dredging program 2015 geelong trial dredge – wilson … · 0 26 august 2015 j milne delwp...

DREDGING PROGRAM 2015

GEELONG TRIAL DREDGE – WILSON SPIT

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

October 2015

Document Control

Rev. No. Date Released Author Purpose for issue

A 30 June 2015 J Milne Internal review

B 15 July 2015 J Milne DELWP Review

C 20 August 2015 J Milne DELWP Review

0 26 August 2015 J Milne DELWP approval, Heron documentation

1 7 September 2015 J Milne DELWP Approval, Heron documentation (Dredge volume adjusted)

2 14 October 2015 J Milne Inclusion of Geelong Trial Dredge – Wilson Spit

3 16 October 2015 J Milne DELWP approval

Endorsed By

Name Signature Date

Peter McGovern, CEO Project Sponsor

16/10/15

Geelong Dredging Program 2015 & Geelong Trial Dredge – Wilson Spit

Environmental Management Plan Rev 3

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1

1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1

1.3 KEY ASSETS, ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND RISKS

3

1.4 VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 3

1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW

3

1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTEXT 7

1.7 EMP APPROVAL 7

2 PLANNING

2.1 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 8

2.2 PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS 8

2.3 EXTERNAL NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

10

2.4 RISK MANAGEMENT 12

2.5 PROJECT GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 12

2.6 DOCUMENT AND RECORD CONTROL 15

2.7 CHANGE MANAGEMENT 15

2.8 TRAINING AND AWARENESS 15

2.9 COMMUNICATION 16

2.10 CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT 17

2.11 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

17


Environmental Management Plan Rev 3

3 MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION

3.1 INCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION 18

3.2 MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

18

3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 18

3.4 CONTINGENCY PLANS 19

3.5 PROCESS MONITORING 19

3.6 INSPECTIONS AND SURVEYS 19

3.7 AUDITS 19

4 MANAGEMENT REVIEW

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT REVIEW MEETINGS 21

4.2 PROJECT CLOSE OUT 21

DRAWINGS AND FIGURES

APPENDICES

1 VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

2 PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS – APPLICABLE WORKS AND PROJECT AREAS

3 PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS

4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS AND CONTINGENCY PLANS

5 COMPLAINTS RESPONSE PROCESS


Environmental Management Plan Rev 3 Page 1 of 22

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT

This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) details the environmental management requirements for the Geelong Dredging Program 2015 (GDP 2015), consisting of deepening of an area adjacent to the Refinery Pier No 4 Berth.

It also includes the Geelong Trial Dredge – Wilson Spit, otherwise known as the Rock Trial Dredge

This EMP includes:

The requirements for environmental management during the planning, implementation and review of dredging activities

The responsibilities for implementing this EMP The Project Delivery Standards (PDS) including environmental controls and limits to

ensure that project objectives and targets are achieved An overview of the environmental management procedures, contingency plans and

associated management action Post dredging requirements including monitoring and inspections

This EMP applies to the capital dredging and ancillary works described below, and associated environmental management programs. The Victorian Regional Channels Authority (VRCA) has overall responsibility for the implementation of the capital dredging and ancillary works in accordance with the requirements of this EMP.

1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

The GDP 2015 involves the removal of approx. 270,000 m3 of seabed material from a shallow section of Corio Channel inshore of the Refinery Pier No 4 Berth (Ref. to Drawings 31-32840-K002 and 31-32840-K003) within the designated port waters of the Port of Geelong, and placement of the material within an existing designated Dredge Material Ground (DMG) in Port Phillip (Ref. to Drawings 31-32840-K002 and 31-32840-K005).

Completion of the GDP 2015 will improve the operational efficiency of handling larger ships at the berth, thereby increasing the productivity and the economic competitiveness of the port.

The Port of Geelong relies on a 32km long dredged channel for shipping access. This channel has been enlarged and developed by periodic dredging for over 150 years. While most of the sea bed material underlying the channel is relatively soft, there is a hard basalt outcrop intersecting the eastern end of the Wilson Spit Channel.



This basalt was encountered during the last major channel deepening contract in 1997.

The Victorian Regional Channels Authority (VRCA) is responsible for planning the future development of the channels to ensure that the port access remains safe and efficient in the face of increasing ship sizes in the global fleet.

Any significant widening or deepening proposal for the existing channels will require the removal of a significant volume of the basalt.

The current proposal is to undertake a trial dredge using a back hoe dredge fitted with a rock ripping head, to assess whether the basalt can be effectively removed by this method.

The volume of material to be dredged is up to approx 15,000 cub m of overburden, and 7,000 cub m of rock. (Estimates are approximate only, and the final volumes will be dependent upon the results of the trial).

A successful trial dredge would provide the VRCA with valuable information to assist in planning future channel improvements, such as:

Viability of the dredging technology trialled Nature of the rock extracted, ie size and shape of fragments, for consideration of

possible future beneficial uses.

The works for the Rock Trial Dredge will be managed in conjunction with the dredging for the GDP 2015, and are expected to include up to seven days of dredging time.

1.2.1 Capital Dredging

The proposed GDP 2015 dredge site is located within the designated port waters of the Port of Geelong, contiguous with the existing commercial shipping channels and in close proximity to the city of Geelong and its environs (Ref. Drawing 31-32840-K001).

The proposed rock trial dredge site is located at the eastern end of Wilson Spit Channel, within the area shown in the attached Figures 1 and 2.

1.2.2 Management of Dredged Material

The dredge material will be placed within an existing DMG. Area E (Ref. to Drawings 31-32840-K002 and 31-32840-K005) is the placement site within the DMG located approx. 6km east of Point Wilson. This existing Port of Geelong outer DMG has been used for previous dredging projects, including the major capital dredging project (CIP) in 1997 and the Geelong Dredging Program 2014.

Material obtained from the rock trial dredge will be placed in the outer DMG, in an area defined in Figure 3.

1.2.3 Navigation Aids

To enable the completion of dredging, an existing channel beacon will be removed. This is a single pile steel structure, which will be held in storage for future use as required.



1.2.4 Environmental Management Plans

Contractors engaged to undertake the work will be required to submit an Environmental Management Plan to VRCA based upon the requirements of this EMP, and avoid potential environmental impacts arising from the use of their floating plant. During the dredging in the vicinity of the beacons, temporary navigation aids will be installed as required by the Harbour Master.

1.3 KEY ASSETS, ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND RISKS

The key ecological assets and potential impacts include:

Impacts due to dredging operations, such as turbidity. The Western Shoreline (Cheetham saltpans) Ramsar site occupying the northern

side of the Geelong Arm – potential impact of turbidity plumes.

Potential impacts upon key social values and economic uses include:

Public amenity – noise and visual effects of the dredging and disposal activities. Recreational activities (eg fishing, boating and beach activities) – impacts of dredging

and resulting turbidity. Commercial uses (including commercial fishing, charter fishing and aquaculture

leases) – potential impacts of turbidity and release of contaminants.

1.4 VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

The VRCA Environmental Policy provides the umbrella policy direction for the project (Refer to Appendix 1).

The VRCA is committed to delivering the Geelong Dredging Program 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge in an environmentally responsible manner and in accordance with its statutory approvals and this EMP.

1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW

An Environmental Management System (EMS), consistent with the requirements of ISO14001:2004 Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use has been developed for the Dredging Program. The EMS consists of the policies, plans, procedures and activities that form a systematic method of managing the environmental aspects of the project. This EMP is a key component of the EMS, describing the main elements of the EMS and providing direction to detailed procedures and processes.



The EMS is designed to be consistent with the Port of Geelong Safety and Environmental Management Plan (SEMP), which is jointly prepared by GeelongPort, Graincorp and the VRCA, the principal owners and operators of the port’s combined assets.

Overall project management requirements are documented in the Geelong Dredging Program 2015 Project Management Plan (PMP).

Contractors will be required to incorporate requirements of this EMP into Contract Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs). All CEMPs will be reviewed by the VRCA before works begin, to ensure consistency with this EMP.

The structure of the EMS is shown below, and key documents are described in Table 1:



Structure of the EMS

Environmental Management Documents

POLICIES

EMP

AND PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS

SYSTEM PROCEDURES

OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES, MANAGEMENT PLANS, DRAWINGS,

REPORTS

VRCA

– GDP 2015 & Rock Trial

Dredge Project

Management Plan (PMP)

VRCA

– GDP 2015 & Rock Trial

Dredge Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

CONTRACTORS

– Contract Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs)

Port of Geelong Safety & Environmental Management Plan (SEMP)



Table 1 – Key Environmental Management Documents

Document Description Content

Port of Geelong Safety and Environmental Management Plan (SEMP)

The SEMP is a document jointly prepared by GeelongPort, Graincorp and the VRCA to provide a whole of port response to safety and environmental responsibilities imposed by the Port Management Act 1995

Comprehensive risk based approach to safety and environmental management of port operations, including roles and responsibilities, risk assessment, process and consultation requirements

VRCA – Geelong Dredging Program 2015 & Geelong Trial Dredge – Wilson Spit

Project Management Plan (PMP)

The PMP is prepared by the VRCA to guide the planning, implementation and close-out of all aspects of the GDP 2015.

Whole of project objectives, schedule, budget, roles, responsibilities and processes.

VRCA – Geelong Dredging Program 2015 & Geelong Trial Dredge – Wilson Spit Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

This EMP, prepared by the VRCA defines the processes and methods by which the environmental aspects of the project will be managed to ensure that environmental effects of the project are within the predictions set out in the risk assessment and statutory authority referrals.

Description of the main elements of the project EMS, their interaction and direction to key procedures (including legal requirements, risk management, induction and training, emergency response, incident reporting, measurement and evaluation, and management review).

External notification and reporting requirements.

Project Delivery Standards (PDS) (incorporating environmental limits and controls)

Description of environmental monitoring programs and contingency plans.

Contract Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs)

CEMPs are prepared and implemented by contractors to document environmental requirements specific to their dredging or other activities.

Requirements relevant to the scope of the contract work, including any relevant requirements of this EMP.



1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTEXT

This EMP has been prepared in support of the following objectives:

To describe the main elements of the GDP 2015 EMS, their interaction and direction to key procedures as required by ISO14001:2004 Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use.

To establish the processes and controls that will be implemented to ensure that the program is delivered with environmental impacts that do not exceed those predicted in the risk assessment and statutory approvals.

To communicate environmental management requirements to contractors. Requirements will be included in CEMPs for each contract.

To ensure that the project does not result in unacceptable impacts on matters of National Environmental Significance.

1.7 EMP APPROVAL

This EMP is a controlled document and will be approved and revised in accordance with the requirements defined in Table 2.

The VRCA will consult relevant authorities on all proposed revisions to the EMP and seek advice on whether these revisions require approval. Where approval is required, this will be sought prior to implementing the change.

Table 2 – EMP Approval requirements

Approval

VRCA Victorian Gov’t (DELWP)

Initial release Approval by CEO, VRCA Approval required, Director Regulation and Approvals.

Procedural or Minor revision (changes within project conditions or consents).

Approval by CEO, VRCA Notification of change to DELWP, Director Regulation and Approvals.

Major revision (changes requiring amendment to project conditions).

Approval by CEO, VRCA Approval required, Director Regulation and Approvals.



2 PLANNING

2.1 LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

Where legislation requires a specific management action or response, these requirements are identified in the Project Delivery Standards (PDS) as environmental controls, limits or monitoring programs, or within contingency plans. The PDS associated with key legislation are shown in Table 3 below. The content of a PDS is further described in Section 2.2.1.

Compliance with legal and other relevant requirements will be evaluated by project audits (Section 3.7).

Table 3 – Legislation and associated Project Delivery Standards

Legislation Applicable Project Delivery Standards

Coastal Management Act 1995 (Vic.)

Environment Protection Act 1970 (Vic.)

All PDS.

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth.)

Dredging and plume

Dredged material management

Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 (Cwlth.)

Heritage Act 1995 (Vic.)

Marine based works

Wildlife Act 1975 (Vic.) Marine based works

Dredging and plume


2.2 PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS

2.2.1 Content of Project Delivery Standards

PDS have been developed for the dredging program to address key environmental risks, effects and legal requirements. PDS are a collation of the management and mitigation measures, environmental performance monitoring and contingency plans for the project.

The dredging program PDS are:

Construction and dredging management Marine based works Dredging and plume




Each PDS includes:

An objective – the performance goal. A target – performance level at which the objective is demonstrated as being

achieved. Application – the project activities and project areas to which the PDS applies

Environmental controls – management and mitigation measures required to support achievement of the objective during the project implementation. These include process controls and associated monitoring.

Environmental limits – numerical performance standards which the project must comply with.

Reference to environmental monitoring programs – the environmental monitoring programs applicable to the PDS.

Reference to contingencies – the relevant contingency plans containing management actions which may be implemented in the event of exceedance of the environmental limit or response level.

Table 4 indicates the applicability of environmental limits, monitoring programs and contingency plans to the PDS for Construction and Dredging Management. The remaining PDS do not have associated environmental limits, monitoring programs or contingency plans.

Table 4 – Applicability of environmental limits, monitoring programs and contingency plans to the PDS

Project delivery standard

Environmental limit

Environmental monitoring

Contingency plan

Construction and dredging management (all activities)

Airborne noise Airborne noise Airborne noise

Contractors must incorporate relevant PDS into their respective CEMPs. A guide to the applicability of PDS to each project area is contained in Appendix 2. The PDS applicable to the dredging program are included in Appendix 3.

2.2.2 Environmental Limits and Response Levels

Environmental limits have been established for:



Airborne noise

A graduated response for management is provided through response levels, which provide an early warning to enable management action to be taken in a timely manner.

The overall management action to a response level or environmental limit being exceeded is indicated in Table 5. Further detail is provided in Section 3.5 and Appendix 4.

Table 5 – Management action in response to exceedance of response levels or environmental limits

Action

Response level reached Modify or suspend the activity if the environmental limit may be exceeded.

Assess cause(s) and identify and implement appropriate management actions as identified in the contingency plan.

Environmental limit exceeded Suspend the project activity contributing to and/or causing the exceedance. Project activities that do not contribute to the environmental limit being exceeded can continue without disruption.

Assess cause(s) and identify and implement appropriate management actions as identified in the contingency plan.

Resume activity when conditions have returned to below the environmental limit and will remain below the limit once activities resume. Approval to resume activity is required from the GDP 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge project sponsor, the VRCA CEO or his delegate, following approval from the relevant agency

2.3 EXTERNAL NOTIFICATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Performance against this EMP will be reported to government agencies as indicated in Table 6.



Table 6 – Notification and reporting requirements

Subject Reporting or notification

Government agency

Timeframe

Environmental Incident DELWP Notification within one day

Incident report required

Environmental limit exceeded Airborne noise – DELWP.

Notification within one working day (normal business hours) of verifying that environmental limit has been exceeded.

Incident report required.

Pollution event or imminent environmental hazard (as defined in Environmental Auditor Guidelines for Conducting Environmental Audits, Publication No 953.2, October 2007, EPA Victoria)

DELWP, EPA Immediate notification.

Incident report required.

Non-Aboriginal heritage Heritage Victoria, DELWP

Notification within 7 working days of discovery of historic shipwreck.

Notification prior to any additional surveys being conducted.

Report to be forwarded following heritage inspections.

Aboriginal heritage Office of Aboriginal Affairs, DELWP

Notification within 7 working days of discovery of Aboriginal heritage items.

Project close-out report. DELWP Close-out report to be forwarded within 90 days of completion of dredging activities.

Audit of the implementation of the EMP by an external auditor.

DELWP Audit report forwarded within 7 working days of finalising the audit report.



EMP Method Statement for Dredging and Disposal Works

DELWP Approval by DELWP to be sought within 10 business days prior to the commencement of dredging.

Dredging Schedule DELWP Notification no less than 5 business days prior to commencement.

Subsequent significant revisions of the dredging schedule will be submitted to DELWP within two working days of approval by VRCA management.

2.4 RISK MANAGEMENT

Environmental risks associated with the GDP 2015 and the Rock Trial Dredge have been identified and documented in risk assessments conducted in accordance with AS/NZS ISO31000:2009 Risk Management – Principles and guidelines.

Potential hazards and worst foreseeable outcomes are identified in the risk registers. Risks are then rated in terms of likelihood and consequence, with a lower and upper bound assessment. Management controls proposed for reduction or mitigation of risks are listed, and the residual risk then assessed.

The risk registers will be reviewed as required to incorporate any changes identified or the results of incident investigations. Changes to the risk registers will be approved by the GDP 2015 project sponsor, the VRCA CEO or his delegate.

Task based risk assessments (eg Job Safety and Environment Assessments) will be undertaken during the project to identify and control workplace hazards.

2.5 PROJECT GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE

The VRCA has overall responsibility for the implementation of the GDP 2015 and the Rock Trial Dredge in accordance with the requirements of this EMP. The VRCA is therefore responsible also for communicating responsibilities to contractors engaged to undertake the dredging and ancillary works.

Project roles and responsibilities are defined in the PMP, and illustrated in the indicative organisation structure below. The VRCA CEO has responsibility for:

Implementing the EMP



Coordinating all activities relating to the EMP Providing adequate resources to undertake the project in accordance with the EMP.

Specific detailed responsibilities for implementing the EMP are identified in plans including:

PMP – responsibilities of the GDP 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge management team CEMPs – identifying responsibilities within each contract team undertaking works

The VRCA will monitor the appropriate delegation of responsibility through the review of key documentation including CEMPs and during audits. It should be noted that the dredging and ancillary works may operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week, therefore a single role may be undertaken by several people during this phase.



VRCA Board

Project Steering

Committee

Dredging Contractor

Stakeholders - Channel

User Group

Study Consultants

Ancillary Works

Contractor

Community Advisory

Panel

Project Manager

Regulatory Authorities

GEELONG DREDGING PROGRAM 2015

GEELONG TRIAL DREDGE – WILSON SPIT

ORGANISATION CHART

VRCA CEO



2.6 DOCUMENT AND RECORD CONTROL

Environment documents and records will be managed in accordance with the standard procedures of the VRCA for document creation, review and approval, and record storage, retention and disposal.

At the completion of the works, documentation relevant to dredging works, dredge material grounds and navigation aids will be incorporated into the VRCA ongoing operational systems. These may include as-built records, calculations, drawings and any operations and maintenance manuals.

2.7 CHANGE MANAGEMENT

Proposed changes to the project will be assessed and documented in order to identify and manage any consequences of the change. This will include an assessment of the risk and compliance with legal requirements.

Changes may include:

Alterations to the project schedule Modifications to work methods within the approved scope Adjustment of environmental monitoring and response levels Changes to dredging technology

Changes will be approved in accordance with Table 2.

2.8 TRAINING AND AWARENESS

All project personnel will be suitably qualified and experienced to undertake their defined work in an environmentally responsible manner. Personnel who have defined responsibilities under this plan will be trained in the requirements of this EMP.

All personnel involved in the dredging program will be required to complete a project induction which will incorporate key environmental aspects of the project. All personnel will be required to complete an assessment to demonstrate an understanding of key issues, requirements and responsibilities.

Induction topics will include:

VRCA environmental policy Key environmental issues and controls Environmental limits and monitoring programs Emergency response Incident reporting Waste management Cetacean requirements Responsibilities



Communication requirements Consequence of departure from the requirements of this EMP.

2.9 COMMUNICATION

The VRCA CEO or his delegate will be responsible for and undertake all requirements with respect to community liaison.

2.9.1 Internal Communication

Regular meetings between VRCA personnel and contractors will be scheduled. Environmental matters will be included as standard agenda items at these meetings.

Where appropriate, additional communication regarding environmental matters will occur in the form of written correspondence such as memoranda, contract instructions and variation orders issued in accordance with the conditions of contract.

2.9.2 External Communication

A variety of methods will be used to distribute to, or receive information from interested members of the community and direct stakeholders. These include the following:

VRCA Website – A section dedicated to the project will be created on the Authority’s website. Within this section there will be a segment for community feedback.

Media Releases – Once the project receives the necessary Government approvals, the VRCA will issue a press release explaining the rationale behind the GDP 2015 and outline the key details of the program. Subsequent press releases will be issued on reaching critical project milestones.

Notices to Mariners – Official alerts to the shipping and boating community will be issued during the course of the project.

Issues Log – A community issues log will be used for this project with protocols in place to ensure that all issues raised by the community are addressed in an efficient and timely fashion.

Key communication activities and content include the following:

All complainants will receive an initial response by the end of the next business day. Complaints will be managed following the process described in Appendix 5 and resolved as soon as practicable.

All enquiries received through the VRCA web site will receive a response within two working days and will be resolved as soon as practicable.

Communication of safety exclusion zones or restricted access zones as per Marine Safety Act 2010 around all major marine equipment.

Communications with operators, tenants and other port stakeholders, through the regular meetings of the VRCA’s Channel User Group.

Briefings / meetings with community, recreational, and other relevant community groups where requested and/or required.

Notice to Mariners to be issued before the start of any work.



A community consultation group established by the VRCA.

2.10 CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

All contractors shall comply with the requirements of this EMP.

Contractor requirements and key performance expectations will include:

Mandatory contractor systems and plans (including a CEMP) for the management of environment and emergency preparedness.

Induction, site and hazard specific training. Inspection regimes and schedules. Environmental performance monitoring and reporting.

All contractors will be required to demonstrate that they have the necessary skills and experience to undertake the work in accordance with this EMP.

2.11 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

Potential emergency scenarios are identified in the project risk register.

Emergency response procedures will be as documented within the Port of Geelong SEMP, the Port of Geelong Emergency Management Plan and the latest edition of the Port Waters of Geelong Operating Handbook including Harbour Master’s Directions, and operating procedures as for normal port operations.

Inductions will provide an overview of emergency response requirements. Site specific induction and training will be undertaken by contractors.



3 MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION

3.1 INCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION

Environmental incidents and hazards, including pollution incidents will be reported and recorded. This requirement will be included in inductions and reinforced during the project. Reporting procedures shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the Port Waters of Geelong Operating Handbook.

External reporting requirements in relation to hazards and incidents are identified in Table 6.

3.2 MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

Environmental performance will be monitored via the following mechanisms:

1. Environmental monitoring – monitoring of environmental conditions. Environmental monitoring programs are described further in Section 3.3. Environmental monitoring data informs operations. Management actions that may be adopted if response levels or environmental limits are reached are identified in contingency plans.

2. Process monitoring, inspections and surveys – monitoring of operational activities, physical conditions and post construction environmental conditions (eg equipment tracking, bathymetric surveys). Process monitoring, inspections and surveys are identified in PDS alongside process controls. Monitoring data informs any additional management action that may be required.

3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

Environmental monitoring programs are identified in the PDS. The environmental monitoring program proposed is:

Airborne noise

A description of the environmental monitoring program is provided in Appendix 4. Detailed monitoring procedures will be prepared prior to the commencement of works and will include monitoring locations and methods, frequency and statistical basis.

Each monitoring procedure will include appropriate measures to be taken in the event that monitoring cannot be undertaken due to extended poor weather, equipment loss or failure or other factors. Flexibility in the form of redundancy of equipment and scheduling of monitoring will be incorporated into monitoring programs to minimise disruption to the project. Should monitoring in accordance with the procedure not be possible, then the overall management approach will be as follows:

Assess the impact of the monitoring failure on the ability to evaluate performance and determine whether to continue, modify or suspend activities.

Where the failure of the monitoring would affect the ability to evaluate conformance with an environmental limit, activities will be suspended.



Monitoring in accordance with the EMP will be reinstated as soon as practicable.

3.4 CONTINGENCY PLANS

Contingency plans have been identified for the environmental monitoring program. Contingency plans describe the process to be followed in the event that response levels or environmental limits have been reached, or monitoring results indicate that management action may be required. The management actions identified in the contingency plans are not an exhaustive list but tangible responses that the project will implement if required. The most appropriate management action will be selected on a case by case basis.

The contingency plans for the project are contained in Appendix 4, and are:

Airborne noise

3.5 PROCESS MONITORING

Process monitoring is identified in the PDS. Process monitoring includes:

Equipment tracking – Dredging and Plume PDS, and Dredged Material Management PDS.

Hydrographic surveys – Dredging and Plume PDS, Dredged Material Management PDS.

3.6 INSPECTIONS AND SURVEYS

Inspections and surveys are identified in the PDS.

3.7 AUDITS

Audits will be used to check compliance with EMP requirements. Opportunities for improvement will be identified as part of the continuous improvement process under ISO14001.

VRCA will appoint an auditor approved by the Director Regulation and Approvals, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning to audit compliance with the EMP. Audits will comprise:

One pre-start audit to ensure required controls and record keeping arrangements are in place

One audit following project completion, to verify compliance with all EMP requirements.

Audits may cover any matters relating to implementation of the EMP.

Compliance may be assessed by observation of project activities, interviews and review of records. Records may include:



Contractor reports Inspection reports Hydrographic survey results Records of equipment tracking Records of induction and training Cetacean sighting logs



4 MANAGEMENT REVIEW

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT REVIEW MEETINGS

Regular reviews of the EMS and environmental performance will be undertaken by the Project Steering Committee at its scheduled fortnightly meetings, and in accordance with the PMP.

Reviews will include:

Compliance with PDS Compliance with legal requirements including statutory approvals and other

commitments Environmental performance monitoring results (including outcomes from

management review for environmental monitoring – refer to Section 4.2) Results of inspections and surveys Results of audits Project risk profile

Management reviews will ensure the continued effectiveness, suitability and adequacy of environmental arrangements and identify opportunities for continuous improvement. Any action arising from the management review will be assigned responsibility and tracked until completion.

4.2 PROJECT CLOSE OUT

A project close out report will be prepared following completion of dredging and ancillary activities. The close out report will contain a summary of project outcomes including:

A summary of project activities Total volumes dredged, calculated from hydrographic survey results Conformance with PDS Summary of environmental monitoring results obtained Summary of consultation activities

The project close out report will be submitted to relevant government agencies (Refer to Table 6)



GDP 2015 Drawings K001 to K006

Rock Trial Dredge Figures 1 to 3

This Drawing must not be

used for Construction unless

signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.

This document may only be used by

GHD's client (and any other person who

GHD has agreed can use this document)

for the purpose for which it was prepared

and must not be used by any other

person or for any other purpose.

DO NOT SCALE

Note: * indicates signatures on original issue of drawing or last revision of drawing

Level 8, 180 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia

T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111

E [email protected] W www.ghd.com

Plot Date: Cad File No:7 September 2015 - 10:48 AM G:\31\32840\CADD\Drawings\31-32840-K001.dwg

Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K001

1

J. MUNRO J.MUNRO

M. WOOTTEN* C. DENGATE*

R. HILL*

18.06.2015

AS SHOWN

LOCALITY PLANNOT TO SCALE

DRAWING LISTDRG No. DRAWING TITLE

31-32840-K001 COVER SHEET, LOCALITY PLAN AND DRAWING LIST

31-32840-K002 LOCATION PLAN

31-32840-K003 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT, NOTES AND SETOUT POINTS

31-32840-K004 DREDGING CROSS SECTIONS

31-32840-K005 DREDGE MATERIAL GROUND (DMG)

31-32840-K006 DMG CROSS SECTIONS

N

SITE OF DREDGING WORKS(NOT INCLUDING DREDGEMATERIAL GROUND (DMG))

N

POINT WILSON SPOIL GROUND

WILSON SPIT CHANNEL

HOPETOUN CHANNEL

POINT RICHARDS CHANNEL

DREDGE MATERIAL GROUND(DMG) FOR 2015 DREDGING.REFER 31-328400-K005

SITE OF DREDGING WORKS.REFER 31-32840-K003

REFINERYPIER

CORIO BAY

OUTER HARBOUR

CITY CHANNEL

CORIO CHANNEL

BULK GRAINPIERS



signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.







DO NOT SCALE



T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111



Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K002

1

J.MUNRO J.MUNRO

M.WOOTTEN* C.DENGATE*

R.HILL*

18.06.15

AS SHOWN

0 300 1200 1500m900600

SCALE 1:30,000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE

LOCATION PLANSCALE 1:30,000

BK004

AK004

CK004

TOP OF BATTER

RP 1

RP 2

RP 3RP 4

N

TOE OF BATTER

BATTER AT SLOPE OF 1V:3H

LASCELLES WHARF

PROPOSED LASCELLESWHARF EXTENSION (UNDERSEPARATE CONTRACT)

REFINERY PIER

EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DREDGEEXTENTS TO -12.3m (CD) CONTOUR

2.5m WHARF FACE TO TOE OF BATTER

-10

-10

-5

-50

0

00

00

00

-13-13

-13 -13

-13

-13

-13

-12

-12

-12

-11

-11

-9

-9-8

-8

-7

-7

-6

-6

-4

-4

-4

-3

-3

-3

-2

-2

-1

-1

-1-1

-1

-1

11

11

1

11

11

BH L4 1BH L4 3

BH L4 6

BH L4 4BH L4 5

BH L4 7

BH 2011 01

BH 2011 02

BH L4 2

BH9

BH2

BH1

EXTENT OF SURVEY

DREDGE TO -12.3



signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.







DO NOT SCALE



T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111


Plot Date: Cad File No:4 September 2015 - 1:47 PM G:\31\32840\CADD\Drawings\31-32840-K003.dwg

Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K003

2

J.MUNRO J.MUNRO


R.HILL*

18.06.15

AS SHOWN

SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE

20100 40 50m30

SETOUT POINTSPOINT EASTING NORTHING

RP 1 270692.333 5780707.667

RP 2 270528.248 5780803.824

RP 3 270599.510 5781102.213

RP 4 270640.995 5781127.290

GENERAL ARRANGEMENTSCALE 1:1000

GENERAL NOTES:1. DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE IN METRES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO).2. LEVELS AND CHAINAGES ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE IN METRES UNO.3. DO NOT OBTAIN DIMENSIONS BY SCALING FROM THE DRAWINGS.4. COORDINATES ARE BASED ON MGA (GDA94) ZONE 55.5. TIDAL LEVELS AT GEELONG PORT ARE SOURCED FROM CHART AUS153.6. DATUM FOR LEVELS IS CHART DATUM (CD). CD FOR THE INNER HARBOUR (INCLUDING

DREDGE AREA) BASED ON SHELL REFINERY DATUM WHICH IS 0.580m BELOW AUSTRALIANHEIGHT DATUM (AHD).

7. EXISTING LEVELS FOR THE DREDGE AREA SOURCED FROM THE HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYCOMPLETED BY FUSION MAP IN APRIL 2015.

8. EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DREDGE EXTENTS ARE BASED ON SURFACE LEVELS AT THE TIMEOF SURVEY LISTED IN NOTE 7 ABOVE. THESE LEVELS MAY VARY POST SURVEY AND AS SUCHEASTERN AND SOUTHERN DREDGE EXTENTS SHOWN ARE A GUIDE ONLY. ACTUAL EASTERNAND SOUTHERN DREDGE EXTENTS ARE TO FOLLOW -12.3m CD CONTOUR AT THE TIME OFDREDGING.

9. OVERDREDGING TOLERANCES ARE 0.0mm ABOVE -12.3m CD AND 400mm BELOW -12.3m CD.10. BEACON No. 10 TO BE REMOVED UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT.

DREDGING VOLUME AND AREA CALCULATIONS:1. TOTAL VOLUME OF DREDGING (INCLUDING BATTERS AND EXCLUDING OVERDREDGING) =

251,900mį.2. TOTAL VOLUME OF DREDGING (INCLUDING BATTERS AND INCLUDING 400mm

OVERDREDGING) = 269,900mį.3. TOTAL AREA OF DREDGING TO -12.3m CD = 33,000mĮ (AREA EXCLUDING BATTERS).4. THE DREDGE VOLUMES ARE BASED ON THE FUSION MAP HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED

APRIL 2015. THE ACTUAL EXTENT OF DREDGING (VOLUME AND FOOTPRINT) MAY VARY.

LEGEND

CUT AREA DREDGED TO -12.3m (CD)

CUT AREA 1V:3H BATTER

PROPOSED LASCELLES WHARF EXTENSION (UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT)

EXTENT OF DREDGING TO -12.3m (CD)

EXISTING CONTOUR (1.0m INTERVAL)

GHD BOREHOLES

WORLEY PARSONS BOREHOLES

-7

NOTE: RP1 TO RP2 AND RP1 TO RP4 TO FOLLOW-12.3m CD CONTOUR AT THE TIME OF DREDGING

BH L4 1

BH 1

BOREHOLE SETOUT TABLE

BOREHOLECOORDINATESYSTEM POINT X POINT Y SOURCE

BH L4 1 MGA55 270567.80 5781027.75 GHDBH L4 3 MGA55 270506.36 5781035.88 GHDBH L4 6 MGA55 270351.84 5780899.44 GHDBH L4 4 MGA55 270489.19 5780872.33 GHDBH L4 5 MGA55 270419.61 5780861.48 GHDBH L4 7 MGA55 270338.28 5780809.07 GHDBH 2011 01 MGA55 270525.33 5780745.82 GHDBH 2011 02 MGA55 270539.79 5780717.81 GHDBH L4 2 MGA55 270537.08 5780877.75 GHDBH9 MGA55 270540.50 5780899.50 Worley Parsons

BH2 MGA55 270615.90 5780867.30 Worley Parsons

BH1 MGA55 270626.70 5781008.40 Worley Parsons

-32.5

760.0

04-2

.274

-2.27

8

-25.0

002.4

74-2

.328

-4.80

2

-2.50

08.3

86-3

.914

-12.3

00

0.000

8.244

-4.05

6-1

2.300

25.00

06.7

43-5

.557

-12.3

00

50.00

05.5

00-6

.800

-12.3

00

-31.7

86-0

.000

-2.53

8-2

.538

-25.0

002.1

52-2

.648

-4.80

0

-2.50

09.6

61-2

.639

-12.3

00

0.000

9.626

-2.67

4-1

2.300

25.00

09.0

89-3

.211

-12.3

00

50.00

08.5

69-3

.731

-12.3

00

75.00

08.0

06-4

.294

-12.3

00

100.0

006.0

74-6

.226

-12.3

00

0.000

0.000

-12.3

00-1

2.300

25.00

03.7

23-8

.577

-12.3

00

50.00

00.8

82-1

1.418

-12.3

00

55.47

80.0

00-1

2.300

-12.3

00

EXISTING SURFACE

CUT

DESIGN SURFACE

SECTIONCK003 250SCALE 1 :

Datum RL -16.00

DEPTH OF CUT

EXISTING SURFACE

DESIGN SURFACELEVEL

CHAINAGE OF DREDGEEXTENTS

DESIGN SURFACE

EXISTING SURFACE

CUT

Datum RL -16.00

DEPTH OF CUT

EXISTING SURFACE

DESIGN SURFACELEVEL

OFFSET FROM PROPOSEDFACE OF WHARF

FACE

OF

PROP

OSED

WHA

RF

13

SECTIONBK003 250SCALE 1 :

-12.3

00-1

2.300

0.00

121.3

47

Datum RL -16.00

DEPTH OF CUT

EXISTING SURFACE

DESIGN SURFACELEVEL

CHAINAGE OF DREDGEEXTENTS

FACE

OF

PROP

OSED

WHA

RF

DESIGN SURFACE

CUT

EXISTING SURFACE

SECTIONAK003 250SCALE 1 :

13

68.60

50.0

00-1

2.300

-12.3

00



signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.







DO NOT SCALE



T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111


Plot Date: Cad File No:4 September 2015 - 1:47 PM G:\31\32840\CADD\Drawings\31-32840-K004.dwg

Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K004

2

J.MUNRO J.MUNRO


R.HILL*

18.06.15

AS SHOWN

0 2.5 10 12.5m7.55


0.0 - 0.1m

0.1 - 0.5m

0.5 - 1.0m

1.0 - 1.5m

1.5 - 2.0m

2.0 - 2.5m

2.5 - 3.0m

0.0 - 0.1m

0.1 - 0.5m

DEPTH BELOW -9.0m CD

LEGEND

DEPTH ABOVE -9.0m CD

AK006

BK006

CK006

DMG BOUNDARY. TOE OF BATTERSTO BE MINIMUM 1.0m WITHIN DMGBOUNDARY.

N

RP1

RP2RP3

RP4

-11.0

-11.0

-11.0-11.0

-11.0-10.0

-10.0

-11.5-11.25

-11.25

-11.25

-10.75

-10.75-10.75

-10.75

-10.75

-10.5

-10.5

-10.5

-10.5

-10.5

-10.5

-10.5

-10.25-10

.25-10.25-9.75

-9.75-9.5

-9.5-9.5-9.5-9.5 -9.25

-9.25

-11.25

-9.25-9.0

-9.5-9.75

-10.25

-10.5

-10.75



signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.







DO NOT SCALE



T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111



Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K005

1

J.MUNRO J.MUNRO


R.HILL*

18.06.15

AS SHOWN

0


3015 60 75m45

NOTES:1. CO-ORDINATES ARE BASED ON MGA (GDA94) ZONE 55.2. DATUM FOR LEVELS IS CHART DATUM (CD). CD FOR THE OUTER HARBOUR (INCLUDING

DMG) BASED ON POINT RICHARDS DATUM WHICH IS 0.524m BELOW AUSTRALIANHEIGHT DATUM (AHD).

3. EXISTING LEVELS FOR THE DREDGE MATERIAL GROUND (DMG) SOURCED FROM THEHYDROGRAPHC SURVEY COMPLETED BY 3D MARINE MAPPING IN 2013, AND REDUCEDTO CD FOR THE POINT RICHARDS TIDE GAUGE.

4. VERTICAL TOLERANCE FOR SPOIL PLACEMENT WITHIN DMG IS 500mm ABOVE -9.0m CD

DREDGE MATERIAL GROUNDPLAN

SCALE 1:1500

SETOUT POINTSPOINT EASTING NORTHING

RP1 289043.290 5781894.820

RP2 289038.244 5782109.761

RP3 289808.856 5782127.853

RP4 289812.861 5781912.888

0% 0%

-100

-9.93

0-1

0.94

1.94

-9

115.0

-11.3

77

OFFSET FROM CENTRELINE

EXISTINGSURFACE LEVEL

DEPTH OF FILL

DESIGNSURFACE LEVEL

DATUM R.L. -13.00

0% 0%

-100

.0-1

0.15

0-1

1.31

2.31

-9

114.0

-11.5

40.0

0-1

1.54



DESIGNSURFACE LEVEL

DATUM R.L. -13.00

0% 0%

0-1

0.64

1.64

-9



DESIGNSURFACE LEVEL

DATUM R.L. -12.00

DREDGED MATERIALEXISTING SURFACETOP OF SPOIL TO -9.0m CD

SECTIONAK005 H 1:500, V 1:100SCALE 1 :

SECTIONBK005 H 1:500, V 1:100SCALE 1 :

SECTIONCK005 H 1:500, V 1:100SCALE 1 :

114.0

-10.7

70.0

0-1

0.77

-100

.0-1

0.33

EXISTING SURFACE

EXISTING SURFACE

TOP OF SPOIL TO -9.0m CD

TOP OF SPOIL TO -9.0m CD

DREDGED MATERIAL

DREDGED MATERIAL

DEPTH OF FILL

DEPTH OF FILL

-10.0

20.0

0-1

0.02

-99

114.0

-11.3

670.0

0-1

1.367

DMG

BOUN

DARY

DMG

BOUN

DARY

115.0

-10.7

7

DMG

BOUN

DARY

DMG

BOUN

DARY

-99.0

-10.3

60.0

0-1

0.36

115.0

-11.5

4DM

G BO

UNDA

RY

DMG

BOUN

DARY

-99.0

-10.2

00.0

0-1

0.20



signed as Approved

Date

Check

Drafting

DateDrawnRevisionNo

A1

Original Size

Title

Project

Client

Check

DesignerDrawn

Scale

Design

Conditions of Use.







DO NOT SCALE



T 61 3 8687 8000 F 61 3 8687 8111



Plotted by:

Matt Wootten

(Project Director)

Approved

Job

Manager

Project

Director

CONSTRUCTION

31-32840-K006

1

J.MUNRO J.MUNRO


R.HILL*

18.06.15

AS SHOWN

AT ORIGINAL SIZE 0

AT ORIGINAL SIZE0

25mHORIZONTAL 1:500

5 15 2010

VERTICAL 1:100 1 5m432

NOTE:1. REFER TO SPECIFICATION FOR FINISHED

DREDGED MATERIAL PLACEMENT TOLERANCES.

N

GEELONG

50

MELBOURNE

DATE:

20/8/2015

DRAWN:

P.BAZALICKI

CHECKED:

J.MILNE

VERTICAL DATUM:

LOWEST ASTRONOMICAL TIDE (LAT)

DRAWING NAME:

DMG Area F-Fig 1.dwg

HORIZONTAL CONTROL/DATUM:

MGA Zone 55 based on GDA 94 Datum

CLIENT:

VRCA

1000 150

FORMAT:

A1

FIGURE 2

Dredge Material Ground Capacity Estimate

Total Area

66,648m3*

3.00ha


Environmental Management Plan

APPENDIX 1

VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

Title ENVIRONMENTAL /OCCUPATIONAL

HEALTH AND SAFETY Policy No. 10.10

Section 1. 10.10 VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

Section No. 10

Date SEPTEMBER 2015 Status Final Version VRCA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Victorian Regional Channel Authority (VRCA) is charged with providing the strategic management of the operation and development of the Port of Geelong and to ensure that this is done in an economically, socially and environmentally sustainable manner. To achieve the above, VRCA will: 2. Document, implement and maintain an Environmental Management System based on the international standard AS/NZS

ISO14001:2004 and will seek continued improvement in its environmental performance; 3. Establish and implement a Safety Plan and an Environmental Management Plan in accordance with the Port Management

Act 1995 (Vic). Section 91D; 4. Ensure VRCA policies, objectives and targets address key port environmental issues and periodic review of these policies,

objectives and targets; 5. Comply with all environmental legal requirements and other applicable environmental obligations; 6. VRCA is committed to conducting its port and marine operations so as to minimise waste, prevent pollution, promote

efficient use of resources and manage environmental impacts; 7. Adopt best practice environmental management techniques where feasible; 8. Encourage a port-wide culture of responsible environmental management; 9. Where able require and influence tenants, contractors and port service providers to develop Environmental Management

Plans and/or systems to manage their environmental impacts; 10. Integrate where appropriate environmental management considerations into decision making and work practices related to

marine operations, property development, planning, design, construction, maintenance and operation of facilities within the Port of Geelong;

11. Provide sufficient resources (human, physical and financial) to achieve the aims, objectives and targets of the Environmental Management System; and

12. Communicate this Environment Policy to VRCA employees, VRCA contractors, VRCA stakeholders and where appropriate to the community.

Signed Date 22/9/15 Peter McGovern Chief Executive Officer



APPENDIX 2

PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS – APPLICABLE WORKS AND PROJECT AREAS


Environment Management Plan Rev 3 Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX 2

Project Delivery Standards – Applicable Works and Project Areas

Project Delivery Standard

Navigation Aids

Dredging

Construction and Dredging Management (all activities)

X X

Marine based works (all areas)

X X

Dredging and plume

X

Dredged material placement

X



APPENDIX 3

PROJECT DELIVERY STANDARDS



APPENDIX 3

Project Delivery Standards (PDS)

PDS – Construction and Dredging Management (all activities)

Objective To plan and implement construction and dredging aspects of GDP 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge activities.

To ensure that noise levels comply with SEPP N-1 requirements.

To ensure that materials are appropriately stored, handled and disposed of.

Target Compliance with all environmental limits and controls specified in this PDS.

Application All project activities and areas for the duration of the dredging program.

Environmental Controls Project Phase

1. Hours of Operation All activities may be conducted on a 24 hour, 7 days a week

basis, except where restricted within a PDS or relevant legislation.

All phases

2. Airborne Noise All activities must be carried out within SEPP N-1 limits. A desktop noise assessment of dredging vessels and major

equipment new to the dredging program to be conducted before acceptance and mobilisation onto project. Where the assessment indicates that the vessel or equipment may not conform to the SEPP N-1, appropriate action is to be taken as described in the Airborne Noise Contingency Plan.

All phases

3. Airborne Noise Monitoring Noise monitoring to be undertaken as described in the

Environmental Monitoring Programs and Contingency Plans (Appendix 4).

Where monitoring indicates an exceedance or potential exceedance, of SEPP N-1 limits, appropriate action is to be taken as described in Environmental Monitoring Programs and Contingency Plans (Appendix 4).

All phases



4. Waste Management All dredging vessels to have sewage containment or treatment

facilities. Sewage treatment shall comply with Section 23G of the Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances Act 1986 (Vic).

No disposal of untreated sewage or other wastes to the bay. Contractor waste management arrangements to include waste

minimisation, containment, segregation and appropriate reuse, recycling, treatment and disposal.

The handling and disposal of unexpected materials identified during dredging (eg inert debris such as metallic wastes and timber) to be included in waste management arrangements.

All waste to be managed in accordance with: o Environment Protection Act 1970 Vic o Quarantine Act 1908 (Commonwealth) – applicable vessels o Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances Act

1986 (Vic)

All phases

5. Fuels, Oils, Chemicals and Hazardous Goods Storage and handling of chemicals to be in accordance with:

o Dangerous Goods Act 1985 (Vic) o International Ship Management (ISM) Code – applicable

vessels o Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances Act 1986

(Vic)

All phases

6. Emergency Response Preparedness Emergency response procedures to be in accordance with

the Port of Geelong SEMP, the Port of Geelong Emergency Management Plan, and the latest edition of Port Waters of Geelong Operating Handbook including Harbour Master’s Directions, including provision for fuel, oil and chemical spills.

All dredge vessels to have oil spill response kits on board, and relevant personnel trained in their use.

All phases



PDS – Marine Based Works (all areas)

Objective To manage marine based work components of the GDP 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge.

To minimise disturbance to and appropriately manage any relevant heritage matters that may be encountered during the project.

To minimise impacts on cetaceans due to vessel manoeuvring.

Target Conformance with all environmental controls specified in this PDS.

Application All marine based activities for the duration of the GDP 2015 and the Rock Trial Dredge.


7. Safety An exclusion zone of 200m radius is to be established around

major dredging equipment during operations.

Dredging

8. Marine Pests Marine pest inspection and certification of all support vessels,

dredges and barges is required before mobilisation for the project where these are sourced externally to Port Phillip. Certification must be received from the final port of call before entry to Port Phillip.

All vessels are to comply with “Protocol for Environmental Management – Domestic Ballast Water Management in Victorian State Waters”, EPA Publication 949.6 (Current Revision)

All vessels are to comply with “Australian Ballast Water Management Requirements”, Department of Agriculture (Current Revision)

Dredging mobilisation

Dredging

Dredging

9. Vessel Anchoring All vessels are to anchor in accordance with the latest edition of

“Port Waters of Geelong Operating Handbook including Harbour Master’s Direction”, VRCA.

All phases

10. Vessel Bunkering All bunkering is to be in accordance with the latest edition of

“Port Waters of Geelong Operating Handbook including Harbour Master’s Direction”, VRCA.

All phases

11. Cetaceans – vessel manoeuvring

If within 300 m of a whale or dolphin the vessel must not: approach a whale or dolphin head on

All phases



restrict the path of a whale or dolphin pursue a whale or dolphin separate any whale or dolphin from a group come between a mother and a calf drop or lower an anchor overboard from the vessel.

If within 300 m of a whale or dolphin, the vessel must:

maintain a constant speed that does not exceed 5 knotsavoid sudden changes in speed or direction

post a lookout for cetaceans manoeuvre the vessel to a distance of at least 300m if the whale

or dolphin shows any signs of being disturbed

All phases

12. Cetacean sightings and log Personnel on board vessels are to report all sightings of

cetaceans. A log of cetacean sightings and action taken to be kept for all

work areas.

Dredging

13. Ancillary Works Management measures such as work method statements are to

be implemented to minimise debris entering the water during removal and replacement of navigation beacons.

Ancillary works

14. Heritage (marine based) – Identification If potential relics are identified during dredging or ancillary

works, works likely to impact the potential relics will be temporarily suspended and Heritage Victoria and DELWP will be notified.

Dredging and ancillary works



PDS – Dredging and Plume

Objective To manage dredging activities and placement of dredged material.

To minimise the area of seabed disturbed and manage the material removed.

To protect assets, beneficial uses and values from long term adverse effects due to dredging.

To develop an appropriate dredging schedule, taking into account the seasonal sensitivities of Corio Bay assets, beneficial uses and values.

Target Conformance with all environmental controls and limits specified in this PDS.

Application All dredging activities. The disposal of dredge material at the designated DMG. Use of backhoe dredge (BHD) or grab dredge and associated

equipment including tugs and barges.


15. Dredging Design depth of 12.3m CD is to be achieved as a minimum over

the whole of the designated dredge area. Due to dredging tolerance, actual dredged depth will exceed design depth.

Dredging must remain within the maximum total insitu volume, width constraints and depth constraints identified below:

o Maximum total insitu volume to be dredged for GDP 2015 is 270,000 cub m +/- 10%, including batters and including 400mm overdredge allowance (reference Drawing No 31-32840-K003).

o Maximum total insitu volume to be dredged for the Rock Trial Dredge is 21,000 cub m +/- 10% (reference Figures 1 and 2).

Dredging equipment and associated support vessels will be required to manoeuvre outside the designated dredge areas, including transit between dredge areas and between dredge areas and the dredge material ground.

Toe lines and dredge areas are defined on: o Drawings – GDP 2015:

31-32840-K001 to 31-32840-K004 o Rock Trial Dredge Figures 1 and 2

Dredging



Tracking of equipment activity as follows:

Equipment Time Date Coordinates

BHD, Grab Dredge

Yes Yes Dredging x, y, z of bucket (northing, easting, depth to Chart Datum)

Split hopper barges

Yes Yes x, y (northing, easting)

16. Dredging Schedule The initial dredging schedule is to be submitted to DELWP no

less than 5 business days before commencement. Subsequent significant revisions of the dredging schedule will be

submitted to DELWP within two working days of approval by VRCA management.

Dredging is to take place in accordance with a dredging plan prepared by the dredging contractor and included in the contractor’s environmental management plan (CEMP), and which will be submitted to VRCA and DELWP for approval.

The dredging plan is to include: o Dredging technology o Dredging configuration (ie. Number, uses and locations

of dredges o Timing, duration and sequences of dredging in each of

the dredge areas and the placement of dredged material at specified dredged material ground.

Pre-mobilisation

17. Consideration of Environmental Limits Revisions to the dredging schedule will be considered as

required to ensure compliance with airborne noise and dredge plume environmental limits

Dredging

18. Consideration of Seasonal Sensitivities Dredging will be avoided during the months of December to May

(inclusive), to mitigate impacts on the environment, recreation and tourism activities.

Dredging



PDS – Dredged Material Management

Objective To manage and track the placement of dredged material.

To place and manage dredged material appropriately within the DMG.

Target Conformance with all environmental controls specified in this PDS.

Application All dredged material placement in the VRCA Outer DMG.


19. Dredged Material Placement All dredged material is to be placed within the specified DMG as

detailed in: o Drawings – GDP 2015:

31-32840-K002 31-32840-K005 31-32840-K006

o Figures 1 and 3 – Rock Trial Dredge Notwithstanding the placement requirements detailed in the

drawings, all dredged material is to be placed such that the final surface level does not project higher than a depth of 9.0m CD. For natural clays classified in consistency as firm or higher, a tolerance of 500mm above this level applies.

Rock material obtained from the Rock Trial Dredge is to be placed in the DMG as shown in Figure 3, and covered with silts, silty clays or clays.

Dredging and disposal locations are to be recorded as per tracking of equipment table (Refer to environmental control No. 15 above).

Volumes are to be calculated from hydrographic survey data.

Dredging



APPENDIX 4

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS AND CONTINGENCY PLANS



APPENDIX 4

Environmental Monitoring Programs and Contingency Plans

The following table contains a summary of the environmental monitoring programs proposed for the GDP 2015.

This is followed by a description of the proposed environmental limits and contingency plans for:

Airborne noise

Program Rationale Procedure and indicator

Monitoring Location

Frequency

Airborne Noise To comply with SEPP N-1.

An initial day time compliance noise check using the standard indicator for airborne noise measurement of ‘A’ weighted equivalent noise level measured in decibels – dB(A)

Refinery Pier No 4

On occasions when identified high noise level equipment is to be used in the evening or night.

In response to a noise complaint.

The following table summarises the relationship between environmental monitoring programs and related contingency plans and PDS.

Environmental monitoring program

Contingency plan Associated project delivery standard

Airborne noise Airborne noise Construction Management (all activities)

Airborne Noise

Environmental Monitoring Program

The main aspect of this environmental monitoring program is the use of the standard indicator for airborne noise measurement of “A” weighted equivalent noise level (Laeq) measured in decibels (dB) – as is used in the State Environment Protection Policy (Control of Noise from Commerce, Industry and Trade) No. N-1 (SEPP N-1).



The need for an environmental monitoring program for airborne noise emissions is assessed as follows:

Dredge Area – The shoreline adjacent to the dredge area contains a diverse range of industrial land uses, including port operations. The nearest residential area is the waterfront area of North Shore approx. 750m to the south-west. This area will potentially be impacted by airborne noise emissions from dredging activities, although these need to be assessed in the context of the existing shipping operations in the Corio Channel and industrial activity between the residential area and the dredging site.

Trial Dredge Area – the Trial Dredge Area is located more than 3km from the shoreline at Curlewis and Clifton Springs, therefore airborne noise impacts are unlikely.

Areas E and F – The DMG Areas E and F allocated for placement of material from the GDP 2015 and Rock Trial Dredge are a minimum distance of approx. 5km from the nearest shoreline and therefore airborne noise impacts are unlikely.

Airborne noise will therefore be monitored adjacent to the dredge area only:

1. Where evening or night time work is proposed with equipment that has the potential to exceed SEPP N-1 requirements, an initial day time compliance noise check will be undertaken and used to assess SEPP N-1 evening and night-time compliance, based on previous ambient noise measurements.

2. If required in response to a noise complaint that has been received from within a distance from dredging operations such that audible levels of noise disturbance are possible.

Environmental Limit

The airborne noise environmental limit is based on calculated SEPP N-1 limits determined from sampled ambient noise levels as shown below.

EPA Period

Days

Time

Lowest Measured Ambient

Background Noise dB(A)

L90

SEPP N-1 based Permissible Noise Limits

DAY

Monday-Friday

S t d

7am - 6pm

7am - 1pm

44

50dB(A) Leq

EVENINGS and

Saturday

Sunday, Pub. Hols.

1pm - 6pm

7am - 6pm

43

46dB(A) Leq



WEEKEND DAYS

All days 6pm - 10pm 40 44dB(A) Leq

NIGHT

All days 10pm - 7am 38 41dB(A) Leq

Response Level

Two events that will trigger contingency actions to manage airborne noise emissions of the dredging program are:

Airborne noise measurement at a monitoring location (during the day time period) is evaluated as likely to exceed SEPP N-1 Evening or Night time period limits unless management contingencies are taken, and

A noise complaint has been received from an area within a distance from GDP 2015 activities that audible levels of noise disturbance are possible.

Airborne Noise Contingency Plan

This Airborne Noise Contingency Plan relates to a potential or actual exceedance of the noise environmental limit from project activities.

Noise complaints will be managed via the complaint response process described in Appendix 5.

Management actions available in the event of a potential or actual exceedance of the airborne noise environmental limit are:

Rescheduling high noise equipment to operate for day time works only, or control locations of evening or night time use to greater distances from key locations sensitive to noise.

Evaluate ways to reduce equipment noise emissions, eg decreasing operation energy, installing additional acoustic attenuating covers and mufflers etc.

Where the assessment of new vessels or equipment indicates that they may not conform to SEPP N-1, management options include:

Selection of alternative vessel or equipment. Modifications to vessel or equipment. Restrictions on the use of vessel or equipment.



APPENDIX 5

COMPLAINTS RESPONSE PROCESS



APPENDIX 5

Complaints Response Process

Management actions if a complaint is received will be as follows:

If a complaint is received, a general response will be given to the complainant by the end of the next business day. The timeframe for further detailed response is dependent on the nature of the complaint and the scale of investigation required. It is expected that there will be management action within 24 hours of the initial assessment of the complaint. The following options for action may be taken:

If the complaint is regarding a single event then no monitoring may be required if a cause cannot be determined.

If there are a number of complaints relating to the same issue then monitoring will be considered as part of the investigation.

Where the assessment of vessels, equipment or activity indicates that they may not conform to relevant legislation, appropriate action will be taken. Management options include:

Selection of alternative vessel / equipment. Modification to vessel / equipment. Restrictions on the use of vessel / equipment. Other actions as deemed appropriate.