driving digital strategy

29
DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY A GUIDE TO REIMAGINING YOUR BUSINESS BY SUNIL GUPTA

Upload: others

Post on 04-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

A GUIDE TO REIMAGINING

YOUR BUSINESS

BY SUNIL GUPTA

Page 2: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Contents

Figure I-1 3

Figure 1-1 4

Figure 1-2 5

Figure 1-3 6

Figure 2-1 7

Figure 2-2 8

Figure 2-3 9

Figure 2-4 10

Figure 2-5 11

Figure 3-1 12

Figure 3-2 13

Figure 5-1 14

Figure 5-2 15

Table 6-1 16

Figure 7-1 17

Figure 7-2 18

Figure 7-3 19

Figure 7-4 20

Figure 8-1 21

Figure 8-2 22

Figure 8-3 23

Figure 9-1 24

Figure 9-2 25

Figure 9-3 26

Figure 10-1 27

Figure 10-2 28

Figure 10-3 29

Page 3: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Introduction Page 6 31/05/18 8:09 PM

DIGITALLEADERSHIP

REI

MAG

INE

YOUR BUSINESS

R&D • Operations • Om

nichannel

REEVALUATE YOUR VA

LUE

CH

AINR

EB

UILD

YO

UR

ORGANIZATION

Transition • O

rganization design • Skills

RECONNECT WITH YOUR CU

STO

ME

RS

Acquiring • Engaging • M

easu

ring

BUILD FOR THE FUTURE

STRENGTHEN THE CORE

Sco

pe •

Busin

ess m

odel • Platform

FIGURE I-1

A framework for digital leadership

3

Page 4: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_01 Page 18 31/05/18 2:23 AM

eBay

Marketplace

App storePhone

Studio

VOD

AWS

Books andelectronics

Kindle

Adnetwork

Amazon

IBM

Microsoft

Hulu

Netflix

ABCNBC

HTC

Samsung AppleApple

Apple

HP

Barnes & NobleWalmartBest Buy

Google

Google

Figure 1-1

Amazon’s business and its competitors

4

Page 5: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_01 Page 19 31/05/18 2:23 AM

Farmequipment

Farmmanagement

Seedoptimization

Irrigation

Weatherdata

• Weather maps• Weather forecasts• Rain, humidity, temperature sensors

• Seed databases• Farm-performance

databases• Seed-optimization

applications

• Field sensors• Irrigation nodes• Irrigation application

• Tractors• Tillers• Planters

John Deere’s transformation

Source: Adapted from Michael E. Porter and James E. Heppelman, “How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition,” Harvard Business Review, November 2014.

Figure 1-2

5

Page 6: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_01 Page 25 31/05/18 2:23 AM

Multiplecustomers

WhatsAppFacebookAmazon MarketplaceUber

WeChatAmazonPaytmPeloton ridersNike+ Run Club Multiple

productsSingleproducts

Singlecustomer

AutomobilesConsumer productsFinancial servicesPeloton bikesNike shoes

Echo and e-commerceKindle and ebooksiPod and iTunesPeloton videosNike+ FuelBand

Network effects:Create virtuous circle

Traditional strategy:Make it cheaper or better

Complements:Razor-blade strategy

Network effectsand complements

Figure 1-3

New ways to provide value to customers and create competitive advantage

6

Page 7: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_02 Page 32 31/05/18 2:32 AM

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CD Vinyl Video

Digital single downloads Digital album downloads Streaming and subscription

Mobile and other digital

Figure 2-1

revenue from the sale of recorded music in the united States, 2000–2017 ($ millions)

Source: Recording Industry Association of America.

7

Page 8: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_02 Page 33 31/05/18 2:32 AM

$18,000

$16,000

$14,000

$12,000

$10,000

$8,000

$6,000

$4,000

$2,000

$0

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CD Vinyl Video

Digital single downloads

Concert revenue

Digital album downloads Streaming and subscription

Mobile and other digital

Figure 2-2

revenue from concerts and from the sale of recorded music in the united States, 2000–2017 ($ millions)

Source: Recording Industry Association of America and Pollstar.

8

Page 9: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_02 Page 35 31/05/18 2:32 AM

Dig

ital

Sub

scri

ber

s ('0

00)

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

00

100

324390

454

509566

640 676 699 727760 799 831

875910

957 9901,041

1,0941,161

1,212

1,332

1,608

1,9162,009

2,114

2,213

224

Mar Apr Jun

2011

Sep Dec Mar Jun

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec

Figure 2-3

Digital subscribers to the New York Times

Source: Compiled from NYT press releases and financial reports.Note: The numbers show digital news subscribers only and do not include subscribers to other digital products such as cooking and crosswords, and print subscribers who have digital access to the NYT.

9

Page 10: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_02 Page 36 31/05/18 2:32 AM

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0

1Q10

2Q10

3Q10

4Q10

1Q11

2Q11

3Q11

4Q11

1Q12

2Q12

3Q12

4Q12

1Q13

2Q13

3Q13

4Q13

1Q14

2Q14

3Q14

4Q14

1Q15

2Q15

3Q15

4Q15

1Q16

2Q16

3Q16

4Q16

1Q17

2Q17

3Q17

4Q17

Video Internet Voice

Figure 2-4

Number and type of Comcast subscribers, 2010–2017

Source: Compiled from company reports.

10

Page 11: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_02 Page 57 31/05/18 2:32 AM

Unwillingness to takeownership of the asset

2%

More flexibleproduct usage

14%

Staggeredpayments over a

period of time39%Desire for quick and

reliable service18%

Less upfront(or total) costs

27%

Figure 2-5

Why consumers accept service-based payment models

Source: Vivek Agarwal, Vinay Arora, and Kris Renker, Evolving Service Centric Business Models:

Quest for Profitability and Predictability, Accenture Report, 2013.

11

Page 12: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_03 Page 75 31/05/18 5:38 PM

Q2 FY 20

13

Q3 FY 20

13

Q4 FY 20

13

Q1 FY 20

14

Q2 FY 20

14

Q3 FY 20

14

Q4 FY 20

14

Q1 FY 20

15

Q2 FY 20

15

Q3 FY 20

15

Q4 FY 20

15

Q1 FY 20

16

Q2 FY 20

16

Q3 FY 20

16

Q4 FY 20

16*

Q1 FY 20

17

Q2 FY 20

17

Q3 FY 20

17

Q4 FY 20

17

Q1 FY 20

180%

8 8

1112

1415 15 16

1820 20 21

2425 25

2729

30 30 31

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

FIGURE 3-1

Starbucks’s mobile transactions as a percentage of total transactions, 2013–2018

Source: Company reports and BI Intelligence.

Note: Q4 FY 2016 excludes week 53. Starbucks’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to September 30.

12

Page 13: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_03 Page 78 31/05/18 5:38 PM

GM, Ford, BMW

Verizon, Vodafone,Telefónica

Tesla, Google

Google, Apple,app developers

Automanufacturers

New players

Telecomoperators

Technologyplayers Consumer

FIGURE 3-2

New ecosystem of automotive industry

13

Page 14: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_05 Page 102 31/05/18 5:36 PM

FIGURE 5-1

The power of 1%

Source: Karim R. Lakhani, Marco Iansiti, and Kerry Herman, “GE and the Industrial Internet,” Case 614–032 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 2014).

14

Page 15: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_05 Page 112 31/05/18 5:36 PM

Delivery speed

Delivery to safe place

Appearance of the delivery personnel

Scheduled delivery in time window

Delivery at announced time

Low cost

Enviromentally friendly delivery

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

FIGURE 5-2

Amazon customers’ most important factors for delivery

Source: Amazon customer survey, 2017, courtesy of Rohit Sodha, Amazon’s country lead for transportation in Middle Europe.

15

Page 16: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_06 Page 122 31/05/18 6:01 PM

TABLE 6-1

Kiehl’s sales and profitability by channel

Channel % of sales Operating profit as % of sales

Company stores 48% 17.9%

Department stores 42% 17.6%

Kiehls.com 10% 40.0%

Source: Adapted from Robert J. Dolan and Leslie K. John, “Kiehl’s Since 1851: Pathway to Profitable Growth,” Case 514-044 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 2013, revised 2015).

16

Page 17: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_07 Page 138 31/05/18 5:36 PM

500

400

300

200

100

0

–100

–2001 2 5 10 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 190 195 198 199 200

Customer number

Pro

fit (S

EK

)Figure 7-1

Profitability of Kanthal’s customers ranked from most to least profitable

Source: Robert S. Kaplan, “Kanthal (A),” Case 190-002 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 1989, revised 2001).

17

Page 18: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

00

50

100

150

200

250

1 5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 99 100

Pro

fits

(% o

f to

tal)

Cumulative % of customers

Figure 7-2

Cumulative profitability of Kanthal’s customers

Source: Robert S. Kaplan, “Kanthal (A),” Case 190–002 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 1989, revised 2001).

18

Page 19: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_07 Page 140 31/05/18 5:36 PM

Advocate

Consume

Purchase

Search andevaluate

FMOT

SMOT

TMOT

ZMOT

Figure 7-3

Moments of truth

19

Page 20: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_07 Page 149 31/05/18 5:36 PM

Ad $$

Impressions

Clicks

Start an app

Finish app

Approved

Active

Remainactive

CPM

CTR

10%

24%

80%

67%

55%

Display = $2.06

Search = $44.75

Display = 0.045%

Search = 4.1%

Display = 13.3%

Search = 8.6%

Display = 38.9%

Search = 17.5%

Figure 7-4

Consumer journey for BBVA Compass Bank’s online customer-acquisition campaign

Source: Sunil Gupta and Joseph Davies-Gavin, “BBVA Compass: Marketing Resource Allocation,” Case 511-096 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 2011), and Teaching Note 512-051 (Boston: Harvard Business School, 2012).

20

Page 21: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_08 Page 157 31/05/18 8:02 PM

Figure 8-1

Time spent by uS consumers on their smartphones

Source: Simon Khalaf and Lali Kesiraju, “U.S. Consumers Time-Spent on Mobile Crosses 5 Hours a Day,” March 2, 2017, http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/157921590345/us-consumers-time-spent-on-mobile-crosses-5.

21

Page 22: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_08 Page 162 31/05/18 8:02 PM

Emotional sparkDrives genuine personal stories

1

2

3

45

6

7

Digitalengine

Data driving real-time content andtransactions

EngagementThrough Facebook andsocial media

OffersFrom merchants andMC assets

OptimizationReal-time testing of offersand themes

AmplificationPaid and organic programmaticbuying

Network effectsSharing and massengagement

Incremental transactionsWin-win for all parties

Figure 8-2

Digital engine at Mastercard

Source: Adapted from company documents.

22

Page 23: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_08 Page 164 31/05/18 8:02 PM

Spend per active card(‘000 USD)

Transactions per active card Number of active MCCs

50%

33%

Duringyear

Postyear

Preyear

Duringyear

Postyear

Postyear

–10%

24%

7%

2%29%

16%4%

Engaged Look-alike

Preyear

Preyear

Duringyear

Figure 8-3

Transactional impact of uS “Priceless Cities”

Engaged consumers spent 4 percent more in pre-year compared to a matched sample of look-alike con-sumers in the control group, but they spent 50 percent more during the campaign year and 33 percent more after the campaign year.

Source: Company documents.

Note: Engaged denotes cardholders who respond to “Priceless Cities” offers. Look-alike is a matched con-trol sample. MCC stands for “merchant category code.” Pre-year: May 2012–April 2013. During year: May 2013–April 2014. Post-year: May 2014–April 2015.

23

Page 24: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_09 Page 176 31/05/18 5:01 PM

$405.54$312.01$309.57$306.08

$289.88$182.98$177.29

$169.26$132.88$104.41

$75.97$75.71$75.71$74.93$73.58$72.97$70.16

Zara

Levi’s

Monster Energy

H&M

Victoria’s Secret

McDonald’s

Starbucks

Blackberry

Disney

Skittles

Subway

Oreo

Adidas

Nike

Dr. Pepper

Xbox

Coca-Cola

Avg: $174.17

$1,613.11$834.76$618.53

BMW

Value of a fan(New brands 2013)

WalmartTarget

Figure 9-1

Value of a Facebook fan

Source: Todd Wasserman, “A Facebook Fan Is Worth $174, Researcher Says,” Mashable, April 17, 2013.

24

Page 25: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_09 Page 182 31/05/18 5:01 PM

Attribution model Description Comments

Lastinteraction

Firstinteraction

Linear

Time decay

Position-based

Regression- ormodel-based

Experiment-based

Last ad or clickaccounts for 100% of thesale

First ad or clickaccounts for 100% of sale

All ads or clicks get a uniform weight

All ads or clicks get some attribution;more recent ads get higher weight

Ads get attributionbased on positionin the path

Attributes weightbased on regression- or other model-based approaches

Attribution based onA/B testing

Difficult or expensive to conduct

Most accurate way to determinead effectiveness but difficult tomanage across many differentad networks and consumers

Ignores that some ads are viewed simply because they are on the relevant site(e.g., contextual ads) even if the ads themselves have no impact

Scientific way to allocate weightsto ads along consumer journeypath

Ad hoc weights

Ad hoc allocation

Overweighs ads that appearfrequently

Overweighs ads that appear frequently

Ignores ads later in the funnel that convert customer

Ad hoc weights (How much decay?)

Ignores long-term effects of ads earlier in the funnel

Overweighs ads that appearfrequently

A B

Overweighs ads that appear frequently

Unclear why ads later in thefunnel should have higherweight

Figure 9-2

Attribution models

Source: Sunil Gupta and Joseph Davin, “Digital Marketing,” Core Curriculum: Readings in Marketing, Harvard Business Publishing, and adapted from Google Analytics Help, “Attribution Modeling Overview,” https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1662518?hl=en.

25

Page 26: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_09 Page 183 31/05/18 5:01 PM

Deg

ree

of

influ

ence

Time from purchase

Fewest people Most people

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

7–12

+ mos

befo

re

4–6 m

os b

efore

2–3 m

os b

efore

1 mon

th be

fore

3 wee

ks b

efore

2 wee

ks b

efore

1 wee

k befo

re

4–6 d

ays b

efore

2–3 d

ays b

efore

Day of

pur

chas

e

Figure 9-3

intensity of consumer search for automobiles

Source: Jim Lecinski, Winning the Zero Moment of Truth (Palo Alto: Think with Google, 2011), 25.

26

Page 27: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_10 Page 194 31/05/18 5:19 PM

Mostly print

Profi

t

Time

FutureToday

All digital

FIGURE 10-1

Potential profit path of NYT during its digital transformation

27

Page 28: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Net

inco

me

($ b

illio

ns)

FIGURE 10-2

Fall and rise of Adobe’s net income during its digital transition

Source: Compiled from Adobe’s financial statements.

28

Page 29: DRIVING DIGITAL STRATEGY

Chapter_10 Page 200 31/05/18 5:19 PM

AdobeFinance

Product Price

Promo

Distribution

Customermanagement

Salesforce

Onlinecommunication

FIGURE 10-3

Impact of new business model on Adobe’s operations

29