drive cycle development and real-world data in the united states
DESCRIPTION
Working paper No . WLTP-02-17 GRPE Informal Group on WLTP, 2 nd Meeting January 2009, Agenda Item 6. Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States. Edward Nam US Environmental Protection Agency WLTP meeting, Geneva, Switzerland January 15, 2009. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States
Edward NamUS Environmental Protection Agency
WLTP meeting, Geneva, SwitzerlandJanuary 15, 2009
Working paper No. WLTP-02-17GRPE Informal Group on WLTP, 2nd Meeting January 2009, Agenda Item 6.
![Page 2: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline
• Drive cycle development history in US– FTP & off-cycle – Inventory cycles– Other cycle development
• SAFD vs Vehicle Specific Power• New driving activity data• US EPA 5-cycle fuel economy labeling
(drive cycle weighting)• Next steps
Apologies for the American units!
![Page 3: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Why drive cycles are important• Serve as a standardized measurement stick for
emissions and fuel economy• Can compare across vehicles (benchmark)• Manufacturers design vehicles to meet standards
set by cycles and test procedures• Serves as proxy for “average” or typical driving• Emissions standards are strongly dependent on
the cycle and test procedure• Drive cycles also change over time, with
infrastructure, policy (speed limits), and technology (power:weight)
![Page 4: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
FTP cycle developmentUS Federal Test Procedure
• LA4 (City, UDDS) Developed in the late 1960’s to describe typical driving (acquired in Los Angeles)
• The highway HFET cycle was developed to describe a typical rural route (acquired outside Ann Arbor, MI in the 1970s)
• These 2 cycles used to describe fuel economy in the US
• US06 (aggressive) and SC03 (A/C) cycles developed based on “3 cities data” of instrumented vehicles from Baltimore, Spokane, Atlanta. – REP05, REM01, SC03 were developed to cover the full
range of driving, but were simplified to US06 and SC03, while FTP remained in place
– These cycles are extreme to prevent “cycle beaters”
![Page 5: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Inventory Cycles - California• Implemented new base cycle
– LA92 – determined from driving in LA in early 1990’s (40kph)
– More representative of 1990’s driving• Facility Cycles (speed correction factors)
– 12 unified correction cycles (UCC) mainly from chase car data in LA
– From 4 to 95kph– Chosen by mean speed, speed-acceleration
frequency distribution, positive kinetic energy (PKE), load, maximum acceleration, maximum deceleration, percent idle, percent acceleration, distance, etc
– These cycles are used to correct the base emission factor from LA92 to other speeds
![Page 6: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
CARB LA92 &
CO2 speed correction
factor
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Speed (mph)
Cor
rect
ion
Fact
or
CO2 CARB CO2 FI CO2 TBI
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
timesp
eed
(mph
)
Bag 1Bag 2
![Page 7: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
US EPA Inventory Cycles
• USEPA - Facility cycles (1997)– Developed by Sierra Research from 3 cities
chase car data (Baltimore, Spokane, LA)– 11 cycles based on roadway type and
congestion level (+ramp)– Each cycle lasts ~10 minutes– Matched second-by-second segments of
chase car data by comparing SAFDs (speed acceleration frequency distribution)
– Can find on EPA website under MOBILE6 technical support documentation
![Page 8: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Speed/Acceleration Frequency Distribution (SAFD)
_0
_10
_20
_30
_40
_50
_60
_70
_80-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
frequency
speed
accel
![Page 9: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
EPA & Sierra cycle specifications• time in acceleration/deceleration • time at cruise • time at idle • maximum speed • average speed • average or predominant speed during cruise • maximum acceleration/deceleration rate • maximum power • length (time and miles) • stops per mile • average positive kinetic energy (PKE) change per mile
and specific power• distributions of speed and acceleration
![Page 10: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
USEPA Cycle development (cont’d)
• Microtrips were chosen based on how well they matched the specifications
• Cycle choice criteria – lowest sums of differences on SAFD– matching real world power (2va) – Segments shortened or lengthened
• Cycles used for (emissions) “speed correction factors” and for speed dependent transportation planning in MOBILE6 (emissions inventory model)
![Page 11: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
UC-Riverside CE-CERT International Vehicle Emission Model
• data collection and cycle development for rapid emissions inventory estimation– Almaty, Kazakhstan – Beijing, China – Lima, Peru – Mexico City, Mexico – Nairobi, Kenya – Pune, India – Santiago, Chile – Sao Paulo, Brazil – Shanghai, China
http://www.issrc.org/ive/
![Page 12: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Vehicle Specific Power: an alternate metric for cycle manipulation
• MOVES is EPA inventory model replacing MOBILE• MOVES is a modal model based on VSP activity• Cycle metric should be based on a more physically causal
variable for emissions formation: e.g. • Road load (tractive) Power • P ~ Av + Bv2 + Cv3 + Mva*
– A,B,C are vehicle target coastdown coefficients– * including road grade
• VSP = P/M (M is mass of vehicle)– Divided by mass since emissions (measured in g/km) is largely
independent of vehicle mass• With VSP distributions and proper modal data, emissions can
be converted from one drive cycle to another• This approach has been validated by a number of studies
![Page 13: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
VSP Distribution in MOVESDistribution o f T im e by M ode
0%
10%
20%
30%
VSP/Sp e e d Bin
Per
cen
t o
f T
ime
Rura l Restr icted Urban Unrestricted
0-25 mph0-40 kph
25-50 mph40-81 kph
>50 mph, >80kph
kW/tonne
![Page 14: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Cycle Development requires data
• Much second by second data has already been collected
• But these were not collected with harmonization in mind, so data is scattered and inconsistent
• Require new and more rigorous analysis methods
![Page 15: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Real world driving data since 3 cities & LA92
• Chase car:– Los Angeles 2000
• Instrumented Vehicle:– US EPA Ann Arbor shootout data 2001 – Kansas City data 2004-2005– Atlanta (Georgia Tech) 2001-2004
• 1600+ vehicles, 800+ households, GPS, accelerometer, OBD
• Vehicles instrumented for 2-3 years• Most comprehensive activity data in existence• Data excellent source for start activity as well• Due to privacy concerns, data has a finite lifetime
![Page 16: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Los Angeles ComparisonSpeed
More time is spent at high speeds in 2000 than in 1992.Speed limits were increased during this period
0
0.02
0.04
0.060.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Speed (miles per hour)
Frac
tion
of A
ctiv
ity
Los Angeles 1992
Los Angeles 2000
![Page 17: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Los Angeles ComparisonAcceleration
More time is spent at high acceleration in 2000 than in 1992.
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
>3 mph/s
Acceleration (miles per hour per second)
Frac
tion
of A
ll Acc
eler
atio
ns Los Angeles 1992
Los Angeles 2000
![Page 18: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
1-25 25-50 50 +30 + 16 30 4027-3024-27 29 3921-2418-2115-1812-15 279-12 15 256-9 14 24 353-6 13 230-3 12 22 33< 0 11 21
VSP
Cla
ss (k
W/to
nne)
Speed Class (mph)
28 38
37
Operating Modes for MOVES VSP bins
For coast and cruise,
13 modes retainedfrom MOVES2004, plus 8 modes added forMOVES2006 formerly bins26 and 36
PLUSOne mode each for idle, and decel/braking--------------------------------Gives a total of23 opModes
![Page 19: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Los Angeles in 1992 compared to 2000Los Angeles then and now
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 26 33 35 36
VSP bin
Frac
tion
of a
ctiv
ity
Los Angeles 1992 (no idle)Los Angeles 2000 (no idle)
<25 mph 25-50 mph >50mph
![Page 20: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Other Factors:California (2000) Urban vs Rural
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 26 33 35 36
VSP Bin
Freq
uenc
y of
Act
ivity Urban California
Rural California
<25 mph 25-50 mph >50mph
Rural driving is faster than urban driving
![Page 21: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
SouthEast Michigan Shootout data
• 15 PEMS instrumented vehicles.• Driven by US EPA or SENSORS
employees in calendar year 2001.• Note: Drivers were not randomly chosen.• Avg. distance driven per vehicle : 52 miles• Average speed : 31.2 mph
![Page 22: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Kansas City (Round 1.5 Only)• US EPA study 2004-2005• Instrumented vehicles (not chase car) from
random population of newer vehicle owners• PEMS (Portable Emissions Measurement
System) equipped to measure emissions and activity.
• Drivers measured for 15,000-30,000 seconds (battery lifetime)
• Measured conventional as well as hybrid vehicles• Avg. distance driven per vehicle: 41 miles• Average speed: 30.1 mph
![Page 23: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Speed acceleration frequency distributions
• Based on a 2-dimensional matrix of speed and accelerations
![Page 24: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Recent Activity Surveys
Recent surveys have the more high speed, high power driving.
LA driving is the most aggressive, & may be comparable to US06
Activity comparison of MOVES, SE Michigan, Kansas City, and Los Angeles
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 26 33 35 36
VSP bin
Freq
uenc
y of
act
ivity
MOVES no idle
SE Michigan no idle
KC no idle
LA 2000 (no idle)
<25 mph 25-50 mph >50mph
![Page 25: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Conventional vs Hybrid Activity
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 33 35 36 37 38 39
VSP Bin
Freq
Total ActivityNon-HybridHybrid
<25 mph 25–50 mph >50 mph
Hybrid driving is slightly less aggressive than conventional vehicles
![Page 26: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
5-Cycle fuel economy labeling• Previously, label fuel economy was based on a 2
cycle number: city and highway– Real-world fuel economy effects were captured with a
20% correction factor• Thesis: Real-world driving can be described by a
linear combination of existing drive cycles• If weighted properly the activity and fuel economy
can be captured better than a fixed correction factor • The key is to use cycles with a broad enough range
to capture the VSP profile– US driving activity is mainly represented by a linear
weighting of 3 cycles: FTP(city), HFET, and US06
![Page 27: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
VSP distribution of FTP, HWY & US06VSP frequency for City, Highway, and US06 Cycles
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 26 33 35 36 37 38 39VSP bin
Freq
% (b
y tim
e)
UDDS CityHighwayUS06
<25mph_ 25-50 mph >50mph
![Page 28: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Other relevant 5 cycle issues• Through a combination of FTP (city), highway,
US06, cold FTP, and hot SC03 (air conditioning) real-world driving was bracketed
• Result: fuel economy label became more representative of what vehicle owners would truly get throughout a year of driving
• Potential lessons for harmonization:– VSP weighting methodology can be a powerful tool– May be able to represent different regions through a
combination (and proper weighting) of drive schedules
![Page 29: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Comparison of FTP, NEDC, JC08
• The NEDC and JC08 have similar VSP profiles – in hot start, should have similar emissions
• Main difference likely due to sequence following starts
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 33 35 37 38 39 40
VSP bin
Freq
uenc
y
FTPNEDCJC08
low speed medium speed high speed
![Page 30: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Conclusions• US has a long history of drive cycle
development• Much new data exists in the US for a
harmonization project (with more coming)• Driving has been getting faster and more
aggressive with each passing decade• VSP activity is a powerful (yet simple) tool
to characterize and combine drive cycles and to compare driving from different regions
![Page 31: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Issues for future consideration
• Definition of “city” vs “highway” (urban vs extra-urban)– City can include high speed driving and
highways can be congested stop and go• Starts/km variability• Shift schedules• Scaling drive cycle for small engine “cars”
![Page 32: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Next steps• We should analyze the existing data especially
the Atlanta data before it is destroyed• Should agree on QA/QC procedures for data• As well as a methodology for cycle generation
and comparing “representativeness”• The US EPA is going to start collecting second
by second activity and emissions data from real-world operation from a variety of cities
![Page 33: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Appendix
![Page 34: Drive Cycle Development and Real-world data in the United States](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022050723/56815dd8550346895dcc041e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Data Limitations• OBD data is noisy when used for accelerations• GPS is noisier than OBD• Should make an effort to determine best filtering
mechanism compared to directly measured accelerations – Accelerometer, 5th wheel, etc.
• Do accelerations matter?– Certification tests have x% eror band for drivers to
follow cycles– But Robot drivers and computer simulations can
follow cycles exactly, so the exact cycle trace can matter