d:\vulpen\documents\erik\eriks articles\roi unraveled
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: D:\Vulpen\Documents\Erik\Eriks Articles\Roi Unraveled](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080906/55a3cd541a28ab0f0d8b4691/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Unravelling ROI
Everyone could be a great marketer, if it was easy to measure the ROI of marketing
investments.
Greatness is not for everyone because, even when thorough analysis has been done, a
large part still depends on judgement, experience, vision and creativity. It is difficult
to isolate the factors and influences, there is no formula for success.
On top of that, the marketing game is rapidly and surely changing to increased
fragmentation on the consumer side and increased choice of media to involve
consumers on the media side, making it even harder to assess the effect of each
component.
Despite this complexity, marketers are increasingly being asked to provide the ROI of
their activities. The time that millions of dollars were invested behind a TVC, just
because the MD said so are over – for most companies.
However, ROI of marketing spend is not just an issue of the marketer, to measure the
ROI of marketing the whole company must be behind it.
1. Role and importance of marketing in the company: What is it that marketing
is set out to do? And to what extend is the marketer is in the driver’s seat of his
own results?
Firstly, the discussion about ROI is diffused. Most professionals will agree that
securing payback and improving the ROI of the company’s investments and assets is
a primarily a marketing job. It’s the marketers job to create higher revenues and
thereby increase the profits. However, when they speak of ROI measurement, it is
mostly related to measuring the return of investments of advertising and promotions, a
much more tactical definition.
Measuring ROI and defining the appropriate metrics, starts with clarifying the role
and importance of marketing to the company.
There are two reasons why marketers could say: ”Don’t ask me for ROI, I have no
control over it”. Firstly, the way global, regional and local allocation of roles and
responsibilities are allocated. Locally marketers may feel they’re merely executional,
while globally marketers may be in the drivers’ seat. Secondly, and more
fundamentally: is the organization truly market driven with marketing driving
business strategy or is the role of marketing seen as keepers of the A&P budget? Is
marketing building the stage for success (positioning, product development and
strategy) or is marketing seen as “making sure the sales people can sell”. Is marketing
seen as an investment or a cost. Paradoxically, in the second scenario, the marketer
may be under more pressure to prove the ROI of his efforts, while he has actually less
control.
Clearly, measuring the contribution of marketing on the company’s ROI requires
different metrics as measuring the ROI of the A&P investment.
![Page 2: D:\Vulpen\Documents\Erik\Eriks Articles\Roi Unraveled](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080906/55a3cd541a28ab0f0d8b4691/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2. Align the rest of the company: systems and processes should support ROI
measurement
Does your finance management reflect reality, or do you adapt reality to fit the
finance management system and views? In many companies, it is the second scenario.
In one concrete case, the companies’ finance system used ATL cost codes and BTL
costs codes separately. The marketing department however, was already working
“through the line”. Finance also implicitly assumed that BTL, meant sales driving,
ATL brand building. Budgets would be allocated accordingly among sales, trade
marketing and marketing. Marketing was working with today’s knowledge that
brands can very well be built BTL, and certainly everything done BTL should
contribute to brand equity and be aligned with the ATL activities. However, if it
would have been up to Finance, marketing would have just been able to work with the
ATL budget.
With this type of misunderstanding, it will be impossible to measure ROI effectively
or use the results effectively. So, you must get the support system and processes to
mirror practice and priorities, not vice versa
Budget management can further support by providing project based costing, rather
than account code costing. Largely automated, real-time and project based finance
systems are still exception rather than norm. On-line project based costing systems
can provide easily available, real time information to managers and executives. Most
importantly these systems can provide an overview of cross departmental
investments. Many case examples can be found on: www.consumergoods.com. Only
when all the costs are accounted for by project – ideally including internal costs such
as time spent - an ROI analysis comes close to reality.
3. Set the Metrics and learn
Based on a clear definition of what it is marketing is set out to do and an integrated
support system, now metrics should be agreed upon to measure marketings’ ROI. Not
only measuring what are the most cost efficient ways to achieve a maximum of short
term sales, but also leading to a situation where marketing knows which direction to
go to create more value for the company.
Mr. Reichheld advocates: Measure the Net promoter Score, based on by asking
consumers the simple question of; “How likely are you to recommend this product to
a good friend?” In the now classic book “the Ultimate question” Mr. Reichheld
makes a compelling case for measuring just this, in stead of the usual battery of
measurements.
Metrics of marketing in the more tactical definition have to do with executional
excellence and are therefore not less important, just of different nature.
How to measure the effectiveness of the design of a car showroom, how to isolate the
effectiveness of promotion girl in a coffeeshop among other promotional tools, how to
measure the difference between putting an ad in the news paper or having an on-line
application.
![Page 3: D:\Vulpen\Documents\Erik\Eriks Articles\Roi Unraveled](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022080906/55a3cd541a28ab0f0d8b4691/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Each item can be linked directly to incremental sales or value – if you’re able to test it
in isolation. It requires great effort, but especially the chocolate and the cigarettes
companies have come a long way. The next important question is how the company
can develop benchmarks as to learn each time they execute, each time they spend
money.
This is really a matter of creating benchmarks that are related only to executional
excellence – not directly linked to sales - and discipline. The discipline to always
measure what you do, in standardised terms and to log that so that it remains
accessible. The book: “Measuring Marketing: 103 Key Metrics Every Marketer
Needs”, by John Davis, provides a practical overview of key metrics.
Stifling?
Does all this ROI measurement lead to slow and stifled companies? Yes, if done in
the wrong spirit. If it is done as a control measure from top-management to bottom, it
will lead to junior managers following the rules and the quantitative measures. If it is
done in the spirit of empowerment “these measures are the boundaries and minimum
requirements, within that you can decide and learn”, it will lead to faster, lower level
decision making, having a learning organization and improved motivation through-out
all levels of the company.