e. ani,wotion ani, order merefurf+ defendant, american financial groupi hc. (hereinafter referred to...

1012212010 %- .,TI

This Document Relates To:

JACK E. DONALDSON, SR (DEC)

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JlJDGMENT WOTION ANI, ORDER

MEREFURF+ Defendant, American Financial GroupI hc. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursumt to CPLR 9 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, American Financial Group, Inc,, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon Notice to all Co-Defendants, all Claims and Cross-claim against Defendants, American Financial Group, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorlc April 12,2010

WEITZ & LWJCFJWERG HODGSON RUSS, LLP 1 IL / L w - ~ R!!%!!&

Michsel Fanelli, Esquire

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Alan Muraidekh, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant Arnerioan Financial Group, Inc.

60 East 4Zd Street New York, Now Yak 101

APR 30 8816 J.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CfRPWTED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I

I NYCAL

I (Heitler, J.)

: Index No.: 117

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part30

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

EUGENE OBRIEN AND JANE O’BRIEN, I I I piEy6634’997 I

Plaintiff(s) I

! NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER I I

-against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

I Defendant( s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be ana the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and-

without casts.

Dated: New Y rk, New York 4 h ,2010

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, lnc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eugene O’Brien and Jane O’Brien 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1 122-3047

N0001062-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK :OUNTY OF NEW YORK

N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

rHlS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

IAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

< I,

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-de

against defendant BMCE Inc., be and t h e same are hereby dismissed

BMCE Inc. Weiner Lesniak LLP New York, NY I0003

888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppaugc, NY 11788

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

c

(I L

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

I

~~

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL ~

10.1 091 /oo


WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with

prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby

Attorneys fo r Defend ant Lockheed Martin Corp. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I 1788

New York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED, H

b--

< L



Index No($&i /a 1 0 1 0 9 1 100


JAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL


WHEREFORE, defendant, Robert A. Keasbey Co., hereby requests summary

udgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

lismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Robert A. Keasbey Co., with

mjudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,

3gainst defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be a


Attorneys for Defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 1 1788

Jew York, NY 10003

;O ORDERED,

AFR 302010




WHEREFORE, Defendant, American Financial Group, hc. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") hereby requests summq judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 8 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, American Financial Group, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thrrreto,

ORDEFUCD, th8t upon Notice to all Co-Defendants, all CIaims and Cross-claims against Defendants, Amerioan Financial Group, h ~ . ~ be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudioe and without costs.

Dared: New York, New York April 12,201 0

.-. .

WEITZ & LUXENBERG HODGSON RUSS, LLP

b e , / A W L & ' - & \

Miclzsel Fanelli, Esquire

Attorneys far Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Alan Muraidekh, Esquire Attorncya far Defendant Arnodcan Financial Group, hc.

60 East 4Zd Street New York, Now York 101

&W

J. IT I5 €0 ORDERED.

G W T E D :


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY X _ l_ - - - -_ l_ - - - -_"_r - -_________________r__-

ASBESTOS LIT1 GATION

Thomas J. Cruger, Sr.

*I

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index N o m

10522 1-98 11 1031-98 102783-00


X l - f _ _ _ _ * f r - - _ - l - - - -

WHEREFORE, defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thedo ,

1 ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all

defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in inter the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and w

Dated: New York, New York

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co. 150 East 42nd Street New York, New York 1001 7 2 12-490-3000

WAY". SO ORDERED,

4 1,~ 1 Our File No. 07536.08563

Hon. Sherry K. Heitkr kPR 3 0 2010

39491 75. I

1 . .


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ _ _ _ _ “ _ _ 1 _ _ _ . . _ - - - _ 1 - _ - - - I - - I - - - - - - - - - r _ - ~ _ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ - - ” -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Thomas J. Cruger, Sr,

. - - .. ..


Index No: 1 1 1243-02 121 743-97

4-3 11 1031-98 102783-00


X - - - _

WHEREFORE, defendant EFUCSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

._. . thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defend defendant EFUCSSON INC., as successor in interest to Ana the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without c


Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New Y ork, New Y ork 10003 ERICSSON INC., as

successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co. 150 East 42“d Street New York, New York 10017

Our File No. 07536.08563 2 1 2-490-3000

SO ORDERED,

39491 75.1


IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) Index No: 106336198

EDWARD SHUBERT NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as

Dana Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross

claims against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation,

F I L E D be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York,

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (2 1 2) 52 1 -5400

SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-IO34461 53.1


In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 106336198

NO OPPOSITION EDWARD SCHUBERT, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff(s), MOTION

- against -

AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,

Defendants. ~

WHEREFORE, Defendant WIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-

MCLAIN”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-

McLain with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either party.

Dated: &d( 7 ,2010

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (2 12) 558-5500

SINGER & MAHONEY, Attorneys for Defendant Weil-McLain 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400

New York, NY 10022 (2 12) 65 1-7500

SO ORDERED,


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ _ _ r - - - - - " r _ - - - - _ l _ - - - - - - - " - - - - - - " - - - - - - -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Thomas J. Cruger, Sr.


Index No: 11 1243-02 121743-97

ZW$ 102783-00


X - - - - l - r - - - - L - - " _ - - - _ l r _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _

WHEREFORE, defendant ERICSSON INC., as swccessor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' coinplaint against defendant ERICSSON LNC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, f

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in inter the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and w


Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Wire & Cable Co. 150 East 42nd Street New York, New York 10017 2 12-490-3000 Our File No. 07536.08563

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K. HeitNr

39491 75. I

APR 3 0 2010


JACK E, DONALDSON, SR (DEC)

Index No.: 103649-97

105280-02

NO OPPOSITION SIJMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEJAEPOFE, Defendmt, American Financial Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, American Financial Oroup, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDEFWD, that upon Notice to d l Co-Defendants, all Claims and Cross-claims against Defendants, Atnericm Financial Group, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

I Dated: New York, New Yilk

April 12,201 0

WEITZ & LUXENEERG HODGSON RUSS, U P

Michael Fanelli, Esquin

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Alan Muraidekh, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant American Financial Group, Inc.

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 60 East 42' Street

New York, NOW York 101

s SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK



JOSEPH P. MCDERMOTT and ROSALIE A. MC D E RM OTT

Index No. 112546/98







against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

fleitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003 Weiner Lesniak LLP

888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I 1788

SO ORDERED,




JOSEPH P. MCDERMOTT and ROSALIE A. MCDERMOTT

Index No. 112546/98




dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Robert A. Keasbey Co., with



against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

,2010

Attorneys for Plaintiff Weitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003

A$p$neys for Defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Hauppauge,

APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK CQUWfcLERKS-

SO ORDERED,




JUNIA L. CROCKETT as the Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT N. CROCKETT and JUNIA L. CROCKETT, Individually




dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Robert A. Keasbey Co., with





DATED: 3 -31 , 2010

Attorneys for Defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Hauppauge, NY 11788

Weitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003

__ SO ORDERED,

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JACQUELINE F, NOCK, Executrix for the Estate of ALAN S. MASTERS,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

Index No.: 100049/99


A. C. & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc,, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being

no opposition thereto,


defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New Y rk, New York J p ,2010

Mamie A, Bartolomeo, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (21 2) 509-3456

F I L E D APR 3 o zaio

NEW YORK Couryn @ERNS

&aLpAwb B 4 ? & s t . Attorney for Plaintiffs Estate of Alan S. Masters WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 0 2010 2082-905

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK lOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION EDWARD MAZUR, JR. and BARBARA A. MAZUR, Plaintiff(s),

ADIENCE, INC., ET AL. Defendants.

vs.

m, -

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER)

/--? INDEX NO.-

125132100


WHEREFORE, defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, improperly impleaded as DB Riley, Inc.

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, with



defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without

costs. F I L E D 4 /48

m APR 3 o m a EW YORK C L E R K ' S O ~

RSON, McNEILL, P.C. Attorneys for Riley Stoker Corporation 233 Broadway New York, New York 10279

W Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 61h Fl. New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878




CAROL ANN KNOPP, Individually and as Proposed Administratrix for the Estate of LESTER T. KNOPP

Index No. 103373/99









DATED: #p/ 5’ , 2010

Andrew M. Warshauer Attorneys for Defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co. i /( Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans

R Attorneys for Plaintiff Weitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th f New York, NY 10003

Hauppauge,


5 536.09806/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW COUNTY OF NEW YORK

YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

This document relates to:

AUGUST ARRINDELL, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs . UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al.,

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sherry K-ein Heitler)

Index No. : 1 0 6 2 4 6 / 9 9

(May 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial Group)


Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Complaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and

crossclaims against defendant, United C o n v e F \oLEQ, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withy%@&ts.

DATED : L/- q! 3 d/ c> East Hanover, New Jersey

h?R

WEITZ & LUXENBERG , GAROFALO Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East,Bnover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, Honorable Sherrykleid

.. . ... -. .

536.08144/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y W K K COUNTY OF NEW YORK



ANTHONY CATALINA,

Plaintiff,

vs .

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al.,

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Lierry Klein Heitler)

Index No. : 106275/99



Defendants.



Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's




crossclaims against defendant, UnitedConveyor

are hereby dismissed with prejudice and same

DATED: c/-9-*>& East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys f o r Plainti 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

APR 3 0 2010

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO & FLINN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, /

Honorabfe kerry Klein Heitler

s 536.10126/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW 20UNTY OF NEW YORK

YORK

~



HAROLD AMES, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs .


Defendants.

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sherry K l e i n Heit,er)

Index No. : 106316/99







ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a11 claims and

crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

DATED : 727-2 d/ I) East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG GARRITY , GRAHAM, Attorneys for Plainti & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438

aver, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, d

Honorable Sherry KTein Heitler ;;ti a 3 0 2010

c

536.10245/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW COUNTY OF NEW YORK



GEORGE L. CHAMPAGNE, Deceased, :

Plaintiff,


Defendants.

3 YORK

NYCAL IAS PART 3 0 (Honorable Sherry K-sin Heitler)

Index No, : 106337 /99









crossclaims against defendant, Unitedconveyor Cor

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

r t on I L ee,& t$e

DATED : yH $?~Jd/d APR 3 0 2010 East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plainti & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation

72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P.O. Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, Honorable Sher2y Klein Heitler

P,PR 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 1 1 1 152/99 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

CAROL E. SAWYER, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE I ESTATE OF DONALD H. SAWYER,

I NO OPPOSITION I I

Plaintiff( s) ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- ; MOTION AND ORDER I


Defendantls). I

3

i WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 4 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. with prejudice, and


ORDEMD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New York, New York @ d q ,2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate ofDonald Sawyer F 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

L E D APR 3 0 2010 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500


1 122-3223

NO00 1443- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL,

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)


I Index No.: 1 1 1 152199 I

I I

CAROL E. SAWYER, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD H. SAWYER,

I

NO OPPOSITION

MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff( s) I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1 I

-against- I I I I I I


Defendant(s).

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary


plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,


defendant, Tishrnan Liquidating Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Ne Y rk, New York g;i 4 ,2010

AL F I L E D Michael Fanelli, Esq.

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation Estate of Donald Sawyer APR 3 0 2010 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 NEW YORK

Gf3JmclERics- (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500


2383-4240

N0001447-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN E: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL


I I

I

I I

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I Index No.: 1 1 1 152/99

CAROL E. SAWYER, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD H. SAWYER,

I

NO OPPOSITION Plaintiff( s) I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER I I I I I I

I


Defendant( s). I

\

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant, Treadwell Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York k[,l 4 ,2010

Michael Fanelli, EG.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Donald Sawyer 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Y & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

c f J u N N c m K $ ~

1235-2742

SO ORDERED,

- * N0001446-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

IN RE NEW YORK CITY X ____________II____________l_____________-

ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J .)

Index Nofi 13354/99/ 124339/00

Marjorie Ann Pauze, as Administratrix for the Estate of Alan Edward Pauze, and Marjorie Ann Pauze, Individually

..


X * - + l w l - - - - - f

WHEREFORE, defendant A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York p y / .<'" 13

Danny Kraft, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, N.Y., 10003

SO ORDERED,

3885749. I

APR 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK I _ l _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ _ l _ _ l - - l - l - - l - - - - - - - l - - " X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Alan Edward Pauze

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S.)

Index N- 124339/00


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street

Adam J. Kipds, Esq. 1 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New J e r s e c B - 3 0 17 973-624-0800

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 U 2010 959877.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _____ l -_ - - -_ l__"_ - - -____________ l f r_____-

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

George Allen

NYCAL 1.A.S Part 30 (Heitler, S.)

Index No: 113378/99

NO OPPOSITION i I SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Dated: New York, New York f 4 L /2 , Z ~ I O

22&LzAL Matthew MacIntyre, I&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500

SO ORDEED, b

WILSON, E ~ S E ~ , MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 071 02-3017 973-624-0800

F I L E D


947827.1

s 536.10614/AJM ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 30UNTY OF NEW YORK

I N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

%is document relates to:

3EORGE W. ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

vs .

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, st al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL IAS PART 30 (Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler)

Index No. : 113378/99

(May 2010 Monthly FIFO Trial Group 1




Zivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

Zomplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with



crossclaims against defendant, United Convey0 q o \ p k a E o n e and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without APR 3 <%bs.

DATED : y- 9.2 d/ 0 East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintif & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation


Hanover , New Jersey 07 93 6

- SO ORDERED, 10 eitlea"PR 'j

3 ;36.01480/AJM ;UPREME COURT O F THE STATE OF NEW YORK IOUNTY OF NEW YORK


chis document relates to:

NYCAL IAS PART (Honorab

IONALD C. ALLEN, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

VS.

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, ?t al.,

Defendants.

30 e Sherry K ein Heitler)

Index No. : 113379/99


NO OPPOSITION SuMMaRY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


Iivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiff's




crossclaims against defendant, United Conv FIVE@, be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED : L/- 7-2 dJ/d East Hanover, New Jersey

APR 3 0

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINJY 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation


ersey 07936

SO ORDERED, W '

Honorable Sherry Kleh Heitler

, j i q i 3 0 2019

I

I

This Document Relates Ta:


NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JIJDGMENT JPIOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFOIRE, Defendant, American Financial Group, hnc. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitIed case, pursuant to CPLR § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against Defendant, American Financial Group, Inc., with prejudice, and &here being no opposition themto,

ORDERED$ that upan Notice to all Co-Defendants, all CIaims and Cross-claims against Defendants, American FEnanoid Group, Inc., be md the same wre hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yo& ApiI 12,201 0

-4- WEITZ & LUXENBERG HODGSON RUSG, LLP

Michsel Fanelli, Esquire

Atbrneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New Yotk 10003

Alan Muraidekh, Esquire Attorneys for Defendant American Financial Group, Iric.

60 East 42"d Street Now Yark, New York 101

CIRANTED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


EUGENE OBRIEN AND JANE O'BRIEN,

I I I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.) I

: Index No.: 1 17398/02, 104861/97 I

I I I Plaintiff(s) I

I NO OPPOSITION -against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S., NC., et al,, I MOTION AND OFWER I I I

Defendant( s), I I


in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiff's


opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and .-

without costs.

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eugene O'Brien and Jane O'Brien 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(21 2) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

I 122-3047

N0001062-I

536.07583/AJM UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW :OUNTY OF NEW YORK

YORK

:N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

'his document relates to:

IETER H. ARANSON, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

VS . JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, ?t al.,

Defendants.

NYCAL I A S PART 30 (Honorable S,,erry Klein Heitler)

Index No. : 117930/99




livil Practice Law and Rules Section 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiff's

:omplaint against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, with

?rejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.


xossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corpor L,&c:psbe% and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice a n p k

DATED : q4- q-2 J/ 0 East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG EsQ*% FRANK M', ORTIZ,

Attorneys f o r Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

.-

GARRITY , GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALC & FLINN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P . O . Box 438

nover, New Jersey 07936

SO ORDERED, Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler

1 L *

c ;36.06788/AJM ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK lOUNTY OF NEW YORK


rhis document relates to:

3ERMAN BORDEN, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, 2t al.,

NYCAL I A S PART (Honorab

30 e Sherry Klein H it1

Index No. : 118277/99



Defendants.



zivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's




crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Corporation, be and the

same are hereby dismissed

DATED : y- $/2d / 0 East Hanover, New Jersey

WEITZ & LUXENBERG FRANK M. ORTIZ,


EsQ--+s

with prej

w - & FLINN Attorneys for Defendant, United Conveyor Corporation 72 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 350 P . O . Box 438 East Hanover, New Jersey 07936

<-

SO ORDERED, Y

' ;"io2010 Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler , II I S " u


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _"---__l_--_-------_ll____l_______ll____-

,

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Stephen Meyer


Index No: 120263/99


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and thc game are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


e% &- WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07 1 02-30 17

Matthew MacIntyre, E s d WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500 33 Washington Street

973-624-0800


APR 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

j I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 120812/99

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


KATHLEEN RAMSDEN, Individually and as Administratrix for the Estate of CHARLES RAMSDEN, [ NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, [ MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A. C , & S., INC., et al.

Defendants. !

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kentile Floors, Tnc., with prejudice in this action, and there being



defendant, Kentile Floors, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: Ne Y k, New York yp5 ,2010

F I L E D APR 3 o zoia

q f W VORK ( A N N CISRK'SOF-

amie A. Bartolomeo, Esq. bydl\ ES.6- Attorney for Defendant Kentile Floors, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Attorney for Plaintiffs Kathleen Ramsden and Estate of Charles Ramsden WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2082-1053

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ___________--______-1__________1_1___ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ _ - - -X This Document Relates to: Rudell Harry Belvin and Adele Biele Belvin,

Plaintiffs, - against -

A.C. & S . Inc., et al.,

c

\

NYCAL I.A.S. P a r t 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No. 6- Index No. 103812 00


WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps I n c . , hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civi

Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc., with prejudice, an


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims ar

cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc . , be dismissed w i t


Dated: Brooklyn, New York r!!b : Just' Cullen M. and Tafe, Dykman Esq. LLP

, 2 0 1 0

Michael Fanelli, Esq. Weitz EL Lumnberg, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rudell H a r r y B e l v i n and Goulds Pumps Inc . Adele Biele B e l v i n 177 Montague Street 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201

Attorneys for Defendant

LE New York, New York LOO03 (718) 855-9000 : 6 7 5 f h 4

3 0 IQIQ So Ordered: @R

W R 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ! NYCAL


ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ANTHONY BURZESI,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER


Defendants. \ WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in


complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there



defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 3 p ,2010

Treadwell Corporation MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Anthony Burzesi

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P,c.

(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, r Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

.~ 1235-1 001 7


IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON


RICHARD KURTZ

NYCAL I.A.S. Part30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190205109 106430100

&mm7q>






prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .-


claims against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly -known as Dana Corporation,

be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost F\LED

Charles F e r g E , tsq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

- REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03445024 1

. - .~ - - . . _-

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY ! C d ' h T Y OF NEW YORK

NYCAL ; 1,A.S. Part 30

I Index No.: 10943 1 /O 122 1 89/99

I (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION

'THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: 1

I a JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS, I I I

Plaintiff(s) I NO OPPOSiTION I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND OFtDER I I I I I I


Defendant( s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against .-- .

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with


ApR 3 0 Dated: New York, New York hni ,2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff John 1;. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 1212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 , ,

SO ORDERED,

NO001 125-1

324-50601

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN FE: NEW YORK COUNTY { NYCAL

I I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITlGATTON I

I

Index No.: 1 0943 1 /O 122 1 89/99 JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS, I I

a THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

I I

Plainti ff(s) I NO OPPOSITION I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER I I I A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendant( s). I I




opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissd with prejudice and

3

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York *,I 4 ,2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc, 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500


11 22-14463

NOOOll24-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

TI-TIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS,

; I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 1 0943 1 /O I

122 1 89/99 I I 53 I I

Plaintiff( s) I NO OPPOSITION I SUMMARY JUDGMENT I MOTION AND ORDER -against- I


Defendant(s). I I




thereto,


defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and .-

without costs.

Dated: New Y rk, New York y-4 ,2010

Michael Fanelli, Esq. N~-QFR# WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1235-1 4073

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I I NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 1 0943 1 /OO, THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS, I I

I

Plaintiff( s) I NO OPPOSITION SIJMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- MOTION AND ORDER I

A.C. & S., INC., et al., I

I Defendant( s). I






defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Ne Y rk, New York l? ,2010

Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Michael Fanelli, Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500


2383-40051 /.,r;'R 3 0 2010

NO@@] 122-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l l _ l _ r _ _ _ _ _ l _ r _ _ _ _ _ _ -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Royal Howard Trimlett




ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. _- Dated: New York, New York

U P ! ! L A 3d3 9 m

Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jer y 71 973-624-08OF e Fob

I

SO ORDERED, APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK ~ U N W CERKS om=

959877.1


Albert Pallamollo


10928 1 /00 1 15948/03


_ _ r - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l - - _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ _ _ _ - - ~ - ~ x

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street I

OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 071 02-301 7 973-624-0800

SO ORDERED,

959877.1


\ I ,


SABE VARSANO

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler. J.)




pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint


prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .-


claims against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana corporation,

be and the same are hereby dismissed

Dated: New York, New York (-1-1 y- 3

I_

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

with

-


Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 03446225.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


MALICK D. BYRNE AND ELIZABETH A. BYRNE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., TNC., et al.

Defendants.


NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND OlRDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests s~unrnauy judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs'





without costs.

Dated: New York, New York N4Rci4 A ,2010

I !

I i

Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (21 2) 509-3456

Malick D. Byrne and Elizabeth A. Byrne WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1235-9975

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _- - -_________I_________________I_____ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ -X This Document Relates to: ESTATE ARNOLD TOM LITTLEWOOD, LITTLEWOOD ARNOLD M, LITTLEWOOD EVA M

Plaintiff ( s ) - against -

Burnham, LLC, et al.

NYCAL I.A.S. P a r t 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.:125070/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMF,NT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham, LLC as successor to Burnham

Corporation. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

§ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Burnham, LLC as successor to Burnham Corporation, with


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross-claims against defendant Burnham, LLC as successor to

Burnham Corporation, be dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York 4114 , 2010 rAdw-

mi&u\ F A ~ ~ I ; , E s q . Weitz & Luxenberg, LLC Attorneys f o r Plaintiff ( s ) ESTATE ARNOLD TOM BURNHAM, LLC . , LITTLEWOOD, LITTLEWOOD 177 Montague Street ARNOLD M, LITTLEWOOD EVA M Brooklyn, New York 11201

New York, NY 10038 Our File No.: 11084-1 Tel No. : (212) 558-5500

700 Broadway (718) 855-9000

Hon. &E%y k. Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _________ I___________________ I_______ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30

______-I____________-------__-------- -X This Document Relates to: Index No. : 125070/99 ESTATE ARNOLD TOM LITTLEWOOD, NO OPPOSITION LITTLEWOOD ARNOLD M, LITTLEWOOD EVA M, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

P 1 aint i f f ( s ) MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Heitler)

- against -

GOULDS PUMPS, INC., et al.

Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismissed with prejudice and

Dated:

without costs.

P A FJLED

a n q (ICE

d Dykman LLP \Att/ok6ys for Defendant Attorneys f o r Plaintiff ( s )

ESTATE ARNOLD TOM WLDS PUMPS, INC. LITTLEWOOD, LITTLEWOOD 177 Montague Street ARNOLD M, LITTLEWOOD EVA M Brooklyn, New York 11201

New York, New York 10003 Our File No.:6754-4418 700 Broadway (718) 855-9000

212-558-5500

0 z m P i

So Ordered:

5 3 6 . 0 8 4 0 3 / A J M SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK



VIRGINIA M. BURNS, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs .


Defendants.


Index No. : 1 2 5 0 7 3 / 9 9









crossclaims against defendant, United

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice an

DATED: ?.--A/$ East Hanover, New 3 0 2014 Jersey

GARRITY, GRAHAM, MURPHY, GAROFALO & FLINN

700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation


SO ORDERED, -

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler Ai-jK 3 0 2010


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ _ _ l - - - - - - - - - - r " r l r _ _ _ _ _ l l _ _ _ _ l f _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S.)

Index No: 100547/00

Allan Charles Reese NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


ORDERED, that upon n against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., b without costs.

Dated: New York, New York La/& 7 3 , Z d O

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07102-301 7 973-624-0800


A.PR 302010

959877. I

. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. - - -.


. . . . . ._ .



JAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL Index No. 109647197

p-> NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing


t h e r e being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-de

against defendant BMCE fnc., be and the same are hereby dismissed

Broadway - 7th floor

Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788

New York, NY 10003



1N RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO;

JAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL




dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with


ORDERED,that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby

New York, NY 10003 Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788

SO ORDERED,




JAMES MARSHALL and MARY MARSHALL Index No. 109647/97

Q-0-J



judgment in t h e above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,




against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be

prejudice-and without costs.

New York, NY 10003

and the same are hereby

Robert A. Keasbey Co, Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I1788

SO ORDERED,


IN RE NEW Y O N CITY X ___l_-- - - l l__r- -___lr - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Thomas J. Cruger, Sr

NYCAL I.A.S, Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No: 11 1243-02 12 1743-97 10522 1-98


WHEREFORE, defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest tu Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

I -7 ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all

defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in inter the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and w


Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co. 150 East 42"d Street New York, New York 10017

Our File No. 07536.08563 2 12-490-3000

kpR '3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

39491 75.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ANTHONY BURZESI,

Plaintiffs,

-against-


Defendants.


Index No.: 121854/9 1 03 594100 0 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’




defendant, Treaawell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York q v j ,2010

Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Anthony Burzesi WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500


>.< 3 0 2010 y “ 4 fi

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -X IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - - -X This Document Relates to: Rudell Harry Belvin and Adele Biele Belvin,

Plaintiffs, - against -

A . C . & S. Inc., et a l . ,

NY CAI; I.A.S. Par t 30 (Judge Heitler)


WHEREFORE, defendant Goulds Pumps I n c . , hereby requestz

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 53212, dismissing plaintiffs'

Complaint against defendant Goulds Pumps I n c . , w i t h prejudice, anc

there being no opposition thereto, -

ORDERED, that upon notice to a l l co-defendants, all claims anc

cross claims against defendant Goulds Pumps Inc. , be dismissed w i t 1

prejudice and without cos ts .

Dated: Brooklyn, New York Lllrlp , 2 0 1 0

Michael Fanelli, Esq. Weitz ti L-axrnberg, P.C. Cullen ar,d Dykrnan LLP Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Rudell H a r r y B e l v i n and Go u 1 ds Pumps In c . A d e l e B i e l e B e l v i n 177 Montague Street 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201


New York, New York 10003 (718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No. : 6 7 5 p &

So Ordered: @

APR 3 0 2010

rl SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL

3 ASBESTOS LITIGATION


MALICK D. BYRNE AND ELIZABETH A. BYRNE,

j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

: Index No.:

i NO OPPOSITION

\ MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC,, et al.

Defendants. !





ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defgndants, all claims and cross claims against


without costs.

Dated: New York, New York M441~44 ,A ,2010

&,"'

Attorney for Plaintiffs Malick D. Byrne and Elizabeth A. Byrne WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

1235-9975




ROSEMARY SCHIANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF DANIEL SCHIANO

Index No. 105249/00



judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,




against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with


DATED: I

4ttor 3 eys for Plaintiff deitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor Vew York, NY 10003

201 0

Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I 1 788

5 0 ORDERED,

. .. .

c &4





Index No. 105249/00



udgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

jismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Robert A. Keasbey Co., with

irejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,


irejudice and without costs.


JATED: ,2010

Andrew M. Warshauer Attorneys for Defendant Robert A. Keas 700 Broadway - 7th floor

New York, NY 10003

Hauppauge, NY 1 1788

5 0 ORDERED,

APR 3 0 2010





Index No. 105249/00


I ,'

WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212, dismissing




against defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

DATED: 201 0

Andrew M. Warshauer Attorneys for Defendant BMCE Inc. Weiner Lesniak LLP

Neitz 8 Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor Vew York. NY 10003

888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I 1 788

SO ORDERED,

... . -. . .. . .. . ..


ASBESTOS LITIGATION


DANIEL SCHIANO AND ROSEMARY I

SCHIANO,

i I.A.S. Part 30 ; (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 105249/00 I

I I

I NO OPPOSITION

I MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff(s) i I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I

I I I I I I

-against- I


Defendant(s). I






defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: Ngw York, New York

/APR O *010

McGiv KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Schiano and Rosemary Schiano 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

NOOOl805-I


APR 3 0 2010 2383-2709

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 ; (Heitler, J.)


DANIEL SCHIANO AND ROSEMARY SCHIANO, I

Index No.: 105249/00 I I I

I NO OPPOSITION

; MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff( s) ; SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I

I -against- I


Defendant(s). I




opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.


Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Schiano and Rosemary Schiano 700 Broadway New York, New York I O O O F I L E D

P-

APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK cnuru7-Y cum#@$ o m

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

NO00 I801 - I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 105249/00 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I


I I

I NO OPPOSITION

I MOTION AND ORDER

I

Plaintiff(s) I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- I I I I I I I


Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summary judgment


complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: N w York, New York @- ,2010

Attorneys for Defendants Patterson Pump Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

A

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Schiano and Rosem Schiano

New 700 Broadway York, New York 1000 P I L E D (2 12) 558-5500

APR 3 o zoia

NEW YORK C a U N T V C ~ ~ S ~ 4 -3 0

SO ORDERED,

FPR 3 0 2010 NDOOl798- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION



: I.A.S. Part 30 ( (Heitler, J.)

: Index No.: 105249/00 I

I I I

I NO OPPOSITION Plaintiff( s) SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER -against- I

I I I I I I


Defendant( s) . I




thereto,


defendant, Treadwell Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.


6a&ook, Esq. Daniel Blouin,&sq. VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Schiano and Rosemary @i#o L E D 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 3 o ma

SO ORDERED, ~ U N ~ c L E R l c S Q F F l c F NEW YORK

1235-6497

NOOOI 802-1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL,



I Index No.: 105249/00 I I I


I NO OPPOSITION Plaintiff( s) SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER -against- I

I I I I I I


De fendant(s). I

WHEMFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary


plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. with prejudice, and






aniel Blouin, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel Schiano and Rosemary Schiano 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

F I L E & WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 *PR 3 0 zore (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

p#F - -- 324-5269

NOOOI 793-1




RICHARD KURT2


Index No:-

12 1981/99






prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .* .


claims against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, ~

be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost

Dated: New York,

Charles Ferguson, WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03445024.1





SABE VARSANO

IndexNo: 1


WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed

Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross .-

claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York F I L E D

v-\y-\Cl

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0003

Y New York, New York 10022

(21 2) 558-5500 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, Hon. S h e r j K; tleitler

US-ACTIVE-I 03446217.1


NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

(Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 0 N

SABE VARSANO fl07144100 >

125770199






prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .-.




Dated: New York, New York +I T-\a

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 12) 558-5500

with

I


Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (21 2) 521 -5400

SO ORDERED, 3 0 2010 Hon. SKerG K. Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 03446225.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ " " _ _ _ _ _ l l _ _ _ _ _ _ " l _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - l l l - - - " - - - - - - - - - - - -


Index No&=) 122 198/99

Royal Howard Trimlett NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,



Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG \ Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark,New r y 71 973-624-080!$1 e gob

I

APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK mUNTY CLERK'S 0-

Won. Sherry Klein Heitler SO ORDERED,

959877.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X __-__- -___- -" - -_ l - -____l___r__l_________-


112458/00 Rudolph F. Migliore


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKF being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-de against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same ar without costs.

Dated: New York, New York l!&imzaab

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street

Adam 1. M n i s , Es4 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07102-3017 973-624-0800


959877.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X ___ l____- - f - -__ -_____ l____ l___________r_ -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Albert Pallamollo

NYCAL I.A.S. Pm 39 (Heitler, S.)

1 15948/03


X - - - - - * . , - - - - -

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, .- INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

OAKFABCO, NC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-3017 973 -624-0800

SO ORDERED,

959877.1


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.) I

IndexN .. 109431/00 1221&9/99 I I 0 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L, MATHIS, I I

Plaintiff( s) I NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT -against- : MOTION AND ORDER

I I I I I I

J


Defendant( s).




thereto,



without costs.

Dated: New Y rk, New York Ilj 4 ,2010

7*- MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

2%

I

I

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1235-14073

NO001 123-1 APR 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ' I NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS,

: I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.) I

Index No. 10943 1 /00 122 1 89/99 I I I 0 I

Plaintiff( s) I NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT



Defendant@). I I

WHEREFORE, defendant Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary







Dated: New York, New York h d I 9 ,2010

3

i ', 1

I

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

John L. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff b

Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

A A

SOORDEED, 1 Hon .

324-50601

NO001 125-1 bPW 3 0 2018'

--.--


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I /-7 I I Index N y 4 3 1/00) 122 1 89/99

JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS, I I I

Plaintiff( s) NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT


A.C. & S,, INC., et al., I I I I I Defendantls).


in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules yj 3212, dismissing plaintiff's


opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York *I1 q ,2010

3

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith L. Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 12) 558-5500


1122-14663

NOOOl124-1


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J,)

Index No : 10943 1/00 122 189/99 I c3 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

JOHN L. MATHIS AND JUDITH L. MATHIS, I

I I

Plaintiff( s) I NO OPPOSITION SIJMMARY JUDGMENT


A.C. & S., INC., et al,, I I I I Defendant(s). I







and without costs.

Dated: Ne rk, New York ,2010

LUGER, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Michael Fanelli, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff John L. Mathis and Judith Mathis 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(212) 558-5500


APR 3 0 201fl 2383-40051

,I

I

I

I !

j i I

NO001 122-1

G k




KARL MULLER Index No. 109465/00







against defendant Robert A. Keasbey Co., be and the same are

orejudice and without costs.

DATED:

O W

Robert A. Keasbey Co. Weiner Lesniak LLP

700 Broadway - 7th floor Vew York, NY 10003

888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY I 1788

3 0 ORDERED,

1-

< Ls.


IN RE: NEW YORK C I N ASBESTOS LITIGATION


KARL MULLER Index No. 109465/00






ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, c i s a against defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the sa # e a k & r e c i!#!is:dmzith

ApR 3 0 2010 prejudice and without costs.

Weitz 8 Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003

Lockheed Martin Corp. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 1 1788

SO ORDERED,

e

,+

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


IRVING BERNSTEIN AND IDA BERNSTEIN,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S . , INC., et al.

Defendants.









without costs.

, 2010 F I L E D

APR 3 0 2010

Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & UUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Irving Bernstein and Ida Bernstein


WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, > Won. Sherry Klein Heitler

ii;;"d 3 0 2010 1235-480

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _______ I____________r_ l_ r______r_______ l -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

John M. Mallon

NYCAL 1,A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, S.) n

Index N<-0 121 5 1400



ross claims ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are without costs.

Dated: New York, New York fi\-cJAGh 2"" 7 i?&!L

m Z&> Matthew MacIntyre, E&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street


OAKFABCO, INC.



904073.1


IN RE NEW Y O N CITY _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Rudolph F. Migliore

CAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S.)


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, XNC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAK being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-de against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same ar without costs.

Dated: New York, New York l i 4 G t a a X Q

Adam 1. M n i s , E s t WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07 102-301 7

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street

973-624-0800

SO ORDERED, % Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

959a77. I


j I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! (Heitler, J,)


BETTY J. SCHRANCK, Individually as Personal Representative for the Estate of RUSSELL SCHmNCK,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., el al.

Defendants.

Index No.: 113834/00








without costs.

Dated: New ork, New 3 /bl Y

York 2010

F I L E D

COUNTY CLERK'S

. Cook, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEV & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Betty J. Schranck and Estate of Russell Schranck WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. S h e q x l e i n Heitler

1235-1266

4

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK IOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JOAN MALASPINA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF FAUSTO MALASPINA, Plaintiff(s),

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) ET AIL. Defendants.

-clr*ii*p

vs.


INDEX NO.: 1133WOO







defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation

costs.

WEITZ & Frank Ortiz, Esq.

ERSON, McNEILL, P Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, gth Fl. New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Riley Stoker Corporation 233 Broadway New York, New York 10279

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: r Hon. Sherry Kl-itler

A T

c - 1

s rhis Document Relates To:

MARY LAMBRUSCHI, as Executrix for the 3state of REGINALD J. LAMBRUSCHI, and MARY LAMBRUSCHI as Spouse, COMPANY

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ON

BEHALF OF FORD MOTOR

Index No.: 115767/00 Plaintiff(s), :

-against-

4.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.,

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs zomplaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDEMD, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 16,2010

FEINSTEIN & 360 Lexington Ave. DEUTSCH, LLP New York, New York 10017 Attorneys for MARY LAMBRUSCHI as Executrix for the Estate of REGINALD J. LAMBRUSCHI and MARY LAMBRUSCHI as

Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 757 Third Avenue New York, New

Spouse T: 2 12-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970

APR 3 2010 4

(00859198.DOC 100842682

s

lOUNTY OF NEW YORK


ANGEL0 RUNCO AND FELICETTA RUNCO,

a".

PLAINTIFF(S),

vs. AC AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al.,

DEFENDANTS.


INDEX NO.: 115822/00


WHEREFORE, defendant, DB Riley, Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint agains

defendant, DR Riley, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant, DE3 Riley, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

F I L E D

ON, McNEILL, P.C. Giovanni #gins, gsq. WATERS, b&JHl?RSON, McNEILL, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway 233 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for DB Riley, Inc,

New York, New York 10279 (212) 558-5500 (212) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: €-Ion. Sherry Klein Heitler


ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 1 101 83/0 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

IRVING BERNSTEIN AND IDA BERNSTEIN,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- j MOTION AND ORDER


Defendants. ~







without costs.

F I L E D APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK J C Q U ~ CLERKS 0FFK;F-

’ &l&Q -

t&&duL ‘q- Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiffs Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Irving Bernstein and Ida Bernstein WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

n A


j : , : ,.i 3 Ll 201Q 1235-480

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL


i Index No.: 118681/0O

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ELAINE SPARACINO, as Executrix for the Estate of ATHANASIO ORESTIS and CARMEN ORESTIS, Individually, i NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, i MOTION AND ORDER

-against-


Defendants. i







without costs.

Dated: New Y rk New York q % 4 ,2010

Treadwell Corporation

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

MCGIVNEY & mUGER, P.C.

(212) 509-3456

Estate of Athanasio Orestis and Carmen Orestis

700 Broadway NewYork,NewYorkfba L E D WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

(212) 558-5500

APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK So ORDERED,

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler COUNTY CLERICS-

LiJJd 3 i) 2010 1235-2385

t -


IN RE NEW YORK CITY _- -_____ l____r___ l___r_ l f__ l r___________- X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Frank SchuIte


Index No: 106977/01 (l-Tf?-T*

, -


X


against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., without costs.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims be and thesame are hereby

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 071 02-301 7 973 -624-0 800

I".

SO ORDERED, APR 3 0 2010 Hon. Sherry klei'n Heitler

959877. I

- - .-.


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _____r - - - -_ l___"r - - -__________ l____ l____-

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

James McKenna (Dec.)

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.) i

I0075803

WHEmFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 1 7

2 12-558-5500

973-624-0 8 00

904073.1

S U P E M E COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN F S NEW YORK CITY ______- -___ l_____ l l -___r___ l_____r______- X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Russell A. Ndley


IndexN &G& 1 1 075 58/0 1 100 1 34/06

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY I

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, JNC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Dated: New York, New York Ih\&J&z:P,-Ld10

; Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG VI Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

SO ORDERED, e WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, N e w p 4 bOeOD 973-624-0800

3 302010

959877. I

APR 3 0 2010

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 3 0 (Judge Heitler)

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering CO, I n c , ,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering

CO. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition there to , .-


Cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. I n c . ,

Index No. :

Plaintiffs, - against - NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT A . C . & S. Inc., et al., MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. - -X

Dated: Brooklyn, New York , 2010

- kG I Esq. Weit z & Luxinberg, p . c . Attorneys for Plaintiffs Edward J. Reilly and Mary Reilly Inc. 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

Attorneys for Defendant M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co.

(718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 10924-1271

SO Ordered: Hon. S h e r r Y K . Heitler


ASBESTOS LITIGATION


FRANK H. HARVEY AND CATHERINE HARVEY,

j I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

i NO OPPOSITION

i MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A, C, & S., INC., et al.

Defendants.







without costs.

Dated: New ork, New York 3//& ,2010

F I L E D APR 3 0 2010

3

I

Ke ann ook,Esq. Attorney for Defendant Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Frank H. Harvey and Catherine Harvey WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1235-2762


3 IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! NYCAL j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, J.)

j Index No.: 100788/01 THlS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

FRANK H. HARVEY and CATHERINE HARVEY, , , ,

i NO OPPOSITION

! MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, i SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants. j





_.. ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against "-


without costs,

Dated: New York, New York q\ 9 ,2010

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

APR 30 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK

lN RE NEW YORK CITY ___r__C-__f - - -_ f -___r____lr r___r_______l - X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Richard Clough


100754/03


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, XNC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Dated: New York, New York pQ!IQff&-&L, 10

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

SO ORDERED,

WILSON, E S R, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, XNC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-3017

ts 973-624-0800

949043.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK r -__ -__ l -__"________________ l__ l r__ l____-

JN RE NEW YOFX CITY x

NYCAL

(Heitler, S.)

Index No: 105913/01

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 39

X _ - _ _ - - _ d _ _ _ * - _ d - -


Robert W. Coggins

T


-HEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismiss( without costs.

Dated: New York New York (LAc-f&7 is 2d\ 0

WEITZ & LUXENBERG WILSON@ESER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 1 2-558-5500


OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 1 7 973 -624-0 800

959877.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK .."

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MARIE QUIRK, Individually and as Personal Representative for the Estate of THOMAS A. QUIRK, Plain tiff(s),

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTMCTING & SUPPLY) ET AL. Defendants.

vs.


1 INDEX NO,: 120434/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

1 ORDER







F I L E D I

costs.

\ > Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6'h F1. New York, New York 10003

WEITZ & L U X E N ~ G , P.


(2 12) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ZOUNTY OF NEW YORK


Index Nd$2-) I 1 8216198


JUNIA L. CROCKETT as the Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT N. CROCKETT and JUNIA L. CROCKETT, Individually



iudgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,






DATED: 3 -31 ,2010

Attorneys for Plaintiff Weitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003 Weiner Lesniak LLP ‘ 4 R Attorneys for Defend ant

Robert A. Keasbey Co.

888 Veterans Memorial i hway Hauppauge, NY 11788 @ 4



IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION FRANCIS J. TABONE, as Administrator for the Estate of EMMANUEL TABONE, and ELIZABETH BRODSY, Individually, Plaintiff(s),

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) ET AL. Defendants.

vs.


INDEX NO.: 120779/00








costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

F I L E D

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6th F1. New York, New York 10003


(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878


SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF Nl3W YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ELIZABETH BRODSKY, Individually and as Proposed Executrix for the Estate of EMMANUEL TABONE,

Plaintiffs,

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., etal.

Defendants.


Index No.: 120779/00



the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Ij 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'




-dice and

Treadwell Corporation MCGTVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Elizabeth Brodsky and Estate of Emmanuel Tabone WEITZ & LUXENBEKG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

ABR 3 0 2010 Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler

1235-2416


IN RF, NEW Y O N CITY X _ _ _ _ _ l r - - _ _ " " _ _ ~ " ~ _ - _ - - 1 - r - - 1 - - - - - l l r - - - - ~ ~ - - - - ~ " ~ ~ - ~ ~


c , -

Index No: 1121


X I " - - -

John M. Mallon

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, TNC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all ross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are without costs. .f

Dated: New York, New York hI.&d 2"" 3 Zbb

/3zLkz Z4&> Matthew Maclntyre, E&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street


OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 17 973 -624-0 800

.:" g? 3 0 2010

904073. I

SLTPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S.Part30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: Index No.: 121569/00

WILLIAM DOWNS,

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S,, INC., et al.

Defendants. !







without costs.

Dated: New Yor , New York 3 I;-i ,2010

ok, Esq.

Treadwell Corporation William Downs MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

_ - 1235-21955


II

- -

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NELDA KLINE, as Executrix for the Estate of SIDNEY P. KLINE and NELDA KLINE, Individually, Plaintiff(s),


vs.


INDEX NO.: 122594/00


WHEREFORE, defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, improperly impleaded as DE Riley, Inc.






costs. F I L E D

ERSON, McNEILL, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, gfh F1. New York, New York 10003


(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: - - Hen. Sherry Kleinwitler

I' PR 3 0 2010


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PATRICIA VENEZIANO, as Executrix for the Estate of RONALD P. McENTYRE, and PATRICIA VENEZIANO, as Executrix for the Estate of EDNAMAE McENTYRE, Plaintiff(s),


vs.


INDEX NO.: 123224/00







defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, be and the same are hereby d i s r n i s s e v l qelu costs.

WEITZ & LUXENBER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6th F1. New York, New York 10003


(212) 558-5500 (21 2) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Kleinweitler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK TN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY j NYCAL -_ , - -. .

ASBESTOS LITIGATION i I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, 5.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: j Index No.: 123777/00

BEATRICE SHEA, Individually and Executrix for j the Estate of FREDERICK AMES,

i NO OPPOSITION


-against-


Defendants. i


the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’





without costs.

Dated: New Y rk, New York 3 p.. ,2010 F I L E D APR 3 o ma

CF

Treadwell Corporation MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004

Beatrice Shea and Estate of Frederick Ames WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDEWD,

wri 3 0 2010 1235-1192


IN RE NEW YORK CITY _ f - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ " l _ _ _ _ _ - - I - r r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Alan Edward Pauze


Index No: 113354/99 c - 7 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT ! MOTION AND ORDER


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. ".. Dated:

Adam J. Kipds, Esq. 1 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

OAKFABCO, JNC.

Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500 33 Washington Street

Hon. Sherry ein Heitler SO ORDERED,

959877. I


IN RE NEW YORK CITY r r________ l_____"____ l l___ l____ l_____r__- X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Marjorie Ann Pauze, as Administratrix for the Estate of Alan Edward Pauze, and Marjorie Ann Pauze, Individually


Index No: 1133 99 e 243 3 9/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER I I

_ _ _ - - - _ " r - _ _ " _ - _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - X

WHEREFORE, defendant A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


I

.-

Danny Kraft, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, N.Y., 10003

SO ORDERED, fi Hon. Sherr K. eitler

3885749. I

l . \ ( d i ( 3 ir 2010


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X - _ _ _ _ " _ - - - _ _ _ - l l - _ _ l - - - - - - - - l - - - " - " - - - - - - - -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S,)

Index No: 124526/00

Frank S. Hitchcock NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

X -1 - - " - - - - -1 - - -_ - - - - -1________1_1______1_-



Dated: New York New York h f C h 52' zcl IO

WEITZ & LUXENBERG 3 0 1''' WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 1 7 973-624-0800

2 12-558-5500

APR 3 u 2010

959877.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 EDWARD MAZUR, JR. and BARBARA A. MAZUR,

NYCAL

(HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER)

INDEXNO.: 10 1251 32/00

ADIENCE, INC., ET AL. a NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER





ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendslnts, all claims andcross claims against


costs.

A

F \ L E D APR 3 o ma

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6th F1. New York, New York 10003


(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW Y O N COUNTY j NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


FRANK €3. HARVEY AND CATHERINE HARVEY,

j I.A.S. Part 30 j (Heitler, 1.)

i Index No.: 119391/00 100781/01 a i NO OPPOSITION


-against-


Defendants, i





ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claim?. against


without costs.

,2010 APR 3 0 2010

Treadwell Corporation MCG~VNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Frank H. Harvey and Catherine Harvey WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon.’Shehy Kyein Heitler

12352162

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAL

j I . A S Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

j Index No . 100788/01 119391/00

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


FRANK H. HARVEY and CATHERINE HARVEY, a

\ NO OPPOSITION

j MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, j SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A. C. & S., INC., et al.,

Defendants. i


the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $ 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'





without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 3\\ "\ ,2010

APR 3 0 2pa

-&?&-- EwvoRK

'$-ccanL ut Attorney for Plainti Frank H. Harvey a WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1 SO Maiden Lane New York, New York I 0038

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 0 2010


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JOANN KAZAKWIC, as Personal Representative for the Estate of CHARLES A. KAZAKWIC, JR. and JOANN KAZAKWIC, Individually, Plaintiff(s),


VS,


INDEX NO.: 101913/01








costs,

Frank Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBE&&& Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, Bth Fl. New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys forkdef Stoker Corporation 233 Broadway New York, New York 10279 (21 2) 227-7878

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK :OUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MARGARET A. JOYCE, as Executrix for the Estate of HAROLD L. JOYCE, and MARGARET A. JOYCE, Individually, Plaintiff(s),


vs.


INDEX NO.: 101925/01








costs.

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6'h F1. New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

F I L E D APR 3 o ma I n

RSON, McNEILL, P.C. Stoker Corporation

233 Broadway New York, New York 10279 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry KleivHeitler


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 ; (Heitler, J.)


CAROL M. ABRAMSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND I

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER ABRAMSKI, I NO OPPOSITION

Index No.: 102567/01 I

I I

; SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

I

Plaintiff( s)

-against- I I I I I


Defendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Patterson Pump Company, hereby requests summaq judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Patterson Pump Company with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Patterson Pump Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

F I L E D APR 3 0 2010

Attorneys for Defendants Patterson Pump Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Alexander Abramski 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 . ,

454-0375

SO ORDERED,

N0000737-1




CAROL M. ABRAMSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND I

AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER ABRAMSKI, ! NO OPPOSITION

! Index No.: 102567/01 I

I I

Plaintiff(s) ; SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER I I I

I I I I I

"against- I


Defendant(s). I I

4. - -






defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, be and the same are hereby i ed with prejudice

and without costs. p h . E ~ Dated: Mew YoLk, New York u+w, 4 ,2010

r r

Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004


(212) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500


N0000742-1 A P R 302010

2383-22513



I THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

CAROL M. ABRAMSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER ABRAMSKI, I NO OPPOSITION

Plaintiff( s)

I Index No.: 102567/01

I I

I I

I I I I I

-against- I

A.C. & S., NC., et al.,

Defendads). I

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests s u m m q






and without costs.

APR 3 0 2014

Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004


(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

2383-22513

N0000742- I , APR 3 0 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION ! I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I : Index No.: 102567/01 CAROL M. ABRAMSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF ALEXANDER ABRAMSKI, I NO OPPOSITION

I I

Plaintiff(s) : SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

I

I I I I I I '

-against- I


Defendant( s) . I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 5 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company with



defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New ;York, New York

M c & W KLUGER, P.C. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Alexender Abramski 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-5991

APR 3 0 2010 N0000732-1

-. . . -. . . ..


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _ _ l _ l - - - - - _ l l " - - - _ _ _ I - - - l - t r - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - - - - - -


James McRenna (Dec.)

Index No: I 1938000 - 10075803


X - - -

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC,, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Y

WEI rz & LUXENBERG EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC.

Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500

h

33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 17 973-624-0800

904073. I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _________________- I_____________ I____ -X NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 30

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Heitler) -X _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

This Document Relates to: Henry Stude and Enza Stude, Index No.: 104980/01

Plaintiffs, - against - NO OPPOSITION

j SUMMARY JUDGMENT A.C. & S. Inc., et al., MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section § 3 2 1 2 , dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against

defendant Burnham LLC, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


cross claims against defendant Burnham LLC, be dismissed with


Dated: Brooklyn, New York qlr b

fiw'IL.h4 p*+17 w. ..., , E a q . Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Cullen and Dykman LLP Attorneys f o r Plaintiffs Attorneys f o r Defendant Henry Stude and E n z a Stude B u r n h a m LLC 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New

(718) 855-9000 Our File No.: 1108


IN RE NEW YOFX CITY _"___--_____l__________lr l______l l l_____- X

NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, \\

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, a1 against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, be and the s with prejudice and without costs.


I &(&rl r,

dL &cv% Danny Kraft, Esq, Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, N.Y., 10003

New York, New York 100 17 Our File. Number: 05335.00001

SO ORDERED,

3892928,l


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X _____l______ll_______ll______________l__-

ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S . )

Index No cicE> 1 19398/00

Robert W. Coggins NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER


ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same ar without costs.

Dated: New York, New York w 2 2C)m

Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 2 1 2-5 5 8-5 500

OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 1 02-30 1 7 973-624-0800

\


959877.1

SUPFLEME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY l " _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ " _ _ _ _ _ c _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ " X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Richard Clough


100754/03



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendan1 OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:. New York, New York /k!?*.r&k. &?- , /o


SO ORDERED,

MOSKOWITZ,

OAKFABCO, XNC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 102-30 17 973-624-0800

949043.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X ______ l_*____ l______L____r r___________ l_ -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Albert Anthony Rahey


Index No: 106459/01


I



n )+f

Joseph W i l l i e 4 . k WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

SO ORDERED, *+- Hon. Sherry K ein Heitler

APR 3 2010

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street ',

958753.1


N RE NEW YORK CITY X _ - _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l l _ _ _ l r _ _ _ - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Vito Pietanza and Raffaella Pietanza

" .I "


Index No: 100 2/03 A, W


X . * l . . - - - -*- l

WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Danny ha f t , Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, N.Y., 10003

Our File Number: 05335.00001

_.-

SO ORDERED,

3886296.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - I I _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ - X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Frank Schulte


1 19379/00 100779/03


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there i being no opposition thereto, I

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., without costs.

w York, New ork Dated: &/& ,?d&

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500


EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07 1 02-30 1 7 973-624-0800

I 959877.1

.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY _- - - I___________________________I____ -X NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. P a r t 30

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Judge Heitler) -X

This Document Relates to: Edward J. Reilly and Mary Reilly, Index No. :

Index No. :%-$ Plaintiffs,

- against - NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S . Inc., et al., MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. -X

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario EL DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,


pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section S3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering

Co. I n c . , with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,

F I L E D I be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

/

len arid Dylr - AW/-, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys f o r Defendant Edward J. Reilly and M a r y M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co. Reilly Inc. 700 Broadway, 6th Floor 177 Montague Street New York, New York 10003 Brooklyn, New York 11201

(718) 8 5 5 - 9 0 0 0 Our File No.: 10924-1271

-. .

So Ordered: Hon. SherwK. Heitler


IN RE NEW YORK CITY - I - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Russell A. Ridley



ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claim and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, ** INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York (hl&,&2;3,-2d)u


WILSON, ELSER, MOSROWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, N e w p 4 bOE00 973-624-0800

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 39 (Heitler, S . )

959877.1


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION RUSSELL A. RIDLEY and GLORIA PONIDEXTES, Plaintiff(s),


vs.


INDEX NO.: 107558/01




Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Riley Stoker Corporation, with




costs.

WEITZ & LUXENB Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway, 6th F1. New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

F I L E D

Stoker Corparation 233 Broadway New York, New York 10279 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED:

1



I Index No.: 108005/01 THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

LORRAINE ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF DANIEL I ROBINSON, I NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff(s) MOTION AND ORDER

I

-against-


Defendant(s). I




opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby d is rn issekik & e e b d

without costs. APF3 3 0 2010

Dated: New rk New York T p ,2010

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, Inc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.c.. Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Daniel Robinson 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500


1122-19771

N0001434-1 APR 3 0 2010

i i I

i

.. ‘ I


ASBESTOS LITIGATION ; J.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)


: Index No.: 108005/01 LORRAINE ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND : AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF DANIEL I ROBINSON, I NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff(s)

I

“against-


I I I I I I I I

Defendads). I




thereto,



without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 4/ 4 ‘ ,2010

M ~ Y & KLUGER, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Treadwell Corporation 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Daniel Robinson 700 Broadway New York, New York 10 E I L E D

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500 APR 3 0 201@

NEW YORK COUNTY C%flk$&-

SO ORDERED,

NO00 I 374- 1 APR 3 0 2818


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 108005/01 I I


LORRAINE ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF DANIEL ROBINSON, I NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff( s) MOTION AND ORDER

I

-against-

A,C. & S,, INC., et al.,

I I I I I I I I

Defendant(s). I






defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: N q i v, New York ,20 1 0

9 p o k , Esq. :Y & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants Tishman Liquidating Corporation SO Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Daniel Robinson

i 700 Broadway ~ e w York, New York 10003 F 1 L E D ,

(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherrv Klein E

bpR 3 0 zolo SO ORDERED,


NO001 433-1


I I.A.S. Part 30 I (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 108005/0 1

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I

I I


LORRAINE ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF DANIEL

I NO OPPOSITION ROBINSON, I I SUMMARY JUDGMENT I MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff( s)

-against-


Defendant(sl I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests summary

3212, dismissing judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules




defendant, Safeguard Industrial same are hereby dismissed with


A a Dated: New York, New York

! i I

I

Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Estate of Daniel Robinson 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (2 12) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

324-6190

536.07146/AJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW COUNTY OF NEW YORK



JAMES McGEE, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

vs .

UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, et al. ,

Defendants.

YORK


Index No, : 110498/01


NO OPPOSITION SuMMaRY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







crossclaims against defendant, United Conveyor Cor+o#Rion, be and the

FRANK M. ORTIZ, E S 0 . d STEPREN F.

Attorneys f o r Plaintiff & FLINN 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10003 United Conveyor Corporation


-. SO ORDERED,

Honorable gheryy Klein Heitler

APR 3 0 2010

' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL COUNTYOFNEWYORK

ASBESTOS LITIGATION : I.A.S, Part 30

3


(Heitler, J.) THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

RAYMOND PFLIEGLER, I I

Plaintiff(s) I

I I NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER -against- I SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I I I I

I Defendant( s) . I



dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company with



defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. FI LE-IF Dated: New York, New York

,20 10

Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond Pfliegler 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

(2 12) 509-3456 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon. Shehy Klein Heitler

324-5985AK

N0000175-1


Index No.: 11 1867/01 In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NICHOLAS DELFINO, Plaintiff(s),

- against -

AC and S , INC., (ARMSGTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-


Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-




to either party.

Dated: t4AwJ-i 50 , 2010 New York New York ZE7- (&/f@ ~

& h \ k Jennife dner, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

(212) 558-5500 Weil-McLain 830 Third Avenue, Suite

New York, NY 10022 1 L E D

(212) 651-7500 APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK SO ORDERED, COUNN CLERK‘S OFFIW



Index No.: 11 1229/01 119620/01 D THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: I

RAYMOND PFLIEGLER, I

Plaintiff(s) I I

' NO OPPOSITION

! MOTION AND ORDER I

-against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I

I I


Defendant(s). I I



dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company with



defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, be -and the same are hereby dismissed with


Dated: New York, New York ,20 10

MCGM K L U ~ E R , P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

F 1 LE'D APR 3 o zoia

/ Attorneys for Plaintiff Raymond Pfliegler 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, Hon, She&y Klein Heitler

324-5985AK

NODOO175-1



NO OPPQSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT M m 0

WETEREPORE, Defendant, American Financial Group, h c . (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant9') hereby requests summary judgment in the elbove-entitled case, pwsuant to CPLR $ 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant, Anadcan Financial Group, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDEFUTD, that upon Notice to all Co-Defendants, all Clahns and Cross-claims against Defendants, American Finamid Group, Inc., ba and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and witbut costs.

April 12,2010 Dated: -ti ew York, New Yark

&M W I T Z & LUXENBERG HODGSON RUSS, LLP

lL /fL~w:d.dl\ Micbasl Fanelli, Esquire

AlWrneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Alan Muraidekh, Esquire Attorneys far Defendant American Financial Graup, Inc.

60 East 42" Street New Yark, NOW York 101

A M 38 t@M J.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

G W T E D :

' I


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Thomas J, Cruger, Sr.


10522 1-98 11 1031-98 102783-00

WHEREFORE, defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co,, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all defendant ERICSSON INC., as successor in inter the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and w


Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 ERICSSON INC., as

successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Co. 150 East 42"d Street New York, New York 10017

Our File No. 07536.08563 2 1 2-490-3000

APR 3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

39491 75.1

Apr 14 10 10:27a

-against-

A.F. SUPPLY CORPORATION; et al

NYCAL I.A,S. Part 30 (Judge Heitler) ,

Index No.: 11654342

KO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTION AND ORDER RE: FEBRUARY 2010 FIFO

shia BROOKLYN PLUMBING & HEATING, hereby request summary judgement in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs' coinplaint against

defendant BROOKLYN PLUMBING & HEATING SUPPLY CORPORATION s/h/a BROOKLYN

PLUMBING & HEATING, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDEED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross claims against defendant

BROOKLYN PLlJ'MElJNG & HEATlNG SUPPLY CORPORATION dh/a BROOKLYN PLU

HEATING, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Albertson New York April A, 2010

Attorney for Plaintiff 360 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017

G & HEATING

BROOKLYN PLUMBING & HEATDIG 200 I.U. WiItets Road Albertsm, New York 1 1507 5 16) 53 5-5433

File No.: CNZZV1711N2 JAE

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I NYCAL I



EUGENE OBRIEN AND JANE O’BRIEN, I 10486 1 /97 I

I Plaintiff( s) I

NO OPPOSITION -against- : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C. & S,, INC, et al., : MOTION AND ORDER

Defendant(s). I I


in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules (j 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs


opposition thereto,


defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New Yprk, New York YIP ,2010

c

Attorneys for Defendants Courter & Company, lnc. 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eugene O’Brien and Jane O’Brien 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

11 22-3047

NO001 062-1

WHEREFORE, defendant COLUMBIA BOILERS hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant COLUMBIA BOILERS, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

COLUMBIA BOILERS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 5,2010

LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP FELDMAN ~ E F F E R , LLP 800 Third Avenue, 13' Floor

New York, NY 10022 110 Pearl Street, Suite 4 Buffalo, New York 1420

!

001 56872. WPD AQR 3 0 2010

ORIGINAL SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY X _______________1_1_111_1________________-----------------------

ASBESTOS LITIGATION X _____________________I__________________-----------------------


DIANE S. STONITSCH, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of GEORGE J. STONITSCH, JR., Deceased,

Plaintiff,

-against-

ARVINMERITOR, INC., et al., Including, MAREMONT CORPORATION,

Defendants .

Index No. 121949/02


WHEREFORE, defendant Maremont Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing

plaintiff's complaint against defendant Maremont Corporation with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

m

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims '&tinst

defendant Maremont Corporation be and the same

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April -7 21 2010

1

Peggy L. Pan, Esq. KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES &

Attorneys for Defendant 1633 Broadway New Y ork, New York 1 00 1 9

Attorneys for Plaintif FRIEDMAN LLP 747 Third Avenue New York, NY 100 17 (866) 298-9934

SO ORDERED, (212) 506-1700

m Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler (2-T 3 0 2010

SUPFSME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORJS COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

James McKenna (Dec.)


Index No: 11938000


WHEREFOREy defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,



Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC.

Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500 33 Washington Street


SO ORZ)ERED, f

Hon. Sherry Kkin Heitler ' jf,t" D b \ 3 Q aQ\Q

904073.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ___r___l_______f l_______l_____r___l____l - X

IN RE NEW YORK CITY NYCAL

(Heitler, S.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

-. ,

Richard Clough

Index No: 119398/00 10591 5/01

<Oi%ET>


WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,



WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York. New York 10003 2 12-558-5 500

OAKFABCO, NC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 071 02-30 17 973-624-0800

949043.1

3

! I


IN RE NEW YORK CITY l " _ - _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ _ l _ _ _ _ _ - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - X

NYCAL

(Heitler, S.)

Index No: 106977/01 1 19379/00


X _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f _ _ _ -


Frank Schulte -my


__r_-_____________lr_____lr_____lr r___l_- X

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and &ere being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, ING., without costs.

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG 'q Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 12-558-5500

be and the same

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 07102-301 7 973-624-0800

*-. Hon. Sherry lein Heitler APR 3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

959877.1

I I


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X ________"__"_____ l__ l_ l___r r____________-

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Vito Pietanza and Raffaella Pietanza


NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER I

WHEREFORE, defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Danny Kraft, Esq. Weitz & Luxenberg, PC Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadwav New York, N:Y., 10003 fl 150 E a s w e t

New Yor ew York 10017 Our File Number: 05335.00001

3886296.1 APR 3 t~ 2018


IN RE NEW Y O N CITY X _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ " _ _ r r r - - _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ r _ -


Albert Pallamollo

Index No: 122203/99

L-3 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

X


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby .- dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


OAKFABCO, INC.

Newark, New Jersey 07 1 02-3 0 1 7

700 Broadway Attorney for Defendant New York, New York 10003 212-558-5500 33 Washington Street

973 -624-0 800

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 0 2010

959877.1

SUPWME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

IN RE NEW Y O N CITY ______ l______ l____________r_____ l l l_____- X


Russell A. Ridley

Index No: 1 193&4/00 I

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT I

MOTION AND I

ORDER


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant OAKFABCO, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed .- with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York ( h i w &'2?,,X 10

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Attorney for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 2 1 2-5 5 8-5 5 00

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, N e w P 4 &OEOo 973-624-0800

959877.1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CclUNTY OF NEW YORK M RE: NEW YORK COUNTY i NYCAt

ASBESTOS LJTICiATION i I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitla, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: !

i IndexNo.: 105719/06 i

i SUMMARYJUDGMENT

LAWRENCE LJBROCQ wnd MARE LEBROCQ, : I

PlaintifFs, i NO OPPOSITION

-@rlst- i -ON AND OWER

A & M WHOLESALE HARDWARE CO., et al.

Def-.

I

I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Gem= Inmrporated, hereby quests summary judgmkt in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 0 32.12, dismissing plaintifk’

complaint against defendant, &msa Incorporated, with prejudice in thia action, and them being

no opposition t.heW,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all codehdants, all claim and cross clairru against

defendtmt, Gema Incorpolwted, be and the same are hemby dismissed with pjjudice and

without costs.

Dated: ew o NewYork p 7 ,2010

I

Gerosa Incorporatad MCGIVNEY & KLUcIER, P.C. 80 Broad Stre8-Suh 2300 New Yo* New York 10004 (212) 509-3456 (212) 267-3091

WILm& GOLDMAN & S P r I z q P.C. 110 William Stmet, 26th Floor New York, New Yo& 10038

SO ORDERED,

NOW24204


ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part 30 i (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMlENT REFERS TO: I

! Index No.: 105719/06 j

Plaintiffs, i NO OPPOSITION

LAWRENCE LEBROCQ and MARIE LEBROCQ, I

/ SUMMARY JUDGMENT -against- i MOTION AND ORDER

A & M WHOLESALE HARDWARE CO., et uZ.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Gemsa Incorporated, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law atzd Rules 0 3212, dismissing plahtiffs’

complaint against defendant, Gerosa Incorporated, with prejudice in this action, and there Wig



defendant, Gerosa Incorporated, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York New York 4 / ! 9 ’ ,2010

Gerosa Incorporated MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P,C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

0

Lawrence LeBmcq and Marie LeBrocq WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.C. 1 10 William Street, 26th Floor New York, New York 10038 (2 12) 267-309 1

SO ORDERFD,

PR 3 0 2010 NOW2620- I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O N COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL

I 1.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I

THIS DOCUMENT MFERS TO:

GEORGE ROUTHIER AND VERONICA I

ROUTHIER NO OPPOSITION

1 Index No.: 1 15679/06 I I

I SUMMARY JUDGMENT I MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff(s) I

-against- I I I I I I I

BEAZER EAST INC., et al.,

Defendant(s). I

WHEEFORE, defendant, Gerosa Incorporated, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 6 3212, dismissing plaintiff's

complaint against defendant, Gerosa Incorporated with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against I

defendant, Gerosa Incorporated be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York 4/17 ,2010 ApR 3 0 2010

P.C. w t b71k,L~%4d- , Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff S f ; / . Gerosa Incorporated 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

George Routhier and Veronica Routhier 110 William Street New York, New York 10038

(2 12) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

A H 3 0 2010 344-0461

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW Y O U COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I I NYCAL,

ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I.A.S. Part dv

(Heitler, J.) I I


GEORGE ROUTHIER AND VERONICA I

ROUTHIER NO OPPOSITION

I Index No.: 1 15679/06 I I

Plaintiqs) I SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

-against- I I

BEAZER EAST INC., et al.,

Defendant(s). I 4

WHEREFORE, defendant, Gerosa Incorporated, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiff’s

complaint against defendant, Gerosa Incorporated with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant, Gerosa Incorpomted be and the m e are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New Y k, New York @p-L 9 ,2010 ** Y & KLUGER, P.C.

3 0 2010 i

I

Attorneys for Plaintiff George Routhier and Veronica Routhier 1 10 William Street New Yo&, New York 10038

Attorneys for Defendants Gerosa Incorporated SO Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler f l o 9 1 3

(212) 509-3456

SO ORDERED,

2 ( tg 3 0 2010 461

... 3 . .-


IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATlON

I.

.. ROBERT SHERNOWIZ AND CARLENE SHERNOWITZ

Plaintiffs,

New York hbestos Litigation (NYCAL)

Index No.: 107014108

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

0IU)ER

-against-

NISSAN NORTH M I U C A , INC., el ab.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, NC., hereby requests summary udgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212!

iismissing plaintiff's Complaint against defendant, NTSSAN NORTH M I I I C A , INC., with

irejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

iefendant, NlSSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice md without costs.

L A W , Q'NEIL, RICCI, CEDRONE & DiSlPIO

merard Cedrone, Esq. 1

Leland 1. Kellner, Esq. Timothy J. McHugh, Esq.


420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 2900 Graybar Building New York, New York 10 170

Our File No.: 6087-94860

New York, New York 10038 NlSSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., (212) 558-5500

(212) 319-6898

$0-ORDERED:

WHERI31~OIIE, IMcndant AMIXlCAN I311.'1*RI'I'E INC., and its wholly owned subsidiaries

(Iiercin rcf'errcd to as "AMERICAN HII,*TRI'I'E INC."), hereby requests Summary Judgmenl in the

abovc-cntitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's'

complaint against Ilefendniit AMEIIICAN BILTlilTE INC,, with prejudicc, and there being 110

opposition thereto,

O I l ~ I l K E D , that upon noticc to all co-dcfcndanls, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,

AMERICAN l ~ l l d ' l ~ K I T I i INC., bc and the same are hereby dismissed with prcjudice and without costs to

either p r t y .

Ihtcd: Ncw York, Ncw York 2010

Atlunioys for Plaintiff 360 L,cxingtan Avenue, 20'" Floor NW York, Ncw Ytork IO0 I 7 ( 2 12) 986-2233

& MAIIONEY, 1,T'D. Attorneys for Defendant, American Uiltritc Inc., 830 Third Avenue, Suitc 400 Ncw York, New York 10022 (2 12) 65 1-7500

GEORGE J. RIBNICKY, JR., as Executor of the Estate of GEORGE J. RIBNICKY, SR.


08/190021

NO OPPOSFITON SUMMARYJUDGEMENT M-QBPlEB

WHEREFORE, defendant FORENTA L.P. hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint qdnst

dsfendant FORENTA L.P., with prejudice in this action, and them being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against dafendant

FORENTA L.P., be and the Same we hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Aprii 7.2010

Audrey P. Raphe, Esq. Aitwneyfor PIaints LEVY PHILLIPS t KONZGSBERG, U P 800 3" Ave. 13'FL

Richard L. Walker, Ekq. KELLY JASONS MCGUlRE & SPINELLI, LLP -0 Libnty PI., Suite 1900 50 south 16h smt

- Now York, NY I0022 Philadtlphia, PA 19102

SO ORDERED,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ..................................................... "-~-~--....-~-

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30

(Heitler, S.)

Index No.: 103352/09

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . This Document Relates to:

KENNETH ROBERT MORRILL and BONNIE MOFUULL JUDGMENT MOTION AND

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

ORDER


Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Federal Pacific with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto.


defendant Federal Pacific be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York New York &J ti; ,2010

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONISBERG, LLP 800 Third Avenue, 13'h Floor New York, New York 10022

88 Pine Street, 24'h Floor New York, Xew York 10005

SO ORDERED,

NOSJM-Revised (Morrill) (2).DOC

h




KENNETH ROBERT MORRILL and BONNIE MORRILL,

against

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., et al.,

1.A.S Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

INDEX NO.: 103352/09


WHEREFORE, defendant, Frick Company incorrectly pled as York Process System - Frick, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice

Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Frick Company

incorrectly pled as York Process System - Frick, with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant, Frlck Company incorrectly pled as York Process System - Frlck,

are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: P J w $ t r y i c k , NJ ,2010

ALLA gOSTINSKY, ESQ. HOAELAND, LONGO, MOWN DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant, Frick Company incorrectly pled as York Process System - Frick 40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480 New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

SO ORDERED: -

APR 3 2010

PATR I C K q I MM I NS, ESQ . LEVY, PHILLIPS & KONIGSBERG, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff(s), Kenneth Robert Morrill and Bonnie Morrill 800 Third Ave, 13th Floor New York, NY 10022

fl Honorable Sherry Klein H itler

BP-PIG-27

- . I

Hoagland, Longo, Maran, Dunst 8, Daukas, LLP Attwrneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New York, NY

c AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

HELENA CAMPBELL, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland, Longo,

Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendant, Frick Company. L-

That on t h e d a y of April, 2010 a copy of the within No Opposition Motion for Summary Judgment

were mailed, via first class to: Patrick Timmins, Esq., Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, 800 Third Avenue, 13,

'loor, New York, NY and one copy to all defense counsel by first-class mail, postage prepaid.

I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the

yoregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.

SERVICE RIDER

Vancy McDonald, Esq. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 1300 Mount Kemble Avenue '0 Box 2075 vlorristown, NJ 07962-2075

loseph P. LaSala, Esq. vIcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP I300 Mount Kemble Avenue '0 Box 2075 Viorristown, NJ 07962-2075

-die Evans, Esq. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker .50 East 42nd Street rJew York, NY 10017-5639

)avid P. Schaffer, Esq. vlalaby & Bradley, LLC 50 Broadway, Suite 600 rTew York. NY 10038

Villiam J. Bradley, Esq. dalaby & Bradley, LLC 50 Broadway, Suite 600 Jew York, NY 10038

oseph J. Ortego, Esq. Jixon Peabody, LLP

Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst 8 Doukas , LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New York, NV

50 Jericho Quadrangle - Suite 300 Jericho, NY 11753-2728

Jason P. Sultzer, Esq. Littleton, Joyce, Ughetta, Park & Kelly, LLP The Centre at Purchase One Manhattanville Road, Suite 302 Purchase, NY 10577

Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq. Braaten & Pascarella LLC Paynter's Ridge Office Park 2430 Route 34 P.O. Box 648 Manasquan, NJ 08736

Thomas M. Beneventano, Esq. LaSorsa & Beneventano 3 Barker Avenue, #70 White Plains, NY 10601

Michelle D. Grady, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004

Anna M. DiLonardo, Esq. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Hwy Suite 540 Hauppauge, NY 11788

Edward Wilbraham, Esq. Wilbraharn, Lawler & Buba 18 18 Market Street, Suite 3 100 Philadelphia, PA 19103

John J. Fanning, Esq. Cullen and Dykman, LLP 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, NY 11201

James B. Daniels, Esq. Budd Lamer, P.C. 150 John F. Kennedy Parkway CN 1000 Short Hills, NJ 07078-0999

Gordon Tresch, Esq. Feldman, Kieffer & Herman, LLP

Haagland, Longo, Moran, Dun& & Dnukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New York, NV

The Dun Building 1 10 Pearl Street, Suite 400 Buffalo, NY 14202

Michael E. Waller, Esq. K&L Gates One Newark Center - Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 07102

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. Reed Smith, LLP 599 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10022

Robert J. Cecala, Esq. Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP 757 Third Avenue New York. NY 10017

Peter C. Langenus, Esq. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLP 140 Broadway, Suite 3 100 New York. NY 10005

Cynthia Weiss Antonucci, Esq. Harris Beach, LLP 100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10005

John J. got, Esq. Waters, McPherson & McNeill 300 Lighting Way - 7th Floor PO Box 1560 Secaucus, NJ 07096

Renee Simon Lesser, Esq. Simon Lesser 420 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10170

David C, Weinberg, Esq. Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022

Michael A, Tanenbaum, Esq. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP 3 Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102-53 1 1

Scott R. Emery, Esq.

Haagland, Langa, Moran, Dunst & Daukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New York, NY

Lynch Daskal Emery, LLP 264 West 40th Street New York, NY 10018

Peter Stasz, Esq. H.B. Smith Company, Inc. 47 Westfield Industrial Park Rd. Westfield, MA 01085

Donald R. Pugliese, Esq. McDermott, Will & Emery 340 Madison Avenue 17th Floor New York, NY 10173-1922

Carol G. Snider, Esq. Damon & Morey, LLP Avant Building, Suite 1200 200 Delaware Ave Buffalo, NY 14202-2150

Suzanne Halbardier, Esq. Bany, McTiernan & Moore Two Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10006

Daniel McNamara, Esq. DeCicco, Gibbons & McNamara, P.C. 14 East 38th Street New York, NY 10016

Thomas Canevari, Esq. Freehill, Hogan & Mahar, LLP 80 Pine Street New York, NY 10005

Frederick D. Berkon, Esq. Leader & Berkon, LLP 630 Third Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10017

Rob C. Tonogbanua, Esq. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. 41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5 Haddonfield, NJ 08033

Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq. Thompson Hine LLP 335 Madison Ave, 12th Floor

Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst 8 Dgukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Sute 1804 New York, NY

John Ronca, Jr., Esq. Ronca, Hanley, Nolan & Zaremba, LLP Five South Regent Street, Suite 517 Livingston, NJ 07039

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for t, Frick Company

Sworn to before me this /F - day of April, 20 10

! Y

1 -




KENNETH ROBERT MORRILL and BONNIE MORRILL,

against

ADVANCE AUTO PARTS. INC.. et al.,

I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

INDEX NO.: 103352/09


WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with prejudice,



defendant, York International Corporation, be and the s a T k b &in with prejudice

and without costs.

DATED: ew Brunswick, NJ 9 ,2010

DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant, York International Corporation 40 Paterson Street - PO Box 480 New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s), Kenneth Robert Morrill and Bonnie Morrill 800 Third Ave, 13th Floor New York, NY I0022

SO ORDERED: Honorable Sh&rry Klein Heitler

BP-PIG-28

Hoagland, Lrsngo, Moran, Dunst 8 Doukas, LLP Attarnays ai Law

1501 Braadwsy Suite 1804 New York, NV

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

HELENA CAMPBELL, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland, Longo,

Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendant, York International Corporation.

That on the d & o f April, 2010 a copy of the within No Opposition Motion for Summary Judgment

were mailed, via first class to: Patrick Timmins, Esq., Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, 800 Third Avenue, 13,

Floor, New York, NY and one copy to all defense counsel by first-class mail, postage prepaid.

I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the

Foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.

SERVICE RIDER

Nancy McDonald, Esq. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 1300 Mount Kemble Avenue PO Box 2075 Morristown, NJ 07962-2075

loseph P. LaSala, Esq. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP 1300 Mount Kemble Avenue PO Box 2075 Morristown, NJ 07962-2075

lulie Evans, Esq. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker 150 East 42nd Street Yew York, NY 10017-5639

David P. Schaffer, Esq. Malaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 Vew York, NY 10038

William J. Bradley, Esq. Ualaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 Vew York, NY 10038

loseph J. Ortego, Esq. Vixon Peabody, LLP

Haagland, Langa, Moran, Dunst

Doukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway S u k 1804 New York, NY

50 Jericho Quadrangle - Suite 300 Jericho, NY 11753-2728

Jason P. Sultzer, Esq. Littleton, Joyce, Ughetta, Park & Kelly, LLP The Centre at Purchase One Manhattanville Road, Suite 302 Purchase, NY 10577

Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq. Braaten & Pascarella LLC Paynter's Ridge Office Park 2430 Route 34 P.O. Box 648 Manasquan, NJ 08736

Thomas M. Beneventano, Esq. LaSorsa & Beneventano 3 Barker Avenue, #70 White Plains, NY 10601

Michelle D. Grady, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004

Anna M. DiLonardo, Esq. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Hwy Suite 540 Hauppauge, NY 11788

Edward Wilbraham, Esq. Wilbraharn, Lawler & Buba 1818 Market Street, Suite 3100 Philadelphia, PA 1 9 103

John J. Fanning, Esq. Cullen and Dykman, LLP 177 Montague Street Brooklyn, NY 11201

James B. Daniels, Esq. Budd Lamer, P.C. 150 John F. Kennedy Parkway CN 1000 Short Hills, NJ 07078-0999

Gordon Tresch, Esq. Feldman, Kieffer & Herman, LLP

!

t-

Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst 8 Doukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite I SO4 New York. NY

The Dun Building 1 10 Pearl Street, Suite 400 Buffalo, NY 14202

Michael E. Waller, Esq. K&L Gates One Newark Center - Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 07 102

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. Reed Smith, LLP 599 Lexington Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10022

Robert J. Cecala, Esq. Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP 757 Third Avenue New York, NY 1001 7

Peter C. Langenus, Esq. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLP 140 Broadway, Suite 3100 New York, NY 10005

Cynthia Weiss Antonucci, Esq. Harris Beach, LLP 100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10005

John J. Kot, Esq. Waters, McPherson & McNeill 300 Lighting Way - 7th Floor PO Box 1560 Secaucus, NJ 07096

Renee Simon Lesser, Esq. Simon Lesser 420 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10170

David C. Weinberg, Esq. Segal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022

Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP 3 Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102-53 1 1

Scott R. Emery, Esq.

Hnagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst 8 Doukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New Vork, NY

Lynch Daskal Emery, LLP 264 West 40th Street New York, NY 10018

Peter Stasz, Esq. H.B. Smith Company, Inc. 47 Westfield Industrial Park Rd. Westfield, MA 01085

Donald R. Pugliese, Esq. McDermott, Will & Emery 340 Madison Avenue 17th Floor New York, NY 10173-1922

Carol G. Snider, Esq. Damon & Morey, LLP Avant Building, Suite 1200 200 Delaware Ave Buffalo, NY 14202-2150

Suzanne Halbardier, Esq. Barry, McTiernan & Moore Two Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10006

Daniel McNamara, Esq. DeCicco, Gibbons & McNamara, P.C. 14 East 38th Street New York, NY 100 16

Thomas Canevari, Esq. Freehill, Hogan & Mahar, LLP 80 Pine Street New York, NY 10005

Frederick D. Berkon, Esq. Leader & Berkon, LLP 630 Third Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10017

Rob C. Tonogbanua, Esq. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C. 41 South Haddon Avenue, Suite 5 Haddonfield. NJ 08033

Ruthe A. Nepf, Esq. Thompson Hine LLP 335 Madison Ave, 12th Floor New York. NY 10015

Hoagland, Longo, Maran, Dunst 8 Doukas, LLP Attorneys at Law

1501 Broadway Suite 1804 New Yark, NY

John Ronca, Jr,, Esq. Ronca, Hanley, Nolan & Zarernba, LLP Five South Regent Street, Suite 517 Livingston, NJ 07039

HOAGLAND, LONGO, M O W , DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP

-tk Sworn to before me this L d a y of 4pri1, 2010

ALESANDRA L. FARRELL NrnARYPUBUCOF NEWERs€r My - EqJb lW18m)lrD


In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

LEONARD GOLDBERG, Plaintiff($),

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Index No.: 190046/2009


WHEFLEFORE, Defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORPORATION,

named Individually and as Successor to Fams Valves and/or Sprague Pumps (“CURTISS-

WRIGHT”) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Curtiss-

Wright with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Defendant, Curtiss-Wright be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

to either part . Dated: $i$f , 2010 NewYor ,Ne York

3 0 2010 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

EW YORK qzcr2-lc --mF Rank lwmhF%q , .~&-[~i Q M J h t l n ,E$?. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 0.2010


I.A.S. Part 30 ASBESTOS LITIGATION I I (Heitler, J.)

I Index No.: 1901 15/09 I 1

I THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:

I I JOSEPH R. COLLINS AND LENORE A.

COLLrNS, I NO OPPOSITION I I SUMMARY JUDGMENT I MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiff( s) I I

-against- I

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al,, I I I

........ . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . .... .... i... . . . . -

Defiendant(s). I

WHEREFORE, defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. Company hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. with prejudice,



defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

without costs.


Q+A ,2010 I

I I

I MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Sid Harvey Industries, Inc, 80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 509-3456

Attorneys for Plaintiff Joseph R. Collins and Lenore A. Collins 300 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 (212) 986-2233

3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

066-0001

......... "."_"" ....... +.* .-+, ...... ......................... ; 31 Yi.''.A 1

I

I :I c rw1 r.l ;:I f I t ' (S 1, I ............................................................................... ........... ............. ..-l-l". ......

..... "'1. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.._:.: ,:,. e-;.. #, ..'"..... ;. ..... ' j ..'\

,';,,., ....... sl"".."-' ... .;;/ I-,,," ,,.,, ......... ', i',,, ....... ,., ..I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY / NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION j I.A.S. Part 30 ! (Heitler, J.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO: i Index No.: 190 120/09

DARRELL R. DALTON and JOANNE J. DALTON, i

Plaintiffs,

-against-

! NO OPPOSITION ! SUMMARY JUDGMENT i MOTION AND ORDER

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Taco, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the above

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant, Taco, Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant, Taco, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Ay-; \ \ 3 ,2010

Taco, Inc. MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C. 80 Broad Street-Suite 2300 New York, New York 10004 (2 12) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs Darrell R. Dalton and Joanne J. Dalton

360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, New York 10170

EARLY & STMUSS, LLC

(2 12) 986-2233

SO ORDERED,

A m 3 0 2010

Y

i

542-1 301



THOMAS C. CARROLL AND CHERYL CARROLL, PLAINTIFF( S),

vs.

A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., DEFENDANTS.

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER) INDEX NO.: 190125/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND OFtDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant, Elliott Turbomachinery Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without

F I L E D costs. Cl-rL -101 a

Charles Ferguson, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 SO Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

&(&& Attorneys for Elliott Turbomachinery Co. 233 Broadway New York, New York 10279

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 227-7878

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heiger

t

Louis 0. D'Addio : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTIONANDORDER SUMMAlRY JUDGEMENT

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiffs9 complaint

against defendant COLUMBIA BOILERS with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

COLUMBIA BOILERS be and the same are hereby dismissed with -tc ~

Dated: New York, New York March 23,20 10

- Au& P. Raphael, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff FELDMAN KIEFFER LEVY, PHILLIPS, & KONIGSBERG,LLP 800 3d Ave. 13'" FL

New York, NY 10022

& HERMAN, LLP The Dun Building 1 10 Pearl Street, Suite 400 Buffalo, New York 14202

00184141.WPD

1 ’ I


LOUIS G. D’ADDIO, NYCAL I.A.S. Part30

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler) Plaintiff( s), -against-

: Index No.: 190 125-09 A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al., NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants. X --”-----”---------------”------------------------”-------

WHEREFORE, defendant POWERS, a DIVISION OF WATTS WATER

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. s/h/a POWERS, a WATTS INDUSTRIES CO. and POWERS, a

DIVISION OF WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC, (“Defendant”), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Defendant. with prejudice, and there



Defendant be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: ;I Iq,zo)o Ne& York, Hew York

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (2 12) 605-6200

Attorneys for Defendant POWERS, a Division of WATTS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 599 Lexington Avenue 0 1 New York, NY 10022 @Q


LORRAINE PIETROWSKI Individually and as the Executrix of the Estate of CHESTER PIETROWSKI


Index: 09/190125

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT MOTIQ NANDO RDER

above entitled case, pursuant tu Civil Practice Law and Rules $3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint

against defendant COLUMBIA BOILERS with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition

thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to d l codefendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

COLUMBIA BOILERS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. - Dated: New York, New York

March43,20 10 4 A// + Audrey'P. phae , Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff FELDMAN KIEFFER L E W , PHILLIPS, & KONIGSBERG,LLP 800 3d Ave. 1 3 ~ FL

New York, NY 10022

& HERMAN, LLP The Dun Building 110 Pearl Street, Suite 400 Buffalo, New York 14202

F I L E D APR 3 0 2010

So Ordered

00184143, WPD

NEW YORK CQUNN CLERK'S




RICHARD KURTZ

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)r ~

Index No: 19020 106430/00 121 981/99




pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint





be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost v\LED Dated: New York,

--..~ ' v

Charles F e r g E , &q-' WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03445024.1


Index No.: 19 0210/09 /1( In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NICHOLAS LOVAGLIO, NO OPPOSITION Plaintiff(s), SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION - against -


De fendant s .

WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLATN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-


Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-



Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

to either party.

Seeger Weiss Attorney for Plaintiff 1 William Street New York, NY 10038 Weil-McLain


830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022 (21 2) 65 1-7500

SO ORDERED,

This Document Relates To: NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Nicholas Lovaglio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l - " - - - _ - - c - l - ~ - - l - - l n l ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ X Index No.: 190210/09

WHETCIEFORE, defendant OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED (formerly known as BOISE

CASCADE CORPORATION), improperly pled as BOISE CASCADE, LLC, (hereinafter "DEFENDANT"),

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil h c t i c e Law and Rules

Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED, with


ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

OFFICEh4(iX INfORPORATED, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

L INE & FORD P.C.

Christopher S. Kozak Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 William Street, 10th Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 584-0700

n I

So Ordered: l Hon. Sheny Idein Heitler

Attorneys for Defendant OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED 120 Braadway, 27th Floor New York, New York 10271-0079 (212) 238-4800

493438.1 DOCN

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NF,W YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, I.A.S. Part 30 3--.._uc_lll-l___-111----..--111111- -X (Heitier, J.) NICHOLAS LOVAGLIO and DOROTHY LOVAGLIO,

NYCAL

Plaintiffs,

- against - A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

Index No.: 00190210-09

WHEREFOW, defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. fMa BECHTEL CORP., hereby

kquests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Swtion

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant SEQUOIA VENTURES MC. fMa BECHTEL

COW., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDEFtED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. f/k/a BECHTEL CORP., be and the same are hereby dismissed with



- % R N A L U J q Attorneys for Plaintiff One William Street, lo* Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 584-0700

-.,

So Ordered:

LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C.

Erin Glover-Frey 0 Attorneys for Defendant SEQUOIA VENTURE* L M a BECHTEL CO

New York, New York 1027 1-00_74 3 0 120 Broadway, 27th F1 r IC$

484880.1 DocsNY

Plaintiffs,

.against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant, Crosby Valve, Inc., improperly sued as Tyco International,

Inc., Individually, as successor to and doing business as Tyco Valves and Controls LP, Crosby

Valve and Hancock (hereinafter “Crosby”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Defendant Crosby with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all ce-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant Crosby be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and w i u d

T

~~ $+ $‘,+--- Christopher P. Hannan, Esq. Tu \ -

Seeger Weiss, LLP One William Street, 10* Floor New York, New York 10004 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

KELLEY JASONS MCGOW

120 Wall Street, 30th Floor New York, New York 10005 Attorneys for Defendant: Crosby Valve, Inc.

SPTNELLI & HANNA, LL 1c45’


~~



NICHOLAS LOVAGLIO and DOROTHY LOVAGLIO Index No. 19021 0109









Colleen M. Cronin 1

Seeger Weiss LLP NY 1 William Street - 10th Floor New York, NY 10004

Attorneys for Defendant Robert A. Keasbey C Weiner Lesniak LLP kd - 888 Veterans Memorial Hauppauge, NY I 1788

4@

rry Klein Heitler Q SO ORDERED, I

Hon. She1

2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK



NICHOLAS LOVAGLIO and DOROTHY LOVAGLIO Index No. 00190210/09


WHEREFORE, defendant, Borg-Warner Corporation, hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Borg-Warner Corporation, with



against defendant Borg-Warner Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Anna M. DiLonardo Attorneys for Defendant Borg-Warner Corporation Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial l-f&J Hauppauge, NY 1 1788

'ldlI1111 I

Seeger Weiss LLP NY I William Street - 10th Floor New York, NY 10004

so ORDERED,


IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 0 N

~


SABE VARSANO

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30, (Heitler, J.) - Index No:

1 144100 I25770199


~









Dated: New York, New York II Y - [ F d a)*

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WEITZ t~ LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

with

-


Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 52 1 -5400

SO ORDERED, 3 0 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03446225.1


NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Heitler, J ~ I ~ This Document Relates to: Index No: I90219109

SABE VARSANO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








Dated: New York, NeN Yock F I L E D

LeTYW

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. A I Charles Ferguson, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

&!Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (21 2) 521 -5400

/ - SO ORDERED, Hon. Shertf K: Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 0344621 7.1





Index No: 190232/09

ALDO SCHINELLA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








FILED ; be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs

Dated: New York. New York

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York I0003 (21 2) 558-5500

R E D SMITH LLP - Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 034461 42.1



ALDO SCHINELLA


Index No: 190232/09










WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York I0003 (21 2) 558-5500

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 52 I -5400

US-ACTIVE-1 034461 22.1



JOSEPH MEOLA


Index No: I90237109




Section 321 2, dismissing plaintws complaint against defendant CertainTed




I

3

i

dismissed with areiudice and without costs.

F I L E D m .

Dated: New York, New York e WElTZ Charles & LUXENBERG, P.C.


REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03445975.1

I I .

3 IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON



Index No: 190259/09

THOMAS C. CARROLL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER






claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same



Charles s s WEITZ Attorneys & LUXENBERG, for Plain tiff P.C. REED SMITH LLP

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (2 1 2) 52 I -5400

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K x i t l e r

US-ACTIVE-1 03444143.1




TERRY TOULANTIS


Index No: 190260/09









Dated: New York, New York e Charles Ferguson, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

F I L E D

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 I 2) 52 I -5400

APR 3 0 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03446202.1

WEINER LESNIAK

LLP

AhVwyvs at Law

829

PARSIPPANY ROAD

PARSIPPANY, NJ

07014-0038

979-403-1 I O 0




TERRY TOULANTIS and HELEN TOULANTIS Index No. 190260/09


WHEREFORE, defendant, Bondex International, Inc., hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Bondex International, Inc., with



against defendant Bondex I n t e r n a t i p l , p L b E n D e same are hereby dismissed


Attorneys for Plaintiff Weitz & Luxenberg 700 Broadway - 7th floor New York, NY 10003

f Arthur D. Byomberg Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Bondex International, Inc. Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788



In Re: NEW Y ORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: l4Q25MW

NO OPPOSITION JAMES VUCETICH, SUMMARY JUDGMENT


i - against -


Defendants. -. . .



Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-




to either party.

Dated: ,2010

I /

FKXTlk -UTE, Ebq. Taw & w ~ h 3 n , E J ~ I

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Je SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

9* &‘ Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant 4) Q

SINGER & MAHONEY, LT*?%

+t$ B-5 G 6 New York, NY 10003 Weil-McLain

830 Third Avenue, Suite 400&,,~i New York, NY 10022

(212) 558-5500

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,




NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J .)

Index No: 190261/09

JAMES VUCETICH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER









WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation

New York, New York 10022 (21 2) 558-5500 (2 1 2) 52 1 -5400

SO ORDERED, APR 3 o zato

APR 3 0 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03446235.1

r- f ?

This Document Relates To: .-

I NYCAL

: (Won. Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No@).: 190262-09

JAMES STEWART and PATRICIA STEWART,: I.A.S, part 3o

Plaintiffs,

-against-

T

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al., NQ-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants.

X ________________________________I_______""_-----"------_

WHEFCEFORE, defendant SQUARIl D COMPANY hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SQUARE I) COMPANY with prejudice, and


ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant SQUARE D COMPANY be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

r-*

K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant SQUARE D COMPANY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 800 Third Avenue, 13 Floor New York, NY 10022

I> (2 12) 605-6200

SO ORDERED,

NW-330301 VI I

-

533.23231/SFB ;UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW JOUNTY OF NEW YORK


rhis document relates to:

XOBERTA FRIEDMAN and STUART ?RIEDMAN,

\.I. FRIEDMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, A.I.

YORK

NYCAL I A S PART 30 (Honorable Sherry L e i n Heitler

Index No. : 190263/09

(April 2010 In Extremis Trial Group)


Friedman, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s Complaint against

defendant, A.I. Friedman, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all

crossclaims ,&inst defendant, A. I. Friedman,

NEW YQRK New Jersey wm= R K s m =

Attorneys for Plaintiff & FLINN 546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor Attorneys for Defendant, New York, New York 10036 A.I. Friedman


SO ORDERED, Y

Honorable Sherry Klein Heitler



JOHN FRISONE

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) Index No:










C(-CFlO

Charles Fer sq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plain tiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003

Ce rta i nTeed Corporation

New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 558-5500 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 03444367.1




FRANK D’ALESSANDRO

NYCAL 1,A.S. Part30 (Heitler, J.) Index No: 190273/09







plyt E r ) claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are




Jodfhan B. Kromberg, Esq. REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED,

hpR 3u mu

US-ACTIVE-1 03444200.1



NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler. J.)


, I

Index No: 190273/09

FRANK D’ALESSANDRO NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without cost

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 03444214.1 ! T? 3 0 2010


~



NANCY BONELLI

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) Index No: 190277/09











Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

SO ORDERED,

APR 3 o tam

US-ACTIVE-1 03444038.1

APR.ZD.ZD1D 0 4 : 3 7 1 9 1 7 4 4 8 7 6 6 5 Belluck 6 Fox LLP

P1 ain !.i 1'1; i N O OYY081110N I SlJ.M.M.A.KY J U.UGNWN1'

-against- ! MOTTON AND ORDER

# 0 2 0 8 P.004 /004

23r

3 0 2010

-

Attorney h r PlainIilY Roharl Horn BELLLICK <!k Fox, LLP 541; Fiilli hvcmlc, 4" Floor Nuw York, New York 10036 (212) 681-1575

A. W. CHESTERTON, et al. : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant SQUARE D COMPANY hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant SQUARE D COMPANY with prejudice, and


ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-

defendant SQUARE D COMPANY be, and the same are hereby, dismis

K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant SQUARE D COMPANY One Newark Center, Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 071 02-5252

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor New York, NY 10036 (212) 681-1575

NW-330250 V I


~

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ~


WILLIAM PIPER Index No. 190282/09

NO OPPOSITION SU MMARY J U DG M ENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Borg-Warner Corporation, hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Borg-Warner Corporation, with


ORDERED, that upon notice to all eo-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Borg-Warner Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed


DATED: &?I / h ,2010 A h

Early & Strauss 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor P.O. Box 3601 New York, NY I001 7

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry

Andrew M. Warshauer Attorneys for Defend ant Borg-Warner Corporation Weiner Lesniak LLP 888 Veterans l $ q i ~ i ~ ~ Hauppauge, N 1 8

-"om@

APR 3 0 2010




This Document Relates to: I Index No: 190285/09

ARTHUR NEFF NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York F I L E D


Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 52 1-5400

? 3 0 2010, US-ACTIVE-1 03446028.1


Index No.: 190291/09 In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NO OPPOSITION ROBERT LEHNERT, SUMMARY JUDGMENT


- against -


Defendants.



Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Weil-




to either party.

Dated: iao6 ( 4 -2010

WEITZ&LU

700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

Attorneys for

’ (212) 558-5500

n

I // JennYfer L. Budner, Esq. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

Attorneys for Defendant Weil-McLain 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400

New York, NY 10022

SINGER & MAHONEY,

(212) 651-7500

SO ORDERED,

..

J - SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

V

NEW Y O N CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION TT

IN RE: NYCAL

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: WILLIAM KLINE and DOROTHY L KLINE

V.

No Opposition Summary Motion and Order

Index No.: 09/190293

WHEREFORE, Defendant, SB DECKING, individually and as successor to SELBY BATTERSBY & Co. (hereinafter “SB DECKING”), hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffls complaint against Defendant, SB DECKING with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant, SB DECKING, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10017 2 12-986-2233

Attorneys for Defendant, SB Decking The Dun Building 1 10 Pearl Street, 4th Floor Buffalo, New York 14202

-5875 F I L E D SO ORDERED, APR 3 0 2010 I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

In Re New York City Asbestos Litigation


DORIS BERGRIN,

Plaintiffs VS.

NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION, et al,

Defendants


WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION, hereby


Section 32 12, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS

ASSOCIATION, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION be

and without costs,

Dated: , 2010 Dated:

IPS & KONIGSBERG LLP

- L A , & Brendan J. Tully, Esq, Attorneys for Plaintiff 800 Third Avenue, 13* Floor New York, NY 10022

National Automotive Parts Association The Avant Building, Suite 1200 200 Delaware Avenue Lw Buffalo, New York 14202



DORIS BERGRTN, : NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

: (Hon, Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No(s).: 190294-09

Plaintiff( s), -against-

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY ABEX CORP.,f/'Wa American Brake Shoe Company, et al. : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEFWFORE, defendant SQUARE D COMPANY hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant SQUARE D COMPANY with prejudice, and



defendant SQUARE D COMPANY be, and the same are h e r e b p i p k d E w j u d i c e and

without costs.

Dated: "@Y; I c f ! 9 0 ( 0 APR 3 0 2010

Newark, New Jersey lJdkdby w YORK e &&le M. Kozin, Esq.' K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant SQUARE D COMPANY One Newark Center, Tenth Floor Newark, NJ 071 02-5252

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED, Hon, Sherry Rein Heitler

NW-330231 VI


Index No.: 190297109 In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NO OPPOSITION ELIZABETH MONTOYA, SUMMARY JUDGMENT


- against -


Defendants.


MCLAN’) hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-




to either party.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

Jennlyfer L. Bud&, Esq. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

-

APR 3 0 2010

yJ&

! !

SINGER & MAHONEY, Attorneys for Defendant Weil-McLain 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400

New York, NY 10022 ~

(212) 651-7500 I

SO ORDERED, 1 Hon, ShenyKlein Heitler

APR 302010



ASBESTOS LITIGATION


ELIZABETH MONTOYA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

summary


udgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules







4 J o n H a . Kromberg, Esq. Charles %ghson ,dq

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. R-MITTH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation

New York, New Yo k'!ot E D (21 2) 558-5500 (212) 521-5400



NYCAL I.A.S. Part30 I Q 03 78 0 9 (Heitler, J.)


I lndexNo: - This Document Relates to:

ISMENIA GONZALEZ NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








Dated: New York, New York * Charles Ferguson, Esq. J o M a n B. Kromberg, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York. New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

Hon. Sher'fy K. Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 03444422.1

.. .

Plaintiffs,

-against-

ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC, et al.,

: NOOPPOSITION : SUMMARYJUDGMENT : MOTI0NANDORDE;IC

: Him. Sherry K. Heitler : IASPart30

WHEREiFORE, American Lamdry Machinery, hc. ("ALMI") hereby =que&

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against ALMI, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and ALMI be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

FLEMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON Attorneys for American

WEITZ & LUXENBURG, LLP

By:

One Liberty Plaza, 35' Floor New York, New York 10006-1404

Andrew J. Sea, Esq. 0 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

(212) 412-9500

SO ORDERED: APR 3 0 2010 Hon. Sherry K. Heitler, J.S.C.

339933


Index No,: 190299/09 In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NO OPPOSITION NUNZY MASSA, SUMMARY JUDGMENT


- against - AC and S, INC., (ARMSGTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al.,

Cefendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant MIL-MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., hereinafter (“WEIL-






to either party.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

F I L E D

Jennifer L. Budner, Esq.

SINGER & MAHONEY, LT- CIsRK’s OFF’= Attorneys for Defendant Wcil-McLain 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400

New York, NY 10022

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE NEW YQRk

(2 12) 65 1-7500 . ,


APR 3 0 2010

-. . .



NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler. J.)


, I

Index No: I90299109

NUNZY MASSA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WH E RE FORE, defendant Ce rtai nTeed Corporation, here by requests








han B. Kromberg, Esq.

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003 New York, New York I

Charles s Ferguson, Esq.

(21 2) 558-5500 (212) 521-5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03445424.1


NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

(Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190312/09

ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 ON 1 This Document Relates to:

HAROLD BAIRD NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

I WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests





claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the sa


Dated: New York, New York q4g-N


Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (2 1 2) 52 1-5400

/-

uu V I \ Y L I \ L W , ,,I I-


APR 3 U 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03444032.1




This Document Relates to: I Index No: 19031 5/09

ANGEL0 GULL0 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER






claims against defendant CertainTeed Corpo



Charles ergusort, WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation

New York, New York I0022

* (21 2) 558-5500 (21 2) 521 -5400

SO ORDERED,

A m 3 0 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03444450.1

APR.20.2010 0 4 : 3 6 1 9 1 7 4 4 8 7 6 6 5 Belluck & Fox LLP

Tides 'No.: 190333/09

# 0 2 0 8 P . 0 0 3 / 0 0 4 I

WHEREFORE, dcfindarit, 'ihc k*:airbanks Company, Iicrcby rcqucsts sumrnary j udgrneni

"in thc a'bovc critititlcd casc, piirsiimt, to Civil Yractice h w and kiiles $ 3212, disnlissing

L and there being no npposition therelo,

ORDERED, Ihat upon rioticc t.0 all co-defmdant.s, nll claims and Cross claims igainsl


IN RE NEW YORK CITY X I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

NYCAL

(Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 30


Rodney Thaut and Kathryn Lynn Thaut

X _ _ " _ " _ _ 1 _ _ 1 _ 1 - _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ - - 1 - - - 1 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

EREFORE, defendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. hereby gment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules sing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT th prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

notice to all co-defendants, all PAINT COMPANY, INC. be

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP. Attorney for Plaintiff 546 Fifth Avenue, qfh Floor New York, New York 10036

150 East 42"* S t w New York, New 2 12-490-3000

SOORDERED, ,

Hon. She . Heitler

3899574. I

.. .... . . . . . . -




BRUCE J. BOYLE

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 I 9 335 b (Heitler, J.)

Index No: -5/09










B. romberg, Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SMITH LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

US-ACTIVE-1 0344408 1

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNW OF NEW YORK

NYCAL

(Heitler, J .) I.A.S. Part 30 l q o W 5 b q IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LIT1 GAT1 0 N

I lndexNo: - This Document Relates to:

BRUCE 3. BOYLE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER







claims against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, forme k l o t e;13) Corporation,

be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. APR 3 0 20@

Dated: New York,

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. REED SMITH LLP

I

3

I


-- Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03444083.1

u '4 ! 7.




LOREN PUBLICOVER and JACQUELINE PUBLICOVER, : NYCAL

I.A.S.Part30 : (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler) Plaintiff,

- against -

BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, et al.

1 Index No(s).: 190336-09

: NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY ' JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. X ____"11_1_____------_----------I----------"--"--------~----

WHEFUZFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,


defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

New York,.W

Ni$obM. Kozin, Esq. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO. 599 Lexington Avenue

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

New Yark, New York 10022 (212) 536-3900


hPR 3 0 2010 NY-776039 vl


X __________________________________________________------- IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION


LOREN PUBLICOVER and JACQUELINE PUBLICOVER,

X ___________________________11__1________---_-------------

: NYCAL : I.A.S. Part 30 : (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No(s).: 190336-09 Plaint iff,

- against -

BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, et al. : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, USA, INC., formerly known as

SQUARE ID COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, USA, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,


defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with


K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, USA, INC. 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, In 4

W2f53g”39sQ,

Hon. Sherry Klein Hiitler

NY-776030 V I




LOREN PUBLICOVER











F I L E D APR 3 0 2010 e $r-\Q

Charles erguso WElTZ & LUXENBERE, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10022 (21 2) 558-5500 (21 2) 521 -5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03446054.1




WElCHl FAN


Index No: 190341 /09










WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington A enue New York, N e w b (21 2) 521 -5400 (21 2) 558-5500

4 4 3 O 2010 SO ORDERED, r

Aa oR 3 0 2010

US-ACTIVE-1 03444346.1

I


NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION


FORREST HUDSON

Index No: 190352/09








3

i

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. F I L E D Dated: New York, New York


Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 52 I -5400

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K. Heitler

US-ACTIVE-1 03444972.1

. I




This Document Relates to: I Index No: 1903&4/09

JOHN LAMPARTER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER






claims against defendant CertainTeed Cor p a \ '0 2. be E& same are hereby

w

3 0 dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York PPR

+IF13 r

Charles Ferguson, Esq' WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 03445037.1

- . . .... . 4 9

C

--?


IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL X _______________________-__________------------""-----------"--"----

ASBESTOS LITIGATION


KAREN RICHMAN, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AS TO

Plaintiff(s), : FORD MOTOR COMPANY l-4- - against -

Index No.: BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC,, et al.,

Defendant( s). :

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY here judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

o-defendants, all claims and c OMPANY be and the same are hereby dis

By: Hilary S . Macklin, Esq. AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017

New York, New York 10036 Counsel for: Karen Richman

T: 212-593-6700

F-I L E D F: 212-593-6970

APR 3 0 2010 SO ORDERED:

{00854723.DOC } (00841 133.




EUGENE R. WALSH


Index No: 190358/09








dismissed with prejudice and without costs. i

Dated: New York, New York 4 m 3 0 2010


REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

K. Heitler SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 03446249.1





EINER JENSEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER








Dated: New York, New York +&-%

Charles er WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 New York, New York I O

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue

9 (21 2) 558-5500 (21 2) 521 -5400

US-ACTIVE-I 034449a5. I




CLIFTON BOUCHEE


IndexNo: % U . U Q &










Charles e WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaint iff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003


New York, New York 10022 (21 2) 558-5500 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

F SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 03444054. I




ROBERT W. ALEXANDER


Index No: 190362/09







claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same



c(- IT-\o

Charles Ferguson, Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERE, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003

REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation

New York, New York I0022

R&- (21 2) 558-5500 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, e Hon. Sherry K. Heitler


i I

1

APR.20.2010 04:36 19174487665 Bolluck b Fox LLP

j Iiidex No.: 190363/09 GERALD MO0,R.S and JOAN MOORS,

n o 2 0 8 P.002 / 0 0 4

wit.hout costs.

634-24

8


X

GERALD MOORS and JOAN MOORS,

Plaintiffs, -V-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants .

Index No, 190363/09

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY .JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Justice Sherry K. Heitler

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodall Rubber Company (“Goodall”) hereby requests summary


dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Goodall with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Goodall Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


BELLI.

BY: -

March a, 2010

u Attornewfor Defendant 116’E. 27” Street, 12th Floor

New York, NY 1001 7 New York, NY 10016 (212) 681-1575 (212) 452-5300

-----<. ~

SO ORDERED: Justice Sherry K, Heitler




GERALD EPSTEIN








claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hFJBby I r dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. REED SMITH LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York I0022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry-&. Heitbr

US-ACTIVE-1 03444327.1




MARIO RIVADENEYRA


Index No: 190374/09









be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

F I L E D

Charles F e r g u s o m WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (2 1 2) 558-5500

Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 1 2) 52 1 -5400 e&-

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry K. h i t l e r

US-ACTIVE-1 034461 09.1





MARIO RIVADENEYRA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER






claims against defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are he


Dated: New York, New York q-lpo

WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaint iff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10022

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue

0 (21 2) 558-5500 (2 I 2) 52 1-5400

SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-1 03446061.1

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LIT1 GATlON


ORISON CASS


Index No: 190375/09










Charles k q u s o d s q . WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

: Jonat R E ~ M I T H LLP Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (2 I 2) 52 I -5400

F I L E D APR 3 0 2010

NEW YORK WUNTYGURWoFFII#

US-ACTIVE-I 034441 74.1




This Document Relates to: Index No: 190376/09

CALVIN CARSON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

9

I I









Attorneys for CertainTeed C c e i D 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New YorkFO\; ! (2 I 2) 52 1-5400 Q %Q'O


US-ACTIVE-1 034441 53.1




DONALD LONG0

NYCAL ~ I.A.S. Part30 ~ (Heitler, J.)

Index No: 190377/09









Dated: New York. New York I -


Attorneys for 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 100221 4

“0 (212) 521-5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03445064.1


NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.) ASBESTOS LITIGATION


KENNETH McDOWELL NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER









WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10003


New York, New York 1OOF I L E D (21 2) 558-5500 (2 I 2) 52 1 -5400

US-ACTIVE-1 03445962. I




ROSA TORRES


Index No: 190379/09


J








F I L E D be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without co


Charles F e r w n , Esq. WElTZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (21 2) 558-5500

A APR 3 o 2010

m R R ! Jon at h &!!& be rg , Esq . REEQ&~TTH LLP Attorneys for Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 521-5400

SO ORDERED,

US-ACTIVE-103446192.1

. ..


WHERFiFORF?,, defendant Terex USA, LLC improperly sued herein as "Terex Cranes, a

division of Terex Corporation, Individually, and as successor in interest to Terex American, as

successor in interest to American Crane Corporation, as successor in interest to Lorain, Terex

Northwestern," and "Terex Lorain, Individually, and as successor in interest to Lorain" (hereinafter

"Terex USA"), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Terex USA

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


defendant Terex USA, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

Dated: New York, NY April 1,2010

By: T W B Patti Burshtyn, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C Attorneys for Plaintiffs 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 791-0285

Terex USA, LLC 50 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 300 Jericho, NY 1 1753 ( 5 16) 832-7500

A t I ."".

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry Klein Healer

12946683.1 APR 3 0 2010

03/30/2010 1

!

58 FAX 2123196932 LAVIN COLEMAN @ 0 0 3

Plaintiffs,

-against-

NO OPPOSITII:1N SUMMARY JU: )GMENT MOTION AND IIRDER

P U T T & W I T N E Y P O W R SYSTEMS, INC,; And UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPOFCATION, Individually and as Successor to Pratt & Whitney (Pratt & Whitney/Aircraft Division); et al.

Defendants, UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPO€UTION s/h/a United T dtmlogias

Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Pratt & Whitney (Pratt & Whit,iey/Aircrafl

Division) and PR4TI & WHITNEY POWER SYSlEMS, JNC., an unincorporated division of

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES COWOUTION (hereinafter "UTC and Pratt & W itney"), by

their attorneys, LAVIN, O'NEIL, RTCCI, CEDRONE & DiSIPIO, hereby reques:~ summary

judgment in the above-entided case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sel:tion 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants, UTC and Pratt & Whitney, wit 'I prejudice,



defendants, UTC and Pratt and Whitney, be and the same are hereby di p s i d c igyu& and without costs.

,2010

UISLPLO U U C

Attorneys for Defendant United Technologies Corporation mnd Pratt and Whitney Power Systemz , Inc.

xington Avenue, Suite 2900 ark, New York 10 170

Belluck & Fox Attorneys for Plaintiffs 546 Fifth Avenue, 4Lh Floor New York, New York 10036

SO ORDERED:

'APR 3 0 2010

I

4

I

4 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YOFX

IN RE NEW YORK CITY X - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l l _ _ r _ r -

NYCAL

(Heitler, S.)

Index No: 190068/10


X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . This Document Relates To:

Dominick Palaio

. "

NO OPPOSITION I SUMMARY

MOTION AND ORDER

JUDGMENT ~

X - - - - - - - -

WHEREFORE, defendant OAKFABCO, INC. hereby requests swnmary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant OAKFABCO, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


Dated: ~ ~ @ e w , Y a k

WEITZ & LUXENBE Attorney for 700 Broadway

212-558-5500

WILSON, ELSER, MOSROWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Attorney for Defendant OAKFABCO, INC. 33 Washington Street Newark, New Jersey 071 02-3017 973-624-0800

SO ORDERED,

APR 302010

970973. I



This Document Relates To: DOMINICK PALAIO and ANNA PALAIO,

X -___l---___-----___l________l____l___l

X - ” - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - ” - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Plaintiff( s), -against-

$ NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No.: 190068-10


WHEREFORE, Defendant, WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, sued herein

as “WEYERHAEUSER CO.”, and its past and present parents, affiliates and subsidiaries

and its predecessors and successors in interest and its agents, heirs and assigns

(“Defendant”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff‘s complaint against

Defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


claims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

MCGUIREWOODS LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1345 Avenue of the Americas 7” Floor


New York, NY 10105 F I L E D (212) 558-5500 (212) 548-2100

SO ORDERED, APR 3 o m a

COUNTY CL€RRSOFFK;F

Honorable Shye;rfrq n Heitler NEW YORK

ApR 8 0 2010


In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 190068/10

I.A.S. Part 3 9 Hon. Sherry K. Heitler DOMINICK PALAIO,

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION

MOTION AND ORDER - against - SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C.& S. INC., et al., Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant KOHLER CO. hereby requests Summary Judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant KOHLER CO. with prejudice, and



against Defendant, KOHLER CO. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

Dated: , 2010

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

700 Broadway Kohler New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022 (3 1 3) 65 1 -7509

AM 3 o 2010 SO ORDERED,


p#R 3 0 2010

3 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 190070/10 In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 3!@ Hon. Sherry K. Heitler ROLAND BARBIER,

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION

MOTION AND ORDER - against - SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A.C.& S. INC., et al., Defendants.

WHEFCEFORE, Defendant KOHLER CO. hereby requests Summary Judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Defendant KOHLER CO. with prejudice, and



against Defendant, KOHLER CO. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs to 'ther party.

Dated: 70 ,2010 New Yor ew York

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE

700 Broadway Kohler New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10022 (212) 651-7500

A m 3 0 2010 SO ORDERED,

APR 3 0 2010



This Document Relates To: ROLAND BARBIER,

X ----________--_l_"l___________I_______

x "__"__--_____"____-____ll__________ll_

Plaintiff( s) , -against-


Index No.: 190070-10


WHEREFORE, Defendant, WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, sued herein

as "WEYERHAEUSER CO.", and its past and present parents, affiliates and subsidiaries

and its predecessors and successors in interest and its agents, heirs and assigns

("Defendant"), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

Defendant with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,


claims against Defendant, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

MCGUIREWOODS LLP Attorneys for Defendant 1345 Avenue of the Americas

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 New 7fh Floor York, NY 10105 F I L E D

(2 12) 548-2 100

SO ORDERED, APR 3 0 2010

couNMcerEF#cs- NEW YORM

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY X _----____--______---------------------

ASBESTOS LITIGATION X

This Document Relates to: Roland Barbier,

Plaintiff, - against -

A . O . Smith Water Products Co., et al.,

c

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30 (Judge Heitler)

Index No.: 190070/10

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY J U D M N T MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Mario & DiBono Plastering Co. Inc.,


pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 53212, dismissin!

plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant Mario & DiBono Plasterin!

Co. Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims anc

cross claims against defendant Mario & DiBono p l a l t k i e 13 Inc., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

APR 3 0 2010

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant R o l a n d B a r b i e r 700 Broadway, 6th Floor Inc. New York , New York 10003 177 Montague Street

M a r i o & DiBono P l a s t e r i n g Co.

Brooklyn, New York 11201

Our File No.: 10924-6176 (718) 855-9000

So Ordered: Hon. ShFrry K. Heitler


Index No.: 190070/10 In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

ROLAND BARBIER, Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT - against - MOTION


Defendants.







to either party. 1

Dated: 417 ,2010

’5 SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003 Weil-McLain (212) 558-5500

SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.

830 Third Avenue, Suite 4 New York, NY 10022 ’1 (212) 651-7500

w? 3 SO ORDERED, 20?@


A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, CO., et ala

Index No,: 190070/10


I.A.S. Part 30 Hon. Sherry K. Heitlei-

WHEREFORE, Defendant AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. (hereinafter "AMERICAN

BILTRITE"), hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Sections 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant

AMERICAN BILTRlTE INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Defendant, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. be and the

and without costs to either partya

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agEainst

same are h e r e ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ r e j u d ~ k e

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway Now York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Defendant American Biltrite 830 Third Avenue, Suite 400 New York, New York 10022

SO ORDERED, -

Inc.

e. ani,wotion ani, order merefurf+ defendant, american financial groupi hc. (hereinafter referred to...

Documents