e-126, phase- vii, industrial area, mohali, punjab-...
TRANSCRIPT
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
Chandigarh Pollution Testing Laboratory - E I A Division
(QCI/ NABET accredited)
E-126, Phase- VII, Industrial Area, Mohali, Punjab- 160055
Website: www.cptl.co.in, e-mail: [email protected]
REVISED PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
EXPANSION OF STEEL MANUFACTURING UNIT BY
REPLACING EXISTING INDUCTION FURNACE
CAPACITY
Steel Billets/Ingots- 25,200TPA to 1, 72,800TPA
Rounds, TMT Bars, wire rode, Flats- 1, 50,000TPA
By
M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LIMITED VILLAGE- GOBINDGARH, ADJOINING PHASE-VII,
FOCAL POINT, LUDHIANA, PUNJAB.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
1 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
INDEX
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-4
2.0 INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT & PROPONENT 5-7
Introduction 5
Partner background 5
Brief Description 6
Need of the project 6
Employment Generation 7
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8-18
Category of project 8
Location of Project 9
Alternate site selection 13
Size & magnitude of operation 13
Manufacturing Process details 13
Raw material & product details 16
Resources optimization 16
Sources of water 17
Quantity of waste generation 17
4.0 SITE ANALYSIS 19-20
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 21-26
6.0 ENVIRONMENT IMPACT & MANAGEMENT PLAN 27-30
7.0 PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE 31
8.0 REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R&R) PLAN 32
9.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATES 32
10.0 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL
(FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS) 33
11.0 CSR 34
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
2 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
LIST OF FIGURES:
1.0 Location of Project 2
3.1 General Location Plan 10
3.2 Location map goggle 11
3.3 Layout plan 12
3.4 Process Flow chart 15
5.1 Isopleths for PM10 (Existing Project) 25
5.2 Isopleths for PM10 (Proposed Project) 26
LIST OF TABLES:
1.1 Détails of area 3
3.1 Project détails 8
3.2 Project co-ordinates 9
3.3 Raw material & Product 16
5.1 Primary data Description 21
5.2 Predicted Maximum Incremental Concentrations (Existing Project) 23
5.3 Predicted Maximum Incremental Concentrations (Proposed Project) 23
LIST OF ANNEXURES:
I Notification of Industrial Area 35
II MOA 38
III Valid CTO from PPCB 42
IV Trend Analysis From Existing Ambient Air Quality Results 50
V Report of Current Ambient Air Quality 52
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
1 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
M/s SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LIMITED
Village – Gobindgarh, Adjoining, Phase-VII, Focal Point, Ludhiana, Punjab.
Location Co-ordinates: Latitude : 30°52'17.53"-30°52'15.14"N,
30°52'15.37"-30°52'12.64"N,
Longitude : 75°56'27.74"-75°56'33.24"E,
75°56'26.41"-75°56'31.81"E,
Elevation : 256 m
Total project cost: - Rs 27.55 Crores (after addition of proposed machinery)
- The location of the project site is given in Figure 1.0 on map of India and other area
details are given in Table 1.1
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
2 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure 1.0
Location of the Project Site
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
3 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
TABLE – 1.1
DETAILS OF THE AREA
S. No.
Particulars Details
A. Location details
1. Location
a Village/ Town/Plot No. Gobindgarh
b Tehsil Ludhiana
c District Ludhiana
d State Punjab
e Latitude 30°52'17.53"-30°52'15.14"N,
30°52'15.37"-30°52'12.64"N, f Longitude 75°56'27.74"-75°56'33.24"E,
75°56'26.41"-75°56'31.81"E, 2. Topo sheet No.
H43J13
3. Project Area Total Area –4. 5 acres or 1.821hectare or
18210 m2
C. Production Capacity Existing:
1) Steel Billets-25,200TPA
2) Forged Roll-3300TPA After Expansion:
1) Steel Billets-1,72,800TPA
2) Round,TMTBars&Flats-1,50,000TPA 3) Forged Roll- 3300TPA
D. Environmental settings
1. Nearest Village Project exists in Industrial Focal Point.
2. Nearest City Ludhiana, approx. 7 km in NW direction
from the project site
3. National Highway/State Highway/ Express
Highway
NH-95 Kharar-Ludhiana is approx 1.0
km in North direction from the project
site.
4. Nearest Railway Station Dhandari Kalan, approx. 3.5 km in west
direction from the project site
5. Nearest Airport Chandigarh Airport approx. 85 km in
east direction from the project site.
6. National Parks/ Wild Life Sanctuaries/ Nil
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
4 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Biosphere Reserves within 10 km radius
7. Reserved / Protected Forest within 10 km radius
(Boundary to boundary distance)
No Reserved Forests exists within 10 km
radius.
8. Nearest water bodies Sirhind Kanal about 11.0 km
9. Source of Water Ground water Existing tube-well
10. Seismic Zone Seismic Zone – IV
D. COST DETAILS
1. Capital Cost of the project Existing -Rs 03.75 Cr
Proposed -Rs 23.80 Cr
Total -Rs 27.55Cr
2. Total cost for Environmental Management Plan
(EMP)
Rs 110.0 Lacs
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
5 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
2.0 INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT AND PROPONENT
M/s Sharu Special Alloys Pvt. Ltd. is already manufacturing Steel Ingot & forged roll at
Village- Gobindgarh, adjoining Phase-VII, Focal Point Ludhiana, Punjab. They now
want to enhance the capacity of their unit by replacing the existing furnace of 6 TPH
with two no Induction furnaces of 20TPH capacities each and concast. They also propose
to add rolling mill for structural section i.e. Round, MS Bars, TMT Bars, wire rod &
Flats. The total project cost of the unit after expansion will be Rs 27.55 Crores. The
projects have already 4.5 acres land. No additional land is required for expansion. The
capacity of the unit after expansion will be 1, 72,800 TPA steel Billets/Ingots, 3300TPA
forged roll & 1, 50,000 TPA Round, TMT bars, wire rod, steel bars, channels and flats.
As per G.O.I Notification dated 14/09/2006 any change in product/expansion required
Environmental Clearance. Accordingly they have to submit Form No- I along with Pre-
Feasibility Report and other relevant documents for getting Environmental Clearance.
Further, the project site falls within the “critically polluted areas” Ludhiana as notified
by the Central Pollution Control Board, as such the project is to be treated as Category
‘A’ and thus the environmental clearance will be given by the Central Govt. MoEF&CC
New Delhi. This Prefeasibility report has, therefore, been prepared to assess the likely
impact of the proposed expansion on various factors which may be affected with the
implementation of the programme and to suggest remedial / precautionary measures, if
any.
I. Partner’s Background:
M/s Sharu Special Alloys (Pvt.) Ltd is a Private Limited Company. The Directors of
the company are as under:
1. Mr. Naresh Kumar Jain
2. Mr. Gaurav Jain
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
6 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
II. Brief description of nature of the project.
In view of the tremendous market potential of Iron & steel, promoters have decided to
expand the capacity of the existing Steel Plant by replacing the existing furnace 6 TPH
with two no Induction furnaces of 20TPH capacities each & concast. Addition in the
existing plant would improve the overall profitability of the project making it
financially more viable. The production details of unit existing & proposed are as
under:
Product Name Existing Additional Total
(TPA) (TPA) (TPA)
Steel Ingot/billets :(-)25,200 +1, 72,800 1, 72,800
(replaced)
TMT Bars & Flats Nil 1, 50,000 1, 50,000
MS Bars, wire rod
Forged Roll : 3300 Nil 3300
III. Need for the project and its importance to the country and or region.
The economy of India is the seventh-largest economy in the world measured by
nominal GDP and the third-largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). The country is
classified as a newly industrialized country, one of the G-20 major economies, a
member of BRICS and a developing economy with an average growth rate of
approximately 7% over the last two decades. This growth rate has a great impact on
domestic consumption of steel as well as export potential to other countries. As a result
of this, the demand for iron & steel remains extremely good, this would continue for
next 10 years if not less, since the per capita consumption of steel in India is still very
low compared to other developed countries. For rapid development of economy and
infrastructure of the country it is necessary to increase the production of steel within
the country.
National Steel Policy – 2005 has the long term goal of having a modern and efficient
steel industry of world standards in India. The focus is to achieve global
competitiveness not only in terms of cost, quality and product-mix but also in terms of
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
7 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
global benchmarks of efficiency and productivity. The Policy aims to achieve over 100
million Metric Tonnes of Steel per year by 2019-20 from the 2004-05 level of 38 mt.
This implies an annual growth of around 7.3% per year since 2004-05.
The above strategic goal is justified on the ground that steel consumption in the world,
around 1000 Million Metric tonnes in 2004, is expected to grow at 3.0 percent per
annum to reach 1,395 Million Metric Tonnes in 2015, compared to 2 percent per
annum in the past fifteen years. China will continue to have a dominant share of the
world steel demand. At home, the Indian growth rate of steel production over the past
fifteen years was 7.0 percent per annum. The projected growth rate of 7.3 percent per
annum in India compares well with the projected national income growth rate of 7-8
percent per annum, given an income elasticity of steel consumption of around 1.
IV. Employment Generation (Direct and Indirect) due to the project.
Direct employment: - for expansion additional 400 Persons will be required. Total
Number of manpower after expansion will be 450 No’s.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
8 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
I. Category & type of project including interlinked and interdependent projects, if
any.
It is originally Category ‘B’ project. As situated within critically polluted area of
Ludhiana, it will be appraised as Category A, project under schedule 3(a) in EIA
Notification, 2006. Details of project is given in Table-3.1
TABLE-3.1
S.
No.
PARTICULARS
EXISTING
PROPOSED
TOTAL
A EXISTING & PROPOSED CAPACITY OF FURNACES & ROLLING MILLS
1 Induction Furnace 6TPH (To be
Replaced) & VD,
LFR & Concast
Two N. IF 20 TPH each & VD, LFR &
Concast
2 Rolling Mills Nil
1 Rolling Mill
1 Rolling Mills
B PRODUCTS
1 Steel Ingot/Billets (TPA) (-)25,200 (+)1,72,800 1,72,800
2 MS Bars, Round, Flats,
TMT Bars, wire rod
(TPA)
Nil 1,50,000 1,50,000
3 Forged Roll (TPA) 3300 Nil 3300
C RAW MATERIAL
1
MS Scrap (TPA) (-)27,900 (+)1,89,900 1,89,900
2
Ferro-alloys(TPA) (-)297 1980 1980
D GENERALS
1
Project Cost (Crores) 3.75 23.8 27.55
2
Land (Acres) 4.5 NIL 4.5
3
Power (KW) 2495 18505 21000
4
Manpower (No’s) 50 400 450
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
9 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
5
Working days 24 hrs 360 working days in year
II. Location (map showing general location- Figure-3.1, specific location- Figure-
3.2, and project boundary & project site layout- Figure-3.3) with coordinates.
LOCATION: The proposed project site is located at Village Gobindgarh, Near Phase-VII, Focal
Point, Ludhiana Distt. Ludhiana (Punjab). The coordinate of project site is given in
Table 3.2. The general location plan of project is given Figure-3.1 & on goggle 3.2.
The layout plan of the project showing different activity is given in Figure 3.3.
Table-3.2
LATITUDE 30°37'54.99"-30°37'54.79"N,
30°37'52.75"-30°37'52.53"N, LONGITUDE 76°19'09.62"-76°19'19.96"E,
76°19'09.54"-76°19'18.51"E,
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
10 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure-3.1 Google Location map
LUDHIANA
KHARAR
NH-95
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
11 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure-3.2 Location map General
KHARAR
LUDHIANA
SAMRALA
NH-95
PROJECT
SITE
Location plan - NTS
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
12 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure-3.3 Layout Plan
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
13 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
III. Alternate sites considered and the basis of selecting the proposed site,
particularly the environmental considerations gone into should be
highlighted.
Addition will be done within existing premises. So, consideration of alternate
site was not applicable.
IV. Size or magnitude of operation.
Existing plant is having Induction furnace of 6 TPH capacity and forging plant.
Now they are proposed to enhanced the capacity of plant by replacing existing
furnace with two no. new furnaces having capacity 20TPH each and one no.
rolling mill. After expansion the production details will be as under:
Product Name Existing Additional Total
(TPA) (TPA) (TPA)
-Steel Ingot/billets (-) 25,200 (+) 1, 72,800 1, 72,800
-TMT Bars & Flats Nil 1, 50,000 1, 50,000
MS Bars, wire rod
- Forged roll 3300 Nil 3300
V. Manufacturing Process details (a schematic diagram flow chart showing
the project layout, components of the project etc. should be given)
A coreless induction furnace operates on a similar principle to a transformer,
i.e., the induction coil acts as primary coil, having many turns, and the charge
acts as a secondary coil, with only as single turn. When an alternating current is
applied to the induction (primary) coil of a furnace, a significantly larger current
is induced in the metallic charge materials. The resistance to the passage of
induced current within the furnace charge causes the charge to heat up until it
eventually melts. Once the metal is molten, the magnetic field generated creates
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
14 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
a stirring action in the bath, producing both homogenization of the chemical
composition and assimilation of any bath additions. Electrical energy at 11 kV
(3-phase) is converted to 1250 V, through a transformer. It is further subjected
to a 3-phase rectifier and inverter system which converts the power to single
phase, high voltage-high frequency. The frequency converter amplifies the
frequency from 50 Hz to 500 Hz. This power is applied to furnace coil to
generate heat. The process flow chart of manufacturing process is given Figure
3.4
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
15 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
RAW MATERIAL
533 TPD
CONCAST MACHINE
(480.2)
BILLET
(480 TPD)
ROLLING
FINISHING
FINAL PRODUCT
FIGURE-3.4
FLOW CHART OF MANUFACTURING PROCESS
MELTING & REFINING
PROCESS
(533 TPD)
BURNING LOSSES
(27 TPD)
SLAG
(25 TPD)
APCD DUST
(0.8 TPD)
MILL SCALES
(9.2 TPD)
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
16 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
VI. Raw material required along with estimated quantity, likely source,
marketing area of final products, Mode of transport of raw Material and
Finished Product.
The details of product quantity and source of raw material required are given in
the Table 3.3.
TABLE-3.3
PRODUCTS EXISTING ADDITION TOTAL
1 Steel Billets/Ingot (TPA) (-)25,200 (+)1,72,800 1,72,800
2 MS Bars, Round, Flats,
TMT Bars, wire rod(TPA) Nil 1,50,000 1,50,000
3 Forged Roll (TPA) 3300 Nil 3300
RAW MATERIAL
1
MS Scrap (TPA) (-)27,900 (+)1,89,900 1,89,900
2
Ferro-alloys(TPA) (-)297 1980 1980
3
Source & Transport Local & International Markets & transport through covered
Trucks.
VII. Resource optimization/ recycling and reuse envisaged in the project, if
any, should be briefly outlined.
Water:
As this project is based on Zero Discharge, 100 % recycling of water will be
done in the process.
Solid/ Hazardous waste:
The existing quantity of slag is 3TPD and is being used for filling of low lying
area. Total quantity of slag after expansion will be 12TPD and will be used in
filling of Low lying area and in Road Making.
Hazardous waste generated (0.03kl/annum) from DG sets in the form of used oil
is being re-used as lubricants within the industry and dust (0.45ton/annum)
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
17 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
recovered by bag filter is also covered under hazardous waste & sent to TSDF
site for final disposal.
VIII. Availability of water its source, Energy/power requirement and source
should be given.
Water requirement met through existing tube well. The detail of water
requirement existing & after expansion is given below:-
DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
Domestic 2.5 KLD 20.0 KLD 22.5 KLD
Cooling (makeup water) 2.5 KLD 18.0KLD 20.5 KLD
Total 5.0KLD 38.0 KLD 43.0 KLD
Power requirement of existing & proposed along with source is given below:-
DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
Power Requirement 2495KW 18505KW 21000KW
Source Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Punjab
IX. Quantity of wastes to be generated (liquid and solid) and scheme for
their Management/ disposal.
Liquid effluents- Proposed project is based on ZERO discharge. There are no
generation trade effluents from process. The waste water generated from
domestic & cooling tower is being treated through septic tank and use for
plantation within premises.
Solid Waste -
Slag is being used in filling of Low lying area and in road making. Used oil
from DG sets is used as lubricants & dust from APCD sent to TSDF site for
final disposal.
Flue Gas Management
There are no combustion related polluted gaseous emissions as no fuel is being
used in the process. The air pollution will be the result of the heating and
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
18 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
melting process in the induction furnace. The gaseous emissions coming out of
the mouth of the furnace crucible need treatment before discharging it into the
atmosphere.
The gaseous emissions will comprise of vapours/fumes, suspended particles, and
some gases. The vapours are, primarily, of metals (iron) and metal oxides (in
very low quantities). Dust and metal particles also contribute to the suspended
particulates. Gaseous pollutants are, mainly, carbon di-oxide, carbon mono-
oxide, and nitrogen oxides, though in very low amounts. The suspended
particulate matter (SPM) concentration will be about 1500-2000 mg/NM3. Most
of the particulates (about 75%) are expected to have size in the range of 1-5
microns. The emissions (after dilution) will have temperature of <150°C.
As per the applicable statutory norms, the SPM level in the gas emission, at
discharge point, shall not exceed 150 mg/NM3. Additionally, the stack height
requirement for discharge of process emissions is also to be complied with.
Also, ambient air quality within the premises should not have particulate matter
concentration exceeding 100μg/m3 on 24 hour basis, and 60μg/m3 averaged on
annual basis.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
19 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
4.0 SITE ANALYSIS
I. Connectivity:
➢ NH-95 Kharar to Ludhiana is well connected with the project.(1.0KM)
➢ Dhandari Kalan Railway Station (2.5 Km)
The regional road network comprises of Kharar-Ludhiana G.T. Road (NH-95) and
forms the major spine. In fact the entire road network gravitates along this major
spine. The project exists in approved Industrial Focal point Ludhiana..
II. Land Form, Land use and Land ownership:
Industrial Land is registered in name of Sharu Special Alloys (P) Limited. The land
is already use for industrial purposes.
III. Existing land use pattern (agriculture, non-agriculture, forest, water bodies
(including area under CRZ), shortest distances from the periphery of the project
to periphery of sanctuary, eco from the HFL industrial area, be given.
It is situated in approved Industrial area. There is no sanctuary, river present within 10
km radius of the project.
IV. Existing Infrastructure:
The infrastructure amenities available in the area denote the economic wellbeing of the
region. The project area is connected with local road and NH-95 & NH-44. Educational
facilities up to Senior School, College, Hospital & Banking facilities are available at
Ludhiana City about 7 km away from the project site. The existing building comprise
of Induction Furnaces, rolling mill shed, Workshop shed & Competitive administrative
block along with office quarters at the
V. Soil classification: The texture of soil is sandy loam.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
20 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
VI. Social Infrastructure available.
Social infrastructure constitutes various facilities pertaining to education, health,
recreational, cultural and other public amenities/ facilities available in urban areas at
various levels whose availability and accessibility determines the quality of life of
an urban centre.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
21 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
5.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
INTRODUCTION:
The main objectives of describing the environment, which may be potentially affected,
are (i) to assess present environmental quality and the environmental impacts and (ii) to
identify environmentally significant factors that could preclude project development.
This chapter contains information on existing environmental scenario for the following
parameters.
1. Land Environment
2. Meteorology
3. Air Environment
4. Noise Environment
5. Water Environment
6. Soil Environment
7. Biological Environment
8. Socio-economic Environment
ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE DATA COLLECTION:
Baseline data for the proposed plant will collected immediately after monsoon season.
Primary data will be collected by monitoring & surveying of various environmental
components/ parameters in the core zone during the study period, details of which are
given in Table - 5.1.
TABLE-5.1
PRIMARY DATA
S.
NO.
PARAMETERS DESCRIPTION
1 Meteorology Meteorological parameters on hourly basis at project
site. Parameters: Temperature, Relative humidity, Wind
Speed & Wind Direction.
2 Air Ambient air quality monitoring (24 hourly), twice a
week. Parameters are PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2 & CO.
No. of Locations: 8 locations in core and buffer zone.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
22 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
3 Noise Noise level monitoring (Day & Night time), once in a
season.
No. of Locations: 8 locations in core and buffer zone.
4 Water Ground water sampling, once in a season.
No. of Locations: 8 locations in core and buffer zone.
Tested for physical and chemical parameters.
5 Soil Soil sampling, once in a season.
No. of Locations: 6 locations in core and buffer zone.
6 Biological
Factors
Biodiversity survey, once in a season.
Location: Core and buffer zone.
7 Socio-economic
Environment
Socio-economic survey, once in a season.
Location: Core and buffer zone.
5.1 Current Ambient Air Quality and its future:-
For the existing project of M/s Sharu Special Alloys, we have carried out Ambient Air Quality
Sampling at Project Site. Test report is given at Annexure-V. Brief detail is as under:-
Date of Monitoring PM2.5
µg/m3
PM10
µg/m3
SO2
µg/m3
NOx
µg/m3
09.01.2018 56.2 105.4 11.2 32.1
To quantify the incremental affect of proposed project, we have carried out Air Quality
Modeling by using AERMODCloud Version-5.
Dispersion Modeling Results
➢ The 24 hourly average ground level concentration (GLC) values from proposed and
current project have been computed for PM10 considering topographical featured
around the project and applicable stability classes. The predicted 24 hourly short terms
Maximum Incremental Concentration values for PM10 from the proposed and current
project are given in Table- 1 & 2. Corresponding isopleths plotted are shown in Figure
1 & 2 for PM10. Modeling inputs are as below:-
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
23 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
➢ Input for Proposed Project:-
I. Stack height = 30m
II. Stack diameter = 1.0m
III. Temperature of stack gas = (273+100°C) =373 K (Ts)
IV. Manometer H (mm) = 14.8 mm H20
V. Velocity of gases (v) = 14.53 m/s
Say, PM concentration = 50 mg/Nm3
VI. Emission rate = 0.46 g/s
➢ Input for Running Project:-
I. Stack height = 30m
II. Stack diameter = 0.75 m
III. Temperature of stack gas = (273+90°C) =363 K (Ts)
IV. Manometer H (mm) = 11.8 mm H20
V. Velocity of gases (v) = 12.8 m/s
Say, PM concentration = 150 mg/Nm3
VI. Emission rate = 0.68 g/s
Table-5.2 Predicted Maximum Incremental Concentrations (Existing Project)
Avg.
Period
RANK Conc,
µg/m3
X, m Y, m ZELEV,
m
Direction a Direction, m a
24 HR 2.69 589949.74 3415673.36 0.00 SSE [160°] 76.00
PERIOD 0 1.05 589794.19 3415818.84 0.00 WNW
[300°]
150.00
Table-5.3 Predicted Maximum Incremental Concentrations (Proposed Project)
Avg.
Period
RANK Conc,
µg/m3
X, m Y, m ZELEV,
m
Direction a Direction, m a
24 HR 1.12 589859.14 3415781.34 0.00 WNW
[300°]
75.00
PERIOD 0 0.49 589794.19 3415818.84 0.00 WNW
[300°]
150.00
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
24 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Predicted GLC’s of current and proposed project
It is predicted that the maximum contribution in GLC’s with units operation is 2.69
µg/m3 for PM10 at 76 m for existing project and 1.12 µg/m3 for PM10 at 75 m for
proposed project.
Conclusion:
➢ As per recent ambient air monitoring, the result of PM10 is exceeding the limit.
➢ As per air quality modeling, Predicted Maximum Incremental Concentrations of PM10
is 2.69 µg/m3 at 76 m for existing project and 1.12 µg/m3 for PM10 at 75 m for
proposed project.
From this study we can conclude that pollution load w.r.t. PM10 will decrease
after proposed expansion.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
25 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure -5.1 Isopleths for PM10 (Existing Project)
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
26 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure -5.2 Isopleths for PM10 (Proposed Project)
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
27 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
PARTICULARS DETAILS
Impact on Air
Construction/
Operational
Phase
Air emissions both gaseous and fugitive from proposed plant will
be on account of process emissions from stacks of existing
Induction furnace & proposed Furnace as well as DG. Sets. The
mitigation measure adopted as under:
➢ The main raw material and product will be brought in and
dispatched by road in covered enclosures.
➢ All the vehicle owners will have valid PUC Certificate
➢ All vehicles are loaded up-to prescribed limit during
transportation.
➢ Dust suppression on haul roads will be done at regular
intervals.
➢ Proper pollution control equipments like Multi-
cyclone/bag filter will be provided.
➢ APCD solid waste after expansion will also be sent to
TSDF site for final Disposal.
Air Quality Management:
Emissions
Management
➢ A stack of adequate height equipped with Bag filter will be
installed with the Induction furnace to control the
particulate and gaseous emissions due to combustion of
fuel.
➢ All the roads are asphalted to control the fugitive dust
emissions
➢ Proper servicing & maintenance of vehicles is/will be
carried out.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
28 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
➢ Green Belt around the periphery and within premises will
be provided.
Monitoring
Management
Ambient air quality and stack emission will be regularly
monitored to ensure that ambient air quality standards and
suggested limits on stack emission loads would be met honestly
at all the time.
Impact on water
Construction/
Operational
phase
Water requirement of the plant will be meeting from existing tube
well. Roof top rain water will be recharged to compensate ground
water.
Water Management
➢ Fresh water requirement of the project will be met by
existing tube well.
➢ Domestic waste water generated from the plant will be
treated in Septic Tank and treated water will be used in
green belt development.
➢ The cooling water will be re-circulated and cooling blow
down will be dispose off through septic tank.
Impact on Noise
Construction/
Operational
Phase
The expected noise levels of some of the proposed equipment like
Pumps (82-95 dB (A), Induction furnace (95-105 dB (A), DG sets
(100-120 dB (A).
The above noise levels worked out are without mitigation
measures. With the mitigation measures the noise levels will be
further restricted within very short distance from the source point.
The operators/personnel working near the noise sources in the
Plant will be provided with earmuffs and earplugs
Green belt will be developed around the plant premises which
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
29 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
will act as noise abatement measures.
Noise Management
➢ There will be no danger of noise pollution from plant. The
green belt (plantation of dense trees across the boundary)
helps in reducing noise levels in steel plant as a result of
attenuation of noise generated due to plant operations and
transportation.
➢ Earmuffs will be used while running the equipments of the
plant.
➢ D.G sets will be provided with acoustic to control the noise
level within the prescribed limit.
➢ A high standard of maintenance will be practiced for plant
machinery and equipments, which helps to avert potential
noise problems.
➢ Personal Protective Equipment like earplugs and earmuffs
will be provided to the workers exposed to high noise level.
➢ Regular monitoring of noise level will be carried out.
Solid Waste Management
Management ➢ APCD dust is being sent to TSDF site and slag from process
is sent to low lying area for final disposal.
Green belt Management
Management
➢ Green belt development in and around the plant site helps to
attenuate the pollution level.
➢ Out of the total plant area approx. 5% land is already
developed as green belt and it will be maintained in future
also.
➢ Green belt has been developed as per Central Pollution
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
30 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Control Board (CPCB) guidelines.
➢ Native species have been planted in consultation with the
local DFO.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
31 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
7.0 PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
I. Industrial Area (Processing Area):-
The site already having administrative and site control office with latest equipment like
computers, walkie-talkie & computerized weighbridge, printers, fax, Xerox machine,
etc. Sufficient power load exists to meet the current requirement. Water for
construction and domestic purpose as well industrial purposes will be drawn from bore-
well.
II. Residential Area (Non Processing Area):-
Labour hut / rest room, toilet, drinking water facility is already provided.
III. Green Belt.
The main objective of the green belt is to provide a barrier between the plant and
surroundings areas. Green belt will be developed according to CPCB guidelines.
IV. Social Infrastructure.
There is sufficient number of educational facilities but health facilities are not up to the
mark. The sports and recreational facilities are also not adequate as there is no national
or state level sports complex; however an indoor / outdoor stadium of lower hierarchy
is available within the town. One cinema and two clubs also exist in town.
V. Connectivity (Traffic and Rail/Metro/Water ways etc)
The regional road network comprises of Kharar-Ludhiana G.T. Road (NH-95) and
forms the major spine. In fact the entire road network gravitates along this major spine.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
32 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
.
8.0 REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R&R) PLAN:-
R & R Plan is not applicable, as it is an expansion of existing plant.
9.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATES:-
I. Likely date of start of construction and likely date of completion (Time schedule
for the project to be given):-
Within one year after receipt of NOC & Environmental Clearance
II. Estimated project cost along with analysis in terms of economic viability of the
project:-
Total proposed project cost is estimated to be around Rs. 27.55 Crs
III. Cost toward Environment Protection: - 110.0 lacs
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
33 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
10.0 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL (FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS)
I. Financial and social benefits with special emphasis on the benefit to the
local people including tribal population, if any, in the area.
Financial Benefits:
Benefits and advantages of expansion of existing plant:
a) It will full fill the Demand Supply Gap.
b) It is help in increment of Life style of Local People By providing Jobs.
Social Benefits:
Greater employment for local populations
Environmental benefits:
a) Low emission of air pollutant (proper APCD will be installed).
b) It is a Brown field project.
c) Proposed project is based on ZERO discharge.
Other Benefits:
Revenues to the State and Central ex-chequers.
Over all development of District- Ludhiana in particular and Punjab State in
general.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
34 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
11.0 CSR ACTIVITIES
Proposed expansion will result in growth of the surrounding areas by increased direct
and indirect employment opportunities in the region including ancillary development
and supporting infrastructure. Special emphasis on Financial and Social benefits will be
given to the local people including tribal population, if any, in the area. Development
of social amenities will be in the form of medical facilities, education to
underprivileged and creation of self help groups.
The company will also propose to take up more activity on account of social corporate
activity after expansion. These activities are as under:
Sr.
No. NAME OF
VILLAGE ACTIVITY PROPOSED COST
(Lacs)
1 Gobindgarh Tree Plantation, Environment awareness
camp, Rs. 2.0
Construction of one classroom in the
Middle School of village and its upkeep
Rs. 2.0
No adverse effect on environment is envisaged as proper mitigation measures will be
taken up for the same.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
35 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
ANNEXURE-I
NOTIFICATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
36 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
37 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
38 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
ANNEXURE-II
MOA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
39 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
40 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
41 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
42 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
ANNEXURE-III
CONSENT TO OPERATE
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
43 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
44 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
45 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
46 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
47 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
48 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
49 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
50 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
ANNEXURE-IV
TREND ANALYSIS FROM EXISTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY RESULTS:
Trend analysis is a form of comparative analysis that is often carried out to identify current
and future movement of pollution level. The process may involve comparing past and current
levels of pollution as they are related to various sites. This type of information is extremely
helpful to make decisions and future predictions.
In this report trend analysis of air pollution have been depicted. For this purpose the data of
Ambient Air from January, 2013 to October, 2017 has been taken into consideration. The
trends of individual pollutant in the city a whole has been carried out and trend analysis for
each pollutant at various sites for the above period has been analyzed. The trends analysis has
also been compared with the NAAQ standard for each individual pollutant to identify
whether the level of pollutants is below or above the NAAQ standard level.
Punjab Pollution Control Board is having four different Ambient Air Monitoring locations at
Ludhiana, but we have taken the results of nearby monitoring stations. Comparative Values
of RSPM, SO2 & NOx is provided in Table 1 and Trend Analysis of RSPM is provided in
Figure-1. SOx and NOx value is well within the limit.
Table 1 Comparative Values of RSPM, SO2 & NOx µg/m3 for the years 2013-2017
Station Name: Nahar Spinning Mills (Earlier Rita Sewing Machine), Ludhiana
Month RSPM (µg/m3) NOx (µg/m3) SO2(µg/m3)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
January 239 227 208 203 131 30 31 30 28 23 11 14 13 16 10
February 246 196 212 168 120 33 30 31 28 22 14 13 13 20 9
March 164 161 231 170 102 29 29 31 27 21 10 13 13 16 7
April 189 158 167 170 127 30 31 30 29 23 12 14 13 19 9
May 254 215 205 181 122 30 32 32 28 23 10 14 12 15 9
June 250 186 138 158 131 31 31 29 25 24 15 14 13 9 11
July 246 169 142 124 131 31 29 24 24 23 13 13 10 8 9
August 253 132 102 108 119 30 30 27 22 22 12 13 11 8 7
September 162 100 126 114 158 26 28 23 19 23 11 11 13 8 11
October 248 159 228 180 209 31 27 30 22 25 13 12 20 9 10
November 271 224 167 204 32 31 33 25 15 13 23 12
December 280 183 197 141 32 35 32 24 15 13 20 11
Annual
Avg.
234 176 177 160 135 30 30 29 25 13 13 15 13
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
51 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
Figure 1: Trend Analysis of Air Pollutants w.r.t. RSPM
Observation: If we compare last five years trend of RSPM at Nahar Spinning Mill station, it
is in decreasing order. And the value of SOx and NOx is below the prescribed limit.
PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT
52 M/S SHARU SPECIAL ALLOYS (P) LTD., LUDHIANA CPTL-EIA
ANNEXURE-V REPORT OF CURRENT AMBIENT AIR QUALITY