dub-_et_al-2013-integrated_environmental_assessment_and_management
TRANSCRIPT
sessment and Management — Volume 9, Number 3—pp. 426–438SpecialSeries
Integrated Environmental As
426 � 2012 SETACAccumulated State of the Yukon River Watershed:Part I Critical Review of LiteratureMonique Dube,*y Breda Muldoon,y Julie Wilson,y and Karonhiakta’tie Bryan MaraclezyCanadian Rivers Institute, University of New Brunswick, Alberta, CanadazDirector of Natural Resources, Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments, Fort Yukon, Alaska, USA
(Submitted 28 February 2012; Returned for Revision 16 April 2012; Accepted 21 August 2012)
EDITOR’S NOTEThis paper is 1 of 9 articles in the Special IEAM Series entitled, Watershed Cumulative Effects Assessment (CEA). The
research program emanated from a 4-year Canadian Water Network initiative, ‘‘Development of The Healthy River EcosystemAssessment System (THREATS) for Assessing and Adaptively Managing the Cumulative Effects of Man-made Developmentson Canadian Freshwaters.’’ The objectives were to develop a framework for watershed CEA, implement portions of theframework in multiple river basins across Canada, and to develop legacy tools (i.e., THREATS decision support software) forongoing development, use, and uptake by water stakeholders.
ABSTRACTAconsistentmethodology for assessing theaccumulating effects of natural andmanmade changeon riverine systemshasnot
been developed for a whole host of reasons including a lack of data, disagreement over core elements to consider, and
complexity. Accumulated state assessments of aquatic systems is an integral component of watershed cumulative effects
assessment. The Yukon River is the largest free flowing river in the world and is the fourth largest drainage basin in North
America, draining 855000 km2 inCanada and theUnited States. Because of its remote location, it is consideredpristine but little
is known about its cumulative state. This review identified 7 ‘‘hot spot’’ areas in the Yukon River Basin including Lake Laberge,
Yukon River at Dawson City, the Charley and Yukon River confluence, Porcupine and Yukon River confluence, Yukon River at the
Dalton Highway Bridge, Tolovana River near Tolovana, and Tanana River at Fairbanks. Climate change, natural stressors, and
anthropogenic stresses have resulted in accumulating changes including measurable levels of contaminants in surface waters
andfish tissues, fishandhumandisease, changes in surfacehydrology, aswell as shifts inbiogeochemical loads. This article is the
first integrated accumulated state assessment for the Yukon River basin based on a literature review. It is the first part of a 2-part
series. The second article (Dube et al. 2013a, this issue) is a quantitative accumulated state assessment of the Yukon River Basin
where hot spots and hot moments are assessed outside of a ‘‘normal’’ range of variability. Integr Environ Assess Manag
2013;9:426–438. � 2012 SETAC
Keywords: Cumulative effects assessment Multiple stressors River Water Yukon River
INTRODUCTIONUnderstanding how a river has been cumulatively affected
by natural and anthropogenic stress over broad temporaland spatial scales is an enormous undertaking. A common,integrated, diagnostic process to assess cumulative effectsof watersheds does not exist nor are key elements agreed on(Dube 2003). Development of an approach in Canada hasbeen hindered primarily by 3 factors; historical and arguablyineffectual application of cumulative effects assessment(CEA) under existing legislation (Canadian EnvironmentalAssessment Act), lack of data to conduct such an assessmentat the scales necessary, and lack of a champion entity ororganization to establish on-going practice.
Assessment of watershed CEA includes 3 main compo-nents, regional monitoring, an accumulated state assessment,and development of relationships where development activ-ities are linked to key ecosystem responses (causal associationat landscape scales) (Dube et al. 2013b, this issue). Relation-
* To whom correspondence may be addressed: [email protected]
Published online 24 August 2012 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1360
ships that link development activities to indicators of aquatichealth are fundamental to develop modeling tools for land useand watershed planning where different development scenar-ios can be forecasted and decided on.
This article focuses on 1 element needed for effectivewatershed CEA, accumulated state assessments. This assess-ment begins with an understanding of normal or naturalvariability at sites unaffected by development in time or spaceor more commonly at sites unaffected by the developmentunder evaluation (Kilgour et al. 2006). In environmentalstudies that measure change due to stress, the existence of thechange is based on some comparison back to a previous orexpected state. Natural variability is often the benchmarkused to compare to for identification of changes in space(‘‘hot spots’’) and time (‘‘hot moments’’). The change canbe chemical or biological in nature. Chemical examinationoften involves the biogeochemistry (chemical composition)of water whereas biological analysis looks at the healthof aquatic organisms through community, individual, andphysiological response indicators (Dube 2003). Accumulatedstate assessments ideally also include a stressor-based assess-ment to assess changes on the land (Dube 2003). If data ofappropriate scale are available, occurring effects can be usedto determine the state of the watershed and create a
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 427
benchmark to assess the sustainability of future development(Dube and Munkittrick 2001).
This article assesses the accumulated state of the YukonRiver Basin (YRB) based on a critical literature review ofexisting information. Areas of documented disturbance, asconcluded by the authors of the literature, were cataloguedas hotspots or areas most at risk for accumulating effects andlater verified through quantitative accumulated state analysis(second article in series, this issue). As data availability are acore limiting factor to assessments and very few studies havecollected data in the context of broad accumulated stateassessments, this article intended to illustrate how resultsfrom existing literature could be integrated to identifyhot spots and hot moments as a preliminary, ‘‘first pass’’assessment.
The Yukon River was selected as a model river for thisstudy, as it is the largest free flowing river in the world(Nilsson et al. 2005) and the fourth largest drainage basin inNorth America, draining 855 000 km2 in Canada and theUnited States (Brabets et al. 2000) (Figure 1). Its headwatersbegin in British Columbia (BC) where it flows into the centralYukon curving into Alaska and finally discharging into theBering Sea. Water that flows from the Yukon contributes 8%of water in the Arctic Sea (Brabets et al. 2000). It contributesmost of the freshwater runoff, sediments, and dissolvedsolutes (such as terrigenous dissolved organic C) to the
Figure 1. Map of the Yukon River Basin showing drainage sub basins, Canad
(inset modified from http://www.water.usgs.gov).
eastern part of the Bering Sea (Lisitsysn 1969; Opsahl et al.1999; Hansell et al. 2004). Because of its remote location it isconsidered pristine but little is known about its accumulatedstate.
EFFECTS-BASED REVIEWThis section reviews the literature where different
responses were measured in environmental indicators forthe Yukon River including water quality, quantity, fish tissueburdens, and fish and human disease reports. It summarizesthe indicators that have been measured and documentedchanges and conclusions based on the original authors’articles. It also presents a baseline from these studies in theform of describing expected patterns and trends of indicatorresponses commonly observed in the Yukon River.
Water quality baseline
The water quality of the Yukon River varies seasonally andspatially. From May to September, when the water is ice-free,75% of the annual stream flow runoff occurs (Brabets et al.2008) concurrent with the greatest discharge of organic C,nutrients, and sediments. Dissolved organic C (DOC) hasbeen studied extensively in the Yukon River because of itscomposition and cycle in the environment and the potentialto be influenced by climate change. Loads are generally
a/US border, and location of hotspots identified from the literature review
428 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
highest in spring during freshet and lowest in winter (Strieglet al. 2005) with 63% exported during ice out (Raymondet al. 2007). Tributaries of the Yukon River surrounded bywetlands, such as the Porcupine River, have the highest DOCloads whereas tributaries surrounded by bare rock, such asthe Tanana River, have the lowest DOC loads (Striegl et al.2005).
The Yukon River is oligotrophic, limiting biological growth(Guo et al. 2004). Additional nutrient loads into the river willalter growth in the system. The major flux of N and P occursduring open water, May to September. The maximumloading of nutrients occurs during spring freshet, May, anddecreases through September. The dominant species areparticulate P (PP) and dissolved organic N (DON) (Guo et al.2004). The source of P and N differs with P coming fromchemical rock weathering, whereas N comes from plantmaterial, land erosion in the spring, leaching of deeper soilhorizons in the summer–autumn, and from groundwater inthe winter (Dornblaser and Striegl 2007). Phosphorus islimited in the system and any increases in P discharge couldimpact aquatic growth and water quality (Guo et al. 2004).
Suspended sediment (SS) in the Yukon River carriesorganic C, nutrients, contaminants, and a full suite of otherminerals to the Bering Sea. Changes in SS concentrations havethe potential to impact aquatic life by interfering with fishrespiration, surface-prey feeding, spawning site availability,and benthic habitats (McLeay et al. 1987; Dornblaser andStriegl 2009). Suspended sediment concentrations of theTanana River and White River contribute the highest SS loadsto the Yukon River (Brabets et al. 2000; Dornblaser andStriegl 2009). Currently 95% of SS discharge occurs fromMay to September (Brabets et al. 2008) although the sourceof the SS deposition changes throughout the seasons. Inspring, sources are from bank erosion and the resuspensionof deposited sediments whereas in the summer–autumn, SScomes from glacial melt (Dornblaser and Striegl 2009).Suspended sediment composition is mostly silt and clay butalso contains carbonate, quartz, and feldspars (Brabets et al.2000; Eberl 2004).
Effects on water quantity and quality
In the interior regions of Alaska, south of the Yukon River,permafrost is warming between 0.3 8C to 1 8C (Osterkamp2005). These authors report that permafrost warming willincrease groundwater runoff consequently altering streamflow. Changes in stream flow have occurred in the YukonRiver at Whitehorse and on the tributaries of the Stewart,Tanana, Takhini, Salcha, and Porcupine Rivers (Table 1:1.12,1.13). Increases in groundwater discharge have also beenobserved through much of the basin over the past few years(Table 1:1.14). These results are supported by Peterson et al.(2002) who showed that freshwater flows from 6 of thelargest Eurasian rivers to the Arctic Ocean (Yenisey, Lena,Ob’, Pechora, Kolyma, and Severnaya Dvina) have increasedas average air temperatures have risen. Increases in freshwaterrunoff are expected to affect ocean stratification, circulation,and even global climate processes through the slowing ofthermohaline circulation (Schiller et al. 1997; Weaver et al.1999; Ottera et al. 2003).
Dissolved organic C loadings are predicted to change, asnorthern regions become warmer, permafrost melts, and riverand groundwater flows are altered. Striegl et al. (2005, 2007)
have predicted that as permafrost thaws DOC yields willinitially increase, as meltwater runoff to the Yukon Riverincreases, but as flow paths deepen DOC will be consumedmore rapidly in the soil and groundwater (Table 1.16).Raymond et al. (2007) are consistent with this predictionstating that warming permafrost will increase stream flowleading to increase DOC loading across the Yukon River Basinas so far that the land has no more DOC to yield to the water(Table 1.17). The discrepancy between the single year resultsshown by Raymond et al. (2007) (a rising trend) and the3-year results shown by Striegl et al. (2005) (a falling trend)illustrate the need for multidecadal monitoring and observa-tion. There is agreement that DOC will increase as temper-atures warm and flows increase but the persistence of theincrease (how long it will occur) is unknown.
Permafrost thaw and consequently a deeper active layerare expected to alter N, P, and SS levels in the Yukon Riverbased on conclusions of Guo et al. (2004), Walvoord andStriegl (2007), McLeay et al. (1987), and Dornblaser andStriegl (2009). Suspended sediment concentrations in theYukon River have increased as water yields have increased(Table 1.18). Increased SS in rivers have affected Arcticgrayling appearance, lowered their food consumption,increased consumption of O2, reduced fish size, and increasedsusceptibility to contaminants (Table 1.9) (McLeay et al.1987). Benthic invertebrate studies in the Yukon Riverhave shown that high SS loads increased the abundance ofpollution tolerant taxa (Table 1.10) (LePage 2009).
Effects—disease and contamination in fish and water
Nearly all village residents of the Yukon River Basin relyheavily on fish and game resources for survival (Kruse 1998;Brabets et al. 2000). All communities along the river obtaintheir drinking water from the Yukon River, its tributaries,or related aquifers and lakes (Roach et al. 1993). In someareas, the water is not treated before being consumed (Roachet al. 1993). Therefore, for many Alaska Natives who rely ontraditional and customary activities any deleterious changes inwater quality could have profound societal impacts (Houseret al. 2001).
Studies on fish from the Yukon River Basin have reporteddetectable levels of contaminants in tissues, some of whichexceed consumption guidelines. In addition, sediment corestaken from Lake Laberge showed residues of contaminantsoriginating from anthropogenic sources (Rawn et al. 2001).Some studies have reported waterborne contaminants insurface waters at concentrations that exceed Canadian and USguidelines for drinking and recreational activities. Recentstudies on salmon have shown them to carry a parasiticdisease known as Ichthyophoniasis that currently threatenstheir migrations from the Bering Sea up the Yukon River(Kocan et al. 2004). The extent and details of these findingsare presented in the sections below.
Trace contaminants
Mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) have been measuredin fish tissues from the Yukon River at levels exceedingconsumption criteria or toxicity thresholds (Duffy et al. 1998;Jewett et al. 2003; Hinck et al. 2004, 2006). In northern pike,longnose sucker, and burbot, Hg levels (0.08–0.65 mg/g)exceeded toxicity thresholds for all bird and small mammalmodels suggesting a risk to piscivorous wildlife throughout
Table
1.Summary
ofaliterature
review
ofstressorvariablesontheYu
konRiver
Nr
Stress
variable
Effect
measu
red
Reference
1.1
Se
Max:in
maleB(0.85
mg/g)in
TRatFB
.High:inmaleNP(0.66
mg/g),femaleLS
(0.62
mg/g)atC-K
confluence
and
female
LS(0.61
mg/g),female
B(0.69
mg/g)in
TRatFB
andfemale
LS(0.60
mg/g)atDHB
Hinck
etal.2004
Mea
n:(0.72
mg/g)in
PRatFish
HookBen
dandseco
ndhighest(0.61
mg/g)in
TRatFB
Max:
inB(0.85
mg/g)in
TRatFB
Hinck
etal.2006
1.2
Hg
Max:
infemale
NP(0.69
mg/g)atToRatTolovana
Hinck
etal.2004
High:in
femaleandmaleNP(0.46and0.56
mg/g)attheDHB,in
male
B(0.30
mg/g)andfemaleandmaleNP(in
TRatFB
)
Mea
n:(0.41
mg/g)atDHB
0.3
mg/g
inallpikeatDHB,ToRatTolovana,andYRatTanana>0.3
mg/g
inallburbotin
TRatFB
Hinck
etal.2006
THg:Highlevels
inLT
(0.30
mg/g)
Brauneetal.1999
Mea
nTH
g:Highin
NP(1.506
mg/g)andAG
(0.264
mg/g)in
YR
Jewett
etal.2003
Mea
nMeH
g:Highin
NPin
muscle
(1.56
mg/g)andin
liver
(1.20
mg/g)
MeH
g:NPandShee
fish
hadlevelsexceed
ing0.2
mg/g
Duffyetal.1998
MeH
g:Specieswithhighestlevels(0.718
mg/g)wasNP
1.3
PCBs
Max:
inFemale
LS(0.09
mg/g)in
TRatFB
Hinck
etal.2004
Mea
n:atFB
(0.062
mg/g)
Max:
inLS
andB(>
50ng/g)in
TRatFB
Hinck
etal.2006
Max:
levels
ofAroclor1260(0.84
mg/g)andAroclor1254(0.71
mg/g)atFB
Muelle
randMatz
2000
Mea
n:in
B(0.40
mg/g)atFB
andB(3.43
mg/g)from
Lake
Laberge
Mea
n:Allmaxlevelsfoundin
fish
from
Lake
Laberge;
B-liver
(1.267
mg/g),LT-m
uscle
(0.448
mg/g),WF-muscle
(0.061
mg/g),AG
(0.021
mg/g),andNP(0.090
mg/g)
Brauneetal.1999
Max:
inLake
Labergesedim
entco
resample:1964at0.0161
mg/g
dw
Rawnetal.2001
Surface
sedim
entslicein
Lake
Laberge:
1991at0.008
mg/g
dw
1.4
DDT
Mea
n:highest(0.011
mg/g)atFB
Hinck
etal.2004
Max:
inLS
(0.0047
mg/g)andNP(0.009
mg/g)atTR
atFB
Hinck
etal.2006
Max:
levels
ofp0 p-D
DE(0.47
mg/g)andp0 p-D
DD(0.44
mg/g)atFB
Muelle
randMatz
2000
Mea
n:Highestlevelin
B-liver
(3.433
mg/g);alsohighin
LT-m
uscle
(0.448
mg/g)andNP(0.247
mg/g)
Brauneetal.1999
(Continued)
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 429
Table
1.(Continued)
Nr
Stress
variable
Effect
measu
red
Reference
MaxDDTin
Lake
Labergesedim
entco
resample:1960at0.0214
mg/g
dw
Rawnetal.2001
DDTdropped
to0.0012–0
.0016
mg/g
dw
insedim
ents
betwee
n1971and1989
1.5
Toxaphen
eMax:
inNP(0.029–0
.034
mg/g)atC-K
confl.andToRatTolovana
Hinck
etal.2006
Max:
alllevels
foundin
fish
from
Lake
Laberge;
B-liver
(2.301
mg/g),LT-m
uscle
(0.344
mg/g),WF-muscle
(0.0338
mg/g),AG
(0.025
mg/g)andNP(0.048
mg/g)
Brauneetal.1999
Highestmed
ian:B-liver
0.14
mg/g
ww
atFB
and0.290
mg/g
ww
atYu
konFlats
Muelle
randMatz
2000
1.6
Enteroco
cci
YRatStevensvilla
geEnteroco
ccilevelsat4980cfu/L
Voyteketal.2005
TRatNen
anaEnteroco
ccilevelsat850cfu/L
1.7
Giardia
cysts
In17%
ofsamplesatWhiteh
orse,
7.5
Giardia
cysts/100Lin
Lake
Labergefrom
surface
water(1992)
Roach
etal.1993
1.8
Cryptosp
oridium
oocytes
Cryptosp
oridium
oocytes:in
5%
samplesatWhiteh
orse,0.3
Cryptosp
oridium/100Lin
Lake
Labergefrom
surface
water(1992)
Roach
etal.1993
1.9
SS
Allunderyearling-AG:exposedto
100mg/L
werepalerin
colorandhadindistinct
parr
marksexp
osed
to300–1
000mg/L:grew
less,co
nsumed
more
oxygen
,decreasedfeed
ingtimes
andresp
onse,andwere
less
distributedwithin
thestream
exposedto
300–1
000mg/L:decreasedtolerance
totoxinpen
tach
lorophen
ol
McLeayetal.1987
1.10
Placerminingim
pacts
Taxo
nrich
ness:
low
atallstations(12to
17taxa)
LePa
ge2009
Dominanttaxo
ngroupsatmined
sites:
chironomids,
olig
och
aetes,andnem
atans
Low
number
ofmayfl
y/stonefl
ytaxa
atmined
sites—
sensitive
toco
ntaminantinputs
1.11
Ichthyo
phoniasis
Infemalesoverallinfectionranged
from
24%–4
0%
(highestin
1999and2000)
Kocanet
al.2004
Inmalesinfectionincrea
sedfrom
20%
in1999to
34%
in2003(pea
k)
1.12
Flow
Annualavg
.flow:low
atPRat10.56km
3/y
(15%<19yaverageof12.4
km3/y)
Striegletal.2007
HighatTR
:8.3%>43yaverage
1.13
Flow
Increa
sesin
winterflow:3%
atStewart
riverto
43%
atWhiteh
orse
Brabets
andWalvoord
2009
Increa
sesin
avg
.Aprilflow:10%
atTakh
iniRiver
to63%
atSalchaRiver
1.14
GW
disch
argech
anges
Largestch
anges
inGW
input:Koyu
kukR.from
1961–1
982(83%),YRatCarm
acksfrom
1952–1
995(58%),
PRnea
rFo
rtYuko
nfrom
1968–2
004(56%),(YRabove
WhiteR.from
1957–2
005(21%),YRatEagle
from
1954–2
005(23%),andTR
atNen
anafrom
1963–2
005(20%)
Walvoord
andStriegl2007
1.15
Open
waterdelta
plain
1985open
waterdelta
plain
was1210km
3,26%
consisted
oflake
sandopen
waterch
annels
Colemanetal.2008
1992open
waterdelta
plain
was2310km
3,48%
consisted
oflake
sandopen
waterch
annels
430 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
Table
1.(Continued)
Nr
Stress
variable
Effect
measu
red
Reference
1.16
Averageflow
1978–1
980:avg
.flow
was193�24km
3/a
Streigletal.2005
DOCexport
0.88Tg
C
DOC
2001–2
003:avg
.flow
was212�21km
3/a
DOCexport
0.53Tg
C
1.17
DOCexport
2004:Annualwaterfluxwas183km
/yandannualDOCflux1.21�109kg
/yRaym
ondetal.2007
2005:Annualwaterfluxwas247km
/yandannualDOCflux2.18�109kg
/y
1.18
SS
TRatNen
ana:avg
.annualSSyieldandwateryield1966–1
970:330�120gm
2/a,31.7�5.6
cmDornblaserandStriegl2009
Avg
.annualSSyieldandwateryield1983–1
987:559�93gm
2/a,33.7�2.6
cm
Avg
.annualSSyieldandwateryield2001–2
005:503�58gm
2/a,35.6�1.3
cm
AG¼Arcticgrayling;a
vg.¼
average;B¼burbot;C-K
confl.¼
Charley-KandikRiverConfluence;D
HB¼DaltonHighwayBridge;D
OC¼dissolvedorganiccarbon;FB¼Fairbanks;G
W¼groundwater;LS¼longnose
sucker;LT¼lake
trout;MeH
g¼methylmercu
ry;NP¼Northernpike;
PR¼Po
rcupineRiver;S
S¼susp
endedsedim
ent;TH
g¼totalm
ercu
ry;ToR¼TolovanaRiver;TR¼TananaRiver;TR
atFB¼TananaRiveratFairbanks;WF¼whitefish;Y
R¼Yuko
n
River.
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 431
the Yukon River basin (Hinck et al. 2006). Hg concentrationsexceeding 0.3 mg/g w/w have been shown to cause repro-ductive impairment in loons through dietary exposure(Table 1.2) (Hinck et al. 2004, 2006). Jewett et al. (2003)measured methylmercury (MeHg) in muscle (1.56 mg/g) andliver (1.20 mg/g) of northern pike at levels that exceeded Stateof Alaska Epidemiology action levels (1.0 mg/g) (SAE 2001).Duffy et al. (1998) measured 7 species of fish for muscletissue Hg in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Region of Alaskaand compared these levels for individual species to humanand animal critical values established by Yeardley et al.(1998). The critical value of 0.1 mg/g of MeHg is the lowestlegal limit used in the world with 1 of 26 countries surveyedusing this value. Using this value as a reference, 85% of thesites sampled exceeded this value. Mean MeHg concentra-tions in sheefish (0.226 mg/g) and northern pike (0.718 mg/g)exceeded the critical value for both human consumption(0.2 mg/g) and animal consumption (0.1 mg/g) (Table 1.2).Methylmercury is of concern because it biomagnifies throughthe food chain and can cause neurological and developmentaldisorders in humans through indirect dietary exposure(Jewett et al. 2003).
Hinck et al. (2004, 2006) measured several contaminantsincluding Se in northern pike, burbot, and longnose sucker at10 sites in the Yukon River basin. Selenium (0.23–0.85 mg/gwet weight [ww]) concentrations at 4 sites, in all 3 speciesexceeded whole body toxicity thresholds for fish of 0.8 mg/gww (assuming 80% moisture; 4 mg/g dry weight [dw]) and0.6 mg/g ww (3 mg/g dw) for piscivorous wildlife (Table 1.1).These authors concluded that Se was a concern at these sites(Charley-Kandik, AK; Fish Hook Bend, AK; The Bridge, AK;Fairbanks, AK) (Hinck et al. 2004).
Persistent organic pollutants
Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) including polychlori-nated biphenyls (PCBs), DDT, and toxaphene have beenmeasured in water, fish tissues, and sediments in the YukonRiver basin. These contaminants were historically used ascoolants, pesticides, and herbicides but are no longer in use.Braune et al. (1999) measured organochlorines includingPCBs, DDT, and toxaphene in fish tissues from Yukon Lakes.Polychlorinated biphenyls in burbot liver (1267 ng/g), laketrout muscle (448 ng/g), and white fish muscle (61 ng/g)from Lake Laberge (1990–1994) were 25-fold, 128-fold, and610-fold higher, respectively, than levels in the same speciesand tissues in other Yukon regional lakes (Table 1.3, 1.4, and1.5). Mueller and Matz (2000) reported similar results forburbot livers sampled in the Yukon, Koyukuk, and Tananarivers in Alaska (AK). Specifically, they reported concen-trations of PCBs in burbot livers were greater than 0.11 mg/gww with the highest concentrations (1.4 mg/g) in samplescollected near Fairbanks, AK. Sediment PCB concentrationsin Lake Laberge were lower than the levels found in the fishand concentrations have decreased by 50% (from 16.1 ng/g to8.0 ng/g) over the period of 1964 to 1991 (Table 1.3) (Rawnet al. 2001). Hinck et al. (2006) reported PCB concentrationsfrom 0.02 to 0.09 mg/g ww in fish tissue samples collectedfrom 9 stations in the Yukon River basin with the highestconcentration measured in female longnose sucker nearFairbanks. None of the PCB concentrations from the researchof Hinck et al. (2006) exceeded New York State Departmentof Environmental Conservation wildlife guideline for fish of
432 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
0.11 mg/g ww. These studies suggest PCB contamination atlocations within the Yukon basin (Lake Laberge, Fairbanks)appears to be decreasing with time and chemical use.
DDT, a persistent organochlorine insecticide, remainspresent in the environment as a result of historical use datingback to the 1960s and 1970s. Hinck et al. (2006) measuredDDT in fish tissues within the basin reporting the highestconcentration in 2002 found in female northern pike(0.009 mg/g ww) and male longnose sucker (0.0047 mg/gww) (Table 1.4). These concentrations were compared tofish and wildlife toxicity thresholds from the literature(wildlife criteria of 0.2 mg/g ww; piscivorous birds of 1–3 mg/g ww; whole body fish criterion of 0.5 mg/g ww) showinglevels in 2002 of low risk to fish and wildlife in the YukonRiver basin. Rawn et al. (2001) have also showed a significantdecrease in DDT in soil samples from 1960 to 1989(Table 1.4).
Hinck et al. (2006), Mueller and Matz (2000), and Brauneet al. (1999) measured toxaphene concentrations in fish in theYukon basin. This contaminant has been classified as themajor organochlorine contaminant in the Canadian Arcticwith concentrations in Lake Laberge burbot livers (2.3 mg/gww) 125 times greater than in other Arctic lakes includingAtlin Lake, Tagish Lake, March Lake, Fox Lake, etc.(Table 1.5) (Braune et al. 1999). Toxaphene was alsodetected in whole body samples of northern pike andlongnose sucker in 2002 (0.012–0.034 mg/g ww) (Hincket al. 2006). Mueller and Matz (2000) measured concen-trations of 0.14 mg/g and 0.29 mg/g in burbot liver inFairbanks and Yukon Flats. As reviewed by Mueller and Matz(2000) and Hinck et al. (2006), acute and chronic effects oftoxaphene on freshwater fish have been observed at wholebody concentrations equal to or greater than 0.4 mg/g ww andfish for human consumption should be below the Health andWelfare Canada residue threshold of 0.1 mg/g. Historically, a‘‘consumption advisory’’ has been in place for areas in theYukon including Lake Laberge due to elevated levels oftoxaphene and other organochlorine contaminates (Diamondet al. 2005).
Bacteriological contaminants
Various waterborne contaminants were detected in surfacewaters of both the Yukon and Alaska in 2 separate studiesin 1993 and 2005 (Table 1.6–1.8) (Roach et al. 1993; Voyteket al. 2005). These contaminants include Enterococci, Giardiacysts, and Cryptosporidium oocytes. In the early 1990s,approximately 1000 Yukon residents required treatment fordiarrheal illnesses due to Enterococcus, Giardia cysts, andCryptosporidium oocytes in their water supply (Roach et al.1993). However, the report rate may be lower than actualdue to underreported cases (Roach et al. 1993).
The biological action of cysts is slowed by cold temper-atures but survival rates are prolonged through drops intemperature (Roach et al. 1993). Two villages in Alaska,Stevens Village and Nenana, reported Enterococci above theUS Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and State ofAlaska drinking and recreational water standards of 0 counts/L and 610 counts/L (USEPA 2000) (Table 1.6). The presenceof Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts were found insurface waters of Lake Laberge and were measured to be athigher levels than the surface waters in other areas (Table 1.7and 1.8).
Disease and salmon migration failures
Ichthyophonus is a genus of unicellular parasites of fish andwas first identified in Chinook salmon in Alaska in the 1980s(Kocan et al. 2004). Studies show that salmon infected withthe disease ichthyophoniasis present with varying degrees ofwhite spots on their heart, liver, and skeletal muscle. Reportsalso suggest that the disease prevents the salmon from dryingproperly and results in a slight ‘‘fruity’’ smell to thoseconsuming infected fish (Kocan et al. 2004). Infected fishsuffered reduced swimming stamina and growth and maycause early onset of fatigue in migrating Chinook leadingthem to die before they reach spawning grounds (Kocan andHershberger 2006). Table 1:1.11 outlines the infectionprevalence in male and female Chinook salmon duringmigrations from 1999 to 2003. Currently no concrete dataexists on how infection occurs, but it is believed that salmonbecome infected in their time spent in the Bering Sea whilefeeding on other infected organisms (Kocan et al. 2004).
Human cancer in Alaska
Current and historical cancer rates within some areas ofAlaska are higher than seen in other states throughout theUnited States. The incidence of malignant cancer for examplefrom 1996 to 2004 was higher for all years compared to theUS rate (O’Brien and Upton 2008). Cancer incidence (per100 000 people) is significantly higher in the Fairbanks NorthStar Borough with 499 to 727 deaths occurring from 1996 to2004. The most prominent types of cancer in the North StarBorough at that time were prostate cancer and female breastcancer (O’Brien and Upton 2008). The US national cancerincidence rate from 2002 to 2006 was approximately 541 to560 deaths per 100 000 people (CDC 2007). No specificcausality was assigned in these reports. Rather, the dominantrisk factors (including tobacco, adult diet and obesity,sedentary lifestyle) known to contribute to cancer deathswere described.
STRESSOR-BASED REVIEWThe remote location of the Yukon River basin and its
low population density result in anthropogenic sources ofstress being concentrated around cities and villages along theriver and its tributaries including Whitehorse, Dawson City,Fort Yukon, Tanana, and Fairbanks. Anthropogenic stressorswhich may result in environmental changes include thedischarge of wastewater (municipal sewage) from treatmentfacilities, waste disposal, hard rock and placer mining, militaryactivities, and activities associated with oil and gas develop-ment and forestry as described below.
Wastewater treatment
Whitehorse is home to 22 898 people and is the largestsettlement in the Canadian portion of the Basin followed byDawson City with a population of 1327 people (StatisticsCanada 2006). Both communities have, at some point,discharged sewage into the Yukon River. Before 1996,Whitehorse discharged treated effluent into the Yukon Riverfrom the Porter Creek lagoon (Roach et al. 1993). When fecalcoliforms were detected in Lake Laberge surface waters,Whitehorse began an upgrade to a 3-cell lagoon system withassociated groundwater monitoring wells and completionoccurred in 1996 (Roach et al. 1993; Cabott 2007).
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 433
In 2003, Dawson City was charged by the YukonTerritorial Court under section 36(3) of the Fisheries Actfor discharging harmful substances into the Yukon River fromtheir wastewater (YG 2009a). Currently, Dawson City hasprimary treatment in place using rotostrainers that removeany solids greater than 0.75 mm (R v. C 2003). There is nodisinfection. Samples taken from the sewage have shown highlevels of ammonia, solids, pathogenic microorganisms, anddetergents (R v. C 2003). From 1983 to 1996, Dawson Cityfailed 25 of 35 LC50 toxicity tests for determining thetoxicity of the effluent to fish (R v. C 2003). Tests were alsofailed in 2000 and 2001 (R v. C 2003). The municipality hasbeen put under court order to build a new wastewatertreatment facility that conducts secondary treatment (YG2009a). The new secondary treatment plant was completed inDecember 2011 (YG 2009a).
Sewage lagoons, outhouses, and ‘‘honey buckets’’ areused extensively by aboriginal communities throughout theYukon River Basin. Many problems exist with these systemsincluding flooding, erosion, and improper maintenanceresulting in sewage discharge into surrounding water bodies(YRITWC 2002). Many communities and First Nationswithin the Yukon River Basin have expressed concern abouttheir sewage treatment and the potential risk it poses to theenvironment and to their communities (YRITWC 2002). TheAlaska Department of Environmental Conservation overseesthe permitting and installation of treatments systems. Ofthe 47 village communities in Alaska there is currently only1 community (Anatuvik Pass) operating under an activedischarge permit. The Department does not have, ormaintain, a current facility list for the 47 village communitiesin the Yukon River Basin. A study by Indian and NorthernAffairs Canada (INAC) assessed 11 wastewater systems inFirst Nation communities in the Yukon (2003). Of thosesystems, 7 had no to minimal problems, 2 needed repairs, and2 systems had potential health and safety concerns (INAC2003).
In Alaska, the only major wastewater treatment facilitywithin the Yukon River Basin is located in the city ofFairbanks. Before the 1970s, there were no wastewatertreatment facilities and in the late 1960s recorded coliformcounts upstream from Fairbanks were 50/100 mL but down-stream they were 500 000/100 mL (Frey et al. 1970). In the1970s, the population of Fairbanks jumped to 17 000 and awastewater treatment system was installed (Pearson andSmith 1975). There were 5 sewage systems in total; 3primary treatment facilities with 1 within the city, 2 at FortWainwright, and 2 secondary treatment facilities at theUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks and the International FairbanksAirport (Pearson and Smith 1975). Currently, a secondarywastewater treatment facility, called The Golden HeartsUtilities Wastewater Treatment Plant, services the city ofFairbanks as well as the University of Alaska Fairbanks, FortWainwright, College Utilities Corporation, and commercialseptage haulers (USAI 2010). It operates under a NationalPollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit(USAI 2010).
Waste disposal
A potential source of contaminants within the Yukon Rivermay be from unregulated landfills located along the river thatleach into the groundwater and into the river (YRITWC
2002). Many First Nation communities and villages locatedalong the river have expressed concern over waste disposal intheir area (YRITWC 2002). In 1972 in Fairbanks, Stateauthorities were threatening to shut down the local landfillbecause it did not meet required standards (Pearson andSmith 1975). It is now partially redeveloped and a newregulated landfill has been installed in another area. There arealso several sites in the North where chemicals were disposedof off the record. For example, there is speculation that PCBsmay have been disposed of in the Whitehorse area because ofhigh levels of PCBs detected in Lake Laberge (Hinck et al.2004).
Mining
Mining has been occurring in the basin since the mid-1800sand currently employs thousands of workers in both theYukon and Alaska bringing in significant revenue to theeconomy (YRITWC 2002). The greatest environmentalimpact from mining operations within the Yukon River Basinis from mines that have been abandoned without siteremediation. These mine sites often have elevated levels ofmetals and contaminants that leach into groundwater andrunoff into surface water. In the Yukon, there are manyabandoned mines but the ones of greatest concern are theFaro Mine, Mt. Nansen, and Clinton Creek (YG 2009b). InAlaska alone, there are over 400 abandoned mines. It isunknown how many of these impact water quality, however,the most high-risk mine openings are near Fairbanks (USDOI2009). Two types of mining occur frequently within theYukon River Basin; placer mining and hard rock mining.Mining within Alaska is concentrated between Eagle andTanana with 90% placer mines and 10% lode mines (Hincket al. 2004). The mines are concentrated near Circle,Livengood, Fairbanks, Wiseman, Eagle, and Tanana (Hincket al. 2004).
Placer mining occurs through various techniques ofhydraulically separating large quantities of sediments thatare brought to the surface and discharged back into the streamusually after being discharged into a settling pond (Pentz andKostaschuk 1999). This may increase sediment depositionand affect local habitat (McLeay et al. 1987; Pentz andKostaschuk 1999; Dornblaser and Striegl 2009). In earliertimes, Hg was used to remove impurities from the Au andcreate a Au amalgam but it is no longer used due to its toxiceffects. However, high levels of Hg are still present in fishwithin the Yukon River as summarized above and in Table 1(Hinck et al. 2004). Many operations within Alaska havepermission to discharge effluents into small tributaries of theYukon including the Fortymile, Tolovana, Chatnika, Chena,Tanana, Koyukuk Rivers, Birch Creek and Yukon-CharleyRiver confluence (Hinck et al. 2004). Smaller tributaries oftenhave lower potential to dilute tailings discharges.
Hard rock mining also occurs to a large extent in both theYukon and Alaska. Valuable minerals are removed and wasterock (tailings) remains with some potential for seepage intolocal water sources (i.e., Se, Cd, Cu, and Zn) (Edmonds andPeplow 2000). Acid mine drainage is perhaps the mostsignificant source of mine pollution. Water from precipitationor surface flow becomes contaminated when it comes incontact with mining wastes, including waste rock and tailings.As water filters through the wastes, metallic sulfides in the oreoxidize, dissolve, and release heavy metals, forming a highly
434 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
acidic effluent. Effluent that contains mineral processingchemicals such as cyanide may also leak from leach pads, wellseals, and pipes. Seeps from tailings impoundments representanother source of contamination.
Oil and gas development and/or spills
Oil development in Alaska began in the mid-1950s. Whena large supply of oil was found in the North Slope in the1960s, plans to build a pipeline were proposed. The TransAlaska Pipeline System (TAPS) was constructed and com-plete by 1977 and carries oil 800 miles to Valdez, Alaska.It crosses the Yukon River between Stevens Village andRampart and runs south to Fairbanks crossing many of thetributaries including the Koyukuk, Tanana, Tolovana, Chena,Salcha, and Delta Rivers (YRITWC 2002; Hinck et al. 2004).There have been 3 larger oil spills within the Basin from thepipeline; 627 000 gallons at Steele Creek in 1978, 285 000gallons near Livengood in 2001, and several thousand barrelsat pump station 9 in 2010; the latter contained in acontaminant overflow area (Mach et al. 2000; Bohrer 2010).
The Trans Alaska Pipeline was built in 1974 and transportscrude oil from the North Slope of Alaska to Port Valdez inPrince William Sound crossing numerous creeks and largerivers of the Yukon River basin including sensitive terrestrialand aquatic habitats (Hinck et al. 2004). Impacts attributed topipeline operation include oil spills, water discharges, andemissions of volatile organic compounds from valves andpump stations. In December 1997, tribal leaders from theentire length of the Yukon River met in Galena, Alaska todiscuss their concerns over the health of the watershed.Residents of Stevens Village, located 20 miles upstream of theTrans Alaska Pipeline crossing of the Yukon River, expressedconcern about benzene emissions from the pipeline pumpstation (YRITWC 2002). Future plans of a natural gaspipeline do exist (Cooney 2004).
Military
Military presence in the North began growing duringWorld War II with the Japanese invasion of the AleutianIslands. Presence expanded during the Cold War when manyArctic training and air force bases were established. Function-ing bases within the Yukon River Basin currently include FortGreely, Fort Wainwright, and Eielson Air Force Base. All 3are located within the Tanana River basin (Hinck et al. 2004).Historical ‘‘bury it’’ or ‘‘out of site out of mind’’ disposalmethods prevalent during pre-environmental assessment lawresulted in leaching of contaminants from the military sites.Sites like Fort Greely’s antiballistic and cold weather trainingcenter (Walsh et al. 2003) produces concern because theDelta River watershed drains the training grounds into theTanana River. Walsh et al. (2003) found munitions residues,relatively high concentrations of research department explo-sives (RDX), high melting explosives (HMX), trinitrotoluene(TNT), 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) and 2,6-DNT, Cr, Cu, Pb,Zn, and Sb in the soils where the developmental weaponshave occurred. From 1961 to 1971 the Fort Greely nuclearfacility buried waste material and a leak was discovered in1997 with site decommissioning still ongoing by the US Army(Griffeth et al. 2001). Additionally, between 1963 and 1967,a series of open-air tests of chemical and biological warfareagents were performed at the Gerstle River test site (Hummel2005).
The Fort Eielson Air Force Base in 1989 was identified asa federal ‘‘superfund’’ site due to 66 potential sources ofcontamination (Wilkinson et al. 2008). Contaminants inGarrison slough (located within the Tanana drainage)included; trichloroethane, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene,tetrachloroethene, jet propellant, hydrocarbons, chlorinatedVOCs, and other hazardous wastes (waste oils, solvents, etc.)(Wilkinson et al. 2008). Fish tissues from Garrison sloughshowed elevated concentrations of DDT, DDD, and DDE(Wilkinson et al. 2008). Bioaccumulation in migratory fishposes a potential mechanism for contaminant transport acrossthe basin, particularly through feeding on exposed macro-invertebrates.
The Chena River, which empties into the Tanana River,runs through Fort Wainwright and was placed on the listof ‘‘superfund’’ sites by the USEPA in 1990 (ADEC 2009).Taku Gardens reports 115 000 mg/kg of PCBs, munitionsrelated debris, buried drums, scrap metal, concentratedpetroleum, chlorinated solvents, herbicides, pesticides, diox-ins/furans, Pb, nitroaromatics, and propellants (ADEC 2009).All contaminants are listed as a threat to human andenvironmental health and remediation of the site is inprogress (ADEC 2009).
Historic construction projects and urban development
Expansion during the Au rush and World War II resultedin use of chemicals not previously found in the Yukon.Polychlorinated biphenyls transported during constructionof the Alaska Highway (INAC 2003) resulted in 3840 L ofliquid PCB and 183 200 kg of PCB contaminated soil that wasremoved from the Yukon and disposed at Swan Hills becauseof the risk to human and environment health (INAC 2010).Many First Nation communities express concerns aboutconstruction contaminants, including an old railroad tie plant(Carcross Tagish First Nation), discarded barrels and vehiclesat Johnson Crossing (Teslin First Nation), and barrels filledwith various substances (left by the military in 1950s)scattering the banks of the Yukon River at Galena (YRITWC2002). The significance or potential risk associated with thisstressor source is unknown.
Long range transport and deposition
Atmospheric currents are key pathways for long-rangetransport of contaminants (heavy metals, organic pollutants,radionuclides) from industrial and agricultural sources toArctic regions (Hinck et al. 2004). Global air transport is animportant source of pollutant loadings to the Yukon Riverbasin. Deposition over forming ice creates a storage andtransport mechanism to the aquatic system. Typically thesecontaminants bioaccumulate in organisms and Arctic foodchains. Hg, for example, is a key metal transported throughthe atmosphere to the Yukon and has been quantified insnowmelt and correlated with tissue burdens of Hg innorthern pike and longnose sucker (Hinck et al. 2004).
Forests
Disturbances like forest fires and pest infestation occurfrequently from May to September. In the Yukon Territoryfrom 1992 to 2002, 1463 forest fires occurred in total andover 1.5 million ha burned (YCS 2003). In 2009, approx-imately 3 million acres burned in Alaska (approximately1.2 million ha) (Lamb and Winton 2009). In 2007, a
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 435
significant number of Yukon Territory white spruce wereobserved to be dead and dying in areas along the Yukon River(YG 2008). The cause of this initial mortality was determinedto be drought but during the wet summer of 2009 an area ofapproximately 2546 ha along the Yukon River (YG 2008) wasdetermined to be impacted by the Northern Spruce engraverbeetle. In Alaska from 2007 to 2009, white spruce wereinfested with the spruce budworm along the Yukon River atthe Dalton Highway Bridge (Lamb and Winton 2009).Additionally, an infestation of the willow blotch miner wasnoted as one of the most severe infestations in the area (YG2008). Approximately 136 336 ha of willow were attacked bythe willow leaf blotch miner with the mass of infestationoccurring on the Yukon mainstem between Circle and Beaverand along the Tanana River (Lamb and Winton 2009). Forestfires and pest infestations occur commonly through forestecosystems and should be an important stressor to considerin any cumulative effects assessment where causal sources ofenvironmental change require consideration.
Climate change
Increasing temperatures in subarctic and Arctic regionshave resulted in thawing of permafrost, drying of lakes,common infestations of beetles in pine tree stands, increasedfrequency of forest fires, and accelerated shoreline erosion(ACIA 2004; Prowse et al. 2006). These changes willdramatically alter wildlife habitats and threaten traditionallifestyles of Indigenous peoples. Alaska and northwesternCanada, in particular, have been experiencing some of thelargest increases in ambient temperature of any region onthe planet. Evidence suggests that freshwater flow from theArctic’s major rivers is increasing as average air temperaturesrise (Peterson et al. 2002). Alterations in flow is onevulnerability associated with climate change that couldsubsequently alter pH of the Yukon River and its tributaries,influencing the solubility and chemical speciation of thevarious constituents, particularly metals (Environment Yukon2011). Moreover, with increasing permafrost thaw, loads of N(organic and inorganic) may increase.
On the pan-Arctic scale, the Yukon River is fundamental tothe function of the Bering Sea and Bering Strait ecosystems(Lisitsysn 1969; Opsahl et al. 1999; Hansell et al. 2004).Therefore, impacts to the Yukon River have implications forthe circulation and species distribution in the coastal zone ofthe Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta (an area the size of Massachu-setts), and for large-scale fisheries and marine ecosystems inthe Bering Sea, Bering Strait, and Arctic Sea. Increases infreshwater runoff are expected to affect ocean stratification,circulation, and global climate processes through the slowingof the thermohaline circulation (Schiller et al. 1997; Weaveret al. 1999; Ottera et al. 2003).
ACCUMULATED STATE ASSESSMENTAn accumulated state assessment is one element necessary
to conduct a watershed CEA where changes are measured inan aquatic system over time and space. This information iscritical to understand the level of existing environmentaldeterioration. Ideally, this is done quantitatively usingregional monitoring data and statistical determinations ofchange relative to a defined benchmark of ‘‘normal’’ based onnatural variation (Dube et al. 2013a, 2013b, this issue).Regional monitoring databases do not commonly exist but
their importance for CEA is being recognized (Main et al.2011; Wrona et al. 2011). Often for assessments of this kind,integration of many different sources of data are required(Squires et al. 2010). In this article, we illustrate the value ofconducting a literature review as a qualitative accumulatedstate assessment to support more quantitative assessments(see Dube et al. 2013a, 2013b, this issue).
In this light, this literature review has identified a total of7 ‘‘hot spot’’ areas of change in the Yukon River Basin(Figure 1). These areas include Lake Laberge, Yukon River atDawson City, the Charley and Yukon River confluence,Porcupine and Yukon River confluence, Yukon River at theDalton Highway Bridge, Tolovana River near Tolovana, andTanana River at Fairbanks.
Lake Laberge
Lake Laberge was identified as a hot spot because ofhistorical contamination, from the 1940s and 1960s, andwaterborne contamination of surface waters. Since the mid-1990s, levels of contaminants in fish tissues have declined(Hinck et al. 2004) although PCBs, DDT (and derivates), andtoxaphene can still be found in fish tissue and soil aroundthe area (Table 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5). In addition, toxaphenemeasured in burbot liver continues to exceed threshold levelsfor human consumption (Hinck et al. 2004). Risk is increasedby Whitehorse’s action to resume discharge of wastewaterdischarge after Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocyteswere found in the surface waters of Lake Laberge (Table 1.7and 1.8). These studies were conducted in 1993 and it isunclear of the ongoing risk to humans who drink untreatedwater from Lake Laberge in the absence of more recentmonitoring or publications. The Yukon River including LakeLaberge is a location of extensive tourism, kayaking, canoeing,and hiking. The Yukon River Quest and Yukon 1000 canoeand kayak races, for example, are the longest races of theirkind bringing competitors from around the world. In 2010and 2011, Dr. M. Dube, an author of this article, participatedas a scientist during these events and was aggressivelychallenged by guides and journalists who accompanied herwhen she required water treatment for racers as a basic healthand safety consideration in the absence of more recent data(Casey 2011). Clearly the need for accumulated stateassessments has direct relevance to understanding river healthand supporting use of the river watershed for recreation andtourism. Risk cannot be accurately assessed in the absence ofmore recent data to confirm the efficacy of municipal effluenttreatment.
Yukon River at Dawson City
Dawson City is a hotspot along the river because of thequality of effluent discharged from the wastewater treatmentfacility. The city itself is small, and the direct impacts ofthe effluent on the Yukon River are not known. For severalmonths of the year, the effluent fails toxicity tests andelevated bacterial levels exist (R v. C 2003). The newsecondary wastewater treatment facility should produce atreated effluent that meets water quality standards and thisshould be confirmed with follow-up monitoring.
Yukon River near the Charley-Kandik river confluence
The Charley-Kandik (C-K) river confluence location hadSe in fish tissues that exceeded guidelines (0.6 mg/g) for the
436 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
protection of piscivorous wildlife (Hinck et al. 2004).Toxaphene was highest in a northern pike and levelsapproached thresholds (35–900 ng/g) for growth and repro-ductive failure in freshwater fish. Toxaphene use as apesticide historically may account for elevated levels althoughlong-range transport may also be a factor. Increased miningactivity between Eagle and Tanana may also be a factorcontributing to increased Se concentrations.
Porcupine and Yukon River confluence
The Porcupine River is one of the few areas within thebasin that is underlain by a continuous layer of permafrost.The permafrost in this area is deteriorating and is accom-panied by thermokarst formation and in some areas surfacewaters underlain with permafrost have drained (Striegl et al.2007). Furthermore, from 2001 to 2005 average annual flowsin the Porcupine River were 15% lower than the 19-yearaverage (Table 1:1.12). Changes in permafrost coverage couldbe affecting groundwater and river flow dynamics therebyaffecting the biogeochemical cycles. Such a change coulddisturb the Yukon River’s productivity through altering C andnutrient cycling.
Yukon River at the Dalton Highway Bridge
The Dalton Highway Bridge is the location where theTrans Alaska pipeline crosses the Yukon River. In 1978,55 gallon oil drums were reported downstream of the bridge ayear after construction was completed (Dapkus et al. 1978).Hinck et al. (2006) found that all pike sampled in this areahad levels of Hg exceeding 0.3 mg/g (Table 1:1.2). Se levelswere also exceedingly high and approached levels dangerousto piscivorous wildlife (Table 1:1.1). White spruce infestationin this area yields an altered forest leading to a modification ofC and nutrient unloading.
Tanana River at Fairbanks and Nenana and Tolovana Riverat Tolovana
The Tanana River is one of the major tributaries of theYukon River and the Tolovana River drains into the Tanana.Military, mining, oil and gas development, and municipalwastewater discharge have affected these rivers and climatechange is altering groundwater inputs and average annualflows (Table 1:1.12, 1.13, and 1.14). High levels of Hg, Se,PCB, and DDT were detected in fish within the Tanana Riverwith the high levels of PCB, DDT, and Se at Fairbanks. TheTolovana River at Tolovana also showed high levels of Hg,toxaphene, and DDT. Elevated cancer rates in FairbanksNorth Star Borough (includes Fairbanks and Tolovanaresidents) were also reported confirming the need for researchto explore potential causal links. Military facilities at FortGreely, Fort Wainwright, and the Eielson Air Force Base havereleased chemicals of concern that remain in soils and surfacewaters in the area. Mining in the area, around Fairbanks andnear Tolovana and effluents discharged into tributaries of theTanana River require monitoring. The Trans Alaska pipelinetraverses through this area as well and 2 significant spills haveoccurred at Livengood near the Tolovana River and Pumpstation 9. The Tanana River is fairly sensitive to climatechange as its headwaters originate in the mountains, in thesouthern portion of the basin, where alpine glaciers andperennial snowfields are receding (Striegl et al. 2007).
Average annual flows have increased over a 4-year periodfrom 2001 to 2005 (Table 1:1.12) and at Nenana ground-water input also increased significantly (Table 1:1.14).Increases in groundwater input and changes in stream flowwill alter sediment discharge rates and biogeochemical cycleswithin this river and the Yukon River.
CONCLUDING COMMENTSThe assessment of cumulative change in river systems has
been significantly affected by a lack of methodology and mostcertainly by a lack of data at the temporal and spatial scalesrequired. To facilitate an accumulated state assessment for theYukon River basin, a critical literature review was conductedand 6 hot spots were identified where further investigation isrequired. Climate change, long-range transport, mining, pastuse of chemicals for pest control, sewage discharges, andmilitary operation have occurred in the basin and contributedto contamination of fish and surface waters, altered hydrol-ogy, and shifted in biogeochemical loads. Although a riverecosystem travels on a geological time scale, impacts fromhuman activities from a short time period can have significantand lasting effects (e.g., spraying in the 1950s continues toaffect chemical levels measured in 2000s) as evidenced in theYukon basin.
Limitation of data and knowledge to assess cumulativechange is currently our most significant challenge. TheIndigenous people of the Yukon River Basin have an extensiveoral history and hands-on experience that encompassesboth the published reports and direct experience. Becauseknowledge transmission, within Indigenous society, occursthrough cultural mediums there exists an unknown amountof information that has never been reported in formalliterature. Our understanding of regional influences onsystem-wide ecological balance does not, or even attempt,to account for Indigenous knowledge of change. Thus,analysis of effects in the Yukon River Basin would greatlybenefit from a mechanism that bridges multiple knowledgesystems (Western and Indigenous).
Acknowledgment—Funding was provided by the CanadianWater Network (Dube). We thank Vince McMullin, ElisePietroniro, and Jeff Lettvenuk.
REFERENCES[ACIA] Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. 2004. Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic
climate impact assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 140 p.
[ADEC] Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. 2009. Division of spill
prevention and response: contaminated sites program. Fort Wainwright, Taku
Garden (102 Communications Site). [cited 2010 June 8]. Available from:
www.dec.state.ak.us/spar/csp/sites/ftwainwright.htm#info
Bohrer B. 2010. Alaska oil pipeline shuts off after spill [Internet]. [cited 2010
June 8]. Whitehorse Star, 12. Canadian Newsstand Prairies. (Document ID:
2046166991). Available from: http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2010/May/
Alaskan-Pipeline-Shut-Down-After-Oil-Spill
Brabets TP, Schuster PF. 2008. Transport of water, carbon, and sediment through
the Yukon River Basin. Anchorage (AK): US Geological Survey. Fact Sheet 2008-
3005.
Brabets TP, WalvoordMA. 2009. Trends in streamflow in the Yukon River Basin from
1944 to 2005 and the influence of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. J Hydrol
371:108–119.
Brabets TP, Wang B, Meade RH. 2000. Environmental and hydrologic overview of
the Yukon River basin, Alaska and Canada. Anchorage (AK): US Geological
Survey. Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4204.
Qualitative Accumulated State Assessment of the Yukon River— Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013 437
Braune B, Muir D, DeMarch B, Gamberg M, Poole K, Currie R, Dodd M, Duschenko
W, Eamer J, Elkin B. 1999. Spatial and temporal trends of contaminants
in Canadian Arctic and terrestrial ecosystems: A review. Sci Total Environ
230:145–208.
Cabott L. 2007. City ofWhitehorse Integrated Community Sustainability Plan. [cited
2010 August 23]. Available from: http://www.city.whitehorse.yk.ca
Casey A. 2011. Environmental Scientist of the Year Award 2011. In: Canadian
Geographic: Protecting Our Water. June 2011. Available from: http://
www.canadiangeographic.ca/magazine/jun11
[CDC] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007. US cancer statistics: An
interactive atlas. [cited 2010 August 20]. Available from: http://apps.nccd.
cdc.gov/DCPC_INCA/DCPC_INCA.aspx
Coleman JM, Huh OK, Braud D Jr. 2008. Wetland loss in world deltas. J Coast Res
24:1–14.
Cooney S. 2004. Proposed Alaska natural gas pipelines: Potential impacts on the
steel industry. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. Order Code
RL31888. [cited 2010 August 23]. Available from: http://ncseonline.org/NLE/
CRSreports/04Feb/RL31888.pdf
Dapkus D, Gabriel B, O’Sullivan T, Pruex W, Motoya P, Crenshaw R. 1978.
Field inspection of the Yukon River (Rampart) June 5-12, 1978. Heritage
Conservation and Recreation Service, Division of Parks and Bureau of Land
Management Fairbanks District.
Diamond ML, Bhavsar SP, Hel PA, Stern GA, Alaee M. 2005. Fate of organochlorine
contaminants in Arctic and subarctic lakes estimated by mass balance
modeling. Sci Total Environ 342:245–259.
Dornblaser MM, Striegl RG. 2007. Nutrient (N, P) loads and yields at multiple scales
and subbasin types in the Yukon River basin, Alaska. J Geophys Res-Biogeosci
112:10–20.
Dornblaser MM, Striegl RG. 2009. Suspended sediment and carbonate transport in
the Yukon River Basin, Alaska: Fluxes and potential future responses to climate
change. Water Resour Res 45:12–24.
Dube MG. 2003. Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: A regional framework
for aquatic ecosystems. Environ Impact Assess 23:723–745.
Dube M, Munkittrick K. 2001. Integration of effects-based and stress-based
approaches into a holistic framework for cumulative effects assessment in
aquatic ecosystems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:247–258.
Dube M, Wilson J, Waterhouse J. 2013a. Accumulated state of the Yukon River
watershed: Part II quantitative effects-based analysis integrating Western
science with Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Integrated Environ Assess
Manag 9:439–455.
Dube M, Duinker P, Greig L, Carver M, Servos M, McMaster M, Noble B, Schreier
H, Jackson L, Munkittrick K. 2013b. A framework for assessing cumulative
effects in Canadian watersheds. Integrated Environ Assess Manag 9:363–
369.
Duffy LK, Rodger T, PattonM. 1998. Regional health assessment relating to mercury
content of fish caught in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta rivers system. AlaskaMed
40:75–77.
Eberl DD. 2004. Quantitative mineralogy of the Yukon River system: Changes with
reach and season, and determining sediment provenance. Am Mineral 89:
1784–1794.
Edmonds R, Peplow D. 2000. Environmental impacts of hardrock mining in eastern
Washington. [cited 2010 August 23]. Available from: www.cfr.washington.
edu/research/factSheets/08-CSSminingimpacts.pdf
Environment Yukon. 2011. Yukon water: A summary of climate change
vulnerabilities. Whitehorse, Yukon. ISBN 978-1-55362- 516-2.
Frey PJ, Mueller EW, Berry EC. 1970. The Chena River: A study of a subarctic stream.
Reference project no. 1610-10/70. Fairbanks (AK): Federal Water Quality
Administration.
Griffeth L, Orr A, Splain W, Kelley J, Dasher D, Read S, Barnes D. 2001. Radiation in
the environment. [cited 2010 August 24]. Available from: http://www.ims.uaf.
edu/orion/publications/images/poster_radiation.pdf
Guo LD, Zhang JZ, Gueguen C. 2004. Speciation and fluxes of nutrients (N, P, Si)
from the upper Yukon River. Global Biogeochem Cy 18:12–24.
Hansell DA, Kadko D, Bates NR. 2004. Degradation of terrigenous dissolved organic
carbon in the western Arctic Ocean. Science 304:858–861.
Hinck JE, Bartish TM, Blazer VS, Denslow ND, Gross TS, Myers MS, Anderson PJ,
Orazio CE, Tillitt DE. 2004. Biomonitoring Environmental Status and Trends
(BEST) program: Environmental contaminants and their effect on fish in the
Yukon River basin. SIR 2004-5285. Columbia (MO): US Geological Survey,
Biologic Resources Division.
Hinck JE, Schmitt CJ, Echols KR, May TW, Orazio CE, Tillitt DE. 2006. Environmental
contaminants in fish and their associated risk to piscivorous wildlife in the
Yukon River basin, Alaska. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:661–672.
Houser S, Teller V, MacCrackenM, Gough R, Spears P. 2001. Potential consequences
of climate variability and change for Native Peoples and Native homelands.
National Assessment Synthesis Team for the US Global Change Research
Program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 351–377.
Hummel LJ. 2005. The US Military as geographical agent: The case of Cold War
Alaska. Geogr Rev 95:47–72.
[INAC] Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2003. National assessment of water
and wastewater systems in First Nations communities: Summary report. [cited
2010 August 2]. Available from: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/enr/wtr/pubs/
watw/watw-eng.asp
[INAC] Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2010. Persistent organic pollutants
(POPs) fact sheet series: Polychlorinated biphenyls. [cited 2010 August 24].
Available from: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/scr/yt/pubs/2010fs/pcbs-eng.asp
Jewett SC, Zhang XM, Naidu AS, Kelley JJ, Dasher D, Duffy LK. 2003. Comparison of
mercury and methylmercury in northern pike and Arctic grayling from western
Alaska Rivers. Chemosphere 50:383–392.
Kilgour BW, Dube MG, Hedley K, Portt CB, Munkittrick KR. 2006. Aquatic
environmental effects monitoring guidance for environmental assessment
practitioners. Environ Monitor Assess 130:423–36.
Kocan R, Hershberger P. 2006. Differences in Ichthyophonus prevalence and
infection severity between upper Yukon River and Tanana River chinook
salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum), stocks. J Fish Dis 29:497–503.
Kocan R, Hershberger P, Winton J. 2004. Ichthyophoniasis: An emerging disease of
chinook salmon in the Yukon River. J Aquat Anim Health 16:58–72.
Kruse GH. 1998. Salmon run failures in 1997-1998 : A link to anomalous ocean
conditions? Alaska Fish Res Bull 5:55–63.
Lamb M, Winton L. editors 2009. Forest Health Conditions in Alaska—009.
Anchorage (AK): U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, Alaska
Region, Forest Health. Protection. R10-PR-21.
LePage P. 2009. Appendix F: Benthic Monitoring Program Report. Georgetown
(ON): Minnow Environmental. Project Reference: 2230.
Lisitsysn AP. 1969. Recent sedimentation in the Bering Sea (in Russian). Jerusalem,
Israel: Program for Science Translation.
Mach JL, Sandefur PE, Lee JH. 2000. Estimation of oil spill risk from Alaska north
slope, Trans Alaska Pipeline, and Arctic Canada oil spill data sets. Anchorage
(AK): Hart Crowser. OCS Study MMS 2000-07.
Main C, Burn D, Dixon G, Dube MG, Flotemersch J, Franzin WG, Gibson J,
Munkittrick KR, Post J, Watmough S. 2011. 2010 Regional Aquatics
Monitoring Program (RAMP) review. Technical Report of the RAMP
Review Panel, Integrated Water Management Program, Alberta Innovates—
Technology Futures. Calgary (AB): Alberta Innovates Technology Futures. 20 p.
McLeay DJ, Birtwell IK, Hartman GF, Ennis GL. 1987. Responses of Arctic grayling
(Thymallus arcticus) to acute and prolonged exposure to Yukon placer mining
sediment. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:658–673.
Mueller KA, Matz AC. 2000. Organochlorine concentrations in burbot (Lota lota)
livers from Fairbanks, Alaska, and Kanuti, Tetlin and Yukon Flats National
Wildlife Refuges, Alaska, 1998. Fairbanks (AK): US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Technical Report NAES-TR- 00-001. 49 p.
Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. 2005. Fragmentation and flow
regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–408.
O’Brien DK, Upton L. 2008. Cancer incidence and mortality in Alaska, 1996-2004.
Anchorage (AK): Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Section of
Chronic Disease and. Health Promotion, Alaska Cancer Registry. 60 p.
Opsahl S, Benner R, Amon RMW. 1999. Major flux of terrigenous dissolved organic
matter through the Arctic Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 44:2017–2023.
Osterkamp TE. 2005. The recent warming of permafrost in Alaska. Global Planet
Change 49:187–202.
438 Integr Environ Assess Manag 9, 2013—M Dube et al.
Ottera OH, Drange H, Bentsen M, Kvamstø NG, Jiang D. 2003. The sensitivity of the
present-day Atlantic meridional overturning circulation to freshwater forcing.
Geophys Res Lett 30:1898–1902.
Pearson RW, Smith DW. 1975. Fairbanks: A study of environmental quality. Arctic
28:99–109.
Pentz SB, Kostaschuk RA. 1999. Effect of placer mining of suspended sediment in
reaches of sensitive fish habitat. Environ Geol 37:78–89.
Peterson BJ, Holmes RM, McClelland JW, Vorosmarty CJ, Lammers RB, Shiklomanov
AI, Rahmstorf S. 2002. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science
298:2171–2173.
Prowse TD, Wrona FJ, Reist JD, Gibson JJ, Hobbie JE, Levesque LMJ, Vincent WF.
2006. Climate change effects on hydroecology of Arctic freshwater ecosystems.
Ambio 35:347–358.
Rawn DFK, Lockhart WL, Wilkinson P, Savoie DA, Rosenberg GB, Muir DCG. 2001.
Historical contamination of Yukon Lake sediments by PCBs and organochlorine
pesticides: Influence of local sources and watershed characteristics. Sci Total
Environ 280:17–37.
Raymond PA, McClelland JW, Holmes RM, Zhulidov AV, Mull K, Peterson BJ, Striegl
RG, Aiken GR, Gurtovaya TY. 2007. Flux and age of dissolved organic carbon
exported to the Arctic Ocean: A carbon isotopic study of the five largest arctic
rivers. Global Biogeochem Cy 21:9–18.
Roach PD, Olson ME, Whitley G, Wallis PM. 1993. Waterborne Giardia cysts and
Cryptosporidium oocysts in the Yukon, Canada. Appl Environ Microb 59:
67–73.
[R v. C] R. vs. City of Dawson. 2003. YKTC 18. Court document: http://
www.yukoncourts.ca/judgements/territorial/2003/r_v_cityofdawson_2003_
yktc_16.pdf
[SAE] State of Alaska Epidemiology. 2001. Mercury and national fish advisories
statement from Alaska Division of Public Health: Recommendations for fish
consumption in Alaska. [cited 2010 August 19]. Available from: www.epi.hss.
state.ak.us/bulletins/docs/b2001_06.htm
Schiller A, Mikolajewicz U, Voss R. 1997. The stability of the North Atlantic
thermohaline circulation in a coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation
model. Clim Dynam 13:325–347.
Squires AJ, Westbrook CJ, Dube MG. 2010. An approach for assessing cumulative
effects in a model river, the Athabasca River Basin. Integr Environ Assess Manag
6:119–134.
Statistics Canada. 2006. Population and dwelling counts, for Canada, provinces
and territories, and census subdivisions (municipalities), 2006 census. [cited
2010 August 23]. Available from: www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/
2006/ref/index-eng.cfm
Striegl RG, Aiken GR, Dornblaser MM, Raymond PA, Wickland KP. 2005. A decrease
in discharge-normalized DOC export by the Yukon River during summer
through autumn. Geophys Res Lett 32:L21413.
Striegl RG, Dornblaser MM, Aiken GR, Wickland KP, Raymond PA. 2007. Carbon
export and cycling by the Yukon, Tanana, and Porcupine rivers, Alaska, 2001-
2005. Water Resour Res 43:2–11.
[USAI] Utility Services of Alaska. 2010. Wastewater treatment. [cited 2010 August
10]. Available from: http://www.akwater.com/wastewater_treatment.shtml
[USDOI] US Department of the Interior. 2009. Project case study: Alaska. Bureau of
Land Management. [cited 2010 August 10]. Available from: http://www.
blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/more/Abandoned_Mine_Lands/Environment_Water/
case_studies_by_state/project_case_study0.html
[USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Improved enumeration
method for the recreational water quality indicators: Enterococci and
Escherichia coli. Washington (DC): Office of Science and Technology. EPA/
821/R-97/004.
Voytek MA, Ashen JB, Fogarty LR, Kirshtein JD, Landa ER. 2005. Detection of
Helicobacter pylori and fecal indicator bacteria in five North American Rivers.
J Water Health 3:405–422.
Walsh ME, Collins CM, Jenkins TF, Hewitt AD, Stark J, Myers K. 2003. Sampling for
explosives-residues at Fort Greely, Alaska. Soil Sed Contam 12:631–634.
Walvoord MA, Striegl RG. 2007. Increased groundwater to stream discharge from
permafrost thawing in the Yukon River basin: Potential impacts on lateral export
of carbon and nitrogen. Geophys Res Lett 34:6–12.
Weaver AJ, Bitz CM, Fanning AF, Holland MM. 1999. Thermohaline circulation:
High-latitude phenomena and the difference between the Pacific and Atlantic.
Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 27:231–285.
Wilkinson M, Pang J, Harding J. 2008. Five Year ROD Review Report, Eielson Air
Force Base, Alaska. Springfield (VA), USA: The United States Air Force
Installation Restoration Program. FA8903-04-D-8685-0009.
Wrona FJ, di Cenzo P, Baird D, Banic C, Bickerton G, Burn D, Dillon P, Droppo I, Dube
M, Hazewinkel R., et al. 2011. Lower Athabasca Water Quality Monitoring
Program, PHASE 1, Athabasca River Mainstem and Major Tributaries. Ottawa:
Environment Canada. 81 p.
[YCS] Yukon Community Services. 2003. Devolution fact sheet: Fire Management
Program. [cited 2010 August 23]. Available from: http://www.community.
gov.yk.ca/pdf/factsheet2.pdf
Yeardley RB, Lazorchal JM, Paulsen SG. 1998. Elemental fish tissue contamination in
northeastern US lakes: Evaluation of an approach to regional assessment.
Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1874–1884.
[YG] Yukon Government. 2008. Yukon Forest Health Report 2008. Forestry
Management and Energy, Mines and Resources. [cited 2010 August 23].
Available from: http://www.emr.gov.yk.ca/forestry/pdf/forest_health_report
2008.pdf
[YG] Yukon Government. 2009a. Dawson City wastewater treatment
project backgrounder/timeline. [cited 2010 August 23]. Available from:
www.dawsonwastewater.ca/projectoverview.html
[YG] Yukon Government. 2009b. Yukon energy, mines and resources: Assessment
and abandoned mines. [cited 2010 August 10]. Available from: http://
www.emr.gov.yk.ca/aam/
[YRITWC] Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council. 2002. Yukon River unified
watershed assessment. [cited 2010 August 23]. Available from: http://
www.yritwc.org/Media/Publications/tabid/80/Default.aspx