e-journal proposal nap october 3, 2010 washington, dc

9
E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Upload: jesse-howe

Post on 26-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

E-Journal Proposal

NAP October 3, 2010Washington, DC

Page 2: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Title

HEALTH CARE POLICY:An Interdisciplinary Perspective

Page 3: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Existing Journals

• Open Access– Open Access Health Services and Policy (UK)

• Standard– Health Policy– Health Policy and Planning– Healthcare Policy– Journal of Health Services Research and Policy– Journal of Health Care Law and Policy– Journal of Public Health Policy

Page 4: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Niche

• Exclusive Focus on Health Policy- few• Open Access- very few• Interdisciplinary- none

Interdisciplinary, Health Care Policy, Open Access

Page 5: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Platform

• E-based (no paper version)• Open Access• Alone Vs. Consortium (Bentham Open)

Page 6: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Editorial Board• Steering Committee– Editor– Associate Editors– Develop Concept (by 01.01.11)– Experience with Journal Editing and/or Scholarship

• Editorial Board– Editor (NAP membership required)– 3-5 Associate Editors (NAP membership required)– 25 Members (NAP membership required)

• Prestige Vs. Knowledge Workers• Call to the membership

– Reviewers (NAP and Non-NAP members)

Page 7: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Pragmatics• Submission open to NAP and non-NAP members• 250 pages per year• 2 issues per year/volume• Peer reviewed• First issue or two on existing policy papers• Build on prior journal• Free• Attempt to be indexed within one to two years

in each of the academy citation sources (e.g., PsyInfo)

Page 8: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Content• Policy Papers– Review– Opinion

• Empirical• Case Studies • Demonstration (organizational projects)• Possible– Reflective Practice– Bio/Obits– Book Reviews– Interviews

Page 9: E-Journal Proposal NAP October 3, 2010 Washington, DC

Budget

• Start-up– Staff– Internet Consulting

• Ongoing– Staff– Internet Access– Consortium