dutch pilot allocation plan for an european emission trading scheme maurits blanson henkemans...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Dutch Pilot Allocation Planfor an European Emission Trading scheme
Maurits Blanson HenkemansMinistry of Economic Affairs NetherlandsDelhi 1-11-2002
-
What I want to discussDutch position EU directiveAim of our Allocation studyFirst resultsConclusions
-
Cost advantages of European Trade
Chart1
20.5
9
6
Euro (bn)
Sheet1
1990Broeikasgassen per doelgroep incl. T-correctie
Landbouw26.2
Energiesector45.3
Industrie71.6
Consumenten22.5
Verkeer31
Overige26.7
Totaal223.3
1999Broeikasgassen per doelgroep incl. T-correctie
Landbouw26.2
Energiesector45.3
Industrie71.6
Consumenten22.5
Verkeer31
Overige3.1
Totaal199.7
199019951996199719981999
RIVM, CO2167179185179
RIVM, GHG216232237230
1999
Wegverkeer
Personenvervoer19.3
Goederenvervoer10.2
Speciale voertuigen0.325
Totaal29.825
1990161
1995176
1996184
1997181
1998181
1999174
1990219219
1995234
1997237
2010256206
Doelstelling
Mobiele bronnen CO2
199029
199533
199633
199734
199835
199936
201038
Tabel A4, MV5
198019901995201020202030
Industrie62.471.673.975.789.3
Verkeer en Vervoer26.63134.44251.4
Energiesector41.245.349.751.347.4
Landbouw24.926.12824.424.2
Overige doelgroepen44.9484946.545.6
Totaal
1980199019951999201020202030
Totaal broeikasgassen204222235235245266285
CO2160167179179206227244
PRIME, EU
Traditionele beleidsmaatregelen45
Nationale emissiehandel19.8
Emissiehandel op EU-niveau13.2
Conventioneel beleid20.511.5
Nationale emissiehandel9
Europese emissiehandel6
Sheet1
26.2
45.3
71.6
22.5
31
3.1
199.7
Sheet2
161
176
184
181
181
174
Mt
Sheet5
204160
222167
235179
235179
245206
266227
285244
Totaal broeikasgassen
CO2
Uitstoot in Mt
DSM
Miljard NLG
Sheet4
Miljard Euro
Sheet3
CO2E Mt1990CO2E Mt1999
Industrie71.6Industrie78.4
Energiesector45.3Energiesector48.6
Verkeer31Verkeer36.8
Landbouw26.2Landbouw25.8
Consumenten22.5Consumenten22.1
Afval13.6Afval11.1
HDO + overigen11.9HDO + overigen12.5
222.1235.3
Prognose MilieubalansV&VPrognose MilieubalansTotaal
1990311990222
199534.41995235
2010422010245
202051.42020266
2030285
Aandeel V& V CO2
199019951998199920102020
Verkeer en Vervoer29.132.13434.74150.4Verkeer en Vervoer
Andere sectoren137.9146.9151144.3165176.6Andere sectoren
Totaal167179185179206227Totaal
Aandeel V& V CO2 GC
19901995199819992010202019902020
Industrie5455.456.856.764.677.1Industrie54Industrie77.1
Verkeer en Vervoer29.132.13434.74150.4Verkeer en Vervoer29.1Verkeer en Vervoer50.4
Energiesector41.345.848.345.349.646.4Energiesector41.3Energiesector46.4
Consumenten22.121.820.821.420.919.8Consumenten22.1Consumenten19.8
Overigen20.723.925.120.93033.2Overigen20.7Overigen33.2
Totaal167.2179185179206.1226.9
1999
Industrie56.7
1.3058419244Verkeer en Vervoer34.7
1.1924398625Energiesector45.3
Consumenten21.4
Overigen20.9
19801985199019951999
Personenauto's13.11415.317.218.5
Lichte bedrijfsvoertuigen1.231.442.12.834.16
Zware bedrijfsvoertuigen5.385.275.616.526.85
Motoren en bromfietsen0.2310.1940.2420.2810.287
Totaal19.94120.90423.25226.83129.797
Sheet3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19801990199519992010
Totaal CO2e204222235235245
N2O1720222319.7
N20199019951999
Industrie323236
Landbouw222826
Verkeer5.66.86
Overig5.45.55.3
DSM
CO28
N2055.09268
Totaal13
0
0
Mt CO2
Mt N20 in CO2e
13Mt CO2
1980199019951998199920102020
Industrie555455.456.856.764.677.1
Verkeer en Vervoer25.229.132.13434.74150.4
Energiesector36.841.345.848.345.349.646.4
Consumenten26.822.121.820.821.420.919.8
Overigen1620.723.925.120.93033.2
Totaal159.8167.2179185179206.1226.9
19801990199519981999
CO2159.8167.2179185179
Totaal GHG204222235241235
Overige gassen44.254.8565656
Industrie555455.456.856.7
Verkeer en Vervoer25.229.132.13434.7
Energiesector36.841.345.848.345.3
Consumenten26.822.121.820.821.4
Overigen1620.723.925.120.9
Huishoudens15210
Eigen vervoer31823
Landbouw14174
Industrie sheltered21240
Industrie exposed58240
Vervoer26196
HDO33239
Overig en afronding3028
Totaal203150
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
Industrie
Verkeer en Vervoer
Energiesector
Consumenten
Overigen
000
000
000
000
000
CO2
Totaal GHG
Overige gassen
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5429.141.322.120.7
55.432.145.821.823.9
56.83448.320.825.1
56.734.745.321.420.9
64.64149.620.930
77.150.446.419.833.2
Industrie
Verkeer en Vervoer
Energiesector
Consumenten
Overigen
CO2-emissies in Mt
56.7
34.7
45.3
21.4
20.9
1999
CO2-uitstoot 1999
77.1
50.4
46.4
19.8
33.2
2020
CO2-emissies in 2020
13.11.235.380.231
141.445.270.194
15.32.15.610.242
17.22.836.520.281
18.54.166.850.287
Personenauto's
Lichte bedrijfsvoertuigen
Zware bedrijfsvoertuigen
Motoren en bromfietsen
CO2-emissies in Mt
219219
2341995
2371997
256206
Mt CO2e
29
33
33
34
35
36
38
Mt CO2
29
33
33
34
35
36
Mt CO2
-
Dutch positionIn General positive to directiveFor mandatory system from 2005 but..Allocation must be fairCrediting of Early actions For the Direct approachDutch industryEU PSR system no CaP (!) for indirect approach.
-
Aim of the studyCan we make an Allocation plan?On the basis of EU Directive/ and PSR indirect Allocation Criteria (Annex III)Propose improvements on the basis of the studyProcedureConsultant makes studyAdvice from Industry/NGO
-
EU allocationBurden Sharing AgreementparticipantsIPPC + createria/correctiesAllocation
-
QuestionsWho are the participants?What size is covert by EU directive?How to set the CapHow to Allocate - Direct or Direct and IndirectAllocate on basis of- Historic emissions/Grandfathering - Performance Standard Rate (PSR)
-
Definition of Participants
IPPC Def.Cut through sectorsLack of info Cogen e.c.Add sector?
> 20 MWthDefinition: installation energy activity encombustion installation
-
What is Covered
-
What is CoveredWide interpretation: 47% of Total EmissionsCHP = Chemical ind. included
-
Set CAP for 2010Cap:90 Mt CO2Reductie UK1:Ca. 4 Mt CO2Statistieken
-
Set a Cap 1National Climate Plan UK1 and UK 2Benchmark Target = CaP for Participants/ DATA ???Allocate 9o Mton450 Mln EURO (5 EURO/CO2)Advantage Support from IndustryDisadvantage: No Trade?
-
Direct versus Indirect (1)Advantage DirectSimple/conform Kyoto ProtocolDisadvantageMarket Power for E-sectorWhat will be Electricity-price
-
Direct versus Indirect (2)Advantage Indirect:Conform BenchmarkStimulate Efficiency User Disadvantage : CO2 content electrity used unknown
-
Direct versus indirect
-
Gas
Electriciteit
Gas
Electriciteit
Allocatie
Allocatie
Kosten
3 t
3 t
1
10 t
9 t
10 t
3 t
10 t
2 t
1
Bedrijf A
Bedrijf B
-
Allocation optionsGrandfathering Direct and IndirectPerformance Standard Rate Direct/Indirect
-
Example of CO2 emissions and PSR
-
Allocation on Basis of Historic emissionsWKKProduction growthNew EntrantsData availabilityWindfall profitsOwnershipStatistieken19902005
-
Performance Standard RatesMax. 300 PSRsCorrections for green/nuclear biomassCorrection for indirect emissions complicated
Europese Benchmarking: different fuelmix
-
Grandfathering options How to support early actions?1995 with production adaptation Too many allowancesAllocation = 2005 Emissions. No incentive for trade/ no support early actionsAllocation = Actual emissions * (performance rate / performance standard rate) distance to world top
-
Conclusions 1Directive Covers 47%Cut through sectors ( opt in)Lack of number on installation levelIndirect approach impossible in one country
-
Conclusions 2Grandfathering direct Actual dates correction for distance to world top (benchmark)E-sector should not get to much power Solution: big supply/low price/competition/CHPBig role Commission for fair competion