drunkenness and sexual victimization a general population study of teenage girls
DESCRIPTION
Drunkenness and sexual victimization A general population study of teenage girls . Preliminary results. Hilde Pape Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Statens institutt for rusmiddelforskning (SIRUS ). In 2010 / 2011, Oslo was rocked by a wave of rapes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Drunkenness and sexual victimizationA general population study of teenage girls
Hilde Pape
Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Statens institutt for rusmiddelforskning (SIRUS)
Preliminary results
In 2010 / 2011, Oslo was rocked by a wave of rapes
«’Take back the night’ is the claim, but [... ]
«’Take back the night’ is the claim, but [... ] one should rather call out ‘BOYCOTT THE NIGHT’» Margrete Geelmuyden, Aften 2/11- 2011
x
Indeed, alcohol use correlates with rape / sexual assault
Some evidence from aggregate level studies, e.g. US state-level data: 10% increase in alcohol consumption → 7% increase in the incidence of rapes (Cook & More 1993)
Individual level studies: Solid evidence of cross-sectional associations
e.g. US national study of college women: Frequent HED → OR 5 of reporting rape (Mohler-Kou et al 2004)
Event-level data:
Rapes / sexual assaults; alcohol typically involved (survey data + police reports)
Analyses of all cases of rape
registrered by
the police in Oslo (2010)
Different types of rape/sexual assault
Party-re-late
d34 %
Stranger-at -tack13 %
Vulnerabil-ity
20 %
In-ti-
mate re-la-
tionship25 %
Other8 %
«Many of those who report party-related rapes,
had black-out during the night and are unable to remember
what happened»
Event data: The victims’ use of alcohol
Stranger attack rapes;
«Typically, the victim is intoxicated
and on her way home at night»
Altogether, - 65% had used substances - 47% had used alcohol only
Alcohol use as a proximal risk factor
The context of drinking – presence of potential perpetrators (weak social control / no guardianship)
Effects of intoxication
- Impairment: Reduced abillity to recognize and respond to sexual assault risk
Alcohol use as a proximal risk factor
The context of drinking – presence of potential perpetrators (weak social control / no guardianship)
Effects of intoxication
- Impairment: Reduced abillity to recognize and respond to sexual assault risk
- Incapacitation: Inability to resist (or consent to) sexual activity
«Economics of crime»: Severe drunkenness increases victim vulnerability and reduces the expected cost of rape to potential offenders
Research on incapacitated sexual assault (ISA)
Little research; studies of US college students predominate (convenience samples / low rr)
Abstainers + non-binge drinkers included in the analyses(How age is related to ISA among youth who binge drink is unknown)
Lifetime ISA → current drinking / PTSD, mental health “outcomes”(Simple bi-variate analyses)
Apart from studies on the role of alcohol; almost no research has ran the risk of revealing that sexual assault vicims differ from “ideal victims”
i.e. “those who, when hit by crime, most readily are given the complete and legitimate status of being a victim” (Christie 1986: 18)
No study on the associations between personality traits and ISA.
Yet, one may assume that impulsivity and related traits increase the risk.The association between an early onset of drinking and ISA supports this assumption
Aims
• To examine the prevalence of ISA among teenage girls in Norway and to explore how it varies with drinking behavior and age
• To test the assumption that impulsivity is related to ISA
• To examine the association between an early onset of drinking and ISA, taking impulsivity into account
• To assess associations between ISA and other alcohol-related outcomes
• To assess associations between ISA and involvement in problem behaviour (illegal drug use / delinquency)
Sample
A school survey in 16 Norwegian municipalities (2006)
Full cohorts of students
Response rate: 85%
Analyses of 15-18 year-old girls
Non-binge drinkers exluded
Impulsivity (Plutnick 1989) : Sum score based on 6 items
Measures
Incapacitated sexual assault (ISA) – past year :Been sexually assaulted without being able to resist because you were very drunk
Frequency of intoxication past year
Severe drunkenness - How often during the past year have you…
.. been so drunk that you could not stand upright? (motor impairment)
.. been somewhere without remebering how you got there? (blackout)
Age at first alcohol intoxication
Impulsivity (Plutnick 1989): 6 items – sum-score
Behaviours in relation to drinking – past year - Involved in fights - Vandalism - Drink driving - Voluntary sex that one later regretted
Illegal drug use, Police contact due to delinqueny – past year
Impulsivity (Plutnick 1989) : Sum score based on 6 items
Composite measureAveraging the frequency of
motor impairment and blackout
Prevalence of incapacitated sexual assault (ISA)
All girls Alcohol past yr (83%)
Intoxicated past yr (73%)
5,2%6,4%
7,4%
N=3832
N=3128 N=2702
Prevalence of incapacitated sexual assault (ISA)
All girls Alcohol past yr (83%)
Intoxicated past yr (73%)
5,2%6,4%
7,4%
15 yr-olds: 57% 16 yr-olds: 63%17 yr-olds: 76%18 yr-olds: 83 %
N=3832
N=3128 N=2702
The prevalence of ISA by indicators of heavy episodic drinking
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40ISA by frequency of intoxication
None 1 2-4 5-10 11-20 20+0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80ISA by frequency of severe drunkenness
Blackout
Motor impair-ment
Prevalence of ISA by age
15 yrs 16 yrs 17 yrs 18 yrs
10.59.1
7.45.4
The result did not reflect age differences in the frequency of intoxication:
15 16 17 18
12.814.3 15.1
17.3
Mean freq. of intoxication by age (r=0.20**)
However, symptoms of severe drunkenness were inversely related to age
The effect of age on ICA, taking severe drunkenness into account;
B SE OR 95% CI
Age -0.26 0.07 0.77** 0.65-0.92
Age -0.17 0.09 0.84 0.70-1.01 Severe drunkenness 0.11 0.01 1.12 *** 1.10-1.14
15 yrs 16 yrs 17 yrs 18yrs0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5Balckout Motor impairment % of intoxication episodes involving..
Motor impairment Blackout
15 yrs 15.0 13.9
16 yrs 11.8 10.3
17 yrs 9.4 9.6
18 yrs 5.3 6.1
Mean freq.
*** p<0.0001 **p<0.01
However, symptoms of severe drunkenness were inversely related to age
The effect of age on ICA, taking severe drunkenness into account;
B SE OR 95% CI
Age -0.26 0.07 0.77** 0.65-0.92
Age -0.17 0.09 0.84 0.70-1.01
Severe drunkenness 0.11 0.01 1.12 *** 1.10-1.14
15 yrs 16 yrs 17 yrs 18yrs0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5Balckout Motor impairment % of intoxication episodes involving..
Motor impairment Blackout
15 yrs 15.0 13.9
16 yrs 11.8 10.3
17 yrs 9.4 9.6
18 yrs 5.3 6.1
Mean freq.
*** p<0.0001 **p<0.01
Impulsivity and ISA
Impulsivity 0.89 0.17 2.44*** 1.74-3.42
Severe drunkenness 0.08 0.01 1.08*** 1.05-1.10
Freq of intoxication 1-4 5-10 1 / month 2-3 / month 1 / week 2+ / week
1.000.030.230.460.961.08
0.250.270.230.270.42
0.97 1.26 1.59* 2.65*** 2.94*
0.59-1.580.74-2.111.01-2.501.57-4.481.29-6.71
Age -0.18 0.09 0.83 0.69-1.01
B SE OR 95% CI
Impulsivity 1.40 0.16 4.06*** 2.74-5.54
Victims Non-victims
48.7
25,0
% High level of impulsivity
mean sumscore >2.5
(scale:1.00-4.00)
*** p<0.0001 *p<0.05
Early onset of drinking and ISA
Victims Non-victims
26.5
11.3
% First alco intox ≤ 13 yrs.
When controlling for the frequency of intoxication, severe drunkenness and age, the effect of early drinking onset on ISA remained significant: OR=1.62 (1.10-2.37)
B SE OR 95% CI
Early intox. debut 0.38 0.20 1.46 1.46-0.99 Severe drunkenness 0.73 0.12 1.07*** 1.05-2.15 Freq of intoxication 1-4 5-10 1 / month 2-3 / month 1 / week 2+ / week
1.00-0.050.210.400.910.95
0.250.270.230.270.42
0.95 1.23 1.49 2.49** 2.59*
0.58-2.150.73-1.100.95-1.551.47-2.081.12-2.36
Age -0.16 0.09 0.85 0.71-4.21
Impulsivity 0.86 0.17 2.40*** 1.68-3.31
But adding ‘impulsivity’
to the model made a difference
(∆ -2 log likelihood: 24.5 (1) p<0.0001)
*** p<0.0001 **p<0.01 *p<0.05
ISA and other alcohol-related problems: Differences between victims and non-victims
Fighting Vandalism Drink driving Regret sex
40.3
33.5
22
71.1
25.720.6
13.1
73.1
12.4 11.2 11.9
18.5
Victims,% Victims adj. % Non-victims, %
ISA and other alcohol-related problems: Differences between victims and non-victims
Fighting Vandalism Drink driving Regret sex
40.3
33.5
22
71.1
25.720.6
13.1
73.1
12.4 11.2 11.9
18.5
Victims,% Victims adj. % Non-victims, %
↓ Adjusted for
- frequency of intoxication,- sympt. of severe drunkenness- age
ISA and other alcohol-related problems: Differences between victims and non-victims
Fighting Vandalism Drink driving Regret sex
40.3
33.5
22
71.1
25.720.6
13.1
73.1
12.4 11.2 11.9
18.5
Victims,% Victims adj. % Non-victims, %
*** Different from non-victims; p>0.0001
Illegal drug use Police contact
33.5
21.121.4
10.711.7
7.5
Victims, % Victims, adjusted % Non-victims, %
Illegal drug use and police contact (delinquency)Differences between victims and non-victims of ISA
*** Different from non-victims; p>0.0001
Concluding remarks
• ISA victimization is not a marginal phenomenon among teenage girls in Norway
• Due to their increased tendency to get severely drunk, the youngest teenagers have an elevated risk
• Impulsivity is related to ISA victimization, as is involvement in alcohol-related problem behaviours.
• Illegal drug use is more prevalent among victims than non-victims of ISA, does not reflect differences in alcohol use
• Cause and effect?