Recreat ionel inpacts

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSRENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 4 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

Hydro Uater Bodv Name Unit #

BALLONA UETLANDS 405.13

COLORADO LAGOON 405.12

MYllNGUEZ CHANNEL 405.12 TIDAL PRIM

LOS ANGELES RIVER 405.12 (TIDAL PRISM)

MCGRATH LAKE ESTUARY 403.11

WGU LAGOOW 403.11

SAW GABRIEL RIVER b05.15 (TIDAL M I W )

SANTA CLARA RIVER 4b3.00

Uater Quality Condition Inter- - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Units Sheet Problem/Need Descrifion --

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

0 0 150 0 150 AC Yes Fishery and w i l d l i f e habitat impairment Point 8 Nm-Point X . X Uetlands alteration Rare and endangered species impairment

0 0 13 0 13 AC Yes High cot iform can ts Non-Point X . X Elevated shell'fish tissue levels

0 0 8 0 8 HI Yes Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Point 8 Won-Point X . X Urban runoff Historic DDT deposition t o sediment

0 3 0 0 3 M I Yes Urban runoff Non-Point . . .

0 0 29 0 29 AC Yes Eutrophication Point 8 Won-Point X . X Threat of recreational impacts Fish k i l l s

0 40 0 0 40 AC No Suspected pesticide& Non-Point . . . 0 0 1500 0 1500 AC Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Non-Point . -X . X

ELevated shel l f ish tissue levels Sedimentation

0 0 3 0 3 MI Yes Elevated f i sh tissue lewels Fish abnormalities Threat of toxic bioassays

Point 8 Won-hint X . X

Region 4 Estuaries

Hydro yater Body Name - Unit AT ESTUARY

VENTURA RIVER 402.10 EST UARY

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PUALlTY ASSESSHEW

Uater Qual i t v Condition Inter- - Total - Fact

Good mediate l m i r e d Unknom Size Units Sheet ProblemlNeed Descrivtion --

0 0 10 0 10 AC Yes Eutrophication Threat of public health concern Threat of rare 8 e m . species impair.


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Non-Point . . I

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1W4 WATER OUALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/25/96


Federal L is ts

Water mli t v Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good d i a t e Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

ACTON VALLEY 403.55 0 20 2 0 22 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment Non-Point . . . Threat of drinking water impgirment

ARROYO SANTA ROSA 403.63 0 6 0 0 6 SOMI Yes Threat of drinking water impairment Point & Non-Point . . . VALLEY

COASTAL PLAIN - L.A. 405.10 450 21 29 0 500 SaMI Yes Drinking water iapeirment Saltwater intrusion Fuel leaks/YOC pollut ion


CONEJO VALLEY 403 -64 0 4 0 0 4 SQMl Yes Threat of drinking water iapeirment Non-Point . . . CONEJO-TIERRA REJADA VOLCANIC AREAS

0 0 0 0 0 Yes Areal extent unknown

HIDDEN VALLEY 404.26 2 1 0 0 3 SQHl Yes Threat of drinking water impairrsent Non-Point . . . HUNGRY VALLEY 403.43 3 1 0 0 4 SQMl Yes Threat of drinking water impairamt Won-Point . . .

High natural ly occurring elements

LAS POSAS VALLEY 403.62 41 37 1 0 79 SOH1 Yes Drinking water ilrpgirment Non-Point . . . . Objectives violated Threat of objectives violated

I LOCKUOOD VALLEY C03.44 15 5 0 0 20 SQnl Yes Threat of objectives vlolated Non-Point . . . I High natural ly occurring elements

Page 126

STATE UATER RESOURCES COllTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PVALITY ASSESS#NT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Ouali t v Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hvdro

Uater Body Name Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

LOUER SANTA CLARA 403.11 RIVER VAL.(MNTURA CO)

246 SPnl Yes Drinking water impeiraart Threat of drinking water i h p a i m t objectives violated

Point O Non-Point . . .

Won-Point . . . lULlBU AREA 404.21 1 SPnl Yes Drinking water i n p e i m t objectives violated

13 Sanl Yes

47 SOMI Yes

Threat of drinking w t e r impairpnt Nan-Point . . . Non-Point . . .

OJAl VALLEY 402.32

PLEASANT VALLEY 403.12 Threat of drinking water i a p e i m t Threat of objectives violated

RUSSELL VALLEY 404.25

SAY FERNANDO VALLEY 405.21

6 S P n l Yes

192 Spnl Yes

Threat of drinking uater iapsiraant . . . Point O Non-Point . . . Drinking water ilpairamt

Designated EPA Super- s i t e Fuel leakslMC pollut ion

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY 405.41 200 Sanl Yes Drinking water i.paimmt Designated EPA S u p r f v d s i t e Fuel l e a k s m pollutim

Point O Non-Point . . .

2S SQMl Yes

5 Sanl Yes

Drinking water iapairaart Non-Point . . . Won-Poi'nt . . .

SIRI VALLEY 403.67

THOUSAND OAKS AREA 403.68

T IERRA REJADA VALLEY 403.65

UPPER OJAl VALLEY 402.31

Threat of drinking w t e r i . q a i m t

0 0 0 1 1 SPnl Yes

0 3 0 0 3 SQMl Yes Threat of objectives violated

Page 127

. . . Nan-Point . . .

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW6 UATER QUALITY ASSESSWENT Report Date : M/L3/94

Region 4 G r d Water

Federal L i s t s

Uater Oualitv Condition -

Hvdro inter- - Total - Fact 3 4 9 Uater BadV Name Unit # mediate Impaired Unknom Units Sheet Problem/Need Deecr i~ t ion Problem Source D

I UPPER SANTA ANA 681.20 0 10 20 0 30 Saul Yes Drinking water ispeirslent VALLEY (LA COUNTY)

Non-Point . . .

UPPEU SANTA CLARA 403.51 53 37 0 0 90 SpHl Yes Threat of drinking water i a p a i m t Non-Point . . . RIVER VALLEY (LA Threat o f objectives violated

W.)

VEUTURA RIVER VALLEY 402.10 0 5 5 0 10 SOMI Yes Drinking water iapairm#rt Point 8 Non-Point . . . Threat of drinking uater Zapaimmt

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSENT Report Date : 05/23/91


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oualitv Condition Hvdro - lnter-

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ProblemfNeed D e s c r i ~ t f q --

BELMDERE PARK LAKE 405.15 0 2 0 0 2 AC Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Eutrophication

Yon-Point . X .

810 SANTA ANITA 405.33 0 0 0 17 RESERVOlR

Won-Point

Won-Point

21 AC Yes Eutrophication Sediamtat ion

2720 AC No Turbidity v io la t iam USITAS LAKE 402.20 0 2720 0 0

197 AC Yes Recreational i m t s Col f f o m exceedmm Eutrophicatiar

Non-Point

160 AC No Drained

5 AC Yes Eutrophication Low water level

COGSELL RESERVOIR 605.43 0 0 0 160

CRYSTAL W <R4) 405.43 0 0 5 0

Recreatfonal iqsncts

58 AC No intermittent - currently &y DRY CANYOtl RESERVOIR 403.51 0 Q 0 58

15 AC Yes Threat of elevated -f id t i a m levels Won-Point ECHO PARK UKE 4B. 15 0 15 0 0

Page 129

STATE UATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Uater Qual i tv Condition In te r -

Water Body Name Uni t # mediate Impaired Unknown Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

EL DORADO PARK LAKE 405.15 0 22 0 0 22 AC Yes Threat of elevated f i s h t issue levels

Non-Point

Non-Point

ELEANOR LAKE 404.26 0 8 0 0 8 AC Yes Eutrophication Urban runoff

ELIZABETH LAKE 403.51 0 0 90 0 90 AC Yes Eutrophication

Receding water level due t o drought Suspected elevated co l i form levels

GARVEY RESERVOIR 405.41 0

HARBOR PARK LAKE 405.12 0

1610 AC

50 AC Yes

Drained fo r maintensnce

Elevated f i s h t issue levels Won-Point Eutrof i icat ion Health advisory i n af k t - c h l o r d a n e > FDA

HOLLENBECK PARK LAKE 405.15 0

HUGHES LAKE 403.51 0

. . . x x x

5 AC Yes

40 AC Yes

Lake i s drained fo r maintenance

Won-Point Lake i s drying up due t o drought Public health c w e r n

LEGG LAKE 405.41 70

LINCOLN PARK LAKE 405.15 0

LINDERO LAKE 404.23 0

L I E OAK RESERVOIR 405.40 0

70 AC Yes

5 AC Yes

14 AC Yes

77 AC No

Eutrophication

Elevated f i s h t issue levels

Intermittent - current ty d ry

Non-Point

Page 130

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSUENT Report Date : 05/23/04


Federal L i s t s

Water a w l i ty C w d i t ion Hydro In ter - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Neme Uni t # a mediate Impaired Unknoun Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Description

MALIBU LAKE 404.24 0 55 0 0 55 AC No Elevated f i s h t issue levels Suspected eutrophicat ion

1 Sedimentation

Won-Point . X .

HATILI JA RESERVOIR 402.20 0 124 0 0 124 AC No Sedimentation Eutrophication

Non-Point . X .

MORRIS RESERVOIR 405.43 0 0 0 420 420 AC Yes Presently being drained

PACOlHA RESERVOIR 405.22

PECK ROAD PARK LAKE 405.41 0 80 0 0 80 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Non-Point

Non-Point PlRU LAKE 403.40

0 0 0 2 2 AC Yes

PUDD INGSTONE 405.52 RESERVOIR

0 0 490 . 0 490 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issua levels Recreational impacts

Non-Point

1 PYRAMID RESERVOIR 403.43 1360 0 0 0 1360 AC Yes

SAW ANTONIO 481.23 0 0 0 139 139 AC No Intermittent - current ly dry RESERVOIR ( R 4 )

SAW DIMAS RESERVOIR 405.44 0 0 0 16 16 AC No Intermittent - current ly d r y

SAN GABRIEL 405.43 500 0 0 0 500 AC No RESERVOIR

Page 131

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UAlER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/96


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problern/Need Description Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition In te r -

~ o o d mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet --- Water Body Name

SAUPlT RESERVOIR

SHERWODD LAKE 184 AC Yes Suspected elevated f i s h t issue levels f in-Point . X X

SILVER LAKE RESERVOIR

TUJUNGA RESERVOIR

UPPER VAN NORMAN RESERVOIR

WESTLAKE LAKE 156 AC Yes Suspected elevated f i s h t issue levels Non-Point . X X Suspected eutrophicatht l

Page 132

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT



ANACAPA ISLAND 406.10

NEARSHORE - POINT WW TO LATIGO POINT

SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND 406.50

SAN Nl COLAS ISLAND 406.20 AND BEGG ROCK

SANTA BARBARA 1 SLAND 406.30

SANTA CATALINA 406.40 ISLAND (AREAS 1-4 )

SANTA MONICA BAY 405.13 (CO. LINE TO PT FERMIN)

Water Pual i tv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet ---

21280 AC Yes

11710 AC Yes

80512 AC Yes

102528 AC Yes

14000 AC Yes

17936 AC Yes

256000 AC Yes

Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

Area o f speciat b io log ica l signif icance

Area of special b io log ica l signif icance

Area o f special b io log ica l signif icance

Area of special b io log ica l significance Threat of m i l i t a r y iapacts

Area of special b io log ica l signif icance

Area o f special b io log ica l sfgnificance

Elevated f i s h t issue levels Sediment contamination Recreational inpacts (surf zone)


federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Point & Uon-Point X . X

Page 133




ALlSO CREEK (L.A. 405.21 RIVER TRIBUTARY 1

ALlSO CREEK (S. 403.21 CLARA RIV. TRIB. MN

CO)

ARROYO CONEJO 403.68

ARROYO LAS POSAS 403.62

ARROYO SANTA ROSA 403.64

ARROYO SECO 405 -15

Water Qua l i t y Condition In te r - - a mediate Impaired Unknoun

ARROYO SIMl 403.63 . 0 15 0 0

BALLONA CREEK 405.13 0 6 0 0

BEARDSLEY YPSH 403.61 0 0 5 0

BOUQUET CANYON CFEEK 493.51 17 0 0 0


15 M I Yes

9 M I Yes

10 M I Yes

8 M I Yes

8 M I Yes

18 M I Yes

15 M I Yes

6 M I Yes

5 M I Yes

17 M I Yes

ProblemlNeed D e s c r i ~ t i o n

Urban runoff

Suspected f isher ies habitat degradation

Transient shelters i n chennel Urban runo f f / i l l ega l dunping i n channel Public health concern

Col i f orm excqedves Pub1 i c health concern V r h n runpff

Agricu!tural wastey~ter Sedimentation DDT, DDE, DDD i n sediment


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Won-Point . . .

Point . . . Point 8 Non-Point . . K

. . . Won-Point . . X

Point 8 Won-Point . . . Non-Poi n t . . .

Page 134

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0


Coed mediate Impaired Unknown Hvdro

Uater Body Name Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ProblemlNeed Descr i~ t ion ---

BRWNS CREEK (R4) L05.21 2 MI Yes Urban runoff Non-Point . . . BULL CREEK ( R 4 ) 405.21 10 MI Yes Urban runoff Won-Point . . . BURBANK-MSTERN 405.21 CHANNEL

6 M I Yes Urban runoff High emronia


CALLEGUAS CREEK 403.11 11 MI Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Objectives violated

Non-Point X . X

6 M I Yes CANADA DE LOS ALAMOS 403.43

CANADA LARGA 402.10 0 0 0 5 5 MI Yes Intermittent stream

CASTAIC CREEK 403.51 8 0 0 0 8 M I Yes

CATTLE CANYON CREEK 405.43 16 0 0 0 16 M I Yes

COWTON CREEK 405.15 0 8 0 0 8 M I Yes Urban r v lo f f

. . . Won-Point . . .

CONEJO CREEK 403.12 0 10 0 0 10 MI Yes C h l o r i d e o b j e c t i v e e x c ~ High phosphate and anmonie Threat of f i sh k i l l s


COYOTE CREEK (S. 405.15 0 17 0 0 17 MI Yes High nutrients, col i fom, end TDS .from Point 8 Non-Point . . . GABRIEL RIV. the upper watershed (Region 8) TR I BUTARI) Urban R v l o f f

Page 135

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet ProblmfNeed D e s c r i ~ t i o n

COYOTE CREEK 402.20 3 . O 0 0 3 M I Yes (VEN.RIV.TRIB.)

DOMlNWEZ CHANNEL 405.12 0 7 0 0 7 M I Yes Objectives violated Threat of toxic bioassay resul ts

GORMAN CREEK 403.43 0 12 0 0 12 M I Yes High f luor ide

HOPPER CREEK (R4) 403.41 0 10 0 0 10 HI Yes Objectives v io la ted High TDS

HOT SPRINGS CANYON 403.41 0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes Objectives v io la ted CREEK High f luor ide end boron

LION CREEK 402.20 9 0 0 0 9 M I Yes

LITTLE SESPE CREEK 403.32 0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes Objectives v io la ted High su l fur and TDS

LOCKUODD CREEK 403.64 0 11 0 0 11 M I Yes Objectives v io la ted I High boron

LOS ANGnES RIVER 405.15 0 28 0 0 28 M I Yes Urban runoff (LOWER) Threat of dr inking u a t w inpsirrnent

LOS ANGELES RIVER 405.21 0 18 7 0 25 M I Yes Urban runoff (UPPER) Localized high VOCs end e n m ~ i a

Threat of dr inking water inpeinnent


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Point 8 Won-Point . . X

Won-Point . . . Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

. . . Non-Point . . .

Non-Poi nt . . . .

Point 8 Urn-Point . . .


Page 136

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quali ty Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet ProblemfNeed Descr i~ t ion

MADEA CREEK 401.24 0 . I 0 0 7 M I Yes Suspected sedimentation Won-Point . . X

HALIBU CREEK 404.21 0 6 3 0 9 M I Yes Fish population decline Spawning inpeirment Sedimentat ion

Non-Point . . .

HATILIJA CREEK 402.20 7 0 0 0 7 M I Yes

HATILIJA CREEK 402.20 5 0 (NORTH FORK)

0 0 5 nl Yes

HATlLlJA CREEK 402.20 0 0 (UPPER NORTH FORK)

0 9 9 M I Yes

0 0 14 M I Yes Urbanrutoff Non-Point

0 0 59 M I Yes TDS, sulfate, boron objectives sometimes Non-Point exceeded

PlRU CREEK 103.42 55 4

0 0 3 M I Yes Naturally occurring sulfur enrichment PlRU CREEK (SOUTH 403.44 0 3 FORK)

POLE CANYON CREEK 403.51 0 7 0 0 7 M I Yes Objectives violated High sulfate and TDS

REVOLON SLOUGH 403.11 0 0 9 0 9 M I Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Threat of drinking water iapairment

Won-Point

Page 137



Federal L i s t s

Uater Body Name

RIO HOMO0 405.41

SAW ANTONIO CREEK 481.23 (CROSSES INTO RUQCB

81

SAW ANTONIO CREEK 402.20 (VENTURA TRIBUTARY)

SAN FRANCISQUIT0 403.51 CANYON CREEK

SAW GABRIEL RIVER 405.43 (EAST FORK)

SANGABRIELRIVER 405.15 (LOWER)

SAN GABRIEL RIVER 405.43 (NORTH FORK)

SAN GABRIEL RIVER 405.41 (UPPER)

SAN GABRIEL RIVER 405.43 WEST FORK)

Uater Qua1 i t y Condition In te r - - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- 0 20 0 0 20 M I Yes Urban runoff

Organic chemicals

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

0 0 0 23 23 M I Yes . . .

16 0 0 0 16 M I Yes Intermittent flow . . .

io o o o 20 MI Yes . . .

15 0 0 0 15 Mt Yes Threat o f recreational impects Non-Point . . . Unpermi t t e d dunping o f trash and debris

0 9 9 0 18 M I Yes Toxic bioassay resul ts High emnonia Urban runoff

Point B Non-Point X . .

6 0 0 0 6 M I Yes Threat o f recreational impacts . . .

0 42 0 0 42 MI Yes Urban runoff Point & Non-Point . . . Threat o f dr inking water i ~ p e i m e n t

18 0 0 0 18 M I Yes Threat o f recreational impatts Threat o f f isher ies habitat degradation

Page 138

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD l W 4 UATER QUALITY ASSESSHENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

Uater Qua1 i t v Condition W r o - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Unit # toad mediate I m i r e d Unknown Size Units Shcet Problem/Need Description

SAN JOSE CREEK 405.41

SANTA ANA CREEK 402.20

SANTA CLARA RIVER 403.00

SANTA PAULA CREEK 403.20

SESPE CREEK 403.30

SlSAR CREEK 403.21

TAP0 CANYON CREEK 403.41

TRIUNFO CANYON CREEK 404.24

VENTURA RIVER 402.10 (LOMR)

0 0 16 HI Yes

0 0 10 HI No

0 0 ' 7 9 H I No

2 o 16 nr yes

0 0 45 HI Yes

2 0 7 HI Yes

o o 10 MI yes

0 0 7 HI Yes

0 0 10 HI Yes

6 0 6 HI Yes

VENTURA RIVER 402.20 9 0- o o 9 nt ves (UPPER 1

Page 139

Urban runoff

Urban and agricultural r w f f Localized exceedences of sulfate, chloride, and n i t ra te objectives

Natural o i l seeps i n the area Fisheries habitat degradation

Natural o i l seeps i n the area

High I D S end sulfate Agricultural runoff

Suspected sedimentation

Urban runoff

Low dl ssolved oxygen/high mmnia Fish k i t ls/excessive plant grouth sps 11s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 1 9

Problem Source 0

Point 8 Won-Point . . . . . .

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

. . . Non-Point . . . Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . X

Non-Point . . . Point 8 Won-Point X . X



Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Un i t # mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Necd Descr ip t ion

VERDUGO WASH 405.21 0 8 0 0 8 M I Yes - Urban runof f

WALNUT CREEK (R4) 405.41 0 13 0 0 13 HI Yes Urban runof f

UHEELER CANYON CREEK 403.21 0 6 0 0 6 M I Yes Objectives v io la ted

Page 140


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER 9 L l T V ASSESSWWT

Region 5 Estuaries

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

DELTA UATERUAYS 544.00 0 0 48000 0 48000 AC Yes Health advisories for Hg Fisheries habitat impeirment Elevated Dioxin, pesticides

Page 142


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D


STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 5 G r d Uater

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In ter - -

Good mediate lnpai red Unknown -- Hydro Uni t #

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problm/Need Oescriptlan --- Water Body Name

ALTURAS BASIN

AMERICAN VALLEY

ASH VALLEY

BEAR VALLEY (SB)

BEAR VALLEY (11)

BERRYESSA VALLEY

BIG VALLEY

BRlTE VALLEY

BUCHER SUMP VALLEY

BURNEV CREEK VALLEY

BURNS VALLEY

BUTTE CREEK VALLEY

USTAlC LAKE VALLEY

CAYTON VALLEY

CEDAR GROVE AREA

Page 143



Federal L i s t s

Water Q u a l i t y Condit ion Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Un i t s Sheet Problem/Need Descr iv t ion

CHOUCHILLA B PORT 5-22 0 0 0 230 230

CHOUCHILLA BASIN 5.22 200 0 30 0 230 SOMI Yes Drinking uater impairment PORT

CHROME TOWN AREA 5-61 0 0 0 5 5

CLEAR LAKE CACHE FH 5-66 0 0 0 36 36 SPMI

CLEAR LAKE PV 5-67 0 0 0 34 34

CLOVER VALLEY 5-58 0 0 0 23 23

COLLAYOHl VALLEY 5-19 7 0 0 0 7

COYOTE VALLEY 5-18 0 6 0 0 6

CUDOY CANYON VALLY 5-82 0 0 0 3 3

CUDDY RANCH AREA 5-83 0 0 0 6 6

CUDDY VALLEY 5-84 0 0 0 4 4

DELTA - MEHbdTA 5.22 65 0 300 0 365 SPMl Yes Drinking water impairment BASIN PORT

DELTA MENOOTA PORT 5-22 0 0 0 365 365

Page 144

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Dote : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Hydro Uater Body Name Uni t #

DIXIE VALLEY 5-53

DRY BURNEY CREEK 5-49 VALLEY

E SAN JOAQUIN PORT 5-22

EASTERN SAW JOAWlN 5.22 COUNTY BASIN PORT

EGG LAKE VALLEY 5-41

ELKCREEK AREA 5-62

FALL RIVER VALLEY

FANDANGO VALLEY

GOOSE LAKE VALLEY

GOOSE VALLEY

GRAY VALLEY

GR I SSLY VALLEY

HIGH VALLEY

HOT SPRlNGS VALLEY

Uater Qua l i t y Condition Inter- -

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ~roblem/~eed D e s c r i ~ t f o n ---

1140

1140 SQHl Yes Drinking water impairment

7

6

120

26

75

8

10

17

3

11

Page 145

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D


Region 5 G r d Water

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In te r - - Total - - Fact

Good mediete Itmaired Unknoun size Uni ts Sheet ProhlemINeed Descript ion -- Hydro

Uater Bod/ Name Uni t #

HUMBUG VALLEY 5-60

INDIAN VALLEY (REG 5-9 5Y)

INNS VALLEY 5-79

JESS VALLEY 5-3

520 0 1 70 0 690 SQMI Yes Drinking uater impairment

25 5 0 0 30

KAMAH BASIN PORT 5.22

KELSEYVILLE VALLEY 5-15

KERN CNTY B PORT 5-22

1770 0 2000 0 3770 SPMl Yes Drinkinguaterimpairment Agriculture impairment Fuel leaks/VOC p o l l u t i o n

KERN CWNTY BASIN 5.22 PURT

KERN RIVER VALLEY 5-25

380 30 1200 0 1610 SQMl Yes Drinking uater impairment KINGS BASIN PORT 5.22

LAKE ALMHDR VALCY 5-7

LAKE BRITTON AREA 5-46

LAST CHANCE CREEK 5-57 V ~ L L E Y

Pege 146

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In te r - -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---


LITTLE INDIAN VALLEY 5-65

LONG VALLEY 1 5-31

LONG VALLEY 2 5-44

LOS BANOS CREEK 5-70 VALLY

5

580 SOMI Yes Drinking water inpairment

6

106

690 SOU1 Yes Drinking water impeircnent

5

340 SOHI Yes Drinking water inpairnent

650

LOVER LAKE VALLEY 5-30

MADERA BASIN PORT 5.22

CUECUE HEADOUS AREA 5-76

UCCLOUD AREA 5-35

MERCED BASIN PORT 5.22

HILL WTERA AREA 5-85

MODEST0 BASIN PORT 5.22

HWOC PLATEAU PVA 5-33 (REG 5 )

HWOC PLATEAU RVA 5-32 (REG 5)

Page 147

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER PUALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 5 G r w n d Uater

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Probkin Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Goad mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- Hydro Unit # Water Body Name

MOHAUK VALLEY

MOUNT SHASTA AREA

MTN MEADOUS VALLEY

N FORK BATTLE CRECK VALLEY

PANOCHE VALLEY

PIT RIVER 8 ALT, S FK

PLEASANT VALLEY PORT

POWDOSA TOVW AREA 5-38 0 0 0 15 15

POPE VALLEY 5-68 0 0 0 15 15

REDDING BQIN 5 7 5 410 100 0 0 510

ROCKHOUSE &@OW 5-70 0 0 Q 5 5 VALLEY

ROUND VALLEY (REG 5) 5-36 15 0 0 0 15

Page 148

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSIIEYI Rrprt Dntr : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In ter - -

Good mediate Inuaired Unknown -- Hydro

Water Body Name - Unit # Total - Fact Size Units Sheet Protitem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---

6 SACATOR CANYON 5-77 VALLEY

SACRAMENTO COUNTY 5.21 BASIN PORT

750 SQMl Yes Drinking water impairment

SACRAMENT0 VALLEY 1 5-55

SACRAMENTO VALLEY 2 5-21 5000 Yes Drinking uater impairment Objectives v io la ted

SACRAMENTO VALLEY 5.21 BAS IN

5000 SQMl Yes Drinking uater impairment

SAW JOAQUIN VALLEY 5-22 ?mO 500 100 0 8500 Yes Drinking water impairment Objectives v io la ted

SCOTT VALLEY 5-14 4

SIERRA VALLEY 5-12 100

SPRINGVILLE AREA 5-74 0

S W VALLEY (FRESNO 5-24 8 COUNTY 1

STONYFORD T W AREA 5-63 0 0 0 7 7

0 0 0 37

Page 149

TEHACHAPI VALLEY, 5-28 37

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94

R e g i o n 5 G r o u n d W a t e r


U a t e r B o d y Name UEST

TEMPLETON MTN AREA

THREE RIVERS AREA

TOAD M L L AREA

TRACY BASIN PORT

TULARE LAKE BASIN PORT

TULARE LAKE PORT

H V d r o U n i t #

TULE BASIN PORT 5.22

TURLOCK BASIN PORT 5-22

UPPER LAKE VALLEY 5-13

VALLECITOS CREEK 5-71 VALLEY

UALKER BSN CREEK 5-26 VALLEY

WARM SPRINGS VALLEY 5-2.02

UESTSIDE BASIN PORT 5.22

W a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n d i t i o n I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t -

Good m e d i a t e I m a i r e d U n k n o u n Size U n i t s S h e e t P r o b l e m / N e e d D e s c r i p t i o n --

0 0 10 560 570 SQMI Yes D r i n k i n g w a t e r i m p a i r m e n t

610 0 170 0 780 SQMl Y e s D r i n k i n g w a t e r i m p a i r m e n t

0 0 0 910 910 Yes

640 0 90 0 730 SQMl Yes D r i n k i n g w a t e r i m p a i r m e n t

465 0 80 0 545 SQMl Y e s D r i n k i n g w a t e r i m p a i r m e n t

10 5 0 0 15

0 0 0 20 20

85 15 0 0 100

200 0 840 0 1040 SPMI Y e s

P a g e 150

3 3 3 0 1 ' 1 3 4 9


STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 UATER PUALITY ASSESSHEW1 Report Date : 05/23/96


Federal L is ts

Hydro Uater Body Name Unit #

YELLWI CREEK VALLY 5-56

Uater Quality Condition Inter- - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Shcet ~ rob lem/~eed Descriotion -- 0 0 0 5 5

0 0 0 10 10

Page 151

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSHEW1 Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oual i ty Condition In ter - - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- Water Body Name

ALHANOR LAKE

ALOHA LAKE

AMADOR LAKE

ANGORA LAKES (SN)

ANTlOCH MUNICIPAL LAKE

AZURE LAKE

BARE ISLAND LAKE

BASS LAKE (MADERA CO)

BAVLEY LAKE

BEACH LAKE 0 0 295 0 295 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue Levels Won-Poi n t

Threat of f i s h population decline Threat of objectives v io la ted

BERRYESSA LAKE 0 0 20700 0 20700 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels

Recreational inpacts Threat t o w i l d l i f e

Won-Point

BETHANY RES

Page 152

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23 /94


Federal L i s t s

Uater Body Name

BIG BEAR LAKE (REG

5)

BIG F I E LAKES

BIG LAKE

BIG SAGE RES

BINCAMAN LAKE

BLACK BUTTE RES

BLACK LAKE

BLAIR RES (NEV CO)

BLUE LAKE

BLUE LAKE, L M R

BOHN LAKE, L M R

8OUPlAN LAKE

BOX LAKE

BRlTTON LAKE

Hydro U n i t # -

Uater Q u a l i t y Condi t ion I n t e r - -

Good mediate I n m i r e d Unknoun -- Total - Fact -

Size U n i t s Sheet ~ r o b l e m / ~ e e d D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 153

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Untcr Qual i t y Condi

Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact - Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet ~ rob lem/~eed Description

BUCKS LAKE 518.42 0 1852 0 0 1852

BULLARDS BAR RES 517.51 0 ,4810 0 0 4810

CAHANCHE RES 531.20 0 7700 0 0 7700 AC Yes Fish k i l l s Fisheries habitat degradation

CAMP FAR WEST RES 516.31 0 2680 0 0 2680

CASCADE LAKES 517.34 0 0 0 85 85

CHERRY LAKE 536.50 1765 0 0 0 1765

CHIEF LAKES 540.60 0 0 0 220 220

CHIOUITO LAKE 540.40 0 12 0 0 12

CLEAR LAKE 513.52 0 0 43000 0 43000 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Eutrophication Recreational and f i s h iapects

COnBlE LAKE 516.33 0 360 0 0 3bO

CONTRA LOMA LAKE SG3.00 0 81 0 0 81

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Non- Point

Page 154

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESWENT


Uater Ouel i ty Condition Hydro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Unit # mediate Impaired Unknown Site Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r f ~ t i ~ I I

COU UEADDU LAKE 536.51 0 0 0 17 17

CRESTA LAKE 518.42 95 0 0 0 95

CRYSTAL LAKE (RS) 553.41

DALLAS-WARNER LAKE 542.30

DAVIS CREEK RES 513.32

DAVIS LAKE 518.34

DEER CREEK LAKE 517.20 . . DEERHART LAKE 518.45

DON PEDRO RES 536.32

MIWNELL LAKE 534.41

DOROTHY LAKE (REG 5 ) 536.60

DORRIS RES 526.52

DUCK LAKE 534.50

EAST LAKE (TULARE 522.33 CO)

12

3800

290 AC Yes Elevated f i s h t lssue levels

4026 Limited informmtlon

56

7

12960 AC

430

481

1060

10

25


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Threat of elevated f i s h t issue levels Non-Point

. . .

. x .

x x x

. X .

. X .

Page 155

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASESSMENT R c p r t Date : 05/23/96


Federal L i s t s

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro In ter - - Total - Fact -

Uater Body Name Uni t # mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

EAST PARK RES 522.33 0 1818 0 0 1818 AC Yes Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue levels Limited sampling Mercury exceeds MIS c r i t e r i a in edib le

EDlSON LAKE 540.40 0 0 0 1880 1880

EGG LAKE 526.42 594 0 0 0 594

ELEANOR LAKE (REG 5 ) 536.53 0 0 0 948 948

ELLIS LAKE 515.40 4 0 0 0 4

EMERALD LAKE 523.22 0 0 0 3 3

EM1 GRANT LAKE

ENGLEBRIGHT LAKE

EVERGREEN LAKE

FEATHER LAKE

FLORENCE LhKE

FOLSOW RES

FORDYCE LhKE

FORNI LAKE

Page 156

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . X .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER WALlTY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Quality Condition In te r - -

Good mediate lmvaired Unknown -- Hydro Uni t #

517.14

517.33

514.42

518.36

532.60

518.44

518.42

Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i m --- Water Body Name

FRANCIS LAKE

FRENCH LAKE

FRENCH MEADOWS LAKE

FRENCHMAN LAKE

FROG LAKE

GLEN LAKE

GOLD LAKE

GOOSE LAKE (REG 5X) 518.33 0 0 0 30 30

GOOSE LAKE (REG 5Y) 527.20 0 124160 0 0 124160

GRANITE LAKE (REG 5) 536.20 0 0 0 7 7

GROUSE LAKE 514.33 0 0 0 6 6

HEATHER LAKE 553.41 0 0 0 10 10

HELL HOLE LAKE 514.45 1250 0 0 0 1250

HENDERSON LAKE 532.40 0 3 1 0 0 31

HETCH HETCHY RES 536.60 1960 0 0 0 1960

Page 157

STATE UATER RESDURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Water Qua l i t y Condit ion Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

HIDOEN LAKES 518.44 0 0 0 1 1

HIGHLAND CREEK 513.54 146 0 0 0 146

HOCKETT LAKES ( C ) 553.42 0 0 0 7 7

HORSESHOE LAKE 552.34 0 0 0 12 12 ( W ( 1 )

HUH€ LAKE (EAST 552.34 0 85 0 0 85 SIDE)

HUNTINGTON LAKE 540.52 0 0 0 1435 1435

ICE HOUSE LAKE 514.33 678 0

ICEBURG LAKE 540.60 0 0

INDIAN VALLEY (REG 513.40 4000 0 5x I

IRON CANYON 526.15 510 0

IRON CANYON RES 526.15 0 0

ISABELLA LRKE 554.21 0 11400

JACKS LAKE 526.46 64 0

0 0 510

0 432 432

0 0 11400 AC Sedimentation

0 0 64

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Page 158

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i tv Condition In te r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- m r o Unit R

517.43

532.60

532.25

553.44

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Protilem/Need Description --- Water Body Name

JACKSON MEADOUS

JEFF DAVIS LAKE

JENKINSOW LAKE

ICAMAH LAKE Non-Point 1940 AC Elevated f ish t issue levels Sedimentation Threat of recreational impacts

KERCKHOFF LAKE

KESUICK RES 650 AC Yes Fish population decline Recreational inpacts Objectives v io la ted

Won-Point

LEOPOLD LAKE

LITTLE BEAR LAKE

LITTLE GRASS VALLEY LAKE

LITTLE LAKE

LfTTLE SPANISH LAKE

LOIS LAKE

Page 159



Uater Body Name

LONG LAKE (2) (PLACER)

LONG LAKE (3) ( PLUMAS)

LOS BANOS RES

LOST CREEK LAKE

LOST LAKE (1) (TUOLUHNE

LOST LAKE (FRESNO)

LOUER BEAR RES

LOUER ROCK LAKE

Hydro Unit #

Uater Qual i ty Condition

Inter- - - Total Fact - Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Probl em/Need Descr i~ t ion --

MACUMBER LAKE 507.12 0 85 0 0 85

MAGEE LAKE "526.34 0 0 0 5 5

M O T H PWL 540.40 1100 0 0 0 1100

RANZANITA LAKE 540.34 26 0 0 0 26

MARSH CREEK RES 543.08 0 0 375 0 375 AC Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels

Page 160


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . a

n x x

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER WALITY ASSESSlIEUl Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Hvdro Water Body Name Un i t #

MARY LAKE (REG 5 ) 536.60

MCCLOUD LAKE 505.23

MCCLURE RES 537.22

HCKINSTRY LAKE 517.34

MCSWAIN LAKE 537.10

HELONES RES 534.22

Water Oual i t y Condition In te r - - mediate Inmaired Unknown

0 0 0 74

0 520 0 0

0 7110 0 0

0 0 0 10

312 0 0 0

1843 0 0 0

HEUDOTA POOL 535.71 0 0 0 500

MERLE COLLINS LAKE 517.13 975 0 0 0

MERRIAM LAKE 540.40 0 0 0 20

HILLERTON LAKE 540.23 4900 0 0 0

MINERS RANCH LAKE 515.40 0 52 0 0

MIRROR LAKE 540.51 0 0 0 6

ROSWITO LAKE, LOMR 532.60 0 4 0 0

WUNTAIN MEADOW LAKE 518.45 5746 0 0 0

WD LAKES (€1 552.33 0 0 0 4

Total - - Fact Size Uni ts Sheet ~ rob lem/~eed D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---

20

4900

52

6

4

5746

4

Page 161

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Threat of elevated f ish ttssue levels Na-Point

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSnENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Oual i t y Condition In ter - -

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown -- Hvdro

Water Body Name Uni t #

NATOWA LAKE 514.21

NEIL LAKE 540.18

NELLIE LAKE 540.51

NEW HOGAN LAKE 533.10

NOBEL LAKE 531.10

NYDIMR LAKES (M) 540.60

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ~ rob iem/~eed D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---

O'NEILL FOREBAY 541.20 0 2250 0 0 2250

OROVILLE LAKE 518.12 0 15808 0 0 15808

PARADISE RES 521.30 0 165 0 0 165

PAROEE RES 532.60 0 2138 0 0 2138 AC Yes Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue levels Yon-Point

Limited sanpling

PETER PANDE 540.60 80 0 0 0 80

PHOENIX LAKE (REG 5) 517.34 0 0 0 16 16

PINE FLAT RES 552.32 0 5970 0 0 5970 AC Threat of recreationat inpacts

RAINBOV LAKE 524.35 0 113 0 0 113

Non-Point

Page 162

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD l W 4 WATER WALlTY ASSESSWENT


Water Oual i t y Condition H ~ d r o - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # Good mediate I n m i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Problm/Need D e ~ c r i ~ t i w

RELIEF RES 534.41 0 288 0 0 288

ROBERTS RES 526.61 0 640 0 0 640

ROCK CREEK LAKE (REG 514.51 0 55 0 0 55 5X)

ROCK CREEK LAKE (REG 518.42 0 80 0 0 80 5Y

ROCKBOUND LAKE 514.45 0 0 0 108 108

ROLLINS RES 516.34 0 825 0 0 825

ROOSEVELT LAKE 536.60 0 0 0 60 60

ROPI LAKE 514.35 0 0 0 20 20

S P LAKES (SE) 514.54 0 0 0 15 15

SADDLE LAKE 518.42 0 0 0 9 9

SALT SPRINGS LAKE 532.60 0 0 0 963 963

SAW LUIS RES 542.32 12700 0 0 0 12700

SAN LUIS WASTEWAY 535.10 0 50 0 0 50


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue Levels Non-Point Limited -l ing

Page 163

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSIIEUT


Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - Total Fact -

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Ueed Description

SARDINE LAKE 517.56 0 0 0 62 62

SAUCER LAKE 518.43 0 0 0 7 7

SCOTTS FLAT RES 517.20 0 720 0 0 720

SEQUOIA LAKE 552.34 0 95 .O 0 95 Threat of recreational inpects Threat o f eutrophication

SHADOW LAKE 526.35 0 0 0 12 12

SHASTA LAKE 505.1 0 29480 20 0 29500 AC Yes Fish k i l l s

SHAVER LAKE 540.25 0 0 0 2177 2177

SHRINER LAKE 532.60 0 0 0 3 3

SlSKIYOU LAKE 525.22 430 0 0 0 430

SLY CREEK RES 518.23 0 562 0 0 562

SMITH LAKE 518.34 0 0 0 80 80

SNAG LAKE (BUTTE CO) 518.60 0 98 0 0 98

SNAG LAKE (SIERRA 518.33 0 20 0 0 20 CO

SNAKE LAKE 518.52 0 100 0 0 100

I Page 164


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Won-Point

. . . x x x

. X .

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Oual i tv Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water BodY Name Unit # @oJ mediate I m i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Prob(em/Need Descr id ion

SOLANO LAKE 511.20 0 125 0 0 125

SPAULDING LAKE 517.34 676 0 0 0 676

SPIDER LAKE 514.46 0 0 0 62 42

STAR LAKE 518.44 0 0 0 90 90

STAR LAKES (N) 537.40 0 0 0 2 2 ( LOUER )

STERLING LAKE 517.34 0 0 0 112 112

S T W GORGE RES 522.22 0 1274 0 0 1274

STRAUBERRY LAKE 560.51 0 0 0 6 6

SUCCESS LAKE 555.12 0 2400 0 0 2600

SUMMIT LAKE (1) 536.20 0 0 0 7 7 (ALPINE)

SUMMIT LAKE (2) 534.50 0 0 0 13 13 (FRESNO)

SWAMP LAKES (W) 552.34 0 0 0 12 I 2

SWAN LAKE 526.35 0 0 0 11 11

Sedimentation Threat o f recreational impects

Page 165


Federal L.ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Won-Point

SlAlL UAltR WLSDllWCLS CONTROL BUAHII l W 4 W A l t R QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23l94


Federal L i s t s

Uater Q u a l i t y Condi t ion Hydro I n t e r - - Total - Fact -

Water Body&! $it #_Coo d d i a t e l m a i r d UnLnoe Units K e r f Problem/Need Oescr ip t ion

THERMALfTO AFTERBAY 515.40 0 4550 0 0 4550

THERMAL I TO TORTRAY 515.40 0 330 0 0 330

1HOnPSON LAKE 518.42 0 0 U 5 5

THREE LAKES (NU) 518.42 0 0 0 16 16

THURSTON LAKE 513.51 0 500 0 0 500

TULARE LAKE 558.30 o o o 6nnno ~ n o o o

TULE LAKE 526.43 0 320 0 0 320

TULLOCH LAKE

TUlN LAKES ( N )

TWIN LAKES ( S )

UNION RESERVOIR

UNION VALLEY

VCE LAKE

VERNON LAKE

VOGELSANG LAKE

1260

10

10

147

2860

40

45

15

Page 166

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMUT


Water Qual i ty Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name - Unit # mediate I n w i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i ~ t i o n

UACA LAKE 514.35 0 0 0 5 5

WAHOO LAVl.5 (NU) 540.4U 0 0 O 10 1 I1

WALTON LAKES 540.40 0 0 0 2 2

uesl VAI I.I'V LAKI e8i'h.81 5 II vro o 11 Ulll

VISION LAKE 552.33 0 0 0 1025 1025

WISKEVTW RES 524.61 0 3151 100 0 3251 AC Yes Rccreat ionat impacts Col i.form bacteria

WRIGHT LAKES (NU) 554.24 0 0 0 5 5

URIGHTS LAKE 514.33 65 0 0 0 65

YWA RESERVOIR 516.32 0 0 0 8 8

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Non-Point

Page 167



Federal L i s t s

Uatcr Quai i tyJt-@ii t_lp_n

Inter: lotnl FI~I 1

1,111ul nw.cllnt.r J~q!nlr~cl I r i L t t ~ ~ u ~ i '.t r r \It11 1 % !~l~t.rI

AH€RICAN RIVER, LOWER

Toxic bioassay resul ts Threat of elevated f i s h t issue Levels Elevated mercury levels

Won-Point X . X

AMERICAN RIVER, MIDDLE FORK

AMERICAN RIVCR, NORTH FORK

AMERICAN RIVER, SOUTH FORK

ANTELOPE CREEK (SACRAMENTO)

ARCADE CREEK

ATKINS CREEK

BAILEY CREEK

BATTLE CREEK

. . . Non-Point . . . Inadequate flows, high teaperature

Fisheries habitat degredatim

BEAR CREEK (R5) Threat t o f isher ies habi ta t Inadequate flows

Ron-Point . . .

BEAR CREEK (SAW 0 0 0 66 66

Page 168

*+yl$ -* %P

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER PVALlTV ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quali ty Condition Inter-

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro

Water Body Name Unit # JOAQN )

Total - Fact - Site Units Sheet ---

Inadequate flows, high tenperature Fisheries habitat degradation

Won-Point . . . BEAR RIVER (FEATHER) 515.10

BEAR RIVER 532.60 (MOKELUMNE

B f G CHIC0 CREEK 509.10

BURNEV CREEK 526.32 Threat t o fisheries habitat Inadequate flows

Won-Point

BUTTE CREEK 520.00 Inadequate flows, no f i sh screens Non-Point Fisheries habi t a t degradation

Threat of elevated f i sh tissue Levels Won-Point Threat t o fisheries habitat Inadequate flows

CACHE CREEK 51 1.30 124 M I Yes

Fisheries habitat degradation Won-Point lnadequete f l o w

CALAMRAS RlVER 533.00

CANTUA CREEK 551.10 10 Ves Threat t o aquatic L i fe Agricultural waeteweter

Non-Point

CHERRY CREEK 536.51 0 1 0 0 1 M I Threat to fisheries habitat Inadequate flows

Non-Point

Page 169



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua1 i t y Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate lmpai red Unknonn Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t ion -- Hydro Unit # Water Body Name

CHIC0 CREEK 0 1 0 0 1 nl Threat t o f isheries habitat Inndcquate flows

Won-Point . . .

Threat t o aquatic habitat Inadequate f lous Loss of f i s h and ui l d l i f e habi ta t

CHOUCHILLA RIVER Yon-Point . . .

0 19 0 0 19 n1 Yes Sedimntation CHURN CREEK

CLAVEY RIVER

CLEAR CREEK (RS) Threat t o aquatic habitat Inadequate f l o w Gravel mining

Won-Point

Non-Point COLUSA DRAIN 0 0 70 0 70 n1 Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Toxic bioassay results Toxic bioassay results

COSUMNES RIVER

COTTONWOOD CREEK Fishcries habitat degradation Gravel mining Agricultural wastewater

Non-Point

Yon-Point Fisheries habitat degradation Insuf f ic ient date t o confirm Aquatic l i f e impairment

COU CREEK

Page 170

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD l W 6 WATER WALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition Hvdro - Inter-

Water Body Name - Unit # - mediate lm~aired Unknown Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ProbZem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i ~ I I ---

CRYSTAL CREEK (RS) 524.63 0 0 0 1 1 M I Insuff icient data Won-Point . . . DEER CREEK 504.20 61 10 0 0 (SACRAMENTO)

Fisheries habitat degradation Inadequate flous Poor f i sh passage

Won- Point . . .

DEER CREEK (TULARE) 555.20 0 58 0 0 58 Threat of f i sh population decline Won-Point . . . Point X . . DELTA (S.J. AT 563 .OO 0 0 1 0

ANTIOCH) 1 M I Yes Dioxin discharge

Elevated f i sh tissue levels Sediment c r i t e r i a exceeded

DIGGER CREEK 507.12 0 3 0 0 3 M I Threat to fisheries habitat Inadequate flows

Won-Point . . .

DINKEY CREEK 552.33 23 0 0 0

DOLLY CREEK 518.54 0 0 1 0

. . . Point 8 Won-Point X . K 1 M I Yes Aquatic impairment

Hunan health impairment nine drainage

DOUNlE RIVER 517.33 20 0 0 0

DRY CREEK 519.21 0 37 0 0 (SACRAMENTO)

Won-Point WNN CREEK 543.00 0 0 9 0 9 M I Yes Objectives violated Fish population decline Elevated mercury levels

Page 171

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUAL I T Y ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 5 Rivers and Strearns

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i tv Condition In te r - - Total - Fact -

Goad mediate l m ~ a i r e d Unknown Size Units Sheet ProMem/#eed Description -- Hydro

Water Body Name Un i t #

ELDER CREEK @ GERBER 504.20

ETICUERA CREEK 0 1 0 0 1 M I Threat t o aquatic l i f e Heavy metals Insuf f ic ient data

Non-Point . . .

FALL RIVER (FEATHER) 518.32

FALL R l M R (PIT) 526.40

. . . Non-Point X . X 0 0 25 0 25 HI Yes Sedimentatioq

Eutrophication Fisheries habitat degradation

FEATHER RIVER, LOWER 519.22

FEATHER RIVER, M FK 518.30

0 0 60 0 60 M I Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Toxic bioassay resul ts

Non-Point X . X

0 83 30 0 113 M I Recreational inpacts Sedimentation

Non-Point . . .

FEATHER RIVER, N FK 518.40 31 66 0 0 97 M I Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Fisheries habitat inpairwent Inadequate f loys, sedimentation

Uon-Poi n t . . .

FEATHER RIVER, N FK, 518.53 E BRANCH

0 0 100 0 100 MI Fish population decline Non-Point . . X

FEATHER RIVER, S FK 518.20 . . . Won-Point x . X FRENCH RAVINE 116.32 0 0 1 0 1 M I Yes Bacteria objectives v io la ted

Page 172

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD lW4 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9 '

Problem Source 0 - Water Qual i ty Condition

Inter- - @oJ mediate Impaired Unknown

Hvdro Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet -7-

Water Body Name

FRESNO RIVER Fisheries habitat degradation Inadequate flows

Non-Point . . .

GARZAS CREEK

GRINDSTONE CREEK

. . . Non-Point . . . Elevated metals concerns

lnsuf f icient data

HARLEY GULCH 8 M I Yes Objectives violated Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of elevated f i sh tissue levels

Non-Point X . X

HAT CREEK Fisheries habitat degredat ion l nadequa te f lows

Non-Point . . .

Fish k i l l s Fish population decline Objectives violated

HORSE CREEK 2 M I Yes Non- Point X . X

Fish population decline Heavy metals Mine drainage

HUMBUG CREEK 9 HI Yes Non-Point X . X

HUNTING CREEK

INDIAN CREEK (R5)

1 M I Yes Limited sampling Elevated metals

Non-Point

Non-Point 50 M I Yes Sedimentation Threat t o aquatic habitat

Page 173

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSES!24ENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Voter Qua l i t y Condition Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # @ mediate Impaired Unknown Sire Units Shcct Problem/Need Description

JAMES CREEK 512.24 0 0 6 0 6 HI Yes Fish population decline Elevated f i s h t issue Levels Mine drainage

KAlAKA CREEK 517.42 0 0 1 0 1 M I Yes Drinking water impairment Threat of f i s h population decline Mine drainage

KAVEAH RIVER (LOVER) 553.40 0 3 9 0 0 39

KAUEAH RIVER (UPPER) 553.40 0 38 0 0 38

KERN RIVER (LOVER) 554.40 0 74 0 0 74

KERN RIVER (UPPER) 554.40 0 90 0 0 90

Loss of f i s h and w i l d l i f e habi ta t Inadequate flows

Fisheries habitat degradation lnedequete flows

Fisheries habitat degradation lnadequate flows

Fisheries habi t e t degradation lnadequate flows

KINGS RIVER (LOWER) 551.90 65 0 30 0 95 MI Yes Objectives v io la ted Elevated f i s h t issue Levels

KINGS RIVER (MAIN 551.90 0 81 0 0 81 Yes S e d i m t a t i o n FORK) Degraded f i s h habitat

Inadequate flows

KINGS RIVER (UPPER 551.90 0 38 0 0 38 N. F O R K )

Page 174

Degraded f i s h habi ta t lnadequate flows

zo-oma 1

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point X . X

Won- Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

STATE UATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALITY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94

Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oualitv Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknoun Size Units Sheet ~roblem/~eed Descriot im -- Hvdro


LINDA CREEK 519.21 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Threat of PCBs Aquatic l i f e inpeirment

Won-Point . . .

LITTLE BACKBONE 506.20 CREEK

2 0 1 0 3 MI Yes Fish k i l l s Fish population decline Objectives violated

Non-Point x . x

LITTLE BUTTE CREEK 521.30 0 8 0 0 8 nl Yes Sedimentation Nutrients

LITTLE CLIPPER CREEK 516.34 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Threat of f i sh population decline Non-Point Threat of elevated f i sh tissue levels

LITTLE CW CREEK 507.33 16 15 2 0 33 MI Yes Fish population decline nine drainege

Non-Point

LITTLE GRIZZLY CREEK 518.54 0 0 10 0 10 MI Yes Fish population decl int nine drainage

Non-Point

0 1 0 0 1 M I Limited information Won-Point No iapairments t o beneficial uses

LITTLE PANOCHE CREEK

LITTLE WLF CREEK 516.32 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Threat of f i sh population decline Nan-Point Objectives violated.

0 0 15 0 15 M I Yes Fish population decline Dairies

Non-Point LONE TREE CREEK 531.40

LOS GATOS CREEK (REG 559.20 0 4 1 0 0 41 Yes Threat of drinking water impairment Won-Point

Page 115



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Uater Qua1 i t y Condition In te r - -


Uater Body Name

5

Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet ---

MAR1 POSA CREEK 538.00 12

24 M I Yes Non-Point MARSH CREEK 543.00 Objectives v io la ted

Fish population decl ine Elevated f i sh t issue levels

MCCLOUD RIVER 505.24

MERCED RIVER, LOUER 535.00

60 M I Yes

90 M I Yes

Sedimentation Won-Point

Non-Point Elevated f i s h t issue levels Toxic bioassay resul ts Pesticides

MERCED RIVER, UPPER 537.00

MIDDLE CREEK 508.10

MIDDLE RIVER 544.00

90

3 MI Yes

30 M I Yes

Sedimentation

Health advisories f o r Hg Elevated f i s h t issue l w e l s

MILL CREEK (1) 552.40

MILL CREEK (2) s 0 p . c ~

Limited sampling Non-Point

Non-Point Fisheries habitat degradation 1 nadequate f \ow

MOKELUMNE RIVER, 531 -20 LOUER

28 M I Yes Fish k i l l s Acid mine drainage, low flows Elevated metals levels

Non-Point

Page 176



Water Quality Condition Hvdro - Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # a mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet ProblemINeed Desc r i~ t i on

MOKELUWNE RIVER, 532.60 83 1 0 56 140 UPPER

Fisheries habitat degradation Inadequate flows

SLOUGH 541 -20 0 0 16 0 16 M I Yes Aquatic l i f e inpairrnents Seleniun, TDS, boron Pesticides, tox ic i ty

NATOMAS EAST MAIN 519.22 0 0 12 0 12 HI Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels DRAIN Toxic bioassay results

Aquatic l i f e iapeirments

OLD RIVER 544 .OO 0 0 68 0 68 M I Yes Health advisory fo r mercury Elevated f i sh tissue levels

ORESTIMBA CREEK 541.10 0 0 3 0 3 MI Yes Toxic biaassey resul ts Threat of f i sh k i l l s Pesticides

OVENS CREEK 535.70 0 0 0 55 55

PANOCHE CREEK 0 0 1 0 1 M I Yes Sedimentation Seleniun Aquatic l i f e Cmpeirment

PIT RIVER 506.00 0 200 0 0 200 M I Sedimentation Eutrophication Fisheries habitat degradation


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point X . X

Won-Point X . X

Won-Point X . X

Won-Point X . X

Nm-Point

Non-Point

Page I??



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Probl ern Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In ter -


Water Body Name - Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

PORT OF STOCKTDN 544.00 1 M I Yes Elevated f i s h tissue levels Aquatic l i f e impairment Dioxin

Won-Point X . X

POSO CREEK 555.50

PUTAH CREEK 511.10

Won-Point . . . Won-Point . . . Fisheries habitat degradation

Inadequate flows

RE0 BANK CREEK 504.23 23

5

17

65

50 M I Yes

RISING RIVER 526.34

ROhRING RIVER 552.34

RUBICON RIVER 514.40

Won-Point SACRAMENTO R. (SHASTA 508.10 DAM TO RED BLUFF)

Fish k i l l s Elevated f i s h tissue levels Spauning impairment

SACRAMENTO RIVER 511.20 (ABOVE SHASTA LAKE)

SACRAMENT0 RIVER 500.00 (RED BLUFF TO DELTA)

185 M I Yes Drinking water inpairment Elevated f i s h t issue levels Toxic bioassay resu l t s

Won-Point

Page 178

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALITV ASSESSUENT Report Date : 05/23/94


federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - S i z e -

Hvdro Unit #

Fact - Sheet - Water Bodv Name

SACRAWENTO SLOUGH


Ves Elevated f i sh tissue levels Toxic bioassay results

Non-Point X . X

Aquatic l i f e inpairments Seleniun, TDS, boron Pesticides, toxic i ty

SALT SLOUGH

Drinking water impairment Threat of f ish population decline

SAW CARLOS CREEK Ves

Ves

Non-Point

Yon-Point SAW JOAQUIN RIVER Fish population decline Elevated f i sh tissue levels Toxic bioassay results

i SPANISH CREEK

SPRING CREEK Yes Fish k i l l s Fish population decline Toxic bioassay results

Non-Point

ST JOHNS RIVER Yes

Yes STANISLAUS RIVER (LMR

Elevated f i sh tissue levels Toxic bioessay results Pesticides

Non-Point

Non-Point STANISLAUS RIVER (UPPER)

Fisheries habitat ffegredetion Inadequate flows

Page 179

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSHENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quality Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---


STONY CREEK

=FUR CREEK 7 M I Yes Drinking water impairment Fish population decline Objectives violated

Non-Point

24 Yes

10 M I Yes

Elevated f i sh tissue levels Non-Point

Won-Point

SUTTER BYPASS

TEMPLE CREEK Fish population decline Elevated salt, #H3 Dairies

THOMES CREEK

T O M CREEK

61

3 M I Yes Non-Point Fish population decline Objectives violated Mine drainage

TULE RIVER (LWER)

TULE RIVER (PIT)

TULE RIVER (UPPER) Fisheries habitat degradation Inadequate flows

Won-Poi n t

Uon-Point Elevated f i sh tissue levels' Toxic bioassay results Pesticides

TUOLUMNE RIVER (LOMR)

32 M I Yes

Page 180

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALlTY ASSESSMENT


Water Quality Condition Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Bodv Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr i~ t ion

TUOLLJMNE RIVER 536.30 90 9 0 0 W M I Fisheries habitat degradation (UPPER) Inadequate f lous

High tenperatures

TURLOCK I R R DST 535.50 0 0 7 0 7 MI Yes Toxic bioassay results LATERAL #5 Threat of f i sh population decline

Pesticides

WEST SQUAW CREEK 505.10 6 0 2 0 8 M l Yes Fish k i l l s Fish population decline Objectives violated

WHITE RIVER 555.30 0 0 0 55 55

I I WILLW CREEK (HADERA 540.21 0 24 0 0 24 Yes Threat of recreational inpacts I COUNTY

UILLOU CREEK 524.63 12 0 3 0 15 HI Yes Fish population decline (WISKEYTOUW) Heavy metals, acid

Mine drainage

WBA RIVER, LOWER 515.30 14 19 0 0 33 MI Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Fisheries habitat degradation Low f low, warm water

WBA RIVER, MIDDLE 517.40 47 16 0 0 63

YUBA RIVER, N FK 517.50 57 1 0 0 58 Fisheries habitat degradation Inadequate flows


Federal L ists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 6 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Won-Point X . X

Non-Point

. . . Won-Point . . .

Uon-Point X . X

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Page 181



Federal L i s t s

Water Ouality Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet ProbLem/Ueed D e s c r i ~ t i a n

YUBA RIVER. S FK 517.30 36 27 0 0 63

Page 182

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Probtem Source D

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESMNT Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 5 Uet 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

Hvdro Water Body Name Uni t #

ASH CREEK WA

BERENDA SLOUGH 545.20

BUTTE SINK FUHA

CINDER FLATS UA

COLUSA NUR

GRASSLANDS MARSHES 541.20

Water Qual i ty Condition In te r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet ---

0

215

435

100

2569

8224 AC Yes

GRAY LWGE WA

KERN NUR

KESTERSON NUR

U S BANOS WA

LOUER SHERMAN ISLAND

nENDOTA NUR

I3ERCED NUR

noDoc NUR

Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n

Aquatic l i f e inpeirment Ui l d l i f e iapeiruent Health Advisories f o r Selenira

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Page 183

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESWENT Report Date : 05/23/94 .

Region 5 Uet l ands

Federal L is ts

Uater Ouali t v Condition Hydro - Inter- - Fact

Uater BodV Name Unit # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Weed Description

liORFDN CHANNEL 544.00 0 0 1 0 1 AC Yes E leva ted f i sh t i ssue lwe ls Health advisory f o r Hg

naRmm SLOUGH 544.00 0 0 1 0 1 AC Yes E leva ted f i sh t i ssue lwe ls Health edvisory f o r Hg

PELEVAW IUR 0 0 0 3106 3106

RECLAWTION SLOUCH 520.10 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Elevatedfishtissuelevels

SACRAMENT 0 NUR 0 0 0 6150 6150

SAH LUIS IUR 0 0 0 2666 2666

W E R NUR 0 0 0 2497 2497

MLTA UA 0 0 0 2600 2600

Page 184

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Won-Point X . X

Won-Point X . X

Ion-Point



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condition I n t e r -


Water Body Name U n i t # Totel - Fact

Size Un i ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descript ion

ADOBE LAKE VALLEY 60 SQMl Local h igh s a l i n i t y

36 SQMI Yes Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment L imi ted information avai lab le Na tu ra l l y ocurr ing trace elements

Non-Point . . . ANTELOPE VALLEY (NL) 631 -10

ANTELOPE VALLEY (SL) 626.00 1622 SQMI Yes M i l i t a r y impacts Fuel leak/VOC p o l l u t i o n Ground water overdraft

Won-Point

AVAWATZ VALLEY 70 Yes Ground water overdraft (See Langford Valley)

BICYCLE VALLEY 120 Yes Natural high s a l i n i t y . (see Langford Val ley)

Won-Point

BLACK SPRINGS VALLEY

BRIDGEPORT VALLEY 630.30

50

100 SQMl Yes Won-Poi nt Possible metals problems Threat o f dr ink ing uater impairment Fuel leaks/voc p o l l u t i o n

120 SQMl Yes L imi ted information avai lab le Ground uater overdraft High sa l in i t y /sa l tua te r in t rus ion

BROADUELL VALLEY 629.00

BROWN MOUNTAIN VALLEY

Page It36



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condit ion In te r - -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknown -- W r o

Water Body Name U n i t # Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet --- 10

27

3

2

17

6 SQMI

Problem/Need Descript ion

BULL FLAT

BUTTE VALLEY (REG 6)

BUTTERBREAD CANYON

CACTUS FLAT

CADY FAULT AREA

CADY SPRINGS 637.20 RECHARGE AREA.

Publ ic health concern Non- Point Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment Threat o f object ives v io la ted

CALIFORNIA VALLEY

CAMEO AREA

CARSON VALLEY 633.10

60

20

20 SQMI Yes

Natural high s a l i n i t y Non-Point

Possible wastewater inpacts Non-Point Possible agr i cu l tu ra l impacts Domestic water supply

Non-Point

Non-Point

CAVES CANYON VALLEY

COLES FLAT

COSO VALLEY

COTTONWOD SPRING A

100

8

50

15

Page 187

Natural high s a l i n i t y




Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # gooJ mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

COW HEAD LAKE VALLEY 0 0 0 7 7

COYOTE LAKE VALLEY 0 0 150 0 150 Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

CRONISE VALLEY 0 0 0 150 150 Yes (see Langford Val ley)

CUDDEBACK VALLEY 0 150 30 0 180 SQMI Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

DARWIN VALLEY 0 70 0 0 70 Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

DEATH VALLEY 609.00 0 0 1320 0 1320 SQMI Yes Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Possible water diversions Natura l ly occurring t race elements

3 3 3 O t l 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

. . . Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

DEEP SPRINGS VALLEY 40 0 0 0 40 Local h igh f luo r ide Non-Point

DENNING SPRING VALLEY

0 18 0 0 18 Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Non-Point

DOC VALLEY 635.10 0 1 1 5 7 SQMI Yes Some wel ls wi th high arsenic Non-Point Possible water d ivers ion f o r export Fuel leaks/VOC p o l l u t i o n

DRY VALLEY 0 0 0 9 9

EAGLE LAKE AREA 637.31 0 0 2 20 22 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment Domestic water supply Publ ic heal th concern

Non-Point

Page 188



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua l i t y Condition Hydro - Inter- Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknom

Total - Fact Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description

Natural high sa l i n i t y

Uater Body Name

EL MIRAGE VALLEY

EUREKA VALLEY

FISH LAKE VALLEY

Non-Point . . .

Natural high sa l i n i t y Possible radioact iv i ty

Non-Poi n t . . .

5

330 SQMI

FISH SLOUGH VALLEY

FREMONT VALLEY

. . . Non-Point . . . Natural high sa l i n i t y

Ground uater overdraft Mining drainage

Natural high sa l i n i t y Non-Point . . . . . ,.

Non-Point . . .

FURNACE CREEK AREA

GOLD VALLEY

GOLDSTONE VALLEY

33

19

30 Yes Natural high sa l i n i t y (see Langford Val ley)

(see Langford Val ley) GRANITE MOUNTAIN A

GRASS VALLEY

GRASSHOPPER VALLEY

GREENUATER VALLEY

HARPER VALLEY

3 Yes

30

24

150

510

Page 189

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . . Non-Point . . . Natural high sa l i n i t y



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In te r -


Water Body Name Un i t # Fact -

Size Uni ts Sheet Problern/Need Descript ion --- HARRISBURG FLATS

HARVEY VALLEY

HIDDEN VALLEY (REG

6

490 SQMl Yes Agr icu l tura l wastewater M i l i t a r y impacts Drinking water impairment

Won-Point HONEY LAKE VALLEY 637.10

HORSE LAKE VALLEY

INDIAN MLLS VALLEY 520 Yes Drinking water impairment Natural high s a l i n i t y Ground uater overdraft

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

IVANPAH VALLEY 612.00 120 100 80 0 300 SQMl Natural high s a l i n i t y

KANE WASH AREA 0 0 0 15 15

KELSO LANDER VALLEY

KELSO VALLEY


LANGFORD VALLEY 0 0 50 0 50 Yes Drinking water impairment Natural high s a l i n i t y M i l i t a r y impacts

Page 190



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i t v Condition Hydro Inter- U n i t # @oJ mediateImairedUnknoun

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

70 Yes Natural high s a l i n i t y (see Langford Valley)

Non-Point . . . LEACH VALLEY

55

1 Yes

LEE FLAT

LEVIATHAN MINE AREA Acid mine drainage Metals (see Bryant Creek)

Non-Point

LITTLE ANTELOPE VALLEY

Won-Point . . . LONG VALLEY (NL) 28 SQMl Yes Agricultural drainage Possible n i t r a t e drainage Ground water overdraft

LONG VALLEY (SL)

LOST LAKE VALLEY . . . Won-Point . . . Natural high s a l i n i t y L M R KINGSTON

VALLEY

Drinking water impairment Natural high s a l i n i t y M i 1 i t a r y impacts

Non-Point . . . LOWER MOJAVE RIVER VALLEY

300 SQMI Yes

Page 191

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMEN1 Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion In te r -


Uater Body Name Un i t # Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descript ion

MADELINE PLAINS 638.00 270 SQMl High sa l in i ty /sa l twater in t rus ion Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment Limited information avai lab le

Non-Point . . .

MARBLE CANYON AREA

MARTIS VALLEY 635.20

30

25 SQMI Yes

. . . Won-Point . . . Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment

Publ ic heal th concerns Domestic water supply

MESQUITE VALLEY Natural high s a l i n i t y Non-Point . . . Won-Point . . . MIDDLE AMARGOSA

VALLEY Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

MIDDLE MOJAM RIVER 628.30 VALLEY

Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Fuel leaks/VOC p o l l u t i o n Indus t r ia l discharges

Non-Point . . .

MIDDLE PARK CANYON 5

100 SQMI Yes

. . . Non-Point . . . Limited information avai lab le

High sa l i n i t y /sa l tua te r inst rus ion MODOC PLATEAU PVA 637.40 (REG 6)

MODOC PLATEAU RVA (REG 6)

Page 192

(a, zo-nrnaI

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Hydro Water Body Name U n i t #

MONO VALLEY 601 .OO

OWENS VALLEY 603.00

W L LAKE VALLEY

PAHRUMP VALLEY

PAINTERS FLAT

PANAMINT VALLEY 620.00

PILOT KNOB VALLEY

PINE CREEK VALLEY

RACE TRACK VALLEY

RED PASS VALLEY

RHODES HILL AREA

RlGGS VALLEY

Uater Qual i ty Condition In te r - - Fact -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Uni ts Sheet -- 0 82 0 168 250 SQMI Yes

0 0 1030 0 1030SQMI Yes

0 0 0 33 33

400 0 0 0 400

0 0 0 9 9

0 359 1 0 360 SQMI

200 0 0 0 200

0 0 0 9 . 9

0 0 0 15 15

0 0 0 150 150 Yes

0 0 0 23 23

0 0 100 0 1 00

Page 193

Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

Threat o f d r ink ing water inpairment Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Uater diversions

Ground uater overdraft Dr ink ing water impairment Fuel leaks/VOC p o l t u t i o n

Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Mining drainage M i l i t a r y impacts

(see Langford Val ley)

Natural h igh sa l i 'n i t y

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

. . . Non-Point . . .



Federal L i s t s

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Water Body .Name U n i t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

ROSE VALLEY 60 0 0 0 60

SALINE VALLEY 0 0 1 209 210 Natural high s a l i n i t y

SALT WELLS VALLEY 0 0 0 30 30

SANTA ROSA FLAT 0 0 0 40 40

SEARLES VALLEY 621 .OO 0 0 1 249 250 SQMI

SECRET VALLEY

SILVER LAKE VALLEY

SLINKARD VALLEY

I n d u s t r i a l discharges Mining drainage Natural high s a l i n i t y


0 0 0 11 11 Yes Possible r a d i o a c t i v i t y problems Possible metals problems (see West Walker River)

SODA LAKE VALLEY 90 0 500 0 .590 Natural high s a l i n i t y

SPRING CANYON VALLEY 0 0 0 12 12

SQUAW VALLEY 635.20 0 0 1 2 3 SQMI Yes Arsenic Pesticides/herbicides Uasteuater irrgacts/leaking UGTs

SUPERIOR VALLEY 0 90 80 0 1 70 Natural h igh sat i n i t y

Page 194

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non- Poi n t . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Poi nt



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Q u a l i t y Condit ion In te r - -

G o o d mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro

Water Body Name U n i t # Fact -

Size Uni ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

Non-Point . . . SURPRISE VALLEY 641 -00 350 SQMI Ground water overdraft Na tu ra l l y occurr ing trace elements Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment

SUEETUATER FLAT

TAHOE VALLEY-NORTH 634.20

5

4 SQMl Yes

. . . Non-Point . . . Drinking water impairment

Fuel leaks/VOC p o l l u t i o n Na tu ra l l y occurr ing trace elements

Non-Point TAHOE VALLEY-SOUTH 634.10 21 SQMl Yes Dr ink ing water impairment Toxic po l lu tan ts Fuel leaks/VOC p o l l u t i o n

TEHACHAPI VALLEY, EAST

TROY VALLEY Non-Point Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

TULEDAD CANYON AR

Threat o f d r ink ing water inpairment Publ ic heal th concerns Popular recreat ion area

Non-Point TWIN LAKE AREA 630.40 5 SQMl Yes

270 Non-Point Natural h igh s a l i n i t y UPPER KINGSTON VALLEY '

Page 195



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3

Hydro Water Body Name Un i t #

UPPER UOJAVE RIVER 628.20 VALLEY

UILD HORSE MESA A

UI LDROSE CANYON

UILLOU CREEK VALLEY

UINGATE VALLEY

Uater Qua l i t y Condition In te r -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion --- 625 SQMI Yes M i l i t a r y impacts

Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment Ground water overdraft

Possible n i t r a t e problem

Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

Page 196

0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point



Water B& Name Hydro U n i t #

ADOBE RES 602.00

AGNEU LAKE 601 .OO

ALGER LAKES 601 .OO

ALTA MORRIS LAKE 634.10

ANGORA LAKES 634.10

ARROUBEAR LAKE 628.00

ARROUHEAD LAKE 603.00

ASA LAKE 632.10

BARNEY LAKE 630.40

BIGPINESLAKES2 603.20

BIG PINES LAKES 6 603.20

BIRCHIM LAKE 603.20

Water Q u a l i t y Condition I n t e r - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate I-ired Unknown Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion -- 0 0 n 0 77 AC W i ld l i f e habi ta t impaired

0 0 0 40 40 AC Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion (see Mono Lake)

0 0 0 114 114 AC Yes (see Mono Lake)

0 0 0 6 6 AC Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

0 0 0 23 23 AC Yes Possible eutrophicat ion Popular recreat ion area (see Lake Tahoe)

0 0 0 12 12 AC Yes (see Owens ~ i v e r )

0 2 0 0 2 AC Yes Possible eutrophicat ion (see Carson River, E Fk)

0 14 0 0 ' 14 AC Yes Possible a c i d i f i c a t i o n (see East Ualker River)

0 0 0 28 28 AC Yes (see Ouens River)

0 0 0 7 7 Yes (see Owens River)

0 0 0 4 4 AC Yes (see Ouens River)


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 197



Federal L i s t s

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Bocb Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

BLACK LAKE 602.00 0 0 60 0 60 AC W i l d l i f e habi ta t impaired

BLUE LAKE (R6) 601 .OO 0 0 0 2 2 AC Yes (see Mono Lake)

BOCA RES 636.00 0 980 0 0 980 Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion Impacts o f recreat ional use (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

BOOT LAKE 638.00 0 0 0 600 600 AC

BRIDGEPORT RES 630.30 0 0 3000 0 3000 AC Yes Sedimentation Recreational impacts Eutrophicat ion

BUCKLEY PONDS 603.20 0 0 0 90 90 AC Yes (seeOuensRiver)

BURNSIDE LAKE 632.10 0 0 0 7 7 AC Yes (see Carson River, E Fk)

CAGWIN LAKE 634.00 0 0 0 2 2 AC Yes Possibleimpactsofrecreation (see Lake Tahoe)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . X X

. . . Non-Point . X .

Won-Point

Non-Point

CARIBOU LAKE 637.20 0 0 0 90 90 AC Yes (see Honey Lake)

CASCADE LAKE 634.10 0 0 0 225 225 AC Yes Threat o f eutrophicat ion Non-Point Threat o f d r ink ing uater impairment (see Lake Tahoe)

Page 198

. . a

X X X

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Good mediate Inpaired Unknoun -- Hydro Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

CONVICT LAKE 1 68 Yes Possible nutr ient loading from past septic system discharges (see Owens River)

Non-Point . . .

COTTONWOOD LAKES

COXEY POND

CROWLEY LAKE

96 AC Yes

1 AC

5280 AC Yes

(see Owens River)

Non-Point Possible arsenic problems Possible vessel waste problems (see Owens River)

CRYSTAL LAKE (R6)

DARDANELLES LAKE

4 AC Yes

12 AC Yes

(see Mono Lake)

Non-Point

Non-Point

Possible impacts of recreation (see Lake Tahoe)

70 AC Yes Pub1 i c health concern (see Owens River)

DIAZ LAKE

DICKS LAKE 634.20 0 0 0 72 . 7 2 Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

DODGE RES 628.00 0 0 0 480 480 AC

DONNER LAKE 635.20 0 960 0 0 960 AC Yes Threat of drinking water impairment Threat of eutrophication Urban runoff

Point 8 Won-Point . X .

DOROTHY LAKE (1) 632.10 0 0 0 2 2

Page 199



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i ty Condition Inter-



Total Size Units --

150 AC

460 AC

19 AC

FacZ - Sheet - Problem/Need Oescr i~ t ion

(see Owens River) DOROTHY LAKE (2) 603.10 Yes

DUNN RES 638.00

Possible impacts of recreation Threat of eutrophication (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point

Non-Point

EAGLE LAKE (1 ) 634.10 Yes

Fish k i l l s Elevated f i s h tissue levels Eutrophication

X X X EAGLE LAKE (2) 637.30 Yes

Yes

Yes

(see Wens River) EASTERN BROOK LAKES 603.20

Threat of eutrophication Non-Point Threat of drinking water impairment Fluctuating water levels

ECHO LAKES UPPER & 634.10 LOUER

Hydrologic modification (see Mono Lake)

Non-Point ELLERY LAKE ,601 .OO Yes

FAIRMONT RES 626.00

FALLEN LEAF LAKE 634.10 Non-Point Yes Elevated f i s h tissue' levels Drinking uater impairment Threat of eutrophication

FERN LAKE 601 .OO Yes (see Mono Lake)

I Page 200


1 Lakes and Reservoirs Federal L i s t s

Uater Qua1 i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet

FONTANILLIS LAKE 634.10 0 0 0 27 27 Yes

GABLE LAKES 603.20 0 0 0 20 20 AC Yes

GEM LAKE 601 .OO 0 0 0 275 275 AC Yes

GIBBS LAKE 601 .OO 0 0 0 8 8 AC Yes

GILMORE LAKE 634.10 0 0 0 78 78 AC Yes

GRANITE LAKE (R6) 634.10 0 0 0 7 7 AC Yes

GRANT LAKE 601 .00 0 0 1095 0 10% AC Yes

GRASS LAKE (1 ) 634.10 0 0 0 20 20 Yes

1 GRASS LAKE (2) 634.10 0 0 0 360 360 Yes

I GREEN L A ~ S 630.40 0 0 0 56 56 AC Yes

I GREEN VALLEY LAKE 628.00 0 0 0 22 22 AC


(see Lake Tahoe)

(see Owens River)

Hydrologic modifications (see Mono Lake)

(see Mono Lake)

Popular recreation area Threat o f eutrophication (see Lake Tahoe)

(see Lake Tahoe)

Recreational impacts Elevated f i s h tissue levels Hydrologic modification

Possible eutrophication (see Lake Tahoe)

Possible highway runoff impacts Possible impacts of recreation (see Lake Tahoe)

(see East Walker River)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non- Point . . .

Won-Point x X X

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 201



Federal L i s t s

Uater Body Name

GULL LAKE

HAIWEE RES

HALF MOON LAKE

HALLSIDE RES

HAROLD RES

HARTSON LAKE

HEATHER LAKE

HEENAN LAKE

HILTON LAKES

HOG FLAT RES

HONEYMOON LAKE

Water Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact Uni t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

601 .OO 0 65 0 0 65 AC Yes Popular recreation area Eutrophication Urban runoff

603.30 0 0 0 1800 1800 AC Yes Mining drainage (see Owens River)

634.10 0 0 0 26 26 AC Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

603.20 0 0 0 1 1 AC Yes (see Ouens River)

637.20 0 0 0 500 500 AC Yes Agricultural drainage Geothermal impacts (see Honey Lake)

634.10 0 0 0 39 39 AC Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . X .

Non-Point

632.10 0 0 0 129 129 AC Yes Water diversion Non-Point Possible threatened species inpacts Natural ly occurring trace elements

603.10 0 0 0 185 185 AC Yes (see Owens River)

637.20 0 1000 0 0 1000 Yes Uater Diversion (see Honey Lake)

603.20 0 0 0 10 10 AC Yes (see Owens River)

Page 202



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water aual i tv Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Imnaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Unit #

630.40

637.40

603.10

Water Body Name

HOOVER LAKES (NEI

HORSE LAKE

HORSESHOE LAKE (1

11 Yes (see East Walker River)

Water diversion Non-Point

53 AC Yes Impacts of recreation (see Owens River)

Non-Point

Fish k i l l s Sedimentation

Non-Point HORSESHOE LAKE (2)

17 Yes

725 Yes

(see Owens River) HORTON LAKE (2)

INDEPENDENCE LAKE Threat of Rare 8 Endangered Species impe Non-Point Hydrologic modification . (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

INDIAN CREEK RES Eutrophication Recreational impacts

Point 8 Won-Point X X X

Non-Point . X .

Non-Point . X .

JACKSON LAKE 7 Yes Surface runoff Possible eutrophication

320 AC Yes Eutrophication Urban runoff (see Mono Lake)

JUNE LAKE

20 AC Yes (see Mono Lake) KIDNEY LAKE

Page 203

STATE WATER RESaURCES CONTROL BOARD 19% WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L is ts

Water Quali ty Condition In ter - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # @otJ mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

KMNIG LAKE 631 -40 0 7 0 0 7 AC Yes Possible ac id i f i ca t ion Possible eutrophication (see West Walker River)

LAKE ARROWHEAD 628.20 0 700 0 0 700 AC Yes Threat of drinking water impairment Threat of recreational impacts Possible metals problems

LAKE GEORGE 603.10 0 38 0 0 38 AC Yes Impacts of recreation possible metals problems (see Owens River)

LAKE GREGORY 628.20 0 0 0 120 120 Yes (see Mojave River)

LAKE LECONTE 634.10 15 0 0 0 15 AC Yes Threat of ac id i f i ca t ion (see Lake Tahoe)

LAKE MAMIE 603.10 19 0 0 0 19 Yes (see Owens River)

LAKE MARY 603.10 140 0 0 0 140 Yes Possible metals problems Impacts of recreation (see Owens River)

LAKE PALMDALE 626.00 0 0 0 288 288 AC Yes

LAKE TAHOE 634.00 0 0 120000 0 120000 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion Sedimentation Objectives violated

Page 204

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source - D

Won-Point . . .

Non-Point . X .

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Poi n t

. . . Point 8 Non-Point X X X



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua1 i ty Condition I&& - Inter- - Total Feet

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate I m i r e d Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

LAMARCK LAKE, UPPER 603.20 0 0 0 38 38 Yes (seeOwensRiver)

LARK SEEP LAGOON 624.20 1 0 0 0 1

LEAVITT LAKE 637.20 0 0 0 2560 2560 AC Yes (see Honey Lake)

Non-Point L l LY LAKE 634.10 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Eutrophication Possible septic system impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

LITTLE ROCK RES 626.00 0 0 0 104 104 AC Natural ly occurring trace elements

LONG LAKE (1) (INYO) 603.30 0 0 0 8 8 Yes (see Ouens River)

LOST LAKE 603.10 0 0 0 22 22 AC Yes (see Owens River)

LOST LAKE (El 633.20 0 0 0 8 8 AC

LUNDY LAKE 601 .OO 0 0 130 0 130 AC Yes ~ydrologic 'modi f icat ion Possible mining impacts (see Mono Lake1

Nan-Point

MARTIS CREEK RES 635.20 0 768 0 0 768 Yes Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue levels Non-Point Hydrologic modificaiton (see Truckee River)

MCCLOUD LAKE (R6) 603.10 0 0 0 10 10 AC Yes (see Owens River)

Page 205

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALlTY ASSESSMENT


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion I n t e r -


Uater Body Name U n i t #

Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

Non-Point . . . MCCOY FLAT RES 627.30 1800 Yes Uater d ive rs ion (see Honey Lake)

Non-Point . . . MElSS LAKE (R6) 633.20 18 Yes Eutrophicat ion Grazing impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

Eutrophicat ion (see Carson River E Fk)

Non-Point . . . NOBEL (NOBLE) LAKE 632.10 5 Yes

NORTH LAKE 603.20

ONEIDA LAKE 601 .OO

PINE LAKES 603.20

PLEASANT VALLEY RES 603.20

22 AC Yes

29 AC Yes

26 AC Yes

'115 Yes

(see Ouens River)

(see Mono Lake)

(see Ovens River)

Non-Point Eutrophicat ion Sedimentation (see Ovens River)

Hydrologic modi f icat ion (see Truckee River)

PROSSER RES 635.20 ,734 AC Yes Won- Point

Non-Point QUAIL LAKE 634.20 12 AC Yes Watershed disturbance (see Lake Tahoe)

16 AC Yes

1 AC Yes

Page 206

(see Lake Tahoe) RALSTON LAKE 634.10

RED LAKE (1) 603.10 (see Ovens River)



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater a ~ l i t y Condition Inter- -

Good mediate lnrpaired Unknom -- Hydro Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Uater Bod/ Name

RED LAKE ( 2 ) 1 Yes Hydrologic modification Highway runoff (see Carson River U Fk.)

Non-Point . . .

RIVER SPRING LAKE I I

ROCK CREEK LAKE 1 ROUND LAKE

200 AC

55 AC Yes

~ 4 1 AC Yes

(see Owens River)

Non-Point Possible impacts of recreation (see Lake Tahoe)

ROUND VALLEY RES

SABRINA LAKE

SADDLEBAG LAKE

420 AC

186 AC Yes

325 AC Yes

(see Owens River)

Hydrologic modification Possible impacts of recreation (see Mono Lake)

Non-Point

SAID RES 638.00 0 0 0 173 173 AC

I SAWILL POND (1) 603.20 1 0 0 0 1 Yes (see Ovens River)

i SAWILL POND ( 2 ) 634.10 0 1 0 0 1 Sedimentation

! SCOTTS LAKE 633.20 0 30 0 0 30 AC Sedimentation

Non-Point

Won-Point

SHELTON LAKE 603.10 0 0 0 12 12 AC Yes (see Ovens River)

Page 207



Federal L i s t s

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

SHERWIN LAKES 603.10 0 0 0 16 16 AC Yes (see Ouens River)

SILVER LAKE 637.20 0 0 0 110 110 Yes Threat o f eutrophicat ion Threat o f recreat ional impacts (see Honey Lake)

SILVER LAKE (1 601 -00 0 110 0 0 110 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion Sedimentation (see Mono Lake)

SILVER LAKES 628.30 0 0 0 400 400 AC

SILVERUOM) LAKE 628.20 1010 0 0 0 1010 Yes Possible mercury problem (see Mojave River)

SMOKE CREEK RES 639.00 0 0 0 100 100 AC

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . X .

Non-Point

I SOUTH LAKE 603.20 0 0 0 180 180 AC yes (see Wens River)

SPRING VALLEY LAKE 628.30 0 380 0 0 380 AC Sedimentat i o n

STAMPEDE RES 636.00 0 0 3444 0 3444 AC Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion Non-Point Lou leve ls a f fec t recreat ion use Elevated f i s h t issue level

SUSlE LAKE 634.10 0 0 0 37 37 AC Yes Possible impacts o f recreat ion Non-Point (see Lake Tahoe)

Page 208


Region 6 Lakes and Reservofrs

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i ty Condition Inter-

G o o d mediate I m i r e d Unknoun -- Total - Fact - Site Units Sheet ---


TAMARACK LAKE 20 AC Yes Possible impacts of recreation (see Lake Tahoe)

Won-Point . . .

Water diversion (see Ovens River)

Point . X . TINEMAHA RES 180 Yes

TIOGA LAKE 81 AC Yes Hydrologic modification (see Mono Lake)

Non-Point . . .

TOPAZ LAKE 2300 AC Yes Objectives violated Sedimentation (see West Walker River)

Non-Point X X X

TWIN LAKE, LOWER Eutrophication Drinking water impairment Elevated f i sh tissue levels

Non-Point

Yon-Point

Non-Point

X X X

Elevated f i sh tissue level Popular recreation area Sedimentat ion

TWIN LAKE, UPPER 265 AC Y e s x x x

3 AC Yes Popular recreation area Eutrophication Excessive plant growth

TWIN LAKES

19 AC Yes

37 AC

(see Ouens River) VALENTINE LAKE

VIRGINIA LAKES

Page 209



Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - TotaC - Fact

Uater Body Name U n i t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problern/Need Descr ip t ion

UALKER LAKE 601.00 0 0 0 87 87 AC Yes (see Mono Lake)

UAUGH LAKE 601.00 0 176 0 0 176 AC Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion (see Mono Lake)

WEBBER LAKE 636.00 0 0 0 225 225 AC Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

UIT-SO-NAH-PAH LAKE 603.10 0 0 0 5 5 Yes (see Owens River)

WOODS LAKES 603.10 0 0 0 5 5 AC Yes (see Owens River)

Page 210

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .



Uater Qual i ty Condit ion Hydro In te r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t XI Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

ADOBE CREEK (R6) 602.00 0 0 6 0 6 M I Fisheries hab i ta t degradation

ALDER CREEK 635.20 0 0 0 1 1 Yes (see Truckee River) '

AMARGOSA RIVER 609.00 0 140 58 0 198 Yes Sedimentation Natural h igh s a l i n i t y

ANGORA CREEK 634.10 0 8 0 0 8 M I Fisheries hab i ta t degradation

ASH CREEK 603.30 0 8 0 0 8 MI Yes Grazing inpacts (see Owens River)

ASPEN CREEK 632.10 0 0 4 0 4 Yes Objectives v io la ted Fish k i l l s (see Bryant Creek)

AURORA CANYON CREEK 630.30 0 0 13 0 13 MI Sedimentation

BAIRS CREEK 603.30 0 0 0 10 10 MI Yes (see Owens River)

BAKER CREEK 603.20 0 13 0 0 . 13 M I Yes Meadowdisturbance (see Owens River)

BALLS CREEK 637.10 0 0 0 6 6 M I

BARE CREEK 641.30 0 0 0 12 12 M I

BAXTER CREEK 637.20 0 15 0 0 15 MI Yes Agr i cu l tu ra l drainage (see Honey Lake)


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . X

. . . Non-Point X . X

Won-Point . . . Non-Point . . .

Won-Point X . X

Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

Page 211



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quali ty Condition Inter-

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Unit # Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

BEAR CREEK (R6) Sedimentation Hydrologic modification (see Truckee River)

Non-Point X . X 4 M I Yes

Grazing impacts Fish habitat degradation

Non-Point . . X BIDMLL CREEK

BIG MEADOW CREEK 7 M I Yes Possible grazing impacts Possible highway runoff impacts Fish habitat degradation

Non-Point . . .

16 M I Yes

16 HI Yes

(see Owens River) BIG PINE CANAL

BIG PINE CREEK Recreational impacts Uater diversions (see Owens River)

Non-Point.

BIG ROCK CREEK

BIRCH CREEK

15 M I

10 M I Yes Non-Point

Non-Point

Possible arsenic problem (see Owens River)

30 M I Yes Recreational impacts Water diversions (see Owens River)

BISHOP CREEK

10 M I Yes (see Ouens River) BISHOP CREEK CANAL

Page 212



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua1 i t v Condition In ter -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro Total - Fact -

Size Units Sheet --- Water Body Name

BLACKWOOD CREEK


8 M I Yes Objectives violated Sedimentation (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point X . X

6 MI Yes Grazing impacts Mining impacts Public health concerns

Non-Point X . X BODlE CREEK

BRALEY CREEK

BRONCO CREEK

5 M I

1 MI Yes

Fish habitat degradation Non-Point

Non-Point Sedimentation (see Truckee River)

BRYANT CREEK 10 M I Yes Objectives v io lated . Mining drainage Sedimentation

Point

BUCKEYE CREEK (R6) Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

21 HI Yes

. 5 M I Yes

5 M I Yes

5 M I

Grazing impacts (see East Ualker River) .

BURTON CREEK Threat of sedimentation (see Lake Tahoe)

BY-DAY CREEK Grazing impacts (see East Ualker River)

CABIN CREEK

Page 213



Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quality Condition Inter-

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro Unit #

Total - Fact Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Uater Body Name

CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT Cr i te r ia v io lat ions Possible metals problems

Non-Point . . .

CARNELIAN CANYON

CREEK Fisheries habita degradation Won-Point . . X

1 Yes

7 M I Yes

46 M I Yes

(see Lake Tahoe) CARNELIAN CREEK

CARROLL CREEK (see Owens River)

CARSON RIVER, E FK Elevated f i sh t issue levels Objectives violated Mining drainage

Won-Point

Non-Point CARSON RIVER, U FK 28 M I Yes Objectives v io lated Recreational impacts Grazing impacts

Grazing impacts (see Owens River)

CARTAGO CREEK

CASCADE CREEK (R6)

5 M I Yes

5 M I Yes Possible septic system problems Possible urban runoff impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point

Non-Point Possible metals problems (see Lake Tahoe)

CATHEDRAL CREEK 1 Yes

Page 214



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quality Condition lnter- - Total - Fact -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units sheet Problem/Need Desc r i~ t i on -- Hydro Unit #

641.30

Uater Body Name

CEDAR CREEK 0 9 0 0 9 M I Sedimentation Grazing impacts

CHENEY CREEK

CHIATOVICH CREEK

CLARK CANYON

0 0 0 7 7 M I Yes (see Honey Lake)

0 0 5 0 5 M I Yes Sedimentation Grazing impacts (see East Ualker River)

Non-Point

0 0 7 0 7 M I Yes Sedimentation Possible metals problems (see East Ualker River).

Non-Point

Non-Point

CLEARUATER CREEK

0 7 0 0 7 Yes Sedimentation Possible metals problems (see Lake Tahoe)

COLD CREEK

I COLD SPRING CREEK

COLD STREAM

. . . Non-Point . . . 0 1 0 7 8 M I Yes Sedimentation

(see Truckee River)

1 COLD WATER CREEK 0 0 0 7 7 M I Yes Possible metals problems (see Ovens River)

COLLINS CANAL 0 0 0 9 9 M I Yes (seeOuensRiver)

Page 215



Federal L i s t s

Water Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problern/Need Description

CONVICT CREEK 603.10 0 0 0 13 13 M I Yes (see Ouens River)

COTTONWOOD CANYON 603.20 0 0 0 5 5 M i Yes (see Ouens River)

COTTONUOOD CREEK ( 1 ) 603.30 0 0 7 8 15 M I Yes Water diversions Recreational impacts Grazing impacts

COTTONWOOD CREEK (2) 604.00

COTTONUOOb CREEK (3) 631 .OO

COXEY CREEK 628.00

COYOTE CREEK (R6) 603.20

CRAB CREEK 628.00

CROOKED CREEK 605.00

DART CREEK 628.00

DAVIES CREEK 636.00

1 Yes Possible metals problems Possible grazing impacts (see West Ualker River)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Non-Point

10 M I Yes (see Ouens River)

12 M I Yes Possible impacts of uatershed disturb- Non-Point ante (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

Page 216


Region 6 I Rivers and Streams

Uater Owl i t y Condition Hydro Inter-

Water Body Name Uni t # = mediate Impaired Unknoun

DEADMAN CREEK 603.00 0 0 0 12

DEEP CREEK (1) 628.00 15 0 0 0

DEEP CREEK (2) 631.30 0 0 0 9

DEEP CREEK (3) 639.40 0 0 0 14

DEEP CREEK (4) 635.20 0 0 0 5

DESERT CREEK 631.30

DIAZ CREEK 603.30

DIRCH CREEK 603.20

DIVISION CREEK 603.30

I DOG CREEK 630.40

DOG VALLEY CREEK 635.10

DOLLAR CREEK 634.20

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description ---

12 M I Yes Water diversion (see Owens River)

15 M I Yes (see Mojave River)

9 M I Yes Possible metals problems (see West Walker River)

5 M I Yes Threat o f sedimentation (see Truckee River)

0 0 0 8 8 M I Yes Possible metals problems. (see West Ualker River)

0 0 0 10 10 M I Yes (seeOuensRiver)

0 0 0 1 1 M I Yes (seeOwensRiver)

0 0 3 7 . . l o M I Yes Recreational inpacts Uater diversions (see Ouens River)

6 0 0 0 6 M I Possible metals problems

0 0 0 18 18 M I Yes (see Truckee River)

0 0 0 3 3 M I Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

Page 217


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

Non-Poi n t


I Region 6 Rivers and Streams

Water Pual i tv Condit ion Hydro - Inter - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # G d mediate Impaired Unknown Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

DOWNER CREEK 635.20 0 3 0 0 3 M I Yes Hydrologic modi f icat ion Possible metals problems (see Truckee River)

DRY CREEK (R6) 603.10 0 0 0 3 3 M I Yes (see Owens River)

EAGLE CREEK (1 634.10 0 0 0 4 4 M I Yes (see Lake Tahoe)

EAGLE CREEK (2) 641.30 0 0 0 9 9 M I Grazing impacts

EAST WALKER RIVER 630.00 0 0 8 10 18 M I Yes Sedimentation Elevated f i s h t issue levels Popular recreat ion area

EMERSON CREEK 641.30 0 6 0 0 6 MI Grazing impacts

EVANS CANYON CREEK 637.10 0 0 0 3 3 M I

FALLS CANYON 603.20 0 0 0 2 2 M I Yes (see Owens River)

FREDERICKSBURG CAN 633.10 0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes Sedimentation (see Carson River, V Fk)

FRY I NGPAN CAN 630.10 0 0 0 9 9 M I Yes Possible metals problems (see East Walker River)

FURNACE CREEK 604.00 0 0 0 11 11 M I

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 218

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UAT ER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua l i ty Condition Inter- - Total FaSt

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet -- Hydro

Water Body Name Unit # Problem/Need Description

10 0 0 0 10 M I Yes Possible metals problems (see Lake Tahoe)

GENERAL CREEK 634.20

4 0 0 9 13 M I Yes Habitat fo r endangered species (see Owens River)

GEORGE CREEK 603 -30

GLASS CREEK 603.10 0 7 0 0 7 M I Yes

0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes

Uater Diversion (see Owens River)

Non-Point

GLEN ALPINE CREEK 634.10 Possible septic system impacts Non-Point Mineral springs (see Lake Tahoe)

Agri cul tural/Geothermal . inpacts Non-Point Septic system impacts (see Honey Lake)

GOLD RUN CREEK 637.20 0 10 0 0 10 M I Yes

GOODALE CREEK 603.30

GRASS LAKE CREEK 634.10

0 0 9 0 9 M I

4 0 0 0 4 M I Yes

Sedimentation Won-Point

Possible highway runoff impacts Won-Point (see Lake Tahoe)

GRASSHOPPER CREEK 637.30 0 2 0 0 2 M I

0 0 4 0 4 M I Yes

Grazing impacts Non-Point

Sedimentation (see Truckee River)

Non-Point GRAY CREEK (R6) 635.00

GREEN CANYON 630.10 0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes

Page 219

Pub1 i c health concern (see East Walker Riwr)

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSWENT

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - Total Fact -

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

1 GREEN CREEK 630.40

GREEN LAKE CREEK 603.20

GREEN VALLEY LAKE 628.20 CREEK

GRIFF CREEK 634.20

HEAVENLY VALLEY 634.10 CREEK

HILTON CREEK 603.10

HOGBACK CREEK (1 ) 603 -20

HOGBACK CREEK (2) 603.30

HOLCOMB CREEK 628.00

HOOKS CREEK 628.00

13 0 1 0 14 M I Yes Grazing impacts Hydrologic modif icat ions (see East Ualker River)

0 0 0 3 3 M I Yes (see Owens River)

0 0. 5 0 5 Yes Objectives v io la ted Drinking uater impairment (see Mojave River)

3 0 1 0 4 M I Yes Sedimentation Urban runoff Fisheries habi tat degradation

0 0 4 0 4 MI Yes Objectives v io la ted Sedimentation (see Lake Tahoe)

0 0 0 9 9 MI Yes (see Ouens River)

0 0 0 10 . 10 MI Yes (see Ouens River)

0 0 0 10 10 M I Yes (see Ouens River)

1 0 0 0 1 Yes (see Mojave River)

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Coliform bacteria (see Mojave River)

Page 220


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994- UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition Hydro In ter -

Water Body Name Unit # mediate Impaired Unknown Fact -

Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description

HORSETHIEF CREEK 633.00 0 3 0 0 3 M I Yes Grazing impacts (see Carson River, U Fk)

Non-Point . . .

HORTON CREEK 603.20 0 9 6 0 15 M I Yes Fish population decline Wi ld l i fe habitat impaired Grazing impacts

Non-Point . . X

Possible metals problems (see West Walker River)

HOT CREEK (1 ) 631.40 0 0 5 0 5 M I Yes Non-Point X . X

HOT CREEK (21 603.10 0 .O 10 0 10 M I Yes Public health concerns Elevated f i s h t issue levels Eutrophication

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point . . . HOT SPRINGS CANYON 630.30 0 0 3 0

HOT SPRINGS CREEK 632.10 ' 0 1 0 0

3 M I

1 Yes

Sedimentation

Geothermal impacts (see Carson River, E FK)

.HOUSTON CREEK 628.00 0 0 0 2 2 MI Yes

5 M I Yes

(see Mojave River) . . . Non-Point . . . Possible uater diversion inpects

(see L i t t l e Truckee River) INDEPENDENCE CREEK 636.00 0 0 0 5 (1)

INDEPENDENCE CREEK 603.30 0 0 0 1 I (2)

11 M I Yes (see Ouens River)

Page 221



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Uater Ouality Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Hydro

Water Body Name Unit # Total - Fact


INDIAN CREEK ( 1 ) 632.20 9 M I Yes Uater Diversions Grazing impacts Public health concerns

Non-Point X . X

INDIAN CREEK (2) 604.00

INDIAN GARDEN CREEK 604.00

IRON CREEK 604.00

JACKASS CREEK 631.30

1

8 M I

2 M I

1 Yes Possible grazing impacts Possible metals impacts (see Uest Ualker River)

Non-Point

(see Truckee River) JUNIPER CREEK 635.20

LASSEN CREEK 637.00

8 M I Yes

6 M I Yes Uater diversions Agricultural drainage (see Honey Lake)

Non-Point

LAUREL CREEK (R6) 603.10

LEAVlTT CREEK 631.40

5 M I Yes

6 M I Yes

(see Wens River)

Possible mining impacts Possible grazing impacts (see Uest Ualker River)

Won-Point

Non-Point LEE VlNlNG CREEK 601 .oo 11 M I Yes Recreational impacts Uater Diversions Sedimentation

Page 222



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oual i t y Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknom -- Hydro

Uater Body Name Unit # Total - Fact


LEIDY CREEK 604.00

Objectives violated Fish k i l l s (see Bryant Creek)

Non-Poi n t X . X LEVIATHAN CREEK 632.10 4 Yes

LITTLE BEAR CREEK 628.00

LITTLE ROCK CREEK 626.00

LITTLE TRUCKEE RIVER 636.00

1 HI Yes

1 HI

33 Yes

(see Mojave River)

Sedimentation Hydrologic modification Inpacts of recreation

Non-Point

Non-Point LITTLE WALKER RIVER 631.40 . . . 18 HI Yes Sedimentation

Possible metals problems (see West Walker River)

LONE PINE CREEK 603.20

LONE TREE CREEK (R6) 603.20

LONELY GULCH CREEK 634.20

13 HI Yes

13 HI Yes

2 Yes

(see Wens River) . . . . . .

Non-Point . . . (see Ouens River)

Sedimentation Urban runoff (see Lake Tahoe)

LONG VALLEY CREEK 630.10 (1)

Page 223



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Oual i ty Condition I n t e r -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet ---

Hydro U n i t # Problem/Need Descript ion Water Body Name

Non-Point . . . 55 Yes Grazing impacts Agr i cu l tu ra l Drainage (see Honey Lake)

LONG VALLEY CREEK

( 2 )

8 'MI Yes

9 M I Yes

5 M I Yes

3 M I Yes

(see West Walker River) LOST CANNON CREEK

LUBKIN CREEK, N FK

LUBKIN CREEK, S FK

MADDEN CREEK

(see Owens River)

(see Owens River)

Non-Point Sedimentation Poor watershed condi t ion (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point 22 M I Yes Geothermal impacts Grazing impacts Publ ic health concerns

MAMMOTH CREEK

Grazing impacts Sedimentation F isher ies habi ta t degradation

7 M I Yes MARBLE CREEK

Geothermal impacts Urban runof f (see Carson River, E Fk l

Non-Point

Won-Point

MARKLEEVILLE CREEK 3 M I Yes

Elevated f i s h t issue Levels Hydrologic modi f icat ion (See Truckee River)

12 M I Yes MARTIS CREEK

Page 224

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Inter-

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro Uni t #

Total - Fact Size Units Sheet ---

6 M I

16 M I Yes

12 M I Yes

4 nr

18 M I Yes

9 M I Yes

Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

MCAFEE CREEK

MCGEE CREEK (1

MCGEE CREEK (2)

MCKINNEY CREEK

MCNALLY CANALS

MEEKS CREEK

(see Owens River)

(see Owens River)

Sedimentation Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

(see Owens River)

Sedimentation Impacts of marinas Fish habitat degradation

MERRILL CREEK 1 Yes Grazing impacts possible lead problem (see Eagle Lake 2)

MESCAL CREEK

MIDDLE CANYON

MILBERRY CREEK

MILL CREEK (1)

1 n l

2 MI Yes

5 MI Yes

14 M I Yes

(see Owens River)

(see Carson River, E Fk)

Recreational impacts Uater Diversions Possible metals problems

Non-Point

Page 225



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quality Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Hydro Unit #

Totel Fact Size Units Sheet --- Water Body Name

MILL CREEK ( 2 )


9 M I Yes Possible septic system impacts Possible highway runoff impacts (see Uest Ualker River)

Non-Point . . .

6 M I Yes Sedimentation Objectives violated

Non-Point X . X

MILNER CREEK

MOJAVE RIVER

9 M I Yes

100 Yes

(see Owens River) . * .

Point 8 Non-Point X . X Recreational impacts Sedimentation Toxic polluants

5 M I Yes (see Mojave River) MOJAM RIVER, E FK OF W FK

5 M I Yes

10 M I Yes

(see Mojave River) MOJAVE RIVER, U FK

MOLYBDENITE CREEK Possible metals problems Grazing impacts (see West Ualker River)

Non-Point

Non-Point MONITOR CREEK 4 Yes Objectives violated Elevated f i sh tissue levels (see Carson River, E Fk)

(see Wens River) MONTGOMERY CREEK

MORRIS CREEK

8 M I Yes

1 M I Yes

Page 226

(see Owens River)



Federal L i s t s

Water Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fac.t

Water Body Name Unit # mediate Immired Unknown Size Units Sheet

MOUNTAINEER CREEK 632.00 0 0 7 0 7 M I Yes

MURPHY CREEK 630.10 0 0 0 8 8 M I Yes

NINEMILE CANYON

NORTH CANYON CREEK

OAK CREEK (1

OAK CREEK (2)

OAK CREEK, N FK

OAK CREEK, S FK

OLANCHA CREEK

OUENS RIVER

1 1 M I

5 5 M I

0 4 Yes

1 1 MI

0 8 M I Yes

0 3 M I Yes

6 6 M I Yes

0 120 MI Yes

OWENS R l MR CANAL 603.00 0 0 0 1 1 M I Yes

Page 227


Metals problem Possible grazing impacts (see Bryant Creek)

Possible metals problem (see East Walker River)

(see Owens River)

(see Owens River)

(see Ovens River)

(see Ovens River)

Elevated f i s h tissue levels Fish k i l l s Fish population decline

(see Owens River)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point x . x

Non-Point



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r -

Uater Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Fact -

Size Un i ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

PAPOOSE CREEK 637.30 0 0 0 2 2 MI Yes Grazing impacts Possible metals problems (see Eagle Lake 2 )

Won-Point . . .

PARKER CREEK 601 .OO 0 0 1 7 8 M I Yes Recreational impacts Uater Diversions (See Mono Lake)

Won-Point . . X

.PELLISIER CREEK 603.20 0 0 0 4 4 M I Yes Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment Threat o f ob ject ives v io la ted Radioact ivi ty/uranium

Non-Point . . .

PERRY AlKEN CREEK 603.20 0 0 0 12

PETES CREEK 604.00 0 0 0 1

PINE CREEK ( 1 ) 603.00 0 0 14 0

12 MI Yes

1

14 M I Yes

(see Owens River)

Non-Point Sedimentation Elevated f i s h t issue Levels (see Ouens River)

PINE CREEK ( 2 ) 637.30 0 0 24 10 , 34 M I Yes Fish populat ion dec l ine Sedimentation Fisheries hab i ta t degradation

Non-Point

PINE CREEK ( 3 ) 637.40 0 0 0 9

PINYON CREEK 603.30 0 0 0 12

9 M I

12 MI Yes (see Ouens River)

Page 228



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Good mediate I w i r e d Unknown -- Hvdro Unit #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Water Bodv Name

PIUTE CREEK (R6)


11 MI Yes Possible grazing impacts (see Honey Lake)

Non- Point . . .

PLEASANT VALLEY CREEK

12 M I Yes (see Carson River, E Fk)

4 M I Yes Possible sedimentation (see Truckee River)

Non-Point

Non-Point

POLE CREEK

12 M I Yes Impacts of recreation Hydrologic modification (see Truckee River)'

PROSSER CREEK

6 M I

7 M I

6 M I Yes

7 M I

PURDY CREEK

RAIDER CREEK

RAUSON CANAL

RED LAKE CREEK

Grazing impacts

(see Owens River)

Mining drainage

Won-Point

Non-Point

RED MOUNTAIN CREEK 603.20 0 0 0 1 1 M I Yes (see Owens River)

RED ROCK CREEK 638.00 0 0 0 23 23 M I

Non-Point REVERSED CREEK 601 .00 0 3 0 0 3 M I Yes Sedimentat ion ~ Eutrophication Urban runoff

Page 229



Federal L i s t s

Uater Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter-

Uater Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknown

ROBINSON CREEK 630.30 0 18 0 0

ROCK CREEK (1 603.30 0 1 0 48

ROCK CREEK (2) 603.30 0 0 0 7

RODRIGUEZ CREEK 631.10 0 0 0 4

ROUGH CREEK 630.00 0 0 8 0

Total - Fact Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description ---

18 M I Yes Hydrologic modification Possible sedimentation (see East Walker River)

49 M I Yes Sedimentation (see Ouens River)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

7 M I Yes (see Owens River)

4 M I Yes Threat of objectives violated Non-Point Threat of toxic bioassay resul ts Mining impacts

RUSH CREEK (2) 639.00 0 0 0 8

Non-Point . . .

8 M I Yes Threat of tox ic bioassay resul ts Non-Point Grazing impacts Public health concerns

RUBICON CREEK 634.20 0 0 3 0 3 M I Fisheries habitat degradation

RUSH CREEK (1 ) 601 .OO 0 0 8 8 16 M I Yes Recreational impacts Water Diversions Sedimentation

SAGE HEN CREEK 636.00 0 15 0 0 15 HI Yes Hydrologic modification (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 230

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOAR0 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Uater Puel i ty Condition Hydro Inter-

Water Body Name Uni t # mediate Impaired Unknown

SALT CREEK (R61 609.00 0 33 . 0 0

SAWMILL CREEK 603.30 0 0 8 0

SAVMILL POND CREEK 634.10 0 1 0 0

SAWPIT CREEK 628.00 0 0 . 0 9

SAXON CREEK 634.10 0 4 0 5

Fact 7

Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description --- 33 M I Natural high sa l i n i t y

Habitat f o r endangered species

8 M I Yes Fisheries habitat degradation (see Owens River)

1 Sedimentation

9 M I Yes Past watershed disturbance Reclaimed l a n d f i l l (see Lake Tahoe)

SECRET CREEK 639.40 0 0 0 17 17 M I

SEELEY CANYON CREEK 628.00 2 0 0 0 2 M I Yes (see Mojave River)

SHALE CREEK 628.00 0 0 0 1 1 M I

SHEEP CREEK 628.00 0 0 0 3 . 3 M I

SHEPHERD CREEK 603.30 0 0 0 13 13 M I Yes (see Owens River)

SHERWIN CREEK 603.10 1 0 0 0 1 Yes (see Owens River)

SILVER CANYON CREEK 603.20 0 0 0 8 8 HI Yes (see Owens River)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Won-Point . . .

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 231



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Good mediate Inmaired Unknoun -- Hydro Unit #

Total Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

SILVER CREEK (1) Won-Point X . X Possible mining impacts Sedimentation

SILVER CREEK ( 2 )

SILVER KING CREEK 14 M I Yes Possible mining impacts Past grazing problems (see Carson River, E Fk)

Non-Point . . .

Grazing impacts Public health concerns

Non-Point X . X SKEDADDLE CREEK

SLINKARD CREEK 12 M I Yes Grazing impacts Possible radioact iv i ty . Elevated f i sh tissue levels

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point . . . Non-Point X . X

15 M I

2 M I Yes

Grazing impacts SMOKE CREEK

SNOW CREEK Watershed disturbance Fisheries habitat degradation (see Lake Tahoe)

22 M I

8 M I Yes

SNOWSTORM CREEK

SQUAW CREEK Non-Point Sedimentation Recreational inpacts Elevated f i s h t issue levels

(see Ovens River) 1 M I Yes

Page 232

SUMMIT CREEK (R6)



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Uni t # a mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

SUSAN RIVER 637.20 0 0 59 0 59 M I Yes Toxic bioassay results industrial discharges Municipal ou t fa l l s

Point 8 Won-Point X . X

SUAUGER CREEK 630.40 0 0 0 15 15 M I Yes Possible grazing problems Possible metals problems (see East Walker River)

Won-Point . . .

Non-Point SWEETWATER CANYON 633.00 0 0 0 5 5 M I Yes Possible metals probelms (see East Walker River)

SYMMES CREEK

TABOOSE CREEK

O 0 10 0 10 M I Fisheries habitat degradation Non-Point

Non-Point 0 0 13 0 13 M1 Yes Fisheries habitat degradation (see Owens River)

0 0 0 7 7 M I Yes Possible septic system impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point TALLAC CREEK

Non-Poi n t TAYLOR CREEK 0 2 0 0 2 Yes Hydrologicmodification Possible metals problems Fisheries habitat degradation

THIBAUT CREEK

TINEMAHA CREEK

1 TOLER CREEK

0 0 0 6 6 M I Yes (see Owens River)

0 0 0 11 11 M I Yes (see Owens River )

Page 233



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua l i t y Condition Inter-


Size Units Sheet --- Hydro

Uater Body Name Unit # Problem/Need Description

18 M I Yes Urban runoff Grazing impacts Objectives violated

Non-Point X . X TROUT CREEK (1) 634.10

TROUT CREEK (2) 635.20 5 M I - Yes Urban runoff possible industr ia l impacts (see Truckee River)

Non-Point . . .

TRUCKEE RIVER 635.20 106 M I Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels 'Hydrologic modification Sedimentation

Non-Point X . x

Won-Point . . . TRUCKEE RIVER, UPPER 634.10 17 M I Yes Sedimentation Grazing impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

Fisheries habitat degradation (see Wens River)

Non-Point X . X TUTTLE CREEK 603.30 10 M I Yes

Non-Point . . . TUELVE MILE CREEK 642.00

TWIN PEAKS CREEK 628.00

VIRGINIA CREEK 630.40

5 M I

1

19 M I Yes

Possible grazing impacts

. . . Non-Point . . X Sedimentation

Grazing impacts Uater diversions

Uater Diversions (see Mono Lake)

Non-Point . . X WALKER CREEK (R6) 601.00 a MI Yes

Page 234



Federal L i s t s

Uater m a 1 i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Immired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need O e s c r i ~ t i o n

WAR0 CREEK 634.20 0 0 7 0 7 MI Yes Sedimentation Bar r ie rs t o f i s h migrat ion Objectives v io la ted

UATSON CREEK 634.20 0 3 0 0 3 MI Yes Sedimentation (see Lake Tahoe)

WEST UALKER RIVER 631.00 0 0 1 46 47 M I Yes Sedimentation Agr i cu l tu ra l drainage Uater diversions

UILDHORSE CREEK 604.00 0 0

UlLFRlO CREEK 603.10 0 0

Ul LLARD CREEK 637.20 0 9

Ul LLOW CREEK (1 ) 603.20 0 0

UILLW CREEK (2) 637.40 0 31

UlLLOY CREEK (3) 637.20 0 0

UlLLW CREEK (4) 637.10 0 0

0 1 1 MI'

5 0 5 M I Yes U i l d l i f e hab i ta t degradation (see Ovens River)

0 0 9 M I Yes Habitat impairment Possible grazing impacts (see Honey Lake)

0 1 1 M I Yes (seeOuensRiver)

0 0 31 MI Grazing impacts

0 1 1

0 1 1

Page 235

I

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point

Non-Point



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Q u a l i t y Condition I n t e r -

Good mediate Inpaired Unknown -- Hydro Un i t #

Total - Fact Size Un i ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descript ion Water Body Name

UILLOU CREEK (5) Non-Point . . . 6 Yes Grazing impacts Possible i r o n problem (see Carson River, W Fk)

Natural high s a l i n i t y Grazing problems

Non-Point . . - UILLOU CREEK (6) 7 M I

9 MI Yes Recreational impacts Water diversions (See Mono Lake)

Non-Point . . X WILSON CREEK (R6)

Sedimentation Grazing impacts (see Carson River, E Fk)

UOLF CREEK (1) 14 MI Yes Non-Point

Non-Point Grazing impacts (see West Walker River)

UOLF CREEK (2)

UYMAN CREEK

6 MI Yes

12 MI

1 MI Yes (see Owens River) YELLOUJACKET CREEK

Page 236


Region 6 Saline Lake

Federal L is ts

Hydro Water Bodv Name Unit #

ALKALI LAKE, LOWER 641.00

ALKALI LAKE, MIDDLE 641 .OO

ALKALI LAKE, UPPER 641 .OO

DEEP SPRINGS LAKE 605.00

HONEY LAKE 637.20

HONEY LAKE WILDFOUL 637.20 MGMT .

MONO LAKE 601 .OO

Water Ouelitv Condition In ter - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Descr id ion -- 0 0 10855 0 10855 AC Yes Natural high sa l i n i t y

Geothermal/agricultural drainage (see Alkal i Lakes, Middle)

0 0 39475 0 39475 Yes Geothermal drainage Natural high sa l i n i t y Agricultural drainage

0 0 24250 0 24250 AC Yes Geothermal/Agricultural drainage Natural high sa l i n i t y (see Alkal i Lakes, Middle

0 0 1400 0 1400 AC Yes Natural high s a l i n i t y Habitat f o r endangered species (see Owens River)

0 0 55327 0 55327 AC Yes Toxic bioassay resul ts

0 0 500 0 500 AC Yes Threat of tox ic bioassay resul ts Fluctuating water levels Habitat f o r endangered species

0 0 35000 0 35000 AC Yes Objectives v io lated Ui l d l i f e habitat impaired Low f lows/water diversion

0 0 175 0 175 AC Yes Water diversion Natural high s a l i n i t y Wi ld l i fe habitat impaired

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point X X X

Point ' B Non-Point X X X '

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point

Non-Point

X X X

X X X

Page 237

Region 6

Uater Body Name

SEARLES LAKE


Saline Lake

Uater Oual i t y Condition Hydro Inter- ' - Total - Fact Unit # Good mediate Imaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

621 .OO 0 0 26100 0 26100 AC Yes Natural high sal ini ty

Page 238


Federal Lists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

Non-Point x . X

. , .


Region 6 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0


Good mediate lma i red Unknown -- Hydro

Water Body Name Uni t # fotel - Fact

Size Units Sheet --- Problern/Need Description

ADOBE HU, MINOR 602.00 STREAMS

ADOBE HU, SPRINGS 602.00

ALKALI LAKES AREA 641.00 WETLANDS

Grazing impacts Water diversions Natural high sa l i n i t y

Non-Point

AHARGOSA HU, SPRINGS 609.00 Habitat f o r endangered species

AMARGOSA HU, STREAMS 609.00

AMARMSA RIVER 609.00 UETLANDS

Natural high sa l i n i t y Grazing impacts

Won-Poi n t

Non-Point AMEOEE HOT SPRINGS 637.20 1 Yes Objectives violated Geothermal springs (see Honey Lake)

ANTELOPE HU, MINOR 626.00 STREAMS

ANTELOPE HU, SPRINGS 626.00 1 AC

1 Yes Non-Point Grazing impacts (see Vest Walker River)

ANTELOPE VALLEY (NL) 631.00 UETLANDS

1 AC Yes

Page 239

(see Owens River)


Region 6 Uet 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion -- Hydro

Uater Bodv Name U n i t # SPRINGS

BENTON HOT SPRINGS 603.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC Yes (see Owens River)

BICYCLE HU, 616.00 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Grazing impacts Popular recreat ion area (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point

Non-Point

BIG MEADOW UETLANDS 634.10

0 1 0 0 1 Fish k i l l s BISCAR RESERVOIR 637.40 AREA WETLANDS

0 0 0 1 1 Yes - (see Owens River) BLACK ROCK SPRINGS 603.00

BODlE HILLS UETLANDS 630.00 0 350 1000 0 1350 AC Grazing impacts

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Metals/Grazing impacts Uetlands a l t e r a t i o n (see East Ualker River)

I~R IDGEPORT VALLEY 630.10 UETLANDS

Non-Poi nt

BROADUELL HU, MINOR 629.00 STREAMS

BROADWELL HU, 629.00 SPRINGS

Geothermal springs

Page 240

Non-Point BROCWAY SPRINGS 634.10


Region 6 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Q u a l i t y Condit ion In te r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro Un i t #

Total - Fact Size Un i ts Sheet -7-

Problem/Need Descript ion Water Body Name

BROWN HA, EPHEMERAL STREAMS

BURTON CREEK SEZ UETLANDS

1 Yes Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point

Non- Point 1 Yes Threat o f sept ic system impacts Domestic water supply (see Honey Lake)

CADY SPRINGS

CARNELIAN CREEK SEZ UETLANDS

1 Yes

1

1

1

1

Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n (see Lake Tahoe)

Yon-Poi n t

CARSON RIVER E FK HU, MINOR STREAMS

CARSON RIVER E FK HU, SPRINGS

CARSON RIVER U FK HU, MINOR STREAMS

CARSON RIVER U FK W, SPRINGS

CHINA LAKE HA, MINOR 624.20 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

CHINA LAKE HA, N 624.20 0 0 0 1 1 AC

Page 241


Region 6 Vet lands

Federal L i s t s

Hydro Uater Bodv Name Un i t # SPRINGS

CINDER CONE SPRINGS 635.00

COSO HU, MINOR 622.00 STREAMS

COSO HU, SPRINGS 622.00

COTTONBALL MARSH 609.00 UETLANDS

COUHEAD LAKE 641.30 UETLANDS

COYOTE HU, MINOR 618.00 STREAMS

'COYOTE HU, SPRINGS 618.00

Uater Qua l i t y Condition I n t e r - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion --

0 0 I 0 I Yes Objectives v io la ted Domestic uasteuater impacts (see Truckee River)

CUDDEBACK HU, MINOR 627.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

CUDDEBACK HU, 627.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC SPRINGS

DARUIN HA, EPHEMERAL 620.50 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

Habitat f o r endangered species

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X . X

Page 242


Region 6 Vet 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua1 i t y Condition I n t e r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknonn -- Hvdro

Uater Body Name U n i t # Fact -

Size Uni ts sheet Problem/Need bescr ip t i o n --- 1 AC DEEP SPRINGS HU, 605.00

OTHER STREAMS

DEEP SPRINGS HU, 605.00 SPRl NGS

Natural h igh s a l i n i t y Habitat f o r endangered species

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

DEEP SPRINGS 605.00 LAKE/MARSH UETLANDS

DIAMOND VALLEY 633.10 UETLANDS

Grazing impacts

DISMAL SUAMP 642.00 Possible metals problems

EAGLE HA, MINOR 637.30 STREAMS

EAGLE HA, SPRINGS 637.30

EAGLE LAKE AREA 637.31 UETLANDS

1 Yes Metals/Grazing impacts Fluctuat ing lake leve ls (see Eagle Lake)

Non-Point

EAST WALKER RIVER 630.00 HU, MINOR STREAMS

EAST WALKER RIVER 630.00 HU, SPRINGS

Page 243


Region 6 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion In te r -


Water Body Name U n i t # Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr iv t ion

Possi l be metals problems EUREKA HU, MINOR 606.00 STREAMS

EUREKA HU, SPRINGS 606.00 1 AC

1 Yes

Possible metals problems

Geothermal springs Arsenic, uranium (see West Walker River)

Non-Point FALES HOT SPRINGS 631.00

Non-Point FISH LAKE MU, 604.00 SPRINGS

Water d ive rs ion Non-Point Threat o f rare/endangered species impact Grazing impacts

FISH SLOUGH UETLANDS 603.20 1 Yes

FISH SPRINGS 603 .OO 1 AC Yes

1

1 Yes

(see Ovens River)

FISH VALLEY UETLANDS 632.10

Non-Point FOUNTAIN PLACE 634.10 UETLANDS

Grazing impacts (see Lake Tahoel

FREMONT HU, MINOR 625.00 STREAMS

FREMONT MU, SPRINGS 625.00 1 AC

1 AC

Page 244

6-1 SEEP 624.00 Habitat f o r endangered species


Region 6 Wetlands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Swrce D

Water Qual i t y Condition Inter- - Total

7 Fact -

Good mediate Impeired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description -- Hvdro


GOLDSTONE HU, 617.00 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

GRANITE HU, 615.00 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

0 0 0 360 360 Yes Popular recreation area Threat of ASBS impairment (see Lake Tahoe)

Won-Point GRASS LAKE UETLANDS 634.10

0 . o 0 1 1 Yes (seeEastWalkerRiver) GREEN CREEK UETLANDS 630.40

GRIZZLY MEADOW 631.40 WETLANDS

Non-Point . . . GROVER HOT SPRINGS 632.00 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Geothermal springs .Popular recreation area (see Carson River, E Fk)

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Water diversions (see Ouens River)

Non-Point . . . HAIUEE RESERVOIR 603.30 AREA UETLANDS

0 0 0 1 1 AC Natural 1 y occurring trace ekments Won-Point . . . HARPER LAKE UETLANDS 628.42

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Agricultural drainage Trace elements (see Honey Lake)

Non-Point . . . HARTSON LAKE 637.20 WETLANDS

10 0 0 0 10 AC Popular recreation area . . . HAYPRESS MEADOUS 634.10

Page 245


Region 6 Met 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D - Water Qual i ty Condition

In te r - Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown --

Hydro Un i t #

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Water Body Name

WETLANDS Problem/Need Descript ion

HEENAN LAKE AREA WETLANDS

1 Yes Grazing impacts (see Carson River, E Fk)

Non-Point . . .

HERLOWG HA, MINOR STREAMS

HERLONG HA, SPRINGS 1

1 Yes

. . .

Non-Point . . - Possible indus t r ia l impact (see Truckee River)

HOBART MILLS AREA WETLANDS

12000 AC Yes Geothermal impacts Agr icu l tu ra l impacts . Habitat f o r endangered species

Point 8 Non-Point X . X HONEY LAKE AREA WETLANDS

1 Yes Grazing impacts Popular recreation area (see Carson River, E Fk)

Non-Point . . . HOPE VALLEY WETLANDS

. . . Point 8 Non-Point . . .

1

1 Yes

HORSE LAKE WETLANDS

Geothermal impacts (see Carson River, E Fk)

HOT SPRINGS CREEK VALLEY WETLANDS

HUhlTOON VALLEY WETLANDS

1 Yes Grazing impacts (see East Walker River)

Non-Point . . .

INDEPENDENCE LAKE 1 Yes

Page 246

(see L i t t l e Truckee River)


Region 6 Uet 1 ends

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion Hvdro I n t e r - - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion AREA UETLANDS

IVANPAH HU, MINOR 612.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

IVANPAH HU, SPRINGS 612.00

KEOUGH HOT SPRINGS 603.00 Non-Point

Non-Poi nt

1 0 1 Yes High f l u o r i d e Popular recreat ion area (see Owens River)

KYBURZ MARSH 636.00 0 0 300 Yes Grazing/ORV impacts Mi 1 i t a r y impacts (see Truckee River)

0 150 150 AC Habitat f o r endangered species LACEY VALLEY 636.00 UETLANDS

LEACH HU, MINOR 614.00 STREAMS

LEACH MU, SPRINGS 614.00

LEAVl TT MEADOWS 631.40 UETLANDS

0 0 1 Yes Grazing imapacts Possible mining inpacts (see Uest Ualker River)

Nan-Point

LEE FLAT HA, 620.30 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

Page 247


Region 6 Uet lands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion In te r -


Size Uni ts Sheet Problern/Need Descript ion --- Hydro

Uater Body Name U n i t #

LITTLE TRUCKEE RIVER 636.00 HU, MINOR STREAMS

LITTLE TRUCKEE RIVER 636.00 HU, SPRINGS

Non-Point LONG VALLEY CREEK 637.10 UETLANDS

1 Yes Grazing impacts Possible t race elements (see Honey Lake)

MADELINE PLAINS, 638.00 COLD SPRl NGS

MADELINE PLAINS, 638.00 MINOR STREAMS

WELINE PLAINS, 638.00 SPRINGS

MARTIS VALLEY 635.20 UETLANDS

1 Yes Possible metals problem Uetlands a l t e r a t i o n (see Truckee River)

Non-Point

1 Yes Uetlands a l t e r a t i o n Popular recreat ion area (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point MEEKS CREEK 634.20 MEADOU/MARSH UETLANDS

Page 248

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMEN1 Report Date : 05/23/94

Region 6 Uet 1 ends

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Quali ty Condition Inter- -


Uater Body Name Unit # Total 7

Fact - Size Units Sheet ---

Grazing impacts Ui Id1 i f e habi t a t degradation Popular recreation area

Non-Point . . X MElSS MEADOWS 634.10 UETLANDS

1 AC Yes

MESQUITE HU, MINOR 611.00 STREAMS

MESQUITE HU, SPRINGS 611 -00

MOJAVE HU, MINOR 628.00 STREAMS

MOJAVE HU, SPRINGS 628.00

Habitat f o r endangered species UOJAVE HU, ZYZYX 628.00 SPRING

Non-Point MOJAVE RIVER 628.00 UETLANDS

Sedimentation Uater diversions Natural high s a l i n i t y

MONO HU, MINOR 601 .OO STREAMS

1 AC Yes

1 AC Yes

1

(see Mono Lake)

MONO LAKE AREA 601 .OO UETLANDS

Uater diversions U i l d l i f e habitat degredation

Non-Point

NORTH TAHOE HA, 634.10 MINOR STREAMS

Page 249


Region 6 Uet 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion I n t e r -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknom -- Hydro U n i t #

Total - Fact - Size Un i ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr ip t ion Water Body Name

NORTH TAHOE HA, SPRINGS

OSGOOD SWAMP UETLANDS

1 Yes Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n (see Lake Tahoe)

Won-Point

1 AC Yes Grazing impacts (see Owens River)

OUENS HU, MINOR STREAMS - CHALFANT v.

OUENS HU, MINOR STREAMS - LOWER OUENS

1 AC Yes Grazing impacts (see Owens River)

.OWNS HU, OTHER SPRINGS - CHALFANT

V.

1 AC Yes Grazing impacts (see Ouens River)

(see Ouens River) OWNS HU, SPRINGS - LOWER OWENS HA

1 AC Yes

1 AC Yes OUENS HU, UARH SPRINGS - CHALFANT v.

(see Owens River)

Non-Point OUENS LAKE UETLANDS 1 AC Yes Uater diversions W i l d l i f e hab i ta t degradation (see Owens River)

Page 250


Region 6 Uet 1 ands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Pual i t y C o d i t i on In ter -

~ o o d mediate Inmi red Unknown -- Hydro

Uater Body Name Unit # Totel - Fact Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Descrivtion

OWENS RIVER UETLANDS 603.00 1 Yes Uater diversions Grazing impacts '

(see Owens River)

Non- Point . . .

OWL CREEK MARSH 641 .OO UETLANDS

Potential uater diversion impacts Non-Point . . - Habitat fo r endangered species

OULSHEAD HU, MINOR 613.00 STREAMS

OULSHEAD HU, SPRINGS 613.00

PAHRUMP HU, 610.00 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

PANAMINT HA, 620.60 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

PERAZZO VALLEY 636.00 UETLANDS

130 AC Yes Habitat fo r endangered species Grazing impacts (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

Grazing impacts Possible mining impacts (see Vest Ualker River)

Won-Point PICKEL MEADOUS 631.40 UETLANDS

1 Yes

PIUTE PONDS UETLANDS 626.00

Page 251


Region 6 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition In te r -

Good mediate lmpai red Vnknoun -- Hydro

Water Body Name Un i t # Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet --- Problern/Need Descript ion

Won-Point . . . PLEASANT VALLEY 632.10 UETLANDS

1 Yes Grazing impacts (see Carson River, E Fk)

Non-Point . . . POLE CREEK WETLANDS 635.20 1 Yes Grazing impacts Threat o f sedimentation (see Truckee River)

Urban runo f f Hydrologic modi f icat ion Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n

Non-Point . . . POPE MARSH WETLANDS 634.10 468 AC Yes

RACE TRACK HU, 608.00 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

RED ROCK CREEK 638.00 HEADW UETLANDS

ROBBERS HA, 620.80 EPHEMERAL STREAMS

ROGERS LAKE UETLANDS 601.00 1 Yes

1 AC

(see Mono Lake)

ROSE HA, MINOR 624.10 STREAMS

ROSE HA, SPRINGS 624.10 1 AC

1 Yes Non-Point SAGEHEN CREEK FENS 636.00 UETLANDS

Threat o f ASBS impairment (see L i t t l e Truckee River)

Page 252

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 6 Wet lands

Water Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- - Total

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

SALINE HU, EPHEMERAL 607.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

SANTA ROSA HA, 620.40 0 0 0 1 1 AC

EPHEMERAL STREAMS

SEARLES HA, SPRINGS 621.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC

SEARLES HU, MINOR 621.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC

STREAMS

SILVER KING VALLEY 632.10 0 0 0 1 1 Yes (see Carson River, E Fk) UETLANDS

SLINKARD VALLEY 631.20 0 1 0 0 1 AC Grazing inpacts UETLANDS

SNOW CREEK SEZ 634.20 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Wetlands a l te ra t ion UETLANDS (see Lake Tahoe)

SNOWSTORM HA, MINOR 637.40 0 0 0 1 1 STREAMS

SNOWSTORM HA, 637.40 0 0 0 1 1 SPRINGS

SODA CONE 632.00 0 0 0 1 1 Yes Geothermal springs (see Carson River, E Fk)


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 253


Region 6 Wet lands

Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condition Hvdro - Inter - Totel - Fact

Water Bodv Name U n i t # Good mediate Impeired Unknown Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

SOUTH TAHOE HA, 634.10 0 0 0 1 1 MINOR STREAMS

SQUAW CREEK MEADOW 635.20 0 0 450 0 450 AC Yes Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n WETLANDS Impacts o f recreat ion

(see Truckee River)

SUPERIOR HU, MINOR 619.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC STREAMS

SUPERIOR HU, SPRINGS 619.00 0 0 0 1 1 AC

SURPRISE VALLEY HU, 641 .OO 0 0 0 1 1 MINOR STREAMS

SURPRISE VALLEY HU, 641 .OO 0 0 0 1 1 SPR l NGS

SUSAN RIVER HA, 637.20 0 0 0 1 1 MINOR STREAMS

SUSAN RIVER HA, 637.20 0 0 0 1 1 SPRINGS

Some geothermat springs

TAHOE MEADOUS 634.10 0 1 0 0 1 Yes Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n UETLANDS (see Lake Tahoe)

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 254


Region 6 Uetlards

Federal L is ts

Uater Qual i tv Condition fnter- -


Uater Body Name Uni t # Total - Feet Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Desc r i~ t i on --- Problem Source

1 Yes Grazing impacts Possible metals impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

Non-Point TAYLOR CREEK 634.10 MEADOUS/MARSH WETLANDS

Threat of Rare 8 Endangered Species impa Won-Point Uater diversions

TECOPA HOT SPRINGS 609.40 WETLANDS

1 Yes Drinking water impairment Objectives violated (see Honey Lake)

Non-Point TOP SPRING 637.20

1 AC , Geothermal springs Non-Point

Non-Point

TRAVERTINE HOT 630.10 SPRING

0 1 0 0 1 Yes Wetlands a l te ra t ion Possible industr ia l impacts (see Lake Tahoe)

TROUT CREEK MEADOU 634.10 WETLANDS

TRUCKEE RIVER HU, 635.00 MINOR STREAMS

TRUCKEE RIVER HU, 635.00 SPRINGS

UPPER CACTUS HU, 623.00 MINOR STREAMS

UPPER CACTUS HU, 623.00 SPR 1 NGS

Page 255


~ Region 6 Wet l a d s

Water Body Name

UPPER TRUCKEE R I M R MEADOW WETLANDS

WATSON CREEK SEZ WETLANDS

MNDEL HOT SPRINGS

WEST WALKER RIVER HU, MINOR STREAMS

.WEST WALKER RIVER HU, SPRINGS

Water Oual i tv Condition Hydro I n t e r - Un i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknonn

Tota l - Fac.t - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion ---

1 Yes Wetlands a l t e r a t i o n Urban runof f (see Lake Tahoe)

1 Yes Offroad vehicles (see Lake Tahoe)

1 Yes Objectives v io la ted Geothermal springs (see Honey Lake)

WILDROSE HA, 620.20 0 0 0 1 1 AC EPHEMERAL STREAMS

WINEATE HA, 620.10 0 0 0 1 1 AC EPHEMERAL STREAMS


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point X . X

Page 256


Region 7 Grwnd Water

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Q u a l i t y Condition I n t e r -

Good mediate I w i r e d Unknown -- Hydro

Water Body Name Un i t # Tota l - Fact - Size Un i ts Sheet Problern/Need Descr ip t ion ---

AMES VALLEY 705.00 150 SQMl

AMOS VALLEY 726.00

ARROYO SECO VALLEY 715.50

220 SQMl

430 SQMI

85 SQMI BESSEMER VALLEY 703.00

BORREGO VALLEY 722.13 110 SQMI Yes Threat o f dr ink ing uater impairment Point

BRISTOL VALLEY 710.00

BUCK RIDGE FAULT VALLEY

0 47 47 SQMI

CADIZ VALLEY 0 0 430 SQMI

0 0 150 SQMI

0 16 16 SPMI

0 0 440 SQMI

0 120 120 SQMI

0 0 870 SQMI

0 0 40 SQMI

CALZONA VALLEY

CANEBRAKE VALLEY

CHEWEHUEVI VALLEY

CHOCOLATE VALLEY

CHUCKWALLA VALLEY

CLARK VALLEY

Page 258

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALl TY ASSESSMENT R e p o r t D a t e : 05/23/94



U a t e r Body Name

COACHELLA VA. GU.

COLLINS VALLEY

COPPER MOUNTAIN VALLEY

COYOTE UELLS VALLEY

DALE VALLEY

DAVIES VALLEY

DEADHAN VALLEY

EAST SALTON SEA I BASIN

FENNER VALLEY

HELENDALE FAULT

HEXIE MOUNTAIN AREA

1 IMPERIAL VA. GU.

IRON RIDGE AREA

JACUMBA VALLEY

H y d r o U n i t #

U a t e r O u a l i t v C o n d i t i o n I n t e r - - T o t a l - F a c t -

Good m e d i a t e I m i r e d U n k n o m Size U n i t s Shee t Prob lem/Need D e s c r i p t i o n -- 662 0 28 0 690 SQMl Yes Threatofdrinkinguaterimpairment

0 0 0 25 25 SQMI

0 110 0 0 110 SQMl

0 100 0 0 100 SQMl

260 0 0 0 260 SQMI

0 0 0 13 13 SQMI

160 0 0 0 160 SQMl

150 0 0 0 150 SQMI

no o o o no SQMI

0 0 0 4 4 SQMI

0 0 0 35 35 SQMl

1870 0 0 0 1870 SQMl

0 0 0 12 12 SQMI

0 0 0 10 10 SQMl

Page 259

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9


P o i n t 8 N o n - P o i n t . . .


Region 7 G r d Uater

Federal L i s t s

Uater Body Name

JACUNBA VALLEY-E

JOHNSON VALLEY

LANFAIR VALLEY

LAVlC VALLEY

LOST HORSE VALLEY

LUCERNE VALLEY

MASON VALLEY

MEANS VALLEY

MORONGO VALLEY

NEEDLES VALLEY

OCOTILLO VALLEY

OGlLBY VALLEY

OROCOPIA VALLEY

PAL0 MRDE MESA

PAL0 MRDE VA.

Hydro Un i t #

723.20

702.00

713.40

706.00

708.10

701 -00

722.50

704.00

719.43

713.30

722.20

726.00

725.00

715.40

715.40

Uater a u a l i t v Condition In te r -

Good mediate Inmaired Unknom -- Fact -

Size Uni ts Sheet --- 8 SQMI

150 SQMI

280 SQMI

40 SQMl

40 SQMI

260 SQMl Yes

17 SQMl

25 SQMI

14 SQMI Yes

140 SQMI Yes

410 SQMl

220 SQMl

140 SQMl

280 SQMI

200 SQMl Yes

Page 260


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment Point

* . .

Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment Point . . . Threat o f d r ink ing uater impairment Point 8 Won-Point . . .

. . .

. . . Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment Point 8 Non-Point . . .



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Quality Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknom -- Hvdro

Water Body Name Unit # Total - Fact -

Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description --- PINTO VALLEY 717.30 310 SQMI

PINYON WASH AREA 722.30 16 SQMl

PIPES CANYON FAULT 705.00 VALLEY

PIUTE VALLEY 713.10 270 SQMl

26 SQMl

40 SQMI

PLEASANT VALLEY (R7) 717.40

QUIEN SABE POINT 715.30 VALLEY

300 SQMI

40 SQMI

10 SQMI

180 SQMI Yes M i l i t a r y base impacts

RICE VALLEY 716.00

I SAW FELIPE VALLEY 722.40

1 TERUILLIGER VALLEY 722.11

1 TUENTYNINE PALMS 709.10 ~ VALLEY Point

1 VALLECITO-CARRIZO 722.61 VALLEY

200 SQMI

1 VIDAL VALLEY 715.10 160 SQMI

770 SQMl Yes Local high f luor ide

Page 261

Point WARD VALLEY



Federal L i s t s

Water Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

WARREN VALLEY 708.20 0 20 0 0 20 SQMI

WEST SALTON SEA 721 .OO 190 0 0 0 190 SQMI BAS i N

WHALE PEAK AREA 722.20 0 0 0 3 3 SQMI

YAPUI WELL AREA 722.30 0 0 0 32 32 SQMI

YUMA VALLEY 727.00 1 70 0 0 0 170 SQMI

Page 262

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D



Water Body Name

CAHUILLA LAKE

FlNNEY LAKE

HAUGHTELIN LAKE

HAVASU LAKE

IMPERIAL LAKE

RAMER LAKE

SENATOR WASH RES

SUNBEAM LAKE

WEST POND

YIEST LAKE

Hydro U n i t #

714.00

723.10

727.00

714.00

Water Qual i t v Condit ion In te r - -

~ o o d mediate Inmaired Unknown -- Total - Fact

Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion ---

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

310 AC No Sedimentation Non-Point


Federal L i s t s

25000 AC Yes Threat o f object ives v io la ted (Seleniun Non-Point 8 Sal ini ty); Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue levels (Selenim).

180 AC No Sedimentation Non-Point . X .

Page 263



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Pual i ty Condition Inter-

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun -- Hydro Unit #

Totel - Fact Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

ALAMO RIVER 52 M I Yes Elevated f i sh tissue levels Toxic bioassay results Recreational impacts

Non-Point X . X

ANDREAS CREEK

ANTELOPE CREEK

ARRASTRE CREEK

AZALEA CREEK

BANNER CREEK

BARD VALLEY DRAINS

7 M I

16 M I

10 M I

4 M I

10 M I Yes

20 M I Yes

Threat of objective v io lated (bacteria) Non-Point

Threat of objectives v io lated Non-Point Threat of toxic bioassay results Threat of sedimentation

BIG MORONGO CREEK 15 M I

10 M I Yes Threat of objective v io lated (bacteria) Unknown BORREGO PALM CANYON CREEK

10 M I Yes

2 M I

45 M I Yes

Threat of objective v io lated (bacteria) Non-Point BOUNDARY CREEK

BROWN CREEK

Threat of objective v io lated (bacteria) Non-Point CARRlZO CREEK

Page 264

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro In te r -

Water Body Name U n i t # - mediate Impaired Unknown p&& - Fact

Size Un i ts Sheet --- Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

CHINO CANYON CREEK 719.47 0 0 0 3

Threat of object ives v io la ted Threat o f tox ic bioassay resul ts Threat o f sedimentation

COACHELLA VA. DRAINS 719.47 0 63 0 0 63 MI Yes Non-Point . . .

Bacteria ob ject ive v i o l a t e d Threat o f tox ic bioassay resu l t s

Non-Point X . X COACHELLA VALLEY 719.47 0 0 20 0 STORM CHANNEL

20 M I Yes

Threat o f ob ject ives v io la ted (Seleniun 8 Sal ini ty); Elevated f i s h t issue levels (Selenium, DDT, Total Chlordane)

Point 8 Non-Point . . . COLORADO RIVER 715.00 230 0 0 0 230 MI Yes

COPPER BASIN CREEK 5 M I

26 M I Yes

3 MI Yes

3 M I

4 MI

8 MI

. . . Non-Poi nt . . . COYOTE CREEK Threat o f ob ject ive v i o l a t e d (bacteria)

Threat o f sedimentation due t o mining Non-Poi n t . . . . . . . . . . - .

CRYSTAL CREEK

DUTCH CREEK

FALLS CREEK

GRAPEVINE CANYON CREEK

HATHAWAY CREEK

HOMER WASH

Page 265

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Federal L is ts

3 3 3 D l 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qual i ty Condition In ter -

Good mediate Impaired Unknom -- Hydro

Uater Body Name Uni t # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet --- Problem/Need Description

IMPERIAL VALLEY 723.10 DRAINS

1305 M I Yes Threat of objectives violated Fish k i l l s Toxic bioassay results

Non-Point X . X

LITTLE MORONGO CREEK 719.10

MILLARD CANYON CREEK 719.32

MISSION CREEK (R7) 719.42

NEU RIVER (R7) 723.10

15 M I

5 M I

15 M I

60 M I Yes

. . .

. . . Point 8 Won-Point X . X Public health hazard

Objectives violated Fish k i l l s

PALM CANYON CREEK 719.47 15 M I

16 M I Yes PAL0 MRDE OUTFALL 715.40 DRAIN

Bacteria objective violated Non-Point Threat of toxic bioassay results Threat of sedimentation

PAL0 MRDE VALLEY 715.40 DRAINS

131 M I Yes Threat of objectives violated Non-Point Threat of toxic bioassay resul ts Threat of sedimentation

PINTO UASH 717.30

PIPES CANYDN CREEK 705.00

PIUTE CREEK 713.10

56 M I

12 M I

1 M I Yes

Page 266

Threat of objective violated (bacteria) Non-Point

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMEN1 Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condit ion In te r - -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Problem Source Hydro U n i t #

719.32

725.00

722.40

Total - Fact Size Uni ts Sheet --- Water Body Name

POTRERO CREEK

Problern/Need Descript ion

SALT CREEK 6 M I Yes Threat o f ob ject ive v io la ted (bacteria) Non-Point . . . 60 M I Yes Threat o f ob ject ive v io la ted (bacteria) Non-Point . . . SAN FELIPE CREEK

(R7)

30 M I

7 M I

10 M I Yes

1 M I

SAN GORGON10 RIVER

SNW CREEK . . . Threat o f ob ject ive v io la ted (bacter ia) Unknown . . . .

. . . TAHQUITZ CREEK

THOUSAND PALMS CANYON CREEK

TUBB CANYON CREEK 3 MI

15 M I Yes

3 M I Yes

26 M I

8 M I Yes

25 MI

3 M I

. . . Threat o f ob ject ive v io la ted (bacter ia) Non-Point . . . Threat o f ob jec t i ve v io la ted (bacter ia) Non-Point . . .

TULE CREEK

TWIN PINES CREEK

VALLEClTO CREEK

WALKER CREEK Threat o f ob ject ive v io la ted (bacteria) Unknown

WHITEWATER RIVER

UILLOU CREEK (R7)

Page 267

Region 7

Water Body Name

SALTON SEA

Saline Lake

Hydro Unit #

ne.oo

STATE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Water Quality Condition Inter- - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description --


Federal Lists

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

0 0 220000 0 220000 AC Yes Objective violated (Salinity) Won-Point X X X Elevated fish tissue Levels (Seleniun) Recreational impacts

Page 268

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Region 7 Vet 1 ands

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Probtem/Need Descript ion

FINNEY-RAMER UA 0 0 0 2600 2600 AC

HAVASU N M 0 0 0 520 520 AC

HAZARD TRACT 0 0 0 535 535 AC

IMPERIAL NUR 0 0 0 3640 3640 AC

IMPERIAL UA

SALTON SEA NM

UISTER UNIT 0 0 0 5255 5255 AC

Page 269


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D



Federal L i s t s

Uater Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- Total

7 Fact -

Uater Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet

ANAHEIM BAY 801 .ll 0 180 0 0 180 AC Yes

HUNTINGTON HARBOUR 801.11 0 0 150 0 150 AC Yes

NEWPORT BAY, LOUER 801.11 0 0 700 0 700 AC Yes

Page 271


Elevated she l l f i sh t issue levels Potential tox ic hot spot

Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels Threat of sedimentation Toxic bioassay resul ts

Recreational impacts Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels Toxic bioassay resul ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Poi n t X . X

Non-Point X . X

Non-Point


Region 8 Estuaries

Federal L is ts

Hydro Water Body Name Unit #

ANAHEIM BAY MARSH 801 .ll

BOLSA BAY MARSH 801.11

BOLSA CHICA 801.11 ECOLOGICAL RESERVE

SANTA ANA RIVER 801.11 MWTH

UPPER NEWPORT BAY 801.11 ECOLOGICAL RESERVE

Water Qua1 i t v Condition Inter-


Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description ---

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

780 AC Yes Threat of elevated she l l f i sh tissue leve Non-Point . . . Storm water runoff

900 AC Yes Threat of elevated shel l f ish tissue leve Non-Point . . . Stormwater runoff Threat of tox ic pol lutants

294 AC Yes Threat of elevated she l l f i sh tissue leve Non-Point . . . STORMUATER RUNOFF

270 AC Yes Possible input of toxics STORMUATER RUNOFF

Non-Point . . .

752 AC Yes Eutrophication Non-Point . X . X Threat of recreational impacts Threat of tox ic pol lutants

Page 272



Federal L i s t s

Hydro Uater Body Name Un i t #

ARLINGTON GU 801 -26

BIG BEAR GU 801.71

BUNKER HILL 1 GU 801 -52

BUNKERHILLIIGU 801.52

BUNKER HILL PRESSURE 801.52 GU

CHINO I GU 801.21

CHINO I 1 GU 801.21

CHINO I11 GU 801.21

COLTON GU 801.44

CUCAMONGA GU 801 -24

ELSINORE GU 802.31

GARNER VALLEY GU 802.22

HEMET GU 802.15

IDYLLWILD GU 802.22

Uater Qual i ty Condition I n t e r - T o t a l . - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion -- 0 0 13 0 13 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment

23 0 0 0 23 SQMI Yes Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment

13 0 9 0 22 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment

0 0 n 77 77 SQMl Yes Drinking water impairment

0 0 24 0 24 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment

0 90 SQMI

0 104 SQMl

0 48 SQMI

0 14 SQMI

0 24 SQMl

0 21 SQMI

0 10 SQMI

0 42 SQMI

0 1 SQMI

Yes Drinking water i m p a i m n t

Yes Drinking water impairment

Yes Dr ink ing water impairment



No

No


Yes

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . . Non-Point . . . Non-Point . . . Non-Point . . . Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . . Non-Point - . . . Non-Point . . . Point 8 Non-Point . . .

Non-Point . . -

Non-Point

Page 273



Federal L i s t s

Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Un i t # Good mediate Immi red Unknown Uni ts Sheet

IRVINE FOREBAY I GW 801.11 0 8 10 0 18 SQMI Yes

IRVINE FOREBAY I I GW 801.11 7 2 5 0 7 S Q M I Yes

IRVINE PRESSURE GW 801.11 0 19 20 0 39 SQMI Yes

LA HABRA GW 845.62 0 0 40 0 40 SQMI Yes

LAKEVIEW GW 802.14 0 25 0 0 25 SQMl Yes

LYTLE CREEK GW 801.42 9 0 0 0 9 SQMI No

MENIFEE I GU 802.12 0 9 0 0 9 SQMI Yes

MENIFEE I 1 GW 802.12 0 6 0 0 6 SQMI Yes

PERRIS NORTH GW : 802.11 0 37 0 0 37 SQMI NO

PERRIS SOUTH I GW 802.11 0 11 0 0 11 SQMI Yes

PERRlS SOUTH I 1 GW 802.11 0 17 0 0 17 SQMI NO

PERRIS SOUTH I11 GW 802.11 0 5 0 0 5 SQMI Yes

RIALTO GW 801.43 27 0 5 0 32 SQMI Yes

RIVERSIDE I GW 801.27 0 0 17 0 17 SQMI Yes

RIVERSIDE I 1 GW 801.27 0 0 11 0 11 SQMI Yes


Dr ink ing uater impairment



Dr ink ing water impairment



v Drink ing water impairment

Threat o f dr ink ing uater impairment

Drinking water impairment

Drinking uater impairment


Drinking water impairment



Problem Source

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Poi nt

Non-Point

Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

Page 274



Federal L i s t s

Uater Qua l i ty Condition Hydro Inter- Total - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Impaired Unknom Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description Problem Source

Non-Point RIVERSIDE I11 GU 801.27 0 0 14 0 14 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment

SAN JACINTO - CANYON 802.20 0 4 0 0 4 SQMI Yes Threat of drinking water impairment GU

Won-Point

SAN JACINTO - INTAKE 802.20 GU

19 SQMI Yes

Non-Point

Non-Point

SAN JACINTO - LOWER 802.20 PRESSURE GU

14 SQMI Yes Drinking water impairment

SAN JACINTO - UPPER 802.20 PRESSURE GU


61 SQMI No



'SAN TIMOTEO GU 801 -60

Non-Point

Non-Point

SANTA ANA FOREBAY GU 801.11

SANTA ANA PRESSURE 801.11 GU




Non-Point

Non-Point

Non-Point

SANTIAGO GU 801.12

TEMESCAL GU 801.25

UPPER TEMESCAL I 801.32 BEDF FOR^) GU

7 SQMI Yes Drinkingwaterimpairment

Page 275

Non-Point UPPER TEMESCAL I 1 801.34



Federal L i s t s

Hydro Water Body Name U n i t # (LEE LAKE) GU

UPPER TEMESCAL I11 801.31 (COLDWATER) GU

WINCHESTER GW 802.13

Water Q u a l i t y Condition In te r - - Total Fact -

Coed mediate I m i r e d Unknown Site Uni ts Sheet

3 0 0 0 3 SQMI Yes

0 0 . 16 0 16 SQMI Yes

Page 276

Problem/Need Descr i ~ t i o n


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0




Federal L i s t s


ANAHEIM LAKE 801.11

BALDWIN LAKE 801 .73

BIG BEAR LAKE 801.71

CANYON LAKE 802.12 (RAILROAD CANYON RESERVOIR)

Water Q u a l i t y Condition In te r - 9 - Fact

G o d mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion -- 0 5 0 0 5 AC Urban runof f

Dai ry runof f

0 1100 0 0 1100AC Yes Threat o f eutrophicat ion Seasonally in te rmi t ten t

0 2970 0 0 2970 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion Sedimentation Elevated f i s h t issue levels

0 2017 0 0 2017AC Yes Eutrophicat ion Recreational impacts Threat o f f i s h populat ion dec l ine

ELSINORE, LAKE 802.31 0 2600 0 0 2600 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion

Objectives v io la ted Fish k i 11s

ERWIN LAKE 801 -73 75 0 0 0 75 AC Approximate acreage.

Lake i s normally dry.

EVANS, LAKE 801 -27 0 42 0 0 42 AC Yes Fish k i l l s Sedimentation

FULMOR, LAKE 802.21 0 0 9 0 9 AC Yes Threat o f eutrophicat ion Tota l Col i form exceed MCL

HEMET, LAKE 802.22 470 0 0 0 470 AC Yes Threat o f recreat ional impacts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Won-Point . . .

Non-Point . . .

Non-Point X X X

Non-Point

Won-Point

Non-Point

Non-Poi n t

Non-Point

. . .

X X X

Page 277

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT


Water Owlity Condition Hydro Inter- - Fact -

Uater Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknoun site Units Sheet Problem/Need Description

IRVlNE LAKE 801.12 650 0 0 0 650 AC Yes Threat of recreational impacts

JENKS LAKE 801 -72 9 0 0 0 9 AC Yes Threat of f i sh population decline Threat of eutrophication


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point . . .

MATHEUS, LAKE 801.33 2750 0 0 0 2750 AC Yes

PRADO PARK LAKE 801.21 0 60 0 0 60 AC Yes Eutrophication Recreational impacts

Federal L i s t s

LEE LAKE 801 -25 0 70 0 0 70 AC Yes Objectives violated Non-Point

PERRIS, LAKE 802.11 0 2340 0 0 2340 AC Yes Threat of dr inkinguater inpairment Non-Poi n t Concrn f o r potential THM precursors

Non-Point

Page 278



Federal L i s t s

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion Hydro I n t e r -

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown

BOLSA CHlCA STATE 801.11 7 0 0 0 BEACH

CORONA DEL MAR STATE 801.11 1 0 0 0 BEACH

HUNTINGTON BEACH 801.11 3 0 0 0 STATE PARK

IRVINE COAST REFUGE 801.11 1024 0 0 0

NEUPORT BEACH 801.11 6 0 0 0

NEUPORT BEACH REFUGE 801.11 166 0 0 0

SEAL BEACH 801.11 1 0 0 0

SUNSET BEACH 801.11 3 0 0 0

Total - Fact - Size Un i ts Sheet ---

7 MI Yes

1 M I Yes

3 M I Yes

1024 M I Yes

6 M I Yes

166 AC Yes

1 M I Yes

3 MI Yes


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Threat of recreat ional impacts Non-Point . . . Threat of recreat ional impacts Point & Non-Point . . . Threat of recreat ional impacts Non-Point . . . . Threat from storm water runof f

Potent ia l contamination from S.G. River Non-Point . . . S p i l l s from of fshore o i l f a c i l i t i e s

Page 279



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i ty Condition Inter- -


Water Body Name Unit # Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description ---

3 No

17 M I

ALGER CREEK

ALlSO CREEK

BAILEY CANYON CREEK

BARTON CREEK

BAUTISTA CREEK

BEAR CREEK (R8)

BOULDER BAY CREEK

CAJON CREEK

CARBON CANYON CREEK

10 Yes

8 Yes

6 M I Yes Threat of drinking uater impeirment Unknom (Bacti. and TDS levels.)

CHINO CREEK, REACH 1 801.21 2 M I Yes Threat of recreation impacts (dair ies) Non-Point Threat of objectives violated from dairy runoff (N, TDS and pathogens)

CHINO CREEK, REACH 2 801.21 10 MI Yes Th ispor t ion isconcre te l ined.

C I T Y CREEK 801.57 15 Yes

3 Yes COLDWATER CANYON 801 -32 CREEK

Page 280



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condition I n t e r -

Good mediate I m i r e d Unknown -- Hydro Uni t #

Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion --- Uater Body Name

5 Yes CUCAMONGA CREEK, MOUNTAIN REACH

13 M I Yes This p o r t i o n i s concrete l ined. Non-Point . . . CUCAMONGA CREEK, VALLEY REACH

DAY AND EAST ETIUANDA CREEKS

5 Yes

EAST TWIN AND STRAUBERRY CYN CREEKS

5 Yes

FALLS CREEK 4 MI Yes

FISH CREEK

FORSEE CREEK

FULLER MILL CREEK

2 M I Y e s High Cu, Hg leve ls during snow melt. Non-Point GROUT CREEK

HIGH CREEK

KNICKERBOCKER CREEK 2 M I Yes Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment Non-Point Threat o f recreat ional impacts Urban/residential storm water runoff

Page 281

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER QUAL l TY ASSESSMENT


Water Qua1 i ty Condition Hydro Inter- -

Water Body Name Unit # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown

LITTLE SAN GORGON10 801.69 12 0 0 0 CREEK

LYTLE CREEK 801 -40 0 18 0 0

MEADW CREEK 801.71 ' 1 0 0 0

Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need D e s c r i ~ t i o n ---


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

18 M I Yes Threat o f drinking water impairment Threat of recreational impacts

1 M I Yes . . . METCALF CREEK 801.72 2 0 0 0 2 No . . . MILL CREEK (PRADO 801.25 0 4 0 0 4 M I Yes Threat of GUR impairment (from dair ies) Non-Point X . X AREA) Threat of recreational impacts

MILL CREEK, REACH 1 801.58 5 0 0 0 5 Yes Threat of recreational impacts Non- Poi nt - . . . Threat of drinking uater impairment Threat o f objectives v io lated

MILL CREEK, REACH 2 801.58 8 0 0 0 8 M I Yes Threat o f objectives v io lated Non-Point . . . Threat of bacteria contamination

MONKEY FACE CREEK 801.70 0 1 0 0 1 MI Yes Threat of Bacti objective violated. Non-Point . . . MOUIITAIN HOME CREEK 801.58 0 4 0 0 4 M I Yes Threat of recreational impacts Non-Point . . .

Threat o f drinking uater inpairment Threat of objectives v io lated

MOUNTAIN HOME CREEK, 801.70 1 0 0 0 1 No EAST FORK

Page 282



Federal L is ts

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condition In ter -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- 1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

Total - Fact Size Units Sheet ---

Hydro Unit #

801.72

801.69

801.57

801.72

802.21

801.23

801.11

Problem/Need Description Water Body Name

NORTH CREEK

OAK GLEN, POTATO CANYON, BIRCH CREEKS

PLUNGE CREEK

RATHBONE (RATHBUN) CREEK

SALT CREEK (R8)

SAN ANTONIO CREEK

(R8)

SAN DIEGO CREEK, REACH 1

5 Yes

2 M I Yes

Threat of recreational impacts Won-Point . . . Won-Point X . X Snow melt from sk i area.

Inputs of nutr ients and sediment.

6 No

2 Yes

6 M I Yes Elevated f i s h t issue levels Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels Eutrophication

Point 8 Yon-Point X . X ,

Non-Point X . X SAN DIEM CREEK, 801.11 0 0 6 0 REACH 2

6 M I Yes Elevated f i sh t issue Levels Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels

SAN JACINTORIMR, 802.12 6 0 0 0 REACH 1

SAN JACINTO RIVER, 802.13 9 0 0 0 REACH 3

SAN JACINTO RIVER, 802.14 7 0 0 0 7 M I No

Page 283



Federal L i s t s

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion Hydro In te r - Total - Fact -

Uater Body Name U n i t # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet REACH 4

SANJACINTORIVER, 802.21 7 0 D 0 7 MI No REACH 5

SAN JACINTO RIVER, 802.21 2 0 0 0 2 M I No REACH 6

SANJACINTORIMR, 802.22 7 0 0 0 7 MI No REACH 7

SAN TIMOTEO CREEK, 801.62 0 5 0 0 5 M I Yes REACH 1




SANTA ANA RIVER, 801.10 0 9 0 0 9 M I Yes REACH 1

SANTA ANA RIVER, 801.13 0 19 0 0 19 M I Yes REACH 2

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Threat t o CUR (Nitrogen) . . .

Recreational impacts Point CUR impairment (N) Aquatic l i f e impairment (Unkoun tox ic )

Recreational impacts Ground water impairment (N).

Point

Recreational impacts Point Ground water impairment (N). Aquatic l i f e impairment (Cl and UIA).

Urban runof f

Urban runof f Dai ry runof f from Reach 3

Non-Poi nt

Non-Point

Page 284



Federal L i s t s

Water Qua1 i t y Condition Hydro In te r -

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun

SANTA ANA RIVER, 801.20 0 0 18 0 REACH 3

SANTA ANA RIVER, 801 -27 0 0 12 0 REACH 4

SANTA ANA RIVER, 801 -52 17 0 0 0 REACH 5

SANTA ANA RIVER, 801 .R 18 0 0 0 REACH 6

SANTIAGO CREEK, 801.12 9 0 0 0 REACH 1



SHAY CREEK 801.72 1 0 0 0

SIBERIA CREEK 801.71 1 0 0 0

Total - Fact Size Un i ts Sheet ---

18 MI Yes

12 MI Yes

17 M I Yes

18 M I Yes

2 M I Yes

1 Yes

1 No

Page 285

Problern/Need Descript ion

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Recreational impacts Point & Non-Point X . X Threat o f o f object ives v i o l e d form d a i r y runof f (N, TDS and pathogens)

Objectives v io la ted Point & Non-Point X . . Impaired f o r REC(Path0gen)and GWR(N)uses Aquatic l i f e impacts ( C l )

Non-Point . . .

. . .

. . .

Objectives v io la ted f o r minerals, bact i . Unknoun X . X



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i ty Condition Inter- -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Units Sheet Problem/Need Description ---

Hvdro Unit # Water Body Name

2 M I Yes Objectives violated Recreational impacts Drinking uater impairment (Bacti).

Non-Point X . X SILVERADO CREEK 801.12

SKINNER CREEK

SLIDE CREEK

STONE CREEK

9 Yes STRAWBERRY CR./SAN JACINTO R., N. FORK

2 MI Yes snou mlt runoff from sk i area.

3 M I Yes

SUMMIT CREEK

TEHESCAL CREEK, REACH 1A

3 M I Yes This port ion i s concrete lined. TEMESCAL CREEK, REACH 10

TEMESCAL CREEK, REACH 2

TEMESCAL CREEK, REACH 4

TEHESCAL CREEK, REACH 5

7 Yes

Page 286


Region 8 Rivers and streams

Uater Body Hydro

Name - U n i t #

TEMESCAL CREEK, 801.35 REACH 6

TEQUESQUITE ARROYO 801.27 (SYCAMORE CREEK)

VIVIAN CREEK 801.70

UATERMAN CANYON 801.57 CREEK

YUCAIPA CREEK 801.67

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion I n t e r - Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion --


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Page 287


Region 8 Wet 1 ands

Water Qual i ty Condit ion Hydro In te r - - Total - Fact -

Water Body Name Un i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

GLEN HELEN 801.59 3 0 0 0 3 AC Approximate acreage

PRADO FLOOD CONTROL 801.25 9741 0 0 0 9741 AC BASIN

SAN JACINTO WILDLIFE 802.15 4700 0 0 0 4700 AC PRESERVE

SHAY MEADOWS 801 .n 30 ' 0 0 0 30 AC Approximate acreage


3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

SAN JOAQUIN 801.11 0 400 0 0 400 AC Yes Threat o f Rare B Endangered Species impa Non-Point FRESHWATER MARSH Threat o f increasing s a l i n i t i e s

Threat o f heavy metal contamination

STANFIELD MARSH 801.71 143 0 0 0 143 AC

Page 288

Federal L i s t s

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 WATER OUALITY ASSESSMENT Report Date : 05/23/94


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0



Size Units Sheet --- Hydro

Water B e Name Unit # Problem/Need Description

CENTRAL MISSION BAY 906.40 1040 AC Yes Recreational impacts Objectives violated Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels


DANA POINT HARBOR 901.14

EAST MISSION BAY 906.40

215 AC

500 AC Yes

. . . Point B Won-Point X . X Recreational impacts

Objectives violated

Point & Non-Point X . X OCEANSIDE HARBOR 902.11 210 AC Yes Objectives violated Recreational impacts Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels *

4000 AC Yes SAN DlEGO BAY, 908.21 CENTRAL

Objectives violated Point 8 Non-Point X . X Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels Elevated f i s h tissue levels

SAN DIEGO BAY, NORTH 908.21 4000 AC Yes

4000 AC Yes Objectives violated Point 8 Non-Point X . X Elevated she l l f i sh tissue levels Elevated f i s h tissue levels

SAN DlEGO BAY, SOUTH 908.21

Page 290


Region 9 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua l i ty Condition Inter- Total - Fact

Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Problern/Need Description -- Hvdro

Uater Bodv Name Unit #

0 0 1 399 400 AC Yes Elevated shel l f ish tissue levels Threat of objectives violated Sedimentation

AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON 904.31 Unknown X . X

0 0 420 0 420 AC Yes Eutrophication Fish k i l l s Recreational impacts

Non-Point X . X BATlQUlTOS LAGOON 904.51

. . . Won-Point X . X

0 200 0 150 350 AC Eutrophication BUENA VISTA LAGOON 904.21

0 0 31 0 31 AC Yes Eutrophication FAMOSA SLOUGH 906.40

KENDALL-FROST 906.40 MISSION BAY MARSH

LOMA ALTA SLOUGH 904.10

LOS FLORES CREEK ' 901.52 ESTUARY

LOS PENASQUITOS 906.10 LAGOON

0 D 1 384 385 AC Yes Recreational inpacts Eutrophication Threat of objectives violated

Point B Non-Point X . X

SAW DlEGO RIVER 907.11 ESTUARY

SAN DlEGUlTO LAGOON 905.11

Page 291


Region 9 Estuaries

Federal L i s t s

Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

SAN ELIJO LAGOON 904.61 0 0 150 180 330 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion Recreational impacts Threat o f recreat ional impacts

SAN LUIS REY RIVER 903.11 0 0 0 160 160 AC ESTUARY

SAN MATE0 CREEK 901.41 0 . O 0 30 30 AC ESTUARY

SANTA MARGARlTA 902.11 0 0 268 0 268 AC Yes Eutrophicat ion LAGOON Recreational impacts - Objectives v i o l a t e d

SOUTH SAN DlEGO BAY 908.21 0 0 0 2400 2400 AC WETLANDS

SWEETWATER MARSH . 909.12 0 936 0 0 936 AC

TIJUANA RIVER 911.11 0 0 150 0 150 AC Yes Objectives v i o l a t e d ESTUARY Recreational impacts

Elevated f i s h t i ssue levels

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Non-Point X . X


. . . Point 8 Non-Point X . X

Page 292



Uater Qual i ty Condition Hydro In te r - - - Fact -

Uater Body Name Un i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Size Uni ts Sheet

AGUA HEDIONDA HA GU 904.30 0 30 0 0 30 SQMI

AGUANGA HA GU 902.80 102 0 0 0 102 SQMI

AULD HA GU 902.40 96 0 0 0 96 SQMl

BARRETT LAKE HA GW 911.30 97 0 0 0 97 SQMl

BATIQUITOS GU 904.51 0 2 0 0 2 SQMl

BOULDER CREEK HA GU 907.40 105 0 0 0 105 SQMI . BUENA VISTA CREEK HA 904.20 0 ' 0 23 0 23 SQMI Yes GU

CAMERON HA GU 911.70 45 0 0 0 . 45 SQMI

CAMP0 HA GW 91 1.80 107 0 0 0 107 SQMI

CAMP0 VALLEY 911.82 4 0. 0 0 4 SQMl

CAVE ROCKS HA GW 902.70 85 0 0 0 85 SQMl

WAHUILA VALLEY 902.70 25 0 0 0 25 SQMl

COTTONVObD HA GU 91 1.60 45 0 0 0 45 SQMl

COTTONU000 VALLEY 91 1.60 3 0 0 0 3 SQMI

Page 293



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

TDS object ives exceeded along coast Non-Point . . . Drink ing water impairment



Federal L i s t s


DELUZ HA GU 902.20

DULZURA HA GU 910.30

EL CAJON VALLEY 907.13

EL CAPITAN HA GW 907.30

ESCONDIDO CREEK HA 904.60 GU

ESCONDIDO VALLEY 904.62

HODGES HA GU 905.20

JAMUL VALLEY 909.21

Water Qua1 i tv Condition In te r - -

Coed mediate Impaired Unknown Total

Size Uni ts --

112 sQn1

100 SQMl

8 SQMI

88 SQMI

89 SQMI

*

20 SQMI

50 SQMI

5 SQMI

Fact - Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion - Problem Source

Yes t h i s subbasin i s Located u i t h i n the Loue Point & Non-Point r San Diego HA GW basin. The impairment i s as l i s t e d f o r the HA.

Yes d r ink ing water object ives exceeded Point B Non-Point

Yes This subbasin i s Located u i t h i n the Esco Non-Point ndido Creek HA GU. Impeirment i s as l i s t ed f o r the HA.

LACUNA HA GU 901.10 0 64 0 0 64 SQMI . . . LAS PULGAS VALLEY 901.52 3 0 0 0 3 SQMI . . .

LOMA ALTA HA GW 904.10 0 10 0 0 10 SQMI . . . LOWER SAN DIEGO HA 907.10 0 15 155 0 170 SQMl Yes uater q u a l i t y object ives exceeded Non-Point . . . GU

Page 294


Ground Uater Federal L i s t s


LOWER SAN LUIS REY 903.10 HA GU

LOWER SWEETUATER HA 909.10 GU

MIDDLE SUEETUATER HA 909.20 GU

MIRAMAR HA GU 906.40

MIRAMAR RESERVOIR HA 906.10 GU

MISSION VALLEY 907.11

MISSION VIEJO HA GU 901.20

MONSERATE HA GU 903.20

MONUMENT HA GU 91 1.40

MORENA HA GU 911 .so

MURRIETA HA GW 902.30

NATIONAL CITY HA GU 908.30

Uater Qual i ty Condit ion In te r - - Total - Fact -

Good mediate Impaired Unknom Size Uni ts Sheet -- 0 146 40 0 186 SQMl Yes

0 0 49 0 49 SQMI Yes

85 0 0 0 85 SQMl

0 0 11 0 11 SQMI Yes

0 177 0 0 177 SQMI

171 0. 0 0 171 SPMl

37 0 0 0 37 SQMl

24 0 0 0 24 SQM!

133 0 0 0 133 SQMl

0 0 0 11 11 SQMI

Page 295

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Threat o f d r ink ing water impairment Non-Point . . . . ~

object ives exceeded

Dr ink ing water impairment object ives exceeded

Non-Point . . .

water q u a l i t y object ives exceeded. Non-Point . . . This subbasin i s located w i th in the Lowe r San Diego HA GU. Impairment same as HA



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Q u a l i t y Condit ion I n t e r -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Total - Fact - Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr iv t ion ---

Hydro Uater Body Name Un i t #

75 SQMI OAKGROM HA GU 902.90

OTAY VALLEY 910.20 4 SQMI

47 SQMI Yes Threat o f dr ink ing water impairment Non-Point OTAY VALLEY HA GW 910.20

PAM0 VALLEY 905.50 4 SQMl

44 SQMI PECHANGA HA GU 902.50

PINE VALLEY 91 1.30

WTRERO HA GU 911.20

2 SQMI

81 S&I

WTRERO VALLEY 911.25 2 SQMI

POUAY HA GU 906.20 41 SQMI

4 SQMI WUAY VALLEY 906.20

RANCHITA TOWN AREA 903.31 4 SQMl

SAN CLEMENTE HA GU 901.30 21 SQMI

SAN DIEGO RIVER 907.15 VALLEY

Page 296



Water Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro In te r - Total - Fact

Uater Body Name Un i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet

SAN DIEGUITO VALLEY 905.11 0 0 6 0 6 SQMl Yes

SAN ELlJO VALLEY 904.61 0 0 3 0 3 SPMl Yes

SAN JUAN VALLEY 901.20 0 18 0 0 18 SQMl

SAN LUIS REY VALLEY 903.10 , 0 0 40 0 40 SQMl Yes - SAW MARCOS HA GU 904.50 0 55 0 0 55 SQMl

SAN HATE0 CANYON HA 901.40 135 0 0 0 135 SQMl GU

SAN MATE0 VALLEY 901.40 4 0 0 0 4 SQMl

SAN ONOFRE HA GU 901.50 103 0 0 0 103 SQMI

SAN ONOFRE VALLEY 901.51 2 0 0 0 2 SQHl

SAW PASQUAL HA GU 905.30 0 66 0 0 66 SQMl

SAN PASQUAL VALLEY 905.30 0 12 0 0 12 SQMl



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

uater q u a l i t y exceeds object ives Non-Point . . . This subbasin i s located u i t h i n the Sola na Beach HA GU. Impairment same as HA.

This subbasin i s Located w i t h i n the Esco Non-Point . . . ndido Creek HA GU. The impairment i s as l i s t e d f o r the HA.

This subbasin i s located u i t h i n the Lone Non-Point r San Lu is Rey HA GU. The impairment i s the same as l i s t e d in the HA.

Page 297

Report Date : 05/23/94 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Uater Qua1 i t v Condition Hvdro In ter -

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate Impaired Unknown Totel - Fact

Size Units Sheet ---

75 SQMI

13 SQMI

24 SQMI Yes

ProblemINeed Description

SAN VICENTE HA GU 907.20 75 0 0 0

SANTA HARGARITA GU 902.11 0 13 0 0

Nitrates std. threatened. Public health warning. This i s a subbasin of the Sant a Maria HA GU. Same impairment as l i s ted

Nan-Point . . . SANTA MARIA VALLEY 905.40 0 0 24 0

SANTA MARIA VALLEY 905.40 33 0 24 0 HA GU

57 Saul Yes Threat of drinking water impairment Threat of objectives violated Public health uarning issued-cty. health

Non-Point . . .

SANTA YSABEL HA GU 905.50 129 0 0 0

SOLANA BEACH HA GU 905.10 0 0 45 0 45 SQMI Yes Threat o f drinking uater impairment uater qua l i ty exceeds objectives

Non-Point . . .

This subbasin i s a port ion of the Lower Sueetuater HA GU. The impairment i s the same as l i s t e d fo r the HA.

Non-Point . . . SUEETWATER VALLEY ' 909.11 0 0 3 0 3 SQHI Yes

TECATE VALLEY 91 1.81 1 0 0 0 1 SQMl

150 Saul

8 SQMI Yes

TEMECULA VALLEY 902.50 150 0 0 0 . . . Point 8 Non-Point . . . T 1 JUANA GU 911.11 0 0 8 0 This subbasin i s a port ion of the T i juan

a Valley GU HA. The impairment i s the sa me as l i s ted fo r the HA.

Page 298

STATE UATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1994 UATER QUA1 1 TY ASSESSMENT


Uater Qual i ty Condit ion Hydro In te r - - Fact -

Uater Bodv Name U n i t # Good mediate Impaired Unknoun Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

TIJUANA VALLEY HA GU 911.10 0 0 30 0 30 SQMI Yes Dr ink ing water impairment Object ives v io la ted pub t i c heat th threatened

UPPER SUEETUATER HA 909.30 100 0 0 0 100 SQMI GU

UARNER VALLEY 903.31 0 00 0 0 40 SQMl

UARNER VALLEY HA GU 903.30 0 208 0 0 2C8 SQMl

YSIDORA HA GU 902.10 0 43 0 0 43 SQMI


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Point & Non-Point . . .

Page 2W



Water Oual i tv Condition Hydro In te r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Good mediate I m a i r e d Unknoun Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

BARRETT LAKE 91 1.30 81 1 0 0 0 811 AC

CALAVERA LAKE 904.31 0 0 0 35 35 AC

CHOLLAS RES 908.22 0 0 0 16 16 AC

CUYAMACA LAKE 907.43 930 0 0 0 930 AC

DIXON LAKE 904.62 71 0 0 0 71 AC

EL CAPITAN RES 907.31 1562 0 0 0 1562 AC

EL TOR0 RES 901.20 22 0 0 0 22 A P

GAJOME LAKE 903.11 0 24 1 0 25 AC Yes Fish k i l l s

Sedimentation Eutrophicat i o n

HENSHAW LAKE 903.31 1500 0 0 0 1500 AC

HODGES LAKE 905.21 0 1234 0 0 1234 AC

LAGUNA NIGUEL LAKE 901 .I3 0 0 0 40 40 AC

LAKE JENNINGS 907.12 1 76 0 0 0 176 AC

LAKE W A Y 905.21 62 0 0 0 62 AC

LOVELAND RES 909.31 454 0 0 0 454 AC

Page 300


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Won-Point X . .


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qual i ty Condit ion In te r -

Good mediate Impaired Unknown -- Hydro U n i t #

Total - Fact - Size Un i ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion --- Water Body Name

LOWER OTAY RES

MIRAMAR LAKE

MISSION VIEJO LAKE

MORENA RES

MURRAY LAKE

RED MOUNTAIN LAKE

SAN DIEGUITO LAKE

SAN ELIJO LAKE

SAN MARCOS LAKE

SAN VICENTE RES

SKINNER LAKE

SUTHERLAND LAKE

SWEETWATER RES

TURNER LAKE

UPPER OTAY RES

Page 301



Federal Lists

Water Quality Condition Hydro Inter- Totel - Fact

Water Body Name Unit # mediate Impaired Unknown Size Units Sheet Probkem/Need Description

VAlL LAKE 902.81 1000 0 0 0 1000 AC

WHLFORD LAKE 904.63 222 0 0 0 222 AC

Page 302

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D



Uater Pual i t y Condit ion Hydro In te r - Totel - Fact -

Water Body Name U n i t # 9 mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet

COASTLINE OF SAW 75 12 15 0 102 M I Yes DIEGO REGION

HEISLER PARK 901 .ll 1536 0 0 0 1536 AC ECOLOGICAL RESERVE

LA JOLLA (0) 906.30 0 12 0 0 12 M I

POINT LOMA KELP BEDS 908.10 3 0 3 0 6 M I Yes

SAN DIEGO MARINE 906.30 92 0 0 0 92 AC, LIFE REFUGE

SAN DIEGO-LA JOLLA 906.30 518 0 0 0 518 AC

ECOLOGICAL REFUGE

TIJUANA EST ' 911.11 0 0 10 0 10 M I Yes SHORELINE

Page 303



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

impaired - Aliso/San Juan Creeks mouths Point 8 Non-Point X . X impaired - Point Loma k e l p beds impaired - Tijuana Estuary shore l ine

Recreational impacts Point

. . . X . .

Objectives v i o l a t e d Point 8 Non-Point X . X Recreational impacts beach area permanently quarantined



Uater Q u a l i t y Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # Goad mediate I m a i r e d Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descript ion

AGUA HEDIONDA CREEK 904.30 0 9 0 0 9 M I

ALlSO CREEK 901.10 0 0 1 19 20 M I Yes Recreational impacts Objectives v io la ted Bacter ia l contamination

ARROYO TRABUCO 901 .20 0 0 1 0 1 M I Yes Heavy metals

BOULDER CREEK (R9) 907.41 11 0 0 0 11 M I

BUENA VISTA CREEK 904.20 0 8 0 0 8 M I - CAHUILLA CREEK 902.71 0 0 0 17 17 M I

CAMP0 CREEK . 91 1.80 0 0 0 19 19 M I

CANYON DE LAS , 904.40 0 0 0 4 4 MI ENCINAS

CHOLLAS CREEK 908.22 0 0 0 6 6 MI

COTTOWOOD CREEK, 91 1.20 0 0 0 14 14 MI LOWER

COTTONUOOD CREEK, 91 1.60 12 0 0 0 12 M I UPPER

DELUZ CREEK 902.21 14 0 0 0 14 MI


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Unknown X . X

Unknown

Page 304



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D

Water Qua1 i t v Condit ion Hvdro - Inter - - Total - Fact Un i t # Good mediate Inmaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion Uater Body Name

ESCONDIDO CREEK

FORESTER CREEK 907.13 0 3 0 0 3 M I Yes Threat o f elevated f i s h t issue leve ls Threat o f impacts from industry

905.32 10 0 0 0 10 M I GUEJITO CREEK

LA POSTA CREEK

LOMA ALTA CREEK

LOS COCHES CREEK

LOS PENASQUITOS CREEK, LOUER

LOS PENASQUITOS CREEK. UPPER

MURRIETA CREEK

OTAY RIVER, LOUER

PARADISE CREEK

PINE VALLEY CREEK

ROSE CANYON

Page 305


Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source D


Water Qual i ty Condition Hydro I n t e r - Total - Fact

Water Body Name Uni t # a mediate Impaired Unknown Size Uni ts Sheet Problem/Need Descr ip t ion

SAN CLEMENTE CANYON 906.40 0 0 0 13 13 M I

SAN DlEGO RIVER, 907.1 1 0 13 0 0 13 MI L W R

SAN DIEGO RIVER, 907.15 0 30 0 0 30 M I

MIDDLE

SAN DIEGUITO RIVER, 905.10 0 11 0 0 11 M I LOWER

SAN JUAN CREEK (R9) 901.20 0 8 1 0 9 M I Yes Recreational impacts Unknown - Objectives v i o l a t e d per iod ic beach closures

SAN LUIS REY RIVER, 903.10 0 21 0 0 21 M I The recreat ional uses a t the r i v e r ' s m u Non-Point . . . LOWER t h i s occasional ly threatened.

SAN LUIS REY RIVER, 903.20 0 30 0 0 30 MI . . . MIDDLE

SAN MARCOS CREEK 904.50 0 0 0 13 13 MI . . . (R9)

SAN MATE0 CREEK (R9) 901.40 0 0 0 17 17 MI . . . SAN ONOFRE CREEK 901.51 0 0 0 13 13 M I . . . SANTA MARGARITA 902.10 11 0 0 0 11 M I yes . . .

Page 306



Hydro Water Body Name Unit # RIVER

SANTA MARIA CREEK 905.41

SANTA YSABEL CREEK 905.50

SECUNDA DESHECHA 901.30 CANADA

SUEETWATER RIVER, 909.10 LOUER

SYCAMORE CREEK 907.12

TECOLOTE CREEK (R9) 906.50

TEMECULA CREEK, 902.51 LOUER

TEMECULA CREEK,UPPER 902.91

TIJUANA RIVER 911.11


Good mediate Impaired Unknown --

TUCALOTA CREEK 902.41 0 0 0 26

WILSON CREEK (R9) 902.61 0 0 0 16


9 M I

7 M I Yes



Federal L i s t s

3 3 3 0 1 1 3 4 9

Problem Source 0

untreated domestic and industr ia l wasteu Point 8 Won-Point X . X ater from c i t y o f T i juana. Severe health problem exists. extensive rec impacts.

Page 307

draft - home page | california state water resources ...€¦ · draft water quality assessment may...

Documents